Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 1  February 14, 2023 County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUSDAY,FEBRUARYIA 2023, BEGINNING AT 4:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MEETING ROOM AND] BY'ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATION  Present were:  Dale Herring, Chair Marie Durrer, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Abbey Heflin, Member Davis Lamb, Member  Staff present:  Brenda Garton, Interim County Administrator Kelley Kemp, Assistant County Attorney Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Jim Frydl, Director of Planning and Zoning Terry Beigie, Grant Writer Melissa Meador, Director of Emergency Services  RE: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN  Mr. Frydl shared al list of projects, already vetted by the Planning Commission, that further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. He said that Greene County has not yet taken the step to create a budget and fund the Capital Improvements Plan. He said that the Board can pull from the list of projects what they believe are the priorities and begin to fund them, most of which are deferred needs of the County. Other projects are those that the citizens would like to see over the next 20 years. Some of the possibilities to fund the CIP would be a tax increase, the use of a replenishable funding source, such as the cigarette tax to create a savings fung for projects, obtaining al loan or using any funds that were not spent at the end of each fiscal year and sweeping them into a capital improvements fund. Mr. Frydl shared that Ms. Beigie is searching for grants  tol help fund these projects, as well.  The Board discussed some of the options for funding the CIP.  Ms. Garton suggested that the Board should select some oft the highest priority projects SO that when she is trying to balance the budget, she could try to include some of them for the upcoming year. She said that thel Board could choose to earmark money, such as the cigarette tax, and possibly choose to add a penney or two to the tax rate to begin this process. She said that Greene County has some really pressing capital needs, but no identified method for funding them.    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 2  Mr. Bowman said that hei is in support of allocating the cigarette tax, but he also feels that there is an incentive if people know that if they are frugal in their spending during the year, they can recommend that some of or all of the funds that are left over can be designated for a capital program that they really want to see go forward. He said that his biggest concern is that, in the  past, the Board has done nothing to plan for future funding needs.  Mr. Frydl explained that the departments have made their needs known and it is incumbent on the Board to choose the ones that are the highest priority and create a funding source. He said that some of those needs could not even begin to be looked at in the near future and it would be  difficult to try to spread the funds out evenly over departments. right away, but they are starting aj plan to try tol begin funding them.  Mr. Herring said that there is a long list of projects and that the Board may not get to them The Board discussed the potential revenue due to the reassessment and shared that because oft the tax equalization rate, there would be the possibility that the Board could lower the tax rate yet still see an increase in revenue in the next year or they may have to raise it to maintain the current revenue amounts. They discussed the need tol begin setting aside funding each year SO the  future Boards would not be faced with aj potential crisis.  Mr. Bowman said that, from his perspective, the water system and public safety training complex arel his top priorities. Ms. Durrer said that she agrees, but that the Board should also look at current facilities that have not been upkept as they should. Mr. Bowman said that he agrees with mainintaing what we have. Ms. Heflin said that the Board needs to know the life cycle of items such as ambulances SO that they can plan for future needs. Mr. Bowman said that is also true ofthings such as the radio system and other technologies that are constantly evolving. Ms. Garton commented that it may not be a good idea to allow departments to set aside funds for projects they deem as critical in their operation although they are not critical overall. Department heads could then be tempted to make bad decisions, such as leaving vacant positions open in order fulfill those needs, as that is the easiest way to save money, or they could over budget SO that they have money left over. Mr. Bowman said that he agrees, but he feels there should be some kind ofi incentive for department heads to be frugal with their spending. Ms. Garton said that the Board could look at their policy that says what level the fund balance should be kept at and use excess fund balance at the end of each year to sweep into a capital account. That way, everyone's excess would be contributing to the whole and the Board could then prioritize the needs of the  County.  Mr Herring summarized the conversation by the Board and asked that Ms. Garton consider  these ideas while balancing the budget. RE: CLOSED: MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 3  Meeting the following matter(s):  Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body concerning the county administrator position and the process of filing that position. Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by the public body and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable legal litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, regarding specific legal, namely, a breach of contract issue and the RSA Discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for a public purpose, or of the disposition of publicly held real property, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body. Discussion of plans to protect public safety as it relates to terrorist activity or specific cybersecurity threats or vulnerabilities and briefings by staff members and legal counsel concerning actions taken to respond to such matters or a related threat to public safety; discussion ofinformation subject to the exclusion in subdivision 2 or 14 of$2.2-3705.2, where discussion in an open meeting would jeopardize the safety of any person or the security of any facility, building, or structure; or discussion of reports or plans related to the security of any governmental facility, building or structure, or the safety of persons WHEREAS, pursuant to: 2.2-3711(A)0), (A)(3), (A)(7), and (A)(19) of the Code of NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  concerning reconfiguring the county' 's organizational structure.  litigation and withdrawal agreement.  using such facility, building, or structure.  Virginia, such discussions may occuri in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 4  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND) MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA Board adopted the agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROMT THE PUBLIC  Ms. Gwen Baker thanked the Board for aj job well done regarding the CIP discussion. She said that the Virginia Association of Counties offers classes for the certification of Board members. She said that Bill Martin was the last person to get that certification in 2017. She said that they    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 5  also offer classes on budgets as well as planning and land use. She feels these could be good team building projects for the Board. She also said that public notices should be put on places such as the County's Facebook page and an e-newspaper such as The Greene Journal because the classic RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM 33E GREENE, LLC FOR A REZONE FROM SR (SENIOR RESIDENTIAL) WITH PROFFERSTOI PUD/PLANNEDUNIT DEVBLOPMENT) WITH PROFFERS PERTAINING TO THE PHASING OF UNITS, UNIT TYPES, DESIGN STANDARDS, ONSITE AMENITIES, AND CASH PROFFERS. THE PARCELS ARE IDENTIFIED AS TMP# 61-(A)-20, LOCATED ON_SPOTSWOOD TRAIL, AND' TMP#'S 60-A1-42.60-A)2A. LOCATED ON CARPENTERS MILL Mr. Frydl shared the request from 33E Greene, LLC for a rezone from senior residential with proffers to aj planned unit development with proffers pertaining to the phasing of units, unit types, design standards, onsite amenities and cash proffers for parcels located on Spotswood Trail and Carpenters Mill. This property is currently zoned for 600 homes. The request is to change that from 600 senior residential homes to aj planned unit development. The number of homes will remain the same. Mr. Frydl shared maps showing the location oft the parcels in relation to the two routes adjoining the property. He shared slides showing the zoning and land use plans and shared that thesej parcels are. located within our growth area. The applicant has used the same development style and plan in previous developments and they typically end up with a balance of about 65% seniors and 35% families. The types of! houses that they build are geared towards seniors, but what is being discovered in the market now: is that 100% Senior residential is no longer an active market and that people prefer to live where there is a mix of of age groups. Mr. Frydl explained that our comprehensive plan and our zoning ordinance tries to direct growth into the growth areas because the number one goal in the comprehensive plan is tol keep the rural areas rural and try tol keep the open spaces, farming spaces and the beautiful views that we have here. Mr. Frydl shared slides regarding a traffic impact analysis provided by the applicant showing the potential for an increase of 2,081 average daily trips as a result of this rezoning. He said that the applicant is proffering $600,000 for road improvements, VDOT SmartScale applications, local matches, etc. for transportation or transit projects in the Ruckersville area to help offset the additional trips. Mr. Frydl shared an indepent impact study that showed public water and sewer infrastructure is available and the developer will be responsible for building required infrastructure to serve the community which will result in $12,000,000 inj potential impact fees for water and sewer EDU's. He said that there would be 180 projected school children coming from this project. The Fiscal Impact Analysis indicates that the cost to the County per student is $5,869. Using the possible number of students based upon the Weldon Cooper Center numbers, the annual cost for new students would be $1,056,420 ($5869 x180 students). The proposed rezoning does not add new revenue to the County. The rezoning proposes the exact same number of units, sO the revenue at buildout would not be increased. The applicant offers a cash proffer of $1,380,000 for school improvements, including improvements to existing schools or land acquisition for a new elementary school in the Ruckersville area. Mr. Frydl said that, at the December 21, 2022 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval 5-0 with proffers, of the  newspapers have died out.  proposed rezoning.    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 6  Mr. Charlie Armstrong of Southern Development was present to share his plan with the Board to build a 600 unit planned unit development which would be a more vibrant, active, and healthy neighborhood with multigenerational diversity where residents would have open space and interact with nature. He shared the changes to the proffers since his last presentation in 2021 which includes a decreased pace of development, turn lanes and right of way for sidewalks and multi-use trails at each of the two entrances and cash proffers for both transportation and school  improvements.  The public hearing was opened.  Ms. Gwen Baker asked the developer what the actual cost of these homes would be and whether they would be affordable housing. She also shared her concerns regarding the traffic on  Route 33.  Mr. Jim Higgins asked the Board to deny the rezoning request. He feels this request contradicts the county's Comprehensive Plan. He said that it made sense in 2004 to zone Wood Park as senior residential and it makes even more sense to retain that designation in 2023.  Mr. Mike Kilpatrick echoed Mr. Higgins remarks and said that this is not affordable housing. He shared his concerns regarding the traffic impacts. He said that this looks like a great development but that it's in the wrong place. He asked the Board to not completely deny this request, but to push it out a little further sO that we could see a realistic plan on the traffic impacts.  The public hearing was closed.  Mr. Bowman asked what the housing costs would be. Mr. Armstong said that these houses would start in the $300,000 and go into the $400,000 range. Attached homes would be in the  $200,000 to $300,000 range.  Mr. Lamb said that he likes the plan, but feels iti is the wrong time because of the need for water. He is also concerned about the impact on the schools and emergency services. He said that  he will not vote in favor of this request.  Ms. Durrer shared her concerns over the traffic. impacts. She said that she feels the proffers Mr. Herring asked the applicant how these homes would be marketed. Mr. Armstrong said that a lot of the homes would be built as one level living which would draw older people which  are, great but that she is not sure they offset the concerns she has with the development.  would mean there wouldn't be as many school children.  Ms. Durrer asked if the applicant will still build 600 units if this request is turned down. Mr. Bowman said that he, as a senior, would want to live in a vibrant community instead of as senior housing community. He likes the cash proffers and he will support this request.  He said that they own the property and will build something on it.    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 7  Ms. Heflin said that she is extremely concerned about the traffic: impacts. She said that she Mr. Herring said that he will support the request as he did the last time it came before the Mr. Bowman made a motion to approve the rezone request as submitted, seconded by Mr.  likes the concept, but she can not support this request.  Board. Herring.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  No Yes Yes No No  Motion failed.  Mr. Armstrong asked the Board to defer action on this request to allow him time to work Upon motion by Marie Durrer, second by Dale Herring and affirmative roll call vote, the Board agreed to defer action until a later date to allow the applicant time to gather more  on the traffic concerns of the Board.  information.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes No No  Motion carried.  RE: PRESENTATION OF FY22 AUDIT  Mr. Matt McLearen of Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates presented the FY22. Audit to the Board. Each year he presents the required communications between an auditor and a government body. The first required communication between an auditor and a government body are responsibilities under the audit. The auditor, of course is required to test documents, test controls, conduct compliance tests and opine on the financial statements. The county or the management of the financial statements is required to also participate in the audit. Participation relates to maintaining the system of controls, a system of records and representing the financial statements arej presented with accuracy. The second item communicated in this required communication letter isi implementation of new accounting standards. He said it seems like each year there are new accounting standards and fiscal year 2022 also included a new accounting standard related to lease accounting. Next item communicated is corrected and uncorrected misstatements. An auditor is required to communicate any uncorrected misstatements. Each audit there are proposed audit adjustments, proposed through audit testing, to make sure the balances that are reported are materially correct. Wej propose these adjustments, if management agrees to them, and posts them,    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 8  they are considered corrected misstatements. If management disagrees with those adjustments, those are considered uncorrected misstatements and required to be disclosed under professional standards that there are uncorrected misstatements. Mr. McLearen said he is pleased to report there were no uncorrected misstatements for fiscal year 2022. The auditor is required to disclose any disagreements we had in applying accounting principles. He is pleased to report there were no disagreements in applying any required professional standards or accounting principles for the fiscal year 2022 audit. Lastly, the auditor is required to communicate the details of any financial statement findings or significant deficiencies and he said the the auditor has no findings or significant deficiencies disclosed as part of the fiscal year 2022 audit. He briefly reviewed thel key financial statements of the audited financial report. Page one of the independent auditors report is the official opinion on the financial statement, the accuracy oft the numbers that are reported, and the auditor has issued an unmodified or clean opinion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. He reviewed the key financial statements in the audit. The fund balance was approximately $23.1 million at. June 30, 2022. The term unassigned and committed fund balance are the least restrictive sO they're available for appropriation at the Board's designation, and the total of those two for the general fund was approximately $20.4 million. This total in last years audit ending June 30, 2021 was $17.3 million, so the committed and unassigned, the least restrictive categories of the general fund fund balance, increased approximately $3.1 million for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. The next financial statement is a statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance which is very similar to a profit and loss or an income statement for a for-profit entity. It reports that total increase in fund balance which was approximately $5.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2022. The independent auditors report on internal controls is where an auditor would describe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the financial reporting process. Mr. McLearen is pleased to report there were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses found in the county's financial reporting process. This also includes the school board and other component units as well. Lastly, the auditors are required to conduct a compliance audit, and this isaf federal compliance audit required by the federal oversight for each entity that receives greater than $750,0001 federal awards during a given fiscal year. The auditori is required to randomly select financial expenditures for select federal programs and opine on those compliance tasks, and he is pleased to report an unmodified or clean opinion on the compliance testing for thel Federal awards. In closing, Mr. McLearen said that the county has submitted the reports timely to both the state and thei federal agencies and he wanted to extend his gratitude to the management of the county as well as the school board and social services and the treasurer for their assistance and input into  the financial statement audit.  Mr. Lamb asked how the County is doing with the reserves. Mr. McLearen said that a lot of financial policies suggest about 25% and for Greene County, the percentage was 47% for year  ending June 30, 2022.  Ms. Heflin asked where the $5.1 million dollar increase in revenue came from. Mr. McLearen said that a lot of localities in Virginia did experience an increase in fund balance over the last several years, some of which relates to the federal expenditures, there are federal awards that were given to the localities, quite simply, that supplanted some of the local share of some of the operating costs for each locality. That includes not just the county side, you also have to consider the school side as well. So that's where some of that increase comes in. Some ofit can be    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 9  probably considered conservative budgeting. Some of the increase can also be looked at as far as  the increase in property tax assessments.  The Board thanked Mr. McLearen for his presentation.  RE: CONSENT AGENDA  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved the consent agenda as presented.  a. b. C.  Minutes of previous meeting  Approval toj participate in opioid settlement (See Attachment "A") Approve revised Greene County Budget Process and Schedule  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $50,000 FOR THE LOCAL ASSISTANCE & TRIBAL Ms. Beigie told the Board that Greene County has received $50,000.00 from the U.S. Department of Treasury as part of the Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund for Fiscal Year 2022. The Fund was established by Section 605 of the Social Security Act, as added by Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Counties have broad discretion in how the funds are used and may use them for any governmental purpose other than lobbying activities. Guidance from the U.S. Department of Treasury notes specifically that the funds can be used to "meet non-federal cost-share or matching requirements of other federal programs," with some exceptions. Most Federal grant applications require some amount of local funding match, the amount of which varies dependent on the grant program. Ms. Beigie said that staff recommends the Board accept this funding and set it aside to meet the local match for upcoming grant applications, if awarded, for which funds are not already allocated within a department's budget,  CONSISTENCY FUND  pert the County Administrator's discretion at the time of the grant application.  Mr. Lamb asked if this money could be used by any department and Ms. Beigie said it Ms. Heflin asked how it would be decided which grants to use the money for. She feels it should be spread evenly between all departments. Ms. Garton said that it would be used as grant  could.  awards come in.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board agreed to accept and appropriate the funds as requested. (See Attachment "B")    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 10  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: APPROVALOFI RESOLUTION REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO DESIGNATE TMP 60-(A)-37 AS A HOUSING Mr. Frydl explained The Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of parcel 60-(A)-37 in 2019 to support the relocation of a 41-unit mobile home park adjacent to an existing 72-unit mobile home park. The parcel currently is permitted 113 units only. The approval supported the Greene County Comprehensive Plan's goal of promoting diverse housing types and kept an existing affordable housing development from being eliminated. During the site plan review process, it was discovered that the site does not support installing the necessary septic systems for the relocated manufactured homes. Additionally, the current septic systems for the existing mobile home park are failing and do not have adequate areas for repair or new installation. The Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development supports individuals seeking to expand or maintain affordable housing. DHCD endorses the provision for the upgrade to public sewer because it provides health, safety, and welfare improvement over septic systems. Funding isa available to support infrastructure upgrades to maintain affordable housing and a resolution is required from the Board of Supervisors to designate the area as a "housing revitalization area." Approving the resolution allows DHCD to provide support and resources to assist with the planning and infrastructure extension of the public sewer: system to serve the parcel. Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer: and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the resolution as submitted. (See attachment "C")  REVITALIZATION AREA  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS  Mr. Lamb said that he attended the Social Services meeting and learned that the extra monies citizens were receiving during the pandemic will cease in April. He also had a meeting  with Culpeper soil and water they want people to apply for stream exclusions.  Mr. Bowman said he attended the Jaunt meeting where they approved the Transit Development Plan. They discussed alternative fuel issues and emergency training as it related to the' Transit Development Plan. They also said they have excess capital that will be districuted back tol localities. He also attended the school board meeting, and they had some very passionate public    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 11 presentation.  comments about school safety issues that came before the board and there was a budget  Mr. Herring said that he attended the' TJPDC meeting where they discussed the Home ARP draft allocation plan. They discussed the VATI process update of the current project, and said that we are still waiting to hear back on the second application. A lot of residents may be receiving notifications from REC that they are somewhat behind schedule, meaning that we: may start seeing things in the fall versus the spring. We also discussed a RideShare program which Greene does  participate in.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT  Ms. Garton said that she wanted toi report that thes special election for election ofa candidate to fill the Clerk of the Circuit Court position vacated by the resignation of the last clerk is to be held on Tuesday, April 4, 2023 and it is to fill the unexpired term to end on December 31, 2023. There are three candidates on the ballot, Ashby I. Lamb-Gomez, Steve G. Keane, and Jamie Henshaw Morris. She also said that staff has its collective nose to the grindstone working in the  budget.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BOARD  Mr. Lamb said that he had received a phone call from a citizen regarding keeping chickens inan neighborhood. He asked that the Board review that ordinance at their upcoming meeting. Mr. Bowman announced that he will not seek reelection to the Board next year. Mr. Herring said that he has received phone call and an email from citizens requesting the Board to revisit tourism: in) R-1. Hes said that there was one areat that had a large number of Airbnb's and after the Comprehensive Plan is finished, the Board may choose to revisit it. He also stated that he will not seek reelection to the Board next year. Mr. Herring said that he has received a request for another presentation to the Board on affordable housing in which they will explain in more depth that the inventory increase does have a positive impact on affordable housing.  Ms. Heflin said that she has also spoken with several individuals who would like to offer Airbnb in R-1 but they all have ample acreage sO she agrees that there may be some middle ground to find, but she feels that there should be an even larger discussion about the zoning ordiances as  awhole. RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Sheet 12  Motion carried.  DR A Dale Herring, Chair  hulH Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Attachment A  RESOLUTION  Al RESOLUTION OF THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING OFTHE COUNTY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF OPIOID- RELATED CLAIMS AGAINSTTEVA, ALLERGAN, WALMART, WALGREENS, CVS, AND' THEIR RELATEDCORPORATE ENTITIES, AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND/OR THE COUNTY'S OUTSIDE COUNSEL TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARYTO EFFECTUATE THE COUNTY'S PARTICIPATIONI IN  THE SETTLEMENTS  WHEREAS, the opioid epidemic that has cost thousands of human lives across the country also impacts the Commonwealth of Virginia and its counties and cities, including the County of Greene, by adversely impacting the delivery of emergency medical, law enforcement, criminal justice, mental health and substance abuse services, and other services by Greene's various  departments and agencies; and  WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia and its counties and cities, including Greene County, have been required and will continue to be required to allocate substantial taxpayer dollars, resources, staffenergy and time to address the damage the opioid epidemic has caused and  continues to cause the citizens oft the Commonwealth and Greene County; and  WHEREAS, settlement proposals have been negotiated that will cause Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS to pay billions of dollars nationwide to resolve opioid-related  claims against them; and  WHEREAS, the County has approved and adopted the Virginia Opioid Abatement Fund and Settlement Allocation Memorandum ofUnderstanding (the "Virginia MOU"), and affirms that these pending settlements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, CVS, and Walgreens shall be considered "Settlements" that are subject to the Virginia MOU, and shall be administered and allocated in the same manner as the opioid settlements entered into previously with opioid distributors McKesson, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen, and opioid manufacturer. Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and WHEREAS, the County Attorney has reviewed the available information about the proposed settlements and has recommended that the County participate in the settlements in order  to recover its share of the funds that the settlement would provide;  NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Greene County Board of Supervisors, this 14th day of February, 2023, approves of the County's participation in the proposed settlement of opioid-related claims against Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, and their related corporate entities, and directs the County Attorney and/or the County's outside counsel to execute the documents necessary to effectuate the County's participation in the settlements, including the ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON FEBRUARY  required release of claims against settling entities.  14, 2023.    Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb  Votes: Durrer: Lamb: Bowman: Heflin: Herring: 2 Dale Herring, Chair  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3  ATTEST:  Amly Brenda Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  21175141    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Attachment B  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY'SLOCAL  ASSISTANCE AND TRIBAL CONSISTENCY FUND  WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Treasury has awarded the County of Greene funding through its Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) need tol be accepted and appropriated to the correct line item in the 2022-2023 budget  of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, BEIT ANDITIS, HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) be appropriated to the General Fund for use as matching funds for  future grant applications.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Interim County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to all things necessary to give his resolution effect.  Adopted this 14th day of February, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  20 7h Dale Herring, Chair  ATTEST:  Brenda G.  hchdbik Greene County Board of Supervisors  Garton, Clerk  Greene County Board of Supervisors    State Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia Virginia  Recipient Name Essex County Fairfax County Fauquier County Floyd County Franklin County Frederick County Giles County Gloucester County Grayson County Greene County Halifax County Hanover County Henrico County Henry County Highland County James City County King George County Lee County Loudoun County Madison County Mecklenburg County Montgomery County Nelson County Northampton County Orange County Page County Patrick County Prince George County Prince William County Pulaski County Rappahannock County Richmond County Roanoke County Rockbridge County Rockingham County Scott County Shenandoah County Smyth County Spotsylvania County Stafford County  FY22Allocation $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $107,983.24 $50,000.00 $111,410.77 $50,000.00 $53,315.39 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $88,676.20 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $75,181.09 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $190,490.20 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $158,751.96 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $105,972.12 $141,091.54 $109,006.38 $119,468.03 $242,900.74 $50,000.00 $50,000.00  FY23Allocation  $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $107,983.24 $50,000.00 $111,410.77 $50,000.00 $53,315.39 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $88,676.20 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $75,181.09 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $190,490.20 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $158,751.96 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $105,972.12 $141,091.54 $109,006.38 $119,468.03 $242,900.74 $50,000.00 $50,000.00    Board of Supervisors February 14, 2023 Attachment C  RESOLUTION TO DESIGNATE A HOUSING REVITALIZATION AREA  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-55.30:2. A oft the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia, desire to designate the area (the' "Area") described as Tax Map Parcels 60-(A)-37 and shown on Exhibit A attached hereto as a  revitalization area;  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY DETERMINED as follows:  (1) the Area shown in Exhibit A, is currently occupied by mobile home parks that provide critical affordable housing for 113 families. The current 72-unit mobile home park was built using septic fields instead of public sewer and, at the time, Greene County did not require secondary septic fields. The septic systems are deteriorating and, if not replaced with public sewer, will, force the closure of failing systems and, over time, the abandonment of the parks and loss of affordable housing. The approved 41-unit mobile home park, due to poor drainage and limited area, will face the same septic failures in the future and will benefit from the sewer infrastructure (2) private enterprise and investment are not reasonably expected, without assistance, to produce the construction of public sewer lines and pumps necessary to support the needs oft the low- and moderate-income persons and families living in the parks and public sewer will preserve affordable housing and enable more persons and families to live within the Area and thereby NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 36- 55.30:2. A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Area is hereby designated as a revitalization area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY FURTHER DETERMINED that the following non-housing systems and facilities located or to be located in the. Area are necessary or appropriate for the Public sewer service for all the residential homes in the Area, including design and installation of sewer pipes, laterals and pumps needed to serve all the units in the parks.  expansion.  create a desirable economic mix of residents in the Area.  revitalization of the Area:  1    EXHIBIT A  IT  00 9  2    ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON FEBRUARY 14, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Marie Durrer  Votes: Durrer: Lamb: Bowman: Heflin: Herring:  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  4  ATTEST:  hulw /Brenda Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Herring, B   Greene County Board of Supervisors  3