LEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MCSWAIN EXTENSION EDUCATION. AND AGRICULTURE CENTER 2420 TRAMWAY ROAD SANFORD, NC: 27330 October 3, 2022 MINUTES Roll Call Present: Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Absent: Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives CALLTO ORDER INVOCATION Chairman Smith called the meeting to order at 6:00pm. Commissioner Lovick provided an invocation and led the Board int the Pledge of Allegiance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ADDITIONAL AGENDA last meeting. Mover: Dr. Andre Knecht Motion Result: Passed Mover: Cameron Sharpe Motion Result: Passed Motion: Move to revive the youth representative discussion that was tabled at the For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives Motion: Motion to approve the agenda as amended. Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick II. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Mover: Cameron Sharpe Motion Result: Passed Motion: Motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives II.A Purchase Approval ARPA Project, Lucas CPR Machines for Lee County EMS Ambulance Service Quote State Contract LUCAS 3_v3.1 Data Sheet.pdf II.B Fire Panel Upgrade at! Lee County Government Center Patterson Group_ Fire Alarm Upgrade_ LCGC.pdf Sole Source_ Patterson Group_ Fire Panel Upgrade_ LCGC.pdf Memo_Sole Source Justification_ Fire Panel Upgrade_LCGC.pdf II.C HVAC Controls Upgrade at the Ruby McSwain Facility Lee Col McSwain GBB220214.1R1.pdf: Sole Source_ Brady Services_ HVAC Controls Upgrade_ McSwain.pdf Memo Sole Source Justification Brady Services_HVAC Controls Upgrade.McSwainpar II.DI Budget Amendment #10/03/22/03 10-03-22-03v2.pdf 165-1 FY23 Lee.pdf II.E Request for Health Promotion to accept additional funds II.FI MOA1 for contracted Maternal Health Services through Piedmont Health Piedmont Health LCHD 22-23 Contract.doc II.G Lucas CPR Machine MOU with FirstHealth Lee_FirstHealth Mou Lucas Devices FH CEO Signed.pdf IIH ARPA Funding Trustees II.I Consideration of Appointment of Gabby Murillo Anderson to the Library Board of II.J Consideration of Appointment of. John Rzycki to the Fire Advisory Board 2 II.K Consideration of the Appointment of. James Alexander Ammons to the Fire Advisory Board III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. OLDI BUSINESS Noy public comments were received. IV.A Discussion of Youth Representation at Board of Commissioner Meetings Dr. Bill Stone, Director of the Cooperative Extension Lee County Center, gave the Board a presentation regarding a potential youth perspective at Board of Commissioner meetings. Dr. Stone provided greater detail about the purpose of the initiative, youth eligibility requirements, structure of the youth representative position, role of the representative, as well as overall expectations. The Cooperative Extension Director would be responsible for facilitating the youth representative seat on behalf of the Young Commissioners and Youth Council. There is a photo release form already in use and could also be used for this seat. Commissioner Sharpe would support ay youth sitting on County committees, but not to have them seated on the board or with the Clerk. Dr. Stone said the youth representative would be more ofay youth advocate and present at meetings and could provide input as requested, but would nott take an active role in the business oft the board. The Young Commissioners is a 4-H Club for students in grades 8th-10th. Itis a two-week program that focuses on civics and government. The Youth Council functions as a Commissioner Reives, while not in attendance, asked that the following be readi for "oppose placing ay youth on an elected board; however, IS support and recommend adding ay youth seat to all or any one oft the 27 boards and commissions we already have in place. lalso ask that the Board recognize that this proposed policy is limited to only those youth who are members of one of the existing programs, Youth Council or the Young Commissioners club. Other students are ineligible according to this policy regardless of their interest or capabilities. Moreover, it does not address an age limit or/may have overlooked: it. I'm open to youth participation in local government ini the right arena. Ihope the Board will consider my concerns. Thanks." The purpose, eligibility criteria, and procedures will be memorialized in a Resolution Motion: Motion to approve Youth Representation at Board of Commissioner Meetings, as well as the Lee County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. County committee. the record: to be adopted by the Board. Mover: Bill Carver Against: 1- Cameron Sharpe Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives Motion Result: Passed lasCounyoumeocRepesemtalieFMALdox For: 4- Dr. Andre Knecht, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick 3 V. NEW BUSINESS V.A Davenport Debt Presentation Ted Cole of Davenport. appeared before the Board to discuss debt capacity and the debt funding model, as well as the proposed change in Moody's rating methodology and Moody's Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") methodology. A copy of the presentation given is attached and incorporated into these minutes. Lee County, NC Discussion Materials 9.21.22. pdf V.B Hiring 2 Additional Staff for Board of Elections Elections Director Jane Rae Fawcett came before the Board on behalf of the Board of Elections to ask for authority and funding to hire two additional staff members, a full- time attorney, or adequate funds to hire outside counsel, and a public records request coordinalo/adminsraive assistant. At the Board of Election's September 14th meeting, a motion was passed unanimously to hire an attorney and a second permanent full-time employee with their primary focus to address public records requests and serve as backup to the current Elections technician. These hiring requests were discussed by the Board of Elections after the department received multiple public information requests for extensive information that must be provided in compliance with NC General Statutes and also received. a notice of prospective litigation and demand for records retention. We have an obligation to fulfill these requests, without impeding our elections preparations. Both job descriptions for the attorney and coordinator were approved by the Board of Elections and the Lee County Human Resources Director. Commissioner Sharpe recommended providing Elections what they need. Elections has been using the State Board of Elections and Commissioner Reives, while not present, asked that the following be read for the "fully support the manager's recommendation for the Board of Elections. Each one of Dr. Crumpton recommended to approve up to $50,000 to hire outside counsel and to fund the coordinator position. The Elections Department was reviewed back in March and every position was analyzed. Elections are taking longer to prepare and review, and there's only one person doing it currently. We felt like we need to have backup for that person. Ifully support that position and putting money in their professional services for outside counsel. It was originally budgeted $12,000 and to get started, they need $20,000. Commissioner Knecht made a motion to approve the coordinator position and $20,000 to hire outside counsel, and also noted that Ms. Fawcett can come back for Motion: Motion to fund the public records request coordinator position and allocate $20,000 for the Board of Elections to hire outside counsel. For: 5-Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick V.CF Recommendation award, project # 4843-01-22 Historic Lee County Courthouse the County Attorney thus far. record: the appropriations for the attorney and the new hire." more ifneeded. Mover: Dr. Andre Knecht Motion Result: Passed Design to Hobbs Architects Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives 4 Development Services Director Santiago Giraldo presented staffs' recommendation award fort the Historic Lee County Courthouse project design. On August 11, the Request for Qualifications was posted for the design. Staff opened four sealed qualifications and conducted three in-person interviews, a site visit to one of the finalists, Hobbs Architects, in Pittsboro, and distance site tours. With unanimous consensus, staff chose Hobbs Architects for the design project. Hobbs Architects is a reputable design firm, which has successfully completed several projects with a similar scope, such as the restoration of the Chatham County Historic Courthouse. Lee County. Notice of Award- Architect Lee County HC- 9SEP2022.docx Motion: Motion to approve the recommendation to award project # 4843-01-22 Historic Lee County Courthouse Design to Hobbs Architects. For: 5-D Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick V.D Project 4839- 02-22 Lee Co. Multi Sports Complex Experience Theme Discussion Development Services Director Santiago Giraldo asked to discuss the multisportsplex experience theme with the Board. He noted that we need to start steering the architects towards the flavor we want for the park, between traditional, contemporary, feel, contemporary is similar to San-Lee Park Nature Center andi is a little more creative, and whimsical is a lot more colorful. Mr. Giraldo said we can blend some of these. After internal conversations and meeting today, and based on target audience of children ages 12 and under, we feel there should be more whimsy and color. The UDO provides guidance as to what colors and textures that can be utilized in the design. After providing feedback from tonight's meeting to the architects, the project will then go to the Planning Board and TRC in the next couple months. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has not reviewed these options yet due to timing. Staff consensus was a combination ofoptions 2and 3, contemporary and whimsical. Mr. Keel said at the renovations for Kiwanis Children's Park and Horton Park, Parks and Recreation has been using whimsical designs and the parents and families love it. The playgrounds would be whimsical and the rest contemporary. The Board gave consensus on utilizing ac contemporary and whimsical design, and directed staff to move forward accordingly. Planner Curtis Lee is taking over the Board presentations for Planning Administrator Amy McNeill. Mr. Lee noted the rezoning application by Street Dog Properties, LLCis to rezone 4.45 acres consisting of four parcels of land addressed as 3224 and 3226 Hawkins. Ave from Residential Agricultural (RA) to Highway Commercial (HC) to allow the installation ofa self-standing ice vending machine on the subject property. The Lee County Planning Board voted unanimously. County Attorney Whitney Parrish reminded the Board that they cannot vote ift there is a conflict ofi interest per NC G.S. 160D-109. 2. Hobbs RFQ 4843-01-22. pdf Mover: Mark Lovick Motion Result: Passed Absent:2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives and whimsical. Traditional is more of college campus 2022-09-15 Experience Images.pdf V.E Planning Board recommendation for a rezoning request. There were no conflicts noted. RECO-REZ@32248326 Hawkins Ave-BINDER.pdr 5 Motion: Motion that the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the Plan SanLee long range plan designation of Maker District because Highway Commercial (HC) zoning is listed as a secondary district and For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Motion: Motion that the Lee County Board of Commissioners approve the proposed zoning map amendment because the site is appropriate fora highway commercial land use andi is reasonable and in the public interest given the location along al busy roadway and access to public water. For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick convenience retail uses are allowed. Mover: Dr. Andre Knecht Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives Motion Result: Passed Mover: Mark Lovick Motion Result: Passed Absent: 2-/ Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives V.F Horton Pool Project Change Order #3 Development Services Director Santiago Giraldo said that early in June of this year while contractors were working on bathhouse at Horton Park, they discovered unsuitable soils beneath the structure. The County has worked out a plan to address the soils with McGill and. JMT, resulting in this change order. The total change order amount is $41,279.25 for change order #3. Change order #4 will address contract changes, but we do not have numbers yet, as we are still in negotiation. Mr. Giraldo requested that the Board give the County Manager authority to approve change order #4. Count Manager Dr. Crumpton said the contractor asked for the extension due to the additional time that was taken to formulate a plan to address the unsuitable soils and the associated overhead expense. The County Manager said we need the authorization to keep the project moving between meetings and expect more change orders because of the issues we're running into with the old building. If we want to finish the project by May 1,2 2023, Memorial Day, we need to keep the change orders moving to address any Motion: Motion to approve Change Order #3 for the Horton Pool Project and For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick V.G Allocation of ARPA revenue loss funds for Horton Park Bath House Project Assistant County Manager Lisa Minter asked the Board to allocate $125,0000fARPA revenue. loss funds to the Horton Park Bath House project to cover a change order related to unsuitable soils and the potential costs of delays that have been caused by the soil problem. The $125,000 will come from the $1,268,775 that was reserved on August 29, 2022 by the Board of Commissioners for projects that were not ready to be further unforeseeable issues that may arise. Change Order No 3.pdf JMT CO3 CvrLtr 09 30: 2022.pdf Mover: Bill Carver Motion Result: Passed authorize the County Manager to approve Change Order #4. Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives started yet. ARPA revenue loss update for 10-3-22.pdf for the Horton Park Bath House project. Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives V.H2022 Fire Prevention Week Proclamation Motion: Motion to approve the allocation of $125,000 of ARPA revenue loss funds For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Mover: Dr. Andre Knecht Motion Result: Passed Emergency Services Director Matt Britt and Fire Marshall Aaron Bullard presented the 2022 Fire Prevention Week Proclamation to the Board. The ultimate goal of this proclamation is supporting the mission ofreducing injury and death, as well as property loss, as it relates to home fires. Mr. Bullard read the proclamation aloud, a copy ofv which is attached and incorporated into these minutes. Lee County Fire Prevention Week Proclamation 2022.docx Motion: Motion to approve the 2022 Fire Prevention Week Proclamation. For: 5-D Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Mover: Cameron Sharpe Motion Result: Passed Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives V.I Basis of Charges for Work with Terraquest County Manager Dr. Crumpton noted project request for $85,800.6 63 that's broken down into four sections well installation, a vacuum event, ground water sampling, and vapor intrusion study. This request is coming to the Board for approval because this item takes us over the $60,000 the Board has already allocated. We still have $31,000 available, but that means we're $54,800 short. These funds will come from fund balance. Terraquest, provided several maps, copies of which are attached and incorporated into these minutes. The mapi from August 17, 2022 shows a lot of red, which depicts the material need to be removed. The map from September 13, 2022 shows that after the first exercise, it's mostly green with a little bit of orange. Dr. Crumpton willi inform the Board when it's the last vacuuming occurs, but there will be more untila all of the hazardous material is gone. We are getting closer to finishing, but 9-2022 Agreement for Services Basis of Charges Schedule A.pdf Motion: Motion to approve the Basis of Charges for Work with Terraquest in For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick this is not last. the amount of $85,800.63. Mover: Mark Lovick Motion Result: Passed V.J State of the County Report Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives NCACCIICMA Management Fellow Ben McQueary presented his first project to the Board, the State of the County Report. Mr. McQueary wanted to create something the public could interact with and share on social media. The video component of the report isal large portion oft this project. Mr. McQueary is new to Lee County and has enjoyed 7 getting to speak with the managers, survey the results, and getting to know Lee County. There are more statistics within the report, a copy of which is attached and incorporated into these minutes. The areas oft the report are Economic Development; Healthy and Educated Citizens; Maintaining a Safe, Clean Community; Enhancing Community Resources; and Efficient Usage of Tax Dollars. The State of the County video was shown and is available on the Lee County website and YouTube channel. VI. MANAGERS' REPORTS VI.A August 2022 Financial Report Finance Director Candace Iceman provided the financial report for August 2022. August 2022.pdf VII. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS VIII. CLOSED SESSION Motion: Motion to go into Closed Session Per N.C. General Statute S 143- 318.11(a)(4) to discuss matters relating to the location or expansion of business. The Board took at five-minute break at 8:26 p.m., then went into For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Closed Session. Mover: Mark Lovick Motion Result: Passed Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives The Board went out of Closed Session at 9:01 p.m. ADJOURN Mover: Bill Carver Motion Result: Passed Motion: Motion to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m. For: 5- Dr. Andre Knecht, Cameron Sharpe, Kirk Smith, Bill Carver, Mark Lovick Absent: 2- Arianna Lavallee, Robert Reives DDSmitw Kirk D. Smith, Chairman Lee County Board of Commissioners COUN? ATTEST: COUN, #wloHall Hailey Hall, Clerk tot the Board Exhibit G- Sole Source Justification Form CARO SOLE SOURCE. JUSTIFICATION FORM (for Hems costing $5,000.00 or more) Patterson Group Services, Inc. FIREA ALARMF PANEL UPGRADE ATT THELCGC Vendor: Hem: Estimated expenditure fort the abovei item: 46,393.37 CONTAINING JUSTIFICATION, AND: SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION. INITIALALLI ENTRIESBELOW1 THAT APPLYTO1 THEF PROPOSEDF FURCMASEATACHAMEMO 1. 2. monufacturer. 3. 4. Sole sourcei is tori the original manufacturer orp provider. There are no area distributors. The parls/equipment are not interchangeable with similar parts ol another This is the only known item or service that will meet the specialized needs of this The ports/equipment are required from this source toy permit slandardization. 5. - None oft the above apply. A detailed explanation andj justification for this sole source The undersigned requests that compelitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the material or service described in this sole source justification be department orp pertorm thei intended function. inc contained inf the attachedi memo. authorzedasas solesourcet fort the material ors service. fan Manage Lmpontly Board of Commissioners upt to$ $30,000) and ($30,000 up) a ID-3-22 Date Lee County Purchasing and Contracting Poicy Page 58 Revised! March 16, 2020 Exhibit G- Sole Source Justification Form CAR SOLE SOURCE. JUSTIFICATION FORM (forl lems costing $5,000.00 or more) Brady Services Vendor: Hem: HVAC CONTROLSUPGRADE, ATR RUBY MCSWAIN FACILITY Estimated expenditure for the above item: 50,318.00 CONTAINING. JUSTIFICATION. AND: SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION. INITIALA ALL ENTRIES BELOW THAT APPLYTOT THEF POPOEDAAOMAEATACIA MEMO 1. - Sole sourcei ist tort the onginaimanufaclurer. or provider. There arer no area distributors. 2. monufacturer. 3. 5. The parls/equipment are not interchangeable with similar parts of another This is the only known item or service thal will meet the specialized needs of this None oft the above apply. A detailed explanation and) justificationi for this sole: source department orp pertorm thei intended function. incontained int the attached memo. 4. V Thep parts/equipment ore required from this source top permit slandardization. The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the material ors service described in this sole source justification be authorized aso asoles sourse fort the material ors service. our" Manage 5,000 upt Board of Commissioners ($30,000C andup) Lpaw A Departmekt ID-3-22 Date Lee CountyF Purchasing and Contracting Poicy Page5 58 Revised! March 16,2 2020 MEMOT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: LEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OHNACRUMPTON, LEE COUNTY MANAGER BUDGET AMENDMENT#: 10/03/22/03 October 3, 2022 SECTIONI. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL FUND(1100) REVENUE INCREASES ARE HEREBY APPROVED: CURRENT BUDGET 10,000 4,253,206 NEW CHANGE BUDGET 24,586 34,586 74,963 74,963 84,269 4,337,475 183,818 DEPARTMENT Other Revenues Sheriff Revenues Fund Balance ACCOUNT# DESCRIPTION 1100-3930-38330 Insurance Refunds 1100-3431-32699 Sheriff Officers Fees 1100-3990-39900 Fund Balance Appropriated TOTALCHANGES SECTIONII. THE FOLLOWING GENERALFUND(100) EXPENSE INCREASES ARE HEREBY APPROVED: CURRENT BUDGET 139,136 NEW CHANGE BUDGET 24,586 163,722 52,235 52,235 19,414 19,414 140 140 312 312 2,862 2,862 34,741 34,741 7,500 7,500 25,775 25,775 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 1,253 1,253 125,000 125,000 308,818 DEPARTMENT Sheriff Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant Sheriff Grant SheriffG Grant Sheriff Grant Misc Expense ACCOUNT# DESCRIPTION 1100-4310-43310 MaintenanceVehicles 1100-4311-43380 Maintenance-Tech 1100-4311-46413 Technology Equip $5000&> 1100-4311-44100 Office/Department: Supplies 1100-4311-46416 Technology Equip <$500 1100-4311-46412 1100-4311-43380 MaintenanceTechnology 1100-4311-43300 1100-4311-44260 Uniforms 1100-4311-44541 1100-4311-45700 Crime Prevention 1100-4311-43100 Professional Services 1100-9800-49584 Transfer to ARPA Technology EQ$ $500-$4,999 Maintenance-rqupment Recognition Program Exp TOTALO CHANGES DESCRIPTION TOTAL CHANGES SECTIONIII THE FOLLOWING GENERALFUND(100) EXPENSE DECREASES ARE HEREBY APPROVED: CURRENT BUDGET 1,083,049 NEW DEPARTMENT Sheriff-SRO ACCOUNT# CHANGE BUDGET 125,000 958,049 125,000 1100-4313-41200 Salaries & Wages SECTIONI IV. THE FOLLOWING ARPAF FUND (2114)F REVENUE INCREASES ARE HEREBY APPROVED: CURRENT BUDGET NEW DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT# DESCRIPTION TOTAL CHANGES DESCRIPTION TOTALCHANGES CHANGE BUDGET 125,000 125,000 125,000 Horton Sanitation Facility 2114-3930-39700 Transfer from General Fund SECTIONV. THE FOLLOWING ARPAI FUND( (2114) EXPENSE INCREASES ARE HEREBY APPROVED: CURRENT BUDGET 737,116 NEW DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT# CHANGE BUDGET 125,000 862,116 125,000 Horton Sanitation Facility 2114-8123-46300 General Construction 41 mlmy sll KIRK HAILEYHALL, CLERK Kosdu TOTHE BOARD uAy GGARE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING: BETWEEN LEE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ANDI FIRSTHEALTH OF THE CAROLINAS, INC. REGARDING CHEST WHEREAS, the Lee County Board of Commissioners prioritizes the safety ofall citizens and visitors ofLee County andi in doing so provides emergency medical services through ai franchisee agreement with FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc (hereinafter called) FirstHealth).; WHEREAS, the Lee County Board of Commissioners recognize that many oft the emergency medical service calls require first responders to engage inl life-saving techniques, WHEREAS, the Lee County Board of Commissioners approved the expenditure of $96,000.00 for the purchase of six Lucas 3 chest compression devices which provide automated chest compressions designed toj provide al higher level of care for patients receiving CPR; and, WHEREAS, thel Lee County Board of Commissioners will equip each oft the six ambulances with al Lucas 3 chest compressor to be utilized inj performing the franchise service of providing emergency medical services to alll Lee County citizens and visitors; and, WHEREAS, the-Lee County Government willi maintain ownership oft the devices while FirstHealth will utilize the devices for thei remainder oft the franchise agreement or for the useful NOW,THEREFORE, Lee County Government and First Health do mutually agree as 1. Lee County Government willj purchase the six Stryker Lucas 3 chest compression FirstHealth oft the Carolinas willl be responsible for maintaining accountability for each device including which ambulance each device is assigned to at any given time andj providing this information tol Lee County Government upon request. 3. FirstHealth of the Carolinas will ensure each ambulance serving Lee County's jurisdiction willl be equipped with ai fully working device at all times. FirstHealth oft the Carolinas will ensure all ofLee County's purchased devices remain on any vehicle primarily assigned tol Lee County's jurisdiction. COMPRESSION DEVICES and, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); and, life oft the devices; and, follow: devices and will assign asset numbers to each device. 2. 5. Lee County willj purchase the six devices tol be utilized by FirstHealth until either the franchise agreement term ends, or at the end of the life of the device, whichever If, when the franchise agreement terminates, FirstHealth stilll has active devices in use on its ambulances, the devices willl be returned tol Lee County, as Lee County will maintain ownership oft the device throughout the term of the agreement or until the 7. Lee County has full discretion to determine ifa device has reached the end ofits usefull life. Ifa any device reaches its useful life and FirstHcalth is still providing services under its franchise agreement, Lee County is under no obligation tor replace occurs first. 6. useful life oft the device expires. said device. FirstHealth will ensure the following conditions are met. A. FirstHealth will make each device available to) Lee County Government for inventory atl least once annually, and willj provide the device for inspection at any time during the term oft the franchise agreement. B. Thel Lee County Emergency Medical Services Division of] FirstHealth will bei responsible for providing device training to all Emergency Medical C. Thel Lcc County Emergency Medical Services Division will be responsible for providing training tol Lee County Emergency Responders who assist with calls through thel First Responder program. D. FirstHealth of the Carolinas will complete all required maintenance and repair to the devices based on best practices and when available, vendor recommended maintenance schedule and protocols. E. FirstHealth oft the Carolinas will repair and/or replace the device if damaged or destroyed for sol long as FirstHealth isi responsible for maintaining accountability for each device. FirstHealth will provide all required single use supplies necessary to support the use oft the device. Services Personnel. F. Thet twol Parties agree this Memorandum of Understanding willl bei ine effect for the duration of thel Lee County Emergency Medical Services Agreement. Adopted thist the 3rd dayof.Dchber LEE/COUNTY GOVERNMENT Amlonte kirk D. Smith,eir Lee County Board of Commissioners ATTEST Hall thgitl Hafley Clerk, Lee County Board of Commissioners FIRSTHEALTH OF THE CAROLINAS om2s 2022. COUN? CEO ATTEST Secretary A SEALS Aebishat abulis la 5 o la 3 0 6 o 3 I 2 3 2 44488 33923 13993899988 SUOIIW 93333988 SUOIIW I 1 - I a 8E0Z ZEOZ 9E02 SEOZ VEOZ EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OE0Z 6202 8202 LZOZ 9202 Szoz vzoz EZOZ @ @ - 8 e I - II 8E02 LEOZ 9E02 SEOZ VEOZ EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OEOZ 6202 8Z02 LZ02 9202 9zoz 4zo2 EZOZ AEEEERE 5 a E o E E 1402 Evoz Zvoz Tvoz Ovo2 6802 8E02 LEOZ 9802 SEOZ VEOZ EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ 080Z 6202 8202 LZOZ 9202 92oz Vzoz EZOZ vvoz Evoz Zvoz Tvoz Ovoz 680Z 8802 ZEOZ 9802 SEOZ VEOZ EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OEOZ 6202 8202 LZO2 9202 9202 vzoz EZOZ : o 08 99889898 SUOIIW SUOIIWI S tvoz Evoz @ Zvoz Tvoz Ov0z 6802 880Z LEOZ 9802 SEOZ VEOZ EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OEOZ 6202 8202 LZOZ 9202 9z02 4Zoz EZOZ tvoz Ev0z Zvoz Tvoz Ovoz 6E02 8802 Z80Z 9802 SEOZ V802 EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OE0Z 6202 8202 LZOZ 9202 9Z02 vzoz EZOZ tvoz Evoz Zvoz Tvoz Ov02 6802 880Z ZEOZ 9802 SEOZ VE0Z EEOZ ZEOZ TEOZ OEOZ 6202 8202 LZOZ 9202 Szoz 4zoz EZOZ AEEEEEEERE 8888866 9 8 e b0 3 8 ci E4 b a NRS 888888 BE 5p E 8 005 I # OE O6 I fo 043 a 2 L 2 8 3332 2 S883 333 6 E 9 S - F à N N , 8 I a 00 5 a e E S X 0 888888 888888 8888888 8888888 @ h - - 8 0 8 C 1 a o 9 B e bo o I 0 LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Committed Today for a Betfer Tomorrow FINANCIAL POLICIES RESOLUTION WHEREAS, stability inf fiscal affairs is a desirable objective but a difficult goal for counties to attain because of many factors some ofv which aret the relationship oft the various units of government, WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners is of the opinion that the statement of minimum standards off fiscal policy would help present and future boards and staff to adapt tot the changes that occur NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lee County Board of Commissioners does the changing economies and thel limited authority ofl local government; and and helpt them toa attain a reasonable measure off fiscal stability; hereby adopt thet following financial policies: mandates, Debt Debt service will not exceed 15% of general fund expenditures. Ina any year where the debt service is less than or equal to 14% of general fund expenditures at least 1% of the operating budget will bet transferred to capital reserve. This contribution will only be made ifavailable fund balancei is at 15% or greater of general fund expenditures. Payout of aggregate principal outstanding shall be no less than 50% repaid within 10 The County will strive to maintain its net bonded debt ata al level not to exceed two percent As part of the budget process, the County shall annualy review the fees and user charges. All changes to the schedule of fees and charges must be approved by the Board of The County should charge other fees when it is allowable, when a limited and specific group of beneficiaries can be identified, when iti is feasible to charge beneficiaries for the services rendered, and when there is no reason to subsidize the service wholly or in part. To the extent possible, fee levels should be set to recover the full costs of the services provided, unlessi itis deemed necessary or desirable tos subsidize the service. Factors to consider in deciding whether a subsidy is appropriate include the burden on property tax payers, the degree to which the service benefits a particular segment oft the population, whether beneficiaries can pay the fee, and whether the service provides a years. ofthe assessed valuation oft taxable property withint the County. Fees and user charges Commissioners. broader benefit tot the community. Fund Balance The County will maintain as ai floor an available fund balance equalt to 16% of the General Fundb budget att the end ofe each fiscal year; however, the County will strive tor reacha at target General Fund balances in excess of target levels will be transferred to capital reserve funds top provide equity resources tof fund the County's capital improvement plan. Ino order tor recruit and retaint ther most qualified employees while ensuring fairness and non- discrimination, Lee County will commit to having the Human Resources Department conducta a comprehensive compensation and classification study of 20 percent ofj jobs each year with 100 percent being reviewed over a five year period.. The study shall be based on the complexity and relative worth of each job as well as an extensive market comparability analysis which identifies competitive pay rates for jobs similar in content to those oft the County int the labor market inv which we compete for our labor supply. Ina an effort to maintain competitive rates of pay the County will strive to make annual cost of living adjustments for all employees based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban In an effort tos stabilize the County's tax rate, the Board of Commissioners will adopt a tax rate that considers the succeeding four years' anticipated expenditures and will strive not The Board of Commissioners prefers tol limit the growth oft the annual operating budget to an amount which can be accommodated by growth in the tax base as well as other local state andf federalr revenues, without at tax rate increase, whenever possible. Ina ane effort to stabilize the County's tax rate, the County will strive to develop and annually review projections of revenues, expenditures and fund balance for the next five years. Longer range projections should be developed as necessary. In an effort to stabilize the County's tax rate, all grant funded positions will be reviewed annually to verify continuation of funding. If grant funds are no longer available for a position, the position will be terminated unless a non-tax related source of revenue is of24%. Competitive Employment Wage Earners, Southern Region, Average ofA All Groups. Tax rate toc changet the rate until the nextr revaluation. providedt to cover the cost of the position. Adopted this 19thd day of March, 2018. Amy M. Dalrymple, Chair, Board of Commissioners ATTEST: Jennifer Gamble, Clerk 00 I U.S.PUBLICF FINANCE MOODY's INVESTORSSERVICE ISSUER COMMENT 28May2 2021 RATING General Obligation (or GOR Related)' Aa2 Contacts Katiel Townsend Associatel LeadAnalyst katie.t townsendemoodys.com Gregory W.L Lipitz VsOmdroceNemger segylpiuemoo)s.com CLIENT SERVICES Americas AsiaP Pacific Japan EMEA Lee County, NC Annual Comment on Lee Issuer Profile County NoOutlook Lee Countyis is locatedi int theg geographic center of North Carolina. The countys seat of Sanford +1.212.553.3761 rate was 5% (3rdo quartile)2 The largesti industry sectors that drive the locale economy are +1.212.553.7782 Wer regardt the coronavirus outbreak asas social risk under oure environmental, social and isapproximately 40r miles southwest oft the Raleigh-Durham metro area. The county! hasa population ofe 60,481 anda moderate population density of2 235 people per square mile. The county'sr median familyi income is $59,667 (4th quartile) andt the March 2021 unemployment governancef framework, given thes substantial implications forp public health ands safety and thee economy. We dor nots seea any material immediate credit risks for Lee County. However, dependo onb both thes severitya and durationo oft the crisis. Ifour view oft the credit quality of Lee manufacturing, retailt trade, and healths services. thes situation: surrounding coronavirusi is rapidly evolving andt the termi longert impact will 1-212-553-1653 County changes, wev will update our opinion att that time. 852-3551-3077 Credit Overview 81-3-5408-4100 Lee Countyh has ay veryl high quality credit position. Its Aa2 ratingi is equivalent tot the median 44-20-7772-5454 rating of Aa2 for counties nationwide. Key credit factorsi include ar robust financial position, manageable pensionl liabilitya and small debt burden. The ratinga also reflectsac considerable Finances: Thef financialp position oft the countyi is very stronga andi is relatively favorable when comparedt tot thea assignedr rating ofA Aa2. Cash! balancea asap percent ofc operating revenues (278%) iss slightly beneath the USr mediant but grew between 2016 and 2020. Fund balance asap percent ofc operatingr revenues (34.2%) is consistent with the USr median. Debt and Pensions: Thep pensionl liability oft the county is affordable andi isar modest credit strength relative toi its Aa2r ratingp position. Thel Moody's-adjusted net pension liabilityt to operating revenues (0.4 43x)f favorablyi ist materially lower thant the USr median. Lee County! has alight debt burden whichi isre reflectedi int thea assignedr rating ofA Aa2. Net direct debt tof full Economy and1 Tax Base: Thee economy andt tax base oft the countya ares solid buts some aspects arev weak when comparedt toi its Aa2 rating. Total full value (S66 billion)i ist belowt the USr median buti increased from 2016t to 2020. Fully value per capita ($98,6 603)i iss stronger than the US median andr medianf familyi income equals only7 77.2% oft the USI level. Management: and Governance: North Carolina counties have ani institutional framework score 2of" "Aaa," or very strong. Property taxes, counties' main revenue source, are highly taxb base andr moderate wealth andi income profile. value (1.59)i iss slightly highert thant the US median. Thisd authorized document hasb beenp preparedf fort theu usec ofMitch Brigulioa andisp protected! byl law. Itmay notb be undera ac contract with Moody'so ord otherwise authorizedi inv writing! by Moody's. transferred or copied, disseminated unless MOODY'SI INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE predictable ands stable. Counties have moderate revenue-raising ability, givent the cap; however, allr rated counties maintain ample headroom undert this cap. Expenditures, which arel largely forp personnel, arel highly predictable and stable and counties have ahigh North Carolina counties willo continue tob benefitf froma a growing state economy and strongr management, supported! byt thel Local Government Commission, despitee economic disruption duet tot the coronavirus. Sales tax collections will bei impactedb by thep pandemic, but willr rebound overt ther mediumt term, anda ani improving! housingr market willp provide stabilityi in property taxr revenues. Strongr reserve levels andl lowf fixed costs will providef financial flexibility. Pensionsa aret typically well funded, whereas debt burdens are slightly high abilityt tor reduce expenditures given modestf fixed cost burdens andi no collective! bargaining units. Sector Trends North Carolina Counties because counties arer responsible fors schoola andt technical college infrastructure needs. EXHIBIT1 Keyl Indicators 451 Lee County Economy/ /TaxE Base Total Full Value FullV Value Per Capita Median Familyl Income (%0 ofUS Median) Finances Available Fund Balance as%of Operating Revenues Net CashE Balance as%0 of Operating Revenues Debt/ /Pensions Net Direct Debt/ /Full Value Net Direct Debt/ Operating Revenues Moody/s-adjusted/ Net Pension Liability (3-yra average)t toF Full Value Moody's-adjusted/ Net Pensionl Liability (3-yra average)t to Operating Revenues Debt andF Financial Data Population Available FundE Balance ($000s) Net CashE Balance ($000s) Operating Revenues ($000s) Net Direct Debt ($000s) Moody's Adjustedi Net Pension Liability (3-yra average) ($000s) Source: Moody's sinvestorss Service 2016 2017 2018 79% 2019 2020 USMedian Credit Trend $5,084M $5,182M $5,292M $5,540M $5,963M $8,266M $85,402 $86,655 $88,021 $91,607 $98,603 $88,050 Improved Improved 93% Weakened 34.3% Improved 39.5% Improved 0.5% Stable 0.56x Stable 1.2% Stable 1.39x Stable 2020 USI Median 84% 83% 77% 77% 26.0% 28.3% 29.5% 31.6% 34.2% 21.2% 22.8% 23.7% 25.5% 27.8% 1.1% 1.4% 0.85x 1.02x 1.37x 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1.18x 1.12x 0.6% 0.6% 2019 0.29x 0.36x 0.43x 0.45x 0.43x 59,540 59,805 60,125 60,481 60,481 $17,731 $19,616 $20,325 $23,013 $26,666 $14,412 $15,812 $16,340 $18,561 $21,673 $68,119 $69,374 $68,804 $72,912 $77,881 $58,073 $70,465 $93,960 $86,341 $87,049 $19,524 $25,304 $29,929 $33,036 $33,725 2016 2017 2018 N/A $26,112 $30,464 $72,972 $40,647 $97,433 Thispublicationd doesnota announcea acreditr rating action. Fora anycreditr ratings referencedir inthisp publication, pleases seet www.moodyscomfort themostu updatedo credit rating actioni informationa andr ratingh history. emPbonwesw, pageon 28May2021 Lee County, NC: Annual Commento onleec County Thisd documenth hash been preparedf for theu use ofMitch Brigulioa andi is protectedb byl law. Itmay authorized undera ac contract with! Moody's or otherwise authorizedi inv writing by Moody's. notb be copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE EXHIBIT2 Availablef fundb balance asa percento ofo operating revenuesi increasedf from 2016t toz 2020 AvailableF FundBalanceas9 SsalOpeatigReenue" -L USMedian 35% 30% 25% 2016 2017 2018 TotalFullValue 2019 2020 Source:k Issuerfi fnancalstatements Moody's sinvestorsService EXHIBIT3 Fully valued oft thep property taxb basei increasedf from 2016t to2 2020 (millions) $6,000 $5,500 $5,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: ksuerfmancalsatements: Governmento datas Offeringstatements: Moody'sinvestorss Service Moody's-adjustedi netp pension liabilityt too operatingr revenuesi increasedi fromz 2016to2 2020 EXHIBIT4 Debt! Pensions 2.0x 1.0x 0.0x 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: Issuerfi financialstatements Governmento datasources; Offeringstatements Mood/sinesossenice Endnotes 11 Thera rating referencedint thisn reporti isthei issuer's General Obligation (GO) rating orit itsh highestp publicr ratingt thatis is GO-related. AGOL bondisg generally backedbyt thef fullfa faitha ando creditp pledge andt totalt taxing powero oft thei issuer. GO-relateds securitiesi includes general obligation! limitedt tax, annual appropriation, leaser revenue, non-adv valorem, andn moralo obligation debt. Then referencedr ratings reflect theg government's underlying credit quality Thed demographic datap presented, including population, populationo density, pero capita personali income andu unemployment ratea ared derived fromt then most recentlya available USg government databases. Population, populationo densitya and perc capitap personali income comef fromt theA American Community Survey Thel largesti industrys sectors ared derivedf fromt the Bureauo of Economic Analysis. Moody's allocatedt thep perc capita personal income dataa andu unemployment dataf fora allo countiesi inthel US censusi intoc quartiles. Theq quartiles areo orderedf from strongest- to-v weakest froma creditp perspective: theh highest per capita 3 Thei institutionalf framework scorea assessesa amunicipality's! legala ability tor match revenuesy withe expenditures based oni its constitutionally: andl legislatively conferredp powers andr responsibilities. See! USL Local Government General Obligation Debt (July 2020) methodologyr report for more details. 4 Ford definitions ofthen metricsir int thek Keyl Indicators Table, USLocal Government General Obligation Methodology: ands Scorecard User Guide (July 2014). 5 Then medians comef from ourn mostr recently publishedlocalg government medians report, Medians- Tax bases expansion bolsters revenue. but pensions remaina ahurdle (Mayz 2020)V whichisa availablec on Moodys.com. Then medians presented here areb based ont thek keyr metrics outlinedi in! Moody'sGO withoutr regardt tos stateg guarantees, enhancement programs or bondi insurance. whilet theu unemployment ratec comes fromt theB Bureaud ofL Labor Statistics. personali income quartilei isf firsto quartile, andt thel lowest unemployment rateis isf firsto quartile. Metricsn representeda as N/Air indicatet thed datav were nota available att thet timec ofp publication. methodologya andt thea associateds scorecard. 28May 2021 Leec County, NC: Annual Comment onLee County This document hasb been prepared fort theu use ofl Mitch Brigulio andis isp protected! by! law. Itmay not bec copied, transferred or disseminated unless authorizedu undera a contractv with Moody'soro otherwise authorizedi inv writing! by Moody's. MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 020211 Moody'so RATINGS SYMBOLS ANDD CREDITR RATINGS. CREDITR RATINGS DON NOT VOLATILITY. CREDITR RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS OPINIONSA ANDP RATINGS, MOODY'S ISSUESITSCREDITI RATINGS, THATE EACHINVESTORY WILL, WITHDUE CARE, MAKEI ITSOWNS STUDYA ANDE HOLDING, ORS SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHERC ORC OTHERWISEF REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHERT FORA ANYS CONSENT. FOR MOODY'S Tothee extentp indirect,s special, damages, particulard creditra ratinga assignedb by! MOODY'S. representatives, licensorso ors suppliers, arisingf fromo NOV RATING, ASSESSMENT OTHER Moody'sl U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE Moody'sinvestors: Service, Inc, MoodysAnalytics. Inc and/or their! licensorsa anda affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S") Allrightsreserved. CREDITR RATINGSI ISSUEDBYN MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARET THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OFT THEF RELATIVEF FUTURE CREDITF RISK OFE ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, ORD DEBT ORD DEBT-LIKES SECURITIES, ANDI MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICESA ANDI NFORMATIONPUBISHED: BYI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS)MANI INCLUDES SUCHCURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY'S DEFINESCREDITI RISK AST THEF RISKT THAT ANENTITYN MAYI NOT MEETI ITS CONTRACTUAL STATEMENTSOFG CURRENT ORH HISTORICALF FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSOINCLUDES QUANTITATIVE MODEL- BASEDE RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHEDB BYI MOODY'SA ANALYTICS, INC. AND/ORI ITSA AFFILIATES. OPINIONSA ANDP PUBLICATIONSI DONOTO CONSTITUTEC ORF PROVIDEI INVESTMENT ORF FINANCIALA ADVICE, ANDMOODY'S CREDITR RATINGS, AST THEYCOMED DUEA ANDA ANYE FINANCIALI LOSSI INT THE EVENT OFD DEFAULT ORI IMPAIRMENT. SEEA APPLICABLE! MOODY'S ONT THET TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED MOODY'S BUTN NOTL LIMITEDT TO:L LIQUIDITYF RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE ANDO OTHER OPINIONSI INCLUDEDI INMOODY'SE PUBLICATIONS AREI NOT TOPURCHASE, SELL, ORH HOLDI PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY'S DONOTO COMMENT ONT THES SUITABILITYOF ANINVESTMENT! FORA ANYP PARTICULARI INVESTOR. PUBLICATIONS) WITH THEE EXPECTATION/ AND UNDERSTANDING THATI ISUNDER CONSIDERATIONF FOR PURCHASE, ANDPUBLICATIONS AREN NOTI INTENDEDFORI USEE BYRETAILI INVESTORSA ANDITY WOULDE BER RECKLESS BYL LAW, INCLUDINGE BUTI NOTL LIMITEDT TO, COPYRIGHTL LAW, ANDN NONE OFS SUCHINFORMATIONT FORI ANY OTHERR RISK, OF CREDITR RISK AND RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OTHER AREN NOTA ANDD DONOTP PROVIDER ANDP AND OTHER OPINIONS ANDI YOURF FINANCIAL ORC OTHERE PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. EACHS ANDI INAPPROPRIATE FORR RETAILI INVESTORST TOUSE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS ORF ANI INVESTMENT USE DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTEDORF RESOLD, ORS STOREDFORS INWHOLE ORI INPART, INANYE FORMORN MANNERC OR BYA ANYI MEANS WHATSOEVER, BYA ANY PERSONV WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIORV WRITTEN CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONSA ANDP PUBLICATIONS AREI NOTI INTENDEDFORI USE BYA ANY PERSONASA BENCHMARK AST THATT TERMIS ontained! nereinis obtainedby MOODY'S froms sources blievedbyittobe: accuratea andreliable. Because ofthep possibility of humanorr mechanicalerror: aswell asotherf factors, however, allir informationc containedh hereinisp provided" "ASIS"V without warrantyo ofany kind. MOODY'S adoptsa all necessaryr measures sothatt thei informationit isofs sufficientg quality andfroms sources! MOODYS considerst tober reliablei including. whena appropriate, independentt third-p party sources. However, ineveryi instanceir independently verify orv validatei informationn receivedi ther rating process ori inpreparingitsP Publications. by law, MOODY'S anditsd directors, officers,e employees, agents, representatives, licensorsa ands suppliers disclaim! liability toanyp personore entityf forany orir incidentall losses ord damagesv whatsoever arisingf fromorir inconnectiony withtheir informationo containedh hereinort theu useofori inability touseany suchir information, evenif MOO ODY'S ora anyo ofitsdirectors, officers,e employees, agents, representatives, licensorsors suppliersis advisedina advancec ofthep possibilityo ofsuch! lossesor butn notl limited to: (a)any! lossofp presentorp prospectivep profitsor (b)anyl lossord damagea arisingy wheret ther relevant financialirn instrumenti snott thes subjectofa Tothee permittedbyl law, MOODY'S anditsdirectors, officers, employees, agents. representatives, licensorsa ands suppliers disclaimb liability fora any director compensatory losseso ord damagesc caused toanyp persond ore entity, including but not! limited toby anyr negligence (bute excludingf fraud, willful misconducto oranyo other type ofliabilityt that, forthe avoidancec ofd doubt, bylawc bee excluded)o ont partof, ora any contingencyy withino ort beyond thec control of, MOODY'S oranyofitsd directors, officers, employees, agents, Service, Inc,a av wholly- ownedo credit ratinga agencys subsidiaryo ofMoody's Corporation( (MCO"), hereby disclosest thatm mosti issuers ofdebts securities (including corporatea andmunicipalt bonds, debentures, notesa andc commercialp paper): andp preferreds stock ratedbyN Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, priorto assignment ofany creditr rating. agreedtopayt to Moody'sl Investorss Service, Inc. forcreditr ratingsopinions: ands servicesn renderedbyit tfeesr ranging froms $1,000toa approximately $5,000,000. MCOandN Moody's Investorss Service alsor maintainp andp procedurest toa addresst thei independence of Moody's Investorss Service credit ratings andcreditr ratingp processes. Informationregarding certaina affiliationst thatn maye existb betweend directorso ofMCOa andratede entities, andbetweene entities whoholdo creditr ratings from Moodys Investorss Service and havea alsopublicly reportedtot theSEC ano ownershipi interestir inMCOofmoret than5 59,isposteda annuallya atw www.n moodys.comu under thel heading" "InvestorR Relations- Corporate Governance- Service PtylimitedABNE 610033 3996 657AFSL3 336969 and/ort Moody's/ Analytics Australiap Ptyl LtdA ABN941 105 136 972A AFSL3 383569 (asa applicable). Thisd documentis intended tobep providedonlytos wholesalec dlients"v withint ther meaning ofsection? 761Gofthe Corporations Act2 2001. Bycontinuing toaccesst thisc documentf fromw within Australia, you indirectlyd disseminatet thisc documento orit itscontentst to" retailo clients" withinthem meaningo ofsection? 761Gofthec Corporations/ Act2001. MOODY'S credit ratingisano opiniona asto Additionalt terms forj lapano only: Moody's) Japank KK (MJKK")isa wholly-ownedo credit ratinga agency subsidiaryof Moody's Group Japan G.K, whichis wholly- -ownedby Moody's Overseas Holdingsl Inc., awholly- -owned: subsidiaryofMCO Moody'sSFJ JapanKK ('MSF) isa wholly-ownedo creditr ratinga agencys subsidiaryofMIKK MSFJisnot Nationally Recognizeds Statistical Organization ('NRSRO") Therefore, creditr ratings assignedbyN MSEJareN Non-NRSROCedits Ratings. Non-N NRSROCreditF Ratings area assignedbyan entityt thatisnota aNRSROa and, consequently. theratedo obligationy willn noto qualify ford certaint types oftreatment under U.S. laws. MIKKa andM creditr ratinga agenciesr registered MIKKO OrMSEI (asa applicable)h hereby discloset thatn mostis issuers ofdebts securities (includingo corporatea andn municipalb bonds, debentures, notes and commercialp paper)a and preferred MJKK or MSFJ( (asa applicable) have, priortoa assignment ofany creditr rating, agreedt topayt tOMIKKO MSFJ(asa applicable)t forc creditr ratingso opinionsa ands services PURPOSESA ANDMUSTN NOTE BE USEDI INA ANYV WAYT THAT COULD RESULT INT THEM BENCHMARK witht thei informationc ther useofori inabilityt tousea anys suchir information. AST TOTHEA ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILTY ORF FITNESSE FORA ANYP PARTICULAR PURPOSE OFA ANYO CREDIT ORI INFORMATIONIS GIVEN OR MADE BYN MOODY'SI IN ANYF FORMORN MANNERV WHATSOEVER. Directora ands Shareholder AffiliationP Policy." Additionalte terms forA Australiao only: Anyp publication intoA ofthis documentis ispursuantt tot the Australian Financial Servicesl License OfMOODY'S affiliate, Moody's sInvestors representt tOMOODY'S thaty youar are, orarea accessingt thed documenta asa representativec of,a client" andti that neither younort thes entitys yourepresenty willo directlyor thec stock MIKKa obligationo oft theis issuer, noto onthe equitys securitieso oftheis issuer ora anyf formo ofs security thatisa available toretailin investors. withthej JapanF Financials Services Agencya andtheirr registrationn renderedbyit feest ranging fromj PY125,000t toa approximately] JPY550,000,000. areF FSACommissioner (Ratings)No. 2and3 respectively. also maintaing policiesa andp procedurest toaddress) Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1264496 28May2 2021 Leec County, NC: Annual Commento onLee County This document hasb beenp prepared fort theu usec ofMitch Brigulio andi is protected! by law. Itmay not be copied, transferredc orc disseminated unless authorized undera ac contract with Moody's ord otherwise authorizedi inv writing! by Moody's. MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE CLIENT SERVICES Americas AsiaP Pacific Japan EMEA U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE 1-212-553-1653 852-3551-3077 81-3-5408-4100 MOODY's INVESTORS SERVICE 28May2 2021 Leec County, NC: Annual Commento onLee County This documenth hasb beenp preparedf fort theu use ofN Mitch Brigulio andi is protectedb byl law. Itmayr notb be copied, transferredc or disseminated authorized undera ac contract with Moody's or otherwise authorizedi inv writing by Moody's. unless U.S. PUBLICFINANCE MOoDY's INVESTORSSERVICE CREDIT OPINION 11May2 2018 Ratet this Research > Lee (County of) NC Update to credit analysis Summary fiscaly years. Exhibit1 $72 $70 2 $68 $64 $62 $60 $58 $56 $54 2013 Sourcelee-Coung,.NC Credit: strengths Stablef financialo operations High dailyi in-migration Credit challenges Slightlye elevated unemployment Lee County (Aa2)t benefits froma at favorablel locationi int the central portion of North Carolina (Aaa,stable)t between majore employment centers. Prudentr management has drivens sound financial operatingr results with revenue growtha and operating surpluses forf four consecutive Contacts Tiphanyl Lee-A Allen AVP-Analyst tiphany.lee-a allen@moodys.com Edward( (Ted) Damutz VP-SrCreditOficer warddamutuemcoscom CLIENTS SERVICES Americas AsiaP Pacific Japan EMEA +1.212.553.4772 Modest operatingr revenueg growtht trends will continue +1.212.553.6990 Largestr revenues source, propertyt taxes 60% ofFY 17revenues 1-212-553-1653 E $66 852-3551-3077 E 81-3-5408-4100 44-20-7772-5454 2014 2015 2016 2017 Experiencingg growth duet top proximityt toR Research Triangle Park Thisd document hast beenp preparedf for theu use ofN MitchE Brigulio andis isp protected byl law. Itmay notb be copied, transferred or disseminated unless authorizedu undera ac contractv withN Moody's oro otherwise authorizedi inv writing! byN Moody's. MOODYSINVESTORS SERVICE U.S.PUBLIC FINANCE Wealthi indicest belowr nationala averages Rating outlook Outlooks aret typically nota assigned tois issuers with this limiteda amount ofd debt. Factors that could lead to an upgrade Broade expansiona ando diversification ofl locale economy Factors that could lead toa a downgrade Failuret toa appropriate debt service payment Increasedu unemployment andt taxt base erosion Depleted financialr reserves Keyi indicators Exhibitz Lee(Countyo Of)NC Economy/T TaxB Base TotalF FullV Value($000) Population FullV ValuePerC Capita MedianFamilyl Income( (%ofU USMedian) Finances OpwraingFenversoo) FundBdance/s000) GshBalance/(S000) FindBaancesaséofF Pevenues CashE Balanceasa9 %ofF Pevenues Debt/Pensions Net Diredt Debt ($000) 3-Year Averageof! MooysANF_(S000) NetD Direct DE/QperirgfhEw Net Direct Deb/FJIVaue/9 Moody/s- adjustedNet Pensionl Liability (3-yra average)t tor Pevenues(x) Mood/'s- adjustedNet Pensionaility/S.yra average)t toFull Value(%) Source: Moodysinvestorss Service, UCCensus LeeCounty, NC Increasedi reserves 2013 58,735 85.9% 23.7% 18.6% 1.1x 1.4% 0.3x 0.4% 2014 59,096 86.1% 25.6% 20.0% 1.0x 12% 0.3x 0.4% 2015 59,418 83.3% 26.1% 20.5% 0.9x 1.1% 0.3x 0.4% 2016 59,540 84.4% 26.0% 212% 0.9x 1.1% 0.3x 0.4% 2017 59,616 84.4% 28.3% 228% 1.0x 1.4% 0.4x 0.5% $4,829,272 $5,131,932 $5,042,549 $5,084,832 $5,182,396 $82,221 $86,841 $84,866 $85,402 $86,930 $60,202 $62,760 $63,203 $68,119 $69,374 $14,294 $16,092 $16,521 $17,731 $19,616 $11,185 $12550 $12,945 $14,412 $15,812 $68,260 $62,855 $57,440 $58,073 $70,465 $17,552 $20,674 $20,192 $19,524 $25,304 Profile Locatedi int theg geographic center of North Carolina, 25r miles from Pinehurst and4 46r miles southeast of Raleigh Durham( (Aaas stable), Lee Countyb benefitsf from proximity to RTP andag growinga advancer manufacturings sector. (Aaas stable) and Detailed credit considerations Thispublicationc doesnota announcea acreditr ratinga action. Fora anyo credit ratingsn referencedir inthisp publication, pleases seet theratingst tab onti thei www.moodyscomfort then most updated creditn ratinga actionir informationa andra ratinghistory. issuer/entityp pageo on 11May2 2018 Lee( (Countys of) NC: Update tocredita analysis This document has beenp preparedf fort theu use of Mitch Brigulio andis is protectedb byl law. Itmay be authorizedu undera a contractv withN Moody's ord otherwise authorizedi inv writing! by Moody's. notb copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODY'SI INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE Diversifying locale economy withs strongr rate ofc daytimei in-migration Lee Countyy willo continue toe experience modest growthi ini its diverset tax! base giveni itsl location, justs south oft the Research Parka andr relative proximityt toF Fort Bragg. Over the past fivey yearst thet taxb baseh has seena average annualg residential developmenta andt theg growtho oft thec county'sr manufacturing: sector whichr represented 319 % oft growtho totale of1.7%, reflectingr new Triangle employment in Q3 2017. Exhibit3 $5,300 $5,200 $5,100 $5,000 $4,900 $4,800 $4,700 $4,600 2013 Source: Modestf fullg growtht trends willo continue Fully valueh hasa averageda almost2 2%g growtha annually overp past5 Syears 2014 2015 2016 2017 Several large manufacturing companies! have establisheda aj presence int the countyi including Pfizer Inc (A1 stable), Coty, Inc. (Ba1s stable) cosmetics, Caterpillar Inc (A3s stable), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (Ba3s stable) poultry processinga andl Moen Inc. (as subsidiary ofF Fortune BrandsH Home & Security, Inc. (Baa3s stable)p plumbingf fixtures. Favorably, employers! haves set upp partnerships with Central Carolina The countye enjoys al higho dailyi in-migrationa asi itsp populationg grows! 5.2% more thani itsr regular residential population Employment has steadilyi increased, while unemployment ratesh have generallyt beens slightly above thes statel level, with the current rate at 4.9%. The southern edge oft the county is ana approximately: 30r minuted commute toF Fort Bragg, aU.s. major Armyi installation, with approximately 57,000n militaryp personnel, 11,0000 civiliane employees and 23,000f familyr members makingit it one oft thel largestr military thev world. Thec county's per capitaa andr medianf familyi incomel levels approximate national levels and are! higher than thes complexesi state. Lee Countyv willl likelyr maintaina ar relatively healthyf financial positiong givenp proactive planninga andp prudent fiscal policies. Fore infi fiscal 2016t thec countyi implementeda al long-termf financial plan whichi includeda7 750 centi increase largelyt tof fundi upcoming example, capital Community Colleget tot traint thev workf force. in Soundf financial operations needs, schoold operatingo costs andt thee establishment ofac capital reserve. 11May2 2018 Lee (County of) NC: Updatet toc credita analysis or disseminated unless This document hast beenp preparedf fort the use of Mitch Brigulioa andi isp protected by law. authorizedu underac contract with Moody'so oro otherwise authorizedi inv writing! by Moody's. Itmay bec copied, notb transferred MOODYSINVESTORS SERVICE U.S.PUBLIC FINANCE Thec countyh has achievedo operatings surpluses int thep pastf foury years ande expecta anothery year off favorable resultsi inf fiscal 2018 budgeted $1.9r milliona appropriation. Growing reserves ando cashb bolster financialf flexibility 5-yearg growthi inc casha andf fundbalancec overs 5% despitea Exhibit4 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Source:L leeCounty, NC the GeneralF Fundb budget. LIQUIDITY Manageable debt position "Fund Balance as a % of Revenues "Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Prudently the county! hasa ap policyo ofc only usingr reserves tof finance capitala ando other onet time expenditures. Additional financial includer maintaininga anu unreserved GeneralF Fund! balance at least 14%0 oft the GeneralF Fund! budget, with the goal ofr maintaining policies 18% of Countyl liquidityr remains soundg growingt to $15.8 millioni inf fiscalz 2017, or 22.8% ofr revenues. The county debt positionis ise expected tor remain modest, despite additional borrowing plans, givene expected tax base expansion and rapid amortization ofp principal (92% oftaxs supported debt within 10y years). Ona direct basis, the debt burdeni isas slightlya above averagea at1 1.4% offullv valuei inclusive ofl lease appropriation debt. Medium term capitalp plans (5y year CIP)i includea milliony with7 77%1 fundedv with additional debt. The countyr maintainsap policy ofl limitingo debt service expenditure to1 approximately 15% oft total $453 expenditures. DEBT STRUCTURE Allo debti isf fixedi rated. DEBT-RELATED! DERIVATIVES The countyisn notp party toa anys swapa agreements. 11May 2018 Lee( (Countyo of)NC: Updatet to credit analysis Thisd document hast been preparedf fort the use ofN Mitch Brigulio andi is protected byl law. authorized under ac contract with! Moody'soro otherwise authorizedi inv writing byl Moody's. Itmay notb bec copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE PENSIONS AND OPEB proportiont Exhibit5 U.S. .PUBLICF FINANCE The county contributes tot thel North Carolinal Local Government Employees Retirement System (NCLGERS), definedb benefit retirementplan administered! byt the State of North Carolina. We determined the county's share ofl liability for thes state-runp toit its contributions tot thep plan. The countya also operatesasmal! Law Enforcement Officers' Special Separation Allowance plani in plan. Thec county'sa adjustedr net pensionl liability, under! Moody'sr methodology fora adjusting reported pensiono data, is$ $36r million, approximately: ane elevated 0.521 times operating revenues in2017. or Debta andp pensionsy willr remainr manageable 3year average ANPLO.36%0 ofOperatingR Revenues "Moody's adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) Net Direct Debt/Operating! Revenues (x) 1.6x 1.4x 1.2x 1.0x 0.8x 0.6x 0.4x 0.2x 0.0x Source: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 The county! hasr notb been fullyf funding OPEBa annualo contribution requirements thel lastf few years asit it devisesa a strategyt toa address thel liability. Ita addresses the annualo cost onap pay-gob basis. The most recent actuarial valuation date, ther reported unfunded actuarial North Carolina Cities have ani institutional framework: score ofA Aaa, whichi ish high compared tot ther nation. Institutional framework scores measurea as sector'sl legala abilityt toi increase revenues ando decreasee expenditures. The sector's majorr revenue sources ares toacap, which cannot bec overriden. However, thec cap of1 15%, stilla allowsf fors significantr revenue-raising: ability. Unpredictable subject revenuef fluctuationst tendt tob ber minor, or under 5% annually. Acrosst thes sector, fixed andr mandated costs areg 25% ofe expenditures. North Carolinai isa" "right tov work" state, providings significant expenditure- -cuttinga ability generally! tol localg governments. accrued! liabilityy was $17.4 million. Lee County operatesv withina a strongs statei institutional framework lesst than Unpredictable expendituref fluctuations tendt tob ber minor, under! 5%a annually 11May2 2018 Lee( (County of) NC: Updatet toc credit analysis Thiso document has beenp preparedf fort theu usec of Mitch Brigulioa andi is protected byl law. Itmay nott authorizedu undera ac contractv with Moody'so or otherwise authorizedi inv writing! byN Moody's. bec copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODYSINVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE 02018N Moody's Corporation, Moody'si Investors Service,l Inc, Moody's Analytics, Inc and/ort theirl licensorsa anda affliates (collectively," CREDITF RATINGSIS ISSUEDE BYI MOODY'SI INVESTORSS SERVICE, INC.A ANDITSR RATINGSA AFFILIATES( ("MIS") AREN MOODYSCURRENT "MOODY'S"). Allrightsr reserved. RISKO OFE ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, ORD DEBT ORD DEBT-L LIKE SECURITIES,A ANDN MOODYSPUBICATIONS: MAYI INCLUDE OPINIONSOFI THER RELATIVER FUTURE CREDIT RELATIVEF FUTUREC CREDITR RISKO OFE ENTITIES, CREDITO COMMITMENTS, ORD DEBTO ORI DEBT-L LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT MOODY'S CURRENTO OPINIONSOF THE MAYN NOTN MEETI ITSC CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AST THEYC COME DUEA ANDA ANYE ESTIMATEDFINANCALI LOSSI INT EVENT RISK AST THER RISKT THAT ANENTITY DONOTA ADDRESSA ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDINGB BUTN NOTL LIMITEDT TO: LIQUIDITYR RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, ORF PRICE VOLATILITY. THEE CREDIT OF DEFAULT CREDIT RATINGS OPINIONSI INCLUDEDIN INMOODY'S PUBLICATIONSA AREN NOTS STATEMENTSO OF CURRENT ORH HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS RATINGS ANDMOODY'S MODEL-E BASEDE ESTIMATESC OF CREDIT RISKA ANDR RELATEDO OPINIONS ORC COMMENTARYP PUBLISHEDE BYN MOODY'SA ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT MAYA ALSOINCLUDE QUANTITATIVE ANDU UNDERSTANDINGI THATE EACHINVESTORY WILL, WITHDUEC CARE, MAKEI ITSC OWNS STUDYA ANDE EVALUATIONOFI EACHS MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITHT THE EXPECTATION ANDNONE OFS SUCHINEORMATIONMAYE BEC COPIEDO OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, BUTN NOTI LIMITEDT TO, COPYRIGHTU LAW, ORF RESOLD, ORS STOREDFORS SUBSEQUENT USEF FORA ANY SUCHPURPOSE, INWHOLE ORI INP PART, INANYF FORMORN MANNER TRANSFERRED, ORB BYA DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED DONOTO CONSTITUTEC ORF PROVIDEI INVESTMENT ORI FINANCIAL ADVICE, ANDO CREDITF RATINGSA ANDN MOODY'SP RATINGS ANDN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS AREI NOTA ANDD DONOT THATI ISUNDER CONSIDERATIONFOR DECISION. RECKLESSA ANDI INAPPROPRIATE FOR ANYN MEANSV WHATSOEVER, BYA ANY DEFINEDF FORR REGULATORY PURPOSES Moodyspublications liabilityt toanyp personore entityf fora any isnott subjecto ofa liability fora anyo directo or compensatory PROVIDER RECOMMENDATIONSI TOPURCHASE, SELL, ORH HOLD PARTICULARS SUITABILITYO OF ANI INVESTMENTF FORA ANYP PARTICULARII PURCHASE, HOLDING, ORS SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS ANDN RETAILI INVESTORST TOUSEN MOODY'SCREDITR RATINGS ORN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKINGA ANI YOURF FINANCIALO ORC OTHERF PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALLI INFORMATION CONTAINEDH PERSONV WITHOUTI MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTENCONSENT CREDITE RATINGSA ANDMOODY'SF PUBLICATIONS AREN NOTI INTENDEDF FOR USEB BYA ANYF PERSONA ASAB BENCHMARK AST THATT TERMISD ANDN MUSTI NOTB BEL USEDI INA ANY WAYT THATC COULDR RESULT INT THEMB BEING CONSIDEREDA BENCHMARK Allinformationc containedhereinise obtainedby MOODY'S froms sources believedbyi ittobea accuratea andn reliable. Becausec ofthep asotherf factors, however, allir informationo Tothee extentp permittedb bylaw, MOODY'S andits directors, officers,e employees, agents, representatives, licensorsa ands suppliersd disclaimli indirect,s special, consequential, orir incidentall losseso ord damagesy whatsoevera arisingf fromo ori Tothee extentp permittedbyla law, MOODY'S anditsd directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensorsa andsuppliersd disclaiml lossesord damagesc toany personore entity, includingb but notl limitedt tobya anyr negligence bute excludingf fraud, willfulr Moody'si Investors Service, Inc, awholly- ownedcreditr ratinga agencys subsidiary ofMoody's Corporation( ("MCO"), hereby disclosest Additionalt termsf forA Australiac only: Anyp publicationi intoA Australiao ofthisd documenti ispursuantt totheA AustralianF Financial indirectly disseminatet thisd documento orit its.contentst to" retailo clients" withint ther meaningofsectioni 761Gofthec Additionalt terms for) Japano only: Moody's] Japank KK CMK)isawholly ownedcreditr ratinga agency subsidiaryo ofMoody's Group) Japan G.K., Recognizeds Statistical Rating Organization( ("NRSRO"). Therefore, creditn ratingsa assignedb by! MSFJa are Non- NRSROC Credit MJKKO MSFJ (asa applicable) herebyd discloset thatn mostis issuerso ofdebts securities( (including corporatea MIKK andMSFja also maintainp policiesa andp procedurest toa address) Japaneser regulatoryn requirements. NEITHERO CREDIT RATINGS MOODY'SISSUES ITSCREDITE RATINGS ANDP PUBLISHESN NORI MOODY'SP PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ONT THE PUBLICATIONS/ AREN NOTI INTENDEDFORI USEB BYF RETAIL INVESTORS ANDIT) WOULDBER PROTECTEDBYL LAW, INCLUDINGE IFINDOUBT YOUSHOUIDCONTACT hereini isprovided" "ASIS" withoutv warrantyo ofanykind. MOODY'Sa adopts allr possibility ofhumano orr mechanicale error aswell usesina suchi ratingisofs sufficient quality andf froms sources MOODY'SO considerst toben including, whena necessaryr measuress sothat thei informationit MOODY'SI isnot ana auditor andcannoti everyi instanceir independentlyv verifyorv validatei informationn receivedi inther rating appropriate, processorir inpreparingt independentt the third-p partys sources. However, eveni FMOODY'Sora anyo ofits directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensorso ors suppliersisa containedh advisedin ina advance hereino ortheu useo ofori inabilityt tousea any damages, indludingbutn not! limitedto: (a)anyl losso ofp presento orp prospectivep profitso or( (b)anylossorc damagea arisingy wheret ther relevantf financiali instrumentis ofthep possibilityo thes ofsuchl lossesor avoidancec ofo doubt,b byl lawo bee excluded)o onthep parto of,o ora any.contingencyv withino ort beyondt thec controld of, MOODY'S misconductora ora any ofitsd directors, any othert officers, typeo ofliabilityt that, forthe licensorsors suppliers, arisingf fromo orinconnectionw witht thei information containedh hereino ort the useo oforir inabilityt tousea anys suchi information, employees, agents, RATINGO ORC OTHER OPINIONO ORI INFORMATIONISGIVENG ORI MADE BYN MOODY'SI INA ANYF FORM ORN MANNER WHATSOEVER PARTICULARP PURPOSE OFA ANYS SUCH corporatea andmunicipalb bonds, debentures, notes ando commercialp paper)a andp preferreds stockr ratedby Moody's sinvestors Service, thatn mosti ofdebts securities (including agreedt payt Moody's Investorss Service, Inc. fora appraisala andr ratings servicesn renderedbyit feesn rangingf from $1,500t toa Inc have, priort toassignment ofanyr rating, policies ndp ures toa addresst thei independenceo ratingsa andr rating processes. Informationr regarding affiliationst approximately $2,500,000. MCOa and MiSa alsor maintain ratede entities, between entitiesy whoholdra ratingsf fromN MISa andhavea alsop publicly reportedt tot thes SECa and ownershipi certaina interesti thatr maye existt betweenc directors ofMCOa and www.n moodys.com undert theh heading" Investor Relations- Corporate Governance- Directora ands ShareholderA Affliation Policy,." inMCOofmoret thans 5%,isposteda annuallyat Service Pty LimitedA ABN6 610033 3996 657AFSL3 336969a and/or Moody'sA Analytics Australiap Ptyl LtdABN941 1051 1369 972 AFSL Servicest Licensec ofM MOODY'S affiliate, Moodys Investors only to" wholesalec dlients" withint then meaningo ofsection? 761Go ofthe Corporations Act 2001. By.continuingt toa 383569 accesst (asa applicable). Thisd documentis intended ofadebto obligationo ofthei issuer, noto onthee equitys securities oftheis issuero ora anyf form ofs Corporations securityt thatis Act2 2001. MOODY'S creditr ratingis isand opinion as andir inappropriatef forr retail investorst tousel MOODY'Screditr ratingsorpublicationsi when makinganir investment decision. Ifindoubty savailablet ton retaili investors. Itwouldbe reckless OverseasH Holdingsi Inc, awholly- owneds subsidiaryofM MCO. Moody'sSE) JapankK. ("MSF)")is isay wholly- owned credit ratinga agencys subsidiaryofMKK whichisv wholly- ownedb by Moody's entityt thatis nota NRSROa and,o consequently, ther ratedo obligationy willnotq qualifyf for certaint typeso oftreatment underu U.S. Ratings. Non-N Credit Ratings area assignedbyan witht thej apan Financial ServicesA Agencya andtheirn registrationn numbersa areFSAC Commissioner (Ratings)N No. 2and3 Brespectively. laws. MJKK andN MSFJ arec credit ratinga agenciesn registered stock by MIKK MSFJ( (asa applicable)h have, priort toa assignmento ofanyr rating,a agreedt topayt toN MJKK andmunicipal or MSFI (asa bonds, applicable) debentures, notesa and commercial paper)a andp preferred witht thei informationo particulard creditr ratinga assignedbyM MOODY'S. NOV WARRANTY,E ORI IMPLIED, AST TOT THEA ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABLITYOR FITNESS FORA ANY issuers tobep tothed adviser. representt 100DY'S thaty youa area accessingti the asan representativec of,a'y wholesalec client'a andt thatn neither thisd documentf fromw withinA Australia,) you younort theer entityy youre represent willd directlyor yous shouldcontacty yourf financialo or other NRSRO MSFjisnota Nationally fora appraisala andr rating servicesr renderedbyit itfees ranging PY200,0 000t toa approximately PY350,000,000." REPORTI NUMBER 1122790 11May2 2018 This document has beenp authorizedu Lee( (Countyo of) NC:L Updatet to credit analysis preparedf fort the use ofN Mitch Brigulioa andi isp protected by law. Itmay noth be undera ac contractv with! Moody'so oro otherwise authorizedi inv writing! byN Moody's. copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODY'SI INVESTORS SERVICE Contacts TiphanyLee- Allen AVP-Analyst tiphany.le lee-a allen@moodys.com U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE CLIENT SERVICES AsiaF Pacific Japan EMEA +1.212.553.4772 Edward(Ted)p Damutz +1.212.553.6990 Americas VP-SrCreditoficer dwarddamutemcos.com: 852-3551-3077 81-3-5408-4100 44-20-7772-5454 MOODY's INVESTORS SERVICE 11May2 2018 Lee( (Countye Of)NC: Updatet tocredita analysis This document hasb been preparedf fort theu use of MitchE Brigulio andisp protected authorizedi undera ac contractv withN Moody's oro otherwise authorizedi inv writing! byN Moody's. byl law. Itmay notb bec copied, transferred or disseminated unless MOODY's INVESTORS SERVICE Bonds, Series 2018 Global Credit Research- 06 Apr 2018 $32.71 Million ofc debt affected million Limited Obligation Bonds Series 2018. RATINGS RATIONALE management. RATING OUTLOOK Increased reserves Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Lee County, NC's Limited Obligation New' York, April 06, 2018. - Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa3 ratingt to Lee County's (NC)$32.7 The Aa3 ratingi incorporates reflects the risk ofr non-appropriation; the more essential nature oft thet financed projects tot the county's mandate; adequate legal provisions and the sound long-term tax-backed credit ofth the county. Lee County benefitsf froma af favorable locationi int the central portion of thes state, between profile employment centers, soundf financial operations, affordable debt andp pension profiles and prudent major Outlooks are generally nota assignedt toi issuers with this amount of debt outstanding. FACTORS THAT COULDI LEAD TO AN UPGRADE Broade expansion and diversification ofl local economy FACTORS THAT COULDI LEAD1 TOA AI DOWNGRADE -Failuret to appropriate debt service payment Increased unemployment: and tax base erosion Depleted financial reserves LEGAL SECURITY Debts service ont the 20181 Limited Obligation Bonds is secured byt the county's service appropriations. The more essential nature oft the projects and pledged pledge assets somewhat mitigates risk ofr non-appropriation byt the county. The: 2018 Limited Obligation Bonds will bes secured the 20181 Trust Agreement ands securityi interesti in Wicker Elementary School Facility. The county will make payments undert the Installment Purchase Contract directly tot the days priort to debts service payment dates. Further strengthening security, the thea appropriation ini itsp preliminary budget, andi itr must ber removedf from the annual county Proceeds fromt the 2018i issuance willi fund various county-wide projects including: Construction oft the Wicker Elementary School, upgrades andi renovations tot the Locatedi int the geographic center of North Carolina, 25 miles from Pinehurst and 46r miles southeast ofF (Aaa stable)a and Durham (Aaas stable). The population wase estimated at 59,660i in tor make annual debt the byt County's least has Trustee, covenanted atl toi five affirmative include budget by ana vote oft the county board of commissioners. USE OF PROCEEDS Courthouse and The 2015. county is Government Center, and Parks andF Recreation projects. County PROFILE Raleigh comprised of2 255s square miles. METHODOLOGY The principal methodology usedi int this rating was Lease, Appropriation, Moral Obligation and Comparable Debt ofl US State andl Local Governments published inJ July: 2016. Please see the Rating! Methodologies page Forr ratings issuedo ona a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures inr relation toe eachr rating ofas subsequently issued bond or note oft the same series or category/class ofc debt orp pursuantt to ap program for which ther ratings are derived exclusively from ratingsi in accordance with! Moody's rating practices. Forr ratings issued ona a support provider, this existing announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures inr relation to the credit rating action ont the support provider andi in relation toe each particular credit ratinga action fors securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation tot the provisional rating assigned, andi ini relation toa definitive ratingt that may be assigneds subsequent tot thef finali issuance oft the debt, ine each case wheret thet transaction: structure andt terms have noto changed prior tot the assignment oft the definitive ratingi ina ar manner that would have affected the rating. Forf furtheri information please see ther ratings tab ont thei issuerlentity page for the respective issuer on Regulatory disclosures containedi int this press release apply tot the credit rating and, ifa applicable, ther related Please see www.moodys.comi fora any updates ond changes to thel lead ratinga analyst andt tot the Moody's Please seet ther ratings tab ont thei issuer/entity page onv www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures onv www.moodys.comi fora a copy oft this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES www.moodys.com. ratingo outlook orr rating review. entity that hasi issued the rating. fore each credit rating. Tiphany! Lee-Allen Lead/ Analyst Regional PFGI Northeast Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 7World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New' York 10007 US JOURNALISTS: 12125 553 0376 Client Service: 12125 5531 1653 Leonard. Jones MANAGING DIRECTOR Regional PFGI Northeast JOURNALISTS: 12125 5530 0376 Client Service: 12125531 1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich: Street New York, NY1 10007 U.S.A JOURNALISTS: 12125 553 0376 Client Service: 12125 5531 1653 legal MOODY's INVESTORS SERVICE 02018 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). Allr rights reserved. and CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ANDI ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAYI INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT ANE ENTITY MAY NOT ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED MEET FINANCIAL LOSSI INT THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DOI NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOTI LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED INI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS, ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSOI INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, CREDIT RATINGS ANDI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DOI NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INC. INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS ANDI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT ANDI DOI NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, ORH HOLD PARTICULAR: SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF ANI INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION. AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY ANDI EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATIONI FOR MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS ANDI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS ANDI ITV WOULD BEF RECKLESS ANDI INAPPROPRIATE FORI RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDITE RATINGS ORI MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING ANI INVESTMENT DECISION. IFINDOUBT YOUS SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHERI PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALLI INFORMATION CONTAINEDI HEREINI IS PROTECTED BYL LAW, INCLUDING BUTI NOTL LIMITED COPYRIGHT LAW, ANDI NONE OF SUCHI INFORMATIONI MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED ORI RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, WHOLE ORI INF PART, INA ANY FORM ORI MANNER ORI BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON IN CREDIT RATINGS ANDI MOODY'SI PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FORI USE BY ANY PERSON A BENCHMARK. AS THAT TERMI ISI DEFINED FORI REGULATORY PURPOSES ANDI MUST NOT BE USEDI ASA IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULTI INT THEMI BEING CONSIDERED, ABENCHMARK. Alli information contained hereini is obtained by MOODY'S1 from sources believed! byi itto bea accurate and reliable. Because oft the possibility of human orr mechanical error asv well as othert factors, however, all information contained hereini isp provided" "AS IS" without warranty of any! kind. MOODY'S adopts allr measures sot thatt thei information it uses in assigning a credit rating is ofs sufficient quality and froms sources necessary MOODY'S considers to ber reliablei including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is nota ana auditor ando cannoti ine every instancei independently verify or validate information received Tot thee extent permitted byl law, MOODY'S: andi its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, incidental losses or damages whatsoever arisingf from ori inc connection with thei special, information contained or the use ofori inability tou use any suchi information, eveni ifMOODY'S ora any ofit its directors, officers, herein or agents, representatives, licensors ors suppliers is advised ina advance oft the possibility of such losses employees, or damages, including! but notl limitedt to: (a) any loss ofp present or prospective profits or (b)a any loss or arising where ther relevantf financial instrumenti is nott thes subject ofap particular credit ratinga assigned damage by Tot the extent permitted byl law, MOODY'S: and its directors, officers, employees, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability fora any direct ord compensatory losses or damages agents, causedt to any person ore entity, including but notl limited tob by any negligence (bute excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. TO, WITHOUT MOODY'SF PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. int ther ratingp process ori inp preparingt the Moody's publications. licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person ore entity fora anyi indirect, consequential, MOODY'S. representatives, othert type ofl liabilityt that, for thea avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) ont the part of, contingency within or beyondt the control of, MOODY'S ora any ofi its directors, officers, representatives, licensors ors suppliers, arisingf from ori in connection with thei information employees, contained agents, NOI WARRANTY, EXPRESS ORI IMPLIED, AS TOT THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR/ ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OPINION ORI INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S INA ANY FORM ORI MANNER OR OTHER Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that mosti issuers of debt securities (including corporate andr debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated byl Moody's Investors municipal Service, bonds, Inc. prior toa assignment of any rating, agreedt top pay tol Moody'sl Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal services rendered! byit itf fees ranging from $1,5001 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO andI MIS also and rating policies and procedures toa address thei independence of MIS's ratings andi rating processes. Information maintain regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated who hold ratingsf from MIS and! have also publicly reportedt tot the SEC and ownership entities, interest inl betweene entities than 5%, is posteda annually aty www.moodys. com under the heading "Investor Relations = MCO ofr more Governance - Director and Shareholder. Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publicationi into Australia oft this document is Financial Services License ofN MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's! Investors Service Pty Limited pursuant ABN tot 61 the Australian 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody'sA Analytics Australia Ptyl Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972/ AFSL 383569 003: 399 applicable)." This document isi intendedt tob be provided only to" wholesale clients" within ther 761Gd oft the Corporations Act 2001. By continuingt to access this document from within Australia, meaning ofs toN MOODY'S thaty you are, ora are accessingt the document as a representative of, a" wholesale you represent neither your nort thee entity) your representy willo directly ori indirectly disseminate this document client" andt that "retail clients" within ther meaning of section 761G oft the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S ori credit its contents rating is to opinion ast tot the creditworthiness ofa debto obligation oft thei issuer, not ont the anyf form ofs securityt thati is available tor retail investors. Itv would ber reckless and equity inappropriate for oft issuer or tou use MOODY'S creditr ratings or publications when making ani investment decision. doubt retail investors Additionalt terms for. Japano only: Moody's. Japan K.K. ("MJKK")is a wholly-owned credit of Moody's Group. Japan G.K., whichi is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings rating a wholly-owned subsidiary subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF. Japan K.K. ("MSFJ")isa a wholly-owned credit rating Inc., MJKK. MSFJisn nota al Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). agency Therefore, subsidiary credit of ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit entity thati is nota aN NRSRO and, consequently, ther rated obligation will not Ratings for certain assigned by an under U.S. laws. MJKK andI MSFJ are creditr rating agencies registered with qualify the. Agency andt their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2a and Japan 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose thatr mosti issuers of debt securities (including corporate municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper)a and preferred stock rated by! MJKK applicable)! have, prior to assignment ofa any rating, agreedt top payt to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) or MSFJ( (as appraisal andr ratings services rendered byii itf fees rangingf from. JPY200,000 toa approximately. PY350,000,000. for MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures toa address. Japanese regulatory requirements. or any herein ort the use ofori inability tou use any suchi information. WHATSOEVER. have, and Corporate (as section securities thei an Ifino you should agency are Financial types Services of treatment contact yourf financial or other professional adviser. and S&P Global Ratings RatingsDirect Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation Ann! MF Richardson, Dallas + (214) 765-5878; mmarcharden@-pacbhilcom Chase C Ashworth, Centennial + (303) 721-4289; dhausashonth@mabhulcom Primary Credit Analyst: Secondary Contact: Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Research WWW.STAMDARDANDPOORS: COM/RATINGSDIRECT APRIL 6, 2018 1 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation Credit Profile US$32.751 mill Itdo oblig! bnds ser 2018 due 05/01/2038 Long Term Rating Lee Cnty GO comnty colll bnds Long Term Rating Unenhancedi Rating Manyi issues aree enhancedb by bondi insurance. Rationale AA-/Stable AA/Stable AA-(SPUR)/Stable New Affirmed Affirmed Lee Cnty certs ofp part (Pub Sch & Comnty Coll Proj)s ser 2004 S&P Global Ratings assignedi its' 'AA- long-term ratingt tol Lee County, N.C's series 2018 limited obligation bonds (LOBs) based ont thea application ofits Issue Credit Ratings Linked' To U.S. Public Finance Obligors' Creditworthiness criteria, published. Jan. 22, 2018, onl RatingsDirect. S&P Global Ratings also affirmedi its' 'AA'1 long-term rating ont the county's general obligation (GO) bonds outstanding, as well asi its' "AA-'rating on the county's existing certificates of Thes series 2018LOBs willf finance project costs associated with renovating and constructing a newe elementary campus, providef fundingf for courthouse renovations, andi fund parks and recreational project costs. Thel LOBs and COPS are secured by payments made by Lee County pursuant to at trust agreement. We rate these obligations oner notchl lower than our GO rating onl Lee Countyt to account for the appropriation risk associated with the payment. The county has pledgedi its best effortst tos seek appropriations annually out ofi its operating budget, and has considered the affordability of the payments ini itsl long-t term plans. Our consideration oft the affordability and likelihood of thea annual appropriation payments isr reflectedi int the' 'AA- rating. In our view, thei features oft thet trust agreements and terms are standard with nou unusual risks regarding timely payment of debt. The county's faith-and-credit- and-taxing-power, pledges secures the GO debt. Wel base our view ofL Lee County ont thef following factors: participation (COPs). Weake economy, with projected per capita effective buyingi income at 74.6% of the nationall level and market value Strong management, with goodf financial policies andj practices under our Financial Management Assessment (FMA) Strong! budgetary performance, with operating surpluses int the general fund and att the total governmental fund level per capita of$ $88,831; methodology; WWSTANDARDANDPORS COMRATINGSDIRECT APRIL 6, 2018 2 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation inf fiscal 2017; Verys strongk budgetary flexibility, with an available fund balancei inf fiscal 2017 of21% of operating expenditures; Verys strongl liquidity, with total government available cash at 31.7% oft total governmental fund expenditures and Adequate debt and contingent liability position, with debt service carrying charges at 10.7% ofe expenditures andi net direct debt thati is 137.8% oft total governmental fund revenue, as well as rapid amortization, with 67.6% of debt We consider Lee County's economy weak." The county! has ane estimated population of 59,616. The county! has a projected per capitae effectivel buyingi income of 74.6% oft the nationall level and per capita market value of$88,831. Overall, the county's market value grew by 2.1%i in 20161 to $5.31 billioni in 2017. The county unemployment rate was Lee County encompasses 255 square miles in central North Carolina, about 46r miles southwest of Raleigh-Durham. Broadway and Sanford, which together serve as the county seat, aret the onlyt twoi incorporated municipalities within the county. Although thel local economy has continued to diversify, manufacturing iss still Lee County's largest employment industry. Leadinge employers include Lee County Schools, Pilgrim's Pride Corp., and Coty USI LLC. In October 2017, the county's largest taxpayer, Pfizer Inc., announced: a$130r millioni investment focused on gene therapy research that would create! 501 high-payingi jobs overt the next five years. Ina addition tot thesel local employers, management indicates Lee County residents commute toj jobsi ini int thel Raleigh-Durham metropolitan statistical area (MSA), including Chapel Hill and] Research' Triangle Park. The county! has also seen growth inc commercial activity, including new restaurants, retail, and grocery stores. Due tol Lee County's location near thel Raleigh-Durham MSA, we We view the county's management ass strong, with goodf financial policies and practices under our FMA methodology, indicating financial practices exist inr most areas, butt that governance officials might not formalize or monitor all of When draftingt the budget, management analyzes historical trends for revenue and expenditure assumptions and uses outsides sources tog gauget trends. Management monitors thel budget, with the ability to amend, throughout the fiscal year and provides monthly budget-to-actual reports tot the county commissioners. Att this time, the county does not maintain ai formall long-term financial plan, but wel believe forward-looking projections for the operating fund are being discussed alongside management's fiscal 20191 budget preparations. The county maintains af formalf five-year capital improvement plan, whichi is updated annually andi identifies project funding sources. Ina addition, the county commissioners have adopteda ai formal investment policy, but holding reports are not regularly provided to the county commissioners. Af formal debt management policy exists, andl limits debt servicet to 15% ofg general fund expenditures. County officials adopted a formal fund balancep policyt to maintain ar minimum available fund balance of 16% ofg general fund expenditures, though the county! has a target of24%. The countyi is currently inc compliance with this policy. 3.0xg governmental debt service, and access to external liquidity we consider strong; scheduled tob ber retired in 10y years; and Very strongi institutional framework score. Weak economy 5.9%i in 2016. expectg growtht to continue over thet two-year outlook period. Strong management them ona a regular basis. WWWSTANDARDANDPORS APRIL 6, 2018 3 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation Strong! budgetary performance Lee County's budgetary performance iss strongi in our opinion. Thec county had operating surpluses of6 6.5%of expenditures int the general fund and of3.2% across all governmental: funds inf fiscal 2017. Our assessment accounts for thef fact that we expect! budgetary results couldo deteriorate somewhat from 2017 results int the neart term. After accounting for recurring expenses andi revenues into and out oft the general fund as well as one-time transfers to fund capital projects, the county experienced an operating surplus ofa approximately: $4.3 million, or6 6.5%of expenditures ini fiscal 2017. Lee County regularly transfers funds from its general fundt toi its capital projects outlay fund. Inf fiscal 2017, about $1.0r million oft the $1.61 million that it transferredi into the capital fund was at the county's discretion; therefore, we didi noti includet that discretionary transfer as ane expense. Property taxes aret the county's The county's approved $70.1 millionf fiscal 2018 budgeti included ai fund balance appropriation ofa approximately $1.9 million. The appropriation oft the fund balancei is consistent with the county's budgeting practices over the past several fiscaly years. Due to conservative revenue ande expenditure projections as well as current trendsi ins sales tax revenue, wea anticipate atl least balanced operations inf fiscal 2018. Budget preparations for fiscal 2019 are underway, but we do note expecta anys significant changes year-to-year. Asa a result, wel believe the county's budgetary performance will remain atl least strong overt ther next two years, ort thel budget willl be atl least balanced, but operating surpluses in Lee County's budgetary flexibilityi is very strong, inc our view, with ana available fund balancei in fiscal 2017 of21%of We consider thec county's general fund unassigned and assigned fund balances tob bea available. Lee County's nominal availablel balancel has consecutively grown overt thep past three years, and the county! has consistently maintainedi it above 15% ofe expenditures. Based ony year-to-date budget-to-actuals, we expect the county tor maintain very strong County officials approveda a7.5-centi increase inl Lee County's propertyt tax rate forf fiscal 2016, bringing the tax rate to 79.5 cents per $100 ofa assessed value from 72.0 cents. The purpose oft thisi increase was tof fund education capital needs, includingt this bond issuance, pay for ongoing schools system expenses, and to establish a capital reserve for future capital projects or debts service costs. The capital projects outlay fund maintained: af fundl balance ofa about $3.3 million aty year-end 2017. Based on conversations withi management, wel believe that reserves int the capital projects outlayf fund could! ber made available for any lawful purpose, should the need arise. Depending ons sales taxi receipts, the county couldu use about $2.31 million overt ther nextt two years associated with the initial increase in debt service ont the 2018LOBs. Asar result oft thep planned use oft these reserves, wel have noti included these available funds in our calculations. Asp per state statutes, Lee County alsol has more than $5.7 millioni ini its restricted general fund balance thati isr noti includedi inc oura available fund balance. North Carolina requires that certainf financial amounts ber restricted from appropriation untilt they are realized as cash. Therefore, this balance is noti included int the county's overall available fund balance, but wer recognize that it adds additional flexibility for North Carolina issuers. Had the combined $9r millioni fromt the capital outlay projects fund and state restricted reserve fund been included, we estimate that largestr revenues source at6 60% of general fund revenue, followed by sales taxes at 18%. excess of5 5%1 might noth bes sustained. Very strong! budgetary flexibility operating expenditures, or $13.41 million. reserves over ther next two years, and remain compliant withi its reserve] policy. WWW.S STANDARDANDPOORS. COMRATIGSDIRECT APRIL 6, 2018 4 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation reserves would] have totaledr more than 30% of operating expenditures. Very strongl liquidity Inc our opinion, Lee County's liquidityi is very strong, with total government available cash at3 31.7% oft total governmental fund expenditures and3 3.0x governmental debt service in 2017. In our view, the county has strong Lee County's strong access to externall liquidity is demonstrated, wel believe, by the county's issuance of GO debt and COPS over thej past 20 years. The county does not engage int the aggressive use ofi investments that we view asl likely toa adds significant volatility toi itsl liquidity position. Ina addition, the countyi isr not exposed to variable-rate debt that The county hase enteredi intos several private placement COPS. Whilei its private placement transactions contain acceleration provisions, we believe thel liquidity risks are partially mitigated byt thej provisions of Section 160A-20 oft the North Carolinas statutes, which does not allow for deficiency judgments. Ina addition, on review oft these provisions and Inc our view, Lee County's debt and contingent liability profilei is adequate. Total governmental fund debt serviceis 10.7%0 oft total governmental fund expenditures, and net direct debti is 137.8%0 oft total governmental fund revenue. Approximately 67.6% oft the direct debti is scheduled tob ber repaid within 10 years, which isi inc our view aj positive credit Since ourl last review, wel have changed our assessment oft the county's debt profile to adequate from strong because, following thes sale oft thes series 2018 issuance, overall debt-to-market valuei is estimated at 3.1%. We make positive adjustments for overall debt-to-market valuel being less than 3%. Lee County has no additional debt over ther next two years. Asar result, and givent the growing economy, wel believe the county's debt profile willl likelyi improve tov what we consider tol bes strong withint ther next two years. Direct debt oft the countyi is about 2%. Based on our understanding of the proposed structure oft the 20181 LOBs, wee estimate that more than 65% ofd debt will be retired overt ther next 10 years. Ins subsequent reviews, should the 10-year pay-out fall! below 65%, our view of debt may weaken. Lee County's combined required pension anda actual other postemployment benefits (OPEB) contributions totaled2.1% oft total governmental fund expenditures in 2017. Oft that amount, 1.4% represented required contributions top pension obligations, and 0.7% represented OPEB payments. The countyr madei its full annual required pension contribution in The county participatesi int three pension plans: thel North Carolina Local Government Employees'" Retirement System (LGERS), thel North Carolina Registers of Deeds' Supplementall Pension Fund (RODSPF), and thel Law Enforcement Officers' Special Separation Allowance. According to Governmental. Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68, employers with benefits administered through cost-sharing, multiemployer pension plans such asI LGERS andl RODSPF must report their proportionate share oft ther netp pension liability. As of June 30, 2017, the county's proportion ofn net LGERSI liabilities was $5.1 million. Ina addition, the plan fiduciary net! positiona as aj percent oft the total pension liability ofLGERS was 91.5%. As ofJ June 30, 2017, RODSPF was overfunded with aj planf fiduciary net position as aj percent of access to externall liquidity ifr necessary. could resulti in unduel liquidity pressures. other terms oft the agreements, wel believe thee events of default arer remote. Adequate debt and contingent liability profile factor. 2017. WWWISTANDARDANDPOES: COMRATINGSDIRECT APRIL 6, 2018 5 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation total pension liability of 160%. The county's proportionate share OfRODSPF assets was $107,416. Thel Law Enforcement Officers' Special Separation. Allowancei isa a single-employer, defined-benefit pension plant that provides benefits to qualified law enforcement officers. Lee County funds this plan ona aj pay-as-you-go basis from the generalf fund. Inf fiscal 2017, the county contributed: $47,068 tot thej plan with ant unfunded! liability of$1.161 million. Lee County also participatesi ina a supplemental: retirement income plan forl law enforcement officers. The supplemental retirement income plani isac defined-contribution; plan offered tol lawe enforcement officers ina addition tot their pension Thec county provides OPEBI through as single-employer, defined-benefit plan. Lee County funds thel health care benefits plan onap pay-as-you-go! basis, andt the county board of commissioners has the authority toa amend the plan. The county's OPEB costi inf fiscal 2017 was $476,378 with ant unfunded liability of$19.21 million. Thei institutional framework score for North Carolina counties is verys strong. plan. Inf fiscal 2017, the county contributed: $151,991 tot this plan. Very strongi institutional framework Outlook The stable outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' opinion that Lee County will continue tor maintain itss strong financial performance and verys strong reserves. Ina addition, wel believe the county's strong management and growingl local economy provide additional ratings stability." Therefore, we do not expect to change the rating withint the two-year Witha allo other ratingf factors remainings stable, ifeconomici indicators were tos show sustained improvement tol levels we Ifbudgetary performance were to deteriorate, leadingt tos significant reductions inr reserves, we could lower the rating. outlook period. Upside scenario Downside scenario Related Research consider commensurate witht the county's higher-rated peers, we could raise the rating. S&PE Public Financel Local GO Criteria: How We Adjust Datal For Analytic Consistency, Sept. 12,2013 Incorporating GASB6 67A And 68: Evaluating Pension/OPEB Obligations Under Standard & Poor's UIS. Local Alternative Financing: Disclosure Is Critical" To Credit Analysis In Public Finance, Feb. 18, 2014 Government GO Criteria, Sept. 2,2015 2017 Update OfI Institutional Framework For U.S. Local Governments Certain terms usedi int this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view onr rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed tot themi in ouro criteria, and shouldt therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. WWSTANDARDANDPOES: COMPRATINGSDIRECT APRIL6,2018 6 Summary: Lee County, North Carolina; Appropriations; General Obligation Please seel Ratings Criteria at mmwsamdaréandpor.com forf furtheri information. Complete ratings information is available tos subscribers of RatingsDirect atv www.capitalig.c com. Allr ratings affected! by this rating action can bef found ont the S&P Global Ratings' public website atv westamdacamepor.com Use the Ratings search box located int the left column. WWW.STANDABDAMDPOORS COMRATIGSDIRECT APRILE 6, 2018 7 CopyrightG 02018bys Standard8 &Poor'sFinancial Servicesl LLC.A Allrightsn reserved. Noc content lincludingr ratings, credit-re relateda analyses andd data, valuations, model, softwarec ord othera applicationo or outputt therefrom)ora any partti thereof (Content)mayb be modified, reversee engineered, reproducedord distributedi inanyf formb bya anym means, ors storedi inadatabaseo orr retrievals system, withoutt thep priorv writtenp permissionof Standard& Poor's sFinancial Servicesl LLCoritsa affiliates (collectively, S&P). TheC Contents shalln notbeu usedf fora anyu unlawfuloru unauthorizedp purposes. S&Pandanyt third-party providers, aswella ast theird directors, officers, shareholders, employees ora agents! (collectively S&PP Parties)d dor notg guaranteet thea accuracy, completeness, timelinessor availabilityo ofthe Content. S&PP Partiesa aren notr responsible fora anye errors ord omissions (negligento or otherwisel, regardlesso ofthec cause, forthen results obtainedf fromt theu use ofthe0 Content, orfort thes security orr maintenancec ofa anyd dataii inputbytheu user.T The Contenti isprovidedo ona an" "asis" basis. S&PP PARTIES DISCLA LAIMA ANYA ANDA ALLE EXPRESS ORIMPLIEDV WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUTN NOTL LIMITEDT TO,A ANYV WARRANTIES OFN MERCHANTABILITYI ORFITNESSF FORAF PARTICULARP PURPOSE ORU USE, FREEDOM FROMBUGS, SOFTWAREE ERRORSO ORDEFECTS, THAT THEC CONTENTSFUNCTIONINGY WILLE BEL UNINTERRUPTED ORT THATT THE CONTENT WILLO OPERATE WITHA ANY SOFTWARE ORH HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. Innoe events shall S&PP Partiesb bel liablet toanyp partyf fora anyd direct,i indirect,i incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, specialoro consequentiald damages, costs, expenses, legalf fees, orl losses lincluding, withoutli limitation, lostir income orl lostp profits ando opportunity costs orl lossesc causedby Credit-r relateda ando othera analyses,i includingra ratings, ands statementsi intheC Contenta ares statements ofo opiniona asofthed dateti they aree expressed andnots statements offact. S&P'sopinions, analysesa andr ratinga acknowledgment decisions (describedb below) arenotn recommendations topurchase, hold, ors sella lanys securities ortomake any investmentd decisions, anddon nota addresst thes suitabilityo ofa anys security. S&Pa assumesr noo obligationt toupdatet the Contentf followingp publicationi inanyf formorf format. The Contents shouldn notb bere reliedona andisn notas substitutef fort thes skill,j judgmenta ande experienceo oft theu user, itsm management, employees, advisorsa and/or clientsv whenn making investmenta ando otherb business decisions. S&Pd does nota actasa afiduciary ora anir investment advisore exceptv wherer registereda ass such. While S8Phaso obtainedi informationf from sourcesit believest tober reliable, S8Pd doesn notp performa ana audita andu undertakesr nod duty ofdued diligenceo ori independent verification ofanyi informationit treceives. Toth thee extentt thatn regulatorya authorities allowa ratinga agencyt toa acknowledgei inonej jurisdictiona aratingi issuedina another jurisdictionf for certainr regulatory purposes, S&P reservesti theri righttoa assign, withdrawo ors suspends sucha acknowledgment: atanyti timea andinitss soled discretion. S&PP Partiesd disclaima anydutyy whatsoever arisingo outofthe assignment, withdrawalo ors suspension ofana acknowledgment: asv wella as anyl liabilityf fora anyd damagea allegedt tohave beens sufferedo ona accountt thereof. S&Pk keepsc certaina activitieso ofit itsbusinessu unitss separatef frome eacho otheri inordert top preservet thei independence ando objectivityo oftheirr respective activities. Asa aresult, certain! businessu unitso ofS&Pn mayh haveir informationt thatis isnota availablet toothers S&Pb business units. S&Ph hase establishedp policiesa andp procedurest ton maintaint the S&Pn mayn receivec compensationf forit itsr ratingsa ando certaina analyses, normallyf fromi issuersoru underwriters ofs securities orf fromo obligors. S&Pr reservest theri righttod disseminate itsop opinions andar analyses. S&Pspublicr ratingsa anda analysesa arer madea availabled onitsV Webs sites, www.s standardandpoorscom) (freeo ofchargel, andv www. ratingsdirect.com andw www. globalcreditpontal.com! (subscription), andm mayb bec distributedt througho othern means, includingv vias S&Pp publications andt third-partyr redistributors. Additional negigence'incometiont witha anyu useot oft theC Contente evenifa fadvisedo ofthep possibilityo ofs sucho damages. confidentiality ofcertainr non-publici information receivedir inc withe eacha analyticalp process. informationa abouto ourr ratingsf feesis isa availablea atwww.s mmdridsusalasmieis STANDARD& &POOR'S, S&Pa andRATINGSDIRECT: arer registeredt trademarks ofs SandadaPorsFnamcials ServicesLLC. WWWSTANDARDADPOR: COMRATINGSDIRECT APRIL6,2018 8 - A a North Carolina 2022 Fire Safety Week Proclamation Lee County, and security ofa allt those livingi in and visiting our County; and WHEREAS, Lee Countyi is committed to ensuring the safety WHEREAS, firei isas serious! public safety atg greatest risk from fire; and Association" (NFPA9), and fire departments WHEREAS, smokea alarms sense smoke have asl little as2r minutes toe escapes safely; and WHEREAS, workings smoke WHEREAS, Lee County residents oft thes smoke alarms andl knows howt tor respond; and WHEREAS, Lee County therefore ber morel likely tos survivea ai fire; and family members, including WHEREAS, Lee County responders through prevention: andj protection education; and WHEREAS, Lee County residents increase their safety from fire, especially int their homes; and WHEREAS, the Lee Countyi itisi important tol have al home fire escape plan; and NOW,THEREFORE, 15, 2022, as Firel Prevention' Weekt throughout andt home fire escapet for Firel Prevention Week 2022 tos support firea ande emergency services. Datedt this 3rd day ofOctober, 2022. concern! both locally and nationally, and homes are the locations where people are civilian deathsi int the United Statesi in2 2020, accordingt tot thel National Firel Protection wellb before you can, alerting yout to danger in the event off firei in whichy your may WHEREAS, home fires caused 2,580d int the United States responded to3 356,5001 home fires; and alarms cut ther risk of dyingi inr reportedl home fires in! half; and should bes sure everyone int thel home understands thes sounds residents whol have planned andj practiced al home fire escape plan are more prepared and will willr make sure their smoke and carbon monoxide (CO) alarms meet the needs ofa allt their are dedicatedt tor reducingt the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries WHEREAS, Lee Countyr residents those withs sensory or physical disabilities; and first that are toj responsive public education measures are better able tot take personal stepst to 20221 Fire Prevention Week" TMt theme," "Fire won't wait. Plan your escape." TM,"e effectively serves tor remind BEI ITI RESOLVED, that thel Lee County Board of Commissioners dol hereby proclaim October 9- this County, and urge allt the people ofI Lee County to plan andj practicea ther many public safety activities and efforts ofLee Counties AIL Kirk D. Smith, Lee County Boar ATTEST: COUA 4 BF simtlc Hailey! Hall, Clerkt tot thdB Board CAR NORTHCAROLINA,! LEECOUNTY Presented forr registrationo ont tisl day othnuany20,33 aD:55AMPM recordedi in Book 34 Pageln33 Pamela G. Bilt, Registero rofDeeds