WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 5, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  1. A request has been made by INA Ilc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations south façade on the property located at 157 West Main  Street:  a. Construction of a deck on the south elevation  b. Installation of a rollup door  C. Introduce 7 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. Don Perkins for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct an 8'x20' deck in the back yard of the property located at 405 East 2. Ar request has been made by Ms. Linda Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 10'x12' shed in the back yard of the property located at 625 East Main 3. Ar request has been made by Ms. Karen Mann for a Certificate of Appropriateness  Second Street.  Street.  to remove 3 trees on the property located at 711 Short Drive.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 120 Charlotte Street to install a backup generator on the back of the 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 North Main Street to repair façade using like materials on the.  house on the property and extend existing fencing to screen it.  property.  1    3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 145 East Main Street to replace existing sidewalk using like 4. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 816 West Main Street in repair existing roof deck using like 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Approprateness for the owner of 239 East Second Street to complete the following on the property.  materials on the property. materials on the property.  a. Replace damaged front porch steps using like materials. b. Replace gravel driveway using like materials. C. Install a 20' fun of fencing in the back yard. d. Install an 8'x10' shed in the back yard.  6. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 West Second Street to replace two (2) windows on the front 7. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 117 North Charlotte Street to replace wood gate using like materials 8. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127 North Market Street to replace windows with like materials on 9. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #28 - 241 Moss Way to construct 10. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 215 West Main Street to replace the roof using like materials on the 11.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 625 East Main Street to replace front porch floor using like materials  façade using lie materials on the property.  on the property. the property.  anews single-family dwelling on the property.  property.  on the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Update Rules and Procedure to change the meeting times from 7:00pm to 6:00pm  2. Fences: Major to Minor Work 3. Informational Brochures  2    VII. Approval of Minutes - October 1, 2019  VII. Adjourn  3    OLD  BUSINESS    INA, LLC  157 - WEST MAIN  STREET  Construction of A Deck On the  South Elevation  Instalation of A Rollup Door  Introduce 7 Arched Windows On the West Façade of the Newer  Addition    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thet front lobby of City! Hall under" Developmental Filing! Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 157W, MAIN TEAMAyEN  Historic Properly/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  INA,LLC  50 (width)  feet by  239.5 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work tol be Done: The alteration would include:  Wel hereby propose tor remodel/alter the side and back facade ofthe building facing thel Pamlico River. Installation of a proper deck Structure. Architectural and engineering design willl bes sent for approval /permit. -Installation ofs single door with sidel light to provide ingress and aggress through. the baok oft the! building, -In the meantime. all the window openings will be coyered by painted plywood. waitingptoper windows. The provided picture shows the roof top back parapet lowered tot the side parapet olevations. (Please note that this iss what wel like the final look to be in future. Int the meantime, the back parapet is untouched.) Our hope is to present our plans to the committee in near future for changing thel back building roofing from the Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Construction of three arched openings (approx. 8'Wx 11'H),  Installation ofar rollup door with the proper access to the lower level. - Replacing the existing lower level windows with the proper ones, Installiug3 3 to 4 windows at the side of the building. per attached picture,  metal A-frame to the original flat roofing stracture.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sed Naziri (Name of Applicant -type or printy 7Maling Address) 8/15./2019 (Date)  (Initials)!  ACTION  5161 Six Fark,Ra,N 27609  (ZipCode)  79-274-4900 (Daylime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature) TSgnalyeapalicanty  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certifiçate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until,  Issuance of al Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting,  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the appliçation is to be considered. You must give. written. permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printeds September 25, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  PBARA  Property Land Owners . Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:39Feet    OBJECTID 6580 OWNER NAME INA LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27609 TOT VAL 420337 PREV ASSESS 422572 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOKand PAGE 1949/00542 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1920 SUB DESC COMMERCIAL EFF YR 1980  GPIN 5675-87-0984 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC 1LOTO COR UNION ANDI MAIN STRIVERIOWN/MALL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508284 STAMPS 700.00 NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 01013463  GPIN Long 5675-87-0984 MAILING. ADDRESS 5161 SIXE FORKS ROAD STATE NC LAND VAL 229320 BLDGVAL 191017 TAXABLE VA 420337 PROPERTY ADDRESS 157 WI MAINST DATE 1/8/2018 SALE PRICE 350000,00 NBHD DESC ZONE1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC10 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 43634  Beaufort County online map: access is provided asap public: service, asi is, asa available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websitei is for informational purposes only and is noti intended toc constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofB Beauforta and thev Website Provider disclaim allr esponsibility: andl legall liabillyf fort thec content published ont thisy website. The usera agrees thatE Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shall be! heldharmlessf from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft thet use of County data.    Adjoining Property Owners: 157 West Main Street  INA LLC 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD RALEIGH NC27609 BLACKSTONE J WHIT 222 W STEWART: PKY STE204 WASHINGTON NC2 27889 LITCHFIELD WILLIAMI F 2007 NI MARKET ST WASHINGTON NC 27889 GRAY MARK VL 108 N ELM: STREET GREENSBORONC27401 WALLJAYNEI D 111 SI REED DR WASHINGTON NC27889 163 WESTMAINS STREETLLC 451 MILLERSLN NEW: HYDEI PARK NY 11040 WOOLARD BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PO: BOX36 WASHINGTON NC27889 LTHOMAS PROPERTIES LLC 201 WESLEY ROAD GREENVILLE NC 27858 EVANSJERRY O 162 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 MOORE PROPERTY GROUP LLC 2305 W ALABAMA: ST HOUSTON TX 77098 ALMI INVESTMENT COMPANYI LLC 610 COURTLAND ST GREENSBORONCZ7401  BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL 108 GLADDEN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 GOLDEN ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 45 MILLER LANE NEW HYDE PARK NY 11040    ocntoun ecelopmenb Ofbtoric Preseroation  0  Cityy  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  September 20, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 157 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation worki is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by INA Ilc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations south façade on the property located at 157 West Main Street:  a. b. G. e. f.  Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor  Construction of a deck Installation of a rollup door d. Introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor Replace the two existing windows  Introduce 3 or 4 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    a.Construction of a deck on the  south elevation        Pamio  Poyision STORE      IIIIII  - - -  INA,LLC 157WMANSTREI,WASHINGIONNC 190CT2019    ZZ8  831 IS  992  46  821  881  3k  6  df  L  8 f  0  1?    48'8L 821 19  ZLE 993  46 Zk  96  8EL  ee    Taslng gtyle    Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  a. Construction of a deck on the south elevation  a) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter! 5.4 Decks:  5.4.1 A deck: shall be designed and constructed so that the historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks so they can be removed 5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed in inconspicuous locations, usually on the building's rear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and: steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained in a color that is compatible with the historic  int the future without damage to the structure.  proportions of the building. structure and district.  Based on finding of fact the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation  Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 157 West Main Street- deck construction to the property located at 157 West Main Street:  Ar request has been made by INAI llc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make thei following changes  a. Construction of a deck on the south elevation  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA llc. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter! 5.41 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA lic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to INA llc. to make the above changes on the property located at: 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 5.41 Decks.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9ld), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the    applicant pursuant to NC GS160A-400.9ld), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment ont the request.    b.Installation of a rollup door        PP STORE    IIIIIII  TTME  INA,LLC  190CT2019  157WMAINSTRET,WASHINGTONNC    ZZ8  831 1S  992  46  831  881  Zk  c  f  L  0  93  80  P    MARKET  Door 8lyle    Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  b.1 Installation of a rollup door on the south elevation  (B) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details:  3.4.11 Introduction of new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin 3.9.1 Retaina and preserve historic side and rear elevations and their architectural features. 3.9.2 Historic structures which are adjacent to rear parking areas or public rights-of-way are encouraged to utilize reare entrances: allowing public and private access. If the rear entrance is public, awnings and other exterior features should be more subdued than those of the primary 3.9.3 Whenever a rear elevation faces a public right of way or parking facilities, particularly on the waterfront, unnecessary utility lines and equipment shall be removed, whenever possible. 3.10.1 Original architectural components and details shall be retained whenever possible. 3.10.2 When architectural components and details must be replaced, the new componentsor details shall match the historic elements as closely as possible in style, proportion, and material. 3.10.3. Architectural components and details that are not appropriate to the historic character of the structure shall not be added. New features should not be added unless there is physical or 3.10.4 Historic architectural components shall not be replaced with materials, such as plywood, vinyl, and aluminum that would not have been used int the original construction.  patterns.  elevation.  other evidence that they historically existed.  Based on finding of fact the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines. Though the roll-up door is on the back of the building, it is still a principle elevation, because it faces Stewart Parkway and the waterfront.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 157 West Main Street- introducing fenestrations, deck construction, window replacement. Ar request has been made by INAI Ilc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following changes  to the property located at 157 West Main Street:  b. Installation of a rollup door on the south elevation  Tog grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to INA Ilc. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motioni is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA Iic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details. further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to INA Ilc. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic    Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC G5160A-400.9ld), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    C.Introduce 7 arched windows on the west façade of the newer  addition        Pamio  STORE  Povisiom   iris    I1IIII  TTM  INA,LLC  190CT2019  IPMMAMSTMATWAIMSTCANKC    188L 8213 I9  ZLE 992  46 Ek  881  CE    fromi insides andtheys showt have    Sentfrommyi iPhone ffeif Historicl Preservation Planner Community! Development Washington, NorthCarolinaz 27889 Office:2 252916.0897 Fax2 2529161965 cimag-oo1jpg <IMG 7701JPG> <MG. 7709.PG> 4MG 7707JPG>  EmilyR    Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The applicationi for the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  C. Introduce 7 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details:  (B) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  3.4.11 Introduction of new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin 3.9.1 Retain and preserve historic side and reare elevations and their architectural features. 3.9.2 Historic structures which are adjacent to rear parking areas or public rights-of-way: are encouraged to utilize reare entrances allowing public and private access. If the rear entrance is public, awnings and other exterior features should be more. subdued than those of the primary 3.9.3 Whenever: a rear elevation faces a public right of way or parking facilities, particularly on the waterfront, unnecessary utility lines and equipment shall be removed, whenever possible. 3.10.1 Original architectural components and details shall be retained whenever possible. 3.10.2 When architectural components and details must be replaced, the new components or details shall match the historic elements as closely as possible ins style, proportion, and material. 3.10.3A Architectural components and details that are not appropriate to the historic character of the structure shall not be added. New features should not be added unless there is physical or 3.10.4 Historic architecturat components shall not be replaced with materials, such as plywood, vinyl, and aluminum that would not have been used in the original construction.  patterns.  elevation.  other evidence that they historically existed.  Based on finding of fact the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines. Though the proposed windows are on the back of the building, it is still a principle elevation, because it faces Stewart Parkway and the  waterfront.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 157 West Main Street- introducing fenestrations, deck construction, window replacement. Ar request has been made by INAI Iic. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following changes  to the property located at: 157 West Main Street:  C. Introduce 7 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA lic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA llc. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details. further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA llc. to make the above changes on the property located at: 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic    Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MAJOR  WORKS    405 East Second Street  8'x20' Deck    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  / -  Citys  DEPARTMENT OF  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  OFFICE USE ONLY Date Paid:  Fee: $50.00  Ref No.:  PROPERTY INFORMATION: Owner's Name: Do Ferkins Historic Property/Name (ifa applicable): McNair Property Address: 405 E 2t S+.  Date of Application: 16/15/19  Waskagtn  N< 27859 State  Address  ZipCode  Lot Size: 55  Feet By 260 Feet  DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED Brief Description of Work to be Performed. adehhicn --g'vz0 woock deck  lunderstand that all applications fora a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review byt thel Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) must be: submitted by 5:00 p.m. On the 15th of the month prior to the meeting lwisht to attend, otherwise consideration willl be delayed until thet following HPCI meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand I must begin the approved work within one year of thei issuance. Should the work cease for more thans six (6) months after one (1) year oft the said  approval, this Certificate of Appropriateness willl become invalid.  FOR OFFICE USE ONLY  Don Perking (Namec dApplamt-wpeerpin  Date Received ACTION n Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval ofA Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  INITIALS  Address  City  State  ZipCode  1o/s/9 Date Dhlbno Signatured ofA Applicant  203 893 0690 DaytimeP Phone Number  Upon beings signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Minor Works Certificate tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anyl law. Minor work projects not approved  Issuance ofal Minor Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor,  by staff will bet forwarded to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  Minor Work Auth. Signature:  Date:  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized epresentative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the applicant is tol be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the  hearing on your behalf by completing the authorization section on the next page.  Revised: August 23, 2019  Page 1of3.    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Citys  DEPARTMENT OF  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-OWNER APPLICATION  NOTE:  IFTHE PERSON WHO IS REQUESTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO TAKE ACTION ON A PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY ISI NOTTHE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR DOES NOTI HAVE AI BINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, THEN IFTHE PERSON WHO IS REQUESTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO TAKE ACTION ON AF PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IS THE OWNER OFT THE PROPERTY OR HASABINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, PLEASE DISREGARD THIS  THE ACTUAL OWNER OF THE LANDI MUST COMPLETETHIS FORM.  FORM. Dear Sir or Madam,  lami the owner of the property located at:  Address  City  State  ZipCode  Ihereby authorize:  (AuthorizedA Agent)  to appear with my consent before the City of Washington  Historic Preservation Commission in order to askf for a Certificate of Appropriateness to: (Deseribel Usea andl LocationE Below).  att thisl location. lunderstand that the Certificate of Appropriateness, if granted, is permanent and runs with thel land. lauthorize you to advertise and present this matter in my name as the owner oft the property. Ifthere are: any questions, your may contact  me atr my address: or by telephone at: Respectfully: yours, Owner  Contact Address  City Alt Phone:  State  ZipCode  Sworn to and ascribed before me, this the  day of  ,20  Notary Public My commission expires:  Revised: August 23, 2019  Page 2of3    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Citys  DEPARTMENT OF  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA PROJECT CATEGORIES (CHECKALTHATAPA: Exterior Alteration  Addition  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  This document does not constitute thei issuance of a Building Permit. Itis ther responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  New Construction  Demolition  252-975-9304.  SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Attached 8-1/2"X11"s sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessaryto completely describe thep project. Use the checklist below to ensure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILLI NOTI BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blanki ift thei item isi not applicable). K PLOT PLAN (if applicable). A plot plan showing ther relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc. must be provided ify your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or other landscape work. Show accurate measurements. Your may also use a copy oft the survey that you received when you bought your property.  Revise the copy as needed to show existing conditions and your proposed work.  n DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS (provide samples if appropriate).  K Photographs of existing conditions. n PLAN drawings.  R DRAWINGS showing proposed work. Include one: set of fulls size drawings when available.  I ELEVATION drawings showing the new façade(s). DIMENSIONS shown on drawings. blueprinting andj photocopying businesses. include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  8-1/2" X11" REDUCTIONS of full-size drawings. Ifreduced sizei iss sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"X11" snapshots of individual drawings on the! big sheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from ar number of STATE ANDI FEDERAL TAX CREDITS/FUNDS OR CAMA PERMITS. Ifyou are applying for any of these programs, you must BLACKI INK. Your application must bep prepared in blacki ink on 8-1/2"X11"s sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy poorly and willl be not accepted.  Revised: August 23, 2019  Page 3of3    Beaufort Printed October 24, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:36 Feet    OBJECTID 10654 OWNER NAME PERKINS DONALD, A MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 106855 TAXABLE VA 160935 PROPERTY ADDRESS 405 E2NDST DATE 12/30/2014 SALE PRICE 114500.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44845  GPIN 5685-0/-2430 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT405E EAST2NDSTREET TOT VAL 160935 PREV ASSESS 173747 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1861/00670 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1891 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1980  GPIN Long 5685-07-2430 MAILING ADDRESS 405 E2ND: STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 54080 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.27 MBL 56850993 STAMPS 229.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2220 NBRBED 4 PIN 01002653  Beaufort County online mapa access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published on this website is fori informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice ors services of industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim alir responsibility andl legall liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shall bel held) harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    A            Request for Certificate of Appropriateness  405 East Second Street  Don Perkins  OWNER NAME FINNERTYVIRGINIA M HENSCHELL GARYF  MAILING ADDRESS 400 EAST MAIN STREET  CITY  STATE ZIP  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  9110 VTROPICANA AVENUE LAS VEGAS NV 89147  JENKINS VERGIL CARROLLJR 412 EASTI MAIN ST  MAIN: STREET GANG LLC FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH  135 HARBOR ROAD 307 E3RDST  FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH 307E3RDST JENKINS VERGIL CARROLL JR 412 EAST MAIN ST EDWARDS JARED MICHAEL 409 EAST: 2ND STREET  PERKINS DONALD, A FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH NEMECZ ATTILA NEMECZ GEORGE BEAN PROPERTY LLC MILLER KENNETH' W BEAN PROPERTY LLC  405 E2ND: STREET 307E3RDST 415 EAST2ND STREET 2225 DUNGIVEN CT PO BOX2694 414 E2NDSTREET POBOX2694  GARNER  NC 27529    Downtown Development & Historic Preservation  City.  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  Adjacent Owner Notice  October 24, 2019  Re: Certificate of Appropriateness = 405 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation worki is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According tot the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adjacent to the above subject  property.  A request has been made by Mr. Don Perkins for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the  following alterations to the property located at 405 East Second Street. 1. Construct an 8' X20' deck in the back yard of the property.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior toi the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time  and place:  DATE: PLACE:  TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2019  CITY HALL - MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 102 EAST SECOND STREET. (ENTER FROM THE MARKET STREET SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND GOTO THE SECOND  FLOOR.) 7:00 pm.  TIME:  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, - o4 Emily R. Rebert Historic Preservation Planner City of Washington reben@wasnngtoncgor 252-946-0897  ADJACENT OWNERNOTICE  Page 1of1    Staff Report  405 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 405 East Second Street is requesting to construct an 8'x20' Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.4 Decks:  deck ini the back yard of the property.  5.4.1 A deck shall be designed and constructed so that the historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks so they can be removed 5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed ini inconspicuous locations, usually on the building's rear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained in a color that is compatible with the historic The proposed deck is being constructed with the appropriate design, materials, and location. Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design  in the future without damage to the structure.  proportions of the building. structure and district.  Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 405 East Second Street- Construction of a Deck. deck in the back yard of the property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. Don Perkins for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct an 8'x20' To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditionsthe Commission feels appropriate may be attached  toi the motion. Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Don Perkins to construct an 8'x20' decki int the back yard oft the property located at 405 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Don Perkins to construct an 8'x20' deck in the back yard of the property located at 405 East Second Street. This motion is based on thei following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Don Perkins to construct an 8'x20' deck in the back yard of the property located at 405 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the    applicant pursuant to NC G5160A-400.9d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment ont the request.    625 East Main Street  Install 10'x12' Shed    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS    Citys  DEPARTMENT OF  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  OFFICE USE ONLY Date Paid:  Fee: $50.00  Ref No.:  PROPERTY INFORMATION: Owner's Name: Linda + JimHess Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Property Address: 635 EMain St  Date of Application: 10/14119 Washing ton NC 37889  Address Feet  State  ZipCode  Lot Size:  Feet By  DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED Brief Description of Work to be Performed.  Thre will not be  WE want yo put a 10'x12' shed in Hhe backyard,  any cictrical gAs oy waler hockups,  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness: that require review byt the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) must be: submitted by! 5:00p p.m. Ont the 15th of the month prior to ther meeting wish to attend, otherwise consideration willl be delayed until thet following HPCI meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand Imust begin the approved work within oney year of thei issuance. Should the work ceasef for moret than: six (6) months after one (1) year oft thes said  approval, this Certificate of Appropriateness willl become invalid.  FOR OFFICEUSE ONLY  binda + Jim Hess (Namec dApplamt-wpeerpin 56MAInSk 10/14/19 Date WRAA MEH Signature ofA Applicant  Date Received ACTION n Approved - Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  INITIALS  Wasingthn NC 17889  Address  City  State  ZipCode  203-470-6199 Daytime PhoneN Number  Upon! beings signed and dated below byt the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes al Minor Works Certificate tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved    Issuance ofa Minor Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor,  by staff willl bef forwarded to thel Historic Preservation Commission for review: at its next meeting.  Minor Work Auth. Signature:  Date:  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the! Historic Preservation Commission at which the applicant is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the  hearing on your behalf by completing the authorization section on the next page.  Revised: October 9,2 2019  Page 1of3    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  C  Citys  DEPARTMENT OF  Washinton NORTH CAROLINA  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-OWNER APPLICATION  NOTE:  IFTHE PERSON WHOI IS REQUESTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO TAKE. ACTION ON A PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR DOES NOTH HAVE AI BINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, THEN IFT THE PERSON WHOI IS REQUESTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO TAKE ACTION ON Al PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IS THE OWNER OFTHE PROPERTY OR HAS AE BINDING OPTION TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, PLEASE DISREGARD THIS  THE ACTUAL OWNER OF THE LAND MUST COMPLETE THIS FORM.  FORM. Dear Sir or Madam,  lam the owner of the property located at:  Address  City  State  ZipCode  Ihereby authorize:  (AuthorizedA Agent)  toa appear with my consent beforet the City of Washington  Historic Preservation Commission in order to ask for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to:(Deseribel Usea andL Location Below)  at this location. understand that the Certificate of Appropriateness, ifg granted, is permanent and runs with thel land. lauthorize you to advertise and present this matter in my name as the owner of the property. Ifthere are any questions, you may contact  me at my address: or byt telephone at: Respectfully yours, Owner  ContactA Address  City Alt Phone:  State  ZipCode  Sworn to and ascribed before me, this the  day of  ,20  Notary Public My commission expires:  Revised: October 9,2 2019  Page2of3    CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  C  Cityy  DEPARTMENT OF  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA PROJECT CATEGORIES CHECKALLTHATAPW:  PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT  This document does not constitute the issuance ofal Building Permit. Itis the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Attached 8-1/2" X11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to ensure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILLN NOTI BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank ift thei item is not applicable).  PLOT PLAN (if applicable). Al plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc. must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or other landscape work. Show accurate measurements. Your may also use a copy of the survey thaty you received when you bought your property.  Revise the copy as needed tos show existing conditions andy your proposed work.  n DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS (provide samplesifappropriate).  Photographs of existing conditions. D PLAN drawings.  DRAWINGS showing proposed work. Include one set of fulls size drawings when available.  ELEVATION drawings showing the new façade(s). DIMENSIONS shown on drawings. blueprinting and photocopying businesses. include a copy ofy your letter or permit from the State.  8-1/2"X11" REDUCTIONS of full-size drawings. Ifreduced! size iss sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"X11" snapshots ofi individual drawings on thel big sheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of  D STATE ANDI FEDERAL TAX CREDITS/FUNDS OR CAMA PERMITS. Ifyoua are applying for any of these programs, you must - BLACKI INK. Your application must be prepared in blacki ink on 8-1/2"X11" sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared inl blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy poorly and willl be not accepted.  Revised: October 9, 2019  Page 3of3    Beaufort Printed October: 10, 2019] SeeE Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:44 Feet    OBJECTID 10778 OWNER NAME HESS. JAMES E MAILING. ADDRESS2 625 E MAIN STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 139424 TAXABLE VA 196924 PROPERTY ADDRESS 625 EN MAIN ST DATE 11/30/2018 SALE PRICE 275000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 44095  GPIN 5685-16-0462 OWNER NAME2 HESS LINDA C CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT 625 EAST MAIN STREET TOT VAL 196924 PREV ASSESS 219524 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1977/00283 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1920 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1980  GPIN Long 5685-16-0462 MAILING ADDRESS 625 E MAIN: STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 57500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.31 MBL 56850911 STAMPS 550.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2812 NBR BED 3 PIN 01009745  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as aj publics service, asi is, as available andy without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published on this websitei is for informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute al legalr record nor should itl be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website." The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assignss shall bel held! harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    LASI  DSE  brpour Shet  Bauillas 50ppM4  Anko  River    i    J  3)        dADZESBPES SIBEHS: 8  z'E-s NUHL 0'6-S S133HS: 338 HIGIM> xVW. .0-9L    - d 8  -  -        ez  XVW.8L  So1k  XVW.8-L    62  XVW.8L  oz  XVW.8-L    -  Be  XWW.8-.    VESBOE-S SI3IHS33S  zES8PES SIEEHSE B3S  GIMSNI HOLONXVW.  Pe-SS06-S $133HS33S    -  -    Request for Certificate of Appropriateness 625 EAST MAIN STREET LINDA HESS MAILING ADDRESS 1351 HARBOR RD 5542 N5THDRIVE  OWNER NAME  CITY  STATE ZIP  LITCHFIELD HOLDINGS LLC FLANNERY PATRICK, A MCCAFFREYTIMOTHY M HORNE LANNY CHRIS II HESS. JAMES E NEWBOLD GINGER W SMITH STEPHEN. JOSEPH OWENS SHARON BARRETT SAIRANEN KAREN A MATTHEWS LINDA GIBSON  WASHINGTON NC 27889  PHOENIX  AZ 85013  CHRISTNER DEBORAH JOANNA 613 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  619 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 623 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 612 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  625 El MAIN: STREET 629 E MAIN STREET 622 E MAIN STREET 628 E MAIN ST 1344 BOLLINGAVE  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 NORFOLK VA 23508    Downtown Development & Historic Preservation  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  Adjacent Owner Notice  October 24, 2019  Re: Certificate of Appropriateness - 625 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adjacent to the above subject  property.  A request has been made by Ms. Linda Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the  following alterations to the property located at 625 East Main Street. 1. Install a 10' X12 shed in the back yard of the property.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time  and place:  DATE: PLACE: TIME:  TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2019  CITY HALL - MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 102 EAST SECOND STREET. (Enter From The Market Street Side Of The Building And Go To The Second Floor.)  7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Cples Emily R. Rebert Historic Preservation Planner City of Washington relen@wasnngomegow 252-946-0897  ADJACENT OWNERI NOTICE  Page 1of1    Staff Report  625 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 625 East Main Street is requesting approval to install a  10'x12' storage shed int the back yard.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings and  Accessory Structures:  3.12.5 Designs for new outbuildings and accessory structures: should complement the architectural style and period oft the primary structures as well as examples of similar structure 3.12.7 New outbuildings should be proportionally the same in size and height to the primary structure as is seen int the relationship between other primary and secondary structures in the 3.12.8 Prefabricated wooden accessory structures that are not architecturally similar to the primary structure are allowed onlyi if screened from view from any existing right-of-way.  within the district.  3.12.6 New outbuildings should be located in rear yards if possible.  district.  Prefabricated metal storage buildings are not acceptable.  The proposed shed will be 10'x12' and is appropriate materials. It will be located in the back yard. Based on finding of fact, the request is congruous with the Design  Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 625 East Main Street- Installing a 10'x12' shed in the back yard  A request has been made by Ms. Lindal Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 10'x12' storage shed on1 the property located at 625 East Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory. Structures. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Linda Hess to install a 10'x12' storage shed in the back yard of the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12  Outbuildings and Accessory Structures.  Or  Imove. that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Linda Hess to install a 10'x12' storage shed in the back yard of the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures. Ifurther move thati the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Linda Hess to install a 10'x12' storage shed in the! back yard oft the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic    Preservation Office (HPO): staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    711 Short Drive  Remove Ther (3) Trees    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Comisson Washington. NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thei front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Stroot Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: hort Drive  Historic Property/Name (f applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Karen s Ley mann  feet by  feet  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Doner  Tree Removat. Wewould le tovemove 2. trees 1n. vear yarà thatare dead and Itree u fvont yard thatis +uD lanc forspar, eo cloe +o  house and Powerlines.  Tundersland that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that requirc review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitled by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month pnor to the meeting lwish to attend, otherwise consiceration will be delayed until the following HPC mecling. Ani incomplete application wil not be accepted. lunderstand approved lequests are valid for one year  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdcawn Staff Approval  Kaen WAWn 7Namc ofApplcant-type 07 printy 111 ShoRT Dyive  (Initials)  ACTION  MalingAddress) 105119 (Datd)  (Zip Codo)  252-445-410D (Daytme Prone Number)  Vaw (Signature of Applicant)  [Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Depatment or designee, this appkcation bocomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contraçtor, tenant, or prepery awner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or uny law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor' Works Certificate of Approprinteness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the HiloricPleservation Connission for revew at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth Sig.)  (Date!  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized ropresentative is required at the meeting ot the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considored. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearingon: your behalf.    Beaufort Printed October 24, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  GIORTOR  1:40Feet    OBJECTID 6240 OWNER NAME MAILING, ADDRESS2 711 SHORT DRIVE ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 234110 TAXABLE VA 527574 PROPERTY ADDRESS 711 SHORT DR DATE 9/17/2015 SALE PRICE 517500.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL WATER ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42252  GPIN 5675-59-7023 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC LT3 MRS FRANKI H: SHORT TOT VAL 527574 PREV ASSESS 515985 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1882/00054 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1925 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 2000  GPIN_Long 5675-59-7023 MAILING ADDRESS 711 SHORT DRIVE STATE NC LAND VAL 293464 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.41 MBL 567500198 STAMPS 1035.00 NBHD CDE HW EXEMPT AMT SQFT 3044 NBR BED 4 PIN 01025400  MANN CRAWFORD ALEXANDER JR MANN KAREN  Beaufort County onliner map access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available andy without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shalll bel held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of Countyd data.        711 Short Drive  Tree #1 is River Birch, 15' from house foundation. Trees 2 &3  are dead.  Driveway  Garage  The green areas are planned site of replant for 3 trees, most likely holly or other evergreen, suitable for the soil, existing trees and landscaping.  House  #2  #3  Pamlico River    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Subject:  Karen Mann kmanno/egmai.com> Wednesday, October 30, 20191:33AM Emily Rebert Fwd: Fw: 711 Short Drive  Forwarded message From: Lex Mann mannexehotmal.com, Date: Tue, Oct29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Subject: Fw: 711 Short Drive  To:! kmann107@gmal.com mann10/egmal.com"  From: Wayne Woolard barefooter6@embarqmail.com)> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:21 PM To: Lex Mannlexehotmalcon Subject: Fw: 711 Short Drive Lex, Let me know ify you got this e-mail. Original Message From: Wayne Woolard To: Wayne Sent: Sunday, October 27, 20196:30F PM Subject: 711 Short Drive 10/25/2019 Lex Mann 711 Short Drive Washington, N.C.27889  Lex, assessed the River Birch in your back yard and the 6-8 inch Cherry and River Birch iny your front yard. The Cherry and River Birch have succumbed to salt intrusion due to flooding from the Tar River followed by drought conditions. suggest you water your trees to keep their root balls from drying out if we have the same conditions next summer. This The River Birch next to Short Drive has an excessively high root ball and the main support and feeder roots have cracked the walls in the basement, lifted the walk slabs and cracked the walkway. The high root ball makes it highly likely to blow  should prevent you from loosing other trees.  over. Iwould remove all three as soon as possible.  Wayne Woolard Wayne's Tree Service 252-943-7082    Request for Certificate of Appropriateness 711 SHORT DRIVE KAREN MANN MAILING. ADDRESS 701 SHORT DRIVE 719 SHORT DRIVE 715 SHORT DRIVE  OWNER NAME SLOAN ELIZABETHP TATE JOHN B III PECKI R BRANTLEY JR KUCAS MARKA A BRADBURY. JANETT MCLENDON CHRISTOPHER B SCALES GI FREDERICK VAN DORP ABRAHAM HJR POSTON MAGGIE  CITY  STATE ZIP  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON NC 27889  MANN CRAWFORD ALEXANDER JR 711 SHORT DRIVE  107 BENEDUM PLACE CARY 715 WI MAIN STREET 705 SHORT DRIVE 713 WI MAIN STREET 709 WEST MAIN ST  NC 27518  705 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889    Downtown Development & Historic Preservation  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  Adjacent Owner Notice  October 24, 2019  Re: Certificate of Appropriateness -7 711 Short Drive  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adjacent tot the above subject  property.  A request has been made by Ms. Karen Mann for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the  following alterations to the property located at7 711 Short Drive.  1. Remove three (3) tress on the property.  Ify youy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. Additionally, the full application is available on the çity website. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time  and place:  DATE: PLACE:  TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2019  CITY HALL - MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 102 EAST SECOND STREET. (ENTER FROM THE MARKET STREET SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND GO TO THE SECOND  FLOOR.) 7:00 pm  TIME:  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 4  Emily R. Rebert Historic Preservation Planner City of Washington reber@wasnnaomeaew 252-946-0897  ADJACENT OWNERNOTICE  Page 1of1    Staff Report  711 Short Drive the property.  The application for the property located at 711 Short Drive is requesting approval to remove 3 trees in Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.1 Landscaping:  4.1.1 Retain and preserve significant and character-defining vegetation including mature trees, 4.1.3 Trees and other vegetation shall not block views of historic structures and should be well 4.1.8 A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for the removal of live trees with a diameter of six (6) inches or greater. Removal of significant trees should only be done if it has disease or 4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it: should be replaced bya suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan. The tree replacement must occur within one (1) year of removal, preferable between the dates of September 1St and March 1st to encourage survival. Should the replacement tree die, the tree shall be continuously  hedges, shrubs, and ground cover whenever possible.  maintained and pruned regularly.  storm damage or is a safety hazard to historic structures.  replaced until it survives.  The property owner has made the effort to provide a professional assessment with the application. They specified what species the trees will be replaced with on the landscaping plan. Based on finding of fact, the application is congruous with the Historic  Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 711 Short Drive- Tree Removal  A request has been made by Ms. Karen Mann for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove 3  trees on the property located at 711 Short Drive.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Karen Mann to remove 31 trees on the property located at 711 Short Drive. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation  Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Karen Mann to remove 3 trees on the property located at 711 Short Drive. This motion is based on the followingi findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Ms. Karen Mann to remove 3 trees on the property located at 711 Short Drive. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation  Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping.  Or  move the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO    regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 120 Charlotte Street to install a backup generator on the back of the house 2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 North Main Street to repair façade using like materials on the property. 3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 145 East Main Street to replace existing sidewalk using like materials on 4. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 816 West Main Street in repair existing roof deck using like materials on the 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 239 East Second Street to complete the following on the property. a. Replace damaged front porch steps using like materials. b. Replace gravel driveway using like materials. C. Install a 20' fun ofi fencing in the back yard. d. Install an 8'x10' shed in the back yard.  on the property and extend existing fencing to screen it.  the property. property.  6. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 West Second Street to replace two (2) windows on the front façade 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropnateness for the owner of 117 North Charlotte Street to replace wood gate using like materials on the 8. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127 North Market Street to replace windows with like materials on the 9. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #28 - 241 Moss Way to construct a new 10. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 215 West Main' Street to replace the roof using like materials on the 11.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 625 East Main Street to replace front porch floor using like materials on the  using lie materials on the property.  property. property.  single-family dwelling on the property.  property. property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Update Rules and Procedure to change the meeting times  from 7:00pm to 6:00pm    Agenda Date: November 5, 2019  o  City.  Washington NORTH GAROLINA Memorandum  To: From: Date: Subject:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Historic Preservation Planner Amending the Rules and Procedures  October 31,2019  During Historic Preservation Meeting, dated October 1, 2019, the Commission was asked ift they would like to change the meeting time from 7:00PM to 6:00PM. All Commissioners were in favor  oft the change.  RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  WHEREAS, the state authorizes cities to safeguard the heritage of the city by preserving any historic site therein that embodies important elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological or architectural history and to promote the use and conservation of such site for the education, pleasure and enrichment oft the residents of the city, county, and state as a whole; and WHEREAS, pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, chapter 160A, article 19, part 3C, the City Council designates a commission to be known as the Washington Historic Preservation WHEREAS, except as otherwise provided in the City Code, all boards and commissions of the city shall adopt Rules of Procedure for Small Local Government Boards that includes in the document WHEREAS, the city planning staff needs to update the Rules of Procedure to comply with North Carolina General Statute 160A-388, a2: Notice of Hearing that would require notices to be mailed not less than 10 days and not longer than 25 days prior to a meeting. Within that same time period, the city shall also prominently post a notice of the hearing on the site that is the subject of the THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington Historic Preservation Commission of the  Commission (HPC); and  the commission's parliamentary procedural rules governing its meetings; and  hearing or on an adjacent street or highway right-of-way.  City of Washington wishes to amend the current Rules ofProcedure as follows:  Section 1. That Rule 1. - Regular Meetings, be amended by changing. "The board shall hold ar regular meeting on the first Tuesday of each month, except that ifa a regular meeting day is a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the next business day. The meeting shall be held at City Council Chambers and shall begin at 6:00 p.m. A copy of the board's current meeting  schedule shall be filed with the city clerk and the board's secretary".    Agenda Date: November 5, 2019  Section 2. This Amendment shall become effective upon its adoption. Section 3. All Rules of Procedure or parts in conflict herein are repealed.  Adopted this day of  2019  Cheri Vaughn, Chairman Approved  Commission Members: Cheri Vaughn, Chairman Karen Mann, Vice Chairman Kathleen Couch Colleen Knight Rebecca Clark Scarlett Boutchyard Scott Craigie    Fences: Major to Minor Work    Agenda Date: November 5, 2019  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA Memorandum  To: From: Date: Subject:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Historic Preservation Planner Correction of Appendix 2-I Major/Minor Works  October 31, 2019  In 2009, the Historic Preservation Commission updated the Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6-] Fences and Walls. Though it was discussed to make new fence requests Major Works (originally Minor Works) and fence repair/replacement as Minor Works (originally no COA required), that change was not included ini the recommended proposal to the City Council dated June 15, 2009. Note: The Chapter 4.6 - Fences and Walls was evaluated again in 2016. However, City Council  did not accept the proposal.  Please see the highlighted areas on the following pages.    Agenda Date: November 5, 2019  EXHIBIT 1- EXISTING APPENDIX A.2 Commission Approval (Major Work) New Construction or additions to primary building Exterior alternations to principal elevations of buildings Demolition of any structure Relocation of any structure Removal of accessory structures of historical significance Construction of new accessory structures Construction or removal of chimneys when made of brick Alteration, addition or removal of existing deck Construction of new decks Construction of new driveways Removal ofl live trees greater than 6" in diameter New or expanded parking areas Construction, addition, or removal of porches or steps Changes to historic roof features Construction, addition or removal of swimming pools Installation of new windows and doors Alteration of exterior surfaces Substantial changes to COA Renewal of expired COA on projects of substantial proportion  MINOR/MAJOR WORKS  Staff Approval (Minor Work) Addition, or repair of existing accessory structures Replacement ofs synthetic siding Addition, or repair of existing awning & shutters Installation of new awnings and shutters when appropriate Repair or replace existing siding, windows, doors, (no change) Construction of appropriate fences, walls orhedges Repair or replacement of exposed foundations (no change) Installation or replacement ofg gutters Emergency removal of dead diseased, or dangerous trees Removal of deteriorated accessory buildings (non- contributing) Repair of existing masonry Installation or removal of HVAC or mech. equipment (rear yard) Repair or replacement of existing porches (no change) Installation or appropriate signs Installation of satellite dishes & TV antennas (rear yard). Repair of existing stairs and steps Repair, replacement, or construction of walkways Installation of storm windows and doors Replacement of existing roof coverings (no change)  No COA Required (Routine Maintenance) Painting Repair or replacement of existing driveways & walks (no change) Repair or replacement of existing fences or walls (no change) Repair or replacement of existing gutters or downspouts (no change) Minor plantings or clearing of overgrown bushes & shrubs Tree removal (less than 6" in diameter) Repair or replacement of exterior lighting fixtures (no change) Repairs, including repointing, toe existing masonry Repair or replacement of existing parking lots (no change) Repair or existing roof coverings (no change). Repair or replacement of existing signs (no change). Repair to existing swimming pools Construction of wooden trellises in rear yard. Repair or replacement of existing sidewalks Window air conditioners at reare elevations.  ** This list is meant to be used as a quick reference guide. Fora full explanation oft the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines, please consult the Planning Department. at (252) 975-9384.    Agenda Date: November 5, 2019  EXHIBIT 2- UPDATED OPTION  APPENDIX A.2 Commission Approval (Major Work) New Construction or additions to primary building Exterior alternations to principal elevations of buildings Demolition of any structure Relocation of any structure Removal of accessory structures of historical significance Construction of new accessory structures Construction or removal of chimneys when made of brick Alteration, addition or removal ofe existing deck Construction of new decks Construction of new driveways Removal ofl live trees greater than 6" in diameter New or expanded parking areas Construction, addition, or removal of porches or steps Changes to historic roof features Construction, addition or removal of swimming pools Installation of new windows and doors Alteration of exterior surfaces Substantial changes to COA Renewal of expired COA on projects of substantial proportion Construction of appropriate fences, walls orh hedges  MINOR/MAJOR WORKS  Staff Approval (Minor Work). Addition, or repair of existing accessory structures Replacement of synthetic siding Addition, or repair of existing awning & shutters Installation of new awnings and shutters when appropriate Repair or replace existing siding, windows, doors, (no change) Repair or replacement of existing fences or walls (no change) Repair or replacement of exposed foundations (no change) Installation or replacement of gutters Emergency removal of dead diseased, or dangerous trees Removal of deteriorated accessory buildings (non- contributing) Repair of existing masonry Installation or removal of HVAC or mech. equipment (rear yard) Repair or replacement of existing porches (no change) Installation or appropriate signs Installation of satellite dishes & TV antennas (rear yard). Repair of existing stairs and steps Repair, replacement, or construction of walkways Installation of storm windows and doors Replacement of existing roof coverings (no change)  No COA Required (Routine Maintenance) Painting Repair or replacement of existing driveways & walks (no change) Repair or replacement of existing gutters or downspouts (no change) Minor plantings or clearing of overgrown bushes & shrubs Tree removal (less than 6" in diameter) Repair or replacement of exterior lighting fixtures (no change). Repairs, including repointing, toe existing masonry Repair or replacement of existing parking lots (no change) Repair or existing roof coverings (no change) Repair or replacement of existing signs (no change) Repair to existing swimming pools Construction of wooden trellises in rear yard Repair or replacement of existing sidewalks Window air conditioners at rear elevations.  ** This list is meant to be used as a quick reference guide. Forai full explanation of the Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines, please consult the Planning Department at (252) 975-9384.    CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA  May 11,2009 PAGE  AUTHORIZING THE VACANT LOT OFFER TOI PURCHASE AND CONTRACT City Attorney, Franz Holscher updated the Council regarding the vacant lot offer top purchase and contract with. Annie Mayo. Council had previously given Mr. Holscher the authority to attempt to meet with the Mayo's and arrive at an agreement. The purchase price is $67,150 for approximately 3.5: acres ofl land adjacent to the McConnell The only contingency is on page 3 paragraph 14: Other Provisions and Conditions (b)The Closing is contingent upon andt the closing date may be extended by the Buyer until such time as Buyer received' "waiver approval" from thel National Parks By motion of Councilman Davis, seconded by Mayor Pro tem Mercer, Council authorized the City to enter into a contract to purchase this property contingent upon (This contract is hereby incorporated into the minutes.) ACCEPT CONVEYANCE OF OLD CITY HALL  FOR THE MAYO PROPERTY  Sports Complex.  Service for this purchase.  receiving waiver approval from thel National Parks Service.  City Manager, Jim Smith noted the Beaufort County Commissioners at a meeting held on March 2, 2009 voted unanimously to move forward with the transfer of the Old City! Hall property to the City of Washington. This is pursuant to the provisions of NCGS Item (1): A general description of the survey boundaries of what the County convey tot the City. The City would then take responsibility for surveying the boundaries and provide and easement for maintenance purposed along the northerly boundary for the sidewalk thatf forms the side property line. The rear boundary will include: three Item (2): As specific understanding oft the consideration from the City to the County in exchange for the property to be conveyed. The property willl be conveyed at no cost to the City under the following condition. Int the event the City should sellt the property within the City's firstt twenty years of ownership, the City may take such action independent of input from the County provided that (a) the County would receive one half of the: sales priçe from the City and (b) thes sales price is no less than $60,000. Should the City wish to convey the property for a sum less than $60,000, the City must firsts seek the County's permission to sell the property at al lesser sales price. By motion of Councilman Woolard, seconded by Councilman Brooks, Council accepted the Conveyance from Beaufort County of Old City Hall in accordance with the terms spelled out by the Commissioners excepting that the division of any future sales SET- PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES TOI INCLUDE REVISED GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF FENCES AND Planning Administrator, John Rodman updated Council ont the proposed changes tot thel Historic Preservation Commission(HPC) Design Guidelines. The HPC met on February 3, 2009 and appointed a sub-committee to consider the use of fences and walls in the historic district. The sub-committee met twice and drafted revised guidelines ont fences and walls. At the May 2009 the Historic Preservation Commission discussed and reviewed the amendments. Apublic hearing will be scheduled for the. June 2, 2009 HPC meeting and a public! hearing will be scheduled for City Council on June 15, 2009. Dee Congleton came forward and noted that the Washington Area Historic Foundation By motion of Councilman Jennings, seconded by! Mayor Pro tem Mercer, Council accepted the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission and scheduled  160A-274 with thet following stipulations:  would  parking places currently owned by the County.  price be net of any amounti invested by the City.  WALLS IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT  endorses these changes.    CITY COUNCILI MINUTES WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA  May 11,2009 PAGE  ap public hearing for Monday, June 15, 20091 to amend the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines toi included revised guidelines on the use of fences and AWARD- - BID ON 59 MONTH INSTALLMENT NOTE FOR THE ELECTRIC FUND AND ADOPT AI RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINANCING TERMS Councilman Jennings requested tol be recused fromi this topic due to a conflict of interest with his employer. By motion of Councilman Davis, seconded by Councilman Matt Rauschenbach, CFO stated that in FY 2008-2009 budget, Council authorized the City to borrow $2,154,000 ini the Electric Fund through a 59 month installment note to purchase vehicles and equipment. The items to be financed are as  walls in the local historic district.  Woolard, Council recused Councilman Jennings from this item.  follows:  Electric Fund Vehicles 35-90-8390-7401) Replace line truck #602-$ $170,000 Replace pick-up truck #615-$25,000  Electric Fund Power Line Construction 35-90-8390-7401) *Circuit line rebuild Phase 1,1 mile $80,000 (nol lien by! bank) *Bath circuit rebuild, Back Creek Bore 1,100", 4-4" Pipes and labor- $97,000 Vaults $63,000 and materials $154,500 (no lien by bank on $314,500) Electric Fund Substation Improvements 35-90-8370-7401) Replace 2 system transformers $1,530,000 Replace 35 KV circuit vacuum breaker. $35,000  Grand Total: $2,154,500  *The City of Washington desires that the lending financiali institution not include Byr motion of Councilman' Woolard, seconded by Councilman Brooks, Council awarded the $2,154,000 fifty-nine month installment note bid to BB&T and adopt a  security lien holdings on the noted projects totaling $394,500. resolution approving thet financing terms oft the loan.  APPROVE RETAIL RATE ADJUSTMENTS  Jim Smith, City Manager reminded Council of the, January discussion regarding the pending NCEMPA rate increase that occurred in February. At that time, Council unanimously voted to defer installment note capital expenditures in the electric fund through June 30, 2009, consume the electric fund contingency, and decrease the transfer tot the General Fund from the Electric Fund in FY08-09 int the appropriate amounts that would allow us to forestall the proposed rate increase through the rest of Based upon the most recent estimates from our rate consultants, Booth and Associates, thei impact of the February wholesale power cost increase and the delayed expenses for deferring implementation to. June with collection in July willl be increased cost of $1,928,270 for budget year 2009-2010. A5% retail rate increase for all classes of customers will raise approximately $1,790,000 in additional revenue. We recommend thei increase be limited to 5% effective June 1, 2009, though ity willl leave a remaining shortfall of approximately $140,000. Each month the rate is delayed increases the overall rate increase by %%, soi if we delay implementation until, Julyt the Mayor Pro tem Mercer reminded Council that in January, Council voted to absorb thei increase through the current fiscal year. Councilman Mercer also noted that we have not discussed the Electric Department proposed budget for next fiscal year and we should wait to discuss the rate increase until after that budget is discussed. Council  thet fiscal year.  increase would be 5 %%.    CITY COUNCILI MINUTES WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA  JUNE 15,2009 PAGE  governing board "shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and int the public interest"; WHEREAS, this zoning request was duly advertised and was the subject of a public hearing by the Council of the City of Washington on June 15,2009; WHEREAS, the Council for the City of Washington has considered the application to amend the Zoning Map and finds that the amendment is not warranted, in order to achieve the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WASHINGTON CITY COUNCIL THAT, the Plan Consistency Review Statement presented by the Planning Board be adopted and as ar result, the adoption of the proposed rezoning of the subject parcels  be denied. Adopted this 15 day of June 2009. ATTEST: s/Cynthia S. Bennett CITY CLERK  th  s/Judy M. Jennette MAYOR  AMEND - HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES TO INCLUDE REVISED GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF FENCES AND WALLS IN THE Michael Overton, Chairman Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) came forward and gave al brief history on this topic. Mr. Overton explained ar meeting was held byt the HPC on February 3, 2009 and a subcommittee was appointed to consider the use of fences and walls int the historic district. The subcommittee met twice and drafted revised guidelines on fences and walls. In May 2009 a meeting of the full Historic Preservation Commission was held and amending the guidelines was discussed. Ap public hearing was held during the. June 2, 2009 Historic Preservation  LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT  Commission.  Mayor Jennette opened the public hearing.  Bobby Roberson, 235 East Main Street voiced concern over the height limit of4 feet for ap privacy fence for those properties South of Main Street. Mr. Roberson felt the Erick Greene, Ross Hamory, Billie Malison, Shirley Stone, Dee Congleton, Leonard Huber, Karen Tripp, Johanna Huber and Betty. Jane Greene all spoke in support oft the revised guidelines and asked Council to approve the recommended There being not further comments, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Pro tem Mercer concurred with the changes to the guidelines and asked the HPC to revisit their guidelines for other areas that may need attention and By motion of Councilman Jennings, seconded by! Mayor Pro tem Mercer, Council accepted the recommendation of thel Historic Preservation Commission and approved an amendment tot thel Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines to include revised guidelines on the use off fences and walls in the local historic district.  heightl limit for the privacy fence should be increased to 6f feet.  changes.  strengthening.    CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA  JUNE 15,2009 PAGE  ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 4.0, STREETSCAPE AND: SITE DESIGN, BE ITORDAINEDI byt the City Council of the City of Washington, North Carolina that: Section 1. That Chapter 4.0, Streetscape and Site Design, Section 4.6 Fences and Walls of the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines shall be amended to Section 4.6. Fences and Walls shall be omitted entirely and replaced with the Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption. Section 3. AIl Ordinances or parts in conflict herein are repealed.  SECTION 4.6 FENCES ANDI WALLS  include the following:  attached revised guidelines: AttachmentA  Adopted this 15"h day of June 2009. ATTEST: s/Cynthia S. Bennett CITY CLERK  s/Judy M. Jennette MAYOR  COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC  Gary Tomasulo thanked everyone fori including the Façade Grant program int the upcoming budget. He voiced concern over privilege taxes and thinks this is very unfair. Bobby Roberson voiced concern over: several topics and they are listed below: 1. Additional staffing needs for the Planning Department 2. Funding for Demolition by Neglect 3. Contract for Clean' Water Trust Fund - replacing plants in wetlands 4. Car allowance for Department Heads 5. Funding for stimulus coordinatorllaw: enforcement development AUTHORIZE - POLICE STATION ARCHITECTURAL AMENDMENT Jim Smith, City Manager noted that at the March meeting, Council authorized the City Manager to sign an agreement with Architect's Design Group. Approval was subject to the requirements of USDAI Rural Development Community Facilities Building Grant program and the State of North Carolina, fort the services in conjunction with the design of a new facility for the Washington Police Department. Since that time, work has been under wayt to finalize the agreement in accordance with the requirements of the various parties and we believe the contract as presentedi in now essentially in its final form. However, in order to finalize the fee component of the agreement, a facility program including site selection, and cost estimates must be completed. Therefore, we are asking for Council's authority to proceed with this phase oft the project in accordance Mayor Prot tem Mercer asked to make sure thatt the design team comes back to Council with the needed square footage and Council will determine ifs such size is appropriate. Councilman Davis voiced concern over the proposed site location. Byr motion of Councilman Davis, seconded by Councilman Woolard, Council authorized the City Manager toi issue a notice to proceed with Architect's Design Group, Inc. for Phase One services including site selection and suitability analysis. ADOPT- BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR THE HISTORIC Mayor Pro tem Mercer asked for clarification on thel Historic Preservation Fund Grant andt the area this encompasses. John Rodman, Planning Administrator explained thet first map received was a suggested area toi include as a National Register Historic District from the City of Washington's Historic Preservation Commission. That mapy was  planner  witht the original proposed fee of $5,000.  PRESERVATION FUND GRANT    Attachment A  4.6 Fences and Walls  Many different types of fencing and walls can be found in the historic district including low masonry walls, wooden picket and privacy fences, and wrought iron fences and gates. Inn residential areas, fences and walls were used historically to enclose yard areas and define property lines. In commercial areas, fences and walls can be used to screen service areas and parking lots. Fences are prominent landscape features and should be constructed in a manner and design that is sensitive to the character of the historic structure and district. The introduction of new fences and walls should be handled with concern for design, materials, height, details, color and placement. The applicant requesting permission toe erect ai fence or wall shall submit a site plan locating the fence or wall configuration and a scaled elevation drawing. A photograph from the public right of way is required for any  Fence and Wall Guidelines 4.6.1 Retain and preserve historic fences and walls whenever possible including gates, hardware, cast or wrought iron details, ornamental  pickets, etc.  proposed fencing.  BEAUTY  4.6.2 Wood,  brick, design  stone, are  decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link fences are not  authentic  allowed.  g4h    Attachment A  4.6.3 Deteriorated fence and wall elements should be repaired rather than replaced. New elements should match the original in material, texture, 4.6.4 Repairs to existing chain link fences may be allowed up to 50% of a fence run (area between right angles). If50% or greater of any linear feet of chain link fence run is damaged or otherwise requires repair, the entire chain link fence shall be removed and if replaced, shall be with a new fence made of material other than chain link and consistent with these 4.6.5 Fences and walls should be properly maintained according to guidelines for masonry, wood, and metal. 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be of a design that is appropriate architectural style and period of the historic structure. 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to a main street or a side street should be of an open design, such as picket and no greater than four (4) feet in height. Iti is prohibited to use solid privacy fences in front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox are also prohibited.  and design.  4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the rear yard. If a majority of a privacy fence is visible from the public right-of- way, a landscape buffer shall be included. No fence, including a privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in  guidelines.  height.  to  the  1ALAXIT E  4.6.9 Arear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure.  3WA-    Attachment A  4.6.10 All newly constructed wooden fences which are parallel to a main street or side street shall be finished using an opaque stain or painted. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure.  4.6.13 Fences and walls should be used to screen service areas, refuse receptacles, and parking lots in the commercial areas.  4.6.14 Masonry walls that were historically unpainted should not be painted. Repainting previously painted masonry walls is permitted.  4.6.11 Itisi inappropriate to construct walls and fences on the waterfront that obstruct views and vistas from the historic district or from the water. No privacy fence that exceeds four (4') feet in height shall be allowed in the side or rear yards of property located south of Main Street. 4.6.12 The use of plant screenings, in the form of hedgerows and landscaping, is encouraged as an alternative to fences and walls. Any such plantings shall comply with the height and location standards of these guidelines.  348    Attachment A  4.6.15 Retaining walls, when visible from a public right-of- way, must be constructed of brick or stone. Landscape timbers and railroad ties may be used when they are not visible from the public right-  of-way.  Side Street  Side Yard  Front Yard  Rear Yard  Side Yard  Typical Yard Layout  -319-    City Council Minutes - Page 6  February 8, 2016  ACCEPT/AMEND- RECOMMENDATION OF THE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION: TO, AMEND THE HISTORIC: PRESERVATION: DESIGN GUIDELINES TO INCLUDE REVISED GUIDELINES ON' THE USE OF FENCES AND WALLS IN THE BACKGROUND & FINDINGS: The Historic. Preservation Commission met and appointed a. sub- committee to consider the use offences and walls in the historic district. The sub-committee met numerous times and drafted revised, guidelines onj fences and walls. In September 2015 a1 workshop was held with the Historic Commission to discuss and finalize the amended, guidelines.. A recommendation to forward the amended, guidelines to City Council was approved during the November HPC meeting. Council made additional comments that were addressed by the HPC & Committee.  LOCAL. HISTORIC: DISTRICT  Mayor Pro tem Finnerty said that she has been contacted by several members of the community asking her toj please vote ini favor oft the revisions made by HPC and fence committee. She contacted John Wood, State Historic Preservation Officei in Greenville, in addition she contacted the following municipalities: Edenton, New Bern and Elizabeth City. She found that the recommendations presented by the fence committee are: not appropriate. Six foot fences are allowed in all of these areas. Requiring 5ft. fences would be an additional expense as they would have tol be custom made and a 5ft. fence could  hardly be called a' "privacy fence".  By motion of Mayor Pro tem Finnerty, seconded by Councilmemberh Mercer, Council voted to not approve changes as presented and voted to leave the guidelines as they are. Motion carried 4-1 with  Councilmember Pitt opposing.  By motion of Councilmember Mercer, seconded by Councilmember Beeman, Council moved that the guidelines regarding fences and walls ini the historic district not bej presented to Council for at  least 121 months. Motion carried 4-1 with Councilmember Pitt opposing.  ACCEPT- AUDIT SERVICES AGREEMENT EXTENSION  Matt Rauschenbach, CFO explained that Martin Starnes was awarded the audit contract for five years when it was bid in 2011 through the RFQ process. They were selected as thei most qualified and were the lowest bid of the qualified proposals received. They continue tol be among the top qualified auditors of governmental entities in NC. The fees for the three year agreement extension are consistent with what the City has paid for the previous two years. Staffrecommends the acceptance ofthis  extension.  Bymotion of Councilmember Mercer, seconded by Mayor Pro tem Finnerty, Council accepted Councilmember Beeman inquired about the 3% increase in 2nd year ofe extension and another 3 % in 3rd, year of the extension. Mr. Rauschenbach noted that the agreement willl have to come back for  the audit services agreement extension from Martin Starnes & Associates.  approval each year, but it can be a consent agenda item.  Councilmember Mercer reviewed that ai new purchasing policy was recently adopted. Council needs to also review and adopt ai revised travel policy. Discussion was held regarding the current cut- offp policy for utility bills. Bobby Roberson noted the travel policy will be reviewed before. June 30th.  (copy of contract and bids attached)  February 22, 2016 8of36    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: Design Guidelines: Updating Appendix A2, addressing Fences as Major or Minor Works  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission uphold the existing and original Appendix A2 int the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines. New fence requests shall hence forth be considered as Minor Works while repairs and replacement of existing fencing shall be considered as routine maintenance and not require a Certificate of Appropriateness.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to City Council to accept the updated option for Appendix A2 in the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines (reflected in Exhibit 2), which would make the construction of new fences and walls Major Works while the repair or replacement of existing fencing shall be considered as Minor Works.    Informational Brochures    A7NOS SasOdand NOLIVHISNTTI JOIS SI GNV: DNILNINd IV.I 103449 NIS SMOHS dvw  GNVISISTISVD  HIATI 0D17WVd AM4IVMEL  MIAINIVI AGINOHS  ISNIVW ISGNZ ISGHE ISHLL ISHIS  AGMWVd  ADISG DOIS!H s,uolbuIyseM        MINUTES    WASHINGION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting Minutes  Citys  Tuesdav October 1. 2019 Members Not Present Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Dawn Maye, Administrative Support  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  Members Present Cheri Vaughn - Chairman Karen Mann -V Vice-Chairman Scarlett Boutchyard Rebecca Clark Kathleen Couch Scot Craigie Colleen Knight I. Opening of the meeting I. Invocation HI. Roll Call  A. Amoment ofs silence was taken.  A. Asilent roll call was taken by staff. All members are present.  IV. Changes to the Agenda A. Public Discussion Forum V. Old Business VI. Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Ar request has been made by Mr. Stephen Barnes for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations in the back yard of the property located at 303 East Main a. Remove the existing pergola on the rear of the house and add a screened porch. b. Convert double windows facing Harvey Street into French doors leading to screened C. Remove front walkway from Main Street and add a new walkway leading from Harvey d. Grade the existing driveway to add brick edging and gravel or crushed oyster shells. Ms. Carol Nash, representing Mr. Stephen Barnes, came forward and was: sworn Vice-Chairman, Karen Mann, ift the Barnes are going to remove the sidewalk to the existing front door? Ms. Nash, yes due to the roots coming from the existing tree int the front yard. The sidewalk has become broken and the owners are concern that someone might get hurt. The Barnes are proposing to replace a portion of the sidewalk from the front steps and have the sidewalk turn and intersect into the: sidewalk that is perpendicular to Harvey Street. Scarlett Boutchyard, have the owners looked into repairing the sidewalk? Ms. Nash, not at this time, but could be an option. The design for the driveway has not been finalized due to the amount of existing roots. Duet to the roots the Barnes are proposing to use. gravel  Street:  porch. Street.  in. Ms. Carol asked fora any question from the Commission.  Revised: October 7, 2019  Page 1of12    or crushed oyster shells for the driveway. Kathleen Couch, the commission allows for the removal of the sidewalk, what willl become of thisarea? Ms. Nash, will become a natural grass area. Ms. Couch, would they remove the tree roots? Ms. Nash, as much as possible. Scarlett Boutchyard, would this be al hazard. Ms. Nash, this walkwayi is not being used currently due to the damage. Scot Craigie, back porch roof, will the roof be extended over the back porch? Ms. Nash, the existing pergola would be removed and the existing roof that is over the kitchen would be extended at the same pitch using the same materials of the existing roof. This roof would be al little larger than the existing pergola. Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions. There were no questions and was Rebecca Clark, stated that the sidewalk in question is al hazard. Since the Barnes have as sidewalk on the other side, regulations states that you have to have the front sidewalk, go to a sidewalk. Cheri' Vaughn, asked, does it have to go the one that the house is facing the street? Ms. Clark, does not state that you cannot remove the sidewalk. Colleen Knight, the: sidewalk has to come from the front doorto the sidewalk. Ms. Clark, it has to come from the front door to the sidewalk, it does not say that you cannot remove the sidewalk, unless it was historic. Scarlett Boutchyard, clarified, ify you want to install a sidewalk that would go into a sidewalk on the side of the house, this would still meet the guidelines? Ms. Clark, this is my understanding, the regulations do not specify the front sidewalk. They specify the front drive, and front door. Kathleen Couch, read Chapter- 4.3.19, from the Historic District Design Guidelines. The Guidelines states the following: Front walks ini residential areas shall lead directly from the public. sidewalk to the front door of the structure. Ms. Clark, it does, this is a public sidewalk. Ms. Couch, does not say the primary entrance. Mr. Craigie, it is still a public sidewalk on the side of the house. Ms. Couch, it does not read ifit has as 90 degree turn. Colleen Knight, ifiti is the roots from the trees that caused the problem, the Barnes do not have any alternative. Scarlett Boutchyard, from the insurance side, ift theiri insurance company' was to come out to assess the house they would probably make the Barnes remove or repair the sidewalk. Ms. Boutchyard, does not know ift the Barnes has looked into what could be done to repair the existing sidewalk and would like to know if that could be done. Ms. Clark, thati is not what the request states, we need to decide if this meets the guidelines. Karen Mann, there are big trees with roots all over town andi is concern that everyone will start removing sidewalks. Ms. Mann believes that the sidewalk is a historic park of the house. Mr. Craigie, how many homes have a sidewalk that goes directly from the street to the front door? Mr. Craigie has one inside his yard but not coming from the street. Scarlett Boutchyard, clarified that Mr. Craigie does have a sidewalk coming directly from a public sidewalk. Mr. Craigie misunderstood and does have a sidewalk going to his front door. Ms. Clark, the guidelines do not say that they cannot remove the sidewalk. Mr. Stephen Barnes, came forward and was: sworn in. Mr. Barnes came forward toa answer questions. Cheri Vaughn, what is the main reason for removing the sidewalk. Mr. Barnes, stated, it so badly damaged and is beyond repair. His concern is that someone will get injured. Kathleen Couch, Ms. Nash had mentioned that there are large tree roots all over the property, if you were to place a sidewalk coming off of Harvey Street are you going to have the same problem? Mr. Barnes, no, there are not tree roots all over the property. There are tree roots coming from the giant magnolia tree in the front yard and another tree  brought back to the table.  Revised: October 7,2019  Page2of12    over the driveway, thisi is the reason why the driveway cannot be paved. There is not a problem with a short sidewalk going to Harvey Street, no trees oni this side of the property. Cheri Vaughn, ify you could go around the tree? She withdrew her question. Kathleen Couch, what type of material will be used entering from Harvey: Street, will it be concrete? Mr. Barnes, at this time not sure of the material, excavation has not been completed. (NOT AUDIBLE). * Kathleen Couch made the following motion: move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Barnes to make the above changes on the property located at 303 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 4.3 Parking, Driveways, and Sidewalks, and 5.3 Additions. Please note that this certificate deviates from the standards to remove the front walkway due to the physical hazard of the broken concrete from the tree roots. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted 6 in favor and 1  (Karen Mann) opposed.  2. Arequest has been made by Beaufort County for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace two windows on the second floor of the front facade on the property located at 111 West  Second Street.  Ms. Christina Smith, Public Works Director for Beaufort County, representing Beaufort County, came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Smith, asking to replace two windows on the building on second street. Currently this building houses the District Attorney's Office. Due to the damaged windows the office is not usable. The windows were replaced in the 1980's. The existing windows have snap in mutins that are currently falling into the offices. The request is the replace the existing windows with wood windows that are wrapped in vinyl. These windows were previously approved by the Commission in 2015 to replace two windows on thei first floor of the same building. The window will have 8 panes over 8 panes, the manufacture sheet shows 6 panes over 61 panes. This will be a custom order so that itwill match the existing windows. The windows will have a white raised profile. Scarlett Boutchyard, will the mutins match what the existing windows? Ms. Smith, yes. Ms. Vaughn, what is the type of windows in the reset of the building? Ms. Smith, currently there are six different types of windows. Some windows have been replaced int the 1980's and there are some original windows. Ms. Vaughn, more concern is with the front façade of the building. Ms. Smith, all are original with storm windows. Kathleen Couch, clarified that all are original except the two windows that are being requested for replacement. Ms. Smith, to best of her knowledge thati is correct. Some may have been replaced in the! 50's or 60's. Scot Craigie, stated thet two windows below the windows in question have been replaced at some point. Ms. Boutchyard, the bulk of the windows are wood windows. Ms. Smith, yes, the windows in question would be wood windows just wrapped in vinyl. Ms. Boutchyard, a wooden window do not have to be wrapped inv vinyl, the window can be painted. Ms. Smith, for the maintenance side she would prefer the vinyl clad. The windows in the application were previously approved by the Commission in 2015 and Ms. Smith is trying to! be consistent in the choice of window. Ms. Couch, clarification, are there any wood windows presently installed ini the front of the building? Ms. Smith, yes. Ms. Couch, which  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions.  Revised: October 7, 2019  Page3 3of12    ones? Ms. Smith, there are six that appear to be wooden windows with age. Ms. Boutchyard, at some point you would replace all of the windows with the vinyl clad? Ms. Smith, yes. Ms. Boutchyard, even though the company makesa wooden windows. Ms. Smith, yes. Collen Knight, the windows that you want to replace, were they installed in the 1980's? Ms. Smith, yes, not able to locate records. Ms. Vaughn, would you be opposed to replace with wood windows. Ms. Smith, Twould prefer the vinyl clad windows, this is due to the cost of maintenance. But the windows need to be replaced. Scot Craigie, could you replace with vinyl clad sashes and then you would be keeping the same wood frame. Ms. Smith, that is a possibility. Ms. Boutchyard, the wood window hasa a 40 year plus warranty. Karen Mann, is this building a contributing structure. Staff, the building was built in 1936 and the addition was built later. The building is age appropriate and it could be a contributing structure. Mr. Craigie, ift the two windows ont the right side were approved in 2015 whyi is there any discussion on this replacement window. Collen Knight, the biggest concern from the public has been consistency and we are talking about the same building with the same issue and now we are not going to approve something that was already approved. Ms. Boutchyard, soon the entire building will be vinyl windows and no wooden windows. Ms. Vaughn, the Commission needs to be concern with the guidelines and not what a Commission ruled in previous years. Ms. Couch, we need to be concern with the primary façade as opposed to a secondary façade and the direction of the street the secondary façade is not visible to the street until you have passed the building. Ms. Mann, the financial aspect is not something that the Commission is supposed to consider. Ms. Couch, nor do we consider precedent. Ms. Smith, clarification, ift this is not approved could installing wood Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions. There were no questions and was Karen Mann, there are many different types of windows installed in the building and this building would fit in betteri if the windows would be wood. Cheri Vaughn, even though vinyl windows were approved in the past, the current Commission needs to try to bring the building back to its original. Scarlett Boutchyard, if they are looking to replace others in thei future then the entire building would become vinyl clad windows. Scott Craigie, thei two that are in question are currently vinyl windows. Ms. Mann, but the original was wood. Mr. Craigie, ify you are replacing with like material, should this even come before the commission? Staff, the existing windows are replacement windows. Mr. Craigie, but the existing window isvinyl. Collen Knight, they are not original, the windows were replaced in the 80's. Mr. Craigie, went and looked at the windows and thinks that the windows in question are vinyl. Ms. Boutchyard, there was al lot of things going on in the 70's and 80's that really should not have happened. Ms. Knight, even with that being said, if you are replacing like for like, so if the windows are vinyl now Ms. Smith should not have had to come before the Commission. Ms. Mann, the guidelines states that it should match the original oft the building. Mr. Craigie, stated that it also says like for like. Ms. Vaughn, asked if the windows are wood. Staff, understood that they were wood with snap in mutins. Ms. Smith, clarification, is the main issue that the windows are located on the front façade, again Ms. Smith works on an annual budget and not sure if she could replace all of the windows in one year or would have to spread out to other budget years. If the windows on the front façade were to be replaced with wood windows, would the side façade be able to match the existing vinyl windows? Ms. Vaughn, there are different  windows be considered a Minor' Works. Staff, yes.  brought back to the table.  Revised: October 7,2019  Page4of12    guidelines fori the side facades. Rebecca Clark, as al board we are not allow to comment ont future applications, we can only address what is currently ini front of the Commission. Ms. Boutchyard, the angle oft the street will depend ont the guidelines. Ms. Couch, read Chapter-3 3.4.3 from the Historic District Design Guidelines. The guidelines state the following: Ifreplacement of a window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original in size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. Soi in this case the original windows would have been wood. Mr. Craigie, how do you know that you Ms. Smith withdrew the application to replace two windows on the front façade of the building with two vinyl clad windows. Beaufort County will proceed with NO VOTE WAS TAKEN DUE TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPLICATION.  are replacing the original?  replacing the windows with wooden windows.  3. A request has been made by INA LLC. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to. make the following alterations south façade on the property located at: 157 West Main Street:  a. Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor b. Construction ofa deck C. Installation ofa a rollup door d. Introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor e. Replace the two existing windows  Introduce 3 or 4 arched windows on the west façade of the newer: addition Mr. Sed Naziri, came forward and was. sworn in. Renovation began on the front façade and going to the rear and to the side. After completion of the front façade renovations will continue to the rear. Currently the rear façade looks like a warehouse with no openings. Proposing to make 3 large doors or windows on the second level. On the lower level would like to have access sO that equipment could move in and out of the building. This opening would be al large double door orar roll up (garage type door) and would be mechanically open and close. The existing door and: side light will be moved to the side and will become a new location for windows. For the deck, the design has not been completed by the architect and: structural engineer. Access for the second level will be the side door and a room inside with a stair case going to the second level. The stairs will depend on the architect and structural engineer. The deck will have two raised decks on the side. Public will be able to walk out and: step up: SO that they can see the river. The reason for the raised deck is due to Ribeye's has installed electrical equipment and is encroaching on the property. You must have three feet on either side oft the electrical, but you are allowed to go above the electrical. Rebecca Clark, will the exterior. stairs serve as at fire escape? Mr. Naziri, this will depend on the architect and structural engineer. The drawings are to show the possibility of what might happen. (referring to the drawings) Colleen Knight, is this the deck that you are going to build? Mr. Naziri, same location but may have additional design to make more attractive. Kathleen Couch, the drawings look wonderful, but having a problem visualizing what is currently there and what your vision. Currently on the lower floor there are al lot of doors that you want to introduce. Do you have any pictures of what is current and what you want revise? Mr. Naziri, not at this time, have pictures on my phone. Previously there were two large openings at the rear of the building and at some time the openings were filled in with cinder blocks and closed off. This was also done on the front of the  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions.  Revised: October 7,2019  Page5of12    building. Karen Mann, is the building currently 2 stories or just one open area. Mr, Naziri, currently the building is 2 stories. Scarlett Boutchyard, asked: staffif they were able to locate any pictures that would show facades of the building? Staff, no information was able to be located. The building was maybe built in the late 1960's or 1970's. Mr. Naziri, it is apparent that the openings were original and filled with new brick and cinder blocks. Rebecca Clark, is this building a contributing structure. Staff, no iti is not a contributing structure. Ms. Mann, the entire: structure or just the rear of the building. Staff, the entire structure. Due to how the building has been altered oft the years. Ms. Clark, the front would be original. Mr. Naziri, yes. Ms. Mann, there are windows on the lower side of the building, there are. some double hung windows with al little bit of an arch. Colleen Knight, the request states that you are going to replace 3 or 4 windows on the side, but the rendering shows much more. Mr. Naziri, this was just an idea for the type and: style of window that would bei installed in the future. There is not light coming in on that portion of the building. The number of windows are not exact. The design that the architect shows about7. Ms. Knight, is that depended of the interior design. Mr. Naziri, it is more depended on what type of business will bei in the space. Cheri Vaughn, the concept is very nice, just does not feel like there is enough information to make decision, sounds more like ani idea and other applications have been presented that show more detail. Ms. Couch, would like to see what is currently in place and what will be final. Staff, do you want it superimposed on top of each other. Ms. Couch, yes. Ms. Vaughn, we would require this from anyone else that was coming before the commission. Ms. Couch, would need details on the doors on the lower level showing the dimensions and showing what would be placed in the openings. Ms. Vaughn, not sure if Mr. Naziri would like to delay for a month and return with more details. Mr. Naziri, cannot delay due to the master mason is working on the project. Mr. Naziri has already had delays and if he delays again not sure when the mason will be able to return. He is asking for the Commission to allow him to continue cutting the existing openings that werei filled in with cinder blocks. Then he will come back with more detail and additional design. Scott Craigie, there is nothing currently in place, iti is just a blank brick wall. Ms. Vaughn, iti is the back and is facing the river. Mr. Craigie, looking at Mr. Naziri's example, the riverside apartments are very similar to what he is asking to be approved. Ms. Mann, the hard part is what is proposed and what is being explained are hard to understand. Mr. Naziri, clarify what is the hard part. Ms. Vaughn, when applicants come before the Commission they have details of the windows that will be installed, the type of materials, etc. Mr. Naziri, every window int the front were the blocks are being removed, the windows are: SO damaged that the worker is repairing every opening. After every opening is repaired, then each window has to be measured and a custom window willl have to be ordered. There is no way to determine what type of window willl bei installed, not until all of the cuts and repairs are complete. Allow me to place plywood ini the openings afteri the cuts have been completed and then will return with more details. Ms. Couch, aren't you: suppose to make the cuts fort the: size of the window? Mr. Naziri, they will be custom windows. The size oft the windows is based on the cuts. For every window there has to be an arch, due to the integrity of the structure there cannot be any straight cuts. Ms. Mann, on the drawings there are 7 windows on the side, but your request is 3or4 windows. Itis vague on what you intend to accomplish but, do want to commend you on' what you have completed. Mr. Naziri, if the Commission would approve the back and five on the side. Ms. Knight, the windows on the side are already  Revised: October 7,2019  Page6 6of12    existing. Ms. Mann, this isal brick wall currently. Staffi the addition was in the 60's and 70'sand windows would be located on the addition. Ms. Couch, the new windows will only be on the addition. Rebecca Clark, this is not ac contributing structure. Ms. Couch, wants to know what she is approving. Ifthere will4 4 windows or 7 windows and as per other details that are required, the same: as from other occupants. Ms. Knight, trying to clarify, Mr. Naziri has an expert that is currently working the building and once he has completed the front. That is your issue, you want to get as much work completed as possible. Mr. Naziri wants to move the mason directly to the rear of the building and for him to start masonry work. Mr. Naziri, after the mason has completed all of the cuts he will be able to leave. Mr. Naziri has a solution, already have windows on the side oft the first building and he can continue the same look and style, width, and dimensions and continue down the side of the building keeping the same pattern. Ms. Knight, how many window will need to be cut open? Ms. Mann, that will be al lot, because there is already a lot of windows done the side of the building. Mr. Naziri, the first building is 3 stories, then the second building is 2 stories. Iwould follow the pattern of the second story to the end oft the building. Ms. Knight, believes that this is reasonable. Ms. Boutchyard, you are not going to make any bigger openings than whati is currently on the building? Mr. Naziri, exactly, lam only going to remove the cinder blocks and recreating the opening, no smaller or  larger.  Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions.  Mr. Trent Tetterton, came forward and was sworn in. Stated the following in support of Mr. Naziri's project: Working with the downtown to try to beautify the downtown area. The "Belk" building has been vacant for over 30 years. Wanted to commend Mr. Naziri for his hard work and attention to detail. Mr. Naziri's workman is exceptional. Mr. Naziri came before this Commission back in November of 2018 to get approval for thei front façade when his craftsman was available at the time. Had Mr. Naziri been able to go ahead, the front façade would be complete. Mr. Naziri is trying to transform the white elephant into a thing of beauty and will be a star for the downtown. Ifyou look at all oft the work that has been completed, all of the work has been excellent. Would like to give my complete support to Mr. Naziri. Reason for the windows int the rear of the building is to maximize the visibility of the river. By replacing windows will be better energy efficiency. Looking forward Mayor, Mac Hodges, came forwards and was sworn in. Stated the following in support of Mr. Naziri's project: Iti is important for Washington and the history oft the building to have it restore. People are coming into the Downtown spending money to refurbish buildings. Ift the Commission could allow for Mr. Naziri to cut out just he windows. This would help keep the project moving Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions. There were no questions and was Cheri Vaughn, agrees to what Mr. Naziri is proposing especially since this portion of the building was an addition. It would make since to let Mr. Naziri to cut out the openings then for him to come back to the Commission with more detail information. Colleen Knight, Mr. Naziri would follow the original building for the placement of the windows. Kathieen Couch, clarify, just the window cut-outs on the side and ont the back. Rebecca Clark, yes justt the windows on the side and on  to see the completion of the building.  forward. brought back to the table.  Revised: October 7, 2019  Page7of12    the back. Ms. Couch, clarification, the windows and doors and thati is where the existing doors are on the second floor of the addition. Rebecca Clark, the doors are located on the first floor. Anything is better than what is current. Mr. Naziri's proposal is totally reasonable. Karen Mann, trying to understand how to make the motion. Discussion continued concerning how to word the motion. Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA LLC. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. Referencing the following items: A, D,E&F. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.91 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details. Colleen Knight seconded the motion  and all voted 7 in favor and Oopposed.  4. Ar request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street.  Mr.. Jonathan Russell, City Manager, representing the City of Washington, came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Russell stated the following: The City of Washington is requesting approval to replace the clerestory windows at the Civic Center. This request is unique in that the this is a public facility that is used for social events. This issue had come before the Commission in October of 2018. The existing windows do not appear to be original to the building. The request is consisting of a piece of glass sandwiched between: strips of wood with an aluminum alloy frame. Due to the location of the windows it is difficult to examine the existing windows. The City does subsidize the use oft the facility greatly to help the community and the Downtown area. Alternative materials have been used in other locations due to the type of facility and the location. Scarlett Boutchyard, does Double Hung Window (company that performed the inspection) offer repair or restoration work. Mr. Russell, the cost is almost the same for replacement or repair. Ms. Boutchyard, Carolina Windows and Doors is the provider that you proposed to do the replacement, do they provide a repair or restoration other than an aluminum window, because it looks like Double Hung Window offers an alternative. Mr. Russell, with the aluminum you: are able to get a narrow frame that would replicate the existing window and with Double Hung Window was not able to replicate the existing window. Rebecca Clark, you would ber replacing a replacement window because there are not records of what was originally installed. The Cityi is wanting to keep the look that is currently installed instead ofr replacing with plywood. Mr. Russell, yes, there are no character  defying elevation, there are a lot of varying opinions. Chairman, Cheri Vaughn asked for any questions.  Kathleen Couch, clarification, the frame is aluminum and the window is wood., Mr. Russell, what would be holding the glass is aluminum inside a wooden frame. Ms. Couch, would you be able to see the aluminum? Mr. Russell, you would be able to see some of the aluminum on the edge of the glass. The aluminum would be covered in ai texture enamel. Ms. Couch, but the majority of thei frame would be wood. Mr. Russell, iti is about 50/50. Ms. Couch, do you have a picture oft the trim of the original windows? Staff, no, could not locate any pictures. Karen Mann, didn't Double Hung Window mention in the report what was original. Mr. Russell, they had some: speculation what was there but, what is currently installed  Revised: October 7, 2019  Page 8of12    is about 151 to 20 years old. They struggled to even call it a window. Double Hung Window wanted to call it plate glass sandwiched. Ms. Mann, has a third story window andi if she was having to replace the window she would have to replace with wood. Why should the City not have to the: same? NOT AUDIBLE. (1:14:02) Cheri Vaughn, thel building is not a contributing structure. Rebecca Clark, the building has already been impacted and ify you are change the windows and do not know what the original window you don't know what type of window to purchase for the replacement. Mr. Russell, contacted the North Carolina School of Government, the state Statute that gives the Historic Commission authority, and quoted State Statue 106A-40.9, Section. A. Ms. Couch, that is from the School of Mayor Pro-tem, Virginia Finnerty, came forward and was sworn in. Stated that she attended at workshop with. John Wood and during the workshop Mr. Wood stated that ify you could not tell what the original structure was you could use alternative materials. Ms. Finnerty, directed to staff that they could call Mr. Wood anytime that they would like. Karen Mann, asked even in an historic building. Ms. Finnerty, yes. Ms. Mann, found that hard to believe. Ms. Finnerty, Mr. Wood said that ifit was not financially noti feasible and you could not determine the original it would be okay to use alternative materials. Ms. Finnerty Johnathan Russell, began speaking again presenting the application and answering questions. The train depoti in question is very similar to the one located in Richmond, Virginia and at that location they used alternative materials. Also, the one built in Wilmington was constructed the same. Both buildings were constructed within 10 years ofe each other. Both buildings were used as events space. (NOT AUDIBLE) Karen Mann, did you place vinyl windows in that building. Mr. Russell, (NOT AUDIBLE). Colleen Knight, he said that they did not use vinyl windows, alternative materials in the building. The proposed window is a wood frame with a small piece of aluminum holding the glass, and the aluminum will be coated in a texture aluminum. It is not an aluminum or vinyl window; iti is basically a wood window with an aluminum band. Scot Craigie, the window isa wood window with an aluminum sash. Kathleen Couch, is it like a storm window that would have aluminum then placing in a wood frame. Ms. Russell, the frame iswood andi the glass has aluminum around the edge. Ms. Mann, thei information that was presented looks the windows are aluminum windows. Mr. Craigie, that is the sash not the frame. Usually the window is the wood frame around the sash. The proposal is that the sash that is holding the glass is aluminum and the window frame is wood. Ms. Mann, it says that you are replacing any deteriorated wood, it seems al little confusing. The Double Hung Windows look more to what the design guidelines require. Mr. Craigie, the number of windows differ from application to what is currently installed, counted 154 windows. Mr. Russell, thank you for Chairman, Cheri Vaughnasked" forany questions. There were no questions and was Scarlett Boutchyard, the proposal is really replacing sashes with sashes. Rebecca Scot Craigie made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City of Washington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is  Government not from the State Preservation Commission.  returned to the audience.  making this aware. brought back to the table. Clark, it is replacements.  Revised: October 7,2019  Page9of12    congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades. Kathleen Couch, requested to addi to the motion. Rebecca Clark, stated that Ms. Couch was not able to add anything toi the motion. Staff, the motion had Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and all voted 31 in favor and 4 opposed. Second Motion: Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City of Washington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades. The application is not totally congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines; this isa unique situation due to the original items int this location are undetermined. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion and  to be voted on as the was that it was presented.  Motion Failed.  all voted 7 in favor and 00 opposed.  B. Minor Works  1. Karen Mann made a motion to approve all minor works. Kathleen Couch seconded the  motion and all voted 7i in favora and 0 opposed.  VII. Other Business  A. Open Public Discussion  1. Ms. Virginia Finnerty returned to address the Commission. She asked for clarification on the removal and trimming oftree in the Historic District. During the hurricane a main limb came off of one of Ms. Finnerty trees. She consulted an arborist that teaches at ECU and isar member of the National Arborist, he came to Ms. Finnerty's home to assess her tree. Ms. Finnerty was informed that the tree must bei trimmed, if not the tree would rot and the tree would be destroyed. Ms. Finnerty called at tree removal company to have the tree trimmed and he asked where was located. Ms. Finnerty gave him her address and he asked ift that was int the City of Washington Historic District. She replied yes. He informed Ms. Finnerty that he would not be able to perform any work on thet tree unless yous go before the Historic Commission to get approval to trim the tree. Ms. Finnerty did not know anything about what he was saying. The gentleman informed Ms. Finnerty that she would need to get approval or he would not come and trim the tree. Scarlett Boutchyard, youd only need to come before the Commission for removal of at tree not for trimming a tree. (NOT AUDIBLE) Ms. Mann, asked Ms. Finnerty who told her differently, she would nots say, but that he was told. Kathleen Couch, stated that he was misinformed. Rebecca Clark, as per the guidelines you as a property owner you are required to property maintenance and to prune your trees. This is not al Minor or Major Works. Ms. Boutchyard, recommended that he call the city. Staff, stated that it has been the policy that tree trimming within thet Historic District will need to have a Minor Works approval. Ms. Boutchyard, asked why, the guidelines only say removal nothing about trimming. (NOT AUDIBLE-TOO MANY COMMISSIONERS SPEAKING AT ONE TIME) Staff, stated that owners were trimming trees to the point where thet tree needed to be removed. This has been a practice since staff started work with the City of Washington. Ms. Finnerty, people are going to take down a treei if they want to take down at tree. She does not think that it is reasonable to ask people to come in to get permission to trim their landscaping. It is known were in the book. Ms. Mann, some people have trimmed trees tot the point  Revised: October 7,2019  Page 10of12    where the tree does not reasonable at tree. Actually the City has done some of that. Ms., Finnerty, we: should have some say in what is to be done with our property. Ms. Mann, told Ms. Finnerty to call Wayne Woolard to. start trimming her landscaping. Rebecca Clark, asa City Council member and the City is asking for something that is not in our guidelines, we as a Commission cannot make a decision on that, they would need to go before the Council. We are quasi-judicial and we do not have any authority to tell anyone not to something. Ms. Boutchyard, if the cityi is requiring this to be al Minor' Works to get approval to trim at tree, we cannot tell the city that they are wrong. Ms. Finnerty, isi it written anywhere. Staff, this has been since the beginning ofs staff's employment. This is something that was put in place during the last Planning Director tenor. Ms. Finnerty, ifit Scott Craigie, back in August someone came before the Commission wanting to remove a dead tree. According to the guidelines they should not have had to come before the Commission. It: should have been a Minor' Work. Ms. Boutchyard, removal is supposed to come before the Commission. Rebecca Clark, people are having to pay a $50.00 application fee to come before the Commission for something that is not required that is bad on the Commission. This is something that needs to be addressed. Karen Mann, directs to Staff1 that it would be nice to give staff the power to make the decision sO that the public would not have to come before the Commission on this item. Staff, ift this is something that the Commission would like to proceed with, then it would need to be written up and approved by the Historic Commission and then presented toi the City Council for final approval. Ms. Clark, would this be something that we would vote on to ask staff to complete? Staff, staff would come up with the wording and present it to the Commission for approval. Ms. Boutchyard, guidelines for removal is that the tree has to be replaced. Cheri Vaughn, yes. Ms. Boutchyard, ifs someone comes ini to remove a dead tree that is Minor Works, how is the Commission to know that the tree has been replaced. Ms. Vaughan, now we just get approval for removal and within the approval state that the owner must replace the tree. Staff, within the design guidelines states that thei tree has to be replaced and also ini the COA it is also documented as to what the requirements for the approval. There is also a spread sheet that is maintained for the COA to keep up with the approvals to make sure that the decision oft the Commissions is completed. Ms. Couch, this could be taken care ofa along with the time change. Staff, if the property owner supplies a letter from at tree professional describing the condition of the tree. MS. Boutchyard, should the change also state that the tree must be dead or irreversible dead?  isnot published anywhere then it is not to come before. someone.  Ms. Clark, itj just needs to state dead. The discussion ended. B. Update Rules and Procedure to comply with General Statues  1. Staff, updating the Rules and Procedures for compliancy one item was found that was not a. Notify property owners 7 days prior. Should read as the following: Notify property owners 10 days prior. This is in regards to getting signs posted, advertisement, etc. Please note that changing the Rules and Procedures will not have to go before Rebecca Clark made a motion to the change the following: Notify property owners 7 days priort to Notify property owners 10 days prior. Kathleen Couch seconded the motion all voted 7 in favor and 0 opposed. b. All members signed to. Amend the Rules and Procedures. 2. Discussion: Subcommittee for New Construction and. Additions.  compliant. See the following:  Council. A vote of the Commission is all that is required.  a. On the enclosed flow chart shows a "New Construction Sub-Committee". This Committee is not utilized in over: a decade. From the Staff's understanding is that  Revised: October 7,2019  Page: 11of12    the Committee added an extra step to the process. It does give the property owners more feedback before a meeting. This will be an item that will be discussed  at the next meeting.  VIII Approval of Minutes = September 3, 2019  A. Changes to the minutes: Page 5of6, paragraph 3, line 3-1 the word not was removed.  Kathleen Couch made a motion to approve the September 3, 2019 minutes. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion all voted 7 in favor and 0 opposed.  IX  Items that were readdressed at the next meeting.  A. Public Forum - Scott Craigie had a question concerning the public forum that was discussed at the lasti meeting. Wanted to know when the public forum was going to meet again. Staff B. Christina Smith - Concerning her withdrawal of application concerning replacing the windows at111 West Second Street. She asked if the Minor' Work could be approved now without coming back toi the next meeting? Staff will be able to approve the Minor Work and Ms.  Smith would not have to come back to the next meeting.  VIX Adjourn.  A. There being no other business  Scarlett Boutchyard made a motion to adjourn. Kathleen Couch second the motion all  voted 7 in favora and 0 opposed.  Revised: October 7,2019  Page: 120 of12