Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 1  April 12, 2022  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2022, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER AT THE WILLIAM MONROE HIGH SCHOOL AND BYZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATION  Present were:  Marie Durrer, Chair Dale Herring, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Abbey Heflin, Member Davis Lamb, Member  Staff present:  Mark B. Taylor, County Administrator Kelley Kemp, Assistant County Attorney Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Jim Frydl, Director of Planning and Zoning Tracy Morris, Director ofl Finance Stephanie Golon, Deputy Planning Director  Shawn Leake, Erosion & Sediment Control & Stormwater Management  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for closed meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel concerning FOIA. WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711 (A)(7) and (A)(8) ofthe Code of Virginia, such  Meeting the following matter(s):  oft the public body concerning RSA.  discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 2  NOW, THEREFORE, BE: IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting. Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board entered into closed meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Dale Herring and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA Board approved the agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 3  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC inappropriate for school-aged children. RE: CONSENT AGENDA  Steven Kortepeter was present to share his displeasure with some oft the book options that were available to students in the libraries of the public schools. He said that the content was  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved the consent agenda items as presented.  a. b. C. d. e. f. g.  Minutes of previous meeting - March 1, 2022 Minutes of previous meeting March 10, 2022  Resolution to accept and appropriate $76,651.00 in additional State funds for authorized reimbursable expenditures of the Department of Social Services (See Resolution to accept and appropriate $981.00 for the Local Law Enforcement Resolution to accept and appropriate $28,956.00 in additional funds for the Resolution to accept and appropriate $93,453.13 for the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Governor's Emergency Education Relief Adoption ofProclamation: recognizing May, 2022 as Older Americans Month (See  Attachment "A")  Block Grant (See Attachment "B")  Department of Parks & Recreation (See Attachment "C")  (GEER) Funding (See Attachment "D")  Attachment "E")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM HALEY, CHISHOLM & MORRIS, INC./CRIMSON ROCK CAPITAL, LLC FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR TOURIST LODGING, REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 3-1-2.1AND ARTICLE 16-25-2 OF THE GREENE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, FOR 144 TOURIST LODGING UNITS AND ACCESSORY USES TO INCLUDE A RESTAURANT, A POOL, A SPA AND A MEETING FACILITYLOCATED ONI DYKE ROAD AND MUTTON HOLLOW ROAD    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 4  Mr. Frydl shared the details of the request by Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc./Crimson Rock Capital LLC: for a special use permit for tourist lodging to include 144 units, a restaurant, a pool, a spa and a meeting facility located on Dyke Road and Mutton Hollow Road. He shared images of the aerial view oft the property and the zoning map showing that the property sits in the A-1,Agricultural Zoning District. Mr. Frydl went over: a list oft the by-right uses ofthis parcel that are allowed with the current zoning. He shared a site plan oft the proposed facility, which would be called Sojourner and would be considered a "glamping site." He said that that the Comprehensive Plan goals for tourism support this project. Mr. Frydl reviewed the Zoning Ordinance and how it should be used to make decisions regarding individual projects. He shared conditions that were added to address impacts and spoke about the impact analysis for traffic, water and sewer, tree cover and screening, noise, environmental impacts, and emergency services. Andy Murphy spoke on behalf of his team at Crimson Rock Capital who were present to address the Board and share their proposed Sojourner Glamping facility plan. He said that the mission of he and his partner is to create places to connect with friends, family and nature; places that exemplify their values of community, connection, conservation and collaboration and their love for the outdoors. Mr. Murphy explained that they were supposed to present to the Board in February, but deferred until April to allow time to address concerns regarding water availability and drain field issues, to develop a 3D depiction oft the property SO that people could truly see and understand the proposal and to have the time to get to know the residents of the County. He said that they chose Greene County because of the amazing mountain views and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, whichl he feels this project supports fully. This project is also consistent with the goals oft the 2025 Tourism Strategic Plan. He said that Greene County is within two hours of three different major metropolitan areas, Washington DC, Richmond and Charlottesville, which makes it the perfect location for a project like this. He shared that The Getaway is the fastest growing glamping company ini the United States with 191 locations and its best performing location isin Stanardsville. They have been operating quietly for four years with no EMS or otherit impacts. Statistics show that there are not enough vacation accommodations in our area for the demand that exists and he feels that Greene County deserves its share oft the pie. He wants to position Greene tol be the destination of choice for tourists in this area. He shared that Greene County can currently only handle 1/3 ofthe capacity for overnight guests due to our wedding venue operations meaning that we are sending business to our surrounding localities. Mr. Murphy said that this property is perfect because ofi its magnificent mountain views, its proximity to Shenandoah and the beauty of Greene County. This property has already been mostly developed for a subdivision. All of the road work is in, all oft the gravel to finish the road work is in and all ofthe stormwater management has been done. VDOT has also already approved the entrance. He said that 60% of the property iss surrounded by unoccupied forest and there are five adjacent neighbors. They have agreed in their conditions to leave 24 acres of this property wild and undeveloped. Before Haley, Chisolm & Morris bought this property, there was a dump on it. It was not the pristine condition that some describe: it as. The condition that the property: isi ini today is due toi the work done by Haley, Chisolm & Morris to haul off all of the trash and restore the property. He shared the original plan for the subdivision that will be constructed on the propertyifthis SUP request is not granted. Mr. Michael Boggs of Haley, Chisolm & Morris addressed the Board and explained that they plan on    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 5  developing the subdivision of291 lots that is currently approved for this property should this request not be approved. Mr. Lamb asked ifs stormwater retention ponds were already inj place. Mr. Boggs said they are. Mr. Murphy showed the difference between how they will develop and tree-up the property versus how the 29-lot subdivision will clear most of the trees which would not preserve  the rural character.  Mr. Murphy said that this is a seasonal business. He said that occupancy is down to 25% in the winter and up to 85% in the summer. Mr. Murphy shared the jobs that would be created with this project including 141 created during construction and 65 local full-time equivalent jobs with Sojourner plus another 17 indirect impact induced jobs. He said that these jobs will start at $15/hour, with the average pay being $25/hour and some oft the positions paying $50,000/year or more, such as the manager position that will be a six-figure salary. Mr. Murphy said that taxes, including sales tax, meals tax, TOT tax, etc., will bring $723,463 to the County in the first year of business, equating to $3.8 million over the following 5 years. The approximate tax revenue from houses should the property become a subdivision would be $157,275 per year. Ify you add in the impact of school children, that number would be decreased to a net of $73,836 in tax revenue assuming that the homes that were built were very large, luxury homes. Some oft the tax dollars would go to Tourism. The net tax after 3% going towards TOT would still be around $550,000/ year which would cover the proposed items requested in the Capital Improvement Plan for FY23, FY24 and FY25. Mr. Murphy also noted that the monthly spend on local agriculture products such as eggs, bacon, sausage, beefand chicken for theiri in-house guests alone would be the cost of851 dozen eggs, 237 pounds of! bacon, 210 pounds ofs sausage, 2,080 pounds of beefand 1,769 pounds ofchicken. A lot oflocal farmers would benefit from the restaurant, alone. There would be about $1.82 million in local food and beverage spend each year. That is over $18 million in a 10-year period. Their store would distribute and sell local products and they would promote local activities and services. They would allow public use oft the restaurant and spa. They would allow access to  resort amenities for adjacent neighbors and support local service businesses.  Mr. Murphy addressed traffic and water impacts. He said that they have worked very closely with the County tol be sure that there were 33 conditions placed ini the SUP to address every potential impact. Regarding traffic, Dyke Road is at less than 25% capacity and Sojourner would only add 2%. Their traffic impact would be no greater than a 29-home subdivision. He said that 70% of the traffic would come onto Dyke Road from Route 33. Regarding water and sewer, the drain field plan has been certified by the Greene County Health Department. At peak demand, there is 40% more septic capacity on the property than they will need. There is also more water on the property than they will require. They will only use a fraction of the available water on a daily basis, according to State-certified engineers. Mr. Mark Viola, Engineer, Viola Engineering, was present to summarize his finding on water availability. He said that, according to the USGS State Geologic Water Resources Report, the Piedmont Province of Virginia has an abundant ground water supply. He said that, based on the water demand required to support the Sojourner Glamping Resort and compared to the available storage of114 acres, he can verify that the ground water capacity is sufficient to manage the resort without altering local ground water consumption. He explained, in depth, how he came to this conclusion. Mr. Bowman asked ift the USGS report    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 6  he referenced was indeed from 1985. Mr. Viola said it was. Mr. Bowman asked Mr. Viola to comment on a study sited from 1989 that stated that the average possible amount of ground water that is stored is 730 gallons per acre. Mr. Bowman said that this is about 1/3 of Mr. Viola's estimate. Mr. Viola said that he cannot discount those claims any more than the author of that report could discount his claims, as he does not know how that was achieved. Mr. Bowman said that in his report, in the table regarding the calculations ofwater demand, it was indicated that you used a 40 gallon per day per person rate based on the VHD accepted rate, but that same letter that Mr. Bowman previously referred to quoted that, in 2015, it was reported that the average American uses 82 gallons per day. He said that is 27,000 more gallons than his estimate and asked Mr. Viola toc comment on that. Mr. Viola said thatitisasourcerelative number, but even at 100 gallons/day, there would still be enough water. Mr. Murphy added that the usages in the report are also consistent with the reports submitted by Mr. Michael Craun of Old Dominion Engineering and  accepted by the Department of Health and have been approved by the State.  Mr. Murphy shared the plan. He said that, in order to preserve and celebrate the rural character of the area, anything that is not a tent should look and feel like a barn, compliment the natural landscape and use muted earth tone colors to blend in. The tents will be the best safari tents in the world. They will be double walled canvas with insulation with similar R Values to a typical house on raised wooded decks SO to disturb the land as little as possible and to allow water to flow as it naturally would. There will be as many places to relax on the property as possible using as many trees as possible. He shared pictures ofhow the restaurant and spa would look and how the camp store would look and how he hoped it would be stocked by local businesses. There will be al kids club with professional child care workers to allow parents a day out to explore. Bob Pineo ofl Design Develop, LLC, modeled a 3D animation of! how the proposed project would look using existing conditions and topography and overlaying the project design showing the reality of the context of the design. Mr. Murphy said that the idea is to tree the property, sO that when you drive by it, you will not see the open fields as you do now, but forest with the structures hidden and blending in. They also modeled what the subdivision would look like to highlight the differences between the two projects. It was modeled using the existing site plan as submitted. It shows how much more forest would be there with the Sojourner project versus the  subdivision and even as the land lies now.  Mr. Murphy showed a comparison of the three options for this property. The Sojourner project checked more boxes than the 29-home subdivision and the option to do nothing. He shared that Mr. Jay Willer, the previous Chair oft the Planning Commission when this project came before them, has said in a letter to the Board that he would like to change his vote from no to yes as he feels that Sojourner has addressed the concerns that caused him to vote against the project. Mr. Murphy said that he feels that this project will bring substantial benefits to the County, residents, businesses and tourism industry. He believes that the Sojourner plan and the 33 conditions of approval mitigate all concerns raised by the neighbors and the community. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will not change the character and established pattern of development in the area. This project is inl harmony with the by-right uses in A-1 and will not adversely affect    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 7  the use ofneighboring properties nor willit! hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land or impair its value. Mr. Murphy said that they believe this will actually increase land values around this area. Mr. Bowman said that he knows that a number of neighboring residents have reported dry wells in the summer. He is concerned about the water. He also said that he is concerned about how land disturbance could affect the future flow and quality of the Blue Run Stream that feeds Greene Mountain Lake. Mr. Murphy said that all well data was pulled, and the report was based on that existing well data, and it showed that there are not many wells ini that area because there is no one living on the majority of that property. He said that the stream in question is located on the part of the property that will not be developed. Itis surrounded by riparian buffers and there will be no impact on that stream. Mr. Lamb asked Mr. Pineo if he had an overlay of the septic systems. Mr. Pineo shared the images with the Board showing the septic layout for the subdivision and said that the Sojourner septic system will be centralized and can be placed in an area that is not forested. Mr. Craun explained that they looked at all oft the different areas oft the property to identify the best area for the centralized system. He said that the main difference between the residential plan and the commercial plan is that the commercial facility will be treating the wastewater to thel highest standards in Virginia. Mr. Lamb askedi ifthey will be pumping sewage. Mr. Craun said that everything will be pumped, treated and the cleaned wastewater will be distributed throughout the property to be reintroduced to the  groundwater.  Ms. Durrer opened thej public hearing andi reminded people oft the rules ofPublic Comment. There was a total of 66 in-person public speakers and 5 who spoke via Zoom. There were many who spoke out in opposition to this request and also many who were in favor ofit. All public  speakers were passionate about their stance. The public hearing was closed.  Ms. Valerie Long, part oft the applicant team addressed some oft the public comments and Ms. Mary Beth Bowen of Hive Creative Group, shared that they were hired to conduct community outreach and correct misinformation. She shared the launch of a website, Facebook and Instagram to accomplish these goals. She shared statistical data regarding the 4000 reactions on social media and that 98% oft them were positive. Itis a case oft the silent majority.  offered rebuttals and reiterated some important points.  Mr. Lamb questioned the engineer about the water and septic report. Mr. Bowman said that he did receive a number of supportive emails from individuals who had initially signed the petition against this project. He said that he read each and every email, letter and text message that was sent. He and Mr. Herring met with about 35 citizens who opposed the project at the Lydia Barn and he said they did a great job in articulating their positions. He said that he is very conflicted about this decision. He loves the concept and thanked the applicants but he still has significant issues with traffic impacts, the water usage, the number ofs sites on the property and the character change in the neighborhood. He said that he is reluctant to say that he will vote against this project. Mr. Herring said that hel has also received several emails and phone calls and has tried to respond to all of them. He said that some comments referenced the protection of the Scenic    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 8  Byway. He said that the Scenic Byway was created for tourism and there was a petition against it. It was passed by the Board with a 3-2 vote. He said that he did vote in favor ofit. He said that another comment was that our landfill could not handle the trash. Mr. Herring explained that we do not have a landfill. We have a transfer station. Any trash that comes into it actually decreases the amount that citizens have to pay to drop offt their trash, sO it would actually be a benefit for us. Mr. Herring said that the sewer was approved by the Virginia Department ofHealth. He said that al lot of comments have been made concerning Airbnb's s in R-1. This is not an Airbnb in R-1. He said that he voted to have Airbnb's in R-1 with a Special Use Permit, but he also then voted to remove Airbnb's from R-1 due to the impact it was having on residents. One of the issues cited with Airbnb'si in R-1 was that, ifthere was aj problem, the property owner was not on site and could only be reached by phone. With Sojourner, there will be 2 full-time staff members on site at all times. He said that he has no argument against the impact of trespassing but he believes that this isn not something that usually happens. Regarding smoke, the stoves that will be used are similar to the Solo Stove, which is a smokeless stove. Regarding traffic impacts, Mr. Herring said that there will only be 1.2 cars per minute at max. The crossover on Route 33 has excellent sight distance. The road to get to this property is only 1.2 miles. He said that there will be a positive fiscal impact no matter what happens buti it will bei more SO with the proposed project versus homes. He said that this will have a positive impact on the Town of Stanardsville. Mr. Herring said that ifwe want to keep farm land, we have to provide a place for farmers to sell their products. Ifwe don't, farmers will sell their land and divide it up to reap the benefits of the housing boom. Mr. Herring said that he does feel that this supports our Comprehensive Plan. As far as EMS and Sheriff's Office staffing, Mr. Herring said that we added a full-time staff to the EMS department for the upcoming budget year and 3 deputies with the promise of3 additional the following year. We are also looking at expanded fire services. He said that Nelson County was able to increase their TOT tax to 10% which allowed them to decrease their real estate and personal property tax rates. They were able to do this because they embrace tourism. He said that he feels that the mitigations applied address all of the concerns and that he will support this project. Ms. Heflin said that she appreciates Mr. Murphy'sefforts, but that no where in the A-1 zoning does it mention restaurants or spas. They go into commercial zoning. She said wel have toj protect the A-1 zoning. Ifwe allow this to go through, future SUP applicants can claim a discrimination based on prior approvals. SUP's go with the property. Ms. Heflin said that she cannot see that this is an appropriate approval of an SUP in this area. She said that she is not against the plan, it just needs to go somewhere else. Mr. Lamb said that he is concerned about the traffic. Ms. Durrer said that she commends the work ofMr. Murphy and his team. She said that she is not against the project, but she does not think that it's the right area. She is concerned about weddings parties and the restaurant. She does not: feel that this fits int the Comprehensive Plan. She understands the citizens who live there that oppose this project. She feels that, with houses, you would have neighbors, not visitors. She said that she cannot support it at this point. She said that she may approve it in a  different location.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and affirmative vote, the Board denied the Special Use Permit request #21-001 as submitted by the applicant due to significant    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 9  issues with the potential traffic impacts, the water usage, the number of sites on the property and  the character change of the neighborhood. (See Attachment "F")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes No Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE GREENE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 35- ELECTIONS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A POLLING PLACE FOR THE TOWN OF STANARDSVILLE PRECINCT LOCATED AT THE PVCC GIUSEPPE CENTER AT 222 MAIN STREET, STANARDSVILLE AND TO ESTABLISH A CENTRAL ABSENTEE PRECINCT FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING. COUNTING AND RECORDING ABSENTEE BALLOTS LOCATED AT THE VOTER REGISTRAR'S OFFICE Mr. Frydl explained the amendment to the County Code Chapter 35 to establish a polling place for the Town of Stanardsville precinct which will be located at the PVCC Giuseppe Center at 22 Main Street in Stanardsville and to establish a Central Absentee Precinct for the purpose of receiving, counting and recording absentee ballots which will be located at the Voter Registrar's Office at 32 Stanard Street in Stanardsville. This will finish the clean-up of all of the voting  ADSTANARDSTRET. STANARDSVILLE  changes due to the new census numbers and bring the Code into compliance. The public hearing was opened and closed with no comments.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Dale Herring and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the amendments to the Greene County Code Chapter 35 - Elections to establish the polling place for the Town of Stanardsville precinct which will be located at the PVCC Giuseppe Center at 22 Main Street in Stanardsville and to establish a Central Absentee Precinct for the purpose of receiving, counting and recording absentee ballots which will be located at the  Voter Registrar's Office at 32 Stanard Street in Stanardsville as presented.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Sheet 10  RE: CORRECTION FOR THE RECORDOF MOTIONT TO DENY SUP  Mr. Bowman said that he has been made aware that he may have misspoken the Special Use Permit request number in the motion he made in denial of the Sojourner Glamping project. He said the correct number is SUP # 21-007. He asked that this clarification be made for the  record.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS  Mr. Herring said Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission met last Thursday and approved a PPEA (Public Private Education Act) resolution for the VATI Grant. He said that Greene County has submitted a grant request for the planning ofa pedestrian bicycle pathway from Stanardsville to Ruckersville. Mr. Frydl presented that on behalfo of Greene County. Mr. Herring shared that the Emergency Services Advisory Board will meet next' Tuesday at 6:00. The meeting  will be livestreamed.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE  Mr. Taylor thanked staff for all of their work to move the meeting location for tonight.  Ms. Durrer echoed this.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BOARD  Mr. Bowman said that he received a call from Shannon Dean who lives on the corner of Swift Run and Mays Road complaining about trash that falls off of trucks going to the transfer  station. He asked the County Administrator to check on it.  RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  ymave eS Marie Durrer, Chair Greene  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk MB Greene County Board of Supervisors  County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Attachment A  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SEVENTY-SIX THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE DOLLARS. IN ADDITIONAL STATE FUNDS FOR AUTHORIZED REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF  SOCIALSERVICES  WHEREAS, the State has approved additional funds for authorized reimbursable WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of seventy-six thousand six hundred fifty-one dollars ($76,651.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022  expenditures of the Department of Social Services; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that seventy-six thousand six hundred fifty-one dollars ($76,651.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 12th day of April, 2022.  Motion: Dale Herring Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  Ypi dhan Marie C. Durrer, Chair' Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk ADy Greene County Board of Supervisors    -Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Attachment B  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE  DOLLARS FOR LOCAL: LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT  WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Department of the County of Greene has received funding WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of nine! hundred eighty-one dollars ($981.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022 budget of the County of  for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant; and  Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that nine hundred eighty-one dollars ($981.00) be appropriated to  the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator oft the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 12th day of April, 2022.  Motion: Dale Herring Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  VAais Coteur Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Attachment C  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE: TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX DOLLARS IN ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE  DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION  WHEREAS, the Department of Parks and Recreation has requested additional funds for expenditures and revenue collected/projected for the remainder of FY 2022 will fund this  request; and  WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of twenty-eight thousand nine hundred fifty-six dollars ($28,956.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that twenty-eight thousand nine hundred fifty-six dollars ($28,956.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 12th day of April, 2022.  Motion: Dale Herring Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dalel R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Y7oie ea Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Cler  Greene County Board of Supervisors      Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Attachment D  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE NINETY-THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND THIRTEEN CENTS FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR FEDERAL CARES CORONAVIRUS  RELIEF FUNDS  WHEREAS, Congress passed and the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, WHEREAS, the funds will be used for qualifying expenditures incurred during the WHEREAS, the following funds in the amount of ninety-three thousand four hundred fifty-three dollars and thirteen cents ($93,453.13) need to be accepted and appropriated to the  and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020; and period that begins on March 1, 2020; and  2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that of ninety-three thousand four hundred fifty-three dollars and thirteen cents ($93,453.13) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene,  Virginia.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator oft the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget and to do  all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 12th day of April, 2022.  Motion: Dale Herring Second: Davis Iamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  VAox Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Mark B. Taylor, Clérk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors April 12, 2022 Attachment E  Older Americans Month 2022  AP PROCLAMATION  WHEREAS, Greene County includes a growing number of older Americans, currently over 16 percent of the population, who contribute their strength, wisdom, and experience  to our community; and  WHEREAS, our community benefits when pcople ofa all ages, abilities, and backgrounds  are welcomed, included, and supported; and  WHEREAS, Greene County recognizes our need to create a community that provides the services and supports older Americans need to thrive and live independently; and WHEREAS, Greene County can work to build an even better community for our older  residents by:  Providing supports and services that allow for greater independence. Developing infrastructure that is responsive to individual needs and preferences. Designing programs, services, and policies with people ofa all ages in mind. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, on this 12th day of April, 2022, that the Greene County Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim May 2022 to be Older Americans Month. We urge every resident to recognize the contributions of our older citizens, help to create an inclusive society, and join efforts to support older Americans'  choices about how they age in their communitics.  ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF GREENE COUNTY ON  THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022. Motion: Dale Herring Second: Davis Lamb    Votes: Bowman: Yes Durrer: Herring: Yes Lamb: Heflin:  Yes Yes Yes  Yue Marie Durrer,Chair  ATTEST:  Mark B.  Clerk Taylor,  c  HABLA    Board of Supervisors, April 12, 2022, Attachment F  0-2022-013  AN ORDINANCE (0-2022-013) GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUP#21-007)TO HALEY CHISHOLM &N MORRIS, INC./CRIMSOM ROCK CAPITAL, LLC. FOR TOURIST LODGING, REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 3-1- 2.1 AND. ARTICLE 16-25-2 OF THE GREENE COUNTY, ZONING ORDINANCE, FOR 144TOURIST LODGING UNITS AND ACCESSORY USESTO INCLUDE A RESTAURANT, AF POOL, ASPA, AND A MEETING FACILITY. THE PARCELS ARE IDENTIFIED AS TMP# 26-(A)-27 & 28, LOCATED ON DYKE ROAD AND MUTTON HOLLOW ROAD, IN A-1 (AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT) AND THE PARCELS EQUAL APPROXIMATELY 99.58 ACRES. THE GREENE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS WHEREAS, $15.2-1427 and 515.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be amended from time to time, enable a local governing body to adopt, amend and codify ordinances or portions thereof; WHEREAS, $15.2-2280, $15.2-2285 and $15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, WHEREAS, on December 15, 2021 the Greene County Planning Commission held a public hearing WHEREAS, on December 15, 2021 the Greene County Planning Commission voted 3-2to recommend to the Board of Supervisors denial of the request to grant the Special Use Permit (SUP); WHEREAS, the Greene County Board of Supervisors caused to be published a notice of public hearing on this matter ini the Greene County Record on March 31, 2022, and April 7,2022; and WHEREAS, the full application was available for publici inspection in the Greene County Administration Building, Room 226, 40 Celt Road, Stanardsville, Virginia 22973; and  PARCEL AS "RURAL AREA " (SUP#21-007)  and  enables al local governing body to adopt and amend zoning ordinances; and on this matter and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard; and  and  WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022, the Greene County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Greene County Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Article 16-2 of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance, public necessity, convenience, general welfare,  matter and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard.  and good zoning practice, that the SUP request is hereby denied.    0-2022-013  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APRIL1 12, 2022.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Votes: Durrer Lamb: Bowman: Heflin: Herring:  Yes Yes Yes Yes No  7lpow ATTEST: Greene County Board of Supervisors  1ab Mafk B. Taylor, Clerk  Marie Durrer, Chair  Greene County Board of Supervisors