PUBLIC NOTICE City of Lockhart  Historical Preservation Commission 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, April 5, 2023 Municipal Building - Glosserman Room 308 West San Antonio Street  AGENDA  1. Call meeting to order.  2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item.  3. Consider the minutes of the October 5, 2022 meeting, the February 9, 2023 meeting, the 4. CFA-23-11. Consider a request by Haley Conlin for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for a concrete pad and enclosure for a barbecue pit on part of Lot 1, Block 13, Original Town of Lockhart, 5. CFA-23-12. Consider a request by Cheryl Evans for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for a window sign and a sign attached to an awning on part of Lot 6, Block 20, Original Town of Lockhart, 6. Consider designs and cost estimates for City-designated Historic Landmark placards for placement 7. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda items.  February 15, 2023 meeting, and the March 1, 2023 meeting.  zoned CCB (Commercial Central Business) and located at 102 East Market Street.  zoned CCB and located at 215(A) West Market Street. on officially designated Historic Landmark structures.  8. Adjournment.  Posted on the bulletin board in the Municipal Building, 308 West San Antonio Street,  Lockhart, Texas at 3:00 p.m. on the 29th day of March, 2023.    City of Lockhart October 5, 2022 MINUTES  Historical Preservation Commission  Members Present: Christine Ohlendorf, Ronda Reagan, Michel Royal, JohnLairsen, Ron Faulstich, Ray  Ramsey  Members Absent: None  StaffPresent: Yvette Aguado, Kevin Waller, David Fowler, Dan Gibson Public Present: Marcia Proctor, Melissa Reese (applicant, Agenda Item 4) 1. Call meeting to order. Chair Reagan called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m.  2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item.  None.  3. Consider the minutes of the September 21, 2022, Meeting. seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of 6-0.  Commissioner Ramsey moved to approve: the minutes as presented. Commissioner Faulstich 4. CFA-22-14. Consider a request by Melissa Reese on behalf of Texas Monthly for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for a temporary wall mural on part of Lot 3, Block 14,Original Town of Lockhart, zoned CCB (Commercial Central Business District) and located at 200 East Market Planning Staff Kevin' Waller reported that the applicant proposes a temporary mural tol be painted onto the west wall of the building that will advertise the Texas Monthly BBQ Fest in November. The mural will be located on a previously painted wall that will be visible to pedestrian and vehicular traffic. It will measure approximately 35 feet wide by 9 feet tall, or 315 square feet. Since the Coca-Colae bottle and logo are a small, incidental part of the mural, the mural will not be classified as a sign for the purposes of review. Texas Monthly has agreed to paint over the mural within 90 days of its completion, with a color matched to the current building color. The removal of the mural has been planned to coincide with the property owner's intended timeframe to repaint the building. Mr. Waller utilized a PowerPoint presentation and answered Commissioners' questions. Staff recommends approval of the temporary mural, with the Commissioner Faulstich recalled that the Commission decided upon 60 days andi not 90 days, and  Street.  condition to remove it as proposed within 90 days from date of completion. that the Coca-Cola bottle would not be sO prominent but moret to the side.  -1-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 10-05-2022    Mr. Waller replied that the Coca-Cola logo is more discreet and that it fails outside of the sign category. He didn'tn recall the 60-day timeframe preference, ands stated that the application does Commissioner Faulstich replied that the application did state 60 days, but when the Commission had the discussion previously, it went from 90 days to 60 days after completion. Texas Monthly would paint over the mural and not wait for the Mendez family to repaint the building. Applicant Melissa Reese, on behalf of Texas Monthly, commented that the application does specify that Texas Monthly would be responsible to paint over the mural. She did recall 60 days had been mentioned in the discussion, but also many other ideas, sO she went with the 90 days, which is what she hoped to get approved. She responded to Commissioners' questions. Coyle Buhler, 1000 Magnolia, came forward to share his thoughts regarding the temporary: aspect ofa approvals. He felt problems could arise with consequences of approving items not allowed by amendments proposed and to be considered by City Council. Mr. Buhler stated that he was not opposed to the mural being approved, but hoped to point out the dilemmas that could arise. He stated that temporary is temporary until removed, and that the overall objective may fail once City Planning Director Dan Gibson stated that the Coca-Cola logo was discreetly placed such that the proposal is considered a mural rather than a sign. The Sign Ordinance does not allow signage to exceed 7% of the wall façade in the CCB zone, which is roughly 1/14 of the entire wall; the Ms. Reese stated that the Coça-Cola logo was intended to be integrated into the muralina a more complimentary manner, and' less of a commercial: image, while still acknowledging the sponsor (Coca-Cola). She added that the mural design is still conceptual, and that revisions could still be Commissioner Faulstich stated that the Commission is in the process of amending the Sign Ordinance to prohibit murals in the downtown Historic District. The proposed mural review and approval is being considered before the Ordinance is being consideredand passed by City Council. But just like anything else, the City Counçil may decide to override any decision the Commission makes. Mr. Faulstich stated that he liked the 60 days over the 90 daystemporary: approval. Chair Reagan stated: that she was not opposed to the mural, since it is promoting a fabulous festival that they are bringing to the town. It is changing the façade of the building, but it is temporary. The commitment of it being temporary needs to bei in writing by letter or statement. Ms. Reese responded that it is stated on the application that Texas Monthly will paint over the Chair Reaganrequested that Texas Monthly provide al letter from their legal department as to the exact timeframe of the proposed mural, in order to avoid past situations where something is proposed and changes are later made inconsistent with the approval. Ms. Reagan also asked why Ms. Reese answered that it's a sponsor-related expectation, but they could certainly provide a  specify' 90 days.  considered by City Council.  mural is much larger.  made.  mural after 90 days, color-matched to the building color.  they needed it to be 90 days. letter if needed.  -2-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 10-05-2022    Mr. Waller added that Staff recommends a condition of approval for either 60 or 90 days, with Staff to confirm the mural's removal after the expiration. Enforcement action would be taken if Vice-Chair Lairsen commented that he was the minority vote in favor of allowing permanent murals in the Historic District, with very stringent guidelines. He felt the Commission could be setting a double-standard, as they've been adamant about not approving murals in the Historic District, but now they're trying to push this mural through as a temporary mural. Mr. Lairsen added that murals are wonderful for tourism, and he was going along with the approval for the Commissioner Royal stated that she does not trust that the mural will be removed if approved for the 60 or 90 days, thinking of past issues that have occurred in which the applicant does not follow through based on what was promised and approved. Mrs. Royal added that they've talked at length about having murals, and that she just wasn't in favor of the proposed mural, and felt Commissioner Ohlendorf explained that her concern was that the Commission is planning to amend the Sign Ordinance to prohibit murals downtown. While the Commission doesn't object tot the BBQ Fest event, they have already recommended the prohibition to the City Council. Chair Reagan stated that if the proposal is not approved, it can go before the City Council. Mr. Gibson replied that they have a right to appeal the Commission's decision to City Council Planning Staff David: Fowler commented that this application iss submitted under the wire before the regulations potentially change; and suggested the Commissionact: accordingly. Mr. Buhler stated that the Commission could make a statement for the record and to the City Council that approving this temporary mural doesn't change the Commission'srecommendation Vice-Chair Lairsen stated that the proposed mural is temporary, and not permanent, which the Commissioner Ramsey stated that he had no problem with the proposal, but was concerned that the applicant might not follow through with the removal of thet temporary mural and repainting Mr. Waller referenced the checklist on Page 2 of the Certificate for Alteration application form, stating that Section' Two, Question' Three establishes: a 90-day timeframe for temporatyateration Chair Reagan moved to recommend approval of CFA-22-14 with the condition that the mural is temporary and required to be removed within 90 days after its completion, and the property be returned to original or agreed-upon condition. Vice-Chair Lairsen seconded, and the motion  the mural is not removed.  90-day temporary placement.  that the event could bej just as successful without the mural.  :  within 30 days.  on1 the proposed Ordinance amendment. Commission must consider.  the building back to its original color.  or construction.  passed by a vote of4-2.  -3-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 10-05-2022    5. Consider designs and cost estimates for City-designated Historic Landmark placards for Commissioner Faulstich stated that he had no update on this agenda item, as it is unclear what information and graphics the placard would contain, but that he did bring a material sample for Commissioner Faulstich and Chair Reagan agreed to gather more informationand discuss options Mr. Buhler explained that during his time on the Commission, they tried and tried to get the placards approved. Buhler encouraged the Commission to take this across the finish line to completion. There were many people out there who would, be proud to place the placard ont their  placement on officially designated Historic Landmark structures.  consideration.  on the material type and the language on the placard.  building.  The Commission tabled this agenda item to af future meeting by consensus.  6. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda Mr. Waller stated that no applications had been submitted for the October 19 meeting, with today being the deadline to submit. The next regularly scheduled meeting after October 19 is  items.  Wednesday, November: 2. 7. Adjournment,  Commissioner Faulstich moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Ramseyseconded. The  motion passed by a vote of6 6-0, and the meeting adjourned at 6:18p.m.  Approved:  (date)  Yvette. Aguado, Recording Secretary  Ronda Reagan, Chair  4-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 10-05-2022    CityofLockhart February 9, 2023 MINUTES  Historical Preservation Commission  Members Present: Christine Ohlendorf, Ronda Reagan, Michel Royal (5:31pm), John Lairsen, Ron  Faulstich, Ray Ramsey, Kevin Thuerwaechter  Members Absent: None  Staff Present: Kevin Waller, David Fowler, Kelly Stilwell, Yvette Aguado Public Present: Jim and Winn Smith and Engineer team (applicant, Agenda Item 4) 1. Calln meeting to order. Chair Lairsen called the meeting to order at5 5:30.p.m.  2. Citizen.comments not related to an agenda item. None 3. Consider the minutes of the. January 4;2023 meeting. seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of6 6-0.  Vice-Chair Reagan moved to approve the minutes as presented. Commissioner Thuerwaechter 4. CFA-23-03. Consider a request by Jim and Amelia Smith of Jack Pearce LLC for approval ofa Certificate for Alteration for new. construction, consisting ofa proposed three-level building, on Lots 1 and 2, Jack Pearce Subdivision, zoned CCB (Commercial Central Business District)  and located at 120 and 124 East MarketStreet Member Royal arrived at 5:31 pm.  Planning Staff Kevin Waller provided: a brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. The applicant proposed a construction of a new, 15,600 square-foot, three level building containing both commercial and residential uses on the only two vacant lots in the Courthouse Square. The first story will include four commercial lease spaces, an internal courtyard, and a single-car garage for one of the two third-floor residential units. Three office spaces are proposed on the second story, along with a shared roof patio at the building's southeast corner. Two separate residential units are proposed on the third storywith as sawtooth style roof, as well as aroof patio above the second story for thel living units and located primarily along the north and east edges of the building. Per applicant, the building will not exceed the 90% lot coverage maximum set forth in Zoning Ordinance Appendix I, which will be verified during the plan review process as part of the Building Permit submission. A 15-foot-wide alley, dedicated to the City along the south edge of the property, is utilized for trash, access, and deliveries for all buildings along the same block, and also allowsadditional parking opportunities for Henry's Restaurant. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: add an architectural focal point at the top of the building, or other building feature(s) in locations and of atype(s) deemed appropriate by the Commission; and obtain approval of a Specific Use Permit  for amixed-use building from the Planning and Zoning Commission.  -1-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    Chair Lairsen asked what the setback in the rear is and if this would be on the property line Mr. Waller replied it is normally 101 feet and yes, it is on the property line backing into the alley way. However, the Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Zoning Variance to allow the waiving Winn Smith, 6009 Mountain Climb Dr., Austin, TX 78731, came forward to speak on behalf of Jim and Amelia Smith and to give few comments and introduce their architectural team. He gave a history of his parents' construction projects in the community and expressed how in his opinion their projects in and around downtown had been a good addition to the community and filled a nice function for businesses or residents that choose to live close to town, and hope they can continue doing that within town. He said they hired the best architectural team because they understand the importance of the project and he introduced. Adam Martin ofl Lake Flato. Adam Martin, Architect of Lake Flato, 319 Carrolton Ct., San Antonio TX 78212, came forward to discuss their proposed plans for the project and gave look into the history of their firm. He proceeded to discuss the plan in a brief description of each step to give better insight to the project as a whole and get the idea in context of their care and craft proposed to be put into the project. He also provided a pamphlet prepared by their firm which provided floor plans, building elevations, exterior siding details, examples of brick and roof shingle patterns typically found in  backing upi into the alley way.  oft the 10-foot rear building setback to zero feet in. June 2021.  historic districts and other pertinent information and a slideshow. Chair Lairsen asked where the shingles were proposed to be ont the building.  Mr. Martin responded that the metal shingles would be pushed back away from the street and  further back on the residence.  Chair Lairsen asked ifi it would. be the: entire wall.  Mr Martin replied, yes.  Vice-Chair Reagan asked what color would be used.  Mr. Martin replied they are looking at various very neutral greys with no painted colors nor gloss and to be set back and be a backdrop and not up against the street making it more important to preserve the historic nature. He continued describing the proposed plans and materials to be used for the project. He commented that they would be architecturally and historically opposed to the conditions brought upl by staff regarding adding an architectural element to the top of the brick because would be in-authentic and would age badly. They instead proposed vertical pilasters which will pass the parapet line and are characteristic with many of the masonry Chair Lairsen commented that the pilasters are already proposed per the plans, and asked if the Mr. Martin said they are happy with the way the pilasters are currently proposed. He stated that the pilasters are a common brick construction method, a way of expressing the structure of the  buildings.  pilasters could be raised higher.  building on the exterior.  -2-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    Commissioner Thuerwaechter asked how they would explain the distance the pilasters go above Mr. Martin explained he hadn't measured but assumed they go upabout three courses which is Commissioner Thuerwaechter asked if the pilasters as proposed were comparable to other  the roof line and how does that compare to the existing structures.  about eightinches ors SO.  pilasters on the same street or on the square.  Mr. Martin replied that he believed that there is a wide varietyof pilaster heights. Commissioner Royal asked why they didn'tgo all the way yp with the third-floor brick. Mr. Martin answered they felt it would be too overpowering to the street frontage.  Vice-Chair Reagan asked if looking at the top of first picture facing Market Street, to the right of the brick it was grayed out, and ifiti is level and flushed with the front brick wall or is it recessed Mr. Martin responded it was recessed al little, that the building next door is flushed withi the front of the pilaster and is twelve inches out and back from the pilaster and from façade as well. Vice-Chair Reagan proceeded to ask why they. didn'tmake that part brick. painted plaster as it is predominant ini the downtown area.  alittle.  Mr. Martin stated they were trying to connect portions of the building, but it could be brick or a Vice-Chair Reagan asked. regarding the office suite if that was aroof top deck or a room above. Mr. Martin replied it was a shared roof deck for second floor office tenants. He added that getting daylight into the space was important, sO they were trying to match the height of the transom over the sidewalk canopy and up against the alley way and avoiding bringing them down. Commissioner Royal stated that the saw tooth roof doesn'ts seem compatible with the rest of the Mr. Martin replied that saw tooth roof types are a historic type ofroof and essentially are about gathering daylight, typically northern facing daylight, and are a very effective way to capture daylight in a space in the times before electricity. It is energy efficient and was used historically Commissioner Ohlendorf asked about the sliding barn looking door int the same structure. Mr. Martin replied that it hides an opening to a gardening equipment storage area for the proposed roof top gardens. It is nine feet back from the face ofthe building and not visible from Vice-Chair Reagan expressed that shei felt the review process would take more than one meeting. She added that the recommendations, not preferences, to make the building more compatible  Historic District, and asked ifi it served any purpose.  and: still works today, so the third floor space gets the most ambient light.  the street.  -3-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    with the Historic District should be considered. Ms. Reagan added that she would agree that the new construction would need to be more in context with the surrounding buildings, but felt this would dominate the whole block. She did support the suggestion that the pilasters be raised, to maybe 10 or 12 inches, and should be more consistent with those of the other buildings Mr. Martin responded that the gable would be competing with the oldest building in a certain way. He stated that what they propose is for the building to have its own character and not tryt to Commissioner Faulstich asked what the measurement of the metal pieces was and will it look like Mr. Martin replied no, that is made out of bonderized steel which is az zinc finish on steel and has  downtown.  replicate other historic buildings.  asbestos shingles. the ability to weather.  Chair Lairsen asked the Commission to identify the changes being rèquested. roof line by maybe eliminating the first saw toothy roof of the apartment.  Vice-Chair Reagan replied that the pilasters could bei taller at 10or12 inches. Consider a different Commissioner Faulstich stated that doing it that way gives it the same image as other buildings Chair Lairsen commented that the saw tooth style gives the building a modernized look. In addition, he stated that ift they were doing stucco on one side, then doi it on the other side as well. Vice-Chair Reagan asked about thé window panels on second floor and ift they were six over six.  int the downtown area.  Mr. Martin replied theré were opportunities int terms oft the patterning. Vice-Chair Reagan also recommend arches on the second floor.  Commissioner Faulstich stated that there is al building with windows like this across' West Market Chair Lairsen added that he felt they should embrace the new designsrather than try and mimic old designs, and thought that the firm had been very thoughtful in the setbacks and proportions of facades and the Commissioners' suggestions to help blend it in more. He stated that there Vice-Chair Reagan stated that she thought it was workable, but didn't feel they should rubberstamp it as iti is presented, but review it and have it return for further discussion and vote. Commissioner Ramsey stated that he had no issues with any aspect of the proposed building. Mr. Martinr responded1 to the arches question, explaining that beingona double lot makes it more difficult to compare the proposed building with others ont the Square. The other buildings may be on a 9-foot grade, and ours are on a 12-foot. The arches would be of a different size. Also, the reason why they didn't want to do at triangular-shaped feature at the topi is because the buildings  Street from the fire department.  should be discussion on: suggested modifications.  4-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    thathaveit ita arec onasingle lot and haveat three-Dayorganzationonthewindows, ,orareons! slightly Chair Lairsen asked if any ornamental lighting would be attached on the brickwork.  larger lots but not as large as theirs.  Commissioner Ohlendorf asked if they could point out where the exterior soffits would be Mr. Martinresponded that they would be utilized iny various places, including the sidewalk canopy Commissioner Royalcommented that thisi is thet first building ont the Square like this, and felt that the Commission needs to put thought into it, and not just put a stamp on it. She added that the point of building in the Historic District is to blend in, and not conflict with, with the other Chair Lairsen stated that he thought the applicant had done a great job with the main brick and didn't work too hard to mimic any building in the downtown area. Since it is not towering over the other buildings and hiding elements of the other buildings, he is for it. He again asked the Chair Lairsen stated that he understands the modifications to include the raised pilasters at three or more courses of brick, stucco where the door is to the right of the stair rail, and the removal of one oft the sawtooth window features at the roof, which he felt willmodifyt the whole building. He added that he agreed with Commissioner Faulstich's point that this type of window already Vice-Chair Reagan said her suggestions were not a preference, but thats she puti in al lot ofresearch to show that she wanteds some oft the elements of the older buildings sot this would be compatible, Commissioner Ohlendorf commented that she supported whatever could be done to make the residential structure look a little less modern. She thanked the applicants for all the research, Applicant Jim Smith, 1480 Clearfork St., Lockhart, Texas, explained that they have put in all the effort and time and: money into the engineering firm to do an extensive amount of research to not conflict or mimic any roof line or replicate any other buildings. He added that as a builder and owner he was not for changing the roof line at this point in their extensive research that proved itwas compatible. Changing parapets is something they don't mind discussing. Chair Lairsen moved to approve CFA-23-03 with the condition that the pilasters are raised 12 inches above the parapet line and staff's condition of an SUP. for a mixed-use building by Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Thuerwaechter seconded, and the motion  utilized.  and underneath the breezeway.  buildings.  Commission to list all they want the applicant to modify.  exists in other buildings downtown.  and not to replicate but blend in  efforts, and investment they've done for the project.  passed by a vote of 5-2.  -5-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    5. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda Mr. Waller stated that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be held February 15th, since  items.  two applications had been submitted.  6. Adjournment.  Vice-Chair Reagan moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Royal seconded. The motion  passed by a vote of 7-0, and the meeting adjourned at 6:56 p.m.  Approved:  (date)  Yvette Aguado, Recording Secretary  John Lairsen, Chairman  6-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-09-2023    City of Lockhart February 15, 2023 MINUTES  Historical Preservation Commission  Members Present: Christine Ohlendorf, Ronda Reagan, Michel Royal, JohnLairsen, RonFaulstich, Ray  Ramsey, Kevin Thuerwaechter Members/ Absent: None  Staff Present: Kevin Waller, David Fowler, Yvette Aguado  Public Present: Caroline Kiefer-Bell (applicant, Agenda Item 4), Sandy Dosier, Lee Valgarett 1. Calln meeting to order. Chair Lairsen called the meeting to order at! 5:30 p.m.  2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. None 3. Consider the minutes of the ehnuan9.2023.metine.  This item was tabled to the next meeting by consensus, as the minutes were not yet ready for 4. CFA-23-04. Consideran request by Caroline Kiefer-Bell, on behalf of Robert Mendez, for approval ofa Certificate for Alteration to allow an existing, temporarymural originally approved by the Commission on October 5, 2022 through CFA-22-14 to becomepermanent within the Courthouse Square Historic District on Part of Lot 3, Block 14, Original Town of Lockhart, zoned CCB Planning Staff Kevin Waller provided a brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. He gave a summary of the October 5, 2022 Commission decision to approve a temporary wall mural, which was painted onto the west wall of the building located at 200 East Market Street in the days leading up to the Texas Monthly BBQ Fest on November 5, and completed that day. The Commission's approval was based upon the condition that the mural be removed no later than 90 days after its completion, or February 3, 2023. Murals were prohibited within the Historic District shortly after the Commission's approval of this mural by amendment of the Sign Ordinance that was passed by the City Council. It was determined that the proposal to keep the mural should go back before the Historical PreserationCommision for consideration as ap permanent mural, since the Commission had originally approved the mural prior tot the mural Commissioner Faulstichread as statement that explained the muralwas approved by the Lockhart Historical Preservation Commission as at temporary mural. Texas Monthlyand the building owner also knew that the mural was to be temporary. Mr. Faulstich added that he wasn't sure if Texas Monthly notified the artist that it was to be a temporary mural. The new request to make the mural permanent violates two City ordinances. He recommended that the City Council should be the deciding factor, since they requested that the Commission draw up a City code on murals  review.  (Commercial Central Business) and located at 200 East MarketStreet  prohibition in the Historic District.  -1-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-15-2023    citywide. The Commission decided it was in the best interest to prohibit murals in the Historic District, and the City Council approved the ordinance. Faulstich made the motion to send  CFA-23-04 to City Council for consideration.  Chair Lairsen seconded the motion and asked for discussion.  Commissioner Ramsey stated that he also agreed that it would be best to send the proposal to City Council, and reminded all that this was an agreement for atemporary mural. He added that the mural is now a violation of the Ordinance, since murals are now prohibited in the Historic Vice-Chair Reagan agreed to send the proposal to City Council, since murals are now prohibited in the Historic District due to the ordinance amendments. She reiterated that the mural was only to bei temporary: and to be painted over within 90 days as stated on the application submitted for approval, and that it was for an advertising gimmick to get people to attend the BBQ Fest. Chair Lairsen agreed that the Sign Ordinance is being violated by this request for a permanent mural. Should the mural go before the City Council for consideration, the Council could either amend the ordinance in favor of the mural, or vote against the mural. Mr. Lairsen felt that his position on the Commission was not to override the City Ordinance, and that the matter should Commissioner Ohlendorf explained that the mural was initially presented one way, which has now changed significantly. She agreed with the recommendation to send the proposal to City Council for approval, to make surei it staysi in compliance with the Ordinancest that currently exist. Commissioner Royal stated that she agreed that the City Council should make the final decision. She expressed that the mural was presented as temporary, and that the owner would be repainting their buildingi ina af few months. Mrs. Royal explainedt thatt the Commission is not against the mural. by any means, but it is on a building located in the Historic District which is what they Commissioner Thuerwaechter said he concurred and didn't have anything else to add, but was happy to see sO many people passionate about the mural and the cityofL Lockhart. He added that this is why we're on the Historic Commission, and agreed that it needs to go before the City Planning Staff David Fowler explained that in order to send the proposal to City Council, the process would be to make the motiont to deny the application, andt then the applicant would need Applicant Caroline Kiefer-Bell, 196 Kellogg Ct., Lockhart, shared her thoughts about why she felt the mural should remain. She mentioned her support for art ini the community, as they give the locals and patrons opportunity to identify with the history. Ms. Kiefer-Bell stated that murals are a part of Lockhart's history. She recommended that the Commission revisit the policy that prohibits new murals, as murals play an important role in commerce and tourism. Sandy Dosier, 1207 Maple St., asked if the mural would be able to remain while it is reviewed by  District.  be left to the City Council.  as the Commission are responsible for.  Council.  to apply for an appeal to Council.  the City Council.  -2-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-15-2023    Commissioner Ohlendorf stated that the Commission is a representation to the community, and that the proposal was initially presented as a temporary mural. She added that the Commission was appointed to preserve the Historic aspect of the downtown area, and that they are not against art, as they too take pride in the community. The mural was an advertisement for a Lee Valgarett, 400 W. Prairie Lea, asked if there were standards for the approval of murals. He Chair Lairsen responded that murals were prohibited in the Historic District but not in any other Commissioner Faulstich moved to deny the application for CFA-23-04 and send to City Council for consideration. Chair Lairsen seconded, and the motion passed by avote of7-0. 5. CFA-23-05. Consider a request by Teresa Charnichart for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for a hanging sign of the non-pre-approved variety on Part of Lot1, Block 13, Original Townof Lockhart, zoned CCB (Commercial Central Business) and located at 200 East Market Street. Mr. Waller explained that the applicant proposes a wooden hanging wall sign, to be hung by chains on the existing hooks above the front window. He added that since the sign is not of a shape that can be considered Pre-Approved", nor does it contain a border, the sign is to be considered by the Commission through the Certificate for Alteration review procedures. He provided a brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. Staff recommends Chair Lairsen asked for Commission discussion. Hearing none, he asked for amotion. Vice-Chair Reagan moved to approve CFA-23-05 as presented. Chair Lairsen seconded, and the 6. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda Mr. Waller stated that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be held March 1, with five  community event.  also asked ift they could repaint the existing murals.  areas of the community.  approval.  motion passed by a vote of 7-0.  items.  applications submitted. 7. Adiournment.  Vice-Chair Reagan movedto adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Royals seconded. Ther motion  passed by a vote of7-0, and the meeting adjourned at 6:06 p.m.  Approved:  (date)  Yvette Aguado, Recording Secretary  John Lairsen, Chairman  -3-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 02-15-2023    City of Lockhart March 1, 2023 MINUTES  Historical Preservation Commission  Members Present: Christine Ohlendorf, Ronda Reagan, Ray Ramsey, Kevin Thuerwaechter  Members Absent: John Lairsen, Michel Royal, Ron Faulstich Staff Present: Kevin Waller, David Fowler, Yvette Aguado  Public Present: Adam Costa (applicant's representative, Agenda Item 4), Hailey Conlin (applicant's  representative, Agenda Item 5), Derek Royal (applicant,A Agenda Iteme 6),Jeff Hammett (applicant, Agenda Item 7), and Gabriel Morey (applicant, Agenda Item 8)  1. Call meeting to order. Vice-Chair Reagan called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.  2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. None 3. Consider the minutes of the February15,2023.n meeting.  This item was tabled to the next meeting by consensus, as the minutes were not yet ready for 4. CFA-23-06. Consider a request by Jesse Maciel, Jr. of Central Texas Autos for approval ofa Certificate for Alteration for the replacement of a damaged building façade with new materials, as well as a new gutter system, new awnings, overhead door replacements, and window replacements on Part of Lot 4, Block 17, Original Town of Lockhart, zoned CHB Planning Staff Kevin Waller provided a brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. He reported that the applicant proposes to replace the entire exterior façade ofthe building after a school bus crashed into the southeast corner, causing substantial damage to the exterior. Visual renderings were displayed to show the new façade material options. Also proposed is a new gutter system, new awnings, the replacement of three windows and two  review.  (Commercial Heavy Business) and located at 101 South Colorado Street.  overhead doors. Staff récommends approval. There was brief discussion with staff and Commission. present to speak on behalf of or against the item.  Vice-Chair Reagan, acting as Chairwoman in Chairman Lairsen's absence, asked if anyone was Adam Costa, 101 S. Colorado Street and representative oft the applicant, came forward to discuss Vice-Chair Reagan moved to approve CFA-23-06 as presented. Commissioner Ramsey seconded,  the proposal with Commissioners and respond to questions.  and the motion passed by a vote of 4-0.  1-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 03-01-2023    5. CFA-23-07. Consider a request by Teresa Charnichart for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for a new exterior door on Part of Lot1, aanoalmnadlasams CCB (Commercial Central Business) and located at 102 East Market Street. Mr. Waller provided a brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. The applicant proposes: ar new front door entrance to be located at the end ofthe exterior hallway on the right-hand side of the building where a wall currently exists. The door will measure 6.6 feet tall by three feet wide overall, with a door frame that includes ani inset glass panel of  5.5 feet tall by 2.2 feet wide. Staff recommends approval. Discussion ensued between Commissioners and staff. discussion and to answer questions from the Commission. Thuerwaechters seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of4-0.  Hailey Conlin, 102 E. Market Street and representative of the applicant, came forward for Commissioner Ohlendorf moved to approve CFA-23-07 as presented. Commissioner 6. CFA-23-08. Consider a request by Derek Royal for approval ofa Certificate for Alteration for an awningreplacement. on Part of Lot 6, Block 20, Original TownofL Lockhart, onpropertyzonedccB Mr. Waller provided al brief overview of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. Proposed is ther replacement of an existing 61-foot wide by 8-foot deep awning with a new awning. The new awning will feature a galvalume snap-lock standing seam metal roof and 6-inch rain gutter with Applicant Derek Royal, 732 Fir Lane, came forward and briefly explained that he would do work like the other two projects he completed in the Historic District with one on north side and the Commissioner Ramsey moved to approve CFA-23-08 as presented. Commissioner Ohlendorf 7. CFA-23-09. Consider ar request by Jeff Hammett of Nostalgic Rags, LLCfora approval ofac Certificate for Alteration for new signage, lighting, and cedar board sidingon! Part oft Lot 6, Block 20,Original Town of Lockhart, on property zoned CCB andl located at 215 West Market Street. Mr. Waller gave a brief report of the proposal via PowerPoint presentation. Proposed are new signs, lighting fixtures, and cedar board siding. Two signs will be applied to the two windows on opposite sides of the front door, one on each window. Another proposed sign will mount above the awning in a similar fashion to the Printing Solutions sign, and will not extend higher than the top of the building. Four porcelain lights beneath the awning are also proposed, measuring 18 inches wide by 12 inches high. Also proposed is horizontalyaligned cedar board: siding on the  andI located at 211 and 215 West Market Street.  downspouts at opposite ends.  other on the east side of the downtown square. seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of4-0.  front wall façade. Staff recommends approval.  There was brief discussion between Commissioners and: staff.  -2-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 03-01-2023    Applicant Jeff Hammett, 215 W. Market St., came forward and responded to Commissioners questions. He added that at few wrought iron chairs would be placed at the front oft the store. Vice-Chair Reagan stated that the Commission doesn'tcontroli furniture placed on the sidewalk, but that the City does have at three-foot minimum clearance requirement for pedestrian traffic.  Discussion continued between the applicant and Commissioners.  Vice-Chair Reagan moved to approve CFA-23-09 as presented. Commissioner Thuerwaechter 8. CFA-23-10. Consider arequest by Gabriel Morey and M. Kaye Askins for approval of a Certificate for Alteration for new fencing and paving stones on Part of Lot 4, Block 20, Original Townof lochart.onproperyioned CCB and located at 210 West San Antonio Street. Mr. Waller reported that the applicant proposes the construction of a four-foot tall, wood, hog-wire design decorative fence, locatedi in the west portion ofthe property,A6-foottal. privacy fence with wooden, horizontal boards and wooden posts will be located in the south and southeast portions of the property. Paving stones, already in place, are located within the proposed fenced area on the west and south portions of property. The stones measure two feet by three and one-half feet each and are made ofl limestone. Mr. Waller presented via PowerPoint Vice-Chair Reagan asked Staff if fencing will only be located on three sides of the property, with no fencing along San Antonio Street. She also added that she likes the choice to use horizontal Mr. Waller confirmed that the fencing will be located on three: sides of the property, and not the Appliçant Gabriel Morey, 210 W. San Antonio St., stated that the fence will look nice. Mr. Morey also clarified that the dimensions oft the paving stones are approximately two feet by five feet. Vice-Chair Reagan moved to approve CFA-23-10 as presented. Commissioner Ramsey seconded, 9. Discuss the date and agenda of the next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda Mr. Waller stated that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be held April 5th, since no  seconded, and the motion passed by a vote of4-0.  and: stated that Staff recommends approval.  fencing boards and a see-through design. San Antonio Street frontage.  and the motion passed by a vote of 4-0.  items.  applications had been submitted by the deadline for the March 15th meeting.  10. Adjournment.  Commissioner Ramsey moved to adjourn the meeting, and Commissioner Ohlendorf seconded.  The motion passed by a vote of4-0, and the meeting adjournedat6:17 p.m.  Approved:  (date)  Yvette Aguado, Recording Secretary  John Lairsen, Chairman  -3-  Historical Preservation Commission Meeting 03-01-2023    ESAN AMTONDOST  100 206 102 104 106 108 110 114 116 118-B 118  CHB  w BANMATONDSI  101 03 105 111 113 E  CMB  110  EMARKETST  CCB w MARKET  119 ST 207 203 205 211  17  2 200 206 208 210 212  118  215  212 216 218  219  217  EPRARIEL LEAST  WP PRAIRIE LEAST  303  CMB 301  300  snn  211  CFA-23-11 102 E MARKET ST CONCRETE PAD AND  Subject Property Zoning Boundary scale 1"= 100'  ENCLOSURE FOR BARBECUE PIT    STAFF REPORT CASE SUMMARY  CERTIFICATE FOR ALTERATION  STAFF: Kevin Waller, Historical Preservation Officer/Senior Planner kwl APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Concrete pad and an enclosure for barbecue pit  CASE NUMBER: CFA-23-11  REPORT DATE: March 29, 2023 MEETING DATE: April 5, 2023 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval  CONDITION: Reposition proposed enclosure location such that a minimum of 5 feet of clearance is  maintained between the main building and the enclosure.  BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Haley Conlin OWNERS: Philip and Claude DuCloux SITE LOCATION: 102 E. Market St.  LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot1, Block 13, Original Town of Lockhart EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant Commercial Lease Space PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Commercial ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CCB (Commercial Central Business)  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes a new concrete pad and enclosure for a barbecue pit at the rear of the property for the new Barb's-B-Q business establishment, the pad and barbecue pit of which are already in place. The applicant was made aware of the required enclosure by the City Health Officer (see email correspondence with the Health Officer, enclosed). Measuring 17 feet long by 81 feet 6 inches wide by 9to 101 feet tall, the enclosure over the concrete pad will consist of metal framing with screened-in windows and a corrugated, galvanized steel roof. The smokehouse enclosure will be located to the south of the building to house the new restaurant, and approximately 7 feet north of the private alley access traversing the south portion of the property. The Commission approved a hanging wall sign for the proposed business on February: 15,2023, and a new exterior door on the front of the building on March1, 2023. COMPATIBILITY: The pad and proposed enclosure are not of a design, nor in a location, that would detract from the character of the Courthouse Square. Smitty's Market is also locatedv within the Historic District, and contains a barbecue pit to the rear, or east end, of the property, that also does not present a visual impact to the area. It should be noted that the corrugated metal trim framing the lower portion of the proposed enclosure (see enclosed photographs) is of a material that is somewhat uncharacteristic of a historic district, however, its location at the rear of the property and against an alley helps to minimize any visual impact. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: The concrete pad and proposed enclosure are subject to approval of this Certificate for Alteration, which is required for all construction within the Historic District (Historic Districts and Landmarks Ordinance Section 28-11(a)). In addition, the proposal is subject to compliance with building code requirements, as well as health and safety regulations. A recommended condition of approval is to reposition the proposed enclosure location such that a minimum of 5 feet of clearance is maintained between the main building and the enclosure, in accordance with the Fire Code, which would shift the enclosure one foot further south. According to Section 28-11(d)(1), the only exemption from a Certificate for Alteration when not visible from a public street is for signs. Further, the proposed enclosure will be visible  from the South Commerce Street right-of-way. ALTERNATIVES: None necessary.        @ 6    Kevin Waller From: Sent: To: Subject:  Barbs BQ yeehaw@batbsbgcom, Friday, March 3, 2023.4:21PM Kevin Waller Re: CFA smokehouse  Hi yes, it is Corrugated Galvanized Steel 31- Gauge Roof Panel.  On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at: 11:00 Kevin' Waller walerelocsnar-xot wrote:  Thanks, Chuck. Could you please provide any additional detail about the roof, since it can't really be seen much in the photos? Ore even a photo of the roof from al birds-eye perspective, with details about the type ofmetal roof, would be  even better.  Kevin    Ba SMOKEHOUSE PROPOSAL CURRENT BUILDINGI 19' DOOR3'  8'6".  EXISTING PARKING  DOOR3'  EXISTING BUILOING  PROPOSED SMOKEHOUSE  ROOF OVERHANG6"  H DOOR3'  PROPERTYLINE    CERTIFICATE FOR ALTERATION APPLICATION  DATE RECEVED:3/6/23 DATE APPROVED:  CERTFICATENUMBER: CFA-23-1  NOTE: An approved Certificate For Alteration (CFA) is required by City Code for all signage, construction, alteration, or modification of property designated as Historic, if sucha activities will change the architecture, design, finishes or outward appearance ofa building, structure, object, site, or area as viewed from the exterior. (Ord.93-19, Sec. 11a and1 12). A City Sign Permita and/or City Building Permitr may also! ber required byt the City Code.  ONLYFULYCOMPLETED APPLICATIONS WILLI BE/ ACCEPTED  Applicant Haley Conlin MailingAddress Austin, TX78721 701-441-9450 Telephone  Property Owner Philip DuCloux Mailing Address 78602  1122 Richardine Ave  P.O Box 3, Bastrop, Texas  Telephone 512-303-1477 Estimated Cost $6300  Person Doing Work_ Jose Barrio Property! Legal Description Property Street Address PropertyCiyZoningDesignations Include photos of: Area ofWork_  Part of Lot 1, Block 13, Original Town of Lockhart 102 E Market St, Lockhart, TX, 78644  CCB  LocationMapAttached  PHOTOS ARE REQUIRED SHOWING ALL THE AREAS TO BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK DESCRIBED:  FullElevation: Showing Area Affected andlor Site_ Description of Proposed Work 8'6"W X 17'L concrete pad  3000 psi, 4" thick, 10 gauge wiremesh, #3 rebar 18"  With an enlcosure covering the pad made of metal roof and framing with  screened in windows.  Please Attach Scope ofWork Questionnaire/7 Attach Sketches/llustrations. 1 Are! Detailed Plans Available? REQUIRED SIGNATURES: Beforer me the undersigned authority, on this day appeared and solemnly swears, that the statements above and attached concerning the above-described property aret true andt that (s)he is authorized toa acta as ana agent inprocuringt the certificate requested.  Applicant Signature: SHaly Bonlue Historical Preservation Officer Approval: Historical Preservation Commission:  Date: 3/1/23 Date: 3/1/23 Date: Date:  Property Owner Signature: Consent only:Phelp Ducloug  A Certificate For Alteration isv validf fora a period concurrent with the Building Permit granted for thep proposed work, or aj period nott to exceed 18r months.    Certificate No. CFA2.3-W Page2of Reviewed:.  CERTIFICATE FOR/ ALTERATION SCOPE OF WORK QUESTIONNAIRE  KWI  Thef following questions must bea answered and the form completed byt the applicantf for a Certificate ForA Alteration." This questionnaire shall bea attachedt to anya applicationf for Certificate ForA Alteration. Thel Lockhart Historical Preservation Officer shalli independently" verify allir information provided ont the application andt the attached questionnaires. Thel Lockhart Historical Preservation Officer shall reviewt the applicationa andt this questionnairei ina an expedient manner andn notifyt thea applicant oft the outcome ofther review. Thel Lockharth HistoricalF Preservation Officer maya approve the Certificate For Alteration prior toac commission hearing, based upon adequacy oft their information provided andv verification oft thes scope ofv work. Additionali information may ber needed to complete thea application and reviewp process. Finalr reviewa anda actiono ont thea applicationf for Certificate ForA Alterationb byt thel Lockhart Historical Preservation Commission ataproperly scheduled public hearingn may ber required. Any  required explanationst to answers givens shallb bei inwritinga ande attached.  Yes No Verified  Scope OfWork Questions  Section One  kw/ 1. Is this application for construction or alteration on or ata a property whichi is in al Historic kw 2. Is this application for any construction or alteration work that is NOT described or defined as  District or a designated Historic Landmark? What is its: zoning designation? CHL? H?V ordinary maintenance of al historic property? Isi it more than limited' "Ordinary Maintenance"? 3. Willt the construction or alteration covered by this application include any work visible from the 4. Will the construction or alteration covered by this application remove or, physically change any structural elements of the property? (i.e. Interior or exterior: load bearing walls, columns, posts,  exterior  Kw Kw  of the property? foundations, footings, etc.)  Section Two  kw 1. Is the construction or alteration covered by this application considered an emergency repair of sudden, accidental or unforeseen property damage? When did damage occur? Kw 2. Is the construction or alteration covered by this application considered necessary to correct a circumstance that endangers al building, business, owner, or the public? 3. Is the construction or alteration covered by this application considered permanent, to be in place jenl more than 90 days? (A temporary construction or alteration isi required to be removed within 90 days and the property is to ber returned to the original or agreed upon condition.) 4. Has ap permit been issued for any of the proposed work? Date:  Permit No.  V kw/ Has any work actually started?.  Describe: Section Three  Kw 1. Will the construction or alteration covered by this application make aj physical change to any design elements, features or finishes visible from the exterior of the property? kwl 2. Will the construction or alteration covered by this application repair or replace an element of the building or property with a material different from the original material of that element? 3. Will the construction or alteration covered by this application include painting exterior surfaces 4. Does the construction or alteration covered by this application include demolition or removal of any part or element of the property visible from the exterior of the property? 5. Will the construction or alteration covered by this application make any change in the appearance of the property as viewed from the exterior of the property?  V yw V Kw  that have not been previously painted?  The undersigned owner or authorized agent attests that the statements made above and on any attached explanations are true and agrees that this Scope Of Work Questionnaire and any attachments shall become a part of the application and the Certificate For Alteration cited and will be the limit of construction andlor alteration work undertaken. Further, construction will nots start prior toa authorization byt the approval ofthe Certificate For Alteration.  Applicant Signature: Haley Conlu  Date: 3/1/23 Date:  Verified By: KRvWAlwpate 3/1.9/7ction:    Kevin Waller From: Sent: To: Subject:  Stacy Wright Thursday, March 30, 2023 11:45 AM Kevin Waller; Kelly Stilwell RE: CFA-23-11 Staff Report (Conlin)  The smokestack needs to be above the roof line and needs reinforcement bracing to the wall of the building. Ithinkl recommended that the smokestack be at least 51 feet above the roof line in order to prevent nuisance odors from impacting thei indoor spaces on the 2nd floor as well as any fresh air intakes that could be on the roof from A/C units. I  will send youthe emails Isent to the owner.  Stacy Wright, MS, RS, REM  Registered Sanitarian/Code Inspector  CITY OF  Lockhart  TEXAS  P.O. Box 239 308 W. San Antonio Street Lockhart, TX78644 Main: (512) 398-3461 ext. 2380 Direct: (512)376-6757 Fax: (512)398-3833 Website: www.ockhart-tx.OTg From: Kevin' Waller walerelocenareko Sent: Thursday, March 30, 202311:37AM Subject: CFA-23-11 Staff Report (Conlin)  To: Stacy Wright swrgnelocartotp" Kelly Stilwell stiwelelocanar.torp    Kevin Waller From: Sent: To: Subject:  Stacy Wright Thursday, March 30, 2023 11:46. AM Kevin Waller; Kelly Stilwell FW: permit forms  Stacy Wright, MS, RS, REM  Registered Sanitarian/Code Inspector  CITY OF  Lockhart  TEXAS  P.O. Box 239 308 W. San Antonio Street Lockhart, TX 78644 Main: (512)398-3461 ext. 2380 Direct: (512)376-6757 Fax: (512)398-3833 Website: www.ockharl-tx.T8 From: Barbs B Q yenawarospacom, Sent: Tuesday, February1 14, 20233:25PM To: Stacy Wright Swigntelccenar-op Subject: Re: permit forms indoors int the kitchen. Thanks,  Hi Stacy, we do plan on using solar-powered lights. In terms of any cutting or preparation, yes, confirm that it will all be  1    On Tue, Feb: 14, 2023 at 3:14 PM Stacy Wright wrgntelocenar-xo wrote:  Happy Tuesday Chuck,  Will there be any electrical in the BBQ pit for lighting etc.? Reason why! laski ist that your may want to have electrical conduit ran by al licensed electrician before doing the concrete pour. The electrician would need toi take out a permit with the Cityand have the worki inspected before the pour. You could always dos solar powered or battery powered lighting ifr needed. Please note that there is not any food prep: allowed in the BBQPit! based on the current proposed Based on our conversation, all cutting and preparation willl be indoors in the kitchen. Any cutting or meat preparationi in the BBQ Pit would trigger a hand sink and lighting requirements. Please confirm for our records.  structure.  Stacy Wright, MS, RS, REM  Registered Sanitarian/Code Enforcement  CITY OF  Lockhart  TEXAS  P.O. Box 239  2    308 W. San Antonio Street Lockhart, TX 78644 Main: (512)398-3461 ext. 2380 Direct: (512)376-6757 Fax: (512)398-3833 Website: www.lockhart-xOTg  From: Barbs B Q yeehaw@batbsba.com" Sent: Tuesday, Febnuany14,2023300PM. To: Yvette. Aguado RuAtoechaItsO Cc: Stacy' Wright wnghtelocnart-ko Subject: Re: permit forms  Yes, it will be metal roof and framing + screened in windows.  Thanks,  On Tue, Feb: 14, 2023 at 14:33 Yvette Aguado BRURCPPOSPATEKOIR wrote:  Good day.  I've shared what you submitted with Mr. Wright, City Health Inspector and he has asked for the  following:  Need specs for building materials & roofenclosure? Ex. Scree? Metal Roof?, etc.  Thank you.  3    Chuck  On Mon, Feb13, 2023 at 10:00 Stacy Wright swrgntelocenar-tog wrote:  Sounds like a good plan. The purpose oft the screening enclosure and roofi is to protect food from insects and rodents so thet fire box outside will be fine. Let me know as soon as yous submit the plans sO we can geta fast review and get permit issued. Iwould also recommend raising the smoke stack above the roof line to prevent any future nuisance  complaints. Probably want to clear roof line by 51 feet or more. just in case.  Stacy Wright, MS, RS, REM  Registered Sanitarian/Code Enforcement  2    CITY OF  Lockhart  TEXAS  P.O. Box 239  308 W. San Antonio Street Lockhart, TX 78644 Main: (512)398-3461 ext. 2380 Direct: (512)376-6757 Fax: (512)398-3833 Website: www.lockhart-x.Og  From: Barbs B Q yeehawOharbspacom Sent: Monday, February 13,20239:50AM To: Stacy' Wright SWIRItOOCPATEKOIR Subject: Final draft of smokehouse  Hi Stacy,  We met with the Fire Marshall and he approved ofe everything we proposed in terms of how far the smokeri is from the  existing buildings as long as push the smoker 1 foot further towards the alley.  3    We are planning tol lay concrete 8W) x: 16L and build the enclosure around it, this gives us room for a walkway byt the doors of the smoker and the enclosure will cover the entire smoker, includingt the smokestack, except thet fire box  which will be sticking out oft the enclosure something like this: Valentinas in Austin, Tx  4    ENTS  NNG&EV  :  Svs    There will be doors at both ends of the enclosure that align to the entrance of the building.  We would like to submit the building permits soon and would like to know ifyouhave any feedback before we submit  our plans.  Thanks,  Chuck  6    2 119 C 6  207 wS SANA ANTONOSI  6  215  101 383  B03  120  202  20216219  111 113  00  111  1  CCB  1171  LoC 201 C WIMARKETST  117  s 217 B 4  118  202  302  310  200  207  CMB 205  209  WF PRAIRIE LEAST  CFA-23-12  Subject Property Zoning Boundary scale 1"= 100'  215 A W MARKET ST WINDOW SIGN AND SIGN ATTACHED TO AWNING    STAFF REPORT CASE SUMMARY  CERTIFICATE FOR ALTERATION  STAFF: Kevin Waller, Historical Preservation Officer/Senior Planner w CASE NUMBER: CFA-23-12  REPORT DATE: March 30, 2023 MEETING DATE: April 5, 2023 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval  APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Window sign and sign attached to awning  CONDITION: Removal of the patterned graphics on either side of the double-door entry.  BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Cheryl Evans  OWNER: Judy Chapman and Diane Morgan Chapman, Chapman FamilyTrust LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part ofLot 6, Block 20, Original Town of Lockhart EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Clothing alteration and repair (commercial) ZONING CLASSIFIÇATION: CCB (Commercial Central Business)  SITE LOCATION: 215(A) West Market St. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Same  ANALYSIS OF ISSUES  PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes a window sign, as well as a sign to hang from the awning, for the new Sew & Sew clothing alterations business. Already in place, the adhesive window sign reads "Sew & Sew Alterations", with a phone number contact below, and two sewing spool graphics above and below the sign text. This sign is located on the glass of the right-side entry door. The sign to hang from the awning's edge is to be of a wood material, will face the street, and simply read "Alterations". Since this sign is not of a shape that can be considered Pre-Approved", nor does it contain a border, the sign is to be considered by the Commission through the Certificate for Alteration review procedures. Note that the awning along the entire storefront, from the west end of the building to where it meets the fire station at the east end, is currently in the process of reconstruction, as approved by the COMPATIBILITY: The proposed signs are not ofas scale or design that would detract from the character of the Courthouse Square Historic District. Other street-facing hanging signs located along the same block include the Lockhart Sports Therapy sign at 211 West Market Street, as well as the Sladek Real Estate sign located at 215 West Market Street. Numerous hanging signs perpendicular to the sidewalk can be found along the San Antonio Street side of the Historic District, and window signs are common COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: The signs comply with the Sign Ordinance, and the required Sign Permit is subject to approval of this Certificate for Alteration. It should be noted that there are two patterned graphics on either side of the double-door entry, beneath the door glass. These graphics appear to resemble items that might be advertised or sold at a clothing alterations shop, and are effectively considered signs. However, each of the two graphics individually would exceed the maximum sign area limitation of 8 square feet for all signage, and therefore must both be removed as a condition of approval. Further, the graphics could not be considered murals, as murals are prohibited in the ALTERNATIVES: The two patterned graphics on either side of the double-door entry could be displayed within the building and made visible to the public right-of-way, provided that they are not affixed to the  Commission at its March 1, 2023 meeting.  throughout the District.  Historic District by a recently approved City Council Ordinance.  inside ofthe door glass.    a X 3  6 3  1  S a  3 S  &  y d  (o    CERTIFICATE FOR ALTERATION APPLICATION  DATE RECEIVED: 3//23 DATE APPROVED:  CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CRA-13-11  NOTE: An approved Certificate For Alteration (CFA) is required by City Code for all slgnage, construction, alteration, or modification of property. designated as Historic, if such activities will change the architecture, design, finishes or outward appearance of building, structure, object, site, or area as viewed from the exterior. (Ord.93-19, Sec. 11a and 12). A City Sign Permit andlor City Building Permitr may also! ber required byt the City Code.  ONLY FULLY COMPLETED APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED  Applicant Cheny! Evaus Harwood TX 78632  Property Owner_ Tudy Chapman Richland Hilk TX7618 Telephone 817 614 3996  3011 Chalk Aa 830 857 6944  2624  Parko.  MailingAddress Telephone Property Legal Property  Mailing Address  Scruggr  Qlairt Bde Marketsto!  Person Doing Work Chery! Evans o ha Estimated Cost $60.00  Part & L 215A Woit  Description Street Address  70 OssimTw RLckhp  Lockhart  V LocationMapAtached  PropertyCiyZoningDesignations CCB Include photosof Area ofWork_  PHOTOS ARE REQUIRED SHOWING ALL THE AREAS TO BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK DESCRIBED:  FullElevation Showing Area Affected and/or Site_ Description ofF Proposed Work  Adhesive 6I9A OA door windlow. 22"x29"  Wodd sign Susponded Lrom awnng 55x1x45" (Pleusa nfok atlehed dhaising) Facng toshe! *Woe sn maybe mewntra owveie ngit wle so ak te ynin  Ceosonse ayiceninhypic. ppked  o Sitelsr  on enigno  ww M  Sinemele sri omsis 10  Srn vegoio,  onee gntis pou nouspllggs 0 a sevoo nous   Please Attach Scope of Work Questionnaire Applicant Signature: CI Historical Preservation Officer Approval Historical Preservation Commission:  Attach Sketches/llustrations,  Are Detailed Plans Available?D  REQUIRED SIGNATURES: Before me the undersigned authority, on this day appeared and solemnly swears, that the statements above and' attached conceringt the above-descried properw/Argtrue and that (s)hei is authorized to act as an agent inp procuring the çertificate requested.  Date: 3/7k3 Date: 3117/13  Property Owner Signature: Gudy M, Choyman  Date: Date:  A Certificate ForA Alteration is valid for a period concurrent with the Building Permit granted fort the proposed work, or a period nott to exceed 18r months.    CFA-23-2 ft  CERTIFICATE FORALTERATION SCOPE OFWOPKQUESTOAMARE  Certificate No. Page2.of Revlewed:  Thef following quéstions must be answered and thet form completed byt theia applicant fora Certificate For Alteration. This questiomaires shallb be atlachedto anys applicationf for Certificate ForA Alteration. The Lockhart Historical Preservation Oflicer shalli independently verify alli information provided ont the application' ardt the' attached questionnaires. The Lockhait Historical Préservation Offioer shall revlewt the application andt thisq questlonneirei inane expedients manner andr notifyt thes applioent oft theo outgome oft ther revlew. Thelockhart Historical Preservation Officerr mays approve the Certificate For Alteration priort tos ac commission hearing. basedy upon adequacy ofd thei information providede and verification' of thes scope ofv workA Additonali inforation may! ber neededt to completet thea application and reviewp process. Finalr review and actiono on thea applicationf foro Certifioate! ForA Alteration bythel LockhaifHistorical Preservation' Conmission afap properly scheduled publici hearingr may' ber réquired. Any  required explanations to answers givens shall be Iny writing anda attached.  Yes No Verified.  Scope O/Work Questions  Section One  kw 1. Is this application for construction or alteration on orat a property which is in al Historic Kw. 2. Ist this application for any construction or alteration. work thati is NOT described or defined as Kw 3. Will the construction or alteration covered by this applicationi include any work visible from the  District or a designated Historic Landmark? What is its zoning GHPMCCRNML ordinary maintenance of al historic property? Isi it more thant limited' "Ordinary Maintenance"? 4. Will the construction or alteration covered by this appicationremove: or, physically change any structural elements oft the property? (i.e. Interior or exterior: load bearing walls, columns, posts,  exterior of the property? foundations, footings; etc.)  /  kw  Section Two  kw 1. Ist the construction or alteration çovered by this application. considered. an emergency repair of V kw 2.. Is the construction oL alteration çovered. by this application considered neçessary to correct a  Sudden, accidental. or unforeseen property damagé? When did damage occur?. circumstance that endangers al building, business, owner, or the public? 3. Ist the construction or alteration covered by this application considered permanent, to be in place more than' 90 days? (A1 temporary construction" or alterâtion is required to bé removed" within 90. days and the property is to be returned to the originalor agreed upon condition.) 4. Has a permit been issued for any of the proposed work? Date:  yw kw.  Permit No.  Has any work actually started?,  Describe: Section Three  w 1 Will the construction oralteration covered by this application make ap physical change to any kw 2. Will thè construction or alteration covèred by this appication repair or replace ani element of the Kw 3. Will the construction or alteration covered by this appication include painting exterior surfaces kw 4. Does the construction or aiteration covered by this application include demolition or removal of  design elements, features or finishes visible from thes exterior of the property? building or property with a material different from the original material of that element?  that have not been previously painted?.  any part or element oft the property visible from the exterior of the property? 5., Will. the. construction or alteration covered by this appliçation make any change in the appearance of the property as viewed from the exterior oft the property?  The undersigned owner or authorized agent attests that the statements made above and on any attached explanations are true and agrees that this Scope Of Work Questionnaire and any attachments shall become a part of the application and the Certificate For Alteration cited and wil be the limit of construction and/or alteration work" undertaken. Further, construçtion will nots start priort to authorization byt the approval ofthe Certificate For Alteration.  Applicant Signature:  Date: Date:  CHC  Verified ByktnWAlae Da:3/39/3Atiom:    SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION  SP-23  CITY OF  BTA0O  512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398.3833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644  Lockhart  308 West. SanAntonio Street  08a AB  0aos y  TEXAS  CONTRACTOR/OWNER Bysiness Owner CONTRACTOR.NAME   TMBue  Chenyl Evans  LICENSE NO.  DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 430 857 6944 E-MAIL. chealreldaul.con OWNER NAME. Judy Chayimau DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 817 614.3990  ADDRESS 301 Chalk Road  iblud  Harwood TX 78632  SuDAsnT pia  GM  bne  u  0  evo  ADDRESS. 2624 Scruogs Park D.  Richland Hills TXx 76118  E-MAIL  o(enple osrlosiis  10 -  PROPERTY  31 MOTART  ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 215A Wost MankefStroet  ZONING CLASSIFICATION CCB  HISTORIC LANDMARK OR DISTRICTYIN) Ves  NUMBER OF STREET FRONTAGES (Property lines abutting a public street).  PRINCIPAL USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDINGS ON THE SITE. Clothng allevation  and repair.  4  -  NAME OF BUSINESS TO OWN OR USE PROPOSED SIGN, Sow5ow  STAGI  BRUTAMDIB o 95MMIS9 OFF-PREMISE  REQUESTED PERMIT  PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION (Check all that apply) TYPE OF SIGN PROPOSED (Check all that apply)  ON-PREMISE  NEW/SIGN  STRUCTURAL REPAIR  STRUCTURAL ALTERATION/RELOCATION  WALL  MARQUEE HIGHPROFILE  LOW/PROFILE  MEDIUM PROFILE  INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTE ENTRANCE  RESIDENTIAL IDENTIFICATION    o  M BTAG  Wwwdow Sigh avd Awnivig sigu*    71. of M3WWAa- Sin Hrt  Pripua SR.15s'  PARACTERSTSGFSONNA  IFATTACHED SIGN, TOTAL AREA OF BUILDING. FACADE ON WHICHLOCATED 114:34 SQ.FT. IFF FREESTANDING SIGN, SETBACK FROM NEAREST STREET RICHT-OF-WAYLINE,  FT.  HEIGHT TOTOP OF SIGN ILLUMINATION  FT. TOTAL SIGN FACE. AREA (One side only). 6.155 SQ. FT.  V NONE  INTERNAL  REFLECTED  BARE BULB  SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS  DRAWING, PREFERABLY SUBMITTED ON PAPER NO. LARGER THAN 11 X:17", SHOWING: 1) The location of the proposed sign on the site or building, including dimensioned references to adjacent building features or nearest property. line, as appropriate; 2) Dimensions of the. sign and sign structure, including foundation or mounting details; 3) Material and electrical specifications; 4) Name of sign manufacturer, if applicable; and, 5) Ifthe sign is to be freestanding and over six feet high, certification by al licensed engineer LIST OF SIGN FACE. AREA OF ALL EXISTING SIGNS, IF ANY, ON THE SAME BUILDING FACADE (for attached signs) OR ALONG EACH STREET FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY (for freestanding signs). COPY OF STATE PERMIT OR AUTHORIZATION IF APPLICATION IS FORA AN OFF-PREMISE SIGN. COMPLETED APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ALTERATION IF SIGNI IS IN HISTORIC DISTRICT PERMIT FEE OF $10.00, PLUS $0.25 PER EACH SQUARE FOOTO OF SIGN AREA OVER 40 SQUARE FEET, (applied to only one side of double-faced. signs), PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART WHEN  fors structural compliance with the building code.  OR ON HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY.  THEPERMIT IS ISSUED.  IHEREBY AFFIRM THAT IFIAM NOT OWNER OF THE PROPERTY UPON WHICH THE SIGN ISTOBE LOCATED, IAM AUTHORIZED BY THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS ENTITY OWNING THE PROPERTY TO REPRESENT THEM IN THIS APPLICATION. TOTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATIONAND: ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT.  SIGNATURE  DATE. 5/K/23  C  PRINTED OR TYPED NAME,  Choryl Evans  NOTE: Allfreestanding signs require a pre-pour foundation inspection to verify the location andi reinforcement of the sign. Itis the contractor's responsibility to call for the inspection.  OFFICE USE ONLY: SAA APPROVED BY  1,  3.2904878 Building Inspection    Planning  PERMIT NUMBER SP.23  CERT. FORALTERATION NUMBER CFA- 23-12  lo.so  DATE  FEE  RECEIPT#.