Live Life Lincoln . Live - Life - Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln - Live - Life - Lincoln . Live . Life Lincoln MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN Regular Meeting August 10, 2021 CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY OPEN SESSION MEETING Meeting conducted at City Hall, 3rd Floor Council Chambers, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, CA and virtually on Zoom with Live Stream on City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18. 1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Silhi at 6:00PM. 2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Paul Joiner Dan Karleskint William Lauritsen Mayor Alyssa Silhi Councilmembers absent: Holly Andreatta Roll Call: 4 members present, 1 member absent, 0 members excused. Staff members present: Mark Scott, Interim City Manager Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief (via Zoom) Jennifer Brown, IT/GIS Manager (via Zoom) Jim Bermudez, Public Works Director (via Zoom) Steve Prosser, Community Development Director Veronica Rodriguez, Human Resources Director (via Zoom) Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present via teleconference. 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated there was no reportable action from the August 5, 2021 closed session meeting. 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE led by Stan Nader. 5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS - none. 6.F PRESENTATIONS - none. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDAITENS a) Stan Nader, a Lincoln resident, stated his concern with the City's interpretation of Brown Act as compared to the Western Placer Unified School District (WPUSD) Board's recent meeting where they allowed public comment related to COVID-19 mask requirements with no time limit. Mr. Nader also stated his concern with sales tax leakage because of the County's new Bickford Ranch Marketplace and distributed b) Richard Pearl, a Lincoln resident and former Economic Development Committee (EDC) and Airport Committee member, stated his concern with John Fett's comments at the previous City Council meeting regarding the City's airport. Mr. Pearl stated it is a lengthy process to close an airport and doesn'tfeel the City should pursue that direction because it is very difficult and the City would have toj jump through a lot of c) Lena Labosky, a Lincoln resident attending via Zoom, stated her concern that the work sessions weren't available via Zoom and there wasn't any audio from that meeting. Mark Scott, Interim City Manager, an opposition letter, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. hoops. stated the future work session meetings will include Zoom.capability. 600 Sixth Street * Lincoln, CA 95648 www.d.luncol.ca.us 916-434-2400 Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live. Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lipcoln Page 2of4 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor. Agency Regular Meeting Minutes August 10, 2021 d) Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, stated his concern with Brown Act training for Staff, Council and public. Mr. Chapman also stated his concern with the oak tree maintenance project schedule approved at the last Council meeting and the City Attorney's definition of maintenance stated at the last meeting. 8. - CONSENT Mayor Silhi asked if any members of the City Council or public would like to pull any items from the Consent Agenda, hearing none she called for a motion. Councilmember Joiner motioned approval of the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Councimember Lauritsen. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Andreatta - Absent. Those items approved were: 8.A. Approval of Minutes of. July 27, 2021 Regular City Council meetings. the City Manager and filed in the Office of the City Clerk by July 29, 2021. 8.B. Receive and file Contract Report, identifying contracts, task order and purchase orders executed by 8.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-147 accepting the Warrants of July 23 and 30, 2021 to be placed on file 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-148 authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract for construction for the City Hall ADA Parking Lot Project -CIP 472 with PBM Construction, Inc. in the amount of $56,015 and The project is funded by $123,000 from Fund 620 as part of CIP 472 City Hall ADA Parking Lot Project FY 8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-149 authorizing a budget augmentation of $265,000 from available unencumbered Fund 221 (Gas tax) to CIP 439 - Bridge Maintenance at Various Locations, and authorizing the City Manager to award the contract for construction with TPA Construction, Inc. ini the amount of $449,042, authorizing the Community Development Director to approve change orders not to exceed 8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-150 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Chavan & Associates llp, ini the amount of $100,000 for year-end closing of the financial statements and year-end audit preparation for the final audit that will be conducted by MUN CPA's in October and transfer of knowledge from the consultant to City staff, plus additional hours for questions that may arise in Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The cost associated with the contract will be absorbed within the adopted. 2021/2022. Annual Budget of with the City Clerk and available for audit. authorize a 10% contract contingency of $5,600 for a total construction cost of $61,615. 2020/2021 Capital Improvement budget. $45,000. Account 600-4060-50400, Professional Services. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. Waive full reading and introduce, by title only, ORDINANCE 1038B of the City of Lincoln amending Section 10.56.010 to the Lincoln Municipal Code establishing speed limits throughout the City. Roland Neufeld, Senior Civil Engineer, gave a brief staff report. Mayor Silhi opened and closed the public hearing at 6:20PM with no comments: A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding reduced speed on Spring Valley Parkway and Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV's) and conditions ati intersection of Groveland and Joiner Parkway. Councimember Lauritsen motioned approval of the first read of the ordinance and the motion was seconded by Councimember Karleskint. By the following Vote 600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 ww.cilincoln.ca.ts 916-434-2400 - Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live Life - Lincoln Live Life Lipcoin Page 3of4 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes August 10, 2021 (Approved): Lauritsen - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi = Aye and Andreatta - Absent - ORDINANCE 1038B of the City of Lincoln amending Section 10.56.010 tot the Lincoln Municipal Code establishing speed limits throughout the City. 10. GENERAL BUSINESS within Village 1: 10.A. Purchase and Sale Agreement for Easements associated with the Oak Tree Lane Improvements 1.A Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-151, thereby determining the project has been adequately addressed under the Village 1 Specific Plan Project EIR (SCH No. 2005062001): and that no further analysis under the 2. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-152, thereby approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement of Easements between the City of Lincoln (City) and the County of Placer (County) for property in the Village 1 Specific Steve Prosser, Community Development Director, gave a brief staff report. A lengthy City Council discussion ensued regarding: the trichloroethene (TCE) contaminated land from the former Titan I-A missile facility in this vicinity; who is responsible for remediation; whether the easements would transfer remediation responsibility to the City of Lincoln; location and path of travel of the plume (a three-dimensional volume in which a contaminant of concern is found and concentrated); and depth of the easement. Mayor Silhi opened a) Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, stated his concern with who would ultimately be responsible for Mayor Silhi closed the public discussion with no further comments and called for a motion. Councilmember Karleskint motioned approval of the first resolution associated with this item and Councimember Joiner asked for and received affirmation from Steve Prosser that no further CEQA analysis is required. Councimember Lauritsen seconded the motion. By the following Vote (Approved): Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi- - Aye Andreatta - Absent RESOLUTION 2021-151, thereby determining the project has been adequately addressed under the Village 1 Specific Plan Project EIR (SCH No. 2005062001): and that no further analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)is Councilmember Karleskint motioned approval of the second resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Lauritsen. By the following Vote (Approved): Lauritsen - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye and Andreatta - Absent- - RESOLUTION 2021-152, thereby approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement of Easements between the City of Lincoln (City) and the 10.B. Adopt RESOLUTION 2021-153 approving the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mid- ManagemenuConigenua: Group and the City of Lincoln and Related Salary Schedule. Veronica Rodriguez, Human Resources Director, gave a brief staff report. Mayor Silhi opened and closed the discussion to City Council and the public with no comments. Councimember Lauritsen motioned approval of the item and the motion was seconded by Councimember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Lauritsen - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Karleskint = Aye, Silhi - Aye and Andreatta - Absent- RESOLUTION 2021- 153 approving the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mid-Management/Confidential Group and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required or appropriate. Plan Area. the discussion to the public with the following comment: remediating the contaminated site. required or appropriate. County of Placer (County) for property in the Village 1 Specific Plan Area. the City of Lincoln and Related Salary Schedule. 600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www. aladlnca-vI63.e Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lipcoln Page 4of4 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes August 10, 2021 11. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS Mayor Silhi stated he concern with recent spikes in COVID-19 cases as evidenced by the City's wastewater studies. She asked for and gained Council consensus to have a discussion at the next City Council meeting tor revisit COVID-19 protection measures. 12. INFORMATION ITEMS Councimember Joiner questioned whether the pending Federal Infrastructure legislation would allow airport improvements and a brief City Council discussion ensued on National League of Cities policy emails related toi infrastructure. 13. ADJOURNMENT - Mayor Silhi adjourned the meeting at 6:52PM. Submitted by: vencaiR Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk 600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 www.d.lincoln.a.Is" +916-434-2400 To Placer County Community Development Dept. Environmental Coordination Services Attention: Shirlee Herrington From: Stan Nader Re: Bickford Ranch Marketplace EIR Date: 8-10-2021 attended the zoom scoping meeting for the NOP/EIR for Bickford Ranch Marketplace on July 29th. A number of individuals who reside near the proposed project site expressed concerns ranging from the lack of adequate public safety presence in the area, traffic congestion, narrow roads and the matter that they chose to live where they are because it is a rural area and are not pleased that development in invading their life style. As the comment period was drawing to an end, I had expected someone (City Elected Official or City Staff) from the City to come on and provide a comment. When that did not happen, 11 felt like someone needed to say something so - I hit the raised hand button on my computer to share a concern. stated that I felt there were too many environmental issues for this parcel to receive a General Plan amendment and Zoning change. I will now expand on why I made that statement. The Bickford Ranch Specific Plan has been amended several times since its original approval in 1999. In 2015 the amendment of the parcel in question had a designation of Village Commercial which was eliminated as part of the approval of that amendment. (See 2-5 of the Specific Plan, which I have attached to this email.) have been told the reason for the removal of the Commercial designation was a Nursery was operating on the parcel to grow trees for the Bickford Ranch project and that the Nursery's work was completed and the designation was no longer needed. Attempting to bring back the Commercial designation does raise some serious environmental issues. When you look at Figure 2-1 Site Features and Figure 5-1 Wetland Resources (Attached to this email) from the Specific Plan there is large riparian area going right through the middle of the parcel. The wetland swale would have to be relocated which will be no small matter to address. trust the EIR will explain how that could happen. There will be a huge loss of populations and other animals that depend on that to tree canopy and habitat for sensitive bird survive. Again, that will all need to be addressed in the EIR. The human activity that a commercial project would bring will create more pollution (noise, air, light, and water) to the parcel and surrounding properties. All these matters should be addressed in the EIR. Impacts to the quality of life of the surrounding residents should be addressed in the EIR. These include the lack of public safety presence in the area, traffic congestion, narrow roads, and the proposed project's invasion of the neighboring properties who moved to these locations because they wanted a rural atmosphere. Conflicting interfacing of zoning designations is not a good practice. Considering the County's Mission Statement which is to protect and preserve the agricultural and open spaces of the County, it is difficult to understand why the County is involving itself so much in residential and commercial development when those needs in the County can best be served by the incorporated cities of the County. believe that an exhaustive NOP/EIR study will demonstrate that the zoning for this parcel should remain Open Space/Wetland Swale and not be considered for Commercial development. Thank you for considering my concerns of this proposed project. Respectfully, Shaisake Stan Nader Lincoln Resident (916)645-1149 BICKFORD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN I DECEMBER 8, 2015 I PAGE2 2-5 Modification to the mix of residential housing types tos shift units from the lowest and highest density ranges (High Density Residential and Rural Residential) to mid-range densities (Low Density and Medium Density). Increase int the number ofa age- restricted residential units by three units from 9471 to 950 units, with a corresponding three unit reduction ini the number of conventional unitst from 943t to 940 units, thus maintainingt the 1,890 residential unit cap established with the 2004 BRSP. Elimination of the 17.3-acre high density site (Village Residential Elimination of the 9.7-acre commercial site (Village Commercial. site). Open Space and Recreation Golf Course Facilities. Elimination of the golf course, driving range and golf course maintenance facility (316 acres). Parks. Reduction in overall parkland by 18.1 acres and shift of15.2 acres of parkland from public parks to multiple smaller parks (maintained privately) within neighborhoods. Tower Park was removed. Open Space. Increasei int the acreage of open space preserves by 109.7acres: and creation of an open space transition area of 163.5 acres between residential and open space preserves uses. Open Space Corridors/Parkways. Increase int the acreage of open space parkways by 77.5 acres. A portion of the: acreage previously located in open space parkways is nowi in Open Space Preserves. Public Facilities Public Facilities Parcel. Elimination oft the 4.7-acre Public Facilities parcel on the east side oft the Plan Area and addition of 5.1-acre Public Facilities parcel (PF-5)adjacent to the: school site. School Site. Increase ini the acreage oft the school site (PF-3) by 3.0 acres toa a: 15.0-acre site. Fire Station Site. Increase ini the acreage oft thet fire station site (PF-1)by 0.4 acre. Public Utilities Shifted: secondary access north on Sierra College Boulevard. Reduced the number of project entries from threet to two. Realignment oft trails to correspond to updated village design, open space constraints, and roadway network. Modification street andt of alignments trail sections. Enhancements (paving, restriping) to the existing park and ride lot located on the west side of Sierra College Boulevard near SR 193. The 2004BRSP included ap park and ride facility within the Village Commercial Site that was eliminated as part of the 2014 BRSP. December 8, 2015, the Board approved the revised project. The Board considered the previously certified BRSP EIR, together with an Addendum toi the EIR (2015). The 2015 Addendum addresses the changes between the project evaluated in thel BRSP EIR including the 2004 Addendum and the project described ini thel December 8, 2015 Bickford Ranch Specific Plan/Development Standards/Design Guidelines. site). Commercial Water Facilities. Increase in the size of the water tanks site on the east side oft the project site by 1.6 acres to accommodate Placer County' Water Agency (PCWA)'s water facilities. Addition ofa three-acre site on the wests side oft the site to accommodate: a second water tank and pump Infrastructure Plans. Update to infrastructure and utility service plans to correspond to revised land use plan and updated roadway network. Water Conservation. Addition of water conservation measures (e.g. reduced turf, smart irrigation controls, recirculating hot water, etc.) that will resulti in av water savings of 24.5 percent. Elimination of the Bickford Ranch Roadi intersection near English Colony Way and relocated main access of Bickford Ranch Road to intersect with Sierra College Boulevard across from Penny Lane. station. Transportation BICKFORD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN I DECEMBER 8, 2015 IF PAGE2-3 CLARK 'CATE 3937100 VANIIS Figure 2-1 I Site Features Figure 5-1 I Wetland Resources NON-AGENDA ITEMS VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it tothe City Clerk prior to the start oft the meeting. MY NAME: MEETING GtoA Nder B1D-21 DATE: ireside inside City limits? Ireside outside City limits in Placer County? ireside outside City/County in MYPHONE # 1 MYE EMAIL: SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO: SPEAK ON 3xwh AZ Birkctad Rarc Ma krbplcs Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit. NON-AGENDA ITEMS VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MY NAMELLZ Perz MEETING DATE: ETreside inside City limits? DIreside oytside City limits in Placer County? Direside gutside City/County in MY PHONE #: MYI EMAIL: SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON: Bupailb Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit. ACTION SUMMARY Aug. 10, 2021 Regular Meeting Page 1 Presentation CONSENT ITEM RESO/ORD# Andreatta Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Mayor Silhi 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 147 148 149 150 A B S E N T 1 1 1 1 1 Y y Y Y Y 2 2 2 2 2 Y y Y Y Y Y 1 Y 2 ACTION SUMMARY Aug. 10, 2021 Regular Meeting Page 2 CONSENT (cont.) Public Hearings General Business 10B 153 NT 2 Y 1 Y ITEM RESO/ORD# Andreatta Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Mayor Silhi 9A 1038 Absent Y 2 1 Y 10A 10A 151 152 AB SE Y Y 1 1 2 2 Y Y