Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 1  March 12, 2019  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS METONTUESDAY,MARCH12,2019  BEGINNING AT 5:301 P.M. IN THE COUNTY MEETING ROOM.  Present were:  Bill Martin, Chair Michelle Flynn, Vice Chair David Cox, Member Marie Durrer, Member Dale Herring, Member  Staff present:  Brenda Garton, Interim County Administrator Kelley Kemp, County Attorney Patti Vogt, Deputy Clerk Jim Frydl, Director ofl Planning and Zoning Tracy Morris, Director of Finance  RE: BUDGET WORK SESSION  Ms. Brenda Garton, Interim County Administrator, reviewed her proposed budget for FY 19-20 which will be attached to the agenda for tonight's meeting and also posted on the County's website under budget documents. In the FY 18-19 budget, $4.8 million was used from the fund balance tol balance the budget. The estimated real estate tax revenue for FY 18-19 was over stated Ms. Garton reviewed the projected revenue and expenditure requests for FY 19-20. There isa $6.7 million shortfall in revenue. Even using the $4.8 million from the fund balance like last year, there is a $1.9 million shortfall. A reassessment will be effective for 2019 and projected Next Ms. Garton reviewed thel budgeted use offund balance compared to the actual change in the fund balance at year end per audits. The minimum fund balance per the policy, the actual year end audited fund balance, and the cash balance were discussed. The County's highest cash balance is in June of each year and the cash balance dropped to a low of around $3 million in Requests for increases included the local transfer to schools ($481,863), the contribution to the juvenile detention home ($75,356), an additional shift for paid EMS ($180,319) and a  by $683,340. This adds to the problem for the upcoming year.  revenue is based on the equalized tax rate of$0.77.  October of2018.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 2  proposed salary increase for county staff($232,710). A total of12 new positions were: requested. The Sheriffrequested. 5 deputies, 2 dispatchers and toi increase 2 animal control officers fromj part- time to full-time. The Treasurer requested 1 new position as did the Buildings and Grounds department. The Commonwealth's. Attorney requested 1 new position asi mandated by the General Assembly. The total for new requested positions was $814,803. Ms. Garton also reviewed the Itwould take a $0.32 increase ini thereal estate tax ratet to cover the shortfall of$6.7million. There are really only two ways to balance a budget that is short and that is to increase revenues Ms. Garton then reviewed the philosophy she used to propose a balanced budget which One-time sources of funds should only be used for one-time expenditures. Ongoing expenses should be funded with ongoing revenues. transfers from a contingency fund ifiti isl healthy enough.  major capital and one-time items requested in the general fund.  and/or: reduce expenses. included:  Emergency needs, rather than budgeted in every department, can be managed through An modified zero-based budgeting should be used. The real question to ask is did you really need what you had int that linei item last year. Everythingi is examined and youdon'tassume The amount of fund balance actually used was much less than what was estimated. This either means revenues have been significantly under-estimated and/or expenditures have been Ms. Garton talked about the approach she used to balance the FY 19-20 budget which involved looking at figures for 3 prior fiscal years and available year-to-date information to determine ifrevenue estimates could be increased. She also reviewed expenditures, line by line, and reduced budget requests where they were not sufficiently justified or the budget request was not used inj prior years. The same 3 prior years and year-to-date information was used to estimate expenditures. She proposed a large enough contingency fund to take care of emergencies since those funds havel been systematicalyremoved from departments. The reliance on: fund balance to balance the general fund budget was reduced to the extent that she only proposed the use of fund balance for one-time items which also included the sweep of school construction reserve fund balance to cover debt service on thei new school project. As a last resort, the proposal includes the Ms. Garton reviewed the adjustments made to balance the proposed FY 19-20 budget with the use of $1,895,933 of fund balance which is ai reduction of $2,878,950 in use of fund balance. The current budget was balanced using $4,774,883 of fund balance. Ms. Garton noted that she recommends the use of the school capital reserve fund balance for debt payment. Once that is depleted, in about 3 years, there will have to be revenue to fund that debt service Adjustments were made to increase revenue estimates by $565,833. Ms. Garton discussed the Treasurer's collection rate and the collection oft not only current taxes, but past due taxes. She thanked Mrs. Morris and Mrs. Deal for researching andj providing numbers. Ms. Garton said she then switched over to expenditures. The position at the Commonwealth's Attorney Office is mandated. A 2% pay increase for county employees is proposed and the School's request for a pay increase was reduced from 5% to 2%. None of the  that you get what you got last year.  significantly over-estimated.  smallest increase possible in the real estate tax rate to support the deficit.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 3  other requested positions were funded. The reductions made to requested expenditures totaled $3.1 million leaving a $1.1 million shortfall. Thel budget includes aj proposed $0.05 increasei in the real estate tax rate to $0.82 which will generate $1,018,005 taking collection rates into consideration. The budget was still short by $125,599 which necessitated the reduction of the contingency fund to approximatelys $114,000. The current tax ratei is $0.775, the equalized tax rate is $0.77 and the proposed tax rate is $0.82. One cent on the real estate tax rate in the upcoming Ms. Garton summarized the total general fund revenue adjustments and the total general fund expenditure reductions. A comparison of real estate taxes rates with surrounding localities for 2018 and 2019 were provided. She noted that Greene County had ai real estate tax rate of$0.84 The transfer to the School System represents 45.76% of the general fund budget while the The Social Services Fund, the Children's Services Act Fund, and the Solid Waste Fund were discussed. Fees for Solid Waste were increased and the program will be self-supporting meaning there will be no transfer required to that fund from the general fund in the proposed Ms. Garton then reviewed the proposed local transfer to schools. The original request for the local increase was $833,463. That number was then adjusted for health insurance and loss of state revenue and revised to $481,863. The amount was further reduced by the difference between thei requested 5% salary increase and the 2% proposed salary increase for school staffr resulting in Next was a comparison of the school operating revenues and expenditures. Overall the school budget increased by a total of $198,321. An estimate of $6 million in remaining bond proceeds to be spent on the school construction project was included in the proposed FY 19-20 The County's capital improvement fund includes $4.2 million ofremaining bond proceeds for the purchase of stream credits and $1.41 million remaining for engineering design of the water treatment project. Other capital items are projected at $274,450 for a total of$5,901,508 for the The overall budget proposed for adoption on May 14, 2019 totals $94.41 million for FY 19- 20 compared to $83.7 million in FY 18-19 which is an increase of $10.6 million. That increase includes the bond proceeds as discussed previously. After the subtraction ofinterfund transfers, Ms. Garton said she would like the Board to remember big ticket items that need to be addressed in future budget years and have no impact on this budget other than consulting or engineering fees, including the radio communication project; the actual construction oft the water reservoir, the water treatment plant and other components; and any renovations resulting from the Ms. Garton said shel has proposed a balanced budget and iti is not pretty. No one receiving funding from the County will bel happy and she is sorry about that. Her concerns include needed positions that are not funded, a 2% salary increase for schools rather than the requested 5%, the salary increase for county staff being reduced from 3% to 2%, the contingency fund being too  fiscal year will yield $209,803 if100% collected.  in 2005.  reduction of that budget only represents 32% oft the overall reduction.  budget.  anet decrease in the proposed local transfer of $280,077.  budget.  County's Capital Improvement Fund.  the total overall proposed budget for FY 19-20: is $75.4 million.  recommendations ofthe facility study.    Board of Supervisors March 12,2019 Sheet 4  small, depleting the school capital reserve in 3 years, any use of fund balance, and the low point Ms. Garton indicated the conclusion ofl her presentation ofh her proposed budget for FYI 19- 20 and she said it is now the Board's budget to adjust. Ultimately, the decisions related to how much fund balance to use, what tax rates to set, and what requests to fund or not fund rest with the Board of Supervisors. She thought it fairt to say that no department or entity that asked for funding this year is going to be happy with this budget. She hoped she explained how she fairly and diligently went through the process and was as fairi in making decisions as she could be. Ms. Garton thanked Mrs. Morris, Mrs. Deal, and staff who helped during this process. She said Dr. Whitmarsh and Ms. Spencer were very cooperative in providing information. The budget schedule includes work sessions on March 14, March 18 (ifn needed), the public hearing on April 23, and adoption oft the budget on May 14, 2019. Ms. Garton recommended the Board advertise a slightly higher tax rate than they think is needed in case the decision is made to approve additional Mr. Martin noted the work session on March 14 is open to the public and will be live streamed. He thanked Ms. Garton for the work she has done inj preparing her proposed budget. Mrs. Flynn questioned handicapped access at the Park. Mr. Martin said that access would be from the parking lot down to the playing fields. Ms. Garton said shei removed the request from Mrs. Flynn also questioned the rates at the Solid Waste Facility and a transfer not being necessary in FY 19-20. She clarified that bringing in more waste actually helps the program be  int the County's cash flow.  funding.  the proposed budget as that project will be: funded this year. self-sufficient. Ms. Garton agreed with her clarification.  The Chair called a short recess.  RE: CLOSEDI MEETING Board approved the following: Meeting the following matter(s):  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for closed meeting.  Upon motion by David Cox, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body, with respect to the EDA, After-School Program, Emergency Services and Board of Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel  Zoning Appeals.  posture of the public body concerning Nimmo Case.  concerning alleged trespass.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 5  WHEREAS, pursuant to: 22-371CA0.AX0and(A)8)ofthe Code ofVirginia, such NOW,THEREFORE, BEI IT RESOLVED that thel Board of SupervisorsofOrene County  discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion oft the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: RECONVENE IN OPEN MEETING AND CERTIFY CLOSED MEETING  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board return to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, all members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the  motion to enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  RE: APPOINTMENT TOTHE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Board ofZoning Appeals for a five-year term to expire March 13, 2024.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Michelle Flynn and unanimous roll call vote, the Board agreed to recommend to the Circuit Court Judge the appointment of Mark Kelpe to the  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 6  RE: APPOINTMENTREAPPOINIMENT TO THE GREENE COUNTY ECONOMIC Upon motion by Bill Martin, second by Michelle Flynn and unanimous roll call vote, the Appointment of James Tsikerdanos to the Economic Development Authority fill an Reappointment ofMichael Payne to the Economic Development Authority for a four-year  DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  Board approved the following:  unexpired term ending March 1,2 2021 term to expire March 1, 2023 Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Board approved the agenda with change as noted: Remove item 9a - minutes of previous meeting  Upon motion by David Cox, second by Dale Herring and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROM7 THE PUBLIC There were no matters from the public.  RE: PUBLICHEARING- - GREENSTONE DEVELOPMENT. LLCTO AMEND ARTICLE 6R2.RESIDENTIAL. OF THE GREENE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE Mr. Jim Frydl., Director of Planning and Zoning, reviewed the request from Greenstone Development, LLC to amend Article 6, R-2, Residential, and all applicable references of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance. (OR#18-004) The request to amend the Zoning Ordinance is not specific to any parcel or any project but rather all property in the County zoned R-2. The Comprehensive Plan supports the preservation of the rural beauty of the County. To achieve this goal, it is recommended that growth be centered in areas with infrastructure. The Zoning Ordinance is designed tol help achieve the goals ofthe Comprehensive Plan. Concentrating    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 7  growth helps meet the County's fiscal objective ofp providing municipal services andi infrastructure without incurring an unreasonably high tax burden for residents of the County. The most recent census showed 2.4 people per household compared to 3.5 previously. This means a third more households are required. Population trends indicate an expected 25,596 people in our community in the next 20 years which may require up to 3,0001 households. Wei need more density and more options in the growth area to house people. Greene County is identified as a high-growth locality and is required to establish an Urban Development Area (UDA). The UDAS are centered in the high-density areas around Route 29 and Route33, the' TownofSlanardsville, and the Corner Store. Mr. Frydl said there are 67 parcels in the County currently zoned R-2. Of that number, only 9 are currently vacant. Terrace Greene and Lily Ridge apartment complexes have 12 units per acre. Residential subdivisions, such as Oxford Hills and Holly Hill, have 2 units per acre. Mr. Frydl reviewed the proposed revisions to areai regulations, density, setback regulations, Mrs. Flynn asked if an "up/down duplex", which share a ceiling and floor, would be allowed. Mr. Frydl said that up/down duplex does not fit in any ofthe proposed definitions and The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request with the following Amend the definitions for single family attached dwelling, single family detached dwelling, and multiple family dwellings. The: amended definition for single familyattached dwelling units will include consolidating terms such as duplex, two family dwelling, Amend the current ordnance to eliminate Article 6-6-1.2, two family dwelling. This dwelling type will bei included under the single family attached dwelling unit definition. Mr. Justin Shimp, representative of the applicant, said this proposal is ai modernization of the current Zoning Ordinance. There is increased demand for smaller, more affordable units with smaller yards and more open space. The goal was to get the density to ai more efficient use ofland  The density in al UDA is recommended at 12 units per acre.  open space requirements and definitions in the Zoning Ordinance.  would need to be added to correct this oversight. recommended revisions to the proposed language:  triplex, and townhouses, etc.  int the growth area with setbacks that accommodate a smaller house footprint.  The Chairman opened the public hearing.  Ms. Mary Wright agreed that open spaces are important. She lives on Lake Saponi Drive and said they already have duplexes in the subdivision. She said she is concerned about how the proposed amendments will impact their area. She understands the need for morel housing for more Ms. Nicole Mohiuddin, resident ofLake Saponi, was concerned about the existing traffic patterns in the area as there will be a lot of people entering the subdivision. There are already potholes, no speed limits, no "no outlet" sign, no parks, people parking on the grass, etc. Toadd more traffic and more people will be way too crowded. She also said there are questions about  people. She also said there are no parks ini the area.  water usage and asked where one can go: for answers and assistance.  Thej public hearing was closed.  Mr. Frydl pointed out where the current R-2 zones are in the County and said any new property would havet tol ber rezoned. Thereare 9 vacant parcels that would bei impacted. Ifsomeone    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 8  wished to tear down existing buildings on R-2! property and build something else, they could. Most oft the properties have water and sewer available. Mrs. Durrer asked about the Lake Saponi area. Mr. Frydl said water and sewer are available in the Lake Saponi area. He reiterated that the  proposed amendments are: not about a specific parcel ofland. growth area and supports the proposed amendments.  Mr. Frydl said the Economic Development Director supports the higher density in the Ms. Kelley Kemp, County Attorney, questioned the lack ofattachment "A"tot thej proposed ordinance resolution. An attachment "A"is referenced but there is no link to the attachment. She expressed concern that this is not as clear as it should be. Mr. Martin pointed out that the information is on the back oft the staffreport. Ms. Kemp said her advice would bet to continue and Mrs. Flynn said the way to keep the rural character and open space is toj put the density in one place. She felt some of the comments and concerns are irrelevant to tonight's topic as the proposed amendment would affect every R-2 zoned property in the County and is not parcel specific. A VDOT representative is here every quarter. If you have concerns about what your neighbors are or are not doing, take it up with your HOA. Ifit's not in your HOA but you have to drive by it, those property owners have rights. In Greene, our yards are our open space. She likes that the fencing requirement has been removed which will keep it from being choppy and blocked off. She felt it is up to the Board tol listen to concerns but bei thoughtful where development takes Mrs. Durrer was concerned about the setbacks being reduced. She said all this does is help the developer make more money. Mrs. Flynn said smaller setbacks allow for bigger open spaces. Mr. Herring said he did not have a problem with the density and he liked the open space concept which makes sense in this type of development. This does impact R-2 zoned property across the County. The Board of Supervisors will consider any requests to rezone property to R-2 Mr. Martin said the Comprehensive Plan was created by citizens with help from the Planning Commission and consultants. A third of our county is a national park and there is a beautiful county park with amenities with more to come, we hope. He felt the people who participated in creating the Comprehensive Plan were thoughtful in keeping the denser neighborhoods in the designated growth areas. The Comprehensive Plan will be amended every5 5 years and citizen participation is encouraged. Mr. Martin said he was a little concerned with the setbacks and how dramatic they are. The presentation tonight has helped him become more comfortable with it. He felt Mrs. Flynn raised a really good point on property rights. Property owners have the right to do with their property as they wish as long as they follow the ordinances. They also have the right to ask for a change in the ordinance. One must be very careful when considering people's property rights. He also agreed with Mrs. Flynn's comments on VDOT. If itis not a state road, then the home owners or the HOA is responsible for the roads. Mr. Martin thought this is a creative and an appropriate direction for the County to be going to alter this. He questioned why the County would be willing to give up the option ofk keeping this as a special use permit as opposed to by right. Mr. Frydl said in order to achieve the goals of the Comprehensive  re-advertise the public hearing for a future meeting.  place and howi it shapes that area oft the community.  Mrs. Durrer said she liked more open space around the homes.  zone.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 9  Plan, we want this density and housing type, and do not want to put up additional barriers by requiring additional costs and public hearings for a density that is called fori in the Plan. Mrs. Flynn said we don'thave: a very diverse housingi inventory and we' re gettingi ready to lose some housing inventory of a certain type that is more manageable for some families than a single-family home on a % acrel lot. This gives people options to live and work in Greene County. She asked ift there was consideration of any setback in between the current requirements and what is proposed. Mr. Frydl said this is an initiative that staff had hoped to get to, but an applicant brought it forward first. Staffresearch confirmed that those are: relatively common. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed setbacks during their public hearing and did not recommend any changes. Mrs. Flynn said she puts great weight on1 the Planning Commission's outcome as she has such respect for how thoroughly they investigate things. Mr. Martin agreed. Mr. Frydl said Upon motion by Michelle Flynn, second by David Cox and unanimous roll call vote, the Board deferred action on this request to their meeting on April 9, 2019. Another public hearing  the Planning Commission met twice to consider the proposed amendments. will be advertised and held to consider the proposed amendments.  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dalel Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC: HEARING- BOUNDARYLINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN GREENE AND Ms. Garton said there was a boundary line issue between Greene and Orange Counties where records showed that certain properties, which had been treated as being in Greene County, were actually in Orange County. This was pointed out by the State Board of Elections. Per an agreement between Greene and Orange, these properties were treated as if they were in Greene County. The children went to Greene County schools, they paid taxes in Greene County and voted in Greene County. The State Board ofElections said they could no longer vote in Greene because As survey was completed to locate the actual boundary lines. The survey showed that the boundary line is actually below Route 670 and the properties are already in Greene as are some other properties that thought they were in Orange. The boundary line is adjusted to run along the The language for the adjustment was created by Mr. Lacheney and is the same language the Orange County Board of Supervisors will have to approve. State Code provides that if two localities agree on a boundary line adjustment, go through the process, hold public hearings, and approve appropriate documents, there is a process whereby the County Attorney will go through the court to record the boundary line adjustment. Orange County is holding their public hearing The Chair opened the public hearing. The public hearing was closed with no comments.  ORANGE COUNTIES  they were actually in Orange.  road so that everyone is where they thought they were.  tonight also. It was noted the land was originally surveyed in 1838.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 10  Upon motion by Michelle Flynn, second by David Cox and unanimous roll call vote, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Greene County to execute the boundary establishment agreement with Orange County and that the County Attorney: is hereby authorized to file all necessary documentation to effectuate the terms of the boundary adjustment agreement and to file the necessary court procedures to complete the process. (See Attachment "A")  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: POSTING OFNOTRESPASS SIGNS ON VACANT COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY Ms. Garton said the County owns various properties, some of which have buildings on them and serve the public, others such as the park property, and vacant property purchased fora particular purpose. There is a large tract of land that was purchased for the eventual construction of a water reservoir. There have been recent allegations that someone was harvesting hay" without county permission on that large tract of land. The County also learned that hunters are using the property and tree stands are in place. Hunting is probably something that someone said years ago was fine but there is no formal agreement to that effect. The County has not given anyone permission to do those things nor have we prohibited anyone from doing those things. Ms. Garton's recommendation is to post the property with no trespass signs to make it clear this is County property and these things are not allowed. First review of this proposal was at the last Board meeting. It was estimated to cost $1,200 to post the property. The County will allow the hunters who have tree stands on the property time to remove the tree stands. Mrs. Flynn felt this Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the resolution authorizing the posting of no trespass signs on vacant county  should be done within ai reasonable amount of time. property as presented. (See Attachment "B")  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David Cox Marie Durrer Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARD LIAISON REPORTS Services Board in April.  Mrs. Flynn said a State representative will conduct training for the members oft the Social Mr. Herring said the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission met last Thursday and approved the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. He may ask tol have the plan presented to the Board at a future meeting. The Planning Commission meeting was moved to February 27    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 11  duet to snow and ai rezoning was sent to thel Board of Supervisors for consideration. The Broadband Committee heard from representatives of Rappahannock Electric Coop about their plans for fiber and how that fiber may be utilized to expand broadband in our community. Mrs. Durrer said she will not be attending the meeting of the Central VA Regional Jail this Thursday, as the Board of Supervisors has scheduled a budget work session for that night. She received information today that the number of federal inmates continues to rise. Mr. Martin said there has been progress on the Greene Commons project and things should move fairly quickly. The structures should be up shortly after the site work is completed. The farmers market will go on as planned at this location on the first Saturday in April. The Economic Development Authority is a little concerned with criticism about ai revolving loan fund. The EDA mission statement was approved by the Board ofSupervisors and: includes the revolving loan fund for businesses that are found to be worthy of assistance. Mr. Yost clarified that funding for the micro-loan program came from the development of the Industrial and Business Parks.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE  Ms. Garton said she has been working on balancing the proposed budget for FY 19-20 which was presented earlier this evening. A budget work session: is scheduled for' Thursday, March 14 and then again on Monday, March 18 ifneeded. The Board will need to approve a tax rate to advertise. The public hearing on the budget and tax rates will be held on April 23 with tax rates The renewal license for the After-School Program was received from the Virginia Department of Social Services. Itl has worked out for the program to remain open through the end of the school year. Ms. Garton and Dr. Whitmarsh still plan to discuss steps to talk to families The Board acted on the boundary line adjustment earlier tonight. The Board had approved funding to replace the sidewalk between the courthouse and Main Street known as Judge's Walk. Thej project was completed but some grading work needs to be done to alleviate drainage issues at the church. The building on the corner of Route 33 and Route 29 is down and should be cleared  adopted at that meeting. The budget will be adopted on May 14.  about alternatives.  by the landowner.  RE: OTHER MATTERS FROM BOARD MEMBERS  Mr. Martin commented on the demolition ofMr. B's on the corner. People are asking what the County is going to put there. This is private property that is currently on the market. There are exciting things going on at that intersection and we can onlyl hope that whoever buys that property will come in with some good ideas to meet demands that Greene County citizens have. The new County Administrator, Mr. Mark Taylor, will be coming in on April 9. There is  a1 two week overlap with Ms. Garton'sl last day on April 23.    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Sheet 12  RE: ADJOURNI MEETING  The Board will meet on Thursday, March 14 at 5:30j p.m. for a budget work session with a possible extension to Monday, March 18. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board will  be on March 26, 2019. The meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m.  Nlik-hat William Bryan Maftin, Chair Greene County Bbard of Supervisors  huh Ahiin Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Attachment "A"  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF GREENE COUNTY GREENE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A BOUNDARY LINE. ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN  Whereas, parcels 66F-2-3, 66F-2-4, 66F-2-5, 66F-2-6, 66F-2-7, 66F-3-3, 66F-3-4, 66F- 3-5, 66F-4-7, 66F-4-8, 66F-4-9, 66F-4-10, have been taxed and treated as a portion of Greene  County since the parcels were developed; and  Whereas, both the Greene County and Orange County GIS systems identify these parcels Whereas, both Greene County and Orange County agree that said parcels should fully be Whereas, the County did advertise its intent to enter into a Boundary Line adjustment with Orange County once a week for two successive weeks in The Greene County Record; and  as lying fully or partially in Orange County (Exhibit 1), and  located within Greene County; and  Whereas, a public hearing was held on this matter on March 12, 2019,  NOWTHEREFORE be it hereby resolved that:  1. The Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute the Boundary Establishment 2. The County Attorney isl hereby authorized to file all necessary documentation to effectuate the terms of the Boundary Adjustment Agreement and to file the necessary court procedures to ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON MARCH 12,  Agreement with Orange County.  complete the process.  2019 Motion: Second: Recorded Vote: Bill Martin Michelle. Flynn David L. Cox Marie C. Durrer Dalel R. Herring EL  Michelle Flynn David Cox  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes hat-  d  ATTEST:  Bryan Mrtin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 12, 2019 Attachment "B"  RESOLUTION AUTHORZINGTHE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO HAVE VACANT COUNTY PROPERTIES POSTED "NO TRESPASSING"  WHEREAS, the County received and investigated a complaint from a citizen alleging that someone was harvesting hay" on a County-owned parcel ofland without permission; and WHEREAS, further, citizens report having received informal permission from individual Board members in the past to hunt on County property, and have placed tree stands and other constructs WHEREAS, the County has never officially taken action to condone any of those activities on vacant county property, nor has it taken any official action to expressly prohibit such activities by NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia, that the County. Administratoris: authorized tol have vacant County properties posted with BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator publish in the local newspaper that such action will be taken after a designated date sO that individuals who have items of value (for example, tree stands for hunting) may remove those items from the County's property prior  on county property toward that end; and  posting No Trespassing" signs on vacant County properties;  "No Trespassing" signs as soon as practical; and  to that date.  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON MARCH 12,  2019. Motion: Second: Recorded Vote: Bill Martin Michelle Flynn David L. Cox Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring  Dale Herring Marie Durrer  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  William  Mhhhuf Bryan Martn, Chair Greene County Bogrd of Supervisors  Aulas SH  Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors