Johnston County Planning Board August 20, 2024-6:00 PM Johnston County Courthouse County Commissioners Room Smithfield, North Carolina  1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APPROVALOFTHE, MINUTES:  From the. July 16, 2024) Planning Board Meeting  6:00pm (Subdivision Review)  3. SUBDIVISIONS (Speakers to be Sworn In)  Selma Residential (24.99 acres, 22 lots) 752 Old Moore Rd. (SR 1720) in O'Neals Parrish Memorial Rd. Tract (38.94 acres, 35 lots) Parrish Memorial Rd. (SR 2364) between Batten Farm Rd. (SR 2363) and Cardinal Country Club Rd. (SR 2365) in  Township.  Micro Township.  6:00pm or after (Public Hearings)  4. REZONING. AND CONDITIONALZONINGCASES  CASE 24-19  Rezoning Petition: Petition to rezone a 1.2 acre tract located 9157 US Highway 301 S. in the Elevation Township from Community Business-Special Use  District (CB-SUD) to Agricultural Residential (AR). Tax ID: 01G10014T Owner: Jeffrey & Tammy Hutchens Applicant: Jeffrey & Tammy Hutchens    CASE 24-20  Rezoning Petition: Petition to rezone: a 27.86 acre tract located int the 2500 Block of Thanksgiving Fire Rd. in the O'Neals Township from Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business-Conditional Zoning (GB-CZ).  Tax] ID: 16L05030E Owner: Black & Greyl LLC Applicant: Lipscomb Development  Conditional Zoning Request: Multiple General Business uses.  5. DISCUSSIONITEMS 6. INFORMATION: ITEMS 7. NEXTI MEETING: September17,2024 8. ADJOURNMENT    DRAFT  MEETING OF THEJOHNSTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARD  Tuesday, July 16, 2024 6:00 p.m.  The Johnston County Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, July 16, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Johnston County Courthouse Present: Jared Crenshaw, Michelle Davis, Brooke Holmes, Debbie Howard, Will Absent: Freddie Hudson, Timothy Little, BOCC Representative, BOE Representative Also present: Braston Newton, Director; Todd Marr, Senior Planner; Cameron Pittman, Chairman Letchworth opened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance led Chairman Letchworth stated that Rezoning Case 24-11 had been withdrawn by the  Annex, Smithfield, N.C. with the following members:  Letchworth, Gary Lovering, Jay Sasser  Planner; Jennifer Slusser, County Attorney  by Mr. Crenshaw. Applicant.  Approval of the Minutes:  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve the June 18, 2024 Planning Board Minutes, seconded by Mr. Crenshaw, and carried by a unanimous vote of 7-0, the June 18, 2024  Planning Board Minutes were approved as presented.  All speakers were sworn in. Subdivisions:  Rickie Norris Tract June 2024 Owner: Stricklands Crossroads-Lan, LLC Developer: Stricklands Crossroads-Lan, LLC Surveyor: Dalton Engineering & Associates, PA Acreage/Lots: 15.98 acres, 11 lots Tax ID #: 01G12029A Address: 9000 Block of Stricklands Crossroads Rd.  Mr. Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information. Mr. Marr spoke about direct driveway access on Stricklands Crossroads Rd. and from the. Johnston County Land Design Manual regarding developments creating 4 or more. lots. Mr. Marr stated that the proposed subdivision was presented to the Board and tabled at the March 19,2024 Planning Board meeting and was withdrawn from the May Planning Board  agenda.    Mr. Jerry Dalton, 446 E. Main St., Clayton, N.C., Dalton Engineering & Associates, PA, stated the particulars oft the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Dalton stated that the proposed subdivision consistedoflloisandi the drainage patterns were changed to improve the drainage. Mr. Dalton stated that they had spoken with NCDOT about the new design. Mr. Dalton stated that the proposed lots were accessible on an internal road system that met requirements. Mr. Dalton stated that the runoff patterns have not changed and water patterns have not been interrupted. Mr. Dalton stated that the water basin has not been changed and a drainage easement had been identified. Mr. Dalton stated that the drainage easement was over the top of what is considered to be subsurface drainage. Mr. Dalton stated that the internal roadway system would split at the crown of the road and was proposed to go from the crown northward to an existing ditch. Mr. Dalton also spoke about a blue line stream. Mr. Dalton stated that a small portion of the upper part oft the subject property would go over to the stream instead of sheet flow across the subject property. Mr. Dalton stated a swell has been proposed on every lot to break up the water as much as possible. Mr. Dalton stated that there was about 1,500 ft of drainage including the roadway that goes in front of each lot and down a swell toward the back. Mr. Dalton stated that there is a 36-inch pipe under Strickland Crossroads Rd. that captures water coming onto Eagle Road and puts it under Strickland Crossroads Rd. Mr. Dalton stated that the impervious area for the total project is less than two acres, 8,000: ft per lot. Mr. Dalton stated that there is no significant impact to the stream based on  the proposed design.  Ms. Davis asked Mr. Dalton ifl he had spoken with NCDOT.  Mr. Dalton confirmed and gave the Board ai memo from NCDOT, as well as a preliminary Ms. Davis expressed concern for the driveway being located across from Eagle Rd. Mr. Newton clarified that the preliminary map from Mr. Dalton came in after the packets Ms. Holmes asked Mr. Newton ift the new preliminary map had been accepted by staff. Mr. Newton responded that a comprehensive review had not been done but that on the There was discussion among the Board as they reviewed the new preliminary map. Mr. Dalton stated that the driveways were separated to meet the 500 ft standard. Mr. Lovering asked about the impervious area and ifit was more or less than the original Mr. Dalton stated that it depended on how much each lot used, but that the maximum impervious available is 15% outside the environmental sensitive overlay district.  map.  to the Board had already been distributed.  surface it was an improvement.  design.  2    Mr. William Samuel Godwin, Attorney, was present to represent Bruce and Glenda Adams at 2865 Hannah Creek Rd., Benson, N.C. Mr. Godwin stated that Mr. Adams and his wife own the 40 acre track adjacent to the subject property. Mr. Godwin: spoke about the exhibits and testimony presented at the March Planning Board meeting. Mr. Godwin stated that additional materials and studies requested at the March meeting had not been submitted to the best ofhis knowledge. Mr. Godwin stated that Mr. Adams was present. Chairman Letchworth stated that Mr. Godwin could submit the previous exhibits into Mr. Godwin requested that exhibits one through 13 be entered into evidence. Mr. Godwin Mr. Adams stated that he was 74 years old and had lived on Hannah Creek all of his life. Mr. Adams stated that hej probably goes onto the property daily and that hel has been on the property since receiving notice oft the hearing and took pictures. Mr. Adams stated that his property is located behind the subject property. Mr. Adams stated that there is woodland and as stream in the upper right corner. Mr. Adams stated that his property was still an active  evidence given that it was a new case.  questioned Mr. Adams.  farm.  Mr. Godwin referenced some oft the exhibits. Ms. Howard asked about one oft the exhibits.  Mr. Adams answered and spoke about the drainage pipe. Mr. Adams stated that he owned several parcels. Mr. Adams stated that the land slopes and water will always run through it  and run into his fields.  Mr. Godwin referenced exhibits nine through 13.  Mr. Adams explained how the water flows across the properties and how the waterways connect on his properties. Mr. Adams stated that the water ultimately flows into a larger pond on a nearby parcel. Mr. Adams spoke about I-40 and the I-40 overpass and the increase in water flow after its construction. Mr. Adams spoke about taking out flood  insurance due to high levels of water at times.  Mr. Sasser asked about the current water flow without any development.  Mr. Adams responded. Mr. Adams stated that no buffers had been proposed between the subject property and his property. Mr. Adams expressed concerns for water runoffontol his  property from the proposed subdivision. Mr. Godwin questioned Mr. Dalton.  Mr. Dalton stated that runoff from the proposed subdivision will go into the jurisdictional buffer. Mr. Dalton stated that the buffer goes through the subject property and neighboring properties all the way down to the pond. Mr. Dalton stated that there should not be any increase in the water flow from new construction. Mr. Dalton stated that the amount of  3    development to be applied to the land based on that project is minute considering the drainage area for the riparian buffer. Mr. Dalton stated that lines on the preliminary map show the embankment with the cut field for the highway. Mr. Dalton spoke about the location of Stone Creek and his belief that it is large enough to handle the approximately 8-10 CFS that would be generated by the project. Mr. Dalton stated they would adhere to the ordinances ofJohnston County Public Utilities for stormwater and erosion control. Mr. Dalton stated that he did look ats subsurface drainage and found the corrugated plastic pipes. Mr. Dalton stated that he did not see any water running through the corrugated pipes. Mr. Dalton stated that they are not doing anything to disturb or impact the subsurface. Mr. Dalton stated that stormwater calculations were performed for the plan design. Mr. Dalton presented pictures to the Board oft the inlet tot the subsurface drainage and stated the surface water could not get into the drainage system. Mr. Dalton stated that the drainage easement would not impact building or septic systems and that there would be no building or septic Chairman Letchworth asked Mr. Dalton about the runoffcoefficient used to determine the Mr. Dalton responded that it is pretty close depending on the use. of the farm field and that there are some residential developments that have a lower coefficient than farming. Mr. Chairman Letchworth asked that depending on the way the farm field is used, if a residential type development could generate less volume than a farm field or depending on Mr. Dalton responded that it could be very similar but it could also be less because a residential development typically has more year round vegetation on it than a farm field. Chairman Letchworth asked if any buffers are required in the County ordinance between  system in close proximity to the easement.  volume of water ofa a residential development versus a farm field.  Dalton stated that typically both oft them range from 30 to 50 to 55.  the use could be a very similar volume of water.  like uses.  Mr. Dalton responded no.  Mr. Kevin McLamb, 9328 Strickland Crossroads Rd., Benson, N.C., and Mr. Ronald Wood, 9360 Strickland Crossroads Rd., Benson, N.C., are adjacent property owners and  expressed concerns to the Board. Mr. McLamb provided pictures to the Board. 20 gallons of water a minute on Easter Sunday.  Mr. Wood stated that the drainage pipe has been crushed and that the pipe was discharging Chairman Letchworth asked about an image showing the inlet to the drainage pipe. Mr. McLamb stated that the inlet to the pipe is up north and the picture is showing the junction box used tol keep the pipe cleaned out sO water can continue to flow.  4    Ms. Howard asked about the location oft the junction box.  Mr. McLamb pointed out the location of the junction box and the inlet on GIS. Mr. McLamb stated that they had videos and notes showing that the pipe was running before it waso crushed. Mr. McLamb discussed photos presented and expressed concerns for flooding on the proposed lots 1-4. Mr. McLamb stated that it flooded on. January 13, 2013,July 19, 2020, August 15, 2020, October 6, 2022, May 14, 2024, and May 18, 2024. Mr. Wood expressed concerns for the land being saturated with water when the drainage pipe is blocked or no longer in use. Mr. Wood stated that someone had cleaned out the Mr. McLamb stated that heavy rains did not wash the straw out of the ditch and that the water doesn't flow towards the ditch. Mr. McLamb explained the direction of the water  ditch.  flow.  Ms. Davis asked about Mr. Wood's property.  Mr. McLamb confirmed the location of Mr. Wood's property. Mr. McLamb expressed caution to the developer for lots 1-4 and expressed concern for the maintenance of the drainage pipe. Mr. McLamb stated that water just stands on the subject property and takes  forever to go down.  Ms. Holmes asked about the date of one oft the photos.  Mr. McLamb responded April 5.  Mr. Lovering asked about the size oft the underground pipe and the length that it runs. Mr. Wood responded six inches and that it runs approximately 750 ft to the tree lines. Ms. Holmes asked for confirmation that the underground pipe runs approximately 750 ft. Mr. Wood confirmed and stated that the whole total pipe is approximately 1,100 ft. Mr. Wood stated that the pipe drains Mr. Norris' property. just as much as it does his. Mr. Sasser asked ift the drainage pipe was operating properly before it was crushed.  Mr. McLamb responded yes.  Ms. Howard asked ifit kept the water offoftheir property.  Mr. McLamb responded yes.  Mr. Wood stated that it kept the water drained down and explained how the drainage pipe  worked.  5    Mr. McLamb stated that the drainage pipe was added back in the day SO the whole land  could be worked and they didn'thave a ditch.  Mr. Sasser asked ift the pipe was fixed would there be a problem. Mr. McLamb responded that it would keep the water from standing and it would continue running. Mr. McLamb stated that he would like for the pipe to be fixed. Mr. Lovering asked ift the pipe was solid or perforated.  Mr. McLamb responded that it was originally terracotta but a combine broke it years ago.  Mr. Lovering asked ifit was a solid pipe. Mr. Wood responded that it was a drain pipe. Mr. Dalton responded that it was perforated.  Mr. McLamb stated that it started out as terracotta. Mr. McLamb stated that Mr. Norris told the developer that the pipe had been there for 70 plus years and that it had been there as Chairman Letchworth asked for clarification about the drainage pipe and that the pipe handles some oft the drainage coming through the area and that there is also drainage that Mr. McLamb confirmed and stated that in his opinion the pipe is not there to capture any Chairman Letchworth asked ift the storm runoff still primarily travels over land.  long as Mr. Wood had been there.  in storm events exceeds the capacity of the pipe and flows over land. stormwater but is there to drain the land SO it can be worked.  Mr. McLamb confirmed.  Mr. Dalton stated that there are two different purposes for drainage, subsurface drainage is for farmland and surface drainage. Mr. Dalton stated that there is a proposed drainage Chairman Letchworth asked ifthe drainage easements flow parallel to the property lines to Mr. Dalton confirmed. Mr. Dalton stated that he believed the developer was willing to put apipe around the field to ensure that there would still be an outlet should anything happen Chairman Letchworth asked ifthey would be willing to add a condition for a pipe around  easement for the purpose ofs surface drainage. catch the water coming across the property.  to the corrugated pipe.  the field to redirect the subsurface drainage.  6    Mr. Dalton stated that the only way to handle the surface drainage is through ai maintained  easement along the property lines.  Mr. Sasser asked about the water going down each property line.  Mr. Dalton stated that it is SO little and each lot drains about 1,500 square feet. Mr. Dalton stated that the water would probably go into the ground before it reached the easement on at typical rain. Mr. Dalton stated that conditions could be added for both, the easements and  assisting in redirecting the pipe around the field. Ms. Howard asked about the need to fix the current pipe.  Mr. Dalton stated that the terracotta was already busted. Mr. Dalton stated that they could put an easement oni it, repair it, and take it around thei field for the subsurface drain to work.  Ms. Davis asked about the drainage easement pipe maintenance.  Mr. Dalton stated that it would be redirected around the property line and would barely impact any land other than adjacent to the property line. Mr. Dalton stated that any  maintenance would probably be turned over to the HOA. Mr. Sasser asked ift the pipe was proposed as an easement.  Mr. Dalton responded yes, there is a proposed easement for both subsurface and surface Mr. Patrick K. Smith, Professional Engineer with Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, representing Mr. McLamb and Mr. Wood. Mr. Smith presented slides to the Board and discussed the material presented in the slides. Mr. Smith stated that he had visited the property multiple times and there is a lot ofstanding water that exists close to the surface and is an area that is typically going to be wet. Mr. Smith expressed concerns for on-site runoff, off-site drainage, and subsurface drainage. Mr. Smith stated that there are general wateri issues on Mr. Adams' land where water tends to stand. Mr. Smith expressed concern for not having a thorough analysis of stormwater and stated that a drainage easement is Ms. Davis asked about the possible relocation of the drainage pipe and ifit would affect Mr. Smith responded that for simplicity reasons, the subsurface drain and the: surface drain should be in the same location especially if there is going to be a permanent drainage easement. Mr. Smith stated that it would be complicated to redirect the surface flow. Mr. Smith asked about on-site wastewater and soil evaluations. Mr. Smith discussed various Ms. Howard asked ift the stormwater plan, grading plan, and others would come after the  drainage.  critically important. Mr. Smith also asked about a grading plan.  the flow and absorption.  scenarios involving on-site wastewater. preliminary approval by the Board.  7    Chairman Letchworth confirmed.  Mr. Smith stated that the difference in this case was that the Board asked for additional information at the March Planning Board meeting but noneofineinformation materialized. Chairman Letchworth stated that this is a separate case and thel Board can ask foradditional information again if the Board feels like they need additional information above and Mr. Sasser asked about studies discussed previously and if they would be needed before Mr. Newton stated that the burden is on the Applicant to produce engineering designs and have performed a study ofthe site and be sufficient to conform to the County stormwater ordinance. Mr. Newton stated that level of detail was not required at the preliminary level. Mr. Newton stated that the Applicant does have to provide a stormwater statement and the  beyond any testimony provided.  environmental and stormwater approval.  Applicant has provided a stormwater statement. There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr stated the staff recommended denial due to less than 5001 ft ofdriveway separation and lack ofa dedicated right-of-way meeting Johnston Co. standards fora a Major subdivision. Mr. Marr stated that ac comprehensive review of the new preliminary map was not completed, but it did appear that those concerns might have been addressed in the new preliminary map. Ms. Holmes expressed concern that staff were not able to conduct a comprehensivereview: Ms. Davis expressed concern for the drainage easement and maintenance of the drainage Chairman Letchworth referenced the County ordinance: and expressed concern for drainage  oft the latest plans. pipe.  and concern for lots 1-5.  Ms. Davis expressed concern for the septics.  Ms. Holmes stated concern for potential problems for either future owners or adjacent Chairman Letchworth stated that there wasn't a concern for stormwater generated by the There was discussion among the Board concerning the surface flooding on the subject  property owners. development. property.  Mr. Lovering expressed concern for the maintenance of the drainage pipe.  8    Chairman Letchworth spoke about stormwater dealing with surface drainage and this instance being a subsurface drainage issue. Chairman Letchworth spoke about it being wetland that is only made dry through the existence of the pipe. Chairman Letchworth expressed concern about the land being dry and suitable foral home site well into the future Mr. Lovering discussed drainage concerns as well as the role of the engineers. There was discussion among the Board concerning the roadway design and access points. Mr. Lovering spoke about the adjacent stream and runoff flowing into the existing stream. Chairman Letchworth asked Ms. Slusser about thel Board's ability to add conditions. Ms. Slusser responded that the conditions have to be consented upon by the applicant. Mr. Lovering asked about the easement and maintenance oft the easement.  and referenced the County ordinance.  Chairman Letchworth responded that typically the easement is mowed and maintained by Ar member of the audience asked about the width oft the proposed easement.  the homeowners.  Chairman Letchworth responded that the preliminary plat states a 10 ft public drainage Chairman Letchworth asked about the County's stormwater process and ifi it takes into account the off-site stormwater coming across the subject property and how it is diverted Mr. Newton responded that it would look at the pre and post development of the site and how that impacts downstream. Mr. Newton stated that he could not say for definite ifit looks upstream. Mr. Newton stated that there was no representation from the stormwater Chairman Letchworth discussed possible conditions concerning drainage easements.  easement.  into drainage.  division of Public Utilities.  There was discussion among the Board. Mr. Newton reviewed the Board's options.  Ms. Slusser reviewed Johnston County Ordinance Section 14-176 with regards to Ms. Holmes expressed concern for tabling it since it was withdrawn when tabled in March.  consideration of the preliminary plat and possible Board actions.  There was discussion among the Board concerning possible conditions.  9    Chairman Letchworth asked Mr. Dalton if they would agree to the two additional conditions, that the swells contained within the drainage easements were sized sufficiently to handle the off-site stormwater coming onto the site and that the existing drainage pipe  be repaired and placed within a permanent easement. Mr. Dalton agreed to the two additional conditions.  SlatRecommendation: Denial  Upon a motion by Mr. Sasser to approve Rickie Norris Tract June 2024 with the inclusion ofthe two additional conditions, seconded by Mr. Lovering, Rickie Norris Tract June 2024 was approved by a vote of 5-2 at the July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting, with Ms.  Davis and Ms. Holmes dissenting. Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of30,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds 4. Certifications 5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval maintenance on Final Plat  7. Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for shared 8. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 9. Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec. 14-226( (g) 10. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street 11. Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording  maintenance (DM Sec 7, L. item 8)  12. Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14- 13. Drainage easements along the property lines and swells within those be sized to accommodate the offsite stormwater trailing on to the site. 14. Existing drainage pipe be repaired and included within a permanent 15. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services.  75(d)(3)  easement.  cluster box mail receptacle units: a. CBU shall not impede the flow oftraffic. C. CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health] unapproved lot  16. Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each  10    [NCDOT]  17. A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 18. All design aspects oft the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access 19. It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted  construction  to North Carolina Highways  ifany road improvements will be required 20. Driveways do not meet 200' spacing requirement.  [Public Utilities]  21. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 22. Stormwater Statement Required well as anyjurisdictional features and buffers.  23. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as 24. Property is limited to 15% impervious area without stormwater management. 25. Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline  construction. [Emergency Services]  26. Provide road dimensions, weight rating, and grade detail. 27. Provide fire flow report and waterline/hydrant detail. 28. Please submit construction drawings prior to starting construction. ***Items in bold were added by the Planning Board and agreed to by the  applicant during the Planning Board meeting.  There was a brief five minute break. Steel Bridge Road Subdivision Owner: Jimmy Dale Developer: RRTI Development, LLC Surveyor: Stocks Engineering Acreage/Lots: 43.87 acres, 28 lots Tax ID #: 15H05024N Address: 3316 Steel Bridge Rd.  Mr. Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information. Mr. Marr stated that the subject property was within the ESA, however no floodplain appears on the parcel. Mr. Marr also spoke about reverse frontage lots and stated that a reverse frontage buffer would be required for lot 13 along Cooper Branch Rd. Mr. Ethan Averette, 801 E. Washington St., Nashville, N.C., Stocks Engineering, stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board.  11    Mr. Averette stated that all lots would be 40,000 square feet since the subject property is within the ESA. Mr. Averette stated that there is a blue line stream and a frontage buffer would be added, the mail kiosk would be shown on the preliminary plat, and the lot lines would be modified sO the pond would be fully located in the HOA owned open space.  Ms. Holmes asked about the location oft the mail kiosk.  Mr. Averette stated that it was not shown on the preliminary plat, but that it would likely  be located near the pond and open space.  Mr. Sasser asked about the modification of the lot lines and the pond.  Mr. Averette confirmed that the full perimeter of the pond would be located within the Ms. Holmes asked about the David Sutphin property and ift there was any type of planned Mr. Averette stated that there is no planned buffer but they would be willing to add al buffer  HOA owned open space.  buffer along the backs of proposed lots 1-3. along the backs ofl lots 1 and 2. There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report. Ms. Davis asked about adding a condition for the pond. Ms. Davis expressed concern for Ms. Holmes added two additional conditions as discussed, add a landscape buffer at the back of lots 1 and 2 and modify the lot lines to encompass the pond within the HOA  the enrollment numbers for the school district.  maintained space.  Staff Recommendation: Approval  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve Steel Bridge Road Subdivision with the inclusion of the two additional conditions, seconded by Ms. Howard, Steel Bridge Road Subdivision was approved by a unanimous vote of7-0 at the. July 16, 2024 Planning Board  Meeting.  Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of 40,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds 4. Certifications  12    5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval 7. All lots shall access internal streets 8. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 9. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 10. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance (DM Sec 7, L. item 8) 11. Provide reverse frontage lot buffer for lot 13 along Cooper Branch Rd. 12. Driveways shall be separated 500 feet apart 13. Show to whom open space is dedicated 14. Provide 20' fee simple access to open space  15. Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14- 16. Modify Lot lines to encompass pond inside space maintained by HOA. 18. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance ofu utility services.  75(d)(3)  17. Provide landscape buffer on lots 1 and 2. cluster box mail receptacle units: a. CBU shall not impede the flow oftraffic. C. CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health] unapproved lot [NCDOT]  19.Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each  20. A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 21.All design aspects ofthe plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access 22. It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted  construction  tol North Carolina Highways  ifany road improvements will be required  [Public Utilities]  23. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 24. Stormwater Statement Required well as any jurisdictional features and buffers. without stormwater management.  25. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as 26. Property is located within the ESA and limited to 12%i impervious area 27. Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline  construction.  13    [Emergency Services]  28. Provide a fire flow: report and water distribution details. 29. Submit construction drawings prior to starting construction. ***Items in bold were added by the Planning Board and agreed to by the  applicant during the Planning Board meeting.  Earpsboro 1C Owner: Joseph &. Joretta Vann Developer: Darlington Advisors LLC Surveyor: Adams & Hodge Engineering, PC Acreage/Lots: 35.26 acres, 36 lots Tax ID #: 11M02063C Address: 600 Block of] Earpsboro Rd.  Mr. Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information.  Mr. Donnie Adams, 314 E. Main St., Clayton, N.C., Adams & Hodge Engineering, PC, stated the particulars oft the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Adams stated that there is a riparian buffered stream on the subject property that they plan to cross perpendicular. Mr. Adams stated that the mailbox cluster unit is Chairman Letchworth asked about the hammerhead design and ifit was designed such that  located at the front across from lots 1 and 2, on the front side ofl lot 36.  itc could be extended onto the adjacent property.  Mr. Adams confirmed.  Chairman Letchworth asked if there was a way to get a stub out between there and Earpsboro Rd. without losing a lot. Chairman Letchworth asked how it could be designed in case the adjacent property was developed to avoid another driveway on Earpsboro Rd. with one entrance and exit. Chairman Letchworth asked about a possible stub out around Mr. Adams responded that it might be aj possibility without losing a lot and he would look Chairman Letchworth stated that the County ordinance requires a sign at any stub out.  lots 9, 10, orl 11. at it.  Ms. Davis asked about a new traffic count on Earpsboro Rd.  Chairman Letchworth asked were there any anticipated roadway improvements.  Mr. Adams responded no. There was no further discussion.  14    Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staffi report.  SlatfRecommendation: Approval  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve Earpsboro 1C, seconded by Mr. Sasser, Earpsboro 1C was approved by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at the July 16, 2024 Planning  Board Meeting.  Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of30,000 sf. 2. Metes & bounds 3. Certifications 4. Entrance sign & street signs 5. Street name approval 6. All lots shall access internal streets 7. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 8. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 9. Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec. 14-226 (g) 10. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street 11. Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording  maintenance (DM Sec 7,1 L. item 8)  12. Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14- 13. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services.  75(d)(3)  cluster box mail receptacle units: a. CBU shall not impede the flow oftraffic. . CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health] unapproved lot [NCDOT]  14. Approval ofall lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each  15.A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 16. All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access 17. .It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted  construction  tol North Carolina Highways  ifany road improvements will be required  15    [Public Utilities]  18. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 19. Stormwater Statement Required well as any. jurisdictional features and buffers.  20. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as 21.4 A 401/404 permit and buffer approval are required for the road crossing. 22. Property is limited to 15% impervious area without stormwater management. 23. Waterline construction will have to be to continue in both directions to the end 24. Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline  ofthe street that lots 18-21 front.  construction. [Emergency Services] 25. Provide a fire flow report.  26. Provide construction drawings prior to starting construction.  Crocker's Station Owner: Dorothy H Creech Irrevocable Trust Developer: Michael Ford Surveyor: Alsey J. Gilbert, PLS Acreage/Lots: 83.55 acres, 38 lots Tax ID #: 15M13007 & 15M13008D Address: 1347 Crocker Rd.  Ms. Howard recused herself from voting on this subdivision.  Upon ai motion by Ms. Holmes to recuse Ms. Howard, seconded by Ms. Davis, the recusal of Ms. Howard was approved by a unanimous vote of 6-0 at the July 16, 2024 Planning Mr. Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information. Mr. Marr spoke about reverse frontage lots and that a reverse frontage buffer would be required for Old Sanders Rd. behind lot 27. Mr. Marr spoke about direct driveway access on Crocker Rd. and from the Johnston County Land Design Manual regarding developments creating Mr. Alsey Gilbert, 442-1/2 E. Main St., Clayton, N.C., Surveyor, stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Gilbert described the unique size and shape of the subject properties and explained the design of the proposed subdivision. Mr. Gilbert spoke about adding a reverse frontage buffer along Chairman Letchworth asked about a shared driveway between lots 35 and 36.  Board Meeting.  4 or more lots.  the front ofOld Sanders Rd. along lots 35, 18,31, and 27.  Mr. Gilbert confirmed.  16    Ms. Holmes asked about a shared driveway for lots 1,2, and 3.  Mr. Gilbert confirmed.  Chairman Letchworth asked about lots 32-34 plus another piece being retained by the  owner sharing a 30 foot access. Mr. Gilbert confirmed.  Ms. Davis asked about the reverse buffer on lots 18, 31,27, and 35.  Mr. Gilbert confirmed.  Mr. Virgil Yansom, 952 Old Sanders Rd., Smithfield, N.C., nearby property owner, expressed concern for current traffic, as well as increased traffic and safety concerns. Ms. Jane Creech Hales, 100 Elizabeth Rd., Smithfield, N.C., adjacent property owner, stated that she grew up on the land and has been living there since 1986. Ms. Hales spoke about the history ofthe land. Ms. Hales expressed concern for the entrance and exit ofOld Sanders Rd. Ms. Hales asked questions about landscape buffers adjoining her property and Mr. Walter Daughtry, 149 Elizabeth Rd., Smithfield, N.C., nearby property owner, expressed concern for current traffic due to recent HWY 70 work. Mr. Daughtry stated that traffic has increased on Old Sanders Rd. and Crocker Rd. due to the HWY 70 and Creech Mill Rd. work. Mr. Daughtry expressed concern for the proposed subdivision's close  expressed concern for water runoff.  proximity to another coming subdivision.  Chairman Letchworth asked about the change in traffic flow to HWY 70.  Mr. Daughtry responded that Creech Mill Rd was cut off and traffic has been rerouted towards them. Mr. Daughtry stated that there is 10 times more traffic on Old Sanders Rd. Mr. Daughtry asked for the Board to consider recently approved subdivisions in the area. Chairman Letchworth discussed the County's process of developing a Comprehensive  Transportation Plan.  Ms. Davis stated appreciation for the number ofl lots.  Mr. Ben Daughtry, Smithfield, N.C., adjacent property owner, stated that he grew up on the land and expressed concern about the density and the lot size for the proposed subdivision. Mr. Daughtry expressed concern for the septic systems. Mr. Daughtry stated  that the design is out of character for the area.  Ms. Davis asked about the location ofMr. Ben Daughtry's property. Mr. Ben Daughtry confirmed the location ofhis property.  17    An audience member asked Ms. Davis to repeat an earlier statement.  Ms. Davis stated that the maximum density per County standards would allow up to 121 Mr. Steve Smith, 65 Elizabeth Rd., Smithfield, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed concerns about the density, traffic, and how wet the site is. Mr. Smith expressed concern Ms. Leslie Daughtry, 979 Old Sanders Rd., Smithfield, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed opposition for the proposed subdivision. Ms. Daughtry had questions about septic systems, stormwater runoff, retention ponds, turn lanes, sidewalks, and other planned amenities. Ms. Daughtry asked about affordable housing. Ms. Daughtry expressed concern for the impact on local wildlife, as well as the increase in traffic. Ms. Sarah Williams, 1415 Hill Rd., Smithfield, N.C., nearby property owner, expressed concerns for the increased traffic coming from HWY 70 and Brogden Rd. Ms. Williams expressed concern for infrastructure and the road damage. Ms. Williams also expressed Chairman Letchworth discussed the process following the Board's decision, including NCDOT: review, stormwater review, and Environmental Health review. Ms. Davis discussed information concerning the Voluntary Agricultural District.  lots and the proposed subdivision consists of38 lots.  for the septic systems and spoke in favor of preserving family farms.  concerns for local wildlife.  There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr stated the staff recommended denial due to less than 500 fto ofdriveway separation and lack ofa dedicated Ms. Davis asked Mr. Gilbert about the driveway entrance distances between lots 1-3 and  right-of-way meeting Johnston Co. standards for a Major subdivision. lots 4-16 and ifit met the 500 ft driveway separation requirement. Mr. Gilbert confirmed that it met the distance requirement.  Ms. Davis asked about another subdivision possibly going in across Old Sanders Rd. and Mr. Gilbert responded that he did not think the other subdivision was at that location. Chairman Letchworth asked about any preliminary indications from NCDOT.  its proximity to the entrance to lots 18-31.  Mr. Gilbert responded none yet.  Ms. Davis asked about the portion oft the subject property noted as retained by the owner.  18    Mr. Gilbert responded that the retained area would not be a subdivision, possibly two ten- acre tracts. Mr. Gilbert stated that they had a very intense soil survey done and it depends Ms. Leslie Daughtry asked on behalfofher mother, Ms.. Jane Hales, about a possible buffer  oni ifanother perk site can be found.  between her mother's property and proposed lots 21-25. Ms. Davis asked about access tol Ms. Hales' property.  Ms. Leslie Daughtry responded that the landlocked property is accessed through Ms. Mr. Gilbert responded that it would depend on the septic soils but that a 20 foot landscape  Hales' property off Elizabeth Rd. buffer might be possible.  Chairman Letchworth stated that a buffer is not required between like uses.  Ms. Davis spoke about the number of proposed lots. Mr. Lovering spoke about the distance between the driveways.  SlatfRecommendation: Denial  Upon a motion by Mr. Lovering to approve Crocker'ss Station, seconded by Mr. Cresnshaw, Crocker's Station was approved by a unanimous vote of6-0 at the July 16, 2024 Planning  Board Meeting.  Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of 30,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds 4. Certifications 5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval  7. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 8. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 9. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance (DM Sec 7, L. item 8) 10. Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along lot 27 on Crocker Rd. 11. Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for shared maintenance on Final Plat 12. Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording 13. Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14-  75(d)(3)  19    14. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design ofand utilization of b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance oft utility services.  cluster box mail receptacle units: a. CBU shall not impede the flow oft traffic.  CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health] unapproved lot [NCDOT]  15. Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each  16. A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 17. All design aspects oft the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access 18. Ity will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted 19. Shared driveways for 35 &3 36, shared driveway for 1,2,&3, and shared  construction  tol North Carolina Highways  ifany road improvements will be required  driveways for 37&38. [Public Utilities]  20. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 21. Stormwater Statement Required well as anyj jurisdictional features and buffers.  22. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as 23. Property is limited to 15% impervious area without stormwater management. 24. Lots that front existing right-of-way shall have services installed prior to 25. Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline  recording the plat. construction. [Emergency Services]  26. Provide road dimensions, weight rating, and grade detail. 27. Provide a fire flow report and waterline/hydrant detail. 28. Provide construction drawings prior to starting construction.  Parker's Landing Phase 2June 2024 Owner: Axiom Holdings LLC Developer: Axiom Development LLC Surveyor: Stocks Engineering, PA Acreage/Lots: 83.16 acres, 461 lots  Tax ID #: 11L03030, 11L03030D, 11L03030C, & 11L03030B  20    Address: Sweetfern Lane  Mr. Marri introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information. Mr. Marr stated that the subject property was within the ESA, however no floodplain appears on the parcel. Mr. Marr stated that a left turn lane will be required on NC 96 turning onto Sweet Birch Ln. per NCDOT. Mr. Marr also stated that no lots shall be recorded in Phase 21 until the existing stub of Sweetfern is improved and dedicated with the other proposed streets with a letter stating that they meet NCDOT standards. Mr. Marr stated that this subdivision was proposed and approved at the March 2024 Planning Board meeting for Mr. Ethan Averette, 801 E. Washington St., Nashville, N.C., Stocks Engineering, stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Averette stated that more suitable soils were discovered during further evaluations leading to the additional lots. Mr. Averette addressed concerns from the previous approval and stated that Sweet Birch Ave. and Yellowwood Ave. have already been turned over to NCDOT and had a letter from NCDOT. Mr. Averette stated that Sweetfern Ln. has not been built yet and is only gravel. Mr. Averette stated that the wetlands and stream have  40 lots and they are now proposing six additional lots.  also been evaluated with the buffer shown on the preliminary plat.  Mr. Lovering asked about the roads. Sweetfern Ln. had not.  Mr. Averette clarified that Sweet Birch Ave. has been turned over to NCDOT and that Ms. Howard asked about Sweetfern Ln. not having enough residents to be turned over to  NCDOT.  Mr. Averette confirmed. There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report.  Staff Recommendation: Approval  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve Parker's Landing Phase 2. June 2024, seconded by Mr. Sasser, Parker's Landing Phase 2. June 2024 was approved by a unanimous vote of  7-0 at the July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting. Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of 40,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds  21    4. Certifications 5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval 7. All lots shall access internal streets 8. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 9. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 10. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance (DM Sec 7,1 L. item 8) 11. Show to whom open space is dedicated 12. Provide 20' fee simple access to open space  13. Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14- 14. No lots shall be recorded in Phase 2 until existing stub of Sweetfern is improved and dedicated with the other proposed streets with a letter stating 15. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services.  75 (d)(3)  that they meet NCDOT standards. cluster box mail receptacle units: a. CBU shall not impede the flowoftraffic. C. CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health] unapproved lot [NCDOT]  16. Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each  17.A A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 18.All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access 19.It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted 20. All lots to be served internally, require no-access easements for all frontage 21. Require encroachment agreement for any proposed utilities within ROW. 22. Require left turn lane for site on NC 961 turning onto Sweet Birch Ln.  construction  tol North Carolina Highways  ifany road improvements will be required  lots.  [Public Utilities]  23. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 24. Stormwater Statement Required  25. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as well as any. jurisdictional features and buffers. A buffer call will be necessary.  22    26. Property is located within the ESA and limited to 12% impervious area 27. Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline  without stormwater management.  construction. [Emergency Services]  28. Provide topographic information. 30. Provide cul-de-sac details. 31. Provide a fire flow test.  29. Provide "No] Parking" signage along access road at fire hydrant locations.  32. Provide fire hydrant distribution plan/layout. Rezoning and Conditional Zoning Cases and Special Uses:  Rezoning Case 24-11 Tax ID: 16L05030D Owner: Donald & Kimberly Waters Applicant: Donald & Kimberly Waters  Rezoning Petition: Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business (GB)  Location: 23.21 acre tract located in the 2600 Block ofThanksgiving Fire Rd. ini the  O'Neals Township  Rezoning Case 24-11 was withdrawn by the Applicant. Special Use Request: Petition to request a Special Use Permit  Rezoning Case 24-13 Tax ID: 09G15019A  Owner: Gloria & Damion L. Herring Applicant: Network Towers II, LLC  Location: 6450 NC Hwy 242 in the Meadow Township Special Use Request: A 264' wireless elecommunications tower. Mr. Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated that the request had been reviewed by the County's technical consultant. Mr. Anthony Bologna, Attorney with Williams Mullen representing Network Towers II, LLC,301 Fayetteville Street Suite 1700, Raleigh, N.C., stated the particulars ofthe request  and was present to answer any questions from the Board.  There was no further discussion. September 3, 2024 meeting.  Rezoning Case 24-13 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  Consistency Statement  23    This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that the tower height isallowed in this land use area. The request is reasonable and in the public interest in that, the use can be limited in scope using special conditions and the proposed development meets the standards found int the. Johnston County Land Development Code. The conditions will ensure that the request is compatible with the surrounding area and will not negatively  affect the public.  Finding of Facts for the Special Use Permit:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to Applicant: The proposed wireless telecommunication facility has been sited and designed to maintain/promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by improving voice and data usage in the surrounding area. According to 911.gov over 81% of911 calls are made by wireless devices. Cellular usage is the primary form of 2. That the use oft the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 and with all applicable regulations; Applicant: The proposed wireless telecommunication facility will comply with all regulations and standards generally applicable with the zoning district AR- Agricultural Residential. Additionally, the proposed use will meet the requirements and design standards governing wireless telecommunication 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated SO as to maintain or enhance the value ofc contiguous property, or that the use or development Applicant: The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is a use that is a public necessity as cellular use is the primary form of communication for most people today. The proposed use will allow students to have access to the latest educational opportunities, allow employees the opportunity to work from home, allow local business and emergency workers to communicate effectively. 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development Applicant: The proposed wireless communication facility is a use that will be consistent with Johnston County general plans for development of the county. In today's society, reliable wireless service is a necessity for residents, students, business and emergency personnel. The use will provide Verizon with the needed infrastructure to expand their wireless service footprint within the county. Specific Land Uses: APPLICANT: Proposed installation ofa 264' elecommunications self-support lattice tower inside a 75'x75' fenced in compound. The wireless elecommunications facility will be located within a 100'x100' lease area.  maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;  communication for most people today.  facilities found in Section 14-257.  isa a public necessity;  policies as adopted by the Board of Commissioners.  24    Special Use Conditions:  1. Permitted Uses: Proposed installation ofa 264' telecommunications self-support lattice tower inside a 75'x75' fenced in compound. The wireless telecommunications facility will be located within a 100'x100' lease area. 2. The Special Use Permit may be revoked with the violation of any Special Use 3. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan forreview: and approval by the Planning 4. All buildings and/or structures must comply with rules enforced by Federal, State 5. Installation ofa Class B landscape buffer along the outer perimeter of the chain- link security fence surrounding the base of the tower (2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9 shrubs) every one hundred (100) linear feet. Existing natural vegetation may 6. All feed lines shall be installed within the support structure and antenna ports shall be sealed in a manner to prevent access by birds and any other wildlife. 7. The proposed structure shall not be lighted (unless FAA requires). 8. At the time of permitting, the Applicant shall provide a structural analysis signed by a North Carolina Professional Engineer to comply with ANSI/EIA/TIA-222- G (as amended) for. Johnston County for the approved number of antenna arrays. 9. The facility shall be constructed SO that access is only attainable by qualified  Condition.  and Zoning Department Staff. and Local agencies.  be used ifmore intense than the buffer requirement.  personnel. Rezoning Case 24-14 Tax ID: 11P02060D Owner: MichaelJHocutt Applicant: Network Towers II, LLC  Special Use Request: Petition to request a Special Use Permit  Location: 13600 Block ofl NC Hwy 42 East in the O'Neals Township Special Use Request: A 294' wireless elecommunications tower. Mr. Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated that the request had been reviewed by the County's technical consultant. Mr. Anthony Bologna, Attorney with Williams Mullen representing Network Towers II, LLC,301 Fayetteville Street Suite 1700, Raleigh, N.C., stated the particulars ofthe request and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Bologna stated that the Ms. Davis asked if the two tower requests were similar to requests heard at a previous Mr. Bologna confirmed and stated that they were both self-supported lattice towers.  request was for a 290: ft tower with a 4 ft lightning rod.  Planning Board meeting.  There was no further discussion.  25    Rezoning Case 24-14 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  September 3, 2024 meeting.  Consistency Statement  This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that the tower height is allowed in this land use area. The request is reasonable and in the public interest in that, the use can be limited in scope using special conditions and the proposed development meets the standards found in the. Johnston CountyLand Development Code. The conditions will ensure that the request is compatible with the: surrounding area and will not negatively  affect the public.  Finding of Facts for the Special Use Permit:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated SO as to Applicant: The proposed wireless telecommunication facility has been sited and designed to maintain/promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by improving voice and data usage in the surrounding area. According to 911.gov over 81%0 of911 calls are made by wireless devices. Cellular usage is the primary form of 2. That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 and with all applicable regulations; Applicant: The proposed wireless elecommunication facility will comply with all regulations and standards generally applicable with the zoning district AR- Agricultural Residential. Additionally, the proposed use will meet the requirements and design standards governing wireless telecommunication 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use or development Applicant: The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is a use that is a public necessity as cellular use is the primary form of communication for most people today. The proposed use will allow students to have access to the latest educational opportunities, allow employees the opportunity to work from home, allow local business and emergency workers to communicate effectively. 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development Applicant: The proposed wireless communication facility is a use that will be consistent with Johnston County general plans for development of the county. In today's society, reliable wireless service is a necessity for residents, students,  maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;  communication for most people today.  facilities found in Section 14-257.  is aj public necessity;  policies as adopted by the Board ofCommissioners.  26    business and emergency personnel. The use will provide Verizon with the needed infrastructure to expand their wireless service footprint within the county. Specific Land Uses: APPLICANT: Proposed installation of a 294' telecommunications self-support lattice tower inside a 75'x75' fenced in compound. The wireless telecommunications facility will be located within a 100'x100' lease area.  Special Use Conditions:  1. Permitted Uses: Proposed installation ofa 294' telecommunications self-support lattice tower inside a 75'x75' fenced in compound. The wireless telecommunications facility will be located within a 100'x100' lease area. 2. The Special Use Permit may be revoked with the violation of any Special Use 3. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan forr review and approval by the Planning 4. All buildings and/or structures must comply with rules enforced by Federal, State 5. Installation ofa Class B landscape buffer along the outer perimeter of the chain- link security fence surrounding the base of the tower (2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9: shrubs) every one hundred (100) linear feet. Existing natural vegetation may 6. All feed lines shall be installed within the support structure and antenna ports shall be sealed in ai manner to prevent access by birds and any other wildlife. 7. The proposed structure shall not be lighted (unless FAA: requires). 8. At the time of! permitting, the Applicant shall provide a structural analysis signed by a North Carolina Professional Engineer to comply with ANSI/EIA/TIA-222- G (as amended) for. Johnston County for the approved number ofa antenna arrays. 9. The facility shall be constructed SO that access is only attainable by qualified  Condition.  and Zoning Department Staff. and Local agencies.  be used ifmore intense than the buffer requirement.  personnel. Rezoning Case 24-15 Tax ID: 11001044C Owner: Jose Fernando Hernandez Applicant: Jose Fernando Hernandez  Rezoning Petition: Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business (GB)  Location: 5.08 acre tract located in the 7390 NC Hwy 231 in the O'Neals Township Mr. Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned AR and is used for those purposes. Chairman Letchworth asked Mr. Marr to give a sample of the types of business permitted Mr. Marr responded that it could be anything from stores to bars to car dealerships.  with a straight rezoning to General Business.  Ms. Holmes asked ifthe surrounding properties were zoned AR.  27    Mr. Marr confirmed.  Mr. Jose Hernandez, 3441 Wendell Rd., Wendell, N.C., Owner/Applicant, stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Hernandez stated that along with his dad, he owns HC Auto Towing and Services. Mr. Hernandez stated the intent was to use the property for their towing services with possible future auto sales. Mr. Hernandez stated that they were located at 400 David Rd. and then purchased the subject property. Mr. Hernandez included a site plan with his rezoning Chairman Letchworth asked Mr. Hernandez about the reason to request a rezoning to General Business instead of a Special Use District that would be limited to his specific Mr. Hernandez responded that he originally planned to request the Special Use District but Mr. Marr stated that there had been complaints and the Applicant was receiving violations from the County's Zoning Enforcement Officer. Mr. Marr stated that the Applicant had a certain amount of time to turn in an application. Mr. Marr stated that with a conditional zoning application, there are many things that need to be done and they were not getting done. Mr. Marr stated that the Applicant came in to submit the application without the  application.  uses.  was told he could request General Business.  additional items and went with a straight General Business rezoning. Mr. Lovering asked Mr. Hernandez about the hours of operation.  Mr. Hernandez responded that they would have set hours of operation, possibly 8am to  5pm.  Mr. Lovering asked about working with the police. Mr. Hernandez responded that it would be a 24-hour call.  Chairman Letchworth noted that under General Business the Board does not have the Mr. Hernandez stated that there are multiple car businesses on NC HWY 231. There was discussion among the Board concerning the location oft the subject property. Mr. Chris Brackin, 2109 Whitley Rd., Middlesex, N.C., adjacent property owner, stated that he had spoken with Mr. Hernandez about his intentions to put a home on the subject property and discussed with him about the drop in elevation and flood plain. Mr. Brackin stated that he had asked Mr. Hernandez about buying a portion oft the subject property. Mr. Chairman Letchworth asked ifit was inconsistent with the surrounding land use.  ability to set conditions.  Brackin stated that the area is all homes and agricultural.  28    Mr. Brackin confirmed.  Mr. Matthew Haseley, 59 Thoroughbred Dr., Middlesex, N.C., nearby property owner, expressed concerns on traffic impact and safety with a school bus stop and with the poor sight line due to a dip. Mr. Haseley also expressed concerns for the environmental impact and spoke about private wells, Moccasin Creek, and the nearby Flower Hill Nature Preserve. Mr. Haseley also expressed concerns with financial impact and property values. Mr. Haseley stated that the requested use was not a good fit for the area and that others Chairman Letchworth asked for a show ofh hands from the audience for those with the: same Mr. Scott Ballard, 7406 NC HWY 231, Middlesex, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed concerns about the environmental impact stating that asphalt had been dumped on the property and expressed concerns for possible gas and grease runoffinto the creek. Mr. Ballard expressed concerns for increased noise and the impact on local wildlife. Mr. A resident ofThe Preserve at Buckhorn and chairman of the HOA spoke on behalfofthe residents and expressed opposition to the rezoning request. He spoke of the endangered Dwarf Wedge Mussel present in Moccasin Creek and expressed concern for the possible Ms. Lucy Smith, 16 Arabian Dr., Middlesex, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed Mr. Marc Descoteaux, Grayson Properties and Investments, LLC, 7360 NC HWY 231, Middlesex, N.C., adjacent property owner, asked about the proposed containment fence Mr. Hernandez stated that he had proposed a 100 ft buffer from the creek on the subject property. Mr. Hernandezstated that hel had crushed asphalt delivered to the subject property for the driveway. Mr. Hernandez stated that he had proposed an 8 ft fence on the small triangle portion of the subject property across NC HWY 231. Mr. Hernandez stated there were no plans for the back portion of the subject property because there was no way to  from the neighborhood were present at the meeting.  concerns.  Ballard also expressed concerns for erosion.  environmental impact, as well as the impact on property values.  concerns for safety and security.  and expressed concerns for the environmental impact from vehicles.  cross the creek.  There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr provided a staff recommendation of denial due to inconsistency with the County's Land Use Plan.  StatfRecommendation: Denial  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to deny Rezoning Case 24-15 due to the surrounding land uses and its inconsistency with the County's Land Use Plan, seconded by Mr. Crenshaw,  29    Rezoning Case 24-15 was recommended for denial by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at the. July Rezoning Case 24-15 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting. September 3, 2024 meeting.  Consistency Statement  This request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that it conflicts with LU-1: Direct future growth toward the municipalities" and "LU-2: Concentrate commercial development in activity nodes" found in the Envision  Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan. There was a brief five minute break. Rezoning Case 24-16 (GB-CZ) Tax ID: 02K15031A Owner: Parker & Harvey Anderson Applicant: Andy Anderson Township  Rezoning Petition: Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business-Conditional Zoning  Location: 1.09 acre tract located 873 Stricklands Crossroads Rd. in the Bentonville Conditional Zoning Request: Country/General store with future Grill, Agricultural Mr. Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned AR and is a vacant store. Mr. Marr stated that it was anon-conforming use previously but the: store closed. Mr. Marr stated that it was originally Ms. Katina Anderson, 2091 Joyner Bridge Rd., Four Oaks, N.C., Applicant, stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Ms.  Equipment repair.  as store.  Anderson stated that the intent was to reopen the store and add a grill. Chairman Letchworth asked about the request for equipment repair.  Ms. Anderson responded that it would be farm equipment and Mr. Harvey Anderson Chairman Letchworth asked about the buildings on the subject property and storage oft the Ms. Anderson pointed out on GIS the building on the subject property that was added in the 1970s and stated that it would be used as the shop for the equipment repair.  mainly worked on John Deere.  equipment.  30    Chairman Letchworth asked ifany equipment would be stored outside while waiting to be Ms. Anderson stated that some tractors would likely be stored outside during the busy season. Ms. Anderson stated that most of the calls are farm calls, but some are able to be Chairman Letchworth asked for larger tractors, ift they would go out to them instead oft the  worked on.  brought into the shop.  equipment coming into them. Ms. Anderson confirmed. as written in the staff report. Ms. Anderson responded yes. about the hours ofc operation.  Chairman Letchworth asked Ms. Andersonifthey! had read and agreed with the conditions  Chairman Letchworth asked ifthere were conditions that they wanted to change and asked  Ms. Anderson requested no changes and agreed to the conditions.  There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr provided a staff recommendation: ofa approval and presented a draft statement of consistency and conditions  for consideration.  Statr/kecommendation: Approval  Uponan motion by Ms. Holmes to approve Rezoning Case 24-16, seconded by Ms. Howard, Rezoning Case 24-16 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of7-0 at the Rezoning Case 24-16 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting. September 3, 2024 meeting.  Consistency Statement  This request is consistent with the Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that in the Vision area of the plan, it states that Agricultural support uses, rural businesses and home based businesses may be aj part oft the mix of uses in an  agricultural area.  Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated SO as to  maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;  31    Applicant: The property located at 873 Stricklands Crossroads Rd. was established in the late 70's, served as a country/general store and shop. There is no plans to change what this property developed as. The corner property will be maintained with safety, health, and general welfare as a priority to benefit the Bentonville community and promote local, accessible products to meet the needs 2. That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV oft the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 and with all applicable regulations; Applicant: This country/general store along with the agricultural equipment repair shop will provide more accessible goods and services to the community. This will decrease commute time for neighbors to purchase fresh, local grown products at affordable prices. This will be a benefit to our rural community as 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated SO as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use or development Applicant: This corner location provides easy access to our community for regular day travelers as well as those that will be driving large agricultural equipment. The daily operation will support the community-farmers with groceries and supplies for their family or business. With thei inventory of the local grown items 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development Applicant: This country/general store and agricultural repair shop will assist in helping the agriculture industry thrive by providing resources to the farmers and selling local grown/made products. By using the current structure, which has been closed for years, and enhancing the property and grounds, this will bring  ofc our community.  well as farmers and other businesses.  isaj public necessity;  this will be beneficial to small farms and small businesses.  policies as adopted by the Board ofCommissioners.  new life back to the corner.  Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information  1. Please Provide the purpose oft the district, a project narrative, and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district. Applicant: Country/General Store- Provide grocery items/farm and garden supplies/ local grown and made goods/ livestock and pet supplies. Agricultural equipment repair shop-Provide service and goods for  agriculture and farm equipment.  2. Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district:  Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements may be addedwhich may assist in miligating the impacts the  32    du pe. prant mu lav.  dbi 'ing 26 nunily and the  environh n.Si ine Plan ngb Boai Lund parda/Commisioners: propose d la on. tio, chu ing the M P process. Please list may condition sinalyc propose, 1l 'applice 4 below.  any  Applical - I ioility ofa u ire grill within the store (area is already establis! ed) tors vide fres 5 lot and cold foods to those in the comr V ityas well as thoe VI 91 may be traveling through to visit  Bentoni lel Battleground an Howell Woods.  onditions:  1. Land srestricted to Country/General Store with a grill (future) and agricuitural equipment repair. (Proposed by applicant) 2. The development shall conform to all requirements oft the Johnston 3. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the 4. Lighting shall be engineered dark skyldown-lighting sO as not to shine 5. Hours of operation limited to Monday-Sunday 6 am-9 pm 6. All buildings and/or structures must comply with rules enforced by 7. Installation of at least a Class B buffer along all rezoning boundaries lines (21 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9 shrubs) every one hundred (100) linear 8. All signage must comply with the Johnston County sign ordinance. 9. Environmental Health regulations must be adhered to for any food 10. Alla agricultural equipment being repaired or awaiting repair will be stored  County Land Development Code. Planning and Zoning Department Staff. onto adjacent properties.  Federal, State and Local agencies. feet. Existing vegetation may be used.  preparation or sales.  inside ofbuilding or behind fencing. 11. NCDOT driveway permit required.  Rezoning Case 24-17 (GB-CZ) Tax ID: 13B02017C Applicant: Ronald S Fish Township  Rezoning Petition: Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business-Conditional Zoning  Owner: Shaw TI Fish Revocable Trust, Janci F Cahoon Trustee  Location: 3.35 acre tract located at 4033 Plainview Church Rd. in the Pleasant Grove  Conditional Zoning Request: Retail/Display of Storage Buildings. that the existing land use was zoned AR and is used for those purposes.  Mr. Marrintroduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated  33    Ms. Holmes asked about the surrounding land uses, all being AR.  Mr. Marr confirmed.  Mr. Alsey Gilbert, 442-1/2 E. Main St., Clayton, N.C., Surveyor, stated the particulars of thei request and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Gilbert stated that the subject property was used for a lay down yard for. Johnston County building water lines and already has gravel on it. Mr. Gilbert stated that the Applicant was planning to use the site to display buildings. Mr. Gilbert spoke about the required buffers and setbacks off of Ms. Howard asked about what items were on the property and if a fence was on the Mr. Gilbert responded that it had been a lay down yard and had pipe and other materials onit. Mr. Gilbert stated ai fence was not currently ont the subject property. Mr. Gilbert stated that there was not a plan for an office on-site and would not have septic. Ms. Davis asked about the size of the driveway and ifi it was large enough for storage buildings being transported on and off the subject property.  Plainview Church Rd. and NC HWY 210.  property.  Mr. Gilbert confirmed.  Ms. Howard asked staff about the proposed conditions. that there was not a violation on the subject property.  Mr. Marr stated that there was a mistake on the recommendation on the staff report and  Chairman Letchworth asked about the proposed hours of operation.  Mr. Marr confirmed. written in the staff report. Mr. Gilbert responded yes. There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked Mr. Gilbert if the Applicant agreed with the conditions as  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr provided a staff recommendation of denial based on the inconsistency with the Comprehensive Land Use Plani in that titi isinaLow) Density Residential area and not in close proximity to any activity  nodes.  Staff Recommendation: Denial  34    Chairman Letchworth stated that the request seems more reasonably compatible with Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve Rezoning Case 24-17, seconded by Ms. Davis, Rezoning Case 24-17 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of7-0 at the Rezoning Case 24-17 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  surrounding farm and residential uses.  July 16, 20241 Planning Board Meeting. September 3, 2024 meeting.  Consistency Statement  This request is not consistent with the Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plani in thati iti isi inaLow Density Residential area and not in close proximity to any activity nodes. It also conflicts with LU-1 of the Envision Johnston Plan that recommends to "Direct future growth toward the municipalities."  Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated SO as to Applicant: Former Johnston County laydown yard. Storage Building display should be in harmony with surrounding lots. Most hours will be during daylight 2. That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257: and with all applicable regulations; Applicant: Corner lot retail for storage buildings. Itwill not be used for assembly 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use or development Applicant 50' buffer along Plainview Church Rd. and 70' buffer along NC 210 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development Applicant: Consistent with major traffic along NC 210 keeping commercial  maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; hours with minimal traffic. No office just sale calls.  ofbuildings.  is a public necessity;  will keep displays away from highways.  policies as adopted by the Board of Commissioners.  applications along major roads.  Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information  1. Please Provide the purpose of the district, a project narrative, and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district.  35    Applicant: No response.  2. Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district:  Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding communily and the environment. Siaff the Planning Board, and Boarlo/Commisioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. Please list any conditions that you propose, as the applicant, below. Applicant: Hours 8 am-6 pm and landscape buffers to protect from  view.  Conditions:  1.1 Proposed uses: Retail/Display of Storage Buildings. (Proposed by 2. No assembly ofbuildings on-site. (Proposed by Applicant) 3. Normal Business hours 8am-6pm Monday-Saturday. (Proposed by 4. The development shall conform to all requirements of the Johnston 5. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the 6. AC Class B (2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9 shrubs every 100 linear feet) shall bei installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside of any fencing. (existing vegetation may be used) 7. All signage shall comply with the. Johnston County sign code. 8. All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal, State, and 9. Secure an NCDOT driveway permit. Only one ingress/egress will be allowed and must be onto Plainview Church Rd. only (Not NC Highway 10. Any lighting will be dark sky or down lighting sO as not to shine onto  Applicant) Applicant)  County Land Development Code. Planning and Zoning Department Staff. landscape buffer  Local agencies. 210).  adjacent properties. 11. Limited to 20 buildings on site.  Rezoning Case 24-18 (GB-CZ) Tax ID: 13C03055A Owner: DANSETHI LLC Applicant: Dan Beauchamp  Rezoning Petition: Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Business-Conditional Zoning  36    Location: 8 acres ofa 34.12 acre tract located at 17343 NC Hwy 210 in the Pleasant  Grove Township  Conditional Zoning Request: Indoor Storage.  Mr. Marri introduced the case and referenced the information listed above. Mr. Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned AR and is used for those purposes, zoned AR-CZ and used as a cell tower and also a Duke Energy substation, and zoned I-2 SUD and used as a Mr. Dan Beauchamp, 1790 Harrington Rd., Fayetteville, N.C., Applicant, stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. Beauchamp stated that there were limitations tot the subject property and al local engineering company recommended an indoor storage facility. Mr. Beauchamp stated that they have  solar farm.  proposed al buffer around the subject property.  Chairman Letchworth asked about clearing the subject property.  Mr. Beauchamp confirmed that the intent is to only clear what is needed and to leave as Chairman Letchworth asked about the entrance and how it related to the overhead power Mr. Beauchamp stated that the intent is to go between the power lines with the entrance.  much oft the natural buffer as possible.  lines.  Mr. Sasser asked about an office on-site. Mr. Beauchamp confirmed. the staff report.  Chairman Letchworth asked the Applicant ifl he agreed with the conditions as written in  Mr. Beauchamp responded yes.  Ms. Holmes asked about there being 24-7 access.  Mr. Beauchamp responded no, that they do not want to offer 24-7 access because the roads will be permeable and he is concerned about safety outside of daylight hours. Ms. Katherine Cotton, 17301 NC HWY 210 and 17191 NC HWY 210, Angier, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed concern for traffic and speed on that portion of the  highway. Ms. Cotton spoke about the proposed buffer. Ms. Howard asked about a fence on the subject property.  Mr. Beauchamp responded that there would be ai fence around the storage.  37    Ms. Cotton asked about lights.  Chairman Letchworth explained the buffer requirements and exterior lighting must be towards the building. Chairman Letchworth also explained the NCDOT review. Ms. Bennett Johnson, 620 Sweetbriar Rd., Angier, N.C., adjacent property owner, expressed concern for lights shining into the neighboring house and stated that logging is already taking place on the subject property. Ms. Johnson expressed concern for the impact on quality oflife. Ms. Johnson expressed concern for traffic and speed coming down the  hill.  There was no further discussion.  Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation. Mr. Marr provided a staff recommendation of denial based on the inconsistency with the Comprehensive Land Use  Plan.  Ms. Howard asked staff about the subject property being in the flood zone.  Staff showed the subject property on GIS. There was discussion among the Board. SlafRecommendation: Denial  Upon an motion by Mr. Sasser to approve Rezoning Case 24-18, seconded by Ms. Howard, Rezoning Case 24-18 was recommended for approval by a vote of4-3 at the July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting, with Mr. Crenshaw, Ms. Holmes, and Mr. Lovering dissenting. Rezoning Case 24-18 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their  September 3, 2024 meeting.  Consistency Statement  This request is not consistent with the Envision Johnston Comprehensivel Land Use Plan in that iti isinal Low Density Residential area and not in close proximity to any activity nodes. It also conflicts with LU-1 of the Envision Johnston Plan that recommends to "Direct future growth toward the municipalities."  Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to Applicant: Thel land is an underdeveloped area of the county east of Black Creek. The area is unlikely to be developed due to the wetlands surrounding the Black Creek. Thel location ofthes site will have little impact on local traffic patterns. The Storage units attracts little traffic due to the infrequent usage. An exterior  maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;  primary access road will be along an existing utility easement.  38    lighting and security system will be present to monitor incoming traffic. The The project intended is to blend into the existing natural beauty ofthe land. No land will be cleared with the twenty feet (20') set back along the property lines. The buildings are set back off the road. The building will be located outside the utility easement which will reduce the visibility from the road. The exterior boundary fence will bel black chain link fence with no barbwire. A small business 2. That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 and with all applicable regulations; Applicant: With smaller houses being built on smaller lots, individuals find themselves in need to store their personal belongings such as furniture, tools, equipment, and clothing in storage. These storage units are intended to have _The design plan is to place solar power panels on the tops of the storage units to supply electrical energy for the project. If a commercial agreement can be achieved with the electrical grid operator, the solar power panels will provide energy to the power grid. These: storage units could be providing electrical power 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use or development Applicant The operation of the facility would be seven (7) days a week during daylight hours. Generally, there is little traffic impact due to the storage unit business. Once customers offload their items, they return only to retrieve them on an as needed basis. The office will be maintained on a part time basis which will provide moving supplies and answer questions for customers. A parking area will provide access to the office area. The office will have water and sewer allow 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development Applicant: As new and existing land development along the Highway 210 corridor, the community will be served by having additional storage space for climate and non-climate personal possession. Buildings offset from the highway, utility easement and natural landscape buffer will minimize the exposure from Highway 210. The project will use clean renewable energy to support the project. Ifa commercial agreement can be reached with local grid provider, the project will provide energy to many local homes and businesses in the community.  exterior lighting will not affect local community.  sign will be posted near the highway.  climate and non-climate control units available to the public.  to the adjoining communities.  isa aj public necessity;  for customers.  policies as adopted by the Board ofCommissioners.  Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information  39    1. Please Provide the purpose oft the district, aj project narrative, and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district. Applicant: This conditional zoning area is limited toi indoor, climate and non-climate control storage units for eight (8) of the thirty four (34) acres. Future development for the remaining land could occur. At this time, for this permit, thes scope of the project are storage units.  2. Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district:  Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding communily and the environment. Staff the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. Please lisl any conditions that you propose, as the applicant, below.  Applicant: underbrush. retention ponds.  1. Screening of storage unit will be natural undisturbed trees and 2. Internal roads and parking area will be permeable stone in accordance with DEQ standards to minimize dust and water 3. Exterior lights will be directed toward thel building away from the  street to minimize lights exposure to the street.  Conditions:  1. Proposed uses: Indoor Storage Buildings. (Proposed by Applicant) 2. Screening of storage unit will be natural undisturbed trees and underbrush. (Proposed by Applicant) 3. Internal roads and parking area will be permeable stone in accordance with DEQ standards to minimize dust and water retention ponds. (Proposed by Applicant) 4. Normal Business hours 7am-10pm Monday-Sunday. (Proposed by 5. Exterior lights will be directed toward the building away from the street to minimize lights exposure to the street. (Proposed by 6. The development shall conform to all requirements oft the Johnston 7. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the 8. A Class B (2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9: shrubs every 100 linear feet)  Applicant) Applicant)  County Land Development Code. Planning and Zoning Department Staff. landscape buffer  40    shall be installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside ofany fencing. (existing vegetation may be used) 9. All signage shall comply with the Johnston County sign code. 10. All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal, State, and 12. Any lighting will be dark sky or down lighting sO as not to shine onto  Local agencies. 11. Secure an NCDOT driveway permit. adjacent properties.  Discussion Items:  There were three written decisions for the Board's review.  The MacLehose at Little River Owner: Jeffrey P. Hawley Developer: Corbentz, LLC Surveyor: Alsey J. Gilbert, PLS Acreage/Lots: 80.64 acres, 63 lots Tax ID #: 16L02028 Address: 13756 NC Hwy 96 The Board reviewed the written decision.  Upon ai motion by Ms. Holmes to approve the written decision for The MacLehose at Little River, seconded by Mr. Crenshaw, and carried by a unanimous vote of 7-0, the written decision for The MacLehose at Little River was approved as presented at the. July 16, 2024  Planning Board Meeting. Turlington Tract  Owner: Long Rock Land Development, LLC, Tony & Diane Johnson  Developer: Benson Hardee Road-Lan, LLC Surveyor: Freedom Firm, PC Acreage/Lots: 32.34 acres, 33 lots Tax ID #: 01D07029, 01D07030 Address: 3020 & 3902 Benson-Hardee Rd. The Board reviewed the written decision.  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve the written decision for Turlington Tract, seconded by Mr. Sasser, and carried by a unanimous vote of7-0, the written decision for Turlington Tract was approved as presented at the. July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting.  Big Pine 2  Owner: Cloudbreak Investments, LLC Developer: Cloudbreak Investments, LLC Surveyor: Adams & Hodge Engineering, PC Acreage/Lots: 10.89 acres, 91 lots Tax ID #: 05G04049F Address: 100 Block ofBig Pine Rd.  41    The Board reviewed the written decision.  Upon a motion by Ms. Holmes to approve the written decision for Big Pine 2, seconded by Ms. Howard, and carried by a unanimous vote of7-0, the written decision for Big Pine 2 was approved as presented at the July 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting.  The meeting ended at 9:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted by:  Jodie Gay, Secretary for the Board  42    Selma Residential Owner: Jeanne & Scott Penny Developer: Brad Gordon Surveyor: Austin Jackson, Kimley-Horn Tax ID# #: 11M08025, 11M08025D, & 11M08026B Address: 752 Old Moore Rd. Latifude/Longitude: 35.62169,-78.27429  Locational Data: 752 Old Moore Rd. (SR 1720) in O'Neals Township. The proposed subdivision is Sitel Data: 24.99 acres, 22 lots, (maximum allowable density: 36), water service shall be provided by Johnston County public water and lots willl be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided: fee-in-lieu, open space required: $22,000, traffic count: 500 vpd (2019), property owners notified: 17.  served by the North Side Fire District and the THS Rescue Squad.  Additional Information:  o School District: The Student Generation Ratio (SGR) is 0.53. Therefore, Selma Residential Subdivision will generate approximately 12 K-12 students split amongst the The following is based on the Out-of-Capacity Table provided by ORED.  three schools below.  District Selma ES Selma MS Corinth-Holders HS asn needing Improvement.  Capacity 850 552 1731  Enrollment 756 334 2219  CTP: This portion ofOld Moore Rd. does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan Environmentally Sensitive District: This parcel is not within the ESA; however: a floodplain  appears on a small portion oft the parcel.  Staff] Recommendation: Preliminary approval. subject to the following conditions and requirements  Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of 30,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds 4. Certifications 5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval 7. All lots shall access internal streets 8. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 9. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 11. Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording 12. Show to whom open space is dedicated 13. Provide 20' fee simple access to open space  10. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance (DM Sec  7,L. item 8)  14. Provide utility easements along alll lot lines in accordance with LDC: Sec. 14-75 (d)(3) 15. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster box b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services.  mail receptacle units:  a. CBU shall not impede the flow oftraffic.    CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  [Environmental Health]  16. Approval ofall lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot 17. A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 18. All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina 19. Itw will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any road  [NCDOT]  construction Highways  improvements will be required  [Public Utilities]  20. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 21. Stormwater Statement Required jurisdictional features and buffers.  22. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as well as any 23. Property is limited to 15% impervious area without stormwater management. 24. Construction plans willl have to be submitted and approved for waterline construction.  [Emergency Services] 25. Provide topographic information. 26. Provide cul-de-sac detail. 27. Provide a fire flow test.  28. Provide fire hydrant distribution plan/layout.    a    MAVORSUBDIVISION REVIEW  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 3091 E. Markct Strect,S Smithficld, NC 27577 Phonc (919) 989-5150 Fax (919)989-5426  APPLICATION POICTINTOIAION Date Submitted:  epnoNcoNypas  BEFORE 4:30F P.M.  Subdivision Name: Selma Residential Property Owner Name: Jeanne Penny, Scoll Penny Developer Name: Brad Gordon Surveyor/Eingineer: Austin Jackson Email: inpcsomehmeylamn.con  Phonc: Phone: 919-427-3736 Phone: 919-678-4178 Fax:. N/A  SITE) DATA  Location: Old Moore Road Selma, North Carolina Tax ID: 11M08025, 11M08025D, 11M08026B Total Acrcage: 1,088,438 SF (24.99AC) Number ofLots: 22 Amenitics Provided: Yes Water Supply: Johnston County SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTS 1. Completed Application 2. Fcc (4-71 lots: $250 + $12.50/lot)  (State Road &i Number," Township)  Open Space Required: 108,843 SF (2.49AC) Open Space Provided: 108,843 SF (2.49AC) Open Space Fcc-: $1,000.00 per lot cffcctive 9/1/2021 Sewage Type: Septic" Tanks and Septic Fields  No  Amount of Open Space outside Wetlands or Buffers: 108,843SF (2.49AC  2--14/4:00  41S a  (8+ lots: $1000 + $18.75/lot)  3. 2-FOLDED 18, x 24 copies oft the preliminary- plat 4. 10-FOLDED 11x1 17 copies of the preliminary plat  5. Stormwater Statement  6. Certified TIA required for those proposed subdivisions with 100 or greater lots. Applicant's TIA must cither be performedby the County consultant, or reviewedby the County's consultant. TIA fees and/or revicw fces must be paid by the applicant. Developments requiringa'TIA cannot be  placed on an agenda until a' TIA is conducted/tevicved by the consultant.  All owners of property to be considered for this application must sign bclow this statement indicating their knowledge and agreement that all of or a portion of their property is being considered for potential development. Also, allowing County staff access to the property whilc conducting the revicw of this proposal  development: Owner(s) Signature  Date  6pg/44 67828    Staff Useonly:  FEE:. SUBMITTAL DATE: RECEIVEDBY  4  Please copy for your records  2024    Kimley>>Horn  July1,2024 Johnston County Planning Department 309 E. Market Street, Smithfield, NC: 27577  RE: Selma Residential- - Stormwater Letter  The project is located at Old Moore Road Selma, NC (PIN Numbers: 261800-51-5720, 261800-51- 9773, 261800-51-7095). The three lots are currently undergoing a recombination and minor subdivision sO the basis oft this subdivision will be one lot totaling 24.99 acres as shown in the attached plans. The new PIN number to be determined. This project proposes subdividing the 24.99 acre lot into a 22-lot subdivision. The nitrogen export accounts for the full site area prior to minor and major subdivision and The Site Plan for the Selma Residential proposes a total impervious area of 2.99 acres. This totals 8.31% of the total site which is less than the 15% max impervious for this project to qualify as low density. Calculations Two scenarios have been calculated for nitrogen export from the site with one being the proposed impervious of 2.99 acres and one being the maximum 15% impervious threshold which is 5.40 acres of impervious. Since the project is proposing less than 3.6 Iblaclyr export no stormwater best management practice (BMP) or offset payment will be required in accordance with Section 4.3 of the Johnston County Stormwater Design Manual. Nitrogen export calculations can be Please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 678-4178 or Austn.Jackson@kmley-hom.com,  totals 36.00 existing acres.  found within Appendix A.  should you or your staff have any questions.  Sincerely, H J. Austin Jackson, PE Project Engineer  CAROL SEAL 052560, STIN  Kmley-hon.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC27601  919677200    Appendix A    Nitrogen Loading Calculation Worksheet  Project Name: SELMA RESIDENTIAL Date: 6/24/2024 By:, JAJ  Checked By:  For Quantifying TNE Export from Residential Industrial Commercial Dovelopments when Footprints of alll Imporvious Surfaces are Shown  Impervious Area 5.40 TN from! Imporvious Area 114.49 Open Space (acres)- 30.60 TNf from Open Space 36.72 Total Area (acres)= 36.00 TN from development 151.21  (acres)=  (Ibs)= (Ibs)= (A) before treatment (Ib)= TNf from dovelopment bofore troatment (Iblaclyr)- (2) Area (acres) 0.17 (2) Area (acres) 30.60 5.40 (2) (3) (acres) export (3)*Reduction coeff.  4.20  Predevelopment (1) Typec ofL Land Cover Impervlous Surfaces Postdevelopment Bypass (1) Type ofL Land Cover Pervlous Surfaces Impervious Surfaces Postdevelopment to BMPs (1)  15%  (4) %  Type ofL Land Cover Area TN Column (2)*  Pervious Surfaces 0.00 1.20 0.00 WETH POND( (30%) Impervious Surfaces 0.00 21.20 0.00 WETF POND (30%) Impervlous Surfaces 0.00 21.20 0.00 POST SF UNTREATED Area (acros)= 36.00 Treatment (Iblyr)= 151.21 Imp% ofl Total 0.15 TNExport Coef (Ib/aclyr) 4.20 Total Nitrogen Export 'Total Nitrogen Export (Ibs)  Pervious Surfaces 0.00 1.20 Total Apportioned Apportioned Area: Nitrogon Control (Iblaclyr) 4.20  0.00 TN'Loading After ((A)- Column (4))  POSTSF UNTREATED  4236)36.00AC-30y. 648/ Ibs  $ 28.35 $ 18,372.83    Nitrogen Loading Calculation Worksheet  Project Name: SELMARESIDENTIAL Date: 6/24/2024 By:, JAJ  Checked By:  For Quantifying TNE Exportf from Residential, /Industrial Commercial Developments when Footprints ofa alll Impervious Surfaces are Shown  Impervious Area 2.99 TN from Imporvious Area 63.44 Open Spaco (acres)- 33.01 TNf from Open Space 39.61 Total Area (acres)- 36.00 TN from development 103.05  (acros)"-  (Ibs)= (Ibs)= (A) before treatment (ib)= TN from dovelopment bofore treatment (Iblaclyr)- (2) Area (acres) 0.18 (2) Area (acres) 33.01 2.99 (2) (3) (acres) export (3)* *Reduction coeff.  2.86  Prodevalopment (1) Type of Land Cover Impervlous Surfaces Postdovalopment Bypass (1) Typo ofL Land Cover Pervious Surfaces Impervious Surfaces Postdevelopment to BMPs (1)  8.31%  (4) % 0.00 WET POND( (30%) 0.00 TNLoading After [(A)- Column (4))  Type ofLand Cover Area TN Column (2)* Pervious Surfaces 0.00 1.20 Pervious Surfaces 0.00 1.20 Total Apportioned Apportioned. Area: Nitrogen Control (Ib/aclyr) 2.86  Impervious Surfaces 0.00 21.20 0.00 WETH POND( (30%) Impervious Surfaces 0.00 21.20 0.00 POSTS SF UNTREATED Area (acres)= 36.00 Treatment (Iblyr)= 103.05 Imp% ofl Total 0.08 TNE Export Coef (Iblaclyr) 2.86 Total Nitrogen Export 'Total Nitrogon Export( (bs)  POSTSFL UNTREATED  2.86-3.96.00AC0y -7961 Ibs $  28.35 $ (22,579.93)    Appendix B    VANYO HIRON AINO) NISNN OT'AOPASTINVAIB VoI0aNaNA TVIINEGISIH VWT3S  snoiA83dWI AadJdd  WIOHAajuy    vaysy, HIRON A1A9S OT'AOTAITINVAIS HOJOINARNA TVILNEGISI8 VWTES  snoiAdEdAI ABQ.SOd  WIOHAajuy  y    S I 3  E  SELMA RESIDENTIAL PREPAREDFOR BRANTLEYJOY,LLC CSICICONIY  12324  Kimley>Horn  COVER SHEET    SELMA RESIDENTIAL PREPAREDFOR BRANTLEYJOY,LLC XISICACONIY  KimleyHorn  GENERAL NOTES    BE  RE  SERE    0  BN  SELMA RESIDENTIAL PREPAREOFOR BRANTLEYJOY,LLC XISICNCOVNIY  EXISITING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN  Kimley>>Horn    EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITIONI PLAN OVERALL  SELMA RESIDENTIAL PREPAREDFCI BRANTLEYJOY,LLC MASSICNCOVNNY  KimleyHorn    BE  PAAPAPARDAAADARA KimleyHorn  SELMA RESIDENTIAL PREPAREDFOR BRANTLEYJOY,LLC AISICNCCVY  SITE PLAN    Parrish Memorial Rd. Tract Owner: Linda V. Lassiter Family Estate' Trust Developer: RRT Development, LLC Surveyor: Stocks Engineering, PA Tax ID #: 10008016 Address: 600 Block of Parrish Memorial Rd. Latifude/Longitude: 35.53003,-78.18654  Locational Data: Parrish Memorial Rd. (SR 2364) between Batten Farm Rd. (SR 2363) and Cardinal Country Club Rd. (SR 2365) in Micro Township. The proposed subdivision is served by the Site Data: 38.94 acres, 35 lots, (maximum allowable density: 56), water service shall be provided by Johnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided: fee-in-lieu, open space required: $35,000, traffic count: not available, property owners notified: 23.  Micro Fire District and thel North Johnston Rescue Squad.  Additional Information:  School District: The Student Generation Ratio (SGR) is 0.57. Therefore, Parrish Memorial Rd. Tract Subdivision will generate approximately 201 K-12 students split The following is based on the Out-of-Capacity Table provided by ORED.  amongst the three schools below.  District Micro ES North Johnston MS North Johnston HS  Capacity 442 826 863  Enrollment 412 599 803  CTP: This portion of Parrish Memorial Rd. does not appear ont the Comprehensive Reverse Frontage. Lots: Reverse frontage buffers are required for lots backing up to Direct Driveway access on Batten Farm Rd.: Major subdivisions to be located on al local road shall be SO designed that there shall be no more than one direct residential driveway connection per 500 feet along the same side oft the local road, unless it can be demonstrated that the proposed subdivision cannot be physically designed, that no reasonable alternative exists, or it would create an unreasonable hardship without a corresponding public benefit toj prohibit individual driveway access onto a local road.  Transportation Plan as needing improvement. Cardinal Country Club Rd.  *Also, from, Johnston Co. land design manual: 4(+)1 Lots: Developments creating 4 or more lots:  (1) Where no easement exists, and where the parent tract(s) have direct road frontage, an easement shall not be allowed. The development must dedicate a right-of-way meeting the A waiver may be allowed if determined by the Planning Board tbat, in pursuit of lhis. section, a bardship is crealed upon the proper!y that provides no benefit to the. safely, we/far, and qualily of lije of the public. Staff] Recommendation: Denial, due to less than 500 ft ofdriveway. separation and lack ofa dedicatedi right-of-way meeting.Jolmsion Co. standards) for a Major. subdivision, for lots on Batten  requirements of this section.  Farm. Rd.    Conditions and Requirements [Planningl  1. All lots must be a minimum of 30,000 sf. 2. Complete flood plain information 3. Metes & bounds 4. Certifications 5. Entrance sign & street signs 6. Street name approval  7. Cul-de-sac lots must have 40' road frontage 8. Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 10. Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Cardinal Country Club Rd. 12. Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording  9. Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance (DM Sec 11. Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for shared maintenance on 13. Provide utility easements along alll lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec. 14-75 (d)(3) 14. Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design ofa and utilization of cluster box b. CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance ofu utility services.  7,L. item 8) Final Plat  mail receptacle units:  a. CBU: shall not impede the flow oft traffic. CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements.  Environmental Health]  15. Approval ofall lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot 16. A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to 17. All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina 18. Itwill be determined at the time the driveway permit application iss submitted if any road  [NCDOT]  construction  Highways  improvements will be required  [Public Utilities]  19. Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 20. Stormwater Statement Required jurisdictional features and buffers.  21. Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan ifany are present as well as any 22. Property is limited to 15% impervious area without stormwater management. 23. Waterline extension to serve Street A and Street B will be required. 24. Construction plans willl have to be submitted and approved for waterline construction.  [Emergency Services] 25. Provide topographic information. 26. Provide: a fire flow test. 27. Provide fire hydrant distribution plan/layout.    84    MAJOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 3091 E. Market Street, Smithfield, NC27577 Phone (919) 989-5150 Fax (919)989-5426 phasocom/Pmang  APPLICATION MORCTINTOEMATION Date Submitted: 7/1/24  BEFORE430PM  Subdivision Name: Parrish Memorial Road Subdivision Property Owner Name: Linda V. Lassiter Family Estate Trust Phone: Developer Name: RRT Development, LLC Surveyot/Engineer, Stocks Engineering, PA Email: eaverete@stocksengineering.com  Phone: 919-880-0058 Phonet 252-459-8196 Fax: 252-459-8197  SITEDATA  Location: Parrish Memorial Road (SR 2364), Micro  &1 Number,' Township)  Tax ID:24400-18-2364 Total Acreage 38.94 Ac. Number ofLots: 35 Water Supply: Public SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENIS 1. Completed. Application 2. Fee (4-7 lots: $250 + $12.50/lot)  DOobe  Open Space Required: 5.84 Ac. (15%) Open Space Provided:0.0 Ac. Sewage Type-Private Septic  Amenities Provided: OYes No Amount of Open Space outside Wetlands or Buffers: OAc.  Open Space Fee-: $1,000.00 perl lot effective 9/1/2021  (8+ lots: $1000 + $18.75/lot)  3. 2-FOLDED 18 x 24 copies oft the preliminary plat 4. 10-FOLDED 11x1 17 copies of the preliminary plat  5. Stormwater Statement 5. Certified"  EGEV 041720  TIA required for those proposed subdivisions with 100 or greater) lots. Applicapts TIA must either be performedby the County consultant, or reviewedby the County's consultants 6EA TIA fees and/or review fees must be paid by the applicant. Developments requiringa TIA cannot be All owners of property to be considered for this application must sign below this statement indicating their knowledge and agreement that all of of a portion of their property is being considered for potential development. Also, allowing County staffaccess to thej property while conducting the review of this proposal  placed on an agenda until a TIA: is conducted/revieved by the consultant.  development: Olyncr)Sigature X -  Date X 7/1124  OHA  StaffUse Only.  FEE SUBMITTALDATE RECEIVED:BY  Please copy for your records  2024    25 1999 2024  STOCKS ENGINEERING  RE: Parrish Memorial Road Subdivision Stormwater Statement  The Parrish Memorial Road Subdivision property consists of approximately 38.94 acres with 35 Lots proposed for development. The development plans have reserved 0.0 acres of open  space and will pay the fee in lieu for the open space requirement.  Impervious Calculation:  With the streets taking up 1.25 acres of impervious area and assuming each lot develops with maximum allowed 5,500 SF impervious area per lott thet totali impervious area will be 5.67 Ac. This is below the 15% impervious exemption of 5.84 Ac. acres. This site is not located in the Environmentally Sensitive Area. Therefore, there are no stormwater detention measures proposed for this development. Stormwater will be directed to discharge through scour holes into an existing drainage pattern toward the ditch that runs through the middle of the property.    sg  PARRISH MEMORIAL ROAD: SUBDIVISION JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA  STOCKS ENGINEERING  FOD as-s    STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE: 24-19  Rezoning Petition: Petition to rezone a 1.2 acre tract located 91571 US Highway 301 S. int the Elevation Township from Community Business-Special Use District (CB-SUD) to Agricultural Residential (AR).  Tax ID: 01G10014T Owner: Jeffrey & Tammy Hutchens Applicant: Jeffrey & Tammy Hutchens Utilities & Services:  Wynn Fire District and Four Oaks Rescue Squad. Existing and Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning: real estate office and auction house  Existing Land Use: Zoned Community Business-Special Use District (CB-SUD) and approved for a Surrounding Land Uses: Zoned AR and used for residential and agricultural purposes.  Traffic Concerns: capacity. Land Use Plan:  Traffic count for this portion ofUS Hwy 301 Si is 3,900 vpd (2021). This portion of US Hwy 301 S appears on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as a major thoroughfare with adequate design  This area is located within a designated "Agricultural Area Placetype" on the County's Envision Johnston  Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Staff Comments and Recommendation: Number of notices sent: 4.  STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL based on the following consistency statement.  Statement  This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan "Envision Johnston 2040" int that it takes away the commercial designation and takes it back to its original Agriculural/Residential designation.    Ro Bo B MCLLCV Ai DN SDR Bo    d0  GJ  4    HollowOakD  o 0 - 4 N    24-19  NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, 24-19 Johnatono For! County Information Planning Please Zoning Contact Dmpun (919) 989-5150  CASE: mhe  AUGA 2024  AUG/S 9/2024    REZONING & CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION IPPCINTNIORLTION  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 309) E. Market Strcet, Smithficld, NC27577 Phone (919) 989-5150 Fax (919)9 989-5426 gphsonecomP.mng  Name of Applicant/Petitionet:; Rmn7y HicACu5  Mailing Address of Applicant:, 9555Huy 3015 Faur Oaks  do-as7-o Email: TOaawhycoA PROPIRTY INFORMLITION Owners Name(s): SeIGmap, Hckens  Faxi  Mailing Addrcss of Owner:. FlssusHuy 3015 forraaks Site Address: 9157 USHuy 3015 feuroaks  Tp2-257-1B9 TaxI IDI M-AIGI0QI4T State) Road #: 301 Sothn Township:. Fevotion LONING INTORMITION Current Zoning District(s):. CB-CL Acres Being Rezoned:  Email  Decd] Book 0475 Pager 0585  Requested Zoning) District:. AR Total Acres inl Parcel:. 1.2  CONDTIONLLZONING INFORLATION Prrequesting Conditional. Loning, please (ill onL this secnon ind Payes2-3.)  List Requested Uses: Going 76 hesiclento  SUBMITTAL. REQUIREVENTS 1. Completed. Application 2. Zoning Fee: (Less then 3. Acres: $375.00)  (3.01 -6.00 Acres: $625.00) (6.01-+ Acres: $1250.00 + $18.75/Acre)  3. (2)-FOLDED: 18x24 & (10)-FOLDED: 11x1 17 copies oft the preliminaryplat Certified' TIA required for developments with 100 peak hour trips or 1000 or more  SSEPA  must either be performed by the County consultant, or reviewed by the County's consultant. TIA' fees and/or revicw fecs must bej paid by thc applicant. Developments requiring A'TIA cannot bc placcd on an agenda until: a'TIAis Icertify on this date, 7118104 that all the information presented in this petition/application is accurate to thc best of my knowledge, information and belief. Furhety,Iunderstand. that should this petition/application be approved by the Johnston County Board of Commissioners, no site activity can take place until a sitc plan and/or any other land development permits arc issucd.. Additionally, I allow county staff access to the petition property whilc conducting review  conducted/revicwed byt thc consultant.  CERTIHICATION OF APPIICANT IND/OR PROPERTY OWNER  ofthis petition. gNs a UICANTIS)  DATHIZ-18-2Y DAn-24    StaffUse, Ouly:  FEE: SUPMITALDATE: RECBIVEDBY  24-19  Pleasd copyforyour vocords  2024    STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE24-20  Rezoning Petition: Petition to rezone a 27.86 acre tract located int the 2500 Block ofThanksgiving Fire Rd. in the O'Neals' Township from Agricultural Residential (AR) to General Busines-Condtional  Zoning (GB-CZ). Tax ID: 16L05030E Owner: Black & Grey LLC Applicant: Lipscomb Development  Conditional Zoning Request: Multiple General Business uses.  Utilities & Services:  North Side Fire District and Thanksgiving Rescue Squad.  Existing and Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning:  Existing Land Use: Zoned Agricultural Residential (AR) and is vacant land.  Surrounding Land Uses: Zoned AR and used for residential and agricultural purposes and fire station. Zoned GB-SUD: and is approved fora a Dollar General and a storage facility. Zoned GB and  is going to be al hardware store and a storage facility.  Traffic Concerns:  Traffic count for this portion of Thanksgiving Fire Rd. is 900 vpd (2019). This portion of Thanksgiving Fire Rd. does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as needing  improvement.  Land Use Plan:  This area is located within a designated "Rural Crossroads" Future Land Use Placetype on the Envision Johnston 2040 County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This denotes an areai in which state roads meet other major roads in rural areas. Uses typically include convenience retail, food outlets, restaurants, etc.  Staff Comments and Recommendation: Number of notices sent: 5.  STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL based on the following consistency statement.  Consistency Statement  This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that it is located within a designated "Rural Crossroads" Future Land Use Placetype on the Envision Johnston 2040 County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This denotes an area in which state roads meet other major roads in rural areas. Uses typically include convenience retail, food outlets, restaurants, etc. The request is reasonable in that the proposed zoning is compatible with  surrounding land uses and zoning districts.  Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions:  1. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain or promote the Applicant: The subject property is well located to expand the commercial offerings of the intersection and  public health, safety, and general welfare;    meet the demands oft the rapidly growing region for businesses and services. The development of commercial uses at this site fulfills the vision of the Future Land Use Map, which envisions the area as a commercial center 9"rural crossroads") The result will be less traffic and miles traveled as people will not have to drive The intersection ofThanksgiving Fire Rd. and Hwy 42 East is slated to be improved as a roundabout by NCDOT. This will greatly improve the accessibility and safety of visitors to the proposed business plaza. The property is already serving commercial uses, as a portion of the site will house off-site septic systems As shown on the site plan, the site will be an extension of and associated with the commercial area immediately south, which is zoned General Business and is currently under construction as a Hudson's Hardware and multiple attractive flexible use commercial buildings. The properties will connect with The design of the property envisions mini- and outdoor-storage on the eastern portion of the property, intentionally situated well back from the street to reduce visual impacts from the right of way. Enhanced buffers are provided to shield non-commercially zoned adjacent properties from any undesirable impacts, with buffers greatly exceeding the minimum buffer standards of similar development types. For example, when a business use abuts a residentially zoned property, the minimum bufferi is 10'- this project Buffers are proposed to be further enhanced with evergreen plantings as needed: a condition has been added that the site will be evaluated to determine where existing vegetation may not provide adequate visual The site has been evaluated for adequate septic soils, and ample land has been preserved for septic systems 2. That the use oft the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations ofA Articles II & IVofthe. Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 and with Applicant: This property designi isaj physical extension ofthe commercial: area to the: south, hichiscurrently The proposed uses of this conditional zoning-GB district are a limited selection from the list of permitted uses within the General Business zoning district and represent uses anticipated for the commercial Uses were: selected that are: anticipated to be well-needed and utilized by thes surrounding area. Theselection will allow for a range of uses including various retail, office, and service-oriented businesses. The sitel layout 3. That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain or enhance the Applicant The site is designed as a physical extension of the commercial development abutting it to the south, and a condition is proposed to require building design and site landscaping consistency. As such, it will be a The scale of the project and the site to the south is intentionally smaller in scale, utilizing multiple buildings instead ofl larger buildings to best integrate with the more rural character oft the surrounding area. The storage uses shown on thes site plan are intentionally set well back from the street to reduce visual impacts from the public right of way, and greatly enhanced buffers are proposed between the site and adjacent non- 4. That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County's Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development policies as adopted by the Board ofCommissioners. Applicant: The subject property is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which designates this area as on the Future Land Use Map as "Rural Crossroads." These "crossroads" are envisioned as commercial areas at crossroads of major roads, serving the relatively rural regional community. Uses are The final engineered site plan will be reviewed to ensure it will meet all applicable Johnston County ordinances, including applicable state and federal rules regarding transportation, utilities, environmental  so far to meet their needs.  for the commercial area abutting the property to the south.  vehicular connection points, enhancing vehicular access and safety.  envisions up to 60' of undisturbed buffer, as shown on the site plan.  screening and evergreen plantings will be added.  to serve both this and the commercial property immediately south.  all applicable regulations;  under construction and zoned General Business.  development as a whole.  will naturally restrict the scale ofany uses.  value ofcontiguous property, or that the use or development is aj public necessity; seamless visual connection to that site and will noti impact the character of that: area.  commercially zoned properties.  limited to those that will best serve the needs ofthe surrounding community.    preservation, and stormwater management.  Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information  1.  Please Provide the purpose oft the district, aj project narrative, and a list of proposed land uses to be Applicant: District Purpose: The purpose of the Thanksgiving Plaza Conditional Zoning-General Business district is to create a commercial development that will serve: as a natural extension oft the commercial site to the south, currently under construction. The Conditional Zoning-General Business district allows for: assured consistency ofq quality design and site layout with that oft the commercial property to the south. The district also allows for a limited set of uses to best reflect the Rural Crossroads designation and ensure that undesirable uses are prohibited. Project Narrative: Thel Future Land Usel Map adopted by. Johnston County has identified this property and others at this intersection as a site supportive of "Rural Crossroads" commercial development. With this in mind and combined with thei immediate demand for commercial growth to serve the rapidly growing residential population in this area, the development team has formed the  allowed within the conditional zoning district.  Thanksgiving Plaza Conditional Zoning proposal.  Thel Project consist of:  Multiple commercial roadfront buildings creating a maximum of 25,000 sfof commercial flexible space. The design will mimic the high quality design of the under-construction The project also includes mini-storage and outdoor storage interior to the site, well set back Overall, the project meets known demand for commercial activity and storage in the area in the way that implements the Future Land Use Map, creates an attractive development site, and respects  buildings to the south. from the road.  adjacent properties.  Thanksgiving Fire Road Conditional Zoning Allowed Uses:  Uses shall bel limited to the following uses. A variety of uses are proposed to account for the multitude of neighborhood businesses and services that are: suitable for flexible commercial space in a The following categories are taken from the List of Permitted Uses-General Business in the Johnston All uses and accessory uses shall bes subject to the screening, buffering, and other applicable  rural crossroads location. County Code ofOrdinances.  standards of the Johnston County Code of Ordinances.  Allowed Uses:  Automotive Parts Sales stored overnight. Bakery-Retail Bank  Automotive repair-Mechanical: Limited to a maximum of2,000 sf, no more than 8 vehicles Automotive Repair-Paint/Body. Visually damaged vehicles under or awaiting repairs shall be  subject to open storage screening requirements. Barber/Beauty Shop to include. Nail Salon Building Materalwsmppic-keta. Sales  Business-Office    Business-Retail Business-Wholesale  Cemetery-there is an existing cemetery on thes site which shall remain undisturbed.  Contractor's Office w/Storage Yard. Dry Cleaning Establishment Feed & Seed Sales Heating & Air Conditioning Shop LandscapimgNursery Sales Medical Clinic Mini-Storage sufficiently screened with landscaping) Parcel Post Shipping/Receiving Pharmacies Physical Fitness Center Place of Worship Plumbing-Hieating Supply Offices and Storage Area Printing/Reproduction/Pubishing Recreation-Indoor Recreation-Outdoor Restaurant Spa-Day Sporting Goods Tanning Salon Thrift Sfore-Apparl/lonelod Tire ale-Non-Dstributimg Veterinary Clinic  Day Carel Facility-Child. Limited to a maximum of 5,000: sf.  Open Storage (perimeter screening shall be provided via 8 fence that shall be opaque or  School-Montessori or other Educational  Warehouse Facility/Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of 30,000 sf.  2.  Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district:  Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions andi requirements may be addedwhich may assis! in mitigating the impacis the development may have on the: surrounding communily andi the environment. Staff, the Plaming Board, and Board ofCommissioners. may propose additional conditions during the review process. Please list any conditions that you propose, as the applicant, below.  Applicant: Proposed Conditions:  1. Site plan and engineering approval shall be required prior to site construction. Final site plan design shall be consistent with the design depicted in the Conditional Zoning site plan. 2. Building design and site landscaping shall be consistent with that of the parcel development 4. Toe enhance visual screening between the property and adjacent lots, buffers between the subject property and adjacent non-commercial lots shall be increased beyond the minimum required by the ordinance in effect at the time of the Conditional Zoning approval and shall be consistent with  immediately south.  3. The cemetery located on the property shall remain undisturbed.  thei increased widths indicated on the associated site plan. 5. Uses shall bel limited to the following uses and standards:  Automotive Parts Sales stored overnight.  Automotive repair-Mechanical: Limited to a maximum of2,000 sf, no more than 8 vehicles Automotive Repair-Paint/Body. Visually damaged vehicles under or awaiting repair shall be  subject to open storage screening requirements.    Bakery-Retail Bank  Barber/Beauty Shop to include Nail Salon Building Materalsupplc-kctal Sales  Business-Office Business-Retail Business-Wholesale  Cemetery-there is an existing cemetery on the site which shall remain undisturbed.  Contractor's Office w/Storage Yard. Dry Cleaning Establishment Feed & Seed Sales Heating & Air Conditioning Shop LandscapigNursery Sales Medical Clinic Mini-Storage sufficiently screened with landscaping) Parcel Post Shipping/Reciving Pharmacies Physical Fitness Center Place of Worship Plumbing-Heating Supply Offices and Storage Area Printing/Reproduction/Pubishing Recreation-Indoor Recreation-Outdoor Restaurant Spa-Day Sporting Goods Tanning Salon Thrift Slere-Apparllouschola Tire Sale-Non-Dstributmng Veterinary Clinic  Day Care Facility-Child. Limited to a maximum of 5,000 sf.  Open Storage (perimeter screening shall be provided via 8' fence that shall be opaque or  School-Montessori or other Educational  Warehouse Facllity/Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of 30,000 sf.  Conditions:  1. Site plan and engineering approval shall be required prior to: site construction. Final site plan design shall be consistent with the design depicted in the Conditional Zoning site plan. (Proposed by 2. Building design and site landscaping shall be consistent with that of the parcel development 3. The cemetery located on the property shall remain undisturbed. (Proposed by Applicant) 4. To enhance visual screening between the property and adjacent lots, buffers between the subject property and adjacent non-commercial lots shall be increased beyond the minimum required by the ordinance in effect at the time of the Conditional Zoning approval and shall be consistent with the increased widths indicated on the associated site plan. (Proposed by Applicant) 5. Uses shall be limited to thei following uses and standards: (Proposed by Applicant)  Applicant)  immediately south. (Proposed by Applicant)  Automotive Parts Sales overnight.  Automotive repair-Mechanical: Limited to a maximum of2,000 sf, no more than 8 vehicles stored Automotive Repair-Paint/Body. Visually damaged vehicles under or awaiting repair shall be    subject to open storage screening requirements. Barber/Beauty Shop to include Nail Salon Building Materalssuppics-kcta. Sales  Bakery-Retail Bank  Business-Office Business-Retail Business-Wholesale  Cemetery-there is an existing cemetery on the site which shall remain undisturbed.  Contractor's Office w/Storage Yard. Dry Cleaning Establishment Feed & Seed Sales Heating & Air Conditioning Shop Landscaping/Nursery Sales Medical Clinic Mini-Storage screened with landscaping) Parcel Post Shipping/Receiving Pharmacies Physical Fitness Center Place of Worship Pumbing-Heating Supply Offices and Storage Area Mutipephsdwaiaing Recreation-Indoor Recreation-Outdoor Restaurant Spa-Day Sporting Goods Tanning Salon Thrift Siore-ApparelPouseod Tire Sales-Non-Distributing Veterinary Clinic  Day Care Facility-Child. Limited to a maximum of 5,000 sf.  Open Storage (perimeter screening shall be provided via 8' fence that shall be opaque or sufficiently  School-Montessori or other Educational  Warehouse Facility/Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of3 30,000 sf.  6. C The development shall conform to all requirements of the. Johnston County Land Development Code. 7. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by thel Planning and 8. A Class B( (2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9: shrubs every 100 linear feet) landscape buffer shall be installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside of any fencing. (existing 10. All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal, State, and Local agencies.  Zoning Department Staff. vegetation may be used)  9. All signage shall comply with the. Johnston County sign code.  11. Secure an NCDOT driveway permit.    GWEAT  AA    @ Ee  SMAS    24-20  NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SASE 24-20 t n o aowant Planninga E (919) 989-5150  2024  Asosey LOUA    REZONING & CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION PPLICANT INTFORMATION  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 3091 E. Market Street, Smithfield, NC27577 Phone (919) 989-5150 Fax (919)989-5426  yphnioamcomfPming  Name of Applicant/Petitioner:. Lipscomb Development Mailing Address of Applicant: 334 E Main Street, Clayton NC 27520 Email: Emly@upscombDevelopment.com Owners Name(s): Black and Grey LLC Telephone: 919-422-4704 Tax ID! Number:, 16L05030E Township:. O'Neals LONINGI INFORMATION Current Zoning District(s):. AR Acres Being Rezoned:. 27.86 List Requested Uses:. See Attached SCENITTALREQUIRENIENTN 1. Completed Application  Telephone: 321-795-7413 PROPERTY INFORMATION  Fax:  Mailing Address of Owner: 3407 Barber Mill Rd, Clayton NC 27520 Site Address: 2500 Block of Thanksgiving Fire Road Statel Road #: 1720 (Thanksgiving Fire Road)  Email; ames@myHTR.com  Deed Book:_ 06096  Pager 0811  Requested! Zoning District:. Conditional Zoning GB  Total. Acres in Parcel:. 27.86  CONDITIONAL ZONING INFORMITION [Ifrequesting Conditional Zoning, please fill out this section and Pages2-3.)  2. Zoning Fee: (Less then 34 Acres: $375.00)  (3.01 -6.00 Acres: $625.00) (6.01+ Acres: $1250.00 + $18.75/Acre)  3. (2)-FOLDED 18x24 & (10) -1 FOLDED 11x 17 copies of the preliminary plat  Certified' TIA required for developments with 100 peak hour trips or 1000 of more daily trips. Applicant's TIA must either bej performedl by the County consultant, or reviewed by the County's consultant. TIA: fees and/or review feesi must be paid by the applicant. Developments requiring a TIA cannot be placed on an agenda until aTIAis  conducted/teviewed by the consultant.  CERTTFICA ITION OF IPPLIC INT ND/OR PROPERTT OWNER  Icertify on this date oft this petition. OWNER)SIGNATURE - - APPLICANT/S) SIGNATURE: milly Bddugpll  that all the information presented in this petition/application is accurate to the  best of my knowledge, information and belief. Further,Iunderstand that should this petition/application be approved by the Johnston County Board of Commissioners, no site activity can take place until a site plan and/or any other land development permits are issued. Additionally I allow county staff access to the petition property while conducting review  DATE: 7-1564 DATE: 07/15/24  0D 24-00  Staffu Use Only:  FEE: SUBMITTALDATE: RECEIVEDBY  Please copyf foryour records  2024    REZONING & CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 3091 E.I Market Street, Smithfield, NC27577 Phone (919) 989-5150 Fax (919) 989-5426  poARcCNps  COMPLETE TOR CONDITONALZUNNG APPLICATION Board in determining its recommendation. public health, safety, and general welfare:  The applicant must ansmer the following questions and provide adequate explanation and documentation.for each. These questions avill be used as guidelinesfor the Planming 1. Explain how the use/developmenti is located, designed, and proposed tol be operated so as tos maintain/promote the  See Attached  2. Explain how all uses permitted under the proposed new district classification are appropriate for the neighborhood or  area: See Attached  3. Explain how the use/development. is located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain/enhance the  character of the neighborhood, and thatt the use/development is aj public necessity:  _See Attached  4. Explain how the proposed zoning changei is consistent with the Johnston County Comprehensive Land Use Plan and  other adopted plans and policies: See Attached  Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information:  1. Please provide the purpose oft the district, aj project narrative, anda al list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the  conditional: zoning district. See Attached  Staff Use Only:  FEE: SUBMITTALDATE: RECEIVEDI BY:  Please copyforyour records  2024    REZONING & CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION  Johnston County Planning & Zoning 3091 E. Market Street, Smithfield, NC27577 Phone (919) 989-5150 Fax (919) 989-5426  phstoccmp-mang  2. Conditions to apply to the Conditional Zoning District:  Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assisti in mitigating thei impacts the development may have on the surrounding community and the environment. Staff, the Planning Board, and] Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. Please list  any conditions that you propose, as the: applicant, below.  See Attached  Staff Use Only:  FEE: SUBMITTALDATE: RECEIVEDBY  Please copyforyour records  2024    Recreation- - Indoor Recreation- Outdoor Restaurant Spa- Day Sporting Goods Tanning Salon Thrift Store -A Apparel/lousehold Tire ales-Non-Dstrluting Veterinary Clinic  School - Montessori or other Educational  Warehouse Fadlity/Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of 30,000: sf.  6    Thanksgiving Fire Road Thanksgiving Plaza" Conditional Zoning Application Responses  The following information represents the applicant's responses tot the inquiries found on the  Johnston County Conditional Zoning Application.  1. Explain how the use/development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain/promote the public health, safety, and  general welfare: Response:  The subject property is well located to expand the commercial offerings of the intersection and meet the demands of the rapidly growing region for businesses and services. The development of commercial uses at this site fulfills the vision of the Future Land Use Map, which envisions the area as a commercial center ("rural crossroads.") The result will be less traffic and miles traveled as The intersection of Thanksgiving Fire Road and Hwy 42 East is slated to be improved as a roundabout by NCDOT. This will greatly improve the accessibility and safety of visitors to the The property is already serving commercial uses, as a portion of the site will house off-site septic As shown on the site plan, the site will be an extension of and associated with the commercial area immediately south, which is zoned General Business and is currently under construction as a Hudson's Hardware and multiple attractive flexible use commercial buildings. The properties will The design of the property envisions mini- and outdoor-storage on the eastern portion of the property, intentionally situated well back from the street to reduce visual impacts from the right of Enhanced buffers are provided to shield non-commercially zoned adjacent properties from any undesirable impacts, with buffers greatly exceeding the minimum buffer standards of similar development types. For example, when a business use abuts a residentially zoned property, the minimum buffer is 10' - this project envisions up to 60' of undisturbed buffer, as shown on the site Buffers are proposed to be further enhanced with evergreen plantings as needed: a condition has been added that the site will be evaluated to determine where existing vegetation may not provide The site has been evaluated for adequate septic soils, and ample land has been preserved for septic  people will not have to drive so far to meet their needs.  proposed business plaza.  systems for the commercial area abutting the property to the south.  connect with vehicular connection points, enhancing vehicular access and safety.  way.  plan.  adequate visual screening and evergreen plantings will be added. systems to serve both this and the commercial property immediately south.  1    2. Explain how all uses permitted under the proposed new district classification are appropriate for the neighborhood or area:  Response:  This property design is a physical extension of the commercial area to the south, which is currently The proposed uses for this Conditional Zoning-GB district are a limited selection from the list of permitted uses within the General Business zoning district and represent uses anticipated for the Uses were selected that are anticipated to be well-needed and utilized by the surrounding area. The selection will allow for a range of uses including various retail, office, and service-oriented 3. Explain how the use/development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated sO as to maintain/ennance the character of the neighborhood,  under construction and zoned General Business.  commercial development as a whole.  businesses. The site layout will naturally restrict the scale of any uses.  and that the use/development is a public necessity:  Response:  The site is designed as a physical extension oft the commercial development abutting it to the south, and a condition is proposed to require building design and site landscaping consistency. As such, it will be a seamless visual connection to that site and will not impact the character oft that area. The scale of the project and the site to the south is intentionally smaller in scale, utilizing multiple buildings instead of larger buildings to best integrate with the more rural character of the surrounding The storage uses shown on the site plan are intentionally set well back from the street to reduce visual impacts from the public right of way, and greatly enhanced buffers are proposed between the 4. Explain how the proposed zoning change is consistent with the Johnston County Comprehensive Land Use Plan and other adopted plans and  area.  site and adjacent non-commercialy zoned properties.  policies: Response:  The subject property is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which designates this area as on the Future Land Use Map as "Rural Crossroads." These "crossroads" are envisioned as commercial areas at crossroads of major roads, serving the relatively rural regional community. Uses are limited to those that will best serve the needs of the surrounding community.  2    The final engineered site plan will be reviewed to ensure it will meet all applicable Johnston County ordinances, including applicable state and federal rules regarding transportation, utilities, Purpose of the district, project narrative, and list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the  environmental preservation, and stormwater management.  conditional zoning district.  District Purpose:  The purpose of the Thanksgiving Plaza Conditional Zoning-General Business district is to create a commercial development that will serve as a natural extension of the commercial site to the south, currently under construction. The Conditional Zoning-General Business district allows for assured consistency of quality design and site layout with that of the commercial property to the south. The district also allows for a limited set of uses to best reflect the Rural Crossroads designation and  ensure that undesirable uses are prohibited.  Project Narrative:  The Future Land Use Map adopted by Johnston County has identified this property and others at this intersection as a site supportive of "Rural Crossroads" commercial development. With this in mind and combined with the immediate demand for commercial growth to serve the rapidly growing residential population in this area, the development team has formed the Thanksgiving Plaza  Conditional Zoning proposal. The project consists of:  Multiple commercial roadfront buildings creating a maximum of 25,000 sf of commercial flexible space. The design will mimic the high quality design of the under-construction The project also includes mini-storage and outdoor storage interior to the site, well set back  buildings to the south. from the road.  3    Rendering of Building design of under-construction commercial, plaza to south.  Overall, the project meets known demand for commercial activity and storage in the areal in a way that implements the Future Land Use Map, creates and attractive development site, and respects  adjacent properties.  Thanksgiving Fire Road Conditional Zoning Allowed Uses  Uses shall be limited to the following uses. A variety of uses are proposed to account for the multitude of neighborhood businesses and services that are suitable fori flexible commercial space in The following use categories are taken from the List of Permitted Uses General Business in the All uses and accessory uses shall be subject to the screening, buffering, and other applicable  arural crossroads location.  Johnston County Code of Ordinances.  standards of the. Johnston County Code of Ordinances.  Thanksgiving Fire Plaza - Conditional Zoning-General Business  Allowed Uses  Automotive Parts Sales  Automotive Repair - Mechanical: Limited to an maximum of 2,000 sf, no more than 8 vehicles stored overnight.  Automotive Repair - Paint/Body. Visually Bakery - Retail damaged vehicles under or awaiting repair shall be subject to open storage screening  requirements. Bank Business - Retail  Barber/Beauty Shop to include Nail Salon  Building Materials/Supplies - Retail Sales Business = Office  Business - Wholesale Dry Cleaning Establishment Heating & Air Conditioning Shop Medical Clinic Open Storage (perimeter screening shall be provided via 8' fence which shall be opaque ors sufficiently screened with landscaping) Pharmacies Place of Worship mnphepoacenPdlenng Recreation Outdoor School = Montessori or other Educational Sporting Goods Thrift Store - ApparelHousehold Veterinary Clinic  Cemetery = there is an existing cemetery Contractor's Office w/Storage Yard  on the site which shall remain undisturbed. Day Care Facility - Child. Limited to a maximum of 5,000 sf. Feed & Seed Sales Landscaping/Nursery Sales Mini-Storage  Parcel Post Shipping/Recelving Physical Fitness Center Plumbing - Heating Supply Offices and Storage Area Recreation - Indoor Restaurant Spa - Day Tanning Salon Tire Sales - Non-Distributing Warehouse Facility/Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of 30,000s sf.  4    Conditions to apply to the Conditional Zoning Within a Conditional. Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding community and the environment. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners. may propose additional conditions during the review process. Please list any conditions that you) propose, as the applicant,  District:  below.  Proposed Conditions  1. Site plan and engineering approval shall be required prior to site construction. Final site plan design shall be consistent with the design depicted int the Conditional Zoning site plan. 2. Building design and site landscaping shall be consistent with that of the parcel development 4. To enhance visual screening between the property and adjacent lots, buffers between the subject property and adjacent non-commercial lots shall be increased beyond the minimum required by the ordinance in effect at the time of the Conditional Zoning approval and shall be consistent with the increased widths indicated on the associated site plan.  immediately south.  3. The cemetery located on the property shall remain undisturbed.  5. Uses shall be limited to the following uses and standards:  Automotive Parts Sales vehicles stored overnight. Bakery - Retail Bank  Automotive Repair - Mechanical: Limited to a maximum of 2,000 sf, no more than 8 Automotive Repair - Paint/Body. Visually damaged vehicles under or awaiting repair  shall be subject to open storage screening requirements. Barber/Beauty Shop to include Nail Salon Building Materials/Supplies - Retail Sales  Business- Office Business - Retail Business-V Wholesale Contractor's Office w/Storage Yard Dry Cleaning Establishment Feed & Seed Sales Heating & Air Conditioning Shop LandscapingNursery Sales Medical Clinic Mini-Storage ors sufficiently screened with landscaping) Parcel Post ShppingRecelving Pharmacies Physical Fitness Center Place of Worship  Cemetery - there is an existing cemetery on the site which shall remain undisturbed.  Day Care Facility - Child. Limited to a maximum of 5,000 sf.  Open Storage (perimeter screening shall be provided via 8' fence which shall be opaque  Plumbing - Heating Supply Offices and Storage Area  5    PrintingReproduction/Pubishing Recreation - Indoor Recreation - Outdoor Restaurant Spa - Day Sporting Goods Tanning Salon Thrift Store - ApparelPousehold Tire Sales - Non-Distributing Veterinary Clinic  School - Montessori or other Educational  Warehouse Facility /Wholesale Establishment. Limited to a maximum of 30,000 sf.  6      bE  00  REZONINGE EXHIBIT-SITEPLAN BLACKANDGREY,LIC  THANKSGIMING FIRE ROAD PROPERTY JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTHCAROLINA      ISAG  0  REZONINGI EXHIBIT-SITEPLAN BLACK AND GREY,LLC  THANKSGMING FIRE ROAD PROPERTY JOHNSTONT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA