GW  WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 2, 2014  7:00 PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business 1. None  V. Major Works, Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by the Washington/Beaufort County Chamber of Commerce for a Certificate of Appropriateness to (1) remove the existing deck and steps and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and (2) construct a new deck with a handicap ramp on the south side (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway. The building is a non- 2. A request has been made by Mr. Justin Fejfar representing New Vision Partners, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 3td floors of the Fowle Building. The balconies are requested to be located on the front, rear and west side of the building located at 189 West 3. A request has been made by Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building by; (1) adding a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; (2) construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and (3) add pitched roof entranceway. The property is located at 100 North Bridge Street. 4. Ar request has been made by the Orr Lodge #104 Masonic Temple for a Certificate of Appropriateness for construction of a six feet high wooden privacy fence on the rear property line of the property located at 116 East 3rd  contributing structure.  Main Street.  Street. B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a new attached sign on the front of the  building located at 138 South Market Street.    2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of 6' high wooden screen to enclose the mechanical and trash container on the rear of the building located at 116 East  3rd Street.  VII. Other Business  1. Water Street House  VII. Approval of Minutes = November 4, 2014  VIII. Adjourn  2    Major Work  102 Stewart Parkway  Construct New Entranceway  Construct New Deck    2 : Citys  0  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Staff Report  Date: To: From: Re:  November 24, 2014 HPC Members John Rodman, Director Community and Cultural Services HPC Agenda - Item #1 - Major Works  Request:  to (1) remove the existing deck and steps and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and (2) construct a new deck with a handicap ramp on the south side  (waterside).  Applicant:  Catherine Glover, Director 102 Stewart Parkway Washington, NC 27889  Washington/Beaufont County Chamber of Commerce  Property Information: Owners: Location: PIN#  The Greater Washington Chamber of Commerce, Inc  102 Stewart Parkway 5675-87-2585  Project Information:  The applicant has requested to (1) remove the existing deck, steps, and handicap ramp at the front entrance of the building and redesign the entranceway to include a new landing; and (2) construct a new deck and handicap ramp on  the south side (waterside) oft the building.  Proposed Work: Size: Material:  Front Entrance: 8'x6' Rear Deck: Handicap Ramp: 4'x32' Composite material for decking & railings  53'x16'    Attachments:  COA Application Photographs of existing conditions Site Plan Conceptual Drawings Adjacent Property Owners  Staff Findings: Guideline:  Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.3 Foundations: Review 3.3.68 &3.3.7 Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility: Review all sections Section 5.3 Additions: Review Additions Guidelines Section 5.4 Decks: Review Decks Guidelines  Guideline:  Chapter 5.0 New Construction  Based on staff review of the submitted material for the project and the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines it does appear that the project does meet the  intent of the guidelines and is compatible with the historic district.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please Use Black Ink  102 Stewart Parkway  Non-Contributing. Building  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Washington/Beaufort County Chamber of Commerce  58' (width)  feet by  59' (depth)  feet.  0.08 acres  List all properties within 100 feet; on both sides, in front (across the street), and to the back of the  property: (lfr necessary, attach a separate sheet) Brief Description of Work to be Done:  (1) Remove existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building; and (2) construct  a new deck on the south side (waterside) of the building.  U understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Catherine Glover Director (Name of Applicant-type or print) 102 Stewart Parkway (Mailing Address) 11/20/14 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  Washington, NC 252-946-9168 (Daytime Phone  27889  (Zip Code) Number)  Fatherine Glouer (Signature of Applicant)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Iti is the responsibility of the applicant too obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x11"sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE, APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Written Description. Describe clearly and in detail the nature of your project. Include exact dimensions Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  for materials to be used (ie. Width of siding, window trim, etc.)  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12" x11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is sO small as to bei illegible, make 8-1/2"x11"; snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2"x11" sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work Add new entranceway Add new deck  Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.3 Additions Section 5.4 Decks    102 Stewart Parkway Chamber of Commerce  Property Information    T  E  2 E  a    11/25/2014  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  CONNEÇTGIS  Printed Nove ember Beaufort 2014 See Belowf for Disclaimer 25,  WEB HOSTING  Parcels No Aerial Property Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  6  Total Length: 92.19 Feet  Sq. Feet or Acres orSq. Miles 1:17F Feet  w  oMsAwOSNwASeAPGAMAPAAEyNN  1/2    11/20/2014  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  Beaufort  CONNEÇTGIS  Printed November 20, 2014 See Belowf for Disclaimer  WEBI HOSTING  Parcels  ABFREE  Property Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State    6V  1:17F Feet  plpasuatcomacysompomoaflashaBARAAYRAERaAkdRATAaaNtid  1/2    11/25/2014 OBJECTID 6842 GPINLONG 5675-87-2585  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  PIN 01022204 OWNER NAME THE GREATER WASHINGTON CHAMBER CITY WASHINGTON PROPERTY/ ADDRESS STEWART PARKWAY MAP SHEET 567508 DEED BOOKand PAGE 837/912 DEFR_VAL 0 NBHD DESC WATERFRONT STAMPS LAND USE MBL ROAD TYPE P NBR_BED 0 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 3  GPIN 5675-87-2585 OWNER NAME2 MAILING ADDRESS OF COMMERCE INC STATE NC ACRES 0 NBR BLDG 1 LANDVAL 76950 TOT_VAL 472769 SUBCDE SALE PRICE DISTRICT 1 EXEMPT AMT YR_BUILT 1985 NBR BATHS 2 CENSUS BLOCK NBRJ HALF BATHS  MAILING ADDRESS2 POBOX665 ZP 27889 ACCT NBR 41397 DATE BLDGVAL 395819 NBHD CDE W SUB DESC ZONE B1H PROP DESC OF WASHINGTON SQFT 2577 EFF YR 1985 FLOOD PLAIN  1LOT STEWARTI PARKWAY/CITY 567508186  0  Beaufort County online map: access is provi ided as a public service, as is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute a legal record nor shouldi it be substituted for the advi ice or services of industry) professionals. The County of Beaufort and1 the Website Provi ider disclaim allr responsibility andI legal liability for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort County andi its Assigns shall be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out of the use of County data.  Mptbauvtcomacgisamp-MNuwRYSATAdasraedutma-piate  2/2    102 Stewart Parkway Chamber of Commerce  Existing Conditions    -            102 Stewart Parkway Chamber of Commerce  Proposed Changes    AR Chesson  Co Inc    AR Chesson Construction Col Inc        102 Stewart Parkway Chamber of Commerce  Property Owners    Adjoining Property Owners - 102 Stewart Parkway  City of Washington PO Box 1988 Washington, NC 27889 Fredman-Ravenwood LLC PO Box 1845 Washington, NC 27889 Warren F. Smith 601 Shorewood Drive Washington, NC 27889 South Market Properties LLC PO Box 668 Washington, NC 27889 Archie Jennings 328 West Main Street Washington, NC 27889    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTOHISTORIC PRESERVATION  OH  November 21, 2014 Subject:  Certificate of Appropriateness = 102 Stewart Parkway = Chamber of Commerce  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District, all property owners within 1001 feet ofthe proposed construction activities and adjacentproperty owners are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the Washington/Beaufort County Chamber of Commerce your property is located within a 100 feet of the  above subject property.  A request has been made by the Chamber of Commerce to remove the existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building jandconstruct a new deck on the south side You are welcome and encouraged to attend the regular scheduled meeting of the Washington  (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway.  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Place: Time:  Tuesday, December 2, 2014  City Hall-N Municipal Building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street side of the building and go to the second floor. City Council Chambers.  7:00 P.M.  During the meantime, should you have any questions, please direct your inquiries to Mr. John Rodman, Planning and Development, by phoning 975-9383 during normal working hours Monday  through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.  Sincerely,  John 42R Rodman Planning and Development  P.O. Box 1988 Washington, N.C. 27889 D(252)975-9383    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission John Rodman, Planning and Development  102 Stewart Parkway - Construction of new entranceway & deck  A - request has been made by the Washington/Beaufort County Chamber of Commerce for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove the existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and construct a new deck on the south side (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the  and Chapter 5.0 New Construction.  Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  - move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Washington/Beaufort County Chamber of Commerce to remove the existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and construct a new deck on the south side (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility and Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.3 Additions  and Section 5.4 Decks.  or  r move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Washington/Beaurort County Chamber of Commerce to remove the existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and construct a new deck on the south side (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility and Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.3 Additions and Section 5.4 Decks. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission  place the following conditions on the approval:  or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Washington/Beaurort County Chamber of Commerce to remove the existing deck and construct a new entranceway on the front of building and construct a new deck on the south side (waterside) of the building located at 102 Stewart Parkway.This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the    application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility and Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.3 Additions  and Section 5.4 Decks.    Major Work  189 West Main Street  Construct New Balconies    T City,  0  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Staff Report  Date: To: From: Re: Request:  November 24, 2014 HPC Members John Rodman, Director Community and Cultural Services HPC Agenda - Item #2 - Major Works  to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 3d floors of the Fowle Building. The balconies are requested to be located on the front, rear and west side of the building.  Applicant:  Justin Fejfar New' Vision Partners 13016 Saxon Way Raleigh, NC 27613  Property Information: Owners: Location: PIN#  New Vision Partners, LLC 189 West Main Street 5675-78-9150  Project Information:  The applicant has requested to add balconies to some of the windows on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the building. The balconies would include windows on the front, rear and west side of the building. The balcony railings would be made of metal and would extend 4 feet out from the building. A total  of eight balconies are being requested.  Proposed Work: Size:  The balconies would be approximately 8 feet X 4 feet. The  railings would be at least 3 feet in height.    Material:  The railings would be of a metal material and the flooring  would be  Attachments:  COA Application Photographs of existing conditions Conceptual Drawings Previously approved balconies Adjacent Property Owners  Staff Findings: Guideline:  Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings  Section 3.8 Upper Facades: Review Upper Façade Section 3.9 Rear Elevations: Review Rear Elevation  Guidelines Guidelines  The Historic Preservation Commission has granted approval for the installation of balconies on the upper stories of several buildings downtown during previous requests. These approvals were primarily for the rear and the sides of the buildings. No requests for balconies on the front of the buildings were approved unless there was evidence Based on staff review of the submitted material for the project and the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines and past approvals it does appear that the request does meet the intent of the guidelines and is compatible with the historic district with the exception of the front elevation. This approval is conditioned on the fact that the new  shown that balconies had existed on the front of the building previously.  additions will not cover or obscure any architectural detail    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please Use Black Ink  189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  New Vision Partners  N/A (width)  feet by  N/A (depth)  feet.  List all properties within 100 feet; on both sides, in front (across the street), and to the back of the  property: (Ifnecessary, attach a separate sheet) Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Add balconies to the 2nd and 3rd floors of the building. The balconies would be on the rear, front and west  side of the building.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Justin Fejfar, New Visions Partners (Name of Applicant -1 type or print) 102 13016 Saxon Way (Mailing Address) 11/4/14 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  Raleigh, NC 919-810-9571 (Daytime Phone Number)  27613  (Zip Code)  Llustin Teilar (Signature of Applicant)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of al Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Iti is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank ift the item Written Description. Describe clearly and in detail the nature of your project. Include exact dimensions Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy oft the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  for materials to be used (ie. Width of siding, window trim, etc.)  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is so small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2" X 11" snapshots ofi individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2'x11'sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work Add new Balconies  Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.8 Upper Facades Section 3.9 Rear Elevations    189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Property Information    E  e E -  1  - C    11/25/2014  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  Beaufort  CONNEÇTGIS  Printed Nove ember 25, 2014 See Below for Disclaimer  WES HOSIING  Parcels No Aerial Property Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line Couniy Line (Solid) State  ANSI  Total Length: 92.19 Feet  N W  Sq. Feet or Acres or Sq. Miles 1:26 Feet  aplba-ortcarecgis.ompomioafleahA.PAPRAXRAXX2XXAATVT2AstuskeSba,himsi-pinid  1/2    11/24/2014  ConnecIGIS Featurel Report  Beaufort  Printed? Nove ember 24, 2014 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Ber  Prcperty Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  60  86  N  1:26F Feet  plpauortcomecyis.aborsaxfleasihaidsmgs-gEVkaNTetaMSi82xlansrgtinid  1/2    11/24/2014 OBJECTID 6734 GPINLONG 5675-78-9150 MAILING ADDRESS STATE NC ACRES 0 NBR BLDG 1 LAND VAL 154123 TOT VAL 644643 SUB CDE SALE PRICE 70000 DISTRICT EXEMPT AMT SQFT 17790 EFF YR 1980 FLOOD PLAIN  ConnectGIS FeatureReport  PIN 15007123 OWNER NAME NEW VISION PARTNERS LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 1205 KINSDALE DRIVE ZP 27615 ACCT NBR 918576 DATE 09/27/2013 BLDG VAL 490520 NBHDCDE AC1 SUBDESC ZONE B1H PROP DESC ROAD TYPE P NBR BED 1 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 5  GPIN 5675-78-9150 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROPERTY ADDRESS 195 & 189 W MAINST MAP SHEET 567508 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1829/0281 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC STAMPS 140 LANDUSE MBL YR BUILT 1934 NBR BATHS 1 ÇENSUS BLOCK NBR HALF BATHS  ZONE 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL  LOTS SE CRN OF MAIN & RESPESS 567508290  0  Beaufort County online mapi access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this ebsite is fori informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services of industry professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provi ider disclaim allr responsibility and legall liability for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort County and its Assigns shall bel held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out of the use of County data.  tp.pauibrtcomacyissomoomioxdflesihasia.umpaa-Ss/k2TA2MSins-pintd  2/2    189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Existing Conditions    de    e 8  3 6  Bir    @ a 3    a    189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Proposed Changes    189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Previous Balcony Approvals    158 West Main S+.  building to accommodate a rooftop deck, and (4)add balconies to the rear and west side of the building located at 158 West Main Street. Bob Henkel came forward and John Rodman administered the oath. Mr. Henkel presented elevation drawings showing the windows that will be removed and replace with doors, windows that will remain and windows that will be added. The doors leading to the balconies will be a double French door with lights on each side and a light panel above, same transom as other windows. The awnings on the lower level will be squared off and similar to what is there now only shorter. They will be squared off and not come down as far over the windows, you will just be able to see the bottom oft the transom. Mr. Henkel stated he may need to come back at al later date to change the request fori the awnings, being each unit  will be a different store. Comments: none  The following motion was made by Katherine Tate and seconded by Chris Collier: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Bob Henkel to replace the awnings on the front of the Request number 2 &4 - Mr. Henkel stated that for the French doors to be installed, one windowwill have to be removed and expand the opening toi install the doors. Three new windows will be added on the bottom level. John Rodman stated the balconies will bel high enough to accommodate truck traffic, the power lineswill fall belowthel balconies. Hei is proposing wood flooring with tile on the balconies and simple vertical pickets. The decks will be four feet wide. Water will flow between the joints of the tile on the floor oft the deck. Comment: Bill Sykes and Scott Campbell stated the balconies add tot the! project and this is an extremely benefiçial project to downtown. Frances Brundage The following motion was made by Kathy Simpson and seconded by Katirie Leach: Ir move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Bob Henkel to replace and add windows to the west elevation and add balconies tot the rear and west side oft the building located at 158 West Main Street. The pickets on the balconies shall be vertical pickets. Mr. Henkel stated the railings will not be seen from the front ofthe building. They will be built to code and made ofv wrought iron and will be picket style.  building. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  stated this project gives character to a plain building.  All voted in favor and the motion carried.  2     E    3 0    Rol West Main 9+.  Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.13 Safety and Accessibility. All voted in favor Mr. Bradshaws stated there is a cedar tree growing into the gutters of the Church Besidei the sanctuary. Itis not very pretty andi is messy. John Rodman stated there Isno need to get a letter from an arborist if thet treei is nots suspected ofb being Diseased. Michael Overton stated that a formal COA needs to be presented if 2. Ar request has been made by Port Bath Builders, acting as agent for Tri-Star Aviation, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the rotten soffit and fascia board with new material on the structure located at 101 North Bridge Street. The existing siding is masonite and will be replaced with hard-board plank. Michael Overton stated this item couid be approved as Minor' Works. A motion was made by Bet Archie and seconded by Kathy Simpson to move this request to ar minorv works request and allow staff to approvei it. All voted int favor 3. A request has been made by Glenn & Sharon Williams for a Certificate of Appropriateness to add a 10' x5 metal balcony on the 3rd floor rear exterior of the building located at 201 West Main Street. Glenn Williams came forward and John Rodman administered the oath. Mr. Williams stated this is located at the rear of the Curiosity Shop and will be an all metal flooring with wrought iron rails. John Rodman stated that balconies on the rear of buildings have been approved ini the past. He further noted that the surrounding businesseshaveno Thet following motion was made by Bet Archie and seconded by KatirieLeach: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to: Glenn & Sharon Williams for a Certificate of Appropriateness to add a 10'x5' metal balcony on the 3" floor rear exterior of the building located at 201 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Existing Buildings Subsection 3.9 Rear Elevations. All voted in favor and the motion 4.Arequest has been made by Mr. HarryLangley, representing Randolph Funeral Home, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 40'x x50' garage ati the rear of the property located at 219 North Bonner Street. The siding to be used is hard-board plank. Harry Langley came forward and John Rodman administered the oath. Mr. Langley stated the garage will be 40' wide and 50'  and the motion carried.  the Church wishes to remove the tree.  and the motion carried.  objection to the addition of the balcony.  carried.  3    DESCRIPTION  Attach 10.5Wx5Dx42'HI metal balcony to 3r floor exterior of building facing south toward Pamlico River. The balcony will be within the property boundaries of said property. The floor of the balcony willl be made ofr metal and the rails willl be made of late 1800's fleur del lis design  wrought iron.  PHOTOGRAPH of EXISTING CONDITION        189 West Main 91.  be minimized to 4.2ft instead of 5.2ft. Jon Zellweger stated that would not be a problem Lee Hemick - Chamber - Stated he was fort the project, but wondered what consideration was being given for parking, being that is a public parking lot behind the building. Maureen Lavan stated this was not a concern for the HPC, but was handled by the Planning Board. John Rodman stated that the City Council has created a parking committee developed under Archie Jennings and that committee is working oni this issue. Bea Morton: Ms. Morton stated the meters need to be screened sO they are not visible from the: street. Shefurther stated she was concerned about ther rear decking and possible flooding. Mr. Zellweger stated the deck would be raised and open sO water could flow through and it will be the same height as the deck on the rear of Washington Jewelers. She further stated she had concerns that the structure could not hold the addition of another story. Mr. Zellweger stated their have a structural engineer who believes the masonry is strong enough to support the addition, but there may need to be work done to the existing interior wood structure. Ms. Morton voiced concern overthe 10ft. right-of-way stating it may not be closed. Mr. Zellweger stated that if that right-of-way was not relinquished they would scale down the rear deck to accommodate that, but this is not HPC discussion: Katiriel Leach stated she was just not comfortable at the moment twitht the addition. Mr. Zellweger stated additions such as this have been done in DC, Raleigh, Wilmington, etc. He would appreciate the opportunityt to meet with thes subcommitteetotry John Rodman stated that the Commission can approve everything butt the rooftop addition. Thei following motion was made by Michael Overton and seconded by Bet Archie: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriatenessto.Mr. Jon Zellweger-Agent for Oakview Capital, for the renovation and development of the existing three story Fowle Building located at 189 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place thei following conditions on the approval: the Respass Street balconies can be not exceed 4.2ft, the meters need to be screened, continue the request for the rooftop addition to explore other options. All voted in favor  Public comment:  Opposed:  really a concern of the HPC.  to enhance the addition to where all members feel comfortable with it.  and the motion carried.  Maureen Lavan exited the meeting - Bet Archie now acting as chair.  4    h,a    elll 00 1    Ma  Slahe    189 West Main Street  Fowle Building  Property Owners    Adjoining Property Owners: 189 W. Main Street  Elizabeth Morton 414West Main Street Washington, NC 27889 The George Inn LLC clo Milton Kirkland 4140 Mendenhall Parkway High Point, NC 27265 Sharon' Williams PO Box 2165 Washington, NC 27889 Randall Walker PO Box 2632 Washington, NC 27889 PGML LLC 107 Island Lane Washington, NC: 27889 Melton Everett 231 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Wolf Enterprises LLC 19245 Fishburne Dr Spring Hill, FL 34610 Ruth Schmitt 202 West Main Street Washington, NC 27889 nedmar-Ravenwoo., LLC 401 Moss Landing Suite 301 Washington, NC 27889 Betty Ingalls PO Box 1386 Washington, NC27889    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 189' West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your property is located within 100 feet of the  above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner of 189 West Main Street to construct balconies on the 27d and 3rd floors of the building. The balconies are requested to be located on front, rear and west of the building located at 189  West Main Street.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, December: 2, 2014  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the  Market Street side of the building and go to the second floor.,  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  oR John Rodman Planning and Development 252-975-9383    Thomas Czuhai 24 Somerset Lane Stafford, VA 22554 L Thomas Properties, LLC 201 Wesley Road Greenville, NC 27858 Jerry Evans 162W. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Benjamin Woolard PO Box 36 Washington, NC 27889    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION. ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission John Rodman, Planning and Development  189 West Main Street- = Construction of new balconies  A - request has been made by Mr. Justin Fejfar of New Visions Partners for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 3td floors of the Fowle Building. The balconies are requested to be located on the front, rear and west side of the building located at 189 West Main Street. Please review the Design To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings.  Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Justin Fejfar of New Visions Partners to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the Fowle Building. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.8 Upper Facades and Section 3.9 Rear Elevations.  or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Justin Fejfar of New Visions Partners to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 31d floors of the Fowle Building. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.8 Upper Facades and Section 3.9 Rear Elevations. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  or  In move that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Justin Fejfar of New Visions Partners to construct new balconies on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the Fowle Building. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings, Section 3.8 Upper Facades and Section 3.9 Rear Elevations.    Major Work  100 North Bridge Street Former Riverwalk Steaks  Building Renovation    Citys  Washincton NORTH CAROLINA  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Staff Report  Date: To: From: Re: Request:  November 24, 2014 HPC Members John Rodman, Director Community and Cultural Services HPC Agenda - Item #3 - Major Works  to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building; add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and add pitched roof entranceway.  Applicant:  Brad Horton Horton Contractors 1100 West 5th Street Washington, NC 27889  Property Information: Owners: Location: PIN#  M.M. Fowler Inc 100 North Bridge Street 5675-68-7999*  Project Information:  The applicant has requested to renovate and remodel the existing building. The applicant will add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and add pitched roof  entranceway. Building: 40'x65' Extensions: 8'x38' & 16'x25'  Proposed Work: Size: Material:  Brick Veneer, Architectural Shingles, Aluminum Storefront,  Hardi-Plank Siding    Attachments:  COA Application Photographs of existing conditions Site Plan Conceptual Drawings Adjacent Property Owners  Staff Findings: Guideline:  Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.1 ExteriorWalls: Review Walls Guidelines Section 3.2 Materials: Review Masonry Guidelines Section 3.7 Storefronts: Review Storefront Guidelines  Based on staff review of the submitted material for the project and the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines it does appear that the project does meet the intent of the guidelines and is compatible with the historic district. The building is a non-  contributing structure and is in need of repair.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: /00 SBLOGE ST. Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  TALÉ 3 COMPVTINL CEVTVEE oMwEC)- M.M. ANLEC Iwc. LeEET)  OwwEe  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  KENOOBL TWE ov LwE MALK KEITUEAUT BuoG. DEMOLAIH ExISTwc SLOG Opsw 70 Btoce AuS REPLACE WITN A MEw Auce WEEK ExTECIOK WITA 3 AILITÉCTWAL SHIGLES.- N6 ALuMwL STDCEFwN) Lopowf Avo Aocs  For FcowT of RLAG. SFL ATTACHED PLAwS.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropnateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration willl be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Kuno Acw (Mailing Address) 1-34-14 (Date)  (Name of Applicant -1 type or print)  (Initials)!  ACTION  Hpo S7A ST DANLDP, NC aP19  (Zip Code)  251-(23-9076 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of al Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    100 North Bridge Street Former Riverwalk Steaks  Property Information    E  A  -  E  1 e  by    11/25/2014  ConnectGIS FeatureR Report  Beaufort  CONNEÇTGIS  Printed November: 25, 2014 See Belowf for Disclaimer  WEB HOMNG  Parcels No Aerial Property Land Owners Annotation Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line - County Line (Solid) State  AAKSN  1:36F Feet  rplbeakrtcomecyisgmDomkadfiaahas-smpat.ah.86HAENESTAltn8-pinid  1/2    11/25/2014  ConnectGIS  CONNECTGIS  WEBHOSING  194  Overview Map  a Vs,  Quick Search Advanced Search Search Builder Coordinate Search Comparable Search  fify  (1,05) DisplayLabeis,  Excel 2000/2003  Results  02009-2014 Mobile311, LLC Various icons by: Silk Icons  tp.beaufotcomectyis.comMapaspx  1/1    11/25/2014 OBJECTID 6557 GPIN LONG 5675-68-7999 MAILING ADDRESS LOCATION #135 STATE NC ACRES 0 NBR BLDG 2 LAND VAL 74800 TOT VAL 172926 SUB CDE SALE PRICE DISTRICT EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2905 EFF YR 1960 FLOOD_PLAIN  ConnectGIS FeatureReport  PIN 01027869 OWNER NAME MMI FOWLER INC MAILING ADDRESS2 4220 NEAL RD ZP 27705 ACCT NBR 27600 DATE BLDG VAL 98126 NBHD CDE AC1 SUB DESC ZONE B1H PROP DESC ROAD TYPE P NBR_BED 0 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 1  GPIN 5675-68-7999 OWNERI NAME2 CITY DURHAM PROPERTY. ADDRESS 100 S BRIDGE ST MAP SHEET 567500 DEED BOOK and PAGE 836/106 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC STAMPS LAND_USE MBL YRE BUILT 1950 NBR BATHS 0 CENSUS BLOCK NBR HALF BATHS 2  ZONE 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL  2LOTS BRIDGE & MAIN STREET 567500186  Beaufort County online map access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services of industry] professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provi ider disclaim allr responsibility and legall liability for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort County andi its Assigns shall be! held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out of the use of County data.  eplpeauortcomecgisamDomafla.ahl.snpatk.s28Me7BR2RSTRa-pinid  2/2    100 North Bridge Street Former Riverwalk Steaks  Existing Conditions                100 North Bridge Street Former Riverwalk Steaks  Proposed Changes    pngep--),. SAGLDYAINOO NOIOH ARC GBaIAONAS SONIMVI  bugndwoo 2 eyel  UILI 1HS  o    bupndwoo Z eyel  ys SHGLDMLINOD NOTOH  u  AlAa    pgepm. y SOLDVLINOO NOIOH ABG3GIACAES SSNINVAG  bugndwoo Z eyeL  Juu    100 North Bridge Street Former Riverwalk Steaks  Property Owners    Adjoining Property Owners - 100 North Bridge Street  Tri-Star Aviation 122 Catnip Point Bath, NC 27808 Michael A. Wrought 111 Wellington Drive Washington, NC 27889 Anne Stuart O'Neal 511 West Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Sonny Swanner 731 West 2nd Street Washington, Nc 27889 Timothy Evans 1566 Hwy 30 Greenville, NC 27834 CilyofWashington PO Box 1988 Washington, NC 27889 Pirate Properties Dev. LLC 8737 Bald Eagle Lane Wilmington, NC 28411 Elizabeth Davis 509 West 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWNDEVELOPMENTOHISTORIC PRESERVATION  November 21, 2014 Subject:  Certificate of Appropriateness - 100 North Bridge Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District, all property owners within 1001 feet oft the proposed construction activities and adjacent property ownersa are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors your property is located within a 100 feet of the above subject property. Ar request has been made by Mr. Horton to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building. Add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles. Construct new. storefront You are welcome and encouraged to attend the regular scheduled meeting of the Washington  with aluminum windows and doors. Add pitched roof.  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Place: Time:  Tuesday, December 2, 2014  City Hall-N Municipal Building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from thel Market Street side of the building and go to the second floor. City Council Chambers.  7:00 P.M.  During the meantime, should you have any questions, please direct your inquiries to Mr. John Rodman, Planning and Development, by phoning 975-9383 during normal working hours Monday  through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.  Sincerely,  42RD John Rodman Planning and Development  P.O. Box 1988 OWashington, N.C. 27889 D(252)975-9383    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission John Rodman, Planning and Development  100 North Bridge Street - Renovate and remodel building  A request has been made by Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors for a Certificate of Appropriateness to Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.1 Exterior Walls, Section 3.2 Materials, & To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the  Section 3.7 Storefronts.  Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building; add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and add pitched roof entranceway. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.1  Exterior' Walls, Section 3.2 Materials, & Section 3.7 Storefronts.  or  r move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building; add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and add pitched roof entranceway. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.1 Exterior Walls, Section 3.2 Materials, & Section 3.7 Storefronts. If further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Brad Horton of Horton Contractors to renovate and remodel the former Riverwalk Steaks building; add a new brick veneer exterior with architectural shingles; construct new storefront with aluminum windows and doors; and add pitched roof entranceway. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section  3.1 Exterior' Walls, Section 3.2 Materials, & Section 3.7 Storefronts.    Major Work  116 East 3rd Street  Orr Lodge #104  Construct a New Fence    S City  CO  Washincton ORTH CAROILNA  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Staff Report  Date: To: From: Re:  November 24, 2014 HPC Members John Rodman, Director Community and Cultural Services HPC Agenda - Item #4 - Major Works  Request:  to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property line) for security and  privacy reasons. Douglas Bennett Orr Lodge #104 1269 Biggs Road Pinetown, NC 27865  Applicant:  Property Information: Owners: Location: PIN#  Orr Lodge #104 116 East 3rd Street 5675-98-4604  Project Information:  The applicant has requested to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property  line) for security and privacy reasons.  Proposed Work: Size: Material:  Length of fence: 95' Height of fence: 6' Wooden fence    Attachments:  COAApplication Site Plan  Photographs of existing conditions Adjacent Property Owners  Staff Findings: Guideline:  Chapter 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design Guidelines beginning with 4.6.1  Section 4.6 Fences and Walls: Review Fence and Walls  Based on staff review of the submitted material for the project and the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines it does appear that the project does meet the intent of the guidelines and is compatible with the historic district. The fence would only  cover. a portion of the rear yard to maintain security.  2    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historiç Property/Name (if applicable):  Please Use Black Ink  116 East 3rd Street  OrrLodge: #104-N Masonic Temple  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  OrrLodge#104  114' (width)  feet by  285' (depth)  feet.  List all properties within 100 feet; on both sides, in front (across the street), and to the back of the  property: (If necessary, attach a separate sheet) Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Add 6' high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the  property. Along the the rear property for security and privacy reasons.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Douglas Bennett II (Name of Applicant -t type or print) 1269 Biggs Road (Mailing Address) 11/16/14 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  Pinetown, NC 252-945-5335 (Daytime Phone Number)  27865  (Zip Code)  Doualas Bennett (Signature of Applicant)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Itis the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2"x11": sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Written Description. Describe clearly and in detail the nature of your project. Include exact dimensions Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy oft the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  for materials to be used (ie. Width of siding, window trim, etc.)  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2") x11" snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2"x 11" sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work Add new fence  Chapter 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences & Walls    116 East 3rd Street Orr Lodge #104  Property Information    e E  I  de    11/25/2014  ComeciGIS FeatureF Report  Beaufort  PCONNEÇIGIS  Printed Nove ember 25, 2014 See Belowf for Disclaimer  wB HCABNG  Parcels No Aerial Property Land Owners Annotation Aerior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line L County Line (Solid) State  Q128A)  0009  @  Ry  Anee  ORRLODGE 0009  8  SARDAK  N  1:42Feet  tp/peaufortcomecyiss.mborisafleahashdr.EepAuSACSPPHTIESAXRANXUA00097eMax.unairprintc  1/2    11/25/2014  ConnectGIS FeatureReport  Beaufort  PCONNEÇIGIS  Printed Nove ember 25, 2014 See Below for Disclaimer  WEBHOSTNG  Parcels  AE)  Property Land Cwners Annotaticn erior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  3004  a)  ORRLODGE 0003  1:42Feet  tylbeauortcmecdyis.,mbomoxfiemhd.wanganseseRASRKARASTRAORRSapesuskelns-pintd  1/2    11/25/2014 OBJECTID 7271 GPIN LONG 5675-98-4604 MAILING ADDRESS 116 EAST: 3RD STREET STATE NC ACRES 0 NBR BLDG 2 LAND VAL 40352 TOT_VAL 308592 SUB CDE SALE PRICE DISTRICT  ConnectGIS Featurel Report  PIN 01012925 OWNER NAME ORR LODGE NO 104 MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-98-4604 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROPERTY ADDRESS THIRD & BONNER ST MAP SHEET 567508 DEED BOOK and PAGE DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC STAMPS LANDUSE MBL 56750897 EXEMPT AMT SQFT 7686 EFF YR 1970 FLOOD PLAIN  ZP 27889 ACCT NBR 5372 DATE BLDG VAL 268240 NBHD CDE B1HR SUBDESC ZONE B1H PROP DESC STREET YR_BUILT 1958 NBR BATHS 2 CENSUS BLOCK NBR HALF BATHS  B1 HISTORICAL RESIDENTIAL  1LOT COR THIRD & BONNER  ROAD TYPE P NBR BED 0 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 3  0  Beaufort County onliner map access is provided as ap public service, as is, as available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services of industry professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provi ider disclaim allr responsibility and legall liability for the content published on this website. The userl agrees that Beaufort County and its Assigns shall be held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out of the use of County data.  tplbaukxtcaradgs.mpomiafie.shar-EmpPARXER08PMAIT8SANAXARd  2/2    116 East 3rd Street Orr Lodge #104  Existing Conditions    Rear  Yard    Corner  of Building    116 East 3rd Street Orr Lodge #104  Proposed Changes    jees Jeuu0s  € 5 E  - * @ 8 -  # 8  3  892    Ada fence    116 East 3rd Street Orr Lodge #104  Property Owners    Adjoining Property Owners - 116 East 3rd Street  Taft Family Offices PO Box 566 Greenville, NC 27835 Deborah B. Wright 2502 N. Heritage Street Kinston, NC 28501 Faustina Harman 129 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. Washington, NC 27889 Rev. David Moore 406 East 5th Street Washington, NC 27889 Scott A. Shepherd 7245 Sumter Hwy Alcolu, SC 29001 Gene F. Godley 210 Jackie Lane Washington, NC 27889 Clinton Earl Tetterton 315 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 William Dotson 2334 Tar Landing Rd Williamston, NC 27892 Betty Randolph 127 Wellington Drive Washington, NC 27889 Leonard Van Cura 217 Pamlico Drive Washington, NC 27889 Harris Investment Group 4525' VOA Rd Washington, NC 27889    CITY OF - WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  G  November 21, 2014 Subject:  Certificate of Appropriateness = 116 East 2nd Street - Orr Lodge #104  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District, all property owners within 100 feet ofthe proposed construction activities and adjacentproperty owners are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by Mr. Doug Bennett of Orr Lodge #104 your property is located within a 100 feet of the above subject property.  Arequest has been made Mr. Bennett to add a 6' high wooden privacy fence from the northwest comerofthe property to the northeast comerofthe property. The fence will be located along the You are welcome and encouraged to attend the regular scheduled meeting of the Washington  rear property for security and privacy reasons.  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Place: Time:  Tuesday, December 2, 2014  City Hall- Municipal Building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from thel Market Street side of the building and go to the second floor. City Council Chambers.  7:00 P.M.  During the meantime, should you have any questions, please direct your inquiries to Mr. John Rodman, Planning and Development, by phoning 975-9383 during normal working hours Monday  through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.  Sincerely,  4R John Rodman Planning and Development  P.O. Box 1988 Washington, N.C. 27889 D(252)975-9383    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission John Rodman, Planning and Development 116 East 3rd Street - Construction of new fence  Ar request has been made by the Orr Lodge #104 for a Certificate of Appropriateness to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property line) for security and privacy reasons. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the  Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Orr Lodge #104 to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property line) for security and privacy reasons. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0 Streetscape  and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls.  or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Orr Lodge #104 to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property line) for security and privacy reasons. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Orr Lodge #104 to add a six feet high wooden privacy fence from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property (along the rear property line) for security and privacy reasons. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0 Streetscape  and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls.    Minutes  November 4, 2014    WASHINGTON HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting-N Minutes Tuesday November 4, 2014 7:00 PM Members Present Mary Pat Musselman Stacey Thalmann Geraldine McKinley Ed Hodges Seth Shoneman Judi Hickson Members Absent Victoria Rader Others Present Jennifer Brennan, Historic Planner John Rodman, Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Amoment ofs silence was taken. IlI. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business 1. None  V. MajorWorks, Certificate of Appropriateness  MajorWorks  1. Ar request has been submitted by the owner of 189 West Main Street to install two roll up  industrial doors at the rear of the property.    Ed Hodges reminded the Commission that thei information for the request had been presented to them at their last meeting. Trent Tetterton came forward and was sworn in. He explained that the plani is to install two roll up doors on whati isi formally known ast the Fowle Building. He stated that the doors willl have twot functions: one, to allow thei fermenting equipment for the micro-brewery to goi into the building and secondly to provide a view oft the outside and to! bring the outside into the dining area of the restaurant. He explained that it will be wonderful to have the doors open during pleasant weather and bring the outside in. Mr. Tetterton stated thata. precedent has already been set and there are: similar doors that have been in the areas and facilities surrounding the building. Ms. Judi Hickson asked ift the doors would be glass. Mr. Tetterton stated that they would be glass pane doors and they would bel located int the dining Mr. Tetterton stated that included with the request is proposed balconies on the second and third levels. He explained that the 2"d and 3" levels will include 4a apartment units and they would like to add balconies to each one oft those apartments. He stated that there would be 2 balconies on the front of the building, two on the Respess Street side, and 4 off the back oft the building. Mr. Tetterton stated that the Hotel Louise did have balconies on the front oft the building, setting a precedent. Mr. Hodges stated that those balconies were original tot the building. Mr. Rodman came forward and gave the Commission: a history on how the Commission has approved/ addressed balconies int the past. He explained that in 2004 with the re-habitation of the Louise Hotel the Commission did approve balconies ont the rear, side, and front of the building because they provided evidence that sometime when the Hotel was there, there were balconies on the structure. In. July of 2006 the original owners oft the Fowle Building also brought in some diagrams similar to the current request and also asked for balconies on the rear of the building and the Respess Street side. Mr. Rodman stated that they did not request balconies on the front of the building. He explained that those balconies were going to come out5%ft. and the Commission asked that they reduce that to about 4% ft. and they agreed to do that. In March of 2007 Mr. Bob Henkel came before the Commission and asked for balconies on thet front, the Union Alley side, and the rear of his building. Mr. Rodman explained that the Commission did approve the balconies on the rear and Union Alleys side, but did not approve the ones on thet front Main! Street side. Mr. Rodman stated that the only! balconies that have been approved on the front of the building were the Louise Hotel and they presented evidence showing that there were balconies there in the past. He stated thati the Commission has approved balconies in thei front in the past, but they were hesitant to do sO without some Mr. Hodges asked about the material that will be used for the proposed balconies. Mr. Tetterton stated that the intent would bei for the floor decking to be a treks material and the balcony railings to be a power coated aluminum, simulating the ornate iron type ofrailing. Mr. Tetterton explained that thel balconies would come out 4ft 10ins from the wall. Mr. Hodges then spoke about how the windows willl be replaced with doors to provide access toi the balconies on the rear of the building and how the square doors will disrupt thel brick archway  area of the restaurant.  evidence oft them existing in the past.  2    design currently over those windows on the third floor on the rear. Mr. Tetterton and the Commission discussed thisi issue. Ms. Thalmann recommended maybe using an arched door on the third floor so that it will noti interrupt the brick arch over the doorway. Ms. Brennan explained that the reason for the difference maybe because the third floor has a different height than the: second floor, so they may be making an adjustment because of thei interior support structure. She explained that the ceiling heighti is much shorter on the third floor. The Commission discussed how thel balconies on the third floor will affect the detailing on the second floor oft thel building. Mr. Tetterton stated that based on the photographs of the rear of the buildingi it doesn'tseem that the arch is as ornate on the upper level, as it is on thel lower levels. Mr. Tetterton stated that het felti it would be worth investigating arched doors for1 the third floor. Mr. Hodges stated that the Commission would not be voting on thel balconies tonight, all they would be voting on is the doors. Mr. Tetterton stated that he would follow up with the developers about the arched door idea. Ms. Thalmann stated that she is steadfast against interrupting the architecture detail of the building by removing the arches. Ms. Brennan again reminded the Commission that they are not voting on the balconies and stated that maybe the best recommendation would be to go backt to the architect and discuss options with Mr. Hodges stated thati it would havel been nice to have the entire plan presented to the Commission instead of receiving request in a piece mill manner. Mr. Hodges asked if there were The Chairman stated that there were none present to speak for or against the request.  the concern about the archways and maintaining those.  any other questions about the doors at the rear of the property.  The Commission discussed the door request further.  Judi Hickson made thet following motion: Imovei that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to New Vision Partners, LLC toi install two large industrial roll up doors at the rear of the property located at: 189 West Main Street. Thisr motion is based on thet following findings of fact the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.9 Rear Elevation. Her motion was seconded by Stacey Thalmann. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  Minor Works the front yard.  1. Ar request has been made by the owner of 722 West Main Street to remove a dead tree from 2. Ar request has been made by the First Baptist Church on Harvey Street to remove at tree that 3. AI request has been made by the owner of 107 West Main Street to change out the exhaust  isac danger to the church building. fan on the roof.  3    4. Arequest has been made by the owner of 601 East Main Street to replace the heading 5. AI request has been madel by the owner of 126 North Market Street to create ai transition 6. Ar request had been made by the Brown Public Library to remove a dead tree from the Bridge 7. AI request has been made by the First Presbyterian Church on' West Second Street to reverse 8. Arequest has been made by the owner of 405 East Main Street to replace the current metal Judi Hickson made a motion to approve the minor works. Her motion was seconded by Stacey  system with an HVAC: system. from existing sidewalk to door threshold.  Road side that is dying and in danger of fallingi into the street. existing wooden doors so that doors open out to meet ADAI requirements. roof with a new matching metal roof on thet front porch of the house.  Thalmann. All voted int favor and the motion carried.  VI. Other Business  Mr. Rodman came forward and explained that the First Christian Church has decided on some plans and they plan to rebuild on the parking lot across the street from the original location. He explained to the Commission that the parking loti is not located in the historic district. Ms. Musselman asked whyt they are not building on the original site. Mr. Rodman stated that they felt the original site would not bel large enough for the new church. He explained that the original site would become a memorial garden. Mr. Rodman explained that since the lot is not int the historic district, the church does not have to confirm to the historic cguidelines. Ms. Brennan then came forward and updated the Commission on the Water Street house  auction.  VII. Approval of Minutes - October 7,2014 motion and all votedi ini favor. VIII. Adjourn  Judi Hickson made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected. Stacey Thalmann seconded the  There being no other business Geraldine McKinley made a motion to adjourn. Her motion was  seconded by Stacey Thalmann and all voted in favor.  4