C  WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Citys  AGENDA  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, May 5, 2020-6:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Charles Caldwell and Patsy Pierce, owners of 109 Brown  Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the following:  a. Build a 10'x12' shed in the rear yard b. Install metal handrails on the front porch. of Appropriateness for the following:  2. A request has been made by Marye McBride, owner of 420 E Main Street, for a Certificate  a. Replace waffle style pavers in the existing driveway with 1920's brick. b. Extend the existing driveway to the rear yard with 1920's brick.  C. Install metal handrails at the front steps.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made by Mitchel Norton, owner of 209 Washington Street, for a 2. Arequest has been made by Amber Thomas, owner of 502 E Main Street, for a Certificate 3. A Request has been made by Charles Caldwell and Patsy Pierce, owners of 109 Brown Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repair the existing front porch  Certificate of Appropriateness to remove and replace a decayed tree. of Appropriateness to install a picket fence around the property  VI. Other Business VIII. Adjourn  VII. Approval of Minutes - Tuesday, April 7, 2020  Revised: April2 29, 2020  Page 1of1    OLD  BUSINESS    None    MAJOR  WORKS    109NBROWNST  BUILD A 10'X12' SHED IN THE REAR  YARD.  INSTALL METAL HANDRALLS ON  THE FRONT PORCH.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application! Fee of $50 tocashiers in the front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmenta. Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 109A.6ROWL STREET  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: CHARLES OELDMCLLEPPY PIERCE  Lot Size:  50' (width)  feet by  100 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work tol be Done: bhIco SHED  11  PIcH,  BREL YARD. SPEXPIPRE  PODE HEMETECTUPRL SHIGLES STOInG HARSY PLKKOR CEMEZT LAP/ WOOD RARECONSTALCTON, PHIMTS SHILE AS HOLSE MeRELAREGRNEEAATKXArShgaaa CPMTPRERALT MERMFSMOI FROURERS, 8 (SOPHER) lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  DRAW/TG IETIPCKD  EMAILED  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date) Upon being signed  CHARLES  CMAML/Ac  7Name of Applicant type or print) GS0SRAINBW (Mailing Address) Pgoo  (Initials)  CERALEIGI ME 94550279 (Daytime PhoneNumber)  ACTION  27611 (ZipCode)  (Authorized and dated below  h1a  Signature)  ALE  by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomesa  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 toc cashiersi int thet front lobby ofCity! Hall underDevelopmental Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 09A-EROWK SIREET  Historic Property/Name (if appliçable):  Owner's Name: CHARLES CALDWETL A PATSY PIERCE  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  IMSTALE TROM AAADRAILS AT FRonT PARCH. HOTOS HIZC/CO OF HAADRAILS on 6MAM.  * EmalkE4  COIERETK METSDAR Mry SIMO IFRDAneZ lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  CRLOWELL  CHRLES  FAISHHERLE  (Name of Appicant-type or print)  (Initials) 6SOSKAINW CE  ACTION  KEIGH MC 27612  (Mailing Address) 492010 (Date), (Signature of  (ZpCode)  (Daytime Phone AAEAAZE  (Authorized Signature)  KPE  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor' Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    SNM    Apiliy, 2020  Dear 71.0  A4tachod h fh two apphefins  fo Histericel Commission Gefificaciy  TApepaita  One application  apposal  olauid CL 10'x12'  o1r  loaclyaral at 109 N. Browm St. Wa havt Lean waling wish oten ConfIge?, MEs 1 helacve Re comnguist  Sepher oLl.  Yhe  with 4 C2A aboet yhis Jab Weane a SC  wa Wailupfon  an exnye fagoler  Wle ara atta chng a nocph slakh sh  appticafai ufa  bur lot,  9 oter ayeeh  70 atlach wnaspkt linne  40 OuEen hovtskyps 2h fy Purpozes  Wansedt Whovic W ae Jarlay 0277-  S  afaher  on     Rease bruaKnw whet addifonel    youg-han us rocelaet   / C  Y Celduell  Contact:  Pienca.calolwuell 0 attret  phoa phons  919-755-0279 919-455-0276  E                            50  ,  -5  SHER  18'  : : : : :  * :X31  :X  BECK  :  -  :  1  : :  - : - :  : : :  505  BROCIL $7.  FRMT        -  ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER  Citys  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  April 20, 2020  Re: Certificate of Appropriateness = 109 Brown Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted ini the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According tot the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adjacent tot the above subject Ar request has been made by Charles Caldwell and Patsy Pierce for a Certificate of Appropriateness to  property.  make the following alterations to the property located at 109 Brown Street.  1. Build a 10'x12' shed in the back yard 2. Install metal handrails at the front steps  Due to COVID-19 Precautions, please see the following:  1. Plans for the above application will be available on the City of Washington's website after 2. Historic Preservation Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting. Ify you would like to participate please contact the Planning Office at 252-975-9383. Date, Place and' Time for meeting are listed  1:00pm April 28, 2020.  below.  DATE: TUESDAY, May 5, 2020  PLACE: VIRTUAL MEETING (TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE CALL THE PLANNING OFFICE AT  252-975-9383.)  TIME: 6:00 pm  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Elr Domini Cunningham, PLA, CZO Historic Preservation Planner City of Washington hpc@washingtonnc.ow 252-946-0897  Cc: Mike Dail, Community and Cultural Services Director Mike Weldin, Chief Building Inspector  ADJACENT PROPERTYOWNER  Page 1of1    HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  STAFF REPORT  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, May! 5, 2020-6:00PM  HPC20-0029 : 109 Brown Street  Single Family Home  Request: Applicant: Location: Parcel Number: Attachment:  To build a 10'x12' shed in the rear yard and install metal handrails on the front  porch  Charles Caldwell & Patsy Pierce 109 Brown Street 5685-06-9749 1. Site photos  2. Supplemental materials 3. Location map of property  The Commission should consider this request based upon general conformance with the Design Guidelines.  Structure:  This structure is al late 19th century 2-story, plain frame house with turned porch posts, ornamental sawn details, and an entrance with sidelights and transom.  Project Analysis: The applicant intends to construct a 10'x12' shed in the rear yard! 5' off of the property  line in compliance with the City Zoning Ordinances. The new shed willl have a 4:12 roof pitch with architectural shingles. The applicant has stated that the siding will either be Hardie Plank or other cement lap siding. The structure willl be painted the same color as the primary house. The applicant also intends to install handrails on the front porch of From the Design Guidelines (shortened toi include only sections that apply):  the home.  Chapter 3  Title  Pages 45-67  Changes to Existing Buildings  3.12.1 The same criteria related to the use of materials for new construction apply to 3.12.5 Designs for new outbuildings and accessory structures should complement the architectural style and period of the primary structures as well as examples of  outbuildings and accessory structures. See Section! 5.0.  similar structure within the district.  3.12.6 New outbuildings should be located in rear yards if possible.  3.12.7 New outbuildings should be proportionally the same in size and height to the primary structure. asi is seen int the relationship between other primary and  secondary structures int the district..  (HPC 20-0029: 109 Brown Street) Tuesday, May! 5,2 2020, HPCI Meeting    3.12.8 Prefabricated wooden accessory structures that are not architecturally similar to the primary structure are allowed only if screened from view from any existing right of way. Prefabricated metal storage buildings are not acceptable. 3.13.1 When projects must include the addition of health and safety features, use whatever means possible to minimize visual impact, and protect the historic character oft the structure, and its character-defining details. 3.13.3 Health and safety features that are visible from the publicr right-of-way shall be constructed so that the scale, materials, and details are compatible with the  historic structure. Chapter 4  Title  Pages 71-83  Streetscape & Site Design  4.1.2 Historic site features, such as walkways, walls, formal and informal gardens, 4.1.7 When undertaking new construction, significant trees or vegetation shall be 4.2.4 Existing or new lighting shall not adversely affect or: spill over into neighboring 4.2.7 Low height, low brightness landscape lights are allowed as long as they don't 4.3.18 Walkways and steps shall be compatible to the architectural style and character  fountains, and trellises should be retained.  preserved. properties.  detract from the structure or historic landscape. of the structure located on the property.  Chapter 5 (BFE).  Title New Construction  Pages 87-94  5.2.1 The height ofr new construction shall be compatible with other residential buildings in the district when measured from the current Base Flood Elevation 5.2.2 Oversized or monumental residential construction is not prevalent in the district and should be avoided. Only in special cases andi in strategic locations should 5.2.5 New construction projects should follow the site features and district setting 5.2.6 The design of a new building should not attempt to create a false historic appearance, but rather complement the existing district. New construction 5.2.7 The fenestration of a new building should reflect that ofe existing historic structures within a district and be compatible in proportion, shape, location, 5.2.8 Architectural details such as cornices, trim, windows and doors should reflect  this type of architecture be permitted. guidelines found in Chapter 4 of this document. should have its own character and style.  pattern and size.  the scale of buildings in the existing historic district.  (HPC: 20-C 0029: 109 Brown! Street) Tuesday, May 5,2 2020 HPCI Meeting    5.2.9 New homes within the district should be built with approved materials. Modern materials, if used, should be similar in appearance and texture traditional 5.2.10 Ifvinyl-clad windows are used, they must have permanent exterior muntins to 5.2.11 Aluminum and vinyl siding are prohibited on new construction. 5.2.12 There are a variety of roof forms in the district including gable, hip, and  materials.  match the existing windows.  gambrel. The roof forms used on new construction should relate to neighboring 5.2.13 The historic landscape oft the district including green space and mature trees is one of the character-defining elements of the district. When undertaking new construction, significant trees or vegetation shall be preserved A. The applicant intends to build a new shed in the reary yard of the property with a roof that has architectural: shingles, while the primary residence has a metal roof. There are other residential properties within the district where the primary structure has a metal roof and the accessory. structure has shingles or other roof materials and vice versa. The accessory: structure is proposed to be placed in the rear yard in accordance to the Design Guidelines. Based on these Findings of Facts, the request is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design B. The applicant intends to install al black metal railing on the front porch oft the primary residence. There are other properties within the Historic District with similar railings. The railings are being proposed for safety reasons in accordance to the Design Guidelines. Based on these Findings of Facts, the request is congruous  buildings in form and material.  Finding of Facts:  Guidelines.  with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.  (HPC 20-C 0029:1 109E Browns Street) Tuesday, May5 5, 2020 HPC Meeting    HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REQUEST FOR COMMISSION, ACTION  C  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAR'OLINA  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, May 05, 2020 -6 6:00PM  HPC-20-0029 : 109 Brown Street  Single Family Home  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation: Commission  Domini Cunningham, Historic Preservation Planner and install metal handrails on the front porch.  109 Brown Street = Request to building 10' X12' shed in the rearyard  Ar request has been made by Charles Caldwell & Patsy Pierce a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at: 109 Brown Street.  1. Building al 10'X12' shed int the rear yard. 2. Install metal handrails on the front porch.  Please review the Design Guidelines specifically, Chapter. 3.12-C Outbuildings and Accessory Structures, 4.1 - Landscaping, 4.2-L Lighting, 4.3- Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks and 5.2- - To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make Finding of Facts, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Residential Construction.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Charles Caldwell & Patsy Pierce to make the above changes on the property located at 109 Brown Street. The motion is based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically, Chapter 3.12-Outbuldings and Accessory Structures, 4.1-landscaping, 4.2-L Lighting, 4.3-Parking,  Driveways and Sidewalks and! 5.2-R Residential Construction.  OR  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Charles Caldwell & Patsy Pierce to make the above changes on the property located at 109 Brown Street. The motion is based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is congruous' with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically, Chapter 3.12-Outbuildings: and Accessory Structures, 4.1-landscaping, 4.2-1 Lighting, 4.3-Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks and! 5.2-Residential Construction.. Ifurther move: that the Historic  Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  (HPC-20-0029: 109E Brown Street) Tuesday, May 05, 2020, HPCMeeting    OR  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness' to Charles Caldwell & Patsy Pierce to make the above changes on the property located at: 109 Brown Street. The motion is based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically, Chapter 3.12-Outbuildings and Accessory Structures, 4.1-landscaping, 4.2-1 Lighting, 4.3-Parking,  Driveways and Sidewalks and 5.2 - Residential Construction..  OR  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness: application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9d) which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request isr received from the commission to review and comment on the request.  (HPC-20-0029: 109 Brown Street) Tuesday, May 05, 2020, HPCI Meeting    420 E MAINST  REPLACE WAFFLE STYLE PAVERS IN THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH  1920'S BRICK.  EXTEND THE EXISTINGDRIVEWAY TO THE REAR YARD WITH 1920'S  BRICK.  INSTALL METAL HANDRAILS AT  THE FRONT STEPS.    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  CO  City,  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA  HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING  OFFICE USE ONLY  Minorv Work Fee: $0.00 Major Work Fee: $50.00 Date Paid:  Ref No.:  PROPERTY NFORMATION: Owner's Name: MARYE M.MEBRIDE Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Lot Size: S6.28 Feet By, 211,05 Feet DESCRIPTION OF WORKTO BE PERFORMED Brief Description ofV Work tol be Performed.  Date of Application: 4/a/30z0  Property Address: 410E.MALNL Sr, WASHENGTON, NC 27889  Address  Anrigue 1920's  REPLACE Waffle siyle pavexs in DRIVEway wie, Conplete diveway wih 1920's - brick,  BRICK. INSTALL METAL HANDRALS for safety at front steps. lunderstand tha: alla applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require reviewl by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) must be submitted by! 5:00 p.m. On the 15th of the month prior tot the meeting! Iwish to attend, otherwise consideration will be delayed until thet following HPCmeeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand! Imust begin the approved work vi ithin one year oft thei issuance. Should the work cease for more than six (6) months after one (1)year of the said  approval, this Certificate of Appropriateness willl become invalid.  FOR OFFICE USE ONLY  MARVE M. MSBRIDE Nameclkeplan:-" Email 420E.MAIN S. 4alaoa0 aature plicant  Date Received ACTION C Approved r Approved with Conditions r Denied - Withdrawn Staff Appr. val ofA Appropriatene 55. Itisv valid until. Minor Work Auth. Signature:  MARTIO fa6tahac.con  INITIALS  lwastaiglne NC.27RR9  Address  State ZpCode  704124-5455 DayrimeP Phone! Number  Tawprgbd  Upon being signe da and dated below byt the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes al Minor Works Certificate tenant, or prope ty owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anyl law. Minor work projects not approved  Issuance ofal Minor Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor,  bys staff willl be forwarded toi thel Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  Date:  Applicant's prese nce ort that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the app'i icant isto be considered. You must give written permission toy your authorizedi representative to attend the  hearing on your iehalf by completing the authorization section on the next page.  Revised: March23, 2023  Pagelof3    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  U  City.  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING  OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-OWNER APPLICATION  NOTE:  IF1 THE PERSON WHOI IS REQUESTING THE HSTORICPRESERVATION COMMISSION TO TAKE ACTION ON A PARTICULARI PIECE OF PROPERTY ISI NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR DOES NOT HAVE AB BINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, THEN IF THE PERSON WHO IS REQUESTING THE HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION TOT TAKE ACTION ONA AF PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IST THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR HAS A BINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, PLEASE DISREGARD THIS  THE ACTUAL OWNER OF THE LANDI MUST COMPLETE THIS FORM.  FORM. Dear Sir or Madam,  l'am the owner of thep property located at:  Address  Cay  State  ZipCode  Ihereby authorize:  (AuthorizedA Agent) to appear with my consent before the City of  Washington Historic Preservation Commission in order to ask for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to:(Describe Usea andl LocationB Below) at this location. lunderstand that the Certificate of Appropriateness, ifgranted, is permanent and runs with the land. lauthorize you to advertise and present this matter in my name ast the owner of thep property. Ifthere are any questions, you may contact  me at my address: or by telephone at: Respectfully yours, Owner  ContactA Address  City Alt Phone:  State  ZipCode  Sworn to and ascribed before me, this the  day of  ,20  Notary Public My commission expires:  Revised: January 10, 2020  Page 2of3    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  0  Cityy  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT CATEGORIES (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):  HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING  This document does not constitute thei issuance ofa Building Permit. Itis ther responsibility oft the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department: at  w Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attached 8-1/2"X1 11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphici information necessaryto completely describet the project. Use the checklist below to ensure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWILL NOTI BE ACCEPTED. (Leave thec checkbox blanki ifthei itemi is not applicable). M SITEP PLAN / PLOT PLAN (ifa applicable). Ap plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc. must be provided ify your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or other landscape work. Show accurate measurements. Your may also use ac copy oft the survey that your received wheny youk bought your  property. Revise the copy as needed to showe existing conditions andy your proposed work. DRAWINGS showing proposed work. Include one: set oft fulls size drawings when available.  M DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS (provide samples ifa appropriate).  Photograpns ofe existing conditions. D PLAN drawings.  R ELEVATION drawings showing ther new façade(s). a DIMENSIONS shown on drawings.  8-1/2"X11" REDUCTIONS of full-size drawings. freduced: size iss so small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"X11" snapshots of individual drawings on thel big sheet. Photocopy reductions mayl be obtained from a number of  blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  D STATE ANDI FEDERAL TAX CREDITS/FUNDS OR CAMA PERMITS. Ify you are applying for any oft these programs, your must BLACKI INK. Your application must! be prepared in blacki ink on 8-1/2" X11" sheets so that ito can be copied for commission members. Applications preparedi in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy poorly and willl be nota accepted.  Nla include ac opy ofy your letter or permit from the State.  Revised:. January 10, 2020  Page3 3of3        Domini Cunningham  From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Domini,  Michael Woodward Tuesday, April 28, 2020 1:08P PM Domini Cunningham RE: Driveway questions  City of Washington Standard Designs & Details.pdf  10' minimum is correct. Here is the subdivision ordinance, see page 79.  Thanks, Michael Woodward Engineering Technician mwoodward@washingtonnc.gov  From: Domini Cunningham Sent: Tuesday, April 28,202011:47A AM Subject: RE: Driveway questions  To: Adam Waters <awaters@washingtonnc.gov>; Michael Woodward mwoodward@washingtonncgov,  Thanks again gentlemen. Ihave another question, are there any design standards for driveways? In my mind Ibelieve the minimum width ofa driveway tol be 10' or: 11' depending on the location. Is that the same here? Is there a manual of  design standards here? Thank you,  Domini VJ Cunningham, PLA, CZO City of Washington Planning Office Historic Preservation Planner 252-975-9897  Pursuant to NCGS Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) that may be sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to yequest and review by anyone at any time.  From: Adam Waters  Sent: Thursday, April 23, 20202:40PM Subject: RE: Driveway questions Thanks Mike.  To: Michael Woodward <mwoodward@washingtonncgov: Domini Cunningham acunningham@washingtonncgov>    Domini, Mike is correct on everything. The only thing Iwould add is that a single family residential lot disturbance is 1  acre. Let us know ify youl have any further questions,  Adan Watere City of Washington Public' Works Director 252-975-9332 waterewasnngtoneRow  From: Michael Woodward Sent: Thursday, April 23, 20201:55PM To: Domini Cunningham dcunningham@washingtonnc.gov> Cc: Adam Waters <awaters@washingtonnc.gov> Subject: RE: Driveway questions  Domini,  Adam is working from home today so l'll try to answer this the bestIcan. Icopied him on this reply so he can They are not required to have a driveway permit unless they are trying to expand the driveway at the street, or make another curb cut. Ifall the work is happening beyond the back of the sidewalk, Public Works has no issues. As long as they keepi the amount of impervious under a half-acre they will be fine. l'm not even: sure single family I'm not sure how close they can get to the property line with the driveway. Public Works has rules about how close the driveway opening (curb cut) can be toi the property line, but once they're out of the right of way, those rules don't  comment/correct.  residences are: subject toi the Tar-Pam storm water rules, but Icould be wrong.  apply. There may be something int the zoning ordinance that addresses that, but I'm not sure.  Thanks, Michael Woodward Engineering Technician mwoodward@washingtonnc.gov From: Domini Cunningham Sent: Thursday, April 23,202012:03PM To: Adam Waters Kawaters@washingtonncgov Subject: Driveway questions  Cc: Michael Woodward mwoodward@washingtonnc.pov; Mike Dail <mdail@washingtonnc.gov>  Adam,  Ihave a question pertaining to a new driveway at 420 E Main Street. This person has begun work on extending their driveway to the back yard and is also going through the process of presenting their "proposed" work tot the HPC. They  also plan on replacing some existing pavers in their current driveway with brick.  2    Are they required to get a driveway permit for this work? Aret there any limits to the impervious surface requirements fort the driveway? Are there any limitations on how close they can get to the property line with their driveway?  Please let me know at your earliest convenience.  Thank you, Domini VJ Cunningham, PLA, CZO City of Washington Planning Office Historic Preservation Planner 252-975-9897 cunningham@washingtonnc.gov Citys Washindton OTI CAROLINA  o  Pursuant to NCGS Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) that may be sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review by anyone at any time.  3    0-2  d    Existing Driveway Surface  Proposed Driveway Surface  Approx. 15-6"  Approx-257    Existing Driveway Soft Surface  Proposed Driveway Surface  Approx14  Approx. 92"  Approx:    Existing Steps (No Handrails)  Proposed Handrails (Dark Blue Color- Shown in White for Clarity)  Approx.42  Manufacturer's Product Photo: Metal Railing. Tol be painted to match front door color.  Approx.28 Approx. 36"  Approx. 36  @  Note: Rail colori in rendering shown in white for clarity.    Existing Steps (No Handrails)  420  Proposed Handrails (Dark Blue Color to Match Door- Shown in White for Clarity)  420    4/23/2020  420E EN Main St- Google Maps  Google Maps 420 E Main St  Google  Image capture: Jun 2013 02020 Google  Washington, North Carolina Google Street View  Currently shown:. Jun 2013  420 Eas  EM  Mapslhwmgogecom.mapsMAPDAANQMEMAINSSIOR-TONSA7osn8aa1921ain.sa.aa1sldat-smflelisms. 1/1    Existing Hard Surface Area  Replacement  16.8'  5  6.4'  17.2'  1.6'  2.2' 7.8'  Existing Hard Surface Area Replaced With 1920 Antique Brick To Match Home.  26.1  COVERED PORCH Wrought Iron Handrails Installed Where None Presently Exist. 56.28'  EXISTING DRMEWAY  6 62'09'43"W    Existing Soft Surface Area  Replacement  1920 Antique Brick Matches Existing Brick Walkways.  Existing Brick Walkways. 16.8'  5  Existing Soft Surface Area Replaced With 1920 Antique Brick Tol Match Home.  17.2'  1.6'  Width Varies 7'-10" to 14. Length of Driveway: 92' (Existing Soft Surface Area)  -2.2" 7.8'  Existing Hard Surface Area Replaced' With 1920 Antique Brick To Match Home.  26.1"  COVERED PORCH Wrought Iron Handrails Installed' Where None Presently Exist. 56.28'  EXISTING DRIVEWAY  $6 62'09'43"W    I, HOOD RICHARDSON, CERTIFY THAT UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS MAP. WAS DRAWN FROM AN ACTUAL LAND SURVEY USING DOCUMENTS OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP AND THAT THE ERROR OF CLOSURE IS 1:10,000 AS CALCULATED. BY LATITUDES REFERENCE: AND DEPARTURES, THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 21, CHAPTER 56 SECTION .1600 OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATNE CODE. NO DETERMINATION OTHER THAN AS IS SHOWN D.B.1583,P.331 HAS BEEN MADE APOUT G.S. TAAS (11), DASHED D.B.1983,P.87 UNES WHOVF/NOTATON ARE SOT SURVE HOOPA. RICHARDSON, P.L.S. L-2PRPESSIONAL CARP-576 THIS IS A SURVEY DF AN EXISTING PARCEL OFTANDL-2522  MCNAIR TOWN  830 Re MEIONP  ON THIS MAP SEAL ON  HAND AND  9 SEAL ON -  MCNAIR: STREET  KEITHA.HARDT CRYSTALB.! HARDT D.B.1 1082, P.830 S 27'31'20"E 211.31" 0.27 ACRE SHED SHED  35.2 13.5' DWELLING 4.9 211.05' N 27'43'29'W VERGIL CARROLL. JENKINS, JR. D.B.976,P.427  f 609 o"  0    LEGEND: FOUNDI IRONI PIPE FOUNDI PKNAIL CENTERLINE NO SCALE t WATER ST.  ST. 3RD ST. 2ND STEWARI PARKWAY PAMLICO RIVER  PROPERTY OF: MARYE MCBRIDE NORTH CAROLINA SURVEYED BY: HOOD RICHARDSON, P.A. ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 110 WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 PHONE: (252) 975-3472  6 CITY OF WASHINGTON  BEAUFORT COUNTY  SITE  SCALE: 1"= 50' SURVEY DATE: JANUARY 2, 2020  19-01-254 GAM        ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER  Citys  DEVELOPMENTSERVICES HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  April 20, 2020  Re: Certificate of Appropriateness - 420 E Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adjacent to the above subject Ar request has been made by Marye McBride for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following  property.  alterations to the property located at 420 E Main Street.  1. Replace waffle style pavers in the driveway with antique 1920's brick 2. Install new pavers at the rear of the home and on the side  3. Install metal handrails at the front steps  Due to COVID-19 Precautions, please see the following:  1. Plans for the above application will be available on the City of Washington's website after 2. Historic Preservation Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting. If you would like to participate please contact the Planning Office at 252-975-9383. Date, Place and Time for meeting are listed  1:00pm April 28, 2020.  below.  DATE: TUESDAY, May 5, 2020  PLACE: VIRTUAL MEETING (TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE CALL THE PLANNING OFFICE AT  252-975-9383.)  TIME: 6:00 pm  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Elr Domini Cunningham, PLA, CZO Historic Preservation Planner City of Washington pc@washngtonnc.ox 252-946-0897  Cc: Mike Dail, Community and Cultural Services Director Mike Weldin, Chief Building Inspector  ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER  Page 1of1    HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  STAFF REPORT  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAR'OLINA  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, May 5, 2020-6:00PM  HPC 20-0031 : 420 E Main Street  Single Family Home  Request:  To replace waffle style pavers in driveway with antique 1920's brick, extend the existing driveway to the rear yard with 1920's brick, and install metal handrails at  the front steps. Marye McBride 420 E Main Street 5685-07-2172 1. Site photos  Applicant: Location: Parcel Number: Attachment:  2. Supplemental materials 3. Location map of property  The Commission should consider this request based upon general conformance with the Design Guidelines. Project Analysis: The applicant intends to replace the waffle style pavers in the driveway, extend the  Structure:  This structure is ac. 19th century, 2-story house with brick veneer  driveway to the rear yard using 1920's brick, and install new handrails at thet front steps From the Design Guidelines (shortened to include only sections that apply):  that will be painted blue.  Chapter 3  Title  Pages 45-67  Changes to Existing Buildings  3.6.1 Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements ofal historic structure and should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, balustrades. doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and 3.13.1 When projects must include the addition of health and safety features, use whatever means possible to minimize visual impact, and protect the historic character of the structure, and its character-defining details. 3.13.3 Health and: safety features that are visible from the public right-of-way: shall be constructed so that the scale, materials, and details are compatible with the  entablatures.  historic structure.  (HPC: 20-0031: 420EN Main Street) Tuesday, May5 5, 2020, HPCI Meeting    Chapter 4  Title  Pages 71-83  Streetscape & Site Design  4.1.2 Historic sitet features, such as walkways, walls, formal and informal gardens, 4.1.5 Shrubbery planted along! building edges and property lines shall have a mature 4.1.7 When undertaking new construction, significant trees or vegetation shall be 4.3.1 Parking lots, driveways and sidewalks shall comply with City Code requirements for size and landscaping elements as well as site grading. Refer to Article. XVII- 4.3.3 Parking in residential areas should be to the reard of the structure whenever 4.3.7 Residential parking areas shall be: surfaced with appropriate materials such as brick, concrete, asphalt crushed stone, crushed and compacted oyster shells, or 4.3.10 Driveways on residential properties within the Historic District shall be composed of either concrete, brick, asphalt, crushed stone, or compacted and crushed oyster shells. Loose material is prohibited in commercial areas. From the. Zoning Ordinance (shortened to include only sections that apply):  fountains, and trellises should be retained. height ofl less than six (6) feet.  preserved.  Parking of the Zoning Ordinance  possible. Parking in front) yards is not permitted.  gravel (with edging materials).  Article VII  Title Bufferyard Landscaping Requirements  Sections 40-167 to 40-176  40-167 General  (b) Exceptions. The provisions contained in the bufferyard requirements shall not apply to those uses located within the B1H Zoning District.  Article XVII 40-445 Surface Material  Title Parking  Sections 40-438 to 40-450  (b) Parking areas serving individual single-family dwellings, churches, and seasonal, recreational, or temporary activities shall be exempt from the surface material requirement of this section.  40-447 Parking area location criteria  (a) All uses, except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, shall provide off-street parking on the same parcel of land as the use  iti is intended to serve.  (HPC 20-0031:4 420E EN Mains Street) Tuesday, May5 5, 2020! HPC Meeting    40-448 Improvement standards  (a) All off-street parking areas designed for two (2) or less spaces shall (1) Shall be surfaced in accordance with section 40-445. (2) Shall have adequate ingress and egress. All uses, excluding single-family detached and two-family attached (duplex), (4) Shall be in accordance with article VII of this chapter, pertaining to bufferyard landscaping requirements, and article XV oft this chapter, pertaining to special districts. (5) Driveways, in the absence of a garage or carport, shall be considered as providing off-street parking for single-family and two-family dwellings. The area to which the driveway approach provides access shall be sufficiently large to store any vehicles using the driveway completely off the right-of- way, on private property. Parking of vehicles shall not be (6) All off-street parking areas shall be separated from walkways, sidewalks, bikeways, streets or any dedicated right-of-way. To prevent vehicles from driving across these areas, except at an approved driveway approach, and to prevent parking or maneuvering vehicles from overhanging upon such areas, there shall be a six (6) inch raised curb or stop bar constructed between such areas and the parking area.  meet the following requirements:  shall be subject to section 40-448(b).  permitted on sidewalks.  40-449 Schedule of required parking spaces  Off-street parking spaces shall be provided for all land uses in the following proportions: Single-family detached = 2 per dwelling unit, on the same zone  lot.  Finding of Facts: A. The applicant intends to replace the waffle style pavers ini the existing driveway with  1920's brick. The proposed paving material will be 1920's brick in accordance to the Design Guidelines. Based on these Findings of Facts, the request is congruous with B. The applicant has begun extending the driveway to the rear yard and has removed: a few pavers and the lawn on the left side of the home. The width of the driveway varies with the width being 7'-10" at the narrowest point. Neithert the alterations to the driveway or vehicular movement shall encroach onto an adjacent property. The driveway is being extended to the rear of the home in accordance to the Design Guidelines. Based on these Findings of Facts, the request is congruous with the The applicant intends to install metal handrails at the front steps. The proposed handrails willl be metal in accordance to the Design Guidelines. Based on these Findings of Facts, the request is congruous with the Historic Preservation  the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.  Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.  Commission Design Guidelines.  (HPC20-0031:4 420EMains Street) Tuesday, May 5, 2020HPCMeeting    HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REQUEST FOR COMMISSION, ACTION  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAR'OLINA  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, May 5, 2020- 6:00PM  HPC20-0029 :4 420 E Main Street  Single Family Home  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission  Domini Cunningham, Historic Preservation Planner  420E EN Main Street- Request to replace waffle style pavers in driveway with 1920's brick, Extend the existing driveway to the rear yard with 1920's brick, and  install metal handrails at the front steps.  Ar request has been made by Marye "Marty" McBride, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make  the following alterations to the property located at 420E Main Street. 1. Replace Waffle Style Pavers in driveway with 1920's brick. 2. Extend the existing driveway to the rear yard with 1920's brick.  3. Install metal handrails at the front steps.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapters. 3.6-A Porches and Entryways, 3.13-5 Safety To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make Finding of Facts, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be  and Accessibility, 4.1-Landscaping, and 4.3- Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks.  attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Marye "Marty" McBride to make the above changes on the property located at 420 El Main Street. The motion is based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically Chapters 3.6- - Porches and Entryways, 3.13-Safety and  Accessibility, 4.1-L Landscaping, and 4.3 - Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness Marye "Marty" McBride to make the above changes on the property located at 420E E Main Street. The motion is based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically Chapters 3.6- - Porches and Entryways, 3.13-S Safety and Accessibility, 4.1-landscaping, and 4.3 - Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation commission place the following conditions on the approval:  (HPC 20-0029: 420EN Main Street) April7,2020, HPCI Meeting    Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Marye "Marty" McBride to make the above changes on the property located at 420 E Main Street. The motion isb based on the following Findings of Facts: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines specifically Chapters 3.6 on Porches and Entryways, 3.13- Safety and Accessibility, 4.1 - Landscaping, and 4.3-F Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application andi invoke NCC GS1 160A- 400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NCGS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and  comment on the request.  (HPC: 20-0029: 420EN Main Street) April7, 2020 HPCI Meeting    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made by Mitchel Norton, owner of 209 Washington Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove and replace a decayed tree. 2. A request has been made by Amber Thomas, owner of 502 E Main Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a picket fence around the property 3. A Request has been made by Charles Caldwell and Patsy Pierce, owners of 109 N Brown Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repair the existing front porch    OTHER  BUSINESS    None    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting- Minutes Tuesday, April7,2020-600PMI  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA  Members Present Cheri Vaughn - Chairman Karen Mann - Vice-Chairman Scarlett Boutchyard Kathleen Couch Scot Craigie Colleen Knight Rebecca Clark  Members Not Present  Others Present  Mike Dail, Director, Director Community and Cultural Services  Domini Cunningham, Historic Preservation Planner Dawn Maye, Administrative Support Specialist  DUE TO COVID-19 MEETING WAS CONDUCTED VIA GoToMeeting.com,  I. Opening of the meeting II. Invocation  1. Chairman, Cheri Vaughn requested a moment of silence to remember everyone that has been  affected by COVID-19. A moment of silence was taken. 1. A verbal roll call was taken by staff. All members were present.  III. Roll Call IV. Old Business 1. None  V. Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Beacon Street Moss, LLC for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of 3 new single family homes at the following  addresses:  A. 235 Water Street (Lot:23) B. 231 Water Street (Lot 25) C. 229 Water Street (Lot 26)  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked the Commission if they would like tp combine the applications for Beacon Street Moss, LLC. It was the consensus that the Commission would agree on combining the applications into one discussion and vote. Mr. Jim Wiley, representing Beacon Street Moss, LLC was sworn in.  Mr. Jim Wiley, Lots 23, 25, and 26 are closer toi the Downtown area and the homes are ali little smaller. These homes will have the same quality as the previous built homes. The three homes will fill in the remaining 3 lots on the West end of Water Street and will finalize the block for the development. The exterior details are noted in the agenda Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked for any questions from the Commissioners. The  packets.  Commissioners did not have any questions at this time.  Revised: April 13, 2020  Pageiof6    Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked if anyone public attendees would like to speak Mr. Scot Campbell, 213 N Market Street, asked to speak. He was sworn in. Stated that the cottages would be great and Moss Landing has done a great job on their homes. This is more of an observation. While speaking to some property owners that live in the development, the owners are not aware that changes to the property must be brought before the Commission. Mr. Campbell, has found that owners believe that if their neighbor installed something they must be allowed to install the same structure. Mr. Campbell, is asking that the developer, Jim Wiley, or the Commission or the City remind the property owners that they are ini the Historic District and they do need to Ms. Scarlett Boutchyard, thanked Scot Campbell for the suggestion and agreed this is something that is needed. Scarlett Boutchyard, this would be a good idea for the Commission to send information to the Moss Landing residence. Mr. Jim Wiley, would be happy to support sending information to the residence of Moss Landing along with a co-letter from the development company. This letter would state the importance of bringing changes to their property before the Commission. Mr. Scot Campbell, thanked Jim Wiley. Mr. Campbell states that information has been presented to the development and the development has given approval for the changes and then the property owners proceed with Ms. Rebecca Clark, we (The Commission) have had some oft the home owners come before the Commission and we have given permission for their additions. But some of the newer property owners may not be abiding to the Guidelines. Ms. Clark, would support staff sending information out to the property owners of Moss Landing concerning the Major and Minor Works. Mr. Jim Wiley, also clarifying int the letter the difference between Major and Minor' Works and what Ms. Rebecca Clark, fences, have not been approved as a Minor Work and have only been voted on as a Major Work. Ms. Scarlett Boutchyard, understood that this was voted on before Emily Rebert left. This needs to be checked out and the Commission needs to be made aware oft the decision. Staff, there is al list of Major and Minor Work items in the. Appendix oft the Design Guidelines that could be sent with a letter from the Chairman. Itwas the consensus that the Commission agreed to the proposal. Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked if anyone would like to speak for or against this proposal. No one requested to speak. Brought it back to the table. Karen Mann made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to, Beacon Street Moss, LLC to construct new single-family homes located at 235 Water Street (Lot 23), 231 Water Street (Lot 25) and 229 Water Street (Lot 26). This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 -Landscaping, 4.2-1 Lighting, 4.3-F Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks, 5.2 - Residential Construction and 5.4 Decks. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion. Verbal vote was taken, all voted,  for or against the request.  present changes to the Commission.  the changes without coming before the Commission.  can be approved under al Minor Work.  Chairman, Cheri Vaugh, asked for a motion.  7in favor and 0. The Motion Passed  Revised: April 13, 2020  Page 2of6    2. Arequest has been made by Seldon Taylor, Stocks and Taylor, representing Dr. Andrew McCoy, Owner, of 234 West Main Street, for a Certificate of  Appropriateness for the following:  a. Tor remove existing rear wall and reconstruct in like materials with wood studs;  sheathing; brick veneer; windows and doors. b. Reinstall electrical service, phone services and gas meter. Install roof drainage downspouts int the existing location. d. Install a concrete sidewalk along the rear of the building.  Seldon Taylor of Stocks and Taylor, representing Dr. Andrew McCoy, was Mr. Seldon Taylor, wanted to make sure it was known that the owner is Dr. Andrew McCoy. Dr. McCoy has had a structural engineer to examine the rear oft the building. The structural engineer determined that the rear exterior wall has structurally failed and will need to be demolished. The owner is trying to maintain a business and there are also two tenants on either side of the building. They are proposing the following: it appears that there was a veneer made of masonry brick, could not tell when the brick was installed and the brick was painted at some point. A portion of the brick has been removed to see the back brick wall structural damage in the main bearing wall. The proposal is to build at temporary wall inside the existing space and remove the entire rear brick wall. The reconstructed will be a wood stud wall and then reinstall the brick veneer. Will place the three windows in the rear in the same location of similar size. Concerning the aluminum storefront door that is currently installed, it would be replaced with a new aluminum entrance door in the same location. There is also a modern hollow core wood door, with no historic value, going into the rear of one of the tenants. We will replace the door with similar profile but using hard metal. We will be installing a new sidewalk at the rear of the building. All meters will need to be replaced with new meters. Chairman Cheri Vaugh, asked for any questions from the Commission. Ms. Kathleen Couch, are the windows going to be replaced with wood windows or vinyl clad? Mr. Taylor, we proposed vinyl clad. Mr. Taylor, contacted Builders First Source to find out what windows had been approved in the Historic District. Mr. Taylor, was told that the vinyl clad window had been approved for the Annex Building on Second Street. Ms. Couch, as far as she is aware the Commission never approved vinyl clad windows on the Annex Building. Ms. Couch, asked if any of the other Commissioners recall concerning this vote? Mr. Scot Craigie, that request was withdrawn. Ms. Scarlett Boutchyard, they said that they were going to proceed with wood windows not vinyl clad and come back as a Minor' Work. Mr. Taylor, the windows are located on the rear oft the building. The windows are not original tot the building but, are made of wood. Ms. Couch, are you going to replace with six (6) over six (6)? Mr. Taylor, yes, same double hung with six (6) over six (6). Ms. Couch, regarding the chimney, it was removed so that the structural integrity of the building could be evaluated, is that correct? Mr. Taylor, correct, that was removed before Stocks and Taylor saw the building, under the first evaluation by the owner. The chimney was falling down. Ms. Couch, do you have anyi intention of replacing the chimney? Mr. Taylor, the owner prefers not to replace the chimney. Ms. Couch, what would be the reason for not replacing the chimney? Dr. Andrew McCoy, the chimney is not a  sown in.  functional chimney.  Revised: April13,2020  Page 3of6    Staff, swore in Dr. Andre McCoy.  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked for any questions.  Ms. Rebecca Clark, the sidewalk leading to the rear, are you going to repair the sidewalk and is there a walkway leading from the parking area? Dr. McCoy, the current property adjoins the Presbyterian Church property, which is shown on the tax map in your agenda packets. Currently there is asphalt pavement and a couple of concrete pads and concrete by the door. Mr. Taylor, some of the concrete pads and asphalt will be removed to install a new footing fort the wall. After that is completed we will clean it up and install a new sidewalk on the rear of the building. Dr. McCoy's customers park in the rear of the building. Ms. Karen Mann, you do have clients that park in the rear of the building and will use the rear entrance? Dr. McCoy, correct. Ms. Kathleen Couch, the awning of the back door will the awning be replaced? Dr. McCoy, yes, Icould do a similar awning. Ms. Couch, will the brick be painted. Mr. Taylor, currently the brick is painted, not sure what the Commission prefers. Ms. Couch, believes that if the brick was painted originally, then the brick would need to painted again. Mr. Taylor, most of the projects that Stocks and Taylor have completed downtown have used "Common Brick" and painted a "Common Red." Ift the Commission required that the brick be painted, we would propose to use a Red Common Brick color. Ms. Mann, asked staff what is his thought on painting the brick? But it is her understanding not to paint the brick and in this case part of the veneer has been painted. Mr. Taylor, the entire wall will be removed. Staff, if all of the brick is being replaced there is no point in painting the brick, because brick needs to be brick. Ifit was previously painted and leaving painted brick, it could be seen as matching the existing façade so that you would not have the patchwork. But, you are replacing everything the brick would need to stay as the style of brick that you are using. A brick façade looks better unpainted. Mr. Taylor, the front oft the building will remain painted, but you cannot see both sides at the sometime. Also, the buildings on either Ms. Cheri Vaughn, would you be willing to reconstruct the chimney on the rear oft the building, because the guidelines do call for maintaining chimneys or character defining structures. Dr. Andrew McCoy, the chimney was not original tot the building and was built at the same time as the brick façade on the front of the building. Dr. McCoy, assumes that the chimney was built to vent furnace and is not a functional chimney. It was made of modern brick placed against the existing wall. Ms. Scarlett Boutchyard, what are the two (2) holes coming out of the rear façade? Dr. McCoy, vents for the furnace, below the holes the chimney consists of solid brick and concrete. Ms. Vaughn, were does the air that comes out oft the vents go? Dr. McCoy, for a while they were vented into the chimney and the holes will be gone with the new construction. Ms. Vaughn, the holes were installed when the furnace was installed. Dr. McCoy, not sure when the chimney was installed but, it was tied into the façade that is coming down and was placed over the existing failing wall. Ms. Couch, we are looking at the original brick where the chimney has been removed? Dr. McCoy, yes. Ms. Couch, after you tore off the chimney that is the original brick? Dr. McCoy, yes. Mr. Taylor, the chimney itself was constructed out of the modern brick, not sure why this was done. Ms. Mann, this was a false chimney for looks to hide the two vents that comes out of the wall. Dr. McCoy, alli that is known is that it was built with modern chimney and does not know when the chimney was constructed. Ms. Couch, there is no evidence of a  side are not painted.  Revised: April 13, 2020  Page 4of6    fireplace ever located inside the building. Dr. McCoy, no, and under the two (2) Ms. Kathleen Couch, the door that is toi the left the chimney in the apex of the roof, is that original? Dr. Andrew McCoy, yes. Mr. Taylor, we are putting that door back ini its existing place because iti is original to the building. Chairman Cheri Vaughn, asked for any questions from the Commissioners. No Chairman Cheri Vaughn, asked if anyone from the public wanted to speak for Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, brought back to the table. Asked for any discussion Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked if the Commission wanted to make one motion or break down the items into separate motions. Ms. Karen Mann, thinks that the windows should be replaced with wood windows because they are at ground level and that is what is currently installed. Not sure why the building company advised them of using the vinyl clad windows, but that has no bearing on the Commission. Chairman, Vaughn, asked if they wanted to break the windows out as a separate motion? Mr. Scot Craigie, regarding the windows, if you look in the guidelines at section 3.8.7 it states, "Original windows on upper floors that are located on rear or non-character-detning elevations may be repaired, or replaced with vinyl-clad windows that match the originals in design, size, proportions and detail." Ms. Kathleen Couch, with this elevation and having people going in and out of the building, might be a real elevation and there is a public parking lot and is visible from the church. Ms. Rebecca Clark, all of the buildings downtown are visible from the rear, but we have always treated the rear elevation as the rear of the building. Ms. Vaughn, thinks that if it also faces a main street, Iknow that it is not a main street and even not like an alley. Ms. Clark, it is two (2) parking lots. Ms. Couch, the owners have agreed to do wood windows, sO why would we not just follow what we have done in general and say that you should install wood windows. Dr. McCoy, would like to install vinyl clad windows. Mr. Craigie, was reading from the guidelines section 3.8.7. Ms. Mann, Scot the guideline that you are referring to is talking about the second story, it is not talking about the first floor ofa building. Mr. Craigie, and it also says non-character defining elevations. Ms. Clark, agree with Scot on the windows, the building does not face a street. Ms. Couch, it is al business entrance and people do walk behind the building. Ms. Rebecca Clark, have we determined if this will be one motion or will the Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, sounds like there is some difference of opinion concerning the windows and I believe that we should break the windows out. What is the feeling about the chimney? That is not listed on the application. Ms. Rebecca Clark, the chimney is aiready being removed. Ms. Kathleen Couch, point is that you can see, looking at the picture and from the back oft the building, after removal of the chimney we can now see the original brick. By this we can see that the chimney was not original to the building, weather the chimney has obtained historical significance we do not know, because we do not know when the chimney was added. We should not worry about the  vents was filled with concrete.  one had any questions.  or against the proposal. There were no questions.  from the Commissioners.  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, asked for any questions. windows be pulled out for a second motion?  chimney.  Revised: April 13,2 2020  Page! 5of6    Chairman, Cheri Vaughn, suggest doing two (2) motions, one (1) to cover the majority of the application and one (1) to cover the windows. Ms. Scarlett Boutchyard, we could put on a condition with the motion. Kathleen Couch made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to, Dr. Andrew McCoy to make the above changes ont the property located at 234 WMain Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 - Exterior Walls, 3.2-1 Materials, 3.4- Windows and Doors, 3.5-Roofs, 5.9- Rear Elevations and 3.14- Mechanical and Communication Systems. Pertaining to the following items: A, B, C&D. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion. Verbal vote was taken, all voted, 7 in favor and 0. The Motion Passed Asecond motion was presented concerning the windows on the rear façade. Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Ir move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to, Dr. Andrew McCoy to make the above changes on the property located at 234 WI Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4- = Windows and Doors and specifically Chapters 3.8.7. Scot Craigie seconded the motion. Verbal vote was taken,  all voted, 4 in favor and 3. The Motion Passed.  VI. Minor Works  Rebecca Clark made the following motion to approve all minor works. Kathleen Couch seconded the motion, Verbal vote was taken, all voted, 7 in favor and 8 opposed.  Minor Works Passed  VII. Other Business 1. None  VIII. Approval of Minutes - March 3, 2020  * Kathleen Couch made a motion to approve the March 3, 2020 minutes. Karen Mann seconded the motion. Verbal vote was taken, all voted, 7 in favor and Oopposed.  Minutes were approved. 1. There being no other business  IX. Adjourn.  Rebecca Clark made a motion to adjourn. Kathleen Couch second the motion. Verbal vote was taken, all voted, 7 in favor and 0 opposed. Meeting was  adjourned.  Revised: April 13, 2020  Page 6of6