Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Page 1  July 27,2021  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUESDAYJUNE 22, 2021, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING  MEETING ROOM. AND BY. ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATION.  Present were:  Bill Martin, Chair Marie Durrer, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Dale Herring, Member Davis Lamb, Member  Staff present:  Mark B. Taylor, County Administrator Tom Lacheney, County Attorney Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Jim Frydl, Director ofl Planning and Zoning Tracy Morris, Director of Finance Melissa Meador, Director of Emergency Services  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Mr. Lacheney read the proposed resolution for closed meeting.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved the following: following matter(s):  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Meeting the  Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711 (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia, such discussions may occur NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County does  the public body concerning RSA and Charlottesville Land.  in Closed Meeting.  hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.    Board of Supervisors July27,2021 Page 2  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPENMEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA Board approved the agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: FIREFLY BROADBAND PARTNERSHIP UPDATE    Board of Supervisors July27,2021 Page 3  Ms. Melissa Gay, Communications and Member Services Manager, was present on behalf of Central Virginia Electric Cooperative (CVEC) to give an update on the Firefly broadband partnership. She acknowledged that our partners from the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, David Blount and Christine. Jacobs, were present as well. She explained that Firefly Fiber Broadband is a subsidiary of CVEC. They will have 10,000 subscribers in rural, Central Virginia by Labor Day, which will have 20 gigabits per second of data at peak, with a capacity of 100 gigabits pers second. She said that the project is called the Regional Internet Service Expansion Project (RISE). She showed a map with areas of proposed coverage for Central Virginia. She also showed a map for Greene County specifically, which showed the area that they have proposed to cover. She explained that, currently, there are approximately 1,936 homes and businesses that are unserved in the area they are looking to bring service to. There are 220: miles of fiber. Ifapproved, they would begin construction in 2022 and finish by 2025, with the first home gaining broadband access 6 months after the start of construction. Preliminary budget numbers show the project amount at $13,200,000. There is a possibility of $3.9 million dollars in VATI grant funding and itis estimated that the County would havet to provide $2 million dollars. On August 24, 2021, they will return to the Board with ai final estimate and ask the Board to make a decision on whether they would like toj participate or not. The VATI grant application is due on September 14, 2021. The  VATI grant awards should be announced in December of2021.  Ms. Gay said that residents in Greene can help by taking an online survey and submitting as speed test. There are two upcoming Town Hall meetings for residents to gain more: information. They are going to be virtual meetings on' Thursday, July 29, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. and Monday, August 2at12:00 p.m. She said the Governor is planning to allot $700 million for broadband and that we can use our. ARPA funds for this project. She shared the current Firefly rates and connection fees. Mr. Martin asked if she had any data regarding the current survey responses. She said that she does, but it is organized by city, rather than county, sO she is going to get that information and get itt to the County Administrator as soon as possible. Mr. Herring confirmed the timeline of construction. Mr. Martin asked ifthis service would be run on the power poles. Ms. Gay said yes, itwould be using Rappahannock Electric infrastructure. Mr. Herring asked ift the grant application would be handled by Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. Ms. Gay said yes, they are the administrator for the grant. Mr. Martin thanked Ms. Gay for her presentation.  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC  Ms. Gwen Baker was present to speak regarding issues she is having with the Tourism Council pertaining to meeting agendas and minutes. She does not feel that they arel being published properly. She does not feel that she is ablei to participate in Tourism meetings because oft the times  they are held.  Ms. Amy Hollis was] present to speak regarding the construction on Moore Road. She does not feel the road is big enough to handle the amount of traffic that will be there once the new housing complexes are finished. She does not feel that VDOT is taking control of the situation with the new road that is being built. She said that VDOT has no plans to improve the road situation. She said that the Board should stop approving new housing developments due to lack  ofemergency services.    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Page 4  Ms.Joanne Burkholder was present to question thes status ofher request for smoke detectors in County buildings. She said that it has been a month since her initial request. Mr. Martin said  that he would have Mr. Taylor reach out to her with an update.  Ms. Angela McClennan emailed a statement to the Board which was read by Mr. Frydl. The email expressed her gratitude to the Board for bringing forward the resolution ofintent to ask the Planning Commission to consider amending the ordinance that allows tourist lodging by special use permit in R1 zoning districts. She asked that the Board consider prohibiting the use  entirely.  RE: CONSENT AGENDA Board approved the following items:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Dale Herring and unanimous roll call vote, the  a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. 1.  Minutes ofp previous meeting Francis Schlicht (See Attachment "A") Department (See Attachment "B") the Clerk's Office (See Attachment "C") Shelter for sterilization of dogs (See Attachment "D") Subdivision (See Attachment "E") Emergency Medical Services (See Attachment "F") Sheriff's Department (See Attachment "G") for the Sheriff- - FY22 (See Attachment "H")  Request from Commissioner of Revenue for refund of real estate tax for Robert Resolution to accept and appropriate $15,043.52 for donations to the Sheriff's Resolution to accept and appropriate $11,275.00 for Item Conservation Grant for Resolution to accept and appropriate $1,520.00 for donations to the Animal Resolution to accept and appropriate $2,000.00 for proffers for Wexford Resolution to accept and appropriate $1,910.29 for an insurance recovery for Resolution to accept and appropriate $4,388.89 for an insurance recovery for the Resolution to appropriate $10,376.00 for Compensation Board authorized salary Resolution to appropriate $40,462.00 for state authorized salaries of General Registrar and Local Electoral Board Members FY22 (See Attachment "T") Resolution to accept and appropriate $38,926.00 for Constitutional offices from Resolution to accept and appropriate $38,154.00 for the Registrar's Office from  the Compensation Board - FY22 (See Attachment "J") the Department of Elections - FY22 (See Attachment "K")  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors July2 27, 2021 Page 5  RE: COURTHOUSE CAMERA PROJECT UPDATE  Mr. Taylor gave the Board a brief update on the status of the courthouse camera project. He explained that we are replacing the security system and the design detail of such systems are excluded from public disclosure as an exception to the FOIA statute for the sake of maintaining the security of the facility. He said that we have selected, in cooperation with the Sheriff's lead security officer, and with the recommendation ofours security consultant, Mr.J Jones, an expandable camera system. We are proceeding with the installation at a cost ofj just under $50,000 to replace the aging system at the Courthouse. The initial installation will be a significant expansion ofwhat is currently in place, but there are also recommendations for future phases of this project. We  expect installation of the first phase to be complete in August.  RE: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES BUILDING PROJECT UPDATE  Ms. Meador was present to give the Board an update on the status oft the new Emergency Medical Services building. She explained that work completed to date includes the sitework and stone grading for new pavement, the generator has been set and final testing is underway, the waterline has been installed and tested, the interior framing and sheetrock work continues, the electrical, plumbing and HVAC rough-ins are complete and the IT rough-in is underway. In the upcoming weeks, they will complete the framing and sheetrock in the attic area, begin the interior painting, install the garage doors, pour the concrete sidewalks, aprons and the dumpster pad, continue with IT installations, electrical, plumbing and HVAC and install traffic control measures for Spotswood Trail. She said that during the month of August, they will install the kitchen cabinets, ceilings and flooring, as well as the HVAC, electrical and plumbing fixtures. They will finish interior painting, exterior sitework, landscaping and paving and make the water and sewer connections, as well as test the HVAC, electrical and plumbing systems. The Board thanked Ms. RE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REQUEST FROM LAMM PROPERTIES, LLC/MERIT GREENE, LLC C/O THE FRIED COMPANIES TO REZONE FROM B-3 WITH PROFFERSTOI PUD WITH PROPPERSIOCATED ON SEMINOLETRAIL Mr. Frydl shared staff's presentation of the request from Lamm Properties, LLC/Merit Greene, LLC clo the Fried Companies to rezone 65.17 acres on Seminole Trail from B-3 with proffers to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with proffers. The proffers at this time include residential density and design of 282 townhomes, phasing of residential and commercial development, dedication of a public park, transportation improvements that tie in with VDOT's  Meador for the update.  Route 670 Connector Road project and public water and sewer connectivity.  Mr. Frydl shared the conceptual master plan of the Villages at Terrace Greene. He also shared a slide that showed the phasing plan of the project, which is one of the proffers, and explained what each phase includes. He gave a history of the site, starting back in the year 2000 to current time, regarding rezoning and proffers. He shared the GIS map of the parcel and pointed out where the Route 670 project would be. Thel Route 670 project is ac cut-through roadi that VDOT undertook as a Smart Scale Project. This project was discovered to be underfunded by about $1 million dollars which proved to be a setback to this project. After much discussion and several revisions to the proffers to add some flexibility in financing for the road or signalization needs,  VDOT is, again, moving forward with this project.    Board of Supervisors July2 27, 2021 Page 6  Mr. Frydl said that this area is identified as a growth area in the Comprehensive Plan. The parcel is located in the Mixed-Use Village Center area ofour future land use map. He shared that the site has public water and sewer. As far as school impacts, the demographic multiplier from the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service indicates the possibility of 84 school age children. The Superintendent has indicated that the facilities study for the schools shows that Ruckersville Elementary: is currently operating at or beyond capacity and the study said that the construction of  an additional elementary school is planned.  Mr. Frydl explained the proffers. He said that between VDOT contingency funding and proffered project savings, the deficit for the connector road project is approximately $400,000. The applicant is offering to contribute up to $700,000 for the road project. This would leave approximately $300,000 for future signalization. At this point, there is no funding source for the additional signalization that may be required in the future. He explained that any savings that could be realized through the proffers that would reduce the project scope could be applied toward the signalization. The applicant is proffering tol build the turn lane at Route 29 and Heatherton and  the left turn lane at Terrance Greene Circle and Route 29.  The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezone with proffers submitted on June 8, 2021 and recommended that the Board of Supervisors gain increased stability of the  Route 670 connector road project funding with VDOT.  Chris Gordon, the development team owner's representative, was present to explain to the Board the applicant's request. He said that the design team felt that this project needed to provide goods and services tailored to the specific needs of this neighborhood in an environment that is convenient, service oriented, pedestrian scaled and connected to the urban lifestyle. He said that in order for the residential, commercial and retail to be successful together, you must think residential, honor the pedestrian, remember that parkingi is power and extend the dayi into thei night.  This is the basic plan for this project.  Mr. Gordon said that the project will be constructed in three phases. Each of the phases will build upon each other, meaning that phase two will not be started until phase one is complete, but during phase one, they will be planning and preparing for phase two with electrical rough-ins, etc. He said they are fully committed to the commercial portions of this project, not just the residential. He said that iti is their plan to deliver approximately 40,000 square feet ofretail/office space during the first two phases ofthe project, not taking into consideration the two pad sites that  will be available.  Mr. Gordon touched on the Route 670 Connector Road project and said that it does not actually have anything to do with the success or failure oft this development. He said that it would serve as a great tool to mitigate the congestion at Matthew Mill and Preddy Creek Road. He said they are willingly giving VDOT the five acres to build the road on, but the project does not need the connector road. He said that the team does believe that signalization will be needed right away at Heatherton, SO they were making sure there was enough funds left fori it from the proffern money.  He said that all project savings would go towards signalization, as needed.    Board of Supervisors July2 27, 2021 Page 7  Mr. Gordon said that there has already been $1 million dollars committed to this project. He said that they have received many inquiries about the light manufacturing site on the north side of the connector road and his team is taking many steps to show their commitment to get these businesses to locate here, which shows their commitment to Greene County. He closed by saying that successful retail and commercial depends on successful residential neighborhoods and not the other way around. This project is the ideal that eghbomoodcommercin streets should strive for. Ms. Lisa Hawkins of Hawkins Law, speaking for the applicant, clarified some of the language regarding the 80/20 percentage split for mixed use development. She asked the Board to realize that the language pertains to the entire growth area along Route 29, not just the area for this project. She also explained that the PUD zoning would bring more coordination, integration and walkability than piecemeal rezones that would take much more time to complete. She spoke about the fiscal impact study that was completed that showed that this project has a net positive fiscal impact for the County on a phase-by-phase basis, as well as the project as a whole. She also said that their team has come up with a different number of possible school children than the Weldon Cooper formula used by the County. This is because, as proffered, a large percentage of the townhomes will only be 1-2 bedrooms, with only a small percentage being 3-bedroom units. Also, 30ofthose townhomes are the live/work units and arel located ont the retail boulevard. Lastly, she said that the largest fiscal impact has to do with the connector road. The budget gap is being satisfied by the proffers in this project. Any additional project savings could be used as matching funds for the County for other projects such as signalization. She also pointed out that, not only are they integrating the stormwater management and soil issues from the connector road into their  project, but they will also maintain the ponds going forward.  The Chairman opened the public hearing. There were eight people that spoke. Those that spoke against approval of the rezone addressed the following topics:  a. Turning Greene into bedroom community for Albemarle b. Need more commercial development, not more housing More housing will overburden Emergency Services  d. Population is growing too rapidly  Those that spoke for approval oft the rezone addressed the following topics: a. Best project that has been presented in the last ten years b. Want Greene residents to spend their green in Greene Site readiness and available buildings for economic development Fits comprehensive plan and Ruckersville area plan perfectly  d. Brings in business taxes The public hearing was closed.  Mr. Lacheney said that there is no guarantee that what has been presented will bel built, based on the proffers. The whole purpose ofPUDi is to plan the details as specifically as possible, but the applicant does not commit to the design with their proffers. He recommended that the    Board of Supervisors July2 27, 2021 Page 8  proffers be amended to specifically say what the Board wants them to say. The only thing that can be enforced is the proffers and they are much too general. Mr. Herring asked Mr. Lacheney to clarify ifthel Board could request proffers or just ask the applicant to modify them. Mr. Lacheney said that the Board could request proffers. Mr. Lamb asked about a discrepancy in the dates oft the completion oft the stormwater proffers. Mr. Lacheney said that applicant is bound by state law. Mr. Martin said that the connector road project is making him feel uncomfortable. He would like some clarification about this project. Adam Moore, VDOT Charlottesville Residency, explained that the reason that the connector road project does not currently include signalization is because, during the planning phase oft the Smart Scale project, they used the traffic estimation based on existing regional growth rates. This project signifies a significant increase in growth in the immediate vicinity of the road. Therefore, without this project, signalization would not have been needed. Mr. Herring said that the Board was against the r-cut design but VDOT was adamant that it had to be that and he is disturbed that VDOT made that decision thinking that this property wouldn't be developed in a five to ten-year timeframe. Mr. Moore said that VDOT made that decision thinking that transportation growth in thei region would stay consistent. Mr.Herring asked Mr. Moore ifVDOT has agreed that the proffers for this project would satisfy their needs as far as construction ofthe connector road. Mr. Moore said that the road would have tol be constructed per  the plans and then modified by the developer after it was opened.  Mr. Bowman asked Mr. Fryd! if he was correct in saying that the Planning Commission had approved this project with the caveat that the Board of Supervisors obtain some stabilization on the plans for the connector road. Mr. Frydl said the Planning Commission had provided additional advice that the Board should not approve this project unless the applicant, County and VDOT came to the agreement that the connector road would move forward. He asked if the Ruckersville Advisory Committee had weighed in. Mr. Frydl said, no, as they are: not an advisory board. Mr. Bowman said that the comprehensive plan wants an 80/20 split between residential and commercial. He asked Mr. Frydl how the area compares with that ratio currently. Mr. Frydl said the core growth areas, contiguous with Route 29, are mainly commercial or undeveloped. There are suburban developments that are within those corridors and significant developments that are planned. He said there are 2000 potential units proposed within the growth area that would make up the residential component oft the ratio. He said the ratio now was skewed more towards commercial, but with everything being developed, it would skew more towards residential. Mr. Martin asked Mr. Frydl to explain the difference between a concept plan and a site plan for a regular B-3 development versus the same for a PUD. Mr. Frydl explained that our regulations do call for more details in the site plan for a PUD such as where the water, sewer and roads will be, as well as the ratio ofresidential tol business. The ordinance says that any substantial modification of the concept plan would require a review of the project. Mr. Frydl said that the  County does have a preliminary site plan that shows all oft these things.  Mr. Chris Gordon said that the intent of the developer is to build The Villages as the concept plan shows and with the phasing as stated. Ms. Lisa Hawkins stated that one of the differences between this project and past potential projects on this site is that the property will be owned by the developer and not leased. Mr. Bowman stated that he is very concerned with the    Board of Supervisors July27,2021 Page 9  impact on the community with the number ofresidences where emergency services are concerned. Mr. Gordon said that phasing allows time necessary to address these concerns. Mr. Herring said that Ruckersville is the growth area that was designated SO that we could maintain the rural areas int the rest of the County. He said that we need to amend the proffers SO that the concept plan is a guarantee. Mr. Martin said that he likes this project. He said that the County has done a good job of keeping everything outside of the growth area rural. He said that he does not want the uses allowed by-right with a B3 zoning on this property. He wants to see the continuity of planning and phasing. Mr. Martin said that he did want to tighten the proffers SO that the Board could feel more comfortable with the plan. Mr. Martin suggested that this be deferred. Ms. Lisa Hawkins said that she is very frustrated with the comments on the proffers. She said there have been nine versions and this is the first time that she is hearing these issues. She said she does not agree with Mr. Lacheney's comments. She said that she believes the proffers provide adequate protections for the County but they need to have some flexibility with the marketing of the property. Ms. Durrer said that the proffers give her concern as well. She would like to give the developer the opportunity to clarify some of the concerns and then come back. Mr. Herring said that he would support the project, with tightened proffers. Mr. Martin feels the same way. Mr. Lamb said the he likes the project but the past issues with this property are concerning to him. Mr. Bowman said that he likes the concept but he is not convinced that this project is what's best for this site. Mr. Adam Fried said that it would be a great honor if the Board would vote tonight to approve this project. The Board said that without the changes to the proffers, they would be likely to vote no. Mrs. Barbara Fried said that she understands some of the objections to the proffers and believes that they can work this out as expeditiously as possible. Ms. Hawkins said that the applicant will  be happy to process the changes to the proffers ifit is done expeditiously.  Upon motion by Dale Herring, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous vote, the Board deferred the decision until August 10, 2021, during which time the County Attorney will make  suggested proffer amendments to the applicant.  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDSTO Mr. Frydl explained to the Board that this resolution will allow the Planning Commission and staff to begin the process to amend the Zoning Ordinance in regards to Special Use Permits in  SPECIAL USE PERMITS INR-1 TOURISTLODGING  R-1 for tourist lodging.  Mr. Bowman asked Mr. Frydl to consider tenting and camping restrictions while amending the ordinance. He also asked that an ordinance, like the one from Orange County, regarding a Short-Term Rental Registry be considered by the Planning Commission. Mr. Bowman asked if    Board. of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Page 10  this resolution would allow the Planning Commission to decide that there are no conditions that will satisfy the request and recommend that the Board of Supervisors ban it. Mr. Frydl said, yes, the Planning Commission could recommend banning tourist lodging in the residential areas. Mr. Herring stated that the Board had the option to accept or deny the recommendations oft the Planning Commission. Mr. Fryd! said yes. Mr. Lamb asked if public input would be allowed. Mr. Frydl  said, yes, that this would require a public hearing.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous vote, the Board moved to approve the resolution ofi intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance regarding special use  permits in R-1 tourist lodging. (See Attachment "L")  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS for Greene County's withdrawal from RSA.  Mr. Martin said that the Stanardsville Town Council is considering a resolution ofs support Mr. Martin also shared that, during the EDA meeting, the business who held the final Mr. Herring said that the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission announced a $2 Mr. Herring said that the Emergency Services Advisory Board met last week and had a Mr. Bowman said that the Planning Commission held a public work session on the law enforcement and emergency services portion of the Comprehensive Plan. They also had two  remaining business loan outstanding for the EDA has agreed to pay offthe balance.  million-dollar affordable housing grant award.  good meeting. He said that these meetings are now being live-streamed.  public hearings for special use permits.  Mr. Lamb said the Social Services Board met. They announced the resignation ofone of  their employees, but said they have already hired her replacement. RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE  Mr. Taylor updated the Board on the status of Greene County Water and Sewer. He informed the Board that Greene County's proportionate share of the RSA reserve is $4,399,280. Mr. Taylor said that RSA felt that the reserves on hand consisted chiefly of availability fees. Mr. Taylor said that he is continuing to research the cash reserves. Mr. Taylor said that we still have no discussion from RSA regarding transitioning operators currently employed with RSA to Greene County Water and Sewer. He said that there will be a pre-proposal meeting tomorrow morning    Board of Supervisors July2 27, 2021 Page 11  with interested firms specializing in water and sewer operations. Mr. Taylor shared that he, Mr. Martin and Herb White met with Peter D'Alema of VRA. VRA acknowledges the resolutions from Greene, Madison and Orange Counties regarding Greene's withdrawal from RSA. They also acknowledge the memorandum of agreement between Orange and Madison that settles the issue oft the leadership of the board of members. They recognize that Greene County is leaving RSA. They are very pleased with the Town of Stanardsville's resolution of support. VRA approval is required by statute in order for Greene to withdraw from RSA. VRA's concern is purely financial and their focus is entirely on the analysis necessary to support the financial viability of Greene County Water and Sewer and the future of RSA. VRA is looking forward to Stantec's updated rate analysis for Greene County. VRA will be reaching out to RSA directly to learn about their plans for future operations serving Orange and Madison Counties. Following VRA staff's approval of the financial analysis, the VRA Board ofDirectors will take action to approve Greene County's withdrawal from RSA. Mr. Taylor also said that he is still in communication with Senator Hanger and there is the possibility for another bill ofsupport for the withdrawal ofGreene  County from RSA during the upcoming session oft the General Assembly.  Mr. Taylor said that the Virginia Clay Festival is looking for volunteers.  Mr. Bowman said that he had spoken with the Sheriff regarding the road side trash pickup program. He said that the Solid Waste Facility told them that the grant money had run out and they would need payment for the trash to be dropped off. Mr. Taylor said that Ms. Morris had reached out to the Solid Waste Facility to tell them that the grant is revolving and that the funds  are there for the trash to be disposed of.  Mr. Lamb asked if Greene County is accredited. Mr. Taylor said that we do not have a bond rating, but it is a vision of ours for the future. Mr. Taylor said that we are also looking forward to grant opportunities that will help us to improve our water and sewer infrastructure. Mr. Martin asked about our new IT staff. Mr. Taylor said that Kevin Estep started work with the County yesterday and has hit the ground running. Mr. Martin said that we will need him to prioritize the meeting room technology and get it up-to-date. Mr. Taylor said that it will  definitely be a top priority. cut at Smith Mountain Lake. RE: MONTHLY REPORTS  Mr. Lamb asked about the 911 outage. Mr. Taylor said that it was due to a fiber line being  There were no questions or comments on the monthly reports.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM BOARD MEMBERS There were no other items from the Board.  RE: ADJOURN was adjourned.  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Dale Herring and unanimous vote, the meeting    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Page 12  Recorded vote:  Bill Martin Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Dale Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  Wbe 5hata William Bryan Martin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark B! Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment A  of  atate Bren  1716  OFFICEOF THE COUNTY, ADMINISTRATOR  POST OFFICE Box 358 STANARDSVILLE, VIRGINIA 22973 434-985-5201 FAX: 434-985-3705  MEMORANDUM  TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE:  Gireene County Mark B. Taylor,County  Authorization for Trensurerto sshe-Rekind Robert Francis Schlicht ofS2,636.99 forTax Releflorsepiember: 1,2020rhrough December  A  to  31,2020and the first halfof:2021  July:2-.2021  Recommended Action:  Move to authorize the Treasurer to issue a refund to Robert Francis Schlicht for tax relief totaling $2,636.99 for real estate tax for September 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 and for the first half of 2021 per the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue and the concurrence of the County  Attorney. Background:  Commissioner of the Revenue Larry V. Snow: has presented a request to Issue a refund to Robert Francis Schlicht for disabled veteran's real estate property tax relief for September 1.2020 through December31. 2020and for the first of halfof2021 per Virginia Code 58. 1-3219.5. County Attorney Kelley Kemp has Since Virginia C'ode essentially requires Board approval once sufficient documentation and approval has been presented. this item is being presented on the C'onsent Agenda for Boardapproval.  reviewed the material and is in agreement with the request to issucar refund.  cc: Stephanie Deal. Treasurer  Larry Snow. Commissioner of the Revenue Kelley Kemp.County Attorney Tracy Morris. Directorof Finance File: Tax Refunds    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment B  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FIFTEEN THOUSAND FORTY- THREE DOLLARS AND FIFTY-TWO CENTS FOR SHERIFF EXPENSES  WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Department for the County of Greene has received funding WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of fifteen thousand forty-three dollars and fifty- two cents ($15,043.52) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2020-2021  from donations for expenses; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that fifteen thousand forty-three dollars and fifty-two cents ($15,043.52) be appropriated to the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  Mab  LAE William Bryar/Martin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment C  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ELEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR ITEM CONSERVATION GRANT  WHEREAS, the Clerk's Office of the County of Greene has received funding for the WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of eleven thousand two hundred seventy-five dollars ($11,275.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2020-2021  Item Conservation Grant; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that eleven thousand two hundred seventy-five dollars ($11,275.00) be appropriated to the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget  tod do all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Bak  ATTEST:  that  William Bryan Martin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark(B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment D  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS FOR THE STERILIZATION  PROGRAM FOR DOGS  WHEREAS, the Animal Shelter for the County of Greene has received funding from WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of one thousand five hundred twenty dollars ($1,520.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2020-2021 budget of  private donations for the sterilization program for dogs; and  the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that one thousand five hundred twenty dollars ($1,520.00) be  appropriated to the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator oft the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of. July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  KL hhak William BryaryMartin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark_B. Taylor, Clerk MBy6 Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment E  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWO THOUSAND  DOLLARS FOR PROFFERS  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has received proffers for Wexford subdivision; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene,  Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) be appropriated to the 2020-  2021 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  MLMf William B. Martin, Chair Greene County/Board of Supervisors  MarkB. Taylor, Clerk ADs6 Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment F  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY-NINE CENTS FOR. AN  INSURANCE RECOVERY  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has received funding for an insurance recovery; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of one thousand nine hundred ten dollars and twenty-nine cents ($1,910.29) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2020-  2021 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that one thousand nine hundred ten dollars and twenty-nine cents ($1,910.29) be appropriated to the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene.  BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27h day ofJ July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  William  MLBE Mark'B.Taylor,  Bryan Martin, Chair llhat Greene County Board of Supervisors  Clerk  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment G  RESOLUTIONTO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND EIGHTY-NINE CENTS FOR AN  INSURANCE RECOVERY  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has received funding for an insurance recovery; and WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of four thousand three hundred eighty-eight dollars and eighty-nine cents ($4,388.89) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item  in the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, ITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that four thousand three hundred eighty-eight dollars and eighty- nine cents ($4,388.89) be appropriated to the 2020-2021 budget of the County of Greene. BEITFURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all  things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Ma Mark' B. Taylor, Clerk Greene County  ATTEST:  William Bryan) Martin, Greene County Board of Supervisors   Board of  Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment H  RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE TEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-SIX DOLLARS FOR COMPENSATION BOARD AUTHORIZED  SALARY FOR THE SHERIFF  WHEREAS, the Compensation Board authorized an increase in the salary of the WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of ten thousand three hundred seventy-six dollars ($10,376.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022  Sheriff; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that ten thousand three hundred seventy-six dollars ($10,376.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget  todo all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of. July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin Ws  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  Khah  Ma Mark B.7 Taylor, Cler  William Bryan Martin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment I  RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE FORTY THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO DOLLARS FOR STATE. AUTHORIZED SALARIES OF THE GENERAL REGISTRAR AND LOCAL ELECTORAL BOARD MEMBERS  WHEREAS, the State authorized an increase in the salary of the General Registrar WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of forty thousand four hundred sixty-two dollars ($40,462.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022 budget of  and Local Electoral Board Members; and  the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that forty thousand four hundred sixty-two dollars ($40,462.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget  to do all things necessary to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 27th day ofJ July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST:  William Bryan Martin, Chair Lhk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Mark'B. Taylor, Clerk MB2b Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment J  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPTS AND APPROPRIATE THIRTY-EIGHTTHOUSAND NINE HUNDREDTWENTY-SIX DOLLARS FOR CONSITTUTIONAL OFFICES  FROMT THE COMPENSATION BOARD  WHEREAS, the County of Greene will receive revenue reimbursement for WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of thirty-eight thousand nine hundred twenty-six dollars ($38,926.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022  Constitutional Offices from the Compensation Board; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that thirty-eight thousand nine hundred twenty-six dollars ($38,926.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget  tod do all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Khaf William Bryan Martin, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  Clerl  Greene County Board of Supervisors  A6    Board of Supervisors July 27,2021 Attachment K  RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR DOLLARS FOR REGISTRAR'S OFFICE FROMTHE  DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS  WHEREAS, the County of Greene will receive revenue reimbursement for the WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of thirty-eight thousand one hundred fifty-four dollars ($38,154.00) need to be appropriated to the appropriate line item in the 2021-2022  Registrar's Office from the Department of Elections; and  budget of the County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that thirty-eight thousand one hundred fifty-four dollars ($38,154.00) be appropriated to the 2021-2022 budget of the County of Greene.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget  to do all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 27th day of July, 2021.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Dale Herring Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb Bill Martin lh William  Yes- Yes Yes Yes Yes Chair huA  ATTEST:  MALD4 Clérk Taylor,  Mark B.  Bryar/Martin,  Greene Counfy Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors July 27, 2021 Attachment L  RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE  WHEREAS, the Greene County Zoning Ordinance may from time to time be amended, supplemented, changed, modified or repealed by the governing body pursuant to WHEREAS, this resolution is to amend various sections of the text of the Zoning Ordinance, which are listed below, for purposes of correction, modification, and elaboration of general regulations. Amendments are proposed for clarification of intent,  Section 15.2-2285 of the Code of Virginia.  the addition of definitions, and correction of inconsistencies.  Article 16-25-3, Tourist Lodging is only permitted by special use permit in the R-1 WHEREAS, in an effort to promote property rights for homeowners the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS added Tourist Lodging by special use permit in R-1 zoning in June WHEREAS, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS has determined that a review of Article 16-25-3 to develop conditions that promote harmony with traditional neighborhoods is beneficial to the health, safety and welfare of county residents; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT for purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good Zoning practices, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS hereby adopts a resolution ofi intent to amend the appropriate section of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance to achieve the purposes described herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the zoning text amendment proposed by this resolution of intent, and make its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, at the earliest possible date. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors (1) finds that these amendments are in furtherance oft the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, (2) directs staff to prepare draft amendments for consideration, and (3) directs that the proposed amendments on these matters be brought forward for notice, hearing, Planning Commission recommendation, and Board  zoning district.  2018; and  of Supervisors' action.  Adopted in Open Meeting this 27th day of July, 2021  William Martin, Chairman fhn Greene County Board of Supervisors    ATTEST:  ASA  Mark Taylor, Clerk Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie Durrer Dale Herring Davis Lamb William Martin  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes