Law Offices 311South Second Street Suite 200 FortPlerc,FL34950  NEILL GRIFFIN MARQUIS OSKING, PLLC  RichardV.Neill (1934-2023) RichardV.Neill,) Jr.+* Renée) Marquis-Abrams Ian! Eielson Osking Brandon! M.I Hale Matthew C. London  Mailing Address: Post Officel Box: 1270 Fortl Pierce, FL34954-1270 Telephone: (772) 464-8200 Fax: (772)464-2566  *Board Certified Wills, Trusts, and Estates! Lawyer Certified Circuit Civil/County Court Mediator + Board Certified Civil Triall Lawyer Mayor William G. Thiess 2512 Lightlewood Lane Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 Mr. James Grimes 3203 North Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Ms. Ingrid M. Van Hekken 304 Anchor Way Fort Pierce, FL 34946  April 12, 2024  Mr. Dale Reed 2811 North Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Mr. John Langel 2511 North Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Mr. Timothy Ritter 2513 Lightlewood Lane Fort Pierce, Florida 34946  RE: Town of St. Lucie Village - March meeting  Gentlemen and Ms. Van Hekken:  Please accept the following as our attorney's report for the April 16th meeting.  1. Quiet Zones - Follow up discussion. This is agendaed fori follow up discussion after the 2. NUS1 (Parcel No. 1428-501-0048-000-3Conceptual site plan review. Acopy of the preliminary site plan is enclosed. The applicant seeks conceptual approval.  County's Town Hall Meeting.    Mayor and Board of Aldermen Page 2 April 12, 2023  3. Proposed Resolution 2024-3- - Approval of Stow & GoSite Plan. lam drafting a resolution, current version enclosed, with the idea of memorializing the terms and conditions of any approval. lam also enclosing the current landscape plan that's being considered and the plans and calculations that have been approved by our engineer. Also enclosed for your information is a copy of the draft variance order. 4. 2310N. Old Dixie (Walker Campbell Farms) - Lot Split Question. I'm seeking your concurrence on my response to Ms. Walker's question, copy enclosed. 5. - Kimley-Horn Proposal for Engineering Services for Phase 1 Construction. The proposed scope of work by Kimley-Horn is enclosed for your review and approval. 6. Appointment of Special Magistrate to Complete Term through. January 15, 2025. I've reached out to retired judge Bob Makemson to see if he would take this on. My email and 7. Certification of Election. Since all positions up for election were unopposed, you can certify the election. Ihave drafted and enclosed a Certification of Election. 8. Informational items. The following are for your information and will only carry forward inr my- report if they remain pending for my further attention/nyolvement:  attachment are enclosed.  Zoningo queries. We had a query from Mr. O'Berry regarding Parcel No. 1421- 603-006-000-9, on the east side of US 1 just north of the Zito property which has an addition which encroaches 1.5 feet over the property line. His email is  enclosed. He questions thei impact on development.  ii. Lien queries. None.  ili. Phase 2 Sewer. The property owner has agreed to give an easement for the  Hagen to Palmetto sewer connection.  iv. Heritage Preserve Boundarylssue. There's been no activity. V. St. Lucie School Property Boundary. There's been no activity.    Mayor and Board of Aldermen Page 3 April 12,2023  Do feel free to call if there's anything you want to discuss with me before the meeting.  With best regards.  Moyw 7  Richard V. Neill, Jr.  RVNjr/dw Enclosures  CC: Paulette T. Burgess, Acting Clerk (w/encls.) Carl Peterson, Building Official (w/encls.)  Cathy Townsend (w/encls.) Wesley Taylor (w/encls.)  Leon Ghougasian, Marshall (w/encls.)    cadycsozuesed 9911-609-1053  NVHETIA S000F. 833 0023 31S svas A SLYE NOISI0 93#n193IHOWVVH  JOYTIA 3083ld1 INOI- ebpoisAw  dnosoo OINUNOD O  -Do  STORMWATE MANAGEMENT    RESOLUTION 2024-3  A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR STOW & GO STORAGE, LLC, ANDI PROVIDING TERMS AND  CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL  WHEREAS, Stow & Go Storage, LLC ("Applicant"),has applied for site plan approval for a  site plan on the following described properties:  a. Parcel ID (Parcel 1): 1433-123-0006-00-3  Legal Description of Property: 33 344 40 BEG. ATI PT WHERE S BDRY OLSONS S/D INTI E RD R/WLIOFI HWY US 1, THN89251 19E400.801 FT, THS01 23 41 E245.29 FT, THS89 29 08 W 320.61 FTTOERDI R/WLIC OF HWY US 1, THNWLY ON CURVE CONC NE, R  OF 11,359.2 TH NWLY ALG ARC258.82: FT TO POB (2.04AC)  b. Parcel ID (Parcel 2): 1433-124-0005-010-2;  Legal Description of] Property: 333 34 40 FROMINT OF S. BDRY OLSONS S/D AND ER RD R/W LI OF HWY US 1 AND CURVE CONC NE, R OF 11,359.2 FT, TH SELY ALG ARC 258.82FTTO! POB; TH CONT ALG ARC110.64 FT, THN8929 08 E268.08 FT, THS2131 34) E228.78 FT, THI IN682826F E 1251 FT, THI IN2131341 W 407.92 FT, THS892519W 39.78 FT, THS0123.411 E108.331 FT, THS892908W32061 FT TO POB (1.69AC)  C. Parcel ID (Parcel 3): 1433-124-0005-020-;  Legal Description ofl Property: 33 34 40. FROM: INT OF S BDRY LI OLSON'S S/D WITH ELY R/W LIUS #1 RUN SELY ALG ELY R/W 369.46 FTTO POB, TH CONT SELY ALG SD ELYI R/W 240 FT, TH N8 87 DEG 09 MIN 04 SEC E2 265.12 FT, TH N21 DEG3 31 MIN: 34 SEC W 228.78 FT, THS 89 DEG 29. MIN 08 SEC W268.08 FTTO: POB (1.35AC)  Total Size of] Property (Parcel 1,2, 3): 5.08. Acres  WHEREAS, the site plan is submitted fori the permitted use, Outdoor Storage Facilities for Families and Businesses, which is permitted subject to site plan approval in the commercial  zoning district, in which the properties are located.  WHEREAS, the Applicant, ini its submittal, has described the types of vehicles to be stored  at the subject facility as:  The site is considered an Outdoor Open-Air Storage business. The items being proposed for storage vary ranging from boats on trailers, recreational vehicles including travel trailers, motorhomes, and accessory trailers. All units stored, will  be required to be portable.  1    WHEREAS, Applicants submittal also provided that, "no semi-trucks or trailers will be stored on this property" and the Applicant had previously described the desired storage to be  boat and RV storage.  WHEREAS, the entrance/exit gate at the north end of the property cannot be used in accordance with FDOT regulations without reconfiguration but Applicant desires to maintain the  entrance for emergency use.  WHEREAS, the Applicant's plan is based on access through the south gate which will be a WHEREAS, Applicant has submitted, and the Village engineerl has reviewed and approved WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted the landscape plan attached as Exhibit B which WHEREAS, the Applicant has secured a variance, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C, and submitted the revised landscape plan attached as Exhibit D which meets the requirements  manned gate that will be opened and closed each day and, as in compliance, the site plan submitted as attached Exhibit A. was deemed in compliance by the Village landscape architect.  oft the code after the variance relief.  WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted construction plans copies attached as Exhibit E. WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted irrigation plans copies attached as ExhibitF. WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted drainage calculations copy attached as Exhibit G. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF ST. 1. The plans and submittals attached as Exhibits A, B and D-G, are approved, subject 2. No changes to the approved plans or calculations shall be made without submittal to the Board of Aldermen of the Town of St. Lucie Village for review and approval. 3. This site plan approval is for the entire site, that is fori the three parcels which make 4. Applicant, having commenced work adjacent to the St. Lucie School property and having encroached onto the St. Lucie School property, shall sod and irrigate and maintain the property until ground cover is securely established. 5. In addition, any' work, including sloping shall be removed from the St. Lucie School property sO that the entirety of Applicant's and improvements are located solely on Applicants property and not the Village'sp property. In that regard, Applicant's contractor shall coordinate with the Village's surveyor to confirm the boundary line around the St. Lucie School and shall construct the project accordingly. 6. Upon completion oft the proposed paving, grading and drainage improvements, the engineer of record shall provide final certification to the Town of St. Lucie Village, upon completion of the project that the project or system and its components, as  LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA, that:  to the terms and conditions herein.  up the site, together, and not separately.  2    approved hereby, have been constructed in substantial conformance with the approved plans, including certified "as builts" completed by a Florida registered land 7. Applicant and any successors in interest shall be responsible for maintaining in good order and repair the improvements, including the swales and retention areas, trees and shrubberies, the opaque green screen fence, and the like, which responsibility shalli include repair and replacement of the same, ifnecessary; and, in particular, dead trees, shrubs, and sod shall be replaced within 90 days with plants conforming 8. Applicant shall reimburse the Village'se engineer and landscape architect expenses 9. The items stored on the subject property shall be limited to boats on trailers, recreational vehicles including travel trailers, motorhomes, accessory trailers and 10. Semi-tractors and trailers, commercial vehicles and commercial trailers, and heavy machinery and heavy equipment (except in conjunction with licensed businesses on the Parcel 3 (the parcel at 2450 N. US1 1) and stored on that property only) are not permitted. Also prohibited are, fleet operations --where vehicles (ori fruit trailers, fori instance) are stored overnight or otherwise but routinely go in and out for business operations, junk vehicles or items that may be stored in aj junk yard, yard waste or other debris, unserviceable vehicles, storage pods or cargo containers. 11. While the northern emergency access may be maintained, its use shall be limited to emergencies and project access shall be limited to the south gate at 2450NUS1, which shall be a manned gate that is opened and closed each day. Any deviation from the stated entry gate operation should be reviewed by FDOT and submitted as PASSED. AND APPROVED by the Board of Aldermen ofi the Town of St. Lucie Village on  surveyor.  to the approved plan. before commencing work.  campers, as well as boat trailers, cars and pick-up trucks.  amodification oft the site plan approval.  this 16th day of April, 2024.  APPROVED:  BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA  By:  William G. Thiess, Mayor  fAttestation on following page]  3    ATTESTED: By:  Paulette T. Burgess, Acting Clerk  I, Paulette T. Burgess, Acting Clerk oft the TOWN OF ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA, do hereby certify that this is at true and accurate copy of Resolution 2024-3 which was duly introduced, read, and adopted at the regular meeting oft the Board of Aldermen of the TOWN  OF ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA, held this 16th day of April, 2024.  Paulette' T. Burgess, Acting Clerk  4     0 gae  22  53  STOW& GOS STORAGE .PIERCE,FLORIDA  LANDSCAPER PLAN    Stormwater Management Report  Engineering Calculations & Supplementary Documents Supporting a Surface Water Management System Serving  Stow & Go Storage  Location: Town of St Lucie Village, FL StLucie County, PCN: 1433-123-0006-000.3 Prepared by:    GIANGRANDE Engineering & Planning Consulting Civil Engineers 710 SE Ocean Boulevard Stuart, Florida 34994 772-888-9076 FLCertification: 3093 Revised: December 2023  Signed by: aase6 Dylan O'Berry, PE PEI Regi #88512 Date: 12/12/2023  Digitallyisigned by Arthur D O'Berry Location: Gangrande Engineering and. Planning, Stuart, FL Reason: amthe author oft this document Contact lofor email: dylan@gép-liG. com cell: (772) 203-0664 Date202312.121 14:15:59-0500  No. 88512 * STATEOF FLORIDP SIONAL      Table of Contents 1. Project Description. 2. Existing Conditions 2.1. Existing Site.. 2.2. Existing Site Drainage. 2.3. Control Elevation 3. Proposed Conditions 3.1. Project Description 3.2. Land use. 3.3. Water Quality 3.4. Stormwater Runoff Volume. 3.5. Stormwater Design Elevation.  Appendices Appendix A. Appendix B... Appendix C... Appendix D. Appendix E..  Location Map Sub-Basin Map Geotechnical Report  Stormwater Calculations - Existing Conditons Stormwater Calculations - Proposed Conditions  Pagei    1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION  The Stow & Go Storage facility is owned and operated by Haynes & Son Holdings LLC. Iti is conveniently situated on the eastern side of US Hwy-1, approximately one mile north of the intersection of US Hwy 1 and SR-A1A. The establishment will be developed utilizing the remnants of a previously demolished building and the existing boat maintenance facility, aiming to provide comprehensive storage solutions for boats, recreational vehicles (RVs), and other similar items. The planned enhancements for the site encompass the refurbishment of the existing asphalt pavement, the utilization shell rock base to stabilize the old building footprint, andi the establishment of an on-site stormwater drainage system to ensure water quality and accommodate thet full storage capacity oft the 100-year, 1-day storm event. Additionally, the site  presently incorporates a 260 linear foot exfiltration trench with twoi inlets.  MArportand Business  PROJECT SITE  Foit  Image obtained from Google Earth. Figure 1- Location Map 27'28'51.51"N, 80-20'19.61"W  Location- Section 33, Township 345, Range 40E, St. Lucie County, FL  2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1. EXISTING SITE  The subject site encompasses 3 parcels of land totaling 5.08 acres of land, situated to the east of US Hwy- 1.It benefits from convenient accessibility via three FDOT driveways that connect directly to US Hwy-1. According to historical aerials and public records, the site was originally developed prior to 1992 and    subsequently subdivided in 2009. In 2007, the building on the premises was demolished, resulting in the presence of the existing asphalt pavement and drainage inlets. Fora a comprehensive understanding of the existing site conditions, please refer to the provided aerials and existing conditions maps on Sheet EX-1. The current site drainage involves four sub basins according to the historical drainage patterns of the original site. Sub-Basin' "A" drains 1.35 acres towards the northeast corner retention area and lowest point on site. This flow causes flooding in that section during significant storm events. Sub-Basin "B" historically drains 1.21 acres to the south draining into two existing inlets connected by exfiltration trench, effectively preventing any flooding during significant storm events. The Sub-Basin "C" drains 0.39 acres westerly into the pervious area on-site. The Sub-Basin "D" drainages the remaining 2.13 acres to three storm inlets, these inlets are not included in this analysis since no changes were made to this area. A Sub-Basin map is Fromi the Geotechnical report provided by Andersen. Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. (AACE). Itv was found that the ground was table was lower then 72 inches from existing grade. This was from hand augers done on 4/12/2022 onsite. These finds are correlated from the USGA Soils Map also estimating the ground water tol be deeper then 80 inches. With the average ground elevation for the site at 30.65ft NVAD and both the estimated water table elevations be deeper the 72 and 80i inches. The estimated control elevation was set  2.2: EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE  provided in Appendix D. 2.3. CONTROL ELEVATION  as 23.17fNVAD.  3. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION  The proposed improvements for the site will be to stabilize the old building footprint with an impervious section consisting of 8" shell rock base (LBR 100), and 12" stabilized subgrade (LBR 40) to allow for boat/RV storage, an on-site stormwater drainage area to treat water quality in the northeast corner, and perimeter fencing and landscaping. The water quality treatment volume will be mitigated by the retention areai in the East and the exfiltration trench in the middle of the site. See the proposed site plan, on Sheet Table 1 shows al preakdown oft the proposed land use compared to the existing land use for the site. The drainage features of the area outside of the stormwater management area will not be altered from existing conditions. This is why the table below 3.83 acres in total compared to the overall 5.08 acres. The pond  S-1, fort the layout of the future site.  3.2. LAND USE  bottom fort the proposed retention area is at elevation 27.0ft-NAVD.  Table 1-L Land Use Summary Land Use Summary  Land Use  Pre-Dev (ac) 0.56 0.67 2.60 0.00 3.83  Post-Dev (ac) 0.74 0.00 2.42 0.67 3.83  Difference (ac) 0.18 (-)0.67 (-)0.18 0.67  Open-Space Old Building Space Existing Asphalt Shell Rock Base ParcelTotal    3.3. WATER QUALITY  Water quality storage is provided for the site! based on the greater of 1 inch of rainfall over the project area or the total runoff of 2.5 inches times the percent impervious. Net impervious area was assumed to be inclusive of the existing pavement area, the gravel storage area, and the open space. The required 0.32 ac-ft of storage will be provided in the proposed retention pond based on the 1-ich over project area.  Calculations are provided in Appendix C. 3.4. STORMWATER RUNOFF VOLUME storms were analyzed.  The proposed site conditions have a net neutral generation of stormwater runoff. The following design  The minimum road crown elevation willl be above the 5-yr/1-day.  The 100-year/1-day storm was used to review pre VS. post discharge and used for the retention  recovery analysis.  Table 1- Pre VS. Post Runoff Volume Summary  Runoff Volume  Design Storm Pre-Development Post-Development Difference  (ac-ft) 1.45 3.11 3.36  (ac-ft) 1.45 3.11 3.36  (ac-ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00  5-yr/1-day 25-yr/3-day 100-yr/1-day  Proposed stormwater calculations are provided in Appendix C.  3.5. STORMWATER DESIGN ELEVATION  The proposed dry retention area is sized to contain the required water quality volume for the site. The storage area will be set at or above the peak stage from the 100-year / 1-day storm event. The existing roadway/parking. area are set above the 5-year/1-day. Table 2 below provides a summary of the design  stage for this project. Proposed stormwater calculations are provided in Appendix C.  Table 2- Design Elevation Summary Design Elevations (ftNAVD) 29.43 30.41 31.35  Design Storm Post-Development Design Elev Category  (ftNAVD) 33.00 33.30 31.40  Water Quality 5-yr/1-day 100-yr/1-day  WQ Road Stored Elevation  Additional project design information is listed as follows:  Rainfall: The design storm for this analysis was the 100-year, 24-hour and 5-year, 24-hour rainfall event was estimated to by. 12.0 inches and 5.9 inches per Appendix. C of SFWMD's Environment  Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook' Volume II.    Outfall: There is no outfall on site, as the site willi fully contain the runoff up to the 100 year/1-day Recovery: The dry retention pond must recover half of its treatment volume in less than five days. Ina addition, the pond must recover 90% oft the 25-year, 3-day runoff volume (evaluated based on the 100-year, 1-day runoff volume) within 12 days from the cessation oft the storm event. The 50% treatment volume and 90% runoff volume are recovered 0.061 days and 0.16 days, respectively. The retention area's recovery calculations are provided with the post development calculations in Geotechnical Information: The soils onsite were evaluated by Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. The soils were to found to be a mixture of poorly graded sands ranging from dark gray to light brown, with trace amounts of rock fragments found within the Ot to 32 inch range. Orange-brown poorly graded sands with at trace amount of clay was found within the 101 to72  storm event.  Appendix C.  inch range, sampling was terminated at 72i inches.    APPENDICES    : : : :  Appendix A Site Plan    B4 R4 R4  D4  43  4444 1343    Appendix B  Stormwater Calculations - Existing Conditions    GIANGRANDE  Pre-Development: Land Use Calculations Project Explanation  Project Name: Project# #: Engineer: Date:  Stow & Go Storage 22-014 DCC 8/23/2022 Computation Type: Land Use & Stage-Storage Datum: NAVD Average Ground Elevation (ELgra)= 30.65 ft-NAVD Controll Elevation (CE)= 23.17 ft-NAVD  Engineer: Revision Date:  Source: USDA Soill Map  Site Land Use Percentage of On-Site Total Areas (SF) Total Areas (A.) Bldg. % Bldg. Area (A,) Pervious % Pervious Area (Ap) Impervious % Impervious Area (A,) Open Water % Open Water Area (Ac.)  Green Space Compacted Existing Exist. Area Exist. Area Total  Coquina Asphalt (ac) (ac) 0.76 2.30 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.76 2.30. 0.00 0.00  4 (ac) 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00  5 (ac) (ac) OSF 167,011SF 0,00 3,83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 3.06 0.00 0.00  (ac) 20,1% 0.77 0.00% 0,00 0.77 0,00 0.00% 0,00  19.8% 60.1% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 0.00% 0,00% 0,00% 0.00% 20.14% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 79,86%  33,637SF 33,041SF 100,333SF OSF  0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%  Landl Uses SSa andy WQC Calcs8 8-24-2022 Overall  Page2of15  6/7/2023    GIANGRANDE  Pre-Development: Stage-Storage Calculations ProjectE Explanation Storage Type: Stage-Volume Starting Stage= 27.00 Ending Stage= 34.00 Stagel Increment= 0.10 Name Area Start Elev End Elev Stage Feet NAVD 27.00 27.10 27,20 27.30 27.40 27.50 27.60 27.70 27.80 27.90 28.00 28.10 28.20 28,30 28,40 28.50 28.60 28.70 28.80 28,90 29.00 29.10 29.20 29,30 29,40 29.50 29,60 29.70 29.80 29.90 30.00 30.10 30.20 30,30 30.40 30.50  Green Space Compacted Existing 0.77 28.50 32.80 Ac-ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.07 0,09 0.11 0.13 0,15 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.36  Coquina Asphalt 0.76 2.30 29.07 28.57 31.61 33.30 Linear Linear Linear Total Storage Storage Storage Storage Ac-ft Ac-ft Ac-ft 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0,01 0,02 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.05 0,07 0,00 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.14 0.01 0.13 0.20 0.02 0.17 0.26 0.03 0.21 0.33 0.04 0.26 0.41 0.06 0.31 0.50 0.08 0,37 0.60 0.10 0.43 0.71 0.13 0.50 0.83 0.16 0,57 0.96 0.19 0,65 1.10 0.23 0.73 1.25 0.26 0.82 1.40 0.31 0.91 1.57  Land Uses SSa andy WQCalcs8 8-24-2022 Overall  Page3of15  6/7/2023    GEP GANGRANDE  Pre-Development: Stage-Area Calculations Project Explanation Storage Type: Stage-Area Starting Stage= 3.00 Ending Stage= 6.50 Stage Increment= 0.10 Name Area StartE Elev EndE Elev Stage Feet NAVD 3.00 3.10 3.20 3,30 3.40 3.50 3,60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 4.60 4.70 4.80 4.90 5,00 5.10 5.20 5,30 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.70 5,80 5.90 6.00 6.10 6.20 6.30 6.40 6.50  Green Space Compacted Existing 0.77 28.50 32.80 Area Ac 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00  Coquina Asphalt 0.76 2.30 29.07 28.57 31.61 33.30 Linear Linear Linear Total Area Area Area Ac Ac Ac 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00  Land Uses SSa andv WQ Calcs8 8-24-2022 Overal!  Page4of15  6/7/2023    GEP GANGRANDE sning  PRE-Development Stormwater Calculations  Project Explanation  Revised: Engineer:. DCC Date: 8/23/2022  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Land Use Table 0.00 0.00  Use  Imp. (ac) Bldg. (ac) Pervious (ac) Total (ac)  Basin = 3.06 TOTAL: = 3.06  0.77 0.77  3.83 3.83  Find Curve Number:  Avg. Pervious Ground El. = 30.65 Control Elev.: = 23.17 Distance to Water Table: =L 7.48  Soil Storage Table  Depth to Coastal Flatwoods Depression W.T.() Storage (in) Storage (in) Storage (in),  0.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0  0.0 0.6 1.6 2.5 4.6 6.6 8.8 10.9  0.0 0.6 1.6 2.5 4.0 5.4 7.2 9.0  0.0 0.6 1.4 2.1 3.3 4.4 5.6 6.8  Findi the basin's soil classification andi input below as' "Soil Storage" using the above' Depth to W.T.".  Soil Type = Flatwoods  Max. Available Soil Storage (Smax): - 9.00 inches Compaction Factor (Fcompaci): = 25% Compacted Soil Storage (Scompact) = 6.75 inches Available Soil Storage (Savail) = 1.36 inches Curve Number (CN): = 88  (Use 25%1 for developed site) (Smax/(Fcompact) (Ap/(Scompac/(A) 1000/(Savar+10)  Notes:  1. Soil Storage Table taken from Section 5.7.4.2 of the SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II. 2. Curve Number determination based on method presentedi in USDAI NRCS Technical Release 55 (TR-55)  "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds".  Land Use SS and' WQ Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page: 5of15  6/7/2023    Appendix C  Stormwater Calculations - Proposed Conditions    GE r GANGEANDE  Post-Development Land Use Calculations Project Explanation Stow & Go Storage 22-014 DCC 8/23/2022 Computation Type: Land Use & Stage-Storage Datum: NAVD Average Ground Elevation (ELgma)- 30.65 ft-NAVD Control Elevation (CE)= 23.17 ft-NAVD  Project Name: Project #: Engineer: Date:  Engineer: Revision Date:  Source: USDA Soil Map  Site Land Use  Compacted Existing Retention Exist. Area Coquina Asphalt Bottom 19.8% 60.1% 2.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 79.86% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0,00%  Open Space (ac) 17.5% 0.67 0.00% 0.00 0.67 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00  Pond (ac) 0.10 0.00 0,10 0.00 0.00  Total (ac) 3.83 0.00 0.77 3.06 0.00  5 (ac) 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00  (ac) 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00  (ac) 2.30 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.00  Percentage of On-Site Total Areas (SF) Total Areas (A) Bldg. % Bldg. Area (A,) Pervious % Pervious Area (Ap) Impervious % Impervious Area (A) Open Water9 % Open Water Area (Ac.)  29,159SF 33,041SF 100,333SF 4,478SF OSF 167,011SF 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 20,14%  Land Use SSa and WQC Calcs8 8-24-2022 Overall  Page6of15  6/7/2023    GIANGRANDE  Post-Development: Stage-Storage Calculations Project Explanation  Storage Type: Stage-Volume Starting Stage= 25.00 Ending Stage= 32.60 Stagel Increment= 0,10 Name Area StartE Elev End Elev Stage Feet NAVD 25,00 25,10 25.20 25.30 25.40 25.50 25.60 25.70 25,80 25,90 26.00 26.10 26.20 26.30 26,40 26,50 26.60 26.70 26,80 26.90 27.00 27.10 27.20 27.30 27.40 27.50 27.60 27.70 27.80 27.90 28,00 28,10 28.20 28.30 28.40 28.50  Open Space Compacted Existing Retention Exist. Exist. Area Coquina Asphalt Pond Area8 9  0.67 28.50 33.00 Ac-ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00  0.76 2.30 29.07 28.57 32.50 33.00 Ac-ft Ac-ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00  0,10 0.00 0.00 27.00 0,00 0.00 33.00 0.00 0.00 Ac-ft Ac-ft Ac-ft Ac-ft 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0,01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0,01 0,00 0.00 0.01 0,01 0,00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0,00 0.00 0.01 0,02 0,00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0,00 0.00 0.02  Linear Linear Linear Linear Vert Vert Total Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage  0.00  Landu Uses SS: andV WQC Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page7of15  6/7/2023    GIANGRANDE  Post-Development: Stage-Area Calculations Project Explanation  Storage Type: Stage-Area Starting Stage= 3.00 Ending Stage- 6.50 Stage Increment= 0.10 Name Area Start Elev EndE Elev Stage Feet NAVD 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 4.60 4.70 4.80 4,90 5.00 5,10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.50 5,60 5,70 5.80 5.90 6,00 6.10 6.20 6,30 6.40 6.50  Open Space Compacted Existin Retention Coquina- 9 Pond 0.76 2.30 0.10 29.07 28.57 27.00 32.50 33.00 33.00 Linear Linear Linear Linear Total Area Area Area Ac Ac 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00  0.67 28.50 33.00 Area Ac 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00  Area Ac 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00  Ac  Land Uses SS andv WQC Calcs8 8-24-2022 Overall  Page8of15  6/7/2023    GEP GANGRANDE  Post-Development Stormwater Calculations  Project Explanation  Revised: Engineer:. DCC Date: 8/23/2022  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Land Use Table 0.00 0.00  Use Basin = 3.06 TOTAL: 3.06  Imp.(ac) Bldg, (ac) Pervious (ac) Total (ac)  0.77 0.77  3.83 3.83  Find Curve Number:  Avg. Pervious Ground El. = 30.65 Control Elev.- 23.17 Distance tol Water Table: - 7.48  Soil Storage Table 0.0 0.6 1.6 2.5 4.6 6.6 8.8 10.9  Depth to Coastal Flatwoods Depression W.T.(ft) Storage (in) Storage (in) Storage (in)  0.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0  0.0 0.6 1.6 2.5 4.0 5.4 7.2 9.0  0.0 0.6 1.4 2.1 3.3 4.4 5.6 6.8  Findt the basin's soil classification and input below as' "Soil Storage" using the above' "Depth to W.T.".  Soil Type= Flatwoods  Max. Available Soil Storage (Smax) - 9.00 inches Compaction Factor (Fcompac) = 25% Curve Number (CN):  (Use 25% for developed site) 1000/(S.var+10)  Compacted Soil Storage (Scompact) - 6.75 inches (Smax/(Fcompac) Available Soil Storage (Savai)= 1.36 inches (Ap/Seompa)/(AJ  85  Notes:  1. Soil Storage Table taken from Section 5.7.4.2 of the SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II. 2. Curve Number determination based on method presented in USDA NRCS Technical Release 55 (TR-55)  "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds".  Land Use SS and WQ Caics 8-24-2022 Overall  Page9 9of15  6/7/2023    GEP GANGRANDE  Post-Development Water Quality Calculations  Revised: Engineer: DCC Date: 23-Aug-22  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  1-inch Over the Project Area (Treated Volume) 1-inch  1-ft/12-in  3.83 PROJECTAREA  0.32 Jac-ft TREATED VOLUME  2.5-inches Times the Percent Impervious  (Site Area). 3.83  0.00  0.00 ROOFS(AC) 0.77 (AC)  = 3.83 ac SITEAREA 3.06 IMPERVIOUS AREA 79.86% 2.00 in INCHES TOI BE TREATED 0.64 ac-ft TREATED VOLUME  AREA PROJECT (AC) LAKES (AC)  (Impervious Area) (%1 Impervious) (2.5-in*%l Imp.) (Treated Volume)_ 2.00  3.83 (AC)  ac  SITE AREA PERVIOUS. AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA*1 100% SITE AREA (AC) 2.5-inches 1-ft/12-in  79.86% PERCENT IMPERVIOUS 3.83 PROJECT AREA- LAKES (AC)  TREATED (IN)  Required Wet Detention  0.64 ac-ft 0.48 Jac-ft 0.32 ac-ft 0.32 ac-ft No 0.32 ac-ft  Required Dry Detention (75% of Wet Detention) Required Retention (50% of Wet Detention)  Treatment System Type Retention Treatment Volume Required Direct Discharge to OFW? Total Treatment Volume Required  Water Quality Elevation (ELwa) = 29.43  NAVD  Land Use SS and WQ Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page 10 of15  6/7/2023    GEP GANGRANDE  EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Engineer: DCC Date: 8/23/2022  Water Quality' Volume: = 0.32 Ac-ft  V V  - = V Volume Treated w Trench Width K Hydraulic Conductivity* H2 Depth to Water Table Du Non Saturated Trench Depth Ds Saturated" Trench Depth (feet) Length of Trench Required  (Dry System) (Wet System) 3.83 Ac-in 3.00f ft 6.55E-04 cfs/ft-ft.head 6.65 ft 3.00 ft 0.00 ft 111ft (Dry System) (Wet System) 260ft 3.00 ft 6.55E-04 6.65 ft 3.00f ft 0.00 ft 8.99 Ac-in 0.749 Ac-ft 30.15 NAVD 29.35 NAVD  KW2HD,,2NyP0H13P10ywD.) K2H/D,D,42W/D.-0138-10WD.)  V= KNKW2yO,02D)-13P107WD) V=L K2/D,D,42H/D,-0138-0yWD.) Length of Trench Provided W Trench Width K Hydraulic Conductivity (cfs/tr2-ft.head) H2 Depth to Water Table Du Non Saturated' Trench Depth Ds Saturated Trench Depth Volume Treated  Top ofWeir  Paving and Backfill  H2  Du D.  Pipe Coarse Rock  Pipe Invert 23.50 NAVD 26.35 NAVD  27.85 NAVD  w  Hydraulic Conductivity! based on AACE Geotechnical Investigation, file No. 22-245  Land Use SS: and' WQ Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page 11of15  6/7/2023    GEP GIANGRANDE  Estimated Required Attenuation Project Explanation  Revised: Engineer: DCC Date: 8/23/2022  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Pre-Developed Runoff 5Year- 1Day Area, A( (ac)=3.83 Soil Storage, S( (inches): - 1.36 Curve Number, CN: = 1000/(S-+10)  =8 88  5 Year- -1I Day) Rainfall, P( (inches) =: 5.9  (From Figure C-8 SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II  Depth ofl Runoff, Q (inches)- = (P-0 0.25)/P+0.85) Volume, V( (AC-FT)= A*Q  =4.53 =1.45  Post Developed Runoff  5Year- 1Day. Area, A (ac) = 3.83 Soil Storage, S (inches) = 1.36 Curvel Number, CN= = 1000/(S+10)=  85  5 Year- 11 Day Rainfall, P( (inches) = 5.9  (From Figure C-8 SFWMD! ERP. Applicant's Handbook Volume II  Depth of Runoff, Q( (inches) = (P- 0.25)-/P+0.89) Volume, V(AC-FT)=A A*Q 5Y-1D Elevation  = 4.53 =1.45 30.41  NAVD  Land Use SS and WQ Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page 12 of15  6/7/2023    GEP ÇANGBANDE  Estimated Required Attenuation Project Explanation  Revised: Engineer: DCC Date: 8/23/2022  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Pre-Developed Runoff 100 Year- 1Day. Area, A (ac)= = 3.83 Soil Storage, S( (inches)- = 1.36 Curvel Number, CN= 1000/(S+10)  =8 88  (00 Year- 11 Day Rainfall, P( (inches) = 12  (From Figure C-8 SFWMD ERP. Applicant's Handbook Volume II  Depth of Runoff, Q (inches) = (P-025)P+0.85) Volume, V( (AC-FI)=A*Q  = 10.51 =3.36  Post Developed Runoff 100 Year-1 1Day. Area, A (ac) =3 3.83 Soil Storage, S( (inches) = 1.36 Curvel Number, CN= = 1000/(S+10)=  31  85  100 Year- 11 Day Rainfall, P( (inches)- = 12  (From Figure C-8 SFWMD ERP Applicant's Handbook Volume II  Depth of Runoff, Q (inches) = (P- 0.2S)/P+0.8S) Volume, V(AC-FT)-A*Q 100Y-1D Elevation  = 10.51 =3.36 31.35  NAVD  Land Use SS andi WQ Calcs 8-24-2022 Overall  Page 13 of15  6/7/2023    Pond Recovery Calculations  Methodology for Estimating' Vertical Unsaturated Flow- Modified Greena and Ampt Infiltration Methodology for Estimating Lateral Saturated Flow- Andreyev and Wiseman (1989)  Project: Stow & Go Storage Project #: 22-014  Engineer:_ DCC Date:_ 6/5/2023  Project Area = 3.83 acres %1 Impervious = 79.86% Off-site Drainage Area = Pond Bottom Elevation = 27.001 FT-NAVD Wet Season Water Table= = 23.171 FT-NAVD Impervious Layer Elevation = 0.00 FT-NAVD 100y/ld Storage Volume: = 3.358 ac-ft 90% of 100y/ld Storage Volume = 3.022 ac-ft 50%0 of 100y/lds Storage' Treatment' Volume = 1.679 ac-ft  0 acres  146,271 R 131,644 73,136f f 0.3 2 56.59 fl/day 4356.01 f?  atEL 31.25 FT-NAVD atEL 31.261 FT-NAVD atEL 31.26 FT-NAVD  Fillable porosity ()= Factor of Safety (FS)= Hydraulic Conductivity (K)= 6.55E-04 cfs/Ft-ft.head Pond Bottom Area (Ap)= 0.10 acres  Assume arect. Pond L= 350.0ft W= 17.5ft  Time tol Recover Half ofTreatment Volume:  Height ofv water above pond bottom (h,)= 4.26ft Height of pond bottom above WSWT (h)= 3.83ft Height of water reqdt tos saturate soil (h)= 1.149ft Unsaturated Vol. (V.)=Aphf- 5,005 f Is' Treatment Volume: S V.? NO  Ish,sh,?1 NO  Ifeither oft the above answers is YES, then infiltration is entirely under vertical unsaturatedi flow, otherwisei ita alsoi is unders saturated lateral flow Unsaturated. K=2/3*K= 37.73 f/day Infiltration! Rate ()=K/2= 18.86 fl/day  Vertical Unsaturated. Flow  time tos saturation (fsm) 0.061 days <5days, so OK    Time tol Recover 90% ofVolume:  Height of water above pond bottom (h,)= 4.26ft Heighto ofp pond! bottom above WSWT( (ha)= 3.83ft Heighto of water reqdt tos saturate soil (h,)= 1.149ft Unsaturated' Vol. (V.)=Aph,f- 5,005 R Is Treatment Volume: < V.?NO  Ish,sh,?NO  Ife either oft the above: answersi is YES,t theni infiltration is entirely under vertical unsaturated: flow, otherwise ita alsoi is unders saturated lateral flow Unsaturated] K=2 2/3*K= 37.731 fi/day Infiltration: Rate (a)-K/2= 18.86 ft/day time tos saturation (fa)= 0.061 days Remaining Volume = 126,639 R  Vertical Unsaturated. Flow  2.907 ac-ft  atEL 31.20 FT-NAVD (att-tota h=h)  Saturated! Laterall Flow  Heighto ofv watera above WSWT att timet t(h,)= 3.83ft Height above pond! bottom for remaining vol. (h,)= 4.20ft  Hy=hz+h,- 8.03ft Fy-hg/Hp= 0.48 L:W ratio-L/W= 20.00 therefore, Fx= 0.75 =WP/4-K-D*E- 0.10 days toll-tamtt-L 0.16 days  Initials saturated thickness of aquifer (H) = 23.17ft Avg saturated thickness ofa aquifer (D)=H+h/2= 25.09ft  12 days, so OK  Notes:  1,Ir Impervious layer elevation assumed from USGS Water) Resources Investigations Report 03-4242 2, Fillable porosity () assumed based on typical value for sandy soils F,f froml Dimensionless Curves Relating Basin Designl Parameters tol Basin Water Level in al Rectangular Basino over anl Unconfined. Aquifer (F-0.3) (Source: Andreyev and Wiseman, 1989)    Appendix D Sub-Basin Map    bBast 1.19AC.  Sub-BasinB 1.16AC.  EBasmn 1.06AC.  SUB-BASIN A=1 1.19AC. B: =1.16.AC. C=0.42AC. D=1.06AC. 3.83AC.  REV 12/12/23    Appendix E Geotechnical Report  (Provided by: Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc.)    ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.  AACE File No. 22-245 August7,2022  Geotechnical Engineering Construction. Materials Testing AACE Environmental Consulting Giangrande Engineering & Planning, Inc. 22081 SE Ocean Boulevad, Suite 1A Attention: Mr. Dylan O'Berry, P.E. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING STOW & Go I2 2500 NORTH US HIGHWAY ONE FORT PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA  Stuart, FL 34996  SUMMARY REPORT  INTRODUCTION  In accordance with your request and authorization, Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. (AACE)has completed thes scope of work outlinedi in our Proposal No. 22222/dmed04/222:  This report documents our field work and presents our findings.  PROJECT UNDERSTANDING  The subject sitei is located at: 2500 North US Highway One in Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida. Based on ourreview ofthep providedp ppletreatedimntomaston, weu unéertandtatispopoued toi improve the site for the purpose of constructing a boat storage yard. We further understand  that no Geotechnical Engineering services are being requested.  FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM Field Exploration Program  To explore the site conditions, the following requested exploration program was completed:  Field Work Type Pavement Core and Auger Boring (PC-#) Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Test (EX-#) ERPIM!)  Standard #of Borings/Tests Depth Below Grade [feet]  Location See Below See Below  ASTM D1452 SFWMD  1 2  4 6  (1)S SFWMDI Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual  834: Swan Avenue, Port St, Lucie, Florida 34983 Ph: 772-807-9191 Fx: 772-807-9192 www.aaceinc.com    STOW & Go-l 2500N NORTH USI HIGHWAY ONE AACE Filel No.22-245  Page -2--  Ourfieldexploration program was completed August 5,2 2022. Thes shownfieldwork! locationswere deterinedinthefieldbyc ourf field crew usingt thep providedschematic, aerial photographs,existing site features, and tape/wheel measurements. The locations should be considered accurate only  tot the degree implied by the method of measurement used.  FINDINGS  Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Tests  The soil hydraulic conductivity (exfiltration) tests were performed in accordance with methods described. int the South Florida' Water Management District (SFWMD) Permit Information Manual.  Ins summary, the exfiltration tests yielded the following results:  EX-1;K=7.4x10 cfs/ft?-ft. head EX-2;K=5.7x10" cfs/ft?-ft. head The exfiltration test reports are attached hereto.  Pavement Core  The pavement coring was performed using a 4-inch diametercore barrelandahand (bucket)auger sO ast to determine the thicknesses of the various elements in the existing pavement section (i.e. asphaltic wearing surface, base course and: subgrade soils) to a depth of 41 feet below the asphalt surface. Following the coring and hand augering, the borehole was backfilled with accumulated soil cuttings and the core hole was filled with asphaltic "cold-patch" material. Inbrief, the pavement core (PC-1) encountered 1941 inches of asphalt over 8% inches of light brown coquina rock, ini turni followed by light brown fine sand (AASHTO 'A-3')t to a depth of 4 feet below grade. A photograph of the recovered asphalt core is presented below.    STOW & Gol I 2500 NORTH USI HIGHWAY ONE AACE File No. 22-245  Page -3-  CLOSURE  We are pleased to be of assistance to you on this phase of your project. When we may be of  further service to you or should you have any questions, please contact us.  Sincerely,  ANDERSEN, ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.  R Peter G. Andersen, P.E. Principal Engineer Fla. Reg. No. 57956  This report has been digitally signed! by Peter G. Andersen, P.E. oni the date adjacent tot thes seal. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and thes signature must be verified  on any electronic copies.  ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.  WWW.AACEINC.COM    e @  ofs    xofs    6' tall chainlink fence  25 ft. on center with opaque green screen  IXA 15  MG 275  Gtat chainlR-fènce. with, opaque greenscreen  +t  it  +t  Exist. palms to kemain-  88  match Une WE NNRE MANKeS 4* Msatur fyes wp 7 tpispler Sas toto T ST. LUCIE VILLAGE LANDSCAPE ODINANCE: 45 SPECIES OF TREES SPECIES OF TREES PRDVIDED TOTALING 36 TREES 2 TREES ADDED EAST OF PROPERTY 2TREES PLANT MATERIAL LIST Code IREES None KPALMS DuantityscientFiel Indleates None notlye tree) Cormon Nare IC LEXO CASSINE IXA ILEX ATTENUATA MAG MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA CUERCUS VIRGINIANA RUBS GRDUNDCOVERS Code Name Cwantitysclentirk Nane 128 HAHELIA PATENS 275 MISCANTHJS GIGANTEUS UYHER MATERIALS MULCH 30 cu. YDS. ENVIRD MLCH KEST3 saD 7,600 so. FL.I BAHJA SOD KEST  ONE TREE FOR EVERY 2500 SQFT.UF DEVELOPED AREA 88072 DIVIDED BY 2500 3522 36 TREES.  FOR 31_T0_40 TREES TOTAL. 38 TREES  Fonting Ske XS,ACTI'IBH KS,4CTUH XS,ACTDH Plantings Size avX18 #3,24'0C  DAHCON HOLLY EAST PALATKA HOLLY BXB,ACTDH MAGNOLIA LIVE. OAK Cornon Nare FIRERUSH GIANT CHINESE SILVER GRASSX16 13,24'0C  LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR NOTES MFENT TEL KLS C EP ILMOSENE TNE CEMRICICES E HAVE E  FEV E E RIPRESENTATIVE  EVAEKN E DUL AEAST TOA FLANICE MD F ANTS. E FLANT AND ARTE I CPai av ABDT E ES ALIVE COEN AMPD E: SHEET L-1 OF TWO SCALE 1-20  VILAC  AAD  AVN" MNN ARAR   Ps-  TREE PLANTING cuY. MRES  SHRUB, PLANTNG  DATE 6/11/22 REV. 8/17/23 REV. 8/21/23 REV. 12/8/23add trees gast  LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH PORTION STOW & GO STORAGE.  DANIEL  DSCAPE SUSTEST PLANNER  BeES EBS- N BEACH, FL 34958 REV. 10/16/23 tree_sizes_    B R B  B  B4    499 44 1853.    - -             R4  Bu B  R  E3  395 4444 1313.            0A            INI RE: PETITION FOR VARIANCE OF  STOW & GO, LLC  ORDER  This matter came before the Board of Adjustment oft the Town of St. Lucie Village, Florida, on March 20, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at the Village Hall on the request of Stow & Go, LLC for relief: from provisions of the St. Lucie Village Land Development Code applicable to its  property.  The Board of Adjustment, having considered the petition of Stow & Go, LLC, having heard from Brandon and Meghan Haynes, Dylan O'Berry, PE, and the public, and having  otherwise given the matter full consideration, finds as follows:  1. The hearing was properly noticed by publication and mailed notices, as required by the 2. Thes subject property is three contiguous properties, zoned commercial, currently improved with pavement and fencing, located at 2500 NU US Hwy 1, Fort Pierce, Florida 34946,  St. Lucie Village Land Development Code.  and the tax I.D. number and legal description is as: follows:  a. Parcel ID (Parcel 1): 1433-125-0006-00-3  Legal Description of] Property: 3334401 BEG ATPT WHERE S BDRY OLSONS S/D INT E RD: R/WLIOFHWY US1,THN:92519E4000 FT, THS0123 41E245.29: FT, THS89 29 08 W 320.61 FTTO: EI RDI R/WLI OF HWY US1, THNWLYON CURVE CONC NE, R  OF 11,359.2TH) NWLY ALG. ARC 258.82 FT TO: POB( (2.04AC)  b. Parcel ID (Parcel 2): 1433-124-0005-010-2;  Legal Description of] Property: 33 344 40 FROM INT OF S. BDRY OLSONS S/D AND ERD R/W LI OF HWYUS: 1 AND CURVE CONC NE, R OF 11,359.21 FT, TH SELY ALG ARC 258.82 FT TO. POB; TH CONT ALG ARC 110.64 FT, THN8929081 E268.08 FT,THS2131 34 E228.78 FT, THN6828261 E: 125] FT, THN21313 34W407.92FT, THS892519W 39.78 FE,TES012341E1083F1,THS892908 W320.61 FTTOPOB(I.69AC)    C. Parcel ID (Parcel 3): 1433-124-0005-020-5;  Legal Description of] Property: 33 344 40 FROM INT OF S BDRY LI OLSON'S S/D WITH ELY R/WLIUS: #1 RUN SELY ALGI ELY R/W 369.46 FTTO POB, TH CONT SELY ALG SDI ELYI R/W 240. FT, THI N'87) DEG 09 MIN 04 SEC E: 265.12 FT, THN21) DEG 31 MIN 34 SEC W: 228.78 FT, THS 89 DEG 29 MIN 08 SEC W2 268.08 FTTO POB (1.35AC)  Total Size of Property (Parcel 1,2,3): 5.08 Acres  3. Stow & Go Storage, LLC: requests five variances for relief from Ordinance 2012-4 (now incorporated into the St. Lucie Village Land Development Code at Section 3.6.1, ets seq.),  particularly,  a. From Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(a) Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties, requiring a 42" planting height in a seven-gallon container, SO as to  allow aj planting height of 18" in a three-gallon container,  b. From Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(b) Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties, requiring a tree be provided or preserved for each 30 linear feet or major fraction thereof, sO as to provide relief from the requirement along a portion of the north perimeter oft the property, as shown in the attached plan provided that the total tree count required for that portion of the north perimeter  will remain on the property;  . From Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(c) Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties (Proposed Parking Abutting Existing Barrier), requiring that whena a proposed parking area abuts an existing hedge wall or durable landscape barrier on an abutting property, so that the landscape buffer and tree count requirements are: not required to be included in the landscape plan on the east side of the  property, as shown on the attached plan; requirement for interior landscaping; and  d. From Section 3.6.4(B)(3) Parking area interior landscaping, SO as to eliminate the    e. From Section 3.6.4(2), Planting requirements (tree count) sO that the total tree count (ofnew/additional trees) to be added to the site is 37 rather than 72.  4. Concerning the variance requests described at paragraph 3(a) above, the standards at Section 9.2.0, including particularly any hardship beyond cost, have not been met.  5. The variance requests described at paragraphs 3(b) through 3(e) ("those requests") arise 6. As to those requests, literal enforcement of the Code would deprive Property Owners of 7. Granting those requests as specified herein will not be materially detrimental or injurious 8. Granting the below variances will not confer any special privilege to Property Owners 9. The variances set forth below are the minimum variance which will make possible the 10. The spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and Town Comprehensive Plan are not  from conditions that are unique to the land or structures involved.  rights commonly enjoyed by other property owners in the same zoning district.  to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. which is denied to owners of similar properties.  reasonable use.  opposed to the specified variance. Iti is thereupon, ORDERED as follows:  1. Thel Petition for relief from Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(a) Perimeter Landscaping Relating to 2. The requested variance is GRANTED sO that Property Owners are granted relieffrom Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(b), that is from the requirement for landscaping along the west portion oft the north perimeter oft the property, as shown in the attached plan, provided, however, that the total tree count required for that portion of the north perimeter will remain on the property.  Abutting Properties is DENIED.    3. The requested variance is GRANTED sO that Property Owners are granted relief from Section 3.6.4(B)(2)(c), sO that the landscape buffer and tree count requirements are not: required to be met on the east side oft the property extending south from the St. Lucie School, as shown on  the attached plan.  4. Ther requested variance is granted sO that Property Owners are granted relief from Section 3.6.4(B)(3), sO as to eliminate the requirement for interior landscaping.  5. Thei requested variance is granted sO that Property Owners are granted relief from Section 3.6.4(2) so that the total tree count (ofnew/dditional trees) to be added to the site is 40 rather  than 72.  6. Property Owners are not otherwise granted relief from the provisions of the Ordinance, 7. This variance expires automatically in twelve (12) months unless a permit has been  the applicable building code(s), or any permit requirement(s).  issued for the proposed improvement().  DONE AND ORDERED by the Board of Adjustment oft the Town of St. Lucie Village,  Florida, this day of April, 2024.  BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TOWN OF ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA  By:  Jim Van Hekken, Chair  Copies furnished to:  Stow & Go, LLC Board of Adjustment William G. Thiess, Mayor  Board of Aldermen Paulette T. Burgess, Acting Clerk Carl Peterson, Building Official    Richard V. Neill, Jr. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:  Richard V. Neill, Jr. Sunday, April 7, 2024 12:57 PM walkera08@gmai.com  William Thiess; Paulette Burgess; David Whitney Walker Campbell Farms -- 2310 N Old Dixie  Ms. Walker,  As the St. Lucie Village Attorney, lam responding to your query concerning the parcels described below. Aslunderstand your issue, you would like to sell the north parcel, but retain the south approximately 7 Ita appears to me that the two parcels have been in existence, in their current configurations since before 1995. If that is correct, then you could split the lot (but only once) without formally subdividing itand both "new" lots would comply with the lot size and dimensional requirements. And, ift that's That said, just to be sure that there is no question later, Iwill ask the Board of Alderman to confirm my opinion at its Tuesday, April 16 meeting at 630 pm at the Village Hall. You don'tneed to attend but you Ifl'm wrong on the facts or the issue, please let me know. Otherwise, I'I proceed as indicated.  feet ofit, sO that the existing fence will remain part of the south parcel.  correct, no formal approval of the Village is required.  would be welcome.  Thank you.  PS-- One question that came to mind as Iwas getting ready to hit send was setbacks. If you're reconfiguring, you probably need to comply with setbacks. How far north is the fence (and proposed  new boundary) from your existing building?.  Parcel n1o.143341.3.0030.0205 Site Address NOLDI DIXIE HWY Jurisdiction Saint Lucie Village Parcel nfo:1433-113-0030-030-8 Site Address 2310 NOLD DIXIE HWY Jurisdiction Saint Lucie Village  Owner  Walker Campbell Farms LLC  Acres Owner  2.90  Walker Campbell Farms LLC  Acres  1.02    Richard V. Neill, Jr. Town Attorney  Town of St. Lucie' Village, Florida Neill Griffin Marquis Osking, PLLC Post Office Box 1270 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 Telephone: 772-464-8200 Fax: 772-464-2556 ichard.nell@stluclevllaget.gov  Please Note: Florida has a very broad public records laws. Most written communications to or from myself of Village officials regarding Village business are public records available to the public and media upon request. It ist the policy of St. Lucie Village that all Village records shall be open for personal inspection, examination and/or copying. Your e-mail communications will be subject to public disclosure unless an exemption applies toi the communication. If you received this email in error, please notify the senderby reply e-mail and delete all  materials from all computers.  2    EXHIBIT A  TOWN OF ST. LUCIE VILLAGE ENGINEERINGIPROFESSIONAL SERVICES  Phase 1 Low-Pressure Sewer System Services During Construction - Milton and  Chamberlin Areas  INTRODUCTION  Kimley-Horn and Associates (CONSULTANT) was previously authorized by the Town of St. Lucie Village (VILLAGE) for the project referred to as the Phase 1 Low-Pressure Sewer System Design and Permitting (for Milton and Chamberlin areas). The project design is completed and permitting isr nearing completion. The VILLAGE intends to advertise the project for competitive bids through eh Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) procurement division. This Scope of Services provides for assistance during the bidding phase and engineering services during construction for contract  administration. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 Preconstruction Activities  The CONSULTANT will prepare legal descriptions and sketches for 24 easements that are necessary to construct sewer lines where adequate right-of-way is not available.  Task 42 Bidding and Contractor Selection  The CONSULTANT will support FPUA's procurement staff with preparing the contract documents for obtaining bids. CONSULTANT will participate in a pre-bid meeting and respond to up to two rounds of questions from perspective bidders. FPUA will lead the bidding phase services with  support from the CONSULTANT. Task 53 Project Management  Additional hours are included for Project Manager coordination, miscellaneous administrative needs and supporting services during construction (4 hours per month). If construction exceeds 12 months, additional fees may be required. The CONSULTANT will participate in a substantial completion walk through and document required punch list items to be addressed prior to final walk through. A final walk through will then be conducted upon final completion. This task also includes bi-weekly meetings (24 total) for the 12-month duration of the project. These meetings will be with the VILLAGE, FPUA and/or the contractor as needed to track  progress throughout the active construction phase.  Sub-Task 3a Shop Drawings  The CONSULTANT will review up to 12 shop drawings from the contractor for this project, for continuity of design and to determine conformance with specifications. CONSULTANT  1    will accept or notate and reject shop drawings as needed. Any submittal meeting the intent of the design that deviates from the specific design will be presented to the VILLAGE for  review prior to accepting. Sub-Task 3b Field Observation  The CONSULTANT will prepare for and participate in a pre-construction meeting with the design team, VILLAGE and FPUA staff, and the contractor prior to commencing construction. The project schedule, work hours, laydown area(s), sequencing, and owner The CONSULTANT will respond to RAls from the contractor throughout construction and prepare change orders as needed. CONSULTANT will also review monthly pay The CONSULTANT anticipates a 12-month construction duration for this project. The CONSULTANT will provide an average of four hours per week of field services to observe installation of subgrade features and pressure testing prior tol backfill. The budget estimate CONSULTANT will not supervise, direct, or control contractor's work, and will not have authority to stopt the Work or responsibility fort the means, methods, techniques, equipment choice and use, schedules, or procedures of construction selected by contractor, for safety programs incident to contractor's work, or for failure of contractor to comply with laws. CONSULTANT does not guarantee contractor's performance and has no responsibility for contractor's failure to perform in accordance with the Contract Documents.  preferences will all be documented int this meeting.  applications from the contractor.  fori is based on 4 hours per week for 52 weeks (208 hours).  The CONSULTANT will work closely with the contractor to prepare the as-built drawings for this project. The contractor shall be responsible for the preparation of the as-built CONSULTANT will not supervise, direct, or control contractor's work, and will not have authority to stop the Work or responsibility fort the means, methods, techniques, equipment choice and use, schedules, or procedures of construction selected by contractor, for safety programs incident to contractor's work, or for failure of contractor to comply with laws. CONSULTANT does not guarantee contractor's performance and has no responsibility for contractor's failure to perform in accordance with the Contract Documents.  survey.  Sub-Task 3c Permitting  CONSULTANT will, upon completion of construction, submit the required certifications for completion to FDEP for the domestic sewer system. CONSULTANT will also coordinate with FEC, as needed, per the issued permits. The VILLAGE shall pay all additional permit fees directly. This task does not include preparing additional permit applications beyond  those completed ini the design phase.  2    ASSUMPTIONS  The CONSULTANT has made the following assumptions in the development of this scope of 1. The VILLAGE and FPUA will obtain any necessary easements (not included in this Scope  services:  of Services).  2. The VILLAGE will pay all permit application fees, if applicable.  COMPENSATION  The services included in Tasks 1 through 5 of this Scope of Services will be provided on a lump  sum basis for ai fee of $70,700, as detailed out in the table below. COMPENSATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2 Bidding & Contractor Selection $ 1,500  Task  Description  Total $12,000 $57,200  1 Preconstruction Activities 3 Project Management  Lump Sum Total $70,700  SCHEDULE OF DELIVERY  Total project duration through construction is anticipated to be approximately 12 months from notice to award. Time periods to perform the professional services are estimated as follows:  SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES  Task Name  Duration 45 Days 45 Days 15.5 months  Task 1 - Preconstruction Activities Task 2 - Bidding and Contractor Selection Task 5 - Project Management  3    Richard V. Neill, Jr. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Judge,  Richard V. Neill, Jr. Saturday, April 6, 2024 12:42 PM Bob Makemson David Whitney RE: Coe Enforcement Special Magistrate DRAFT Fran Ross Contract.docx  Thank you for your timely response and I'm sorry for my own untimely response.  Lwould like to get you on board and ask you to complete the current term which runs through January 15, 2025. Your services wouldn't be needed frequently--the "threat" has usually worked. sO well that we've not had any hearings yet. But, Ithink we have some ongoing issues  on which decisions will be needed.  And,Irealize that we will need to work with your schedule.  Ify you are willing to take on the position, Iwould propose to use a modified version of the form agreement, attached, that we have used in the past. lwould need you to give me an hourly rate to include and let me know if there are other changes you would need in order to be  comfortable with the form of agreement.  My current thought is that I'd like to put the matter to our Board at its regular meeting on the  April 16th. wouldn'tthink that there would be any need for you to attend.  Thanks for your consideration of this matter.  Regards, Richard  Richard V.Neill, Jr., of Neill Griffin Marquis Osking, PLLC Post Office Box 1270 Ft.F Pierce, FL 34954 Telephone: 772-464-8200 Fax: 772-464-2566 mellr@nellgrfin.com  1    AGREEMENT  THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this  day ofJ January, 2019 by and between the Town of  St. Lucie Village, Florida, a municipal corporation and Fran O. Ross, Esq.  WHEREAS, the Town of St. Lucie Village, Florida, ("Town") desires to enter into this Agreement with Fran 0. Ross, Esq. ("Ms. Ross") to serve as a Special Magistrate for the Town on a  contract basis; and  WHEREAS, the Special Magistrate is not a Charter Officer of the Town; and  WHEREAS, the Special Magistrate is not an Officer pursuant to Article II, Section 6-5 (a) of  the Florida Constitution; and  WHEREAS, the Special Magistrate is not an employee of the Town but is an Independent  Contractor,  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Town of  St. Lucie Village and Ms. Ross agree as follows:  1. The aforementioned "WHEREAS" Clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as being  true and correct and are incorporated herein.  2. Ms. Ross shall serve in the capacity of a Special Magistrate to the Town in accordance with Ordinance 2018-3 of the Ordinances oft the Town ("Town Ordinances"). To the extent permitted by law, and within the limitations set forth in Section 768.28, Fla. Stat., the Town will indemnify and defend Ms. Ross in her capacity as Special Magistrate for municipal Code Enforcement proceedings, from any cause of action that may arise from the performance of her duties as Special  Magistrate on behalf of the Town within the scope and course of her employment.  3. Ms. Ross agrees to attend hearings pursuant to Ordinance 2018-3 of the Town  Ordinances if, as and when requested by the Town.  4. As full payment and compensation for Ms. Ross' services hereunder, Town shall pay    to Ms. Ross and Ms. Ross agrees to accept from Town the sum of $125.00 per hour or part thereof, paid during the month following the month of service rendition after presentation of an  itemized statement.  5. The parties agree that Ms. Ross is an independent contractor and not an Officer or  employee of the Town.  6. Ms. Ross shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance 2018-3 of the Town  Ordinances.  7. Ms. Ross shall keep all books, records and documents relating to the Agreement. Such books, records and documents will be available at all reasonable times for examination and audit by the Town. All records stored electronically shall be provided to the Town via a format that  isc compatible with the Town's information technology system.  8. Ms. Ross shall comply with the public records retention laws and shall provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the Town would provide the records. The records shall be provided at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law. Pursuant to Florida Statute $  119.0701 the following statement. must be included in this contract:  IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTORS DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATINGTOTHIS CONTRACT, CONTACTTHE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT; 2841 OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, ST.  LUCIE  VILLAGE,  FLORIDA  34946,  (772)466-6900,  DONNA.DENNIS@SILUCIEVILLAGEPL.GOV  Upon completion of this Agreement, Ms. Ross may transfer, at no cost to the Town, all  public records inj possession ofMs. Ross, or keep and maintain public records required by the Town to perform the service. If Ms. Ross transfers all public records to the Town upon completion of this Agreement, Ms. Ross shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. IfMs. Ross keeps and maintains public records  2    upon completion of this Agreement, Ms. Ross shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to Town, upon request from the Town's custodian of public records in a format that is compatible with the information technology  systems of the Town.  9. Ms. Ross shall ensure that public records which are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law. 10. Ms. Ross shall adhere to all rules and regulations for retaining public records. Upon completion or termination of this contract, Ms. Ross shall transfer to the Town, at no cost to the Town, all public records in her possession. Upon transfer, she shall destroy any duplicate records. The Town's records custodian for transfer of these records shall be the Town Clerk. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Town in a format that is compatible with the  information technology systems of the Town.  11. This Agreement is for a term of two years and is renewable for additional two year terms upon the mutual agreement of the Board of Aldermen and Ms. Ross. This agreement may also be terminated for convenience of the Town, at any time, and is terminable by Ms. Ross upon  thirty (30) days written notice to the Town.  12. Nothing contained within this Agreement shall be deemed or otherwise interpreted as waiving the Town's sovereign immunity protections existing under the laws of the State of Florida, oras increasing the limits of liability as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes.  13. Ms. Ross holds a position of trust and should adhere to the highest standards of integrity, impartiality, and competence. At a minimum, Ms. Ross is obligated to be honest, unbiased, impartial, to act in good faith, to be diligent, and to avoid any conflict of interest include the mere appearance of a conflict of interest. Ms: Ross must disclose any facts or circumstances  that may give rise toj justifiable doubts as tol her impartiality ori independence.  3    14. Ms. Ross shall not discriminate against any person in her operations, activities, or delivery of services under this Agreement. Ms. Ross shall affirmatively comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local equal employment laws and shall not engage in or commit any discriminatory practice against any person based on race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, physical or mental disability, political affiliation, or any  other factor which cannot be lawfully used as a basis for service delivery.  15. The written terms and provisions of this Agreement shall supersede any and all prior verbal or written statements of any official or other representative of the Town. Such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into, or forming a part of, or altering in any manner  whatsoever, this Agreement or Agreement documents.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date above written.  TOWN OF ST.LUCIE VILLAGE, FLORIDA  By:  William Thiess, MAYOR  ATTEST:  DIANE ORME, TOWN CLERK  BY: DONNA. DENNIS, DEPUTY CLERK  FRANO. ROSS, ESQUIRE  Ms. FRANC O. ROSS, ESQ. Telephone: (772)467-9985  Address:  7003 Shannon Drive Fort Pierce, Florida 34951  4    LUCIE  Town of St. Lucie Village  PO BOX a 3878 F FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34948-(72)466.900  196)  STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SAINTI LUCIE  WE THE UNDERSIGNED, ALL THE: BOARD OF ALDERMEN, IN AND FOR SAID TOWN, DO CERTIFY HEREBY' THAT WE MET ATTHE VILLAGE HALL ON THE 16th DAY OF APRIL, 2024, AND WE DO HEREBY CERTIFY SOLELY, EXCLUSIVELY,AND ENTIRELY FROMT THE RETURN ON FILE WITH THE MAYOR AND VICE. MAYOR OF THE. BOARD OF. ALDERMEN THAT EACH OF THE BELOW CANDIDATES RAN FOR ELECTION UNOPPOSED AND THAT PURSUANT? TOTHE TOWN CHARTER, AND ORDINANCES THOSE CANDIDATES HAVE BEEN ELECTED TO SERVE. IN THE. POSITIONS AND CAPACITIES INDICATED BELOW:  FOR MAYOR:  WILLIAMTHEISS  FOR ALDERMAN:  JAMES GRIMES DALE. REED  James Grimes, Alderman Ingrid Van Hekken, Alderman Dale Reed, Alderman John Langel, Alderman Timothy Ritter, Alderman    Richard Neill From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hil Richard Niel, Jr.  Art Dylan OBerry cyenearoegnemgnet Monday, April 1, 20243:46PM Richard Neill Dave Mestecky  Question about addition overlapping property line  Federal Hwy survey (1) (2).pdf  lam working on a new project within the Town. Parcel n01421-603.0006.0009 located on the east side of US-1 just  1/8 mile north of Fairwinds Drive.  The proposed site intends to construct: a commercal/automotwe, /retail/apartment building on the vacant lot. But we  wanted to discuss a small issue we have discovered:  According to the survey (attached), the property to the south (built prior to 2009) is overlapping the property line by  about: 1.5-feet.  176A0  We will have a perimeter buffer and landscape as we fully develop the property to its maximum potential. In doing sO,  the house may have a 6-foot fence and landscape right up next to their window.  Question: How do we deal with this? Should we (ort the Town) begin a request for the addition to be removed/relocated?, Or try. to work out some- easement or agreement with the other- property?-    What would be the simplest way of moving forward with the development while finding a solution to this small  predicament? We would like your opinion ont this.  Please feel free to reply-all to this email or call anytime to discuss.  Thank you, Dylan OBerry PE (772)203-0664  2