WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, September 3, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Ms. Emily Mayne for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations in the back yard of the property located at 735 a. Demolish the garage in in the south west corner of the back yard b. Construct a garden shed in the south east corner of the back yard 2. A request has been made by Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a deck in the back yard of the property located at 117 Charlotte Street. 3. A request has been made by New Vision Partners for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at 189  West Main Street:  West Main Street:  a. Alter storefront entryways on the north side b. Change window configurations C. Construct a covered deck on the south side d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck  e. Construct two balconies on the second floor of the south side  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 415 East Second Street to repair the front porch 2.A A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 131 East Main Street to repair the existing roof  boards using like materials on the property.  using like materials on the property.  1    3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 102 West MLK Street to elevate the HVAC units in 4.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 117 North Charlotte Street to repair the existing 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 113 South Harvey Street to repair a porch pier  the same location on the property.  roof using like materials on the property.  using like materials on the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Summary from Public Forum VII. Approval of Minutes - August 6, 2019  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    None    MAJOR  WORKS    735 West Main  Street  Demolition of a Carport  Construction of a Garden Shed    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 toc cashiers int thei front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 13SMertMa aatsN  Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Nla  AiwField  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  avcl Emily Maywe  feet by  X (depth)  feet.  (width)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  OThenrssinalal 13'2' gar rage hasbeew Iseriow disrepair swce raGyew Sept. Doos)with rgwifsant Foundation chamagie ond etemrve termite damage Ihs Acweirbeowl repir cwd it Sruckurally uwsfe. We are reeking ogreement regaring demaW.w-@)shct a tool Bud au. twA. bace, yord oF tuo lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting hgug, Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Wiwfieldewd Emly Mayve (Name of Applicant type or print) MNC 2h889 (Mailing Address) oglosig (.52)1.5P-FPq4 (Date) wi0 - hame (Signature of Applicant)  (Initials) 135 et Mai Sreét  ACTION  (Zip Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minor work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply): Exterior Alteration O Addition New Construction R Demolition SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x1 11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item 0-PropertyOwnersAderes-Pondrristofpopenymmessadiesessesefalproperties  isnot applicable).  ecated'withima-e1eProFthneabovesubyectpoperty-  Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy oft the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the newi façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is SO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11", snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  0-StateorFederal Tax Credits/Funds-orCAMAPermits.Tryourareapplyngoranyorinese.programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" X 11" sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks andlor pencil copy  yeemustindudeesyon yourtetter or permit from theState:  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort Printed August 23,2 2019 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  Bcs  EICO  1:39 Feet    OBJECTID 6211 OWNER NAME MAYNE WINFIELD K MAILING ADDRESS2 735 WEST MAIN: STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 152702 TAXABLE VA 239702 PROPERTY ADDRESS 735 W MAIN ST DATE 9/2/2005 SALE PRICE 287000.00 NBHD DESC WEST SIDE HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42296  GPIN 5675-59-4414 OWNER NAME2 MAYNE EMILYB CITY WASHINGTON PROPDESC 1LOT7351 WEST MAIN STREET TOT VAL 239702 PREV ASSESS 257928 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1475/00532 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1916 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1976  GPIN Long 5675-59-4414 MAILING ADDRESS 735) WEST MAIN STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 87000 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.39 MBL 567500105 STAMPS 574.00 NBHD CDE WSH EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2720 NBRBED 3 PIN 01025034  Beaufort County online mapa access is provided as a publics service, asi is, asa available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County of Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website, The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of Countyd data.    JPH BUILDERS, INC.  Picott Harrington I picott@iphbulders.net  8/7/2019  To Whom It May Concern:  On Wednesday, July 24",Imet with Wink and Emily Mayne to discuss their options for renovating the existing storage barn at their residence. They were concerned about the structure and the feasibility of rehabbing in its current state. Upon inspection, it was discovered that significant structural repairs would be required to bring the barn back to its original condition. The following issues Rot and Termite Damage throughout sill plates, stud walls, ceiling joists and rafters, and exterior wood siding oft the barn. Settlement issues with foundation cracks and walls out of plumb along the left and rear walls with voids in mortar joints and cracks in The interior concrete floor has separated apart and lifted more than an The entire structure is leaning to the East several inches and can be When taking into account the demolition and replacement ofthe masonry and concrete foundation, framing members, exterior siding and metal roofing, and hardscape repairs to the area around the barn, its my opinion that the removal of the existing barn and the building ofa new structure will be more cost effective. Ifneeded, I'm happy  were observed:  bricks.  inch along the center ofthe slab.  pushed back and forth with minimal force.  to be contacted and can discuss in detail.  Sincerely,  Picott Harrington  718 West Main St. Washington, NC 27889 Office: 252-95-2575/picottiphbuilders.net    0815119 Wp MANNE PROPEATY  3-v'foot eNd of Short rive  brickLwalI  Neighbor Fence  Elmwood gorage  magwol.a tree  2ouove.  Abd-  pecan tree  exstiNg sarage  N 9 F o WA S h e d 9 e & b  a S  H E D  desi  decis  e W a M  Houre  Ronh porch  a  e  aA M  City S'sde ali -          CAE OM ntcd dayk Lobor hblenl  aA Ca  LLL mhs hw o ADLUN    Adjoining Property Owners 735 West Main Street MAILING ADDRESS 729 SHORT DRIVE 739 W MAIN STREET 705 SHORT DRIVE 738 W MAIN STREET 731 WEST MAINS ST  A  B  C CITY  D E STATE ZIP  1 OWNER NAME. 3 BEHAR MICHEAL 4 WICKHAM JOHNO C 5 GRAVES C SWANSONI III 6 MAYNE WINFIELDK 7 SAUVE FREDERICK P. JR 8 RATCLIFF ZENO III 9 SMOOT RICHARD ARNOLD TODD 10 MECHLING LINDA C 11 BERRY RICHARD TODD 12 LOBOS MICHAELJ 13 CORREA WAYNE JOSEPH  2 RIVER CHASE HOMEOWNERS ASSC POBOX82  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  735 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 1564 TERRA CEIA ROAD PANTEGO NC 27860 736 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 734 WEST MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 316 SUNNYSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC 27889  732 W MAIN STREET  WASHINGTON NC 27889    ocntoion Decelopmenb fitoric Preeroation  C  Cityy  Washincton NORTH CAROLINA  August 23, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 735 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Emily Mayne for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations in the back yard of the property located at 735 West  Main Street: a. b.  Demolish the garage in in the south west corner of the back yard Construct a garden shed in the south east corner of the back yard  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@washngomegow    Staff Report  735 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 735 West Main Street is requesting approval to demolish the existing carport located in the back yard of the property and construct a garden shed ini the southeast  corner of the back yard.  The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 6.0 Demolition and Relocation:  6.1.1 Prior to undertaking demolition work, the property owner shall approach the Historic Preservation Commission to determine the historic significance of the structure and its 6.1.2 If the HPC determines that the structure is historically significant, it shall delay the demolition for an appropriate time in order for staff and the Commission to work with the property owner to seek viable alternatives to demolition. Alternatives to demolition includel Ifal building is in disrepair, working with the property owner to develop a rehabilitation plan and identify funding assistance such as rehabilitation tax credits that would allow the Ifal building does not fit the owner's required needs, determining if the structure could be o Working with the property owner to locate a buyer who will use the property without Asal last resort, finding a suitable location within the district for the historic building to be moved and working withi the property owner to develop a plani for relocation. 6.1.3 Ifa all alternatives for preservation have been exhausted, the HPCS shall work with the owner to make aj permanent record of the historic resource including photography, an architectural description of the building, chain oft title, floor and site plans, or collection of other historic documentation that is available. Since Washington is a Certified Local Government, it must make an annual report to the Department of Archivesand History that includes a list ofall 6.1.4 When a demolition is proposed, the applicant must submit al landscaping plani illustrating proposed landscaping and other site development to be completed within six (6) months after 6.1.5 Ifay property is subject to demolition by neglect, the City Council has the authority to adopt ac demolition by neglect ordinance that requires the property owner to repair the conditions  relationship to the district.  among other things:  building to be rehabilitated. adaptively reused. demolishing the structure.  demolitions and provide historic data on the demolished properties.  demolition.  causing the deterioration.  The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures:    3.12.1 The: same criteria related to the use of materials for new construction apply to  outbuildings and accessory. structures. See Section 5.0.  3.12.2 Retain and preserve original outbuildings which have gained historic significance on their 3.12.3 Architectural elements of historic outbuildings such as roofs, siding, material, windows and doors, foundations, and character-defining detailing should be retained and preserved. 3.12.4Ifr replacement of an element on a historic outbuilding is necessary, replace only the deteriorated portion to match the original in material, size, proportion, texture, and detailing. 3.12.5 Designs for new outbuildings and accessory structures should complements the architectural style and period oft the primary structures as well as examples ofs similar structures  own.  within the district.  3.12.6 New outbuildings should be located in rear yards if possible.  3.12.7 New outbuildings should be proportionally the same in size and height to the primary structure as is seen in the relationship between other primary and secondary structures in the 3.12.8 Prefabricated wooden accessory structures that are not architecturally similar to the primary structure are allowed only if screened from view from any existing right of way.  district.  Prefabricated metal storage buildings are not acceptable.  a) This dependency building has gained historic: significance in its own right. The building appears to be an early carport and is a part of historic fabric oft the district. Efforts should be made to save the structure. Based on finding of fact, request A is not congruous with the Historic Preservation b) The proposed garden shed is of appropriate size, materials, location, and style. Based on finding of  Design Guidelines.  fact, request Bi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development garden shed in the back yard oft the property.  Re: The owner of 735 West Main Street has submitted a request to demolish a carport and constructa  AI request has been made by Ms. Emily Mayne for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations int the back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street: a. Demolish the garage ini in the south west corner of the back yard b. Construct a garden shed int the south east corner of the back yard To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion. Possible Actions, Request "A"  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to allow for the demolition oft the carport located in the back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Section 6.0 Demolition and Relocation.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to allow for the demolition oft the carport located in the back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.0 Demolition and Relocation. Ifurther move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place a delay on the demolition for  (up to 365) days.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff.lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    Possible Actions, Request "B"  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to construct a garden shed in the south east corner of the back yard back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Section 3.120utbuildings and Accessory Structures.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to construct a garden shed int the south east corner of the back yard back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures. I further move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to construct a garden shed int the: south east corner of the back yard back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding |detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment ont the request.    117 - North Charlotte  Street  Construction of a Deck    APPLICATION FOR. A GERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in the front! lobby of Cityl Hall underDevelopmental. Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street. Address of Property: 17 North  Charlotte Styeet  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  MA  Owner's Name: Taafualsal-haigt aid Steve bnight  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  We AN planning h addadck tD the Cear of our hevne. AHachod is estwele and masvias tobe used,  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application' will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  -mbawph-hanght (Name of Applicant - type or prnt) 1SLoiyfastDage. 28269  (Initials)  AGTION  (Mailing Address) 81719 (Date) ERe  (ZipCode)  709-491-8260 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized  (Date)  Signature) 7Signature of  A-Kay  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, fhis application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining.any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  toi the Historic Preservation Commission for review at jts next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is reguired at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your aufhorized represenfative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check ail that apply): Exterior Alteration a Addition New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Iti is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2") x11"s sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item  isn not applicable).  Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11", snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" X 11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort Printed August 07, 2019 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid).  1:45Feet    GPINLong 5685-16-3691 MAILING ADDRESS 117 N CHARLOTTE STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 38500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.24 MBL 56850942 STAMPS NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2748 NBR BED 4 PIN 01012403  OBJECTID 10821 OWNER NAME BAUTISTA TERRI-ANN MAILING ADDRESS2 117 N CHARLOTTESTREET  GPIN 5685-16-3691 OWNER NAME2 KNIGHT STEVENV CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT117 CHARLOTTE STREET TOT VAL 126283 PREV ASSESS 107166 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1876/00786 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1920 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1965  ZIP 28269 BLDG VAL 87783 TAXABLE VA 126283 PROPERTY ADDRESS 117 N CHARLOTTE ST DATE 12/1/2015 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID  Beaufort 43791 County onliner map accessi is provided asap publics service, asis, asa available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is for informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the this advice website," ors services The user ofi industry that professionals. Beaufort County) The  County of Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility and! legall liabilityf for the content published ont data. and its Assigns shall be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use ofC County  agreest    -    391921  verse  Zb  SOLDTO ADDRESS CITYSTATE,ZIP CUSTOMER OBDERIO.  SHPEB-TO- ABBRESS CITY,STATE,ZIP TERMS Bemteg  MA  Mha  lclè Esuat RYERIBEL  Kaypat  EO.S.  DATE 8-5-19  T  eilace 1RK2Z Prck wth d han ho Boof dE -0X22  HSg d4 2xArr Dekray Bean Zek Elecb AL 2EBank Rxy Ar hmerl.G 42"Kik  Sreeset  KpeG 2x2 nek  Cha She Cehy Declc  de Laft sdf  Deok !) be 56 divganet  Peof Bybat dndl Piphescoakk  hank Becfn Rpr  4a  Bonalicu. Kesn avE dwhnh.  6558  395600 3000  Dapisltae De OINO  as  ZT  aadams D8140  01-11        Adjoining Property Owners 117 North Charlotte B  A  C CITY NORFOLK  D E STATE ZIP VA 23508  1 OWNER NAME 2 SAIRANEN KAREN A 4 WALL JAYNE D 6 FRANZ PATRICIA ROSE 7 STALLINGS JOHN WJR 8 CRAWFORD DON O 9 STRICKLAND WILLIAM 10 BAUTISTA TERRI-ANN 11 EASTMAN BRENDAJ 12 FARRELL PEGGY W 13 CITY OF WASHINGTON 15 CITY OF WASHINGTON  MAILING ADDRESS 628 EMAIN ST 111 S REED DRIVE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET 120 CHARLOTTE STREET  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  3 MATTHEWS LINDA GIBSON 1344 BOLLING AVE 5 BURLESON DEEANNAI LOU 116 CHARLOTTE ST  236 HUNTINGTON AVE STE 318 BOSTON 10721 GRASSY CREEK PLACE RALEIGH 117 N CHARLOTTE STREET 711 EAST MAIN STREET POST OFFICE 2605 POBOX1 1988 POE BOX1988  MA 02115 NC 27614  WASHINGTON NC 28269 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  14 HOWARD CONSTANCEL 137 EMAIN ST    Dotntoion Deoelopmenb fitoric Presevoation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  August 23, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 117 Charlotte Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a deck in the back yard of the property located at 117 Charlotte Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2019  Place: City Hall- - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 2  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@washngtommegow    Staff Report  117 North Charlotte Street in the back yard oft the property.  The application for the property located at 117 North Charlotte Street is requesting to construct a deck Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter! 5.4 Decks:  5.4.1 A deck shall be designed and constructed. so that thel historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks 5O they can be removed 5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed in inconspicuous locations, usually on the building's rear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained in a color that is compatible with the historic The proposed deck is being constructed with the appropriate design, materials, and location. Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design  in thet future without damage tot the structure.  proportions oft the building. structure and district.  Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 117 North Charlotte Street- Construction ofa a deck.  Ar request has been made by Ms. Terri Knight fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct: a deck in To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate mayk beattached  the back yard of the property.  to the motion. Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Terri Knight to construct a deck in the back yard oft the property located at 117 North Charlotte Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter! 5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Terri Knight to construct a deck in the back yard oft the property located at 117 North Charlotte Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter! 5.41 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place thet following conditions on the approval: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Terri Knight to construct a decki in the back yard oft the property located at 117 North Charlotte Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 Decks.  Or  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff.lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission. is seeking. from HPO that will aidt them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    189 West Main  Street  Alter Storefront Entryways  Change Window Configurations  Construct a Covered Deck  Create a Rooftop Lounge/Deck  Construct Two Balconies    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 toc cashiers in thet front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street. Address of Property: 189 W. Main St., Washington, NC Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Fowle Building Owner's Name: New Vision Partners, LLC.  Lot Size: 60ft.  feet by  130ft. (depth)  feet.  (width)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  Primarily Interior Upfit of the first floor. Adding covered deck in the back. Change some existing doors to windows to match existing building and/or connected property recently upfit. Creating a rooftop lounge/deck which is partially covered, partially enclosed and partially open.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  New Vision Partners, LLC. (Name of Applicant- type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  13200 Strickland Rd. Ste. 114-222, Raleigh, NC 27613  (Mailing Address) 8/12/19 TE  (Zip Code)  919-810-9571 (Daytime Phone Number) Managing Member  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minorv work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  8. Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Property Owners & Address. Provide a list of property owners & addresses of all properties Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  located within a 100' of the above subject property.  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  o Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). > Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12" x 11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11"; snapshots ofi individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any oft these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" X 11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort Printed August 23, 2019 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  BeeR  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  N  1:261 Feet    OBJECTID 6491 OWNER NAME NEWVISION PARTNERS LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27615 BLDG VAL 273368 TAXABLE VA 425588 PROPERTY ADDRESS 189 WI MAIN ST DATE 9/27/2013 SALE PRICE 70000.00 NBHD DESC ZONE1 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC17 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 16369  GPIN 5675-78-9150 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC TOT VAL 425588 PREV ASSESS 644643 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1829/00281 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1934 SUB DESC OFFICE EFFYR 1990  GPINLong 5675-78-9150 MAILING ADDRESS 1205 KINSDALE DRIVE STATE NC LAND VAL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.17 MBL 567508290 STAMPS 140.00 NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBR_BED PIN 15007123  LOT SE CRN OFI MAIN AND RESPESS 152220  Beaufort County online map access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is for informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor shouid it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County ofE Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim alir responsibility: andI legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website. Thet user agreest that Beaufort County  and its Assigns shall bel held! harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    North Carolina Department ofNatural and Cultural Resources  State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator  Govemor Roy Cooper Sccrctary Susi I.I Hlamilton October 27,2017 Justin Fejfar, PE Castle Island, LLC 13200 Strickland Road, Suite 114-222 Raleigh, NC27613  Offices of. Archives and! listory Deputy Secretary Kevin Cheny  justin@newysionle.net  RE: 2016 CDBG Downtown Redevelopment Project: Rehabilitation of Fowle Building,  189 West Main Street, Washington, Beaufort Co., ER 17-0556  Dear Mr. Fejfar:  Thank you for your October 20, 2017 e-mail submittal of drawings for the above-referenced property that provide a description oft the material tol be used for the storefronts and detailed drawings ofthe proposed replacement windows. These are in response to our October 5,2 2017, letter. Wel have We understand that the remaining historic wooden window sashes located on the first floor will be retained and rehabilitated. The windows on the second and third floor have been replaced with aluminum windows, Damaged or deteriorated replacement windows will be replaced with aluminum windows that match the existing replacement windows. Replacement windows will have aj painted finish and clear glazing. All existing wooden jamb, sill, head, and casing elements will be retained. The two second-floor doors and transom windows on the rear elevation will match the materials, finish We find the proposed aluminum replacement windows and second-floor doors to be consistent with the appearance, size, design, proportions, and profiles of the historic windows. Further, we find the proposed first-floor storefront material consisting of aluminum framing elements with al Kynar paint finish and clear glazing to be consistent with the size, design, proportions, profiles, and finish found on Based on our review of this submittal, we. find that the conditions outlined in our previous correspondence have been satisfied and that the project meets the Secretaryofthe Interior's Standards  reviewed the drawings and offer the following comments.  and profiles oft the replacement windows.  historic storefronts.  for Rehabilitation.  Location: 1091 Hast) Jones Streer, Ralcigh: NC27601 Mailing/ Address: 4617) Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC2 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: 91807-4671/40-499    The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 oft the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR part 800 and in accordance with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive Order XVI. Ifyou have questions concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/807-6579 or enee.gledhill-carley/@neder.gov.  Sincerely,  Psldh-Fadley  Oamoma) M. Bartos  cc: Dan Becker, NC Department ofCommerce Richard B. Moore, McDavid Associates, Inc. Kevin Richards, Mid-East Commission John Wood, SHPO Eastern Office  dan.becker@nocommerce.com bm@medavid-ne.com rchri@micestcom.re johm.papod@ndergoy    STATE  RoY COOPER Governor ANTHONY M. COPELAND Secretary KENNY FLOWERS Assistants Secretary  PRIL 12.177 QUAMV VIDR  May 14, 2019  The. Honorable Jay MacDonald Hodges, Mayor City ofWashington 102 E. Second Street Washington, North Carolina 27889  Dear Mayor Hodges: Subject:  Release ofl Funds CDBG 16-E-2904  City ofWashington Downtown Revitalization  Thank you for the information submitted regarding the above referenced grant. The information is satisfactory, and all conditions relating to the grant are released effective the date oft this letter. Funds may now be obligated or expended on any approved activity in the Ifyou have any questions, please contact Libby Smith at (919)814-4677 or email  grant.  bysmienscommeren.  Sincerely, h fpn Iris Payne  Director, State CDBG Programs Cc: Jonathan Russell, City Manager Kevin Richards, Mid-East Commission Libby Smith, NC Commerce  Northo Carolinal Department of Commercel Rural Economic Development Division 301 NorthV Wlmingtons Street 143461 Mails Service Center I Ral-gh.NC27690-4346  9198144 4600T    STATE  Roy COOPER Governor ANTHONY! M. COPELAND Secretory NAPOLEONWALLACE DeputySecreldry  November 16, 2017 Cityo ofWashington 102 E. Second St. POI Box 1988 Washington, North Carolina 27889 Dear Mayor Hodges, Subject: Grant Agreement  The Honorable Jayl MacDonald Hodges, Mayor  Grant Number 16-E-2904 Downtown Redevelopment Fund  Itisi my pleasure to notify, you that the CityofWashington hasl been awarded a CDBG economic development; grant in the: amount of $500,000.00 for the rehabilitation ofthe Per CDBG1 regulations, no) projecta activities can begin and no funds may be obligated or expended until the following conditions on thef funding approval (enclosed) are released: 1. The Grant Agreement (enclosed) is executed and returned to the Rural Economic  Fowle Buildingl located at 189 W. Main St.  Development Division.  2. The Funding Approval is executed and returned. 3. Two signatory forms are completed and one: is returned. 4. AVendor Blectronic Payment form is completed and returned. 5, Ane executed copy oft the Loan Agreement is returned.  NorthCarollnal Department ofCommerce!! Rural Economlc Devclopment Dlvislon 3011 Northy Wiiminglon: Street/4346N Mails Service Center Ralelgh, NC2 27699-4346  919844 4600T    Thel Honorable Jay MacDonald Hodges November: 16,2017 Page 2  Upon the Rural Economic Development Division receipt and approval oft thei information requested above, ai release offunds letter willl bei issued. No CDBG funds will be disbursed until the release off funds letter) has been issued to the City of Washington. Everyone involved in the development of the City'ssuccessful. application is to be congratulated. We commend the City fori its economic development efforts andl look forward to working with you on the implementation of the project. Ifyoul have any questions regarding this award, please call Dan Becker, thel Main! Street Grants Administrator for thel DepartmentofCommere, at (919)814-4668.  Sincerely, peryrhmil George Sherrill Chief ofStaff : Bobby Roberson  North Carolinal Department ofC Commerce! RurolE Economic Developnien!! Division 30INorthV Wininglons Street! 14346MallServlce' Center Raleigh.NC27699- 4346  9198144 4600T    NORTHCAROLINA. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Small Citles Community Development Block Grant Program  FUNDING APPROVAL  1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF RECIPIENT: City of Washington 1021 E. Second St. PO) Box 1988  2. CDBG GRANT NUMBER: 16-E-2904  Approval Date: Noyember 16, 2017  Washington, North Carolina 27889  3.A APPROVED PROJECT: DOCE Project Number E-1  Prolect Name Castle Island  Grant Amount $500,000.00  4.E ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION: Nof funds can be obligated or expendedo on anya activityl Int the grant untilt the Rural Economic Development Dlvision recelves and approves the affidavit of Publication oft the Notices oft the Finding of No  Significant Impact ont the Enviranment (FONSI) and the Requesti for Release of Funds.  5,A ADOTTONALCONDTIONS. by the Rural Economlo Development Division:  Nof funds can! be obligated or expended on any activity In the grant until thet following conditions arer released inv writing 1. The grant agreement Is executed by the authorized local official and a copy isr returned.  2. Thef funding approval is executed: and ac copy returned. 3. Twos signatory forms are executed and onel Is retumed. 4. AVendor Electronic Payment form is completed and returned. 5. An executed copy ofthel Loan Agreementi isr returned.  SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OFFICIAL hyefhny George Sherrill, Chief of Staff Date: _Noyember 16.2017  7. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED RECIPIENTOFFICIAL  Date: 12/4/17    NORTHCAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE GRANT. AGREEMENT ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT  COMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENTBLOCKPROGRAM  Recipient Name: Project Name:  City of Washington Castle) Island  Grant No. 16-E-2904  Upon execution oft this grant agreement, thel North Carolina Department of Commerce (DOC) agrees toj provide to the: recipient the Community) Development: Block Grant assistance under TitleIofthel Housing and Community Development. Act of1974, as amended (P.L. 93-383) authorized by the) DOC funding: approval, thel North Carolina Community) Development Block Grant administrative rules, applicable. laws anda all other requirements ofDOC now or hereafteri in effect. The grant agreement is effective on the date thc grant agreement and funding approval are signed by ther recipient. The approved application, including the certifications, maps, schedules andi theirs submissions in the application, any subsequent amendments to thes approved application and funding approval andt the following general terms and conditions are fully incorporated into 1. Definitions. Except tot the extent modified or supplemented! by the agreement, any term defined in the North Carolina Community Development Block Grant. Administrative Rules, (a) Agreement means this grant agreement, as described above and any amendments (b) Recipient means the entity designated as a recipient for grant assistance: int the (c) Certifications mean the certifications submitted withi the grant application. (d) Assistance provided under this agreement mcans the grant funds provided under (e) Program means the community development program, project, or other activities, Including thea administration thereof, for which assistance: is being! provided under this agreement. (f) Private entity means the corporation, parinership, proprietorship or other entity, which has entered: into an equally binding commitment with the recipient to create and/or retain 2, Obligations of the] Recipient. The recipient shall perform thej program as specified in the application approved by) DOC. The recipient shall also comply with all other lawful requirements ofDOC, all applicablei requirements ofthe General Statutes oft the State ofNorth Carolina and any other applicable laws, rules; regulations, requirements, policies andl Executive Orders currently or hereafter ini force, The recipient shall be responsible fore ensuring that all projectj jobs are created or retained in accordance witht the approved CDBG application, that such jobs arei filled byl low and moderatei income persons int thej proportion presented int the application, and that all parties incur the full level of private investment committed toi in the application. In the event ofaf finding! byt the recipient orb by DOCt that aj participating private entity has failedt to  and formaj part oft this grant agreement (this' "agreement"): 4NCAC1. K: shalll havet thes same meaning when used herein.  ors supplements thereto,  grant agreement and funding approval.  this agreement,  jobs as part oft this program.  Rurall Economio! Development Division 1/14  1    fulfilli its responsibilities undert the project application and any) legally binding commitment between aj participating private entity and the recipient (the "LBC"), including ther responsibilities to create and/or: retainj jobs andi invest private funds, thes recipient shall promptly exercise its rights and remedies to require repayment ofCDBG funds, or to assess such other penalty as provided by 3. Obligations of Recipient with respect to Certain' Thirdl Party Relationships. DOC shall hold the recipient responsible for complying with thet provisions of this agreement even whent the recipient designates a third party or partics tol undertake all or any part of thej program. The recipient shall comply with all lawful requirements ofDOC necessaryt to ensure that the 4. Conflict of) Interest. None of thef following or their immediate family members, during thet tenure oft thes subject person or for one yeart thereafter, shall have any direct ori indirect financial interest in any contract, subcontract or thep proceeds thereof for work tot thej performed: in connection with thej program assisted under this agreement: employees or agents oft thes recipient who exercise any function or responsibility with respect tot thej program, and officials oft the recipient, including members oft the goveming body, Thes samej prohibition shall bei incorporated 5. Reimbursement to) DOCfor Improper Expenditures, Therecipient will reimburse DOC for any amount of grant assistancc improperly expended. Inaddition, in the event ofa finding by the recipient or byI DOC that aj participating, private entity has failedt to fulfill its responsibilitiesi under thet project application or LBCt to create and/or retainj jobs, the recipient shall repay to) DOC the amounts to: set: forthi in) Paragraph) LA. ofthe LBC, whether or not: such 6. Access to Records. The recipient shall provide any duly authorized representative of DOC, thel North Carolina State Auditor, thel North Carolina Office ofBudget and Management, HUD and the Comptroller General at all reasonablei times access tos and ther right toi inspect, copy, monitor, ande examine: all ofthe books, papers, records, and other documents relating tot the grant foraj period ofthree years: following the completion of all close-out] procedures. 7. Profect Savings. The recipient is obligated to contribute 100 percent ofi its pledged cash contribution to the CDBG project even ifthep project expericnces as savings after authorized activities are completed, Any project savings accrue tot the CDBGprogram. 8. Payment of Income Generated by the Grant. The recipient shalll havet the responsibility to collect andj payt to. DOC certaini income generated by the CDBG and eamed by ther recipient, Suchi income includes buti isi not limited tot thet following: (1)payment ofprincipal andi interest on) loans made using CDBG funds; (2) proceeds from thel lease or disposition of real property acquired with CDBG funds; (3) any late fees associated withl loan orl leasej paymentsi in (1)and (2) above; (4) sale ofutility lines; and (5) interest earned ont the income int this part pending disposition ofs suchi income. Payments ofi income includedi in this part: shall be made to The assistance provided under this agreement shall not be usedi int the payment of any bonus or commission for thet purpose of obtaining) DOC approval oft the application for such assistance, or DOC approval ofe applications for additional assistance, or any other approval or concurrence of DOCI required under this agreement, or thel North Carolina Community Development. Block Grant Administrative Rules, with respect thereto; provided, however, that reasonable: fees or bona fide technical, consultant, managerial or other such services, other than actual solicitation, are not  thoLBCa and applicable state and federal laws.  program. is carried outi in accordance with the recipient's application.  in alls such contracts or subcontracts.  amounts are collected from thej participating private entity,  DOC within fifteen (15) days ofreceipt ofs same byt thei recipient.  hereby prohibited if otherwise eligible as program costs. Rural Economic Dovelopment: Division 1/14  2    Upon execution oft this agreement byl DOC and thet recipient in thes spaces bclow, the recipient hereby accepts the assistance ont thet terms of this grant agreement, effective ont the datei indicated below, and further certifies thatt the official signing below) has been duly authorized by the  recipient's governing body to execute this grant agreement,  Signature ofI Department ofCommerce Authorized Official By: enyefkemis George Sherrill, ChiefofStaff Cityo of Washington Name ofl Recipient Government  Date: November 16, 2017  Date: Dedahc4r0r7  By:  Mah Signatureo of Authorized Mayor (Title)  Aly  Rural Economic! Development Division 1/14  3    Adjoining Property Owners 189 West Main Street B MAILING ADDRESS CITY POBOX1988 P OBOX1 1988  A  C  D E STATE ZIP  1 OWNER NAME 2 WASHINGTON CITY OF 3 CITY OF WASHINGTON 4 BBL VENTURES LLC 5 ADDLED DADI LLC 6 SHOP & GOLLC 7 WILLIAMS DAVID GLENN 8 183 W MAIN STREET LLC 9 NEW' VISION PARTNERS LLC 10 HUGGINS. JI WAYNE 11 SCHMITT CHARLES RODNEY 12 163 WEST MAIN STREET LLC 13 THE HACKNEY DISTILLERY LLC 14 CZUHAI THOMASE E 15 LIVE WATER LLC 16 LTHOMAS PROPERTIES LLC 17 SUNNYSIDE PARTNERS LLC  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  409 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 129' VANI NORDEN ST WASHINGTON NC 27889  4525) VOAI ROAD 201 W MAIN ST  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  209 EDGEBROOK DR GREENVILLE 1205 KINSDALE DRIVE RALEIGH  NC 27858 NC 27615  111 DI DRIVE 45 MILLERS LN  CHOCOWINITY NC 27817 NEWHYDE PARK NY 11040  202) W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 627 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  24 SOMERSET LANE STAFFORD  VA 22554 NC 27858  POBOX422 201 WESLEY ROAD  WASHINGTON NC 27889  GREENVILLE  324 SUNNYSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC 27889  18 GOLDEN ROCKI INVESTMENTS LLC 45 MILLER LANE  NEWH HYDE PARK NY 11040    orntoion Decelopmenb fhtoric Presevoation  -  City  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  August 23, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 189 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by New Vision Partners for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at 189 West Main Street:  a. b. C. e.  Alter storefront entryways on the north side Change window configurations Construct a covered deck on the south side d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck  Construct two balconies on the second floor of the south side  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  189 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 189 West Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  a. Alter storefront entryways on the north: side 0. Change window configurations Construct a covered deck on the south side d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck  e. Construct two balconies on the second floor of the south. side  a) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.7 Storefronts: 3.7.1 Retain and preserve commercial storefronts and storefront details that contribute to the historic character of the building including display windows, recessed entryways, doors, 3.7.2 Retain and preserve historic materials including wood, stone, architectural metal, and cast 3.7.3 Follow the guidelines outlined in the materials section in order to protect and maintain historics storefront materials such as wood, masonry, and architectural metals. 3.7.41fre replacement ofa a deteriorated storefront or storefront feature is necessary, replace only the deteriorated element to match the original in size, scale, proportion, material, texture and 3.7.5 Ifr reconstructing a historic storefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifa available. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation. 3.7.6 Altering the entrance, including its location, through a significant storefront is not permitted. Changing a storefront sO that it appears as an office or residential use other than 3.7.7 Using materials which detract from the historic or architectural character of the building, b) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4. Windows 3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary by splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 If replacement of a window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original in size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. 3.4.7 Historic windows and doors should be properly maintained and protected by:  transoms, corner posts, columns, and other decorative features.  iron.  detail.  commercial shall not be allowed. such as mirrored glass, shall not be allowed.  and Doors:  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. deteriorated section to match the original.    of Maintaining caulking and weather stripping to ensure the unit is weather tight and to improve oProperly cleaning wood windows and doors and maintaining a sound paint film 3.4.11 Introduction ofr new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin  thermal efficiency  patterns.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4. Upper Façades: 3.8.1 Retain and preserve historic facades and their architectural features such as brick corbelling, brick and stone string courses, quoins, stone and tile coping, cornices, and other 3.8.2 Retain and preserve historic materials whenever possible including wood, stone, 3.8.3 It is prohibited to cover architectural details or entire facades with non-historic materials or treatments. Whenever possible, remove metal cladding or other non-historic coverings from 3.8.4 If replacement of an upper facade feature is necessary, replace the deteriorated element with a new element and design that matches the original in size, scale, design, proportion, 3.8.6 Original windows in upper facades shall not be covered up or bricked-in. 3.8.7 Original windows on upper floors that are located on rear or noncharacterdefining elevations may be repaired, or replaced with vinyl-clad windows that match the originals in  façade elements.  architectural metal, and cast iron.  historic facades.  detail, and material, if possible.  design, size, proportions: and detail.  c) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.4 Decks:  5.4.1 A deck: shall be designed and constructed so that the historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks sO they can be removed 5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed in inconspicuous locations, usually on the building'srear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained ina a color that is compatible with the historic d) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  ini the future without damage to the structure.  proportions ofi the building. structure and district.  3.5.1 Retain and preserve historic roofs and roofing materials including Its overall design, shape, 3.5.2 Character defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  pitch, and line.  trim, and: soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.    3.5.3 Roofs on historic structures are often characterized by their historic material including clay tiles, slate or wood shingles, and metal. These materials should be retained and preserved, 3.5.4 The use of white or very light colored shingles is strongly discouraged. 3.5.5 Changing the historic character of the building by adding roof elements that are not historically accurate such as dormer windows, vents, or skylights is prohibited. 3.5.6 Protect and maintain historic roofs in an appropriate manner: O Ensure the roofi is weather tight by repairing leaks and deteriorated metal flashing. o Roofs should be properly ventilated to prevent moisture retention and condensation as o Roofing material should be adequately anchored to protect against wind and weather o Protect: a roof from vegetation that may potentially damage the roof. OF For flat roofs in downtown, iti is important to insure that they are properly drained and 3.5.7 Roof ventilators and other mechanical items shall be installed on rear slopes or other locations not easily visible from the public right-of-way. Roof additions in downtown should be placed away from the primary elevation or hidden behind parapet walls. 3.5.8 Built-in gutters that are important to the architecture of the structure should be repaired 3.5.9 Painting roofing materials that historically were not painted is prohibited. 3.5.10 The installation of new gutters and downspouts is appropriate and should be done in a e) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.9 Rear 3.9.1 Retain and preserve historic side and rear elevations and their architectural features. 3.9.2 Historic: structures which are adjacent to rear parking areas or public rights-of-way are encouraged to utilize reare entrances allowing public and private access. If the rear entrance is public, awnings and other exterior features should be more subdued than those of the primary  whenever economically feasible.  OF Routinely clean guttersand downspouts. well as insect infestation. damage. watertight.  rather than removed.  manner that does not damage any architectural features.  Elevations:  elevation.  This property received a federal grant that required the Section 106 review by both the State Historic Preservation office in Greenville, Raleigh, and the National Parks Service. The presented. requests have been approved by all entities. Based on finding of fact the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 189 West Main Street- storefront restoration, window reconfiguration, rooftop lounge, deck, and A request has been made by New Vision Partners for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the  balcony.  following changes to the property located at: 189 West Main Street:  a. Alter storefront entryways on the north side b. Change window configurations Construct a covered deck on the south side d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck  e. Construct two balconies on the second floor of the south side  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to New Vision Partners to make the above changes on the property located at 189 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, 3.7 Storefronts, 3.8 Upper Facades, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to New Vision Partners to make the above changes on the property located at 189 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, 3.7 Storefronts, 3.8 Upper Facades, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and! 5.41 Decks. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the  approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to New Vision Partners to make the above changes on the property located at 189 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is not congruous with the    Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, 3.7 Storefronts, 3.8 Upper Facades, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9ld), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.        FROI  0000     FRONT  onon  i CAnan              PMFEN  ST G-03  o o o 0 o o o 0  0 o 0 o E o 0 o o  5  DA  1.01 Suite 1000 Floor Plan  1.02 Roof Floor Plan  1.03 Covered Deck Area Plan  DATE    0367  OBA6-TO  -  OFRONTWAL  ORACKWAI STOREFRONTS  EL1  HISTORIC REVIEWSET    D36  EL2 REVIEWSET    L  P fian  i  @3DFRONT  03DBAC  SET EL3    JL  First National) Bank.  Prioros BY  EL4  HISTORICI REVIEWS SET    SBBO OFTOP 3ORO TP-AECK 6  JI  332-103869  22NDE06  ISTEOORG OEOUNDATION6 6  1)  546-14456  BATHROOM 36  38-  SE1  HISTORIC REVIEWS SET    SHGHRSOF 6  46-1094  SHGBSOFG  5  OINATMECHAREN  OSATIONATR  LOR 4ROOFIOPDECK6  3/4- 6  2NDFISR  MSTFLOOA NDATION  SE2  HISTORIC REVIEWSET    EHEHBPOE 3  546-1014 6  A  ROOM 414 6 4RQOFI3F-A4AK 6  32  22NDEIOOR 6  STRORO FOUNDATON 6  SE3  HISTORIC REVIEWSET    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Approprateness for the owner of 415 East Second Street to repair the front porch boards using like materials 2. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 131 East Main Street to repair the existing roof using like materials on the 3, A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 102 West MLK Street to elevate the HVAC units in the same location on 4. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 117 North Charlotte Street to repair the existing roof using like materials on 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 113 South Harvey Street to repair a porch pier using like materials on the  on the property.  property.  the property.  the property.  property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Summary from the Meeting with City Council to Discuss  Further Direction    1A  Washington City Council Richard Brooks Virginia Finnerty Doug Mercer William Pitt Roland Wyman  Mayor Mac Hodges City Manager Jonathan Russell  Cityy  Washington  NORTH CAR'OLINA  MEETING SUMMARY  Department: Community & Cultural Service  Date: Time: Location Present:  August 22, 2019 6:00 PM-7:30PM Civic Center, Washington, NC  City of Washington Council: Mac Hodges, Mayor; Virginia Finnerty, Mayo Pro-Tem; Dough Mercer, Council Member; Ronald Wyman, Council Member. Cityo of Washington Staff: Jonathan Russell, City Manager; Mike Dail, Community & Cultural Services Director; Emily Rebert, Historic Preservation Planner; Dawn Maye, Historic. Preservation Commission: Cheri Vaughn, Chairman; Karen Mann, Vice- Chairman; Rebecca Clark, Commission Member; Scarlett Boutchyard, Commission member; Scot Craigie, Commission Member; Colleen Knight, Commission Member.  Planning Administrative Support; Andy Olsen, IT Administrator.  A Public Input meeting was held at the Washington Civic Center at 6:00 PM on Thursday, August 22, 2019 in regards to the Historic District Design Guidelines. Attendees were asked to sign in at arrival.  Thei following attended from the public: 1. Elanie Roberson 235 EM Main Street  NAME  ADDRESS  NAME  ADDRESS 1186 Bayview Drive 424 E2nd Street 513E2nd Street  2. Bobby Roberson 235 E Main Street  3. Janene Lyles 5. Ken Miller 9. Bobby Turner 11. Pat Griffin 13 Sim Hodges 15. Justin Ferrari 17. Mike Renn 19. Dee Aongleton 21. Tom Jardone 25. Jeff Furst  356 Mill Creek Lane, 4. Par Lyles  Bath 418 E2nd Street 145 E Main Street 414 Lodge Road 222 E2nd Street 604 W: 2nd Street 164 E Main Street EWater Street 209 E Main Street  6. Carolyn Wilberscheid  7. Johanna Hudson 417 CBH Lodge Road 8. Ed Stone  10. Betty Jane Green 307 El Main Street 12. Trent Tetterton 201 Lawson Road 14. Mary Anne Foy 501 E Main Street  16. Shirley Stone 18. Karen Renn 20. Briana Dintino 22. Andy Olsen Carpenter  513 E: 2nd Street 164 EN Min Street 518 E. 2nd Street 245E 2nd Street 415 E2nd Street 524 W Main Street  23 David Carraway 110 N. Academy Street 24. Bennett 27. Barry Friedland 114 N. Bonner Street 28. Gayle Hudson  129 Van Norden Street 26. Scott Campbell 213 N. Market Street  102 East Second: Street, Washington, North Carolina 27889  (252/975-9300 www.washingtonnegor    29. Howell Miller 31. John Carbone 33. Robert Sands 37. Diane Lewis 39. Kay Mitchell 41. Steve Mower 43. Al Dintino 45. Vann Knight 47. Dominic Reisig 49. John Stallings 51. Tony Burdi  305 Lawson Road 214 EV Water Street 820 Park Drive 227E E: 2nd Street 103 Lee Place 518 E 2nd Street 231 E. Main Street 117 McNair Street 239E. 2nd Street  30. Kimberly Lee 32. Patty Franz 34. Attik Nemecz 38. Bill Sykes  412 W Main Street 118 Charlotte Street 415 E: 2nd Street 628 El Main Street 213 N Market Street  35. Cheryl Woolard 1202 N Market Street 36. Karen Dairane  114 N. Bonner Street 40. Betty B. Nichols 519 W. Main Street  42. Butch Strickland 705 EN Main Street 44. Glenn Simpson 203 S. Academy Street  46. Amber Flora Thomas 48. LizStallings 52. James Nevin  502 EN Main Street 120 Charlotte Street 239 E2"d Street 235 E2md Street  120 Charlotte Street 50. Kathy Burdi  53. Marie Woodland 1207 N Market Street  The following is al brief meeting summary that highlights the major items discussed.  SUMMARY:  Jonathan Russell, City Manager, welcomed everyone for coming out to participate in the forum concerning the City ofWashington Historic District. Mr. Russell explained, this was a time for the public to express their thoughts and concerns about the Design Guidelines. The following attendees spoke and  their comments are summarized below. Ken Miller, had the following concerns: 1. Lack of consistency of rulings  2. Public needs more information concern the Historic Commission Design Guidelines. 3. Would like for the Commission to look into using modern products for restoration. (example: hardy plank: siding, non-wood windows that are: affordable and historical in aesthetic.  Don Stroud, explained the following:  1. He explained how the Historic District began. Mr. Stroud was very clear about how the rules are  working and there should not be any changes to the Design Guidelines. Betty. Jane Greene, had the following concerns and questions: 1. Wants the guidelines to stay stringent. 2. Consistency in enforcing the Design Guidelines.  3. Ms. Greene does not want vinyl materials or chain link fencing to be used within the Historic 4. Better communication between City Staff and the public that is residing within the district 5. Would like to have a summary of rules and the process for a Certificate of Appropriateness  District.  concerning the Design Guidelines requirements.  (COA).  Page2of4    Dee Congleton, expressed the following: not want the, guidelines to change. Shirley Stowe, had the following concerns: 2. Questions concerning code enforcement. James Nevin, had the following suggestion: using vinyl materials.  1. Ms. Congleton, explained that she is very pro towards the current Design Guidelines. She does  1. The Commission needs to follow the guidelines and be consistent. 3. Ms. Stowe does not want the current Design Guidelines to change.  1. Agreed that the Commission should looki into using modern materials, but does not agree to  Kathy Burdi, had the following questions:  1. Asked whati is the mission statement for the Historic Preservation Commission? 2. Ms. Burdi does not think that there should be a fee to apply for a COA. 3. How can the COA process be expedited. sO that the home owner's projects are not delayed. 4. Would like to get a list of projects that can be performed without a COA. 1. How does the Commission enforce the Design Guidelines?  Kay Mitchel, had the following questions:  2. Do Houses of Worship have to meet the same standards as private homeowners? 1. What does the $50.00 application fee fort the Certificate of Approprateness go towards?  Amber Thomas, had thei following questions:  2. Isthe City of Washington budget available fori the public? James Nevin, spoke again agreeing to previous comments. Kathy Burdi, had the following concerns: 1. Front yard code enforcement. a. Debris in front yard b. Height of grass in yards.  Large items being stored ini front yards.  2. Would like to know if code enforcement could handle these problems?  Attila Nomecz, had thet following questions: 1. Would like to see cobble stone side streets.  2. Wanted everyone at the meeting to be mindful oft the income and physical ability oft the neighbors. Some neighbors are not physically or economically: able to bring their home up to  code.  Don Stroud, expressed the following: due to neglect.  1. Reminded everyone of the 'Demolition by Neglect" and how many house have been demolished  Page 3of4    An unidentified concerned resident of the Historic District, had the following comment: 1. Agreed that the commission needs toi investigate new materials that would be acceptable and  stay within the characteristics of the Historic District. Dominic Rerisigh had thei following concerns and questions:  1. He brought another factor that had not been addressed during thet forum, children with 2. Mr. Rersig has a child with disabilities and asked the question about installing a sidewalk along  disabilities and asked thet following:  McNair Street to the board walk, for pedestrian access. 3. What is the process to have curb cuts for handicap accessibility? Rebecca Clark, Historic Preservation Commission, suggested the following:  1. The City of Washington start a loan program to assist with renovations. This would be al loan with interest but, with al low interest rate. This could help homeowners who are not able to  obtain a loan from a bank.  Scarlett Boutchyard, Historic Preservation Commission, presented the following: 1. gave al brief resume of herself. She took notes throughout the forum.  2. Tried to answer questions and concerns that the audience had brought up during the meeting. After all discussion was completed, Jonathan Russell, City Manager, again thanked everyone for coming  out and closed the forum. The forum ended at7:15 PM.  Page 4 of4    MINUTES    Revised: August 9, 2019  WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Minutes Tuesday, August 6, 20197:00 pm Members Present Cheri Vaughn - Chairman Karen Mann - Vice-Chairman  Rebecca Clark Scarlett Boutchyard  Colleen Knight Scot Craigie  Members Not Present Kathleen Couch Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Dawn Maye, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation  1. Amoment of silence was taken. 1. Asilent roll call was taken by staff.  ill. Roll Call IV. Old Business V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Mr. Ronald Clark for a Certificate of Appropriateness to recreate a previously existing 4.5-foot fence along west side property line on the Mr. Ronald Clark came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Clark explained that when Mr. Jim Fortescue purchased the property adjacent to Mr. Clark's property Mr. Fortescue moved the existing fence that was built by Mr. Greg Purser. Thei fence was moved approximately 100 feet 5o that Mr. Fortescue could subdivide the property. Mr. Ronald Clark wants to restore the fence back to its original location and appearance. The back  property located at 334 West Main Street.  section.off fencing will stay in its original location and condition. The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Karen Mann, asked if the fence would be wooden. Mr. Clark responded that thei fence would be constructed out of wood and painted white, just as originally built.  1    Revised: August 9, 2019  Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Clark to recreate a previously existing 4.5-foot fence along west side property line on the property located at: 334 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings andi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6-F Fences. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion and all 2. Ar request has been made by Ms. Colleen Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 17'x12' dependency building in the back yard of the property located at: 231 Colleen Knight recused herself from the vote due to a conflict of interest. She resides at Karen Mann made the following motion that the Historic Preservation Commission recuse Colleen Knight from voting on the current issue. The motion was seconded by Mr. Vann Knight came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Knight explained to the board that he is proposing a 17'x12's studio that will be constructed out of Nordic! Spruce. This isal kit that will be constructed on site. The studio would be placed in the rear of the Cheri Vaughn asked ift the studio would be painted? Mr. Knight responded that the studio will be painted the same color as the existing house, Scot Craigie asked if the studio would be placed on a foundation? Mr. Knight responded that the studio would  voted 6 in favor and 0 opposed.  East Main Street.  231 East main Street and will be part of presentation.  Rebecca Clark and all voted! 5i int favor and 0 opposed.  property. The building would be wired for electricity.  be sitting on blocks.  The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Rebecca Clark made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Colleen Knight to construct a 17'x12' dependency building in the back yard of the property located at 231 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter312-Outbuldinegs and Accessory Structures and 5.2 - Residential Construction. Scot Craigie seconded the motion and all voted 51 in favor and 0 opposed. Karen Mann made the following motion that the Historic Preservation Commission reinstate Colleen Knight toi the Historic Preservation Commission. The motion was seconded by Scarlett Boutchyard and all voted 5 in favor and 0 opposed.  3. Arequest has been made by Ms. Patsy Pierce for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace 3 doors located ont the secondary and tertiary facade of the property located at  109 North Brown Street.  2    Revised: August9 9, 2019  Ms. Patsy Pierce and Mr. Charles Caldwell came forward and was sworn in. The property was purchased in! December, 2018. Mr. Caldwell is proposing to replace three doors with modern sliding doors. The house is at federal style house. Renovations began in the kitchen, that included removing the subfloor and constructing a new foundation. Doors that are currentlyi installed are rotted and need to be replaced. Due to the: subfloor and foundation repairs the subfloor come up over the threshold of the existing door. The makes the existing door unusable. Please refer to the insert showing  the doors that are being proposed. The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Cheri Vaughn, asked if the replacement doors are wooden? Mr. Caldwell responded that they are vinyl. Scot Craigie corrected and: said that the doors are actually wooden doors with vinyl clad. Cheri Vaughn, asked ifa allt three doors would be sliding doors. Ms. Pierce responded yes. Scot Craigie asked the questions concerning the mullions. Ms. Pierce responded that there would be mullions along both sides of each door. Colleen Knight made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patsy Pierce fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace 3 doors located on the secondary and tertiary facade of the property located at 109 North Brown Street. This motion is based on the following findings andi fact: the applicationis congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 - Windows and Doors. Scarlett Boutchyard 4. Arequest has been made by Mr. Matthew' Willard fora Certificate of Appropriateness to remove a maple tree in the back yard of the property located at 318 East Second Street. Ms. Susan Zachary will be representing Mr. Matthew Willard. Ms. Susan Zachary came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Zachary described that the existing maple tree was dead and she has contracted Wayne's Tree Service to remove the existing tree. The tree will  seconded the motion and all voted 6 inf favor and 0 opposed.  be replaced with either a Silver Maple or Live Oak. The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Colleen Knight made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Matthew Willard for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove a maple tree in the back yard of the property located at 318 East Second Street. This motioni is based on thet following findings andi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 - Landscaping. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion 5. Arequest has been made by Ms. Bunny' Wayt fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at 404 East' Water Street:  and all voted 6i in favor and 0 opposed.  a. b. C.  Install a driveway Construct a garden shed/dog house Install walkways  3    Revised: August 9, 2019  Ms. Bunny Wayt came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Wayt proposed to installa driveway onto Academy Street at an existing curb cut. The driveway will have a red brick apron with crush stone in the center. Ms. Wayta also proposed to build a garden shed/dog house in the rear oft the house. This shed/dog house will mirror the existing house in façade and colors. There will also be a wired fence installed at the shed/dog  house to contain the owner's dogs. The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Karen Mann asked if this is a dog house kit. Ms. Wayt responded that she could not find al kit for the size. This would be constructed on site. Rebecca Clark ask about the height oft thel building. Ms. Wayt responded that the height would be between 61 feet to 81 feet tall to obtain a roof pitch for rain. Cheri' Vaughn asked about the proposed walkway. Ms. Wayt responded that there willl be al brick apron with concrete in the center. The walkway will go to Water Street and the side entry and will have to curve around an existing tree. Cheri Vaughn wanted to confirm the appearance oft the sidewalk. Ms. Wayt confirmed that the walkway would be constructed with a brick apron and concrete going down the center. Collen Knight asked about the fence. Ms. Wayt responded that ai fence would bei installed as per the pictures that were. submitted with Rebecca Clark made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to A request has been made by Ms. Bunny Wayt fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the  her application.  property located at 404 East Water Street:  a. b. C.  Install a driveway Construct a garden shed/dog house Install walkways  This motion is based on thet following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12 - Outbuildings and Accessory Structures and 4.3 - Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted 6i in favor and 0 opposed. 6. Ar request has been made by Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the existing standing seam metal roof with an architectural shingle roof on the Ms. Terri Knight came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Knight came forward to explain about the roof damage that was caused to hurricane Florence. Ms. Knight has had insurance adjusters to inspect the house and their conclusion was that the leaks were due to seepage not from hurricane damage. Ms. Knight has had roof contractors to give estimates on replacing the roof with standing seam metal roof and architectural asphalt shingles. Due to the cost oft the metal roof Ms. Knight proposed architectural shingles. Ms. Knight presented the board with a sample of shingles. The front porch roof and side entrance roof are also leaking. The roof on the side entrance is also leaking at the  property located at 117 North Charlotte Street.  flashing.  4    Revised: August 9, 2019  The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Cheri Vaughn asked ift the metal roof was original to the house? Ms. Knight responded that she did not know. Staff reported that the metal roof was original to the home. Cheri Vaughn asked about the why Ms. Knight would not consider the metal roof. Ms. Knight responded that her estimate on the standing seam metal roof was $16,000, Ms. Knight prefers the standing seam roofs so that the screws would not be seen, and the shingle roof was $9,000. Ms. Knight has considered patching the roof but was concerned about the how the house would look compared to other homes on the street. Scarlett Boutchyard wanted to confirm that the damage was caused due to hurricanes. Ms. Knight referred to the pictures that was: submitted in the application. Cheri' Vaughn asked how much damage has been done to the inside of the home? Ms. Knight responded, damage on the second floor ceiling and down stairs whichi is caused from the leak on the second floor. Due toi the water damage the plaster is starting to separate from the wall. Cheri Vaughn asked ift the insurance would help pay fori the damage to the walls. Ms. Knight responded that the insurance company has denied the claim stating that the damage was caused from seepage and not from the roof. The insurance company believes the damage is not coming from the roof but, from the sides of the house and is pre-existing damage that happened before the Knight's purchased the home. Scarlett Boutchyard confirmed thati the insurance company thinks that this is from wear and tear and not from al hurricane. Ms. Knight responded, thei insurance company believes that the damage is caused from seepage from the siding. Cheri Vaughn referred to the Design Guidelines concerning replacing roofs with the same materials that were original. Cheri Vaughn continued to aski if was possible to replace portions oft the roof overtime and if Ms. Knight had obtained an estimate for replacing portions oft the roof? Ms. Knight did not know if that would be possible. Ms. Knight referred to the Design Guidelines concerning hardship, due to that she is not able to afford a standing seam metal roof shei thought that she would be considered fora hardship. Ms. Knight stated, most homes on her street have asphalt shingles. Scarlett Boutchyard disagreed with Ms. Knight definition of hardship. Scot Craigie asked what year was the home built. Ms. Knight responded 1920. Scarlett Boutchyard asked if this home was her primary residence. Ms. Knight responded that the home will be her and her husband's home primary home in June 2020. Scarlett Boutchyard asked when did Ms. Knight purchase the home. Ms. Knight responded 2016. Karen Mann asked if there were any pictures of the house prior to Ms. Knight purchase? Ms. Knight responded that the pictures that were include with the application are the only pictures oft the house. Cheri Vaughn asked if the roof was original toi the home. Rebecca Clark stated that renovations have been completed on the house in previous years. Staff stated that the roof was original to the home. Karen Mann stated that if the roof originally had a shingle roof then the commission could approve the proposed shingle roof as per the Design Guidelines. Cheri Vaughn asked ift there were any questions. The discussion continued with the commission: There was a general discussion comparing a screw down roof compared to a standing seam roofing. The commission discussed about getting an estimate to roof the house in stages, only if this was possible. The commission also discussed about Ms. Knight getting estimates for a screw down metal roof. The discussion continued in response to Ms. Knight asking for al hardship. Staff reminded the commission is not to review any personal finances. Itwas the  5    Revised: August9 9, 2019  concerns of the commission that if this application was to be approved for hardship, then every application would want to be considered for a hardship. This part of the There was concern. about future leaks ift the roof is not replaced. Previously applications were denied when proposing as shingle roof. Design Guidelines states that replacement has to be like the original. The Commission stated that there was the option of screw down metal roof and the cost would more economically than standing seam. Karen Mann made the following motion: I move. that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the existing standing seam metal roof with an architectural shingle roof on the property located at 117 North Charlotte Street. This motion is based on the following findings and fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials and 3.5 roofs. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion and all voted 41 in favor and 2 opposed 7. Arequest has been made by Mr. Richard Mechling for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following landscape alterations to the backyard of the property located at 603  discussion concluded.  (Scot Craigie and Rebecca Clark.  West Main Street: a. b. C. d. e.  Construct an outdoor kitchen Build a pergola Create a fireplace Construct a terraced slope Install a fountain  Mr. Richard Mechling and Mr. Sean Tunney (contractor) came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Mechling described the construction. Landscaping at the reara and side of the property, driveway project, terrace at the rear of the property to reduce erosion, installation of a circular driveway path to the garage and pergola on the patio with an outdoor fireplace at the end and an outdoor kitchen and new fountain to be installed. Mr. Mechling asked that any direct questions concerning construction please address to  Mr. Sean Tunney.  The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Rebecca Clark asked where would the stone veneer be installed? Mr. Tunney responded; stone veneer willl bei installed facing the terrace wall, the outdoor kitchen and fireplace. Karen Mann asked if the columns on the pergola were going to match the existing columns on the house? Mr. Tunney responded yes. Karen Mann asked what color would be used on the pergola? Mr. Tunney responded yes, color will match the existing house. Also, Karen Mann asked concerning the sidewalk on Main Street; Mr. Tunney responded that the sidewalk would be the same material, this is to replace the existing sidewalk that is cracked. Scot Craigie; is the sidewalk going to the garage, Mr. Tunney responded that the sidewalk will be in the existing location running parallel to the river. Karen Mann asked about the tree at the base oft the property; response was that the driveway would be circular around the tree and off of Pierce Street. Rebecca  6    Revised: August 9,2 2019  Clark asked about the time frame of the project. Mr. Tunney responded that the project will: start on October 1, 2019 and will continue until completed. Karen Mann asked about location of the newi fountain; Mr. Tunney responded that the existing fountain will remain at its current location. The newi fountain will bei installed in the down the  steps on Main Street at the right corner. Discussion was closed.  Rebecca Clark made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Mechling for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following landscape alterations to the  backyard oft the property located at 603 West Main Street:  a. b. C. d. e.  Construct an outdoor kitchen Build a pergola Create a fireplace Construct ai terraced slope Install a fountain  This r motion is based on thet following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3 - Parking, Driveways, and Sidewalks; 4.6 - Fencings and Walls; 5.3 - Additions; and 5.4 - Decks. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted 6i in favor and 0 opposed. Arequest has been made by Mr. Jeff Furst for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to a primary facade located at 215 West Main Street:  a. b.  Replace and expand the existing fire escape Alter and introduce fenestrations  Mr. Jeff Furts and Curtis McLawhorn (designer) came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Furts stated that he purchased the building in 2017 at that time Mr. Wayne Harold came before the Commission to grant an entrance by the existing store (Scoop's). When the building was purchased the rear fire escape did not meet existing building code. At this time the second floor apartment was occupied. It was with the understanding that the 3rd floor apartment would not be occupied until the rear fire escape was brought up to code. Mr. Furts continued by adding the extra doors to the rear of the building is fort the egress of the apartment facing Main Street and this ist for safety issues and would full fill  the obligation to the city.  The Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Cheri Vaughn asked about the layout of the apartments? The building is laid out with two (2) apartments on each floor. One apartment facing Main Street and the second apartment facing the river. There willl be a rear hallway for egress and will provide asa secondary access for the third floor that is currently unoccupied. Rebecca Clark asked about color of the building? Mr. Furts; in keeping with the existing rear façades of the adjacent building Mr. Furts has consulted with River Girl and the building color willl be pastel green. Scarlett Boutchyard asked about the color of the fires cape? Mr. McLawhorn responded that the color willl be green as represented on the drawings that are included in the application. Rebecca Clark asked if the designs have been approved  7    Revised: August 9, 2019  by planning? Mr. McLawhorn responded that the plans have not been submitted for permits, but this project has been designed for the existing building code. There was a structural review of the building and it was the recommendation thati thet fire escape be replaced due not being in compliance with current building code. The fire escape treads and landings willl be constructed out of composite decking. Karen Mann asked about the depth of the fire escape? Mr. McLawhorn responded that the fire escape would be the same depth as the existing. Karen Mann asked about the apartments on the North side of the building? Mr. McLawhorn responded there is currently one means ofe egress and would like to have two (2) means of egress. The agreement with the building inspector is that there would have to have two (2) means of egress. Colleen Knight made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jeff Furst for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to a primary facade located at 215  West Main Street: a. b.  Replace and expand the existing fire escape Alter and introduce fenestrations  This motion is based ont thet following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4, Windows and Doors; 3.8 - Upper Facades; 3.9 - Rear Elevations; 3.10 - Architectural Details; 3.13 - Safety/ / Accessibility. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and all voted 6  in favora and 0 opposed. B. Minor' Works  1. Karen Mann made a motion to approve all minor works. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded  the motion and all voted in favor. Other Business (Presented by Staff)  1. Meeting with City Council to Discuss Further Direction- Waiting to Reschedule a. An meeting has been scheduled with the City Council on August 22, 2019 at 6:00PM at the Civic Center. This meeting will be an open forum to get feedback from the public concerning the Design Guidelines of the Historic Preservation Commission. Staff willl be sitting at the front and the City Council willl be sitting in the audience. Rebecca Clark asked about advertising the meeting. Staff responded, advertisement has been sent to Meg Howdy oft the Harbor District Alliance, social media, and has  This will be a public meeting.  been sent to all Commissioners.  2. Certified Local Government Training- Morehead City, September 6, 2019 a. Staffasked that ifany of the Commissioners would like to attend to please let staff  know in ai timely manner.  8    Revised: August9 9, 2019  d.  Approval of Minutes -J July 3, 2019  Colleen Knight mad a motion to approve the. July 3, 2019 minutes. Scarlett Boutchyard  seconded the motion all voted 6 in favor and 0 opposed  e.  Adjourn.  There being no other business Rebecca Clark made a motion to adjourn. Colleen Knight  second the motion all voted 6 in favor and Oopposed.  9    46-1017F  4B0OFIO.PEKG  33210346  2NDFI9ORG  I  MHSIFIOORG OFOUNDATION 6  @)3D1STFLOOR  OB6S EPSE  SE4 REVIEW'SET    a e  316  OBAG-TO  0  OFRONTAL  DAE  EL1  HISTORIC REVIEWSET    WITHTHE  LL  OBISPESSST  EL2 REVIEW'SET    INTERIORVIEW OWADOABIEVATON  TYP. MEETINGI RAIL  TYP. MEETING RAIL  HEAD  HEAD  SILL  JAMB  SILL  JAMB  OWIPOWBDETALIS  OWINDOW/ADETALS  W1  HISTORIC REVIEWSET    INTERIORVIEW 334 DOWDEL  TYP.MEETINGI RAIL  TYP. MEETING RAIL  HEAD  HEAD  SILL  JAMB  SILL  JAMB  OWMDOWCDETALS  OWMDOWDDETALS  W2  HISTORIC    INTERIORVIEW OWNDWE  TYPICAL INTERIORI MULLION  HEAD  SILL  JAMB  HEAD  JAMB  STOREFRONTD  W3  HISTORIC REVIEWSET