OFASTAT OUNTY,F SINCE, 1872  TOWN OF ASTATULA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES  SPECIAL MEETING TOWN HALL  TUESDAYOCTOBER 22, 2020  Having been duly advertised as required by law, Chairman Boyd called the Regular Planning  & Zoning meeting to order at 6:08 pm and led the Pledge of Allegiance.  Members Present: Marjorie Boyd, Chairman Karen Smith Sean Donnelly  Town Staff Present: Graham Wells, Town Clerk Tim Green, Town Planner  Roll Call was performed, and it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman Boyd  welcomed those present, around thirty residents.  MINUTE APPROVAL  Approval of Minutes - October 6, 2020 Special P & Z Meeting.  MOTION by Member Smith to approve; SECONDED by Member Donnelly  For: Boyd, Smith, Donnelly Against: None MOTION CARRIED 3-0  Approval of Minutes - October 6, 2020 LPA Meeting.  MOTION by Member Donnelly to approve; SECONDED by Member Smith  For: Boyd, Smith, Donnelly Against: None MOTION CARRIED 3-0  PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 2020-17  Review and consideration of PUD Rezoning for the proposed Tula Parcj project. Thej property is approximately 54 acres and consist of four zoning designations (21.64 Acres of A, 1.09 Acres ofR-1,28.48 Acres ofR-3, and 2.5. Acres ofC-1).The project is located north of Georgia Avenue, west of Monroe Street, eastand west of Adams Street, east ofWashington Streetand south of Pennsylvania Avenue. The plan proposes 184 residential dwellings, 20,000 square feet of commercial buildings, an on-site Wastewater Treatment Plant, a private community  park, and a dog park.  Town of Astatula Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes  October 22, 2020 Page: 1of5    Chairman Boyd gave the floor to Planner Tim Green who introduced himselfand went over in detail his staff report showing the difference in the zoning designations against the  proposed PUD. RESIDENTIALAREA: Zoning Designation: Future Designation Project Size Number of Lots Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Street Frontage Minimum Street Frontage ona cul-de-sac Maximum Lot Coverage Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Pertinent Site Data Side Street Corner Setback Rear Yard Setback High Water Line Setback Wetland Setback Maximum Building Height Minimum Living Area Gross Density  Pertinent Site Data Requirements Requirements Requirements Project Data  R-1 1.09 2 21,780sq ft 100 feet 100 feet 751 feet 30% 30feet 8feet 30 feet 201 feet 50 feet 25 feet 35 feet 1,200 sq ft  R-3 28.48 227 5,000s sq ft 501 feet 25 feet 75 feet 50% 201 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet 50 feet 25 feet 35 feet 1,000 sqft Central Water with Central and Sewer  PUD Planned Development 52 Acres 184Lots 5,000 sq feet 501 feet 501 feet 25 feet 50% 25 feet 51 feet 151 feet 15 feet 501 feet 25 feet 35 feet 1,000 sq ft Water and Sewer  Land  Use Mobile Home Mobile Home Mobile Home  21.64 4 5acres 150f feet 1001 feet 75 feet 20% 301 feet 5feet 301 feet 5feet 501 feet 251 feet 351 feet 1,200 sqft  Requirements Requirements Requirements Project Data  1DU/5A Acre 2DU/Acre 8DU/Acre with 3.4 DU/Acre  COMMERCIALAREA: Pertinent Site Data Zoning Designation: Future Land Use Designation Project Size Number of Lots Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Street Frontage Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Side Street Corner Setback Rear Yard Setback Maximum Building Height  Requirements C-1 Mobile Home 2.5 acres 1 No minimum No minimum 100 feet 25 feet 10 feet 25 feet 20 feet 401 feet  Project Data PUD Planned Development 2.5 acres 2.5 acres 174 feet 576 feet/174 feet 25 feet 10 feet 25 feet 20 feet 401 feet  Town ofA Astatula Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes  October 22, 2020 Page2of5    CONCEPTUAL CONCURRENCYI REVIEW:  Service  Calculation 184 Lotsx7.38 ADT (Average Daily Trips) Central Water On-Site Treatment Plant 6.55 Ibs x 184 lots x 2.79 persons /house/day Compllance with Chapter 40C-42, 40C-4and  Anticipated Demand 1,359 ADT's Onsite Septic 1.96 acres 3,241bs  Traffic Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Drainage Facilities  Recreation/Open: Space 4acres per 1,000 residents x 494 residents""  17-25,F.A.C.  "Comp Plan Standard = 125 gallons /person/day * Comp Plan Standard =1 111 gallons /person/day : Comp Plan Standard E 4 acres /1,000 residents Persons per Household = 2.79 PARKS: Home builder will be responsible for paying park impact fees.  PUD Enhancements vs Existing Zoning:  Maximum Lots limited to 184 VS 233 per lot size minimums On site Waste Water Treatment Plant for residential and commercial areas Nor residential driveways on any existing public right of way. Dog Park to be owned and maintained by the HOA Recreation Area to be owned and maintained by the HOA Stormwater Ponds owned and maintained by the HOA Perimeter Buffers increased to 20' from 10' Rear Setback increased to 15' from 10' Corner Lot Setback increased to 15' from 10'  Commercial Area retained  Related Actions:  Final approval of this rezoning is contingent upon the review and acceptance of The Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Mobile Home to Planned Residential will allow for site-built homes rather than the existing requirement that the homes At this point in the meeting, Chairman Boyd requested that the residents were able to ask their questions and make their comments before the board had their deliberations.  the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.  be manufactured.  Areas of questions and concerns raised included:  Impact on the existing taxpayers for the water supply. There is none. Retention ponds. There are. more retention areas than required by the code to keep all Upgrade to the water system. This is covered in the developer agreement. Concerns about smell from the sewer treatment plant. Developer. stated that it will be Types of construction. The developer plans to build block homes.  water run offwithin the development. as sealed unit and will not create any odor.  Town ofA Astatula Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes  October 22, 2020 Page 3of5    Additional traffic on Georgia Ave and speeding. The additional number of daily trips Access to the Canal. There would be canal access for the lots on the canal only. Potential inclusion of a boat launch. There would not be a boat launch. Effect on Birds and wildlife along the canal line. There would be an environmental Potential responsibility the town has for the wastewater plant. None.  was in Planner Greens report ande explained.  study.  All questions were responded to by Mike Rankin from LPG, Tim Green and Clerk Wells. Further responses were that there were benefits to accepting this proposed PUD as the density was reduced from the permitted 416 lots to 184 lots in the conceptual plan, there were additional roads and buffers from Pennsylvania Ave and there would be no external driveways on existing roads. All driveways would front the roads within the subdivision. The Chairman closed public comment and asked for comments from the board.  Member Smith stated that she was okay with the underground sewer system but wanted the five lots on the canal removed. If this was agreed to, then she would vote to accept the Member Donnelly asked about the buffers. Mr. Green described the three types of buffers that were listed in the code. He also asked whether the PUD was transferrable to another developer and if the plan could be changed. It could be sold but the PUD would not change unless the new owner started the process over. There is a timeframe to begin development He also asked about who was responsible for the sewer pipes from the plant to the houses. Mr. Eddy responded that the homeowner is responsible for anything on their property and the HOA for the rest. The town has no responsibility at all. He asked whether rentals would be allowed in the community. Mr. Eddy said that provisions regarding renting would be Member Smith said that she would not approve the plan unless the five lots on the canal Chairman Boyd asked ifthere were any plans for the R2 portion of the PUD. There were two privately owned residences in this zoning. She asked about the dog park location and the issue of barking. Mr. Stout said that he would consider moving the lots on the canal to the dog park area and do away with the dog park. They would lose the more valuable lots on the  plan.  and it was unlikely that this would happen.  incorporated in the HOA agreement.  wererelocated.  canal but would get extra smaller lots where the dog park is. There being no questions, Chairman Boyd requested a motion. lots was discussed and will be included in any motion.  Member Smith requested that it is included in the minutes that the relocation of the canal  Town of Astatula Planning &2 Zoning Meeting Minutes  October 22, 2020 Page4ofs    MOTION by Member Donnelly to recommend that the plan is approved with the condition thatlots17 thru2 21 are relocated to the green space area shown on the plan as the dog park with provision for some type of community structure: SECONDED by  Member Smith For: Boyd, Donnelly, Smith Against: None MOTION CARRIED 3-0 ADJOURNMENT  There being no further business, Chairman Boyd thanked everyone for attending; the  meeting was adjourned at 8:03 pm. Respectfullys submitted, k  Clerk  -  7  Town of Astatula Planning &2 Zoning Meeting Minutes  October 22, 2020 Page 5of5