WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 7, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. Ed Stone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a run of 3-foot picket fencing in the front yard of the property located at 513 2. A request has been made by Mr. Travis Stephenson for a Certificate of Appropriateness to expand onto the south entryway and replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters on the south side of the property located at 3. Ar request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 4-foot gate. on the east side of the property located at 221 East Second 4. - A request has been made by Mr. Joseph Wooten for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove a tree in the public right-of-way on the property located  East Second Street.  112 South Respess Street.  Street.  at 311 East Main Street. B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot? #12 to construct a 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127-128 West Main Street to replace two wooden  new single-family dwelling on the property.  windows using like materials on the property.  1    3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 124 Washington Street to replace the existing 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 731 East Main Street to replace the existing roof and repoint the decorative motifs on top of the towers using like materials on the 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127 West Main Street to install signage on the 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 109 North Brown Street to replace the existing gas 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 414 East Second Street to replace the existing gas 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 East Second Street to replace the existing gas 9. An emergency request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 731 West Main Street to remove a tree in the back  HVAC unit in the same location on the property.  property.  property.  pack unit in the same location on the property.  pack unit in the same location on the property.  pack unit in the same location on the property.  yard of the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Discussion- Facebook Page for Historic District  VII. Approval of Minutes = April 2, 2019  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS  None    MAJOR  WORKS    513 East Second  Street  Fence Construction    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please! Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 too cashiers int thei front lobby of City! Hall under" Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property; 515Second S+  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  EDDIE + SHIRLSY ST0NE  feet. by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  ENSTHI! AB RUN 0-6 3-fest picret fence  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  EDDEE STONB (Name of Applicant t-type or print) 513 Eanl (Mailing Address) 4-1-19 (Date)  (Initials)  St  ACTION  27889  (Zip Code)  336-420 -045/ (Daytime Phone Number)  Eldls Bten (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.        Beaufort Printed April 29, 2019 SeeE Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linés Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)    1:36 Feet.    OBJECTID 10709 OWNER NAME STONE EDDIE EARL MAILING ADDRESS2 513 E2ND: STREET ZIP 27889  GPIN 5685-07-7144 OWNER NAME2 STONE SHIRLEY. A CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC TOWN DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.25 MBL 56850971 STAMPS 154.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2836 NBR BED 4 PIN 01001477  GPIN Long 5685-07-7144 MAILING ADDRESS 513 E2 2ND STREET STATE NC LAND VAL BLDG VAL 130769 TAXABLE VA 186929 PROPERTY ADDRESS 513 E2ND ST DATE 8/11/2006 SALE PRICE 77000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44975  (,26 AC) EAST: 1/2LT100 MCNAIR 56160  TOT VAL 186929 PREV ASSESS 206663 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1538/00682 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1891 SUB DESC EFF YR 1980  SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE  Beaufort County online map access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this websitei is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice ors services of industry professionals. Beaufort Thel County of Beaufort andt the' Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andi legal liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that  Countyl  and its Assigns shall! be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    VICINITY MAPI N.T.S. s ( SITE E L  US/HWY/264 4th_ST 5 5 3rdST b 2nd ST b 5 g A MAIN ST= 6 E   REFERENCES DB:1092; PG:771 DB:1478; PG:101 DB:1466; PG:747 DB:803; PG:407 DB:1514; PG:873  WATER ST PAMLICO RIVER  PK  2ND E. S 4812'18" E 50' R/W 184.91   5617'51" ST.s 53.50' NPS 0.94 DRILLHOLE 2.2'  RBS  PORCH6.3 19.7' 1796 SF /6.1 20.3  6  A 5  AREA 11403.01 SF 0.26 ACRES 8.7" 6 BARN 31.9' 13.5 EIP  EIP  TOM MOLON WESLENE MOLON DB:1466; PG:747    N5 56'07'48" W 54.48'  ERTIFICATE sertify thot this plat was' draun sion from an actudl survay made slen (esed doscription  (other) recorded that in otsurveyed are cleorly_indicoted as nation found in. the ratio of precision as 1,000+; ation seal Witness this Z dayof origina! 2006 also certify that this survay is of lor parcels of! land and does not. set or change in on existing street.  LEGEND OEIP EXISTING IRON PIPE ONIP NEW IRON PIPE ONPS NO POINT SET OCM CONC. MONUMENT ON&C EXISTING NAIL & CAP OEPK EXISTING PK NAIL ONPK NEW PK NAIL SET CPP POWER POLE pLP LIGHT POLE OMP METER POLE n TCI TELE EDUANE  50  0 Scale 1" = 50'  50    E mm mm    TTTT  m  TIT  m -  MVET    EEIITE INAELIED IEIESETT TAIETYT  Allil TIN IIT    F  513 East 2nd Street Front Fence    36"  33"        Adjoining Property Owners: 513 East Second Street  RANSONE CAROLINE H 510: EMAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 WILLARD DANGELA. A 7508 SLATESTONE RD WASHINGTON NC 27889 TURNER PRESTON KEITH 514 EN MAIN ST WASHINGTON: NC 27889 POTTS ROBIN ROBERSON TRUSTEE 107 SOUTH REED DRIVE WASHINGTON NC: 27889 HARSTAD JAMES ALAN TRUSTEE 332 TALON DRIVE PITISBORONC27312 MOLONTOM 113 MCNAIR ST WASHINGTONI NC27889 HAWKINS FREDERICK: F 507 E2 2ND STREET WASHINGTONNC278) REAPP BRIAN 509 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 STONE EDDIE EARL 513 E2ND STREET WASHINGIONNCZISY O'ROURKE DORCAS 510. E2ND STREET WASHINGTONNCZIS READ FRED 411 WALNUT STREET #7595 GREEN COVE SPRINGS FL: 32043  KEUSENKOTHEN MARK 524 EAST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 DINTINO ALFRED. M 518 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889    Docntoion Decelopmenb fltoric Preseoation    Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  April 26, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -513 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Ed Stone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a run of 3-foot picket fencing in the front yard of the property located at 513 East Sec-  ond Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  24  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  513 East Second Street  The application for the property located at! 513 East Second Street is requesting approval toi install a run  of3-foot picket fencing in the front yard oft the property.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be ofac design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowedi in the rear yard. Ifa majority ofa a privacy fence is visible from the public right-of-way, a landscape buffer shall bei included. No fence, includinga 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure. 4.6.12 The use of plant screenings, in thei form of hedgerows and landscaping, is encouraged as an alternative to fences and walls. Any such plantings shall comply with the height and location  fences are not allowed. and period of the historic structure.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  standards of these guidelines.  The fence is within the height requirements and is of an appropriate design. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 513 East Second Street- Fence Construction  A request has been made Mr. Ed Stone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a run of 3-foot picket fencing int thet front yard of the property located at 513 East Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which arei included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Ed Stone to install a run of3-foot picket fencing in the front yard oft the property located at 513 East Second Street. This motion is based ont the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Ed Stone to install a run of3-foot picket fencing in thet front yard oft the property located at 513 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the  following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Ed Stone to install a run of3-foot picket fencing in the front yard of the property located at 513 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.6 Fences and' Walls.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC G$160A-400.9(d); which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff.lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC G5160A-400.9d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    112 South Respess  Street  Entryway Alteration Shutter Alteration    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thei front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 1R S0M ligiss St. Walig-lon NC Historic Property/Name (if applicable): fowle Melou (Whe!) Owner's Name: BBL Vemtvies (Vawico Arcs erat)  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  -Depair and erpand atla chd laudig GVeA Cor sohem entromce. VsuAy suthg bricbs and Bnishus Vertcal  svrlaoer le erickitas haldiy ler alladed)  Repla.exiahur chwral sMulter  with wAnrkind  C  doos  yon Suultel.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Trir Sllewon BLL Velies 7Name of Applicant-type or print) 15layss sh (Mailing Address) 4-1519 (Date) (Signgture B  (Initials)  ACTION  27884 (Zip Code)  919-669-5057 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed April 29, 2019 See Belowf for! Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linés Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:19 Feet    OBJECTID 6486 OWNER NAME 112 SOUTH RESPESS STREET LLC MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-78-8013 OWNER NAME2 CITY GREENVILLE PROP DESC (TRACT2) DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.06 MBL 567508468 STAMPS 693.00 NBHD CDE CH EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRE BED PIN 01020751  GPIN Long 5675-78-8013 MAILING. ADDRESS 209 EDGEBROOK DRIVE STATE NC LAND VAL BLDG VAL 312102 TAXABLE VA 388538 PROPERTY ADDRESS 112 S RESPESS ST DATE 7/30/2018 SALE PRICE 346500.00 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC17 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 42786  ZIP 27858  1LOT112S SOUTH RESPASS STREET 76436  TOT VAL 388538 PREV ASSESS 498846 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1967/00256 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1840 SUB DESC OFFICE EFFY YR 1992  Beaufort County online map: access isp provided as a publics service, as is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legal liability for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County!  andi its Assigns shall be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    EIRERLIADIO  -    (0.  SEARS D  AKIM    CE4 DL  a   a    Cxisliug    Proposed    Adjoining Property Owners: 112 South Respess Street STRONG SHIELD: PROPERTIES LLC 444 STEWART: PARKWAY WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 112 SOUTH RESPESS STREETI LLC 209 EDGEBROOK DRIVE GREENVILLE NC: 27858 ADDLED DAD LLC 129 VAN: NORDEN ST WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 SHOP & GOI LLC 4525 VOA ROAD WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 WILLIAMS DAVID GLENN 201 W: MAIN: ST WASHINGTONNC: 27889 NEW VISIONI PARTNERS LLC 1205 KINSDALE DRIVE RALEIGHNC27615    Dotntoin ecelopmenb ffstoric Preseroation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  April 26, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 112 South Respess Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  AI request has been made by Mr. Travis Stephenson for a Certificate of Appropriateness to expand onto the south entry way and replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters on the south side of the property located at 112 South Respess  Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,   Aual Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  112 South Respess Street  The applicationi fori the property located at 112 South Respess Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations to south side of the property: a) Expand onto the south entry way  b) Replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters  A) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.6 Porches and  Entryways:  3.6.1 Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements of al historic structure and should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, balustrades. 3.6.4 Reconstruction of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. If adequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifi it is compatible with the style and period of the  doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and entablatures.  building.  The new design is compatible with the style and period of the building, and is also reversible. The entryway has changed many times throughout the lifespan of the structure, and there is no proof what the original entryway looked like. Therefore, based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Design Guidelines. B) Please reviewi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows  and Doors and 3.10 Architectural Details:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. Alle elements and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary bys splicing or patching only the 3.4.5 Install shutters on a historic structure onlyi if the building would have originally had shutter assemblies. New: shutters should be made of wood and: should have the appearance of being 3.10.2 When architectural components and details must be replaced, the new components or details shall match the historic elements as closely as possible in style, proportion, and material. The existing wooden chevron shutters do not seem to be original to the building. It appears the original doors did have the wood placed in a diagonal direction (see image), but pushed inward and not pull outward. The proposed iron shutters would match the historic elements as closely as possible in style, proportion, and material. Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Design Guidelines.  deteriorated section to match the original.  functional.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 112 South Respess Street- Expand south entry way and replace wooden door shutters with iron A request has been made by Mr. Travis Stephenson for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at: 112 South Respess Street:  a) Expand onto the south entry way  b) Replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and  Entryways, and. 3.10 Architectural Details.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Travis Stephenson to expand onto the south entryway and replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters on the south side of the property located at 112 South Respess Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Travis Stephenson to expand onto the south entryway and replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters on the south side oft the property located at 112 South Respess Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, and 3.10 Architectural Details. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Travis Stephenson to expand onto the south entryway and replace the existing chevron shutter doors with iron shutters on the: south side of the property located at 112 South Respess Street.    This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC G5160A-400.9d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    221 East Second  Street  Fence Construction    APPLICATION FOR AC CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink To: Washington Historic 102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: 8A-E.2d Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Owner's Name: Bymne Brly Moony  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  Preservation Commission  Please submit theA Application Fee of $50 toc cashiersi int the front lobby of Cityl Hall under"Developmental. Filing Fee"  S+.  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  Gati addid b pushg Pene - (ontinuahch fum neghhs fud fn CLADSS ny daveyig Shart 312 fbot gate CASSL  Cate me  Get  abur 10t1 teetécs. Wodd -hock lau  muydarus  netr  ASS 74  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness: that require review! byt the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month priort toi the meeting lwisht to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPCI meeting. Ani incomplete application will not! be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) O Approved O Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  (Name BlHy ofApplicant- Moy tgpe orp prnt) 274 E2dst Maling Address) 41519 (Date)  (Initials)  27889 (ZpCode)  ACTION  252- 341-2332 (Daytime Phone Number)  DoML  (Authorized Signature) (Signature qApplicant)  Upont being signed and dated below! by thel Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relleve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved bys staff willl bet fowarded Applicant's presence ort that of youra authorized representativel is required att the meatingofthe Historic Preservation Commission at whicht the application! Ist tol be consldered. Youmustgive written permission toy your authorized representative to attend tho hearing ony your behalf.  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itisv valid until tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  Issuance ofal Minor.  (Minor Work/ Auth. Sig.)  (Date)    Google    Beaufort Printed April 29, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  PCONNEÇTGIS HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linès Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:36 Feet    OBJECTID 6962 OWNER NAME MOORING KENNETH RYAN MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-97-3880 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOTE EAST 2ND STREET TOT VAL 116294 PREV ASSESS 93536 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1709/00003 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE EFFYR 1980  GPIN Long 5675-97-3880 MAILING ADDRESS 221E E2ND STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 49131 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508183 STAMPS 178.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2866 NBR BED 5 PIN 01003936  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 67163 TAXABLE VA 116294 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 221 E2ND: ST DATE 1/8/2010 SALE PRICE 89000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44692 fori informational purposes only Website andi Assigns  access isp provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this website is  Beaufort County onliner map and is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel  disclaim all responsibility and legall liability for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  County its ofE Beaufort shall and be! held! the harmless Provider from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    BAC p  a  3-43    exishiug nuiglbosfento  d  Rosr  Aapk    Sidwalk  nef  Cast Beccwd Bhogt  *Notlo &cap.    Adjoining Property Owners: 221 East Second Street ST'PETERS BPISCOPAL CHURCH 101 NORTH BONNER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 CROSS NICHOLEL 2201 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 CONNARD DAVID MCK 2261 EASTI MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC278) BOWEN TONY C 228] BASTI MAIN STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 MOORING KENNETH RYAN 221 E2ND STREET WASHINGTONNC278) LEWIS AMBROSE. B 227) E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 SOLOMAN GUY DOUGLAS 210) MALLARD DR WASHINGTON: NC 27889 CRAIGIE SCOT 222 E: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889 GONZALEZ. JOSE MANUEL GUTIERREZ 228 E2 2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 STILES. JOSHUA MICAH 232 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889    orntoin  C -  Decelopmenb  Citys  fatoric Preseroation  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  April 26, 2019  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness: -221 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 4-foot gate on the east side of the property located at 221 East Second Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019  Place: City Hall- - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Aas Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  221 East Second Street  The'a application for the property located at 221 East Second Street is requesting approval to install a run  of 4-foot fencing/ gate across the driveway on the east side oft the property.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be ofa design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the rear yard. Ifar majority ofay privacy fence is visible from the public right-of-way, a landscape buffer shall bei included. No fence, including a 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure. 4.6.12 The use of plant screenings, in the form of hedgerows and landscaping, is encouraged as an alternative to fences and walls. Any such plantings shall comply with the height and location  fences are not allowed. and period oft the historic structure.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  standards of these guidelines.  The fence is within the height requirements and is of an appropriate design. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 221 East Second Street- Fence/Gate Construction  A request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring fora Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 4-foot high, 10-foot long gate on the east side of the property located at: 221 East Second  Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.61 Fences and Walls.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 4-foot high, 10-foot long gate on the east side oft the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 4-foot high, 10-foot long gate on the east side of the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the  following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservâtion Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 4-foot high, 10-foot long gate on the east side of the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based on thei following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    311 East Main  Street  Tree Removal    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiersi int the front lobby ofCityh Hall under"Developmental Filing! Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  311 East Mcn Street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  osephA.ed Luci H. Woolew  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Lorgedoguaod fafrmtofhare on Asicihermk, astuap gdil  On  rtr  y LZ-wkcgmad AatflynIh  t &y  sos-fh be -aeddE publc  0  GasckOaaSho  hayerd  Arbrist  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Awosler -type or print)  (Initials)  MhpA-d  ACTION  3LLEasf Mon (Mailing Address) (Date)  27889 (Zip Code)  4/15/19 232-412-1652 ahawsts  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" X 11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Property Owners & Address. Provide al list of property owners & addresses of all properties  isnot applicable).  located within a 100' of the above subject property.  Plot Plan (if applicable). Al plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x1 11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2" X 11" snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" X 11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort Printed April 29, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS HOSTING  Parcels  goy  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linés Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  124 Feet    OBJECTID 6980 OWNER NAME WOOTEN JOSEPH A MAILING ADDRESS2 221 LAKE ROAD ZIP 27834 BLDG VAL 113621 TAXABLE VA 153901 PROPERTY ADDRESS 311 EN MAIN ST DATE 5/26/2010 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42405  GPIN 5675-97-6179 OWNER NAME2 WOOTEN LUCIH CITY GREENVILLE PROP DESC TOT VAL 153901 PREV ASSESS 169989 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1720/00193 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1970-  GPIN Long 5675-97-6179 MAILING ADDRESS 221 LAKE ROAD STATE NC LAND VAL 40280 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.15 MBL 56751217 STAMPS NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2464 NBR BED 3 PIN 01024006  1LOT3 311 EAST MAIN STREET  Beaufort County online map access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County ofE Beaufort and thel Website Provider disclaim all responsibility and legall liability for the content published on this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  and its Assigns shall be! held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.            Gene Stano 401 Middlebury! Dr. Greenville, NC27834  April 19, 2019 Joseph Wooten 311 E. Main St Washington, NC  Tree report for) Joseph Wooten, Washington, NC  Contacted by Joseph Wooten to evaluate a Dogwood, Cornus florida, for overall health and disposition. The tree was evaluated: in accordance with thel International Society of Arboriculture Best Management  Practices.  The treei in question is ini thet tree lawn between the sidewalk and the curbi ini front of the residence, of Mr. Wooten. The tree al Dogwood of approximately 15" diameter shows extensive signs of declining health and decay. The treei is made up of three mainl leaders of which two are already dead. The third, while still showing green leaves, also has decay and dieback present. Tree report is attached. After conducting: a full tree: risk assessment, it is my recommendation that the tree should be removed toj prevent any potential injury toi thej public or property. Upon removal a new tree can be planted  ini its place tol help allleviate the loss of tree canopy. Gene Stano Certified Arborist MA 49914 A    ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form  Client Joseph Wooten Tree species. Cornusf florida Flowering Dogwood Assessor(s). Gene Stanol MA4991A  Date 4/17/2019 Height 18'  Time 1600 Sheet_ Crown spread dia. 20'  Address/ /Tree location 311 EMains St, Washington,NC Located int tree lawn! between curb ands sidewalk Tree no.  of  dbh1 16" Time frame Target Assessment  Tools used Visual  Targetz zone  Occupancy rate  -occasional 1-rare 88 3-frequent 4- constant : E 2 no no  Target description Pedestrians Cars in road Utilities  1 2 3 4  V. V V  V V V 3 no yes V V V 4 no no  Site Factors  History off failures_ Old breaks and main laterals removed  Topography! Flat Slopel  % Aspect.  Site changes Nonel E Grade changel Site clearinga Changed: soil hydrologyD Root cutsD Describe_ Soil conditions Limited volumel E SaturatedD ShallowD CompactedD Pavement over roots 75 % Describe. Sidewalk and road Prevailing wind direction SW Common weather Strong winds E IceD SnowD Heavy rainl Describe_ Storms Species failure profile Branches! E Trunkl RootsD Describe Branch dieback and trunk decay with age  Tree Health and Species Profile  Vigor Low E Normal D HighD Foliage None (seasonal)D None (dead)D Normal 25 % Chlorotic % Necrotic 75 %  Pests_  Abiotic, Load Factors  Wind exposure ProtectedD PartialDl FullE Windf funneling Recent orp planned changei in loadi factors None  Relative crown size Small MediumD Largel)  Crown density Sparse! a NormalD DenseD Interior branches Fewl a NormalD) Densel Vines/Mistietoe/Moss! D  Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting thel Likelihood of Failure  Crown and Branches Cracks a Inb broken Branches Codominant D Weak: attachments D  Unbalanced crown! E Broken/Hangers Number. Over-extended! branches a Pruning history Reduced Flush cuts Load on defect Dead/Missing bark a Codominant: stems D  LCR25 %  Lightning damage D Included bark! D Cavity/Nest hole_ %0 circ.  Dead twigs/branches a 75_%overall Max. dia. 8"  Max. dia.  Previous branchi failures E old breaks prese Similar branches present E Dead/Missing! bark E Cankers/Galls/Burls D Sapwood damage/decay E Response growth Poor. epicormic arowth on remainina live stem  Crown cleaned E Thinned a Raised D Main concern(s) Dead and dying branches over 75% oft tree  Topped D Lion-tailed D Conks D  Heartwood decay E  Other_ N/AD -Trunk Abnormal bark texture/color E IncludedbarkD  Minor D Moderate D Significant a  Likelihood off failure Improbable D Possible D Probable E Imminent D  Roots and Root Collar = Decay! D Cavity! D. %circ.  Collar buried/Not visible D Depth_  Stem girdling D Conks/Mushrooms D  Cracks! D Poort taper D  Dead D Ooze D Root platel lifting! D Response growth Maino concern(s)- Likelihood off failure  Sapwood damage/decay E Canker/Gall/BurlsD Sapc ooze D Lightning damagel D Heartwood decayl Conks/Mushrooms D Mainc concern(s). continued decline ofr remaining live tree Load ond defect N/ADI Minor D Moderate E Significant D Improbablel Possiblel E Probablel D Imminent D  Cracks D Cut/Damagedi rootsD] Distancei fromtrunk,  Cavity/Nest hole_ %circ. Depth, Lean. 20 - Corrected?. No Response growth. epicormic growth  Soilv weakness D  Load on defect N/AE Minor! D Moderate D Significant! D Improbablel Possible D Probable D Imminent D  Likelihood off failure  Page lof2    Risk Categorization  Likelihood  Failure  Impact Failure & Impact Consequences  (fromN Matrix1 1)  Risk rating ofp part (from Matrix: 2) high mod mod  Conditions  Target protection  Tree part ofconcern Crown Dead Branches 1 and Branches 2 3 4  8" 6-15 1 none 8" 6-15 3 none  o  8" 6-15 2 none 000,0000004  0)0 000000  0000000000000000 00000000000 D0009 0000000000 00,090,00999099009 0000000000000009 0000000000000000 0000000000000009 0000000000000000 0000000000000000  Matixl.Likelihood matrix. Likelihood ofF Failure Very low  Likelihood ofl Impacting Target  Low  Medium Unlikely Somewhat likely Unlikely Consequences ofF Failure Low Moderate High Low Moderate High  High Very! likely Unlikely  Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Very likely Likely Somewhat likely Low Unlikely Notes, explanations, descriptions  Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe  Extreme High Low  North  Low Low  Moderate Moderate Low  Low  Mitigation options Atar minimum thet tree should be pruned to remove any dead or dying branches. Ift thisi is done Residual risk Low there will be minimal live tissue tos support thet tree andi ity will continue to decline as is currently happeningi in the Residual risk remaining live crown. Tree should be removed to allow for a new tree to take its place and remove any hazard Residual risk  int the public area.  Residual risk  Overall tree risk rating Low! D Moderate D Highl E Extreme D Overall residual risk Low E Moderatel D HighDl Extreme D Data Final Preliminary Advanced assessment needed No Dyes-lype/Reason Inspection limitations None Visibility DJAccess Vines DRoot collar buried Describe  Work priority 10 20 30 40 Recommended inspection interval Homeowner Daily  This datasheet wasp produced! byt thel International SocietyofAtboricaulture (ISA)a andi isi intended foru useb by7 Treel Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists- 2013  Page 2of2    Adjoining Property Owners: 311 East Main Street  BIENES JERRYF POBOX2108 WASHINGTONNC2738) MASON CHARLOTTE NICHOLLS 119 S HARVEY STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 ROLINSKY-RADER VICTORIA 113 HARVEY STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 RADER STEVENP 113 S HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 GIRARD ROBERT: M 303 E. MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 BRIDGMAN MAURICE. M 204 YUKON ST HAMPTON VA 23663 WOOTEN JOSEPH. A 311 E. MAIN ST WASHINGTONNC27889 GREEN BETTY JANE 307 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 DARRELAURA ANN 316 RIVERSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC27889 CAHOONI RACHEL H 319: E: MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 113 NHARVEY STREET WASHINGTONNC2789  SIMPSON GLENNCJR 322 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNCZIBS)    Downtoun Decelopmenb ffstoric CPreseroation  -  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  April 26, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness s-311 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Joseph Wooten for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove a tree in the public right-of-way on the property located at 311 East Main Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Aas Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@washngtomegow    Staff Report  311 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 311 East Main Street is requesting approval to remove Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping:  located in the city right-of-way the property.  4.1.1 Retain and preserve significant and character-detining vegetation including mature trees, 4.1.3 Trees and other vegetation shall not block views of historics structures and should be well 4.1.8 A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for the removal of live trees with a diameter of six (6) inches or greater. Removal of significant trees should only be done ifit has disease or 4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced by a suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan, within sixty (60) days from time  hedges, shrubs, and ground cover whenever possible.  maintained and pruned regularly.  storm damage or is a safety hazard to historic: structures.  ofr removal.  The property owner has made the effort to seek a professional assessment, and the recommendation is for the tree to be removed. Since this is in the city right-of-way, it would be the responsibility of the city to replace the tree. Based on finding of fact, the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 311 East Main Street- Tree Removal  A request has been made by Mr. Joseph Wooten for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove at treei in the publicr right-of-way on the property located at 311 East Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Joseph Wooten to remove a tree int the public right-of-way on the property located at 311 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.1 Landscaping.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Joseph Wooten to remove a tree in the public right-of-way on the property located at 311 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping. If further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Joseph Wooten to remove a tree ini the public right-of-way on the property located at 311 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.1 Landscaping.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #12 to construct a new: single-family dwelling on 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127-128 West Main Street to replace two wooden windows using like materials 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 124 Washington Street to replace the existing HVAC unit in the same location on 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 731 East Main Street to replace the existing roof and repoint the decorative motifs 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the 6. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 109 North Brown Street to replace the existing gas pack unit in the same location 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 414 East Second Street to replace the existing gas pack unit in the same location 8. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 East Second Street to replace the existing gas pack unit in the same location 9. An emergency request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 731 West Main Street to remove a tree in the back yard of  the property.  on the property. the property.  on top of the towers using like materials on the property.  owner of 127 West Main Street to install signage on the property.  on the property.  on the property.  on the property.  the property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Discussion  Facebook Page for  Historic District    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Minutes Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:00 pm Members Present Colleen Knight Kathleen Couch Mark Everett William Kenner Rebecca Clark Karen Mann Members Present Cheri Vaughn Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Ar moment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Ms.. Judy Van Dorp for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in Ms.. Judy Van Dorp came forward and was sworn in. She explained that they would like to put up a 3-foot wrought iron picket fence on a one-foot brick base along the back of their property on Short Drive. She stated that thei fence would be replacing a rail and post wooden fence that is rotten ati the base. She stated thaty you could probably push over the current fence with one finger. Ms. Van Dorp stated that it is about 701 feet of fencing in total. She explained that theyf found a great fence company in Connecticut that makes beautiful iron fences and Ross Boyer will be doing the work.  the back yard oft the property located at 709 West Main Street.  1    The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission granta a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Judy' Van Dorp fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 709 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted in 2. Arequest has been made by Mr. Jonathan Russell fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence int the back yard of the property located at 746 Mr. Jonathan Russell came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Russell stated that the fence isai fairly straight forward 6-foot wooden privacy fence. He explained that the fence has ap particular use for him. He stated that he has two small children that are 4 and 2. He stated that they also have two dogs that are on the rambunctious side and thei fence will be used tol keept them in. He stated that the fence willl be of similar construction to William Kenner made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jonathan Russell to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in the back yard of the property located at 746 West Main Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls. The motion was seconded by Kathleen Couch and all 3. Arequest has been made by Mr.J.B. Bland fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east: side of the property located Mr. J.B. Bland came forward and was sworni in. Mr. Bland stated that there is an existing dirt driveway on the property now. He explained that initially he did ask Singleton & Sons to do rock or some kind of pebble and they suggested that he go with the concrete due to the washout on the property. He explained that there isac chimney on this side of thel house and he is starting to see some damage to the chimney due to that washout, sO the contractor suggested the concrete. He stated that the driveway itself willl be 10ft wide and will start at the: sidewalk and extend back to the fence, which is about 47/481 ft. He explained that he does not want a parking pad behind it, just the  request.  favor.  West Main Street.  many oft the fences throughout the district.  voted in favor.  at 242 East Second Street.  driveway.  2    The Chairman opened the floora and no one came forward to speak for or against the Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr.J.B. Bland to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property locate at 242 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3 Driveways and Sidewalks. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and ally voted 4. Ar request has been made by Mary Chandler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves oft the front porch using cement board on the property Ms. Mary Chandler came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Chandler explained that they discovered that the eaves of the front porch were covered with interior plywood and they are tattered. She stated that the carpenters wanted to put something there that William Kenner: stated that he could see whyt the eaves rotten. since the house does not have any gutters. Kathleen Couch stated that the rest of the house is wood and asked why Ms. Chandler wanted to use hardi-plank instead of wood. Ms. Couch stated that the wood siding on the rest of the house looks relatively in good shape. Ms. Chandler stated that shet thought the carpenters decided that the hardi-plank would last longer and this specific spot was in worse shape than any other area oft the house. Kathleen Couch stated that the plywood that was on the eaves wasn't meant for exterior application. Ms. Couch asked the age of the siding on the rest of the house. Ms. Chandler stated that she didn't know the age oft the wood siding on the house, she has only been there since 2016. Ms. Couch asked if some oft the work had already been done. Ms. Chandler gestured that it had. William Kenner asked ift they had to do both sides of the porch. Mr. Chandler explained that both sides would have to be replaced.  request.  int favor.  located at 524 West Second Street.  would survive longer than two or three years.  The Chairman opened the floor. No one came forward.  William Kenner stated that he could see why the carpenter would suggest the hardi- plank because this area is exposed with the water coming off of the roof. He stated that they will rot againi if wood is used. Mr. Kenner stated that this could be a special case due to thei fact that iti is such as small amount. He stated that he wouldn'ta allow the hardi-plank ifi it was the whole house, but it is such a small portion oft the house and it does look better than the plywood that was there before. William Kenner did say that the carpenters could slide upt the boards so that they are in line with the existing siding of the house. He stated that this is an affordable solution to a problem that she will  3    continue to. see. Mark Everett stated that with the proper flashing and dripe edge she would probably not have the issue. William Kenner stated that those solutions would be another big project. Ms. Couch: stated that thet fact that the wrong wood was used at that location was probably the reason why the eaves rotted. She stated that the house was built in 1910 or: 1915 and if the sidingi is in good shape. She stated that she didn't see any reason why this certain spot would have any more exposure to rot ift the proper material was used in the first place and maintained. Rebecca Clark stated that she didn't have a problem with the request. She stated that it is such a small area and there has been a precedent set already. Ms. Clark stated that she didn'tfell replace such a small area would change any oft the historic structure itself. Karen Mann stated that she disagreed and felt that people are doing things and then make their request toi the Commission after the work has already been done. She stated that with no offense to Ms. Chandler, this is happening and it will continue to happen if they allow it. Kathleen Couch stated that many of the contractors and carpenters in this town know that an Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mary Chandler to replace the siding on the eaves oft the front porch using cement board on the property located at 524' West Second Street. This motion is based ont thet following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls with the caveat that aj precedent has already been set. Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mary Chandler to replace the siding on the eaves of the front porch using cement board on the property located at 524 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls. Her motion was seconded by' William Kenner. The motion carried with a majority vote of5to 1 with Rebecca Clark voting in  item like thisi is generally not allowed.  The motion failed due to a lack of a second.  opposition. B. Minor' Works  1. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of111 West Second Street to replace the existing door on the second floori in the same style and using like materials. They will also bei installing a small awning over 2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 302 East Second Street to replace rotten siding and rears shed roof using like materials on the property. The property owner will also be installing gutters.  the back door.  4    3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 307 West Main Street to repair the roof using like materials on the 4. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the City of Washington to remove the trees along the old Rowing Club. 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 109 Brown Street to repair the roof using like materials on the property. 6. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 West Second Street to repair the siding and HVAC: stand using like Rebecca Clark asked about the trees that removed along the old Rowing Club. Emily Rebert explained that they went ahead and removed those trees because they were breaking up the bulkhead at the base. She explained that they were originally planted to hide the Rowing Club and they were planted to close together; they were magnolias and they were only planted a couple of feet apart. She stated that when the streetscape is done newi trees will be planted to replace those trees. She explained that with the Rowing Club building being restored to trim those trees off oft the building it Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve all the minor works. Colleen Knight seconded  property.  materials on the property.  compromised over! 50% of the tree as well. the motion and all voted ini favor.  VI. Other Business  1. Tree Policy, Request for Commission. Action  Emily Rebert presented the revised tree policy to the Commission and explained the William Kenner made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant approval oft the revision of the Landscaping Design Guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines be sent to the City Council for final approval.  concerns from the City Council.  Kathleen Couch seconded the motion and all voted inf favor.  2. Terrell Award Nominations  Emily Rebert explained that staff is seeking nomination for the Terrell Awards and asked the Commission to email her their suggestions. She stated that the Terrell Awards are part oft the City's CLG certification and are presented in honor of Historic Preservation  month.  5    VII. Approval of Minutes - March 5, 2019 seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve the minutes from the March meeting. Colleen Knight  VIII. Adjourn  There being no other business Colleen Knight made a motion to adjourn. William Kenner seconded  the motion and all voted in favor.  6