Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 1  August 23, 2022  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2022, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MEETING ROOM AND BYZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATION  Present were:  Marie Durrer, Chair Dale Herring, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Abbey Heflin, Member Davis Lamb, Member  Staff present:  Mark B. Taylor, County Administrator Kelley Kemp, Assistant County Attorney Jim Frydl, Director of Planning and Zoning Tracy Morris, Director of Finance Terry Beigie, Grant Writer  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment; assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body concerning the County  Meeting the following matter(s):  Administrator.  Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the  public body concerning the Charlottesville Land. discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;  WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711(A)CI) and (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia, such  BOOK 41-6E444    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 2  NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Bowman and unanimous roll call vote, the  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enteri into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OFSILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA Board approved the agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  BOOK 41nsr445    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 3  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC  Ms. Gwen Baker was present tol let the Board know that the new audio equipment sounded weird online from the Board Room for both its meeting and the Planning Commission meeting the week prior. Additionally, she told the Board that she's aware that there is a lot happening in the county but requested the Supervisors make sure they're taking care ofa all the Citizens int the County  and place Citizens first and not corporations or large businesses.  Ms. Paige Roberts was present to ask Mr. Taylor to further explain statements he made during a meeting on March 22 regarding the employee health insurance. Ms. Roberts noted that Mr. Taylor told the board at that meeting that Local Choice needed al breakdown of the cost share oft the 15.6% increase. Ms. Roberts said she spoke the director at the state Office of Health Benefits  at Local Choice who refuted the claim.  Mr. Steven Kortpeter was present to question the role of the Conservation District in the County's Zoning Ordinance, which requires 8 acres per dwelling, ifa Special User Permit would  allow more than one dwelling per parcel. RE: CONSENT AGENDA approved the consent agenda as presented.  Upon motion Davis Lamb, second by Dale Herring and unanimous roll call vote, the Board  a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. i.  Minutes of previous meeting  Resolution to accept and appropriate $6,000.00 for the Greene County Parks & Resolution to accept and appropriate $45,000.00 for the Virginia Domestic Resolution to accept and appropriate $1,228.00 for the Local Law Enforcement Approve the resolution authorizing the transfer of $82,155.00 from the contingency fund for various departments for FY 2022 (See Attachment "D") Resolution to appropriate $9,831.00 for additional expenditures for FY 2022 (See Resolution to appropriate $691,219.00 for additional expenditures for FY 2022 Resolution to accept and appropriate $75,000.00 for carryover programs (See Resolution to accept and appropriate $645,896.99 for the National School Lunch Resolution to accept and appropriate $456,338.45 for the National School  Recreation on the Go grant (See Attachment "A") Violence Victim Fund Grant (See Attachment "B") Block Grant (See Attachment "C")  Attachment "E") (See Attachment "F") Attachment "G")  Program for FY 2022 (See Attachment "H")  BOOK 41cr446    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 4  Breakfast Program for FY 2022 (See Attachment "T") Benefit Card Program for FY 2022 (See Attachment "J") Operational Costs for FY 2022 (See Attachment "K")  k. 1. m. n.  Resolution to accept and appropriate $3,063.001 fort the School Nutrition Electronic Resolution to accept and appropriate $12,061.68 for Child Nutritional Emergency Resolution to accept and appropriate $49,133.57 for Supply Chain Assistance funds for School Nutrition Program for FY 2022 (See Attachment "L") Resolution to accept and appropriate $51,272.66 for the Summer Food Service  Program for FY 2022 (See Attachment "M")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM DAVID AND KUMUD VANDERVEER/WILLIAM D. HURR FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOURIST LODGING (ARTICLE 3-1-2.1), LOCATED AT 215 MULBERRY DRIVE, STANARDSVILLE. THIS WILL BE THE SECOND TOURIST-LODGING DWELLING ON THIS PARCEL, TMP#48-2-67.AND IS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.84 ACRES, ZONED A-1, Mr. Frydl shared the request from David and Kumud Vanderveer/Wiliam D. Herr for a Special Use Permit for a tourist lodging on an A-1 Agriculture zoned parcel. Mr. Frydl noted the parcel in question contained a single-family home on it and the request was to add a second residential dwelling on that parcel. Mr. Vanderveer requested the permit for the second tourist lodging dwelling for a motorboat that would be turned into a single-family home. Mr. Frydl said County staff advised the owners to work with the building official to determine whether the boat could be converted into a single-family home to which the official said he believed it could. The boat would consist of approximately 300-800 square feet and the owner would instead build a  AGRICULTURE.  cabin of that size if the boat could not be converted.  The Riverdale neighborhood is zoned A-1 Agriculture and tourist lodging is allowed by- right in the county under A-1 and C-1 Conservation zoning, but the request for the Special Use Permit came from the second dwelling being located on the same parcel. Mr. Frydl told the Board that the County's Comprehensive Plan encourages tourism to help maintain the rural atmosphere in the western section of the County. He told the Board of Supervisors that the Planning Commission voted 4-1 in favor oft the Special Use Permit at the. July 21, 2022, meeting.  Mr. Vanderveer told the Supervisors he had received a Special Use Permit on a different parcel when adding the Treehouse tourist dwelling when there was already a single-family  dwelling being used as tourist lodging on that site.  BOOK 41PAGE447    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 5  The public hearing was opened and there were six speakers. Four spoke against the Special Use Permit and three spoke in favor ofit. Reasons against included: increased traffic; private road maintenance; and the fact that Riverdale subdivision has covenants that do not allow commercial enterprises. Reasons in favor of the permit included how well-kept Mr. Vanderveer keeps the property and that most of the parcels adjacent to the lot in question were already owned by Mr.  Vanderveer as tourist lodging.  Mr. Bowman asked why there is a minimum 300 square foot requirement and Mr. Frydl said that's the minimum size the County requires for accessory dwelling units as it must have the features of a single-family home such as a bathroom, kitchen, and bedroom. Mr. Bowman asked whether approving the Special Use Permit set aj precedent for additional structures to be on any of the numerous ponds and lakes within the County. Mr. Frydl said it does not set a legal precedent because each Special Use Permit has to be considered independent of others and weighed only on  the impacts and merits ofi its own proposal.  Mr. Lamb asked whether anything could be considered an accessory dwelling, such as an airplane fuselage or rundown Recreational Vehicle. Mr. Frydl said it would be up to the building  official whether they could be converted to single-family homes.  Ms. Heflin asked Mr. Frydl if the County cannot enforce the covenants of the subdivision how could the Supervisors also grant anything that goes against those covenants. Mr. Frydl said one of the questions to answer is whether or not the proposed use fits the character of the  development.  Ms. Durrer said she doesn't see how a boat could be characteristic of a subdivision and Upon motion by Mr. Lamb and second by Ms. Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  would not fit the character of any subdivision in Greene County. Special Use Permit was denied. (See Attachment "N")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM BRUCE SHIFFLETT FOR AN AMENDMENTTOTHE CURRENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONSTHAT INCLUDED DENSITY, OUTDOOR RECREATION. AND ACCESSORY USES (SUP10-002 WITH CONDITIONS). THE AMENDED SUP FOR TOURIST LODGING (ARTICLE3-1-2.D) WITH CONDITIONS INCLUDES THE ADDITION OFAI POOL, 12 ADDITIONAL CABINS, FOUR TINY HOUSES, ONE ADDITIONAL PAVILION, A VEGETIVE BUFFER, AND  BOOK 416E448    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 6  NOISE RESTRICTIONS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 426 MOUNTAIN LAUREL PASS AND IDENTIFIED ASTMPHIBAH-IION. APPROXIMATELY 122.8 ACRES ZONED Mr. Frydl shared the request from Bruce Shifflett to amend the current Special Use Permit atl Lydia Mountain to include the addition ofap pool, 12 additional cabins, four tiny houses and one additional pavilion. Mr. Frydl noted thej property, 426] Mountain Laurel Passi is 122.8 acres is zoned C-1 Conservation. Mr. Frydl said a Special Use Permit is required because it's more than one parcel per acre even though the parcel is 122.8 acres. He said it wouldn't matter if it was 1,000 acres,1 ifit had a second structure it would need a Special Use Permit because only one structure is allowed by-right. As the property would be for tourist lodging, Mr. Frydl demonstrated that tourism brought in $400,000 ini revenue last year to the County with $240,000 to Tourism-related expenses and the remainder to the general fund. My Frydl said VDOT performed a traffic study on the road, finding there is an average of 100 trips per day from U.S. Route 33 to Saddleback Road and 160 average trips from Saddleback Road toward Turkey Ridge Road. Mr. Frydl said water and sewer are site-plan issues and would need to bel built to Department of Health Standards and if what they were proposing could not meet that, they would have to scale back. Mr. Frydl also noted that firetrucks and rescue vehicles can travel along the road, but that the road is very narrow. He added that the lodge has averaged less than one call per month, including fire, police, rescue calls together. While the area is rural, Mr. Frydl said, tourism, lodging and tourism activities are promoted by the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission discussed the proposal in detail, coming up with 28 conditions, voting 4-1 to recommend approval, Mr. Frydl said. Mr. Frydl said as a Special Use Permit hearing, conditions must mitigate the impacts from proposed development. Mr. Shifflett spoke to the Board, noting it's been 20 years since the business began. He said he' s requesting the permit change to allow growth oft the business. He noted that the property  CL.CONSERVATION  isz zoned C-1 Conservation, but the business already exists there.  Ms. Tina Deane thanked the Supervisors for visiting the site to see what's currently there and where the new development is proposed. Ms. Deane said people have complained about tree removal, but that is not all because of their business but other development on the mountain. Ms. Deane noted that it has been 12 years since they had requested an adjustment to their Special Use Permit. She added that the business supports Greene County, paying almost $300,000 per yeari in sales, lodging, and personal property taxes. She said she and Mr. Shifflett feel it's time to grow  the business again.  Mr. Lamb asked Mr. Shifflett about the zipline and tubing lane. Mr. Shifflett said the zipline was already approved and the tubing lane caused more noise than they liked SO they shut The public hearing was opened. Thirty-two speakers spoke during the public hearing with People who spoke against the approval of the Special Use Permit stated some of the  that down.  four in favor and 28 against the Special Use Permit.  following reasons:  BOOK 41P16E449    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 7  too much growth for Conservation zoning  environmental impacts ecological impacts keeping the area rural water table  fire and emergency medical services access on the narrow roadways  disruption of peace and quiet for neighbors land not designed as a resort area saving open space for future generations possibility of wildfires trespassing  People who spoke in favor of the approval of the Special Use Permit stated some oft the  following reasons:  extending the opportunity for others to see the beauty of Greene County  supporting local business  owners oft the business were great to guests allowing others to enjoy the peace and quiet of the area  Mr. Bowman asked whether the County requires permits for fireworks, which Mr. Frydl said it does not. Mr. Bowman asked ift there was any notice to Public Safety for events going oni in the community. Mr. Frydl said events up to 400 people or roughly 200 vehicle trips per day do not require any special conditions. Mr. Bowman asked what's required if an event will exceed that, and Mr. Frydl said they would need a Special Use Permit. Mr. Bowman said he's received comments regarding enforcement of previous Special Use Permit conditions, asking if Mr. Frydl was aware of those. Mr. Frydl said his office has received complaints over the years and investigated them. He added he's working with the applicant regarding a home business as it no longer meets that criterion. Mr. Bowman said he's s struggled with the application since it was first made because he strongly supports individual property rights and he understands the need for tourist industry in this County. He said he's complementary of Mr. Shifflett's efforts and what's been put in place on Lydia Mountain. Mr. Bowman said the question of saturation has arisen, which he admitted is a judgement call. He said that to him, the neighbors' arguments regarding  traffic, noise, and other issues, means he could not support it at this time.  Mr. Herring asked if the applicant would be able to respond to the comments made during thej public hearing. Mr. Shifflett said he feels like there are a lot of "what ifs" from the community, but not in the day-to-day reality. He said he feels the growth is needed for his business.  Ms. Deane highlighted what the Supervisors did not hear: the site could be subdivided with many additional wells and septic fields; that neighbors speaking about wildlife and conservation  BOOK 41ner450    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 8  are pumping water from Bull Yearling into their ponds; and that she has personally been yelled at  in her own driveway.  Mr. Herring thanked everyone who had emailed or called or submitted letters regarding the application. He said hel has a concern regarding the narrowness oft the road and whether emergency service vehicles could get to the site. He said he wonders ift they could in bad weather.  Ms. Heflin asked whether the traffic count included everything or just the new tourist lodging locations. Mr. Frydl noted that the two wedding sites already exist and the permit did not ask for new space to hold weddings, just a pavilion over one of the sites. Ms. Heflin said she has al lot of respect for the operation that is there and it is beautiful, however, for her it's in the C-1 Conservation District and that the County should stay true to its zoning. She said she believes  expansion will dramatically change the character of the area.  Mr. Lamb said he feels the area is becoming overcrowded. Mr. Lamb listed the other parcels located around the parcel in question, which are also owned by the applicant. He quoted the Greene County Code section 38-122, Stormwater Permit; exemptions, B. regarding single family residences. He feels that the applicant's ownership of the surrounding parcels should be considered a common plan of development and that the parcels should not be exempt from stormwater plan requirements. Mr. Lamb also shared some photos which he believed showed examples of excessive erosion. Mr. Herring said that those parcels are not part of the application  that is being considered tonight.  Ms. Durrer said she is concerned about emergency vehicles and traffic on the narrow road. She added the property is in the C-1 Conservation District, which are areas that the County needs to preserve. She said there is a point when growth needs to stop and once Lydia finishes with everything permitted by previous Special Use Permits, they could return to ask for additional  density.  Upon motion by Mr. Lamb and second by Ms. Heflin and 4-1 roll call vote, the Special Use Permit was denied. (See Attachment "O"). Mr. Lamb cited 1,2,3,4,60 of Article 1-3 as the  reason for the denial.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes No Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: VATIAPPLICATION LETTER OFS SUPPORT.  Mr. Frydl presented a Letter of Support to the Board of Supervisors for the 2023 VATI Application that would allow Firefly and CVEC to bring broadband to an additional 300 homes  BOOK 41-6E451    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 9  above and beyond the ones that are part of the 2022 application. The cost to the County would be  up to $80,000 if the grant is awarded.  Mr. Herring said the letter does not obligate the County to spend the money, but it shows governmental support to the state for the application. He also reminded everyone to sign up for Firefly in case it passes by their location and could be brought to their home during the RISE Upon motion by Mr. Herring and second by Mr. Bowman, and a unanimous roll call vote,  project.  the Letter of Support was approved. (See Attachment "P")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes No  Motion carried.  RE: TRANSIENT OCCUPANCYTAX RATE.  County Attorney Kelley Kemp told thel Board she' d looked at the possibility of raising the transient occupancy tax rate from the current 5%, but that would require working with the state representatives in the General Assembly to have an exception in the state code. She said that all the counties with an additional rate in the state code have a specific purpose and that it ties into tourism. Ms. Kemp recommended speaking with the state delegation regarding this if it's  something the County wanted to pursue.  Mr. Herring said there had been discussions regarding adding 1 cent to 3 cents to the rate, with the addition above the 5 cents to go toward Public Safety. He said the Emergency Services Advisory Board had suggested that any additional hotel could require a ladder truck and that  additional tourism results the protentional for additional calls for service.  Mr. Bowman said he would support that ifit the funding was earmarked for all emergency services. He said it would not necessarily cover personnel, but could cover equipment, stations,  and infrastructure needed to support public safety. safety, but instead a specific tourism-related project.  Ms. Kemp said she believes the County would need to be more specific than just public Mr. Herring asked how specific the County would need to go beyond additional people increase the potential for the need for public safety. He asked what the process is once it is approved at the state level. Ms. Kemp said the County would need to pass an ordinance. She said as far as the specificity she thinks it must be more specific than just emergency services. Mr. Bowman said he believes the County could write a specific statement regarding the facilities needed for public safety, along with thel Emergency Services Advisory Board members, and reach  BOOK 416r452    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 10  out to state legislators. Mr. Herring also questioned if the Tourism Council would be in favor of  it.) Mr. Bowman and Mr. Herring agreed to work on it further.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS  Mr. Herring told thel Board that the Rivanna River Basin Commission met and there will be a conference held Sept. 29 that will contain topics related to solar energy and solar farms. He said that while Greene hasn't had it come up yet, it might. Mr. Herring said the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission elected officers and he's been elected Vice Chair. Additionally, Mr. Herring discussed the possibility of the Commission submitting a grant for a roadway safety  planning grant.  Mr. Bowman said he attended the Planning Commission meeting on August 17 where it approved a rezoning from Agricultural A-1 tol B-3. Business Highway High Intensity, afterap public hearing. The parcel in question is next to. Domino's at the Gateway Market Center in Ruckersville for an emergent care facility. Mr. Frydl said the landowner had not wanted to rezone until recently. Mr. Bowman said the Planning Commission also had a work session on the Solid Waste chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. He also attended the School Board meeting on August 14, where Dr. Brian Huber was designated to serve as school superintendent if Dr. Whitmarsh is out. He said the  Rapidan Service Authority meeting was canceled for August, as well.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT  Mr. Taylor told the Board that the 911 tower behind the Sheriff's Office is finished. There iss still more work for the additional towers, he said. Mr. Taylor said the new Water and Sewer Director Greg Lunsford has hit the ground running and that Ms. Deborah Baugher had started as the financial specialist. The duo is working on a business plan for the County's Water and Sewer Department as it breaks away from Rapidan Service Authority. Mr. Taylor told the Board that the Madison County Board of Supervisors must redo its public hearing regarding Greene leaving the authority as it requires a 30-day notice and they only provided 20 days. It will be held September 27, which pushes back the possible transfer date. Mr. Taylor said he believes it will be early  October.  Mr. Bowman asked if the State Corporation Commission approval was the final step Mr. Taylor said there are many steps, but the approval from the State Corporation Commission is needed before the property will transfer. Mr. Taylor said the County is also working to get the permit transfers under way, as well, for water and wastewater. He said most of it will happen all at once and the County needs to be prepared toi fully operate when the transfer happens. He said they are actively recruiting the needed staff to operate the facilities and the equipment needed to do field repairs, with the expectation of being ready to go on October 1.  needed beyond the public hearing.  Mr. Taylor said the County needs additional data regarding collections before it can be sure it can offer any reliefin this calendar year. He said as soon as the report is completed, he will have that information before the! Board. Finally, he said the Tourism Bylaws are expected tol be available  at the first meeting in September.  BOOK 41s453    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Sheet 11  Mr. Lamb asked about needed equipment for the Water and Sewer Department tol be ready to go. Mr. Taylor said he and Mr. Lunsford are drilling down to figure out what's needed and by when. Mr. Bowman said the County may need toi rent equipment at thel beginning oft the operations.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BOARD  Mr. Herring said the Supervisors had held previous Town Hall meetings and is starting off with the Monroe District and as At-Large Supervisor he will also be in attendance. He also invited any of the other supervisors who'd d like to. have a' Town Hall tol let the County Administrator know  and he would try to attend. RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  YMae Sun MarieDurrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41sr454    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment A  RESOLUTION: TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS  FOR THE GREENE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION ON THE GO! MOBILE PLAYGROUND  WHEREAS, the Parks & Recreation Department of the County of Greene has received funding from the Bama Works Fund oft the Dave Matthews Band for a mobile playground; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene,  Virginia.  NOW,1 THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that six thousand dollars ($6,000.00) be appropriated to the 2022-  2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITE FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator oft the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 231dday of August, 2022.  Motion: DAVIS LAMB Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes- Yes Yes  Zberhs MariéC.I Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark  Greene County Board of Supervisors    BOOK 41A6E455    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment B  RESOLUTIONTO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FORTY-FIVETHOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THE VIRGINIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIM FUND GRANT  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has been awarded a grant from DCJS for a Virginia WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) will need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of  Domestic Violence Victim Fund; and  Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) be appropriated to the  2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER: RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Vhuicde Mariee-Durrer, Vice Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 416:456    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment C  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT DOLLARS FOR LOCALLAW ENFORCEMENT  BLOCK GRANT  WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Department of the County of Greene has received funding WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of one thousand twol hundred twenty-eight dollars ($1,228.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of  for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant; and  the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ofthe County of Greene, Virginia that one thousand two hundred twenty-eight dollars ($1,228.00)  be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator ofthe County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes  Ypi cae Marie CDurrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST: M  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41ncr457    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment D  RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFER OF $82,155.00 FROM THE CONTINGENCY  FUNDT TO DEPARTMENTSTO COVER EXPENDITURES  WHEREAS, the following departments have insufficient funds to cover expenditures: Board of Supervisors, Commissioner of Revenue, Reassessment, Computer Technology,  Registrar, Non-Departmenta; and  WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds in the contingency fund to cover expenditures; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia, that $82,155.00 be transferred from the Contingency Fund (4-100-091400- 9200) to the various departments listed above in the General Fund in the 2021-2022 budget of  the County of Greene, Virginia.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Ydulbw Marie CDurrer, Chair Greene County Board of.Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clérk AE Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 410r458    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment E  RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE NINE THOUSAND  EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY-ONE DOLLARS FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene had additional expenses for sewer and water; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of nine thousand eight hundred thirty-one dollars ($9,831.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022 budget of  the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that nine thousand eight hundred thirty-one dollars ($9,831.00) be  appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator ofthe County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  hpuicdur Marie E. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  1 Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41459    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment F  RESOLUTIONTO APPROPRIATE SIX HUNDRED NINETY-ONE1 THOUSAND  TWO HUNDRED NINETEEN DOLLARS FOR  ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene had additional expenses for repairs/maintenance WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of six hundred ninety-one thousand two hundred nineteen dollars ($691,219.00) need tol be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-  and disposal services for the Solid Waste Facility; and  2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that six hundred ninety-one thousand twol hundred nineteen dollars ($691,219.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator ofthe County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Muplw Marie C) Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark'E B. Taylor, Clerk 15 Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41460    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment G  RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE SEVENTY-FIVETHOUSAND DOLLARS FOR  CARRYOVER PROGRAMS  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia has unused WHEREAS, the following funds in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) need to be accepted and appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of  appropriated balances from fiscal year 2021-2022; and,  Greene, Virginia: Program  Amount $75,000.00  Sheriff/E911 - Equipment-Console Replacement  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) be received from the above programs and be accepted and appropriated to the appropriate line items in the 2022-  2023 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget and to do  all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ai cillan Marie C. Durrer, Vice Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  MAL Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41PAGE 461    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment H  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SIX HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-SIX DOLLARS AND NINETY-NINE CENTS  FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional National School Lunch Program WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of six hundred forty-five thousand eight hundred ninety-six dollars and ninety-nine cents ($645,896.99) need to be appropriated to the appropriate  Funds for the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and  line item in the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that six hundred forty-five thousand eight hundred ninety-six dollars and ninety-nine cents ($645,896.99) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of  Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  Vai eclses Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  41,6E462  BOOK    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment I  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FORTY-FIVE  CENTS FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional National School Breakfast Program WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of four hundred fifty-six thousand three hundred thirty- eight dollars and forty-five cents ($456,338.45): need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item  Funds for the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and  in the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that four hundred fifty-six thousand three hundred thirty-eight dollars and forty-five cents ($456,338.45) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of  Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  Mhie erlues Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41nsr r463    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment J  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE THREE' THOUSANDSIXIY-  THREE DOLLARS FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional School Nutrition Electronic Benefit Card Program Funds for the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of three thousand sixty-three dollars ($3,063.00) need tol be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene,  Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that three thousand sixty-three dollars ($3,063.00) be appropriated to  the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  Vuedu Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk 17 Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 416r464    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment K  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWELVE THOUSANDS SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS AND SIXTY-EIGHT CENTS FOR. ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional Child Nutrition Emergency Operational Costs Funds for the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of twelve thousand sixty-one dollars and sixty-eight cents ($12,061.68) need tol be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022 budget of  the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that twelve thousand sixty-one dollars and sixty-eight cents ($12,061.68) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget oft the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  Pai Couves Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  MO Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41n0465    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment L  RESOLUTION TOACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FORTY-NINE THOUSANDONE HUNDREDTHIRTY-THREE DOLLARS AND FIFTY-SEVEN CENTS  FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional Supply Chain Assistance Funds for WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of forty-nine thousand one hundred thirty-three dollars and fifty-seven cents ($49,133.57) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-  the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and  2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that forty-nine thousand one hundred thirty-three dollars and fifty- seven cents ($49,133.57) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 23rd day of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes_ Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  ATTEST:  Mluicehem Marie CDurrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  4  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41sr466    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment M  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FIFTY-ONE THOUSANDTWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO DOLLARS AND SIXTY-SIX CENTS  FOR. ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional Summer Food Service Program Funds WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of fifty-one thousand two hundred seventy-two dollars and sixty-six cents ($51,272.66) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-  for the School Nutrition Program from the Federal Government; and  2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that fifty-one thousand two hundred seventy-two dollars and sixty-six cents ($51,272.66) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all the  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 231dday of August, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Yes Marie C. Durrer Yes Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Yes Davis Lamb  Yes Yes  Aucdlus Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B.  Clerk Taylor,  Dyh2  Greene County Board of Supervisors  41ner467  BOOK    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment N  0-2022-008  AN ORDINANCE (0-2022-008) GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP#22-004) TO DAVID & KAMUD VANDERVER/WILLAM D. HURR REQUESTS. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOURIST LODGING (ARTICLE 3-1-2.1). LOCATED AT2 215 MULBERRY DRIVE, STANARDSVILLE, VA. THIS WILL BE THE SECOND TOURIST LODGING DWELLING ON THIS PARCEL, TMP# 48-(2)-67, AND IS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.84 ACRES, ZONED A-1, AGRICULTURE. THE GREENE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE WHEREAS, $15.2-1427 and $15.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be amended from time to time, enable a local governing body to adopt, amend and codify ordinances or portions thereof; WHEREAS, 515.2-2280, $15.2-2285, and $15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, WHEREAS, on. July 20, 2022, the Greene County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this WHEREAS, on. July 20, 2022, the Greene County Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of the request to grant the Special Use Permit (SUP); and WHEREAS, the Greene County Board of Supervisors caused to be published a notice of public hearing on this matter ini the Greene County Record on August 11, 2022, and August 18, 2022; and WHEREAS, the full application was available for public inspection ini the Greene County Administration Building, Room 226, 40 Celt Road, Stanardsville, Virginia 22973; and  MAP DESIGNATEST THIS PARCEL. AS A "RURAL AREA ".( (SUP#22-004).  and  enables a local governing body to adopt and amend zoning ordinances; and matter, and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard; and  WHEREAS, on. August 23, 2022, the Greene County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Greene County Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Article 16-2 of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance, public necessity, convenience, general welfare,  this matter and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard.  and good zoning practice, that the SUP#22-004 request is hereby denied:  1  BOOK 41nor468    0-2022-008  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON AUGUST23, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Abbey Heflin  Votes: Durrer Lamb: Bowman: Yes Heflin: Herring:  Yes Yes  Yes Yes  Haria CSLMLCLATEST. Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk 17 Greene County Board of Supervisors  2  BOOK 41r469    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment 0  0-2022-002  AN ORDINANCE (0-2022-002) GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP#22-004) AS REQUESTED BY BRUCE SHIFFLETT TO AMEND THE CURRENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS THAT INCLUDED DENSITY, OUTDOOR RECREATION, AND ACCESSORY USES (SUP10-002 WITH CONDITIONS). THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR TOURIST LODGING (ARTICLE 3-1-2.1) WITH CONDITIONS INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF A POOL, TWELVE ADDITIONAL CABINS, FOUR TINY HOUSES, ONE ADDITIONAL PAVILION, A VEGETIVE BUFFER, AND NOISE RESTRICTIONS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 426 MOUNTAIN LAUREL PASS AND IDENTIFIED AS TMP# 18-(A)-11, ON APPROXIMATELY 122.8 ACRES, ZONED C-1, CONSERVATION. THE GREENE COUNTY FUTURE WHEREAS, $15.2-1427 and $15.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be amended from time to time, enable a local governing body to adopt, amend and codify ordinances or portions WHEREAS, $15.2-2280, 515.2-2285, and $15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, WHEREAS, on. July 20, 2022, the Greene County Planning Commission held a public hearing on WHEREAS, on. July 20, 2022, the Greene County Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of the request to grant the Special Use Permit (SUP); ;and WHEREAS, the Greene County Board of Supervisors caused to be published a notice of public hearing on this matter in the Greene County Record on August 11, 2022, and August 18, 2022; WHEREAS, the full application was available for publicinspection in the Greene County Administration Building, Room 226, 40 Celt Road, Stanardsville, Virginia 22973; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2022, the Greene County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Greene County Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Article 16-2 ofthe Greene County Zoning Ordinance, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, that the SUP#22-002 request is hereby denied.  LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS PARCEL ASA "RURAL AREA".( (SUP#22-002)  thereof; and  enables a local governing body to adopt and amend zoning ordinances; and this matter, and all oft those who spoke on this topic were heard; and  and  on this matter and all oft those who spoke on this topic were heard.  1  BOOK 41mer470    0-2022-002  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON AUGUST: 23, 2022.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Abbey Heflin  Votes: Durrer Yes Lamb: Yes Bowman: Yes Heflin: Herring: No  Yes  yuicluas Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST: Mark B.  15, Taylor, Clerk  Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41sr471    Board of Supervisors August 23, 2022 Attachment P  of  G os  BOARDOF SUPERVISORS Posr OrFICE Box358 SIASARPVIULS, VIRGISIA 22973 TFIFPHONK: 434-985-5201  August 23,2022  Dr. Tamarah Holmes, Director 600 East Main Street, Ste 300 Richmond, VA23219 Dear Dr. Holmes:  Office of Broadband Department of Housing and Community Development  The Greene County Board of Supervisors is committed to creating universal access to high-speed internet for all citizens and businesses. In order to increase coverage in unserved and underserved areas with in the county, the Board of Supervisors supports the regional 2023 VATI Application submitted by lead applicant Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission with The Board of Supervisors is also committed to supporting the application, which seeks to serve more than 300 unserved households in Greene County, by committing match funding not to exceed $80,000.00, which represents a 5% match of the overall budget in Greene County. The Board of Supervisors approved this letter of support for the application by a consensus vote  ISP partner FireFly Fiber Broadband.  on August 23, 2022. Sincerely,  Yhauir Dillusefhod Mariè-Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  BOOK 41ner472