PUBLIC NOTICE City of Lockhart Planning and Zoning Commission 7:00 PM, Wednesday,lanuary 12, 2022 Municipal Building - Glosserman Room 308 W. San Antonio St. AGENDA 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Elect Chair and' Vice-chair for 2022. 3. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. 4. Consider the Minutes oft the December 8, 2021, meeting. 5. ZC-22-01. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Alan Balser for a Zoning Change from AO Agricultural-Open Space District to RHD Residential High Density District on 40 acres in the Cornelius 6. ZC-22-02. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Alan Balser for a Zoning Change from AO Agricultural-Open Space District to RHD Residential High Density District on 6.52 acres in the W. C. Williams Survey, Abstract No. 300, located at 2100 North Cesar Chavez Parkway NB (North Bound). 7. ZC-22-03. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Earnest Yanez and Albert Yanez on behalf of Trinity Street Properties, LLC, for a Zoning Change from CHB Commercial Heavy Business District to RHD Residential High Density District, on Lot 3, Block 1, MOSO Subdivision, consisting of 0.614 acre located at 8. - ZC-22-04. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Sarah Corona of PSCE, Inc., on behalf of Alan Balser and Pamela Guffey, for a Zoning Change from AO Agricultural-Open Space District to CHB Commercial Heavy Business District, on 5.484 acres in the Cornelius Crenshaw Survey, Abstract No. 68, 9. PV-22-01. Consider a request by Mark Scammerhorn of IAM Properties, LLC, for Variances to Chapter 52 "Subdivision Regulations", oft the Lockhart Code of Ordinances, Sections 52-31(a) and 52-205(c), to allow a building permit to be issued for construction prior to recording the findl plat of Lockhart Industrial Park II, Section One, on the future Lot 1, Block A, consisting of 10.101 acres in the Cornelius Crenshaw Survey, Abstract No. 68, zoned ILI Industrial Light District, and currently part of an unplatted tract addressed at 500 10. DP-22-01. Consider a request by Riley Baldus for approval of a Development Plat for Lockhart Ridge consisting of 23.613 acres in the Compress Hill Supplement Addition, and in the Byrd Lockhart League, Abstract No. 17, zoned RLD Residential Low Density District, and located at 601 Flores Street (FM 672). 11. Discuss the date and agenda of next meeting, including Commissionrequests for agenda items. Crenshaw Survey, Abstract No. 68, located 1601 Silent Valley Road (FM2001). 1201 Blackjack Street (FM 20). located at 1507 North Cesar Chavez Parkway-S Southbound. FM 2720. 12. Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission reserves the right to adjourn into Executive Session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, as authorized by the Texas Government Code, including, but not limited to, Sections 551.071 (Consultation with Attorney), 551.072 Deliberations about Real Property), 551.073 (Deliberations about Gifts and Donations), 551.074 (Personnel Matters), 551.076 (Deliberations about Security Devices), 551.087 (Economic Development), 418.183 (Dellberations about Homeland Security Issues) and as authorized by the Texas Tax Code, Section 321.3022 (Sales Tax Information). Posted on the bulletin board in the Municipal Building, 308 West San Antonio Street, Lockhart, Texas, at 3:50 PM on the 7th day of January, 2022. City of Lockhart Planning and Zoning Commission December 8, 2021 MINUTES Members Present: Philip Ruiz, Bradley Lingvai, Rick Arnic, Ron Peterson, Chris St. Leger, Phil McBride, Manuel Oliva Member Absent: None Staff Present: Dan Gibson, Kevin, Waller, Christine Banda Visitors/Citizens Addressing the Commission: Andrew White, Amy Antone, Barbara Schiller, Bill Barton, Kerry Gaddis,Jaclyn Zapien 1. Calln meeting to order. Chair Ruiz called ther meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2. Citizen comments not related to an agenda item. None. 3. Consider the Minutes of November 17, 2021, meeting. Commissioner Arnic moved to approve the November 17, 2021, minutes. Commissioner 4. ZC-21-19 and PDD-21-02. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by Keith Schauer, P.E.,on behalf of Jesco Construction, Inc., for a Zoning Change from RMD Residential Medium Density District to PDD Planned Development District, including a PDD Development Plan forthe. Jesco Subdwison.n91Bavrel int the James George Survey, Abstract No.9,located Mr. Gibson explained that a duplex subdivision was previously proposed for the subject property, and a final plat was approved in February 2020 but hasn't been recorded yet because the necessary public improvements haven't been constructed. A different development is proposed that would use the: same street and lot layout that was previously approved, although the need for additional access easements requires revisions tot the approved final plat. The PDD classification is needed for the development because the current RMD zoning doesn't allow moret than one principal dwelling per lot, whereas the PDD development plan proposed multiple principals structures on the lots. Thel homes would be two-storydetached single family dwellings with garages. Sidewalks would be provided on both sides of the street, whereas the previously proposed duplex subdivision would have had sidewalks on only on side of the street. The PDD development plan also shows an additional park area with a childrens' playscape. Mr. Gibson mentioned that a letter of protest was received which could affect the City Council vote. St. Ledgerseconded, and the motion passed by a vote of 7-0. at9 920 Trinity Street. -1- Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 12-08-2021 Chair Ruiz opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant. Bill Barton, ofLennar Homes, said they want to build a smallcommunityonthesabjettproperty. They will have separate rear yards with privacy fencing for allthehomes. Commissioner Oliva asked what the pricing fori the homes would be. Mr. Barton replied that they would be three and four-bedroom homes that range from $200,00 Commissioner St. Ledger asked how this development made it a community instead of just Mr. Barton replied that they would have picnic tables in the open space areas. And with the to $300,000 in price. another subdivision. sidewalks on both sides, iti is a walkable community with an HOA. Commissioner McBride asked about the proposed floor area of the homes. Mr. Barton said they would range between 1,200 and 1,500 square feet. Chair Ruiz asked for any other speakers. Kerry Gaddis,, of 826 Trinity Street, said he attended the previous meeting two years ago when the duplex project was approved. He said he liked this plan better than the duplexes but is concerned that the homes would be purchased and later rented out. He didn't want rental Jaclyn Zapien, owner of the house at 909 Trinity Street, said her property is directly across the street from the property. The view from the front yard would be the rear of two-story homes that could be seen above any screening fence. Also, the subdivision would add traffic along Bill Barton said that an HOA would be responsible for taking care of the landscaping, and that Chair Ruiz asked for any speakers and, seeing none, he closed the public hearing and asked for Mr. Gibson said that staff recommended approval of the zoning change and PDD development plan. He mentioned that the commission could add a note requiring aperimeterscreening: fence Commissioner Oliva moved to recommend denial of ZC-21-19 and PDD-21-02. Commissioner St. Ledgerseconded, and the motion passed by a vote of5-2, with Commissioner's. Peterson and property in his neighborhood. Trinity Street. She requested that the proposed development be denied. the current RMD. zoning allows two story dwellings. the: staff recommendation. ifdesired. Lingvai against. -2- Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 12-08-2021 5. FP-21-11. Consider a request by Glenn Synnott for approval of a revised Final Plat for Jesco Subdivision, consisting of 9.186 acres in the James George Survey, Abstract No. 9,to be zoned Kevin Waller explained that the plat accompanies the PDD development plan and zoning change request for the same property. The subdivision would have 35 lots, 33 of which are for residential use, with the remaining two being one for public parkland and the other one for stormwater detention with a park open space. There are 68 dwelling units that will be individually owned as condominiums with an HOA. He mentioned that the previous final plat was approved in February 2020 for 34 duplex lots, which would be the same total number of PDDI Planned Development District, and located at 920TrinityStreet dwelling units, but the subdivider is now pursuing a differentproposal. Chair Ruiz asked for the applicant. Bill Barnett, with Lennar Homes, said the revised plat was consistent the with proposed PDD Chair Ruiz asked for any other speakers and, seeing none, he asked for the staff Mr. Waller: saldstaffrecommended approval because it met allapplicable plattingrequirements. Commissioner. McBride moved to deny FP-21-11. Commissioner Olivaseconded, and the motion 6. ZC-21-20 and PDD-21-03. Hold a PUBLIC HEARING and consider a request by. Jim Meredith, on behalf of Terry Kelley, for a Zoning Change from RMD Residential Medium Density District and AO Agriçultural-Open Space District to PDD Planned Development District, including a PDD Development Plan for Kelley Villas, on 16.17 acres in the Cornelius Crenshaw Survey, Abstract Mr. Gibson explained that the applicant would develop 160 dwelling units in the form of 80 duplex condominiums whereby the owner/residents will own their individual structures, while the land area would be owned and maintained in common by a property owners association. The internal street would be private, similar to the internal circulation in a large apartment complex. He said the PDD classification better suites this type of development. The units will bet two story, with garages, and that there would be sidewalksalong' both sides of the street. development plan. recommendation. passed by a vote of5-2, with Commissioner's. Peterson and Lingvai against. No. 68, located at 1712 West San Antonio Street (SH142). Chair Ruiz opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant. Andrew White, of 4301 West Bank Drive in Austin, said he is the applicant, and that Mr. Gibson Commissioner McBride asked Mr. White if he was concerned about the traffic that would be generated by his development, and what the cost and square footage would be per unit. gave a good overview oft the request. -3- Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 12-08-2021 Mr. White replied there will always be traffic, and that they would install al left turn lane in West San Antonio Street to make it a little safer. The cost of the duplex units would be $200,000 to Amy Antone was present to represent the seller. She said traffici is bad everywhere in town and that these units would be a steppingstone for those individuals who wish to purchase al home in Barbara Schiller, 1400 Foxwood Cove in Austin, said she owned the property adjacent to the west oft the subject property. She knows there arei traffic issues, and asked if there are any plans to improve West San Antonio Street (SH 142). She believed the development would be good, Chair Ruiz asked for any other speakersa and, seeing none, he closed the publichearing and asked Mr. Gibson said that staff recommended approval. He also noted that he was not aware of any planned improvements for West San Antonio Street (SH 142), but that it would have to be a Mr. White clarified that the proposed private street would be maintained by the HOA. Commissioner Peterson moved to recommend approval of ZC-21-20 and PDD-21-03 to City Council. Commissioner, Arnic: seconded, and the motion passed bya vote of 7-0. 7. PP-21-08. Consider a request by Jim Meredith, on behalf of Terry Kelley, for approval of a Preliminary Plat for Kelley Villas Planned Development District, consisting of 16.17 acres in the Cornelius Crenshaw Survey, Abstract No. 68, to be zoned PDD Planned Development District, Kevin Waller explained that the plat accompanies the PDD development plan and zoning change request for the same property. The plat presented is for one lot that will contain 160 duplex- style condominium units to be served by a private street network. There will also be some open space areas with landscaping and some amenities for the residents. Since the park and open space areas will be privately owned and maintained, a fee inl lieu of public parkland dedication would be paid prior to recordation of the final plat. Four-foot-wide private sidewalks are proposed along both sides oft the internal streets, as well as a five-foot public sidewalk along the $250,000 for a 1,500 to 1,575 square-foot unit. the future. This development would be a great asset to Lockhart. but is concerned about the increase ini traffic. for the staff recommendation. TxDOT project. and located at 1712 West San Antonio Street (SH142).. West San Antonio Street frontage. Chair Ruiz asked for the applicant. Mr. White offered to answer any questions the Commission may have. There were none. Chair Ruiz asked for the staff's recommendation. -4- Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 12-08-2021 Mr. Waller said that staff recommended approval. Commissioner Arnic moved to approve of PP-21-08. Commissioner Lingvai seconded, and the 8. PV-21-06. Consider a request by Bob McGee on behalf of the Opal McGee Estate for a' Variance to waive the requirement in Section 52-31(a) of the Subdivision Regulations for submittal and approvalofasubdwsion plat to allow a temporary division ofland ownerhpconssingofnwe acres out of an 83.873-acre tract in the Francis Berry Survey, Abstract No. 2, zoned RLD Residential Low Density District and AO Agricultural-Open Space District, and located at 612 motion passed by a vote of 7-0. State Park Road (FM2 20). Mr. Waller reported that staff received a written request to withdraw this request. 9. Discuss the date and agenda of next meeting, including Commission requests for agenda items. Mr. Gibson stated that the next regular meeting date would be. January 12, 2022. 10. Adjourn. Commissioner Oliva moved to adjourn, and Commissioner Peterson seconded. The motion passed by a unanimous vote, and the meeting adjourned at 8:56 p.m. Approved: (date) Christine Banda, Recording Secretary Philip Ruiz, Chair -5- Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting 12-08-2021 - - AO e RMD 1701 VAO RLD RHD WORSESHOE IL RMD MK&TRR) UNIONPACIEICRR RHD RMD ZC-22-01 AOTO RHD SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING BOUNDARY 200 FT BUFFER 1601 SILENT VALLEY RD scale 1" = 600' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT ZONING CHANGE CASE SUMMARY STAFF: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORT DATE: January 6, 2022 CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: December 18, 2022 REQUESTED CHANGE: AO to RHD STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval CASE NUMBER: ZC-22-01 PLANNING AND: ZONING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: January12,2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Alan Balser OWNER: Same SITE LOCATION: 1601 Silent Valley Rd. (FM 2001) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Metes and bounds SIZE OF PROPERTY: 40 acres EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant land LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential, General-Heavy Commercial ANALYSIS OF ISSUES REASON FOR REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE: Staff is not aware of anys specific plans for the subject parcel, but the owner would like to make the property available for high density residential development, which would typically be apartments but could be other forms of housing such as townhouses. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: Existing Use Zoning AO RMD AO Future Land Use Plan Medium Density Residential, General-Heavy Commercial Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential, North Vacant land East Vacant land, one single-family dwelling South Vacant land, two single-family dwellings West Vacant land, one single-family dwelling AO, RHD Low Density Residential Industry TRANSITION OF ZONING DISTRICTS: There is an undeveloped area zoned RHD southeast of the subject property on the south side of Silent Valley Road. Otherwise, there is no other RHD zoning nearby. The RMD-zoned area adjacent to the east is just one step lower in terms of residential density. ADEQUACY OF INFRASTRUCTURE: Vehicular access will be available from Silent Valley Road. Water will be available with short off-site extensions to the east or north along Silent Valley Road, but there is currently no sanitary sewer in the area. However, because other large developments are being proposed in the area north and east of Silent Valley Road, a major off-site sewer line extension is planned to be constructed from the railroad track northward along Stueve Lane to: serve this part of the city. Further extensions are the responsibility of subdivisions to be developed east oft the subject property. POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: The surrounding area is currently rural in nature, with sparse development. The abutting tracts are planned to be developed as a variety of residential densities and housing types, sO the development of the subject property will be just one element in the changing character of the entire area. As this part of the city is developed, the greatest impact will be traffic on Cesar Chavez Parkway, Silent Valley Road, and the future extension of Stueve Lane. Each developer proposing access onto a State road will be required by TxDOT to doa traffic impact analysis, and TxDOT can requiret the developer to construct roadway safetyi improvementsatstreet: and drivewayi intersections CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed RHD zoning classification is not consistent with the Medium Density Residential future land use designation, but the subject property is located in a transition area from higher land use intensities to the north and west, and lower land use intensities to the east, ift those areas are developed in accordance with the land use plan map. Therefore, the proposed RHD zoning classification represents an acceptable deviation in terms ofl land use intensity. ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: The zoning classification that wouldh be most consistent with the land use plan map is RMD, which is the same as the existing zoning of thei tract adjacent to the east. RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: The owner and resident of land across Silent Valley Road to the west inquired by phone about the possible implications of the proposed zoning change to RHD, but he did not ifd determined to be necessary by thet traffic impact analysis. indicate that he was opposed toi it. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. January 12, 2022 Lockhart Planning & Zoning Commission P.O. Box 239 Lockhart, TX 78644 Re: Zoning Support To Whom It May Concern: My name is Doug Spillman andla am the major land owner adjoining both of Mr. Balser'sz zoning proposals ZC-22-01 and ZC-22-02. Ifully support and recommend both zoning proposals. Thank you, Doug Spillman CITYOF ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION fockhart 512/398-3461 - FAX/512/398-3833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 WestsanAntonio. Street APPLICANT/OWNER APPLICANT NAME Alan Balser 11166 Lawnhaven Rd. Dallas, TX 75230 ADDRESS DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 214-368-8025 E-MAIL awD@palaura.com OWNER NAME Alan Balser DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 214-368-8025 E-MAIL awD@palaura.com ADDRESS 11166 Lawnhaven Rd. Dallas, TX 75230 PROPERTY ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION Between 1301 Silent Valley Rd. &Toll Road 130, Lockhart, TX75644 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED), See attached metes & bounds description SIZE 40 ACRE(S) LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION AeDensity Residential EXISTING USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING(S). Agriculture PROPOSED NEW USE, IF ANY High Density Housing REQUESTED CHANGE FROM CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION, Agriculture TO PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION High Density AD Residential RHD REASON FOR REQUEST High density housing such as apartments. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IF NOT PLATTED, A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. APPLICATION FEE OF $ 950, PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS: NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPERTY LIEN-HOLDERIS), IF ANY. De 1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 and one acre One acre or greater $125 $150 $170 plus $20.00 per each acre overoneacre TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT IOR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNINGTHIS APPLICATION. Riaw BBelsur 11/24/2021 SIGNATURE DATE OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY RECEIPT NUMBER, 0104306) CASE NUMBER. ZC- 22 -o) Dlibsmn DATE SUBMITTED 1-24-21 DATE NOTICES MAILED 12o PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. 1-18-22 DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED, 12-30-202 1-2-27 DECISION 130 @Tou PANE A AO - 130 GATOLL RMD 1701 RLD 2001 RHD ZC-22-02 AO TO RHD SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING BOUNDARY : CITY LIMITS : 200 FT BUFFER 2106 N CESAR CHAVEZ PKY, NB scale 1"=7 700' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT ZONING CHANGE CASE SUMMARY STAFF: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORT DATE: January 6, 2022 CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: December 18, 2022 REQUESTED CHANGE: AO to RHD STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval CASE NUMBER: ZC-22-02 PLANNING. AND ZONING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: January12,2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Alan Balser OWNER: Same SITE LOCATION: 2106 North Cesar Chavez Parkway Northbound (SH 130) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Metes and bounds SIZE OF PROPERTY: 6.52 acres EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant land LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ANALYSIS OF ISSUES REASON FOR REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE: Staff is not aware of anys specific plans for the subject parcel, but the owner would like to make the property available for high density residential development, which would typically be apartments but could be other forms of housing such as townhouses. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: Existing Use Zoning AO AO AO AO Future Land Use Plan Agriculture/Rura Development Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential North SH130 East Vacant land South Vacant land West Vacant land TRANSITION OF ZONING DISTRICTS: There is no other RHD: zoning nearby. An application for rezoning the propertyabuttingi tot thes south from AO1 tol PDD Planned Development District is expected to be submitted soon. The PDD will be a single-family residential subdivision with an average density of up toi five acres. ADEQUACY OF INFRASTRUCTURE: Vehicular access will be available from Cesar Chavez Parkway. Water will be available with off-site extensions from the west and/or connection from the proposed subdivision adjacent to the south. There is currently no sanitary sewer in the area. However, because other large developments arel being proposed in the areas north and east of Silent Valley Road, a major off-site sewer line extension is planned to be constructed from the railroad track northward along Stueve Lane to serve this part of the city. Further extensions are the responsibility of subdivisions to be developed south and west of the subject property. POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: The surrounding area is currently rural in nature, with sparse development. The abutting tractt toi the: south is proposed to be a single-family residentialsubdivision with av variety of lot sizes averaging a density of no higher than five units per acre, and other land to the west of the planned Stueve Lane extension is proposed to be developed as medium density residential uses. Therefore, the development of the subject property will be just one element in the changing character of the entire area. As this part of the city is developed, the greatest impact will be traffic on Cesar Chavez Parkway, Silent Valley Road, and the future extension of Stueve Lane. Each developer proposing access onto a State road will be required by TxDOT to do a traffic impact analysis, and TxDOT can require the developer to construct roadway safety improvements at street and drivewayi intersections if determined CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed RHD zoning classification is not consistent with the Low Density Residential future land use designation, but the reasoning for requesting thel higher density zoning is that the subject property abuts SH 130, and RHD could be an effective transitional residential buffer between the highway and the planned low densitydevelopment adjacent to the south. ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: The zoning classification that would! ber most consistent with the landu use tol be necessary by the traffic impact analysis. plan map is RLD. RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: None as of the date of this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. January 12, 2022 Lockhart Planning & Zoning Commission P.O. Box 239 Lockhart, TX 78644 Re: Zoning Support To Whom It May Concern: proposals ZC-22-01 and ZC-22-02. My name is Doug Spillman andla am the major land owner adjoining both of Mr. Balser'szoning Ifully support and recommend both zoning proposals. Thank you, Doug Spillman CITYOF ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION fockhant /512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398-3833 P.O. Box 239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 WestsanAntonio. Street APPLICANTIOWNER APPLICANT NAME Alan Balser DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 214-368-8025 E-MAIL awD@palaura.com OWNER NAME Alan Balser DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 214-368-8025 E-MAIL awD@palaura.com ADDRESS 11166 Lawnhaven Rd. Dallas, TX 75230 ADDRESS 11166 Lawnhaven Rd. Dallas, TX 75230 PROPERTY ADDRESS 210b NOesarChawez OR GENERAL LOCATION, PIy,B LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) See attached metes & bounds description SIZE 6.52 ACRE(S) LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION Low/Density Residential EXISTING USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING(S) Agriculture PROPOSED NEW USE, IF ANY High Density Housing REQUESTED CHANGE FROM CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION Agriculture AO TO PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION High Density Residential RD REASON FORI REQUEST High density housing such as apartments. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THATOWNS THE PROPERTY. IF NOT PLATTED, Al METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. APPLICATION FEE OF $_ 280.40 PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS: NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPERTY LIEN-HOLDERIS), IF ANY. 1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 and one acre One acre or greater $125 $150 $170 plus $20.00 per each acre over one acre TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT I OR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. 11/24/2021 SIGNATURE Mawbelow OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY. DATE RECEIPT NUMBER, Dalibfon 01043061 DATE SUBMITTED, M-7+-21 DATE NOTICES MAILED 12-22-202 CASE NUMBER ZC-2 22-02 DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED 12-30-292 PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE, 1-1Z-2Z PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 1-18-27 DECISION 1000 A&B 1007 1100 RMD 8 820 CLB 1200 1201 RUDDY ST 1100 FIFHIST & 1200 1206 1308 1307 1310 5 1309 1312 1316 $ 8 9 5 1217 RHD FIFTHST 1205 1202 SHERNOODSI 41311 1318 a a a a 1305 BLACKJACEST 1320 1322 1324 8 1300 TEALST (nof open) 13 RHD CHB 1203 1201 1213 1300 1200 1204 IL 100 11041108 1000 RMD IH ZC-22-03 CHB TO RHD SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING BOUNDARY 200 FT BUFFER 1201 BLACKJACKST scale 1" = 200' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT ZONING CHANGE CASE SUMMARY STAFF: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORT DATE: January 6, 2022 CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: December 18, 2022 REQUESTED CHANGE: CHB to RHD STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval CASE NUMBER: ZC-22-03 PLANNING AND: ZONING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: January 12, 2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Trinity Street Properties, LLC OWNER: Earnest Yanez and Albert Yanez SITE LOCATION: 1201 Blackjack St. (FM 20) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Metes and bounds SIZE OF PROPERTY: 0.61 acre EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant land LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ANALYSIS OF ISSUES REASON FOR REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE: The applicant wishes to construct either a duplex or a four-plex on the subject lot. Both uses are allowed by-right in the RHD district, but are not allowed at all by the existing CHB zoning. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: Existing Use Zoning Future Land Use Plan One single-family dwelling on a large tract, North one other single-family dwelling, manufactured home East Vacant lot, commercial building West Multifamily residential RHD, RMD Medium Density Residential CHB RMD, CHB Industry RHD Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Single-family dwellings, one multifamily South dwelling TRANSITION OF ZONING DISTRICTS: RHD zoning already exists adjacent to the north and west, sO the proposed RHD zoning would simply be small expansion of the current RHD zoning pattern. ADEQUACY OF INFRASTRUCTURE: Existing utilities and frontage for vehicular access are adequate. POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: Iffour dwelling units are constructed on the subject lot, it would be equivalent to about 6.5 units per acre, which is at the low end of the medium density range. Although there areresidential parcels north oft the subject lot, the dwellings arenot close to the subject lot. Because this lot fronts on a highway at the edge oft the neighborhood, the impact should be negligible. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed RHD zoning classification is not consistent with the Medium Density Residential future land use designation. However, the lot abuts areas currently designated as High Density Residential and Industry, in addition to Medium Density Residential, on the land use plan map. Furthermore, the proposed development will actually be low density with a duplex, ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFIÇATIONS: The zoning classification that wouldl be most consistent with the land use plan map is RMD, but the closest RMD zoning is on the south side of Blackjack Street. RMD zoning would allow either a duplex or four-plex, which is classified as a "combined-family" dwelling in our Zoning Ordinance. However, the combined family dwelling would also requireapproval of a specific use permit or medium density with a four-plex. (SUP) int the RMD district, whereas it is allowed by-right in the requested RHD district. RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: None as oft the date oft this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. CITYOF ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION lockhart 1512/398-3461 . FAX/512/3983833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 West SanAntonio. Street APPLICANTIOWNER APPLICANT NAME TNSt DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 3874-81044 E-MAIL eqg tot boN C Yahoo.com CRES HCOst Dandelionst acklgit 78144 OWNER NAME Ernest V Aert) ABORESS 705 Dandelion gh DAY-TIME TELEPHONE n aclarh 7X 780-4/ E-MAIL. H PROPERTY ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 134Balguks. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED). 14650 546D o3 Aces B114 SIZE ahl ACRE(S) LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION, Mehim DaiRenlcatial EXISTING USE OF LAND. AND/OR BUILDING(S) PROPOSED NEW USE, IF ANY mWh Camiy xacan-lang Zuple orplg REQUESTED CHANGE FROM CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION CHB TO PROPOSED ZONING CASSRCATON.RHD REASON FOR REQUEST Building 4Pley ok dupley SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A. LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IF NOT PLATTED, A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. APPLICATION FEE OF $ 1560, PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS: NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPERTY IEN-HOLDERIS), IF ANY. 1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 and one acre One acre or greater $125 $150 $170 plus $20.00 per each acre overoneacre TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT I OR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE Lyur DATE 1/a5302) OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY. Danbibion DATE SUBMITTED 1-29-21 DATE NOTICES MAILED 12-22-W21 RECEIPT NUMBER 0404373 CASE NUMBER ZC 22-63 DATE NOTICE! PUBLISHED 12-30-222/ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE 12-22 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 15-22 DECISION HIDDEN PATH RD FM 2001: 2835 AO RMD 2 B - A RPMR 1701 ZC-22-04 AOTO CHB SUBJECT PROPERTY B CITY LIMITS :: 200 FT BUFFER 1507 N CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY SB scale 1"=5 500' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT ZONING CHANGE CASE SUMMARY STAFF: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORT DATE: January 6, 2022 CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: December 18, 2022 REQUESTED CHANGE: AO to CHB STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval CASE NUMBER: ZC-22-04 PLANNING. AND ZONING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: January12,2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND DATA APPLICANT: Sarah Corona of PSCE, Inc. OWNER: Alan Balser and Pamela Guffey LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Metes and bounds SIZE OF PROPERTY: 5.484 acres EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant land SITE LOCATION: 1507 North Cesar Chavez Parkway Southbound (SH1 130) LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural/Rura Development ANALYSIS OF ISSUES REASON FOR REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE: A commercial building consisting of a convenience store and Mexican market is proposed to be constructed on the subject property. Such development is not allowed by the existing AO zoning. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: Existing Use Zoning AO AO AO AO Future Land Use Plan Agriculture/Rura Development Agriculture/Rurd Development General-Heavy Commercial Agriculture/Rura Development, General-Heavy Commercial North Vacant land East Vacant land South SH130 West Two single-family dwellings, manufactured home, City water tower TRANSITION OF ZONING DISTRICTS: There is no other CHB zoning nearby, although there will be in the future if the area is developed in accordance with the land use plan map. Because the AO district is automatically assigned when propertylsannexed, its should be expected that it will eventually be rezoned ADEQUACY OF INFRASTRUCTURE: Vehicular access is available from Silent Valley Road and Cesar Chavez Parkway. Water willl be available with an off-site extension from the west, across Silent' Valley Road. There isc currently no sanitary sewer in the area. Either a lengthy off-site sewer main extension will be needed under SH: 130, or a single commercial building in this location can be served by an on-site sewagesystem to allow urban development of a higher intensity. (septic tank). POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: The surrounding area is currently rural in nature, with sparse development. The proposed commercial development will generate additional traffic on Silent Valley Road and Cesar Chavez Parkway. The developer willl be required by TxDOTto do a traffic impact analysis, and TxDOT can require the developer to construct roadway safety improvements at street and driveway intersections long either road if determined to be necessary by the traffic impact analysis. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed CHB zoning classification is not consistent with the Agriculture/Rura Development future land use designation, but is consistent with the General- Heavy Commercial designation that is centered around the adjacent intersection of Silent' Valley Road and ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: The zoning classification that is most consistent with the land use plan map is the existing AO zoning. However, proposals for developmentalong Cesar Chavez Parkway should Cesar Chavez Parkway (SH 130). be expected, especially commercial uses at major intersections such as this. RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION: None as oft the date oft this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION CITYOF /512/398-3461 - FAX/512/398-3833 Box239 Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 WestsanAntonio Street PO. . Lockhart TEXAS APPLICANTIOWNER APPLICANT NAME Sarah Corona, PSCE Inc. (Authorized. Agent) DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 512)238-6422 E-MAIL, psce@psceinc.com ADDRESS 2205 W. Parmer LN. Suite 201 Austin, TX 78727 OWNER NAME Alan Balser and Pamela Guffey DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 214)368-8025 E-MAIL awD@palaura.com ADDRESS 12740 Hillcrest Rd. Suite 220 Dallas, TX 75230-7114 PROPERTY ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION 1507 N. Cesar Chavez PKWY SB, Lockhart, TX78644 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF PLATTED) N/A SIZE 5.484 ACRE(S) LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION, General eyCamwercial EXISTING USE OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING(S) Vacant PROPOSED NEW USE, IF ANY Commercial (gas station development). REQUESTED CHANGE FROM CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION Agricultural-Open Space TO PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION Commercial Heavy Business REASON FOR REQUEST We are requesting this zoning change in order to have the appropriate zoning for a commercial gas station development; this development would include the construction of a gas station with three diesel MPDs, six regular MPDs, and a 9,000sf general retail/ mexican market building. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, A LETTER SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER CERTIFYING THEIR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO REPRESENT THE PERSON, ORGANIZATION, OR BUSINESS THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. IF NOT PLATTED, A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. APPLICATION FEE OF $ 259.60 PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF LOCKHART AS FOLLOWS: NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPEKYIEN-HOLDERS, IFA ANY. 1/4 acre or less Between 1/4 and one acre One acre or greater $125 $150 $170 plus $20.00 per each acre over one acre TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT IOR ANOTHER REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE PRESENT AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS CONCERNINGTHIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE Smahlaa DATE 11/29/2021 OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY Dimfibsan DATE SUBMITTED 1-30-21 DATE NOTICES MAILED 1222-20M RECEIPT NUMBER. 010444s4 CASE NUMBER ZC-22-04 DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED (2-30-2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE 1-12-2021 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE 1-18-2021 DECISION PROFESSIONAL STRUCIVIL ENGINEERS,INC. P E STRUCTURAL CVIL TRANSPORTATION 2205W. PARMERLN., SUITE #201,A AUSTIN, TEXAS 78727 512.238.6422 PSCEQPSCENCCOM REGISTERED FIRMF-4951 Owner's Authorization Letter I/wel hereby certify that Iwe am/are the owner(s) oft the property located at the northeast corner ofthel FM2001 and N. Cesar Chavez Parkway intersection, Lockhart, TX7 78644, (associated Deed Instrument #2017-005439 and #2018-002187, to be later addressed as 1507 N. Cesar Chavez PKWY SB). Iwe am/are respectfully requesting processing and approval ofthe associated applications to be submitted by Authorized. Agent Sarah Corona, Professional StruCIVIL Engineers, Inc., toi include the Zoning Change Application. I/wel hereby authorize the Applicant (Sarah Corona, Professional StruCIVIL Engineers, Inc.)to act on my/our behalf during thej processing and presentation oft this request. The Applicant/Authorized. Agent shall be thej principal contact with the Cityi in processing this application. First Owner's Signature alawlelsey First Owner's Printed Name Alew BALSEY Second Owner's Signature fam Valier Second Owner's Printed Name Pam Balser Date 14/21/2021 Date 1/z./202/ Date 1/41/0041 Date 1/31/2021 for the 5,48 ON Decemmber WY This approval is subjeet 4o ZoNiNG applicshon acye PB beinb for Commercial ZoNIN6 awly 34 zoz1. aud Sao approval esphvas tracf AO 2701 IL 343 PACIFIC RR (MK&TRR) UNION RHD CHB CMB AO WEAMANONO3Tw.Ia, IL RHD PV-22-01 SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING BOUNDARY Var CITY LIMITS 2701 CAHILL STREET I ALLOW PERMITS PRIOR TO PLAT RECORDENG scale 1"=6 600' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT SUBDIMISION VARIANCE CASE SUMMARY STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Waller, Assistant City Planner PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE: January 12, 2022 CASE NUMBER: PV-22-01 REPORT DATE: January 6, 2022 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Waive the requirement that a final plat be recorded prior to issuance of a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, if the Commission finds that all Subdivision Variance Criteria building permit are met. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: None BACKGROUNDI DATA APPLICANT: Marc Scammerhorn OWNER: IAM Properties, Lockhart LLC SURVEYOR: Jerry Hinkle, Hinkle Surveyors SITE LOCATION: 500FM2720 SUBDIVISION NAME: Lockhart Industrial Park III Section One SIZE OF PROPERTY: 10.101 acres (Lot 1, Block A) NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: Four EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IL (Industrial Light District) ANALYSIS OF ISSUES PROPOSED VARIANCES: The Final Plat for Lockhart Industrial Park III Section One was approved by the Commission on August 25, 2021. The applicant is requesting variances to Subdivision Regulations Sections 52-31(a) and 52-205(c) to allow building permits to be issued for construction on the future Lot 1, Block A, prior to recording the final plat. According to the applicant, building materials and equipment have been ordered for the industrial business that will locate on the property, and that the subdivision improvements will not be completed, nor will the final plat be recorded, in time for the arrival and set-up of the materials and equipment. The applicant also states that the granting of the variance would allow for the beginning of foundation work, pouring footers, piers, and slab, along with the parking area development. A temporary construction entrance is proposed be used at the northwest corner of the property. A Zoning Variance was approved by the Board of Adjustment on December 6, 2021 to allow certain areas of the future parking lot to be developed with crushed AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The adjacent properties to the north and east of the subject property are in agricultural use, with the property to the north being located outside the City limits. To the south is the proposed Section Two of Lockhart Industrial Park III. Across F.M.2720 to the west is a property in SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES: The arrival of the building materials and equipment for the future industrial use on the subject property well ahead of completion of the required subdivision improvements and subsequent recordation of the final plat might be considered a special concrete for potential future expansion of the proposed building into those areas. agricultural and rural residential use, also outside the City limits. circumstance toj justify approval oft the variance. PRESERVATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT: The proposed variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Nothing prevents the applicant from completing the subdivision improvements and recording the final plat prior to EFFECT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: The applicant states, and Staff agrees, that the variance will not interfere with surrounding properties and will not adverselyi impact public EFFECT ON ORDERLY SUBDIVISION OF OTHER LAND: Since the request is simply to allow the issuance of building permits ahead of the recording of the plat, the variance will not limit the potential for COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA: In order to approve a variance, the Commission must find that the request meets all three of the criteria outlined in Section 52-3(a) of the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant submitted the attached written explanation as evidence in support of the variance. Staff believes that the variance request warrants approval, if the Commission determines ALTERNATIVES: The only alternative solution would have been for the applicant to complete the subdivision improvements and record the final plat prior to ordering the building materials and PRECEDENT: Approval of the variance might set a precedent by encouraging other developers to seek variances to allow the issuance of building permits for subdivisions in which the final plat has not ordering materials for the future industrial building. health or safety. subdivision or development of other land in the area. that all three variance criteria are met. beginning site work, which would have avoided the need for a variance. yet been recorded. IAM Properties - Lockhart, L.L.C. Shreveport, Louisiana 71163-1148 PO Box 1148 December 8, 2021 Building Official City ofLockhart, Texas Re: Variance Request Dear Sir or Madam: IAM Properties -1 Lockhart, LLC is asking for a variance to allow IAM Properties to obtain building permits which would enable the continued development ofc our propertywithout delays. We will address the four questions for the approval ofthe variance. 1. IAM Properties - Lockhart, LLC property site work willl bet finished before LEDC Ifgranted the variance, we would be able toj proceed with starting foundation work, pouring footers, piers, and slab along with outside parkingareas provided. all We would be able to develop our site without hindering the progress OfLEDC Industrial Parki infrastructure. We will use temporary construction entrance on The design of our site is based off the approved developmental drawings for Doucet and Associates Engineering who designed the LEDC Industrial Park. We have delivery of multiple fully loaded trucks with our property'si metal building att the end of February. Shortly after that, specialized equipment for this plant's 2. The variance is necessary to continue the evacpmemtofourpepetry without 3. The variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, and will Parki infrastructure will be completed. inspections are approved. northwest corner of our property. production willl be delivered. delays. not be injurious to other property in the area. Building Official Page 2 December 8, 2021 4. The variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other lands in the area in accordance with the provisions of the code. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ducky lan A. McElroy Manager SUBDIVISION PLAT APPLICATION CITY OF 1512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398-3833 P.O. Box239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 West. SanAntonio. Street Lockhart TEXAS L Hinkle 512-398-2000 APPLICANTS SURVEYOR NAME Jerry DAY-TIME TELEPHONE ENGINEER NAME, DAY-TIME TELEPHONE E-MAIL OWNER NAME DAY-TIME TELEPHONE 1109 S Main Street Lockhart TX 78644 ADDRESS E-MAIL, contact@hinklesurveyors.com ADDRESS IAM Properties, LLC Lockhart 318-747-8675 1500 Hamilton Rd Bossier ADDRESS LA71111 city, E-MAIL. mscammerhom@mcelroymeta.com TYPE OF APPLICATION X SUBDIMISION DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAT REPLATRESUEDVSION VARIANCE FINAL PLAT AMENDING PLAT MINORPLAT PROPERTY SUBDIVISION ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATED IN TOTAL LAND. AREA ZONING CLASSIFICATIONIS) PROPOSED USE OF LAND LockHart Industrial LOCATION lo.o One 500 FM2320 Park Sechien NAME 2701 Cahill street X CITYL LIMITS Lot - ACRE(S) Bl&kA TL Industrial (futue); ETJ( (COUNTY) (Carat) PDD PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS (KA) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS NAME(S)AND. ADDRESS/(ES) OF PROPERTY LIEN-HOLDERS, IF ANY. EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS ORI RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, IFANY. IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR AN AMENDING PLAT OR REPLATRESUBDMISION - A COPY OF IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR A FINAL PLAT INVOLVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - TWO FULL-SIZE IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR, OR INCLUDES, A SUBDIVISION CODE VARIANCE = COMPLETED VARIANCE SECTION ON NEXTI PAGE. AND REQUIRED STATEMENTI NOTEDTHEREIN. PLAT DOCUMENTS, AS FOLLOWS, CONTAINING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ARTICLE 23-6. (Amending Plats, Replat/Resubdwvision Plats, and Minor Plats are considered the same as Final Plats for the purpose of content andi format). Allplatcopies shall be full-size paper copies. PAPER COPIES OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS. One copyf for staff's completeness review; six copies after plat is deemed complete. Ten copies after initial staff reviews above (preliminary plats, final plats, and epatsresubdMvsons, Two signed and sealed mylar reproducibles (three if applicant wants to keep one) of approved amending plat, replatresubdivsion, final plat, or minor plat, for recording. One recorded reproducible is filed at the County Clerk's office, and the other is retured to the City. FEE, ASFOLLOWS (NOF FEE FORV VARIANCES, APPEALS, SUBDIMISIONI DEVELOPMENT PLANS,ORD DEVELOPMENTPLATS): Two copies after initial staff reviews for amending and minor plats. Preliminary Plat $600.00 payable to the City of Lockhart $400.00 plus $20.00 per acre, payable to the $100.00 payable to the Cityo of Lockhart $71.00 for thet first sheet, and $50.001 for each additional sheet, payable to the Caldwell County Final Plat or ReplalResubdvision Amending plat, Minor plat, or Minor replat not requiring a public hearing Recording fee for Amending Plat, ReplatResubdivsion, Final Plat, or Minor Plat City ofLockhart Clerk To the best of my knowledge, this application and associated documents conform to all requirements of the City of Lockhart Subdivision Regulations. By signing below lagree that if any part of this plat and/or assoclated construction plans Is found to be Incorrect, Incomplete, or otherwise deficient with regard to applicable City standards, the deadline imposed by the Texas Local Government Code, Section 212.009 for approval or denial of the plat and/or assoclated construction plans by the City within 30 days of the date this application is deemed complete is automatically extended for an additional 30 days. Ifurther agree that if any part of this plat and/or associated construction plans remains deficient at such time that the plat and/or associated construction plans cannot be approved prior to the expiration of the second 30 days, the plat or construction plans will be subject to denial by the approval authority. It is understood that or another representative should be present at all public meetings concerning this appliçation. SIGNATURE DATE 12-2-24 TELEPHONEEL 6k6 643 2K PRINTED NAME MARC SATIMERHAN PLAT APPROVAL PERIODS A preliminary plat approval period expires if a final plat for one or more sections is not submitted within 12 months of approval. Upon written request received prior to the expiration, a maximum of two six-month extensions may be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A final plat approval period expires if any required infrastructure construction is not begun within 12 months of approval. Upon written request received prior to the expiration, one six-month extension may be considered. by the City Planner. SUBDIVISION VARIANCE (for variance applications, only) 52-205l) VARIANCE TO SECTION/S) 52314)4 OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS CURRENT ORDINANCE sha REQUIREMENT/S) BuillasPermiks notbe issus wati), a Suolivision fluhs recorled. REQUESTED VARIANCE(S). Allow TSSWAAGR, bulhlng pemibsprir SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REÀSON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS o eseantien of s ese Fipa, Riat. REQUIRED FOR. APPROVAL OF A' VARIANCE: 1. Special circumstances or conditions affect the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of the Code would deprive the applicant reasonable use of the land; 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of 3. The variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, and will not be 4. The variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other lands in the the applicant; injurious to other property in the area; and, areai in accordance with the provisions of the Code. OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY. KevinWalar DATE SUBMITTED 12/5/2 DATEAPPLICATION IS DEEMED COMPLETE, M/A-VEAG RECEIPT NUMBER, CASE NUMBER PV.22.01. DATENOTICES MAILED DATE NOTICEPUBLISHED 171/22 (For certain Repats/Resubdiwsions without vacating preceding plat) PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE. DECISION CONDITIONS AO 18597 13886 13836 18459 CHB 13836 18459 18458 61048 33680 CMB 18480. 18481 18479 18477 18475 RMD, EBARS 33680 18504 AO CHB 18478 RMD RLD 18505 CLB" FM672. RMD ORESST CHB 33716 32158 BA RMD, PI PHop % CENTRALDR CIRCLEDR PEACHDR % CMB' DP-18-01 601 FLORES ST LOCKHART RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAT Subject Property Additional Property Under Same Owner N scale 1"= 400' PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAT CASE SUMMARY STAFF CONTACT: Dan Gibson, City Planner REPORTD DATE: January 6, 2022 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial SUGGESTED CONDITIONS: BACKGROUND DATA CASE NUMBER: DP-22-01 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE: January 12, 2022 OWNER: Lockhart Ridge Land, LP (Riley Baldus) ENGINEER: Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, PE, LOC Consultants, LLP SURVEYOR: Holt Carson, Inc. (no longer associated with the project) SITE LOCATION: 601 Flores Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: No survey or metes and bounds description submitted SIZE OF PROPERTY: 23.613 acres EXISTING USE OFF PROPERTY: Vacant land ZONING CLASSIFICATION: RLD! Residential Low Density ANALYSIS OF ISSUES PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The owner, Riley Baldus, has submitted an application, letter, various attachments, and a development plat for his proposed development, Lockhart Ridge. The documents are attached in their entirety as submitted, except for full-size copies of the development plat, which he has refused to provide other than the initial one submitted with the application. The development plat box is checked on the application form, but the cover sheet of the plat document is entitled "Site Plan" and the remaining 19 sheets also have titles that do not include the word Development Plat", and the letter accompanying the submission and addressed to the Planning and Zoning Commission is entitled "Engineering Plans Permit for Site Construction". The application form was altered by the applicant in several ways that are listed in the attached list of Reasons for Denial. The date at the top of the letter says "Filed: December 17, 2021, but we received it on December 21, 2021. The proposed development consists of 88 single-family homes on one 23.613-acre tract, but there is additional 14.13 acres abutting to the north (cross-hatched on case map), outside the city limits, that is under the same ownership. All infrastructure is proposed to be private and there will be no dedications of land to the City for any purpose. Because the property is not being subdivided into parts less than five acres (there won't be separate lots for the homes), the applicant claims that a subdivision plat is not required, in accordance with the platting exemption in Section52-31(a) of the Subdivision Regulations. However, Section 52-31(b) states that a development plat is required where no subdivision plat is required for construction of a new building. Further, Section 52-40(a) states: Development plats for which it is determined that no land dedications or construction of public improvements is required, may be approved administratively by the city planner. A building permit shall not be issued for the development prior to endorsement oft the city planner's approval on the plat." Following a lengthy compilation of deficiençies and inconsistencies with the submission, Isent a certified letter to the applicant on December 29, 2021, informing him that the plat was denied. He disagrees that I have that authority because he addressed his letter to the Commission. In order to eliminate any doubt, we have put his submission on this agenda so that the Commission can deny it. He tried to submit a similar application over a year ago, and we refused to accept it because it was incomplete. That didn't matter to the applicant, who then claimed that his development was automatically approved because it wasn't approved, approved with conditions, or denied within 30 calendar days of the "Filed" date he put on the cover letter att that time. It required letters from the City attorney to stop that line of argument. In this case, it appears that the appliçant is once again counting on the 30-day clock to run out before action is taken on his development plat (which he refers to as "engineering plans permit"). Thirty days since we received this submission is January 20 2022. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: The southwest corner of the subject property is adjacent to an existing single-family residential subdivision, but the remainder of the surrounding area is sparsely populated or undeveloped. There are cemeteries to the north and south. The remainder of the applicant's property to the north is vacant, while the abutting property to the east contains a single-family dwelling. Plum Creek Elementary School is located southeast of the subject property, on the opposite side of Flores Street. The SF-1 residential development type (single-family detached dwelling) is the only land use allowed by the existing RLD zoning classification oft the subject property is very compatible with the neighborhood. However, as explained in the attached list of Reasons) for Denial, the proposed form of development is not allowed in the RLD district, FORM AND CONTENT: The development plat and application form are incomplete, and have numerous errors and deficiencies. Normally, a submission this inadequate would not have been accepted, but staff decided to go ahead and process it sO that action can be taken to deny it before January 20. Please refer to the attached COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: This proposal fails in many ways to comply with our subdivision standards. Please refer to the attached list of Reasons for Denial. It should be noted that development plats are subject to the same standards as subdivision plats. The reason that the State authorized the use of development plats was because developments were occurring on property where there was no division of ownership, thereby avoiding any kind of plat altogether, and therefore also avoiding the standards that apply to subdivisions. For example, if a lot was able to be developed without submitting a development plat, then a City could not enforce the requirement for public sidewalks along the property's street frontage, even though abutting and nearby platted properties were subject to the sidewalk standard. So, this case is a good example of a proposed development that would not be subject to City standards if we didn't require a development plat. CONCURRENT VARIANCES REQUESTED: None, although there are many elements of the submitted STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the development plat. The application is incomplete for the reasons stated above and, therefore, should be denied. Iti is clearly not eligible for approval, and there is no reason to attempt to approve it conditionally because there are SO many issues identified ini the attached list of Reasons for Denial to the extent that there is more fundamentally wrong with the application and development plat than there is right. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL. The applicant can resubmit a development plat application if it meets all applicable zoning and subdivision which allows only one principal dwelling per lot. list of Reasons) for Denial. development plat that would require zoning and/or subdivision variances. requirements. REASONS FOR DENIAL Lockhart Ridge Development Plat 1. Although the letter submitted by the Mr. Baldus (copy attached after this document) indicates in #4 that the submission includes "2 Sets of Offsite Construction Engineering Plans and Right of Way Construction Permit", we received only one set and, although there are engineering plan type sheets included in the set, there were no plan sheets for a major off-site wastewater extension that will be necessary to serve the number of dwelling units proposed. The development plat cannot be approved unless adequate public utility service is either existing or is proposed, with plans for any needed upgrades or extensions approved by the citye engineer. Also, #8 in the letter refers to attached "Water Service Availability Letters". The document provided by the City on "April 10, 2019, entitled "Utility Service Capacity and Information" does not state anything about the adequacy of any utility for a particular development. It simply verifies what is currently available. Mr. Baldus claims that an easement dedication document dated October 1987 for a 12-inch City water line through what is now his property gives him the right to tapi into water line. The city attorney's office has reviewed that document and it is simply an easement dedication, and is not an agreement that guarantees an automatic right to access water from the water line 2. Engineering plans are reviewed by the city engineer, and must be submitted directly to him. Our city engineer is Jeff Dahm, P.E. at TRC in Austin. He requires one paper copy and a PDF of the engineering plan set. He will not begin his review until the engineering plan review fee is paid (Resolution No. 2019-16, adopted July 16, 2019). The fee is based on the land area of the development, and is $500 for the first acre and $250 for each acre after the first acre, with any fractions of an acre prorated. For 23.613 acres, the fee is $6,153.25. The application is not 3. The application form was modified. It is missing the "Subdivision Plat Application" title that is on our official forms. The Development Plat" option is selected as the Type of Appliçation on the first page of the application form, but the words "Engineering Plans - Acreage Tract, Not a Subdivision" were added. An additional section entitled "Plat Approval Periods" was added by the applicant, and basically states that City cannot require an applicant to waive a deadline, which is referring to the 30- shot clock for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of a plat. It's true that the City cannot require an applicant to waive a deadline, but the first 30-day period can be extended an additional 30-days upon mutual written agreement. This would apply without 4. The Surveyor Name on the untitled application form is listed as Holt Carson, Inc. Mr. Carson informed Mr. Baldus in a letter dated August 23, 2020, that his firm was terminating their business relationship. During the staff review of the development plat and application form, called Mr. Carson and he not only confirmed that he had sent the letter, but he also told me that his name should not be on this application form. The form is not complete without a valid surveyor being listed who has surveyed the property for preparation of the development plat. without approval by the City of the development to be served. considered complete until the fee is paid. altering the application form. 1Page 5. For the Proposed Number of Lots on the untitled application form, it: states: "N/A, Olots, 1 tract". Then, for the "Proposed Use of Land" it states: "Residential homes per Zoning, SITE PLAN - NO SUBDMVISION". The subject property is zoned RLD Residential Low Density District, which in Section 64-196(d) states: "This district provides low population density areas within the city which are limited to tracts with single dwelling units, having a single principal structure with necessary accessory buildings for residential purposes and associated specific uses." The "Site Plan" (Development Plat) shows more than one principal dwelling on the tract, which is not allowed under the current RLD zoning classification of the property. A development plat cannot be approved for a use that is a zoning violation. Multiple principal structures (dwellings) on a single lot or tract are allowed only in the RHD Residential High Density District or PDD Planned 6. If Mr. Baldus wishes to have 88 dwellings on the subject property under the current zoning classification, it must be platted such that each dwelling unit is on an individual lot, with each lot having frontage on an improved public street right-of-way (Section 52-76(b)). The layout of the submitted development plat is not physically identical to how it would look if platted as a subdivision. A subdivision platted according to the lot standards of the SF-1 development type, which is the only residential land use allowed by-right in the RLD district, would require each residential lot to be at least 65 feet wide and 120 feet deep, with a minimum lot area of 8,500 square feet. Also, the streets would be in public rights-of-way at least 50 feet wide, with the street pavement (with curbs) being at least 31 feet wide. The minimum building setbacks would have to be 25 feet from the front property line, 7% feet to interior side property lines (15 feet on the street side of corner lots), and ten feet to the rear property lines. Staff has checked to see if the proposed location of dwellings on the development plat would meet the minimum standards ift the dwellings were to be on separate lots meeting the SF-1 development type and, in most cases, they don't. Therefore, the proposed layout would not work as a subdivision allowed in the 7. The "Information for Permits" form included in the submission is for building permits, only, and does not apply to "engineering plans, off-site utilities, right-of-way construction, and driveway construction" that are listed in the "Permit Type" section. The Public Works Department has a "Right-of-way Excavation Application" form that is used for driveway approaches and other work in the public street right-of-way. Access to Flores Street (FM 672) must be approved by the Bastrop Area Office of TxDOT. They have already been informed that no development of any type has been approved for this property and, therefore, there is no approved driveway or street intersection until such time that a proposed development complies with all applicable City ordinances and standards. They will notify us any time a request for an access permit is submitted. In addition, TxDOT now requires a Traffic Impact Analysis for every new driveway and street intersection for developments along State rights-of-waywhich must be completed before 8. The Development Plat" box was checked on the first page of the untitled application form. Therefore, the plans that were submitted must be labeled Development Plat", instead of "Site Development District. RLD district. any development plans are approved. Plan". 2/Page 9. Under "General Construction Notes" on the first page of the "Site Plan" (Development Plat), Notes #1 and #3 refer to Caldwell County. Because the subject property is in the Lockhart city limits, the County has no authority for the items listed. Note #4 gives an incorrect address for OSHA in Austin. Their physical address is now on La Posada Drive. Details are available at htps/www.oshagoy/ontactusloytate/Tareaofie. Note #6 ends in an incomplete 10. The fourth unnumbered note in the center of the first page of the "Site Plan" states that the site lies inside Caldwell County, which is true, but the remainder ofthe statement refers to items that are regulated by the City. The statement that the site is not subject to those items isi incorrect. 11. There is a signature block in the lower right-hand corner of the first page oft the "Site Plan" for the Caldwell County Engineers Office. Caldwell County's consulting engineer (not on the County staff) will have no authority over this development, including any portion in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). The city engineer will be the approval authority for any engineering plans associated with is development. If the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the development plat, there should be a certificate of approval for the Chair of the Commission to 12. Sheets 2 and 3 ofthe "Site Plan" (Development Plat) show the existing public Laredo and Navarro streets being extended as private streets. Ifthey are not to be extended as public streets, public cul-de-sacs must be constructed to terminate the existing stub-outs, and then one or more private driveways can extend from the cul-de-sacs. Stub-outs such as those are required for continuation of the street network where a subdivision abuts undeveloped property. When the abutting property develops, the street can be extended as a public street, or terminated as a cul- de-sac. The reason for this is that the City will not have any way of preventing the private street or driveway from being blockaded on the private side, thereby leaving a dead-end public street with no turn-around. Extension of Laredo Street, in any form, however, is also affected by the 13. The area at the southwest corner of the subject property is actually part of the Compress Hill Supplement Addition, That subdivision, which was recorded in 1958, includes street rights-of-way and lots that have not been developed, but are still in effect. The plat includes the extension of the Laredo Street right-of-way eastward to a "T" intersection with a new north/south street right-of-way that extends south to Flores Street to, and north to the boundary of the subdivision. The Laredo Street right-of-way does not extend to the east boundary of that subdivision. Therefore, unless the Compress Hill Supplement Addition is vacated, Laredo street cannot be 14. Because a portion of the subject property is already platted, the applicant's development must comply with the lots and public street rights-of-way recorded as the Compress Hill Supplement Addition. Mr. Baldus may not be aware that a portion of the property he owns has been sentence. sign. issue mentioned in #13, below. extended as proposed on the development plat. previouslyplatted. 3Page 15. The City's subdivision standards, which apply to development plats as well a subdivision plats, do not allow dead-end streets. Some streets shown on the submitted development plat have dead- ends. Also, the City standards require a public sidewalk on at least one side of each residential street. None are indicated on the development plat. In addition, all residential development must either dedicate public parkland or, at the City's discretion, pay a fee in lieu of dedication. The: submitted development plat does show a couple of tennis courts in the northeast corner, but 16. On Sheet 2, there is a parking lot that appears to disappear off the edge of the property, and two private streets that also terminate abruptly along that line. We seriously doubt that the intent is too construct a parking lot with a corner sliced off as shown on this "Site Plan". When we originally dealt with Mr. Baldus, he had stated that the remainder of the property under his ownership, which is outside the city limits, would also be developed and include a community or amenity center building just north of the subject property of this application in the approximate location of the parking lot. The requirement for a development plat in lieu of a subdivision plat is in subsection (b) of Section 52-31 "Plat Required" of the Subdivision Regulations. Development plats require the same compliance with City standards as do subdivision plats. In accordance with the City's Interlocal Agreement with Caldwell County (latest version approved in May 2021), the City's Subdivision Regulations (which include development plats) apply in the one-mile statutory ETJ oft the City. Accordingly, ift the remainder of the property northofthe: area shown on this "Site Plan" is to be developed, it must also be included as part of this development plat. That will affect most of the sheets of the plan, the acreage of the development will need to be revised accordingly on the untitled application form, and the engineering plan review fee will increase. 17. On Sheet 3, the city street name Flores Street should be added as al label in addition to FM6 672. 18. Nowhere on the development plat, the application form, or attachments is there a survey or metes and bounds legal description of the subject property. There are distances and bearings shown along some of the boundary lines on the development plat, but the north line of the subject property does not have that required notation. The metes and bounds must close, and be These comments do not represent an exhaustive list of possible deficiencies, but are the major issues that make the application incomplete and, therefore, ineligible forapproval. Also, the comments are limited to the first three pages of the development plan (labeled "Site Plan" on the first sheet). The remaining pages are engineering-related, and must be reviewed and approved by the city engineer. Any approval of the engineering plans by the city engineer, however, does not constitute approval of the development plat, which is still subject to the other considerations listed above that are in doesn'ti indicate the dedication of any public parkland. certified by a licensed: surveyor. addition tot the engineering review. 4IPage MRLSVXaL! IWVH001 1SS $3H014109 C 0 LMId Ss M98LS SVXEI IMHNO01 19938074109 NVId390I8. ISVHM007 SIM.IISNO9D01 NOACTIAS e NVic I1S ve98L SVXEI IVHN001 1$938014109 NVId DO0IS. I8VHX007 SLMIENOODOT NOISIACT TAD a 3NOUO3 DSSNOISIASN Tsmper 3y Senchrark of irbr roo NAVS, sas levalions ENGINEERING PLANS PERMIT FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION VIA CERTIFIED MAIL; RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED FILED: December 17,2021 Municipal Planning Commission (the Authority): City ofLockhart, Texas Planning Commission % Honorable Chairman Philip Ruiz or current Chairman Applicant: Lockhart Ridge Land, LP Property Address: 601 Flores Street MailingAddress: % Riley Baldus Lockhart, Texas 78644 401 Woodward St, #201 Austin, Texas 78704 308 West San Antonio Street Lockhart, Texas 78644 RE: ENGINEERING PLANS SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FORI RESIDENTIAL HOMES; COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; OFFSITEPLANS SERVICE OPGRADE PERMIT; RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR PERMIT. - LOCKHART RIDGE PROJECT Dear City ofLockhart Planning Commission and Honorable Chairman, Enclosed please find our complete permit application, including applicable construction documents and engineering plans for all required permits to begin site construction oft the Lockhart Ridge Project. The Project is a private single family homes residential community per CityofLockhart: Zoning, with a maximum density of up to 118 residential homes at 5 per acre, however only 3.8 homes per acre will be We have carefully reviewed all City ofLockhart code and utility information and look forward to constructing all work to the highest applicable standards, including occasionally volunteering to make We are not subdividing the 23.613 acre property, therefore no subdivision application request is being made; the acreage tract of land is greater than 5 acres, and it has a single Owner, Lockhart Ridge Land, LP and accordingly, is and remains private property with all private driveway and property maintenance by The City ofLockhart exempted the property from platting by enacting the ordinance, stating that no Plat is required for the Project, because "As subdivision plat is not required for the division or assembly of tracts ofl land into parts greater than five acres within the city limits", sO we are following the City ofLockhart ordinance and will not replat, rather we have had professionally engineering plans drawn by a Licensed This permit application for plans is a continuation oft the series of Permits by this Project, that began in 1987 with the provision of water service contract agreement consent permit on October 23, 1987 between constructed by this permit. additional contributions to the improvement of the overall City ofLockhart. the Owner, rather than at the City's expense. Texas Civil Engineer. the City ofLockhart and our Property, under which this permit application is made. Enclosed please find: 1. Lockhart Engineering Plans Application Filled Out and Signed; RILEY BALDUS OPFICE5125223756 Pgiof2 ENGINEERING PLANS PERMIT FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION VIA CERTIFIED MAIL; RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 2. City ofLockhart Information For Permits Application Filled Out; 3. 2 Sets of] Engineering Plans (20 Sheets of Plans Total) Printed to Scale on 36" X24" as requested, and the complete documents and other information requested including but not limited to: Title and Certification page, Existing Detail, topographic base map, drainage area map, private driveway profiles, and the utilities design information with City ofLockhart standard engineering details; 4. 2Sets ofOffsite Construction Engineering Plans and Right of Way Repairs Construction Permit; 7. No building intended for public occupancy within ai federally established flood plain proposed; 5. Commercial Driveway Permit Engineering onto Flores St; 6. Tax Certificate showing all taxes are paid through 2022; and 8. Water Service Availability Letters: a. CityofLockhart Water and Sewer Service is Available (seel letter from Lockhart Utility); b. Water Service Provision Easement Contract Agreement Consent Permit Vol 523 Pg37 C. Lockhart City Code hereby establishing the Lockhart ETJ as a Water and Sewer Service Deed Records; Area of the City ofLockhart Utility. No Engineering Plans Fee has been included because the City. Application form states that there is "NO FEE" because we are not subdividing and we could not find any language in City ofLockhart Ordinances or under the authorities given to the City by the State ofTexas Legislature that allow for such fees, however ifit is later determined that fees are actually due, then they will be paid, ifrequested, at the time ofp permit approval or ifa as the condition of permit approval, then just priort to approval and construction of No building permit for the construction of! homes is included in this application, this will be the subject of We look forward to your response and approval. Please contact me with any questions during your review the plans. a separate homes construction building permit application, whenever applicable. by phone at (512)522.3756 or at my mailing address provided. Kind Regards, LOCKHART RIDGE LAND, LP, al Texas Limited Partnership By: The. Alexander Companies, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, Its General Partner HAIE By: CTIVE DEC 21 2021 TY LOCKHART NE SLAM Managing Member RILEV BALDUS OPHC5125223756 Pg2of2 C VE DEC 21 2021 CITY OF 512/398-3461 . FAX/512/398-3833 P.O.Box 239 . Lockhart, Texas 78644 308 WestsanAntonto Lockhart Street TEXAS APPLICANTS SURVEYOR NAME DAY-TIME TELEPHONE E-MAIL ENGINEER NAME DAY-TIME TELEPHONE E-MAIL OWNER NAME, DAY-TIME TELEPHONE riley@alexaco.us E-MAIL. HOLT CARSON INC (512)442-0990 1904 Fortview Road Austin, TX 78704 POBOX90485 AUSTIN, TX 78709 ADDRESS surveyehcaustin.com LOC CONSULTANTS, LLP (512)524-0677 ADDRESS sergooc@vl@gmal.com LOCKHART RIDGE LAND LP 601 Flores Street Lockhart, Texas 78644 ADDRESS (512)522-3756 TYPE OF APPLICATION SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT REPLATRESUEDMISION VARIANCE FINAL PLAT AMENDING PLAT MINOR PLAT X DEVELOPMENT PLAT ENGINEERING PLANS -A ACREAGETRACI, NOTAS SUBDIVISION PROPERTY SUBDIVISION NAME LOCKHART RIDGE 601 FLORES STREET, LOCKHART, TEXAS 78644 ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION X ACRE(S) LOCATED IN TOTAL LAND AREA ZONING CLASSIFICATIONIS) PROPOSED USE OF LAND CITY LIMITS ETJ (COUNTY) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS PDDNA CLORS / 23.613 RLD Single family sitework construction, private roads/driveways: TTRAT Residential homes per Zoning, SITE PLAN- NO SUBDIVISION SUPHITALREQUREMENTE NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF PROPERTY LIEN HOLDERS, IFA ANY. EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, IFANY. IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR AN AMENDING PLAT OR REPAIRESUBDIMBSION - A COPY OF IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR A FINAL PLAT INVOLVING PUBLIC MPROVEMENTS - THREE COPIES IF THE APPLICATION IS FOR, OR INCLUDES, A SUBDIVISION CODE VARIANCE - COMPLETED VARIANCE SECTION ON NEXT PAGE AND REQUIRED STATEMENTNOTED THEREIN. PLAT DOCUMENTS, AS FOLLOWS, CONTAINING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ARTICLE 23-6. (Amending Plats, ReplatResubdivision Plats, and Minor Plats are considered the same as Final Plats for OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS. the purpose of content and format). Seven copies fori initial staff review. Twelve copies after initial staff review for preliminary plats, final plats, and epats/resubdivsions Two copies after initial staff review for amending and minor plats. Two signed and sealed mylar reproducibles (three if applicant wants to keep one) of approved amending plat, replatresubdivision, final plat, or minor plat, for recording. One recorded reproducible is filed at the County Clerk's office, and the other is returned toi the City. FEE, AS FOLLOWS (NOFEE FOR VARIANCES, APPEALS, SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT PLANS, OR DEVELOPMENT PLATS): Preliminary Plat $600.00 payable to the City ofl Lockhart $400.00 plus $20.00 per acre, payable to the $100.00 payable to the City ofL Lockhart $71.00 fort thet first sheet, and $50.00 for each additional sheet, payable tot the Caldwell County Final Plat or ReplatResubdivsion Amending plat, Minor plat, or Minor replat not requiring a public hearing Recording fee for Amending Plat, ReplalResubdivision, Final Plat, City of Lockhart or Minor Plat Clerk To the best of my knowledge, this application and associated documents conform to all requirements of the City of Lockhart Subdivision Regulations. Texas Local Government Code Title 7 Sec. 212.0097. "APPROVAL PROCEDURE: WAIVER PROHIBITED. A municipal authority responsible for approving plats or the governing body of a municipality may not request or require an applicant to waive a deadline..." SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME DATE DEC/720)/ 5125223756 Riley TELEPHONE Rhe PLAT APPROVAL PERIODS Texas Local Government Code Title 7 Sec. 212.0097. APPROVAL PROCEDURE: WAIVER PROHIBITED. A municipal authority responsible for approving plats or the governing body of a municipality may not request or require an applicant to waive a deadline..." SUBDIVISION VARIANCE (for variance applications, only) VARIANCE TO SECTION(S) OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS CURRENT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTIS) REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT DOCUMENTING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE(S), INCLUDING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE. 1. Special circumstances or conditions affect the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of the Code would deprive the applicant reasonable use oft the land; 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of 3. The variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, and will not be 4. The variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other lands in the the applicant; injurious to other property in the area; and, area in accordance with the provisions of the Code. OFFICE USE ONLY ACCEPTED BY. Inouplett opdication DATE SUBMITTED 2-2(-2 DATE NOTICES MAILED RECEIPT NUMBER, NA CASE NUMBER DP -22-0 MA DATE NOTICE PUBLISHED N.A. (For certain ReplatsResubdwisions without vacating preceding plat) PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE, 1-1Z-22 DECISION CONDITIONS UTILITKSERVICE FORM THIS FORM SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT, AFTER CONSULTING WITH THE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS LISTED BELOW, FOR ALL PLATS, EXCEPT AMENDING PLATS, AND FINAL PLATS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLATS. THE FOLLOWING UTILITY SERVICE CODES ARE TO BE INDICATED, AS APPLICABLE, IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW. A B C D Adequate service is currently available to the proposed subdivision. Adequate service is not currently available, but arrangements have been made to provide it. Adequate service is not available, and arrangements have not been made to provide it from the utility. Additional easements are needed for the utility within the subject property. NAME OF WATER SERVICE PROVIDER APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S). A Lockhart Public Water Utility WASTEWATER SERVICE APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S) A TEXAS GAS SERVICE GAS COMPANY APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S). A NAME OF ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDER Lockhart Public Utility APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE CODE(S). A,D X Yes UNDERGROUND No INFORMATION FOR PERMITS CITY OF Lockhart TEXAS DECEMBER 17,2021 Today's Date: ENGINEERING PLANS SITE CONSTRUCTION, OFFSITE UTILITIES CONSTRUCTICTION,RIGHT OF WAY Permit type: CONSTRLCTION_AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION 601 Flores St. Lockhart All Work By Owner Property Address: Contractor Name: Property Owner Name: Phone Number & Email: MAILING ADDRESS: Riley Baldus 401 Woodward St #201 Austin, TX 78704 Lockhart Ridge Land, LP 5125223756, leygalexaco.us GEIVE DEC 21 2021 CIYOFLOCKHARI DRVEOPVEATOEAMOIS Job Description: Per engineered plans permit DEC1722021 $384,000 Commercial Project Valuation: Sitework Residential Sq. Ft.: HK DECEMBER Date: 17,2021 Signature: NOTE: RECEIPTS WILL BE EMAILED WITHIN 5 BUSINESS DAYS OR AS SCHEDULE ALLOWS IT. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. POBOX239* * 308V W. SAN ANTONIO ST. * LOCKHART, TX78644 PHONE: (512) 398-3461 * FAX:(612)398-3833 Lockhart, TX Code ot Ordinances 9/3/20,11:53AM ARTICLE II. - WATER FACILITIES IMPACT FEES Sec. 31-23. Water: service area. (a) There is hereby established a water: service area, constituting land within the city limits and within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, as depicted on Figure 2 in Exhibit1 attached to the ordinance from which this chapter derives and incorporated by reference (b) The boundaries of the water service area may be amended from time to time, or new water benefit areas may be delineated, pursuant to the procedures insection 31-16. herein. (Ord. No. 02-02,51,1-15-02; Ord. No. 07-11,51,3-20-07; Ord. No. 2017-08, $1, 4-4-17) Sec. 31-24. - Water improvements plan. (a) The water improvements plan for the city is hereby adopted as Exhibit 2 attached to the ordinance from which this chapter derives and incorporated by reference herein. (b) The water improvements plan may be amended from time to time, pursuant to the procedures insection31-16. (Ord. No. 02-02,51,1-15-02; Ord. No. 07-11,51,3-20-07; Ord. No. 2017-08, S1,4 4-4-17) Sec. 31-25. Water facilities impact fees. (a) The maximum impact fees per service unit for waterfacilities are hereby adopted and (b) The impact fees per service unit for water facilities, which are to be paid by each new development, are hereby adopted and incorporated in schedule 2, located at the end of (c) The impact fees per service unit for water facilities may be amended from time to time, incorporated in schedule 1, located at the end of this chapter. this chapter. pursuant to the procedures insection31-16. (Ord. No. 02-02, $1,1-15-02) about:blank Page 1of1 GITYOF fockhap REQUEST UTILITY SERVICE CAPACITY AND INFORMATION Date Request Received: April 9,2019 Requestor: Riley Baldus Telephone #: STREET NAME Subject Street/Address: Property ID#1 13837 (Flores Street, Lockhart, Texas) ADDRESS City Utility Related Information: Water Service Size: None Sewer Service Size: None Electric Service Size: N/A Water MainSize:12" Location: Flores St. to Navarro St. to South of St Mary's Cem. Sewer Main Size: 6" Location: Navarro St. and Laredo St. Electric Primary Size: Location: Details by Utility: Water: There isal 12" water main that is located in Property ID: # 18505 and follows the south border oftheSt. Mary's Cemetery property to N. Commerce St. By: Sean Kelley SK Sewer: There is a 6'sewer main that terminates at the end ofNavarro St. near Laredo St. By: Sean Kelley S Electric: This Property is within our electric service area. By: Date Provided to Requestor: April 10, 2019 Requests may take up to 10 working days. No engineering study will be provided to determine customer needs. This information is provided as a courtesy and in no manner creates a liability for the City ofLockhart. Note: Natural Gas by Texas Gas Services Through Tax Year 2021 Issued By: Caldwell County Appraisai Districi 211 BufkinLn. P.O. Box 900 Lockhart. TX 78644 TAX CERTIFICATE Certificate # 6899 Property information 601FLORES ST LOCKAARI,TX7A6 Property ID. 18505 Gen ID: 0300017-067-3-0 Legal Desc: ADIYLOCKMARLAYRL, ACRES23613 Legal Acres: 23.6130 Situs: DBA: Exemptions" For Entities Caldneh Courty CycfLochhart Far: oAlrket Road Lockhart! I5D Owner ID: 228143 LOCKHART RIDGE LANDLP 2819 FOSTERI LN,APTE F208 AUSTIN.TX7875/-1156 100.00% Value information improvement HS improvement NHS: Landi hS Land: Nris: AssesseValue 141,35 7 14735 Pluns Creek Conseryatont Dst.ct Produclivily Market: Plun Crçek Underground Wser Productivily Use Current/Dalinquent Taxes This is to certify that, after a careful check oft the tax records of this office, the following delinquent taxes, penalties. interest and anyl known costs and expenses as provided by Tax Code $33.48, are due on the described property for the following taxing unit(s): Year Entity Totals: Effective Date: 11/12/2021 Taxable Taxi Due 0.00 Disc.P& 0.00 Tolal Due itp paid by: 11/30/2021 Attornoy Fue 0.00 Tota! DuA 0.00 000 TEXAS Tax Certificate Issued for: Lockhan ISD Pium Creek Underground Water Pium Creck Conservation District Farm tON Market Road Caly ofLockhart Cald.vdlC County Taxes Paidi in 2021 1.664.6! 30.65 30.21 0.15 936.26 989.90 POSSIBLET ROLLBACK lfapplicable, the above-described property! has/is reçeiving special appraisal based oni its use, and: additional rollback taxes may become due based ont the provisions oft the special appraisal (Comptroller Rule 9.3040) or property omitted from the appraisal roll as describert Pursuant tol Tax Code Section 31.08, ifar persont transfers property accompanied bya a tax certificate that erroneously indicates that no delinquentt taxes, penalties ori interest are due a taxing unit ont the property or that fails toi include property becauso ofi its omission fromi an appraisal roll, the unit'st tax lien ont the property is extinguished: and the purchaser oft the propertyi is absolved of! liability tot the unitf for delinquent taxes, penalties ori interest ont the property or fort taxes basod on omitted property. The persony who wasi iiable fort the tax fort the yeart the tax was imposed ort the property was omitted remains personally liablef fort thot tax and for any penalties ori interest. This certificate does not clear abuse of granted exemptions as defmed in Section 11.43 Paragraph(1) ot tho Texas Property Tax Code. under Tax Code: Section 25.21i is noti included in this certificate (Tax Code Section: 31.08(b)). Atax certificate issuod throughf fraud or collusion is voic. May Be Subject to Court Costs if Suiti is Pending VPiHw Mhudvk Signature of Authorzed Oificer cis Collecing Uificu Datent Requested bsue By LOCKHART 11/12/2021 KEANDD iee Amount 10.00 Refvresces 1