WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda  Tuesday. July 1, 2014 7:00 PM  . Opening of the meeting II. Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Major Works, Certificate of Appropriateness  A.  MajorWorks  I. Arequest has been made by the owner at 239 East Third! Street toi install a 61 foot wood 2. Arequest has been made by the owner at 149 North Market Street to replace transom 3. Arequest has been made by the owner at! 523 East Second Street to install ai four foot 4. Arequest has been made by the owner at: 2101 North Market Street to relocate ai mechanical 5. Arequest has been made by the owner at: 227 East Second Street to demolish the rear addition and construct a new rear addition toi include a porch and sunroom. 6. Arequest has been made by the owner of Moss Landing to begin construction on several  privacy fence around the backyard. windows with new aluminum windows. wooden picket fence. damper.  houses. Minor Works HVAC: system. 120 Academy Street.  1. Arequest has been made by the owneri at502 East Second Street to replace the split 2. Arequest has been made by the First Christian Church to install handrails at the rear of 3. Arequest has been made by the owner of 107 West Main Street to replace the 4. Arequest has been made by the owner of 143 North Market Street to replace the 5. Ar request has been made by the owner of225 East Main Street to change out the HVAC 6. Arequest has been made by the City ofV Washington to remove. a dead tree in the right of 7. AI request has been made by the owner of 328 West Main! Street to change out the AC 8. Arequest has been made by the owner of 412 West Main! Street to change out the AC 9. Arequest has been made by the owner of Moss landing to install emporaryadvertsing  condenser int the rear of the building. present air conditioning unit in kind.  system in kind.  way at 735 West Main Street.  unit. unit.  signs at several locations on the property.  VII. Other Business  VII. Approval of Minutes-June3,2014    OLD BUSINESS    MAJOR WORKS  Ms. Stacey Thalmann 239 East Third Street  Install Privacy Fence in Rear Yard    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 239E.eds  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  STAasy IHALGIANIN!  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  6oteedr wiaod paikacy tense baakpart  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that  review year.  Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the require month by the Historic lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC prior to the meeting application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one meeting. An incomplete  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  STEY A.TALMAN (Name of Applicant type or print) 239E. 3e0 (Mailing Address) S/HIHE (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  SEMBSAApuIE 351-AA2-5AR (Daytime Phone Number)  (ZipCode)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature) hslhaa  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next  application becomes a issuance of a Minor  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not property owner from obtaining any  approved by staff will be fowarded  meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. meeting You of the written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf. must give                REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From:. Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: The owner of 239 East Third Street has submitted a request toi install aj privacy fence at the rear of  the property.  A request has been made by Stacey Thalmann to installa 6j foot privacy fence around the rear yardo of the property located at 238 East Third Street. Togrant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included ini the: sample motions below. Anyconditions the Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Thalmann toi install a privacy fence around the rear of the property located at 239 East" Third Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6 Streetscape  and Site Design - Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Thalmann to install a privacy fence around the rear of the property located at 239 East Third Street. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6 Streetscape and Site Design- Fences and Walls. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission  place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Thalmann toi install a privacy fence around the rear of the property located at 239 East Third Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6Streetscape  and Site Design - Fences and Walls.    ADDRESS: 239 E3St  TAX: PARCEL NUMBER: 5675-98-7175  CONTRIBUTING: Yes CONTRIBUTING NUMBER: 416 CURRENT OWNER: Stacey A Thalmann  NON-CONTRIBUTING - NUMBER:  FLOOD ZONE: Yes  SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STRUCTURE: 1277 WINDOW STYLE: upstairs: 1/1 downstairs: same  DOOR STYLE: 61 Panel Colonial ROOF MATERIAL: Asphalt Shingle. DESCRIPTION: Similar to # 415.  OTHER FEATURES: (ie. fences, accessory building, etc.):    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness-239 East Third Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the' Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 1001 feet oft the above referenced property.  An request has been made by the owner of 239 East Third Street to install a privacy  fence ini the rear yard oft the property.  Ify you would like to see plans fori this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday. July 1, 2014  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side oft the building and goto the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan 252-946-0897  Community Development Planner brennan@washingtonncgov    Adjoining Property Owners: 239 East Third Street  Theresa Nielson 3678 Oakwood Dr. Longmont, CO 80503 Diannal Norman 214N N. Harvey Street Washington, NC 27889 Alton Lassiter 224N N. Harvey Street Washington, NC 27889 Paulette Snow 226N N. Harvey Street Washington, NC 27889 Ragalial Properties 206 Worthington-Warren Rd. Stokes, NC 27884 Louise Farris PO Box 501 Washington, NC: 27889 Frederick Roberson 402 Broad Creek Dr. Washington, NC: 27889 Linyear Woolard Heirs 135 Cremona Dr. Newport News, VA 23608 Jose Gonzalez 228 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Joshua Stiles 232 East Second. Street Washington, NC 27889 Joseph Wilberscheid 424 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889    Whiting' Toler 238 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Floyd Brooks 558 Barwick Drive Washington, NC 27889 Caroline Cutler 1912 Bingham Ct. Myrtle Beach, SC: 29588    Page Welch LLC  149 North Market Street  Replace existing Windows with New  Aluminum Windows    5/27/2014  Application: for aCertificate ofH Historic! OHPEAPI-RIcEN  Department of Planning and Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Application for a Certificate of Historic District Appropriateness  Date: 5127/14  Fee:  A: Information on Structure Under Consideration Address: 149N MAKET SK. Date Purchased: 20067 Date Constructed: unkvoun  Current Owner: Page Welb LLC Original Owner (ifknown): Mnknvwn  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Iti is the responsibiltyofthe  applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact Inspections Department: 252-975-9352/252-975-9304. Has a Building Permit been obtained? YES B: Information for Person Making Application Mailing Address: pO Bey 1626 City, State ZIP: Waskniten NC 27459 Phone: 252- 946-9159 c: Proposed Changes to Structure  NO_ x  N/A  Name:  Will PngL  (We) respectfilly request a Certificate ofAppropriateness: byi issued in accordance with the  CiyofWashington Zoning Ordinance for the following reasons: Front, yheu ane wirdous en Ke Onfke Rn Floer asd A- rou 9 T hAe. A prc % Lookig Wendois Wrk A  Market Sd Leoel wenes On  E3  Level. this LAst sefrs  fhusc ls  E  FT Zu7t  wool frems Aloke fekee fike D: ((We)u understand approved requests are valid for one (1)year.    NOTE: APPLICANTS, AND/OR THEIR AGENTS OR PARTIES OF INTEREST, ARE PROHIBITED! FROM. ANY CONTACT: IN RELATION TO THIS MATTER WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS PRIOR TO THEI PUBLIC  HEARING.  Respetilysubmited, ARA  Proceed to: ListofAdiacent Property Owners] Return to: Home] [Planning & Development Historic Preservation  [Historic Preservation- - Design Guidelines] Historic] Preservation: Design Guidelines Introduction)  tpwww.washingtome.gowDatasits/lmedapaminpamirg.nsionsioriccoaappl.rtm  1/2    Glass Service, Inc. January 28, 2013 Brooks Home Improvement Bud Brooks 558 Barwick. Drive Washington, NC27889  Serving Eastern North Carolina Since: 1972  JOB: Market Street - Page  Complete to install new aluminum window assembly at transom level ofs storefront using:  Bronze Flush Glaze 13 3/4"x41/2" 1/4" Tinted Glass Opening: 28'x3'6" Includes Sill Pan  Complete to install in 7 equal panes of glass Complete to install in 15 equal panes of glass Option to Use Greylite IIC Glass (DARK)  $2590.00 $3115.00 $850.00add-on  25131 West Fifth Street, Washington, NC 27889  office (252) 946-2396 Fax( (252) 946.1429tripleaglassembargmai.com    ESTMATE  DATE: NAME:  JUNE2,2014 WILLPAGE  IN ACCOUNT' WITH BROOKS HOME IMPROVEMENIS SANDALASTINO-PESURE WASHING ROOFING-HOME) MPROVEMENIS-PANING-HAULNG  5581 BARWICK: DRIVE WASHINGTON.NC278)  TELEPHONE (252) 927-3636  CELL  (252).943-7057  WORK TOI BE PERFORMED AT1 149N.A MARKETST.WASIINGTON.NC  REMOVE WINDOWS. ANDI REPAIRI ROTTEN FRAMES OF TRANSOM ABOVEI ENTRANCE. DOOR  PAINT AROUND' TRANSOM  LABOR &1 MATERIALSI FURNISHED BY CONTRACTOR  TOTALDUE  $ 3800.00            REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: The owner of 149 North Market Street has submitted a request to change out mezzanine level  windows on the property.  Arequest has been made by Page Welch, LLCI to replace the current windows with new aluminum windows on the mezzanine leveloft the property located at 149 North Market Street. To grant such a request, the Historic' Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate mayl be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness' to Page Welch, LLCt to replace current windows with new aluminum windows on the property located at 149 North Market Street. Thismotion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Section 3.41 Existing Buildings-1 Windows and Doors.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Page Welch, LLC to replace current windows with new aluminum windows on the property located at 149 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section 3.41 Existing Buildings - Windows and Doors. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness: tol Page Welch, LLC to replace current windows with new aluminum windows on the property located at 149 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section  3.4 Existing Buildings- - Windows and Doors.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORIC: PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Approgriatenes-149 North Market Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the CityofWashington. Accordingi to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner of 149 North Market Street to replace  mezzanine level windows with new aluminum windows.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note thei following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday July 1, 2014  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and goi tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00P PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan 252-946-0897  Community Development Planner brennan@washingtonnc.gov    Adjoining Property Owners: 149 North Market Street  Keith Mason PO Box 1945 Washington, NC: 27889 Stephen Graves PO Box 430 Washington, NC: 27889 Select Real Estate Holdings 3600 Charles Blvd Greenville, NC: 27858 Clarence Tetterton PO Box 324 Washington, NC: 27889 Nancy McLendon PO Box 1362 Washington, NC 27889 Jesse Rawls 127 N. Market Street Washington, NC 27889 Betty Stewart 121 N. Market Street Washington, NC 27889    James Harstad and Dawn Dickinson  523 East 2nd Street  Install Four Foot Picket Fence Across Front  Yard    A.4.2  CITY OF WASHINGTON  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  APPLICATION FORACERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Date_ June 5, 2014  Fee_  A.  A: Information on Structure Under Consideration  Address:  523 E: 2nd Street, Washington NC 27889  Current Owner: James Harstad and Dawn Dickinson  Tax Parcel Number:  5685-07-8036  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Dept. at  975-9383. Has a Building Permit been obtained? YES  NO_  N/A_  B.  B: Information on Person Making Application  Name: Address: City: Washington  James Harstad  523 E: 2nd Street, NC: 27889  State: NC  Zip: 27889 Phone: 919-200-2119  C.  C: Proposed Changes to Structure  I(We) respectfully request a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued in accordance with the City of Washington Zoning Ordinance for the following reason: (details of the proposed project)  Four foot wooden picket fence painted white starting from the end of the existing chain link fence to the right of house continuing to the side walk then continuing along side walk (within property) until even with left front. corner, then connecting with left front corner. Please see attached drawing D: (We) understand approved requests are valid for one year. Note: Applicants, and/or their agents or parties ofi interest are prohibited from any contact in relation to this matter with Historic Preservation Commission members prior to the public hearing.  D.  FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: ACTION Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Respectfully Submitted, James A Harstad  DATE  CONas  pna  Signature A4-3    6  a  I  a n I   E 2 E 3 2 5    Pine Gothic Pressure Treated Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-it X 8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x8 B-1t)    - e -  X            REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: The owner of 523 East Second Street has submitted a request toi install a picket fence at the front of  the property.  A request has been made by. James Harstad and Dawn Dickson to install a picket fence at the front of the property located at 523 East Second Street. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Harstad and Ms. Dickson toi install a four foot high picket fence on the property located at 523 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6  Streetscape and Design-Fencesand Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Harstad and Ms. Dickson to install at four foot high picket fence on the property located at! 523 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically: Section4.6 Streetscape and Design - Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Harstad and Ms. Dickson toi install at four foot high picket fence on the property located at! 523 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the applicationi is congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6  Streetscape and Design- - Fences and' Walls.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness-523 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation worki is being conducted ini the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According tot the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner of 523 East Second Street to install a four  foot wooden picket fence at the front oft the house.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior tot the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Date: Tuesday. July 1, 2014  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side oft the building and goi tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan 252-946-0897  Community Development Planner prennan@washingtonnc.gov    Adjoining Property Owners: 523 East Second Street  Jessie Housley 525 East Second Street Washington, NC27889 Kevin Duffy 1512 Briarwood Place Raleigh, NC: 27614 Eddie Stone 513 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Kit Yeung 137 Castle Ct. Washington, NC: 27889 James Helms 528 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Mark Keusenkothen 524 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Cache Reed 518 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Fred Read 411 Walnut Street #7595 Green Cove Springs, FL: 32043 Robin Potts' Trustee 107 South Reed Drive Washington, NC 27889 Betsy West POI Box 1632 New Bern, NC 28563 Dangela Willard 7508 Slatestone Rd. Washington, NC: 27889    Beaufort County  210 North Market Street  Move mechanical Damper on the Second  Floor North Side of Building    A.4.2  CITY OF WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Date_ June 13,2014  Fee_  A: Information on Structure Under Consideration  Address:  2101 North Market Street  Current Owner: Beaufort County Tax Parcel Number: 5675-88-7581  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Dept. at  975-9383. Has al Building Permit been obtained? YES_ B: Information on Person Making Application Name: Christina Smith- Beaufort County Public Works Director  NO_  N/A_  Address: 111 W. 2nd Street City:. Washington  State: NC  Zip: 27889  Phone: 252-327-9621  C: Proposed Changes to Structure  (We) respectfully request a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued in accordance with the City of Washington Zoning Ordinance for the following reason: (details of the proposed project) Relocate a mechanical damper on the: 2nd floor-north side from the most western window to another window on the north face. Glass panes willl bei installed in ther original metal widow frame oft the most western window when the damper isn removed. Thes new damper willl bes sized as small as possible based on mechanical calculations and willl be placed ln  des original window opening.  D: (We) understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Note: Applicants, and/or their agents or parties of interest are prohibited from any contact in relation to this matier with Historic Preservation Commission members prior to the public hearing.  FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: ACTION D Approved E Approved wwith Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Respectfully Submitted,  DATE  CdakSck  Signature A4-3    PintedMay21,2 2014 Seei Belowf for Disdaimer  WEB HOSIING SCONNELIGIS 1567900664 567540-7605 1500-7587 675 56790074527  Parcels  5675:86:8644  Property Land Qwners GPIN  5675:88-7505  Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  4510  567560-6593  5615007060  79007457  706017405  N  56798047452  1:29F Feet    :s 01007869 OWNERNAME BEAUFORT COUNTY MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 ACCTI NBR 7529 DATE BLDG VAL 311591 NBHD CDE CH SUB DESC ZONE BIH PROP_DESC BLDG) YRBUILT 1920 NBR BATHS 0 CENSUS BLOCK NBR STORIES 1  -s 5675-88-7581 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROPERIY ADDRESS 210 N MARKET ST MAP SHEET 567508 DEED BOOKand PAGE 872/776 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC STAMPS LAND USE MBL EXEMPT AMT SOFT 24332 EFFYR 1945 FLOOD PLAIN NBR HALF BATHS 2  372 PINLONG 75-88-7581 AILING ADDRESS .2WEST 2ND STREET TATE C ÇRES BRBLDG ANDV VAL 2950 OTVAL 34541 JBCDE ALEPRICE ISTRICT  1LOT 210/216 N MKT ST (OAKLAND 567508246  DADTYPE BRBED (EMPT PROP REV ASSESS 34541  lufort Countyo online mapa accessi isp provideda asap publicservice, asis,a asa available and withoutwarranties, expressed ori implied, Contentp publishedont this websitei isf for xmational purposes only andis is noti intended toc constitute al legalr recordr nor shoulditbes substituted fort the advice ors services ofh industry professionals. The Countyo of lufort and the Website Provider disclaim all responsibility andl legal liability for the content published on this website. The user agrees that Beaufort County and its!  ignss shallbel heldhamless froma alla actions, daims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the usec dfCountydata.    ASSETMAXX  Page 9 of83  Site: Building: Department: Year Buiit: Vear Acquired: No. of Stories: Square Footage: 23940 Basement: Adds/Renovations: No Occupancy: Froma Type: ISO Class: Fire Protection: x NONE Gnscal Buiisling. Characterississ Roefing: Foundation: Floor Finish: Valuation Casetet Ctitonts PEn Tetal essuratsle Value  13 SMERIFF DEPARTMENT BEAU1301 SHERIPF DEPARTMENT 210 N. MARKET STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 00 NONE 100.00% 06/01/1925 01/01/1925 3 7,980 SF per floor No GPS Police Station JM Joisted Masonry 2J01STED MASONRY  Exterior Wallss BRICK ON MASONRY Cailing Finishs ACOUSTICAL  Partitiuns: PEASTER/STVDS, WoOB PANELING ON STUDS  METAL COMCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS, CONCRETE POOTING FOUNDATION ASPHALT TILE, CARPETING  Services:  ELECIRICAL, PLUMBIRG, MEATING- FORCED WARJ AIR, AIR CONDITIONING FORCED AIR, Replacenest Cost. Less Exciusiong: 860,100.00 0.09 3,174,700.00  Foatures:  Condlusions (Estimated) Repigement Exelusien  Syst New: Amount: 2,462,309.00 147,700.00 2,314,696.09 860,109.00 0.00  0.00 0.00  MwphwaeMacaNMaNMASTAMPMMRANyOin  4/25/2007    Existing Damper  North -Third Street  West - Union Drive  South-2"Street    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From:Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: The owner of 210 North Market Street has submitted a request to relocate a mechanical damper on  the second floor of the building.  A request has been made by Beaufort County to relocate a mechanical damper on the second floor of the buildings north side on the building located at 2101 North Market. Street. Togrant suchar request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the: sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may  be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to relocate a mechanical damper on the building at 210 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.14E Existing Buildings  - Mechanical and Communication Systems.  Or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness' to Beaufort County to relocate ar mechanical damper on thel building at: 210 North Market Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.14 Existing Buildings - Mechanical and Communication: Systems. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imovet that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to relocate a mechanical damper on the building at 210 North Market Street. This motion isl based on thei following findings of fact: the application! is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.14 Existing Buildings  - Mechanical and Communication Systems.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT 01 HISTORICPRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Apropriatenes-ZI0Noth Market Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the' Washington Historic District all property owners within 1001 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 100 feet ofthe above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner of 210 North Market Street to relocate a  mechanical damper on the second floor oft the building.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting ofthe Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday July 1, 2014  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.,  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan 252-946-0897  Community Development Planner brennan@washingtonnc.gov    Adjoining Property Owners: 210 North Market Street  Hood Richardson 208 North Market Street Washington, NC 27889 Cornelius Partrick 204 North Market Street Washington, NC 27889 William Mayo POI Box 635 Washington, NC 27889 Whit Blackstone 222W.Stewart Pkwy! Suite 204 Washington, NC 27889 Ashley Futrell POI Box 1788 Washington, NC 27889 Washington New Media 217 North Market Street Washington, NC 27889 Franklin Johnston 1099 Swann Point Reef Rd. Washington, NC 27889 Scott Campbell 213 North Market Street Suite 202 Washington, NC: 27889    Mr. Ambrose Lewis 227 East Second Street  Demolish Rear Addition, Construct new  Addition    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC  Please use Blackk Ink  Street Address of Property: 227 East Second Street. Washington, NC27889 Historic Property/Name (Ifa applicable): Tom Carawan House Owner's Name: Dlane M. Lewis and Ambrose B. Lewls (sister and brother)  Lot Size:  53 (width)  feet by  213 (depth)  feet  Brief Description of Work to! be Done*:  1. Removei the: additions to the rear of the currenta as-constructed house that are undercover of the metal roof thats slopes from North to! South (rest of housel has asphalt shingle roofing). Constructa new: addition on1 the samei footprint as1 the additions that were demollshed, including a new deck. 2. Replace roofing shingles on entire house with new architectural dimensional shingles. 3. Replace the Westernmostpfi thet two existing front entryo doors with a window ofas style, size andl look to match the other existing front facing (street view) on thel house. 4. Removet thei indicated trees and shrubs on attached photos Remove power, telephone and" TV & internet cable overhead polei feeds and reinstall underground. Instal! 3 newe exterlor A/CL units (1 to replace existing) to provide centralA/Cthroughout house. "(see attachments for more descriptive information regarding the above requests) understand that all applications fora a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review byt the Historic Preservation Commission must be: submitted by 5:00p p.m. on the 15t of ther month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration willl be delayed until thet following HPC meeting. An incomplete appliçation  will not! be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Diane M. Lewis and Ambrose B. Lewis (Name of Applicants -type or print) 2156 Golf Course Drive, Reston, VA 20191 (Mailing Address) June 15, 2014 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Zip Code)  (571) 263-5387mobile (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  of Applicant)  Ahiplag  Upon being signed and dated belaw byt the Planning Department or designee, this application! becomes al Minor Certifiçate shall not relieve the: applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by city code or anyl law. Minor work projects not approved bys staffwilll bet forwarded toi the Historic  Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until_ Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  Issuance ofal Minar Works  (Minor' Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required att the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is tol be considered. You must give written permission to  your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.  Istil    1  DECK WITH HOT TUB  DECK  SCREEN PORCH  KITCHEN  KITCHEN  COVERED PORCH  EXISTING FIRST à  FLOORPLAN  Zuf/    Reference Work Description# #1  #1  -  East Side View of Addition tot be Demolished  South Side View of Addition to be Demplished  30fH    South EleviTion  #1  DECK  RECREATION ROQM  BEDROOM 1  BEDROOM 2    WORKROOM  DC  4  4ofl    #1  7 99  T  5d1    I  IL  6of1    #1  7of1    Reference Work Description #2 (From Certainteed Website) Roofing Shingles  There are three major categories of Roofing Shingle products available in the market; Strip Shingles Strip Shingles aret the original and the most besic ofr roofing shingles availeble in the are denoted byt the fact thatt they are single layered roofing shingles that are generally designed tol look industry. like siate. Strip Shingles Shingles have: a very fiat appearance ont the Foof line and are typically the lightest weight roofing market, Strip shingles used toi bet thep predominant roofing shingie availabie and usedi in the market. shingles Today, significant advances ini lechnology and consumer: sophistication. Strip Shingles are used primarily by home however, builders manufacturing economy priced homes or purchased by homeowners as replacement roofing shingles for homes that have Strip Shingles on the roof. CertainTeed manufactures Strip Roofing Shingles under the product Dimensional Shingles Dimensional Shingles (or Architectural, Laminated Shingles) are now the predominant installed in North Amarica. These products are manufactured as dual layered products (or CertainTeed's tri-laminate technology) and; provide at thicker and richer appearance ont the multi-layered roof Dimensional Roofing Shingles also typically ere heavier weight than Strip Roofing Shingles and (a usually mull-dimensional have improved look). waranty protections, which can rangei from 30-years to Lifetime. CerlainTeed's mnsmag"Spdes.metn. shingles are a Premiun? Shingles Premium Shingles ane usually described 8s eminated. shingles that! haye as dinerentiated unctionalily from traditional Dimensional Rcofing Shingies, These products may! have designs that mimic" old-world" appearence CF shingles, like netural: slate or naturei sheke roofing shingles. CertainTeed's Grand Manor mM and Presidential an prime exempies af Promium roofing shingles thai provide an enhanced cesthetic appaal. Promm Shakem products also have importent functional improwsments. such as Impsct Resistence or Soler Rellectivily that can possibly Reofing extand Shinglss wight oft ther roofing system or provide lovere energy costs. Landmark M Special and Landmark Solaris TM: wrculd! be  available Strip Roofing ini with the aiready names ÇTMM20, XTT in! the case roofing shingles of  25, and XTIM.30.  prototypically design for al Dimensional Roofing Shingle.  roofing the Bfe prinery emples  off Premium roofing shingisa thai provide enhanced functional perormance. Designer category with color tot be: selected from one oft the following:  Replece roofing shingles on entire houser with new Certainteed (or equivalent) Landnas"Dimensional Shingies int the  Colonial Slate  Resawn! Shake  Burnt Sienna  Pewter  RofA    Reference Work Description#3  a  Remove existing door on right Westemmost)  Provide newwindow ton match eMistingwindows where door was removed and patch in wood  Siding to match existing.  9.1    Reference Work Description #4  Bush  PiAe Tree-  Remove: Bush at Street- -L Looking West  Remove Pinel Treei in Front Vard- - Looking East  Tree and Uprooted" Tree Stump - 03/2014 Photo  Remove Tree and Stump- 06/2014 photo  Remove  Remave. Juniper Trec and Evergreen Shrubs Obstructing' View from Rear of House  Remove Apple Treet to Right of Trash Can Restricting Vehicle Access to Garage  Obstructed View from Rear of House  Remove Foliaget from West Side of House at Rear  /a -    Reference Work Description: #5  ARE Overhead Wiring to be rerouted down Utility Polea and Underground tol House  Reference Work Description #6  Existing A/C unit on East sidet that serves partof  Available spaçe on West side toi install new A/CU unit(s)  First Floor.  We are: still in the conceptual design phase for central heating and cooling of thel house, our hopei is to have three distinct temperature control zones (ergo 3 outside units) in thel houses sc that we can control our utility costs by turning zones way down or off when noti in Mse. Ouri intention is also tor raise the outside units approximately 30" above grade to put all equipment. serving the house at thes same level as thei floor of the first floor tol keep put everything at approximately 12' above: seal level for the purpose of obtaining an elevation certifiçatet to reducei flood insurance rate. Most oft the existing house (2/3's)i is cooled by window A/CU units and  haated by gas spacel heaters that werel locatedi in most rooms.    DECK WITH HOT TUB  DECK  SCREEN PORCH  1 /  po  KITCHEN  KITCHEN  COVERED PORCH  EXISTING FIRST FLOORPLAN    EXISTING SECOND FLOORPLAN  1/4"=1-0    DECK WITH HOT TUB  DECK  SCREEN PORCH  KITCHEN!,  KITCHEN  COVERED PORCH  EXISTING FIRST FLOORPLAN  EXISTING SECOND FLOORPLAN    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development house to construct a new addition and porch.  Re: The owner of 227 East Second Street has submitted a request to demolish the rear addition of the  A request has been made by Ambrose Lewis and Diane Lewis to demolish the rear addition of the property and construct a new addition. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Lewis to demolish the rear addition to construct a new porch addition, enclose at front door to make a window and change out the roof shingles on the property located at 227 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section 3.6 Changes to  Existing Buildings.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Lewis to demolish the rear addition to construct a new porch addition, enclose ai front door to make a window and change out the roof shingles on the property located at 227 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.6 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move thati the Historic Preservation Commission place the  following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Lewis to demolish the rear addition to construct: a new porch addition, enclose ai front door to make a window and change out the roof shingles on the property located at 227 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section! 3.6 Changes to  Existing Buildings.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT 01 HISTORICI PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Approprateness-227 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propetyi is located within 100 feet of the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner of 227 East Second Street to demolish the existing rear addition and construct a new sun room/porch addition.  Ify you would like to see plans fori this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday July 1, 2014  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side oft the building and go tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan 252-946-0897  Community Development Planner brennan@washingtonnc.gov    Adjoining Property Owners: 2271 East Second Street  Kenneth Mooring 221 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 St.P Peters Episcopal Church 101 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 Kenneth Crowley 605 Deluth Street Durham, NC 27705 Petra Chambers 235 East Second Street Washington, NC 27889 Walter Fuldner 239 East Second Street Washington, NC: 27889 Alton Ingalls PO Box 67 Washington, NC: 27889 Susan And David Lonnard Trust 226 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 Donald Morrisey 261 Red Canoe Plymouth, MA 2360 Vickie Dotson 620 Duck Creek Road Washington, NC: 27889 Douglas Cutler 238 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889    Beacon Street Properties  Moss Landing  Design Approval on Several Houses  Install Four Foot Picket Fence in Front Yard    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street. Address of Property: Wats - Haivly S. -Moss laiding  Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Owner's Name: acon Streest  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  DSiGn appryal rsvuel w Aoidcafial  popeaties  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. Tunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  (Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Mailing Address) (Date)  (Zip Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the appliçant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  ssuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    MINOR WORKS    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street. Address of  Please use Black Ink  Gt.  Property:  50182  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: HW Tsauss  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  pkoo Splthuks Spf  lunderstand that ali applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th ofi the month prior tot the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sf,L (ZpCode)  or print)  (Initials)  APASP  ACTION  1809 GscsReg 2PY4  (Mâiling Address)  252946604 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  B  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until,  Issuance of a Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 12D Acadeny STREET  Historic Property/Name (ifapplicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Fipst PhritiAN Church  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Pda hondiaik a +wD MaAteyps 4o Mecf  Sofity coolco.  Funderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approveg-requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) C Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Thglas bond 7Name 6/Applicant- typerbr print)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Mailing Address) 6-3-1H (Date) Deh Dehly  (Zip Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 107 W.aN Sf. Owner's Name: Glenw Wbariws  Historic PopatyNampfepiabe,  ON M Stef  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  chapece Codesser bk L6 dak.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Sisfar or print)  Name ADA 09 (Mallng/Address) gl4 Date blo (Signature Applicant)  Spfesc 2787 (ZipCode)  (Initials)  ACTION  arsice Koo  219466474 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining permit required by City code or any law. Minorwork projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  other  any  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date) give  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must nermissinn to vour: anfhorized renregenfafive tn aftend the haarinn nn vnir hahalf  wriften    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 135W pannst Riglt dway  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Caly of Washant  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done::  emse plool AuL sn cly Nioi ways  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) O Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  7Name of Applicant -t type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Mailing Address) (Date)  (Zip Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomesa Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 143N, Mochtge  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: clarenee Tefteriton  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done: Roplace presert  AIC unt with  Ahe unt Couer with lluak  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. I understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Dixoy HettAc (Name of Applicant-typeor) print)  wsh/E (ZipCode)  (Initials)  ACTION  04 Rver Road 27989  (Mailing Address) 6-1074 (Date)  946-6998 (Daytime Phone Number)  Dalna lion Tsignature of Applicant)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomesa Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its  Issuance of a Minor  7(Date) -   EE  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. Youmust give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  aas E. Main, s+.  Owner's Name: Doug Bidle  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  HVAC Changeout in Sane  locatioh  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Aiv Cave dHcL Co (Name of Applicant -type or print) 134WSW S+ (Mailing Address) 6he/14 (Date),  (Initials)  ACTION  278P9 (Zip Code)  252-362-02P0 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  of Applicant)  aHANep  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized epresentative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  328w MAiR ST  AgchE Jwsgs  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  ArchieTns  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  AD ChAyeouT 150kf Bock Ik SAMEpC  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) O Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  LHEs AUAC (Name of Applicant-type or print) 5LYAy26Y (Mailing Address) 6-17-r4 (Date) Z. (Signatureof. Applicant)  (Initials)  ACTION  27839 (Zip Code)  9Y6-1474 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: yaW MAAINST  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  DRENT LEE  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:: chanseoutt  3TON AC UNNT  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  SHAWKy BOvsHPA (Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  4745 REEDYBPANCh, RP 28590  (Mailing Address) 6-14-14 (Date) (Signature a  (ZipCode)  25A-353-5588 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You mustgive written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of  Please use Black Ink  Property:  Walcv 4 Harvey SH  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  M665 Lanlcny  Beacon N/A (width)  Name:  Shreef feet by  Owner's Lot Size:  P/A (dépth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  4k 8 fberdass frames mporany adverhsing igks w/yny bahnes  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until thet following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. I understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Nosh Rivesicu Dr -  Office Use Only (Date Received) C Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Cavol 4ole (Mailing Address) uh3/14 (Date)  (Name of Applicant-type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  Wagh, (ZipCode) 944 3156 (Daytime Phone Number)  37889  252  Carsliy B,Aa  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicaht)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. Your must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    MINUTES    OTHER BUSINESS    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting- Minutes Tuesday. June 3, 2014 7:00 PM Members Present Geraldine McKinley Judi Hickson Ed Hodges Jerry Creech Seth Shoneman Members Absent Victory Rader Picott Harrington Others Absent  Jennifer Brennan, Community Development Planner John Rodman, Community and Cultural Services Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the Meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Amoment ofs silence was taken. III. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff.  Jerry Creech made a motion to accept the agenda. His motion was seconded by Seth Shoneman. All  voted int favor. IV. Old Business  V.  MajorWorks, Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by the owner of 219 East Main! Street toi install a 61 foot high fence around the perimeter of the property and a! 51 foot mechanical gate across the driveway oft the  property.  1    Ms. Sweatland camet forward and was sworn in. Ms. Sweatland explained the events that led up to her constructing her fence and completing the current Certificate of Appropriateness. Ms. Sweatland stated that one of the reasons why she wanted to construct the fence is to keep her neighbors dogs from coming intol her yard. She explained that on numerous occasions she sees random strangers walking through her yard. She stated that the fence is up but she has not completed the gate. Mr. Creech asked Ms. Sweatland if she wanted to put up thei fence and gate for security purposes. Ms. Sweatland stated that security was the main reason why she  wanted top put up the fence. The Chairman opened thei floor.  Don Stroud came forward. He: stated that the Historic Foundation is very concerned with the fence situation in the district. He stated that fences are being put up with COAs and' iti isa an ongoing problem. Mr. Stroud asked for clarification on the actual request and: stated that no site plan was submitted to the neighbors. Mr. Stroud was informed that the fence will only go around the perimeter of the rear yard. Ms. Brennan stated that the letter that was sent out1 to the adjourning property owners indicated that at full copy oft the agenda is available online and also in the office. Mr. Stroud then inquired about al landscaping buffer. Ms. Brennan stated that Ms. Sweatland then explained that only a small portion of the fence willl be visible from Main The Chairman closed the floor and the Commission discussed the request further. Seth Shoneman asked about the gate materials. Ms. Sweatland explained that the gate would only be! 5ftand made of wood. Mr. Creech brought up the landscaping issue. Mr. Hodges stated that Geraldine McKinley made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mrs. Sweatland to install at fence and gate at the driveway oft the property located at 219 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6 Streetscape and Site Design = Fences and Walls. Her motion was seconded by Seth Shoneman. The motion carried with ar majority vote 2. Arequest has been made by the owner at 239 East Third Street to install a 61 foot wood Since the applicant was not present this item was moved toi the. July meeting agenda.  the Commission could include al landscaping bufferi if they wanted.  Street.  het feltalandscaping buffer would not be required ini this situation.  with Jerry Creech voting in opposition. privacy fence aroundi the backyard.  2    3. Arequest has been made by the owner at 115 Van Norden Street to install a picketi fence to Mr. Gregory Purser, owner, came forward and was sworn in. He stated that he recently purchased this property and would like to put up a picket fence down the east side of the vacant lot. Mr. Hodgesasked if the picket fence would look like thet fence currently located on the property. Mr. Purser stated thati ity would be similar, the slats would be al little wider butit  the east side of the vacant lot adjoining property.  would bei the same height. The Chairman opened the floor.  Scott Sipprell, neighbor, asked for clarification of the fence height. Mr. Hodges explained that the fence would bet the same height as the current fence and would look the same except for Seth Shoneman made thet following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness' to Mr. Purser to install a picket fence at the east side of the vacant lot on the property located at 115 Van Norden Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6 Streetscape and Site Design = Fences and Walls. Geraldine McKinley seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. 4. Arequest has been made by the owner at 227 East Second Street to demolish the existing rear addition and replace with a new: sun porch/screen porch. Additionally, replace the existing western front door with al bay window tol be more historically accurate. Also, replace current Mr. Ambrose Lewis came forward and was sworn in. He explained that they willl be closing on this property on Thursday. Mr. Ambrose gave a description of the current rear addition and explained that they would like to demolish the existing rear addition and replace it with a new enclosed porch/sunroom. He explained that they do not currently have the plans fori the new addition but they are working with a draftsman to get that done. Mr. Lewis then explained that they would like to remove one oft the front doors and replace it with a window. Ms. McKinley stated that the current rear additions seem to have been very poorly constructed. She stated that the house is sound but the additions are not original and have al lot ofrot. Mr. Lewis stated that thet footprint of the addition will not be any bigger than the current; it will probably bea a  the slats being al little wider.  shingles with new at time of construction of rear porch.  little smaller.  The Chairman opened the floor.  Scott Campbell came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Campbell stated that he agreed that the rearaddition to that house isi in bad condition and should go and down the road what they are  3    proposing will be a great addition to the neighborhood. Mr. Campbell explained that hei is concerned that the applicant is proposing to doar rather large demolition, but has notp presented a set of completed plans for the new addition. He stated that he was concerned that the demolition will leave an open ended back part of this house for an unknown amount oft time. Mr. Hodges asked Mr. Lewis if hel had a way of securing the house. Mr. Lewis stated that the house should be secure. He explained that theyl have a draftsman working on the new addition and should have them ready to present to the Commission at their. July meeting. Mr. Lewis stated thati if they cannot secure the house they will wait on the demolition. The floor was closed and the Commission discussed the request further.  Jerry Creech made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Lewis to demolish the rear addition to construct: a new porch addition, enclose ai front door to make a window and change out the roof shingles on the property located at 227 East Second Street. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.6 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: before beginning demolition Mr. Lewis will bring back as site plan of the new addition for approval at the. July meeting. Geraldine McKinley seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Seth Shoneman made thet following amendment: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Lewis to demolish the rear addition to construct a new porch addition, enclose at front door to make a window and change out the roof shingles on the property located at: 227 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.6 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move thati the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: that architectural shingles be used on the roof replace. His motion was seconded by. Judi 5. Arequest has been made by the owner at 122 East Second Street to replace all windows in Ms. Sherri Dean, owner, came forward and was sworn in. She explained to the Commission that she has 7or 8 different types of windows in her home. She stated that most of her windows are old and rotting and some oft them do not work at all. She stated thati the condition oft the windows allows al lot of creatures to come into the house. She stated that she had two contractors look at the house and they said thati it was like having 22 holesi in the house because oft the condition and disrepair of the windows. Ms. Dean stated that her average utility billi is around $550and she feelsi iti is way past time to replace the windows in her home. She  Hickson. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  the house with new vinyl windows.  4    explained that she would liket tol have all the windows match. She stated that she definitely wants double hung windows and she would prefer vinyl over wood. She explained that currently some oft the windows are vinyl and some are wood. She stated that she understood that any grills havei tol be on the exterior oft the glass. Ms. Dean explained that some oft the windows do not have any grills. She stated that she understood the guidelinest to state thati if she replaces the windows she ist to replace them with windows that match the originals. She stated that she would be happy to do this with the windows that face the street. Ms. Dean then explained which windows are original tot thel home and where they are located. Ms. Dean and the Commission then discussed the grills. She: stated that she would prefer replacement  windows with no grills because they are more efficient to her.  The Chairman opened the floor.  Scott Campbell came forward to address the Commission. He urged the Commission to preserve the primaryview/facade oft the house with the original window configuration and look, which means wooden windows with dividers on the exterior with a six over six configurations. He stated that hei is not opposed to have the windows on the secondary views be vinyl andi not  having the dividers.  The floor was closed and the Commission discussed the request further.  Seth Shoneman made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Dean toi install new vinyl windows on the property located at 122 East Second! Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically: Section 3.4 Changes to Existing Buildings - Windows and Doors. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation commission place the following conditions on the approval: thet front exterior windows have exterior attached muttons. His motion was seconded by Judi Hickson. The motion passed with a majority vote with Ed Hodgesv voting in opposition. Don Stroud came forward and stated that he wanted the record to showi that Ms. Dean's home already has some vinyl windows. He stated that he does not want to open a flood gate to allow everyone to replace their original windows with vinyl. He explained that Ms. Dean has more of 6.A Arequest has been made by the owner at 143 North Market Street to install a privacy fence Roger Meyland came forward and was sworn in. He explained that he would liket to constructa three sided six foot high security fence around the patio at 143 North Market Street. He stated that the fence will prevent people who are not members oft that club from entering the patio or the club from the back of the location. He stated that he wanted the fence for security purposes  an exception int this case. around the rear patio.  5    also. Mr. Meyland stated that the adjoining properties on both: sides and the property across the parking lot all! have wooden structures, some are privacy fences and some are lattice.  The Chairman opened thei floor.  Dee Congleton came forward and was sworn in. She explained that the proposed 6ft high privacy fence will be visible from East 2"d and East Main and that parking loti is used asa thoroughfare between East Main and East2"d. She stated that she understood that he wanted some kind of parameter for his nightclub. Ms. Congleton recommended large concert pots with The floor was closed and the Commission discussed the request further. Ms. Hickson asked if there may! be another type of fence that Mr. Meyland could use that visually is nota a complete block, maybe rod iron. Mr. Meyland stated that he needed more ofa a privacy fence to stop people from crossing over the fence or passing alcohol through the fence to someone outside in the parking lot. He stated that! he also needs the barrier to stop people with alcoholic beverages from stepping out onto public property, whichi isi in violation of the law. John Rodman explained that one of the reasons Mr. Meyland has to do this is because iti is a city ordinance that if you consume alcohol outdoors, even ifiti is on private property, youl have to have some kind of designated area in which to do that. He explained that the ordinance does not specific whati is used to designated the area, buti it does stated thati it has to designated in order to consume alcohol outside. Mr. Creech: stated that iti isal little unclear as to where this falls in the guidelines. Ms. Brennan stated that was an issue when the request came to staff, because itis nota addressed in the design guidelines. She explained that thisi is thei first time an issue. like this has been presented andi iti is something that should be added to the guidelines in the future. The Commission discussed all the screening options and what would work ini this situation. Mr. Rodman stated that it has to be some type ofe enclosure. Mr. Creech stated that he didn'tknow how to address this since iti is not mentioned in the guidelines. Ed Hodges stated that he personally did not objecttoawooden fence and he did noti feel that Mr. Meyland's request was Judi Hickson made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Meyland to install a privacy fence at the rear patio of the building located at: 143 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.6 Streetscape and Site Design - Fences and Walls. Her motion was seconded by Geraldine McKinley. The motion passed with a majority vote with. Jerry Creech 7. AI request has been made by Beaufort County to replace window panes at thel building  Cypress trees in them.  unreasonable.  voting in opposition.  located at 210 N. Market Street.  6    Christina! Smith, Beaufort County Public' Works Director, came forward and was sworn. She explained the location of the building and some history of the building. She explained that there are! 39 windows total on the second and third floor of this building with at total of 895 panes in the windows. She stated that 167 panes out of the 895 contain cracks. She explained that this has caused the problem of water intrusion. Ms. Smith stated that they went back and looked at what they consider general mantance of the windows and replacing the panes in the windows. She stated that they are metal windows and1 they would just go back and replace the glass panes and retain the window frames. She explained that the glazing would be done from the interior. Ms. Smith stated that there are currently a couple of different types of glassi in the windows. She: stated that the opaque glass with the chicken wire seems to be original to the building, but ise extremely difficult to obtain and cost prohibitive. So, in speaking with staff they believe the best alternative would be to replace it with an opaque type glass, so from the street level it would appear to be the same type glass itj just would not have the chicken wire int the glass. The topic of mechanical louvers was brought upl but was delayed to the next meeting since it was  noti included in the County'soriginal COAI request. The Chairman opened thet floor.  Scott Campbell came forward. He stated that hej just wanted to confirm that the window frames and opening would stay the: same and they would only! be replacing thei individual glass panes. Ms. Smith stated that he was correct. Mr. Campbell asked if there was a sample of the opaque glass they wanted to use. Mr. Smith stated that she did not have a sample. Mr. Campbell stated that he would like to see a sample since he isac close neighbor and has full view of the building. Ms. Smith stated that theyl hoped to match the original opaque pane as close as possible. Mr. Campbell stated that hei is not opposed as long as the window frames are the  same.  The floor was closed.  Geraldine McKinley made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to install new window panes on the second and third floor oft the building to replace cracked and broken window panes on thel building at 210 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.4 Exiting Buildings-Windowsa and Doors. Her motion was 8. Ar request has been made by the owner of118! N. Market Street to replace windows on the Brad Horton, contractor, came forward and was sworn in. He explained that they are looking at replacing at total of 8 windows on the seconded floor oft the building, 4 on the south side and 4  seconded by. Judi Hickson. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  rear of the building.  7    ont the west side of the building. He stated that the windows they are replacing are original to thel building but are falling apart and some of the window openings have plywood in them right now. He explained that water is coming into the building like crazy. He stated that they are going back with a woodi interiorv vinyl clad window with no grills that match the exact windows  that are currently on the front of the building. The chairman opened the floor, but no one came forward.  Judi Hickson made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tol Mr. Ward to replace eight windows in the rear and side of the building with new one over one wood/vinyl clad windows on the building at 118 North Market Street. This motion is based on thet following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.4 Existing Buildings- = Windows and Doors. Her motion was seconded by Seth Shoneman. All  voted in favor and the motion carried.  B. Minor' Works  1. Arequest has been made by the owner at 116 East 3"Street (The Orr Lodge) to install a new 2. Arequest has been made by the owner at 714 East Main Street to change out the air 3. Arequest has been made by the owner at: 216 Fleming Street to replace the existing split 4. Arequest has been made by the owner at 624 West Main Street to replace the hand railsa at 5. A request has been made by the owner at 331 East Main Street to install insulation int the 6. AI request has been made by the owner at 158 West Main! Street to change out the existing 7. AI request has been made by Beaufort County to remove the shutters on the Beaufort County Judi Hickson made a motion to approve all the minor works. Her motion was seconded by Seth  roof on the: shed at the rear. Roof will match Lodge roof.  conditioning unit. heat pump.  the front steps on the sidewalk to what was there historically.  walls oft thel house by exterior application. heat pump for a similar unit. Library, located at 158 N. Market Street  Shoneman. All voted int favor and the motion carried.  Vi. Other Business  Residential Grant Program -Scott Campbell  Scott Campbell came forward and discussed a possible residential grant program. He spoke about the need for this program to help maintain and repair some oft the residential homes in the district. He proposed that the Commission put together a very small committee to produce  8    al letter and ask the City to do a residential façade grant program. He explained thatwe currently have a commercial façade grant program that! has really been beneficial. He: stated that he would like to see the commercial façade grant program stay andj just tack ona residential façade grant. He stated that he would like the Commission to propose to Council as an action item to institute a residential façade grant program. He also proposed the Commission to ask Council tol looki into grant writers that have the ability to search for some type of financial assistance for residential property ownersi in the historic district. He also spoke about encouraging volunteer originations, clubs, or groups to participate in helping some of Mr. Hodges stated that he and Ms. Brennan would get together and work on a plan of action for  these property owners.  thisi issue.  VII. Approval of Minutes voted in favor. VIII. Adjourn Shoneman.  Jerry Creech made a motion to approve the minutes. Seth Shoneman seconded the motion and all  There being no other business. Jerry Creech made a motion to adjourn, which was seconded by Seth  9