Live. Life - Lincoln . Live Life . Lincoln. Live Life - Lincoln . Live. . Life - Lincoln - Live Life Lipcoln  MINUTES  CITY OF LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL & LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Council Work Session June 2, 2020  Work Session - Budget Workshop YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Karleskint at 4:30PM.  No Physical Location, Meeting conducted electronically on Zoom with Live Stream on City of Lincoln  1.  ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Holly Andreatta - teleconference  Peter Gilbert- - teleconference Paul Joiner - teleconference Alyssa Silhi - teleconference Dan Karleskint- teleconference  Mayor  Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 members absent.  Staff members present:  Jennifer Hanson, City Manager- teleconference Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney teleconference Ray Leftwich, Public' Works Dir.-t teleconference Steve Prosser, Comm. Dev.Dir. - teleconference Shawn Tillman, Economic Dev. Manager Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present via  teleconference. 2. 3.  FLAG SALUTE - Councilmember Gilbert led the Pledge of Allegiance PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDAITEMS - none.  4. STAFF REPORTS 4.A. Development.  Direction from City Council Regarding Negotiations for Airport Fixed Base Operator and  Ray Leftwich, Public Works Director, introduced the Fixed Base Operator applicants Alan Ada, Pointe West Development, and Richard Sax, Distinctive Projects, who gave an overview of their proposal in response to the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). A lengthy City Council discussion ensued regarding: the applicant providing financials for the Council to review; what was included in the City's RFP; whether the Airport Committee reviewed the proposal and if they recommended approval; whether the proposal was in line with the Airport Master Plan, the environmental review needed for the proposal; the proposal being more of a development project than just airport management; and a possible conflict of interest in having the Airport Committee providing a recommendation. Mayor Karleskint opened the discussion to the public with the following  comments: a) thereof. b)  Scott Thompson, a Lincoln resident, emailed his concerns with the proposal to Gwen Byron Maynard, a Lincoln Airport Business Owner and Airport Committee member,  Scanlon, City Clerk, and Staff provided a response, made a part of these minutes by mention  stated his concern that the focus would shift away from general aviation with hangar rent and fuel  price increases and urged the City Council to proceed cautiously.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www.d.lincaln.ca.us 9 916-434-2400    Live - Life . Lincoln . Live Life - Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live - Life - Lincoln Live . Life Lincoln  Page 2of2 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Work Session Meeting Minutes June 2, 2020 c) d)  Bob Butera, a Lincoln resident and Airport Committee member, stated his concern for Scott Thompson, a Lincoln resident, stated his concern that the nature of the airport  hangar owners in phase 2 as they could lose significant equity and requested additional details would change and the emphasis would be on development rather than general aviation. Mr. Thompson also asked for a status on the Planes of Fame (POF)negotiations and stated POF Messrs. Ada and Sax briefly responded to concerns voiced by the public. Mayor Karleskint closed the public discussion at 5:56PM. Another brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: the need for City Council to review the financials of the project proponents and to communicate with the Planes of Fame. City Council consensus was to move forward and identify a City negotiator to determine whether City Council is interested in moving forward with the Pointe West Development  should be given the right of first refusal.  proposal. 4.B.  Direction from City Council regarding the implementation of AB 571 which limits  campaign contributions to City Council candidates to $3,000 per donor per election, or whether the Council wishes to adopt a different limit. If the latter, staff also requests direction regarding Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, gave a brief staff report. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding lack of staff needed to enforce limits to campaign contributions. City Council consensus was to take no action and allow AB571 to go into effect on January 1, 2021 limiting candidates to  enforcement provisions.  $3,000 per donor per election.  4.C.  Direction from City Council on City Council Code of Conduct.  Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, gave a brief staff report. Councimember Andreatta stated she had requested this item be brought forward after ai fellow Councimember attended a recent Emergency Counsel meeting. She continued when the Emergency Counsel was formed it was with the understanding that City Council would not attend these meetings. Councimember Gilbert responded that he attended, not in his capacity as a Councilmember, as an alternate for the President of a Service Organization he belongs to and stated he would not be attending future meetings. Al brief City Council discussion ensued regarding Brown Act requirements; difficulty for public to perceive City Councilmembers in any other role; the need to revise the City Council Code of Conduct; and timing to revise the Code of Conduct. Mayor Karleskint opened and closed the public discussion at 7:01PM with no comments. City Council consensus was to bring an updated Code of Conduct based on the League of California Cities to a future work session meeting.  5.  COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS = none.  6. ADJOURNMENT- adjourned by Mayor Karleskint at 7:05PM.  Ouesal Submitted by Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  600 Sixth Street I Lincoln, CA 9d-wwwdi.lmein.-916-343.00    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Subject:  Scott Thompson Tuesday, June 02, 20206 6:43 PM City Clerk; Jennifer Hanson  Re: Questions for Agenda Item 4A (airport FBO) for. June 2 Meeting  Follow on comment #2.  Interesting meeting and a good presentation.  Idid not bring up my question about working around the FAA restrictions that the granted property be only used for aeronautical purposes based on your answer (whichIthinki isi incorrect and incomplete) and Jennifer's knowledge about the subject. It would be nice to see it actually addressed, though, with a citing the appropriate FAA regulations lalso question the drawing on page 26 oft the document provided in the agenda for design of airports and runway. The basic guidance for airport design (AC150/5300-13A): for parallel VFR runways is 700' from centerline to centerline, and 400' parallel taxiway to runway centerline distance. The submitted drawing shows 75' distance between runway and taxiway, and what appears to be 125' separation between two parallel runways.Iquestion the basic competence oft this company to do airport design if such simple FAA guidance is not considered. The design presents corporate jets parked on a ramp with as little as 150' lateral separation from landing aircraft. Think Scottsdale, AZ airport and thei issues raised by such tight (out of guidance) design. Likel Isaid in my comment, the appearance is that this shoehorns the aviation into a small part of the development to maximize the land that can be developed for other non-aviation purposes. And, for what iti is worth, would not expect Planes of Fame and this proposal to be compatible. The airport environment would be completely changed and would not lend itself to warbird operations and airshows. lacknowledge the airport needs a plan and a change of course. This proposal does more than that, which is perhaps what the city wants, buti it needs to be acknowledged and fully explained that this is thei intent. Thank you for your earlier response. Irealize this is very early in the process and this is the first swipe at a very complex  which I believe to be quite specific and not easily circumvented.  proposal.  On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at: 11:05 AM City Clerk iyderelinconagoo" wrote:  Of course.  From: Scott Thompson Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 202010:59A AM To: City Clerk iyderxelnconcaso  Subject: Re: Questions for Agenda Item 4A (airport FBO) for. June 2 Meeting  Thank you.  1    Iwill provide a follow up comment to the City Engineer, if you could pass it along:  Re: Question 1: The typical federal transfer agreement does not speak to "amount ofa aviation use" but rather to how the entire property is used. There are numerous examples available where any non-aviation use of granted airport property is prohibited by the FAA as per the terms of the original transfer agreement. Obviously, this will all be sorted out before the proposal would be allowed to move forward. But I would suggest that the city contact the FAA Airports District Office before moving too far down the road for the FAA'sread on such non-aviation use of a surplus airport  transferred from the federal government.  Onl Tue, Jun2 2, 2020 at 10:40 AM City Clerk tyderxeinconcaso> wrote: Mr. Thompson, Please see the response to your questions provided by the City Engineer.  1.The proposed total amount of aviation use does not change and will be enhanced from its existing level. Furthermore, all development within the airport boundaries and modifications to those boundaries first must 2.All revenues generated by the airport that are required to remain within the airport willl be utilized to offset City  be approved by the FAA.  expenses related to the airport and for reinvestment into the airport.  Dia Gix, Deputy City Clerk 916-434-2490  From: Scott Thompson Sent: Monday,June: 1, 202012:161 PM To: City Clerk clyderkelinconcgo  Subject: Questions for Agenda Item 4A (airport FBO) for June 2 Meeting  1. With the airport land use restrictions mandated by the instrument of transfer of the airport by the federal government to the city of Lincoln, how isi it possible for the majority of the airport land to be developed for non-  aviation use by the Pointe West proposal?  2    2. Ift the Pointe West proposal moved forward, how would airport revenue, beyond that owed back toi the city general fund, be reinvested in the airport as required by the FAA? Certainly the city is not expecting a revenue. stream to the  general fund from the airport land development?  Thank you.  Scott Thompson Lincoln Resident  3