Live. Life. Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live Life. Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lipcoln  MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN Regular Meeting September 27, 2022  CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY  OPEN SESSION MEETING  Meeting conducted in-person at City Hall, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, CA and virtually on Zoom with Live  Stream on City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and' WAVE Channel 18. 1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Andreatta at 6:03PM. 2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Paul Joiner  Dan Karleskint William Lauritsen Alyssa Silhi Mayor Holly Andreatta Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief Travis' Williams, Acting City Engineer (Consultant) Nita Wracker, Finance Director Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused. Staff members present: Sean Scully, City Manager  Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present in person and via 3.REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated that staff received  teleconference.  direction, but there is no reportable action at this time.  4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - led by Nita Wracker, Finance Director.  5.A AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Sean Scully, City Manager, asked to move item 10.C  (Workshop: Lincoln' Wastewater Treatment Plant Joint Powers Authority) from General Business to  Presentations justi item 6. 6. PRESENTATIONS (W.P.U.S.D)  6.A.)Workshop on Youth Development Plan Partnership with Western Placer Unified School District Kerry Callahan, Superintendent, provided handouts ont the Blueprint for Student Success' on the Youth Development Plan to City Council and Staff, made a part of these meeting minutes by mention thereof, and introduced Adrian Ruiz, from the Youth Development Network. Jason Price, W.P.U.S.D Board Member,  spoke in favor of the project.  Mayor Andretta thanked presenters for their presentation. reenacting the Police Activities League (P.A.L) in Lincoln. review funds to assist in program growth.  Councimember Silhi gave kudos and shared her excitement for the project. Councilmember member discussion ensued, agreeing the project is a benefit for all students and could breathe new life into Mayor Andreatta clarified' W.P.U.S. D's goals: City support, incorporate project into our. programs, and  600 Sixth Street  Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.lincaln.ca.uw 916-434-2400    Live - Life . Lincoln . Live - Life . Lincoln. Live Life. Lincoln Live Life. Lincoln - Live Life Lipcoln.  Page: 2of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272022  10.C Workshop: Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Plant Joint Powers Authority - receive an update on the ongoing discussions relating to the Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Plant and associated proposals for the formation of a Joint Powers Agreement and facilitation of an expansion at the Wastewater Treatment Sean Scully, City Manager, gave a Power Point presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof, introduced Nita Wracker, Finance Director, who provided additional financial background, rate Sean Scully, City Manager, introduced Placer County Supervisor, Jim Holmes who attends the 2x2 meetings with the City of Lincoln, Ken Graham, Placer County Public' Works Director and Kevin Bell, Placer  Plant.  information and timelines.  County Assistant Public' Works Director.  Councilmembers agreed to hear public comment prior to City Council discussion. Mayor Andreatta opened the discussion to the public with the following comments:  1. Lena Lebowski, a Lincoln resident, concerned with giving away City asset. Gave kudos to Sean Scully, City Manager, and City Council. Asked City Council to consider all options regarding the 2. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, commented on the bird migration at the Wastewater Treatment 3. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, asked if any development would be impacted by this Sean Scully, City Manager, responded to Mrs. Borchardt, stating that the project does affect all projects in the City of Lincoln, as without the capacity to serve our current and future residents, the City and County will runi into major infrastructure issues. There may be a perception that the expansion is only required as a The City and County are highly invested in ensuring the joint powers authority (JPA) manages the 4. Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, spoke in favor of the joint power authority formation and 5. Anne Constantin Birge, a Lincoln resident, gave kudos for collaboration efforts. Mayor Andreatta asked Ken Graham, Placer County Public Works Director to come to the podium. Mr. Graham thanked the City Council and Staff for their leadership. The JPA has helped us envision wastewater in our region and the importance is mutually beneficial and a win-win relationship. Mayor Andretta thanked Placer County Public Works staff and Placer County Supervisors for their  agreement.  plant. Encouraged residents to visit the Wastewater Plant.  agreement.  result of growth; however, that is a misnomer.  infrastructure, as iti is a majori investment for all municipalities involved.  expansion.  assistance. Councimember discussion ensued. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDAITEMS  1. Kevin Siddle, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff regarding speed mitigation on First Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street, and distributed a petition made a  part of these of these minutes by mention thereof.  600 Sisth Strect * Lincoln, CA 95648 www.di.lincoln.cx 916-434-2400    Live Life Lincoln  Live Life Lincoln. Live Life Lincoln Live - Life . Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln.  Page 3of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272 2022  2. Jose Fuentes, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff regarding speed mitigation on First Street especially between "O" Street and "R" Street. Mr. Fuentes suggested the City of Lincoln put in speed bumps to slow traffic down, as First Street has become increasingly 3. Alex Franklin, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff on speed control on First Street. Mr. Franklin cited a recent vehicle accident, near misses with pedestrians and concern  unsafe.  with students walking to local elementary schools.  Mayor Andreatta, asked Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, to respond to residents on speed mitigation. Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, thanked speakers for their civil and conversational tone. Chief Alves discussed the challenges with the wide roadway, implementing speed bumps and enforcement. Chief Alves and Lincoln Police Department are aware of the increase in speeding on First Street. Travis Williams, City Engineer, added that he would connect with the Public Safety Chief to discuss the possibilities of the narrowing the path of travel, as people naturally will mitigate their own speed when you  have less room for error.  Councimember Lauritsen, suggested adding additional stop signs.  Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, appreciated the suggestion, however, a stop sign mid-street would not Mayor Andreatta thanked City Staff and residents for their collaboration and continued public comments. 4. Anne Constantin Birge, al Lincoln resident, provided historical timelines and information on the Titan Ballistic Missile Site that has been proposed within the Village 1 as the Missile Silo Park. Mrs. Birge expressed concern with ground water contamination left over from the former United States Air Force Missile Site. Supporting documentation was provided outlining potential park location and chemicals of potential concern, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. 5. Ray Birge, al Lincoln Resident, introduced himself as a retired professional as a water and housing developer. Mr. Birge lives in Sun City Lincoln Hills and voiced concern with water shortages due to climate change, drought and on-going development. Mr. Birge stated he is not requesting a moratorium, but asks that the City Council reconsider rapid development.  work, as the nearest stop sign is fifty to seventy-five yards from the intersection.  Mayor Andreatta thanked both speakers for providing comment on the proposed Missile Silo Park in Village 6. Jay Gruenwald, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposal presented at the Parks and Recreation Committee September 7, 2022 meeting and gave a Power Point 7. Gene Morgan, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposal presented at the Parks and Recreation Committee September 7, 2022 meeting and distributed a letter made a Mayor Andreatta thanked both speakers for providing comment. Additionally, City Council and Staff will take their comments into consideration. Mayor Andreatta stated that that the City Council nor City Staffi is responsible for articles in the local newspaper. The proposed Disc Golf Park at Auburn Ravine is just one idea that has not been through the entire vetting process. Mayor Andreatta asked Sean Scully, the City  One and continued public comment.  Presentation made a part of these minutes by mention thereof.  part of these minutes by mention thereof.  600 Sixth Strect Lincoln, CA 95648 "wwwdlincoln.caus . 916-434-2400    Live. Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoin. Live - Life - Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln  Page 4of7  City Council, Public Finance. Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272022  Manager, if he would like to make a comment.  Sean Scully, City Manager, Stated the City of Lincoln can dictate how the process goes, but the City can not control the information printed in newspapers. One oft the objectives oft the Parks and Recreation Committee is to identify and propose recreation amenities fori the community. Some proposals will work, some will not work. Part of the process is going through and figuring out A.) Is the project feasible B) Isit something that the community is supportive of? C.) Is it something that we can afford to do?' We can'tj jump all the way to decision D without doing A, B and C first. Currently, the City Council and Staff are at points A Mayor Andreatta responded to Mr. Morgan, stating that the City Council and Staff will review all comments 8. Jennifer Tandy, is the Lincoln Christian Academy Administrator at the Lincoln Christian Life Center. Ms. Tandy spoke in opposition oft the Deer Crossing Center Development. 9. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center 10. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development. 11. Steve Ernst, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development. Mr. 12. Bill Rath, Pastor of Lincoln Christian Life Center, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center 13. Kim McEwen, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposed at the Auburn 14. CA, Carly, (did not provide her last name) attended the September 21-2022 Planning Commission meeting. Carly addressed the City Council with her concerns related to two members of the Mayor Andreatta asked if there were any more public comments, hearing none, Mayor Andretta closed  and B.  and will take everything into consideration and continued public comment.  Development.  Ernst sent a letter to the Council addressing his concerns.  Development. Ravine Park.  Planning Commission.  public comment. 8. CONSENT  Mayor Andreatta asked if any members of the City Council or public would like to pull any items from the  Consent Agenda. Councilmembers did not pull any items from the Consent Agenda. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, asked to pull item 8.M from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Andreatta called for a motion of the remainder of the consent agenda items. Councimember Karleskint motioned approval of the items and the motion was seconded by Councimember Lauritsen, By the following Vote (Approved): Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye, and Mayor  Andreatta - Aye. The items approved were:  8.A. Approval of Minutes of September 13, 2022 Regular City Council meeting.  600 Sixth Street I Lincoln, CA 95648 www.cilincoln.ca. us +916-434-2400    Live - Life. Lincoln  Live Life Lincoln. Live - Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln.  Page! 5of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272 2022  8.B. Receive and File Treasurer's Report for the period ending August 31, 2022 8.C. Receive and File Budget to Actual Report for the period ending August 31, 2022. 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-218 amending the City's Conflict of Interest Policy. Program budget and the Fiscal year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program.  8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-219 amending both the Fiscal year 2021-22 Capital Improvement 8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-220 allowing the submittal of the application for the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (Cal Recycle) Rubberized Pavement Grant Program for 8.G. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-221 authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order for $384,001 to procure a BME Model 34 Type 31 fire engine and a purchase order for $93,5121 to procure ten 8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-222 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract for Services with Mesa Energy Systems Inc, dba: EMCOR Services Mesa Energy for Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning( HVAC) Services for a total amount not to exceed of $425,348 (Supplemental included) for a three-year period (ending June 30, 2025), with the option to extend the contract for one additional three- year term and authorizing the Public Works Director or his/her designee, to execute any necessary change 8.1. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-223 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with West Coast Arborists, Inc. (WCA), to provide On-Call Tree Care and Maintenance Services, for a total amount not to exceed $180,000 ($60,000 each year) from the Streets Fund 223 for a three-year term, expiring June 30, 8.J. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-224 accepting CIP 492: Fire Station 33 Exterior Waterproofing and CIP 494: Fire Station 34 Exterior Repairs as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of 8.K. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-225 accepting CIP 229: Airport Underground Fuel Tanks Removal Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County 8.L. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-226 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract amendment with Websoft Developers, Inc. that would allow for a one-year extension of their existing contract (for a new term that would end on September 27, 2023) to provide technical support and maintenance of the City's Work Order System for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.Websoft Developers Contract Amendment. 8.N. Waive full reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE 1055B amending Lincoln Municipal Code section 17.16.190 regarding discretionary extensions for tentative subdivision maps to be consistent with State law, and finding the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the California  which the City of Lincoln is eligible.  Scott X3 self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA's) for the Fire Department.  orders that are within the approved supplemental budget.  2025.  Completion with the Placer County Recorder.  Recorder.  Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").  ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA  8.M. Waive full reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE 1054B, establishing a Development Agreement between the Cityof Lincoln, on the one hand, and Pappas Arizona, LP and Pappas Gateway  600 Sisths Street . Lincoln, CA 95648 . www.d.lincaln.ca.ux 916-434-2400    Live Life * Lincoln Live - Life Lincoln. Live - Life Lincoln - Live Life Lincoln Live  Life Lipcoln.  Page 6of7  City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272022  LP (collectively "Pappas") on the other hand for the development of approximately 44.13 acres of General Commercial and Employment Center zoned ("commercially zoned") property within the Twelve Bridges Plan. Area; and finding the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the California 1. Melanie Borchardt, al Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of ORDINANCE 1054B. 2. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, spoke against additional gas stations.  Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). (Kristine Mollenkopf)  Mayor Andreatta called for a motion. Councimember Joiner motioned approval of 8.M and the motion was seconded by Councimember Silhi. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner- - Aye, Silhi- - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, and Mayor Andreatta = Aye: ORDINANCE 1054B  9. PUBLIC HEARINGS- None 10. GENERAL BUSINESS  10.A. City Council discussion, provide edits and consider approval of RESOLUTION 2022-227 approving the draft response to the Placer Grand Jury Homelessness in Placer County" Recommendation 5. Sean Scully, City Manager, provided an update on the Placer Grand Jury report and draft response made to the Grand Jury. The City Manager and City Council agree on the draft as it relates to practical approach for the City of Lincoln the goals it has to be well thought out, planned with wraparound services that elevate Sean Scully, City Manager requested feedback and edits as he needs to submit by September 28, 2022 to  Homelessness Grand Jury Response.  people out of homelessness permanently. Councilmember conversation ensued.  meet deadlines.  Mayor Andreatta opened and closed the Public discussion at 8:22pm.  1. Mona Bass, leads the Adopt-A-Creek organization in Lincoln. The Adopt-A-Creek has been working with the homeless in the Auburn Creek Ravine area for the last three years. Mrs. Bass implores the City Council to keep moving forward, and asks that the City Council and Staff not wait on Placer County direction. The Adopt-A-Creek volunteers ask that the City Council and City staff start really  looking at what we can do in Lincoln. Mayor Andreatta thanked Mona Bass for her comments.  Mayor Andreatta called for a motion.  Councimember Joiner motioned approval of the resolution and the motion was seconded by Councimember Silhi. By the following Vote (Approved) Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye, Karleskint- Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, and Mayor Andreatta - Aye: RESOLUTION 2022-227 approving the draft response to the Placer Grand Jury Homelessness in Placer County" Recommendation 5. Homelessness Grand Jury 10.B. Workshop: Parklet City Council give feedback on the concept of whether to invest resources and time in exploring the establishment of a process to allow permanent or seml-permanent parklets or other  Response.  use of publicspace by downtown businesses within the downtownarea.  600 Sixth Street I Lincoln, CA 95648 www..lincaln.c.us +916-434-2400    Live Life Lincoln Live Life Lincoln. Live Life incoln Live Life Lincoln Live fe Lipcoln  Page 7of7  City Council, Public Finance. Authority and Redevelopment: Successor. Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 272 2022  Sean Scully, City Manager, gave a Power Point presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. The City Council advised that the project is not a high priority; however, they agreed the project is  worth exploring. Councilmember conversation ensued. 11. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS  Mayor Andreatta wanted to understand the methodology on how to address the recent Planning  Commission meeting that was held on September 21, 2022.  Councimember discussion ensued. 12. INFORMATION ITEMS  Library Open House is October 1, 2022, from 5-7pm. The Twelve Bridges Library will be celebrating their Mayor Andreatta reminded the City Council oft the upcoming Kiwanis Children's Health Fair on October gth. Richard Pearl reminded City Council and Staff of the Airport Open House day on October 8, 2022. 13. ADJOURNMENT - Mayor Andreatta adjourned the meeting at approximately 9:03pm.  15th year.  The Health Fair will be held at Glen Edwards Middle School.  Submitted by: uen Barb Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk  600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 www.dilincoln.ca.uy 916-434-2400    WPUSD  Blueprint for Student Success  Goals  1. ALL: students will graduate from high school college and career ready. 2. All: students and families will be actively engaged in learning and in their  school communities. Development Framework  "Youth who develop healthy relationships, participate in meaningful learning opportunities, and are held to high expectations become successful adults who maintain economic self-sufficiency, have neathyrelationsnps and contribute to  their community."  SKILL BUILDING Opportunities to build applicable skills in engaging and challenging ways. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Opportunities to contribute to and gain knowledge of the community.  ENGAGEMENT known as voice and choice. RELATIONSHIP BUILDING  Opportunities for meaningful participation, also  Individuals can develop positive, caring, and consistent relationships with others, including peers, supervisors, and  mentors. SAFETY  People feel physically, culturally, and emotionally safe. They are free from harm or judgment, and they feel confident that they will be  accepted for who they are.  Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) What do we want students to learn or be able to do? How will we guide/support their learning/doing? How will we measure their success? How will we support them if they struggle? How will we push them further if they excel?    Phases 1&2  Participation Youth Relationship Bullding Safety e Olw  Learn Common  Survey the young people of Dive deep with listening  Language of Youth the community to get their circles including young  Development with community stakeholders  voice and opinions  people and their parents and guardians    Phase 3  REPORT  0o  3D Dialogue strategic sessions that focus on designing the key elements ofa Youth Master Plan  Establishing Developmental YDN Facilitation  Full Community of Woodland Youth Action  Areasi indicators through Plan Draft document for  Executive and leadership committee final review    Arenas  Youth at the Center  Public Policy  Systems &  Child Welfare  Services Juvenile Philanthro  Justice  Child Care/ Youth Serving Organizations Health Care  Settings  Parks & Recreation Faith Based Communities Pract  - Youth 2 0-20+ Communities  Public Opinion  Youth Employment  Education  Libraries & &Training Museums  Research  Advocacy    Lincoln/North Auburn  Wastewater Treatment  Plant Discussion    The History & The Issues  March 2012 - Board of Supervisors accepted the City's offer to construct, Own, and operate a regional pump station and pipeline from North Auburn to the Lincoln WWTRF, increase the capacity of the WWTRF to accommodate sewer flows from Sewer Maintenance District 1 (SMD 1), and decommission the wastewater treatment plant  that served SMD 1.  October 2013 - City of Lincoln and Placer County executed the Construction, Operations, and Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (COJA) under which the City constructs and then provides wastewater treatment for SMD 1 as well as operation and maintenance (O&M) of the SMD 1 pump station and regional pipeline for a fixed charge  per EDU.  May 2016 - the improvements were completed and the City began treating wastewater  from SMD 1.    Uncoin    The History & The Issues Continued  Wastewater Treatment is currently combined with collections for Lincoln résidents The City bills the County for treatment, operations and maintenance of their Sewer  Maintenance District 1 (SMD-1) facility  Fixed 0&M charges to the County did not cover City costs which is unsustainable long  term  Repair and Rehabilitation costs were additive above the 0&M charges, making  budgeting difficult  As structural deficit exists within the Lincoln wastewater enterprise fund Lincoln sewer/wastewater rates have not increased in a decade  The Wastewater Treatment Plant (Plant) is reaching capacity limits and expansion is  needed  Additional funds are needed to pay for the expansion    JPA  As part of the ongoing effort to resolve core COJA issues, a new model (driven by  the need to expand the plant) is discussed.  An independent agency with the sole purpose of operating & managing the  wastewater treatment plant.  The Board of the JPA is proposed to be comprised of 2 members from governing  bodies of the City and County.  The anticipated growth in the service area of the Plant is an important reason to  form a JPA.  The JPA would be responsible for future rate increases.  The JPA would be responsible for any future or potential liabilities and regulatory  compliance.    Core Values of Potential JPA  All for One, One for All  No City EDUS VS County EDUS; all EDUS are same regardless of jurisdictional boundaries  Align Interests  Good for one is good for the other/bad for one is  bad for the other  Shared Obligations and Responsibilities  In the existing and future system for all ratepayers    Process of formation  Develop business points  Engage 2x2 and TAG  Engage outside counsel that specializes in JPA formation  Consideration of approval by Council and Board of Sups  Select interim General Manager and Finance Director  Establish JPA and transfer assets to the JPA  Establish charges and construct expansion    Draft Business Points  Own and operate the regional wastewater facilities  Employ agents and employees  Establish charges, or other costs in connection with the regional facilities Charge the County and the City on a proportionate basis based on the number of respective equivalent dwelling units (EDUS) within each  jurisdiction  Develop and adopt policies and procedures  Be governed by the JPA Board comprised of two County Board of  Supervisors and two City Council members  Have the authority to change the Agreement upon a unanimous vote  from the JPA Board    The Expansion  Estimated cost $58M To be completed in 2 phases  Bond debt of between $34-42M to be used for phase 1 (depending on  project details, more next slide)  Additional capacity from both phases will serve approximately 10,000  EDU's  construction of phase 1 to begin as soon as possible Construction of phase 2 should begin by year 2027    Lincoln WWTRF Expansion! Increments and Capacity  1Septemember. 2022 Phase2  Current  Phase2  conditions Phaseiw! FIRSTw! Phase 182 FIRSTw! Phaseiw!  Original Current with Peak Peak Flow Peak Flow w/Peak Flow Peak! MORE Peaki MORE Design Conditions Flow Shaving Shaving Shaving Shaving Flow Shaving Flow Shaving  Peak Flow Factor (PDF/ADWF) 3.5 Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF). mgd 5.9  4.5 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.3 6.4 5.7 6.8 5.9 6.6  Peak Day! Flow. mgd 20.7 22.7 20.7 24.7 22.1 26.4 21.1 23.6 Annual Average BODL Load (AAL), lbld 14,040 15,090 15,960 19,040 17,030 20,280 17,540 19,620 EDUS (0.5BODEDUIday) 28,080 30,180 31,920 38,080 34,060 40,560 35,080 39,240  2021 Capacity Memo  Incremental EDUS Added Opinion ofl Probable Construction Costs( (1) SEDU Ranked by S/EDU  6,160 2,140 8,640 3,160 7,320 $42,660,000 $34,450,000 $58,600.000 $34,450,000 $42,660.000 $6,925 $16,098 $6,782 $10,902 $5,828  3 5 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 6 8  Peak Flow Shaving Events per Year at Peak! Day at Design Conditions (2) Peak Flow Shaving Events per Year atPeak Hour at Design Conditions (2)  (1) Phase 1 alone includes the DAFT and! fiter from Phase 2; Phase 2alonei includes TSB3 from Phase 1. (1) Peak day flow event number based on historic flow data; peak hour events basede on 4 times peak day.    JPA Financial Proforma  RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY IREVENUES (TREATMENT ONLY) FEE REVENUES Recycied (reclamied) water Bond Proceeds Other Revenue Interest Income  Budget FYE2023 FYE2024  Projected Rate Adoption Period FYE2026  Projected FYE2029  FYE2025  FYE2027  FYE2028  $12,175,566 $12,666,242 $ 13,176,691 $ 13,707,712 $ 14,260,132 $ 14,834,816 $ 15,432,659  57,400 42,660,000  57,400  57,400  57,400  57,400  57,400  57,400  121,756 126,662  131,767  137,077  142,601  148,348  154,327  TOTAL REVENUES $55,014,722 $12,850,304 $13,365,858 $13,902,189 $14,460,134 $15,040,564 $15,644,385  EXPENDITURES (TREATMENTONLY Salaries & Benefits Other Operating Costs Capital expenditures Debt Service for current expansion Transfer to Debt Reserve Transfer to General Reserve  $ 261,616 $ 268,888 $ 7,540,044 7,710,194  276,379 $ 308,657 7,934,047 8,164,617 8,404,103 8,648,715 8,900,664 $8,210,427 $8,448,711 $8,696,145 $8,948,941 $9,209,321 3,191,250 3,194,125 3,189,800 3,193,550 3,189,825 $3,723,250 $3,726,125 $3,721,800 $3,693,550 $3,689,825 $ $ $ $ 76,058 $ 78,340 $ 81,348 $ 83,111 $ 85,604 $1,356,123 $1,649,012 $1,960,841 $2,314,962 $2,659,635  284,095 $ 292,041 $ 300,227 $  TOTAL 0&M $7,801,660 $7,979,082  $43,320,000 $ 532,000 $ 532,000 $ 532,000 $ 532,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000  3,191,906 3,191,450  TOTAL CAPITAL/DEBT $46,511,906 $3,723,450  $ 125,027 $ $ 58,330 $  NET OPERATIONS/CAPTAL REVENUES (LOSS) $701,156 $964,415    Financial Stats  OPERATING EXPENSES $7.8M Operations contract & related costs: 68% of operating expenses Utilities: 21% of operating expenses Admin, prof services & overhead: 9% of operating expenses  CAPITAL EXPENSES $43.3M $42.6M for phase 1 expansion $245K for IT equipment  $235K for SCADA control upgrades $180K for fleet equipment    Debt and Rates  Years FYE 2023 Rate  30 yr @ 3.75%30 yr @4% 30 yr @4.5% 30 yr @ 5.5% 40 yr @5.5% 40 yr @6%  2,566,758 32.78 $  2,651,380 33.51 $  2,825,065 33.51 $  3,191,906 34.56 $  2,871,160 3,075,093 33.65 $  $  34.22  The JPA will need to issue bond and acquire debt to fund phase 1  This demonstrates the payment for the first year of the new debt based on different terms and interest  rates  The rate could be reflected of the debt payment  Anticipated TREATEMENT charge breakdown per EDU @ 5.5% A COLLECTION charge breakdown per EDU  O&M Expenses RêR Debt Related Expenses Total Treatment Charge  -$20.73 -$ 1.42 -$12.41 -$34.56  > O&M Expenses - RaR/Capital Debt  -$16.79 -$13.11 -$0.73  Total Collection Charge -$30.63  Combined Treatment and Collection Charge per EDU $65.19  This is the estimated charge per EDU regardless of whether the JPA is formed or not    Connection fees and Expansion - Phase 2  FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029  EXPANSION FUND BEGINNING BALANCE Connection revenues by Cost of Expansion - Phase EXPANSION FUND ENDING BALANCE  $0$ $1,500,000 $5,500,000 $9,406,700 $13,592,450 $1,668,675  $5,296,325  year 2  $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,906,700 $4,185,750 $4,046,225 $3,627,650 $3,627,650  0  0  0  0($15,970,000)  0  0  $1,500,000 $5,500,000 $9,406,700 $13,592,450 $1,668,675 $5,296,325 $8,923,975  Phase 2 would be paid for by fees collected from new connections    Potential Advantages  Charges are set adequately to be sustainable into the future  Charges incorporate Renabiltation and Repair projects Charges are set to fund first expansion project and future expansion projects will be funded through connection fees After expansion project is paid for, charges will be  stabilized  Align the County and City to establish a sustainable authority and  stabilize rates into the future  Create specialized JPA that's sole focus is efficient service delivery of  treatment.  Potential for more transparency.  Create a mechanism to (theoretically) resolve conflicts with the  County as partners versus customer/vendor. Liability and transfer of risk to third party.    Potential Drawbacks  Concerns about potential disparate goals within the JPA format  depending on jurisdiction.  Perception that Lincoln is "giving away" an asset.  Placer County will have less and less of a percentage share of the plant as Lincoln grows over time, concerns may be raised over equal  voting power by County.  Navigation of complexity in establishing true equity given a vast  difference in land use and billing structure.  Some overhead costs will now need to be absorbed directly by the collections system that are current being covered under treatment. Perception that additional government" is being created that may cost slightly more than current operational expenditures.    Questions??7      PETITION  To the council of the City ofl Lincoln, California  We the undersigned residents of First Street petition the Counsel and ask that the City of Lincoln California authorize the Department of Public Works to install and, or implement speed limiting devices on First Street  between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street.  First Street has been, and continues to be plagued with speeders. Following the removal ofthe inverted" speed bumps at 0 Street, many drivers do not stop at the stop sign. Many drivers do not stop at the stop sign at LStreet also. Speeds in excess of 45 miles per hour on First Streetare  routine.  Given that there is not only a church on the street, but also an  elementary school, reduction of speed on First Street should be a priority for the City of Lincoln, as hereby attested to by the undersigned residents of First  Street.  The contact person for this petition is:  Kevin Siddle  1544 1-:StreetLincoln, CA 95648  916-213-9479    PETITION: City ofl Lincoln: speed limiting devices-1st Street between Lincoln Boulevard and RStreet.2022  Name  Address  Phone  Signature ( -  DENNIS KEIEmANS Jaim-Kelkrma N0A2 Siddle Dessentuenhes Jase Feate  Z4SE 73t IStsh S K4s/  SE    -  Biphdinda Dulolis - Secsifa Monaso DOKs KweRr MICHAEL BAUA Mjvaela Lomiyo2  btsbbut Pisdst FiesT <7 FISZT TYSt S  N  Mukala Lani 3  HOWARA SMESON Anakestau, BCRASTN WHE PAUL She22, Pour  ST St 4y /57 15t  Sfbnl    PETITION: City ofl Lincoln: speed limiting devices-1st: Street between Lincoln Boulevard and RStreet.2022  Name  Address  Phone  Signature   Sondra Zovala  137 IST  P  GEPARnO 604742E2 NICETHOPAS JOsph Hobb  hzst 51 I4r 16t 15 1st lsh st LST Ist Isf  -  imks M. Fogel ALEKANDEL FAANKW dei frawlin Oscal Diaz abert Ross Rosis Navarro Virgina DMlus  R  a  ne  V  : -  Denis Surb  ISS SSt 51  - 7      PETITION: City ofLincoln: speed limiting devices-1st: Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street_2022  Name  Address 45+  Phone  Signature  Reyla Shere ressca boja Aixi KbLvcH 875  Shest yr SREET  - L -  inns  JasEBiora Str  Mara F  14.St. MAlgto  -  -  saau  Flust 9T  L    4  Rh hr  Aa Ale Cinda Cortea  Firsts  Dhokh  Finst SE, Linialn  Dvde Cowten  Tost Lopez - Teresa Ochso  fivsT sT lincoln C4 Fyst st LincancA  Tevesp Ohoa  MANIEC MOEALS, HoklwES WoETH AB Mffunes    9    gie 100% Imagery dae. 5/23/14   Canvera: 377m 38"5746N 1217544W  Documents mnade wwollables  Lincoln City Council membars 6D  27 S4p 2022 by:  fone Constantur Birqe    PROPOSED.  PARK  SV-1 TCE 5800 Benzene 12U SV-20 TCE 7.8 Benzene 1.3  SV-2 TCE 1,3 Benzene 2.5  SV-17B TCE 8.2 Benzene 0.45J  SV-19 TCE 30 Benzene 0.77  SV-18 TCE 3.6 Benzene 0.45J  SV-3 TCE 1U(0.99U) Benzene 0.84(0.77)  SV-4 TCE 0.20J(0.92U) Benzene 0.65J(.26J)  -  SV-6 TCE 30 Benzene 1.7 SV-5B TCE 130 Benzene 0.43J SV-16 TCE 100 Benzene 0.52J SV-8 TCE 1.5 Benzene 4.7  SV-10 TCE 1.6 Benzene 0.8  STDEY SV-9B TCE 2.8 Benzene 0.41J]  SV-7 TCE 0.86U Benzene 0.87  SV-11 TCE 2.1 Benzene 1.8  SV-15B TCE 1U Benzene 1.3    The Chemrcaus DTIOW CAV  3Q21 Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring Report Placer County, Lincoln, California  Copes  Former Titan 1-A Missile Facility Formerly Used Defense Site  Chonicalb Poterctial Conceen  Table 2. Groundwater and Soil Vapor Project Reference Levels  Project Rekergne Level  Groundwater Analyte  Analysis Method SW8260CLL 3 3  Basis MCL) MCL) MCL) USEPA) MCL) USEPA) MCL) MCL) MCL) MCL) MCL) Basis ESLe) ESLO ESL9 ESLO ESL9) ESL ESLO) ESL ESLE) ESL ESLO)  PRL(ug/L)  6 6 10 0.48 1 1.5 150 5 0.5 1.75 1.75 PRL (ug/m) 2,400 280 2,800 8.5 3.2 37 10,000 16 0.32 3,500 3,500  1l-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene, cis- 12-Dichloroethene, trans- 1A-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Trichloroethene Vinyl chloride Xylene, 0- Xylenes, m-/p-  Soil Vapor Analyte  Analysis Method TO-15  1,1-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene, cis- 12-Dichloroethene, trans- 1A-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Trichloroethene Vinyl chloride Xylene,o- Xylenes,m-,p-  0  Notes:  PRL- Project Reference Level, ppbv- parts per billion by volume wg/l-micrograms per liter ug/ma- micrograms per cubic meter Reference: sourcei for Project Refence Levels  MCL-California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Maximum Contaminant Levels (ESL = San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board; Table SG-1: Sub-slab Soil Gas and Exterior Soil Gas Vapor Intrusion; Residential Vapor Intrusion (VI) Human Health Risk Screening  (July, 2021)  (D)USEPA - USEPAT Tapl Water Regional Screening Level- May 2021.  Levels (2019)    This is yust -hg Povogrhouse  qt - bpO1 Rr Titan1 site  The diesel generators were removed byt the Air Force before faking bids on saivage contracts. Thave  HED  heard they were all sent to Vandenberg AFB but cannot venfy this.  The above photo shows an operational view of the Power House taken from the mezzanine level looking in the general direction of the fresh air intake which was located behind the large tanks at the upper left of the picture. You can see how the Airman is dwarfed by the equipment around him. The arm of central pivot crane can be seen at top and of course the diesel generators dominate this photo as they do the entire room. The generators were manufactured by Worthington and each could produce 1000 kw of 2400v 3-phase power at 60hz. This capacity was capable in 1960 of providing electrical requirements to a community of 5000 people. Ofcourse that was before the whole house became wired and crammed with electrical appliances like big screen TVs and microwaves. Today's households would of course suck up far more power than the average 60's  household.    Descending to level 2 you can see the extent to which this particular site was flooded. Some fun  facts to bring a bit of perspective here: Depth of the Titanlsilos: Diameter of silos: Volume of empfy silo:  1501 feet 40 feet Approx. 80 feet 8.345 pounds  188,496 cubic feet (rounded to nearest unit) 752,024 gallons (rounded to nearest unit) 6,275,639 pounds or 3,137.82 tons  Estimated depth of water in photo below: Volume of flood water in silo at 801 feet deep: Weight of1 gallon of fresh water: Approx. weight of 80 feet of water ini the silo:  Time to sump silo using 116 galminute pump:* Approx. 108 hours or 4.5days  Assuming at flood depth of801 feet.  For those out there who may already own a silo or those who would love nothing more than to buy an old missile complex and clean it up and restore or renovate it, this is a taste of what you might Dewatering a silo would also require the use of an expensive commercial sump system capable Q lifting water from 150 feet down-- far more than most pumps can handle. The breed of pump that can handle this job is generally used for sumping out mines and construction sites. While such a pump can certainly be sourced and purchased, it would likely be best (and cheaper), to hire  encounter while working on a Cold War "fixer upper".  someone experienced to handle the job.  don't want to sound like I'm trying to discourage anyone from trying to fix up a site, far from it, jus be prepared to run up against some solid challenges when it comes to reclaiming some areas.  noother Titan I sie  irom  anclude aL  -  his doasnt  ne TCE * msbes-tos-dunt:  5n al  aminosted water he Cher pww-ts 5 euch Titan ladiry.    Photo of Titan-1 851-A Ballistic Silo doors and lead shot  Taken by Anne Constantin Birge  August 2022    Auburn Ravine Park  Proposed Disc Golf Project                                    Opendpace Wetland Preserve No dogs, motorized vehicles, Dicycles, dumping or other disturbance of protected wetland nabitats.  Please Fespect and help preserve our open spaces TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSECUTED AND HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES CALIFORNIA RENAL CODE SECTIO 602.8                    CONNEC TING COMMCINITIES Life Cycle of Chinook Salmon  FRI 5 KVINGI OLIK NATCIKAL HI RITAGL  CKEFKS    hfornin woodla and nemdibl, nch with and tre trees and other, evde cool nd -heler elow ke Lincoln  Constellation Energy                    City Council Disc Golf September 27, 2022  lam here to express my. opposition to locating al Disc Golf Course in the Auburn believe there are two reasons not directly related to the obvious that the area is designated as a preservelopen spaçe. One would be the parking/traffic issue. The. .35 mile of Moore Road leading to the inadequate 15 parking spots is not developed. There are no sidewalks and bike lanes. Proponents of this location advocate. for parking along this road. Many spots on this road are not wide enough for cars to get clearly, out of the roadway. This creates a safety issue. In the areas where it is wide enough, cars would be parking on or near dry grass which is another safety issue. They also state that participants will not park in the residential areas - this is wishful thinking as demonstrated from the Dog Park. At the September Parks & Rec committee meeting, Mr. Boyton stated that he had been misquoted and the article in the Lincoln News Messenger was not accurate. Three weeks have passed and Ih have yet to read a correction to this information in the paper. Much of the information Inow have is from that article and flyers from the proponents. Itis stated that the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers did an environmental evaluation and Mr. Boyton has received approval to develop the course at the site.. This is blatantly false. To my knowledge there has been no On May 11 Mr. Boyton contacted the USACOE seeking permission for the course. Int that email he states that the pathways from hole to hole would remain dirt. The pathways are not necessarily dirt now but they will be dirt because no ground vegetation will remain. He also states that the only structures will be concrete pad at the start of each hole, the cage for the disc and ai few trash cans. He also states that his interpretation of the plan is that it is an allowable use of the area. Throughout the rest of May and early June emails are going back and forth about finding copies of varies documents/plans covering the area. On June 8th Ms. Pascus from the USACOE notified Mr. Boyton that she had foud some documents and needed tol look thru them to see if she could find the long term management plan. She inquires about the issue of wetlands and Mr. Boyton responds that they don't have a plan yet waiting for approval before investing resources. June 10 Ms. Pascus notifies Mr. Boyton the plan she is looking for is the Long-Term Operations and Management Plan or the Lincoln Crossing Nature Preserve Area  Ravine Nature Preserve (Open Space)  environmental evaluation by the USACOE    Operations and Management Plan, On June 13 Mr. Boynton states that he can't find the long term plan but he has this one. June 17th he ask if she has reviewed On June 22nd Ms. Pascus notes that since Disc Golf is not specifically restricted in the document and that bicyclinglwalking are the closest activities the Disc Golf Park should follow the 50" restriction from any protected wetland. This is flawed reasoning for two reasons. You can not possibly list all the things that are not allowed - you ask permission for what you want. Comparing this to bicycling and walking is also flawed. These activities are passive while Disc Golf is an active activity which are usually not allowed in protected areas. Idoi not get the impression that Ms. Pascus is familiar with Disc Golf. Mr. Boyton doès not supply her with what Ib believe is critical information. There are multiple baskets on most holes. He did not supply her with the projected number of golfers that will tram down the vegetation - low estimate 5000 rounds of golf with a minimum of 2 players - 10,000 golfers time an average of 6,500 steps per golfer for at total of 65 million steps. Ifwe reach the numbers of. ohnson-springylew park in Rocklion - 19,000 rounds fo Disc Golf X minimum of 2 golfers 38,000 x 6,500 = 247 million steps. believe anyone involved in this decision should have this People have a reasonable expectation of privacy int their backyards. Public Facilities Development 101 is that you don't violate that privacy. Based on city and county documents, communication from the city, and 20 years of past practice we have a higher expectation than normal that our privacy and tranquility The new facility being devèloped in Roseville, the Rocklin, Auburn, and Orangevale courses all haye parking, restrooms, and at least two entry and exit points. Orangevale is located on Sierra Collegé Blvd and entry and exit are lam asking you to direct the Parks and Recreation Committee and the Lincoln staff to remove the Auburn Raviné from consideration for a Disc Golf Park and Ifnoty you need to follow a process where you start with hearings regarding a change int the way you manage the Preserve and open spaces. lfyou make the decision to change your policy and practices, you then néed to hold hearings to  document.  information,  will not be violated.  directly off that road.  direct them toi find another location.  decide how you want to develop those areas.    Another thing promoted by the proponents of this location is that they will drive out the homeless who desecrate the area. Until the last proponent spoke at the last parks and recreation meeting, we were basically told that all Disc Golfers are Cherubs. They never litter, they never park where they are not wanted, etc. Homelessness is a systemic problem in our society that we do not have an answer for. If you move them, where do they go? If they are violating the riparian guidelines for this area than the city has the obligation to deal with this.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MY NAME: KEVIN SIPLE  MEETING DATE: 275EFZo22  QLreside inside City limits? Ireside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/County in  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO: SPEAK ON: STEEP MITIA7ON ON 1T57  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of Luceln BldtRshet - IStshad  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.  NAME: MY  Jsc  MEETING DATE:  fiente  Ireside inside City limits? Direside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/County! in  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECTI I'D LIKE TO: SPEAK ON: Rfins Sed hmp OA Arhsh  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior tot the start of the meeting. MY NAME: AICM FKALKUIN ireside inside City limits? DIreside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/Countyin  MEETING DATE: 9-27-21  AAf  MY PHONE #:  MYI EMAIL:  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TOSPEAK ON s Fi1st Styeet Spoed Cowtrol  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.  MYN NAME:Anne ConstantinBirgp MEETING DATE: 27 5p2022  reside inside City limits? Ireside outside City limits in Placer County? ireside outside City/County! in  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECTI ID LIKE TO SPEAK ON: Iifon Ballistic Msilefing  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within thej jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk priorto the start of the meeting.  MY NAME:  MEETING DATEOpE  KAgb62  272027  Tresidei inside City limits? Direside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/County in  MY PHONE: #s  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TOS SPEAK ON:  hASR  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.  puvpanh  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MY NAMEJAY GRYENWALD eside inside City limits? Direside outside City limitsi in Placer County? Direside outside City/County in  MEETING DATE: 927/302  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECT ID LIKE TO SPEAK ON: Au 34RN RAUAE GOLF IS2 BAk  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within thej jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present itto the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MY NAME: Gene Morqan  MEETING DATE:  la7ba  reside inside City limits? ireside outside City limits in Placer County? DIreside outside City/County in MY PHONE #  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECT! I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON:  AAlrn Ravike PreserPey  Disc Bolf Fark  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments toi issues that are within thejurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the MY NAME: Jepifr Tardy MEETING DATE: 9127122  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.  gireside inside City limits? OIreside outside Cityl limits in Placer County? ireside outside City/County in  MY PHONE #  MY EMAILI  SUBJECTID LIKE TO: SPEAK ON: : Ff lack of pyoksabnefism) vespect  Dwaus my LcAfnuliss 9 shff H' Concuns DerGrosing Deu Speakers are requested to restricttheir comments to issues that are within thej jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present itt to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MY NAME: melame Boxnardt TAJresidei inside City limits? ireside outside City limits in Placer County? Diresideoutside City/County in  MEETING DATE: 927/2022  MY PHONE #:  MYE EMAIL:K  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON: Planoing Commission  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within thet three-minute time limit.  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start oft the meeting.  n  9-2722  MY Fr NAME:  MEETING DATE:  NVEs  Tresidei inside City! limits? Direside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/County in  MY PHONE #s  MY EMAL  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO: SPEAK ON: Der CECST  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within thej jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start oft the meeting. MY NAME: AE EBNST DIreside inside City limits? DIreside outside City limits in Placer County? Direside outside City/County in  MEETING DATE: 922-22  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TOSPEAK ON:  LANWNL CoMM5SON  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.  NON-AGENDA ITEMS  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start oft the meeting. MY NAME: 311 RNTA Diresidei inside City limits? Treside outside City limits in Placer County? ireside outside City/County in  MEETING SDA927  MY PHONE #3  MY EMAIL  SUBJECT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON: Depr Greck  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    ITEMS ON THE AGENDA  VOLUNTARY SPEAKER CARD - Please complete this card and present it to the  City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. MYNAME: MPkOe Borchart Mireside inside City limits? Diresideoutside City limits in Placer County? DIresideo outside City/Countyin,  MEETING DATE: 927122  MY PHONE #:  MY EMAIL:  Please refer to tonight's REGULAR MEETING agenda to complete the section below:  CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # (PULL FOR DISCUSSION) GENERAL  PUBLIC HEARING ITEM#  BUSINESS ITEM: #  8M  DINFORMATION ITEM#  Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to issues that are within the jurisdiction of  the City Council and to stay within the three-minute time limit.    Parkiel  3  L  Presentauor  City of Lincoln  -    Hislory  Parklets (orstreeteries) have a long history in urban planning, primarily within downtown or dense urban cores.  presentation here.  Defined as extensions of public space that provide more room for amenities and shared space. (San Francisco has been credited as developing the first formal parklets but examples can also be found in many European Cities.) COVID-19 spurred the growth of parklet use throughout the Country.    Hisiory Confinted  Many California communities have chosen to extend the life of parklets as restrictions have eased from  COVID-19  Different permitting processes and pilot programs have emerged throughout the state (Sacramento, Modesto, Woodland, Redwood City, Palo Alto, etc.)  *SF Pla    Designis key  IIRARRI  Photo Credit*SF Planning KC    Designis key  (emphasis added)  Photo Credit*E    Many  Consideraiions  Community Desire?  Balance of safety and economic  concern. Parking Loss  Application process/design  review  Transfer of Risk /Indemnity Engineering related  considerations (drainage, traffic  etc).  Not all areas are appropriate for  parklets.    Direciion Needed  . Direct Staff to move forward with outreach and creation of Parklet  Application Pilot Process /Program  2. Provide direction that Parklets are not a priority project at this time.  3. Direct staff to address the matter as part of the Downtown Plan Update.    -  Thankyoul  Questions?    ACTION SUMMARY Sept. 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 1  a  Presentation 6A  CONSENT  ITEM RESO/ORD# Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Silhi Mayor Andreatta  8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 8H 81 8J 8K 8L 8M 8N  218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 1054B 1055B  Y Y Y Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  1 Y 1 Y 1 Y 2 2 Y Y Y  1 1 1 2 2 Y  1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y    ACTION SUMMARY Sept. 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 2  Public Hearings  General Business  Info Items  ITEM RESO/ORD# Joiner Karleskint Lauritsen Silhi Mayor Andreatta  10A 10B 227 1 Y Y 2 Y  Y Y Y Y Y