PUBLICNOTICE City of Lockhart  Planning and Zoning Commission 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 22, 2020 Municipal Building- Glosserman Room 308 W. San Antonio St.  COMMISSION MEMBER AUDIO CONFERENCE PARTICIPATION  One or more members of the Lockhart Planning and. Zoning Commission may participate in a meeting remotely. The member of the Commission presiding over the meeting will be physically present at the above public location. Audio conference equipment providing two-way audio communication with each member participating remotely will be made available, and each portion of the meeting held by audio conference that is required to be open to the public can be  heard by the public at the location specified. CITIZEN. AUDIO CONFERENCE PARTICIPATION  Call-in number: 1-408-418-9388. Attendee Access Code: 626-304-323#. Those wishing to speak will be called upon to address the Commission.  Citizens wishing to listen or participate must call in prior to the start of the meeting, and should identify themselves. Planning and Zoning Commission agenda, packets can also be viewed on-line at www.ockhart-Ixorg starting two days before the meeting. Navigate from the Departments tab at the top to Development Services- - Meeting Mnutes/Schedules (on left side)- - Agendas & Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission Agendas & Minutes-  Attendees may call in to listen only, if desired.  Agenda Packets.  AGENDA  1. Call meeting to order.  2." Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. 3. Consider the Minutes of the March 25, 2020, meeting.  4. SUP-20-05. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Ajmal Anar for a Specific Use Permit to allow a DF-2 Duplex-Family Development Type on Lots 1, 2,3, and 4, Block 1, Olive Grove Subdivision, zoned RMD Residential Medium Density District, and located at 315 and 321 West Olive Street, and at 901 and 905 North Blanco Street. 5. PV-20-01. Consider a request by Hinkle Surveyors on behalf of Luis and Alicia G. Gutierrez for a Variance to Chapter 52 Subdivision Regulations", Section 52-31(a) "Plat Required", to waive the subdivision plat requirement for a two-lot family land grant conveying five acres out of a 10.01-acre tract in the James George Survey,  Abstract No. 9, and located at 1960 Old Kelley Road ini the Lockhart Extraterritorial, Jurisdiction. 6. Discuss the date and agenda ofr next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda items.  7. Adjourn.  Posted on the bulletin board in the Municipal Building, 308 West San Antonio Street, Lockhart, Texas, at 2:00 PM on  the 15th day of April, 2020.    City of Lockhart March 25, 2020 MINUTES  Planning and Zoning Commission  Members Present: Philip Ruiz, Philip McBride, Chris St. Leger, Rick Arnic, Bradley Lingvai  Member Absent: Paul Rodriguez, Manuel Oliva Staff Present: Dan Gibson, Christine Banda  Visitors/Citizens Addressing the Commission: Edgar Gutierrez, Breanne Schafer, Anna Kieler, David Raschke, Natalie Douga, William Anderson, Elvira Saldierra, Jason Balser, David Jevas  1. Callr meeting to order. Chair Ruiz called the meeting to order at 7:00p.m.  2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. None. 3. Consider the Minutes of the March 11, 2020,meeting. seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of4-0.  Commissioner McBride moved to approve the March 11, 2020 minutes. Commissioner Arnic 4. ZC-20-05. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Edgar Gutierrez on behalf of Maria G. Moreno for a Zoning Change from RMD Residential Medium Density District to CHB Commercial Heavy Business District, on Lot 7, Block 2, South Heights Addition, including the South 7.5' of an abandoned alley along the north boundary, and the west 7.5' of an abandoned Mr. Gibson explained that the applicant plans to remove the existing manufactured home on the subject property and combine the lot with the adjacent property along South Colorado Street for future redevelopment. He mentioned that CHB zoning already abuts the subject property on two sides, and presented maps and photos of the subjection lot and the  alley along the east boundary,and located at 1012 South Main Street.  surrounding area.  Chair Ruiz opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward.  Edgar Gutierrez, of 273 Old Luling Road, said that they would like to eventually redevelop the property along South Colorado Street where the existing hair salon is located, and be able to use the subject property for more parking or just to provide a larger area for development. Commissioner McBride asked Mr. Gutierrez if he knew if a different type of business would Mr. Gutierrez replied that they were not sure yet, but it might be a food business or a new hair  replace the hair salon.  salon.  -1-  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 03-25-2020    Commissioner McBride asked if the subject property was affected by flooding after the South Mr. Gutierrez replied that the property still has drainage issues, but the proposed Chair Ruiz asked for any other speakers and, seeing none, he closed the public hearing and  Colorado Street project was completed.  redevelopment would be an opportunity to address that problem.  asked for the staff recommendation.  Mr. Gibson said that staff recommended approval.  Commissioner McBride moved to recommend approval of ZC-20-05 to City Council. 5. ZC-20-06. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Balser Custom Homes on behalf of Alan Balser for a Zoning Change from AO Agricultural-Open Space District and RLD Residential Low Density District to RMD Residential Medium Density District, on 17.228 acres in the Byrd Lockhart Survey, Abstract No. 17,located at 1107 Silent Valley Road (FM 2001). Mr. Gibson explained that the applicant would like to develop a subdivision for duplexes on the subject property, and that requires at least the RMD zoning classification because duplexes are not allowed ini the current RLD and AO zoning classifications of the property. He discussed the characteristics of the property which include a private road that leads to a house on the subject property and also provides access to the adjacent nonconforming land-locked lots. There is also a pond on the property with a dam. He noted that the requested RMD zoning classification is not consistent with the future land use plan, which designates the area as low density residential. He said that any redevelopment of this tract would benefit the area because it provides the opportunity to replace a nonconforming private drive with a public street to serve the nonconforming land-locked lots. In addition, no development can occur without the extension of wastewater service to the area with the help of the developer oft this tract, which could also serve other vacant land along the wastewater line route. If the development does not replace the private road with a public street, the new street access for the subdivision will have to meet the TxDOT standards for spacing along Silent Valley Road. Mr. Gibson reiterated that the development could not necessarily solve all existing issues in the area such as drainage, but it could not make them worse than they currently are. He presented maps and photos of the subject property and the surrounding area. Chair Ruiz opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward.  Commissioner Lingvai seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of5-0.  Jason Balser, of 724H W SW Loop 323 in Tyler, Texas, said his idea was to provide a new community of modern farmhouse duplexes on the subject property. He understood there isa need for rental property in Lockhart. The duplexes would be two-story with double garages, large back yards, and a variety of exterior designs. The front portion of the subject property  would be subdivided into 35 residential lots for the first phase.  -2-  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 03-25-2020    Commissioner McBride asked Mr. Balser if he knew about the history of the property and what Mr. Balser replied that he did not know much about the history of the property, and that the Chair Ruiz asked if he had considered building single-family homes instead of duplexes. Mr. Balser replied that they own other property that they may develop later for single family residential dwellings, but that this property would be better suited for the duplexes they are proposing. He mentioned again that there is a need for rental propertyi in Lockhart.  rental price range he anticipated for the duplexes.  rental price would be based on the prevailing market in Lockhart.  Chair Ruiz asked for any other speakers.  Natalie Douga, of 1111 Silent Valley Road, said that she opposes the zoning change request and listed her reasons. Her first issue was the access easement that provided access to her and the three other lots. Itis a privately owned access easement which is not for public use. Their utilities also run along the private access easement. There are concerns that the entrance to the new development would cause more traffic along an already busy Silent Valley Road. The second issue was drainage. The current pond on the subject property was built sO that it could collect water flowing from the neighboring lots and then drains into a secondary pond that is located in the front portion of the subject property along Silent Valley Road. She stated that any new development on the subject property could potentially increase flooding of her home and her neighbors' homes, which already flood numerous times a year. Ms. Douga's third issue was that Mr. Balser owns other property that is more suited for new development where there are aiready City services available, and where it would not negatively impact their property. The fourth issue was that any new development would add additional stress to the water supply. The existing 1.5-inch water line serving the existing houses provides inadequate water pressure. The fifth issue is that the house located on the subject property had two new septic tanks installed behind the home, and a new addition was added to the home, without permits. Ms. Douga stated that if the owner does things without following the rules, she would be concerned about his proposed new development meeting the City standards. Another point was that the neighbors are concerned about their privacy being taken away with the new development. She added that there could be endangered species on the subject property, and asked if an environmental study would be done. She claimed that the new development would likely cause their property taxes to go up, while lowering their property values because of the development being duplexes instead of single- Breanne Schafer, of 1117 Silent Valley Road, said she opposed the proposed zoning change. She reiterated that Mr. Balser owned more property with City services available. She mentioned that she used to lease the subject property for livestock, and there are different wildlife species located on it. She said that the property floods multiple times a year, and she isc concerned with the increase density. She expressed her concern about Mr. Balser not obtaining permits for the home located at 1107 Silent Valley Road, and asked what would keep  family homes.  him from doing this again.  -3-  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 03-25-2020    Anna Kieler, of 1109 Silent Valley Road, said she bought her home 20 years ago and loves the privacy of her location. They named the private road Meadow Lake because of the beautiful meadow on the subject property. The ponds were built to keep their homes from flooding. She mentioned that they love their privacy and they look out for one another. She works nights and the construction from the new development would harm her health because of the lack of sleep during the day needed for her to do her job well. She, too, mentioned that Mr. Balser owns other land where a new development would be beneficial. She said she opposed Bill Anderson, of 1111 Silent Valley Road, said he opposes the zoning change. He wanted to know who would be responsible when their homes are flooded from stormwater flowing off the new development. He asked about the required separation of streets and driveways along Mr. Gibson replied that TxDOT requires minimum distances between access points along the highways that they maintain, and the spacing is based on the speed limit. He added that the subdivision construction plans would be subject to review and approval by the city engineer, and that the stormwater drainage system would have to meet City standards. David Raschke, of 1100 Silent Valley Road, opposed the zoning change. He asked the commissioner's why they wouldn't see a plan before rezoning the property. He mentioned that inadequate stormwater detention was provided when SH 130 was constructed, and much of Lockhart was flooded along Town Branch Creek, including the former city manager's property, after heavy storms. He believed that this development would cause even more Elvira Saldierra, of 1011 Silent Valley Road, said she opposed the zoning change. She was upset to hear that the new development would have city sewer service when she just paid $11,000 for a septic system for her newly built home. She also was also concerned about her safety considering that the occupants of the duplex development would all be renters. She David Jevas, of 900 Silent Valley Road, said he opposed the zoning change and agreed with his Mr. Balser spoke again to say that he understands everyone's concerns and will be a good neighbor. The drainage would be addressed in the engineering drawings, and that there would be background checks on all tenants. The duplexes would have privacy fencing, which would  the zoning change.  Silent Valley Road.  drainage problems for Lockhart.  askedifthere would be background checks.  neighbors' comments.  also shield the development from the neighboring lots.  Chair Ruiz closed the public hearing and asked for the staff recommendation.  -4-  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 03-25-2020    Mr. Gibson said that there were a lot of arguments heard which are very common when new developments are proposed, but the area will inevitably be developed some day. The City is currently constructing a new water tower to support development in this part of the city. He noted that If the developer constructed single family residences, they too, could be used as rental property since the City had no control over whether residents owned or leased properties. He presented three options to the Commission. The first option is to approve the zoning change as requested. The second option would be to suggest a different zoning change to RLD instead of RMD. And the third option would be to deny the zoning change request. Commissioner Lingvai moved to recommend approval of ZC-20-06 to City Council. Commissioner St. Leger seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of 4-1 with Chair Ruiz 6. Discuss the date and agenda ofnext meeting, including Commission requests for agenda items. Mr. Gibson said that the next regular Commission meeting date would be April gth, but that it  against.  might be cancelled due to al lack of agenda items.  7. Adjourn.  Commissioner McBride moved to adjourn, and Commissioner Lingvai seconded. The motion  passed by a unanimous vote, and the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.  Approved:  (date)  Christine Banda, Recording Secretary  Philip Ruiz, Chair  5-  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 03-25-2020    1105 1103  1019 1017  1105 1013 1007  APPLE ST 1012 204 1008 1006 1004 1003 CEDARST a 917 918" 0 916 911 906 905 N  104 1019 101  1106 1014 1012 1015 1010 B 1009 10031 931 4 929 927  108 0  101 10124 1000 105 10  1002 0 339 341 340 930 4 028 502 915 900 903  209 201 109 202  110 106 104 915  105 102  842-B 837 835 833 831  113 109 202 200 112/108  203  900 209 207 1 834 835 820' 821 814 819 810  321315 901 327 WOLVEST  0  26  827 829 0  806 800 727  809  115  119 1171 0  2  RR  HPPIERES  MEETRE  SUP-20-05  Subject Property Zoning Boundary 200 FtBuffer  315 and 321 W OLIVE ST 901 and 905 N BLANCO ST DF-2 DUPLEX FAMILY  scale 1"=2 200'    1105 1103  T0T9 1017 1017  1105 1013 1007  104 1019 108 0  1106 1014 1012 1015 1010 B 1009 1002  0 1003 339 341 931  930 340 929 927  APPLEST 1012 204 1008 1006 1004 1003 CEDAR ST 917 918 0 916 911 906 9051 N 900 209 207 9911 DE 834 835 6 820 821 814 819 810  101 E100 105 26  209 201 109 202  110 106 104 915  928 902 915 900 903  105 104  4 40 0 30 826  842-B 837 835 833 831 m 9 827 8299 0  203 113 109 202  200 112/108  327 327315 WOLIVES ST  0  0  806 800  809  115  119 117 0  UNON  PACIHIC  727  RR  U 4  MRETR  SUP-20-05  ZONING DISTRICTS  315 and 321 W OLIVE ST 901 and 905 N BLANCO ST DF-2 DUPLEX FAMILY  COMMERCIAL HEAVY BUSINESS COMMERCIAL LIGHT BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL LIGHT RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY  scale 1"=2 200'    $0034  IpOIOINIO 03  SOONVTEN  OBWVAV    PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT  SPECIFIC USE PERMIT  CASE SUMMARY  STAFF CONTACT: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORTDATE: April 14, 2020 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 22, 2020 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.  CASE NUMBER: SUP-20-05  APPLICANT'S REQUEST: DF-2 Residential Development Type SUGGESTEDCONOTIONS: Exclude Lot 2, on the corner.  BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT(S): Ajmal Anar OWNER(S): Same  SITE LOCATION: 315 & 321 W. Olive St., 901 & 905 N. Blanco St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-4, Block 1, Olive Grove Subdivision SIZE OF PROPERTY: 0.555 acre EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Four vacant lots ZONING CLASSIFICATION: Residential Medium Density District  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSED USE: The owner recently platted the subject property into four lots of sufficient dimensions and area to accommodate duplexes of the DF-2 development type. The RMD district allows duplexes of thel DF-1 development type by-right on larger lots, but requires an SUP for lots of this size. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: The neighborhood consists primarilyo ofsi single-family dwellings of av variety of sizes and conditions. The property directly across Olive Street to the south is vacant. The nearest duplexes are the eight duplex-style buildings in the public housing complex at the intersection of West Olive Street and Red River Street, just southwest of the subject property ,and duplexes at 915 and 902 Red River Street (the one at 915 looks like a single-family home at first glance). There are other duplexes, some of the DF-2 development type, scattered throughout the neighborhood. So, in general, duplexes are already well COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: The lots are large enough for the DF-2 development type, but there is a problem with the overall density. As provided in Appendix I, the maximum gross density for the DF-2 development type is 14 units per acre. The proposed eight dwelling units on a total of 0.555 acre is equivalent to a density of 14.4 units per acre. The solution to this, which was agreed to by the applicant after the public hearing notices were mailed, is for one of the lots to contain a single-family dwelling instead of a duplex. In such case, the density would be 12.6 units per acre. Staff has suggested, and the applicant has agreed, that the single-family dwelling should be on the corner lot (Lot 2) since the greater corner side setback along Olive Street leaves less buildable area than on the other lots. Also, it is the more visible lot to the homes ont the east side of Blanco Street. Two of those owners have submitted letters of protest.  Each dwelling unit in the proposed duplexes will have a double-car garage.  integrated into the residential character of the area.  ADEQUACY OF INFRASTRUCTURE: All required utilities are currently available. alternative is to construct single-family dwellings instead of duplexes.  ALTERNATIVES: If the requested DF-2 development type is denied for all four lots, the applicant's only RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: The two attached letters of opposition were received as of the date of this report. One of the properties protesting is on the east side of Blanco Street, and the other is on the north  side of Olive Street, east of Blanco Street.    66' 1 a  #906  in 3 6 5 3 3 9 0 € aj 6S e 3 I - of 3  36    City ofLockhart Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 239 Lockhart, TX 78644 Re: SUP-20-05 Public Hearing  Dear Mr. Gibson:  Wei received a letter recently from The Lockhart Planning commission regarding a request to build al DF-2 Duplex Family Our family has owned our house on W Olive Street for many years. All our neighbors know each other and keep an eye Ifeel that the single family dwelling requirement for our area helps preserve this quality. Ido not agree with allowing  Development Type at the corner ofN Blanco and W Olive Streets.  on each others property to make sure that we have a safe, quiet neighborhood.  Mr. Anar the exception to our: zoning ordinance.  Cidalo RecD Adela Recio 209 W Olive St Lockhart, TX 78644    City of Lockhart Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 239 Lockhart, TX 78644 Re: SUP-20-05 Public Hearing  Dear Planning Committee:  We received a letter recently from The Lockhart Planning commission regarding a request to build a DF-2 My wife. Anna andla are from Houston. We lived in a circa 1896 house once owned by Anna's grandmother just north of Downtown Houston. Itis a gentrification neighborhood that was relatively late in development. We could see high density 3 story townhomes going up all around our neighborhood and knew something had to be done to prevent it from happening in our neighborhood. We were instrumental in organizing a movement to get our neighbor designated in the National Register of Historic Places. While this protected the neighborhood from I-45 expansion it did not address density. Next we were instrumental in getting Minimum Lot Size designation for The Near Northside area, to date the largest square block area in Houston with Minimum Anna's Grandmother and Grandfather lived in Lockhart, and her Aunt Mary and Uncle Victor here born here. We fell in love with Lockhart and decided to buy a house and a few lots around that house. We have worked hard (mostly Anna) over the last 5 year to convert an area that was once a eyesore to an area we are proud to The East Side of N Blanco St has made improvements in recent years. Iwishlc could say the same for the West Side of N Blanco. The property that this public hearing is about had an old house surrounded by a jungle oft trees. The house has been removed but the jungle of trees remain. The property at the other corner ofN Blanco and' W Olive at 835 N Blanco has never been mowed and has fallen trees. Does the City ofl Lockhart have a program to mow empty lots that are not maintained and send al bill to the property owner? In must admit Inoticed that Lockhart zoning commission has designated our area Medium Density. Ihave not read the zoning regulations, but lam assuming that it designates Single Famity Dwellings only, and the purpose oft this Ifeel the City of Lockhart passed their zoning regulations for a reason, to preserve the integrity of the  Duplex Family Development Type across the street from our property.  Lot Size designation.  call home.  that the overgrown property is a convenient spot for our Tarantula Relocation Program.  hearing is to grant a variance to the zoning regulations.  neighborhood. Please deny Mr. Anar's request for aDF-2 Duplex.  Kenneth Price  A Anna Bermudez  abes    CITYOF  SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPLICATION  lockhant  /512/398-3461 - FAX/512/398.3833 P.O. Box 239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644  308 West. SanAntoniStreet  APPLICANTIOWNER  APPLICANT NAME Ajmal Amar DAY-TIME TELEPHONE (1)844.4319 E-MAIL. jmalFENE Ogmpil.com  ADDRESS P.O.Box 36146  Housln,TX 79236 P.0. Box 36146 HooSton TX 27236  OWNER NAME  AjmaL ANAR  ADDRESS  DAY-TIME TELEPHONE (3)894-4319 E-MAIL. ajmlFede Ogmml.cam  PROPERTY  ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 3156321 W, Olve $4. 9016803 N. Blancosk LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) Lols I-Dave Ghove Swodivision  SIZE. 0.555ACRE(S)  ZONING CLASSIFICATION  KLD  EXISTING USE OF LAND. AND/OR BUILDING(S) REQUESTED SPECIFIC USE  Vacant  PROPOSED USE REQUIRING PERMIT. DF-2 Devclopng Type Intbc RMD disksct CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSED USE, INCLUDING INDOOR AND OUTDOOR FACILITIES, ANTICIPATED OCCUPANCY (NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS, RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES, SEATS, OR OTHER MEASURE OF CAPACITY, AS APPLICABLE), GROSS FLOOR AREA, HOURS OF OPERATION, AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION. ATTACH. ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY. 4Duplex BViLOINGS ON) RecenTLY SUBDNIDED LO7S    SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. MA-FNOIPLATTED A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY.  SITE PLAN, SUBMITTED ON PAPER NO LARGER THAN 11"X17", SHOWING: 1) Scale and north arrow; 2) Location of site with respect to streets and adjacent properties; 3) Property lines and dimensions; 4) Location and dimensions of buildings; 5) Building setback distances from property lines; 6) Location, dimensions, and surface type of off-street parking spaces and loading areas; 7) Location, dimensions, and surface type of walks and patios; 8) Location, type, and height of free-standing signs; fences, landscaping, and outdoor lighting; 9) utility line types and locations; and, 10) any other proposed features of the site APPLICATION FEE OF $50.00 PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS:  which are applicable to the requested specific use.  1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 acre and one acre One acre or greater  $125 $150  $170 plus $20.00 per each acre overc oneacre  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT I OR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE ARE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION.  SIGNATURE  DATE_ 3:31-2020    OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY  RECEIPT  Danbisa  NUMBER 929913  DATE SUBMITTED 4-220 DATE NOTICES MAILED 47-3020  CASE NUMBER SUP- - 20-05  DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED 4-09-202  PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE 4-222020  DECISION CONDITIONS    LOCKHART ETJ  1900  1950 o  1968  AO  125  RHD  AO  o 1204 1203 RLD.1273  1205  1203 1204  1206 1207  o 1205 1206 E207 o VAC  BIACKIACKST  PV-20-01  Subject Property Zoning  1960 OLD KELLEY RD  scale 1"=5 500'  Lockhart City Limits  PLAT VARIANCE TO ALLOW CALDWELL COUNTY TO PROCESS FAMILY LAND GRANT    EFFECT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: The planned construction of a single-family residence on the proposed five-acre lot will have negligible impacts in a rural residential EFFECT ON ORDERLY SUBDIVISION OF OTHER LAND: Since the land division will include the construction of only one single-family residence and not create landlocked parcels, the variance will ALTERNATIVES: The applicant could submit a subdivision plat as an alternative to the proposed variance. The Subdivision Regulations do require such features, where applicable, as sidewalks, paved streets, parkland obligation, and City-standard water/wastewater supply systems, among others. However, variances to some of these requirements would be necessary for the proposed land division, which would make the platting process onerous for an otherwise straightforward two-lot  area outside the City limits.  not limit the potential for subdivision or development of other land in the area.  division.    13889  DKELI  55099  1960 OLDIELLEYRD 68896 1,010ac  5.00 acre tracttob be conveyedt to Homestead Daughter via Family Land Grant process thru Caldwel! Çounty Subdivision Rules and Regulations  1968 OLD KELLEYI RD 55098  19500 OLDH KELLEY RD  4.0 act tract. tob be combined with the homestead tract by correct deed or affidavit statingt track will be sold with the 1.00 acre tract as a whole trad dontaing approximately 5acres 55096  55095  55094  55097  13696  Z=LAnd  61541  Hoak  13634  50 100  Feet  Printed by Caldwell County Appraisal District Date Printed: Tuesday, April 14, 2020    Swimlbl Reg.  duis g Alicio  has  I. aypAprBoun shedbrd angasbir. 9K dayk gamviry con eerm wolour heazh aswegm ol,he  nguuinthis  tk favilan Ce 6 ub. wke  Neae u 4 likfallow my dagih &  amcl we    Wegehnon aerrces ond donb pee any  Cllwe  alleus for Sybadut    Canty  tolbwrus  dotal Borempph anfueon aekiy   bgazk *he bwnty keobe kKep she  ou  and the  EE  Q. The Parionceis 77 frak Kp o    aminesml alburzhs.  llah  he  7  widmch atimrotzhe Pubkey  3.The ariardy Sokelyie a  andwilimek he san b athev  s anla oouve ane famy anltaly  Y2 Fhe parimee wilmek hanezhe 4Pehfpuernty  zhe onklyankdngr  lamokin zhe aria  ay eb lellese!  handle shepicras thrw thei bunt lakeyerum fukeo araRegulekono Ahefbmiy andimepaars.  Thani -  gfou tmel  0R    SUBDIMSION PLAT APPLICATION  CITY OF  1512/3983461 . AX/512/398-3833 P.O.Box 239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644  Lockhart  308 West. SanAntonio Street  TEXAS  APPLICANTS  SURVEYOR NAME JERRy HINKIE DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 512.398- 2000 E-MAIL Contact & hinklsugapa.ton  ADDRESS 109  KACKAAT,IZ  78644  ENGINEER NAME NSDR DAY-TIME TELEPHONE  ADDRESS $  E-MAIL.  OWNER NAME KwistAlciA G. GWtIERRE2 ADDRESS 19600ld KEIlEY Rd  DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 672-2270138 E-MAIL, AHICTA Ali7018 CyAhoo.Coe  KockhAATTZ  18644  TYPE OF APPLICATION  SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAT  REPLATRESUEDMISION  X VARIANCE FINAL PLAT  AMENDING PLAT  MINOR PLAT  PROPERTY  SUBDIVISION NAME NIA  KEHEYRC  NIA  ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 1960 ololVlock MAT,TA7644  Kelle  LOCATED  R  IN  CITY LIMITS  XETJ (COUNTY)  PDD  TOTAL LAND AREA O.o1 ACRE(S)  PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 2  ZONING CLASSIFICATIONIS) UApor-EYS  PROPOSED USE OF LAND BuidhonE (SElingTe DALghTER)    SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  NAME(S) AND. ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPERTY LIEN HOLDERS, IFANY. EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, IFA ANY.  IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR AN AMENDING PLAT OR REPLATRESUBDVISION - A COPY OF IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR A FINAL PLAT INVOLVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS = THREE COPIES IFT THE APPLICATION IS FOR, OR INCLUDES, A SUBDIVISION CODE VARIANCE - COMPLETED VARIANCE SECTION ON NEXT PAGE AND REQUIRED STATEMENT! NOTED THEREIN. PLAT DOCUMENTS, AS FOLLOWS, CONTAINING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ARTICLE 23-6. (Amending Plats, ReplatResubdvision Plats, and Minor Plats are considered the same as Final Plats for  OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS.  the purpose of content and format).  Seven copies for initial staff review.  Twelve copies afteri initial staff review for preliminary plats, final plats, and eplatsiresubdvisions  Two copies after initial staff review for amending and minor plats.  Two signed and sealed mylar reproducibles (three if applicant wants to keep one) of approved amending plat, replatresubdivision, final plat, or minor plat, for recording. One recorded reproducible is filed at the County Clerk's office, and the other is returned to the City. FEE, AS FOLLOWS (NOI FEEFORVARIANCES, APPEALS, SUBDMVISIONDEVELOPMENT PLANS, ORDEVELOPMENTPATS):  Preliminary Plat  $600.00 payable to the City of Lockhart $400.00 plus $20.00 per acre, payable to the $100.00 payable to the City ofl Lockhart $71.00 for the first sheet, and $50.00 for each additional sheet, payable to the Caldwell County  Final Plat or ReplauResubdvsion Amending plat, Minor plat, or Minor replat not requiring a public hearing Recording fee for Amending Plat, ReplauResubdivsion, Final Plat,  City ofLockhart  orMinor Plat  Clerk  To the best of my knowledge, this application and associated documents conform to all requirements of the City of Lockhart Subdivision Regulations. By signing below I agree that if any part of this plat and/or associated construction plans is found to be incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise deficient with regard to applicable City standards, the deadline imposed by the Texas Local Government Code, Section 212.009 for approval or denial of the plat and/or associated construction plans by the City within 30 days of the date of this application is automatically extended for an additional 30 days. further agree that if any part of this plat andisr asssslatod construction plans remains deficient at such time that the plat and/or associated construction plans cannot be approved prior to the expiration of the second 30 days, the plat or construction plans will be subject to denial by the approval authority. It is understood that I or another representative  should be present at all public meetings concerning this application.  swmpictag  DATE 3-23-20 TELEPHONE 572-227-0159  PRINTED NAME huis utEneEL    PLAT APPROVAL PERIODS  A preliminary plat approval period expires if a final plat for one or more sections is not submitted within 12 months of approval. Upon written request received prior to the expiration, a maximum of two six-month extensions may be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A final plat approval period expires if any required infrastructure construction is not begun within 12 months of approval. Upon written request received prior to the expiration, one six-month  extension may be considered by the City Planner.  SUBDIVISION VARIANCE (for variance applications, only)  VARIANCE TO SECTION(S)  52-31L)  OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS  CURRENT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT/S) Plut FeruRS for a +wo-lot  divson tw the ET3.  REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) Varlance +o allew Cally Counky to Procass a Fomil Lans Getu to tnelee, a dvisien & .0aere Praperty RSus tv 1 Scse paecfor he eplinnts dyjinker anb e balewre SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS  to pe RENS 9  plicanh: REQUIRED FORAPPROVAL OF A' VARIANCE.  1. Special circumstances or conditions affect the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of the Code would deprive the applicant reasonable use of the land; 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of 3. The variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, and will not be 4. The variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other lands in the  the applicant;  injurious to other property in the area; and, area in accordance with the provisions of the Code.  OFFICE USE ONLY  ACCEPTED BY Kevs Walwr DATE SUBMITTED 3/23/20 DATE NOTICES MAILED NIA  RECEIPT NUMBER. N/A-NaFe CASE NUMBER PV -20-0)  DATE NOTICEPUBLISHED MIA  (For certain ReplatsResubdiisions without vacating preceding plat)  PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE A/27/70  DECISION CONDITIONS    UTILITY SERVICE FORM  THIS FORM SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT, AFTER CONSULTING WITH THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS LISTED BELOW, FOR ALL PLATS, EXCEPT AMENDING PLATS, AND FINAL PLATS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLATS. THE FOLLOWING UTILITY SERVICE CODES ARE TO BE INDICATED, AS APPLICABLE, IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW.  A B C D  Adequate service is currently available to the proposed subdivision.  Adequate service is not currently available, but arrangements have been made to provide it. Adequate service is not available, and arrangements have not been made to provide it from  the utility.  Additional easements are needed for the utility within the subject property.  NAME OF WATER SERVICE PROVIDER. Muk APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S).  WASTEWATER SERVICE  APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S). Sephic (ss-C)  TEXAS GAS SERVICE GAS COMPANY  APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S). None  NAME OF ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDER, BlwE BONNET  APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S).  UNDERGROUND  Yes  No