WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, December 4, 20187:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  1. A request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the structure and remove the chimney on the property located at 613 Old 2. A request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  Second Street.  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed in  the back yard of the property located at 221 East Second Street.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #22 to construct a 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 311 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C 3. - A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 211 South Academy Street to replace the existing  new single-family dwelling on the property.  unit in the same location on the property.  existing materials in kind on the front facade on the property.  split heat pump system in the same location on the property.  1    5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 518 East Second Street to replace the existing 7.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 315 West Main Street to replace the existing roof 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 112 South Respess Street to replace the existing 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 118 North Bonner Street to repair the existing  existing materials in kind on the front facade on the property.  standing seam roof using like materials on the property.  using like materials on the property.  door using like materials. The doors are covered with shutters.  staircase using like materials on the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Resolution to Amend Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Regulations  VII. Approval of Minutes - November 6, 2018  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    613 Old Second  Street  Home Elevation Chimney Removal    Picaset Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washingfon Historic Preseryation Commission  Please: submit the ApplicationFee of $50 to cashiersi in thet frontl lobby of City Hall under' "DevalopmentalFlingl Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Propeny: 01304D aAD  S7  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Cwner's Name! Lot Size:  PATRICIA FRAN/Z  feet by  feet.  (width)  (deplh)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Raisi hoikl A EEma-aguntak  Rimai/e  Phimmuy N AR-Doe  ullo uoi hLckpiss wK Jattee insab  understanc that ail applications for a Certifiçate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submilted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior tot the meeting wisht to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC mecling. An incomplete application will not be accepled. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Recaived) o Approved  Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrewn Staff Approval (Date)  AATRICIA FRANZ (Name 0t7 Applicant type or pant) 18 CHARLOTTE ST  (Initials)  ACTION  (Mailing Address) (Date) (Signature  (Zipo Code)  10-a5-18 $43895 7037 Raag  (Daytme Phone Number)  (Authonzed Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Depariment or designee, this application becomes: a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, ténant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowârded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's. presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behaif.    ConnectGIS Feature Report  10/28/18, 9:18 AM: Beaufort  Printed October 28, 2018 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  QDE  1:29 Feet  htps/peaufor.comectgis.ahdlasampocatDias2a4kM4PAddetanumatrpinlc  Page 1of2    ConnectGIS Feature Report OBJECTID 10820 OWNER NAME FRANZ PATRICIA ROSE MAILING ADDRESS2  10/28/18, 9:18 AM  GPIN 5685-16-1804 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT613 EAST2ND STREET TOT VAL 76145 PREV ASSESS 85316 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1908/00257 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1930 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF) YR 1980  GPIN Long 5685-16-1804 MAILINGADDRESS 118 CHARLOTTE: STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 27470 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.23 MBL 56850951 STAMPS 166.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 1210 NBR BED 2 PIN 01027268  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 48675 TAXABLE VA 76145 PROPERTY ADDRESS 613 OLD: 2NDS ST DATE 8/19/2016 SALE PRICE 83000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE GRAVEL SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42054  Beaufort County online map: accessi is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed advice ori implied. Content published ont this website isf fori informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute al legal record nor shouldi it bes substituted for the ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility and! legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The usera agreest that Beaufort County  landi its Assigns shall be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  veMertowsukcmOwNwONeANANMAEVANe  Page 2of2    OMBI No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018 FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Company NAICI Number  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE 613 Old2 2nd Street City Washington  IMPORTANT: In these spaces, copy the corresponding information from Section A.  Building Street/ Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or BIdg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number:  State North Carolina  ZIP Code 27889  SECTION C-E BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED)  C1. Building elevations arel based on: Construction Drawings* Building Under Construction* X Finished Construction C2. Elevations - Zones A1-A30, AE, AH, A (with BFE), VE, V1-V30, V( (with BFE), AR, AR/A, AR/AE, ARIA1-A30, AR/AH, ARIAO. Complete Items C2.a-hb below according tot the building diagram specifiedi inl Item A7. In Puerto Rico only, enter meters.  *A new Elevation Certificate willl ber required when construction oft the building is complete.  Benchmark Utilized: NCGS Station ARMORY  Vertical Datum: 9.57'  Indicate elevation datum used for the elevations ini items a) through h). below. NGVD1 1929 E NAVD 1988 JOther/Source: Datum used for building elevations must bet the same ast that used fort the BFE. grav) & Top of bottom floor (including basement, crawispace, ore enclosure floor) c) Bottom oft the lowest horizontal: structural member (V: Zones only) e) Lowest elevation of machinery or equipment servicing the building (Describe type ofe equipment and location in Comments) Lowest adjacent (finished) grade nextt tol building (LAG) g) Highest adjacent (finished) grade next to! building (HAG) h) Lowest adjacent grade atl lowest elevation of deck ors stairs, including  Check the measurement used. E feet meters X feet meters X feet meters X feet meters X feet meters X feet meters X feet meters XI feet meters  4.43 6.98 N/A. N/A, 6.20 3,99 5,14 5,14  b) Top oft the next! higher floor d) Attached garage (top ofs slab)  structural support  SECTION D- - SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION  This certification is tol bes signed and sealed by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized by lawi lunderstand to certify elevation information. false Werel latitude and longitude in Section Ap provided by al licensed land surveyor? Yes ONo Check here ifa attachments.  Icertify that the information on this Certificate. represents my best efforts toi interpret the data available. statement may be punishable by fine ori imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code, Section 1001.  thata any  Certifier's! Name Hugh A. Sorrell Title Professional Land Surveyor Company Name Sorrell Land Surveying Inc. Address 107 Union Drive, Suite 101 City Washington Signature  License Number L-2849  State North Carolina Date 08/15/2016  ZIP Code 27889 Telephone (252) 948-2464  Hugh Sorrell RA   Copy all pages of thjs Elevation Certificate anda alla attachments for (1) community official, (2)i insurance agentcompany, and (3) building owner.  Comments (includinglypé ofe equipment and location, per C2(e), if applicable)  C2e. Lowestr machineryi is a air condition unit.  FEMA Form 086-0-33(7/15)  Replaces all previous editions.  Form Page: 20f6    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management. Agency National Floodi Insurance Program  OMB No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Important: Followt thei instructions on pages 1-9.  Copy all pages oft this Elevation Certificate and alla attachments for (1) community official, (2) insurance agent/company, and (3) building owner.  SECTION, A-F PROPERTY INFORMATION  FORI INSURANCE COMPANY USE Policy Number: Company NAICI Number: ZIP Code 27889  A1. Building Owner's Name Edward Irvine Box No. 613 Old 2nd Street City Washington NC Pin Number 5685-16-1804 A5. Latitude/Longitude: Lat. 35.53912 A7. Building Diagram Number 8 A8. Fora a building witha a crawispace ore enclosure(s):  A2. Building Street Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)orF P.O. Route and  State North Carolina  A3. Property Description (Lota and Block Numbers, Tax Parcel Number, Legal Description, etc.) A4. Building Use (e.g., Residential, Non-Residential, Addition, Accessory, etc.) Residential A6. Attach atl least 2p photographs oft the building ift the Certificate is being used to obtain flood insurance.  Long. 77.04564  Horizontal Datum: NAD1 1927 X NAD 1983  a) Square footage of crawispace or enclosure(s) 1,261.44 sqft c) Total net area off flood openings in A8.b 0 sqin d). Engineered flood openings? Yes  No A9. Fora a building with ana attached garage: a) Square footage of attached garage c) Total net area off flood openings in A9.b d) Engineered flood openings? Yes No B1.NFIP Community Name & Community Number City ofWashington 370017 B4. Map/Panel Number 3720568500J  b). Number of permanent flood openings int the crawispace ore enclosure(s) within 1.01 foot above adjacent grade  0  0 sq ft 0 sq in  b) Number ofp peranent flood openings int the attached garage within 1.01 foot above adjacent grade  0  SECTIONI B-FLOODI INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION  B2. County Name Beaufort Effectivel Revised Date 07/07/2014  B3. State North Carolina (Zone AO, use Base Flood Depth) 10.00"  B5. Suffix: B6. FIRMI Index B7. FIRM Panel  B8. Flood Zone(s) B9. Base Flood Elevation(s)  Date 05/15/2003  J  AE  B10. Indicate the source oft the Base! Flood Elevation (BFE) data orb base flood depth entered inl Item B9: X FIS Profile FIRM Community Determined D Other/Source: B11. Indicate elevation datum used for BFE inl Item B9: D NGVD 1929 XJ NAVD 1988  Other/Source:  B12. Is the building located ina a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) area or Otherwise Protected. Area (OPA)? D Yes  No  Designation Date: FEMAI Form 086-0-33 (7/15)  CBRS - OPA Replaces all previous editions.  Form Page 1 of6    AOAS        E  Copuig 513 Cast Bdgut    Da  -    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Subject: 116 Charlotte:  Patty Franz Pranz240gmal.com> Thursday, November 15, 20183:27PM Emily Rebert; John Rodman 613 Old 2nd Street  120 Charlotte:    Second Street left house:  2    3    Second Street Center house:    Second Street right house:  5    View from Cottage of Left house and Center House:  View from Cottage of Center House and Right House:  6    Roof Piers of Center House:   0 G NO  7    Cottage Front:  8    9    FEMA  Fact Sheet  Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage The National Flood Insurance Program: Building Smarter and Safer  Increased Cost of Compliance (ICC) coverage is one ofseveral resources, fory flood insurance, policyholders who need additional help rebuilding after aj flood.. It provides up to $30,000 to help cover the cost of mitigation measures that will reduce flood risk. ICC coverage is a part ofmost standard flood insurance policies available under the Federal Emergency Management Agency ' (FEMA 's) National. Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Reducing Future Damage  floodplain management ordinances. Ift the total damage from flooding is less than 50 percent oft the market value oft the building, ICC coverage is not Repetitive loss means that al building covered by flood insurance incurred flood-related damage two times over aj period of 10 years, and that the cost of the repairs was, on the average, atl least 25 percent oft the market value ofthe building before the damage occurred each time. This applies only ifthe community has adopted a repetitive loss provision in the local floodplain management ordinance, and a flood insurance claim must have been paid in both cases. The combined damage total must be 50 percent oft the value oft the building before the damage occurred, but it need not be evenly distribut- ed. So, ifthe damage was 35 percent of the value of the building in the first event and 15j percent oft the value ofthe building in the second event, the policyholder would qualify for ICC coverage.  available.  ICC coverage provides payment to help cover the cost ofmitigation activities that will reduce the risk of future flood damage to a building. When a building covered by a Standard Flood Insurance Policy suffers ai flood loss and is declared to be substantially or repetitively damaged, ICC will pay up to $30,000 to bring the building into compliance with State or community floodplain management laws or ordinances. Usually this means elevating or relocating the building sO that it is above the base flood elevation (BFE). Non-residential structures may also be floodproofed. ICC coverage applies solely to buildings and only covers the cost ofthe compliance measures undertaken. Itis filed separately from the normal flood insurance Determining Who is Eligible In addition to being insured under the NFIP, a building must meet one of two conditions to be eligible to receive ICC coverage; it must have been either 1) determined tol bes substantially damaged or 2) meet the criteria ofar repetitive loss structure. Substantial damage is the determination by the community that damage due to flood has equaled or exceeded 50j percent of the value oft the building. When repaired, thel building must meet local  FINDING ADDITIONAL POLICYHOLDER FEMA encourages flood insurance policyholders whose homes are damaged extensively by flood to ask their claims adjusters or insurance agents about ICC People can get more information online at: t/Aw.comacoAlturan. MewRecorddo/e-3010 or by calling their insurance agents.  INFORMATION  claim.  coverage.  National Flood Insurance Program  "FEMA's missioni ist tos support ouro citizens and first responders toe ensure that as a nations wev work together tol build, sustain, and Improve our capability top prepare for, protect against, respond  to, recover from, and mitigate alll hazards."    Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage Meeting Compliance Standards ICC coverage can help pay for four different types of with the community's floodplain management Elevation is the most common means ofr reducing a building's flood risk. The process consists ofi raising the building to or above the BFE. While NFIP policy only requires the lowest floor of the building to be raised to the BFE, some States and communities enforce a freeboard" requirement, which mandates community's flood protection level. Floodproofing applies only to non-residential bes substantially impermeable to water and designed to1 resist the stresses imposed by floods. Floodproof- ing techniques include installation of watertight shields for doors and windows; drainage collection systems, sump. pumps, and check valves; reinforce- ment of walls to withstand floodwater pressures; use ofsealants to reduce seepage through and around walls; and anchoring the building to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. Relocation involves moving the entire building to another location on the same lot, or to another lot, usually outside the floodplain. Relocation can offer the greatest protection from future flooding; however, ift the new location is still within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), thel building must be NFIP- compliant, meaning it must be elevated or floodproofed (ifnon-residential). Demolition may be necessary in cases where damage is too severe to warrant elevation, floodproofing, or relocation; or where the building isi in such poor condition that it is not worth the investment to undertake any combination of the above activities. All applicable permits must be obtained prior to demolishing the building. Thej property may be redeveloped after demolition is complete, subject to all applicable Federal, State, and community laws  Using ICC in Concert twith FEMA  Mitigation Grants  mitigation activities to bring al building into compliance Ins some cases, individual policyholders can take  advantage of Federal grant money to supplement the cost of mitigation activities. Policyholders can assign their ICCI benefits to their community and enable the community to file a single claim on behalfofa community mitigation project. FEMA will count the ICC claim monies as non-Federal matching funds when applying for mitigation grants, because ICC coverage isa direct contract between the policyholder and the grant funds to help pay for any additional portion ofthe cost ofe elevation, floodproofing, relocation, or demolition that is more than the ICC claim payment. this process. Individual participation in a FEMA-funded community mitigation project is voluntary and the community: is required toj provide mitigation funds to any property owner whose ICC payment was counted  regulations:  that the building be raised above the BFE to meet the insurer. The community can then use. FEMA mitigation  buildings. For a building tol be certified as floodproof, Iti is extremely important for policyholders and commu- itn must be watertight below the BFE - the walls must nity officials to work closely together at every stage of  towards the matching funds.  For More Information  For obtain more information on ICC coverage, visit: itpy/ww.lema.gowv.ovlbrany.ewRecord.do/d-3010.  and requirements.  "FEMA's missioni ist tos support our citizens and first responders toe ensure that as nations wey work together tol build, sustain, and Improve our capability top prepare for, protect against, respond  to, recover from, andi mitigate dI hazards."    Adjoining Property Owners: 613 Old Second Street  BANKS BRANT SHAWN 602 EI MAIN ST WASHINGTON NC27889 FORTESQUE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC 444 STEWART! PARKWAY WASHINGTON NC27889 GREEN ERIC Y 6101 EASTI MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HARSTAD. JAMES ALAN TRUSTEE 332 TALON DRIVE PITTSBORO: NC27312 NEWBOLD GINGER W 612 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 THOMPSON PEGGY HARRISON 115) BROWN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 FRANZPATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 MACEWAN ROBERT A 1171 BROWN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 OWENS SHARON BARRETT 622 EI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 FRANZPATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 BEAUFORT COUNTY OF 121 W3RDSTREET WASHINGTON NC27889 CAMPBELL CECILSII 5064 SLATESTONE ROAD WASHINGTONNC27A8)  DARRE LAURA 316) RIVERSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC27889 BURLESON DEEANNA LOU 116 CHARLOTTE ST WASHINGTONI NC27889 FRANZI PATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTONNC2738) STALLINGS. JOHN WJR 120 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 YOUNG-MARTIN EMMA 6171 E2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 CASEY JAMES E 124 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 ELKS BARBARA W 601 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889    Docntoun Deoelopmenb 80 Gbtoric reseroation  0  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness = 613 Old Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 613 Old Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Dountoion fftoric  -  eoelopmenb Preseroation  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  November 21, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness: -613 Old Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 613 Old Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday December 4, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  613 Old Second Street  The application for the property located at 613 Old Second Street is requesting approval to elevate Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  the: structure and remove the east side chimney.  3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-defining masonry architectural features including 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering ofa structure. Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.3 Foundations: 3.3.1 Retain and preserve historic foundations including their design, texture, color, and materials. Character-defining features of historic foundations should be retained and preserved including vents, grills, panels, piers, lattice, porch steps, basement windows and door openings. 3.3.2Ifal historic foundation must be repaired or replaced, match the original in size, shape, 3.3.5 New foundation openings including vents or mechanical installations should bei installed only in noncharacter defining elevations. New openings should not be installed if they will 3.3.6 Underpinning shall consist of bricks and joint tooling that match the piers as closely as possible. Nonstructural underpinning may consist of a single course of bricks, lattice brick walls, or event treated wooden lattice. If openings between brick piers are to be filled in, theys should be done with similar materials or lattice. The infill area should be recessed and clearly 3.3.7 Structural underpinning may be a veneer wall of brick covering a concrete block wall. This thickness may meet the minimum requirements fora a foundation wall. Brick lattice may also be  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls.  texture, color, and material. damage the historic structure.  differentiated from the original piers used as a veneer to cover the concrete block.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  3.5.2 Character defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  trim, and soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 6.2 Relocation: Inp planning the move: of as structure, consideration must be given for how the relocated building will impact surrounding structures and fiti into its new setting. Often, architectural features are compromised when moving a structure. Only an experienced house mover. should be used SO that    damage to the historic building itself, significant vegetation, or buildings along the route is minimized. Prior to moving as structure, the property owner is advised to contact the State Historic Preservation Office to determine what measures need to bet taken to ensure that the contributing status oft the Relocation can bel looked at in much the same way as new construction in that the building being introduced into a new environment must complement the character ofi its surroundings in architectural style, size, scale, orientation, and landscaping. Much like new construction, the applicant should submit a plan for relocation including a site plan and drawings of the building in its new environment  building is not jeopardized.  6.2.4 Character-defining elements and significant architectural features shall be protected during the relocation process. Should any damage occur. it should be repaired. 6.2.5 The relocated building must be compatible with the surrounding structures in its architectural style, scale, height, side and front setback, and orientation.  The proposed elevation would not be compatible with the surrounding structures as the house will appear to be on stilts. Infill is needed to supplement the elevation to mitigate the height of the piers. Based on findings of fact, the request is not congruous with the  Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 613 Old Second Street- Elevating the Dwelling and Removing the Chimney  A request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the dwelling and remove its east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 To grant such ar request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation.  appropriate may be attached toi the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2  Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east: side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation.    516 East Second  Street  Home Elevation    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission: Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiers int thei front lobby of City Hall under" "Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  5161 East Second Street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Fred Read (width)  feet by  feet.  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Property owner would like to elevate the house located at 516 East Second Street.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission: must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Fred Read  (Name of Applicant -t type or print) 516 East Second Street (Mailing Address) October 9, 2018 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code)  916-865-7080 (Daytime Phone/umber)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicart)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate. shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Google    ConnectGIS Feature Report  10/28/18, 9:17 AM Beaufort Printed October 28, 2018 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:35 Feet  tps/Dwawfort.comectoisa.awd.gump2ea85005s02am5anbsfac-mmat-pinla  Page 1of2    ConnectGIs Feature Report OBJECTID 10730 OWNERI NAME READ FRED MAILING ADDRESS2 411 WALNUT STREET #7595 ZIP 32043 BLDG VAL 59849 TAXABLE VA 113409 PROPERTY ADDRESS 516 E 2NDST DATE 1/4/2012 SALE PRICE 85000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 41464  10/28/18, 9:17 AM  GPIN 5685-07-8342 OWNER NAME2 READ JANE CITY GREEN COVE SPRINGS PROP DESC 1LOT 516 EAST: 2ND STREET TOT VAL 113409 PREV ASSESS 124172 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1771/00187 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR_BUILT 1976 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1990  GPIN Long 5685-07-8342 MAILING ADDRESS 411 WALNUT STREET #7595 STATE FL LAND VAL 53560 DEFR_VAL 0 ACRES 0.25 MBL 56850979 STAMPS 170.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQ_FT 1396 NBR_BED 2 PIN 01033020  Beaufort County online map access isp provided as a public service, asi is, asa available and without warranties, expressed: ori implied. Content published ont this websitel isf for informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute al legal record nors should it be substituted for the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort and! the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website. The usera agrees that Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shall be! held! harmlessf froma alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  oheetcaksanPeNANSNaNA  Page 2of2    ND  FEMA  NATIONAL FLOOD. INSURANCE. PROGRAM  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE  AND  INSTRUCTIONS  2015 EDITION    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management. Agency National Flood Insurance Program  OMB No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Important: Followt thei instructions on pages. 1-9.  Copy all pages oft this Elevation Certilicate and alla altachments for (1) community official, (2)i insurance agent/company, and (3) building owner.  SECTION. A-F PROPERTY INFORMATION  FORI INSURANCE COMPANY USE Policy Number: Company NAIC Number: ZIP Code 27889  A1. Building Owner's Name Fred Read Box No. 516E.2 2nd St. Cily Washington NC GPIN 5685-07-8342  A2. Building Street Address (including Apt, Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.) or P.O, Route and  State North Carolina  A3, Properly Description (Lot and Block Numbers, Tax Parcel Number, Legal Description, etc.) A4. Building Use (e.g., Residential, Non-Residential, Addition, Accessory, etc.) Residential A6. Attach atl least 2 photographs oft the building if the Certificate is being usedt to obtain flood insurance.  A5, Latilude/Longitude: Lat. 35.54029 A7. Building Diagram Number 8 A8. Fora a building with a crawispace or enclosure(s): a) Square footage of crawispace ore enclosure(s) c) Total net area off flood openings in/ A8.b d) Engineered flood openings? Yes 3 No A9. Fora al buildingy with ana attached garage: a) Square footage ofa attached garage c) Totalr net area off flood openings inA A9.b d) Engineered flood openings? Yes a No B1. NFIP Community Name & Community Number Cily OfWashington 370017 Number 3720568500J  Long. 77.04742  Horizontal Datum: D NAD 1927 X NAD 1983  1681.12 sqft  b) Number of permanent flood openings int the crawispace ore enclosure(s) within 1.0f foot above adjacent grade 0  0.00 sqin  sqft sqin  b) Number of permanent flood openings int the attached garage within 1.01 foot above adjacent grade  SECTIONI B- FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION  B2. County Name Beaufort Effectivel Revised. Date 07-07-2014  B3. State North Carolina  B4. Map/Panel B5, Suffix B6. FIRMI Index B7.FIRM Panel B8. Flood  B9. Base Flood Elevation(s) (Zone AO, use Base Flood Depth) 10.00'  Date. 05-15-2003  Zone(s) AE  J  B10. Indicate the source oft the Basel Flood Elevation (BFE) data orb base flood depth entered inl Item B9: XI FISF Profile FIRM. Community Determined D Other/Source: B11. Indicate elevation datum used for BFEI in Item B9: L NGVD1929 X NAVD 1988  Other/Source:  B12. Ist thel building locatedi ine a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) area or Otherwise Protected. Area (OPA)? D Yes I No  Designation Date: FEMAI Form 086-0-33 (7/15)  CBRS DOPA: Replaces all previous editions,  Form Page 1of6    OMB No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018 FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Company NAIC Number  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE  IMPORTANT: In these spaces, copy the corresponding information from Section A.  Building Street Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.) or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number:  516E.2nd St. City Washington  State North Carolina  ZIP Code 27889  SECTION C- BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED)  C1. Building elevations are based on:  Construction Drawings* Bullding Under Construction* XI Finished Construction  *Ar new Elevation Certificate willl ber required when construction of the buildingi is complete. Indicate elevation datum used fort the elevations ini ilems a) through h) below. NGVD 1929 x NAVD 1988 Other/Source: Datum used for bullding elevations must bet the same ast that used for the BFE. a) Top oft bottom floor (Including basement, crawispace, ore enclosure floor) c) Bottom oft the lowest horizontal: structural member (VZones only) e) Lowest elevation ofr machinery or equipment servicing the! building (Describe type ofe equipment and) location In Comments) Lowest adjacent (finished) grade next to! building (LAG) g) Highest adjacent (finished) grade next tob building (HAG) h) Lowest adjacent grade atl lowest elevation of deck or stairs, including  C2. Elevations Zones A1-A30, AE, AH, A (with BFE), VE, V1-V30, V (with BFE), AR, ARIA, ARIAE, AR/A1-A30, ARIAH, AR/AO. Complete Items C2,a-h! below according to thel building dlagram speclfied inl Item A7. Inl Puerto Rico only, enter meters.  Benchmark Utilized: GPS-NC VRS Network  Vertical Datum: NAVD88  Check the measurement used. 6.09 XI feet meters 8.21 X feet meters N/A feet meters N/A feet moters 8.21 feet 5.00 feet meters 6.10" X feet meters 6.08 X feet meters  b) Top oft the next higher floor d) Attached garage (top of slab)  meters  structural support  SECTION D- - SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION  This certification Is to be signed ands sealed! by al lands surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information. Icert!ly that the information on this Certificale represents my best efforts tol Interpret the data avallable. lunderstand that anyt false Were latitude and longitude in Section A provided bye al licensed lands surveyor? Yos ONo Check here Ifa attachments.  statement may! be punishable by fine ori imprisonment under 18U.S. Code, Section 1001.  Certifler's Name Hugh A. Sorrell Title Professional License Surveyor Company Name Sorrell Land Surveying, Inc, Address 107 Union Drive, Suite 101 Clly Washington Signature d  License Number L-2849  sic  State North Carolina Date 11-02-2018  ZIP Code 27889 Telephone (252)948-2464  Ext.  ESN orca  Copy all pages oft this Elevalion Cerlificate and alla atlachments for (1) communily official, (2) insurance agentcompany, and (3) building owner.  Comments (including type of equipment andl location, per C2(e), if applicable) Benchmark is al Nail Seti Ina Power Pole atk base flood elevation of 10,00'  C2e, Lowest Machinery is a Hot Water Heater.  FEMA Form 086-0-33 (7/15)  Replaces all previous editions.  Form Page 2 of6    BUILDING PHOTOGRAPHS See Instructions for Item A6.  OMB No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018 FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Company NAIC Number  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE  IMPORTANT: Int these spaces, copy the corresponding information from Section. A.  Building Street Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)orP.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number:  516 E. 2nd St. Cily Washington  State North Carolina  ZIP Code 27889  If using the Elevation Certificate to obtain NFIP flood insurance, affix at least 2 building photographs below according to the instructions for Item A6. Identify allp photographs with date taken; "Front View" and' "Rear View"; and, ifrequired," "Right Side View" and "Left Side View," When applicable, photographs must show the foundation with representative examples of the flood openings or vents, asi indicated in Section A8. fsubmitting more photographs than will fit ont this page, use the Continuation Page.  PholoOne  Photo One Caption Front View Taken 11/2/2018  Clear! PholoG One  Pholo Two Replaces all previous editions.  Pholo Two Caption Rear View. Taken 11/2/2018 FEMAI Form 086-0-33 (7/15)  Clear Photo Two Form Page 50f6                E  m    Ckauple: 4 513 &ast Bpraud &    hA   0J  so LS  D  73  A    Adjoining Property Owners: 516 East Second Street  HAWKINS FREDERICKF 5071 E2ND: STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 REAPPI BRIAN 509: E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889 STONE EDDIE EARL 513 E2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 TUBAUGH HARRY S 2964 CORSICA ROAD WASHINGTON NC27889 OROURKE DORCAS 5101 E2ND STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 TAU TRIBE NO 181 REDMENS LODGE 3041 BEECH STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HARSTADJAMES ALAN TRUSTEE 332TALON DRIVE PITTSBORO: NC27312 O'ROURKE DORCAS 5101 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 READI FRED 516E2NDST WASHINGTON: NC27889 KEUSENKOTHEN MARK 524 EAST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 DINTINO ALFRED M 518 E2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 ALLAM SULAIMAN HISHAM 107 RHEM ST NEW BERN NC28562  MOORELEASING COINC POJ BOX 1567 WASHINGTON NC27889    Dorntocn Seoelopmenb 6 btoric Preseroation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness - 516 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gowv    Docntoin Decelopment éfitoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  November 21, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness: - 516 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday December 4, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side oft the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  516 East Second Street the structure.  The application for the property located at! 516 East Second Street is requesting approval to elevate Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-detining masonry architectural features including 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original ins size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering ofa a structure. Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.3 Foundations: 3.3.1 Retain and preserve historic foundations including their design, texture, color, and materials. Character-defining features of historic foundations should be retained and preserved including vents, grills, panels, piers, lattice, porch steps, basement windows and door openings. 3.3.2 Ifal historic foundation must be repaired or replaced, match the original in size, shape, 3.3.5 New foundation openings including vents or mechanical installations should bei installed only inr noncharacter defining elevations. New openings should not be installed if they will 3.3.6 Underpinning shall consist of bricks and joint tooling that match the piers as closely as possible. Nonstructural underpinning may consist ofa single course of bricks, lattice brick walls, or even treated wooden lattice. If openings between brick piers are to be filled in, they should be done with similar materials or lattice. The infill area should be recessed and clearly 3.3.7 Structural underpinning may be a veneer wall of brick covering a concrete block wall. This thickness may meet the minimum requirements for ai foundation wall. Brick lattice may also be  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls.  texture, color, and material. damage the historic structure.  differentiated from the original piers  used as a veneer to cover the concrete block.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 6.2 Relocation: Inp planning the move of a structure, consideration must be given for how the relocated building will impact surrounding structures and fit into its new: setting. Often, architectural features are compromised when moving a structure. Only an experienced house mover should be used sO that damage to the historic building itself, significant vegetation, or buildings along the route is minimized. Prior to moving a structure, the property owner is advised to contact the State Historic Preservation Office to determine what measures need to be taken to ensure that the contributing status of the  building is not jeopardized.    Relocation can. be looked at in much the same way as new. construction in that the building being introduced into a new environment must complement the character ofi its surroundings in architectural style, size, scale, orientation, and landscaping. Much like new construction, the applicant should submit a plan for relocation including a site plan and drawings of the building in its new environment  6.2.4 Character-defining elements and: significant architectural features shall be protected during the relocation process. Should any damage occur. it should be repaired. 6.2.5 The relocated building must be compatible with the surrounding structures in its architectural style, scale, height, side and front setback, and orientation.  The proposed elevation would not be compatible with the surrounding structures as the house will appear to be on stilts. Infill is needed to supplement the elevation to mitigate the height oft the piers. Based on findings of fact, the request is not congruous with the  Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 516 East Second Street- Elevating the Dwelling  Ar request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Fred Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3  Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Fred Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. I further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Fred Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3  Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation.    MAJOR  WORKS    221 East Second  Street  Installation of Storage Shed    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 too cashiers in thet front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 381 E.zhd S+-  Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Owner's Name: Ryan Maohing  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  12x1 Wood Storse shed w/ Shinged roof  MuaSiply Wad aAchded  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that  review. require  Preservation Commission must be submitted 5:00  by the Historic incomplete  by  p.m, on the 15th oft the month  wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC prior to An the meeting application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one meeting. year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date) Upon  Ruan E Bety Mooring (Name of Applicant-type orp print) E2hdst.  (Initials)  ACTION  3AL (Mailing Address) 1-12 (Date) (Signaturg Ax  27889 (ZipCode)  252-34/-2332 (Daytime Phone Number) -  (Authorized Signature)  Ag  being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next  designee, this application becomes a approved by staff will be fowarded  Issuance of a Minor.  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not or property owner from obtaining any  meeting. (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be written permission to your authorized representative to  at the meeting of the considered. You must give  attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed November: 26, 2018 SeeB Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:36Feet    OBJECTID 6969 OWNER NAME MOORING KENNETH RYAN MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 67163 TAXABLE VA 116294 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 221E2NDST DATE 1/8/2010 SALE PRICE 89000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44692.  GPIN 5675-97-3880 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOTE EAST2 2NDS STREET TOT VAL 116294 PREV ASSESS 93536 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOKa and PAGE 1709/00003 NBR BLDG LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1980  GPIN Long 5675-97-3880 MAILINGADDRESS 221E2NDSTREET STATE NC LAND VAL 49131 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508183 STAMPS 178.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2866 NBRBED 5 PIN 01003936  Beaufort County onliner mapa access isp provided asay publics service, asis, as available andv withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websiteisl fori informational purposes onlya andi is noti intendedt to constitute legal record nors shouldi itbes substituted fort thea advice ors services ofi industry professionals. The County ofB Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaima allresponsibility: andk legall liabilityf fort thec content published onth thisv website. The usera agreest thatB Beaufort Countyl  andit its Assigns shall beh heldh harmless froma alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out ofthey usec ofCounty data.    Adjoining Property Owners: 221 East Second Street ST'PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 101 NORTH BONNER STREET WASHINGTON NC:27889 CROSS NICHOLEL 2201 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 CONNARD: DAVIDI MCK 2261 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 BOWEN TONY C 2281 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 MOORING KENNETH RYAN 221 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 LEWIS AMBROSE B 2271 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 SOLOMAN GUY DOUGLAS 2101 MALLARD: DR WASHINGTON NC27889 CRAIGIE SCOT 222 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 GONZALEZ. JOSE MANUEL GUTIERREZ 228. E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 STILES. JOSHUA MICAH 232 E2ND STREET WASHINGTONNC2789    E2ndst  E2ndst  E2nd St    BUILDINGS Packanes  ammel, UGH  BOOM!  Package.  VINL SIDING Package  - Shingle roof - 5/12 roof pitch Overhang all 4: sides - 8' walls 16" on-center studs 2"x6" fascia boards - 2"x6" treated floor joist 34" floor  METAL BUIADING Package Metal roof and siding 5/12 roof pitch Wood framing 6' walls 2'x6" treated floor joist 34" floor  ophoralwindows Shownwith colorviny! andshubers  SMART SIDE  Package  Shingle roof 5 5/121 roof pitch ( Overhang all 4 sides 8'walls - 16" on-center studs 2"x6" fascia boards 2'x6" treated floor joist v.3 34" floor  Sfle we optionaly ert (e, int,  Shown with  2  bleinmost ofthesesizes:  O'x20' e 12'x12" e 12'x16' e 16'x16' e 20'x20'  iardware, nails and blueprint.    BUILDTOUGH  STORAGEI  Sfyowhnows yowr -  way ahound a/  BUILDTO  canknock outa  you  back  PINE SIDING Package  Shingle roof 8 walls 1 16" on-center studs 2 2"x6" treated floor joist 34"f floor  12414  TREATED  7-111 A-ROOF Package  cAdda LOFT!  REATED T-111  BARN STME Package ATIN  Metal roof 5/121 roof pitch Overhang all 4 sides 8' walls 16" on-center studs 2'x6" treated fascia boards 2"x6" treated floor joist 34" floor  - Metal roof 6' walls - 2"x6" treated floor joist 3 34" floor  Cachpackage avail  8'x8' e 8'x12' e 8'x16' o 10'x12' e 10'x16' o 1  Also includes floor to shingles,    Dotntoion enelopmenb 6 Gfistoric Presevoation  0  Cityy  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  November 21, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 221 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed in the  back yard of the property located at 221 East Second Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday December 4, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  221 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 221 East Second Street is requesting approval to install a  12'x16' storage shed ini the back yard.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings and  Accessory Structures:  3.12.5 Designs for new outbuildings and accessory structures should complement the architectural style and period oft the primary structures as well as examples of similar: structure. 3.12.7 New outbuildings should be proportionally the same in size and height to the primary structure as is seen in the relationship between other primaryand secondary structures ini the 3.12.8 Prefabricated wooden accessory structures that are not architecturally, similar to the primary structure are allowed only if screened from view from any existing right-of-way.  within the district.  3.12.6 New outbuildings should be located in rear yards if possible.  district.  Prefabricated metal storage buildings are not acceptable.  The proposed shed will be 12'x16', wood-sided, and an asphalt shingle roof. It will be located in the back yard. Based on finding of fact, the request is congruous with the  Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 221 East Second Street- Installing a 12'x16' shed in the back yard  Arequest has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a storage shed on the property located at 221 East Second Street. Please review the Design To grant such ar request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings ofi fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Guidelines, specifically Chapter3 3.12 Outbuildings.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed in the back yard oft the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based ont the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.12 Outbuildings.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed int the back yard of the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings. Ifurther move: that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed in the back yard of the property located at 221 East! Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.12 Outbuildings.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #22 to construct a new single-family dwelling  on the property.  2. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 311 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location on 3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the existing materials in kind on the  the property.  front facade on the property.  4. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 211 South Academy Street to replace the existing split heat pump system in the  same location on the property.  5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the existing materials in kind on the  front facade on the property.  6. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 518 East Second Street to replace the existing standing seam roof using like 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 315 West Main Street to replace the existing roof using like materials on the  materials on the property.  property.  8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 112 South Respess Street to replace the existing door using like materials. The  doors are covered with shutters.  9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for  the owner of 118 North Bonner Street to repair the existing staircase using like materials on  the property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Resolution to Amend Historic Preservation Commission Rules  and Regulations    CITY OF - WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTO HISTORIC PRESERVATION  MEMORANDUM  DATE: TO: FROM: RE:  November 27, 2018  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  John Rodman  Planning and Development Amending Rules of Procedure  There have been discussions lately on amending the current Rules of Procedure to allow the Chairman to vote on all matters or requests brought before the Commission. Currently, the rules state that the Chairman shall have the right to vote only when there is a tie. This at times may cause an issue with a meeting quorum and the number of votes allowed. The state authorizes cities to create boards and commissions to help conduct the management of the citythrough the public health and safety and welfare and to promote the use and enrichment of the residents of the city. Except as otherwise provided in the City Code, all boards and commissions of the city shall adopt Rules of Procedure for Small Local Government Boards that include in the document the commission's parliamentary The Rules of Procedure may be amended at any regular meeting or at any properly called special meeting that includes amendment of the rules as oned of the stated purposes of the of the meeting, unless a statute or a rule of the body that created the board provides information to be discussed privileged or Attached is a copy of the Resolution amending the current rules of procedure to allow the Chairman to vote on all matters presented to the Commission.  procedural rules for governing its meetings.  confidential.  P.O. Box 1988 OWashington, N.C. 278890 D(252)975-9383    AF RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  WHEREAS, the state authorizes cities to safeguard the heritage of the city by preserving any historic site therein that embodies important elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological or architectural history and to promote the use and conservation of such site for the education, pleasure and enrichment of the residents of the city, county, and state as a whole; and WHEREAS, pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, chapter 160A, article 19, part 3C, the City Council designates a commission to be known as the WHEREAS, except as otherwise provided in the City Code, all boards and commissions of the city shall adopt Rules of Procedure for Small Local Government Boards that includes in the document the commission's WHEREAS, the HPC discussed the potential to amend the current rules of procedure that would allow the Chairman the right to vote on each request brought to the commission and not exclusively in the result of a tie. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Washington wishes to amend the current Rules of Section 1. That Rule 7. Presiding Officer be amended by removing "the chair shall have the right to vote only when there is a tie" and add that "the Chair shall  Washington Historic Preservation Commission (HPC); and  parliamentary procedural rules governing its meetings; and  Procedure as follows:  have a vote on all matters before the Commission".  Rule 7. Presiding Officer  The chair of the board shall preside at all board meetings if he or she is present, unless he or she becomes actively engaged in debate on a particular matter. The-chairshal-have-e-ghtioonywhen-here-sate. The chair shall have the right to vote on all matters before the commission. In order to address the board, a member must be recognized  by the chair.  Section 2. This Amendment shall become effective upon its adoption. Section 3. All Rules of Procedure or parts in conflict herein are repealed.  1    Adopted this  day of  2018  Marc Everett, Chairman  Commission Members: Marc Everett, Chairman William Kenner, Vice Chair Cheri Vaughn Kathleen Couch Karen Mann Colleen Knight Rebecca Clark  Approved  2    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC: PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting. - Minutes Tuesday November 6, 2018 7:00 PM  Members Present  Colleen Knight  Kathleen Couch  Mark Everett (Chairman) William Kenner Rebecca Clark Karen Mann Members Absent Cheri Vaughn Others Present John Rodman, Director Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I.  Opening of the meeting  The Chairman called the meeting to order. A moment of silence was taken. A silent roll call was taken by staff.  II. Invocation III. Roll Call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness:  A. Major Works  1. Ard request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for ac Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, one and al half- Jim Wiley came forward and was sworn in. He stated that as they continue through Moss Landing, they try to make each home very unique to itself. He presented the plans for the proposed home on lot 10. Rebecca Clark stated that she appreciated the fact that they put the stairs going up to the porch on the Academy Street side. She stated that the other two homes that are already there are two story homes and this proposed plan is for a one and a half-story dwelling.  story dwelling on Lot #10 within Moss Landing.  1    She asked how the elevation on the roof ofthis home will compare to the others. Mr. Wiley stated that the first-floor height will be very similar since the garage is located underneath, on the ground floor. He started that the first floor is to where the existing town homes are. He explained that with a one and al half-story the roof pitch will still sit pretty close to the two-story dwellings, just where you would normally have a flat roofthere will be more ofaj pitch. He stated that there would not be a significant difference in the height oft this dwelling and the existing two-story dwellings. Kathleen Couch asked ift the original plots were plated to face Academy. Mr. Wiley stated that he believed the original plan proposed town homes facing Academy Street. Mr. Wiley stated that all the other homes on Academy Street face Academy sO they wanted to keep that consistency. Mark Everett talked about the house being a corner lot facing Academy Street with the door facing Water Street. Mr. Everett stated that with the stairs going out to Academy Street there is not actually entry from Water Street. Mr. Wiley stated that they have already had this treatment on Water Street where the steps do not directly go up to the front door due to the configuration of the house. He stated that they feel walking up the steps on Academy Street and being guided to the door will feel very natural. He stated that they purposely worked on this home design because it has really nice detail down Water Street, SO both sides on the home will have a lot of detail. He explained that you will see the door from Water Street, candidly he would like to give the future home owner the option to have step off of both streets. Mark Everett asked ifthey would be averse to putting stairs going down to Water Street as well. Mr. Wiley stated that he is not averse toi it, but he would like tol keep that up tot the buyer oft the home. The Chairman opened the floor and no came: forward to speak for or against the Rebecca Clark stated that she was okay with the plan and design oft the house. Karen Mann stated that since this is a corner lot iti is a little different than other homes they have looked at in the development. She stated that she agreed that the configuration of the door and stairway goes more with the style oft the home. Rebecca Clark stated that she didn't think turning the door would work but felt a secondary stairway would be fine. She stated that all the other houses on  request.  Academy Street have the entrance facing Academy.  2    Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new: single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #10 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.01 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction. Her motion was seconded by Rebecca 2. A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, two-story  Clark. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  dwelling on Lot #31 within Moss Landing.  Mr. Wiley came forward and presented the plan for Lot #31.  Colleen Knight made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct as new: single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings offact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.0: New Construction Section 5.2  Residential Construction.  3. A1 request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for ac Certificate of Appropriateness: that states once a Moss Landing plan has been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, it can bej processed as a Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness should the plan bej presented again. This would apply for previous and future Major Work plans that fall outside the Emily Rebert explained that in 20161 the Historic Preservation Commission approved al blanket approval for 8 plans in the Moss Landing development with the understanding there may be some variation between them. She explained that there are some other plans that are coming before the Commission that are outside ofthose 8 plans. She explained the request to the Commission. She stated that if ap plan is approved by the Commission then all future construction of that approved plan would be approved as ai minor work. Mark Everett stated that they are being asked to expand that subsection of plans in the 2016 blanket approval and allow them tol be approved as a minor work because it has been previously approved by the Commission as al Major work. Mark Everett asked ifstaffhad enough information to determine which plans would be included. The Commission discussed the request. William Kenner stated that there may be changes to the design that he would like to look at before they are approved.  2016 Moss Landing blanket approval.  3    Mark Everett stated that with the original blanket approved ift there were changes to the design of one of the plans it would have to come back to the Commission for review. William Kenner pointed out problems that may come up with adding tot the blanket approval and requiring plans to come before them for review. Mr. Wiley stated that back in 2016 when the blanket approval was done Beacon Street did not specify at that time that the blanket would extend to new approved. plans. With that being said they are trying to make differentiations in a way where the homes feel unique. He stated that this would just make the process more efficient for them. Karen Mann again questioned the elevations ofthe future homes. Mr. Wiley explained some of the future plans for Moss Landing and stated that they plan for keep the current height oft the elevations and do not The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against. Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant staff the ability to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Jim Wiley of] Beacon Street Development to construct new: family dwellings on1 the property known as Moss Landing ifit has been previously approved as a major work. This is based on the following findings of fact that the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines. This is an addition to the previous 8 plans approved in the 2016 blanket approval. Colleen Knight seconded the motion. The motion carried with aj majority vote 4. Ar request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to recreate and paint the brick of the primary façade of the property located at 157 Mr. Sed Naziri came forward and was sworn in. He explained that he would like tor recreate what use to be the building façade at 157 West Main Street, the old Belk Building. He stated that through the years there has been al lot of changes to the front façade ofthis building and it is currently ai mess. He explained that many oft the bricks are damaged and they would like to recreate the old look oft the façade. William Kenner asked what type of paint they planned to use. Mr. Naziri stated that the paint would be a water-based paint, sO that the brick can still breath but also be protected. William Kenner asked ifl Mr. Naziri would be showing staff the type of paint he would use. Mr. Naziri stated that he would. Mark Everett stated that going over the request it looks like Mr. Naziri will not be going back with the original type of materials, but will be recreating. Mr. Naziri stated that currently the façade is a combination of cement/concrete blocks and bricks. He explained that 30 to 45% oft the bricks are damaged. He stated that they would  plan on going any higher.  with William Kenner voting in opposition.  West Main Street.  4    like to cast inj place with material that is similar to what is there now. He stated that the material is a cement and sand mix, which is pretty much the same mixture as thel bricks that are on the façade now. He explained that they will use this mixture to fill in all the cavities and replace the damaged bricks. He stated that they will carve into the material to make it have the look oft brick. He stated that the facade would: have the same. look as it did before and the material will look like brick once they are finished. He stated that this process will take 151 to 20 days and each day the mixture will be a slightly different color. This is why they are requesting toj paint the façade after the work is done and give it a unified look. Mark Everett asked ifN Mr. Naziri considering finding actual brick to match. Mr. stated that he discussed the façade with his experience mason and they decided that casting in place and using the proposed material was the best solution. He stated that he didn'tthink he would be able toi find brick to match the existing brick on the building. The Commission asked questions about the existing façade. Mr. Naziri stated that he would discuss the paint material and color with staff. He stated that he would try to be compatible with the surrounding buildings along Main Street. He explained that they will probably end up having toj paint the entire building. He stated that they will come back before the Commission when they are ready for the back and the side oft the building. At this time, they are concentrating on the front façade only. Mr. Rodman explained that the metal plate at the top oft the building was put there for safety due tol bricks falling. Mr. Naziri stated that he would like to remove the metal plate and recreate the brick design and look there. He stated that ifthat was not possible, they would go back with a strip of concrete. Rebecca Clark stated that he felt what Mr. Naziri is trying to doi is good because the building is in such back shape, but she was concerned about the amount of changes that are being made to the building. Mr. Naziri stated that in the future he will be removing the cider block, repairing the window frames and putting in windows, but right now they are only discussing the brick repair. He stated that he will be repairing the keystones on the arches also. Kathleen Couch stated that since the restoration is being done sequentially, what they approve on the front façade will affect and roll into the other sides and may limit what they can approve as they go around the building. She stated that they do not have one cohesive picture of the building plans. Mr. Naziri gavea brief description the plan for the rear and side oft the building design. Emily Rebert stated that currently the building is not a contributing structure but with correct restoration it has the potential to become one in the future. Ms. Rebert also explained what the State Office would require ifl he were to use tax credits and what some of the details on the original façade looked like. Mr. Naziri stated that the façade will look nice and they wouldn'twant to do anything that would make it look otherwise. Karen Mann stated that she had hoped that they were only going toj paint the keystones and some oft the: small details, not the entire façade. She stated that painting the brick is against the design guidelines. Mr. Naziri stated that he is open to suggestions for paint and color ofthe paint for the  5    building. Karen Mann stated that by the guidelines the preference is to not paint the brick. She stated that she wondered what the brick will look like once iti is cleaned up. She stated that since they will be using casting, they could color the material to match the brick. Mr. Naziri stated that they planned to power wash the brick first, but it will be very difficult to match the casting material with the original brick. This is why he is requesting toj paint the entire façade. Kathleen Couch expressed concern that they are approving changes to the building piecemeal and without something showing them what the front of the building will actually look like. She stated that they want to make sure the resolute will have a cohesive look and will be consistent with look ofthe downtown. Mr. Naziri stated that his goal is to bring the building back to its original appearance.  The Chairman opened the floor.  Doris Moate came forward. She stated that they all know that this building is in very bad shape. She stated that she encourages what Mr. Naziri ist trying to do. But she is also concerned about the project being done piecemeal. She stated that its seemed tol her that the Commission and the Planning staffneeds some kind of vision or something draw out showing the end result once the work has been done. She stated that as a citizen as well she would like to see what he wants to do to the building. She suggested that ift the Commission allows this project as a piecemeal process then every change will be brought back to the Commission for Meg Howdy came forward and was sworn in. She stated that Mr. Naziri is not currently living in Washington but he is spending al lot oftime coming back and forth working with Emily and keeping her in the loop. She stated that they actually sent this building off to UNCG for plans and this building has had a lot of faces since it was first built. Ms. Howdy stated that unfortunately when it was Belk, they really messed up the front façade. She stated that Mr. Naziri is spending a lot of time and effort into bring up the building. She stated that she understood that the Commission wants to see the entire project and not piecemeal, but he is working closely with Emily as well as John Wood and his team to see what is best for the project. Ms. Howdy stated that they also have to be reasonable when considering the project, with the amount of money it takes to There being no others coming forward the floor was close and the request was Colleen Knight stated that she didn'th have a problem with considering the request piecemeal. She stated that right now with this request they are only looking at. repairing the façade. They are only considering the brick repair and paint. She  consideration.  restore this building. brought back to the table.  6    stated hat the Commission approved paint for the Harbor District Alliance as long as they agreed to work with Emily. She stated that she didn't see how repairing the brick and the modeling on the front will affect anything on the side or back of the building. Mark Everett stated that if they are going to approve one: façade, he would love to see ai rendering of the entire façade including the store front and other details oft the Main Street façade. Rebecca Clark stated that Mr. Naziri is only asking to recreate the brick work and the fact that the building is a non- contributing structure she didn't think painting it was an issue. She stated that the standard for this building is a little different since it has been altered some much already. Ms. Clark stated that personally she didn't have aj problem with what Mr. Naziri is requesting and isj just glad that someone is doing something with this building. William Kenner stated that he had concerns about them pressure washing the brick and the type of paint they plan to use. He stated that pressure washing could damage the current brick and some paints may hold in moisture and cause more damage to the brick. Mr. Kenner stated that he is glad Mr. Naziri Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front façade oft the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.21 Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission note that the motion is based on the building not being ac contributing structure. Colleen Knight seconded the motion. Mark Everett noted that the building is ai noncontributing structure and has an extensive amount of bricks that are damaged. The motion failed with a tie vote. Colleen Knight, Mark Everett, and Rebecca Clark voted in favor and Kathleen Couch, William Kathleen Couch made ai motion to continue the request to the December meeting with ai recommendation that Mr. Naziri provide al rendering ofhis complete plans for the front ofthe building. William Kenner seconded the motion. The motion carried with a majority vote. Rebecca Clark and Colleen Knight voted in opposition. William Kenner stated that he would also like to see past projects. 5. Ai request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to elevate the structure and remove the chimney on1 the property located at 613 Ms. Patty Franz came forward and was sworn in. She stated that this cottage went through substantial flooding during Florence and the City deemed if 83% loss.  came to town and took on this project.  Kenner, and Karen Mann voted in opposition.  Old Second Street.  7    She explained that she is trying to go through FEMA to get the ICC insurance to have the property raised. She stated that she needs the COA in order to get a building permit. Ms. Franz stated that they are looking at raising it 4 feet. William Kenner asked if dirt will be brought in to raise the house. Ms. Franz stated that they would not be bringing in a lot of dirt. She stated that she would like to go with 4-foot piers. She stated that through the flood insurance program one requirement for her is to be cost effective, sO she believes the piers are the best way to go. Mark Everett asked Emily about other projects they have looked at. Ms. Rebert stated that the project on Short Drive is bringing in fill for their elevation. Kathleen Couch stated that the Short Drive was ai much more significate elevation. Ms. Franz stated that the house must be raised above the BFE in order for FEMA to approve it. William Kenner pointed out that this is the last house on Old Second Street and Ms. Franz has done a lot to save the property. Karen Mann asked if the chimney on the East side was a functioning chimney. She explained that she has two chimneys and the one on the east side was not functioning. She stated that she asked to keep the chimney, but it is in such bad shape that once the house is raised the whole chimney will come down. She stated that she planned to keep the chimney ini the middle oft the house. She stated that she plans to keep the bricks from the chimney on the east side and use them The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against Emily Rebert stated that per the State Office ifthe house is raised 4ft then it will not longer be a contributing structure. She stated that the State office recommended two feet ofi fill and 2 ft piers. Kathleen Couch asked ifs staffh had that in writing. Emily Rebert stated that John Wood never got it tol her in an email, but she discussed it with him over the phone yesterday afternoon. Ms. Franz stated that she spoke with. John Wood directly before the meeting and he stated that in New Bern they were working on getting special dispensation to raise the properties but also keep them as contributing structures. John Wood was going to check with someone in Raleigh and she was hoping tol hear from him in the morning. The Commission discussed this information further. Ms. Franz also discussed the cost to raise the house and it would be a financial burden for her to bring in fill/dirt. Ms. Franz stated that this area will flood again and she would fell more comfortable with the 4 ft pilings. She explained that she had 41 ftof water in the house after Florence. Karen Mann stated that perhaps they needed to give Ms. Franz a little more time to meet with staff and consider what the State office is recommending. Kathleen Couch asked ifMs. Franz had an estimate for bringing in fill. Ms. Franz stated that she only had an estimate for the pilings.  for something else on the property.  the request. The Commission discussed the request further.  8    Kathleen Couch made a motion to defer consideration ofthis Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Patti Franz to elevate her dwelling and remove the east side chimney until she has had time to discuss John Wood's recent recommendations regarding 2 ft ofi fill and 2-foot piers, which would maintain the historic integrity ofthe house to the December meeting. Karen Mann seconded the motion. It carried with a majority vote. William Kenner and Rebecca Clark 6. Ar request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to elevate the structure on the property located at 5161 East Second Street. Mr. Fred Read came forward and was sworn in. He explained that his house also flooded during Florence. William Kenner asked ift this was a contributing structure. Emily Rebert stated that it was not. Mr. Read stated that he would need to raise the house 4ft and add the lattice between the piers. The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against Mark Everett stated that the difference with this house is that it is a non- contributing structure. He asked ift there had been any discussion with John Wood about this particular property. Emily Rebert stated that because staff did not receive the elevation certificate until today no recommendation had been made yet. William Kenner asked when thel house was built. Mr. Read stated that the original house was built in 1910 and then rebuilt in 1976. Kathleen Couch asked when the house would become a contributing structure. Emily Rebert stated that itc could potentially in 2026. Kathleen Couch stated that ift the house is raised and done by a certain standard it could be contributing to the district in the future. Ms. Rebert stated that she would have to talk to the State office and get their recommendation. She stated that ifthel house is raised tool high then they could lose a future contributing structure. Rebecca Clark stated that the Commission cannot base a decision on weather or not the house may or may not be a future contributing structure. She stated that this building has to be raised due to the flooding in that area ori it will be destroyed. She stated that she felt like the Commission could not continue to make decisions based on the fact that it could potentially be a contributing structure, but is not currently. Colleen Knight stated that they do not even know for a fact that raising the house would disqualify the house. So, they are going to tell the owner that he can not raise his house based on something that may or may not even happen 8 years from now. Kathleen Couch stated that it is not a question of not allowing him to raise the house, the question is should the raising oft the house be done in a way that ifin the future or currently the house is contributing is there a best way to do it. She stated that they cannot make that decision unless they have all the information and she didn't fell they  voted in opposition.  the request.  9    had all the information from John Wood on this particular house. Karen Mann stated that looking at the houses along Jacks Creek that have just been raised, they are not very attractive. She stated that it is much more appealing to grade the lot a little. She stated that to her it would make more sense for the property owners to want to grade up the lots before raising the houses. Rebecca Clark stated that she didn't see where this property could be graded. Mr. Read stated that his main concern with grading the property is the cost. He stated that also he can not put money into repairing the property and not raise it only for it to get flooded again. Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Read to elevation the dwelling on the property located at 5161 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials and 3.3 Foundation. Making note that this is ai non-contributing structure. Colleen Knight seconded the motion. The motion failed with a split vote. Rebecca Clark, Colleen Knight, and William Kenner voted for the motion and Kathleen Couch, Mark Everett, and Karen Mann voted in opposition. Kathleen Couch made a motion to defer consideration of the COA tol Mr. Fred Read to the December meeting. Karen Mann seconded the motion. The motion carried with a majority vote. Rebecca Clark and Colleen Knight voted in 7. Ar request has been made by the City ofWashington for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at Kristi Roberson with the City of Washington came forward and was sworn in. She stated that the clerestory windows at the Civic Center are: in need of replacement and repair. Ms. Roberson presented the quotes that they received from ai number ofc contractors. She stated that they are having some leaking and deteriorating issues with the windows. The Commission discussed the material of the windows. Emily Rebert stated that the Department of] Interior Standards has been allowing aluminum windows at high elevations of some buildings. William Kenner stated that the City is requesting aluminum windows at 30 feet up. Ms. Roberson discussed the cost difference between the windows they considered. Mark Everett talked the maintenance over time that wooden windows at this location and so high up could require over the years. The Commission discussed the number of windows that need tol be replace and the materials of the  opposition.  108 Gladden Street.  replacement windows.  The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward.  10    William Kenner made a motion to continue the request. Kathleen Couch 8. A request has been made by the Washington Harbor District Alliance fora Certificate of Appropriateness to install string lighting throughout four alleyways Meg Howdy came forward and stated that there are current four alleys downtown that are: not well lite. She stated that they would like to make those alleyways safer as well as make them look nice. She stated that other Main Streets throughout North Carolina have done this and it has been very successful. She stated that this will bring a lot of charm to the downtown as well as bring safe lighted alleyways. Meg Howdy stated that the lights will be up year-round and showed aj picture of the type of commercial grade lights they plan to use. She stated that the lights will be high enough SO people can not pull them down. She  seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  within the Downtown Harbor District.  also talked about which alleys they planned to do. The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward.  Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to the Washington Harbor District Alliance and the City of Washington to install string lighting throughout four alleyways with in the Downton Harbor District. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.2 Lighting. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 405 East Second Street to replace the existing retaining wall along the driveway using like materials on the property. 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the ownerof524 West Main Street to maintenance the existing  ductwork ini the same location on the property.  items on the property: a. Trimming existing trees b. Re-installing the wooden shutters d. Repair existing sills using like materials  Reinstall wood siding where cement board siding was inappropriately placed e. Replace existing siding, fascia, soffit boards, and eaves using like materials  11    4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of117 South Harvey Street to replace the existing 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of507 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of617 East Main Street to maintenance the existing  A/C unit in the same location on the property. unit in the same. location on the property.  items on the property: a. Roofing materials b. Repair porch using like materials Reconstruct previously removed columns  d. Replace the front that is an interior door with the original, exterior door. 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 405 North Market street to install a mini split 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of118 Charlotte Street to replace the existing porch 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 102 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 10.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of184 West Main Street to replace the existing sign 11.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 12.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 405 North Market Street to install a mini split 13.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and 14.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and 15.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of225 West Main Street to replace the split system 16.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of219 East Third Street (Pamlico Rose Institute) to Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve all the minor works. William Kenner  system in the back yard of the property.  floor boards using like materials on the property. ductwork in the same location on the property.  using like materials ini the same location on the property. ductwork in the same location on the property. system int the rear elevation oft the property.  mini split system in the rear elevation of the property. mini split system in the rear elevation of the property.  in the rear elevation ofthe property.  install three (3) arbors in the Healing Garden of the property.  seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  12    VI. Other Business 1. Tree Policy  Emily Rebert came forward and gave an update on what was discussed at the Tree Committee meeting and presented aj pamphlet that they designed.  2. 411 and 415 West Second Street Update  Emily Rebert stated that the Council voted to support working with Preservation North Carolina. She stated that the contents of411 West Second Street will be sold  on Gov Deals.  VII. Approval of Minutes = October 2, 2018 Kathleen Couch and all voted in favor.  William Kenner made a motion to approve the minutes. His motion was seconded by  VIII. Adjourn  There being no other business Rebecca Clark made a motion to adjourn. The motion  was seconded by Kathleen Couch.  13