Live Life Lincoln Live Life - Lincoln-Live. Life - Lincoln. - Live - Life Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln.  MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN Regular Meeting July 13, 2021  CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY  OPEN SESSION MEETING Channel and' WAVE Channel 18.  No Physical Location, Meeting conducted virtually on Zoom with Live Stream on City of Lincoln YouTube  1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Silhi at 6:00PM. 2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Holly Andreatta  Paul Joiner William Lauritsen Dan Karleskint Mayor Alyssa Silhi  Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 member absent, 0 members excused. Staff members present: Mark Scott, Interim City Manager  Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief Jim Bermudez, Public' Works Director Steve Prosser, Community Development Director Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present via teleconference. 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated there was no reportable  action to report.  4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE led by Councimember William Lauritsen.  5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS - Mark Scott, Interim City Manager, stated the Landscape contract on Item 10B was being pulled from the agenda but the discussion portion of the item would be heard.  6. PRESENTATIONS (GSP) Development.  6.A. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Implementation & Groundwater Sustainability Plan Trevor Joseph, City of Roseville Hydrogeologist and lead representative of the West Placer Groundwater Sustainability Agency -WPGSA, gave a powerpoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. ACity Council discussion ensued regarding: groundwater banking and reclaimed water; climate change; changing land use and accessory dwelling unit regulations by the State; sustainability of groundwater; and how droughts affect the model. Mayor Silhi opened the discussion to the public with the a) Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern that Lincoln continues to kick down the road with groundwater recharge and asked three questions: (1) Is Roseville currently still doing recharge or are they pumping? (2) Counties north and south of Lincoln are having problems with the water table dropping and having to do deeper wells so is our basin still good condition? and (3) Is it okay to draw down the base during drought because he hadn't heard that in any other SGMA presentations?  following comment:  600 Sixth Street  Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.Iimcoln.ca.us +916-434-2400    Live . Life . Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live  incoln Live Life Lincoln.  Page 2 of7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July13,2021  7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDAITEMS  a) Mona Bass, al Lincoln resident and Adopt-a-Creek Team Leader, reported on the group's two-year anniversary and services they have provided in past two years such as removal of 36 tons of trash from b) Max Moon, a Lincoln resident and President of Skatepark group, stated his concern with removal of skatepark from McBean Park and his concern that the City wouldn't receive the grant it applied for and therefore wouldn't be able to construct a skatepark at the proposed Community Center Park. c) Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, questioned why his questions from prior item were not answered. Mr. Scheiber also was concerned with July 6, 2021 work session meeting discussion regarding d) Lena Labosky, a Lincoln resident, stated she would also like the answers to Mr. Scheiber's questions Mayor Silhi requested staff respond to Mr. Scheiber's questions and Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney,  Auburn Ravine.  public comments and problems recording the meeting. and requested the topic be on the next City Council meeting stated staff would post the information on the website.  8. CONSENT  Mayor Silhi asked if any members of the City Council would like to pull any items from the Consent Agenda, hearing none she asked ift the public had any items they would like pulled. Albert Scheiber requested Item 8J, WWTRF Oxidation, and Item 8K, Routine & Ongoing City Services. Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the balance of the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Councimember Lauritsen. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner = Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Karleskint - Aye and  Silhi - Aye. Those items approved were:  8.A. Approval of Minutes of June 22, 2021 Regular City Council meeting. the City Manager and filed in the Office of the City Clerk by June 28, 2021.  8.B. Receive and file Contract Report, identifying contracts, task order and purchase orders executed by 8.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-122 accepting the Warrants of June 18 and 25, 2021 and July 2, 2021 to be 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-123 authorizing the City Manager to execute ai three year contract with the County of Placer for an amount not to exceed $598,825, billed quarterly, for animal control and enforcement The FY21/22. Police Department. Professional Services Fund 700-4150-50400) includes $225,000 for animal control services, which is sufficient for year 1 oft the agreement. Future budgets will include the 8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-124 approving the plans and specifications and authorize staff to proceed with the bidding process for construction of First Street Resurfacing Phase 2 Project, Capital Improvement The project. is funded. by Fund 298 (Federal Grant - RSTP) in the amount of $1,900,00 and by local match  placed on file with the City Clerk and available for audit.  services.  appropriate funding necessary: for year 2 and 3 ofthe agreement.  Project (CIP) 470.  Fund 221 (Gas Tax) ini the amount of $40,200.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www.dincoln.ca.us 916-434-2400    Live . Life . Lincoln . Live . Life Lincoln. Live Life . Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln  Page 3 of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July13,2021  8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-125 authorizing the City Engineer to install two-way stop signs at the 8.G. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-126 authorizing a budget augmentation of $9,927 from the available unencumbered Fund 223: Streets TDA to engineering operating budget for the Local Roadway Safety Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract for professional services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $79,927 for the development and preparation of the Local Roadway Safety The LRSP is budgeted by the engineering operating division in the amount of $70,000 from Fund 223. 8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-127 accepting the East Avenue Waterline Replacement Project, CIP 455 as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract amendment No. 1i in the amount of $43,450 with Coastland Total construction cost oft the project is $1,403,1661 from Fund 221 and Fund 711 within CIP 455 of the Fiscal 8.. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-128 accepting the East Side Water and Sewer Replacement Project, CIP 442 as complete and authorize the City Clerk toi file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract amendment No. 3 in the amount of $17,320 Total construction cost oft the project is $5,244,589 from Fund 221, Fund 223, Fund 711 and Fund 721 within 8.L. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-131 authorizing the City Manager to enteri into a three-year contract with Prodigy Electric for citywide Electrical Services for a total annual amount of $120,000 and not to exceed $370,908 (which includes inflation adjustment), ending June 30, 2024, with the option to renew for one Electrical services are paid from Fund 270, Fund 100, Fund 600, Fund 223, Fund 710 and Fund 720. 8.M. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-132 requesting Placer County Collect the Charges for the districts shown  intersections of Havenwood Drive and Banyan Way with Palo Verde Way. The fiscal impact would be $1,500 to Fund. 223 (Street - TDA).  Plan (LRSP).  Civil Engineering. Year 2019/20.  with Coastland Civil Engineering. CIP 442 of the Fiscal Year 2018/19.  additional three-year term.  below on the FY 2020-21 County Property Tax Roll. TAX CODE NUMBER: 61110 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 772B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61120 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 773B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61415 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 979B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61417 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 980B  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-2 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-2  600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.lncola.cA.t916-434-2400    Live. Life : Lincoln . Live . Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoin Live Life Lincoln  Page 4of7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July 13, 2021  8.N. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-133 requesting Placer County Collect the Charges for the districts shown  below on the FY 2020-21 County Property Tax Roll. TAX CODE NUMBER: 61100 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 667B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61130 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61140 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61400 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 740B TAX CODE NUMBER: 61410 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2010-133 & 2010-157 TAX CODE NUMBER: 61510 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2004-202 TAX CODE NUMBER: 84800 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72 TAX CODE NUMBER: 84800 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA:  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 1998-1  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area 2 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area 1 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Series 2018  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2010-1 (Police & Fire Services)  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Foskett Ranch Assessment District No. 2004-3  DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 1999 DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 2001  8.J. Wastewater Treatment Facility Oxidation Aerator Budget Augment, Construction Contract & Roland Neufeld, Senior Engineer, gave a brief staff report. Mayor Silhi opened the discussion to the public  Task Order.  with the following comment:  a). Albert Scheiber, al Placer County resident, stated his concern with the City's interfund and stated the staff report includes a completion date in June, 2022 while prior Council discussions were around urgency of Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Andreatta. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye and Silhi- - Aye RESOLUTION 2021-129(0)Alutinonzing a budget augmentation of $407,047 from available unencumbered Fund 725 to CIP 459-V WWTRF Oxidation Ditch Aerator Conversions Project;(2) Authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for construction with Cushman Contracting Corporation in the amount of $2,494,000 for the WWTRF Oxidation Ditch Aerator Project;(3). Authorizing the Community Development Director to approve change orders not to exceed $249,400; and (4) Approving a Task Order  this project.  Contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc in the amount of $357,766.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648. www.d.lincoln.ca.us 916-434-2400    Live . Life . Lincoln . Live . Life . Lincoln. Live Life - Lincoln  Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln  Page! 5of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July13, 2021  8.K. Routine & Ongoing City Operations.  Mayor Silhi opened the discussion to the public with the following comment:  a) Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern that this was a high dollar item and Mark Scott, Interim City Manager, responded that iti is not uncommon for cities to approve routine operational contracts at the beginning of thet fiscal year. Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Lauritsen. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner = Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Karleskint - Aye and Silhi = Aye - RESOLUTION 2021-130 authorizing the  Council was approving this item without any review.  expenditures for ongoing and routine services required for City Operations.  9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - none 10. GENERAL BUSINESS  10.A.Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-134 approving a Supplemental Design Standard to complement the existing West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual to provide consistency with the Statewide Trash Amendments and provide guidance for the incorporation oft trash controls for qualifying new development Angela Frost, Environmental Services Manager, gave al brief staff report and powerpoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: developers, excluding single-family residential builders, will be required to pay for the new standard after August 1, 2021; the standard is essentially a large net in the storm drain to collect trash which Public Works will maintain prior to the first winter rain event and every couple month thereafter; priority land uses (PLU's) and density level of 10 dwelling units per acre trigger the requirement; and stormwater permit expiration. Mayor Silhi opened the a) Lena Labosky, a Lincoln resident, stated her concern with proposed high-density residential project near Bella Breeze and asked if this standard takes into consideration a lot of high density in one location Councimember Lauritsen motioned approval of the item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Karleskint. By the following Vote (Approved): Lauritsen - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Andreatta - Aye, Joiner = Aye, and Silhi - Aye RESOLUTION 2021-134 approving a Supplemental Design Standard to complement the existing West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual to provide consistency with the Statewide Trash Amendments and provide guidance for the incorporation oft trash controls for qualifying new 10.B.Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-135 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Brightview Landscape Services for City-wide landscape services for ani initial 11-month period beginning August 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022. This will be for a total annual amount not to exceed $1,279,540 (which includes Supplemental Services of $100,500) in year one with the option to renew every year for the following four Landscape services are, paid from the Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District Fund 270, Fund 710, Mark Scott, Interim City Manager, stated the staff report talking included three items: (1)adoption of the annual maintenance contract with Brightview Landscape Services; (2) the level of maintenance pursued underthatcontract full service versus the 30%0 cut lastvearand/3lhisracammendationio move forward  and redevelopment projects.  discussion to the public with the following comment:  development and redevelopment projects.  years (which will cover service up to June 30th, 2026).  Fund 750, Fund 100, Fund 600, CFD (Community Facilities District) 2018-1.  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 "www.c.lincoln.cais 916-434-2400    Live Life - Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln.  Page 6of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July 13,2021  with efforts to try toi figure out the dilemma with the lighting and landscape district assessments and return to full landscaping services. He continued the reason the contract was pulled off the agenda tonight was because the bidder withdrew their bid. They withdrew the bid because staff released the Request for Proposals asking the contractor toi include full service costs but that actual services would most likely be cut 30% as they were last year. The bidder assumed a negotiation down to less than full services and when told the City had decided ont full service an agreement couldn't be negotiated quickly enough on appropriate adjustments sO staff will go back out for an additional Request for Proposal and bring an agreement back to Mr. Scott continued Council needs to consider reinstating the level of maintenance to a level closer to what it used to be in order to avoid losing assets and traffic hazards caused by lack of pruning. He concluded by stating a deep dive into the districts was needed to create a more equitable assessment system, a solution other than the general fund subsidy was needed sO that property owners can adopt something that makes sense for the future of Lincoln and staff would bring this discussion back at a future work session. Mayor Silhi a). Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern that Morrison Landscaping was kicked  Council at a later date.  opened the discussion to the public with the following comment:  to the curb and the public's lack of trust would make a resolution of this issue an uphill battle.  No action taken on this item.  10.C.Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-136 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for construction with A&E Arborist Tree Care, Inc. in the amount of $362,880 for the Oak Tree Maintenance Project, Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 468 and authorizing the Community Development Director to approve change The project is funded by $700,000 from Fund 290 as, part of CIP 468 Oak Tree Maintenance in the FY Steve Prosser, Community Development Director, gave a brief staff report. A Council discussion ensued regarding: timing of work causing damage to oak trees; only one letter included in the staff report that stated the timing of the work was appropriate and that came from the contractor which may be a conflict ofi interest; no value int the wood because the contractor would be chipping and distributing in open spaces; chipping should be declared as organic recycling to comply with Senate Bill 1383; and concerns about maintenance work sparking a fire during driest year on record. Mayor Silhi opened the discussion to the public with the a) Lena Labosky, al Lincoln resident, stated her concern about the maintenance project as the City b). Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern with timing of the project, interpretation of maintaining the number of trees versus maintaining trees and using the money in the oak tree fund. c) Connie Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated she was using her time to voice Byron Chapman's concerns that he raised at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting regarding timing of the project causing damage to trees. Ms. Scheiber also stated her concern that the project would be a fire hazard. d) Stan Nader, a Lincoln resident, stated his concern that the maintenance project does not comply with the City's oak tree ordinance which intended funds to be used to plant trees not maintain them. Mr. Nader also stated 50% oft the oak trees could die from this proposed project and that the real reason Staff is recommending the project is to use the oak tree mitigation fund balance which were discussed in the Joint  orders not to exceed $72,576. 2020/21 Capital Improvement. budget.  following comments:  hasn't had a project like this since she moved here in 2013.  Legislative Audit Committee JLAC)report. done a fewyears ago.  600 Sixth Strect * Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.linc.ln.cA.us 916-434-2400    Live . Life . Lincoln - Live . Life . Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln . Live . Life Lipcoln  Page7of7 City Council, Public Finance. Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes July13,2021  Mayor Silhi closed the public discussion with no further comments and another City Council discussion ensued regarding: the oak tree mitigation ordinance allows maintenance; timing of the project is a fire concern and the effect on trees; phasing project to clear fallen limbs first to lessen fire danger and raising of canopy in the fall to not damage trees; and contractor's insurance and indemnity requirements. Mark Scott, Interim City Manager, suggested this item be brought back to the next City Council meeting with a schedule oft the project and additional letter from a certified arborist that the project is appropriate and received City  Council consensus. No action taken on this item. 11. COUNCIL NITIATED BUSINESS  Councilmembers Joiner and Andreatta requested a status of a recently proposed airport development project  as they have received a number ofi inquiries to invest in the airport.  12. INFORMATION ITEMS  Councimember Andreatta wanted to inform the public that Council was not ignoring the skatepark issue Councilmember Joiner reported on great California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS)  raised earlier in the meeting by Max Moon.  investment returns.  Mayor Silhi stated the next City Council meeting would be an in-person meeting. 13. ADJOURNMENT - Mayor Silhi adjourned the meeting at 8:41PM.  Submitted by:  sbwen &canloy Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www.ci.lincohn.ca.u916-4342400    Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)  Implementation  &  Groundwater  NORTH AMERICAN Subbasin  Sustainability Plan (GSP)  Development  July 13,2021    Introduction/Purpose  1) Todays agenda (Overview of SGMA implementation and GSP development)  South! SuttorV Wator DistrictG GSA Sutter County GSA  Preceding, current, and near future activities Wost Placor GSA  NORTH SUBBASIN AMERICAN  Informational purposes only 2) Highlight future meeting  RDIOOI GSA Sacramonto Groundwator Authority GSA  Pending consideration of GSP adoption  January 31, 2022 State DWR  January 31, 2042 Results  20 years with  GSP due to 5year updates Avoid Undesirab!  Est. Mid 2021 Est. Fall 2021  Est. Late 2021 Implementation Begins  Draft Final GSP Public Hearing Adopt Final GSP & GSP  NORTH AM Subbasin  Release    Agenda  1) Groundwater Levels  SOUTHYUBA SUBBASIN,  Contours and Conjunctive  Use  SUTTER SUBBASIN  2) Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)  AMERICAN SUBBASIN NORTH  3) Local and regional groundwater  management activities  4) limeline/Next steps  5) Questions  SOUTHAMERICAN SUBBASIN    Groundwater Level Contours and  Conjunctive Use  NORTH AME Subbasin    Surface Water Thalweg Elevation Point WellL Location WSEC Contour(n). Groundwater Flow Direction NorthAmerican: Subbasin County Boundary  Groundwater  Levels Contours  Tepoguphed Quadrenglas4 FIGURE  Spring: 2020 UpperA Aquifer Regional Contours  Sutter, Placera and Sacramento Counties North Americans Subbasin  GEI JANUARY 2021    YUBA COUNTY  NEVADA COUNTY  Conjunctive Use  North American Subbasin  Conjunctive use isa proven method )I  "PLAÇER COUNTY  successful  basin  groundwater management  TER TY  LONG-TERM GROUNDWATER LEVELS. NORTHERN SACRAMENTO COUNTY  (WELL 10N05E14Q002M)  YOLO COUNTY  ELDORADO COUNTY  DECADES OF GROUNDWATER DECLINE  K  DROUGHT ENDS  CONJUNCTIVE USE PROCRAM BEGINS  AMADOR- COUNTY  SACRAMENTO COUNTY  -30  South American Subbasin  DROUGHT BEGINS  so  : or -  -  SANJOAQUIN COUNTY    Sustainable Groundwater  Management Act (SGMA)  NORTH AMEI Subbasin    Sustainable Groundwater Management Act  (SGMA)  Local Control  Roles Stakeholders DWR Regulating andAssisting Agency  Groundwater Basins  Groundwater Sustainability Plans required for high- and medium- priority basins by 2020/22  "A central feature of these bills is the recognition that groundwater management in California is best accomplished locally." Governor Jerry Brown, September  SWRCB Enforcing Agency  GSA Planningand implementation Agency  2014  SGMA Timeline GSP Due Jan 31, 2022  Achieve Sustainability Jan 31, 2040/42  GSA Formation June 30, 2017  GSP Due Annual Reporting &  (COD) Jan 31, 2020  5yr GSP Updates    Sustainability - Avoid Six Undesirable Results  Reduction of GW Storage  Lowering of GW Levels  Seawater Intrusion  CommurityPubk Waser Systors, Raw ands Water Suate NDAte Smal Lvwis, 2006-2010 (mg) uote10 0  Depletion of  Water Quality Degradation  Land Subsidence  Interconnected Streams    Local and regional groundwater  management activities  NORTH AMEI Subbasin    Groundwater Sustainability Agency  (GSA) Formation  Reclamation District 1001 GSA Michael Phillips Sutter County GSA Guadalupe Rivera South Sutter Water District GSA Brad Arnold  West Placer GSA Christina Hanson  GSA GSA bbosia Couaty  Sacramento Groundwater Authority GSA Rob Swartz  SUT  South Sutter Water District GSA  Department of Water Resources OV SGMA PORTAL fHome AlIF Posted GSAI Notices  1signin  West Placer GSA  RD 1001 GSA I Sutter 44 County GSA  EGSP Allematives GAudcakedAVEas CBasnModigalien  Locala agenciesh haves GSAI formationn noticest fors smallp portions ofa single: basin, larger portionso ofmuliplet basins, andfors separalea areasy withn thesameb basin. Becausec ofthey vanabilty OfGSAS formedbyk locala agencesa andther requirementte totracks separates 90-dayp periodst for discrete areasw within abasin, themumberc ofentriesa anduniques agenciess showni imthet tableb below, andthen numbers ofagencies lisledinthe" "Exporttocsvme wifnotmatch. Theb besty describet the GSAR fommatione elffortste dateistosay. "Xunique local agencies! haver formed GSASI thata account fory areas! InZDasins."  VIEW LIST GSA BASIN  Showi25 vjentries No ofuniquei LocalAgenciest Listed: 345 No ofBasinsv wtha aGSAF Formed: 143 Showing 1c1cf entrles (Ttered from 3461 lotal GSAName MLPISELOSA Showing 1tc10r1 (titered trom3 346: totale enes)  Search: westp placer  IE ExporttocsV Next  Sacramento Groundwater. Authority GSA  Basin 5-021.84NORTH AMMERICAN  Number 5-021.64  Counties + Posted Placer 0509:2017 08/092017 Previous Next    SOUTMAMERICAN    Draft Content (GSP Regulations & NASb Sections)  GSP Development Phases  2. Develop water levels that consider beneficial uses and users Where Sustainable Management Criteria- 0 Lowering Reduction Seawater Degraded Land SurfaceWater GWlevelsofSlorage Intrusion Quality Subsidence Depletion  3. Develop actions and/or ensure basin is sustainable  1. Understand existing basin conditions  management projects to  Who Administrative Information-  How Projects & Management Actions-  GSAS GSA  GSP Regulation Requirements  What Basin Setting-  Monitoring Network-  Draft Release Sections  Current Section Topics Sustainable Management Criteria Representative Monitoring  Current Section Topics Projects and Actions  NASb GSP Section 1 - Introduction  Draft Sections  Section 2- Agency Information Section 4 - Hydrogeologic Setting Section 5- Groundwater Conditions  Section 3 - Description of Plan Area Water Budgelstwork  NORTH AMERICAN Subbasin    Public Meetings and Interests  Public Meetings  Sustainable Management . Water Budgets  Projects /  Criteria (Feb 10)  (March 10)  Management Action (May 12)  Beneficial Uses and Users  Agriculture  Municipal  Dome  Surface  Environment  GROUNDWATERLIVEL  GROUNDWATERLEVEL  NORTH AMERICAN Subbasin  Source:TNC    Significance of  mplementation/Adoption  1. Will there be new requirements?  MO  Setting thresholds for Water Levels  2. What are the anficipated implications to future water or grounawater  Measurable Objective (MO) that reflect desired conditions..that enable GSA to achieve sustainability  policy?  Water Budget Results  Minimum Threshold (MI) = levels at a site that when exceeded, either individually or at a combination of sites, may cause undesirable results  3. What will this cost?  I Memorandum of Understanding    2. What are the anticipated implications to future water or groundwater policy?  Water Budget Results  GW Storage 350,000 Net Boundary Fiows 300,000 Rechargefrom Canals  350,000  350,000  + GW Storage  +GW Storage  NetE Boundary Flows Rechargefrom Canals  300,000 NetE Boundary Flows Rechargefrom Canals Nets Stream Seepage  300,000  250,000  250,000  250,000  Nets Stream Seepage  Net Stream Seepage  200,000  200,000  200,000  Groundwa Pumping  Groundurater Pumping  Groundwater Pumping  150,000  150,000  150,000  100,000  Dep  100,000  100,000  50,000  50,000  50,000  Inflows Current Conditions  Outflows  Inflows Projected Conditions  Outflows  Inflows Projected with Climate Change  Outflows    3. What will this cost?  Memorandum of Agreemen  GSAANas Preposedy Pcposed GSA Sasram  COUNTY  PCWA Citynl LINÇOINCALFORNIA America's) Hometoun- ACityef Opportunity  /f NIA CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER  SOUTHYUBA SUSBASN  Placer ROSEVILLE  NID  South Sutter Water District GSA  Agreement Regarding CoordinationB Between  West Placer GSA  RD 1001 GSA Sutter County GBA  Sacramento Groundwater Authority GSA  BOUTHAMERICAN BUBBASIN    limeline and Next Steps  NORTH AMERI Subbasi    imeline/Next Steps - Grounawater sustainability  Plan (GSP) development and adoption  Public Meetings Sustainable Management Criteria (Feb 10th) Projects / Management Actions (May 12"h)  January 20 years with 31, 2022 5 year State DWR  June 2016 begin to develop GSP  January 31, 2042 Results  GSAS form and Water Budgets (March 10th)  GSP due to updates Avoid Undesirable  November 2020 Est. Mid 2021 Partial Draft GSP Draft Final GSP Release Sections 1through 5  Est. Late 2021 City Council Adoption Consideration - Final GSP & GSP implementation Begins  Release  Est. Fall 2021 Public Hearing  NORTH AME Subbas    NORTH AMERICAN Subbasin  Questions/Comments    Consideration ofa  Supplemental Design  Standard for Trash Control  Compliance  Angela Frost, Environmenta Services Manager  Public Works Department  July 13, ,2021    Background  Stormwater Permit - The City of Lincoln has a Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit that regulates the discharge of stormwater  into our local waterways.  Regulatory Oversight - State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) )Adoption  of "Statewide Trash Amendments"  Target- Priority land uses (PLUS), as defined in the Statewide Trash Amendments, include high-density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed  urban, and public transportation stations. Track 1- Method of Compliance    Strategy for Compliance  "Trash Amendment" Work Plan for Existing Developed Areas (151 Full Capture  Systems by 2030)  New Projects - Currently use West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual  Effort behind regional Manual update  Staff Proposal for a New supplementa. Design Standard  Capture compliance on new development and redevelopment projects SO  retrofits are not needed.  The City will be responsible to retrofit all storm drains in PLU areas.    Project Categories  Project Category  Definition All projects that create and/or replace (including projects with no net increase in impervious and up to 5,000 square feet  PLU Designation  New Requirement  Small Projects footprint) more than 2,500  ofi impervious surface, Projects that are high-density including detached single residential, industrial, family homes that create commercial, mixed urban, and square feet or more of and all other residential must impervious surface and are also incorporate trash  and/or replace 2,500  public transportation stations,  not part of a larger plan of controls (this does not apply Add Trash Controls  development. and/or replace 5,000 impervious surface.  to detached single family residential building permit encroachment permit  All projects that create applications or associated  All Regulated square feet or more of applications).  Projects (includes Special Case  Regulated Projects - see Includes new development Table 2-2 Design Manual) and redevelopment projects  on public or private land that fall under the planning and permitting authority of the jurisdictional agency.    Exclusions  Projects located outside of the City's jurisdiction or specific project cases (e.g., interior remodels, routine replacement of damaged pavement) are excluded from the requirements of this Supplementa Document. Detached single-family residential building permits or associated encroachment permit applications are not subject to the requirements of  this Supplemental Document.    Summary  Staff recommends City Council adopt this Resolution to implement this new Outreach on the new requirement will be provided to the development New Supplementa Design Standard becomes effective August 1, 2021. Existing projects with entitlement applications (i.e. tentative maps, specific development plan/permit) that have been deemed complete prior to August 1,  Supplementa. Design Standard.  community.  2021 will not be required to comply with this standard.  Development projects must comply with this new regulation when the entitlement applications (i.e. tentative map,specific development plan/permit) are deemed This new Supplemental Standard would alleviate any un-necessary retrofits on  complete on or after August 1, 2021.  future developments where this regulation applies.    Questions?    ACTION SUMMARY July 13, 2021 Regular Meeting Page 1  Presentation 6A  CONSENT  ITEM RESO/ORD# Andreatta Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Mayor Silhi  8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 8H  81 8J Y 2 Y Y Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 2 Y 2 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y  8K 8L 8M 8N  122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133  Y Y Y Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 Y Y Y Y Y 2 2 2 2 2  Y Y Y 1 1 Y Y Y 2 2  Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y    ACTION SUMMARY July 13, 2021 Regular Meeting Page 2  CONSENT (cont.)  Public Hearings  General Business 10C 136 No  ITEM RESO/ORD# Andreatta Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Mayor Silhi  10A 10B 134 135 Y No Y Action Action 2 Taken Taken 1 Y