Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 1  September 12, 2023 County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY OARDOFSUPERVSORS MET ONTUESDAY,SEPTEMBER 12, 2023, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION  BUILDING MEETING ROOM  Present were:  Dale Herring, Chair Marie Durrer, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Davis Lamb, Member Abbey Heflin, Member  Staff present:  Cathy Schafrik, County Administrator Jim Frydl, Director of Planning & Zoning Stephanie Golon, Deputy Planning Director Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Terry Beigie, Grant Writer Melissa Meador, Director of Emergency Services Alan Yost, Director of Economic Development Kelley Kemp, County Attorney  RE: OPEN MEETING, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & MOMENT OFSILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA agenda was adopted as presented. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Marie Durrer, second by Steve Bowman and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 2  RE: PAYA ANDCLASSIFICATION STUDY  Ms. Schafrik said that Baker Tilly was hired to do a comprehensive pay and classification study. She said that she is happy to report that we were able to meet the goals of being able to help with recruitment and retention and deal with all of the compression issues. Ms. Schafrik  introduced Ms. Sarah Towne of Baker Tilly.  Ms. Towne presented the final recommendations and walked the Board through all of the data used to come to the finalized plan. She said that the project began in February and is completed as of September. Ms. Towne explained every step of the project beginning with the data collection, how they sorted it, the tenj peer organizations used, the market assessment results, the pay plan development and implementation scenarios. In the end, Ms. Towne explained that Baker Tilly recommends that Greene County should adopt the use of an open range pay plan for General and Public Safety positions, adopt the proposed grade assignments established with feedback from the County's department heads, and approve an implementation scenario that addresses the County's compensation philosophy, business goals, and that is fiscally attainable and sustainable. She said that Greene County should continue efforts to maintain the classification and compensation system by routinely reviewing. job descriptions and market conditions, adjusting pay structures and salaries annually to keep pace with the market and adopt merit or general increases annually to reward employees and ensure advancement through assigned pay ranges. Ms. Schafrik said that the County has achieved more transparency and fairness to employees in terms of where their pay expectations should be by approving these pay plans. She said that she feels that this is a sustainable plan that the County should continue to use to treat everyone fairly and equitably. Ms. Schafrik said that the budget that the Board set aside for implementation was $1.2 million. She said that, since we are making the implementation effective September 1, 2023, the cost will be $1 million, which leaves a savings of $200,000. She said that there are long-standing issues that she would like to address with the extra funds such as moving one oft the Animal Shelter caretakes from aj part-time to a full-time status, adding an additional five hours weekly to the Social Media Coordinator for the Animal Shelter, making a part-time Scale Clerk at the Solid Waste Facility into a full-time position and adding a new position to the Water & Sewer Department which would be a Director of Operations. This] person would help to oversee the day-to-day management of the maintenance and staff. Ms. Schafrik would also like to add an additional position to the Building and Grounds Maintenance department, since the duties of that department grew when the additional locations for Water & Sewer were added. She said that these  changes and additions would add up to $159,000.  Mr. Lamb asked if adjustments each year would be based on performance. Ms. Schafrik said that, generally, any performance management plan is going to only increase the salary of an  employee who has satisfactorily met the requirements.  Mr. Bowman asked how this proposed plan has affected the Sheriff, as he is the one who originally brought the compression issues forward. The Sheriff said that there were still a few changes that needed to be made, but overall, he was happy with the results. Mr. Bowman asked    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 3  Ms. Meador to comment on the impact on her organization. Ms. Meador said that there are still some errors in her departments that must be addressed, but after that, everything is on the right  track.  Ms. Heflin asked which oft the options Ms. Schafrik chose to implement. She said that she chose to implement the option that was 1% of credit per year of service, capped at 20 years. She said that this option as the most advantageous to employees and it kept us in budget.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the Board accepted the recommendation from Baker Tilly and accepted the implementation plan of  the County Administrator as presented.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  Mr. Herring said that the other discussion for this evening is the additional positions requested by Ms. Schafrik. Ms. Heflin asked for additional information to be provided for the  Water and Sewer Director of Operations position.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the additional positions recommended by the County Administrator except for the  Director of Operations for the Water and Sewer Department.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE  Mr. David Blount, Deputy Director of Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission was present to give the Board a brief legislative update. He said that the General Assembly, after six months, finally adopted changes to thel FY24 statel budget. That budget is now on the governor's desk, and he has a deadline of Friday to act on that, either to propose amendments or sign it. The amendments that were made were to put some emphasis on additional tax relief, as well as some additional investments in key priority areas. Tax relief wise, it looks like single and joint filers will be seeing a state tax rebate sometime this fall. There was a slight adjustment in the standard deduction for 2023 that will come into play with future filings and a few other smaller dollar tax    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 4  relief items. On the investment side, K12 was probably the biggest winner with some additional investment for a pretty sizable pot of funding for addressing learning loss, literacy, and some infrastructure issues. There is also some investment into water quality, mental health, and some site acquisition and then also some grants for localities with regard to site acquisition for economic development purposes. As the Governor moves towards December to present his recommended budget for the next two fiscal years, his Secretary of Finance told the money committees in Richmond about a month ago, that they're setting aside about $2 billion to go into that budget for his priorities in the nature of some additional tax relief, and also some investment in some high priority areas. State agencies are working on their budget requests to go up through the administrative ranks and again, right before the Christmas and New Year's holidays, we will see recommendations from the Governor as fara as his budget is concerned, and those will then be taken up by the legislature beginning in early 2024. As we head into 2024, it's going to be a much different General Assembly than we've seen in quite a while as there is going to be about a third oft the 40 member Senate and at third of the 100-member house turning over. The impacts are: really more profound in the Senate, as you have a number of longtime senior legislators who are retiring at the end of the current term and a number of them are on one of the key committees, the Senate Finance Committee, which considers all the revenues and appropriations on the Senate side, SO, hundreds and hundreds of years ofi institutional knowledge is going tol be lost. Over on the House side, more of the rank-and-file delegates are the ones that are leaving, and only three or four from the House Appropriations Committee. Greene County will have new legislators, a new delegate, and a new senator, in 2024. Mr. Blount said that he thinks it is very important tol keep a watchful eye on what's going on during the General Assembly this coming session. The top three legislative priorities are public education, which is always at or near the top of the priority list for the localities int this region. He said that he feels that there will probably be some enhanced discussion about K 121 funding given the DELARC: report that came out a couple of months ago that really highlighted some of the shortcomings that Virginia has in terms ofs state funding ofl K12 education. The second item relates to budgets and funding related to unfunded and underfunded mandates. The third priority remains broadband. Mr. Blount said that he would be back in November seeking approval  of the legislative priorities.  Mr. Lamb asked if he could share a list of grants that could help us fund our reservoir project. The Board discussed additional revenue streams for our locality such as the cigarette tax and explained that Greene doesn't have to implement the additional taxes but would like the  opportunity to if they chose.  The Board thanked Mr. Blount for his presentation.  RE: REQUEST TO FILL  DEPUTY  EMERGENCY  MANAGEMENT  COORDINATOR/PUBLIC SAFETY RADIOTECHNICIAN POSITION  Ms. Meador was present to continue the conversation that was first started at the Board's May 9, 2023, meeting about her request to fill the Deputy Emergency Management Coordinator/Public Safety Radio Technician position. The Board had asked Ms. Meador to keep track of the amount of revenue recovery money the County received from transports to see ifthat    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 5  revenue could fund this position. She explained that revenue recovery is call volume dependent and that the call volume has been increasing yearly. Ms. Meador said that she would like a November 1 hire date instead of the originally requested October 1 date. She said that she still envisions this position as a 50/50 split between emergency management and radio technician duties, but in the beginning willj probably be 100% radio technician as the new system will be very  complex.  Mr. Lamb asked about Ms. Meador's figures since he understands that postings are not up to date in the county. Ms. Meador said that she reached out directly to our vendor and got all of  the figures from the.  Ms. Heflin asked if the updated salary number was correct for this position. Ms. Meador said that she plans to discuss that with Ms. Schafrik and Ms. Roach because she believes the  number is al little off. very dynamic radio system.  Mr. Bowman said that he feels the County needs this position particularly because of the Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board gave authorization to fill the Deputy Emergency Management Coordinator/Public Safety  Radio Technician position as of] November 1, 2023.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. SEPTEMBER 7,2023  RE: REAFFFIRM ACTION TAKEN TO DECLARE A LOCAL EMERGENCY ON Ms. Meador said that the Board must reaffirm the action taken to declare al local emergency Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the resolution to reaffirm action taken to declare a local emergency on September  on September 7, 2023, regarding the drought situation.  7,2023. (See Attachment "A") Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 6  RE: CLOSEDMEETING Meeting the following matter(s):  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by the public body and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable legal litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture oft the public body, regarding specific legal matters, namely, Taylor, et.al. V. Greene and a WHEREAS, pursuant to: 92.2-3711(A)), of the Code of Virginia, such discussions may NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  possible litigation regarding a settlement agreement.  occur in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Abbey Heflin and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 7  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROM7 THE PUBLIC  Mr. Alan Laudermilch was present to say that the first water bills that went out had errors and that there were problems with the meter readings. He said that he feels this was rushed implementation. He asked that the Board give the new water department the time to do the job  right.  Ms. Lisa Smith was present to share that the trailer court on Jennings Loop was supposed to be relocated to Daniels Park, but they are no longer being relocated, they are now being displaced. She said that the developer has not broke ground on the property in Daniels Park and residents are being given a 6 month notice to relocate. She said that Greene is growing too much,  too fast.  Mr. James Henshaw said that he would like a report from the Board of Supervisors about the money for the water system. He spoke about the drought and said that we are running out of water. He also said that he believes that the way Mr. Frydl interprets the Zoning Ordinance RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REQEUST FROM STEVE PETERS, GARY & DORIS SIMS TRUST, CHARLES, BARBARA, MELINDA AND TRACY MORTON AND BLANCH WHITLOCK REVOCABLE TRUST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 139.96 ACRES FROM R-1TO1 PUD. THE PARCELS ARE IDENTIFIED ASTMPP3HA.EAH Ms. Golon was present to discuss this proposal. She discussed the Comprehensive Plan, how it was adopted, its evolution over time and what its goals are and how it is important when considering zoning decisions. She said that the Comprehensive Plan permits business and residential development in a manner that focuses on the specific growth areas where the infrastructure is located. She said that the parcels being discussed tonight are designated in the future land use map as Stanardsville town center and county mixed use and suburban residential. She explained what those place types look like. She said that the Town adopted and supported this development at their meeting last night and that particular area can now have up to 144 town homes. She showed what the development would look like without the rezone to PUD versus what  differently than the way it was intended tol be.  A3HAZASEAL. AND A PORTION OF TMP# 37A-(A)-66  itwould look like with it.  Mr. Frydl said that the choice tonight is not whether or not this site will be developed, but rather whether this site will be developed as al PUD or under the by right method. He shared slides showing the difference between the development as a PUD versus the development as by right.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 8  He said that no proffers can be negotiated with a by right development. With the PUD, the developer would build the extra outlet onto Route 33. With al by right, the County has no authority to compel them to build it or pay for it and the County would have to pay for it. He said that traffic, school children and water and sewer all have reduced impacts with the PUD. The PUD would offer housing diversity and some affordability as townhomes traditionally cost less than single family homes. Regarding the water issue, with the rezone to PUD, the developer would replace the water lines with pro rata share, but without it, the County will be responsible for it. There will be less land disturbance and more open space with a PUD and there will be no restrictions on the issuance of certificates of occupancy whereas the PUD proffers 75 units per year except for the first year where the limitation shall be 125 units. He shared the concept plan with the PUD and what it would look like with by right. With the PUD, there is a proffer ofa5- acre community park. Regarding water, public water and sewer capacity are currently available, and the developer must extend the required infrastructure to serve the community. This year, the community" S peak monthly usage is 63% oft the capaciy,comparativey, in 2005, thej peak monthly usage was 62% of the capacity. On average, over the last 19 years, the peak monthly usage has been 59% of the capacity. Additional water infrastructure has been planned since 2005 toj provide the necessary storage for our community. Phase 1 of the water project has begun. If water demand approaches the current capacity before the completion of the White Run Reservoir and infrastructure project, then additional connections will not be permitted. Mr. Frydl said that, in Greene County, there is a storage issue and a supply issue, not a usage issue. There will be $10,000,000 in potential impact fees from the purchase of water and sewer Edu's to support infrastructure. The traffic of the proposed rezone does not meet the threshold which would require af full traffic impact analysis. Townhouses generate fewer vehicle trips than detached single- family. The proposed development will generate fewer trip generations than the current by-right development. The proposed 3rd entrance will lessen the congestion at the Celt and Main Street intersections. Additional review will occur with the completion of the final site plan. The consultant will provide additional information regarding the traffic study. Stormwater and Erosion and Sediment plans are a requirement ofthe site plan review process. Erosion control practices are designed toj prevent detachment and transportation ofs soil particles. Sediment control practices are designed to trap eroding soil and soil laden runoff on-site. Practices are temporary and are installed prior to land disturbance and removed or converted after the site is stabilized. The Stormwater Management Plan provides calculations regarding quality and quantity requirements and identifies the best management practices to address the quantity and quality for the site. There are 13 best management practices identified in the approved clearinghouse and Greene County follows them. Mr. Frydl said that the staff has made the recommendation to approve this rezone request because itn meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval 4-1. The Town Council voted unanimously to support their part of this proposal.  Mr. Justin Shimp presented on behalf of the applicant. He said that the staff presented a very thorough comparison of both projects. He said that his firm was originally hired to develop ap plan for this project using the by-right option but discovered that there would be al lot less land disturbance with the flexibility of the PUD. He said that there is a very strong housing demand for this area and ift this request is not approved, they will proceed with the by-right development.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 9  He shared a presentation showing the potential development as a PUD. He said that the preliminary traffic analysis that they performed showed 41 trips per hour coming out by the Historical Society and 82 trips per hour coming out by Icehouse Road. The potential bypass entrance showed 286 trips per hour. The construction of this entrance would alleviate two thirds of the traffic that would be in the Town. The fiscal impact analysis shows a net positive impact. He said that if the loop water line is installed as per their proffers, the water pressure in Town by 10%. The looping connection would upgrade the pipe size and allow the water pressure to go: from 28.5to44.5. This is a multi-million-dolar project that they County would not have to do on their own. It would mitigate the developments impacts and improve the overall situation in the Town. There is a proffer for a five-acre park as well. There are also buffers proffered to preserve the rural feel as you drive by the development. He said that the DEQ regulations are very stringent and do not allow silt to be released into streams. They are proffering a more detailed phased erosion control plan. He finished by saying that all of the concerns they have heard are all  improved with a PUD plan.  Mr. Peters, the developer of the property, said that he wanted to thank the Board and staff for their help in trying to resolve the issues by approving the rezone to PUD. He said that he prefers a collaborative PUD approach, but that he will move forward with the by right.  The Board clarified some points with staff and the developers. The public hearing was opened. There were 24 speakers. The issues stated for those who oppose the rezone were: 1. Lack of water & sewer capacity 2. High volume of development in Greene  3. Runoff into the stream that feeds Greene Mountain Lake  4. Traffic 5. Increased tax rate  6. Construction issues (noise, traffic, trash) The issues stated for those who support the rezone were:  1. Phasing of the growth 2. In the growth area 3. Improved water transmission 4. Attract business  The Board had a lot of discussion about the water capacity for this project.  The public hearing had tol be reopened for two individuals who were missed. One was via Zoom and one was present in the room. Both were. heard and the public hearing was again closed.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 10  Ms. Durrer said that she knows that we cannot stop this development but said that she is not sure how the Town will survive with 500 more homes. She said that, if the PUD is not approved tonight, shel hoped the developer would work with the County to upgrade the water lines,  put in some walks and some buffers.  Mr. Bowman said that he has thought long and hard about this request. He said that he feels it is important to have walkability and to have playgrounds and parks in developments such as this one. He said that he will support this request and that he also feels the Board should  reconsider the application for the entrance on the Bypass to the CTB. Board approved the rezone request from R-1 tol PUD as presented.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Dale Herring and affirmative roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  No Yes Yes No No  Motion failed.  Upon motion by Abbey Heflin, second by Davis Lamb and affirmative roll call vote, the  Board denied the rezone request from R-1 to PUD as presented. (See Attachment "B")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes No No Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY'S EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A LOCAL LEASE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT AND FINANCING LEASE, OR SIMILAR AGREEMENT.IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,100,000, AND RELATED LEASE DOCUMENTS TO VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY (VRA) OR OTHER LENDER, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES.ALLASTHE COUNTY] MAYDEEM, ADVSABLETOACOURERECONSTRUCT Mr. Frydl said that the building is a commercial office space located on Route 29 that has 1.3 acres of] land at 8767 Seminole Trail. The building is 11,600 square feet and built in 2007. He said that this is our first step in acting as recommended in the Space Study in 2018. The Sheriff needs more space, Social Services needs more space and there needs to be consolidation of sister services. The Social Services would move to the new building, the Sheriff would occupy the old Social Services space. Probation would move to the new Sheriff's Office space. The  AND EQUIP PROPERTY: LOCATED AT 8767S SEMINOLE TRAIL    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 11  Commonwealth Attorney would move into the courthouse. The Commissioner of Revenue would move out of the rented space and into the space beside the Treasurer. We can have this building ready in about 61 months where ai new building would take approximately 2 years. The cost is $2.1 million whereas a new space would cost over $3 million without the land. We will receive tenant lease income from thel lower floor oft thel building that willl help offset half of the monthly payment. We would also receive an increase in the lease payment from the State for the Social Services office. The Board would need to approve the resolution this evening to enter the VRA pooled financing program. We currently have a letter ofi intent that secures the property but will need to enter into a contract with the property owner SO that we can complete the real estate closing by October 20th. We would be able to complete the realignment of the offices in July of2024.  The public hearing was opened and closed with no public comment.  Mr. Bowman asked if Judge Barredo is aware of these plans and suggested that he be contacted to seei ifwe can address some oft the issues he had with security while we are doing these renovations. Mr. Frydl said that the staffi is in contact with the. Judge and are working on his list  ofissues to resolve them.  Mr. Herring asked if all of the Constitutional Officers and Mr. Howard are o.k. with this Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the resolution and the purchase as recommended. (See Attachment "C")  plan. Mr. Howard said that he is.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: CONSENT AGENDA  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved the consent agenda as presented.  a. b. C. d. e.  Minutes of previous meeting Attachment "D")  Resolution to accept and appropriate $75,157.00 in additional State funds for DMV stop fees, juror reimbursement and fire program funds for FY 2023 (See Resolution to accept and appropriate $250.00 for donations to the Visitor Center Resolution to accept and appropriate $208.50 for merchandise sold at the Visitor Resolution to accept and appropriate $14,264.00 for registration fees for the  forl FY 2023 (See Attachment "E") Center for FY 2023 (See Attachment "F")    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 12  Virginia Clay Festival for FY 2023 (See Attachment "G") Resolution to accept and appropriate $9,188.70 for donations to the Emergency Medical Services Department for FY 2023 (See Attachment "H") Resolution to accept and appropriate $25.00 for donations to the Victim Witness Resolution to accept and appropriate $20,276.16 for donations to the Animal Resolution to accept and appropriate $22,281.64 for donations to the Sheriff's Resolution to accept and appropriate $632.39 for the sterilization of dogs for FY Resolution to accept and appropriate $407,402.61 from TOT funds and private donations for carryover programs for FY 2023 (See Attachment "M") Resolution to accept and appropriate $7,500.00 for Local Emergency Management Planning Grant for FY 2023 (See Attachment "N") m. Resolution to accept and appropriate $347,404.92 from Thomas Jefferson Regional Home Consortium (See Attachment "O")  f. g. h. i. j. k. I.  Program for FY 2023 (See Attachment "T") Shelter for FY 2023 (See Attachment "J") Office for FY 2023 (See Attachment "K") 2023 (See Attachment "L")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARD LIAISON REPORTS  Mr. Lamb attended the Stanardsville Town Council meeting last night.  Ms. Durrer said that the Jail Board meets Thursday.  Ms. Heflin thanked Mr. Lamb for attending the Town Council meeting in her place. Mr. Bowman said that the Jaunt meeting is tomorrow at 10:00. The School Board meets on Wednesday at 7:00. Thel Planning Commission meets on Wednesday at 6:30. There is al Firefly  virtual Town Hall on' Thursday, September 21stat 4:00.  Mr. Herring said that the TJPDC met last Thursday where they discussed the regional cigarette tax. They also discussed an unsolicited bid for additional grant applications for the broadband expansion that was submitted by Firefly. The ESAB meets next Tuesday night. Mr. Herring said that he received a letter from Mr. Bell asking for additional information about the parts of the County not currently in the Firefly grant area because those areas were challenged by Bright Speed and DHCD upheld their challenge. There is an MOU that we have to go through. There are certain milestones that Bright Speed must meet and if they fail to do sO, that money will gol back to Firefly to provide coverage. Mr. Herring saidi it looks as though that is what willl happen, but we have to wait for DHCD and TJPDC to say that Bright Speed did not meet their  milestones.    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Sheet 13  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS UPDATE  Ms. Schafrik said that we have hired a new Finance Director, Daniel Chipman. He has a Bachelor of Science from UVA in mechanical engineering. He also graduated with an MBA from the University of Illinois. He's worked in mostly finance roles and he has worked for the Department of Corrections, VDH, UVA, Louisa County, and most recently, he's coming from Albemarle Public Schools. We're very happy to have him. Ms. Schafrik said that we will be having ap presentation on the water and sewer projects at the next board meeting on September 26. Lastly, Ms. Schafrik said that we are starting First Friday coffees with the County Administrator. The first one is going to be at Greene Commons on October 6th. After that, she said that she wants to move them around and go to different places. The second one is planned at the Visitor Center on November 3rd, and then December Ist, we plan to try someplace in the Dyke area.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROMTHE BOARD  Mr. Bowman wants to be sure that Ms. Schafrik is on top of the billing and meter reading issues. He also asked for more information on the trailer court issue brought up during Matters form the Public. Mr. Frydl explained the situation and said that there is really nothing we can do tol help in that situation. Mr. Bowman also brought up the Jaunt situation and said that he had attended the Rural Transit Needs Assessment meeting, as did Ms. Schafrik and Mr. Howard. He feels that a Board member should monitor this issue going forward. Mr. Herring said that he reached out to TJPDC about a mobility grant for individuals with medical needs. He said that itis  several years out at this point.  Mr. Herring said that Boards have worked for a number of years towards creating a reservoir. The reservoir was supposed to start much earlier, and people were arguing in this room that we did not need a reservoir. Some of the same individuals are now asking why we haven't already built the reservoir. The project is moving forward. He also talked about how useful' Town  Halls are to share information. RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  DR len Dale Herring, Chair  cug  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  B    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment A  RESOLUTION FOR THE DECLARATION  OFA LOCAL EMERGENCY  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia does hereby find that: 1. Due to the occurrence of abnormally dry conditions, the County of Greene is facing a condition of peril to the lives, safety and property of the residents of Greene County; 2. That as a result of this peril, the proclamation of the existence of an emergency is necessary to permit the full powers of government to deal effectively with this condition  of peril as of 0800 hours on the 7th day of September, 2023.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia, that a local emergency now exists throughout the County of Greene; ITISI FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said emergency, the powers, functions and duties of the Director of Emergency Management and the Emergency Management organization and functions of the County of Greene shall be those prescribed by state law and the ordinances, resolutions and approved plans of the County of Greene in order to Ino order to carry out the effect of this resolution, a sum of money, not to exceed $10,000, is hereby appropriated from the county's unappropriated fund balance to cover the reasonable operational cost of Emergency Management pending further report to this Board and such additional appropriations as shall be deemed necessary to cover the expected scope of this This Declaration shall remain in full force and effect until the Greene County Board of Supervisors determines that all necessary emergency actions have been taken and takes appropriate action to end the declared emergency by a majority vote taken at an open meeting, in Affirmed and adopted this 12th day of September, 2023 due to the emergency conditions caused  and  mitigate the effects of said emergency.  emergency.  accordance with the provisions of Virginia Code Section 44-146.21.  by the abnormally dry conditions.  DR d Dale Herring, Chairman Greene County Board of Supervisors  A2A45    Doaru UL EL LU September 12, 2023 Attachment B  0-2023-006  AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 139.96 ACRES ON 5 PARCELS, TMP#'S 37-(A)-59, 38-(A)-27, 37-(A)-27, 37-(A)-60, AND A PORTION OF TMP# 37A-(A)-66. OWNED BY STEVE PETERS, GARY & DORIS SIMS TRUST, CHARLES, BARBARA, MELINDA, TRACY MORTON, AND BLANCHE WHITLOCK REVOCABLE TRUST FROM R-1, RESIDENTIAL) WHICH ALLOWS FIVE HUNDRED (500) SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES BY-RIGHT TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) TOWNHOMES, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS, AMPLE OPEN SPACE, AND A WELL-CONNECTED STREET NETWORK. (RZ#23- WHEREAS, $15.2-1427 and $15.2-1433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as may be amended from time to time, enable a local governing body to adopt, amend and codify ordinances or WHEREAS, $15.2-2280, $15.2-2285, and $15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, enables a local governing body to adopt and amend zoning ordinances; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission advertised and held a public hearing on the proposed rezoning on July 19, 2023, and all of those who spoke on this topic were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval of the request to WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice  001).  portions thereof; and  rezone the subject property; and support approval of this rezoning; and  WHEREAS, the Greene County Board of Supervisors caused to be published a notice of public hearing on this matter in the Greene County Record on August 31, 2023, and September 7, WHEREAS, the full text of this request was available for public inspection in the Greene County Administrator's Office, County Administration Building, 40 Celt Road, Stanardsville, Virginia WHEREAS, on September 12, 2023, the Greene County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this matter, and all those who spoke on this topic were heard. At this time, the Greene County Board of Supervisors deferred action for further clarification.  2023, and  22973; and  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the Greene County Board of Supervisors hereby denies Ordinance 0-2023-006 to rezone approximately 139.96 acres on 5 parcels, TMP#'s 37-(A)-59, 38-A)-27,37-(A)-60, and a portion of TMP# 37A-(A)-66 owned by Steve Peters, Gary & Doris Sims Trust, Charles, Barbara, Melinda, Tracy Morton, and Blanche Whitlock Revocable Trust from R-1, (Residential) which allows five hundred (500) single- family detached homes by-right to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with proffers, to establish a community of five hundred (500) townhomes, single-family detached units, ample open  space, and a well-connected street network. (RZ# 23-001).    ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON SEPTEMBER 12,  2023.  Motion: Abbey Heflin Second Davis Lamb Votes: Durrer: Lamb: Bowman: Heflin: Herring:  Yes Yes No Yes No  TD li Dale Herring, Chair  ATTEST:  lert Board  Greene County Board of Supervisors  A Greene County  of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment C  FILED SEP 13-2023 GREENE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT  Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia September 12,2023 VRAI Financing (Social Services Building)  AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  OF GREENE COUNTY, VIRGINIA (SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING)  WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 15.2 ofthe Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County ofGreene, Virginia (the "County")is empowered to lease and lease finance the design, acquisition, construction, and equipping ofe essential governmental projects and facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, the County desires to finance all or a portion oft the capital costs to acquire, construct, reconstruct, expand, and equip al building and property located at 8767 Seminole Trail, Ruckersville, Virginia 22968 for governmental use and other purposes, and pay costs ofi issuance  related to such financing (collectively, the "Project"); and  WHEREAS, the County has applied to Virginia Resources Authority ("VRA") for WHEREAS, VRA has approved the County's participation in VRA's Virginia Pooled Financing Program, Series 2023B, and will provide such financing assistance to the County with a portion of the proceeds of the Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure and State Moral Obligation Revenue Bonds (Virginia Pooled Financing Program), Series 2023B, in one or more series (the "VRA Bonds"), in order for the County to finance all or a portion oft the Project, all as  financing assistance to provide aj portion oft the costs of the Project; and  further described below; and  WHEREAS, VRA willi issue the VRA Bonds and provide aj portion ofthe proceeds thereof tothe County, for the purposes described herein, pursuant to thet terms ofal Local Lease Acquisition Agreement and Financing Lease (the "Financing Lease-"), between the County and VRA with respect to any orall or ap portion of the parcel(s) of Real Estate on which the Project is located and the associated Improvements and Personalty of the County located thereon (as such capitalized terms are more particularly defined ini the Financing Lease, and defined collectively herein as the  "Leased Property");a and  WHEREAS, the County willl lease the Leased Property to VRA pursuant to a Prime Lease WHEREAS, pursuant to thet terms oft the Financing Lease, VRA willl lease back the Leased Property to the County, and the County will make Rental Payments (as defined in the Financing Lease) corresponding in amount and timing to the debt service on the portion oft the VRA Bonds  (the "Prime Lease") between the County and VRA; and  issued for the Project; and  WHEREAS, the County intends to pay the Rental Payments as set forth in the Financing  Lease out of appropriations from the County's General Fund; and    WHEREAS, the County may lease a portion of the Leased Property to other parties (the "Companies") pursuant to certain lease agreements or similar agreements (the "Lease  Agreements") between the County and the Companies; and  WHEREAS, VRA will issue the VRA Bonds pursuant to a Master Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2003, as previously supplemented and amended, and as further supplemented between VRA and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"), and pursuant to a certain Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement, and Fixture Filing (the "Deed ofTrust"), VRA will assign to the Trustee all ofitsr right, title, and interest in and to the Prime Lease and the Financing Lease as security for the  VRA Bonds; and  WHEREAS, all such leasing arrangements between the County, the Companies, and' VRA with respect to the Leased Property will contemplate the exclusive and uninterrupted use of the Leased Property for essential governmental and other purposes by the County and Companies, respectively, sO long as no Event of Default or Event ofNon-Appropriation (both as defined in the  Financing Lease) have occurred; and  WHEREAS, all such lease financing arrangements will be set forth in, among other documents, (a) the Prime Lease, the Financing Lease, the Lease Agreements, and any other lease documents or related documents, to the extent necessary, and (b) the Deed of Trust (collectively,  the "Lease Documents"); and  WHEREAS, the County has indicated that the amount of proceeds currently being requested from VRA for a portion of the Project and related costs is $2,100,000 (the "Proceeds Requested"), including amounts necessary to pay the costs of issuance, or such other amount requested by the County in writing and approved by VRA prior to the pricing ofthe VRA Bonds;  and  WHEREAS, VRA has advised the County that VRA's objective is to pay the County an amount which, in VRA's judgment, reflects the market value of the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease (the "Purchase Price Objective"), taking into consideration such factors às the maximum authorized amount of the Financing Lease, the Proceeds Requested, the purchasel price to be received by VRA for the VRA Bonds, the issuance costs oft the VRA Bonds (consisting of the underwriters' discount and other costs incurred by VRA (collectively, the "VRA Costs")) and  other market conditions relating to the sale of the VRA Bonds; and  WHEREAS, such factors may result in the County receiving an amount other than the Proceeds Requested and consequently (a) the principal amount of the Financing Lease may be greater than the Proceeds Requested in order to receive an amount of proceeds that is substantially equal tot the Proceeds Requested, or (b)ifther maximum authorized amount oft the Financing Lease set forth in this Resolution does not exceed the Proceeds Requested by at least the amount of the VRA Costs and any original issue discount, the amount to be paid to the County, given the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, will be less than the Proceeds Requested; and  2    WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County (the "Board") now desires to authorize the Financing Lease, other Lease Documents, and various leasing transactions contemplated by the Lease Documents and to approve the Project in order to accomplish financing  all or a portion oft the Project. GREENE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:  NOW,THEREFORE, BEITI RESOLVED BYTHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF  1.  Authorization of Arrangements in Connection with the Lease Documents and  the Use of Proceeds. The transactions contemplated under the Lease Documents and this Resolution will enable the County to undertake the Project for the essential governmental purposes of the County and other uses. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to enter into the leasing arrangements contemplated under the Lease Documents in order for the County to undertake the Project, as described int this Resolution. Tos such end, the Board hereby approves and authorizes such transactions and thel Lease Documents in the forms and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution, and acknowledges the transactions contemplated by the Deed ofTrust, as required by VRA. The proceeds from the execution and delivery of the Financing Lease shall be used by the County, along with other lawfully available funds, ifany, to undertake the Project, as contemplated under this Resolution and further described in the Financing Lease.  2. Execution and Delivery ofLease Documents. It is determined to be in the best interest oft the County to enter into the leasing transactions with VRA described in this Resolution and accept the offer of VRA to lease finance the Leased Property pursuant to the terms of the Financing Lease, at a price, determined by VRA to be fair and accepted by the Chair or Vice Chair of the Board, or the County Administrator (whether collectively or individually, any one or more ofwhom may act, the "County Representative"), and execute and deliver the Lease Documents to, or upon the order of, VRA upon payment of the lease proceeds, all upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution and the final Financing Lease. The County Representative is hereby authorized and directed to accept the final principal amount of the Financing Lease as advised by VRA, and as authorized by this Resolution. The execution and delivery of the Lease Documents as described, in this Resolution shall conclusively evidence such principal amount oft the Financing Lease and interest component under the Financing Lease as established by VRA and as having been sO accepted as authorized by this Resolution, without any further action from the County  being required.  3. Authorization of Documentation in Connection with the Lease Documents. The County Representative, and such officer(s) of the County as any oft them may designate, are each hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Lease Documents on behalfofthe County, with such changes as any one or more ofthem shall approve, as may be requested by VRA or advised by the County Attorney or the County's bond counsel. The Clerk (or any Assistant Clerk) of the Board is authorized to affix the County Seal on any documentation in connection with the Project and the lease financing therefor, all as may be requested and to attest or counter-  sign the same.  4. Details of the Financing Lease. The Board hereby authorizes the execution and delivery of the Financing Lease on terms as shall be determined by VRA, subject to the VRA  3    Purchase Price Objective and market conditions described in the Recitals hereto; provided however, (a) the maximum principal component of rental payments associated with the Financing Lease shall not exceed the amount of $2,100,000; and (b) the aggregate true interest cost ofthe Rental Payments shall not exceed six and one-half percent (6.50%) per annum, exclusive of Supplemental Interest as defined in the Financing Lease; (c) the Financing Lease shall be issued to VRA at a price not less than 95% oft the principal amount oft the Financing Lease; and (d) the termination date oft the Financing Lease shall not be later than October 1,2045. The actions oft the County Representative in determining the final terms oft the Rental Payments shall be conclusive, Given the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, it may become necessary to issue the Financing Lease in an aggregate amount greater than the Proceeds Requested. Ift the limitation on the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Financing Lease set forth in this Section restricts VRA's ability to generate the Proceeds Requested, taking into account the VRA Costs, the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, the purchase price of the Financing Lease will resulti in an: amount less than thel Proceeds Requested. Subject tot the foregoing limitations, the County authorizes VRA to establish the final principal amount of the Financing Lease, the final interest rate(s) on the Financing Lease, and the final maturity date and the final principal amortization schedule (including principal installment dates and amounts) for the Financing Lease. No further action or approval of such financing terms will be necessary on the part oft the County. The principal ofand premium, ifany, and interest on the Financing Lease shall  and no further action shall be necessary on the part of the Board.  be payable on the dates and in the amounts set forth in the Financing Lease.  5. Details Regarding Form ofLease Documents. The Lease Documents will be in substantially the forms on file with the County Administrator, which are hereby approved with such final details, completions, omissions, insertions, and changes as may be approved by the County Representative, with the execution and delivery of the Lease Documents by the County Representative constituting conclusive evidence of the approval of any such completions, County Treasurer, the County Finance Director, and such other officers, employees, and agents of the County as may be requested, are each hereby authorized and directed to take all proper steps to have the Lease Documents prepared and executed in accordance with their respective terms, and as may be advised by the County Attorney or the County's bond counsel, to deliver the same upon payment therefor, and to execute and deliver (or cause the delivery of) all such additional documents and certificates as may be requested by the County Attorney or the County's bond counsel, or as otherwise required by VRA, in furtherance of the purposes set forth in this  omissions, insertions, and changes.  6.  Authorization as to Additional Documentation. The County Representative, the  Resolution.  7. Redemption, Prepayment or Refunding. The County may defease, redeem, prepay or refund the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease only in accordance with the  Financing Lease or other requirements ofVRA.  8. Essentiality Matters. The Board affirms and declares that the transactions contemplated in this Resolution constitute the financing of essential capital projects for the County's local governmental purposes and other purposes, and the County anticipates that the  4    Project will continue to be essential to the local governmental purposes of the County during and  beyond the term oft the Financing Lease.  Accordingly, the County hereby undertakes to appropriate such amounts as may be requested from time to time as described int this Resolution, to the fullest degree and in such manner as is consistent with the Virginia Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Board, while recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding commitment to make such appropriations in future fiscal years, hereby states its intent to make such appropriations in future  fiscal years, and hereby recommends that future Boards do likewise.  9. Payment of Rental Payments under the Financing Lease and Related Amounts. The County agrees to pay all amounts required by the Financing Lease, including the Rental Payments (as defined in the Financing Lease) and the "Supplemental Interest" and late charges, all as provided therein and as required by VRA in connection with the Prime Lease and the Financing Lease. Reference is hereby made to such provisions of the Financing Lease for the  details oft the requirements therefor.  10. Nature of Obligations with respect to Rental Payments. The Financing Lease will be a lease rental obligation oft the County for the pledge and payment by the County of Rental Payments to VRA for the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the corresponding VRA Nothing in this Resolution, the Lease Documents, or any other documentation in connection therewith, shall constitute a general obligation debt of the County within the meaning ofthe Virginia Constitution or Virginia statutory law. Further, itis tol be expressly understood that the obligations of the County, as set forth in the Lease Documents, shall not include any binding commitment to pay Rental Payments or any other moneys beyond the current fiscal year of the County, as provided by law. The County's obligations to pay the cost and expense of performing its obligations under the Lease Documents, including any documentation in connection therewith, and further including without limitation its obligation to pay all Rental Payments as described in the Financing Lease and any other payments thereunder, under all circumstances, are subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made therefor from time to time by the Board for such purposes. Nothing in this Resolution or the Lease Documents (a) is or shall be deemed to be a lending oft the credit ofthe County to VRA or to any other person, or (b) shall constitute a pledge oft the full faith and credit of the County or the taxing power of the County or otherwise legally bind or obligate the Board to make any such appropriation(s) for the purposes described in this  Bonds, subject to the terms ofthis Resolution and of the Financing Lease.  Resolution.  11. Registration, Transfer, and Exchange. The Board hereby appoints the County Treasurer as its registrar and transfer agent to keep books for the registration and transfer of the Financing Lease and to make such registrations and transfers on such books under such reasonable regulations and procedures as the County may prescribe. No charge shall be made for any such exchange or transfer, but the County Treasurer may require payment ofa sum: sufficient to cover any tax or any other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto.  12. Official Statement. The County authorizes and consents to the inclusion of information with respect to the County to be contained in VRA's Preliminary Official Statement  5    and VRA's Official Statement in final form, both prepared in connection with the sale ofthe VRA Bonds, a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to fund the Financing Lease as requested by the County. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to take whatever actions are necessary and/or appropriate to ensure compliance by VRA and the County, ifany, with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12, all as may be required by VRA in connection with the issuance of the VRA Bonds and its execution and delivery of the Financing Lease and any continuing disclosure requirements thereafter, all as set forth in the Financing Lease and any other  documentation in connection therewith.  13. Reimbursement Matters. Although the County currently intends to issue the Financing Lease as a taxable obligation, int the event the County Representative determines to issue the Financing Lease as a tax-exempt obligation, which is authorized, the County hereby declares its intent to use a portion of the proceeds of the Financing Lease to reimburse certain capital expenditures by the County in connection with the Project, all as required by federal tax laws and further described below. The County has paid (or shall cause to be paid), beginning no earlier than 60 days prior to adoption hereof, and will pay on and after the date hereof, certain capital expenditures (the "Expenditures") in connection with the Project. Further, it has been determined that those moneys previously advanced no more than 60 days prior to the date hereof and to be advanced on and after the date hereofto pay Expenditures related to the Project are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the County for the Expenditures form the proceeds ofthe financing Lease. Accordingly, the County hereby declares its intent to reimburse itselfwith all or any portion ofthe proceeds thereoffort the Expenditures with respect to the Project made no earlier than 60 days prior to the adoption of this Resolution. The maximum principal amount of the Financing Lease or related obligations for the Project is reasonably anticipated to  be approximately $2,100,000.  14. State Non-Arbitrage Program. The Board hereby authorizes the County Treasurert to participate int the Statel Non-Arbitrage Program ("Virginia SNAP")in connection with the proceeds of the Financing Lease, as may be required by VRA and in the discretion of the County Treasurer, if the County Representative determines to issue the Financing Lease as a tax-  exempt obligation.  15. Filing of Authorizing Resolution; Execution and Recordation of Lease Documents. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are each hereby authorized to cause acertified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. The County Representative is authorized and directed to execute the Lease Documents and deliver them to the other parties thereto, and further, to cause thel Lease Documents to be recorded int the Clerk's Office  of the Circuit Court of the County.  16. Further Actions: Authorized Representatives. The County Representative, the County Treasurer, and all officers, employees, and agents of the County as may! be designated, are each hereby authorized and directed to take all such further actions as any one or more of them may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the Lease Documents (including any transactions contemplated thereby). All such further actions consistent within the terms and provisions oft this Resolution shall be conclusively deemed as having been accepted and approved as authorized by this Resolution without any further acts or approvals. All such actions previously  6    taken in connection with this Resolution are hereby ratified and confirmed. The persons named herein as the County Representative shall also be designated as the County's Authorized  Representatives for purposes of the Financing Lease.  18. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.  Approved: September 12,2023  8 Chair  1  Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia  CERTIFICATE  The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct copy ofa resolution adopted by the Board, after the holding of a duly noticed public hearing therefor, at a regular meeting duly held and called on September 12, 2023. A record oft the roll-call vote by the Board is as follows:  AYE X X X X X  NAY  ABSTAIN  ABSENT  Dale R. Herring, Chair Marie C. Durrer, Vice Chair Davis Lamb Abbey Heflin Steve Bowman  Dated: September 12, 2023  [SEAL]  erk,Beard of Greene County, Virginia  GSAR  7    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment D  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE  SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-SEVEN DOLLARS  FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the County of Greene received additional funds from the State; and  WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of seventy-five thousand onel hundred fifty-seven dollars ($75,157.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the  County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI ISI HEREBYRESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that seventy-five thousand one hundred fifty-seven dollars ($75,157.00) be  appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes_ Yes Yes Yes Yes_  DR L 1h Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Greene County Board of Supervisors  AAK    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment E  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS  FOR THE VISITOR CENTER  WHEREAS, the Visitor Center for the County of Greene has received funding from private WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia. NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget  donations for operating expenses; and  of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  A L 1h Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST  Greene County Boardo lofSupervisors  B684x    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment F  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWO HUNDRED EIGHT DOLLARS ANDI FIFTY CENTS FOR MERCHANDISE SOLD ATTHE VISITOR CENTER  WHEREAS, the Visitor Center for the County of Greene has merchandise from various WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of two hundred eight dollars and fifty cents ($208.50) need tol be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene,  vendors that was sold; and  Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI ISI HEREBYRESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that two hundred eight dollars and fifty cents ($208.50) be appropriated to the  2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Iab Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes_ Yes Yes Yes  p2 Lh Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTES:  Cathy  Greene County Board ofs Supervisors      Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment G  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FOURTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDREDS SIXTY-FOUR DOLLARS FOR THE VIRGINIA CLAY FESTIVAL  WHEREAS, the Tourism Department of the County of Greene has received registration fees WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of fourteen thousand two hundred sixty-four dollars ($14,264.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the  for operating expenses for the Virginia Clay Festival; and  County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISH HEREBYRESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ofthe County of Greene, Virginia that fourteen thousand two hundred sixty-four dollars ($14,264.00) be  appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  R d ak Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  2 Cathy  Greene County Boardof Supervisors  he    Board of Supervisors Septerber 12, 2023 Attachment H  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND SEVENTY CENTS FOR THE: EMERGENCY  MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT  WHEREAS, the Emergency Medical Services Department for the County of Greene has WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of nine thousand one hundred eighty-eight dollars and seventy cents ($9,188.70) need tol be appropriated tot the appropriate line itemi in the 2022-2023 budget  received funding from private donations for operating expenses; and  of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County ofGreene, Virginia that ninet thousand one hundred eighty-eight dollars and seventy cents ($9,188.70)  be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes_ Yes Yes_ Yes Yes_  l A ak Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Greene County Board of Supervisors      Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment I  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE  TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR VICTIM WITNESS PROGRAM EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the Victim Witness Program for the County of Greene has received funding from WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) need to be appropriated NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBYI RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that twenty-five dollars ($25.00) be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the  private donations for expenses; and  to the appropriate line item in the 2023-2023 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes_ Yes Yes_  DR * A Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Eathy  Greene County Board of Supervisors  AAyAbe    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment J  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWENTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-SIX DOLLARS AND SIXTEEN CENTS FOR THE  STERILIZATION PROGRAM FOR DOGS  WHEREAS, the Animal Shelter for the County of Greene has received funding from WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of twenty thousand two hundred seventy-six dollars and sixteen cents ($20.276.16) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in  private donations for the sterilization program for dogs; and  the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that twenty thousand two hundred seventy-six dollars and sixteen cents ($20.276.16) be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes_  P R 1 Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Cathy Schafrik,    Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment K  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE DOLLARS AND SIXTY-FOUR CENTS FOR  SHERIFF EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Department for the County of Greene has received funding WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of twenty-two thousand two hundred eighty-one dollars and sixty-four cents ($22,281.64) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item  from donations for expenses; and  in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that twenty-two thousand two hundred eighty-one dollars and sixty-four cents ($22,281.64) be appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of  Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  l K 1 Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTESTY.  Cathy  Greene County Board of Supervisors  p    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment L  RESOLUTIONTO. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SIX HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO DOLLARS AND THIRTY-NINE CENTS FOR THE STERILIZATION  PROGRAM FOR DOGS  WHEREAS, the Animal Shelter for the County of Greene has received funding from the WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of six hundred thirty-two dollars and thirty-nine cents ($632.39) need tol be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County  Department of Motor Vehicles for a sterilization program for dogs; and  ofGreene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ofthe County of Greene, Virginia that six hundred thirty-two dollars and thirty-nine cents ($632.39) be  appropriated to the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  D& A nh Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County  ATTEST: -  Schafrik,  Board of  E  Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment M  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FOUR HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR. HUNDRED TWO DOLLARS AND SIXTY-ONE CENTS FROM THE TOTFUNDS AND PRIVATE DONATIONS FOR CARRYOVER PROGRAMS  WHEREAS, the Tourism Department of the County of Greene, Virginia has received TOT WHEREAS, the following funds in the amount of four hundred seven thousand four hundred two dollars and sixty-one cents ($407,402.61) need tol be accepted and appropriated to the 2022-2023  funds and private donations for various programs; and, Operating Budget of the County of Greene, Virginia:  Program  Amount $ 55,000.00 2 29,187.51  2,000.00 $ 204.00 $321,011.10  Maintenance Capital Reserves TOT Carryover Funds from EDA Virginia Clay Festival Donations  TOT Funds - Balance Unspent as of 6/30/22  NOW,THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that four hundred seven thousand four hundred two dollars and sixty-one cents ($407,402.61) be received from the above programs and be accepted and appropriated to the appropriate line items in the 2022-2023 Operating Budget of the County of Greene, Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget and to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowmen Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb 2R 6 ak Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST  chatrik, lei  Bf  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors Septeber 12, 2023 Attachment N  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING GRANT  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has received funding from Virginia Department of WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene,  Emergency Management for the local emergency management planning grant; and  Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, BE: IT ANDITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) be appropriated  tot the 2022-2023 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Larb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb 22 A - h Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST  chafri lerk  Greene County Boardofs Supervisors    Board of Supervisors September 12, 2023 Attachment 0  RESOLUTION TO. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE THREE HUNDRED FORTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FOUR DOLLARS AND NINETY-TWO CENTS FROM  THOMASJEPFERSON REGIONAL HOME CONSORTIUM  WHEREAS, the Department of Social Services of the County of Greene has received funding from Thomas Jefferson Regional HOME Consortium to support residents that are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or subject to fleeing domestic violence, sexual violence, stalking or human trafficking;  and  WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of three hundred forty-seven thousand four hundred four dollars and ninety-two cents ($347,404.92) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the  2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFOR, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors oft the County of Greene, Virginia that three hundred forty-seven thousand four hundred four dollars and ninety-two cents ($347,404.92) be appropriated to the 2023-2024 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things  necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 12th day of September, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb 2R  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes_  ATTEST:  L6  K1L Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Clerk  Greene County Board of Supervisors  G