PUBLIC NOTICE City of Lockhart Zoning Board of Adjustment 6:30 PM, Monday, June 7, 2021 Municipal Building = Glosserman Room 308 W. San Antonio St.  BOARD MEMBER. AUDIO CONFERENCE PARTICIPATION  One or more members of the Lockhart Zoning Board of Adjustment may participate in a meeting remotely. The member of the Board presiding over the meeting will be physically present at the above public location. Audio conference equipment providing two-way audio communication with each member participating remotely will be made available, and each portion of the meeting held by audio conference that is required to be open to the  public can be heard by the public at the location specified. CITIZEN AUDIO CONFERENCE PARTICIPATION  Call-in number: 1-408-418-9388. Attendee Access Code: 626-304-323#. themselves. Attendees may call in to listen only, if desired. Those wishing to. speak will be called upon to address the Board.  Citizens wishing to listen or participate must call in prior to the start of the meeting, and should identify Zoning Board of Adjustment agenda packets can be viewed online at www.lockhart-xorg starting two days prior to the meeting. Navigate from the Departments tab at the top of the page to Development Services - Meeting Minutes/Schedules (on left side) - Agendas & Minutes = Zoning Board of Adjustment Agendas &  Minutes - Agenda Packets.  AGENDA  1. Calln meeting to order.  2. Citizen comments not related to aj public hearing item. 3. Consider the minutes of the May 3, 2021 meeting.  4. ZV-21-04. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Jim Smith on behalf of Jack Pearce, LLC, for a Variance to Appendix II, Chapter 64 "Zoning", Lockhart Code of Ordinances, to allow a reduction in the minimum 10-foot rear-yard building setback to zero feet for a new building on Lots 1 and 2, Jack Pearce Subdivision, consisting of 0.17 acre zoned CCB (Commercial Central Business District) and located at 120 and 124 East Market . ZV-21-05. Hold al PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by lan Stowe for a Variance to Appendix II, Chapter 64 "Zoning", Lockhart Code of Ordinances, to waive the requirement for off-street parking for a commercial building on Part of Lot 1, Block 42, Original Town of Lockhart, consisting of 0.239 acre zoned CMB (Commercial 6. ZV-21-06. Hold al PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Lance Elrod on behalf of Blackjack Blockl 1, LLC, for Variance to Appendix II, Chapter 64 "Zoning", Lockhart Code of Ordinances, to increase the maximum lot coverage standard from 50 percent to 51.19 percent for new structures on Lot 1, Block 1, Iron Ox Addition, consisting of 24.575 acres zoned IL (Industrial Light District) and locateda at 1205 Reed Drive.  Street.  Medium Business District) and located at 214 Brazos Street.  7. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting.  8. Adjourn.  Posted on the bulletin board in the Municipal Building, 308 West San Antonio Street,  Lockhart, Texas at 4:00 p.m. on the 1st day of. June, 2021.    CITY OF LOCKHART ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 03, 2021 MINUTES  Members Present: Wayne Reeder, Mike Annas, Anne Clark, Kirk Smith, Severo Castillo (By Phone),  Sean Martinez (By Phone)  Members Absent: Lori Rangel, Laura Cline  Staff Present:  Christine Banda, Kevin Waller, Dan Gibson (5)), Winn Smith, Robert McGee  Others Present: lan Stowe (applicant, Agenda Item (4), Arthur Palacios (applicant, Agenda Item  1. Callmeeting to order. Chair Cline called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. Citizen comments not related to a public hearing item. None 3. Considert the minutes of the April 5, 2021 meeting.  Member Annas moved to approve the April 5, 2021 minutes. Member Reeder seconded, and the 4. ZV-21-03. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by lan Stowe for a Variance to Section 64-197gM1Yb)of Chapter 64 7oning',Lockhart Code of Ordinances, to allow vehicles utilizingone regular off-street parking space to back into the street on Partofl Lot 1, Block 42,Original Town of Lockhart, consisting of 0.239 acre zoned CMB (Commercial Medium Business District) and located Planning Staff Kevin Waller explained that the property currently contains a vacant single-family residence, which is a nonconforming use ini the CMB zoning district. The applicant and owner lan Stowe recently remodeled the building for a proposed tattoo parlor. Since a parking lot will not fit in the front yard of the property, Mr. Stowe wishes to utilize off-site parking from a neighboring property owner. Hei is waiting to hear back from those ownersift they will allow the four additional parking spaces that are needed. The variance request is to allow one regular parking space to back into the street. Mr. Waller gave a PowerPoint presentation, reviewed the variance criteria, and Vice-Chair Clark, acting as Chairman in Laura Cline's absence, opened the public hearing and asked Applicant lan: Stowe of 428 Trinity Street explained that he recently bought the property, which was previously used as ar residence int the CMB: zoning district. He wishes to open a commercial business  motion passed by a vote ofe 6-0.  at214 Brazos Street.  stated that Staff recommends approval. fori the applicant to come forward.  Zoning Board of Adjustment 05-03-21    at the property, which must meet the parking standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Stowe had asked nearby business owners if they would be willing to allowi four of the required parking spaces to be provided on their properties. With the variance proposal, he is requesting that customer vehicles utilizing one off-street regular parking space on the subject property be allowed to back Winn Smith of8 8406 Avocet Drive, Austin, stated that he is not necessarily opposed tot the variance, but more sO indifferent. He asked what would happen if the variance is denied, and if only one parking space would be allowed for the proposed use. Mr. Smith does not understand why this side of the street is zoned for commercial use when it is primarily in residential use. He also wondered how the other homes would be affected by the variance. Smith has no issues with cars Mr. Waller explained that there are five required off-street parking spaces fora commercial use on the subject property. If the variance is denied and the off-site parking spaces are not granted by nearby business owners, the applicant could potentially submit a new variance application to request the waiving of all required off-street parking spaces. If that variance were to be denied, theapplicant ostensibly auomindapmtincwiaben rearofthepropertyfortyforthefiverequired Vice-Chair Clark asked for any other speakers; seeing and hearing none, she closed the public Planning Staff Dan Gibson explained that all vehicle parking and circulation must occur entirely on the subject property. The property's current zoning designation was put in place prior to his employment with the City, sO the home is grandfathered as ar residence, but the proposed use is Member. Annas moved to deny ZV-21-03. Member Clarkseconded, and the motion passed byav vote 5. SE-21-01. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Arthur Palacios, on behalf of Robert McGee, for a Special Exception as provided in Section 64-130(c)5) of Chapter 64 "Zoning.". Lockhart Code of Ordinances, to preclude an essentially inadvertent taking of property due toan existing nonconforming lot depth on Part of Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, Original Town of Lockhart, consisting of0.234 acre zoned CMB (Commercial Medium Business District)and located at 110East Mr. Waller stated that the applicant plans to demolish the existing home and redevelop the property with a mixed-use building to contain both residential and commercial office uses. He explained that the lot depth is nonconforming and does not meet the required depth forthe current zoning designation. Therefore, approval of a Special Exceptionis necessary to enable the property tol be redeveloped. Waller stated that Staff recommends approval oft the Special Exception. Vice-Chair Clark opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant to come forward.  into the street.  from the single-family homes backing into the street.  spaces. hearing.  commercial. of6-0.  Live Oak Street.  Zoning Board of Adjustment 05-03-21    Robert McGee of 612 State Park Road stated that he owns the property. He came to know Mr. Palacios when they were remodeling the old gas station to the west of his property. Mr. McGee hast faith that his property value will improve with the future proposed mixed-use building. Applicant Arthur Palacios of 2109 East Cesar Chavez, Austin, stated that hel had just completed the mixed-use building project at thet former gasstation next door. During the remodel, he got tol know Mr. McGee, and had asked him about the property next door. Mr. Palacios believes he can add a quality development to the property and would appreciate the Board's approval. Vice Chair Clark asked for any other speakers; seeing and hearing none, she closed the public Member Annas moved to approve SE-21-01. Member. Smith seconded, and the motion, passed byo a  hearing, and asked the Board for a motion.  vote ofe 6-0.  6. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting.  Mr. Waller stated that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be held Monday, June 7,2021,  ifapplications are received by the May 17 deadline.  7. Adjourn.  Member Smith. moved to adjourn the meeting, and Member Reeder seconded. The motion passed  bya vote of 6-0, and the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m.  Approved:  (Date)  Christine Banda, Recording Secretary  Anne Clark, Vice-Chair  Zoning Board of Adjustment 05-03-21    107 EWALNUIST 104/106 119 115-AI 1151  115 CHB 111  CMB 109 119 NADNUISI 119 z 118 104 117 112 a 1S 11 08 107 106 112 105 E 85 119HABE ANIONOSI WISAN 120 CCB 111 o 201 SCA  110 IH IL 100 102 108 112 110 402  120  315 312  115 118  301 100 101 0 "702 112  201 102 104 106 105 1 u t. 3 ERARKETSI 8 201  CHB 3  ESAN ANTONIOST 100 206  207 ) 202  101 105 3 111 113 117 119  315  410  117 WN MARKETSTI 201 118  2 C 200 206 208 210 275 s 212 8 219  CHB 200 lightbox. 210 300  203 205 211 9212 217 PRA 300 301 315 308 317  202  318  207 - 209 V  301 1 321  WIPRARIEIEAST 202  303 311 310 313 107 EUVEOAEST 110 401  311  300  CMB 208 216  320  319  400 RMD  WIVEOAEST:  CHB  401 400 411  RHD. 220214 ZV-21-04  RMD 402 401 406  408  402  415  403  Subject Property Zoning Boundary  120 & 124 E MARKET ST  TO WAIVE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD BUILDING SETBACK TO ZERO FEET  scale 1"=200'    PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT  ZONING VARIANCE  CASE SUMMARY STAFF CONTACT: REPORT DATE: PUBLICHEARING DATE: June 7,2 2021 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval CONDITIONS: BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: OWNER: SITE LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SIZE OF PROPERTY:  Kevin Waller, Assistant City Planner kw CASE NUMBER: ZV-21-04 Variance to Appendix II to allow a reduction in the minimum required  June 2, 2021  rear-yard building setback from 101 feet to zero feet.  None  Jim Smith Jack Pearce, LLC 120 and 124 East Market Street Lots 1a and 2, Jack Pearce Subdivision 0.17 acre  EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Temporary City Park/ /Outdoor Gathering Space ZONING CLASSIFIÇATION: CCB (Commercial Central Business District)  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  REASON FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE: The applicant wishes to develop the property with a three-story mixed-use commercial and residential building on the last two undeveloped parcels on the southeast side of the Courthouse Square. The building is proposed to directly abut the rear, or south, property line. According to Appendix II of the Zoning Ordinance, the rear-yard setback in the CCB Zoning District is 10 feet, and the Variance request is to effectively waive that setback in its entirety. The CCB District does not require setbacks from the front or side property lines. Since the property is located within the Historic District, any new building must first receive approval of a Certificate for Alteration from the Historical Preservation Commission. In addition, approval of a Specific Use Permit (SUP) from the Planning and Zoning Commission is required if a mixed-use building, or any commercial use requiring an SUP, is proposed (Zoning Ordinance Section 64-196(h)(2)). Currently, the property is being leased by the City for an outdoor gathering space and park area. The owner plans to move forward with the proposed project once the City's lease expires. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The subject property is located within the City's central business district. It is bordered to the west by a tattoo parlor, and Henry's restaurant is located to the south, on the opposite side of a 15-foot wide public alley dedicated to the City. East Market Street abuts the subject property to the north, and South Commerce Street to the east. The Old Pal Bar and Grill at the opposite, or west, end of the same block as the subject property, appears to be only other UNIQUE CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY: The location of the 15-foot wide public alley dedicated to the City, bordering the south end of the subject property, could be considered a unique condition. Neighboring properties to the west are not bordered by the alley, which is only 66.36 feet long and ends at the southwest corner of the subject property. The rear-yard setback of the subject property, therefore, begins 15 feet further north than that of the neighboring properties due to the presence of the alley, which Staff believes creates a unique condition. Additionally, prior to the property's platting and dedication of the alley in 2003, the 10-foot rear setback would have begun at the north property line of the adjacent property to the south, and would have ended five feet south oft the  property on that block with a building located within the 10-foot rear-yard setback.    north boundary of the alley, or within the alley itself. By proposing to construct a building on the current rear property line, the building will actually be located further from the neighboring property to the south than it would have been if the subject property had not been replatted as part of the NATURE OF HARDSHIP: Neither increased financial gain nor reduced financial hardship will be EFFECT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: Since the 15-foot wide alley will not be encroached upon by the proposed building on the subject property, it will effectively create a buffer between the building and the neighboring property to the south. As a result, there will be no increased impacts to surrounding properties and public safety. Service access to the rear of the ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS: Alternative solutions to the proposed variance would either be to require the building to maintain the full 10-foot rear setback, or to reduce the setback to a distance RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: A letter was received by the Planning Department on June 3, 2021 (attached), in which an individual owning property on the same block expressed concerns about day-to-day operations of a building abutting the property line potentially creating challenges for  Jack Pearce Subdivision and the alley never dedicated.  achieved as a result of constructing a new building closer to the rear property line.  future-proposed building will still be available from the alley.  somewhere between zero and ten feet.  neighboring properties.    FROM THE DESK OF PHILIP DUCLOUX P.O. BOX3 BASTROP, TEXAS 78602 PHONE (512)303-1477 email: lucoux@aust.mr.com May 31, 2021  Mr. Kevin Waller Assistant City Planner- City ofLockhart Lockhart, Texas 78644 POE Box 4915  Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 via email to Kwaler@lockhartixorg and fax to 512-398-5103  Re: ZV-21-04  Greetings Mr. Waller,  Ihave received your notice of public hearing scheduled for. June 7,2021. Iam taking you up on your invitation to submit a written statement to you for presentation to the Zoning Board of  Adjustment.  - own property next to a property that has no exterior space of its own. The inevitable consequence ofthat building'sl limitation is that its occupiers and contractors must use my property to do those things that are usually done outside. Contractors, suppliers, utility providers, etc., don't really know whose property they use and often damage. As use and density intensify, sO do the  incursions and damages.  Circumstances such as those existing in downtown Lockhart absolutely require cooperation among owners and occupants but this proposal invites unfair trouble for neighboring properties unless the city determines how a property with no exterior space will service its structure for parking and deliveries, general maintenance, messy contractors, various utilities some of which may be specialized to the occupant, airspace, etc., without having to use the exterior space belonging to its  neighbor.  Cordially, Pikp Ducloug Philip Ducloux  C  JUN 3 2021    8-31  Jack Pearce Subdjvision Vacaling and resubdlviding portions of Lots 3 ond 5, and ool Lot 4, Block 13, of the Originai Town of Lockharl, Texas, out of the Byrd Lockhar Survey A-17 in Caidwell Counly, Toxas  N  99-451.- 4-605..  RIEHGER  GiaSeset Splenks..-.  Claude Hinkle Surveyen    City of Lockhart Caldwell County, Texas Jack Pearce Subdivision Lot3  Lote Lotl Public Alley 15' Wide  sl  k6a 620484  Scole 1"-20"  67.9 Brick Frame 1-Story Bullding Cmmene S79-5217 Lots  S  GeneralN Noles  Thes Fodoming caditicne, righto ofways. eic.. covide ellea lhisp pares scoordingie lo1be Thleo Canmiment )Riçhtofway 407 Teas Pomer andLightCo. recordedmVol. 166Pg.4 498. Celdwdio Couty Desi Records. 2THISSURVEYISFORI USEW WITHTHISONET TRANSACTIONONLY. 3FLOODZ ZONES SHOWN ARE APPROKIMATE AND ÇREATE! NOL ON THE PARTOFT THES SURVEYORA BASEDONF Thep Junel 19.2 2912. Floodz Zone" BOUNDARYMAP. DOESNOTI IMPLY framFiootingor Flood Damage. casions. Grester Floods  GF #1510003 PRDPOSED BORROWER: Alvorez 54 investments Group, uc 911 ADDRESS: 215 5. Commerce Strea! Lockhort, Texas 78644  RATEN MAP. aneu loodplain, HAZARD Flood SURVEYPLAT  deleminedi  LEGEND CAPPED 1/2" IRON PIN SET "STAMPED HIKGE SURVEYORS" CAPPED IRON PNF FOUND "STAMPED HNKE SURVEYORS" HOLE DRILLED N CONCRETE ORIGINAL DEEDED CALLS CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Druwn ByJUH BS Drowing: 20153163.dwg WordD Diek: Begin 11012015 Autocad Diskc Begin 11012015 HINKLE SURVEYDRS  Showing! Lot3 of, JACK PEARCE SUBDMISION, inthe City of Lockhart, Caldwell County, Texas accordingt tothe map or platt thereof recordedi in Plat Cabinet B Slide 31 of Plat Records of Caldwell County, Texas and the improvements asf found situatedt thereon. Idoh hereby certilyt toA ALVAREZSA NVESTMENTS GROUP, LCthat/1) onNovember 12, 2015, (2)! have shown orr noted allr recordede easements or righto of ways listedi int the title report providedby Flowers-McDowell Abstract Company, Lockhart, Texas, GF. #1510003 effective date October1 1, 2015, ands shown ali observable evidence of easements on the ground. There are no encroachments, protrusions. confictsnor anys shortagesi inareanorb boundaryo other thans shownh hereon. THIS SURVEYIS CERTIFIED TO THE PERSON(S) COMPANY SHOWN HEREON AND ITS CONTENTS GUARANTEED FOR Book dc. USE WITH THIS ONE TRANSACTION ONLY DATED THIS DATE. THE SURVEYOR SHALL JobNo. 20153153 INCURNOLABLITYFOR ANY USE OF THIS SURVEYBEYOND: THIST TRANSACTION ORFOR Data: November 2015 ANY PERSONS/S), / COMPANY NOT USTED HEREON. Only those prints containing the raised Surveyed By JLH JOB Surveyo's seale andano orginal"LIVE" signatureshanibe consideredo official and relied uponb by theuser.  thef foregoingp plat isal true ando correct  ofas survey made ont the groundu under my direct supervision  JeryL. *  P.O. Box 1027 1109S. Mains Street Lockharl, TX 78644 Ph:(512)3 398-2000Fax1512)3 398-7683 Email: contact@ hinklesurveyors. .com Fim Registration! No. 100886-00  GHinke Surveyors, 2014    1. Au unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates and exceptional hardship, difficulty, or inequality that would result from literal enforcement oft the ordinance. This is the only vacant property that int the Downtown Square that abuts a rear alley.Asa provision for a subdivision, the City of Lockhart required the property owners dedicate a 15' alleyi in 2004. The owners were advised that they would havet to give upt the alley to have the city approve the subdivision. All the adjacent lots were not required to dedicate the alley, nor do they have easements for the alley. At the time, Property owners were not aware nor were they informed that another method fort the city to gain access to the alleyway was fori the owners to simply grant the city an easement. This creates an inequalitywith: the remaining buildings that adjoin said unofficial alley because the neighboring owners couldI hypothetically build across the "alley" 'to within 10' of their property line. We now have a 10ft. setback requirement from the alley, which we are requesting a variance for. Had we knowna simple easement dedication would have sufficed, we could build to the edge of the alley without this variance. The neighbors were not required to dedicate such alley, and they can build within 10ft. oft ther rear property. 2. The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused bya an action of the propertyowner, Applicant was not aware that the option to grant the city an easement instead of giving up land was an option. The Condition was ap pre-requisite for subdivisions by the City of Lockhart 3. The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow reasonable use oft the property Yes, we would like to maximize the building footprint on the last vacant lot downtown. There are ways to allow us to maximize but this method willl have the minimal affect. 4. The sole reason for the variance in not a desire of the owner, occupant, or applicant for  occupant, or applicant.  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship  No  5. The variance will not adversely affect public health or: safety and will notsubstantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property in the same This variance will have no adverse effect on the public health: and safety. It keeps in place the  district.  alley way that was originally created to include fire truck access.  The variance will not alter the essential character oft the zoning district within which the subject property is located andi is in harmony with intent an depress of the zoning ordinance. This variance will not: alter the character of this zoning districtandespectialy the closely  surrounding area.    The allyway was always an unofficial utility pathway. The west end of the alleyway has buildings that are 10' apart.    CITYOF  ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION  lockhant  512/398-3461 e FAX/512/398-3833 PO.Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644  308 WestSanAntonio: Street  APPLICANTIOWNER APPLICANT NAME Tn Snh DAY-TIME TELEPHONE S17:287. 770) E-MAIL. Jh cfoyubal OWNER NAMEIAL LLL DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 0228-290) E-MAIL Mcfayla  ADDRESS 1480 ClA S  ADDRESS 3605 Conatre  Lurhf A  PROPERTY  RAT lac a 1247 Varkear St Tadk Pance Sohon  ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION N2 lovww Niht N Sapka Conwe  LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) hot Itl  SIZE.  ACRE(S) Lots 13 tosels)  ZONING CLASSIFICATION,  CCK  EXISTINGUSE OFL LANDA ANDIOR BUILDING(S). MACAt - Currnl  AEET Ssrerins Spce OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE  REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE VARIANCE TO SECTION(S) DPps.l T CURRENT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT/S) pmpiy Ln  'sithke Bin  REQUESTEDVARLANCES) Gopady L.  S harkco Ban    SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IFNOT PLATTED, A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTIONOF THE PROPERTY.  A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS REQUIRED FOR  APPROVAL OF A' VARIANCE.  1. A unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates an exceptional hardship, difficulty, or inequity that would result from literalenforcement of the ordinance; 2. The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused by an action of the property owner, 3. The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow areasonable use of the property; 4. The sole reason for the variance is not a desire of the owner, occupant, or applicant for 5. The variance will not adversely affect public health or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property in the same 6. The variance will not alter the essential character of the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance. SITE PLAN, SUBMITTED ON PAPER NO LARGER THAN 11"X1 17", SHOWING: 1) Scale and north arrow; 2) Location of site with respect to streets and adjacent properties; 3) Property lines and dimensions; 4) Location and dimensions of buildings; 5) Building setback distances from property lines; 6) Location, dimensions, and surface type of off-street parking spaces and loading areas; and, 7) any other proposed APPLICATION FEE OF $ DS PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS:  occupant, or applicant;  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship;  district; and,  features of the site which are applicable to the requested variance.  1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 acre and one acre One acre or greater  $125) $150  $170 plus $20.00 per each acre over one acre  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT I OR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNINGTHIS APPLICATION.  SIGNATURE  N  DATE  4/22./71    OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY KRvin Waller DATE SUBMITTED A/32/2) DATE NOTICES MAILED 5-262071  RECEIPT NUMBER 0(001524 CASE NUMBER zv-21 -04  DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED 5-27-2021  BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE. 6/7/3  DECISION CONDITIONS    EWAIRUISI  EWAINUISE 115 120  110 IL 100 102 108 CHB 112 405 110 S 408 502 402404  IH  PI  CHB 111  315 312  301 4 ESAN ANTONIOST 100 112  201 CHB 2061  "702 100 102 104 106 CCB A38 105 5 114 Arg 9  R 201 206 208 CMB 215 210 212 219 LEAS ST EPRAIRIEI 301 321  613 AO 608610  IL 503 505 50* 506  605 607611 604 606  507509,601 508 602  315  CHB 200 a 210 lightbox 300  ER 200  214 218 304 318  301  517 525  509 513  421503 ELVEOAKST 408  303 4 311 300 313 107 ELIVE OAKST 110 401  311   403 411  602  320  402 410 415 E 419 14A 416  400 402 404  RMD 400  5 408  CHB  428 429 432  CHAPARRALSI  D8  402  ZV-21-05 214 BRAZOS ST  Subject Property Zoning Boundary  TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR OFF-STREET PARKING  scale 1"=200'    PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT  ZONING VARIANCE  CASE SUMMARY  STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Waller, Assistant City Planner REPORT DATE: June 3, 2021 PUBLICHEARING DATE: June 7, 2021  CASE NUMBER: ZV-21-05  Kw  APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Zoning Variance to waive the off-street parking requirement for a proposed  commercial use  STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial, due toj failure to meet all: six variance criteria.  BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT AND OWNER: lan Stowe SITE LOCATION: 214 Brazos St. SIZE OF PROPERTY: 0.239 acre  LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part ofLot 1, Block 42, Original Town of Lockhart EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant Single-Family Residence ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CMB (Commercial Medium Business District)  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  REASON FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE: The property currently consists of a vacant single-family residence that the applicant plans to remodel into a tattoo parlor, which is allowed by-right in the CMB zoning district. According to Appendix II of the Zoning Ordinance, the off-street parking standard in the CMB district is one space per 300 square feet of building floor area, plus one per employee in the maximum shift. The required total number of parking spaces for the proposed commercial use is five spaces, based upon the 988 square feet of building area and one employee in the maximum shift. Due to the fact that there is not enough space in front of the building to construct a parking lot and the applicant has been unable to secure off-site parking from neighboring property owners, the applicant proposes that the off-street parking requirement be waived in its entirety. A Zoning Variance application to allow vehicles utilizing one off-street parking space to back into the street, with the intent to submit the current application to waive the remaining four required spaces, was denied by the Board at its May 3, 2021 Public Hearing. The current proposal includes waiving all five required spaces, while at the same time proposing to improve that portion of Brazos Street in front of the property to accommodate two, marked, on-street parallel parking spaces for the future business. According to the submitted site plan, adapted from a survey of the property, each of the two spaces will be 91 feet wide by 22 feet long, with the right-of-way width shown as 25 varas, or 69.4 feet. If the on-street parking spaces are actually constructed, the dimensions of each space AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The immediate area contains a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The adjacent properties to the north, south, and east of the subject property are in single-family residential use and also zoned CMB. The property to the west, across Brazos Street, is in commercial use (Walgreens). This is an older neighborhood, where some existing uses may have  should be 81 feet wide by 23 feet long.  grandfathered", or nonconforming, parking situations.    UNIQUE CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY: The subject property has existed in its current configuration for many years, predating the zoning ordinance. Regardless of the use, compliance with the off-street parking standard for commercial uses is difficult unless a parking lot is constructed at the rear of the property behind the existing building, which would surround a large tree and also require one-way driveways on either side of the building. Based upon the dimensions oft the rear yard, construction of NATURE OF HARDSHIP: Although an exceptional hardship is imposed by the location of the building at the front of the property, where there is inadequate space for vehicles to circulate or turn around, there does appear tol be adequate room for a parking lot at the rear of the property. EFFECT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: There is some increased risk to public safety for vehicular traffic passing by customers exiting and entering their vehicles parked on the street. The applicant did send plans of the proposed on-street parking spaces to Public Works Director Sean Kelley, who provided comments to Planning on June 3 and 4, 2021. Mr. Kelley stated that he isi not opposed to the on-street parking if there are no other viable options, while taking into consideration the proximity of the parking spaces to the travel lane. He also explained that the plans submitted were not stamped by an engineer, no drainage study had been completed to ensure no impacts to neighboring properties, and that the on-street parkingspaces may not leave enough room for future road widening projects. In addition, it should be noted that on-street parking spaces are COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA: In order to approve a variance, the Board must find that the request meets all six of the criteria outlined in Section 64-129(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant submitted the attached written explanation as evidence in support of the variance. Staff believes that the variance request should be denied, as it does not meet all six oft the variance review ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS: An alternative solution is to provide the required five spaces by removing the accessory structures in the backyard and constructing a parking lot. The parking lot would require one-way driveways (one in, and the other out) flanking both sides of the building. This would require a new driveway approach on the south side of the property and modification of the water meter box since it would likely be in the path of the driveway. The applicant has demonstrated that PRECEDENT: A precedent might be set if the variance were to be approved. The owners of other commercial businesses on small properties might cite a variance approval on the subject property to RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: Public hearing notices were mailed to owners of 13 properties within 200 feet of the subject lot. A phone call was received from a surrounding property owner, who seemed to expressopposition to the request and asked for a copy of this staff report for review.  ap parking lot accommodating five spaces appears feasible.  for the public, and cannot be reserved for the subject property.  criteria.  off-site parking is not available, as discussed above.  ustilynotproviding any off-street parking or less parking than what is required.    11-07501 a 3s o  fa  la  - o e  ACTUAL 69 45    214 Brazos St. Lockhart, TX 78644 stowedbc@gmail.com Zoning Variance Response 5/17/21  Criteria 1: A unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates an exceptional hardship, difficulty, or inequity that would result from literal enforcement oft the ordinance. Response: Thel historic 1900 built residence is setback from the property line 15'-6"and has been rezoned Commercial by the City ofLockhart. The 35ft wide home is centered on the 65ft width ofthe propertyl leaving +/- 15 ft. on either side. The property backs up toas spring that runsi into Town Criteria 2: The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused by an action of thej property Response: Thisisa a pre existing condition, not caused by the property owner and applicant. Criteria 3: The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow ar reasonable use of the property. Response: Allowing the existing parking conditions, including the proposed improvement to the on- street parking, to suffice for the future zoning of this] property is thei minimum amount necessary to Criteria 4: The sole reason for the variance is not a desire oft the owner, occupant, or applicant for Response: This improvements proposed will cost money. Money is not the reason for this variance. Logistical impracticability and improvement of the street character andi neighborhood is the reason Criteria 5:' The variance will: not adversely affect public heath or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use ofa adjacent conforming property in the same district; Response: This variance will only improve the current conditions of the district. Criteria 6:' The variance will not alter the essential character oft the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and isi inl harmony with the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance. Response: This block of Brazos St. contains 41 properties in which this will be the 3rd to bej permitted as commercial use. The street is commonly used as parallel parking which suffices the customer, and guest parking for thisl block. There is no city built infrastructure on this block alleviating this condition. This variance willi in no way alter the character oft this district.Id do believe that thei intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance would suggest an improvement in the city right of way on this side of the street. Our proposal would better allow for proper drainage and safer parallel parking for  Branch creek.  owner, occupant or applicant;  allow a reasonable use of the property.  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship;  for this variance.  this commercial district.    CITYOF  ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION  ockhart  /512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398-3833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644  308 WeranAntonosreet  APPLICANTIOWNER  APPLICANT NAME, IAN Stwe DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 713 L 4107000 E-MAIL. sbwchEcegnail.cem OWNER NAME. TANS Showe  ADDRESS 426 Tiryst  Lokhut,Ty 78644  ADDRESS  DAY-TIME TELEPHONE  E-MAIL  PROPERTY  ADDRESS, OR GENERAL LOCATION 214 Buzos St.  LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) Paetof Lat1,Blak 42 Olignal Tow Lockhart ot  SIZE 0,239 ACRE(S)  ZONING CLASSIFICATION CMB  EXISTING USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING(S) Besideatinl  REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE  Apenlix I  VARIANCE TO SECTION(S)  64474)  OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE  CURRENT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT/S) off siet pAekiny spaces  ape feguieed.  REQUESTED VARIANCE(S). On shet PAEKIy is to be pecmilleD in thef of 2) pwallt PAE SpAces PAVeD bythe owner 0n1 hhe Sket R.O.W aclapiy Lufband gefer acteding b  Chyaf Lodehrt Bota Shaderels  RGmmerizt Suiln  4 wwivt Mereipiren Pbbshrwt a/lirg for    SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IF NOT PLATTED, Al METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY.  A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS REQUIRED FOR  APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE.  1. A unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates an exceptional hardship, difficulty, or inequity that would result from literal enforcement of the ordinance; 2. The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused by an action of the property owner, 3. The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; 4. The sole reason for the variance is not a desire of the owner, occupant, or applicant for 5. The variance will not adversely affect public health or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property in the same 6. The variance will not alter the essential character of the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and is in harmony with the intent and purposes oft the zoning ordinance. SITE PLAN, SUBMITTED ON PAPER NO LARGER THAN 11"X17", SHOWING: 1) Scale and north arrow; 2) Location of site with respect to streets and adjacent properties; 3) Property lines and dimensions; 4) Location and dimensions of buildings; 5) Building setback distances from property lines; 6) Location, dimensions, and surface type of off-street parking spaces and loading areas; and, 7) any other proposed APPLICATION FEE OF $ 125 PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS:  occupant, or applicant;  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship;  district; and,  features of the site which are applicable to the requested variance.  1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 acre and one acre One acre or greater  $125 $150  $170 plus $20.00 pere each acre over one acre  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT I OR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT. ATALLF PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION.  5-17-21  SIGNATURE  DATE.      OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY DATE SUBMITTED  WJaler S/-/))  Kerhn  RECEIPTI NUMBER, 01001641 CASE NUMBER ZV  21 O  DATE NOTICES MAILED 524207  DATE NOTICEPUBLISHED 5-27-704  BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE G//21  DECISION CONDITIONS    AO  RLD RMD  RHD  1205  3 % EI 1200 1205 1206 1308 1307 1310 1309 1312 1316 1311 1318 1320 1322 1324 1300  1507 IL  CHB AO 1409 403 1405 1407  RMD  150 1505 1501 CHB RLD,  CHB 1325 PUGACISE 1320  1401  RHD  1355  1408  1201 1203 1205 CHB dpi16.1708 j2001204 IL RMD  IH  AO RLD  1309  ZV-21-06 1205 REED DRIVE  Subject Property Zoning Boundary  TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE STANDARD FROM 50 % TO 51.19 %  scale 1"=400'    PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT  ZONING VARIANCE  CASE SUMMARY  STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Waller, Assistant City Planner Kw  CASE NUMBER: ZV-21-06  REPORT DATE: June 4, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 7, 2021  APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Zoning Variance to exceed the maximum lot coverage standard STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial, due toj failure to meet all six variance criteria.  BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Lance Elrod OWNER: Blackjack Block I, LLC SITE LOCATION: 1205 Reed Dr. SIZE OF PROPERTY: 24.575 acres  LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Iron Ox Addition  EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Currently vacant, proposed light industrial use ZONING CLASSIFIÇATION: IL (Industrial Light Zoning District)  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  REASON FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE: The applicant plans to develop the vacant subject property with a commercial greenhouse facility. A subdivision plat was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission to consolidate two parcels into one for the proposed greenhouse on October 28, 2020, along with variance requests to waive the requirement for a sidewalk along the Reed Drive frontage, as well as to waive the concrete monument requirements at two boundary corners. The plat was subsequently recorded on January 6, 2021. A Zoning Change was later approved for the property from AO Agricultural-Open Space District) to IL by the City Council on March 16, 2021, for the purpose of increasing the maximum lot coverage standard from 30 percent to 50 percent. The current variance proposal is to further increase the lot coverage from 50 percent to 51.19 percent for AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The adjacent property to the north contains the Durant gravel operation. The property to the east, across Reed Drive, consists of the County annex building, County fairgrounds, and County jail. To the south of the subject property and across Blackjack Street are industrial operations and the Lockhart Correctional Facility. The properties to the west are vacant and in seasonal agricultural use. Land uses further west include single-family dwellings. UNIQUE CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY: The applicant explains in the attached letter that the greenhouse's proposed footprint has changed since the original design in early 2020 through technology and workflow innovations. Keeping the footprint at 50 percent of the total land area would reveal operational constraints that would be better served in a modified (expanded) building footprint. The applicant continues that expansion of the footprint would enable the robotic and Al-enabled machinery to further increase yield. Staff, however, does not find a condition unique to the currently vacant property that would require a larger greenhouse facility than the 50 percent maximum allowed by Appendix II of the Zoning Ordinance. The variance cannot be considered the minimum amount necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property, since the property is currently vacant and a reasonable use would be achieved through constructing a building that does not exceed  the greenhouse facility, which the applicant states would increase yield.  the 50p percent threshold.    NATURE OF HARDSHIP: The building footprint's limitation to! 50 percent lot coverage does not create a hardship simply because the applicant wishes to produce a higher product yield. In addition, Variance Criterion 3 of Zoning Ordinance Section 64-129(a) states, in part, that the request for a variance cannot be based exclusively upon a desire of the owner or occupant for increased financial EFFECT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: The proposed increased lot coverage from 50 percent to 51.19 percent would likely not adversely impact surrounding properties or public COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA: In order to approve a variance, the Board must find that the request meets all six of the criteria outlined in Section 64-129(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant submitted the attached written explanation as evidence in support of the variance. Staff believes that the variance request should be denied, as it does not meet all six oft the variance review ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS: An alternative solution would simply be to reduce the size of the proposed greenhouse facility to comply with the 50 percent lot coverage maximum. The 1.19 percent difference is small and the building design could be slightly altered to fit the available PRECEDENT: A precedent might be set if the variance were to be approved. The owners of other commercial or industrial businesses looking to develop their properties or enlarge their buildings beyond the allowed lot coverage threshold might cite approval of a variance that doesn't meet the  gain. Ah higher product yield directly correlates with increased financial gain.  safety.  criteria.  buildable area.  criteria on the subject property as justification for approval. RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: None, as of the date oft this report.    LEGEND: ORANGE: Building! Dimensions Property Setbacks  LOTA 13110AÇRES  LOTB 11.465ACRES  TTTTTL  Iron Ox: New Facility  Overall Site  ARCO A1 URRA  Lockhart,Texas 05.14.2021 SCALE: "-1200 SP7882  GMA    NAIANNIL NIANTANIANIAAIZ  3  AINAINAINAINAITN, MINAINAINATNAIN  G    Iron Ox, Inc. 9557 Terminal Way San Carlos, CA 94070 p:650-485-1965 lance@/ronox.com  IRON voX  e:l  May 20, 2021 -F Rev01 May.17,2021  Towhom it may concern,  Blackjack Block 1, LLC. is requesting a coverage variance for our property located at 1205 Reed Drive, Lockhart' TX, 74688. The variance is to build an additional 12,789SF of building structure on the property. Below is our written statement documenting the reason for the 1.A unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates an exceptional hardship, difficulty, ori inequity that would result from literal enforcement of  variance and associated evidence.  the ordinance;  The hardship exists within the current building footprint that was scoped inj January 2020, which has since changed through technology and workflow innovations in recent months. This hardship would reveal itself in operational constraints that would be better served in a modified building footprint. Expansion of the space would enable Blackjack Block I's ecosystem of robotics and Al enabled hydroponic  farming to further increase yield.  2.The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused by an action of the property  owner, occupant, or applicant;  No unique physical condition or characteristic noted.  3.The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow ar reasonable use oft the  property;  Yes, the requested 1.19% (12,789SF) variance is the minimum amount needed by Blackjack Block I. This is the last request for additionalspace ont the associated  property.    4. The sole reason for the variance is not a desire oft the owner, occupant, or applicant for  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship;  Blackjack Block I's production system is rooted in flexibility. The additional 12,789SF of structure will unlock this flexibility which in turn enables us to shift our post harvesting processes to maintain customer service regardless of season or  requested product mix.  5.7 The variance will not adversely affect public health or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property ini the  same District;  The variance will not adversely affect public health or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use ofa adjacent  conforming property in the same District  6. The variance will not alter the essential character of the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and is in harmony with the intentand purposes of the zoning  ordinance.  The variance will not alter the essential character of the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and is in harmony with the intent and purposes of  the zoning ordinance.  Thanky you.  Alexander, CEO  Zaderr    CITY OF  ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION  Lockhart  TEXAS  /512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398-3833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 ADDRESS 955 Terminal Way  APPLICANTIOWNER  308 WestSanAntonio. Street San Carlos, CA 94070  APPLICANT NAME Lance Elrod DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 650.237.9296 E-MAIL. ance@ironox.com OWNER NAME Blackjack Block I, LLC. DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 650-485-1965 E-MAIL. greg@/ronox.com  ADDRESS 955 Terminal Way  San Carlos, CA 94070  PROPERTY  ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 1205 Reed Drive, Lockhart, TX 78644 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) See attached plat previously filed with City of Lockhart  Lot BIes 5 * Atlten ZONING CLASSIFICATION IL-L Light Industrial  SIZE 24.575 ACRE(S)  EXISTING USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING(S) Agricultural - Green House production  REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE  VARIANCE TO SECTION(S) Sec 64 -A Appendix II  OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE  CURRENT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTIS) 50% Maximum Lot Coverage with Structures  REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) Additional 199 % of Lot Coverage with Structures (Total 51.19%)    SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IFN NOT PLATTED, Al METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY.  A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS REQUIRED FOR  APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE.  1. A unique physical condition exists within or adjacent to the subject tract or structure(s) located thereon which distinguishes it from other similarly situated, and which creates an exceptional hardship, difficulty, or inequity that would result from literal enforcement of the ordinance; 2. The condition or characteristic noted above is not caused by an action of the property owner, 3. The variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; 4. The sole reason for the variance is not a desire of the owner, occupant, or applicant for 5. The variance will not adversely affect public health or safety, and will not substantially or permanently interfere with the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property in the same 6. The variance will not alter the essential character of the zoning district within which the subject property is located, and is in harmony with the intent and purposes of the: zoning ordinance. SITE PLAN, SUBMITTED ON PAPER NO LARGER THAN 11"X 17',SHOWING: 1) Scale and north arrow; 2) Location of site with respect to streets and adjacent properties; 3) Property lines and dimensions; 4) Location and dimensions of buildings; 5) Building setback distances from property lines; 6) Location, dimensions, and surface type of off-street parking spaces and loading areas; and, 7) any other proposed  occupant, or applicant;  increased financial gain or reduced financial hardship;  district; and,  features of the site which are applicable to the requested variance.  641.50  APPLICATION FEE OF $_ 1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 acre and one acre One: acre or greater 24.575. Acres  PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS:  $125 $150  $170 plus $20.00 per each acre over one acre  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT IOR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION.  SIGNATURE  LamBnek  2021  DATE May 17,    OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTEDI BY Kerin DATE SUBMITTED DATE NOTICES MAILED  Walles  0100712)  RECEIPT NUMBER  5/1/ 5/34/2)  CASE NUMBER zv-2) 06  DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED 5/27/31  BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE 6/7/2  DECISION CONDITIONS