MINUTES TOWN OF STOKESDALE REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 8325 ANGEL PARDUE ROAD STOKESDALE, NC 27357 SEPTEMBER 9th, 2021 AT 7:00PM  Members present: Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilmembers Jimmy Landreth, Derek Foy, and Jim Rigsbee, Town Attorney Tom Medlin, Interim Town Clerk Dale Martin, Finance Officer Kim Thacker, and Guilford County Planner Oliver Bass.  1.  Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation:  Thei meeting was called to order by Mayor Flynt at 7:00pm. Councilman Jim Rigsbee led the  Pledge of Allegiance and delivered the invocation.  2.  Review and Adopt Agenda:  Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks requested that agenda item 8 be moved up after item 2, and Councilman Motion by Mayor Flynt to adopt the amended agenda. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro- Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth,  Rigsbee requested item 9 be moved up as well. Tem Hooks and carried unanimously.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  8.  Presentation by Guilford County Fire Marshal Jim Albright on the Stokesdale Fire Jim Albright gave a presentation on the request, by the county, to create a Fire Service District in Stokesdale. He noted that Stokesdale was one of only two areas within Guilford County that had He also explained the process, from various fees tol holding a Public Hearing, to make the Motion by Mayor Flynt to set a Public Hearing for the October 14th, 2021 meeting, seconded by Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, Jim Albright then gave a short presentation on COVID-19 and the local impact it was. having.  District Service Overlay  not already done this, and the benefits such a change could have.  change.  Councilman Foy. The motion carried unanimously.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  128    3.  Review and Approve Minutes (May 13,2021; August 24, 2021; Closed Session  August 24, 2021):  Motion by Mayor Flynt to approve all minutes on the agenda together. The motion was Vote: aye- Mayor. John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth,  seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks and carried unanimously. Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  9.  Discussion on service provided by Republic Waste, Representatives from Republic Mayor Flynt noted he had forgotten that this item had been moved and addressed it here. The representatives, Mr. Fernandez: and Mr. Salamone, then gave aj presentation addressing some of the issues regarding services in Stokesdale and the steps being taken to address them. These included creating ai regularly-checked email account just for Stokesdale: residents to request assistance, attempting to hire more workers, and being more strict about route completion. For the month of August, Fire ChiefTodd Gauldin reported 87 total calls, 39 of which were fire related, 48 rescue related, and overall no meaningful change to the average. He also gave a safety tip to avoid storing fuels, such as gas for lawnmowers and the like, in basements or crawispaces.  Waste will be on hand to discuss any service issues with citizens  4.  Public Safety Reports:  Fire Department  5.  Administrative Reports:  a) Administrative Report from Interim Town Clerk  Interim Town Clerk Dale Martin reported the following for August: 6: meters installed, 38 meters put on hold, 37 811's, 21 work orders processed, 641 water bills sent out, and an order for additional meters to ensure the Town had an adequate supply for upcoming developments. She also noted updates from the State Demographer's office on population estimates for the Town. Mrs. Martin then reported that she was working with Paul Holst on submitting a Performance Bond for road work in his development. She also received al letter from the State that an Authorization to Construct: for the Angel's Glen subdivision would expire soon, and the Finally, Mrs. Martin wrapped up noting that the Guilford County Emergency Operations Planis  developer had been notified.  to be reviewed for administrative changes.  b) Planning Board None Presented  c) Events Committee  Councilman Foy mentioned the upcoming Christmas parade and an event to: remember 9/11 at the fire station. Chief Gauldin commented on the 9/11 event and noted another upcoming event to commemorate an Eagle Scout and everyone that worked with the department going back to  1954.  129    d) Property Committee None presented. 6.  Financial Reports: Finance/Budget Officer Kim Thacker  For the month of August Mrs. Thacker reported: total CDARS for the General Fund at $2,588,533.68, Fidelity account at $541,598.98, ARP of$362,737.50, and total assets for the For the Water Enterprise Fund: total CDARS at $499,152.42, assets at $1,738,960.67. Mayor Flynt asked about an upcoming audit, Mrs. Thacker stated that Mr. Rouse would have it  town at $3,347,355.53.  completed before October 1st, 2021.  7.  Citizen's Comments from the Floor (3-minute limit per speaker):  Mr. Mike Crawford, 8302 Messenger Ct., Stokesdale - Mr. Crawford made a short speech about his position as a mayoral candidate, noting some ofl his personal history (namely having a large body of experience through working at a wide range ofjobs) and ideas for how to improve Vickie White-Laurence, 8400 Westfalls Lane, Stokesdale - Spoke on behalf of the Friends of Stokesdale inviting everyone to the Candidate Open House which they were hosting. She noted that the event was being hosted as a community service and opportunity for open communication  the Town (including improving outreach and communication to the citizens).  with the candidates for the upcoming elections, not tol be a moderated forum.  10. Public Hearings  Rezoning Case 21-08-SIPL-06759; 8400 Lyman Street, RS-40 to CZ-LI; Located on east side ofLyman Street north ofintersection with Ellisboro Road, Guilford County Tax Parcel #164401, Oakridge Township, approximately 1.15 acres. Proposed use condition: Limited to Auto Repair Services, Major. No development conditions are proposed. Proposed sketch plan on file in Guilford County Planning Department. Owner: CP Truck and Automotive Solutions, INC.  Administrative Report by Town Planner Oliver Bass  Mr. Bass explained the purpose oft the proposal, that the area and most oft the surrounding areas had been primarily intended for industrial and commercial use, and therefore determined that an auto repair service would be suitable: for the location and require no adjustments to the Town  plan.  Mayor. Flynt opened the Public Hearing at 8:17pm.  Proponents: None present Opponents: None present  130    Motion by Councilman Foy to approve Case #21-08-STPL-06759; 84001 Lyman Street, RS-40 to CZ-LI, based on staff recommendation and due to the proposed use being consistent with the Stokesdale Land Usel Plan. The motion was seconded by Councilman Landreth and carried Vote: aye-M Mayor. John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, Mayor Flynt then adjourned the Town Council at 8:22pm, called for a recess, and requested that speakers on the Board of Adjustment case prepare to swear an oath.  unanimously.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  Board of Adjustment  1. Case #21-07-STPL-06273 for Daniel and Michelle. Kelly, 8306 Misty Meadow Drive  Mayor Flynt called the Board of Adjustment meeting to order at 8:30pm.  Report from Town Planner Oliver Bass  Mr. Bass introduced himself and explained that this was a case for a variance to section 6-5.5 of the Stokesdale Development Ordinance, which states that noi fence for residential uses shall exceed 4ft in height up to the front setback line, and nos fence shall exceed 8ft in height behind the front setback line. He then explained that the applicant for this case was requesting a variance toi install a fence ahead ofthe front setback line. He stated that the owners ofthe lot, 83061 Misty Meadow Drive, were Daniel and Michelle Kelly. He then explained that the surrounding areas were also for use as single-family residences and provided lot measurements. He explained that, under the Stokesdale Development Ordinance, a variance may be granted with a majority 4/5ths vote oft the Board ifevidence provided by the applicant(s) proves that maintaining the ordinance would cause unnecessary hardship, assuming that the hardship is specific to the location or structures and not due to the actions of the applicants, and so long as the variance is still ultimately aligned with the intent and spirit of the ordinançe. He noted that he had provided a worksheet with facts and figures for the Board to use. in making a decision on this case and Mayor Flynt asked how large the tract was, and Mr. Bass began looking for an answer but did not find one before Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks asked ifother issues werei in question considering there were other pending projects on the lot. Mr. Bass confirmed that this case was only focusing on the 8ft fence along the property line, and the 8ft fence around the shed and parking pad on the Mayor Flynt opened the public portion ofthe hearing and called on Daniel Kelly to speak.  concluded his report.  property.  Proponents  Mr. Daniel Kelly opened by introducing himselfand stating that he would be reiterating a: few things that Mr. Bass had already covered. He noted that the plan for the lot included two columns  131    on either side oft the driveway to mount a gate across and two types of fencing. He specified that the columns would be placed -15ft back from the road, with bases of-2ft by -2f, coming up to -6ft tall, with lights. He commented that they would be similar to columns that neighbors had and matched those generally found in the area. The gate would be mounted behind the columns, -4ft tall, and a -4ft tall aluminum fence would come off of one column and go down to a corner oft the property. That same fence would then go from the corner to about 77ft, the next corner of the property. From there, he stated he would like toi install an -8ft tall wooden fence which would run down through ai ravine between his house and a neighbors' for -150ft, leading into a second -8ft wooden privacy fence which would cover aj parking pad which Mr. Kelly indicated was on the provided map. He explained that several pictures had been provided with examples of. columns and fences in the area, several from his neighborhood, which were similar to what he Councilman Foy asked if there were restrictions from an HOA on what would bej permitted. Mr. Mayor Flynt called on Michelle Kelly to speak, she made an indistinct comment apparently declining to add more at the time. Mayor Flynt then asked ift there were any other proponents for  was intending to install.  Kelly explained that the four homes in the court were not part of an HOA.  the case, and when none commented he called for opponents to the case.  Opponents  Carol Vanderveer spoke against the variance. She explained that she had lived at 8305 Misty Meadow Drive: for 15 years and highly valued the natural environment it was situated in. She stated that she believed people should be able to do what they want with their property sO long as itdida'tnegatively impact their neighbors. She provided an example, explaining that the Kelly's had requested a variance previously toi install a large shed and that she took no issue with it. She then said that she believed the pictures provided by the Kelly's to be misleading and pointed out that her own pictures show that she has no view of their home from her property. She stated that the Kelly's pictures were taken from the street, and that her house was visible sitting -140ft while the Kelly residence is -475ft, fairly far back both from the street and from her own Mrs. Vanderveer then commented on the points made by the Kelly's for their variance request. First, she pointed out that their claim to needing an 8ft fence to protect their dog and keep out animals made. little sense considering that it only sat along her property line, and so animals could simply walk around it. Additionally, she claimed that 8ft offered no additional benefits to Secondly, she questioned their request for the fence to keep people and animals out oft their planned 16ft x 20ft x 3ft koi pond. Electing to avoid the conversation about what regulations might govern something like that in the first place, she mentioned several animals that live in the area and again explained that aj partial fence does nothing to prevent any creature from simply  property.  keeping out most animals as compared to a 4ft fence.  walking around to an open section.  132    Third, she questioned their comments about needing more privacy. She explained that their house is in the middle of6 acres ofe evergreens and hardwoods, with -50 evergreen trees planted just in the 150ft stretch in question. She then stated that, again, she had no view to their property, and that again aj partial fence would be of no benefit as anyone could enter their property from Fourth, she called to question the Kelly's statement that a fence was not required on the opposite side oft the property due tot the presence of a stream. Shej pointed out her own pictures, which show that this stream is in fact ai runoff ditch dry at all times besides during rain. Mrs. Vanderveer then brought up aj petition that nearby residents had signed, stating that 24 of33 petitioned had signed in opposition to the Kelly's being allowed to build an 8ft fence along the property line as it would obstruct views and alter the atmosphere of the neighborhood. She concluded by thanking the Board for their time and asked: ifthere were any questions. Councilman Landreth asked ifs she was objecting to all proposals made by the Kelly's for this case, or only the fence on the shared property line. She clarified that she was only objecting to the: fence along the property line and had: no issue with the proposed fence around the parking  any direction.  area.  Mayor Flynt then called on Andy Marks to speak.  Kris Berger and several other members ofthe community then gathered to speak about the case. Kris explained that she and her husband Alex had moved to the neighborhood -12 years prior, became friends with Carol, and found it very sad that the Kelly's were "tormenting these Andy Marks then began speaking but was cut off as it was determined the conversation was not relevant to the variance case. He: replied that he did believe the points were relevant, as it seemed unlikely that someone would request special permission to build a 4ft fence, then an 8ft fence just along a specific property line, and then drop back to a 4ft fence, ifthey got along with the Mr. Foy then specified that, this being an evidence-based hearing, the Board would like to stick Mrs. Berger then commented that, though she lived across the street, such a large fence would still affect her view and ability to appreciate the natural landscape. She expressed concern that such a fence only communicates the message "I don't want you there," - and that she did: not want Alex Berger stepped up to be sworn in and comment on the case. He stated his name and address (7816 Charles Place Dr) for the record and reiterated that he and his wife had been living in the neighborhood for -12: years. He commended that he and his wife liked to walk, particularly to walk through the natural environment oft their neighborhood, and that they had gotten to know a loto ofpeople in the area by walking several miles every day. He then stated that he moved to the neighborhood specifically because oft the greenery and the layout ofthe area to allow for nice views and a healthy combination ofinfrastructure and wildlife. He then stated that an 8ft fence  people."  neighbor on the other side of the 8ft section of fence.  only to the facts ofthe case without any other details, related or otherwise.  to see such ai message in the neighborhood where she lived.  133    suddenly blocking off a view was antithetical tol being in the area, and he couldn't personally understand why someone would build something like that in such a specific and disruptive location. Het then thanked the Board for listening to him and stated again that the promise of living in the area was to get away from things like high fences and obstructions to nature. Martin Nadel of8211 Windy Gayle then offered his opposition to the case. He commented that he did not live in the neighborhood but knew the (Vanderveer) family very well. He wanted clarification on what the hardship would be should the Kelly's not be allowed to build this fence, andi ifthey would even be able to see the fence. anyway considering some ofthe distances and  environmental factors involved. Proponent Rebuttal  Mr. Daniel Kelly stated that he had not expected such heavy opposition to this variance and SO was willing to discard the planned fence along the property line. He did, however, want to continue with the planned fence around the parking pad and any other elements of their building Conversation continued clarifying some points, but much took place away from the direct pickup oft the microphones. Questions seemed to be oni ift there were any objections to the other elements proposed by the Kelly's, and clarifications about what those other elements would be. Carol Vanderveer seemed to be concerned about how runoff would be affected, and the Board seemed to be concerned about how in-depth they could afford to get with their considerations. Town Attorney Tom Medlin then insisted that everyone return to their positions and continue by properly speaking into microphones and making sure everything was on-record. Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks asked for clarification that Mr. Kelly had changed his mind about the variance. Mr. Kelly confirmed that he no longer wanted to install a fence along the property line which would require a variance but did still want to fence off the parking pad by his shed tol hide two trailers parked there. Mr. Hooks asked how far the corner of the shed was to the property Town Attorney Medlin asked Mr. Kelly to look at a copy ofhis variance application, clarifying which specific sentences to strike from the document and which were still in contention. Responding to a question about the necessity of the second fence listed in the variance application, Mr. Kelly explained that hel had requested a variance 5 years prior to build his shed, mentioning that the ground was too steep in the other parts oft the property to build it elsewhere. Mayor Flynt asked ift the shed was visible from the street, Mr. Kelly stated that it was in the winter but perhaps not durihg other seasons. Mayor Flynt then asked to what end he wanted to fence it in, and Mr. Kelly answered that it was to screen it from the house and other parts oft the  plans for which, tol his knowledge, no variances were required.  line, and Mr. Kelly estimated it around -70ft.  property.  134    Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks asked again how far the shed was from the property line, and Mr. Kelly again estimated that it was likely -70ft from the nearest property line. They discussed how, to build the shed and parking pad, dirt had to be brought in tol level out an area, Mayor Flynt then offered an opportunity for the opposition to rebut.  Opposition Rebuttal  Carol Vanderveer brought up the point that, considering the Kelly's had to level out an area to build the shed in the first place, they could have leveled out any area on their property. There was noi requirement toj put it where they did, and so no need to hide it from their own view. She was asked ifs she had a problem with the shed, and she answered that she did not, but again did The Board began discussing the case, and Town Attorney Medlin insisted that they focus on either asking questions pertinent to the rebuttal or move to the final deliberation. Mayor Flynt then closed the public portion oft the hearing and asked Town Planner Oliver Bass for comments. Mr. Bass had no comment, and deliberation continued. The mayor read the 4 questions the deliberation needed to focus on, and then suggested that there should be another Mr. Foy asked what hardship would be created by denying the variance, and Mr. Hooks agreed that there did not seem to be any. The Board and Mrs. Kelly spoke on this briefly, which was largely inaudible. Town Attorney Medlin clarified that this was a section specifically for Board deliberation and discouraged any further discussion with citizens. Mayor. Flynt then asked Mr. Medlin ifthe Board needed to vote on the points individually, and Mr. Medlin encouraged the Board to focus on1 the first point and reminded them that they had so-far noted that there was no Mr. Foy mentioned that he drove through the neighborhood earlier that day, saying that it was a lovely area, and then continued by explaining that there were: four specific factors that had to be considered. On those limitations, noting his regret, he stated that he could not approve the Mayor Flynt asked the Board ift there would be any unnecessary hardship caused by the strict application oft the ordinance. None of the members could find any hardship by denying the variance on the grounds that no suitable evidence had been presented demonstrating a hardship. Mayor Flynt moved to the second item, asking the Board ifal hardship might be presented by the specific factors oft the property such as topography. Mr. Landreth commented that they had already found no evidence for al hardship, and Mayor Flynt explained that they were considering different factors in sequence. Attorney Medlin suggested that, for this point, the Board might state that the location specifically did not create. al hardship, and that the goal was to ensure that the Board considered things like the factors oft the landscape when making their deliberations.  not see how it would necessitate such a large fence being put up.  location on the property suitable to: move the shed or trailers.  obvious hardship.  variance based on the potential for hardship.  135    Jim Rigsbee commented that he saw no hardship created by the land, and that the proposed fence was for aesthetics and not related to issues ofrunoff or other issues with the land. Derek Foy asked for clarification, and Mr. Rigsbee again stated that he did: not believe the landscape created ai necessity for the proposed fence. Mr. Foy thanked him, and then agreed that the landscape created no hardship. Mr. Landreth also agreed that it did not create al hardship. Mr. Hooks and The Board moved toi item 3, asking ifthe hardship results from actions taken by the applicant. Mr. Rigsbee stated that, due to the fence being planned tol hide aj parking pad and.shed that Mr. Kelly installed on1 the property himself, any hardship would result from actions taken by the applicant. Mr. Foy agreed, as did Mr. Landreth, Mr. Hooks, and Mayor Flynt. Mayor Flynt moved tot the final item, asking ifthe variance was consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety was secured and substantial justice achieved. Mr. Rigsbee stated that hel believed it was not consistent given that there was no safety issue in question. Mr. Foy stated that he could debate the issue, but would not, and agreed with Mr. Rigsbee. Mr. Landreth asked for clarifications on this point, Mr. Medlin explained that the question was ifthe variance was consistent with the spirit ofthe ordinance, and Mr. Foy stated that he was changing his position. He believed that the variance was consistent with the spirit of the ordinance and asked for some assistance with wording his point. Mr. Medlin offered the phrasing that, regardless oft the answers to the other questions, the variance did not present anything contrary to the spirit of the ordinance. Mr. Foy thanked him and agreed that described his position. He merely feels there was not a hardship presented. Mr. Rigsbee asked: for further clarification on the wording oft this point, and Mr. Medlin explained that it was just about considering the original purpose ofthe ordinance. Things like public safety and substantial justice were only examples, and in this case the spirit of the ordinance was focused more on issues ofarchitecture and aesthetics, Mayor Flynt then stated that the purpose oft the ordinance was toj prevent fences of higher than 4ft from being put in peoples' front yards, and therefore the variance was not consistent with the ordinance. Mr. Hooks stated that it was consistent, and Mr. Motion by Mayor Flynt to deny the application due to the Board finding no suitable hardships in Mr. Rigsbee commented that the law was clear in this case, but that he was regretful that things Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, Mayor Flynt thanked everyone for coming, and Mr. Landreth asked ift there was ai right to appeal the decision. The mayor responded that he did, and Mr. Foy stated that it would go to a superior  Mayor Flynt also agreed that the landscape did not create al hardship.  Landreth that it was not consistent.  maintaining the ordinance to justify the variance. Seconded by Mr. Foy.  worked out this way. Mr. Foy agreed with his statement.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  court.  The Board of Adjustment adjourned and took al briefr recess at 9:49pm.  136    Reconvene as Town Council at 9:55pm  OLD BUSINESS  11. Consideration of a Proposal to Clean Up front ofTown Hall and install netting to prevent birds from nesting along the ceiling (Tabled from August 12) Councilman Rigsbee requested that the issue be pushed back again sO that he could consider cheaper options, and perhaps receive another quote. The item was moved to October. 12. Update on Rockingham County/Madison Water Source (Tabled from August1 12) Mayor Flynt commented that he had requested ai representative visit to talk about this in person, but the man had been unable to join them. Hej passed out a document with information, including ap phone number, that people could use to call the representative about this issue. He then After some discussion about possibly running al line down 65, council agreed to discuss the  suggested that this item be tabled until the October meeting. matter further at another date once more: research had been done. 13. Budget Amendment for Capital Improvement (land purchase)  Councilman Foy started by listing the steps needed to complete the land purchase. Mayor Flynt asked for some clarifications on where the money was coming from and expressed concern that there would be no budget for other improvements in the Town. After some debate, Mayor Flynt determined that an action was needed to avoid excessive consideration oft the item. Motion by Mayor Flynt to approve the budget amendment, seconded by Councilman Landreth. Vote: aye- Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, Councilman Derek  Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee nay- Mayor John Flynt  14. Consideration of Proposal from Vaugh Surveying Co., Inc. for survey work for Mayor Flynt stated that the contract they had awarded previously did not include survey work, sO Motion by Mayor Flynt to approve the $2500 proposal, seconded by Councilman Foy. Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth,  water line extension/connection along Ellisboro Road  he requested that Vaugh provide an estimate for the surveying.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  137    15. Resolution Formalizing the Town of Stokesdale's request from Guilford County's allotment of American Rescue Plan Funding for Capital Projects concerning the  Town's Water System  Councilman Foy brought up the Town's lack of action on: requesting funds from the County and Motion by Councilman Foy to approve the request for funds from Guilford County's allotment Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, 16. Discussion on qualifications ofTown Clerk candidate(s). (Closed Session in To consider the qualifications, competence, performance, character, fitness, conditions of appointment, or conditions ofi initial employment of an individual public officer or employeeor prospective public officer or employee; or tol hear or investigate a complaint, charge, or grievance by or against an individual public officer or employee. General personnel policy issues may not be considered in a closed session. Aj public body may not consider the qualifications, competence, performance, character, fitness, appointment, or removal of ai member oft the public body or another body and may not consider or fill a vacancy among its own membership except in an open meeting. Final action making an appointment or discharge or removal by a public body having final authority for the appointment or discharge or removal shall be taken in an open Motion by Mayor. Flynt to enter closed session at 10:23pm. The motion was seconded by Councilman Foy, who suggested an amendment that it would be clarified that the purpose ofthe closed session was to discuss the qualifications ofaj potential Town Clerk candidate. Vote: aye- Mayor. John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth,  presented a formal request which hel had drafted to submit to the County. ofthe American Rescue Plan, seconded by Councilman Rigsbee. Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  accordance with NC General Statues 143-318.11(a)(6)  meeting.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  Reconvéned in open session at 11:06pm.  17. Council Comments:  Mayor Pro-Tem Hooks thanked everyone for attending and wished them safe travels home.  18. Announcements  Mayor Flynt announced that there would be a Planning Board meeting on Thursday, September 23rd, a Town Council meeting on Thursday, October 14th, and a 9/11 ceremony at the fire station Saturday, August 14th. He also mentioned there would be candidate forms available at Town  Hall.  138    19. Adjournment:  Motion by Mayor Flynt to adjourn the meeting. Councilman Derek Foy seconded the motion. Vote: aye- Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Councilman Jimmy Landreth, Being no further business to come before Council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:07 PM.  Councilman Derek Foy, Councilman Jim Rigsbee  Approved: September 8, 2022.  E. Crawford, Mayor  ZIEEAC  ATTEST:  Dakmack Dale. F.J Martin, Town Clerk  139