CITY OF ELK GROVE Incorporated.July 1, 2000  MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL  REGULAR. MEETING Wednesday, May 11,2016  CALL TO ORDERI /ROLL CALL  Mayor Davis called the regular City Council meeting of May 11, 2016 to order at Present: Mayor Davis, Vice Mayor Ly, and Council Members Detrick, Hume, and Suen..  6:06 p.m.  Absent: None:  City Clerk. Jason Lindgren led. the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Davis asked that a moment of silence be observed.  APPROVAL OF AGENDA  Motion: M/S Detrick/Suen to. approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume! and Suen); Noes: 0;  Absent: 0. CLOSED SESSION None,  PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS  4.1 Collin Wallace, Community Relations Manager with Republic Services, gave a presentation of the Trim Your Waste. Winners for resident recycling efforts. 4.2 Mayor Davis presented a proclamation to Marilyn Yu and Térri Gilmet declaring May 12, 2016 as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome  (ME/CFS) Awareness. Day.  4.3 Mayor Davis presented Certificates of Recognition to Sheru Singh and Steve Wilkinson fortheir donation of Achievement Certificates to Elk Grove Schools. 4.4 Assistant Development Services Director Shane Diller açcepted a proclamation 4.5 Public Works Director Robert Murdoch accepted a proclamation recognizing  recognizing May as Building Safety Month.  May 15 to 21, 2016 as National Public Works' Week.  Elk Grove City. Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 1of21    PUBLIC COMMENT  Renee West, Case Manager and Food Program Coordinator at Elk. Grove Food Bank Services noted there was an increase in the senior population served, now at approximately 1,100 seniors per month. She noted Elk Grove Food Bank Services provided site visits to four senior apartments in Elk Grove and maintained an on-site senior program, all programs providing food and assistance resources, and emphasized Asia Williams, junior member of the American Legion Auxiliary Unit 233 in Elk Grove, presented scrap. paper poppies made by disabled veterans; noting the poppies. were a donation program to support the needs of veterans, military, and their families. She stated the Elk Grove unit would be passing out poppiès on May 28 in the shopping center at the southeast corner of Bruceville Road and. Whitelock Parkway and invited the community to display its support for fallen heroes, veterans, and active duty service Judy Sala, the CalFresh outreach coordinator at Elk Grove Food Bank Services, stated the ÇalFresh contract had been recently awarded to begin offering CalFresh opportunities at the Food Bank. She shared operations statistics and noted the increase in. the senior population served at the Food Bank. Ms. Sala encouraged members of the çommunity to become familiar with the CalFresh program and see if Lynn Wheat expressed her disappointment with the level of community participation in the General Plan Update noting she was one of two residents in attendance, along with three developers, and suggested letters be sent out to residents in surrounding areas that may potentially be rezoned.. She. shared her recent experience: at the California Museum that had a display focused on improving health through state and local jurisdiction planning policies, and supported implementing policies to improve health and quality of life in the City. She noted the example of planning to provide all neighborhoods with access to fresh, affordable food and produce, and believed the community should always have the opportunity to participate in local land. use planning I not just through the General Plan. Update. Ms. Wheat believed. the General Plan Update should directly ask residents how big they want the City to be, and shared her  the importance of providing services to the senior, population.  members.  they were eligible for any monetary supplement to their food budget.  belief that the City did not need to expand. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION  City Manager Laura Gill reviewed the May 11, 2016Administrative Report (filed). COUNCIL COMMENTS /REPORIS/FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS  Council Member Detrick attended the Elk Grové Western Festival and participated in events hosted by Project RIDE on the Big Day of Giving to help raise funds for non- profit organizations. He received consensus from the City Council to recognize Elk Grove Unified School District students participating the in local Student Education Video Awards program (with potential that their video submittals may also win national  competition awards).  Elk Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page2of21    Council Member Humie was not able to attend the Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority Board meeting. He attended a workshop reviewing the transitional period bringing on a new General Manager to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, and attended meetings reviewing budget presentations and closed sessions of the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the. Sacramento Area Sèwer Council Member Suen attended the Sacramento Area, Council of Governments (SACOG) Board meeting noting changes to the State transportation improvement program could affect Elk Grove projects but SACOG and City staff were working on contingency plan solutions to address the changes. He stated. June 25 was the Run 4 Hunger run/walk event benefitting Elk Grove Food Bank Services. He attended the Elk Grove Western Festival, attended the grand opening of the farmers market in Old Town Elk Grove, participated in events hosted by Project RIDE on the Big Day of Giving to help raise funds for non-profit organizations, and attended the Elk Grove Regional Vice. Mayor Ly attended the. Elk Grove Western Festival, and! attended a community meeting in the Parkgate community (seeing the potential for a communlyassociation to. develop). He noted May was Asian Pacific Islander (API) month and he stated he participated in the API. legislative caucus. He took part in a creek clean up walk on May 7 with the Franklin Community Association, and attended the Sacramento Regional Mayor Davis served as a judge for the Western Idol competition. He thanked the Vice Mayor in helping to launch the Franklin Community Association, and commended their  District.  Scholarship Foundation scholarship awards dinner.  County Sanitation District Board meeting.  creek clean up walk event. CONSENT CALENDARI ITEMS PUBLIC COMMENT None.  Council Member Detrick noted his recusal from voting on Items 8.4: and 8.5.  Motion: M/S Hume/Suen noting Council Member Detrick's recusal from voting on Items 8.4 and 8.5, to remove Item 8.10 for separate consideration, and to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar as presented. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0 [the vote for Items 8.4 and 8.5 passed by the following vote: Ayes: 4 (Davis; Ly, Agenda. Item No. 8.1: Approved City Council Meeting Minutes of the January 27, 2016 Agenda Item No. 8.2: Received report on City Manager approved purchases and contracts authorized. by Elk Grove Municipal Code Chapter 3.42 Contracts and  Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain/Recuse: 1 (Détrick)]. regular meeting and the February 10, 2016 special meeting.  Elk Grove. City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page:3of21    Purchasing, and projects awarded under' the Uniform Public Construction Cost.Act, filed Agenda Item No. 8:3: Received report on Requests for Proposals, Qualfications, and Agenda Item No. 8.4: Adopted Ordinance No. 07-2016 levying and apportioning the special tax in territory annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2003-2 (Police Services) Annexation No. 36 and amending Elk Grove Municipal Code Section 3.18.010 Agenda Item No. 8.5: Adopted Ordinance No. 08-2016 levying and apportioning the special tax in territory annexed to Community Facilities District No., 2006-1 (Maintenance Services) Annexation No. 37 and amending Elk Grove Municipal Code Agenda Item No. 8.6: Adopted Ordinance No. 09-2016 amending Chapter 9.31 of the Elk Grove Municipal Code to prohibit medical marijuana. dispensary delivery within the Agenda Item No. 8.7: Adopted Ordinance No. 10-2016 amending Section 3.42.090.A.1 (City Manager Authority) and Section 3.42.100.B (Department Head Authority) of Elk Grove Municipal Code Chapter 3.42 Contracts and Purchasing Agenda Item No. 8.8: Adopted Resolution No. 2016-077 dispensing with competitive bidding per the Elk Grove Municipal Code. and authorizing the City Manager to enter into a three-year contract with University Enterprises, Inc., for student assistant services, not to exceed $80,000 per year [for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of Agenda Item No. 8.9: Adopted Resolution No. 2016-078 authorizing the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Joint Community Facilities District Agreement Between the County of Sacramento and the City of Elk Grove for the Laguna Creek Ranch/Elliott Ranch Community Facilities District No. 1,  through May 4, 2016.  Bids.  (Second Reading).  Section 3.19.010 (Second Reading).  City of Elk Grove (CEQA Exempt) (Second Reading).  (Second Reading).  $240,000].  improvement Area No. 2 (Elliott Ranch).  Note: Item 8.10 was removed from consent and considerèd separately:  Agenda-tem-No.840-Adepta-esohation-fnding mo-further-erwrenmmenta-revew-s required-underCEQAeFtne-SheNondPMaemmanRoas-mlersecion.improvements Pioeapr:3.auwhonyeCH/MagerbawaRescmenBREaGEwA Mafin-Bretners-cOASFMCHOP-P-PAe-aPOURE-OF- $2,321,219-60; authorizing theCity Ewerbappwedhagee the City Managerte-exeçuie-a-cOnsrNcin.coNiac-w#h-me-second-owesHbdder. ifthe-first lowest bidder dees -net meet filing ebigations; àmending the. FY-2015-20-CapitaH mprovementProgamandY2015-6Amnua-Buaget:approvnga ul-elosure-ef-the-the-Shelon-RedwadAWaterman-Read intersectien-fer-30-consecutive  Elk Grove. City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 4-of21    Balendardays.ferconsirvction;andauhonangihe-ClyManagerloenterinte-alicense Agenda Item No. 8.11: Adopted Resolution No. 2016-079 authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the IBI Group Comprehensive Operational Analysis of Local and Commuter Service (C-15-213) extending the term to May 31, 2017 and to increase compensation by $35,000 [for a total not to excéed amount of Agenda Item No. 8.12: Adopted Resolution No. 2016-080 rescinding Resolution No. 2016-018, and approving the àcquisition and transfer of ownership of five 2006 CNG Orion VII buses from. the Transit Joint Powers Authority for Merced County to the City of  Agreementwih-the-estem.Area.PoerAdminstaHOP-AWAPA)-  $147,959].  Elk Grove to use in e-tran's. bus fleet for active revenue service. Note: Item 8.10 was removed from consent and considered separately.  Agenda Item No. 8.10: Adopt a resolution finding no further environmental review is required under CEQA for the Sheldon Road/Waterman Road Intersection Improvements Project (PT0138); authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Martin Brothers Construction in the. amount of $2,321,219.60; authorizing the City Engineer to approve change orders not-to-exceed $348,182.94; authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction. contract with the second lowest bidder if the first lowest bidder does not meet filing obligations; amending the FY 2015-20 Capital Improvement Program and FY 2015-16 Annual Budget; approving a full closure of the Sheldon Road/Waterman Road intersection for 30 consecutive calendar days for construction; and authorizing the City Manager to enter into a License. With the aid of a visual presentation (filed), Rick Carter, Capital Program Manager, provided an overview of the staff report and recommended action. The project was changed from what was presented in February 2016, which initially sought approval for a closure: of the east. leg of the intersection only on Sheldon Road. Based on community feedback staff now requested full closure of the Sheldon Road/Waterman Road intersection for a one month period. Full closure had not been looked at as an initial option, but with continuing community feedback, and construction timing of the project, too occur during the summer (to take into account the school year schedule), the project was. put out to bid with both construction timeframe options. Thefull closure reduced the construction period by more. than half, down to 40 working days with a full closure for one month and completing the remainder of the roadway work in't the second month, and the savings associated with the full closure was approximately $361,000. The. full closure would create traffic delays during construction and additional congestion on adjacent roadways for that one month, the scheduled work would be completed in the summer and landscaping would be installed in the fall. The action would also implement budget actions to use open-graded colored concrete in the project, and would authorize working with the Western Area Power Authority to utilize their easement during Motion: M/S Hume/Ly to adopt Resolution No. 2016-081 finding no further environmental review is required under CEQA for the Sheldon Road/Waterman Road  Agreement with the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA).  construction.  Eik Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page50f:21    Intersection improvements Project (PT0138); authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Martin Brothers Construction in the amount of $2,321,219.60; authorizing the City Engineer to approve change orders not-to-exceed $348,182.94; authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract with the second lowest bidder if the first. lowest bidder does not.meet filing obligations; amending the FY 2015- 20 Capital Improvement Program and FY 2015-16 Annual Budget; approving a full closure of the Sheldon RoadAWaterman Road intersection for 30 consécutive calendar days for construction; and authorizing the City Manager to enter into a License Agreement with the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA). The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume; and Suen); Noes: 0;  Absent: 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS  Agenda Item No. 9.1: A public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Major Design Review (DR) for Dutch Bros. Coffee at Sheldon Project (EG-15-042;  APN: 115-0170-037) (CEQA Exempt).  RECOMMENDATION  The Planning Commission recommends. (by-5-0 vote):  Adopt resolution: a) finding no further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is necessary for the Dutch Bros. Coffee at Sheldon Project, pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of CEQA Guidelines; and b). approving a Conditional Use. Permit and Major Design Review to amend the site plan for the Sheldon Crossing Retail Genter to add the Dutch Bros. Coffee at Sheldon Project (EG-15-042), subject to the findings and conditions of With the aid of an overhead presentation (filed), Nathan Anderson, Planner, provided an overview of the staff report and recommended actions. The project sought two entitlements, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a drive-through facility within 1,000 feet of a rural residential General Plan designation, and a major design review to amend the. site plan for the previously approved project on the site to allow construction of an 800 square foot drive-through coffee kiosk. The project was located in part of the Sheldon Crossing Shopping Center at the vacant pad at the northwest corner of the Sheldon Road. I Elk Grove-Florin Road intersection. The original Sheldon Crossing project was approved in September 2004, approving construction of five commercial pad buildings. Four were: built, the fifth, Pad B (the location of this. project site, closest. to the intersection), was the largest building approved at approximately 11,000 square feet, planned as a multi-tenant commercial building, had remained as the last: undeveloped pad on the site (currently a. graded dirt lot). The proposed 800 square foot building would be. located in the center of the pad, a drive-through Dutch Bros. Coffee kiosk. Two drive-through aisles were proposed, one on the north and one on the south - both going east to west. The two drive-through lanes would provide a total stacking distance of 266 feet, 86 feet more than the minimum based on the code, and the surrounding project site provided space for extended stacking if necessary up to 600 feet. The project initially submitted the kiosk building with Dutch Bros. Coffee corporate. colors, which did not match the surrounding shopping center color schéme, and through the design review the appliçant was àmenable to modify the color scheme to match the  approval contained in the draft Resolution.  Elk Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016. Page 6.of21    stucco and coloring of the existing shopping center. The traffic study analyzed the traffic within the site and outside the sité and determined that thére would be no impacts to the site from this project, anticipating 15 vehicles at peak hours and sized to accommodate 20 to 30, in the drive-through lanes and in the parking lot area. Mr. Anderson addressed the Dutch Bros. Coffee site at Elk Grove Boulevard and East Stockton Boulevard, noting that project did not have. a traffic study associated with it as itv was: approved at. the Zoning Administrator level sO no traffic study was required. This project: on Elk Grove-Florin Road was completely self-contained within its own center, with different ingress and egress to the site, and the traffic counts on Elk Grove Boulevard were much higher than the traffic counts on Sheldon Road and Elk Grove- Council Member Hume noted concerns that the existing Dutch Bros. Coffee site at Elk Grove Boulevard utilized accent lighting, but did not believe such lighting at this site was appropriate, for an operation proposed to be open 24 hours a day, in relation to surrounding uses. with fairly subdued lighting. He also questioned on the site plan if there was discussion to move the patio onto the same island between the two drive  Florin Road.  aisles, rather than having it.s separated- as currently proposed. Mayor Davis declared the public hearing open. questions of the City Council as followis:  Charles Nattland, applicant representative and architect for the project; addressed The visual impact of the projeèct in the sense. of the lighting would comply with all City requirements to shield the lighting and to not significantly increase the lighting already there. Though not familiar with thel lighting at the Dutch Bros. Coffee site at Elk Grove Boulevard location, the project was designed with down lighting on the building and thé project would comply with all requirements Ac concern with moving the patio onto the same island between the two drive aisles was putting pedestrians in the center of two drive aisles.. The current proposed layout required pedestriâns to only have to cross one lane of traffic as opposed to crossing the. traffic and being between. two layers of driveway; Light pollution from cars sitting in the queue at nighttime into the intersection was not considered because of the distance from the intersection, however landscaping could be used on the outside edge to obstruct headlights.  set by the City;  Council Member Hume requested staff drive by the Dutch Bros. Coffee site at the Elk Grove Boulevard location at night to garner a sense of the. lighting at that location, and that such a similar level of lighting at this project location would not be acceptable..  PUBLIC COMMENT  Shirley Peters stated the Greater Sheldon Road Estates Homeowners Association (GSREHA) had no issues with the project, but she stated she personally did not like the project, and appreciated the questions asked of the City Councilwhich addressed some of her concerns. Ms. Peters held concerns about the traffic impacts of the project to the  surrounding area.  Elk: Grove City Council Regular Méeting, May 11,2016 Page.7of21    Mayor Davis declared the public hearing closed. glare into the intersection of cars ini the drive-through.  Council Member Suen appreciated the architéct looking at vegetation to block. headlight Council Member Detrick recalled when the original Dutch Bros. Coffee site-at Elk Grove Boulevard opened there was additional accent lighting that was not typical of a Dutch Bros. Coffee facility, and he agreed that similar lighting would not be appropriate at this Motion: M/S Hume/Suen to adopt Resolution No. 2016-082 a) finding no further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is necessary for the Dutch Bros Coffee at Sheldon Project, pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of CEQA Guidelines; and b) approving a Conditional Use Permit and Major Design Review to amend the site plan for the Sheldon Crossing Retail Center to add the Dutch Bros Coffee at Sheldon Project (EG-15-042), subject to the findings and conditions of approval contained in the draft Resolution. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Agènda. Item. No. 9.2: A public hearing to consider adoption of a resolution approving the 2016-17 Action Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute: and filé all documents required to receive U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds (CEQA Exempt).  site.  Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  RECOMMENDATION  Adopt resolution approving the 2016-17 Action Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute and file all documents required to reçeive U.S, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Sarah Bontrager, Housing and Public Services Manager, provided an overview of the staff report and recommendation. The Community Development Block Grant Action Plan was first presented in April for City Council comments. Since that review, per HUD requirements, the plan was made available for 30 days for comments, no comments were received, and the public hearing tonight was the opportunity for formal adoption of  the. 2016-17 Action Plan. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.  Mayor Davis declared the public hearing open.  Mayor Davis declared the public hearing closed.  Motion: M/S Detrick/Hume to adopt Resolution No. 2016-083 approving the 2016-17 Action.Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute and file all documents required to reçeive U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The motion passed  Elk. Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11, 2016 Page 8of21    by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0;  Absent: 0.  Agenda Item No. 9.3:  A public hearirig to consider adoption of:  1). resolutions. calling a special election and declaring results of the special election. for annexation of territory to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Maintenance Services) and introduction of an ordinance levying and apportioning the special tax to the annexing area (Annexation No. 38); and 2) a resolution determining to levy Storm Water Drainage Fee assessments for certain properties in the Laguna Ridge Area, which represents Annexation No. 13 into Storm Water" Drainage Fee Zone 2.  RECOMMENDATION  A-1) Adopt resolution. calling a special election to submit the question of levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Maintenançe Services) to the qualified electors; A-2) (Following tabulation and certification of ballot results by the City Clerk) Adopt resolution declaring the results of the special election held on May 11, 2016 for the thirty-eighth annexation to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 A-3) Introduce and waive the full reading, by substitution of title only, an ordinance levying and apportioning the special tax in territory annexed to Community Facilities District No.2006-1 (Maintenance Services) Annexation No. 38 and  (Maintenance Services); and  amending Elk Grove Municipal Code Section.3.18.010; AND Storm Water Drainage Fee Zone 2 (Annexation 13).  B) Adopt resolution determining to levy storm water drainage fee assessments for Brandon Merritt, Finance Analyst, provided an overview of the: staff report and Mayor Davis declared the public hearing open for Community Facilities District 2006-1  recommendations.  (Maintenance Services) Annexation 38.  PUBLIC COMMENT: None.  Mayor Davis declared the public hearing closed.  Motion #A-1: M/S Detrick/Hume to adopt Resolution No. 2016-084 calling a special election to submit the question of levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Maintenance Services) to the qualified electors. The motion passed by the following voté: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, City Clerk Lindgren stated of 2 possible votes, 2 affirrnative votes were cast authorizing the City of Elk Grove to levy a special tax at the rate apportioned and described. The measure passed with more than two-thirds of all votes: cast in thé election in favor of the measure.. A resolution declaring the results of the election was available for Council  Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  consideration.  Elk Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May-11,:2016 Page9of21    Motion: #A-2: M/S Detrick/Suen to adopt Resolution No. 2016-085 declaring the results of the special election held on May 11, 2016 for the thirty-eighth annexation to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Maintenance Services). The. motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Motion #A-3: M/S Detrick/Suen to introduce and. waive the full reading, by substitution oft title only, Ordinance No. 11-2016 levying and apportioning. the.special tax in tèrritory annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Maintenance Services) Annexation No. 38 and amending Elk Grove Municipal Code Section 3.18.010. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Mayor Davis declared the public hearing open for Storm Water Drainage Fee Zone. 2-  Absent: 0.  Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Annexation No. 13. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.  Mayor Davis declared the public hearing closed.  City Clerk Jason Lindgren announced there was no majority protest. Of two possible votes (weighted according to the proportional financial obligation for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit), two affirmative votes were returned. The ballots approved the proposed assessment and the proposed inflation adjustment. limit described for the parcels identified in the ballot. A resolution determining to levy assessments in the district was Motion #B: M/S Detrick/Hume to adopt Resolution No. 2016-086 determining to levy storm water drainage fee assessments for Storm Water Drainage Fee Zone 2 (Annexation 13). The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly,  available for Council consideration.  Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes:" 0; Absent: 0.  REGULARAGENDA ACTION TENS/RECOMMENDATONS Agenda Item No. 10.1: Animal Shelter Next Steps.  RECOMMENDATION  Staff recommends that. the City Council receive this report, evaluate the available funding options, and provide direction as necessary. Staff is seeking specific direction 1) Continue the project by going forward with the schematic design and environmenta  to:  review; and  2) Issue a Request for Proposal to solicit design services.  With the aid of a visual presentation (filed), Kara Reddig, Deputy City Manager, provided an overview of the staff report. and recommended actions. The City entered into a contract with the County. of Sacramento in October 2013 to provide. shelter  Elk.G Grove City Çouncil Regular Meeting, May: 11, 2016 Page 10c of.21    services for the City, that contract would conclude on June 30, 2019. Since 2014 staff had been studying how to best deliver sheltering services, and in early 2015. concluded the. animal shelter needs. assessment study. report. On January 13, 2016 five steps were proposed to advance the project: 1) refine intake numbers based on two years of data with thè County to include all of calendar years 2014 and 2015,2 2) refine the Elk Grove shelter option baséd on new intake numbers, 3) identify a suitable site and prepare a conceptual site plan study, 4) hold a public meeting (which was held March 28, 2016), and 5) return with the results and receive direction from the City Council. Ms. Reddig reviewed the intake numbers comparing prior statistics from the Society for the. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) compiled in 2013 with the County numbers taken over 2014 and 2015, noting more. consistent tracking of intake numbers over those two years from the County at 40% less than the intake. rèported by the SPCA in 2013. Staff had estimates for 2016, and supported the County intake numbers as a baseline versus the SPCA intake numbers for the purposes of determining housing capacity for a shelter. Housing capacity of a proposed shelter based on intake was: projected to anticipated needs by the year 2036 (increasing today's averages based on 2% population growth per year to 2036). The curreint intake average was 1,334, and projected to 2036 for use of a shelter at 80% capacity yielded a projected intake of 2,433 animals.. The study utilized this intake projection for thé shelter facility needs, identifying a 17,200 square foot building, 3,800 square feet of covered exterior areas, 8,000 square feet of animal exercise yards, a 12,000 squaré foot agility yard, and additional square footage (for parking, service areas, and landscaping) for a total building site area of hundred 125,000 square feet (approximately 2.8 acres). A conceptual site plan was drafted and candidate project location was at the City corporation yard at Iron Rock Way and Union Park Way. A public meeting was held March 28 with approximately 40 attendees who were pleased with the progress. but raised concerns that the facility was; undersized and that the return to field percentages assumed in the housing capacity table were naccurate. Staff and the report consultants believed the facility was adequately sized to meet the City's needs, and the City had an aggressive return to owner program that was an effective mearis to keep animals from having to be received by a shelter (by returning the animal dirèctly back to the owner utilizing microchip identification and posting lost anirnals on. social media sites). The next steps included initiating the schematic site plan and building plan design estimated at $550,000, the environmental review estimatèd at $125,000, and funding for these services was available in the Policè Capital Facilities Fund. The project budget was estimated at $16 million, and with direction to proceed a bond issuance would be anticipated in Spring 2017 to finance construction, with debt service paid through Police Capital Facilities Fees and expected increased returns of Rèvenue Neutrality Increment, property tax from Sacramento County. The operating budget at full buildout in 2036 was estimated at $2.8 million, $1 million over the existing budget for; City Field Services and County Sheltering Service. The $2.8 million was comprised of 21 staff members needed at the 2036 full buildout, the operating budget included field services but did not include use of volunteerservices. Animal Control was funded from the General Fund, additional funding from the Revenue Neutrality Increment would be realized in Fiscal Year 2019- 20. Staff recommended commencing with the schematic design and environmental review to allow the City to refine the project and review fiscal, costs with the current conceptual design, and issue a request for proposals for design services. The completion of the schematic design phase will yield a 30% complète design package.  Elk Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 11.of21.    Council Member Detrick received confirmation the debt, issuance would cover annual payments in the. amount of$1 millionfor operations and $1 million for câpital.  PUBLIC. COMMENT  Tina Marie Stinnett supported the City pursuing 'an animal shelter, but advocated for a high volume surgical center to provide low-cost spay neuter services for the community Lynn Wheat raised concerns with the costs and how the project would be financed. Council Member Detrick believed an animal shelter was needed and was a responsibility of the City, but he believed the current proposed facility and required staffing plan was too much of a cost burden with the proposed debt service plan. Mr. Detrick wanted to evaluate. alternative options to provide sheltering, services and Council Member Hume wanted to evaluate the standalone, high-volume spay neuter Motion: M/S Hume/Ly to: 1). Continue the project by. going forward with the schematic design and environmental review, allowing. the City to refine the project budget. and reduce some. of the uncertain fiscal costs with the current conceptual design, and 2) Issue a Request for Proposals to solicit design services to validate and finalize program elements and budget, conduct further detailed site analysis and planning studies, explore and propose potential phasing options consistent with the budget, develop schematic site plan and building plan, develop site and building design elements, and at completion of the schematic design phase have a 30% completed design paçkage. The motion passèd by the following vote: Ayes: 4 (Davis, Ly, Agenda Item No. 10.2: Receive an update on the Civic Center and provide direction on the revised site plan and design concepts for the Aquatic Center and Veterans Hall. Staff recommends that. the City Council receive this update on the Civic Center and provide direction on the revised site plan and design concepts. for the Aquatic. Center Jason Behrmann, Assistant City Manager, provided an overview of the staff report, recommended actions, and introduced the project team working on the Civic Center With the aid of a visual presentation (filed), Marco Esposito, with SWA Group, provided an overview of the site master plan layout and design, noting the Community / Senior Center,. Veterans Memorial. Hall, and future. library. were kept along Civic Center Drive, the Aquatic Center was.brought to the middleofthe site and a public outer space called the Commons was created conneçting all the facilities.. The three buildings and associated outdoor public gathering spaces of the Commons were then flanked with  to control the feral animal population.  would not support the plan as proposed.  clinic. as an option and to explore.such facilities further.  Hume, and Suen); Noes: 1 (Detrick); Absent: 0.  RECOMMENDATION and'Veterans Hall.  project.  EIK Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May"11,2016 Page 12:of21    parking areas. The buildings along Civic Center Drive had through lobbies providing a straight frontage for each of the buildings along the roadway, and also a frontage to the Commons promenade. Each of, the projects incorporated an indoor / outdoor relationship along the Commons, and encouraged use of amenities such as a splash fountain, public art, special lighting, fire pit, or bocce court as integrated community spaces. The. promenade could accommodate markets and festivals, and he. displayed configurations to expand usable plaza space on: a temporary basis. The site design integrated with the surrounding trees and open spaces to create a park like setting. Dawn Marcus, with Group 4 Architecture, provided an overview of the buildings noting the Veterans Memorial Hall was planned for 7,800 square feet and about 72 parking spaces, the Aquatic Center areas were. 22,300 square feet featuring a full complement of pools with 450 parking spaces, and the Senior / Community Center was 28,000 square feet with 200-240 parking; all built around the Commons and existing trees at the site. The complementary uses with parking provided the opportunity to include 100 parking spaces for park and ride, all in the Phase. 1 plan. Future Phase 2 projects were identified of a Library/Cultural. Arts Center at approximately 50-70,000 square feet (150 to 315 parking spaces), a Children's Museum at 15-25,000 square feet (75-125 parking spaçes), and a Nature Center at 2,500 square feet integrated into the park around the. area of the existing pond at the site. Thèse Phase 2 projects were plaçeholders in the master' plan and would be further elaborated on in terms of opportunity1 for programs. as they became closer to being funded. The master plan at this point identified square footage and parking needs, and as buildings on the site plan were developed they would build off the design guidelinés already developed for the Civiç Center utilizing natural surroundings to inspire the selection of materials and color palettes to reflect Clarence Mamuyac; with ELS Architecture and Urban Design, reviewed the Aquatic Center layout and design. The Aquatic Center buitcling components were. situated to the west and northwest, integrating a shade structure running the length of the aquatic center assisting to direct circulation and provide shade relieffor spectator seating at the 50-meter competitive. pool. There were three pools, the 50-meter pool set apart from the others by being a little bit lower in elevation on the: site, and the recreation and fun pools were at the same elèvation along. with the plazas. The recéssed competition pool assisted with defining circulation patterns, keeping competition and recreation areas separated, but also increased surrounding seating areas around the competition pool. Entry to the facility would be from the northwest at the upper plaza, with the plaza offering another space for civic gatherings. He reviewed conceptual images of the facility used for public gatherings, recreational swini, competition swim, and general layout and design. The buildings would comprise 14,900 square feet, and the water Andy Kwong, with CH&D Architects, Inc., reviewed the design ofthe Veterans Memorial Hall, noting different floor plan and design options were being developed. All options oriented the buildings east-west. plaçing the lobby of the building facing the west. The floor plans were generally similar with conference rooms; office, general services for the building, as well as a canteen, full-service. restaurant. kitchen, and large event center (with areas divisible by a movable partition in the èvent room). The Option 1 floor plan placed the canteen to the. west, separated from the event room by the kitchen. The  durable, warm civic buildings set in an area reflective, of a park sétting.  surface area of the facility would be 22,000 square feet.  Elk Grove City Counçil Regular. Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 13of21    Option 2 floor plan rotated the kitchen northwards so the kitchen did not take up an exterior wall, and created direct access from the event center toward the canteen. The building design Option A proposed tall, slim windows to create a colonnade effect on the building, with thé main entrance. appearing as a tall tower, and integrating canopies similarto those proposed with the Aquatic Center to create. a relationship in feel with. the buildings at the. Civic Center site. The building materials proposed stone, such as sandstone, for the main entrance. (or similar stone as proposed for the.Aquatic Center to integrate site design). Building design Option B was a more contemporary design, removing the taller windows. Both building design options. proposed using the logos of Ms. Marcus provided an update on the: Phase 1 Senior / Community Center feasibility study, creating a multi-shared community project site with program elements for an entry space (lounge, library, café, and gift shop), a community hall performance and meeting space (planned to accommodate 500 for dining and almost 940 in an auditorium or lecture. type setting), conference meeting rooms, enrichment and personal development classrooms, creative. and fine art studio spaces, music room, and spaces for support staff offices and facilities uses. All spaces in the building were inténded for multi-use, with flexibility to change and/or integrate uses. The design of the facility would continue to seèk indoor / outdoor connection, especially on the promenade side, leveraging the indoor space to the. outdoor space with patios, moveable walls to connect outdoor/indoor areas, and the opportunity to double the spaces and functionalities by using complementary exterior spaces.. The project team would' continue outreach and planned to return with the Master Plan approvals before the Planning Commission on  the five branches of the military as decoration on the building.  June. 16 and the. City Council on Juily 13.  PUBLIC COMMENT  Eddie Maximo voiced support for the Civic. Center plan and the. proposed Aquatics  Center.  Phuong Ngyuen voiced support for the proposed Aquatics Center.  Lynn Wheat voiced preference to prioritize building the Senior. / Community Center first. She preferred the opên space areas be planted with drought tolerant varieties of landscaping rather than large areas. of grass to reduce water usage and maintenance Council Member Detrick noted the project plan area had funding mechanisms through financing districts of area residents, and the Senior Center of Elk Grove was. Council Member Hume suggested identifying a solution other than grass for the area within the Aquatic Center. He recommended the Senior / Community Center and future. Phase 2: buildings bring a continuity of design and space. to tie the overall design and feel of the Civic Center site together, and not create an amalgamation of varied,  costs, and voiced concern on the financing for the projects.  contributing $3 million in funding for the Senior / Community Center.  different looking facilities.  ElK Grove City Council Regular Meeting.May 11,2016 Page 14 of21    Council Member Suen observed a majority of the costs were borne by a. small segment of City residents based on the Laguna Ridge financing district, but that the Civic Center amenities would benefit the whole community. He voiced support to look at alternatives to turf for better site plan sustainability. Mr. Suen believed the, City should reach out to the Veterans' community concerning design preferences for the Veterans Memorial Brenda Smart cautioned against artificial turf, notingi it gets hot and compounds heat effects when participants set up canopies.. She believed for the pool premises that grass Assistant to the City Manager Christopher Jordan stated the Civic Center area was. intended to be irrigated by treated effluent as the EchoWater Project was completed, but access to such recycled water was. still a few years out. The turf areas should be maintained, as turf was the only material that could withstând the intense usage Mr. Behrmann stated the design team could evaluate combining the Option 1 design for the exterior on Veterans Hall coupled with Option B on the floor plan. He was aware of drought tolerant turf options that may be a solution, noting that going to a non-turf material would present programming and operational problems for the facility. The City Council received the update and provided direction to verify with the Veteran's Groups their preference for a final design làyout (considering the Option 1 exterior and Option B floorplan), and look at drought tolerant turf options for areas of lawn / grass Agenda Item No. 10.3: Consider a resolution approving the Sacramento Transportation Authority Tax Expenditure Plan and provide direction on whether to  Hall.  was more viable for athletes and people using the facilities.  expected to occur with the. competition events  near the pool areas.  continue public. outreach on a potential local revenue measure.  RECOMMENDATION  Adopt resolution approving the Sacramento Transportation; Authority (STA) Tax Expenditure Plan (TEP) and provide direction on whether' to continue with public With the aid of a visual presentation (filed), Jeff Spencer, Executive Director of the STA, provided an overview of the staff report and recommended action on the TEP. STA administered transportation funds throughout the county. In 2013 a professional advisory group met to look at the priorities of transportation projects needed in the region and the funding for those projects as a supplement to the current. Measure A, and found there were funding shortfalls. Through polling of public opinion, support. was indicated of two thirds or better in support of a tax to get these, transportation projects done, prioritizing fixing current facilities. Measure B would. enact'a 30 year, one half of a percent (0.5%) sales tax which would raise $100 million each year for the. region for the next 30 years. He reviewed the results of the ballot question polling done across the county showing close to 70% support, with an error rate within plus or minus 3%, and displayed which of the various components for use of the tax funds polled best. Based on the polling results, the TEP for the. proposed Measure B would utilize 75% of the  outreach on a potential local revenue measure.  EIK Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11, 2016 Page 15of21    funds primarily for road and transit system repair in the first five years. The tax would balance needs for investment across both roads and transit; and provide for coordinated planning, conformity with air quality laws, and leveraging of local matching dollars at the state and federal level. Measure B would include provisions for an annual audit by an independent taxpayer oversight committee, require. five-year update plans to show progress towards improved roadway conditions and transit operations, and would restrict use of repair funds for new projects in only those instances where overall roadway conditions met a speçifiç threshold, transit met policy and performance goals, or a super majority vote of a local agency made a determination that a project was needed to meet critical néeds. Measure B would generate approximately $3.6 billion over the 30 year term, which would allow agencies to bond for funding. Measure B planned for $2.2 billion to go towards local roads, bike and pedestrian projects, and transit, $125 million for the Capital SouthEast Connector, and $200 million for the Capital City Freeway. Transit would see $393 million over the 30 year span of Measure B for vehicle replacements and. operations and maintenance, $180 million for new services operations and maintenance, capital projects for light rail including an express gold line, airport service line, and extended service to Elk Grove, and $126 million for Paratransit services consistent over" the years. Elk. Grove particular projects included the Fix it First and Complete Streets projects in the first" five years, and funding availability for the Kammerer Road widening and extension, the Highway 99 interchange at' Whitelock Road, bicycle, pedestrian, and trail implementation plans, and Intelligent Transportation Systems program development. Mr, Spencer addressed  questions of the City Council as follows:  The polling conducted only inquired about. the proposed Measure B tax, it did not have any questions on what. effect. a local Elk. Grove sales tax: measure would Funding for transit was formula driven by population and demand, and STA recognized Elk Grove had its own transit system and would enter agreements The allocation of funding for projects did not have specific timing at this point, the goal was for the regional plan to match funds with state and federal funding (though those sources have- changed to be more 50/50, rathér than the prior 80/20 to the benefit of local agencies - which had been the history).  have on support for STA's. regional. sales tax" measure; accordingly with the City based. on" fund availability;  Public Works Director Bob Murdoch clarified Measure B funds would first be allocated to maintenance and repair, and when project funding became available the process would develop an allocation plan on project specific priority. The current project listings and categories were those eligible to be funded undér Measure B, prioritization of projects Council Member Hume noted. a. constraint that the. light rail Blue Line extension to Elk Grove cannot compete with the Green Line extension to the airport for federal funding, as the Green Line was a higher priority of Sacramento Regional Transit. With the aid of a visual presentation (filed).Andrew Keys, Budget Manager, provided an overview of the City's local funding sales tax measure potentially on the ballot for November 2016. In December the City polled a local measure of a general one cent sales tax, receiving 59.1% support margin of error of 4.3%, and similar support for a half  would occur at a future date..  EIk.Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 16,of21    cent measure. The Elk Grove poll did not ask ary questions if an STA sales tax measure would affect opinions on, an Elk Grove measure. Currently the City was conducting outreach meetings with local groups to confirm or refine the priorities within. the measure; the current text ofthe. measure polled was as follows: To provide funding to make neighborhood safer maintain and improve essential services including: maintaining rapid police response times; fixing potholes; repairing city streets; maintaining neighborhood police patrols; providing additional recreational facilities; enhancing commuter transit service; enhancing economic development; maintaining pedestrian bike trails; and other essential city serviçes; shall the City of Elk Grove enact an ongoing one cent sales tax, providing approximately $1.9 million annually, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and all funds spent locally? Additional outreach meetings were. scheduled, in the coming weeks and months, and staff were preparing a contract for a second tracking survey targeting to return results of that survey in July to seek direction to proceed with an Elk Grove sales tax ballot measure. Additional outreach and polling would not be beneficial unless the City Council wanted to continue to proceed with a local measure, and staff sought direction. whether to proceed in light of new information with STA moving forward with the Measure B sales tax proposal. He reviewed sales tax rates of regional agencies compared to Elk Grove, noting how the rates would change if Measure B and/or the Elk Grove local measure were approved, and provided an overview comparing the. voting passage. requirements of a general measure compared to a special measure and the. benefits of using an advisory measure. Ifa local measure was not pursued at this time, the earliest time-to consider a general tax revenue measure would be in 2018. Staff could use the current contracted authority to poll questions to, gauge if the Elk Grove measure would have an effect on the STA. measure. Staff recommended approving the STA TEP and providing direction in relation to the City's local funding measure for 2016. Mr. Keys noted that 2016 poll data would likely not be useful for future elections, it was a gauge of the viability of a measure given the currènt environment and sentiment of the voting public.  PUBLIC COMMENT  Debra Carlton, representing the Elk. Grove Youth Soccer League, voiced support to continue looking at a viable local measure, and supported pursuit of a local sports complex. She provided an example of the economic benefits; to a community when Council Member Detrick was against increasing taxes and would not support the proposed tax measures at this time, and he did support conducting additional polling to Council Member Suen believed Measure B addressed many Elk Grove needs, but there were other needs of the City such as poliçe services: and economic development that Mayor Davis. noted the polling asked whether or not if there was a transportation measure or school bond if voters would still support local measures and the: answerwas yes, but the poll didn't specifically ask if an Elk Grove local measure would negatively  hosting a sports tournament.  find out the effect of a local Elk Grove measure on STA's Measure. B.  warranted consideration of a local measure as well.  affect STA's Measure B.  Elk' Grove City Council Regular.Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 1.7 of21    Mr. Hume did not prefer increasing taxes, but: noted the federal gas tax had not. been raised, since 1986, and the compounding éffect of the increased fuel economy of cars making continued impacts on the roadway network made him view the STA tax as a Vice Mayor Ly voiced support for both Measure B and a local Elk Grove. measure to give the opportunity to the people to decide; but highlighted the. opportunity to approach The City Council provided direction to continue with survey polling to discern if a City local sales tax measure would diminish support of STA's Measure B, and return the Motion: M/S Hume/Ly to adopt Resolution No. 2016-087 approving the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) Tax Expenditure Plan (TEP). The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 4 (Davis, Ly, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 1 (Detrick); Agenda Item No. 10.4: Presentation of Fiscal Years 2016-2021 Capital Improvement  necessity-  the matter through additional questions and surveys.  discussion of a local sales tax measure at a future date.  Absent: 0. Program.  RECOMMENDATION  Receive and comment upon the proposed Fiscal Years 2016-1.7 through 2020-21 (FYs 2016-21) Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Funding for the first year of the CIP will be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Proposed Budget being presented at the May 25, 2016 City Council Meeting. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Annual Budget, including the FYs 2016-21 CIP, could occur as early as.June 8, 2016. With the aid of a visual presentation (filed), Rick. Carter, Capital Program Manager, provided an overview of the staff report and recommended action. The proposed CIP would be adopted as part of the budget scheduled for June 8. The CIP described the transportation, drainage and facility capital improvement. plan by the City, a fiscal planning document setting forth strategy ànd priority of funding for project implementation over the next five years: The CIP had over 200 projects funded from 26 different fund sources (25 of the funds were restricted use funds). The: expenditure forecast encompassed $440 million overthe next five years, $191 million funded (a $61 million increase over the current. five-year plan), $249 million unfunded (a $4 million increase over the current five-year plan). Last year 18 projects with a value of a $26 million (including $9 million in grant awards) were completèd including the Grant Line Road Widening and Bridge Overcrossing, various projects covering pavement renabilitation, traffic improvements, sidewalk, drainage, trail work; and completion of environmental documents to advance projects. The coming year sought to award 24 projects with a value of $22 million (approximately $2 million in grant awards). Mr. Carter noted much of the grant funds came from the Sacramento. Area Council of Governments (SACOG) typically on a two year cycle, the prior year was the. "up" cycle of the first year of grant awards and this year reflected the "down" cycle, lower grant award. New projects included the Green Streets project on Elk Grove-Florin Road, a Park and Ride Lot near Interstate. 5 and Elk Grove Boulevard, widening the:southbound offramp at Interstate 5 and Elk Grove Boulevard, a study to look at a recycled water  Elk. Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,:2016 Page 18of21    transmission line from the EchoWater Project, pedestrian crossing safêty improvements, and Bond Road bridge maintenance. Changes included funding of Phase 2 of the Old Town Plaza, and grant funding. would provide for a sidewalk on Bruceville Road north of Big Horn Boulevard and trail work along Laguna Creek. Funding was substantially increased for Kammerer Road, Big Horn Boulevard, Bilby Road, and the Civic Center. Mr. Carter reviewed funding of thé CIP over 12 programs displaying current funding, projects funded within the next five years, and unfunded needs. The unfunded category projects were not included in the annual budget, and there were no actual expenditures but they remain for planning purposes to continue to analyze funding options for new opportunities (grant funds, impact fee programs, financing district creation, or developer advances or funding). The unfunded categories comprised $240 million, three of these were under the SouthEast Policy Area (SEPA) Employment Oriented Development area including unfunded roadways and utilities in those roads and drainage facilities, Other unfunded categories included the transit multimodal station, additional funding for Kammerer Road, the animal shelter, and pavement maintenance. The Phase. 1 Civic Center projects wère all funded under the CIP (the Commons, Aquatics Center, Veterans' Memorial Hall, and Senior / Community Center), but remaining concepts and phases of the Civic Center were not included in the five year CIP. Mr. Carter addressed pavement maintenance, noting the current Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for. Elk Grove had dropped from 71 to 68; still in the. fair category, but revenues were insufficient to maintain pavement and existing conditions. Approximately $12 million annually was needed and $8.5 million was currently unfunded. The majority of pavement maintenance came from Measure A and Gas Tax, although Measure A had been increasing over the. years Gas Tax was decreasing at à greater rate and in the last five years funding had dropped 3.5%. Additionally, the. Construction Cost Index had gone up about 17% in the same amount of time, eroding  the purchasing power for pavement maintenance.  PUBLIC COMMENT None.  The City Council received and filed the report. Employment Agreement with the City Attorney.  Agenda Item No. 10.5: Consider resolution authorizing the Mayor to Execute an  RECOMMENDATION  Adopt resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an employment agreement with Jacqui Langenberg, Human Resources Manager, provided an overview of the staff Motion: M/S Hume/Suen to waive rule of procedure not to consider new business after 10:00 p.m. and to proceed with the. remainder of the agenda. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Dayis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes; 0; Absent:  Jonathan P. Hobbs for the position of City Attorney.  report and recommended action.  0. PUBLIC COMMENT None.  Elk Grove City Council Regulan Meeting, May 14,2016 Page 19-of21    Motion: M/S Detrick/Ly to adopt Resolution No. 2016-088 authorizing the Mayor to execute an employment àgreèment with Jonathan P. Hobbs for the position of City Attorney. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Agenda Item No. 10.6: Consider resolutions: 1) calling the November 8, 2016 General Municipal Election to elect the Mayor at-large, and Council Members from Districts 1 and 3, requesting the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the gèneral municipal election with the statewide general election; 2) approving a Memorandum of Understanding with the Sacramento County Registrar of Voters to provide Election Services; 3) establishing regulations pertaining to candidates' statements of qualifications; and 4) establishing Council's policy regarding impartial  Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  analyses, arguments, and rebuttal arguments.  RECOMMENDATION  Staff recommends that the Elk Grove City Council consider the. following:  1) Adopt a resolution calling and giving notice of a genèral municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 to elect the Mayor at-large, and Council Members from Districts 1 and 3, and requesting the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the general municipal election with the statewide general 2) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of understanding with the Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections 3) Adopt a resolution establishing regulations for candidates for elective office 4) Adopt a resolution setting forth the City Council's policy regarding impartial analyses, arguments, and rebuttal arguments for any measure(s) that may qualify to be placed on the ballot for the November 8, 2016 General Municipal Election.  election;  Department (VRE) to provide Election Services; pertaining to candidates' statements of qualifications; and  The verbal staff report was waived. PUBLIC COMMENT None..  Motion #1: M/S Hume/Detrick to adopt Resolution No. 2016-089 calling and giving notice of a general municipal election to' be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 to elect the Mayor at-large, and Council Members from Districts 1 and 3, and requesting the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the general municipal election with the statewide general election.. The motion passed by the following vote.. Ayes; Motion #2: M/S Hume/Detrick to adopt Resolution No. 2016-090 authorizing the City Manager to execute. a Memorandum of understanding with the Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections Department (VRE) to provide Election Services. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes; 5 (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and  5( (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume,. and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  Elk Grove City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page 200 of21    Motion #3: M/S Hume/Detrick to adopt Resolution No. 2016-091 establishing regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates' statements of qualifications. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5 (Davis, Ly, Motion #4: M/S Hume/Detrick to adopt Resolution No. 2016-092 setting forth the City Council's policy regarding impartial analyses, arguments, and rebuttal arguments for any measure(s) that may qualify to be placed on the ballot for the November 8, 2016 General Municipal Election. The motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: 5  Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  (Davis, Ly, Detrick, Hume, and Suen); Noes: 0; Absent: 0.  ADJOURNMENT adjourned at 10:02 p:m.  With no additional business to conduct, the May 1, 2016 City Council meeting was  QT JASON LINDGREN, SITYCLERR  ATTEST:  115 STEVE LY, PRESIDINGOFFICER  Elk Grove, City Council Regular Meeting, May 11,2016 Page:21of21