Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 1  March 28, 2023  County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2023, BEGINNING AT 4:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MEETING ROOM AND BYZOOM VIDEOC COMMUNICATION  Present were:  Dale Herring, Chair Marie Durrer, Vice Chair Steve Bowman, Member Abbey Heflin, Member Davis Lamb, Member  Ron Williams, Planning Commission Member John McCloskey, Planning Commission Member Brenda Garton, Interim County Administrator Kelley Kemp, Assistant County Attorney Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Jim Frydl, Director of Planning and Zoning Stephanie Golon, Deputy Planning Director Melissa Meador, Director of Emergency Services  Staff present:  RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORK SESSION (JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING Mr. Frydl shared with the Board the draft Comprehensive Plan update that the Planning Commission has worked on for the past two years. He introduced the two Commissioners who were in attendance, Ron Williams and John McCloskey, who would be able to answer any questions from Board members. The Planning Commission held a series of public meetings over the past two years highlighting a particular chapter or chapters within the Comprehensive Plan, which is the community's) long-term planning document that is revised every five years. Mr. Frydl said one. key chapter within the Comprehensive Plan is thel Land Use chapter, noting that whenever ar rezoning request comes into the department, it is reviewed within the parameter of whether it furthers the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission held public meetings for each chapter at least twice. Mr. Frydl highlighted key proposed changes in the updated Comprehensive Plan, including updated figures from the 2020 census and a recommended new chapter for Flex Technology Research and Development that would be designed for high-salary jobs. Such a development would not be commercial or retail or industrial. Mr. Frydl said Ms. Golon did a tremendous job compiling all the comments from citizens and staff and puttingi itinto  COMMISSION)  one document and thanked her for ajob well done.    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 2  Mr. Williams reiterated Mr. Frydl's statement that the update was created as a group effort that included citizen comment. Mr. Williams said each chapter included valuable comprehensive input on what would be beneficial for the County. He said he views the Comprehensive Plan as a snapshot in time that shows the status of the County and is part aspirational, such as the goals and objectives. He said the Comprehensive Plan shows what the citizens and leadership plan for the  County's future. He said he believes it is an excellent document.  Mr. Herring asked Mr. Williams what he thought the biggest change in the draft Comprehensive Plan update from the previously adopted plan. Mr. Williams said the Land Use category was one of the biggest categories, but that the goals have not really changed. He said the guiding principals in the Comprehensive Plan remain having a designated growth area toj preserve the rural character of the remaining County. He said he felt that the chapter dealing with education received significant updates to include a fleshed-out strategic plan. He said that provided an excellent snapshot oft the accomplishments within the public schools and what the vision is moving  forward.  Mr. Bowman, who serves as the Board liaison to the Planning Commission, congratulated them on the updated plan. He said the discussions were often long and detailed and he felt the Planning Commission clearly addressed every issue possible. He said that he feels the Comprehensive Plan is not a vision statement for the County and though it is a detailed look at various aspects, it is not a vision statement. He said he hopes the Board will address that and look forward. He noted that Mr. Jay Willer had requested something like the Ruckersville Advisory  Committee for the rural portion of the County to advise about the future.  Mr. McCloskey said Mr. Willer raised the point of changing the chapter from agricultural tor rural because there are many who reside in the rural areas who are not farmers and though they want toj preserve farming, he thinks a citizen group that represents the diversity of our rural areai is something he hopes the Board will take on. He said he doesn't know ifit needs to be as detailed as the Ruckersville Area Plan or have the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission  involved.  Mr. Bowman said the County has seen a number of requests come forward for the rural area and there has been pushback to those. He said he would like to see some additional options put forth and incorporated into either the zoning or planning process that give people other options than either by-right or do nothing. One of the things he said he is coming away with is that this needs tol be done now or there will not be a rural area left and that is his biggest concern.  Mr. Williams said tundamentally the Planning Commission is in agreement with the input from Mr. Willer and they did make ai revision to add it to the goals and objectives on Land Use as aplaceholder for whatever: needs to come next. He said that traditional agriculture is on the decline and the best and highest use for that property, from a landowner standpoint, is to convert it for housing. He said he does not think that's completely incompatible with rural and that rural can sometimes bei in the eye oft the beholder and tough to nail down a definition. He said there is plenty of! housing already in the rural portions that do not look like a high-density housing development.    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 3 plan.  He said he welcomes ai forum where new: input, ifite exists, could be gathered, and workedi into the  Mr. Bowman asked whether the Board of Supervisors ought to appoint or direct such a group or the Planning Commission or the County Administrator. Mr. Williams said the initiative  needs to come from the Board of Supervisors.  Mr. Bowman asked about a comment from Mr. James Higgins regarding affordable housing definition. Mr. Williams said he welcomed the opinions but was not sure if they should  make their way into the Comprehensive Plan, but rather the zoning ordinances.  Mr. Bowman said he felt the document was more prescriptive verses visionary and asked whether that was intentional. Mr. Williams said hei felt the language is about encouraging activities that solve a particular need, but that does not mean it is the only solution that will work. Mr. McCloskey said as they went through the document, they noticed many goals without movement, and he said some are meant to be more than five-year goals and while the document must be  updated every five years it is more ofa a 20-year planning document.  Mr. Lamb asked what was meant by "missing middle" income housing in the plan. Mr. William said iti is a term that is used to describe alternate forms of density with certain price points. Mr. Frydl said "missing middle" is between single family and high-density apartments and the types of homes that come between that such as duplexes and town houses, which are not allowed by-right in any zoning. He said the goal is tol have more affordable housing. Mr. Frydl said it is the subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance that are the action tools to make the goal of the Comprehensive Plan happen. He said if the Board valued increasing affordable housing, it would direct staff to create the tool to make it happen. An example is something Mr. Willer mentioned, clustered developments. Cluster development is now allowed within our law and the County has not taken steps to allow cluster development in the rural area. Instead of all houses that might be allowed facing the road, they might be back over a hill and within a smaller area, so it creates the impression of green space. It has been brought up by citizens, Mr. Frydl said, but it's not a tool  within Greene's1 law.  Mr. Herring asked for further clarification. Mr. Frydl said there might be a clustered subdivision in our growth area for higher density. However, in the rural area, cluster divisions would not increase the density allowed on the land. For example, someone can build 25 homes on 100 acres. Instead of building them all on road frontage sO that all you see is houses, they are built on smaller lots which saves money on the infrastructure and put in a corner of the parcel, but the remaining is left with open space and tress. It looks like any rural lot because the homes are  together.  Mr. Herring asked what the driving force is for the technology flex development. Mr. Frydl said it was a collaboration with Economic Development who has seen prospects seeking that type ofzoning. He said the County's current zoning offers only basic industrial, commercial, and retail. He said the County has no identified locations for such development, which are often higher- paying jobs. Mr. Frydl said the Planning Commission unanimously voted to include the    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 4  information in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Herring said the Comprehensive Plan noted how many people commute to jobs outside of Greene County. Mr. Frydl said the recommendation is that we identify an appropriate spot for such development. He said they may remain zoned agricultural, but it would require property owners to come forward to ask for rezoning before the  use could move forward.  Ms. Heflin asked whether the new use would have to be added into the County's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Frydl said it would and would need board support before it could be added as a  separate section.  Mr. Bowman asked if once the Comprehensive Plan is approved will the planning and zoning department make recommendations for what to change SO that thej plan can bei implemented. Mr. Frydl said staff could identify a list of things and present them to the Board with the recommendation oft the Planning Commission and the Board could direct the staff on what to work on. He said staff have always gone through that step to make sure the Board is aware and committed to the changes and gives direction. Mr. Williams said he believes that Economic Development would welcome that as well because as requests come in, they are not able to point  tos something that satisfies their criteria.  Mr. Herring asked whether the Planning Commission had enough citizen input throughout. Mr. Williams said they would welcome higher participation, but the opportunity was afforded to  the community on multiple occasions.  Ms. Heflin said that before the Comprehensive Plan is on the agenda for a vote, she would like to have a more definite plan for what the Board would like to go back to the Planning Commission that would help implement the plan. Mr. Bowman said he would like to have one more work session, which is scheduled for the first meeting in May. Mr. Herring thanked the Planning Commissioners for their work on the Comprehensive Plan and Mr. Williams and Mr.  McCloskey for their presence at the work session.  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body concerning the county administrator position and the process of filing that position; also discussion of specific positions as they relate to reconfiguring the county's organizational Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or  Meeting the following matter(s):  structure.    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 5  resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body, specifically the treasurer and appointments to the Board of Equalization. Consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by the public body and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable legal litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, regarding specific legal, namely the RSAI litigation and withdrawal agreement WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711(A)C) and (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia, such NOW,THEREFORE, BE. ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  as well as possible breach of contract.  discussions may occuri in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion oft the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb Dale Herring  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPEN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only suchi matters as identified by the motion to  enterinto closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 6  Motion carried.  RE: APPOINTMENT OF MATTHEW WOODSON TOTHE BOARDOF  EQUALIZATION  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the Board voted to petition the Circuit Court to appoint Matthew Woodson to the Board of Equalization to finish out the 3-year term of Harold Johnson, which expires March 1,2024.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA Board adopted the agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Marie Durrer, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERS FROMTHE PUBLIC  Mr. Keith Bourne was present to discuss the tax rates for the fiscal year 2024. He asked the Board to keep in mind that citizens have been facing high inflation prior to the average 25% property assessment increase, as well as higher personal property tax levies. He asked that the Board not consider anything higher than the $0.66 cents per $100 of assessed values as it would  be cruel to the taxpayer.  Mr. Greg Pumphrey was present to speak about the tax levy, as well. He noted that traditionally Greene County has a been place where working-class families could afford to buy a home and raise their families. He asked the Board to consider whether raising the tax rate is the  correct thing to do for their neighbors.  Ms. Carolyn Feazell has been a property owner in Greene County for more than 50 years. She said she questions the kind of] Board the County has ifit raises the tax rate sol high on residents.    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 7  She said people are constantly being taxed more and have more expenses. She said the stock market is going down and wondered what will happen when things crash down. She said she does not believe values will continue to rise as banks are closing down. She said she feels the County iss spending money on unnecessary things. She asked the Board to consider that when setting a tax  rate.  Mr. Steven Kortepeter told the Board that residents do not understand the situation with the water system and feel money has been mismanaged by the County. Mr. Kortepeter asked the Board why it continues to hire out for consultant firms, costing the County additional funds. He also noted the increased number is the Fiscal Year 2023 budget for fines and penalties, which is putting the County nearly $900,000 in the hole for Fiscal Year 2024. He said he would like to see  more affordable housing options for teachers and other government workers. regularly update the website with the draft changes for the plan.  Mr. James Higgins was present to discuss the Comprehensive Plan. He asked that staff Ms. Brittany Bornstein was present to discuss the tax rates for Fiscal Year 2024. She said she is disgusted with how the Board handles taxpayer money. She said the County is taxing residents for failed projects oft the past. She asked the Board to vote for the lowest tax rate possible  and not just a few cents off. reviewing the budget.  Mr. Joey Bornstein thanked Mr. Lamb and Ms. Heflin for putting citizens first while  RE: PUBLICHEARINGTO CONSIDER MENDMENIIOCHAETER 3HWATER AND Mr. Frydl told the Board the ordinance needed to be amended from the previously adopted ordinance in ways that are specific to Greene County. One significant change was the removal of wording that the County department would install infrastructure on behalf of citizens. Mr. Frydl said the staff is too small at this time for that responsibility. Developers are responsible for installing infrastructure to specifications. The updated ordinance removes installations fees from  SEWER OF GREENE COUNTY CODE  the ordinance.  Mr. Lamb said the document includes wording about not trespassing on the properties. He said he recalled in previous discussions that the public would be able to access the reservoir once  itis completed.  Mr. Frydl said there is another section on recreation. He said if they allow recreation on the lake there would be hours it is open and that would not be trespassing. The treatment plant  would only be allowed with permission and around the water intake. The public hearing was opened and closed with no comments.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Marie Durrer and unanimous roll call vote, the  Board approved ordinance change as presented. (See Attachment "A")    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 8  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: JAUNT QUARTER UPDATE  Mr. Ted Reick, Jaunt CEO, was present to discuss changes made at the regional transportation provider to improve services to Greene County citizens as well as the Fiscal Year 2024 budget request. He said Jaunt has worked to improve communication with the public and will have a new phone system installed by June. He said Jaunt's goal was to be at 88% on time, which has been exceeded. Jaunt is hiring a safety manager, he said. Saturday service was added, as were additional services to Charlottesville, and Jaunt saw a 43% increase in riders through the first months of Fiscal Year 2023 as compared to Fiscal Year 2022. Jaunt has implemented a more transparent budget process, he said. Jaunt is returning about $177,000 to Greene County because  ita accumulated excess cash from COVID-19 relief funds.  The Board thanked Mr. Reick for his presentation. RE: POCOSON: MOUNTAINTOWER SITE  Mr. Frydl updated the Board about the emergency radioj project and the necessity of at tower on Pocoson Mountain for its suçcess. Current emergency radio coverage is about 65% in vehicles and less on portable radios throughout the County. The emergency radio project is a joint project with Madison County where we could approve some towers that benefit our neighboring county, and they could put some that benefit Greene SO there is overlap. The Pocoson Mountain tower is the final one needed for the project and has been identified by the radio partner that this location is needed to communicate from Tower Mountain, back to Flattop Mountain and back to the Sheriff's Office tower and east to Ruckersville and into Madison. The new system will provide 95% coverage 95% of the time, bringing a major improvement to public safety. The tower site is at the end of the state maintained Pocoson Mountain Road onto a private driveway. The tower is al lattice tower of 120 feet. Mr. Frydl showed the Board photos from the balloon test at the site. The County has a 30-day minimum public comment period required by law and asked a public  hearing be held to be sure the public has a chance to speak.  RE: CONSENT AGENDA approved the consent agenda as presented.  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis and unanimous roll call vote, the Board  a. b. C. d.  Minutes of previous meeting (See Attachment "B")  Resolution from Commissioner of revenue for refund in the amount of $2,918.58. Approval ofinter-governmental cost-sharing agreement with Fluvanna County for Resolution to accept and appropriate $29,605 in carry-over funds from the State  Judicial Assistant services. (See Attachment "C") for Social Services. (See Attachment "D")    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 9  e. f. g.  Authorization for County Administrator to execute low-interest loan and grant Resolution to designate South River Road as a Rural Rustic Road that qualifies Authorization for the Chair to send a letter of commitment to the Virginia Department of Education for School Construction Assistance Program grant  applications for the water project. for Pave-in-Place. (See Attachment "E") funds. (See Attachment "F")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT OF THE PROPOSED Ms. Garton told the Board that the Board has settled on a budget that was balanced on a tax rate of 73 cents per $100 of assessed value, and while the tax rate of 76 cents per $100 of assessed value has been advertised the County needs to advertise the proposed budget. A public hearing on the budget is scheduled for April 25. She noted that the Board may still change the budget before it is adopted at the first meeting in May. She asked the Board to approve the  BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR2 2024  resolution to advertise the Fiscal Year 2024 budget of $108,611,561.00. Board approved the resolution as presented. (See Attachment "G")  Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Bowman and unanimous roll call vote, the  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS  Mr. Bowman said he attended the RSA meeting on March 16 and all the documents were signed that day and transported to Ms. Kemp and were delivered to Richmond by our attorney. Ms. Durrer was at the RSA meeting as an alternate due to Mr. Martin being out of town. He attended the Board of Zoning Appeals on March 22 regarding Natural Roots Farm, owned by William and Rebecca Lunsford. They requested an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's determination that the operation of a campground without a special use permit and tourist lodging offered in a camper is in non-compliance with the definition of tourist lodging. The Board of  Zoning Appeals voted 3-1 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's: ruling.  Mr. Herring said at ESAB the recruitment and retention group came back with two suggestions. One suggestion is related to retirement plans for the volunteers and the other is tax    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Sheet 10  relief for volunteers. At this point they said they would prefer to pursue tax relief for volunteers and will come back with additional information regarding the request in the future.  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT  Ms. Garton told the Board her focus since the previous meeting has been on the budget and the compensation and classification study. All employees completed Position Analysis Questionnaires and the next phase is comparing the salaries to other localities. She told the Board that a date for the transition from RSA could not be set until the State Corporation Commission rules on the transition. Once it is approved, the County can apply for the transfer of the DEQ and  VDH permits.  RE: OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BOARD  Mr. Bowman asked whether an open burning ordinance could be added to an upcoming ESAB agenda for discussion. He said volunteers recently responded to a control burn after phone calls. Mr. Bowman said he worries about the volunteers' safety and would like people to let dispatch know if they are going to have a control burn. He said he is very supportive of the fire company'si recruitment and retention and thinks ChiefDusty Clay did a good job summarizing the elements of the plan. Mr. Bowman said the first thing is pretty simple and that'so offering tax relief  for active volunteers. RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Bowman, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Dale Herring Steve Bowman Abbey Heflin Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  l 7e Dale Herring, Chair  halhE Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment A  AN ORDINANCE CREATING A COMPREHENSIVE WATER AND SEWER SECTION OF THE GREENE COUNTY CODE THAT WILL OUTLINE WATER AND SEWER STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS AND LIST WATER RATES AND FEES WHEREAS, Virginia Code $ 15.2-2109 et. seq authorizes localities to establish or WHEREAS, Greene County Ordinance Chapter 31 addresses Water and Sewer issues; WHEREAS, Greene County is preparing to take over all ownership and operations for WHEREAS, Greene County Ordinance Chapter 31 was reviewed and modified on WHEREAS, the Greene County Ordinance Chapter 31 has been modified to address the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia that the Greene County Code Chapter 31 is hereby amended and enacted as  obtain control ofwater and sewer utilities; and  and  water and wastewater utilities in Greene County; and  August 9, 2022 at the beginning oft the utility transfer process ; and  new utilities department and County control of the water and sewer services.  follows:  This chapter shall take effect immediately upon passage.  ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ONI MARCH 28, 2023.  24 N Dale Herring, Chairman Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST:  hul H Brenda Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment B  Greene County Commissioner's Office  P.O. Box 438  Stanardsville, VA 22973-0438  Phone 434-985-5211 Fax 434-985-5283  Date: March 13, 2023  TO: Greene County Board of Supervisors  FROM: Kimberly Tate, Commissioner of Revenue  RE: Refund Request of $2,918.58 for qualified disabled veteran  Taxpayer submitted qualifying paperwork as a disabled veteran which initiated a partial abatement for 2021 and a full abatement for 2022. This resulted in  an overpayment of $2,918.58 for which a refund is due.    Land Use Impv. Mtn Land Timber Mineral Tot Value Total Tax Fl=Prompt* F2=Disc  66000 Acres (2) 190600 Par.(1)7ca 256600 WBkPg F3=Exit  95 Assessment Loan#  Mor 001 7348 1052.06 1052.06 '2104.12 F24-More Reys  Class 2 *Zone R-1 ID# Ty/Rn/Lnd 77 BkPg 1954 DBkPg Cons/Date  Code Y ACH FG/S  Date 00000000 Bill# Batch St Excl 00 BIPermt 0000000 2H Addt1 06032022  1st Half 1H Addtl 2nd Half Tot. Tax Prort Dt '00'00000'0  Instrmt 22 1526 0000000 G F4=Suppl F11-Transf  F18-Attach Lmos  Bs.dat. 8-12-21  2S.291*/4s /as /56  2021- Jen- June: 10s2.  : 175.39  July Augl-11  : 6246 5.4x11 1289.6 owed foe g001 814.46 Refnd doe fz 3031 2,104.2 Refnd due fc 0032 2,918.57 total Refund due fe RE  2022-    Board of supervisors March 28, 2023 C  Inter-Governmental Cost Sharing Agreement  This Inter-Governmental Cost Sharing Agreement (the "agreement"), made this  day of  2023, by and between the COUNTY OF FLUVANNA, a political subdivision of the  Commonwealth of Virginia, ("Fluvanna"); and the COUNTY OF GREENE, aj political subdivision oft the  Commonwealth of Virginia ("Greene").  WITNESSETH:  WHEREAS, the counties of Fluvanna and Greene are both located in the 16th Judicial Circuit of the WHEREAS, by the current assignment of the judges of the 16th Judicial Circuit, Fluvanna and Greene are WHEREAS, Fluvanna and Greene have determined that Judge Barredo needs judicial assistant services and that it is lawful and appropriate that they provide for such judicial assistant services for Judge Barredo; and WHEREAS, judicial assistant services include the salary, benefits, and operating expenses of the Judge's WHEREAS, based upon the existing caseload, it has been determined that it is most efficient that Judge Barredo have his principal office inl Fluvanna, and Fluvannai is willing and able toj provide appropriate office WHEREAS the Fluvanna and Greene have determined that based upon the time and resources spent on Greene cases, Greene should contribute to a portion of the cost of providing suchj judicial assistant services; NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth hereinafter, and pursuant tot the provisions of Virginia Code Section 15.2-1300, the parties hereby agree as follows:  Commonwealth and are served by the circuit courts thereof; and  served by the Honorable Judge Barredo; and  judicial assistant as enumerated in Fluvanna's annual adopted budget; and  space and to provide for judicial assistant services for Judge Barredo; and  (1) Fluvanna agrees to provide for judicial assistant services for Judge Barredo. Such services may be provided in any manner which may be determined to be acceptable by Judge Barredo and Fluvanna; provided, however, that the Fluvanna covenants that the manner of providing for such services shall be at all times lawful under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and of the (2) Greene agrees to pay to Fluvanna fifty percent (50%) of the judicial assistant's salary and benefits and fifty percent (50%) of operational costs providing for such services, as determined (3) In each year during which this agreement shall remain in effect, Fluvanna shall provide to Greene a proposed budget setting for Greene's share of the estimated amount necessary for the provision of such judicial assistant services. Such proposed budget shall be provided to Greene prior to the adoption of Greene's annual budget, and in no event later than February 1 of each  United States.  hereinafter.    inter-Governmental Cost Sharing Agreement  Witness the following signatures and seals the date first above written.  THE COUNTY OF FLUVANNA  BY:  Its Chairman  ATTEST:  Eric M. Dahl, County Administrator  THE COUNTY OF GREENE BYRR 7 Its Chairman  ATTEST:  hah Hita  Brenda Garton, Interim County Administrator APPROVED ASTOFORM:  Kristinag/Hofmann, Deputy Fluvanna County Attorney EMe    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment D  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWNEY-NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIVE: DOLLARS FROM THE STATE GOVERNMENT FOR  CARRYOVER PROGRAMS  WHEREAS, the Department of Social Services of the County of Greene, Virginia has WHEREAS, the following funds in the amount twenty-nine thousand six hundred five dollars ($29,605.00) need to be accepted and appropriated to the 2022-2023 Operating Budget  received funding from the State Government; and,  of the County of Greene, Virginia:  Program Respite  Amount $ 500.00 $2,500.00 $5,085.00 $6,074.00 $5,946.00  Transportation Assistance Program (Chafee) COVID $9,500.00  Chafee Education and Training (ETV)COVID Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Adult Protective Services (APS)COVID Adult Protective Services  NOW, THEREFORE, ITI IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that twenty-nine thousand six hundred five dollars ($29,605.00) be received from the above programs and be accepted and appropriated to the appropriate line items in the 2022-2023 Operating Budget of the County of Greene, Virginia. BEITF FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget and to do  all things necessary to give this resolution effect. Adopted this 28th day of March, 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb 2 7 ah Dale R. Herring, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  ATTEST: hulhhin  Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment E  RESOLUTION OF THE GREENE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REQUESTING THAT  VDOT MAKE IMPROVEMENIS TO SOUTH RIVER ROAD  WHEREAS, Section 33.2-332 ofthe Code of Virginia, permits thel hard surfacing of certain WHEREAS, any such road must be located in a low-density development area and have WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County, Virginia ("Board") desires to consider whether Route 621, South River Road, approximately 0.55 miles to the end of State  unpaved roads deemed to qualify for designation as a Rural Rustic Road; and  no more than 1,500 vehicles per day; and  Maintenance, should be designated a Rural Rustic Road; and  WHEREAS, the Board is unaware of pending development that will significantly affect WHEREAS, the Board believes that this road should be SO designated due to its qualifying WHEREAS, this road is in the Board's six-year plan for improvements to the secondary NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Board hereby designates this road a Rural Rustic Road, and requests that the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of  the existing traffic on this road; and  characteristics; and system of state highways.  Transportation concur in this designation.  BEI ITI FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board requests that this road be hard surfaced and, to the fullest extent prudent, bei improved within the existing right-of-way and ditch-lines to preserve as much as possible the adjacent trees, vegetation, side slopes, and rural rustic character along the  road in their current state.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the  Virginia Department of Transportation Residency Administrator. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors this 28th day of March 2023.  Motion: Steve Bowman Second: Davis Lamb Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes    22 A Dale Herring, Chair  ATTEST: huk AA  Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment F  of  santp E  3)  s  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PosT OFFICE Box 358 STAMARDSVILLE, VIRGINIA 22973 TELEPHONE: 434-985-5201  March 28, 2023  Dr. Lisa Coons Superintendent of Public Instruction Virginia Department of Education P.O. Box 2120 Richmond, VA 23218  RE: Support for Greene County Public Schools' Construction Assistance Grant Application  Dear Dr. Coons,  The Greene County Board of Supervisors writes to express support for Greene County's Public Schools' Construction Assistance Grant Application. This grant would assist the division in building a safe permanent structure for alternative education programs for students in seventh through twelfth grades. Currently, students are taught in older learning cottages that need extensive work to maintain. Greene County Public Schools' staff works very hard to empower all of the community's children for lifelong success and it's important that our facilities represent that philosophy. Providing a permanent structure for these programs will go a long way to ensuring equity in education for students across the board. The Greene County Board of Supervisors supports this project for the students in the community. The Board further shows its commitment for the project and the application to the Virginia Department ofl Education's s School Construction Assistance Grant by guaranteeing it will maintain the percentage of Thank you for the opportunity to show our support for this project and your consideration during the  local funding to the division annually during the project's timeframe.  grant process. Sincerely,  Dale Herring, Chair  Greene County Board of Supervisors    Board of Supervisors March 28, 2023 Attachment G  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE. ADVERTISING OF THE PROPOSED  BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has discussed the budget for Fiscal Year 2024 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Greene County Board of Supervisors hereby authorizes the County Administrator to advertise the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2024 with a total of $108,611,561 and to do all things necessary to give this resolution effect.  during their budget workshop,  Adopted this 28th day of March, 2023.  Motion: Davis Lamb Second: Steve Bowmn Recorded Vote: Steve Bowman Marie C. Durrer Abbey Heflin Dale R. Herring Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes_ Yes  22 1e Dale Herring, Chair  ATTEST:  hola  Brenda G. Garton, Clerk Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors