WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:00 PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Ms. Vickie Pfahler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at  419 East Main Street:  a. b. C. d. e. f. B. Minor Works  Add shutters to the primary elevation Replace the current front door Replace front porch railing Remove multiple trees on the property  Reconfigure and add new fenestrations on primary elevation Construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in back yard  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 419 East Main Street to the replace the windows using like materials throughout all fenestrations of the property. 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 600 West Second Street to replace the split 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 South McNair Street to replace an 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 331 East Main Street to install a 4-foot open, wooden picket fence on the tertiary elevation of the property. This was an emergency approval. The applicant's proposed work is within the design  heat pump in the same location on the property.  existing roof like materials on the property.  guidelines.  1    5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 515 East Water Street to replace the 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 320 North Market Street to repair and 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 719 West Main Street to repair and replace porch roof, columns, trim, and joists using like materials on the property. 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 428 East Second Street to install gutters, and repair porch columns and siding using like materials on the property. 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 122 South Harvey Street to install a generator on the south side of the property. The space around the generator  existing HVAC unit on the property.  replace siding and trim using like materials on the property.  will be landscaped sO not to be seen from the street.  VI. Other Business  VII. Approval of Minutes - May 2, 2017  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS  none    MAJOR  WORKS    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation: Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 too cashiers int thei front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmental Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 4Ediir Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  VICKIE PEANLEK  So' (width)  feet by  146 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done: Replace. Font purchrailiug,    7E Bud add bhutterb   ENLHGE 1Qwf  OTHE FEAwT1 LEPLALE FIRwT Onr w/ LAELEK MWIT KEMOVE TEES THATAE MLLEO wk OLANGE FLAGCIG. AEwiovic CHA LwC FENLE Mwo LEPLACE WTH L0D PUVALY FOLWCE ACEYAD DWLY.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  BEAD Moilow (Name of Applicant-t type or print) (Mailing Address) $-1541 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  1IQ) 3 ST Sr DASNILT 22119  (Zip Code)  252- 423-908  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    5/24/2017  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  Beaufort Printed May: 24,2017 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  Resl  1:26 Feet  tps/DeaufortcmedgiscmDoumiadfila-n-.ampsmao.rsaraa2Xoxhanarginio  1/2    5/24/2017 OBJECTID 10668 OWNER NAME PFAHLER RODNEY PAUL: SR MAILING ADDRESS2 133 NORTHPORT LANE ZIP 44839 BLDG VAL 94298 TAXABLE VA 137798 PROPERTY ADDRESS 419 El MAIN: ST DATE 3/31/2017 12:00:00 AM SALE PRICE 87000 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 41987  ConnectGIS Feature Report  GPIN 5685-06-1961 OWNER NAME2 PFAHLER VIKIE LYNNE CITY HURON PROP DESC 1LOT419E EAST MAIN STREET TOT VAL 137798 PREV ASSESS 137798 TOWNSHIP 1 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1925/00529 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1922 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1975  GPIN Long 5685-06-1961 MAILING ADDRESS 133 NORTHPORT LANE STATE OH LAND VAL 43500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0 MBL 568509110 STAMPS 174 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 1708 NBR BED 3 PIN 1027868  Beaufort County online mapa access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute al legalr record nor should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County of Beauforta andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liability for thec content published ont thisv website." The usera agrees that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall bel held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  htps.beaufort.comecgscomDownioadFlesixl-.AR.maps/trc41.cia4a9b2a703n383233cx.htmat-prinid  2/2    DRAWINGSP PROVIDEDBY: HORTON CONTRACTORS.It  PROJECTE Pfhaler Remodel  SHEETT TITLE:        Proposed fence style Proposed handrail style Proposed shutter style    Houzz Sketch  Page 1 of1  *Glasb Will not bo, wBvy  SILE  -  ittps/www.houzzcomsketch/canvasld-6736090  5/17/2017    ConnectGIS Feature Report  Page 1 of1  Beaufort Printed May 15, 2017 SeeE Below for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels GPIN  668507-2172  69 5685-06-0966  BCADAT  Property Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines  160  Building Footprints 2007 63 County Line  5685:06-1924  County Line (Solid) State  6685061961  3 56B5:06:2920  Fence Arcay  0  5685062067  N  -1709  5685-06-1757  1:30Feet  5665-062.  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessi is provided as ap publics service, asi is, asa available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is for informational purposes only andi ist noti intendedt to constitute al legal record nors should it bes substituted fort the advice ors services ofii industry professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim all responsibility and legal liability for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County and its  Assigns shall be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  htps./DeaufortcommectgisioDowmilodfieasxi-emplsecteci0413846ap0ses. 5/15/2017        2EVA    REMOVE  TCEE    LDE E  h,  ORTON RICTORSe 975-4774            HONE  RIVER Roc GPNNE CDt  FRON EATRM y  3 A 3  NEw BLUE CHINESE WSERIA 0  & B 8  WALK  EYTING ceAs KTLD  SIOEWALK  yA  BME64 a  X745  , MAASPRLET  E.AN ST    Adjoining Property Owners: 419 East Main Street  HOUGH CHARLES, AJ JR 201 SOUTH ACADEMY STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 ANNA MARIA ISI INVESTMENTS LLC 122S ACADEMYS ST WASHINGTON NC: 27889 HEEKIN SARAH LLEWELLYN 409 EN MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 HANNAN WALTER THOMAS! SR 1721 ANDERSON STREET WILSON NC: 27893 GRAY ALLEN BAHNSON 1645 DEEP RUNI ROAD GREENVILLE NC 27834 DAVIS CHARLES 413 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 PFAHLER RODNEY PAULSR 133 NORTHPORT LANE HURON OH 44839 MOORE WILLIAM WJ JR 2517 CROWN COURT PANAMA CITY FL3 32405 REYNOLDS DAVID 427 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 MOORE LESLIE A 31 EVANSHIRE DR FREDERICKSBURG VA: 22406 JENKINS VERGIL CARROLLI JR 412 EAST MAIN: ST WASHINGTON NC. 27889 O'NEILL. JOHN. JOSEPH 420EN MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 HARDT KEITHA 424 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  MESSNER MICHAEL 428 EMAIN: STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889    Dorontoin Deoelopmenb 6 fffstoric Preseroation  City  Washington  N ORTH CAROLINA  May 30, 2017  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -419 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the owner of 419 East Main Street your prop- A request has been made by Ms. Vickie Pfahler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at 419 East Main Street:  erty is located adjacent to the above subject property.  a. b. C. d. e. f.  Add shutters to the primary elevation Replace the current front door Replace front porch railing Remove multiple trees on the property  Reconfigure and add new fenestrations on primary elevation Construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in back yard  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday June 6, 2017  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  419 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 419 East Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  a. Add shutters to the primary elevation b. Replace the current front door Reconfigure and add new fenestrations on primary elevation d. Replace front porch railing e. Remove. multiple trees on the property f. Construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in backy yard  (A,B,&C) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows  and Doors:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.4.5 Install shutters on al historic structure only if the building would have originally had shutter assemblies. New shutters should be made of wood and should have the appearance ofk being 3.4.11 Introduction of new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware.  functional.  3.4.6' Vinyl shutters are prohibited on historic homes.  patterns.  (D) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.61 Porches and  Entryways:  Chapter 3.6.1 "Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements of a historic structure and: should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, Chapter 3.6.4 "Reconstruction of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. Ifa adequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifi it is compatible with the style and period of the Chapter 3.6.6 "Repairs to porches using materials incompatible with the original materials are not allowed. For example, metal supports shall not be used as substitutes for wood columns, plywood shall not be substituted for beaded board ceilings, and concrete shall not be used as a  balustrades. doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and entablatures."  building."  substitute for tongue-and-groove wood flooring."  (E) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping:    4.1.1 Retain and preserve significant and character-defining vegetation including mature trees, 4.1.3 Trees and other vegetation shall not block views of historic structures and should be well 4.1.8 A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for the removal ofl live trees with a diameter of six (6) inches or greater. Removal of significant trees should only be done ifith has disease or 4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced bya suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan, within sixty (60) days from time  hedges, shrubs, and ground cover whenever possible.  maintained and pruned regularly.  storm damage, ori is a safety hazard to historic structures.  of removal.  (F) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and  Walls:  4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials int the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be of a design thati is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to a main street or a side: street should be of an open design, such as picket and no greater than four (4) feet in height. It is prohibited to use solid privacy fences in front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox are also 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed ini the reary yard. Ifar majority ofay privacy fence is visible from the public right-of-way, a landscape buffer shall be included. No fence, including a 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden reary yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure.  fences are not allowed. and period of the historic structure.  prohibited.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  Note: This is currently not considered a contributing structure in Washington's historic district. Noncontributing structures do not necessarily need to be held to the same standards as contributing structures. However, noncontributing structures have the ability to one day become contributing based on their age or historical significance. When considering alterations to noncontributing structures, also take into account the importance of that feature for that building as it may reset the contributing status clock. Note: The applicant has been approved to replace the current windows throughout the house, because they are going back "in kind". That part is a minor work. The commission is considering the fenestration reconfiguration on the front façade of the  house only.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development porch railing, tree removal, addition of fencing.  Re: 419 East Main Street - Adding shutters, replacing front door, addition of fenestrations, alteration of  A request has been made by Ms. Vickie Pfahleri for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to make  the following changes on the property located at 419 East Main Street:  a. Add shutters to the primary elevation b. Replace the current front door C. Reconfigure and add new fenestrations on primary elevation d. Replace front porch railing e. Remove multiple trees on the property f. Construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in back yard  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically 3.4 Windows and Doors, Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping, and Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be  attached toi the motion. Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Vickie Pfahler for the submitted request on the property located at 419 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping, and Chapter 4.6 Fences and  Walls ways.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Vickie Pfahler for the submitted request on the property located at 419 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping, and Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls ways.Ifurther move: that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or    Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Vickie Pfahler fori the submitted request on the property located at 419 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, Chapter 3.61 Porches and Entryways, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping, and Chapter 4.6 Fences  and' Walls ways.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 419 East Main Street to the replace the windows using like materials throughout all fenestrations of the property. 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 600 West Second Street to replace the split 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 South McNair Street to replace an 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 331 East Main Street to install a 4-foot open, wooden picket fence on the tertiary elevation of the property. This was an emergency approval. The applicant's proposed work is within the design 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 515 East Water Street to replace the existing 6. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 320 North Market Street to repair and replace 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 719 West Main Street to repair and replace porch roof, columns, trim, and joists using like materials on the property. 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 428 East Second Street to install gutters, and repair porch columns and siding using like materials on the property. 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 122 South Harvey Street to install a generator on the south side of the property. The space around the generator will be  heat pump in the same location on the property.  existing roof like materials on the property.  guidelines.  HVAC unit on the property.  siding and trim using like materials on the property.  landscaped sO not to be seen from the street.    OTHER  BUSINESS  none    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC: PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Minutes Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:00) PM Members Present Cheri Vaughn Geraldine McKinley Edi Hodges Judi Hickson William Kenner Members Absent Maryl Pat Musselman Markl Everett Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner John Rodman, Planning Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Amoment ofs silence was taken. III. Roll Call A silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old) Business  1. A request has been madel by the City of Washington to demolish the: single family residence The Chairman explained that this item was continued a couple of months ago. John Rodman came forward and explained that according to the State Historic Preservation Guidelines when: a property owner comes forward and request demolition ofal building in thel historic district, the Commission cannot deny a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition or relocation. However, the Commission may delay demolition or relocation upt to oneyear. Mr. Rodman: stated that ift the Commission delays the demolition for one, yeari itl becomes the Commission's responsibility tol help find an: alternative use for the house. He explained that the only waya demolition can be deniedi isi ift thes structure has been determined tol be of state wide: significance, something that has been recognized as a national land mark. Mr. Rodman stated that the City Council asked that the Commission move forward with the demolition: andi iti is his understanding that they are fine with a 365 day delay.  located on the property: at 415 West Second Street.  1    Edi Hodges stated that he felti it was the consensus oft the Commission to delayt the demolition fort the full 365 days. Mr. Hodges stated that they are all of] like mind on the request and asked that the Dee Congleton, representing thel board oft the Washington Area Historicl Foundation, came forward and was: sworni in. She stated that they recognize that the demolition can be delayed for 365 days. She: stated that thel house: should not be demolished foraj parking lot. Ms. Congleton then mentioned Maggie Gregg with PNCand spoke about the different scenarios that PNC offers tol help save. the structure. She stated thatt the Engineer firm that WAHF retained out of Greenville found that the house was structurally: sound and a good candidate for preservation: andi restoration. She stated that they hoped that within the 365 days there willl be some changes that will occur. Jerry Creech came forward and also spoke against the demolition. Hea also: spoke about the pole that was completed by the Washington Daily News and] how the majority of the voters were, against tearing the house down. Mr. Creech: alsos stated that the City Council did not give the publict the Virginia Finnerty came forward: and: stated that she was there speaking as a private citizen. She stated that she is embarrassed by whati is going on. She: stated that they regulate the type of materials someone can usei int thel historic district: so much; yett tearing al historic: structure downi is sO easy. She: stated that shei is extremely upset by thel lack ofp public supportt to save this house; her hope ist to come together and fight this. She stated that thel house does not deserve tol be demolished.  publiccomments be limited.  opportunity to speak on the request wheni it went before them.  The floor was closed and the Commission discussed the request further.  Cheri Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that thel Historic Preservation Commission granta Certificate of Appropriateness to the City ofWashington to allow for the demolition oft the property located at 415 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with thel Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.01 Demolition and] Relocation. Ifurther movet that the Historic Preservation Commission place a delay on the demolition for up to 365 days. William Kenner seconded the motion and all  voted in favor.  V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by thel First Baptist Church fora Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the: single family residence! located on the property at 120 North Academy Street. David Daniel, representing the church, came forward and was sworn in. He explained that the church has al Futures Committee and that Committee would like to add onto thel Family Life Center. Mr. Daniel stated that the Church purchased this house since the property touches theirs. He explained that with any addition the church would need toi increase their impervious soil, SO thata sedimentation pond would not be required. The Committee feltt that since this propertyi ist touching the Church's property it would be in the Church's besti interest to purchase it. Mr. Daniel stated that they are trying to find someone to take: and remove thel house from thej property. He explained that ifthey can'tfind someone to relocatei iti then they would demolish thel house. Mr. Daniel then talked  2    about thel house and the problems with thel house structurally. Mr. Daniel stated that his understanding is thel house would bet torn down and thel loty would remain: ag green: space.  The Chairman opened the floor.  Dee Congleton came: forward and stated that they have already lost too many historicl homesi in Washington and here they are: again getting ready tol lose another one. She: also spoke about the large cost to move al housei in thel historic district. Ms. Congleton stated that unfortunately their Churches are the worst offenders oft tearing down) houses int their historict town. She stated that the Susan Zachery came forward and was: sworn in. She stated that she moved here 10 years ago because of thel historic quaintness of the town. She stated that she cannot believe that they are thinking about tearing down twol houses. Ms. Zachery stated that shel has been in this house and didn'tsee: anything structurally wrong) withi it. She stated that shei is opposed tot tearing down Lisa Hodges came forward and was sworn in. She: stated that: shej just needed clarification that the Commission cannot denyt ther request. Itwas then explained thatt the Commission cannot delayt the demolition, they can only delayi it3 365 days. She: stated that her home is adjacent to this) property and: shei is very concerned about what will go there once thel housei is removed. She stated that there isn'tanything that can be done, buts she wanted to: state that she didn't want to: see thel house David Carraway, resident of 110 N. Academy Street, stated that his concern isi ifthel house does come down, thel lot is currently nota ani impervious surface and therei is already: a drainage problem int that area. Mr. Carraway stated that the Church does have a drain with the City, but obviously the drain is not big enough tol handle any of the drainage thati is there now. He stated that thisi isa an Mr. Daniel stated that during the current: renovation the Church spent $5000: to add the drain asa courtesy to thei neighbors. Ed Hodges asked if thel house comes down ift the Church would remove the concrete on thel lot. Mr. Daniel stated that the church ist trying to avoid adding a sediment pond and would do anything that they needed to do toi increase thei impervious surface on thel lot. William Kenner askedi ift the Churchl had a 50 year plan. He also: stated that ifthe Church plans on expanding that muchi in thei future they may) want to consider relocating to al larger piece of property. Mr. Daniel stated that the Church would never consider relocating. William Kenner stated that every tenj years they come: and want to tear down something and wait out the 365 days. He: stated that it would bel beneficial to thel historic districti if Churches want to expand SO much, that they relocate tol larger areas and not buy historic homes around them and tear them down. Mr. Kenners stated that with the State: statuettes the Commission'sk hands are tied and they cannot stop The Chairman closed the floor and the Commission discussed the request amongst themselves.  Historic) Foundation isa against tearing down this house.  anotherl housei in thel historic district.  come down.  issue that the City willl have to look ati ift the Church does add on.  the demolition ofal historicl house.  3    Cheri' Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the First Baptist Church to allow fort the demolition of the propertyl located at1201 North Academy Street. This motion is based on thef following findings of fact: the: application is congruous with thel Historic) Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.01 Demolition and Relocation. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place a delay ont the demolition for up to 365 days. Her motion was seconded by 2. A request has been made by Ms. Judy Van! Dorp fora Certificate of Appropriateness to construct ascreened in porch on the tertiary elevation oft thej property located at 709 West Main Street. Judy Van Dorp came forward and was sworn in. Shes stated that they would like to: square offt the back of their house with as screen porch. She: stated thatitisapproximately, 10'x18' and they would use brick pillars, a metal roof, nice big 8'x8' posts and white wood to match the house.  William Kenner and all voted in favor.  The Chairman opened thei floora and no one: came: forward.  Judi Hickson made the following motion: Imovet that thel Historic Preservation Commission granta Certificate of Appropriateness tol Ms.) Judy Van) Dorp to adda9 9'x14' screened inj porch on the tertiary elevation of thej propertyl located at 709 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with thel Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.61 Porches and Entryways and! 5.3 Additions. Geraldine 3. A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to construct a new: single family, two-story dwelling on Lot #16 within Moss Landing. The home will be consistent: and will match single family, residencesi in the development. Jim Wiley came forward and was sworni in. Mr. Wiley presented the new plan to the Commission. Ed) Hodges stated that the neighborhood isl looking great. Mr. Wiley stated that he would like to add Judi Hickson made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission granta Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to constructa new single family dwelling on the property located atl Lot #16 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the: application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.01 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction. They also approve the addition ofas screened porch on the rear of this house on lot #16. Her motion was seconded by Geraldine McKinley: and all voted in favor. 4. A request has been made byl Ms. Ruby Moore fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to: screen ini the porch] located on aj primary elevation on the property located at 307 East Water Street (within Moss Mr. Wiley also presented this request. He stated thatt this house alsol has al rear porch thati faces  McKinley seconded ther motion and all voted ini favor.  the addition ofap possible screened porch on the back oft this house on lot#16.  Landing).  Moss Way and she would like to screen in that porch.  4    William Kenner made thef following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission granta Certificate of Appropriateness tol Ms. Ruby Moore to: screen in thel back porch oft the river side oft thej property located at: 307 East Water Street. This motion isl based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.61 Porches and Entryways. Judi Hickson: seconded her motion and 5. A request hasl been made byl Mr. Bud Farrar fora Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following changes to thej property at 2491 Moss Way (Lot #32) within Moss Landing: A. Screen the existing upper porch andl lowerl loggia. B. Add steps to the east side of porch to access thel lower yard/deck area. C.Adda aj yard deck: D. Add wood louvers to easts side ofl loggia forj privacy. Jim Wiley state that they constructed al home on lot 32 fort the Farrars. He: stated that the porch they wish to: screen is river facing and also explained the otheri items the Farrar'sa are wishing to Judi Hickson made thef following motion: Imove that the Historic) Preservation Commission granta Certificate of Appropriateness tol Mr. Bud Farrari fort the submitted request on the property located at249 Moss Way. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with thel Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 Decks and Chapter 3.61 Porches and Entryways. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion and all voted in 6. A request has been made by Mr. Frank Williams fora Certificate of Appropriateness toi install two additional windows on aj primary elevation of the property located at 716 Eastl Main Street. Frank' Williams came forward andy was sworn in. Mr. Williams stated that he recently purchased thel house andi is doing a complete renovation on thel house. Hes stated that he plans on livingi in the housel himself. He stated that thel house hast twol back rooms and one has three windows and the other onlyl has one and tol his knowledge they windows are not original to thej property. He explained that he would like to remove the single window and replace its with three windows to match the other side to get more light in thel house and improve the view. Mr. Williams stated that Cheri Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that thel Historic Preservation Commission grant ac Certificate of Appropriateness tol Mr. Frank Williams to: install two: additional windows on the south facing façade of the propertyl located at 716 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with thel Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors. Her motion was seconded by  all voted in favor.  add to the construction.  favor.  the windows would be wood..  William Kenner: and all voted ini favor.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of139 West Main Street toi install a 12'x2' sign on the front facade of the property. 2. A1 request hasl been made and approved by staff fora Certificate of Appropriateness. for the owner of 716 East Main Street to replace rotten: siding in kind on multiple elevations oft the  property.  5    3. AI request has been made and approved by stafff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness. for the owner of 418) East Second toi install a wooden garden shedi in the backyard oft the property. 4. A request has been made: and approved bys stafft fora Certificate of Appropriateness. for the owner of 705 West Second Street to replace the existing HVAC unit on the property. 5. AI request hasl been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 304 West Second Street to replace the existing HVAC unit on thej property. 6. A request hasl been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 3181 East Second Street toi installa 3' decorative fence along the eastern property linei in Judi Hickson made a motion to: approve all the minor works. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion  the front) yard oft the property. and all voted in favor.  VI. Other Business  1. Window Standards - Policy Statements  John Rodman came forward andj presented some policy statements on windows that were written by the Commission. Mr. Rodman stated that he thought they should consider asking Council to maybe putan moratorium on the complete changing ofwindows until they can: figure out] how they want to William Kenner made a motion to recommend that the City Council placea a 60 day moratorium on replacement windows until the Commission can draftaj policy or regulations on windows to meet The Commission appointed a committee of Edi Hodges, Mark Everett, William Kennera and possibly  handle windows in the future. The Commission agreed.  their standards. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion: and all voted in favor.  Dee Congleton and others from the public. 2. Demolition By Neglect Ordinance Update  Emily Rebertcame forward and updated the Commission on thel Demolition By Neglect process. Geraldine McKinley made a motion to approve the April minutes. Her motion was seconded by William  VII.. Approval of Minutes - April 4, 2017 Kennerand: all voted in favor. VIII. Adjourn and all voted in favor.  There being no other business Judi Hickson made: a motion to adjourn. William Kenner seconded the motion  6