WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, October 2, 20187:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV.. Old Business  1. A request has been made by Ms. Charlotte Cutler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation of the  property located at 225 West Main Street.  2. Are request has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of dwelling on the property located at 325 Harvey Street.  Appropriateness to demolish the structure and construct a new one and a half story 3. A request has been made by Mr. George Finn for a Certificate of Appropriateness tomake the following alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street:  a) Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the existing gravel driveway to concrete runners at the property located 2. Are request has been made by Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 4' wooden picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 527 3. A request has been made by Ms. Susan Strickland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 705  at 720 West Main Street.  West Second Street.  East Main Street:  a) Replace the existing windows b) Convert a front door to a window  1    B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 243 East Main Street to replace the existing 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropnateness for the owner of 134 South Market Street to replace the broken window glass of the door in the front façade and to replace the existing awning in the 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 803 West Second Street to replace the existing 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 509 West Second Street to repair and replace the existing wooden picket fence using like materials on the house of the property.  window on the front façade on the property.  same location on the property.  HVAC unit in the same location on the property.  VI. Other Business 1. Tree Policy  VII. Approval of Minutes - September 4, 2018  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    225 West Main  Street  Addition of Bistro Tables    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiersi in thet front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 245 Wists main  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Mlanghale Brapedealc  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description ofWork to be Done:  dwe Auto e! hedlro tablis. luso chaiss) yliach table m lach ide a! nthc FhEN/4gaaA4 Yaeachuke Rpat  Calai lei bbokcoss  Apln Bibage  pkistig  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  CAth dasw.Mmar WHn, 7C 27889  (Name of Applicant type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Mailing Address) 0/25/20182  (ZipCodey Number)  (Authorized Signature) dated below  (Signature  this  becomes a Issuance of a Minor.  SR  Upon being signed and  by the Planning Department or designee, application  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    -  /  ET ET  7w Kiy A (rkvy 360   Whlay % tlany  Google    Beaufort Printed. July: 26, 2018 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  Bp  W  1:28 Feet    OBJECTID 6496 OWNER NAME STRONG SHIELD PROPERTIES LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 174524 TAXABLE VA 319460 PROPERTV ADDRESS 225 WI MAIN ST DATE 4/16/2008 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC ROAD TVPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC21 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 19303  GPXN 5675-78-7241 OWNER NAME2 CITV WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT( (2AC) WI MAIN: ST TOT VAL 319460 PREV ASSESS 320156 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1639/00942 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1930 SUB DESC RESTAURANTS EFF YR 1975  GPXN Long 5675-78-7241 MAILING ADDRESS 444: STEWART PARKWAY STATE NC LAND VAL 144936 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.18 MBL 567508505 STAMPS NBHD CDE CH. EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRE BED PIN 15002551  Beaufort County onliner mapa access is provided asa public service, asi is, as available andy without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont this websitei is fori informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County ofE Beaufort andt thel Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legal! liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The usera agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall bel held! harmlessf from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of Countyd data.    WNy MEWn  Fblo leting Ple Ak. &9 Palaung  Lalo & ictung  152-97-6870    Adjacent Property Owners - 225 West Main Street  CITY OF) WASHINGTON POBOX1988 WASHINGTON: NC27889 STRONG SHIELD PROPERTIES LLC 444 STEWART: PARKWAY WASHINGTON NC: 27889 FORTESCUE INVESTMENT GROUPLLC 444 STEWART PARKWAY WASHINGTON NC 27889 SLOAN FAMILY VENTURES LLC 245 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 SMITH WALLACE C 2283 OLD NEW BERN ROAD CHOCOWINITY NC2 27817 HASSELLSID. JR 103 SREEDI DR WASHINGTON NC 27889 ADDLED DADI LLC 129) VANI NORDEN: ST WASHINGTON NC 27889 WALKER RANDALL POBOX:2632 WASHINGTONI NC27889 WILLIAMS DAVID GLENN 201 W MAIN: ST WASHINGTON! NC 27889 RIVERSIDE HOLDINGS LLC 108 RIVERSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC 27889 HUGGINSJERAYWAINE 214 WI MAIN ST WASHINGTON NC2 27889 MBA HOLDINGS LLC 234 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 LYNCH MURRAYWALKER POBOX1887 WASHINGTON NC: 27889    Dorntoion Decelopmenb ffstoric Preseroation  0  6  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  August 23, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 225 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Charlotte Cutler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation of the property located at 225  West Main Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday September 4, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    orntoin eoelopmenb fftoric CPresevoation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  September 18, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 225 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Ms. Charlotte Cutler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation of the property located at 225  West Main Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  94 uA Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  225 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 225 West Main Street is requesting to place two sets of Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.8 Sidewalks:  bistro tables int the primary elevation of the building.  4.8.2 Sidewalk dining is permitted within the downtown commercial district provided that the business owner has obtained a permit from the Planning Office stating that it meets all codes o The placement of tables, chairs and other furnishings must be done in such a manner that at least five (5) feet of unobstructed space (as measured from the street-side edge of the sidewalk) remains on the sidewalk or pedestrian way for the passage of pedestrians. OT The sidewalk dining area is associated with and located directly in front its associated use. OT The placement of street furnishings does not extend past the side property lines of the 4.8.3 Anys sidewalk furniture being placed by a private property owner must be approved by the 4.8.4 Sidewalk furniture should enhance the streetscape and the site on which they are located. Appropriate materials include wood and metal. Plastic, vinyl, or contemporary styled elements detract from the historic quality of the: streetscape and should not be used. Avoid any! highly  related to: sidewalks, and:  o No fire exits or lanes may be blocked.  associated building.  o1 Itr meets all other codes related to sidewalk dining.  Historic Preservation Commission.  ornate design that would misrepresent the history of the area.  While the materials for the bistro tables are appropriate, the style of the furniture would be considered contemporary for the streetscape. Based on finding oft fact, the  application is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: Ms. Charlotte Cutler has submitted a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness: place two sets of bistro tables ini the primary 6 elevation of the property located at 225 West Main Street.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Charlotte Cutler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables int the primary elevation of the property located at 225 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.8 Sidewalks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Charlotte Cutler fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation oft the property located at 225 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.8 Sidewalks. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Charlotte Cutler fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation oft the property located at 225 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation  Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.8 Sidewalks.    325 Harvey  Street  Demolition of the Two-Story  Dwelling    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackink  Historic Preservation: Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation: Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thei front lobby of City! Hall under' Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  325 Harvey Street Caroline Collie feet by  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  The property owner of 325 Harvey Street would- like to demolish the two-story dwelling on the property.  Apotential buyer would like to constructar new, 1 1/2 story dwelling in its place.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Tony Edwards, AG's Home Solutions (Name of Applicant - type or print) 490. Bay Lake Drive Chocowinity (Mailing Address) July23,2018 (Date),  (Initials)  ACTION  27817 (Zip Code) 252-947-2526 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature/of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Note: Provided photos are dated from January 29,2016.    Beaufort Printed) July 26, 2018 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:45Feet    OBJECTID 10759 OWNER NAME DARROW BILLY RUSS. JR MAILING ADDRESS 2 301 CHRISTIAN SERV CAMP RD ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 3212 TAXABLE VA 9612 PROPERTY ADDRESS 325 N HARVEY: ST DATE 6/13/2014 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42280  GPIN 5685-08-2334 OWNER NAME2 KONIGSMARK DOROTHYD CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT: 325 HARVEY: STREET TOT VAL 9612 PREV ASSESS 20738 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1847/00382 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1920 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF VR 1920  GPYN Long 5685-08-2334 MAILING ADDRESS 301 CHRISTIAN SERV CAMP RD STATE NC LAND VAL 6400 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.15 MBL 568505253 STAMPS NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 1686 NBR BED 3 PIN 01025099  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as public service, asis is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is fori informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute a legal record nors should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County of Beauforta andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shall be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use ofc County data.                                    The new. house willl look like 413 North Bonner Street  These plans will be brought to the HPC  at a later date.    Kaepexistin) trees in lele yerch v/Pence- wordprivaey Aroun leek  yorcl'  Screan forch  s  e  sR  Harvay S+.    Adjacent Property Owners - 325 Harvey Street  LILLEY ROSEMARIE P 601 SHOREWOOD DR WASHINGTON NC27889 BASCOM DELORES HOOD 301 KEYSVILLE ROAD WASHINGTON NC27889 FOYETATIAS 318 NHARVEY STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 PHELPS NANCYF 107 RIVERCREST DR GREENVILLE NC 27858 FUCHS STEVENC 125 HONEY PODI FARM ROAD WASHINGTON NC 27889 SHELTON DOYLE PO BOX305 PLEASANT GARDEN NC 27313 WALLACEHOMERI B 323 HARVEYST WASHINGTON NC 27889 DARROW BILLY RUSSJR 301 CHRISTIAN SERV CAMP RD WASHINGTON NC 27889 SIMPSONI ROYL 4027. JOHN SMALL AVENUE WASHINGTON NC27889 WASHINGTON DEMOLITION: & SALVAGE 2051 W5THST WASHINGTON NC 27889 THE WORTHY GROUP LLC 100 RIVERSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC 27889 CITY OF WASHINGTON POBOX1988 WASHINGTON NC 27889    orntoion SDecelopmenb fffstoric Preeroation  0  6  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA A  August 23, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 325 Harvey Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the structure and construct a new one and a half story dwelling on the prop-  erty located at 325 Harvey Street.  Ifyoux would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission: Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday September 4, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation: 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Dorntoion  - -  Decelopmenb  Citys  ffstoric Presevation  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 18, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -3 325 Harvey Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  AI request has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the structure and construct a new one and a half story dwelling on the prop-  erty located at 325 Harvey Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 94 Aanl Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Subject:  Anthony Edwards tonyedwardseagnomesolutions.com>  Thursday, July 26,2018937AM Emily Rebert Fwd: Re: 325 Harvey st.  Original Message  From: Caroline Collie cecoleeppogemalcom To: Anthony Edwards tonyedwards@aghomesolutions.com> Date:. July: 17, 2018 at11:03 PM: Subject: Re: 325 Harvey: st.  HiT Tony,  Absolutely. At this point we are open to any possibilities. Youl have our permission to appear before the  board regarding 325 Harvey Street. Thanks SO much, Caroline Collie  OnJul17, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Anthony Edwards tonyedwartiseaglomesolutons.com> wrote:  Good Morning Caroline,  lam still interested in your property on Harvey St. Twould like to appear before the board in August to get approval for what we plan to do with the property. Ineed your permission to doi that. Emily said that an email from you would be ok. Let me know ify you are. still interested in doing this andj just send an email stating thatl have your permission to appear before the board on your behalf.  Thank you, Tony Edwards  On April 26, 2018 at5 5:49 AM Caroline Collie doleenpotemalcon wrote:  Hi Tony,  Please forgive me for my lack of response thus far. I'm still trying to decide and weigh ini my siblings' preferences on this situation. Do you have any interest in purchasing this property ora are you interested in rehabbing it at our expense? lalso thinki iti is unfortunately, past the point of saving, but also do not think the resources are available inside our family for the exorbitant renovation costs." We would consider ANY    offer to: sell the property- and would be delighted to see yous salvage what you can and make the property work for someone again. I'd be grateful tol have al better sense of the outcome you're hoping for.  Thanks SO much, Caroline Collie  On Apr 22, 2018, at 9:14A AM, Anthony Edwards tonyedwards@aghomesolutions.com> wrote: Good Morning Caroline,  Imet with Emily at your property on Wednesday. I worked with a restoration company for over twelve years and have rebuilt many properties from fire and water damage. Asl long as there are good bones to work. with Ihave never been afraid of a challenge. Unfortunately, your property's bones are to brittle. The floor framing, walls and: support bands are toi far gone. The cost to try and renovate this property would  be exorbitant!  But Wait..... we do have an idea.  Before the property is demolished, we remove. some of the material that can be saved, the hardwood floors upstairs, the handrails, the tub and even some oft the siding and use this ini the new house. We design the new house to mimic the original and incorporate the material that we salvage from the Ifyou guys are interested just let us know.  original.  Tony Edwards  On April 10, 2018a at7:31 PM Caroline Collie tcalcenpogemalcom  wrote: HiTony,  Iwould absolutely be willing to meet with you. We are not in a financial position to rehabilitate the property, but Iwould truly love to not seeit demolished, and instead see it restored.  2    lam reasonably confident my brother and sister (whose names are also on the deed) would be willing to discuss any offer on the house because we have been looking at the possibility of demolishing it since we could see no other option and the City of Washington is seeingi it as al liability. I'm afraid after al long workday on Saturday, I've almost completely lost my voice and cannot give youa call today, butl would indeed love to speak with you and would be glad to meet with youi to show yout the house, ori if Emily would like to do sO she is welcome to. Itisgreat to hear from you. Thanks so much, Caroline Collie 252-916-1820  On Apr10,2018, at 9:53A AM, Anthony Edwards tonyedwards@aghom esolutions.com> wrote: Caroline, My name is Tony Edwards. Iwas meeting with Emily Rebert this morning and your property came upi ina a conversation. She explained the situation about being your family home. Ijust moved my office from the blind center to another location and for the past year lhave wondered about this property. Jwould be very interested in rehabbing this property ifyous would be interested in meeting  3    with me. Give me a call ify you are willing to meet with me. Thank you. Tony Edwards. 252-947-2526 AG'S Home Solutions.    Staff Report  325 North Harvey Street  Ms. Caroline Collie is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness: to demolish the single-family dwelling located at 325 North Harvey Street. The house is currently a contributing structure to the city's National  Register of Historic Places nomination.  The Design Guidelines: states in Chapter 6.01 Demolition and Relocation:  Chapter 6.1 Demolishing al historic structure within the district has the potential toi irreversibly change the character of the district and can compromise the quality and sense of place of the entire district.... Demolition ofal historic structure is strongly discouraged, and any timea Chapter 6.1.1 "Prior to undertaking demolition work, the property owner shall approach the Historic Preservation Commission to determine the historic: significance of the structure andi its Chapter 6.1.2 "lf the HPC determines that the structure is historically significant, it shall delay the demolition for an appropriate time in order for staff and the Commission to work with the property owner to seek viable alternatives to demolition. Alternatives to demolition includel -lfal building is in disrepair, working with the property owner: to develop a rehabilitation plan and identify funding assistance such as rehabilitation tax credits that would allow the -Ifa building does noti fit the owner's required needs, determining if the structure could "-Working with the property owner to locate: al buyer who will use the property without -Asal last resort, finding a suitable location within the district for the historic building to be moved and working with the property owner to develop a plan for relocation. Chapter 6.1.4 "When a demolition is proposed, the applicant must: submit a landscaping plan illustrating proposed landscaping and other site development to be completed within six (6)  demolition is proposed, alternatives must be carefully explored."  relationship to the district."  among other things: building to be rehabilitated. be adaptively reused. demolishing the structure.  months after the demolition."  The property owner has been working with the planning office since being approached with the Demolition by Neglect ordinance in January of2016. The structure is infested with termites and bats. The property was offered to Preservation North Carolina, but it is The potential buyer would like to use the elements (doors, newel post, mantels, bathtub)  financially unfeasible for them to save. in the existing house in the new home.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: Ms. Caroline Collies has submitted a Notice of Intent to Demolish the property located at 325 North  Harvey Street.  A request has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of Appropriateness to  demolish the property located at 325 North Harvey. Street.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the: sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Caroline Collie to allow for the demolition of the property located at 325 North Harvey Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.01 Demolition and  Relocation.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Caroline Collie to allow fort the demolition of the property located at 325 North Harvey: Street. This motion is basedi on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.01 Demolition and Relocation. further move: that the Historic Preservation Commission place a delay on the  demolition for  (up to 365) days.    748 West Second  Street  Balcony Addition    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers ini thet front lobby of City! Hall under" Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 7486 W,2dst. Owner's Name: heore-tJwlie Finm  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Ogtal Lprlney fence on leftrnight eluhonszen 6P Clevation Plkeadrlcsyf betcen houses OM ear curner- O Letsile Contnuingy cNhhiag-Acivney fente 1 Corneet Gunstruet 3nc apalaayaasdadhw Flome lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.. oni the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  to LAF pec Cvrner et bone -  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Tony Edwocdls (Name of Applicant-type or print) (Malling Address) 6-15208 (Date) 1  (Initials)  ACTION  748 W.2nlst hhshiyfon 97989  (Zip0 Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  shr  (Authorized Signature) (SignaturgofA Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anyl law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of al Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.        Beaufort PrintedA August 24,2 2018 SeeB Below for Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  HOSIING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:34Feet    OBJECTID 7579 OWNER NAME FINN GEORGEH MAILING. ADDRESS2 410EN MAIN: STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 100249 TAXABLE VA 131149 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 748W:2NDST DATE 6/18/2018 SALE PRICE 69500.00 NBHD DESC WEST SIDE HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 41489  GPIN 5676-50-7068 OWNERI NAME2 FINNJ JULIE CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT 748) WEST.2 2ND STREET TOT VAL 131149 PREV ASSESS 102228 TOWNSHIP 01 DEEDI BOOK and PAGE 1963/00330 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1975  GPIN Long 5676-50-7068 MAILING ADDRESS 410EMAINSTREET STATE NC LAND VAL 30900 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.24 MBL 567619191 STAMPS 139.00 NBHD CDE WSH EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2640 NBR BED 5 PIN 01032803  Beaufort County onliner mapa access is provideda asap publics service, asi is,asa available andv without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websiteis fori informational purposes only andi isr notir intended. to constitute al legal recordr nors should it bes substituted fort thea advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beauforta andt the WebsiteP Providero disclaim allr responsibilitya andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont thisv website. Theu usera agreest thatB Beaufort Countyl  anditsA Assignss shallb beh heldharmless froma alla actions, claims. damages ori judgments arising outo oftheu useofc County data.    748 W. Bac St.  Construct balong On 2ncl  floov  Deck Boards will le Composite materiol qnd homdrails will be blackiren  y  SA y    820/2018  IMG_1415.JPG  psmalgpge.commalnuonriopodor  1/1    Ps,   5 2  3  2 295 7  KR    21  a Li6 0 o eMAe            2x9TopRail  4242 wolt balluster  2x    Adjacent Property Owners - 748 West Second Street  MUSSELMAN MARY PAT 755 W2 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 BENNETT. JEFFERYA 751W/2NDSTREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 WOODJ JEFFREYL 747 W:2NDS STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 KENNER WILLIAM DAVISIV 743 W2 2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 BARMER GREGORY C 741 W2 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 GOLDEN ROCKI INVESTMENTS 45 MILLER LANE NEW HYDE PARKI NY 11040 LOPRO LLC 3044 ROLSTON ROAD GREENVILLE NC 27858 SAWYER GROVERI HJR 904 W: 3RD: STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 THE COURTYARDS OF WASHINGTON 137EMAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 COLEHANIE ERNEST JR &CONSTANCE POBOX283 CHOCOWINITY NC 27817 CHERRY CHARLESF 79 RIDGECREST DRIVE CHOCOWINITY NC 27817 FINN GEORGE H 410E El MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 STERMAN-VERLING DENNIS 754 W2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  PARKER LAUREN. A 4374 THURGOOD ESTATES DRIVE ELLENWOOD GA: 30294 DEAR TOM 744 W: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 HECIMOVICH GREGG A 740 W SECOND: STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 DUDA TERIANN WAGNER 1307 LAKEHURST WAY BRANDON FL 33511 SWAN RODNEYE 218 FLEMING STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 SMALLWOOD, JOY G 310 BELLCREST DR WASHINGTON NC 27889 BOSTON JOSEPH HENRY LANDER 551 HILLVIEW DR WASHINGTON NC: 27889    orntoin eoelopmenb pfistoric Presevoation  o  6  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  August A 23, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 748 West Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. George Finn for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street:  a) b)  Install fencing in the back yard of the property Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday September 4, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Docntoion Decelopmenb ftoric Preseoation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 18, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -748 West Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. George Finn for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street:  a)  Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  24  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 reber@washngomegow    Staff Report  748 West Second Street alterations to the property:  The application for the property located at 748 West Second Street is requesting to make the following  a) Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation  (A) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows 3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.6.4 Reconstruction of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. If adequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifit is compatible with the style and period ofthe 5.3.1 Additions should be located to the rear or non-character defining elevation. With historic residential structures, additions should be placed in a manner that they are not clearly seen from the public right-of-way. Landscaping can often be used to minimize the visual impact that 5.3.2 New additions should not remove, damage, or obscure character-defining architectural 5.3.3 Additions should be compatible in materials, design, roof form, and proportion to the main structure. However, new additions should be constructed at a scale smaller than the historic 5.3.4 Additions, like new construction, are representative of the time in which they; are built. Therefore, contemporary designs are permitted, but should always be compatible with the 5.3.5 An addition should never mimic or recreate the architecture of the primary historic 5.3.6 Additions to historic structures should be clearly identifiable as such. Additions should be set back and constructed at a smaller scale than the original building. Architectural details should complement the main structure but should be clearly differentiated. 5.3.9 Significant trees or other landscape should not be removed or damaged when constructing  and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, and! 5.3 Additions:  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware.  building.  additions may have to the historic: structure.  feature.  structure so as not to overpower the existing historic building.  existing historic: structure. structure.  an addition.  The proposed balcony is on a rear or non-character defining elevation that cannot be seen from the public right-of-way. It is compatible in materials, and matches the front porch railings. It is clearly identifiable as a later addition to the house. Based on finding  of fact, the application is congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 748 West Second Street- Fencing, Construction of Balcony alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street:  A request has been made by! Mr. George Finni for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following  a) Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. George Finn to construct a balcony on the rear, second story elevation oft the property located at 748 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.6 Porches and Entryways and 5.3 Additions.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. George Finn to construct al balcony on the rear, second story elevation oft the property located at 748 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways and 5.3 Additions. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. George Finn to construct al balcony on the rear, second story elevation of the property located at 748 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways and 5.3 Additions.    MAJOR  WORKS    720 West Main  Street  Driveway Construction    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thef front lobby of City! Hall under" Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street. Address of Property: 720est Mat2 Sfreot Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Gorham - Clow Hause  8 Jorgita feet by  Carbme 1981 (depth)  Name:  John Dis 56' (width)  Owner's Lot Size:  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Thedrueupv.ongrely, MHodof-uo cemeMfpafhs naf GlAlualauplaer, fhepachpof PPANSARAS-He Cogetoagod, EUA biokow upand drredypebulep (bufongihel CAcetcand Flllegcon (OhdA).We UAM to endeplhoaiule Amaato-tnfsorena, @nodyang, st@rtotha-kor, &1 Reghbrn deway of 722 WestMain streof (Pheto B) Te yal. lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Carbme  1hn  MD  7Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  POB2555 Washihgton NC 27889  (Maiing Address) 8/28118 (Date)  (Zip Code)  (99)452-4413 (Daytime Phone Number)  AAILC  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature" of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing onyour behalf.    Google    Beaufort Printed September 18,2 2018 SeeB Belowf forD Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEBHOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line D County Line (Solid).  1:38 Feet    OBJECTID 6263 OWNER NAME CARBONE. JOHN STEPHEN MAILING ADDRESS2 218 STABLEGATE DRIVE ZIP 27513 BLDG VAL 237534 TAXABLE VA 287454 PROPERTY ADDRESS 720 WI MAINST DATE 7/7/2017 SALE PRICE 290000.00 NBHD DESC WEST SIDE HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 44750  GPIN 5675-59-7546 OWNER NAME2 CITY CARY PROP DESC LT2 BLK-B GRIST PROP TOT VAL 287454 PREV ASSESS 163039 TOWNSHIP 01 DEEDE BOOK and PAGE 1934/00181 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1915 SUB DESC SINGLEF FAMILYI RESIDENCE EFF YR 2010  GPIN Long 5675-59-7546 MAILING ADDRESS STATE NC LAND VAL 49920 DEFRVAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567500215 STAMPS 580.00 NBHD CDE WSH EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2119 NBR_BED 3 PIN 01003392  CARBONE. JURGITASULOKATE 218 STABLEGATE! DRIVE  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessi is provideda asap publics service, asis, asa availablez andv withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is Kori informational purposes onlya andi is notir intendedt to constitute legal record nors shouldi it bes substitutedf fort thea advice ors services ofi industry professionals." Thel County ofB Beaufort andt thev Website Provider disclaim all responsibility andk legalli liabilityf fort thec contentp published ont thisv website. The user agreest that Beaufort County  anditsA Assignss shallb beh heldharmless from alla ctions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out ofthe useo ofCounty data.    -  -  A    f    Adjacent Property Owners = 720 West Main Street  BUTLER. JOHN WALTER 731 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 FOWLE SADIE F 721 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 PAYNE THOMASSII III 719 WEST MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 LOBOS MICHAELJ 316 SUNNYSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON, NC 27889 WENDLING CATHERINE H 722 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 KUCAS MARKA 107 BENEDUM PLACE CARY NC 27518 CARBONE. JOHN STEPHEN 218 STABLEGATE DRIVE CARYI NC27513 HARRINGTON. JULIAN PICOTTII 718 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 LOPRO LLC: 3044 ROLSTON ROAD GREENVILLE NC: 27858 SILVERMAN ROD SPENCER 710 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 SWANNER CLYLEFJR 731 W: 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 MELTON WALTER WAYNE 729) WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 HOPE MARGARET W 725 W: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 MARTIN ROBERTJ 721 W SECOND STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889  DEDRICK ROBERTJ 717 W2 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889    Dorntoin eoelopmenb ffstoric Preseroation  C  City.  Washington NORTH GAROLINA  September 18, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness: -720 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the existing gravel driveway to concrete runners at the property located at 720  West Main Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  720 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 720 West Main Street is requesting approval to convert the existing gravel driveway to concrete. Please view the attached images to see the area as to where the concrete would go on the property. The Google Street View image below shows that the driveway was concrete in 2013. The request appears to be congruous with Washington's Historic Preservation Design The Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.3 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks Chapter 4.3.7 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks: Residential parking areas shall be surfaced with appropriate materials such as brick, concrete, asphalt crushed stone, crushed and Chapter 4.3.15 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks: New driveways should be designed to  Guidelines. states:  compacted oyster shells, or gravel (with edging materials).  minimize any impact to thel landscape, building, and historic curbing.  The above image is from Google Maps, taken in 2013. The driveway did have concrete runners, and has since been replaced with gravel. The applicant is requesting to re- pave the driveway using appropriate materials (concrete) and the design is intended to minimize any impact to the landscape, building, and historic curbing. Based on finding  of fact, the application is congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 720 West Main Street- Paving the Driveway  A request has been made by Mr.. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the current gravel driveway to concrete on the property located at 720 West Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3, Driveways and. Sidewalks. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included ini the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Carbone to convert the current gravel driveway to concrete at the property located at 720 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.3, Driveways and Sidewalks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Carbone to convert the current gravel driveway to concrete at the property located at 720 West Main Street." This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3, Driveways and Sidewalks. It further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place  the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Carbone to convert the current gravel driveway to concrete at the property located at 720 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.3, Driveways and Sidewalks.    527 West Second  Street  Fence Construction    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please: submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiers int thei front lobby of City Hall under-Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  S27west 2d Strect  Bridgeman Hajse  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Jeaw Carbme feet by  92' (width)  1424 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Apelof Pence 0AQlstad-to beenectod afthe back and feast)sde FeCMMAOK-GIAAsIDA tho OMEHQ backder slpsbeckpfo, erdenae ofgnacs OOt/ROHR2AM haug ad-fhe MAO II Io wIf Stsilest Zogfreof Tho appienclond ONR waildbe SSORZ Thelnce cabandferond to Crthon theperfylne Mdsdeualks Thicautf  CCMf  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  G  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Jeax  Carbmne RN  7Name of Applicant -t type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  $27W.208 Washiagton NC 27889  (Mailing Address) qlo18 (Date)  (Zip Code)  (919)452-4413 (Daytime Phone Number)  Aa Cabnu (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved. by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until,  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorizéd representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    allawmeto kogpsmau chddrein and pefs 2Way Fomtads whlle playungafaide. Thefente Cua depeiwred -ther ahte-offor polegatlaw, heqng wrth cdlerschowe and 6tyle of6ah oun Eas ayd Camfeghavg. Ploare &Q th2 Bbllavung Orhubr: backofmaun havgQ0i aenal 0LQ dfpgierty Wrto appiormade pOQmOtr-ofQ @), andsane epamplec  oFpuckutsd4pomlig onpnice OEE  AAUNIE Apefpughkomgegoitu, hobe Repluells,andp hoercludod dphite0 of'chone, wtl addoneD : 528w2d8f @ 60W 2dsf8 604 Hown 8f @ S28 B Hawa 8t8) (S6>1175 PiercdfB) (7SPerce 280 and600w29S  0P)  Tdyk yau!    Google    Beaufort Printeds September 18, 2018 SeeB Below forD Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  WEBI HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tractl Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:34Feet    OBJECTID 6403 OWNER NAME CREECH JERRY N MAILING, ADDRESS2 527 W2 2ND: STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 161806 TAXABLE VA 222286 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 5271 W: 2NDST DATE 4/2/2007 SALE PRICE 222000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 04359  GPIN 5675-69-6333 OWNER NAME2 CREECHSUES CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC TOT VAL 222286 PREV ASSESS 225267 TOWNSHIP 01 DEEDBOOK: and PAGE 1578/00129 NBR BLDG LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1980  GPIN Long 5675-69-6333 MAILING ADDRESS 527 W2 2ND STREET STATE NC LAND VAL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.32 MBL 567500149 STAMPS 444.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2654 NBRBED 4 PIN 15024181  (30A AC). JERRYN CREECHETU UX 60480  Beaufort County onliner mapa access is provided: asay publics service, asi is, as available andv without warranties, expressed ori implied. Contentp published ont thisv websiteis fori informational purposes only andis is noti intendedt to constitute legal record nors should itbes substituted fort the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel Kounty ofE Beauforta andt thev Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andk legall liabilityf fort thec content publishedo ont thisw website. The usera agrees thatB Beauforto County  andits Assignss shallbeh held! harmlessf froma alla actions, claims, damages ori judgments arising out ofthey usec ofCounty data.                            56420820  - 0co                        G  e 0e    J a  -    Adjacent Property Owners = 527 West Second Street  LEACH KATHRYN MARIE HOWARD 604) W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 PFEIFFER RICHARDC 118 PIERCE STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 BOLTES CAMERONV 1151 NF PIERCE STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 POSTON MAGGIE 705' WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 WILSON MARIA DEATHERAGE 1512 CAMP LEACH ROAD WASHINGTON, NC 27889 LEGGETT DANNY HINES 601 W: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 MURPHY ROBERTT 11410 WINDING WAY ROAD CHARLOTTE NC: 27226 SUMERLIN GORDON RAY 117NP PIERCEST WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 WILLIAMS GARYD 600 WS SECONDST WASHINGTON, NC 27889 SAWYER GROVER HJR 904 W: 3RD: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 COCHRAN RAMONA DAVIS 511 W: 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 WINFIELD BARBARA A 201 ISABELLA. AVE WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 CHANDLER MARYI HOBGOOD 524 WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTON, NC2 27889  LITCHFIELD WILLIAMI FJR 2007 NORTH MARKET STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 CARBONE JOHN STEPHEN 218 STABLEGATE DRIVE CARY NC27513    Dontoin Deoelopmenb 6 Gistoric Presevoation  (  City.  Washington ORTH GAROLINA  September 18, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -5 527 West Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 4' wooden picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 527 West  Second Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall- - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 2g  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  527 West Second Street  The application for the property located at 527 West Second is requesting approval to install a 4-foot Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 Newi fences and walls should be ofa a design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to ar main street or a side street should be of an open design, such as picket and no greater than four (4) feet in height. Iti is prohibited to use solid privacy fences ini front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox are also 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the rear yard. Ifar majority ofa privacy fence is visible from the publicr right-of-way, a landscape buffer shall bei included. No fence, including a 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure.  wooden picket fence in back yard of the property:  fences are not allowed. and period oft the historic structure.  prohibited.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  The request is adhering to the material and height requirements for fencing in the back yard. Therefore, the application is congruous with the historic preservation design  guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 527 West Second Street- Construction ofa a fence  A request has been made by Mr.. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 4-foot wooden picket fence int the back of the property located at 527 West Second. Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. John Carbone fora Certificate of Appropriateness to construct: a 4-foot wooden picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 527 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Carbone fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 4-foot wooden picket fence in the back yard oft the property located at 527 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 4-foot wooden picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 527 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls.    705 East Main  Street  Window Replacement  Converting a Door into a Window    A.4.2  CITY OF WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Date_ 27 Auque 2018  Fee  A: Information on Structure Under Consideration  Address: 105 E.Man Sireet, Washinglon, NC 27989  Shvickland  Current Owner: Suswn BAyol Tax Parcel Number: MLB4 56850934  PIN4E01014290  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Çontact the Inspections Dept. at  975-9383. Has al Building Permit been obtained? YES B: Information on Person Making Application  NO V NIA  Sucan  Slvicklad  Name: Address: City: Ralugh  Baybl  10721 GVuSSy Cveek Place  State: NC Zip: 27614 Phome/414)612.7780  C: Proposed Changes to Structure  (We) respectiully request a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued in accordance with the City of Washington Zoning Ordinance for the following reason: (details of the proposed project) Beplacemunt of damaqed/bro ken windows o house, Double hung windows by Atvum,se dlached. Wovk o bL Completed by Jessun Conshuchon Cowvevt 2nd fvont dobr buck -o widow D: (We) understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Note: Applicants, and/or their agents or parties of interest are prohibited from any contact in relation to this matter with Historic Preservation Commission members prior to the public hearing.  FOR OFFICE USE: ONLY: ACTION - Approved 0 Approved with Conditions a Denied D Withdrawn D Staff Approval  Respectfully Submitted, BA  DATE  A4-3        Beaufort Printeds September2 24,2 2018 SeeB Below forD Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEBH HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line D County Line (Solid)  1:26 Feet    OBJECTID 10839 OWNERI NAME STRICKLAND: SUSANB MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27614 BLDG VAL 98642 TAXABLE VA 140142 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 705 EMAINST DATE 6/21/2018 SALE PRICE 146000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS8MULT NBR BATHS REID 43529  GPIN 5685-16-3580 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC 1LOT 705E EASTI MAINSTREET TOT VAL 140142 PREV ASSESS 168783 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1963/00653 NBR BLDG 1 LANDUSE YR BUILT 1910 SUB DESC MULTI-FAMILY <5 EFF YR 1990  GPIN Long 5685-16-3580 MAILINGADDRESS 10721 GRASSY CREEK PLACE STATE NC LAND VAL 41500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.17 MBL 56850939 STAMPS 292.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2328 NBR BED 4 PIN 01014288  Beaufort County onliner mapa access is provided asap public service, asis, asa available andw withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websiteis fori informational purposes only andi is noti intendedt to constitute legal record nors shouldi it bes substitutedf fort the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofB Beaufort andt thev Website Providero disclaim allr responsibility: andl legalli liabilityf fort thec content published ont thisv website. The usera agreest thatE Beaufort Countyl  landits Assignss shall be! held harmlessf froma alla actions claims, damages orj judgments arising outo ofthe use ofCounty data.                windows warhinglen,NC  Pe 705 E.Man GA  ATRIUM WINDOWS AND DOORS  PREMIUM VINYL WINDOWS AND DOORS FOR REPLACEMENT    SERIES 8900 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS  INDUSTRY-LEADING PERFORMANCE  Our very best window, the Series 8900 double hung window offers premium enhancements as standard features, along with an array of options for cosmetic, thermal and functional upgrades.  + Exclusive InsulKor" polyurethane fiberglass-enriched sash reinforcement fors superior thermal and structural performance + 34" constant force coil balance offers incredibly easy sash mobility + Fusion-welded sashes and frame add strength and boost insulation + Low-E glass with insulating argon gas yields outstanding thermal efficiency + DP 601 rating (window size tested 36'x74") + Beveled mainframe offers a stylish exterior appearance + Dual push-button night latches position sashes for optimal ventilation * Integrated slim-line lift rail allows you to easily operate: sash + Low-E Glass  + 4 14"1 frame thickness enhances appearance as well as structural integrity + External accessory groove accommodates nail fin option. + Full screen is standard and removable from thei inside* + Dual low) profile, positive-action cam locks increase security (2 locks standard at 27 %4" width or wider) + Fulli interlocking lock and meeting rail + Full vinyl sash dam on sill and high-performance weather stripping protect against air infiltration + 3.25" jamb depth for ideal window sizing + Transferable limited lifetime warranty  Lifetime glass breakage warranty  AH A-QUALITY  For advanced performance and cosmetic appeal, the 8900 offers a wealth of options: + Ultra Low-E Glass + Argon Gas (May be required for Energy Star rating.) + Triple-pane, R-5 compliant glass panels with Low-E Glass + Argon Gas * Super Spacer" nXt" spacer system (standard with triple-pane glass) + Nail fin accessoryf for use in remodeling or new construction applications + Today's eight most popular painted exterior colors (on white interiors) + Three interior wood laminates in cherry, light oak or dark oak + Additional lock colors to complement any interior color  or Ultra Low-E Glass + Argon Gas + InsulKor" multi-cavity foam-filled frame + Exclusive locking half screen*  Scan this QR code to watcha a video about our Series 8900.    SERIES 8900 DELUXE FEATURES  AND SUPERIOR TECENOLGGY  InsulKor" Technology InsulKor technology is a system of sash and frame enhancements that dramatically improves they performance of the Series 8900 double hung window.  1. Triple-pane, R-5 compliant glass double- pane windows)  2. Super Spacer nXt" sealant system (standard with Series 8900 triple- pane glass options, and optional on Series 8900 3. Optional InsulKor multi-cavity foam-filled frame injections  Exclusive InsulKor fberglass-enriched. polyurethane sash reinforcement  External accessory groove  Nail fina accessory  Hunter  Dark  White  Almond  Green" Chocolate" Terratone":  Clay" Brick Red"  +COLOR OPTIONS Available with Series 8900 windows, casements, awnings, bays and bows  Gray"  Bronze"  Tan"  Light Oak Dark Oak Exterior  Cherry  yari  Note: Grido olferingl limitedt to5 5/8" contoured or SDLC one exterior paintedv windows.  Dark Chocolate  Brushed Nickel  White  Almond  Chery  Brass  +LOCK OPTIONS" Available with Series 8900 windows    FleNo. 705EasiMainindowy  PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM  Borrowero oro Owner PropertyAddress 705 East Main Street Cly Washington Cienl  Courly  Slale NC  ZpCode  6 N - 3  705. East Main  6021 East Main  A T  6101 East Main  6121 East Main  6221 East] Main  628A1 East Main  Riltty Appraisal Group    FleNo. 705EasiMainwmdowy,  PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM  Borrowero or Ouner PirpelyA Address 7051 East Main Street Cy Washington Clienl  Courly  Slale NC  ZpCode  630. East Main  701 East Main  II a  711 East Main  715 East Main  Rilty Appraisal Group        Adjacent Property Owners -705 East Main Street  FELLENGER EUGENE R 702EMAIN: STREET WASHINGTON, NC2 27889 SUNDERLIN RICHARD H 10609 GUNSTON. ROAD LORTONV VA 22079 PLEASANTS MARY EVELYN 704 EAST MAIN STREET WASHIGNTON NC 27889 WILLIAMS FRANKI R 716EMAIN: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 STERLING SYLVIA. JORDAN 4807 MORTON ROAD NEW BERN NC 28562 CLARKI LISAE 102. JAMES COURT CHOCOWINITY NC 27817 CRAWFORD DONO 236 HUNTINGTON AVE STE318 BOSTON MA 260868 STRICKLAND SUSANB B 10721 GRASSY CREEK PLACE RALEIGH NC 27614 BAUTISTA TERRI-ANN 117 N CHARLOTTE: STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 EASTMAN BRENDAJ 711EMAINS ST WASHINGTON, NC 27889 FARRELL TIMOTHYJ POST OFFICE 2605 WASHINGTON, NC 27889 CITY OF WASHINGTON POBOX1988 WASHINGTON, NC27889    Dotontoion Decelopmenb fitoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA  September 24, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 705 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Susan Strickland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 705 East Main Street:  a) Replace the existing windows b) Convert a front door to a window  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday October 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@wasnngomego"    Staff Report  705 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 705 East Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations to the property:  a) Replace the existing windows b) Convert ai front door to a window  A) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows  and Doors:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary by splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 If replacement ofay window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original in size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. 3.4.4 Replacement of a multi-light window with a single-pane sash or replacing multi-sash 3.4.12 Sash, window panes, muntins, and rails shall not be replaced with those that are incompatible in size, configuration, and reflective qualities or alter the relationship between  deteriorated section to match the original.  windows with only one: sashi is prohibited.  windowa and wall.  The property owner has not made effort to preserve any elements of their windows, nor have they shown proof of repair. The proposed replacement windows do not match in material, detail, or pane configurations. The replacement windows are one overone pane while the originals are two over two pane configurations. Based on findings of  fact, the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.  B) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows  and Doors, and 3.6 Porches and Entryways:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. Alle elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.6.1 Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements ofal historic: structure and: should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, balustrades.  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware.  doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and entablatures.    3.6.4 Reconstruction of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. If adequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifiti is compatible with the style and period of the  building.  The property owner has not provided any proof showing the second door is not original to the house, therefore the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 705 East Main Street- Window Replacement and Door Removal  A request has been made by Ms. Susan Strickland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make  the following alterations to the property located at 705 East Main Street:  a) Replace the existing windows b) Convert ai front door to a window  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.6 To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings ofi fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Porches and Entryways.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tol Ms. Susan Strickland to replace the windows and convert the east front door into a window at the property located at 705 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.6 Porches and Entryways.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tol Ms. Susan Strickland to replace the windows and convert the east front door into a window at the property located at 705 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.6 Porches and Entryways. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Susan Strickland to replace the windows and convert the east front door into a window at the property located at 705 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.61 Porches and Entryways.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 243 East Main Street to replace the existing window on the front façade on the 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 134 South Market Street to replace thel broken window glass oft the door in the front façade and to replace the existing awning in the same location on the property. 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 803 West Second Street to replace the existing HVAC unit in the same location on 4. Are request has been made and approved. by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 509 West Second Street to repair and replace the existing wooden picket fence  property.  the property.  using like materials on the house of the property.    OTHER  BUSINESS  Tree Policy Update  1    ounlown Develgpment &FHitorio Presewation  City.  Washindton  NORTHCAROLINA  September 4, 2018  Tree Committee Meeting  Present: Emily Rebert, Jessica Green, Amber Perry, Cheri Vaughn, William Kenner, Will Aley  Absent: Monica Ferrari  Old Business:  Review tree removal permit application  Review Design Guidelines - Chapter 4.0 Streetscape & Site Design  New Business:  Discuss Historic Preservation Commission's reinforcement of design guidelines 4.1.9: If a diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced by a suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan, Create an informational brochure for education about trees within the historic district. Release a newsletter to educate people on the importance of trees in the historic  within sixty (60) days from time of removal."  district.    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, September 4, 20187:00PM Members Present Cheri Vaughn Colleen Knight Kathleen Couch Mark Everett William Kenner Rebecca Clark Karen Mann Members Absent All members were present Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner John Rodman, Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Ar moment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call A: silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Ms. Charlotte Cutler fora Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation oft the property located at 225 This request was continued to October, due to the application not being able to attend 2. Arequest has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to demolish the structure and construct a new one and al half story dwelling, on the  West Main Street.  the meeting and present the request.  property locate at 325 Harvey Street.  1    Tony Edwards came forward and was sworn in. He explained that the bones of the house are gone/rotted andi iti is not feasible to repair the structure at 325 Harvey Street. He stated that they would like to demolish the house and rebuild a new house on the lot. Mr. Edwards stated that they planned to use a lot of the materials that are salvageable from the old house on the construction of the new house. He explained that some of the items on the: second floor of the house are in pretty good shape SO they would like to reuse those items. Rebecca Clark asked if Mr. Edwards was the owner. Mr. Edwards stated that he was not the current owner, but he is representing Ms. Collie. He stated that if the request is granted he will be taking possession of the property. Ms. Clark asked ifa an inspection or survey had been done on the property. Mr. Edwards stated that hel had been in the property andi inspected it. Ms. Clark asked for Mr. Edwards credentials. Mr. Edwards stated that he runs his own Construction business and is currently involved in a number of projects ini the historic district. Ms. Clark asked if anyone knew how long the house had been vacant. Emily Rebert stated that the house has been vacant since the 70s or 80s. Ms. Rebert explained this is an heir property and gave: some history on the ownership of the property. She stated that Ms. Collie is currently not financially able to fix the house. Ms. Rebert stated that they had looked into other options for the house and even contacted Preservation North Carolina. Ms. Rebert stated that Preservation North Carolina was not interested in taking on the property. Rebecca Clark asked ift the City had done a survey of the property. Ms. Rebert stated that they had not. Ms. Clark: stated that the property does look horrible, but she does know of3 30 or 4 properties that were condemned in the historic district and are now show places. She stated that ift the property is dangerous and the roof is falling in, she would understand demolishing it. She stated that she knows iti isal lot of money and work to fix al house like this, but she has a problem with the Commission allowing another house in the district to be tore down. Ms. Clark also stated that she did not feel the house they planned tol build after the demolition was appropriate for the area. Mr. Edwards explained that the floor system int the house is completely rotted out and the cost to fix the house is not economically feasible. Mr. Edwards stated that if something is not done the house will eventually be torn down any way. Ms. Clark asked if the property was currently condemned. Emily Rebert stated that it is not condemned but it is one oft the Demolition by Neglect properties. Mr. Rebert then explained why Preservation NC was noti interested in the property. She stated that they would never receive a return investment on the house because oft the extensive cost it takes to fixi it, and with all the houses they already! have it was not: a project they could take on. Mark Everett talkèd about what the fate ofi the house would be ifthis request is not granted. Cheri Vaugh asked ifa cost to repair the house was submitted. Emily Rebert stated that it was not. Kathleen Couch asked if PNC1 felt the house could be saved. Emily Rebert stated that they did not. Rebecca Clark: stated that the house is definitely inhabitable in its current state, but could be fixed. William Kenner asked questions about the new house design. Tony stated that they haven't gotten far with the design of the new house. He explained that this design was recommended to him and it is very similar to al house already located in that area. He  2    stated that initially they had drawn a design fora a 2-story house very: similar to the one there now. But, with cost and resale they decided that it would not bet feasible. Mr. Edwards stated that he wanted to get approval for the demolition before het took responsibility of the property. He stated that once he has ownership oft the property and get closer to building the new: structure he will come back to the Commission with  detailed plans for the new house. The Chairman opened the floor.  Betsy Cain of 302 E2nd Street came forward and was sworn in. She stated that she was very concerned about the possible demolition of around historic structure. She stated. that she has lived in the area 7 months and within that time she has seen three houses int the district come down and she is very concerned about that. She stated that she would like to see the rate of demolition go down. Ms. Cain spoke about the responsibility as property owners to keep up the homes in the district. And discussed the root cause of properties falling into disrepair. Ms. Cain stated that she was also concerned about compatibility. She stated thati is a new home is built on the property then she hoped it would be compatible with the: surrounding structures. William Kenner explained that per state regulations the Commission can not denya a demolition, they can only delayi it for 365. He stated that the City has been very acti in Dee Congleton came forward and was sworn in. She stated that it is sO sad that people wait so long to do something about properties like this. She explained that two years ago when: she went into this house it was still very much fixable. She then talked about houses int the district that were ini the same shape, but have been saved. She stated that the number of houses that have been torn since the 50s is appalling. Mayor Mac Daniels came forward an gave a brief history of the property and the ownership. He stated that the house has been sitting there empty for the last 25/30 Doris Moate came forward and was sworn in. She stated that she is familiar with this house and the: shape that iti isi in. She stated that it appears to her that sometimes within this process that they will have to give in and have some of the structures taken down and replaced with new homes that are compatible with the district. She stated that she believed this to be the case with this house. She explained that she would not say that about all the properties in the district because she too: supports saving historic homes. She stated that there is a point with some oft these homes when iti is not feasible to put money into fixing the homes. She stated that she would recommend  trying to preserve historic structures.  years.  that the Commission allow them to demolish this home.  3    William Kenner: stated that if they do take the house down then they will have to come back before the Commission and present the plans for thé new house for approval. He stated that this may be a way to bring up the neighborhood and the presence of a new home will help the property values on that block. He stated that iti is ai tough call because he doesn't like to: see historic homes come down, but something needs to be done there. CheriV Vaugh stated that the design guidelines do state that a landscape plan should be submitted with the application. Cheri Vaugh stated that she felt they needed more information. She stated that she would like to: see what it would actually cost to fix the home and also a plan for what exactly will go on the property ifit was demolished. Karen Mann asked Emily Rebert where the property was in the Demolish by Neglect process. Emily Rebert stated that they are in the early stage before actually entering the Demolish by Neglect because they have been trying to reach out and look at options for the property. Ms. Rebert stated that the owner is at the point of giving away the house. Karen Mann: stated that the sad thing is if you drive through this section of the district there are al lot of homes in the same shape. She: stated that there isal house down on Main that is in fairly good shape and they can not find any one to purchase it. Ms. Mann stated that ift the Commission does delay the demolition fora a year she hoped someone would take the house and: savei if, but she felt there was a slim chance of that happening. She stated that there is a person present who wants to do something with the property. She explained that it was very concerning that no one has lived in the house for 301 to! 50 years. Ms. Mann stated that no one is on the Commission because they want to see houses torn down.  Robert Sands came forward and was sworni in. Mr. Sands stated that he would like to see the Demolition by Neglect used to address these homes sooner: sO that they will not get to this condition. He stated that he did walk through the house and iti is infested with bats and spoke more about the condition. He stated that the Commission needs to Mr. Kenner stated that thisi is something the neighborhood needs. Ifa new home is built or the current home is repaired then maybe others in the area will start putting more effort into their homes. Mark Everett stated that in the last two years there has been a much more proactive effect with the Demolition by Neglect ordinance and they should continue to look ati it. He stated that no one isi in a place to put $200,000ina home worth $150,00 hypothetically speaking, it has to be economically feasible. Mr. Everett stated that they do have someone present who wants take it down, but who also want to put something on the lot that will be economically productive ini its place and add value to the tax base. Rebecca Clark stated that the Commission did notl have a survey of the property. She stated that maybe it does need to be demolished, but they have not received concrete evidence supporting that. Ms. Clark stated that maybe a survey from a professional would come back saying that the structure is ready to fall down, but they need: something stating that. She stated that homes can look terrible and bei ina awful shape but still be brought back to life. Ms. Clark stated that the Commission needed to be very careful because this issue will come back up time and  decide if they want an empty lot there or a new home.  4    time again sO the Commission needs to be stronger on their parameters of when they accept tearing down al home. Ms. Clark stated that they need a report from a professional stating the condition of the home. Colleen Knight stated that the Commission does have the option to table the request and ask for a report from a professional addressing the condition of the house. The Commission discussed this option. William Kenner addressed the burden they put on the property owner by requesting a report from a structural engineer. The Commission asked if the City Inspector would gol look at the property. Mr. Rodman stated that the Inspector could go look at the property but does not have the same qualifications as a structural engineer and a City Inspector would not give an option as to whether the house should come down or not. William Kenner stated that the Inspector could determine ift the property is deemed safe or unsafe. Rebecca Clark stated that she would like to see the precedence set thati if someone comes and asks to demolish a structure that a survey done by a profession is submitted with the application. Ms. Clark stated that she would like to see this be deferred and engineer report be submitted. Emily Rebert explained that they can defer the request but due tot time the Commission will have to decide at Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a 30 day stay for further evaluation oft the structure located at 325 North Harvey Street, to include a structural engineer report and a site plan for further consideration oft the demolition request. Rebecca Clark: seconded the motion and all 3. Arequest has been made by Mr. Gill Davis for a Certificate. of Appropriateness to install awheelchair ramp in the back yard oft the property located at 735) West Second Street. Susan Davis came forward and was sworn in. She stated that this is just a request to put ina wooden rampi in the back oft the property. She stated that the ramp is needed for family members to access and enter the home. She stated that this would bea  the October meeting.  voted in favor.  permeant wooden ramp.  No one came forward to speak for or against the request.  Cheri Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Gill Davis to installa wheelchair ramp in the back yard oft the property located at 735 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.13 Safety and Accessibility. Her motion was seconded by Colleen Knight and all voted in favor.  5    4. Ar request has been made by Dr. Rod Silverman fora a Certificate of Appropriateness: to construct a decki int the back yard of the property located at710' West Main Street. Dr. Rod Silverman came forward and was sworn in. He explained that initially they received approval fora a sunroof. Dr. Silverman stated that he went to the City Inspections office and spoke to someone in the office who told him that he could puta porch there instead and he did. He stated that there was some confusion and he thought he had approval from the Commission, but evidently, he did not. Emily Rebert stated that the employee that Dr. Silverman spoke to is no longer employed with the City of Washington. Dr. Silverman stated that he hired a designer who drew upa a plan adding landscaping to hid the deck in the rear of the house. He stated that the front of the house has been repaired in accordance with the historic guidelines. Dr.Silverman stated that the landscaping will screen the wire railing that staff was concerned about. William Kenner stated that he previously requested the wiring railing on his deck and was denied by the Commission. Dr. Silverman stated that the wiring railing was done by his designer and he didn'teven know until it was put up. Dr. Silverman stated that only as small portion oft the deck is visible from the street. Cheri Vaugh asked if Dr. Silverman would be opposed to removing the wire railing and putting in something else. He: stated that he preferred not to because it was pretty expensive. He stated that once the landscaping is put in the deck and railing will not be seen from the street. The Chairman opened the floor. Chris Collier came forward and spoke int favor of the request. Emily Rebert stated that Scott Campbell could not attend the meeting but did send an email stating that he did support the request. The Commission discussed the Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Rod Silverman to constructa deck in the back yard of the property located at 710 West Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.41 Decks. Cheri Vaugh  request further.  seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  5. - Arequest has been made by Mr. Dennis Listerman-Vierling for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a gate between the two houses on the east side oft the Tony Edwards came forward and presented the request. He explained that there is an existing 6-foot private fence between this property and the neighbor's property and he simply wants to tie into the existing fence and make a gated walkway between the two properties. Mr. Edwards stated that the new section would be about 91 feet. The Chairman opened the floor. No one came forward to speak for or against the  property located at 754 West Second Street.  request. The Commission discussed the request further.  6    Colleen Knight made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Dennis listerman-Vierling to construct: a gate between the two houses on the east side oft the property located at 754 West Second Street.. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Kathleen Couch seconded the motion and all 6. Arequest has been made by Mr. George Finn fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to make thet following alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street: a.) Install fencing in the back yard of the property! b.) Construct a second story balcony on Tony Edwards came forward and explained the request. He explained the location of the proposed fence and stated that it would be a 6-foot wooden fence. Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. George Finni to install fencing at the property located at 748 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Kathleen The Commission discussed the balcony. Mr. Edwards stated that they would like to change a window into a door and explained the construction of the balcony. He: stated that they can use wood railing similar to the railing on the front oft the house. Mark Everett asked how the applicant would feel about the Commission deferring the request and asking for an actual elevation drawing oft the balcony. Mr. Edwards asked for approval with the condition that elevation drawing will be submitted. William Kenner asked for drawings sO that the Commission could see where the balcony would be located and the look of the construction. Kathleen Couch stated that in the past the Commission had based their decisions on drawing submitted that the applicants and she The Chairman opened the floor and Mr. Dennis Listerman-Vierling spoke in favor of the Tony Edwards asked for permission toi install the door sO that they could finish up the construction on the inside of the house, even ift the balcony request was delayed. He explained that he will have to put up a temporary railing. William Kenner stated that if the balcony is denied then they will have a door there. Tony Edwards stated that the property owners would be okay with that. They would just put up a railing and have the option to open the door. William Kenner stated that they did not have a picture of the  voted in favor.  the rear elevation.  Couch seconded the motion and all voted in favor  felt they should continue with that precedent.  request.  7    type of door they want to install. Mr. Kenner stated that they need that information. Mark Everett stated that het felt the door was part oft the overall request. Karen Mann recommended that the Commission give staff the permission to view the door and Cheri Vaugh made a motion to delay the request for the balcony until next month and request that the applicant provide drawings or pictures to give the Commission: a better sense of what they want to construct and grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner to install a door if staff approves the door. Colleen Knight seconded the motion 7. Arequest has been made by Pamlico Rose Institute for Sustainable Communities fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 219 East Third Street. a.) Install vents to the gable ends of the attic space b.) Convert the mudroom into a screened in porch on the reare elevation c.) Install metal caps on1 the two, non-functioning chimneys d.) Repair the barn structure with different style options e.) Install a deck and wheelchair ramp on the rear elevation f.) Revise the previously Robert Sands came forward and explained each request individually. Mr. Sands stated that request a and e represent options. He stated that they do noti intend on installing the vents on the gable, but have included them in the request in case what theyi intend to do does not work out and they need to use the vent option. Mr. Sands asked that the Commission defer request b. He: stated that they are not prepared to present that request and would bring that back to the Commission when they are ready. He stated that they would like to install metal caps ont two non-functioning chimneys. He explained that the chimney caps would not be visible and would protect the chimneys. Mr. Sands explained that they also need to install an ADA ramp on the reare elevation of the house and a deck. He presented drawings of the dimensions of the proposed deck The Chairman opened thei floor: an no one came forward to speak for or against. William Kenner stated that he loved the design of the deck. Robert Sands explained that two new items that they have added to the landscaping plan. He stated that they plan to landscape the boundary line between this property and the funeral home. He stated that the funeral home supports the request. He presented a drawing showing this. He stated that they would like to add a produce garden and also add a pergola and remove at tree. He explained the location and design of the pergola and stated that it would be made of wood. He then spoke about the tree and stated that they would like to remove itb because it is growing up right against the house. He explained that they plan on adding a lot of shrubs and trees and he didn'ti feel the tree would be missed.  approve at staff level.  and all voted in favor.  approved landscaping plan.  and wheelchair ramp.  8    Kathleen Couch made thet following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Pamlico Rose Institute to make the above change to the property located at 219 East Third Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.13 Safety and Accessibility, 3.5 Roofs, 3.13 Safety and Accessibility, 4.1 Landscaping and! 5.4 Decks. This approval is to install vents in the gable ends of the attic space; install metal caps on the two, non-functioning chimneys; Install a deck and wheelchair ramp ont the rear elevation; and Revise the previously approved landscaping plan with the exception ofa pergola that may be approved by staff and permission to remove the tree. Cheri Robert Sands stated that they would like to keep the barn as it is now. He stated that the current door opens up with a pully: system. He stated that they want to keep the door, but if they can not fix the door they need another option. He stated that the second option is a siding door. He stated that they plan to repair the other components of the barn with like materials. He stated that they only thing that would change on the barn is the doori if they are unable to get the current door to work. Mr. Sands stated that there is a set of double doors on the back that is not visible and they plan to close those doors in with tin. The Commission discussed the barn door request. Mr. Sands explained that if they could not repair the pully system and had to go with the siding door, they would still us the same original bard door, the only difference would be that Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Pamlico Rose Institute to repair the barn structure to the property located at 219 East Third Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically 3.12 Outbuildings. Ifurther ask that the applicant keep the original size of the door and use the original door as he discussed. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted ini favor. Kathleen Couch made a motion to defer the discussion on converting the mudroom into ascreened in porch until drawings are received and reviewed in a separate COA request. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  Vaughn seconded the motion and all voted ini favor.  itwould side.  B. Minor' Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 412 West Main Street to replace the existing  condenser unit in the same location on the property.  9    2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 144 West Second Street to replace the existing mini split system in 3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 164 East Main Street to repair and replace the existing fence using 4. Ar request has been made and approved. by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 734 West Second Street to repair and replace the rotten fascia board 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness fori the owner of 715 East Main Street to repair the foundation on the back addition 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 107 North Gladden Street to replace the roof using like materials on 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Beacon Street Development to construct a new home on Moss Landing Lot#25. 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Beacon Street Development to construct a new home on Moss Landing Lot#30. Kathleen Couch made a motion to approve all the minor works. Her motion was  the same location on the property.  like materials in the back yard of the property. using like materials on the house of the property.  using like materials on the property.  the property.  The home falls under the 2016 blanket approval. The home falls under the 2016 blanket approval. seconded by Colleen Knight and all voted ini favor.  VI. Other Business 1. Tree Policy  Emily Rebert gave an overview of what the Tree Committee discussed at their meeting. She explained that they designing a permit application that will accompany the COA application when someone wants to remove a tree. Ms. Rebert showed and went over the permit application design. She stated that they also discussed the Commission making a formal acknowledgement that they will be requiring a landscaping plan with tree removal. This will require applicants to submit a site plan showing the tree they miss to remove and the location of the replacement tree. Ms. Rebert stated that they also discussed the time frame allowed for replacing a tree. She explained that the current 60 days may not be appropriate during certain times/seasons of the year. She stated that the Committee is considering changing that to a year. She stated that staff would go back and check all the COAS in April and following up with Applicants who have not replaced the tree. Ms. Rebert stated that they are also looking at designinga brochure for outreach, giving helpful tips and information about trees and tree  replacement.  10    VII. Approval of Minutes- July 11, 2018 motion and all voted ini favor. VIII. Adjourn  Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve the July minutes. William Kenner seconded the  There being no other business the meeting was adjourned.  11