Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 1  August 13, 2024  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2024, BEGINNING AT 4:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION  BUILDING MEETING ROOM  Present were:  Marie Durrer, Chair Davis Lamb, Vice Chair Steve Catalano, Member Tim Goolsby, Member Francis McGuigan, Member Cathy Schafrik, County Administrator Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Kelley Kemp, County Attorney Terry Beigie, Grant Writer  Staff present:  Stephanie Golon, Deputy Director of Planning & Zoning David Hundelt, Interim Director of Water & Sewer Alan Yost, Director of Economic Development & Tourism  RE: WORKSHOP WITHTOURISM COUNCIL REGARDING TOT FUNDS  The Board of Supervisors held aj joint workshop with the Tourism Council to discuss TOT fund expenditures. Ms. Jacober said that the Tourism Council is seeking input from the Board regarding their plans to expend TOT funds for certain projects. They discussed several topics  including:  1. The idea of purchasing development rights toj protect scenic areas 2. Support for agricultural events such as the Farm and Livestock Show  3. Reviving community events such as Groovin in Greene and introducing new events 4. Updating tourist information with al kiosk using QR codes rather than paper pamphlets 5. Developing parks and recreational spaces and a new recreation center 6. Conservation easements to protect larger areas of land and protecting scenic areas 7. Restrooms for Greene Commons use SO that it could be rented more often and used for 9. Painting the water tower and addressing the necessary maintenance issues 10. Greene County'simage in the face oftourism, local perception and the ability to attract  such as a talent show  county events 8. Development of hiking trails  businesses    Board of Supervisors August 13, 2024 Sheet 2  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body concerning the Solid Waste Department, the JABA Advisory Board, and the JABA Board Discussion or consideration of the investment of public funds where competition or bargaining is involved, where, if made public initially, the financial interest of the Consultation with legal counsel regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711(A)0), (A)(6), (A)(7), and (A)(8) of the Code of NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITE RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Meeting the following matter(s):  of Directors.  governmental unit would be adversely affected.  legal advice by such counsel regarding county policies.  posture of the public body, specifically an appeal ofal BZA decision.  Virginia, such discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb  Yes Yes    Board of Supervisors August 13, 2024 Sheet3  Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters asi identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: REAPPOINTMENT OF ROBERT MURPHYTOTHE. JABA BOARDO OF DIRECTORS Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board reappointed Robert Murphy to the JABA Board of Directors for a 2-year term which will RE: REAPPOINTMENT OF JEFFERY EARNEYT TOTHE JABA ADVISORY COUNCIL Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board reappointed Jeffery Earney to the JABA Advisory Council for a 2-year term which will  expire on June 30, 2026.  expire on August 31, 2026.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA agenda was adopted as presented. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Tim Goolsby and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 4  Ms. Terry Bond said she lives in Greene Mountain Lake and is on the county's sewer system. She reminded the board that the county had previously approved those legacy sewer systems, and it would not be fair to unduly burden the residents of those systems by increasing their rates. He also addressed aj previous comment by Mr. McGuigan that two-thirds of the county ist not on sewer and water and should not be expected to pay fori it, by pointing out that this building, the schools, and other county facilities are also on the sewer and water system, even though not all  residents use those services.  Mr. Ken Copeland spoke about a proposal to delay raising the EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) fees until at least the end of the year. He stated that this delay would effectively be a gift of at least $2.25 million to the developer of Blue Ridge Meadows, as well as similar gifts to other developers, and that the amount would instead bei forced onto county taxpayers. He said this would  be an unconscionable act that the taxpayers would not stand for.  Mr. Neil Williamson, representing the Free Enterprise Forum, supported the resolution on the agenda to direct staff to research the water development EDU fees and compare them to other Virginia localities. However, he stated that the study alone will not solve the water and sewer funding issue. Williamson said the board must address the need for general revenue to support the water and sewer department, as absent general fund support, EDUS will be set too high for the market to bear. He stated that this may result in larger residential lots to accommodate well and septic or private water and sewer: systems, and that commercial and industrial users may not come, increasing the local government's reliance on real estate taxes. Williamson urged the board to examine EDU fees, current user fees, future user fees, and general fund revenue to develop a  balanced capital funding plan.  Mr. Scott Mingledorff expressed opposition to two resolutions. First, he objected to the proposed change in the noise ordinance that will allow sound levels from an adjacent property to only be objected to if they exceed a certain level inside the home, rather than at the property line as currently mandated. He said this would be an erosion of property rights. Second, he objected to delaying an increase in water and sewer connection fees, stating that each day, week or month of delay is an opportunity for developers to lock in the cost of a connection at the 2006 rate, while housing prices and infrastructure improvement costs have more than doubled since then. He said  the additional costs should be paid for in current dollars, not 2006 dollars.  Mr. Brandon McDaniel thanked the board for their work on the budget and reducing real estate and personal property taxes. However, he called on the board to do everything legally possible to fund the reservoir project without raising taxes. He stated that it is unfair for the two- thirds of residents who maintain their own water and sewer to fund this project, when a third of the homes in the county are on public water and sewer. McDaniel said unbalanced residential development is a driving force behind this and will create added costs that all residents will have toj pay for, such as school expansions and additional fire personnel. He expressed opposition to Greene County becoming a Charlottesville bedroom community, as he believes it has not done  much for the county financially.    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 5  Mr. Steve Barber stated that he and his wife had hoped to1 move to Greene County to escape Northern Virginia, but after signing a contract, they saw an article on Wikipedia recommending not to move to Greene County, though it did not explain why. Barber said Greene County has been approving subdivisions without concern for the financial impact on the county. He stated that water and sewer hookup fees should have been increased to keep up with inflation at a minimum, and that developers and homebuilders need to shoulder the expenses for increased needs like schools, public safety, and fire services. Barber said EDU fees should be increased toj pay for needed water and seweri infrastructure, and that the county should not delay further and should increase the fees  immediately.  Ms. Hope Barber said that she and her husband went to the county dump and noticed that the tipping fees were being undercharged compared to the website rates. She said this is a small amount of money, but the county employees are undercharging. She also said that she drove by the equipment shed on Route 29 and said she doesn't object to the building itself, but she accused the Planning Director of lying to the public about the intended use of the building. She said it's  time to "put the brakes" on him because he is lying to the public.  Mr. George Shifflett stated that the county residents, who are not wealthy people, pay enough in taxes already. He said children and grandchildren cannot afford to survive in the county anymore due to the high taxes. Shifflett suggested that ift the big developers want to come in and make money, they should be the ones toj pay for their own sewer and water, rather than having the middle class and poor residents shoulder the burden. He asked the board to stop raising taxes and try to help the middle class and poor people in the county instead oft the wealthy. Shifflett believes  the county needs to find ways to reduce the tax burden on residents.  Ms. Diane Brown echoed the sentiments of those who spoke before her regarding the water Ms. Crystal Aldridge said that she agrees withi thej previous speaker, George Shifflett, about the high taxes in Greene County. She said that with all the developers coming in and building house after house and apartment complexes, her kids and grandkids will not be able to afford to live in the county anymore. She said the developers are the ones making millions of dollars off these subdivisions and apartment buildings, and they should be the ones footing the bill for the necessary infrastructure like water, transportation upgrades, etc. before they are allowed to break ground. She feels the county is just letting the developers do whatever they want without regard for the impact on existing residents. She believes the county needs to stop raising taxes on the people who have lived there, as they are. not getting anything in return for the high taxes they are paying. She wants the county to make the developers pay their fair share upfront before approving  and sewer fees and taxes.  new developments.  Ms. Faye Shifflett said that she is a senior citizen living in Greene County, and she is against any more tax increases. She said the current tax discount for seniors requires an income    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 6  below $20,000, which is very low, and she feels the county should not be raising taxes sO that big developers can continue making money. Shifflett believes the developers should be the ones paying for the infrastructure, not the existing residents who are struggling to get by.  Ms. Bonnie Shifflett said that she is from the Ruckersville area and was not aware of the Board of Supervisors meeting until she received a phone call about it. She said her complaint is that the developers who are doing the jobs and making fortunes should be the ones paying for the sewer and water infrastructure, not the existing retired residents like herself who are barely surviving. Shifflett said she cannot afford any more taxes, and the county should not be raising  them to benefit the developers.  Mr. Dean Pettigrew said that he believes the county will likely have to raise taxes to pay for all the necessary expenses, but he asked the board to consider raising the land use education a bit more as taxes go up, to give the farmers al break. He suggested finding a way to get more taxes from the apartment residents, perhaps by raising the personal property tax, rather than just relying on the land tax to burden the existing residents. He also asked the board to think about the retired people in the county and how the tax increases will impact them, since they are already having a  tough time.  Mr. Bill Zutt said that he looked at the current EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) fee of $10,000, which was set 18 years ago. Based on inflation, he calculated that the fee should be around $15,800 tol keep up with inflation. Regarding the proposed changes to the noise ordinance, he strongly disagreed with the idea of measuring noise from inside a dwelling rather than at the property line. He said this would severely weaken the ordinance and make it practically unenforceable. He also said that the contemplated changes to the noise ordinance would essentially eliminate its effectiveness, and if the county wants to proceed with those changes, they  might as well just repeal the entire noise ordinance.  Mr. Phil Leffew referenced a 2017 financial plan analysis that had been provided to the county previously, which outlined objectives and projections for the county's water and sewer system. Leffew felt the county did not need to spend more money on additional studies, as the information was already available. He said that the developers should be responsible for contributing to the costs of the water and sewer: infrastructure, rather than just relying on existing residents to fund it through increased fees and taxes. He stated that the county has not been able tor maintain the existing water and sewer system, and that the financial burden should not continue to fall solely on the existing residents, especially the farmers and retirees who are struggling. He urged the board to implement the EDU fee increase immediately, rather than delaying it further, in order to start addressing the financial challenges facing the water and sewer system.  Ms. Linda Copeland expressed concern that the proposed changes would allow noise levels up to 65 decibels inside aj person's home, which she said would result in residents being barraged with unwanted noise and/or music in their homes, upwards of 14 hours a day, seven days a week.    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 7  Copeland argued that shifting the burden to residents to monitor and prove noise levels exceeding the limit inside their homes is ludicrous and would tie up law enforcement resources. She stated that the only entity that would benefit from the proposed changes is Beard Mountain Vineyards, at the expense of surrounding residents and all Greene County citizens. Copeland urged the Board not to consider or pass the proposed amendments to the noise ordinance, stating it would be cruel  and inhumane and that most dogs are treated better.  RE: CONSENT. AGENDA  Mr. Catalano asked that item k. be taken separately.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Tim Goolsby, and unanimous roll call vote,  the Board approved items a. through j. on the consent agenda as presented.  a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.  Minutes of previous meeting  Resolution to accept and appropriate $613.00 for the DCJS Victim Witness grant Refund request from the Commissioner of Revenue in the amount of $2,563.98 Authorize Chair to sign local administration agreement for the Route 670 Resolution to accept and appropriate $53,225.94 for donations received in FY24 Resolution to accept and appropriate $252,185.54 for fees and reimbursements Resolution to accept and appropriate $380,000.00 for CSA funds in FY24 (See Resolution to accept and appropriate $170,248.25 for grants and miscellaneous Resolution to authorize the County Administrator to execute contract to conduct the lead service line inventory for the drinking water infrastructure (See Ratify the resolution for the declaration of a local emergency for Tropical Storm  for the Sheriff's Office (See Attachment "A") forag qualified disabled veteran (See Attachment "B") Connector Road (See Attachment "C") (See Attachment "D") Attachment "F")  received in FY24 (See Attachment "E")  revenues received in FY24 (See Attachment "G")  Attachment "H"). Debby (See Attachment "T)  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. k.  Request from the Sheriff's Office to move aj part time employee toi full time status Mr. Catalano asked if there was an additional budget appropriation being requested to fulfill this request. Ms. Schafrik said that there was not and thati it could be absorbed by the current  budget.    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 8  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved items k. on the consent agenda as presented.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: REFUNDREQUESTI FROMITHECOMMISIONER ROFREVENUEINTHE, AMOUNT Ms. Tate was present to answer questions the Board may have regarding a personal property tax refund totaling $50,947.78 for the years 2021 through 2023 for a trucking business with trucks garaged in the county. The business submitted qualifying paperwork for the past 3 years that was reviewed by Sands Anderson that proved they overpaid according to IFTA, the  OF$50.947.78 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES  International Fuel Tax Agreement.  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano, and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved the refund request as presented. (See Attachment "J")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: RESOLUTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO ADVERTISE PUBLIC HEARING FOR Ms. Kemp provided an overview of proposed changes to the noise ordinance. She said that the current ordinance has separate sections for noise from animals (like barking dogs) and general noise. She said the Board had previously expressed a preference to keep these separate. She explained that one issue with the current ordinance is the requirement for noise from animals to continue for a certain duration with no cessation before it is considered a violation. She said there was discussion about how to define that "no cessation" period. Ms. Kemp said that the current ordinance also exempts properties of 5 acres or more. in certain zoning districts, which was intended to protect hunting dogs, and said that the Board should consider whether they want to continue that exemption. Ms. Kemp said that the main change proposed was to allow noise to be measured from inside a dwelling, rather than just at the property line. Kemp noted concerns about this, such as requiring law enforcement to enter private homes. She also discussed the times the  UPDATESTOTHE NOISE ORDINANCE    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 9  ordinance should reference. She asked the Board for feedback on the proposed changes and said  she was open to revisions before bringing it back for aj public hearing.  Itwas the consensus of the Board that Ms. Kemp amend the ordinance to measure noise at the property boundary, address multifamily structures, make the penalties match at a class 3 RE: RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $420,000 EACH TO STANARDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND DYKE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTTO ACCELERATE THE FIRE APPARATUS REPLACEMENT PROGRAM DUE TO Ms. Meador was present, along with Mr. Catalano, to discuss the acceleration of the fire apparatus replacement program due to impending changes to emissions requirements. She explained the history of the program and that the ESAB had recently voted to change the order of the rotation of appropriations SO that Ruckersville Volunteer Fire could purchase a new tanker truck. They have already received an appropriation of $210,000 in the FY23/24 budget year and there is an appropriation budgeted in the current fiscal year for $210,000. In order for each department to purchase ai new truck before the requirements change, thel Board would need to agree to accelerate the appropriations outside of the rotation they were historically done in. Mr. Catalano explained that, because it takes sol long to get a truck once ordered, he does not feel that there needs to be an out of budget appropriation and that these should be included in the upcoming budgets to  misdemeanor, and to change the times to 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.  IMPENDING CHANGES TO EMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS  align with delivery of the trucks.  Itwast the consensus of the Board to send a letter to Stanardsville and Dyke Volunteer Fire Departments as aj promissory guarantee that they can use when ordering their trucks that the Board RE: RESOLUTIONTOI DIRECT STAFFTO INVESTIGATE ANI INCREASE IN) EDU) FEES FOR WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD OF Mr. Hundelt was present to answer any questions the Board may have regarding the possibility of an increase in EDU fees for water and sewer connections. Hundelt acknowledged there is a belief that EDU fees need to be raised, but stated the county is not prepared at this time to make those choices, as the board has not yet decided on the future direction of the water and sewer system. He explained that conducting a thorough analysis and rate study will take 2-3 months toj procure ac consultant and complete the work, as it requires looking at the county'shistory, projected growth, existing debt, and the community's capacity. Hundelt emphasized the importance of having defensible, long-term decisions on water and sewer funding, rather than making rushed changes. He said the county has been kicking the can down the road on these issues. He noted the competing interests, with developers wanting to keep fees low, while existing residents want to avoid subsidizing new development through taxes. Hundelt said the costs should ultimately be borne by the water and sewer customers. Hundelt recommended the board allow the new water and sewer director, starting the next day, to provide expertise and assist with the analysis  intends to appropriate the funds in the upcoming budget years.  SUPERVISORS BY7 THE END OF CALENDAR YEAR 2024    Board of Supervisors August 13,2024 Sheet 10  before making any decisions. He advocated for a thorough, data-driven process to determine appropriate EDU fees and water/sewer funding, rather than rushing into changes.  Mr. McGuigan disagreed. He said that the four Water and Sewer Committee meetings SO farl have focused on operational issues and funding has not been adequately addressed. He stressed that the current fees and funding mechanisms are inadequate, citing a projected $153 million needed over the next five years for water projects. He said that each month of delay in addressing the funding issue incurs significant costs and said that inflation and increased costs have far outpaced the rate at which fees have been adjusted. Mr. Mcguigan said that he opposes raising property taxes to subsidize new residents' water and sewer needs, advocating instead for adjusting  fees to reflect current inflation and costs.  Ms. Schafrik said that, at the upcoming Water and Sewer Committee meeting on August 22nd, there will be a detailed review of all ongoing projects and their funding sources. This includes understanding how projects, such as the lead line review, which was funded by a$250,000 grant, fit into the larger financial picture. Some proposed projects are still awaiting approval and need clear funding plans. She said that the new Water and Sewer director, starting tomorrow, has astrong financial background and will play a crucial role in developing funding plans. He will need to assess the feasibility of proposed rate adjustments and project planning.  It was the consensus of the Board that the newly hired Water and Sewer Director be given 45 days to study the possibility of an increase in the EDU rate and report back to the Board. Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano and affirmative roll call vote, the Board agreed to give staff 45 days to prepare an analysis of the EDU rate and report back to the  Board.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes No Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARDI LIAISON REPORTS residents that wish to use cisterns.  Mr. Lamb said that he attended the Culpeper Soil and Water meeting where they discussed  RE: OFFICIAL VOTE TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT OF A PUBLIC Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Francis McGuigan, the Board authorized staff to advertise a public hearing to amend the noise ordinance as discussed earlier in the meeting.  HEARINGTO AMEND THE NOISE ORDINANCE  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer  Yes    Board of Supervisors August 13, 2024 Sheet 11  Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS UPDATE  Ms. Schafrik said that two replacement vehicles are needed due to an accident and engine failure, plus one new car for a new employee, for the Sheriff's Office. She said that this will be managed within the current budget, but it wasn'tincluded in the initial budget list, SO she wanted the Board to be aware. She said that the DMV's mobile service will be available in the county on September 9 from 9 AM to 4 PM. It offers all DMV services except driver's tests. She said that the Greene Care Clinic Fun Fair is scheduled for September 15th from noon to 51 PM at Greene Commons, featuring bounce castles, music, face painting, food trucks, and more. Ms. Schafrik also said that a Courthouse Ribbon Cutting ceremony for courthouse improvements will take place on September 3rd at 11 AM. Lastly, she said that recent rains were positive, but the drought may  still persist due to previous deficits. RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  iccdn Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  L4    August 13, 2024 Attachment A  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE DCJS FUNDS REFUNDED TO' THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOR EMERGENCY CUSTODY ORDERS AND TEMPORARY  DETENTION ORDERS  WHEREAS, the Greene County Sheriff's Office will be receiving additional funding for the DCJS WHEREAS, the additional funds need to be accepted and appropriated to the FY25 Victim Witness NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that an additional $613 for a total of $70,000 be appropriated to the FY25 Victim Witness budget of the County of Greene. The amount of $69,387 was previously appropriated at the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things necessary  Victim Witness grant in the amount of $613 for a total funding of $70,000  budget line item.  July 9, 2024 meeting.  to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 13th day of August, 2024. Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Marie C. Durrer Steve Catalano Francis McGuigan Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  yie Buenz Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Marie €  S Eathy Schafrik, Clerk  Durrer, Chair  Greene County Board of Supervisors    August 13, 2024 Attachment B  Greene County Commissioner's Office  P.O. Box438  Stanardsville, VA 22973-0438  Phone 434-985-5211 Fax 434-985-5283  Date: July 24, 2024  TO: Greene County Board of Supervisors  FROM: Kimberly Tate, Commissioner of the Revenue  RE: Refund Request of $2,563.98 for qualified disabled veteran Taxpayer submitted qualifying paperwork as a disabled veteran which initiated an abatement for 2022-2024 personal property taxes for one vehicle each year. This resulted in an overpayment of $2,563.98 for which  arefund is due.    August 13, 2024 A achment C  To: VDOT District Office Local Liaison (Printed Name of Responsible Local Official Issuing Request) Signature: uiccuus  From:  Marie Durrer, Board Chair  mdurrer@gcva.us (Email. Address)  434-985-5201 (Phone)  Date: g/3a4  Locality: Greene  Project #:  UPC:  Project Scope (short narrative): Route 670 will be realigned to provide direct access to U.S. 29. The new connector road will be two lanes, one in each direction. The proposed design will include a Continuous Ist thel locality qualified under the LAP Qualification Program (Effective 1/1/2021): R Yes ONo D N/A  Green Tee intersection where the connector road intersects with Route 29. Local Government Project Delivery Self-evaluation attached: K Yes ONo N/A  Local Responsible Person*  Name: Terry Beigie Email: tbeigie@gcva.us  Phone: 434-242-1281  See Chapter 3.1 ofLAPI Manual forl Responsible Person qualifications  Phase of project to be administered: PE RW CN Other; describe: All  Federal Eligibility: Funding Source(s): (Check all that apply)  Federally Eligible Federal  Federally Eligible with Program Exempt  State  Local  DOther (specify):  Check as applicable: Project will bej pursued though PPTA: K Project willl be administered as Design-Build: Thej project is: Tier1 1 (Provide a copy tol LAD after District Administrator Approval/Denial)  To be completed by District Office  J Tier 2 (Submit with Self-evaluation tol LAD for Chief] Engineer Review)  Recommendation: Approval Denial  District Local Liaison Include Comments ifneeded  Signature & Date  Recommendation: Approval Denial  District Project Development Engineer/PIM or Construction Engineer  Include Comments ifneeded Signature & Date  VDOT Project Coordinator. Assigned:  District Administrator (Tier 1 & Tier 2 Projects) /C Chief Engineer (Tier 2 Projects)  Approved Approved  Denied Denied  District Administrator's Signature & Date Chief Engineer's Signature &1 Date  *Tier 1 projects are definedi inI I&IM #249 tyAw.remidctogharsissialaDa/IMIMIA9rdD and generally are projects which  arer non- federal oversight, under $151 Millioni in Construction Value, and are notI Design-Build Upon completion, provide a copy oft this form tot thel Local Assistance Division. Use Ctrl-Enter to create paragraph breaks within comments.  Revised. July 2024    Local Government:, County of Greene_  Submittal! Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information:  Marie Durrer  Local Government Project Delivery Self-Evaluation for Requests to Administer Federal Aid  Projects Project #:  Include with Request to Administer Submittal  UPC:  Local government administration of federal aid transportation projects can have many benefits and has become an integral part of Virginia's Transportation Construction Program. However, local governments that are considering administering federal aid transportation projects should work closely with their VDOT District Office to ensure that they are have, or can obtain, qualified staffa and processes ("project delivery systems") to administer federal aid projects. Accordingly, local governments are required to submit the attached self-evaluation to their VDOT District Office concurrent with their request to administer ai federal aid project or project to be developed as federal aid. Approval for Tier 1 projects is delegated to the District Administrator. District Administrators may not permanently delegate this authority. Tier 2 project RtA's will be submitted to the Chief Engineer for final approval. Project Tier definitions Antp/wwwvipiniahatoghusinsisauaslebaD-/IMAM29mf,: Tier 2 projects are all projects with construction costs over $15 million, all Federal Oversight projects, and all projects Acompleted self-evaluation will provide the VDOT District Office sufficient background information regarding the locality's ability to manage significant aspects of a major federal aid project; and: sO that weaknesses or deficiencies in the local government's capabilities mayl be identified and addressed during the "Request to Administer" process. Weaknesses or deficiencies may not necessarily preclude a locality from administering at federal aid project; however, the locality and the VDOT District Office should work closely toi identify actions, such as additional training or consultant procurement, which can reduce project risks and lead to an approval of the project administration request. The District office will also use this evaluation in While denials are expected to be uncommon, circumstances which mayj justify a denial to The locality has no staff experience or training that demonstrates an ability to effectively The locality has a documented and repeated history of failure to meet federal phase obligation dates and cannot provide an acceptable corrective action plan. The locality has a documented history of violations to federal and/or state requirements and cannot provide or has not provided an acceptable corrective action plan. Appeals to denials may be submitted in writing to the VDOT Central Office Local Assistance  are defined in' VDOT's IIM# #249 procured as Design-Build.  determining the appropriate level project oversight provided by VDOT staff.  administer a federal aid projecti include: deliver a federal aid project.  Division Director.  Revised July 2024    Local Government: County of Greene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information:  Marie Durrer Vs  Local Government Project Manager (submit if the PM is not also the RP)  VDOTi is required by federal regulation to ensure that the locality is adequately staffed to ensure the project is satisfactorily completed. Local governments may supplement their staff with consultants, including project management duties. Accordingly, local staff and their consultants must have a working knowledge of the locally administered projects process and those federal regulations affecting federal aid projects. The following provides the experience  and training of the Locality Project Manager: Identify the Project Manager*:  Name  Title  *Project Management will be assigned to a consultant; however, the consultant has not  yet been procured (VDOT may request this information after consultant procurement). Select from the following the best choice describing the PM's experience:  The PM has successful experience providing oversight or managing aj federal aid project within the previous five years. Identify and describe those projects on an attachment to include: Project Name and Description; Phases Included (PE/RW/CN), Approximate Date The PM has successful experience participating as a team member, but not a PM, for federal aid projects. Identify and describe those projects on an attachment to include: Project Name and Description; Phases Included (PE/RW/CN), Approximate Date Advertised; Construction Value; Funding Source, if known, etc. The PM has no successful experience with federal aid projects, but has provided oversight for a State-aid transportation project, such as Revenue Sharing or Access. The PM has no experience providing oversight for a transportation project. Has the PM completed VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Qualification Program www.vrginiadot.org/pusines/loca! assistance division qualification program.asp)?  Advertised; Construction Value; Funding Source, if known, etc.  X Yes No  Describe or attach a list of other formal and/or informal training that qualifies him/her to act asal Project Manager for aj federal aid project. Greene will hire an experienced, qualified  consultant to manage the project.  Revised July 2024    Local Government: County ofGreene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information: General Locality Project Management Experience  Marie Durrer  The locality must be able to demonstrate "adequate project delivery" systems* to administer at federal-aid project. This requirement is identified in Chapter 2.2 of the VDOT LAP Manual. Select, from the choices below, that which best describes the locality's project management  experience:  The locality has successfully administered one or morej federal aid highway improvement project(s) within the previous five years. Briefly describe the project/s) (including project scope, cost, and duration) and provide VDOT UPC and project number ifo available, in an The locality has successfully administered one or more non-highway improvement federal aid project (e.g. sidewalk, streetscape, landscaping, multi-use trail, etc) project/s) within the previous three toj five years. Briefly describe the project/s) and provide VDOT The locality has successfully administered a state aid or capital improvement highway improvement project within the previous five years. Provide a detailed explanation of the The locality has not successfully administered a transportation-related project or Capital  attachment.  UPC and project number if available, in an attachment. scope, cost, and duration of the project in an attachment.  Improvement project in the recent past.  Provide list or description of any additional experiences which will demonstrate the ability of the locality to administer aj federal aid project. Greene has administered local capital improvement, projects successfully, but intends to hire an experienced, qualified  transportation consultant to manage this highway project.  Revised July 2024    Local Government: County of Greene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information: Consultant Procurement  Marie Dum2qebwer  Federal consultant procurement requirements are outlined in Chapter 11 of the VDOT Locally Administered Projects Manual. Localities receiving federal reimbursement for professional service contracts must procure those professionals in accordance with the federal Brooks Act Will the locality need to procure consultant services at any time to complete their, federal aid  and Federal Acquisition Regulations.  project? X Yes Yes Services  No X No  Will the locality need VDOT'sservices at any time to complete their federal aid project? Ifyes to either of the above questions, select the services which will need to be outsourced:  Consultant - - X K K  VDOT  (Include comments as needed) (Include comments as needed)  Project Management: Environmental: Design:  PS&E (Including Bid Document): K Aght-or-way/Utites: Construction Engineering/ Administration & Inspection: Other, please specify:  Select, from the options below, that which best describes the locality's understanding and  experience using federal professional consultant procurement processes.  The locality has successfully, procured professional. services in compliance withj federal aid requirements within the previous five years. List the most recent projects and The locality has not procured professional. services in compliance with federal aid requirements within the previous five years, but has staff available, who are familiar with those requirements and will oversee the procurement, process. Describe the staff The locality has no experience procuring or training in the procurement of professional  services procured in an attachment.  experience in an attachment.  services in compliance with federal aid requirements.  Provide any additional information which may demonstrate the locality's ability to comply with applicable federal rules and regulations applicable to professional: services procurement forj federal aid projects. Greene has a Grant Writer who has also completed certified procurement training. She will utilize her training to verify that Greene, follows and  documents all procurement requirements.  Revised July 2024    Local Government: County ofGreene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information:  Marie Durrer  Project Scheduling  Project Scheduling requirements are outlined in VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Manual Sections 10.6 (Appendix A to the Project Administration Agreement) and 12.3.3 (Project Schedules). A defined project schedule which includes major milestones is critical to ensure federal funding is obligated and expended within expected timei frames. Adherence to ab baseline schedule is critical to ensure that all available federal funds are obligated within eachi federal fiscal year. The ability to develop and meet a project schedule is critical toa project's success and is al key determination when agreeing to allow al locality to administera Does the locality have a written project scheduling process so that a project schedule can be sufficiently developed, maintained, and tracked in accordance with the LAP Manual?  federal aid project.  Yes No  Describe the project scheduling approach to be used by the locality, toi include any software that will be employed. Ifthe locality will rely on the design consultant to develop a project schedule, how will the locality engage with the consultant to ensure major milestones are met? Greene will procure an experienced, qualified transportation consultant to develop,  maintain and track the schedule, following all LAPrequirements.  Revised July 2024    Local Government: County of Greene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofl Local Official Submitting Information: Construction Phase Work Orders  Marie Durrer? Rs  Localities must develop a process for managing work orders that are compliant with the processes outlined ini the LAP Manual. The process must include an independent estimate of costs associated with the work order. This requirement is outlined in Chapter 13.3 ofVDOT's Does the Locality have a documented work order process that meets the requirements  Locally Administered Projects Manual.  outlined in VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Manual?  Yes (include documentation).  No, however a work order process that meets the requirement outlined in VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Manual will be developed and incorporated into the construction The locality will use VDOT's Construction Directive Memorandum Work Order process  contract No  and will incorporate it into the construction contract  Compliance / Audit Findings  Does the Locality have any outstanding findings, as the result of any VDOT, FHWA, or US DOT audit or compliance review, related to any state orj federal aid transportation project?  Yes No pending.  Ifyes, please describe the finding or attach the official report and describe corrective actions  Suspension and Debarment Certification  VDOT is required to verify that a subrecipient is eligible to receive federal aid. Further, that the eligible subrecipient certify they themselves are not' 'suspended" or' "debarred" from receiving federal aid, and finally that the eligible subrecipient verify thati its consultants or contractors are not "debarred" or' "suspended" from receiving federal aid. Does the locality certify that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, it is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any state or federal department or agency or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation ini federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and that the locality shall not make an award to a consultant or contractor that is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any state or federal department or agency or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under  Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension?  Yes No  Revised] July 2024        Local Government: County of Greene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information:,  Marie Damauer  Local Government Responsible Person (submit one for each RP)  Al locality is required to provide ai full-time local government employee who is responsible for all major project decisions. This person is referred to as the locality Responsible Person (RP) and may or may not be the project manager. This requirement is outlined in Chapter 3.1 of VDOT's Locally Administered Projects (LAP) Manual. An FHWA memorandum dated August 4,  2011 provides further explanation of this person's duties www.fhwa.dot.gov/federalaid/110804.pd). Name Terry Beigie Title Grant Writer  Identify the full time Local Government Employee assigned as the "Responsible Person": Is the RP also the Project Manager? Yes X No (complete the project manager evaluation VDOT is required by federal regulation to ensure that the locality is adequately staffed to ensure the project is satisfactorily completed. Accordingly, local staff must have a working knowledge of the locally: administered projects process and those federal regulations affecting federal aid projects. The following provides the experience and training of the  page)  Locality Responsible Person:  Select from the following the best choice describing the RP's experience:  The RP has successful experience providing oversight or managing aj federal aid project within the previous five years. Identify and describe applicable project(s) on an attachment to include: Project Name and Description; Phases Included (PE/RW/CN), Approximate Date Advertised; Construction Value; Funding Source, if known, etc. The RP has successful experience participating as a team member, but not a RP, for federal aid projects. Identify and describe applicable project/s) on an attachment to include: Project Name and Description; Phases Included (PE/RW/CN), Approximate Date The assigned RP has no successful experience with) federal aid projects, but has provided oversight for a State-aid transportation project, such as Revenue Sharing or Access. The RP has no experience providing oversight for a transportation project. Has the RP completed VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Qualification Program www.virginiodot.orsDusines/loca! assistance division qualification program.asp)?  Advertised; Construction Value; Funding Source, if known, etc.  X Yes No  Describe or attach a list of other formal and/or informal training that qualifies him/her to act as a Responsible Person. Terry Beigie has managed multiple federal grants and project funding programs. Her experience, detail and training will assist in compliance review. Greene County expect to hire an experienced transportation consultant to manage the actual  transportation project details and tasks.  Revised. July 2024    Local Government: County of Greene_  Submittal Date:  Name ofLocal Official Submitting Information:  Mariel Durrelna Sunaw  Revised July 2024    August 13, 2024 Attachment D  RESOLUTIONTO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FIFTY-THREE THOUSAND AND TWOHUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND NINETY-FOUR CENTS ($53,225.94) FOR DONATION: SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION  WHEREAS, donations were received by the County of Greene; and  WHEREAS, the donation funds in the amount of FIFTY-THREE THOUSAND ANDTWO HUNDRED ANDTWENTY-FIVEDOLLARS AND NINETY-FOUR CENTS ($53,225.94) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene,  Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by thel Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that FIFTY-THREE THOUSAND AND TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY- FIVE DOLLARS AND NINETY-FOUR CENTS ($53,225.94) be appropriated to the 2023-2024  budget oft the County of Greene as follows:  Dept  Account  Budget Supplement  Animal Shelter Sterilization Program Donations Animal Shelter Donations for Animal Shelter Donations EMS Donations for EMS Donations Sheriff Donations for Sheriff  6,413.00 1,133.00 1,223.00 27,137.44 32.00 17,287.50 53,225.94  Tourism Tourism  Tourism) Donations TourismClay Festival Total  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to, give this resolution effect. Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Yes Davis Lamb  Adopted this 13th day of August 2024.  Yes yes Yes Yes  Y Sure Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Cathy  Greene County Board of Supervisors  BAsz    August 13, 2024 Attachment E  RESOLUTION TO. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS, AND FIFTY-FOUR CENTS ($252,185.54) FORI FEES AND REIMBURSEMENIS SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION WHEREAS, fees and reimbursements were received by the County of Greene; and WHEREAS, the fees and reimbursements funds in the amount of TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND FIFTY- FOUR CENTS ($252,185.54) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2023-2024  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS AND FIFTY FOUR CENTS ($252,185.54) be appropriated to  the 2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene as follows:  Dept County Treasurer Sheriff Insurance Sheriff Sheriff Sheriff Sheriff  Account DMVStop Fee Sheriff Fees Insurance E-Summons Fees Animal Control - Court Fines Forfeited Assets State Sheriff OT Total  Budget Supplement  51,390.00 705.76 31,798.68 1,850.00 700.00 2.81 141,103.88 24,634.41 252,185.54  Commonwealth Attorney Forfeited Assets  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 13th day of August 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Ves Davis Lamb  Yes Yes. Yes Yes    VAuie CRue Marie CDurrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Greene County Board of Supervisors  AE6    August 13, 2024 Attachment F  RESOLUTIONTO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THOUSAND ($380,000.00) FOR SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION TO  THE CSA PROGRAM  WHEREAS, the Department of Social Services for the County of Greene: is requesting funding from the office of Children Services which shall be used for youth in the CSA  program; and  WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THOUSAND ($380,000.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2023-  2024 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW.THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ofthe County of Greene, Virginia that THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THOUSAND ($380,000.00) need to be appropriated to the 2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 13th day of August 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes_  Si ow Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Cathy  Clerk  Greene County Board of Supervisors  EG    August 13, 2024 Attachment G  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY-EIGHT DOLLARS ANDTWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($170,248.25) FOR GRANT and MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION  WHEREAS, grants and miscellaneous funds were received by the County of Greene; and WHEREAS, the grants and miscellaneous funds in the amount of ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($170,248.25) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the  2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI ISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County ofGreene, Virginia that ONEI HUNDRED ANDSEVENTYTHOUSAND,TWOHUNDRED AND FORTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($170,248.25) be appropriated to the  2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene as follows:  Dept ARPA-SLFRF Volunteer Fire Dept. Circuit Court  Account ARPA-VATI ATLFire ProgramFunds Juror Reimbursement Total  Budget Supplement  Ambulance and) Rescue Services Motor Vehicle Titling Tax- EMS  44,948.00 104,137.25 15,963.00 5,200.00 170,248.25  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 13th day of August 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes  YhcBs Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST/  Greene County Board of Supervisors  A4    August 13, 2024 Attachment H  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACTTO CONDUCT THE LEAD SERVICE LINE INVENTORY FOR THE DRINKING WATER NFRASTRUCTURE  WHEREAS, the Lead and Copper Rule of the U.S. States Environmental Protection Agency requires waterworks operators toi minimize lead and copper levels  in drinking water; and  WHEREAS, the Commonwealth has set the date that all waterworks must submit al Lead Service Linei inventory to the OficeofDrinking water to October 16,  2024; and  WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health awarded Greene County WHEREAS, the project has been properly procured through the County's WHEREAS, ac contractor has been chosen to perform the work needed to meet NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Greene County that the County Administrator is hereby authorized to finalize a contract and execute a contract with the firm selected to conduct the Lead Service Line inventory for the County's drinking waterir infrastructure, provided that the County Attorney has reviewed the contract and that the total cost of the  $250,000.00 in grant funds to develop the inventory; and  procurement requirements; and  the deadline.  executed contract is not greater than $250,000.00. Adopted this 13th day of August, 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby    Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb Francis McGuigan Yes a bunes Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Yes_ Yes Yes_ Yes_  ATTESTY  Clerke  Greene County Board of Supervisors  REG    August 13, 2024 Attachment I  RESOLUTION FOR THE DECLARATION  OFA LOCAL EMERGENCY TROPICAL STORM DEBBY  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia does hereby find that: 1. Due to the occurrence of Tropical Storm Debby, the County of Greene is facing a condition of peril to the lives, safety, and property of the residents of Greene County; 2. That because oft this peril, the proclamation oft the existence of an emergency is necessary to permit the full powers of government to deal effectively with this condition of peril as NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia, that a local emergency now exists throughout the County of Greene; ITISF FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said emergency, the powers, functions and duties of the Director of Emergency Management and the Emergency Management organization and functions of the County of Greene shall be those prescribed by state law and the ordinances, resolutions, and approved plans oft the County ofGreene to mitigate To carry out the effect of this resolution, a sum of money, not to exceed $10,000, is hereby appropriated from the county's unappropriated fund balance to cover the reasonable operational cost of Emergency Management pending further report to this Board and such additional appropriations as shall be deemed necessary to cover the expected scope ofthis emergency. Affirmed and adopted this 13th day of August, 2024 due to the emergency conditions caused by  of0800 hours on the 8th day of August, 2024.  and  the effects of said emergency.  Tropical Storm Debby.  AESuw Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  -R    August 13, 2024 Attachment J  Greene County commissioners Office  P.O. Box 438  Stanardsville, VA 22973-0438  Phone 434-985-5211 Fax 434-985-5283  Date: August 1, 2024  TO: Greene County Board of Supervisors  FROM: Kimberly Tate, Commissioner of the Revenue RE: Refund Request of $50,947.78 for personal property  Taxpayer submitted qualifying IFTA reports from 2021-2024 requiring an adjustment to their personal property taxes. The paperwork was reviewed and discussed with an attorney with Sands Anderson PC who specializes in trucking companies that agreed with the final determination. This resulted  in an overpayment of $50,947.78 for which a refund is due.