Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet1 1  February 13, 2024 County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OFSUPERVISORS MET ONTUESDAYPBUARYI 2024, BEGINNING AT 4:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION  BUILDING MEETING ROOM  Present were:  Marie Durrer, Chair Davis Lamb, Vice Chair Steve Catalano, Member Tim Goolsby, Member Francis McGuigan, Member Cathy Schafrik, County Administrator Jim Frydl, Director of Planning & Zoning Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Kelley Kemp, County Attorney  Staff present:  Stephanie Golon, Deputy Director of Planning & Zoning Melissa Meador, Director of Emergency Services  RE: BUDGET WORKSHOP - AUDIT PRESENTATION  Mr. Matt McLearen of Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates presented the FY23 Audit to the Board. He said that he is going to review two different documents, the first being a letter called the Communication to Those Charged with Governance and the second document is the full  balanced financial report.  Beginning with the letter to those charged with governance, the first critical point in this document are responsibilities under the audit. As most individuals are aware the auditors are required to test documents to opine on the financial statements and report to the appropriate authorities. The audit team and the county have an important role in the audit process not only at the fiscal year end when the audit is occurring, but also throughout the fiscal year. The audit team is required to maintain a system of controls, maintain an accounting system and to maintain policies and procedures. The next items described in this letter are accounting estimates. As with most financial statements, accounting estimates are used in compiling the financial statements. This letter documents the key estimates used in compiling the county's financial statements and those were largely related to depreciable lives of long-term assets such as buildings, estimates related to OPEB liabilities and assets and the uncollectible nature and property taxes. The next item described in this letter is any difficulties encountered performing the audit and! Mr. McLearen said that he is pleased to report that they had no difficulties encountered in performing the audit for fiscal year 2023. The next point in this letter is disagreements that apply to accounting principles. Ifwel had a disagreement applying accounting principles with management throughout    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 2  the course oft the audit, they are: required to disclose those, and Mr. McLearen said hei is pleased to report they had no such difficulty. Lastly, he said they are required to disclose any significant audit findings and he was pleased to report that there were none for the Fiscal Year 2023 Audit.  As far as the Balanced Financial Report, Mr. McLearen began with the Independent Auditors Report. This is the official opinion on the financial statements and the material accuracy. He said that they had issued an unmodified or clean opinion on financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. The general fund is the main operating fund for the county. The fund balance is the term for equity for the County. The County had a fund balance in the general fund of approximately $24.3 million on June 30, 2023. The statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes ini fund balance, which is very similar to an income statement for a for profit entity, shows  an increase in fund balance of approximately $1.2 million.  Mr. McLearen said that, this year, there were quite a few changes to the financial reporting model for the county largely related to the water and sewer fund. The water and sewer fund is on ac different accounting basis and this year is definitely unique in reporting that for the very first time for the County. He highlighted three financial statements for the water and sewer activities only. They are segregated from the general fund and the other general funds of the county. There isal lot of information to digest this year as it is the first year that there were assets and debt accumulated in those funds and the actual operation of those funds will report starting withl Fiscal Year 24, due to the timing of the water and sewer agreement that was struck with the regional authority. The water and sewer fund reports both long term assets such as the land and structures that were received as part of the agreement as well as the associated debt that the county has incurred to purchase those assets. The next report is very similar to an income statement. He said that this report is not as meaningful this year but will be next year as the water and sewer system will report the actual user charges and full operating expenses for the year for the water and sewer  system.  The Independent Auditors Report on Internal Controls is where an auditor would describe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the County's financial reporting structure. Hes said that this reporti is free ofany significant deficiencies or material weaknesses ini the County's reporting structure or internal control system. The third report that an auditor would issue would apply if an organization receives greater than $750,000 in federal funding and this includes not just the County funds, but also the School Board and Social Services. When that happens, an auditor is required to issue what's called a single audit, and that's a program specific audit the is regulated by the federal government and federal agencies and they are required to test specific requirements and report back to the federal agencies. This report described their compliance testing and he said that they issued a clean or modified opinion of that federal compliance.  Mr. Lamb asked if the current year variance of $2.5 million related contribution to the component unit School Boardi is excess. Mr. McLearen clarified that the $15.4 million is the actual amount necessary toi fund the local portion oft the school, sot the $18 million ist thel budgeted amount and the variance referenced is the difference between those two. Kristie Spencer provided further  clarification for Mr. Lamb.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet3  RE: BUDGET WORKSHOP - CIP PRESENTATION  Mr. Frydl shared the Capital Improvement Program for FY24-25 with the Board. The CIP lists the projects and equipment needs for county agencies and departments. The Board of Supervisors determines the priority of the requests and creates a budget to achieve the goals ofthe community. Mr. Frydl shared the current projects and equipment needs that were collected from the departments and agencies and explained how he sorted them on the spreadsheet. They discussed the priority ofr replacing the scales at the Solid Waste Facility and the roof on the County Administration building. The scales are well past their useful life at 31 years old and require constant repair and the roofis leaking in several places. He discussed the parking lot oft the County Administration building and the fact that it needs to be resurfaced before the current pavement crumbles beyond repair. Mr. Frydl shared the new equipment requests for public safety and explained their priority. He shared the need for fleet management and the eplacemenvaddituon of vehicles as compared to the number of positions approved in the budget. He discussed the fact that our EMS department will need to order an ambulance as it takes several years to receive one after it's been ordered. The Board discussed the requests and talked about the lifecycle of equipment and vehicles. They discussed the roof at length and requested additional information before they decide which type of roof will replace the current one. Mr. Frydl said that last year  was the first time that the Board set aside funding for capital projects.  Ms. Durrer said that she would like to prioritize the scales at Solid Waste, the roof and the parking lot at the Administration building, the vehicle needs of the Sheriff's Office and EMS. Mr. McGuigan asked if the volunteer fire agencies have EMS capable vehicles. Ms. Meador said that they off basic life support and cannot transport patients. He asked if we recapture the revenue from insurance recovery. Ms. Meador said that we do. She said we average $40,000- 60,000 per month. She said those funds go into the general fund and are not earmarked for  anything in particular.  There was discussion about how vehicle financing is listed in the audit and how we should request that the auditor use standard language in the future in order to clarify the amount of money  being spent on vehicle financing.  There was discussion about the volunteer fire department needs such as a generator for Dyke. They also discussed the funds that we allocate to the fire departments for the truck  replacement program.  The Board agreed toj prioritize the scales at the Solid Waste Facility. They agreed that the roof on the County Administration building is a priority but will likely be paid for with currently budgeted funds, sO will notl have tol be added to the CIP. They will use grant funding fora a generator for Dyke Fire Department. They will look at vehicle needs for the schools and public safety as part of the fleet replacement program and prioritize an ambulance and 3 apparatus.  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 4  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body Discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for aj public purpose, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by the public body and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable legal litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, regarding specific legal matters, namely, an employment matter. WHEREAS, pursuant to: 223711AV0.AVO,am4 (A)(7)oft the Code of Virginia, such NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano and unanimous roll call vote, the  Meeting the following matter(s):  concerning the Community Criminal Justice Board.  strategy of the public body concerning utilities.  discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet5  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: APPOINTMENT OF LEWIS. JOHNSONTOTHE COMMUNITY CRIMINALJUSTICE Upon motion by Tim Goolsby, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board appointed Lewis Johnson tot the Community Criminal Justice Board fora a 2-year term which  BOARD  will expire on February 28, 2026. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA agenda was adopted.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 6  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC  Mr. Elijah Lamb was present to speak about the noise ordinance. He said that he does not feel that the 20 minutes time frame for barking dogs should not be deleted from the ordinance. Ms. Tracy Roche was present to reiterate what Mr. Elijah Lamb said regarding the deletion Mr. Fred Turck was present to ask the Board to consider allowing people to speak under public comment even if they are late. He feels that since people are allowed to speak via Zoom without signing up, he asked that the Board do a last call with the audience to allow them an  of the 20-minute time limit for barking dogs.  additional opportunity to speak.  Mr. Lawrence Czajkowski was present to share his frustration with the water and sewer department and the billing issues as well as the fact that no one will speak with him to answer his  questions and concerns.  Ms. Linda Copeland was present to share a proposed bill in the Senate regarding open burning and shared the issues she and her neighbors have with the smoke from a gentleman that  constantly burns.  Mr. Riaan Anthony shared the request of Mr. Fred Turck regarding public comment. He also shared the concerns regarding the Water and Sewer department brought forward by Mr. Lawrence Czajkowski. He said that he cannot figure out his bill and that no one at the Water and RE: PUBLIC HEARINGTO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT: BY DENIS TORRES FOR A HOME BUSINESS (CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING)I LOCATED AT 287 WELSH RUN ROAD AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 5-1-2.16 OF THE GREENE Ms. Stephanie Golon explained the request from Mr. Denis Torres for a home business located at 287 Welsh Run Road. He owns a construction and roofing company. Ms. Golon said that one of the conditions is that the applicant will have to abandon the property line between the two parcels he owns, as the accessory structure for the business is on the vacant property and must be on the same property as the home. She shared pictures of his home showing the adequate parking space for his business vehicles. She said that the Health Department stated that the system isa adequate for the number of employees present in the morning and afternoon timeframe. VDOT indicated that the entrance is suitable for what is being proposed. The Planning Commission did  Sewer department can explain it in a way sO that he can understand it.  COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE  recommend approval with several conditions.  The chair opened and closed the public hearing with no comments.  Mr. McGuigan questioned the number of vehicles and trailers that would be allowed ifthis is approved. He also did not agree with the condition allowing a small shed as there was no clear    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet7  definition of what size small is. He said that he is also unsure that a vegetative screen will be able to effectively screen. He also said that the Board is supposed to approve requests that do not change the character and pattern of a development and he feels that this does. He also wants to be sure that neighbors do not feel that this will impair the value of their land. He said that he has  reservations with the current recommendation.  Mr. Goolsby said that he was present when the Planning Commission heard this request. He said that the shed is 8x 10 and he usually uses it to put shingles in. He shared that the fence was put up by the applicant to shield his ladders from view. He feels that the applicant is doing what he needs to do. He said that only 2-3 vehicles will be at the residence during working hours.  He also said that the neighbors had no complaints.  Mr. Lamb said that he is concerned as this is zoned R1.  Mr. Catalano said that he reviewed the Planning Commission'sc conditions, and he feels the screening will be adequate but is concerned with the number of vehicles. He would like to add a condition to reduce the number of vehicles to 3 business related vehicles. He also said that he agrees with Mr. McGuigan' s concern about the size of the shed and said that the condition should state that the structure is allowed as it currently exists with no modifications. Mr. Catalano said that he is encouraged that there are no community members opposed to this request.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the Board granted the Special Use Permit as presented with additional conditions. (See Attachment  "A")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC EARINCIOCONSDER ANORDINANCETO. ASSESS A COURT FEEOF Ms. Kemp explained that this public hearing is the result of a request from the Sheriff's Office for an ordinance amendment to add a $5 fee on traffic and criminal cases in the general district and circuit courts that would be earmarked specifically for electronic ticketing. The chair opened and closed the public hearing with no comment.  $5.00) IN CRIMINAL OR TRAFFIC CASES  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and roll call vote, the Board  approved the ordinance as presented. (See Attachment "B")    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 8  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: TJPDC MULTIJURISDICTIONAL SAFETY PLAN, SAFE STREETS FOR ALL, Mr. Curtis Scarpignato was present to share the Safe Streets for All plan with the Board and request their commitment to the program. He said that The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law established the Safe Streets and Roads for All discretionary grant program, providing $5-$6b billion in grants over the next 5 years. The goal of this funding is to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. To be eligible to receive project implementation funding, applicants must first have developed an approved Comprehensive Safety Action Plan. Since none of the localities within the Thomas Jefferson Planning District have such a plan in place, the Planning District Commission applied for and was awarded funding through the SS4A program to develop a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan on behalf of participating localities in the region. The benefits ofa Comprehensive Safety Action Plan include: Comprehensive understanding of crash locations and contributing factors, including identification of systemic or recurring factors; it considers safety for all users (roadway, bike/ped, transit); it outlines multi-faceted strategies to reduce/eliminate roadway fatalities and serious injuries; and it creates a pipeline of identified projects to leverage implementation funding beyond SMART SCALE such as: SS4A Discretionary Grant Program for implementation, Transportation Alternatives Program, Revenue Sharing and Highway Safety Improvement Program. He said that the required components of a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan include leadership commitment, an oversight group to develop, implement and monitor, comprehensive safety data analysis, robust public and stakeholder engagement, inclusive and representative process in the plan development, evaluation of processes and policies, comprehensive cemtifcatonpmontration of projects and strategies and ongoing monitoring and reporting. He shared Greene County specific crash data over the last five years. Mr. Scarpignato said that TJPDC is requesting approval from the Board of Supervisors for the Resolution of  PRESENTATION AND REQUEST FOR COMMITTMENT  Commitment to. Roadway Safety Goals.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Tim Goolsby, and unanimous roll call vote,  the Board approved the resolution as presented. (See Attachment "C")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 9  RE: CONSENT AGENDA Board approved the consent agenda.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the  a. b.  Minutes of previous meeting  Resolution to allow the County Administrator to approve the Fiscal Year 2025 Department of Criminal Justice Services School Resource Officer Incentive Grant for three positions by the February 29, 2024, due date - (See Attachment "D")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN ORDINANCE REVISION TO CHAPTER 14, SUBDIVISION 3 - ANIMAL NOISES OF THE GREENE Ms. Kemp said that the Board had previously tasked her with working up options to update the current animal noise ordinance. She said that she had discussed options with the Sheriff and has provided a few different options for the Board's consideration. She noted that the Sheriff has concerns about the amount of staff time this could potentially take up. Ms. Kemp said that this  COUNTY CODE  will be a touchy topic. She shared some of the changes that could be made.  Mr. McGuigan said that if we don't use the length of time a dog barks or a decibel reader, how do we establish competent evidence that the law is broken. Ms. Kemp said she agrees that it  will be difficult to discern.  Mr. Catalano asked what the criteria are for all other noises. Ms. Kemp said that we do have a noise ordinance that is based on decibels, but it is a civil crime and fine. Mr. Mcguigan said that he feels a unified concept of noise and length of noise would be good. Mr. Catalano said  that he would like all noises looked at and not just animal noises. pertains to our Code and make some recommendations.  It was the consensus of the Board to ask Ms. Kemp to look into all aspects of noise as it  RE: CLARIFICATION OF 2024 BYLAWS AS ADOPTED AT THE JANUARY 23, 2024, The Board discussed the changes that they had made to their bylaws for 2024 as staff Mr. McGuigan shared the changes he asked for at thel last meeting and the Board discussed the items that needed tol be clarified. Onei item discussed was the way in whichindividuals wishing  MEETING  needed clarification on some of the points.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 10  to use. AV during a presentation should submit the media. Ms. Schafrik shared that many localities ask individuals to upload their presentations to YouTube which will take care of the concerns regarding viruses and malware. Doing SO would also take some of the pressure off of staff. Mr. McGuigan did not care for this idea because it meant that each individual would have to create their own YouTube account. Mr. McGuigan volunteered toj personally check each presentation in  the place of staff because he felt SO strongly about his position on this matter.  Mr. Catalano stated that it is important to note that no one on the Board wishes to restrict public access to their government. The entire Board wants the public tol have input. He said that this is strictly an operational issue that must be addressed before changes are made. He said that he still has an issue with the direct questioning ofs staff. He said this is a meeting of the Board that the Board holds on behalf of the people. The people are supposed to question the Board and then the Board could direct questions ofs staff members. He feels to do otherwise would be a disservice to citizens as it could create chaos, fear and anxiety. He said that it is the Chair's discretion to allow dialogue and questions. There was further discussion regarding this matter. Ms. Kemp said that the Board allows time for citizen comment as well as time for comment during public hearings. She said that the Board must follow Robert's Rules, which states it is the Board's meeting. The comments of the public are directed at the Board and not staff. Meetings are not a time for back- and-forth dialogue. She said the other thing to remember is that the Board acts as al body. Three  of you have to agree.  Upon motion by Francis McGuigan, second by Davis Lamb and affirmative roll call vote, the Board amended their bylaws to allow speakers to use their time to ask appropriate questions of board members, county employees present such as the County Administrator or planning department and petitioners regarding a matter before the board. All efforts will be made by those individuals to answeri in real time. If the question cannot be answered in real time, the answer will bej provided at the next board meeting fort the supervisors meeting during the county administrator's  minutes.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  No Yes Yes No No  Motion failed.  Upon motion by Francis McGuigan, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board amended their bylaws to allow speakers to us audio visual aids during their presentations. The materials must be sent to the County Administrator in a format as established  by the County Administrator no less than 7 days prior to the presentation.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 11  Upon motion by Francis McGuigan, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board amended their bylaws to say that any person desiring to speak at aj public hearing may sign up via email to the County Administrator prior to the meeting or in person on the day of the  meeting. The request must include their contact information.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS to attending again next month.  Mr. Goolsby reported that he attended his first TJPDC meeting last Thursday. They discussed a $43 million pedestrian bike bridge over the Rivanna River. He said he looks forward  Mr. McGuigan said that he attended the EDA meeting and noted that there is an open position on the EDA due to the resignation of Mr. Reikart. He encouraged anyone who is considering opening a business in Stanardsville to apply for their grant program.  Ms. Durrer attended the Zoning Board meeting on the 24th where they elected officers for the year and approved signs for the Harley Davidson shop and a new sign for the Dollar Tree. She also attended the Central Virginia Regional Jail meeting last Thursday where they discussed the  budget that will be voted on in March.  Mr. Catalano said that he had multiple informal meetings with EMS providers and said that  the newly formed ESAB will begin meetings this month. RE: COUNTY ADMINISIRATORS UPDATE  Ms. Schafrik revisited the roof situation that was discussed during the CIP presentation. She said that she needs Board direction on whether we replace the roof with metal or shingles. She shared the cost of each and warranty information. It was the consensus of the Board to move  forward with a shingle roof.  Ms. Schafrik updated the Board on the request from the volunteer fire departments for SCBA masks. She said that Ms. Meador suggested the use of training funds that were set aside  for the volunteer agencies that were unused.  Ms. Schafrik updated the Board on her solution for answers to questions asked during Matter from the Public. She also read the answers to the questions asked at the last meeting.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BOARD  Mr. McGuigan said he would like to the Board to establish a Rural Advisory Committee, composed of five individuals living in the agricultural and conservation districts and operating an    Board of Supervisors February 13, 2024 Sheet 12  agriculture or agriculture-related business to advise the County on ways to stabilize the rural economy. The members would be chosen by a majority vote of the Board after submission of an application and their interview as required. He also requested the Board create a Budget Citizen Advisory Committee of five individuals to review yearly and periodically the budget and requests of all departments and agencies within the County and that committee members would be empowered to request information from all entities without FOIA requirements.  Itv was the consensus oft the Board to add these items to the upcoming agenda for discussion. Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Francis McGuigan and unanimous roll call vote,  RE: ADJOURN  the Board meeting was adjourned.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  yi Suer Marie Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  G    February 13, 2024 Attachment, A  0-2023-015  AN ORDINANCE (0-2023-015) GRANTING A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS TO DENIS TORRES FOR A HOME BUSINESS, (CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING) AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 5-1- 2.6OFTHE GREENE COUNTYZONING ORDINANCE. THE PARCEL ISI IDENTIFIED AST TMP# 65A-(2)-138 & 64A- (2)-14 (0.99 ACRES), AND IS LOCATED. AT 241 WESTWOOD DRIVE, RUCKERSVILLE. THE PARCEL IS IN THE R-1, RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, AND THE GREENE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATESIT WHEREAS, $15.2-1427 and $15.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be amended from time to time, enable al local governing body to adopt, amend, and codify ordinances or portions thereof; and WHEREAS, $15.2-2280, $15.2-2285, and $15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, enables WHEREAS, on December 20th, 2023, the Greene County Planning Commission held a public hearing on WHEREAS, on December 20th, 2023, the Greene County Planning Commission deferred action until the WHEREAS, on. January 17th, 2024, the Greene County Planning Commission voted 5-Oto recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of the request to grant the Special Use Permit (SUP); and WHEREAS, the Greene County Board of Supervisors caused to be published a notice of public hearing on this matter in the Greene County Record on February 1, 2024, and February 8, 2024;and WHEREAS, the complete application was available for public inspection in the Greene County Administration Building, Room 226, 40 Celt Road, Stanardsville, Virginia 22973; and  AS A "RURAL AREA." (SUP23-006)  al local governing body to adopt and amend zoning ordinances; and this matter, and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard; and January 17th 2024, Planning Commission Meeting; and  WHEREAS, on February 13, 2024, the Greene County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Greene County Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Article 16-2 of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, that the SUP request is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Failure to comply withi the conditions oft this SUP may result ini the issuance ofal Notice of Violation (NOV) by the zoning administrator. The Zoning Administrator may present this SUP to the Board 2. All activities associated with this SUP shall bei in compliance with alll local, state, and federal laws. 3. The home business, for construction, roofing and landscaping shall be located in the existing 4. The home business shall only be a construction, roofing and landscaping contractor without 5. The regular hours of operation will be Monday through Friday, 7 AM1 to 7F PM. 6. An evergreen screening yard shall be installed along the front (northern), eastern and western sides of current parcel 14. Screening yards shall contain sufficient vegetation to provide an  matter, and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard.  of Supervisors for revocation if the NOV is not resolved as directed.  detached accessory structure. customer traffic to the location.    0-2023-015  adequate screen between uses. Evergreen vegetation shall be planted and spaced in staggered rows, at a 15-foot center. Existing vegetation, such as hedgerows and trees may be used to satisfy the requirements of this ordinance. Plantings must be at least! 5' tall at installation. 7. The boundary line between parcels 13 & 14 shall be abandoned, creating one parcel, prior to final  zoning approval.  8. No more than 3 vehicles associated with the business are allowed 9. Al business limited to existing utility building that is currently on site.  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON FEBRUARY13, 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Davis Lamb  Votes: Goolsby: Durrer Lamb:  Yes Yes Yes  McGuigan: Yes Catalano  Ves  yiess Marie Durrer, Chair Greene-County Board of Supervisors  ATTES7:  Greene County Boardo of Supervisors APp    February 13, 2024 Attachment B  AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE GREENE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCESTO  AMEND SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 34, COURTS.  WHEREAS, Sections 15.2-1427 and 15.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be  amended from time to time, enable a local governing body to adopt, amend, and codify  ordinances or portions thereof; and  WHEREAS, Section 17.1-279.1 of the Code of Virginia, as may be amended from time to time, enables al local government to assess a fee to each criminal or traffic case to fund the  implementation and maintenance of an electronic summons system; and WHEREAS, said fee may not exceed five dollars; and  WHEREAS, the Greene County Sheriff's Office has determined that an electronic ticketing system will reduce the time it takes for deputies to issue traffic tickets; and WHEREAS, the reduction in the time it takes deputies to write tickets will make traffic WHEREAS, the Greene County Sheriff's Office supports this fee and wants purchase WHEREAS, the properadvertisement and public hearing was conducted as required by WHEREAS, the full text of this amendment was available for public inspection in the County Administrator's Office, Greene County Administration Building, 40 Celt Road, NOWTHEREFORE, BE: IT ORDAINED BYTHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OFTHE COUNTY OF GREENE that the Code of the County of Greene is amended as follows:  stops safer for deputies; and  electronic ticketing equipment as soon as possible; and  law; and  Stanardsville, Virginia 22973; and  CODE OFTHE COUNTY OF GREENE, VIRGINIA  CHAPTER 34 COURTS  Fee supporting electronic summons system. A fee of $5 shall be taxed as additional costs in each criminal or traffic case in the respective district or circuit courts oft the County in which the defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. The fee shall be collected by the clerk of the court in which the case is heard, remitted to the Treasurer, and held by the Treasurer subject to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors to the Sheriff's Office for funding software, hardware, and associated equipment costs fori implementing and maintaining an In all other respects the Code of the County of Greene shall remain unchanged and be in full  electronic summons system. force and effect.  This amendment shall take effect immediately upon passage.    ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON February 13,  2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Davis Lamb  Votes: Catalano: Yes Durrer: Yes Goolsby: Yes Lamb: Yes McGuigan: Yes  ys w Marie Rurrer, Chair  ATTEST  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  RAMEE    February Attachment  2024 136  RESOLUTION OF COMMITMENTTO ROADWAY SAFETY GOALS  WHEREAS, 125 people were killed or seriously injured in crashes that took place in Greene County from 20181 to 2022 and have lasting impacts on victims, loved ones, and communities at large; and WHEREAS, achieving the goal indicated in Greene County's Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2023 of providing safe travel for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists will require collaboration among Greene residents WHEREAS, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law established the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary program and funds regional, local, and" Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent roadway WHEREAS, Move Safely Blue Ridge- the safety action plan for the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission (TJPDC) -will identify and prioritize roadway safety improvements in the region; and WHEREAS, the federal grant received by the TJPDC requires that this safety action plan contain an official public commitment to an ambitious percentage reduction of roadway fatalities and serious injuries by a specific date with an eventual goal of eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries; and WHEREAS, Greene County is committed to the Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)'s vision of zero deaths and serious injuries and its goal to reduce roadway fatalities and serious injuries by halfby NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Greene County that the County supports Move Safely Blue Ridge, will actively participate in the planning process, and will prioritize implementation of the recommended safety countermeasures, all with the eventual goal of zero roadway  and other jurisdictions, as well as regional, state, and federal organizations; and  fatalities and serious injuries; and  2045;  fatalities and serious injuries. and serious injuries; and  RESOLVED, that Greene County commits to undertake efforts to one day eliminate roadway fatalities RESOLVED, that Greene County commits to undertake efforts to reduce the combined number of I,Kimberly Morris, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and correct copy ofa Resolution duly adopted by thel Board of Supervisors of Greene County by a vote of_5 to_ 0 as  roadway fatalities and serious injuries in the County by 50 percent by 2045.  recorded below, at a meeting held on Feb. 13,2024  Seardoi  ag  Aye Nay X Dn X X  Mr. Catalano Ms. Durrer Mr. Goolsby Mr. Lamb Mr. McGuigan    February 13, 2024 Attachment D  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE FY 2025 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER  GRANT APPLICATION  WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS)i is accepting applications for the Fiscal Year 2025 cycle of the School Resource Officer  competitive grant program; and February 29, 2024; and  WHEREAS, DCJS will accept applications from only the locality until WHEREAS, the Greene County Public Schools Division and the Greene County Sheriff's Office agreed on the need for the additional three School Resource  Officers in September 2022, with only two hired thus far; and  WHEREAS, the DCJS awards grants for the salary and fringe benefits for School. Resource Officers minus the cost ofa locality' s match requirements; and WHEREAS, the Greene County Sheriff's Office and Greene County Public Schools Division propose to fill the vacant position and continue the two hired  positions for Fiscal Year 2025; and  WHEREAS, if awarded, and the positions hired, the grant will require a 34.11% match in funding through cash match based on the existing local costs for personnel, equipment, training, or other local costs to support the position in Fiscal  Year 2025; and  NOW,THEREFORE, BEITANDITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by thel Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that the Interim County Administrator is authorized to execute the grant application to continue the School Resource Officer grant program, originally awarded in October 2022, and if awarded, the County Administrator is permitted to execute the grant agreement and any reimbursement forms or other necessary documents to complete the project.  Adopted this 13th day of February, 2024.    Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb Francis McGuigan  Yes_ Yes Yes_ Yes Yes  ATTEST/  yi Suv Mariè-Durrer, Chair  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  P