Live . Life - Lincoln . Live . Life . Lincoln. Live . Life . Lincoln . Live . Life . Lincoln . Live . Life Lipcoln  MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN Regular Meeting October 13, 2020  CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY  OPEN SESSION MEETING  No Physical Location, Meeting conducted electronically on Zoom with Live Stream on City of Lincoln  YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18. 1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Karleskint at 6:00PM.  2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Holly Andreatta - teleconference  Peter Gilbert 1 teleconference Paul Joiner teleconference Alyssa Silhi- teleconference Dan Karleskint- teleconference  Mayor  Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 members absent.  Staff members present: Jennifer Hanson, City Manager- - teleconference  Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney teleconference Matt Alves, Police Sergeant - teleconference Gary LeCheminant, Finance Director teleconference Ray Leftwich, Public Works Dir./City Engineer teleconference Steve Prosser, Community Development Dir.- teleconference  Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present via teleconference. 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION = Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated no reportable  action.  4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Emily and Allison Frost led the Pledge of Allegiance.  5. AGENDA REVIEW MODIFICATION = none. 6. PRESENTATIONS = none.  7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDAITEMS  a) May Lin, a concerned citizens who did not state their address, emailed the City Clerk with their concern with the California Proposition 16, Repeal Proposition 209. Affirmative Action Amendment (Prop 16), the email was forwarded to councimembers prior tot the meeting and made a part of these minutes b) Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern with zoom meetings and concerns raised ati the last meeting about bullet-proof glass installed at City Hall that was raised by resident  by mention thereof.  concerned with Skatepark. 8. CONSENT  Mayor Karleskint asked if any members of the City Council or public would like to pull any items from the Consent Agenda, hearing none he called for a motion. Councilmember Gilbert motioned approval of the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint - Aye the  consent agenda. Those items approved were:  600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 www.dlincohn.ca.us 916-434-2400    Live - Life  Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live . Life . Lincoln  Live - Life - Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln  Page 20 of8  City Council, Public Finance. Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020  8.A. Approval of Minutes of September 22, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. by the City Manager and filed ini the Office of the City Clerk by October 1, 2020. 2020 to be placed on file with the City Clerk and available for audit.  8.B. Receive and file Contract Report, identifying contracts, task order and purchase orders executed 8.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-168 accepting the Warrants of September 21 and 25 and October 2, 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-169 accepting the Lincoln Crossing Village 11 Subdivision Improvements as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer 8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-170 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for construction with Flex Ground Surfaces, Inc. int the amount of $59,384 fori the Pete Singer Park Playground Matting Replacement Project and authorize the City Engineer to approve change orders not to exceed $25,616. The project is funded. by $85,000 from Fund 215 as part of CIP4 469 Pete Singer Park Playground 8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION: 2020-17lauthorzing the City Manager to execute a Task Order through the On-Call Contract with' West Yost for professional services associated with preparation of the 2020 Urban The Urban Water Management Plan is budgeted by the engineering operating division in the amount of 8.G.Waive Second Reading and Adopt ORDINANCE 1016B, Chapter 18.43- Small Cell Communication Facilities, and determine pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an EIR was certified), Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) the small cell wireless communication facilities ordinance requires no further environmental review. 8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-172 authorizing the City Manager to execute. Amendment No. 11 to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement by and between the City of Lincoln and Cresleigh Homes Corporation for the Cresleigh Grove Subdivision to extend the period of performance for one additional  County Recorder.  Matting Replacement ini the FY 2020/2021 Capital Improvement budget.  Water Management Plan Update for a total amount not to exceed $94,667.  $95,0001 for fiscal year 2020/21 from fund 710.  year.  9. PUBLIC HEARINGS  9.A. (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) Waive full reading and introduce, by title only, ORDINANCE 1017B of the City of Lincoln amending Section 13.04.205 - Metered water use to the Lincoln Municipal Code reducing the current water rates charged for the delivery of potable water; and (3). Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-173 authorizing the transfer of $1,933,451 from the Source Water Connection Fund This item was continued date certain of October 13, 2020 from September 22, 2020 meeting. Jennifer Hanson, City Manager, gave a brief staff report and powerpoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding staff accountability, fee studies and how long the surplus would last depends on rate of development and other factors. Mayor Karleskint opened and closed the public hearing at 6:27PM with no comments. Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the first read oft the ordinance and resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Silhi. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner - Aye,  225 to the Water Capital Replacement Fund 711.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 ww.d.lincoln.ca.ts +916-434-2400    Live Life Lincoln - Live Life Lincoin. Live Life Lincoln Live - Life Lincoln Live Life Lipcoln  Page 3of8  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020  Silhi- Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Gilbert- Aye and Karleskint - Aye -introduction and first read of ORDINANCE 1017B of the City of Lincoln amending Section 13.04.205 - Metered water use to the Lincoln Municipal Code reducing the current water rates charged fori the delivery of potable water and approval of RESOLUTION 2020-173 authorizing the transfer of $1,933,451 from the Source Water Connection Fund 225 to the Water Capital Replacement Fund 711consent agenda and the motion was 9.B. (1) Conduct a public hearing regarding a Zoning Amendment relating to Alcohol Sales; (2) Find the project Categorically Exempt pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3) - General rule of no potential for causing significant impact; and, (3) Waive full reading and introduce ORDINANCE 1018B by title and number for the following Text Amendments to Title 18 -Zoning. Steve Prosser, Community Development Director, gave a brief staff report. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding alcohol sales ini fast food restaurants, fences/barriers around outside eating areas, onsite consumption after COVID-19 restrictions are lifted and City's ability to pull the permit if any issues arise. Mayor Karleskint opened and closed the public hearing at 6:37PM with no comments. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the first read of the ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert- - Aye, Joiner-A Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- - Aye and Karleskint- Aye -introduction and first read of ORDINANCE 1018B by title and number for the following Text Amendments to Title 18- - 9.C.(1) Conduct a public hearing; (2) Adopting RESOLUTION 2020-174 approving Findings asa Responsible Agency of the Certified Joint Final Environmental Impact ReporvEnvronmental Impact Statement, Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; (3) Waive full reading and introduce, by title only, ORDINANCE 1019B of the City of Lincoln adding Chapter 18.89 of Division XI of the Zoning Code, Placer County Conservation Program (4) Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-175 approving the Placer County Conservation Program and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Implementing Agreement for the Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan and (5) Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-176 approving the Jennifer Hanson, City Manager, gave a staff report and powerpoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. Gregg McKenzie, Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) Administrator, stated he was available for any questions. Councimember Andreatta asked the City Manager if tracking for this program would add to staff's workload? Ms. Hanson replied it would add to staff's workload but doesn't outweigh the benefits of this program which streamlines the process. Mayor a) Mike Garabedian, a Lincoln resident, stated his opposition to PCCP, his concern that a map wasn'tincluded in the powerpoint, how quickly the project was being approved and urged City Council to b) Robert Weygandt, Placer County Supervisor, thanked staff and City Council on behalf of c) Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern with source and cost of water for d) Jeff Short, North State Building Industry Association, thanked City Council for their  seconded by Councilmember Joiner.  Zoning.  Placer County Conservation Program Development Fee Schedule.  Karleskint opened the public hearing at 7:31PM with the following comments:  not approve and bring back to a workshop for further discussion.  himself and Kirk Uhler, Placer County Supervisor, who was also in attendance. the PCCP and compensation to landowners for property deemed open space.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 wwwci.lincoln.ca.us 916-434-2400    Live Life Lincoln Live  Life - Lincoln. Live Life - Lincoln Live - Life, Lincoln Live Life Lincoln  Page 4 of8  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020 consideration of the program.  e) George Kammerer, Attorney representing Lincoln Village 3 Landowners, read his letter in support of PCCP which was emailed to City Council prior toi the meeting, made a part of these minutes f) Kate Hart, Attorney representing Richland, developer of Lincoln Village 5, sent al letter in support of PCCP which was emailed to City Council prior to the meeting, made a part of these minutes g) Cheryl Berkema, Placer County resident, sent al letter in opposition of PCCP which was emailed to City Council prior to the meeting, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. h) Mike Garabedian, a Lincoln resident, sent at follow up email the morning after the Council meeting further stating his opposition and concerns with PCCP, made a part of these minutes by Mayor Karleskint closed the public hearing at 7:42PM. Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the first resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Gilbert. By the following Vote (Approved: Joiner-A Aye, Gilbert - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint Aye - RESOLUTION 2020-174 approving Findings as a Responsible Agency of the Certified Joint Final Environmental Impact ReportEnvronmental Impact Statement, Findings of Fact, Statement of Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the first read of the ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Gilbert. - By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner- Aye, Gilbert - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint - Aye ORDINANCE 1019B of the City of Lincoln adding Chapter 18.89 of Division XI of the Zoning Code, Placer County Conservation Councimember Joiner motioned approval oft the second resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Gilbert. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner-Aye, Gilbert- Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint- Aye RESOLUTION 2020-175 approving the Placer County Conservation Program and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Implementing Agreement fori the Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community  by mention thereof.  by mention thereof.  mention thereof.  Overriding Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.  Program.  Conservation Plan.  Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the third resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Gilbert. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner- Aye, Gilbert - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint - Aye- RESOLUTION 2020-176 approving the 9.D. Conduct a public hearing regarding Esplanade at Turkey Creek and take the following actions: 1. Determine that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Government Code section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as a residential project consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan Project EIR (SCH #2010102018) and that no further analysis under the 2. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-177 approving minor amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan; 3. Introduce and waive the first reading of an ORDINANCE 1020B approving minor amendments to the 4. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-178 approving a Large Lot Tentative Map for the Esplanade at Turkey  Placer County Conservation Program Development Fee Schedule.  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required;  Village 1 General Development Plan;  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA Wa'sww.alindhncat :916-434-2400    Live Life. . Lincoln Live  Life Lincoln. Live Life. Lincoln Live - Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln  Page 5of8  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020 Creek; Creek;  5. Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-179_approving Tentative Subdivision Map for the Esplanade at Turkey 6. Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1021B approved a Development Agreement 7. Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1022B terminating the Development 8. Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1023B terminating the Development 9. Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1024B terminating the Development 10. Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1025B terminating the Development Robert Poetsch, Senior Planner, gave a staff report and powerpoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: landscaping corridors and lane reduction on Oak Tree Lane and Ferrari Ranch Road because of cost to maintain landscaping and lack of engineering analysis requiring the additional lanes; additional lanes may have been added as a work-around for logging trucks on Lincoln Boulevard; location of school in relation to the project; and age-restricted gated community would only pay general benefit of CFD 2018-1 as all amenities would be maintained by their homeowner's association. Mayor Karleskint opened the public hearing at a) Mike Garabedian, a Lincoln resident, stated his opposition to the project and concerns with one park being adequate, affordability, development paying fori itself, location of school and isolating b) Jay Pawlek, Taylor Morrison and developer of Esplanade, spoke ini favor of the project. C) Stan Nader, a Lincoln resident and former Councimember, stated he recalled additional lanes Mayor Karleskint closed the public hearing at 8:29PM. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the first resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner- - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi-Aye and Karleskint - Aye . RESOLUTION 2020-177 approving minor amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan. Councilmember Gilbert motioned approval of the first ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint - Aye - Introduce and waive the first reading of an ORDINANCE 1020B approving minor amendments to the Village 1 General Development Plan. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the second resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi-A Aye and Karleskint - Aye RESOLUTION 2020-178 approvinga a Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the third resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint - Aye RESOLUTION 2020-179approving  for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Project; Agreement for La Bella Rosa; Agreement for Enclave at Horizon Edge; Agreement for Epick 3; and, Agreement for Walkup Ranch.  8:27PM with the following comments:  senior development at a distance from public safety.  on Oak Tree Lane was to reduce the number of logging trucks in the downtown area.  Large Lot Tentative Map for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek.  600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 wywlmncaln.ca.us916-434-2400    Live. Life Lincoln Live - Life - Lincoln. Live Life - Lincoln Live - Life Lincoin Live Life Lincoln  Page 6of8  City Council, Public Finance. Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020  Tentative Subdivision Map for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek.  Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the second ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint - Aye - Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1021B approved a Development Agreement for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the third ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta = Aye, Silhi - Aye and Karleskint = Aye - Introduce and waive the first reading Councilmember Gilbert motioned approval of the fourth ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint - Aye Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1023B terminating the Development Agreement for Enclave at Horizon Edge. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the fifth ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint = Aye Introduce and waive the first reading Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the sixth ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Silhi- - Aye and Karleskint - Aye - Introduce and waive the first reading of ORDINANCE 1025B terminating the Development Agreement for Walkup Ranch. 9.E. Conduct a public hearing regarding Twelve Bridges Village 3 and take the following actions: 1. Determine that noi further California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis is required pursuant to Government Code Section 65457 (a) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 whereby a project which is consistent with a specific plan adopted pursuant to Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8 2. Introduce and waive first reading of ORDINANCE 1026B adopting the amendments to the Twelve Bridges General Development Plan and Zoning Regulations for Twelve Bridges Plan Area A; and, 3. Approve RESOLUTION 2020-180 for a Large-Lot Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide Twelve 4. Approve RESOLUTION 2020-181 for a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide Twelve Bridges Escarlet Mar, Assistant Planner, gave a brief staff report and powerpoint presentation made a part of these minutes by mention thereof, and pointed out an error in the staff report that stated there were 86 guest parking but that number should have been 43 as shown on slide 8. Al brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: pink and blue in powerpoint denotes different floor plans; parking and emergency vehicle access (EVA)/solid waste access; side yard setbacks; and fencing only in rear yard to allow EVA. Councilmember Andreatta asked about affordability of homes and project applicant, Bill Heartman of Regis Homes, responded these homes would be about $50,000-560,000 less than comparable projects and that space between two buildings would be at least 5 feet or more. Mayor a) Mike Garabedian, a Lincoln resident, stated his concerns with EVA and parking and closeness of  Project.  of ORDINANCE 1022B terminating the Development Agreement for La Bella Rosa.  of ORDINANCE 1024B terminating the Development Agreement for Epick 3.  of the Government Code is exempt from further environmental review; and,  Bridges Village 3into two (2) parcels; and, Village 3 into 214 single-family residential parcels.  Karleskint opened the public hearing at 9:05PM with the following comment:  600 Sisth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di-lincoln.ca.us +916-434-2400    - Live Life Lincoln Live. Life - Lincoln. Live - Life - Lincoln - Live. Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln  Page 7of8  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020 structures.  Mayor Karleskint closed the public hearing at 9:06PM. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Andreatta. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint - Aye Introduce and waive first reading of ORDINANCE 1026B adopting the amendments tot the Twelve Bridges General Development Plan and Zoning Regulations for Twelve Bridges Plan Area Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the first resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Andreatta. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert-A Aye, Andreatta- - Aye, Joiner- Aye, Silhi- = Aye and Karleskint = Aye - RESOLUTION 2020-180 fora Large-Lot Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide Twelve Bridges Village 3 into two (2) parcels. Councimember Gilbert motioned approval of the second resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Andreatta. By the following Vote (Approved): Gilbert- Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi- Aye and Karleskint - Aye RESOLUTION 2020-181 fora Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide Twelve Bridges Village 3 into 214 single-family residential  A.  parcels.  10. GENERAL BUSINESS emergency ini the City of Lincoln. regarding Halloween Trick-or-Treating.  10.A. Receive COVID-19 report, providing an update on the status of the COVID-19 state of Jennifer Hanson, City Manager, gave a brief staff report. Al brief City Council discussion ensued 10.B. (1) Allow for a discussion; and (2) Adopt RESOLUTION 2020-182 expressing support for actions tof further strengthen local democracy, authority and control as related to local zoning and housing Councimember Andreatta gave a brief description of efforts by other jurisdictions to strengthen local control and why she believes Lincoln should also endorse. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: going beyond League of California Cities efforts; efforts by City of Torrence and not being attached to them; and aligning with the State's legislative bill packages. Mayor Karleskint opened the  issues.  discussion to the public with one comment:  a) Mike Garabedian, al Lincoln resident, supports this item.  Councimember. Andreatta motioned approval of the first resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Gilbert. By the following Vote (Approved): Andreatta = Aye, Gilbert - Aye, , Joiner - Aye, Silhi- - Aye and Karleskint- Aye RESOLUTION: 2020- 182 expressing support for actions to further strengthen local democracy, authority and control as 10.C. Allow for a discussion regarding membership in the National League of Cities.  related to local zoning and housing issues.  Councimember Silhi gave a brief description of the advantages of a membership to National League of Cities (NLC). Councimember Joiner stated he had spoken to NLC officers who stated you get out ofi it  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA Wat'sww.dlinaacaw 916-434-2400    Live. Life Lincoln Live - Life - Lincoln. Live . Life . Lincoln - Live Life * Lincoln - Live Life Lipcoln  Page 80 of8  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes October 13, 2020  what you put in and many nearby. jurisdictions were no longer members of NLC. Abrief City Council discussion ensued regarding: whether toj join NLC; making it a priority to engage in this organization as well as the League of California Cities (LOCC); tools NLC offers such as webinars; benefits during COVID-19; and a grant opportunity from a third-party vendor. City Council consensus was to purchase  aone-year membership and evaluate benefits at the end of that year.  11. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS  Mayor Karleskint stated he and Councilmember Silhi attended the League of California Cities Annual Conference and he'd like to report out but due to the late hour suggested a work session meeting.  12. INFORMATION ITEMS = none.  13. ADJOURNMENT - Mayor Karleskint adjourned the meeting at 10:00PM.  Submitted by: uen Scah Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  600 Sixth Street * Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.lincoln.a.u400    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Subject:  Tuesday, October 13, 2020 1:27PM Public comment for Lincoln  City Clerk  Honorable City Council, elected officials, City clerks etc., My name is May Lin. I'm writing this to express my strong opposition to State Measure 16. State Measure 16 is racist: It gives State institutions power to treat people differently based on their skin color. State Measure 16i is divisive: Once passed, we will no longer be one unified Californain people. Instead, we will become divided ethnic tribes chained to different "casts" (class). Please join us to vote "NO" against State Measure 16. Please join us in keeping California free ofi institutional racism, In keeping California free of bureaucratic shackles. Please keep California free  for you and for me. Please read out my comments in the city council meeting.  Thanks!  May Lin, a very concerned citizen  CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sendera and know the content is safe.  1    -  -  :  L -  2 0 I  V L    o  8 O  a  0  o    A 0 D 3 0 8 o 6 in $ e 2 C S C 9 s @  2 à 2 o o 6  C 5  @ S  0  8 5 6 o @ 2 n I I  - 3 8 8  C O @ 8 - @ 1 - $A a  8 E e 2 - 0 & 1n  E 8  2 @ Z    e  e  8  - - -  e  2 3 o  & K    000  e #  o le . le 3 N @ N @ C  3 : R 11 - 15 & 3 0 6A N A  6  0 7 sO o 8 S 9 9  2 5  o:. ) A e 8 4 6A  8  A  6  A  0 )  8  2  8    8  e > o 9 0 le 9 H @ S I de 6 o E 3 n 8 D  @  0 C o te @ C  8  o @ 0 8 0 f 0 DC e 1n e 8 e t b A 8 0 8 5 I o  o  D ) 9 0 o  - Z O a o    8 J @ 0 & @ E do 8 E 0  -  3 de -  o 0 B 31 3  - A @ 5  a 3 0 3 3 EE 10 5    o 3 3 6 6 @ 8 8 M @ 3 8 5 5  9 @ E f € 2  f 1  8 8 0 6 5 5 e 8 E o e  C -  e 2 e à  : C    S  -    e  à  Da b0  - 8  3  5  8 LJ 5 E 3 3 N 6 8 E 5 5 00 5  e 00  C  8 a  FORNIA  ALID    a a  C @ @ Y o @ 4 a € 9  @ 9 o  o  e  E E    -  3  -  RORNIA  8  E  ALID  6  3    5 -  8 F E 3 a  a 9 0 3 E @ 8 8 8 8 8 5 ! A E I 8 5 &  5 O  E 3 00  -  3 2 f  I I    9 ( C  € 9  o S  a S D  5 -  a  o X  U    o a N  M  @ U 00  d0  8 gp W -  b0  a  a o    M O 1 A LL R LL E A 0 y a  -  R LL E Y - - L  I  a A L 6 T A a  3 - B  W A L a 9 N 9    POpp0000QQC  -  - a    E  D I  E  N e U  1n   -  I  0  a  8 10 N  8 a  -  - / C I  o la  E  3 E  E  D &  E E  O O  C  0    - C -  a   a o a 1 - O L a D 2  lB - e  E a 6 o  A -  I 8    s 9 9 of E a E 5 LE  8 e o la p e de 5    e - -  LE  de    XX  X  X X  XXXx  3 8 8  : B  t C à s @ @ a 8 7 4 2  6  E I C 4    I  - - - -   a 0  €    6 o y e   -  o A 0 C 9  6 & 3 @  9  -  E  8 C -  I  &     E  9 b0 9 - 8 -  S e  0 3 A  I 3 I    2 5 S e - e I  a R 3 E A de  @  S @  , 9 2 5 : lo o o U N 0O I  C E -     S C  6 - 8 -  5O O £   e  0  B  E  o 00 e 8 d05 8 o e T 0 ) O E - e o U 6 8 & 0 C 8e I a - 8  1  2  -  6 8  SORNI  :    E 8 C a : 8 .  m  E a E 6 de C E 8 @ 5 o e b0 8 00  a E t e E de 0 d0 C e is E A @ a 8 E 3 - 5 le e & e -    - O @  o 8 8 S 8  A 0 9 O I A C a  e 8  @  @  @ a a  o 0 E @ D - E € o D - 8 e de 8 a E @ S A C E @ @ o C L   1 e C I @ s 5 C S @ I e  D - 3 of o o @ D Q O & @ 68 E o M 88 - ) - L 281 3 Si 3 4  C E @ a - E E  D  L e  E  0 C) 6 88 d    8    3 E E 8 0 E   a  9 : Q e 00  E  t e A 3 8 6 o @ e € f 8 I 8 - e 5 e  C  o  de 8 0  - 9  - C N  I    S €  e  0  @ e C  D ) b0  e o  E LL  2    9 2 3 e E B E E  6  la M a 00 5 E O ) 8 a E 8 a 8  @   8  a L 1  N  D C    I  in 3  = a I A  I  ) )  la -  S Q    D 8  E  32 O SA  a  @ Q I  6  o 9 m @ I lD 3 e I @  e 8     /   a  + 2  0 A  a  5)    - @  a U e 6 e & e € €  3  3 N &  e S > @ : a E a do lE lS D 3 e de de e 2 e e 0 10 B DE in in o de de o a O E @ @ S N 00 S a LL @ le )  CU I  e 3 à  ) C ) a    D 0 8 - A  )  0 E  1 -  8 8 8  F  6 A  0 A  S C @  @ O t 8 8 - 8 8 E y 4e  0  C I  5 C @ I I  00 o A E & a a de  8  0 S  48 @ 4 9    5 de f a b0 in 2 @ 9 € is 8 2 3  -  - 8  5 e  5    R  e 2 o f e U e 6 8 8 E M @ > E de 9 de 5 de 8 b0 E / is 5 I de  n e @ 0 W Dr 6 to 2 00 lB 0 b0 la a E @ - n e 3 6 a 00 le E B o - 3 a a D de i e B L 8 e 0 is is EE a - $ @ S e 3 E le e E 8 I I e f 5 I    - 8  @ e E I 8 C 9 8 - E  @  8    8  E - E 0 o -   S 6 f a E de A E b0 à € D 2 E E t 8 2 N I I W - A 3 n $ N I 5 e I  00   @  A & o L  -    - B o 9 to 0) 0 3 0 ) is 6 S a 8 E O) L @ N 0o D e C E og o E n I @ 0 ) 8 : ) a f 55 f o - of a : 85 0 à O - 6 de 86 N B -  9 E  >  -    Bo - bb o t o @ A E e 0 E E  -  -    a  C  E 1n a  8 e 8  - C @ E  C 8  O  00 E - 8 a    00  U 1  > e 8  a E 00 a 6  L 8  D    a o 8 20 > R de 5 2A le - nif a< 4  e  lo 00    ) - a y    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:  George Kammerer Saturday, October 10, 2020 10:10 PM City Clerk 'Gregg McKenzie (CDR) 10-13-20).pdf  10-13-2020 City Council Meeting (Item # 9.C Placer County Conservation Plan) Lincoln City Council PCCP Support Ltr (Lincoln Village 3 Landowners Assoc  Ms. Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk Madam Clerk,  Please find attached our comment letter on behalf of the Lincoln Village 3 Landowners Association requesting City Council APPROVAL oft the Placer County Conservation Plan at the October 13, 2020 City Council meeting. Please include this letteri in the administrative record for the hearing and distribute this to the members of the City  Council, the City Managerand City Attorney in advance of the meeting.  Thank you, George George T. Kammerer Attorney Atl Law  CONFIDENTIALITYI NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential anda are intended solelyf fort the use of the addressee(s) named above. Ifyoua are not ani intended recipient, theny youl have received this confidential communication ine error. Any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution oft thise e-mail message, anda anya attached file(s), is strictly prohibited andy your may bel liablet tot the sender and/or the intended recipient(s) for violating this confidentiality notice. Ifyoul haver received1 this confidential communicationi ine error, pleaser notify thes senderi immediately! byar replye e-mail message or byt telephoning at (916)6 612-0407, andy permanently  delete thec original e-mail message, anda anya attachedi file(s), and alle electronic or paper copies.  CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  1    George T. Kammerer Attorney At Law  October 13, 2020  Mr. Dan Karleskint, Mayor Mr. Peter Gilbert, Vice Mayor City of Lincoln City Council 600 6th Street Lincoln, CA 95648  Via E-Mail & First Class Mail  Re: Placer County Conservation Plan, City of Lincoln and Western Placer County, California  Honorable Members of the City Council:  On behalf of our client, the Lincoln Village 3 Landowners' Association ("V-3 Landowners"), the largest landowners within the 2,040-acre Village 3 portion of the City of Lincoln General Plan 2050 planning area, we submit this letter to urge the City Council to APPROVE AND ADOPTthe Placer County Conservation Plan ("PCCP") as currently designed. After submitting detailed written comments upon the Draft PCCP, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ /Draft Environmental Impact Report for the PCCP, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act Permitting Strategy Alignment with the PCCP, and afteri investing 15 years as an active participant on the PCCP Biological Working Group and PCCP Finance Committee, the V-3 Landowners are satisfied that their role has meaningfully contributed toi the PCCP's evolution into at thoughtful, comprehensive, biologically and financially viable mechanism to more effectively and efficiently offset impacts to covered species, waters of the US and wetlands, and other habitat types, compared to the prior project-by-project disjunctive impact assessments We thank you in advance for your vote to APPROVE the PCCP at the October 13, 2020meeting.  and case-by-case permitting of the past.  Verytrulyyours,    Cc: Client Group  Jennifer Hanson, City Manager Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Gregg McKenzie, PCCP Administrator    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi Gwen/Dia!  Kate. J. Hart. City Clerk  Tuesday, October 13, 20203:07P PM  Jennifer Hanson; Steve Prosser; Robert Weygandt; Greg McKenzie LETTER TO CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA ITEM9.C. Ltrt to City Council (10-13-2020).pdf  Please see. Richland's attached letter ofs support for the PCCP. Ify you would kindly distribute a copy to each of  the Council Members, we would be grateful.  Best regards, Kate. J. Hart  Land Use and Permitting Counsel RICHLAND INVESTMENTS  CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  1    RICHLAND  October 13, 2020  SENT VIA EMAIL-gityelerk@lincolnca.goy Mayor Dan Karleskint and Councilmembers clo Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk City ofLincoln 600 6th Street Lincoln, CA 95648  Re: Placer County Conservation Plan; Agenda Item 9.C  Dear Mayor Karleskint and Councilmembers:  Richland is pleased the City is considering adoption oft thej proposed Placer County Conservation Plan or PCCP. The PCCP will ensure the conservation and preservation of various natural habitats and species throughout the County, including the City ofLincoln, while also ensuring development can occur without long permitting delays and processing at the local, state  and federal levels.  In an era replete with partisan bickering and distrust, it is programs like the PCCP that illustrate how the seemingly impossible, isi in fact, possible when citizens, non-governmenta. organizations, local, state and federal agency staffers, and elected officials work together to find solutions toward the greater good. The PCCP is truly a win-win for both development and the  environment.  Richland has supported the adoption of the PCCP since its inception over a decade ago. Today, Richland respectfully urges you to certify the EIR/EIS and adopt the PCCP. Thank you  for your consideration.  Very truly, yours,  Land Use and Permitting Counsel  Rt  cc: Jennifer Hanson, City Manager Steve Prosser, Community Development Director Robert Weygandt, Supervisor Greg McKenzie, PCCP Administrator    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Subject:  Cheryl Berkema City Clerk  Monday, October 12, 20205:31PM Public Comment: item 9C PCCP  Subject: Public comment for item 9C Placer County Conservation Program, Implementing Agreement fori the Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan,  and fee schedule  Lincoln City Council Members,  Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on this most important topic. The Placer County Conservation Program contains many potential positive contributions for Placer County. There are Placer County Community Development Resources Agency (CDRA) has put this and many other highly controversial programs forward during the pandemic. While individuals and small businesses are suffering medical and financial hardships, the County has burdened residents with thousands of pages of environmental documents and the introduction of numerous and significant programs. Placer has changed the entire building code, introduced the massive Zoning Text Amendment, introduced a Winery & Brewery Ordinance, updated the Placer Housing Code, and is considering an extension to a Regional Park. The Placer County Conservation Program has been under consideration for approximately 2 decades. There are already conservation protections in place. I respectfully ask that you postpone your decision and work towards a solution with public workshops that considers all of the cumulative impacts of the programs recently introduced and the PCCP. lask that you postpone your decision for thei following reasons. We are in a pandemic and close to a presidential election. Resident focus is obviously not focused on the PCCP. Recent California wildfires have devastated California. The assessment of fire damage in California and specifically what it means in the near future for air quality, water quality, homelessness, and conservation efforts Irecently attended the Placer Board of Supervisor hearing on October 6, 2020 where the Placer CEO brought forth a proposal for a loan for Lincoln protection services from Placer County. It was quite troubling that Supervisor Uhler raised the suggestion that not only did he want a 2 year review (reasonable) but that he also wanted to know how Lincoln was spending their budget (ifi it was being properly spent) and suggested that the Board may help the Lincoln Council look at best practices and long term efficiencies. This suggestion could have the appearance of Placer oversight/contro" for monies being received by Lincoln. This appearance should be avoided at all costs. Kirk Uhler was voted out of office in March 2020. He has been rapidly pushing his agenda through the board prior to his end ofi term in December 2020. The City of Lincoln is now a member of the Joint Power Authority, the Placer Conservation Authority. The Sunset Area Plan/Placer Ranch would likely use the PCCP (if approved) to mitigate associated projects. The landfill is part of that lawsuit. The Statement of overriding consideration was that the jobs produced by a university would provide benefit. The State of California commissioned a study that did not even include the Sac State/Placer Ranch satellite.  however many challenges and negative impacts not being considered.  is unclear.  1    The Chancellor also stated there would be no additional universities. Lincoln's involvement seems to  be growing in one of Placer County's major challenges.  Respectfully, Cheryl Berkema  lam including my comments to the Placer County Board of Supervisors PCCP hearing below:  Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) Feedback Board of Supervisors Hearing 9/1/2020  Board of Supervisors,  1. Community Development Resources Agency (CDRA) has again taken advantage of the pandemic by jamming non-essential projects through the project pipeline with insufficient public review. The Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP) is an example of a non-essential project, a plani in the making for 20 years, hardly time sensitive. Other examples of CDRA abusing the public's trust and lacking transparency with the introduction of highly controversial projects during the pandemic are Hidden Falls Expansion and the Winery and Brewery ordinance. Similar programs already exist, iti is therefore inexcusable to introduce non-essential programs during the pandemic that benefit special interests and have significant & unavoidable impacts with significant cost to 2. The PCCP wasi failed to be properly socialized. Placer residents are largely unaware oft the PCCP program a. Where was the media splash in the Sacramento Bee and other local papers educating the public on b. The program documentation was: so large that it needed permission to be divided into 3 sections on state & federal registries. Yet the documentation was not made available to the public in County offices C. The Placer County Code and a General Plan Amendment are being proposed by the PCCP. These d. There was significant public participation on the PCCP over the past decades, yet the Planning Commission hearing had extremally limited participation. The impact ofj job losses, business losses, health concerns over the virus, concerns over children returning to schools and an uncertain future shows the insensitivity of Placer management to the residents of Placer with the introduction oft the e. The Board of Supervisors is actually changing the remote communications tool for participation in the hearing on the day of the hearing September1.: 2020, making it difficult for those not able to 3. PCCP in concept could be a great program. The Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP); Western Placer County Aquatic Resources Program (CARP), and Western Placer County in-lieu Fee Program (ILF) should provide al long term strategy for conservation with consistency, however, the current CDRA management team's practices and suggested program implementation falls short of meeting the purported program goals. The proposed PCCP program implementation has several  taxpayers.  the programs proposed benefits, impacts, costs and sources ofi funding?  and libraries.  changes were not brought to the Municipal Advisory Councils for feedback.  PCCP at this time.  manage the new technology.  significant issues:  2    a. The program is supposed to be self-funded. At the Planning Commission, there was a very brief overview of funding describing how development fees covered only 70% of the program funding. The remaining 309 % was said to be covered by state, federal and other grants. It was verbally stated that "loans" will likely be needed to sustain the program. The plan falls short in identifying the contingencies. Are more ballot measures going to be needed? With the current pandemic and recession where trillions of dollars of state and federal bailouts, iti is unreasonable to make such assumptions on grants sustaining the program. CDRA needs to go back to the drawing board and come up with a plan to fund the  program.  i. In Placer County, during a time of great uncertainty where many people  have lost their jobs, homes, and businesses, budgets are being cut to provide only the most basic services, yet Placeri isi introducing yet another business development program that is costly tot taxpayers. Placer has a $3 Billion-dollar short fall for roads, insufficient funds for sewer infrastructure, fire service ballot measures, increases to landfill costs, recent education ballot measures, and increased property taxes. Additional taxes are too great a burden. fire resources, yet the PCCP which has been evolving for approximately 20 yearsi is being introduced which will add to fire control costs. The current state ofe emergency: should be the  ii. The largest fires in California history are ravaging the state depleting all  priority.  ii. Placer parks do not have sufficient funding for maintenance or  improvements, yet another public funding is being requested. shifting responsibility via the Implementing Agreement.  b. The oversight of the program is problematic:  The responsibility for management of the program has been diluted by  1. South Placer Regional Transportation Agency is not a' Wildlife Agency, their main goal is transportation modes and roadi infrastructure (i.e., Placer Parkway). It would appear to be a conflict ofi interest for an organization that is measured on transportation to be responsible for wildlife protection in any way. 2. Placer County has some oft the highest paid employeesi ini the state enjoying significant raises and bonuses and they additionally hire highly paid consultants to produce environmental studies & reports. CDRA: should be able to manage their own responsibilities. CDRA did the same with the Housing program deferring their housing responsibilities to the Private Trust. This dilution ofr responsibilities introduces al lack of accountability, costs tax payers, and creates an unnecessary complexity into the system. 3. The public should not have to "watch" the activities of multiple agencies to follow PCCP permitting activities for public and private developments. This further dilutes 4. Yearly program reports are not sufficient. Too much damage can be done over the course of a year to the environment without transparency and oversight. In ordert to  accountability.  monitor program trends, quarterly reports should be required.  ii. The citizens oversight committee whose composition, empowerment,  and responsibilities have not been documented or vetted. Placer typically uses this asa mechanism to say the public oversight is there to ensure transparency and accountability. As large as the documentation fort the PCCP is and how important the committee is for accountability and transparency iti is being treated as an afterthought, merely included to repeatedly' bring back projects to the Board of Supervisors to offer additional entitlements and fee reductions to the developers. This practice is highly abused with the developers ofl large projects and specific plans. These consistent modifications are not predictable for a program.  placate the public.  iii. Placer Planning consistently produces project agreements only to  3    Total losses to publici funds is unknown. The PCCP as a new program should not follow down the same problematic path, rather should utilize best practices in oversight, accounting and its authority. The PCCP program created a "pilot program" executing on the PCCP program without appropriate state andi federal agency signoff. They also engaged in PCCP activities without completing the required CEQA process first. An interim fee agreement was conveniently set up to run business prior toi the PCCP Program being approved. What other oversteps and infractions can we expect from the PCCP program in the future with top level management abuses setting the bari for poor behavior? Will these overstep activities not only! be executed on amuch larger scale but also trickle down to all oft the permit applicants approving permits? No one is above the law; appropriate safeguards need to be inj place to protect public resources.  reporting.  iv. The PCCP Pilot Program is an example of CDRA management abusing  4. CDRA and the Board of Supervisors consistently kick the can down the road.  - Programs/projects cumulative impacts are: significant and unavoidable  thenj justified by a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Rinse and repeat. The problem with this consistently used Placer strategy is thei true costs of these impacts to the environment are real and remain fori taxpayers in terms of diminished quality ofl life, lost species, destroyed environments andi tax dollars that need to be spent to correct issues created by the approved programs. Stop approving poorly designed programs with significant impacts-  they are avoidable!  i. The PCCP is largely a "Killi in Place and mitigate elsewhere" program. ii. A: similar kick the can strategy was used by Placer County in the iv. Placer County also used the same strategy to purchase GHG Emissions  Eventually you run out of mitigations. County to improve sustainability.  Sustainability Program. Only about 4 out of 51 state guidelines were implemented by Placer credits int the Sunset Area Plan. Placer's mantra of approving projects byi issuing Statements of  Overriding Considerations has consistently been short sighted.  5. CDRA has not been a good steward of protected resources and endangered species in Placer County.  CDRA has undervalued the cost and restoration of protected trees ini the  County fori in lieu fees. Thisi is a distinct benefit to developers and encourages decimation of environmental resources. Tax payers are being cheated out of1 the value of the resources and pay the price inl loss of precious environmental resources. This has been pointed out to CDRA as thousands of protected trees and acres of wetlands were targeted for removal in CDRA proposed projects. Other Counties have significantly more robust plans in place with multiple also consistently ignores public feedback on project requests to save species, wetlands, vernal pools and other resources. The public is owed the current status of lost resources, in lieui funds usage, and the restoration progress. Why would Placer County introduce a significant program when the current programs fail to preserve resources and lack transparency and accountability? simultaneously which will allow developers to destroy vernal pools and endangered species in the Sunset Area Plan/Placer Ranch. Those vernal pools and endangered species should have been included int the PCCP for protection. Placer County allowed special developer interests to win out over the environmental protections but now want to claim the PCCP as a best practice program. Rather disingenuous. Sunset Area Plan/Placer Ranch is currently in litigation. The  times the in-lieu fees.  ii. CDRA fails to report on Tree Preservation and Restoration today. CDRA  The foxi is guarding the hen house.  iii. CDRA designed a strategy for the Sunset Area Plan and the PCCP  4    PCCP should be delayed until resolution of the Sunset Area Plan/Placer Ranch lawsuit, iti is the  largest dependency on the environment in West Placer County.  6. CDRA currently' fails to enforce the conditions it provides in projects for mitigation and monitoring. Thisi is evidenced by multiple Grand Jury Reports. As an example, the Director of CDRA was specifically chartered by the Grand. Jury with creating a winery ordinance with specific actions, het failed to do sO with the recent introduction oft the new ordinance. CDRA management and the Board of Supervisors should take Grand. Jury recommendations seriously. CDRA: should assess the current issues that are not being resolved in monitoring  and mitigation enforcement prior toi introducing new programs.  Thank you for consideration of my comments, please include my comments as part of the administrative record,  Cheryl Berkema Placer County Resident  CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  5    Gwendolyn Scanlon  From: Sent: To: Subject:  Michael Garabedian City Clerk 2020  Wednesday, October 14, 2020 5:45 AM  Fwd: Comment open City Council "hearing" approving PCCP last evening October 13,  For last night's meeting record.  Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Garabedian  Subject: Comment open City Council "hearing" approving PCCP last evening October 13,  2020  Date: October 14, 2020 at 5:33:33 AMI PDT To: "Gregg McKenzie (CDR)"  Cc: Omnkoreingingneases Paterciperalnconasor  Peter.Gibert@LincolnçA.gov, noly.andreatta@iincoinca.goy, pauloner@lincincasoy asasineincneaser <alyssa.slhi@LinconcA.gov, ennifer.Hanson@lincoinca.govy  kistine.molenkopl@lincoinca.gov Re: Lincoln City Council under cover of COVID  Gregg,  Using last night's far less than cursory public involvement to again obtain another key PCCP approval is yet another signal warning that PCCP public involvement has been wholly inadequate for its entire This applies to the agricultural meeting lattended at Mt Pleasant Hall, and toi two "environmental" meetings lalso attended. These were meetings to sell the PCCP as a product, not to inform and involve. The only draft product at the dual meetings was the Executive Summary which was not the subject of any discussion. There was a memo by the two meeting conveyor saying that the General Plan would be frozen by the PCCP, that upon questioning you contradicted-implyng not well-informed My experience is thati the content oft the reports was embargoed from the public for most of its 20 years, and then finally perhaps 3,000 or more pages were unloaded without meaningful workshops. Each item of discussion by City Manger last night had far more certainty about what will happen than The City Manager's: statement that Lincoln needs less that one: staff person's time to implement PCCP Words cannot describe the City! Manager's failure to show the PPCP map in the power point presentation last night. The answer that the map is in the materials discredits the speaker, your  course.  involvement by that Biological Working Group member.  you do. pointed out that there are weakening words in many paragraphs.  spells that PCCP will be at failure from the get-go.  presence there, and the PCCP itself.  1    The City Attorney jumping in to cut my comment off at three minutes while directing staff to cut offr my Zoom contact further with no chance to wrap up or even request wrap up, suggests a process controlled tightly by counsel in a manner no less than censorship. Other commenters were in support of PCCP:I thinki it's fair to say that concerns and opposition had no City Council and Counsel "day in court." Quite clearly the Lincoln City Council does represent the public in one significant way: they and the public demonstrated noi idea what PCCPi is and what this city is doing on PCCP. lattend the past City Council meeting attended by al large group County and other PCCP preparers and boosters that wasa Last night to the Councilloverview introduced my experience with creation of the California Coastal Plan, a Toms River Town research project and successful litigation oft the New. Jersey Pinelands Plan, enforcement litigation in the Adirondack Park Blue Line, and as public, the development oft the California Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (like PCCP, an HCP and California NCCP). I've yet to have an opportunity to meaningfully engage with my experience in the PCCP. The public needs meaningful workshops. IfPCCP is going to continue to not have them, it's left to the  celebration of a done deal.  public to conduct them and to invite you to their program.  This is a comment for the PCCP record.  Mike  Cc: City Council members, City Manager, City Attorney  CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  2    @ e  , I  @ 5  t @ I  )    S  8  E 3 et @ B a o S LI 8 o 8  et @ 00 E e E 8 o E -  0 @ E  U & -  5   la 5 5 e g8 0  I  S I  I  S  5 D @ M C € de a € E a  a   2 N 8 o de 88 -  O<O A O 4  E CO  1 2 3  LO    C  S a a  a S L  Ammae ARaON2    @ E O @ @ o  S 0   - a  - e 00 E 0 @ S O  8    5  N  à  e 9 @ a  o 5) / CV w  7  5 19  e 3 6 9 Bo 5 s 9 L T  €  S    e b0 in B  :E  -    b0    00  a 8 U 8 U  a E € E le & 2 3 C 8 @ E L e @ 0 @ 10 @ > L a 8 I  2 E I 8  C : B - -  e X 8 6 e E 8 e a 5 8 8 e o A E  -  e et € D I LI    a a  a & 3 E 3 o @ 00 à - LJ de 6 la N U L O I t 00 @ S a e C E 8 L a @ 6 K a o l@ o s  e  C E 8   a NN e ) d0  E a a e L de L e de a o o 9 o o o o o o o E A A A : la Nioio 2      00  3 C  ORN    3 @ b0 a - -  00  8  9 8 5 9 3 R 6 a L B o E E 5 la  O  ORNIA  A.LID    9  9 a - I  L 0 Z e L @ 3 o I  a le - R a  E E 8 3  -  I  * la 0  8 I  8    -  Kwyguauore  C  a  E  - 3 00  femybH    V.D.  AETV3.  AETV.G. GVON3 30GREN e ASTWVN.  AE.O.  AaTV.d.  AST.    8 E 00 C  I I  8 E le I 9 3 B e a  E @ E C  @    @ E  E  ssss  fany misss  e  M  @  Ihali #I II I    2  6  € @  9 I  e @ e    B B 00 e I  I  8 6 2 3  I  a I  5  I  e i !  - E  00 U -  I  A    899 38  ATV3.  AETV.G. OVOU3 300B8 SME ATVN.  AETV.0.  Aanvs.    00 de > 0 3 9 de N  a 00 5 co  a 00  De  3 @ 00    6 S C    409  a  -