AGENDA TOWN OF STOKESDALE REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 8325. ANGEL PARDUE ROAD STOKESDALE, NC: 27357 AUGUST 12, 2021 AT 7:00PM Available Venues to Watch/Attend: a) Attend in Person at Stokesdale Town Hall in Council Chambers at' 7pm. b) View Live Stream at Town of Stokesdale's YouTube Channel at' 7pm: smwaaIsINMABRGICIUNTIO 56F EDH6wliA/live c) View & Participate (Citizen Comments) Virtually via Zoom Join Zoom Meeting Meeting ID:88042599077 Passcode: 873884 One tap mobile +1-312-626-6799 Mtps/As0sehzcom.slYLe.IRZMIgAUORw/ON2TWRZ-0P 1. 3. 4. 5. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Review and Adopt the Agenda Review and Approve Minutes: February 15, 2021, March 4, 2021 Board & Administrative Report: Administrative Report from Interim Town Clerk: a) Planning Board: b) Events Committee: c) Property Committee: 6. 7. Financials: Finance/Budget Officer: Kim Thacker Citizen's Comments from the Floor (3-minute Limit per Speaker) PUBLICHEARINGS: 8. Rezoning Case# #21-06-STPL-0556: 6905 US Highway 158 Located on south side ofNC Highway 158, approximately 400 feet west of! Ellison Road intersection, Guilford County Tax Parcel 150698. This is a request to rezone: a portion of said property that fronts Ellison Road from HB-Highway Business tol RS- 30, Single-family residential, approximately 0.82 ofapproximately 1.44 acres. Text Amendment Case# #21-07-STPL-05973: Warehouse, Self-Storage As Permitted The Town of Stokesdale Planning Board will hold a public hearing to consider ai text amendment to the Stokesdale Development Ordinance as follows: Amend Section 4- 3,' Table 4-3-1 (PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE) to remove Warehouse (Self- storage) as a use permitted in the GB and HB zoning districts, and Amend Section 6-4 to remove Subsection 6-4.91, Warehouse (Self-storage) development standards Applicant: Lucie Wilson Joyner. Use In GB And HB Districts 9. for GB and HB. OLDB BUSINESS 10. Discussion on Establishing a Committee to Update the' Town's Land Use Plan. 11. Consideration of] Engineering Bids Water Linel Extension on Ellisboro Road. 12. Discussion on Cost of] Backflow Permits and Inspection Fees through Guilford 13. Discussion regarding Water Accounts, Proofof Ownership/Renter Status, Deposit 14. Consideration ofa Proposal by Excellent Lawncare & Landscape for mulch at' Town Councilmembers to submit names for Consideration. NEW BUSINESS County. Fees, Reconnect Fees. Hall and mini nuggets at playground area. 15. Consideration of] Purchasing Bicycle Racks for the' Town Park. 16. Update on Rockingham County/Madison Water Source, 17. Discussion ofLand Acquisition Opportunity for Town of Stokesdale. (Closed Session item in accordance with NCGS 143-318.11(5). 18. Comments from Council, 19. Announcements: a) Planning Board Meeting Thursday, August 26th at 7pm at' Town Hall b) Town Council Meeting Thursday, September 9th at' 7 pm at' Town Hall 20. Adjournment. MINJUTES TOWN OF STOKESDALE SPECIAL CALLEDTOWN COUNCIL via ZOOM 8325 ANGEL PARDUE ROAD STOKESDALE, NC: 27357 bnary15,02AT7.OPM I. II. Call to Order Review and Adopt the Agenda III. Review and Approve Minutes: February 11, 2021 IV. Citizen's Comments from the Floor (3-minute Limit per Speaker) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Reopen Public Hearing: Rezoning Case # 20-12-STPL-08358: 9157 US Hwy 158 (Gonzales Property); AG to RS-40. Located on south side of US Highway 158, approximately. 550 feet east of Anthony Road, 9157 US Highway 158, Guilford County Tax Parcel 167180. An application to rezone said property from AG-Agricultural to RS-40 Single-family Residential, approximately 3.78 acres. Applicant: Jackson and Gina Gonzalez. Mayor Flynt reopened the public hearing. There were no speakers either in favor or opposed to Motion made by Mayor Flynt to approve the rezoning as presented. Councilman Foy seconded this rezoning request. the motion. VOTE: John Flynt Thearon Hooks Jim Rigsbee AYE AYE AYE Derek Foy Jimmy Landreth AYE AYE 2. Review, Discuss and Vote on Quotes for New replacement Battery, Battery Charger, Hoses Councilman Foy expressed a concern with the cost presented in the amount of $569.97. Motion made by Mayor Flynt to postpone this item until the March 11, 2021 Council Meeting. and Belts for the Town Generator Councilman Rigsbee seconded the motion. VOTE: John Flynt Thearon Hooks Jim Rigsbee AYE AYE AYE Derek Foy Jimmy! Landreth AYE AYE Councilman Rigsbee asked that the specifications be emailed to him. VI. Citizens Comments from the fioor None presented. VII. Adjournment Being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned. Approved: John Flynt, Mayor ATTEST: Dale F. Martin (Interim Clerk at time of approval) MINUTES TOWN OF STOKESDALE 8325. ANGEL PARDUE ROAD STOKESDALE, NC2 27357 MARCH 4, 2021 AT'7:001 PM SPECIALCALLEDTOWN COUNCIL MEETING Members present were: Mayor John Flynt, Mayor Pro-Tem Thearon Hooks, Council Members: Jimmy Landreth, Derek Foy, Jim Rigsbee, Town Clerk Alisa Houk, Finance and Budget Officer Kim Thacker and Deputy Clerk Priscilla Hunsucker. 1. CallTo Order. Mayor. John Flynt called the meeting to order. 2. Discussion on 2021-2022 Annual Budget. Mrs. Kim Thacker explained that she took recurring expenses from last fiscal year and plugged those into this year's budget. She looked back a little farther for the Town's income. Mrs. Thacker began with the General Fund and explained the allocation split for salaries between the general fund and water fund. She then noted a change in the Town's Cable Franchise Fees that will now be coming from the NC Department of Revenue and included in the State Collected Revenues. Mrs. Thacker noted that contribution & donations will remain the same. She noted a decrease in investment earnings which has decreased for everyone. She noted a decrease in Planning & Zoning Fees. Mayor Flynt questioned the decrease and noted that we. have already received $36,000 this year and would expect that much or more: next year. Mrs. Thacker stated that this can be increased if we believe we will get more revenue. Councilman Foy agreed with the Mayor and stated that we. have seen al big year so far and that looking ahead there are some big developments out there that we haven'tseen yet. Mayor Flynt recommended at least $35,000 and noted developments being planned. By consensus, the Council felt that $35,000 was acceptable Mrs. Thacker explained that she has gone back several years to: review the State Collected Revenues and noted that the larger revenue sources come ini in March and June, sO we don't. have those yet. She used the Department of] Revenue website, which anyone can go look at, to estimate those revenues for next year. Several Councilmembers agreed with the $315,000. for Planning & Zoning Fees. Mrs. Thacker stated that that concludes the Town's Revenues. 1 Mrs. Thacker then noted Expenses for Capital Outlays, Events funds and line items left blank since she felt that it is up to the Council to decide what you want to do next year. The numbers included are basically fixed expenses. She noted that since we: raised the Planning Fee Revenues, we may need to increase Planning expenses as well. Mayor Flynt stated that the fee to Guilford County remains at $25,000 and he would like to increase that to $50,000 and consider hiring a Town Planner. Councilman Foy recommended that Planning Advertising be increased to Mayor Flynt again recommended the Town hire a' Town Planner and noted the complaints being received with every zoning case, we. have major projects coming up in the near: future and no one with the Town currently has the time or expertise to take on1 these items. Councilman Foy stated Mrs. Thacker stated that the. Administrative and Property Expenses are: mostly fixed but $4,000. that he would like more information before that decision is made. welcomed any comments on changes the Council feels is needed. was recommended that we take al look ati it later and adjust it ifneeded. website design now, After a discussion that amount was reduced to $8,000. Expenses for the park was discussed, such as tree work and: mulch. $40,000 was reasonable but it Mayor Flynt asked about IT Security and Website Design. It was noted that we are: not doing any Mrs. Thacker stated that the. Audit has been consistent at $13,200. Legal for Mr. Medlin, it was noted things coming up and internal issues that he does in addition to the Council meetings. By Mrs. Thacker stated that she had a request from a Councilmember to figure in a 3% raise in salaries. Mayor Flynt stated that he did not think that was enough since noi raise was given last year. He noted that since Mrs. Thacker just started and recommended a raise for her be delayed until next year. Councilman Foy stated that he was the one that recommended the 3% across the Board. Mayor Flynt then recommended something for merit and longevity since a cost ofliving only allows them tol break even and recommended 6% which amounts to another $2500. Various other amounts were discussed, bothi increases and decreases by the State and private sector. Mrs. Thacker referred to Public Safety and stated that those expenses arej pretty much set in stone. Mayor Pro Tem Hooks stated that inspections are fixed however, investigations can goup ord down depending on cases in town and noted ai recent increase in charges being filed. He recommended the Town make sure it is covered: in this area and recommended $15,000. The Council discussed previous cases that were: investigated, and the amount spent this year. It was Mayor Flynt asked to go back and discuss Payroll Processing Fees. He stated that the service. has been unacceptable and that wei may need to go back to the old provider. Mrs. Thacker stated that she agrees with the Mayor on the lack ofresponse from ADP. Mrs. Thacker explained the transfer ofinformation from one provider to the next and how W2's are computed. She stated consensus $50,000 was agreeable. Salaries were left as presented. decided to leave it as presented and do al budget amendment ifneeded. 2 that she and Councilman Foy have repeatedly contacted them about the corrected W2's. She noted that their payroll service is wonderful. Mayor Flynt stated that ifit takes aj payroll company 6: months to get us a corrected W2 then he wanted to increase the budget and go back to the original provider. Council discussed the issues caused by notl having a W21 here on March 4th and wanted a company that appreciates the Town of Stokesdale. Councilman Landreth recommended this amount be increased by $300 and it be brought before the Council at their Mrs. Thacker then noted the Reimbursements from Water Fund, $129,661. She then noted that Revenues and expenses difference should now be: zero, however, iti is $64,513.22 difference. Councilman Rigsbee stated that he wanted to go back to our Parks and: recommended $25,000 be put in the budget so that we can get a building started this year. The Council discussed increasing that amount to $100,000 for improvements and pulling fromi reserves what is needed. The Council discussed Events/Community line item. Contributions to the schools was discussed and the impact a Guilford County tax increase would have on the school's budget. It was recommended that the Council do something to. help the teachers sO that money does not come out oft their pockets. It was recommended that we combine Events and Community and set it at $12,000 and do an amendment laterifs something comes up. It was agreed to combine the two next meeting. line items. Mrs. Thacker stated this brings our undesignated funds to $47,486.78. Councilman Foy reminded Mrs. Thacker that we need tol have a line item for $3,000 for elections Councilman Foy stated that the $100,000 allocated to our park is the biggest allocation made for the Town in a decade. Mayor Pro Tem Hooks asked if we expected any grant money to be added tot this project. It was noted that this is from the Town's budget. Mayor Flynt noted that at one time we discussed equipment and hiring our own: maintenance crew and asked ifthat is still being considered. Councilman Rigsbee stated that we don'tknow how much al building will cost and it will be next summer before its built. Let's get thel building done sO we will have aj place to Mrs. Thacker then moved onto the Water Fund. She explained the average used for backflow fees. Investment fees same as general fund. She explained her projections for Taps & Connections fees, Water Capacity Fees and Water Sales. She noted a decrease in late fees due to Covid although we are coming out oft that now. Total income was estimated to be $527,000. Mrs. Thacker stated that the $1.1 million mentioned earlier was not included since she felt that it was up to the Council to decide where that money is to be spent. Councilman Foy recommended expense for this coming up election in November. store the equipment then work on that. adding a line-item titled House Bill 436 and include the amount. 3 Council discussed whether or not this grant amount should be included ini the budget. It was noted that the money comes in and out SO it balances out for our budget. The Council and staff pointed out the requirements that must be met to get this money that seems tol be guaranteed. By consensus the Council agreed to include the grant as a separate line item. Mrs. Thacker stated that for Water Purchased she used what was purchased last year and the year to date for this year to come up with an estimate. She explained what is included under Contracted Operations. Under the Engineering & Infrastructure Consulting, we. have finished up Mrs. Thacker stated that most oft the remaining line items are mostly fixed however, explained Salaries. She explained that this is Gary's salary, $10,000. She looked at the last couple ofyears Mrs. Thacker noted a zero amount in line item 13005 for Water Line/Meter Installation and recommended that be merged with 13008 Water Line Repair. All agreed. Town Clerk Houck pointed out that most oft the bills from Yates are for contract work, but sometimes we get a call for a watermain leak that the Town pays: for. The bills are broken down for each item and sometimes we are billed separately for these type events, She explained that Mrs. Hunsucker checks these bills with our workorders to make sure they balance out. The Council discussed the line item for Electronic Water Meters Changeout. Town Clerk stated that Water Works that provides our meters has offered to do a study to seei if we could save money by changing out the meters and have a central system read the meters instead oft them riding around to read them. However, it was going to be thousands of dollars. She and Mrs. Thacker discussed what was spent previously and year to date. They agreed that this amount is Mayor Flynt reminded everyone that Hazen & Sawyer will be coming in with a proposal shortly and felt we should take some money out ofreserves to close up some oft these loops around town. He added that they looked at replacing the meters with the electronic ones several years ago and noted that iti is a safety issue with] people reading these meters on busy highways. Not sure how much it would cost to switch them out but would like this to be looked into. Councilman Foy stated that ifthis would be a permissible expense, we could use the grant money. Mayor Pro Tem Hooks added that it would improve the quality of our water by not having dead ends and more consistent inspections. It was noted that the Town still has approximately 400 of the old meters and 200 auto read meters. It was noted that the life span of atransponder is about 10 years, and it would bel best to stagger them, so they don'tgo out at the same time. Council was interested in getting more: information and figures on this matter. A line item 16001 was added for Meter Changeout in the amount of $25,000. Staff will pull Mrs. Thacker then briefly explained the changes in both funds and stated that we are out of balance by $23,531.20. Where do you want to pull this money from? Mayor Pro Tem. Hooks some projects and this amount should cover the costs that are left. and felt it would be under that amount. sufficient. information together and email out to the Council. 4 stated that wel have two more meetings to work on the budget and asked for new: sheets to reflect Council discussed the current number of water customers and what increase the Town might see Mrs. Thacker stated that she will update her sheets and email out to Council. Councilman Foy asked that on the Balance Sheet presented to the Council at their monthly meetings, show the current rate of return and maturity date for the CR's. Mrs. Thacker agreed. The Town Clerk stated that the next meeting is April 20th. what has been discussed tonight. over the next year. It was decided to base figures on 650 customers. 3. Citizen Comments None presented. 4. Adjournment. Mayor Flynt made a Motion to adjourn the meeting. Councilman Landreth seconded the motion and the vote was all: for and motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:401 PM. Approved: John Flynt, Mayor Attest: Dale F. Martin (Interim Town Clerk at time ofs signing) 5 August 9, 2021 Mayor & Town Council Town of Stokesdale 8325 Angel Pardue Road Stokesdale, NC: 27357 Mayor and Council Members, The Stokesdale Planning Board held their regular meeting on Thursday, July 22, 2021. At that meeting, the Board's agenda contained a rezoning request Case #21-06-STPL-05566 for property located at 6905 US Highway 158. A public hearing was held in accordance with the Stokesdale Development Ordinance and the NC General Statutes. Following is an excerpt oft the draft minutes that meeting: Chairman Jones introduced the following item and deferred to Mr. Bass for the Staff Report. Located on south side ofNC Highway 158, approximately 400: feet west of Ellison Road intersection, Guilford County Tax Parcel 150698. This is a request to rezone a portion of said property that fronts Ellison Road from HB-Highway Business to RS-30, Single-family residential, approximately 0.82 ofa approximately 1.44 acres. Applicant: Lucie Wilson Joyner. Mr. Oliver Bass, Guilford County Planning presented the Staff report for this rezoning request. He described the location ofthe property which fronts on Ellison Rd. The portion fronting on Ellison Road is requested to be rezoned from HB to RS-30, single-family residential, approximately .82 acres. He described the RS-30 district as primarily for moderate density single-family residential in areas without access to public water and wastewater services with a density of1.3 units per acre or less. He described the HB-Highway Business district as primarily intended to accommodate retail services and distributive uses that are typically located along thoroughfares with high visibility and good road access. He further described the area as an area with mixed uses ofc commercial and residential with ai non-conforming single-family dwelling Mr. Bass stated that the olessomiMamufnctumg Corridor is planned for this area along US Hwy. 158 east and terminates at the intersection ofUS Hwy. 158 and US 220. He added that this Rezoning Case # 21-6-STPL-05566: 6905 US Highway 158 located on the adjacent property. 1 property conforms to the Stokesdale Land Use Plan because the Polrsoma/Miamuhcturing Corridor recognizes that the corridor contains existing residential uses. Chairman Jones declared the public hearing open. In] Favor Mr. Anthony Vaughan, Attorney for Lucie W. Joyner, stated that he prepared this request on behalf oft the Joyners. He noted that this is behind Parker's Restaurant and thati it meets all setbacks for the HB and residential districts. He made himselfavailable: for questions. Opposed None presented. Chairman Tim Jones made a Motion toi recommend approval of the rezoning request Case #21- 06-STPL-05566 asi recommended by the Planning Staffand in conformance with the Stokesdale Land use Plan. Mark Nadel seconded the motion and the vote was all for and motion carried. As noted in the minutes, the Planning Board recommends approval of this rezoning request. Respectfully submitted, Dale F. Martin Interim Town Clerk DFM/ 2 Town Ordinance Applicant: Lucie Wilson Joyner Case #21-06-STPL-05566 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF STOKESDALE, NC TOWN OF STOKESDALE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND' THE BEITORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Stokesdale as follows: SECTION 1. The Town of Stokesdale Zoning Map be amended by changing the zoning of property BEGINNING at aj point, the common corner ofLots 1 &2oft the Family Trust ofLucie Wilson Joyner lands as shown on that map titled "Parker Joyner & wife Lucy Wilson Joyner" by Vaughn Surveying Co.a and recorded in P.B.91 - Pg, 124, same being the southwest corner ofLot 1; thence with common lines ofLots 1 & 2 the following courses and distances; north 84 deg. 58 min. 37 sec. east 219.25 feet; south 62 deg. 50 min. 48 sec. east 12.26 feet to a point in the north right of way of Ellison Rd.; thence with the right ofway ofl Ellison Rd. south 30 deg. 17min. 01 sec. west 244.96 feet tot the common corner ofLots 28 &3ofJ Joyner as shown on P.B. 91 - Pg. 124; thence with their common line north 81 deg. 17 min. 49: sec. west 133.91 feet to a point; thence along new. lines through Lot 2 the following courses and distances; north 09 deg. 00 min. 17 sec. east 103.21 feet; north 31 deg. 51 min. 43 sec. east 24.04 feet; Being aj portion ofLot 2 ofthe Family Trust ofLucie Wilson Joyner lands as shown on that map titled "Parker. Joyner & wife Lucy Wilson Joyner" by Vaughn Surveying Company and recorded in P.B. 91 = BEING KNOWN AND DESIGNATED as property located at 6905 US Highway 158, containing 0.82+/- of approximately 1.44-/- acres as recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, Guilford described below to' Town of Stokesdale RS-30. north 02 deg. 20: min. 48 sec. west 55.36 feet to the BEGINNING. Pg. 124. See also D.B. 4642-Pg. 1588. County, North Carolina. SECTION2. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its adoption. Adopted this the 12th day of August, 2021. John Flynt, Mayor ATTEST: Dale F. Martin, Town Clerk REZONING CASE 21-06-STPL-05566: 6905 NC HIGHWAY 158 FROM HBTO RS-30 Property Specifics Located on south side of NC Highway 158, approximately 4001 feet west of Ellison Road intersection, Guilford County Tax Parcel 150698. This is a request to rezone a portion of said property that fronts Ellison Road from HB-Highway Business to RS-30, singlefamlyres.denta, approximately 0.82 ofa approximately 1.44 acres. Applicant: Lucie Wilson. Joyner. Zoning History of Denied Cases: There is no history of denied cases. Nature of the Request Thisi isar request to rezone a portion of property from HB, Highway Business to RS-30, Single- family residential. This request would rezone approximately 0.82 acres fronting Ellison Road and leave remaining approximately 0.60 acres zoned HB. Applicant/Owner: Lucie Wilson Joyner District Descriptions RS-30 residential single-family district. The RS-30, residential single-family district is primarily intended to accommodate moderate density single-family detached dwellings lots in areas without access to public water and wastewater services. The overall gross density in RS-30 areas willi typically be 1.3 units per acre or less. Any proposed major subdivision, as defined in Section 2-1, int this district will be required to connect to the Town of Stokesdale public water HB highway business district. The HB, highway business district is primarily intended to accommodate those retail service and distributive uses which are typically! located along thoroughfares. The district is established to provide locations for establishments which require high visibility and good road access, or which cater primarily to passing motorists. Developments int this district generally have substantial front setbacks. system. (Ord. 0-2021-020) CharacterdftheArea The area has a mix of commercial and residential uses. Although zoned HB, subject property and adjacent property north each has a nonconforming single-family dwelling. Existing Land Use(s) on the Property: building on portion fronting NC Highway 90. Asingle-family residential dwelling on portion fronting Ellison Road. Vacant commercial Surrounding Uses: 1 North: Single-family resident South: Commercial East: Industrial West: Industrial Historic Properties: There are no inventoried Historic Properties located on or neart the property. No cemeteries are. shown to be located on these parcels. Efforts should be made to rule out the potential of unknown grave sites. Infrastructure: and CommunityFaclities Emergency Response: Fire Protection District: Stokesdale Fire Department Miles from Fire Station: Approximately 2.9 miles Provider: Private: Septic Systems and Wells Public Water and Sewer: Stokesdale Water not available Water and Sewer Services: Transportation: Existing Conditions: Collector street; Traffic Count: Not available in vicinity Proposed Improvements: None Projected Traffic Generation: Not applicable Environmental Assessment Topography: Gently tor moderately sloped Regulated Floodplain: There are no regulated floodplains on the property. Streams and' Watershed: Mapped stream along southern boundary. The: site is not in a protected water supplywatershed. Land Use Analysis Land Use Plan: Stokesdale Future Land Use Plan (2007) Plan Recommendation: The Future Land Use Plan designates this area for rolessona/Manufactuning Corridor. The Polesona/Aanuhactumng corridor is planned to provide an area for the growth of office space and light manufacturing services that is consistent with current uses. This corridor would start at the eastern edge of the Town Core on US Hwy 158, follow US Hwy 158 east and terminate at the intersection of US Hwy 158 and US 220. The northern and southern borders of 2 the Polesona/Manuhactunng corridor are identical to the borders oft the scenic corridor. Currently this portion of US Hwy 158 contains industrial, highway business, office, residential and agricultural areas. No new industrial areas are proposed due toi the number of areas currently zoned but undeveloped. Consistency: uses. The proposed use is consistent with the Stokesdale Land Use Plan because the rolessona/Menuiactunng Corridor recognizes thati the corridor contains existingr residential Recommendation: Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval The request is reasonable and in the public interest because the olesiona/Manufactunmg Corridor recognizes that existing residential uses are located within the corridor. The parcel has an existing single-family dwelling as a nonconforming use and structure int the HB district. The parent tract was subdivided into a 3-lot subdivision in 1988, and 2 lots were under a residential zoning. One additional parcel can be divided from this tract and qualify as a minor subdivision and therefore would not require connection to the Stokesdale water: system per newly adopted Ifapproved, an amendment tot the Stokesdale Future Land Use Map will not be required. standards oft the Stokesdale Development Ordinance. 3 DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING FAMILYTRUST OF LUCY WILSON JOYNER BEGINNING at ap point, the common corner of Lots 18 &20 oft the Family Trust of Lucie Wilson. Joyner lands as shown on that mapi titled "Parker, Joyner & wife Lucy Wilson Joyner" by Vaughn Surveying Co. and recorded in P.B.91-P Pg, 124, same belng the southwest corner of Lot 1; thence with common lines of Lots1 & 2 the south 62 deg. 50 min. 48 sec east 12.26 feett to a point int the north right of way of Ellison Rd; thence with the right of way of Ellison Rd south 30 deg. 17 min. 01 sec. west: 244.96 feet toi the common corner ofl Lots 2&3of Joyner as shown on P.B. 91 - Pg. 124; thence with their common line north 81 deg. 17 min. 49 sec. west 133.91 feet to a point; thence along new lines through Lot 21 thei following courses and distances: north 09 deg. 00 min, 17: sec. east 103.21 feet; north 31 deg. 51 min 43 sec. east 24.04 feet; north 02 deg. 20 following courses and distances: north 84 deg. 58 min 37 sec. east 219.25feet; min, 48 sec. west! 55.361 feet to the BEGINNING. Being a portion ofl Lot 2 of the Family Trust of Lucie Wilson. Joyner lands as shown on that map titled "Parker Joyner & wife Lucy Wilson. Joyner" by' Vaughn Surveying Company and recorded in P.B.91-Pg. 124. See also D.B. 4642- Pg. 1588. TOWN OF STOKESDALE Rezoning Application Date Submitted: Fee/Receipt: #: $1000.00 + $25.00 per acre Case Number: al-B-S7rO556 Provide the required information as indicated below. Pursuant to the Stokesdale. Development Ordinance, this application will not be processedi until application) fees are paid; thej form below is completed and signed; and all required maps, plans and documents have been submitted to the satisfaction ofthe Enforcement Officer. Additional. sheets for tax references ands signature blocks are available upon requesi. Pursuant to the Stokesdale Development Ordinance, the undersigned hereby requests the Town ofStokesdalet to rezone the MAKE CHECKI PAYABLETO: TMETOMNOPSTOASDALE property described below from the_ HB zoning district tot the_ RS-30 zoning district. Said property is located 6905 us Hwy 158 in_Bruce Township; Being at total of 0'820_acres. Further referenced oni the Guilford County Tax Maps as: Tax Parcel # 15668(B4 Tax Parcel # Tax Parcel # Tax Parcel # Check One: D The property requested for rezoning is an entire parcel or parcels as shown on the Guilford County Tax Map. Thep property requested forr rezoning is aj portion ofap parcel or parcels as shown on the Guilford County Tax Map;a written legal description oftheproperty: and ar map are attached. Check One Thea applicant is the property owner(s) The applicant is an agent representing the property owner(s); the letter ofproperty owner permission is attached. The applicant has an option toj purchase or lease the property; a copy ofthe offer toj purchase or lease is attached The applicant has no connection tot thep property owner and is requesting at third party rezoning. (financial figures may be deleted). Ihereby agree lo conform to all applicable lavs ofStokesdale and the. State fNorth Carolina and certify that the information, provided is complete and accurate to! thel best ofmy kowledge. Iacknowledge. that byf filing this application, representatives) fom Guilford County Planning and Development may enter the subject property for the purpose ofi investigation and analysis of this request. Respestfully Submitted, Fs Abalaau Representative! Signature Name Mailing Address City, State and Zip Code Phonel Number Gugr EMy WilsanTopa Zo/lo Elisanli Mailing Address City, State and ZipCode Phonel Number ShKLACZNS7 324-444-6350 BAFSBa@ssBasIS 2 B 9 fonu Oy Moans Adjacent Property South Subject Property Looking South on Ellison - NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING CASE ACTION FROM:. TIME: TO: RS-30 B325 DATE: 722/202 - N rtormatoe APET STOKESDALE Ka srlistn Guilford County! 13 Lis t 8 5 Subject Property TOLa August 9, 2021 Mayor & Town Council Town of Stokesdale 8325 Angel Pardue Road Stokesdale, NC: 27357 Mayor and Council Members, The Stokesdale Planning Board held their regular meeting on Thursday, July 22, 2021. At that meeting, the Board's agenda contained a text amendment Case #21-07-STPL-05973: Warehouse, Self-Storage as Permitted Use in GB and HB districts. A public hearing was. held in accordance with the Stokesdale Development Ordinance and the NC General Statutes. Following is an excerpt of the draft minutes that meeting: Text Amendment Case 21-07-Stp-05973: Warehouse, Self-Storage As Permitted Use In The Town of Stokesdale Planning Board will hold aj public hearing to consider a recommendation on text amendments to the Stokesdale Development Ordinance as follows: Amend Section 4-3, Table 4-3-1 PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE) to remove Warehouse (Self- storage) as a use permitted in the GB and HB zoning districts, and Amend Section 6-4 to remove Subsection 6-4.91, Warehouse (Self-storage) development standards for GB and HB. Chairman Jones introduced the Text Amendment and deferred to Mr. Bass for the Staff Report. Mr. Bass, Guilford County Planning presented the Staffr report for this Text Amendment that was proposed at the June Town Council meeting. He explained that the amendment will eliminate warehouse, self-storage uses in the GB and HB districts. This use will only be allowed in LI& HI districts. Hei noted that Subsection 6-4.91 Warehouse (Self-storage) development standards for GB and HB will be removed. He added that if approved, Warehouse, Self-storage will only be allowed in the LI and HI districts. Any application submitted on or after the effective date of Mr. Bass stated that this is aj policy decision and therefore Staff does not offer ai recommend in Gb And Hb Districts this amendment will be subject to the new regulations. favor or opposed. Chairman Jones declared the public hearing open. Ini favor 1 Mr. John Flynt, 8133 Belews Creek Rd., reminded the Board ofthe two rezoning cases recently heard by the Planning Board and Town Council. Hej pointed out that the first case had been unanimous was conditional use Highway Business and the applicant inferred that it would be a professional office building. They can back in and asked for mini storage units. He stated that mini-storage units are permitted in HB district with design standards and pointed out some ofthose standards. He stated that the second case was for property on1 the other side of] Haw River and the applicant came in and was clear about the intended purpose for mini storage units. However, ini the meeting our Attorney pointed out that this case with for HB zoning and not just mini storage units. Mr. Flynt stated that he believes our original intent of our Land Use plan was tol limit storage tol LI and HI, ai more appropriate zone. He added that everything has its place and that mini storage facilities do not mix with residential uses. He wanted to make sure that the two facilities already approved are grandfathered in and allowed to go: forward. Hel believes this amendment is consistent with most towns. Opposed Cecil Little, 2006 Guilford College Rd. Jamestown, stated that he is neutral on the matter. He stated that his concern is that his case approved last month is grandfathered and he is allowed to move forward with his project. He spoke withl his Attorney and was told that he would have to submit a sitej plan or he could be subject to the new regulations and his zoning case could be void Mr. Little wanted some assurance that this would not affect him. He added that he has spent a lot oftime and money on his project. His plans are currently being drawn up but may be several weeks or longer before they can be submitted. He again asked for some assurance that he would Mark Nadel stated that Mr. Litle'sapplication was submitted prior to this change and felti it should have no effect on1 this project whatsoever. He asked ifthis is correct. Mr. Bass explained that zoning does not establish any vesting unless it is a conditional use rezoning. This rezoning was general use and that if their plans have not been submitted and fees paid prior to the effective date oft this amendment, Mr. Little would be subject to the new regulations. He further stated that vesting is established by an approved site plan. Mr. Little again stated that this is what he understood from his Attorney and that is why is here ifthis is approved prior to us getting our plans submitted and approved. be allowed to move forward with his project. tonight speaking on1 this matter. Chairman Jones asked if anyone else in the audience or online wanted to speak. John Flynt requested ai rebuttal and stated that he did not want toj put Mr. Little's project at risk and felt the Town should. honor his request that was approved last month. He suggested putting an effective day out in the future to allow him time to submit his site plan for approval. The Town Attorney Tom Medlin stated that ift the Board is considering making a motion in favor, he stated that the Board could delay the effective date oft the text amendment to some point 2 in the future such as December 1st. This would give Mr. Little and anyone else working on something time to get their site plan submitted, fees paid so1 they are protected. Mr. Angel asked ifl December was adequate time for Mr. Little to submit his plans for approval. Mr. Little stated yes, that should work fine for us but expressed his concern that it might subject the town to another: request during that time period. He asked Mr. Bass ifthey could submit a preliminary plan. Mr. Bass stated that it would. not be sufficient, that a detailed plan addressing all requirements, watershed, stormwater, building details, parking etc. must be submitted. Mr. Little then stated that drawing plans do take time and suggested January 1 might be al better timeframe. Chairman Jones declared the public hearing closed. Chairman Jones made a Motion to oppose the text amendment. Motion dies for lack of second. Mr. Nadel made a Motion to approve the Text Amendment Case 21-07-STPL-05973 as Chairman Jones felt that we arel headed down the road to micro-managing small businesses. He noted that the Town requires buffers, landscaping etc. to protect surround property and didn't feel qualified to determinel how many storage facilities Stokesdale should have. He added that the two storage facilities that have been mentioned are to be built on. Hwy. 68 and he didn't believe anyone would build aj private residence there given the traffic. He felt both locations were appropriate. He is in favor ofa diversified Stokesdale and could not support this proposed. Mr. Hommel seconded the motion. amendment. Mr. Greene stated that he would liket to be sure that the motion includes a date. He then asked Mr. Nadel stated that he was: not willing to set the effective date. He stated that we don'tknow if there are other cases out there being worked on at this time. He felt that February is too long. The Planning Board recommended the storage facility be denied however, Town Council Mr. Nadel asked ifv we can we approve this with this case already in the process being exempt. He wanted to see this gentleman protected. H added that we: may be opening the door for more Mr. Greene stated that there may be another project out there and this would give them time to get their projects in, he didn't believe we would have cases popping up now. Mr. Nadel asked Mr. Medlin if we can approve this with an exception since Mr. Little is already in the process, that he is exempt from it. This would prevent others from coming in. This puts the that the motion be amended tol have an effective date of Feb 1,2 2022. overruled the Board and approved it. cases down the road. regulations inj place but protects this gentleman's interest. 3 Mr. Medlin stated that what you are talking about is a grandfather type clause that says ifyou are already zoned GB or HB that your right to use self-storage would be preserved prior to the date ofthe amendment. He added that this will apply to everybody. Ifyou have other areas already zoned they could puti in self-storage as they would be grandfathered. He stated that he would not recommend that but would recommend an effective date down the road. Ifanything comes in in the meantime, they must be already zoned and submit a site plan or they have to come: in for rezoning. The Town will have some control over that timing. He added that the Town could also pass ai moratorium on self-storage uses ifyou want toj put a stop to it until thisi is in place. He stated that setting an effective date may do it. Those that are concerned about this change, showed up to night and you can give him time to get his site plan submitted. Mark Nadel then amended the Motion to establish an effective date of. January 1,2022. Stewart Mr. Angel asked what recourse Mr. Little would have ifk he ran: into some obstacles with this hard date inj place. Mr. Medlin state that Mr. Bass may be able to answer better but he would have to get his site plan ready and submitted and pay his fees and then tweak it. Worst case scenario he would come back to the Board and say he couldn'tdo it that time frame and needs Light Industrial rezoning with a conditional use or something like that. Ifhe needs to come back and Mr. Bass stated that ifhe can submit ai reasonable site plan we understand there might be slight modifications necessary. Once he comes in with his plan and pays his fees, then he can proceed under the current ordinance. Ifnot, he could come in with a conditional zoning then that would set things in place for him. However, he could not submit a rezoning on the same property within Hommel agreed to the amendment. ask for assistance he can do sO. ayear. Vote Aye: Mark Nadel, Stewart Hommel, James Greene, Bruce Angel. Vote Nay: Tim Jones. Approved: 4-1 As noted in the minutes, the Planning Board recommends approval of this rezoning request. Respectfully submitted, Dale F. Martin Interim Town Clerk DFM/ 4 TOWN OF STOKESDALE ORDINANCE NO. 0-2021- AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING THE' TOWN OF STOKESDALE SECTION 4-3, Table 4-3-1 (PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE) AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 6-4, SUBSECTION 6-4.91 WHEREAS, the Town of Stokesdale desires to have orderly growth toj protect the health, safety, WHEREAS, the Development Ordinance of the Town of Stokesdale is hereby amended as follows: Amend Section 4-3, TABLE 4-3-1 (PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE) of' Town of Stokesdale Development Remove Warehouse (Self-storage) as a use permitted in the GB and HB zoning districts, and Amend Section 6- 4t tor remove Subsection 6-4.91, Warehouse (Self-storage) development standards for GB and HB. and welfare ofits residents and businesses; and Ordinance and Section 6-4.91 as follows: Adopted this12th day of August, 2021. John Flynt, Mayor Attest: Dale F. Martin, Interim Town Clerk TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #21-07-STPL-05973: WAREHOUSE, SELF STORAGE AS PERMITTED USE IN GB AND HB DISTRICTS Natureofthe Request The Town of Stokesdale proposes a text amendment to the Stokesdale Development Ordinance that will remove Warehouse, Self-Storage as a use permitted in the GB, General Business and the HB, Highway Business Amend Section 4-3, Table 4-3-1 (PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE) to remove Warehouse (Self-storage) as a use permitted in Amend Section 6-41 to remove Subsection 6-4.91, Warehouse (Self-storage) development. standards for GB and HB. development standards associated with Warehouse (Self-storage) in the GB and HB zoning districts, which zoning district. For this purpose, the following are being considered. the GB and HB: zoning districts, currently reads as follows: 6-4.91 Warehouse (self-storage). (A) Where required. GB and HB districts. (B) Minimum size. Minimum lot size shall be two acres. (C) Maximum. size. Maximum lots size shall bet five acres. (D) Lot coverage. The total ground area covered by buildings shall not exceed 50 percent of thes site. (E) Maximum height. Maximum height of building(s) shall be 201 feet. (F) Storage. 1) No outside storage shall be permitted. 2) Storage of hazardous, toxic or explosive substances shall be prohibited. (G) Operation. 1) No business activity other than the rental of storage units shall be conducted on the premises. 2) One residential dwelling unit shall be allowed on the same lot for use as a caretaker dwelling. Ifapproved, Warehouse, self -storage will only be allowed int the Lla and HI zoning district. Applications submitted on or after the effective date oft the amendment will be subject to the new regulations. Conditionally zoned property will be subject to the approved conditions. PlanConsistency, Ina adopting a text amendment, the Planning Board must comment, and the Town Council must make a statement whether the proposed amendment is consistent or inconsistent with the Town of Stokesdale Comprehensive Plan. The town may consider whether the proposed text amendments is supported by the 1 vision statement of the Stokesdale Land Use Plan (see below) and the policies of the adopted Future Land Use Plan. VISION STATEMENT Stokesdale should be a town that is quie! and altractive that promotes the "small lown" natre oft the community. Effort should be made to preserve, malntain, and enhance the rural character, natural habital, and beanly oft the community, There should be a sense of community through both, formal and informal association. Residential development should enhançe the community through appropriate neighborhood design, connectivity, and environmental proteclion of the town's natural resources, The historic nafure ofthe town, especially its downtown, should be preserved and maintained through the addition of businesses and services that cater 10 the citizens and are in harmony with existing development. Bffort should be made to create and cnhance the sense of a vibrant communily that is sqfe and convenient for all citizens. The town should promote alternative modes of fransportatlon, including pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian movement throughout the community. 2 Hazena and Sawyer Greensboro, NC27408-3362927490 Hazen 620 Green Valley Rd, Suite 101 July 8, 2021 Mr. John Flynt, Mayor Town of Stokesdale 8325 Angel Pardue Rd Stokesdale, NC 27292 Re: Proposal for Boone Meadows Water Main Extension Dear Mr. Flynt: Hazen and Sawyer is pleased to submit this proposal for the design, permitting, and limited construction administration for the proposed water main extension along Ellisboro Road, and through the proposed Boone Meadows Development along Cornelius Court and South Point Drive. Project Information The Town of Stokesdale (Town) requires a water main extension from the end oft the existing water line near the intersection of Ellisboro Road (NCSR 2046) and NC Highway 65, along Ellisboro Rd, to provide waters servicet to thej proposed Boone Meadows Development. This project would also involve an additional water main extension through the new development, along Cornelius Court and South Point Drive, and would tie-in again tot the existing system int the adjacent development along Deer Path Court. Providing this This project is comprised of several capital improvement projects (CIPs) identified in the Town's Water System Master Plan. The water main extension along Ellisboro Rd comprises CIP project 3011 and a portion of CIP 5011; the segment of water main through Boone Meadows is an alternate project for CIP 9004, which was recommended to address deficient fire flows along Deer Path Court. Prior modeling efforts, as part of the Town's Master Plan, indicated that the water main extension along Ellisboro Road should consist of8 8-inch pipe. Modeling also indicated that a 6-inch extension through thel Boone Meadows Development, to thet tie-in along Deer Path Court, would be: sufficient to address deficient firei flows. This proposal is for the design, permitting and limited construction administration services necessary to provide an engineer's certification to PWS for the installation of approximately 2,200 If of 8-inch pipe along Ellisboro Rd, approximately 1,750 If of 6-inch pipe through Boone Meadows, and related appurtenances. The proposed route of the project is shown on the following page in Figure 1. loop willi improve water quality and pressure in this area. hazenandsawyer.com Hazen Cornelius Ct Boone Meadows (Under Construction) ES Prop. 8-in Water Approx. 2,200 LF CIP 3011 + CIP 5011 An Prop. 6-in Water Approx. 1,750 LF Alt. to CIP 9004 Legend Bi-Rite Market (Under Construction) Prop. Water Main Size 6-inch 8-inch Boone Meadows Development Ex Elev. Tank Ex Pipes 1inch = 500f feet Figure 1. Exhibit of proposed project The following project tasks are included in thej project scope of work: Task 100 Preliminary Engineering Upon notice to proceed, Hazen will immediately begin field investigations and data collection activities. An in-person investigation of the proposed corridor will be completed to identify specific project challenges, necessary route adjustments, utility coordination needs, and collect other pertinent information for detailed design. Survey, geotechnical, and environmental investigations will also occur during Preliminary Engineering phase to further assist with detailed design efforts. Specific field data collection Surveying: A local surveyor will conduct topographical and partial property mapping of the project corridor. Ground: survey efforts will include collection of field datai including, but notl limited to the location of above and below ground utilities, mailboxes, poles/guy wires, structures, property boundaries, and other pertinent items int the project corridor. Utility locates will be performed by 811 services. activities include: Town ofs Stokesdale Boone Meadows Water Main Extension 2 Hazen Geotechnical Investigations: A local geotechnical engineering firm will conduct a limited geotechnical investigation along the pipeline corridor to determine bearing capacities, trenching/backfil! requirements, rock depth, and other critical information to be considered during detailed design. The geotechnical investigation will include the following: Review ofreadily available geologic information relative to the project corridor. Perform (5)geotechnical borings along thej proposed alignment using al hollow-stem auger or mud- rotary drilling techniques to advance the boring. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) will be performed at a nominal interval of5 feet. Boring depths at the roadway crossing willl be 15-ft deep, Perform laboratory testing program on selected samples recovered from thel borings at the roadway crossings. (2) sets ofs soil classification tests consisting of Atterberg Limits, #200 wash, and water Evaluate findings of geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing relative to the proposed pipeline construction and impacts due to rock and groundwater. Evaluations include soft soil considerations, excavation characteristics, andi reuse ofc on-site soils as suitable backfill. Provide a written report summarizing all geotechnical evaluations. Information included in the report shall include, but not bel limited to, descriptions ofs subsurface conditions encountered, rock depth, groundwater considerations, recommendations for dewatering, earth pressure coefficients, expected excavation requirements, and reuse ofe existing soils for trench backfill. Environmental Delineation and Impact Analysis: Wetland and environmental impacts will be identified and evaluated as aj part of the preliminary engineering efforts. All limits ofw wetlands delineated during this phase will be surveyed andi included within the design drawings. Additional environmental considerations (areas of potential soil contamination, septic fields, private drinking wells, etc.)i identified while other borings at non-crossing locations will terminate at 10-ft deep. content have been included. Record ground water elevations encountered: at the end ofe each boring. during this] phase will be accounted for during detailed design. Task 200 - Detailed Design and Permitting The detailed design phase oft this project consists oft the following: Design drawings will build off preliminary engineering phase efforts and include pertinent information required for bidding and construction of the new pipeline. Specific information included in each phase of design drawings will include, but not be limited to, the following: Plan and profile oft thej pipeline Pressure class and restraint requirements Isolation and air/vacuum valve placement Trenchless crossing details Traffic control Erosion Control Standard details Paving and site restoration requirements Hazen will develop project specifications, which will fulfill the criteria provided in the Town's water system guidance document. Hazen will supplement as needed with the use of Division 50 specifications. Town of Stokesdale Boone Meadows' Water Main] Extension 3 Hazen Hazen will conduct an internal quality control and constructability review to ensure that the Hazen will review construction drawings and specifications with the Town prior to issuing the Hazen will include a $5,000 allowance to provide easement figures and assist in the procurement ofeasements. This cost excludes any legal procedures required to procure the property. Hazen will provide an opinion of probably cost at the 30% and 100% deliverable milestones for Hazen will prepare and submit the application for an Authorization to Construct Permit for the Public Water Supply Section OfNCDEQ. This application willi include the construction drawings, project specifications, and a copy of the Town's Water System Management Plan (WSMP). This application also requires a Supplemental Engineer's Report, which will utilize the hydraulic modeling conducted as part of the master plan, to demonstrate that the proposed design is Hazen will prepare and submit the application for a Right-of-Way Encroachment Agreement (Form 16.1 Two-Party Utility Primary and Secondary Highways, Non-Controlled Access) to the Hazen will prepare and submit the application for an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Permit tot the Land Quality Section ofNCDEQ, since the total area ofl land disturbance for this project Hazen will modify construction drawings and project specifications based on comments from The cost of permit application fees has been included in the scope and fees as an allowance for reimbursable expenses to expedite the permitting process. Hazen will issue the check to cover these costs and will invoice for the expense on the next monthly invoice request. proposed project meets all municipal and state regulations. plans to permitting agencies. project planning. The permitting phase of this project consists oft the following: sufficient. NCDOT. This is an online submittal process. will exceed one acre. permitting agencies (NCDEQ PWS, LQS, NCDOT). Task 300 - Bid Phase Services Hazen will provide advertisement and bid phase support for this project, which includes attending a pre- bid meeting, addressing contractor questions, issuing addenda, reviewing bid packages for responsiveness, preparing certified bid tabulations, providing a recommendation of award, and assisting with contract execution. Services will include scope for one round ofbidding. Task 400 - Limited Construction Administration Ifauthorized, Hazen will assist the Town's project representative with limited construction administration services required to certify thej project to NCDEQ PWS. This task includes time for assistance with review ofsubmittals (up to 161 hrs total), the equivalent of five (5) full-day site visits (upt to 401 hrs total) to monitor construction activities, coordination with the Town's resident project representative (RPR) (up to 24 hrs total), and furnishing as-built drawings at the completion of construction activities. Hazen will provide the Engineer's Certification of Project Completion to NCDEQ PWS. Town of Stokesdale Boonel Meadows Water Main Extension Hazen Proposed Fee Wej propose a not to exceed fee of $99,800 for the services described above. We will bill by the hour and only for time spent on the project. This amount includes reimbursable expenses; subconsultants will be charged at cost + 10%. PROPOSED NOT' TO EXCEED CONTRACT TASKI 1.00-E ENGINEERING TASK 2.00-E EASEMENTS $52,300 $5,000 $30,000 $11,000 $1,500 $99,800 TASK 3.00-S SURVEYING AND GEOTECHNICAL, ALLOWANCE TASK 4.00-LIMITED CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION REIMBURSIBLES (PERMIT FEES, FUEL, REPROGRAPHICS TOTAL For all phases, we propose billing by the hour at the following rates: $250 per hour for Associate/Vice Presidents $210 per hour for Senior Associates $180 per hour for Associates $155 per hour for Senior Principal Engineers $130 per hour for Principal Engineers $115 per hour for Assistant Engineers $145 per hour for Senior Principal Designers $100 per hour for Principal Designers $75 per hour for Administrators All reimbursable expenses will be billed without ai markup, including mileage at the approved IRS rate. Town ofs Stokesdale Boonel Meadows Water Main] Extension Hazen Schedule Hazen will complete the design, permitting and bidding in approximately 61 months from the date of notice toj proceed (NTP) by the Town, as shown below by project milestones: Project Milestone Receive Notice to Proceed (NTP) Conduct preliminary engineering efforts, survey, and limited geotechnical investigation Schedule Days Weeks 0 11 4 6 2 75 30 45 14 Design Permitting Start Construction Please call if youl have any questions about our proposal. Wel look forward to working with you. Very truly yours, HAZEN AND SAWYER ASORR Aaron D. Babson, PE Senior Associate Accepted by: Date: (Signature) Towno of Stokesdale Boone Meadows Water Main] Extension KENNERLY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. August 5, 2021 Derek Foy Town Council Member Town of Stokesdale (919) 389-6493 eareyépcaiacon RE: P21-055 Proposal for Civil Engineering Design Services for a Proposed 8i in. Water Line Extension approximately 2,300 LF connecting Hwy 65 along Ellisboro Rd, bringing service to the Boones Landing Subdivision in the Town of Stokesdale, NC Mr. Foy Kennerly Engineering & Design, Inc. (KED) is pleased to offer yout this proposal top provide Civil Engineering Water Line Design Services ont the above referenced project as described below: INCLUSIONS Service -I: Design Services Cover Sheet Existing Conditions Overall Site Plan Plan & Profile of Water Line Details Specifications Calculations Service - I: Bidding Services Bid documents, review of bids submissions, andi recommendation of contractor to client a) Bidding services are estimated on al Per Bid basis. Ifay project requires rebid, additional bid fees will apply. One bid process will include assistance with advertisements, pre-bid conference, issuance of addenda, document distribution, answering questions from bidders for client, Assisting the owner in securing bids, attending bid opening, preparation of bid tabulation and preparation of Contract Documents. EXCLUSIONS PRICES: Geotechnical Testing Land Surveying Services Service -Iwill be provided for Lump Sum Fee of. Service - Il willl be provided for Lump Sum Fee of. The services listed above are offered by al Lump Sum Total Fee of. application permit fees. See Reimbursables below. REIMBURSABLES: Permitting fee for PWS Application fee: $11,500 $ 6,500 per Bid $18,000 These fees include construction plans and coordination with Local and State Agencies as necessary for permitting, response to review comments from agencies andi resubmittal for Permit Issuance. These fees do noti include $150.00 Phone: 336.775.2118 Fax: 336.764.0797 wmalemefyemenerngson 12133 N.HWY150, Ste.F Winston-Salem, NC27127 P21-055- Water Line Extension Water Line to Serve Boones Landing Subdivision Town of Stokesdale DURATION: Once KED has received the necessary survey information, we require one (1) week to verify that all information is complete as requested. After verification, KED can then incorporate your project into the current workload schedules. Oncei integrated, KED estimates this project to take approximately six to eight (6- 8) weeks for a completed design Afters submittal for review, ittakes approximately thirty (30) working days for each review agency for Initial Review. KED will attempt tor respond andi resubmit plans per review agency comments within five (5) working days for Final Approval of Permits for Construction. Permitting agencies typically take ten to fifteen (10-15) working days for Final Permit Approval. These are estimated review times and KED cannot guarantee the speed atv which review agencies will take KEDr requests partial property boundaries ofs selectp properties along the chosen route, topographic, andp physical survey, water system information required for the tie-in along with other utility information as determined through preliminary design along proposed route prior to construction document preparation for production of accurate engineering plans. The use of GIS information for Boundary and topographic information for preliminary design is acceptable buti is not advised for final design as inaccuracy of GIS information can resulti ini issues during construction. Unforeseen conditions and changes will be promptly identified and communicated by the Client, their selected contractor and KED. Work will proceed as stated once signed contract has been received by KED. Charges for additional submittals that are required due to changes int the design pert the owner after initial submittals will be As previously stated, a written acceptance oft this proposal is included at the end of this document andi is necessary to provide Kennerly Engineering with an agreement to commit resources and with al Notice tol Proceed prior to commencing the proposed work. The signed documents will serve as Notice to Proceed and the actual start date. Payment is due within 30 days ofi invoice date. Project will bei invoiced monthly ate estimated percentage of completion. See Payment Terms in General Conditions for further details concerning payment of KED invoices. Additional work required by KEDI will be calculated and applied based on the attached unit prices or ar mutually set to be ready for submittal. with their review. KED DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. AND CHANGES: determined separately. See Payment Section below for determination of additional fee. ACCEPTANCE: PAYMENT: agreed upon fixedf fee. VALIDITY OF THIS PROPOSAL: This proposal is validf for thirty days. contact us at 336.775.2118. Sincerely, This proposal is seven (7) pages whichi includes (4) four Standards Conditions Sheet with signature page for this Contract to serve as Notice tol Proceed and (1) one page containing our 2021 Hourly Fee Schedule. KEDI looks forward tot this opportunity to be of service, and should youl have any questions, please do not hesitate to Vlbkz Kemmal Nikole L. Kennerly, PE President/Owner KENNERLY ENGINEERINGA &L DESIGN, INC. 12133 N. NCHWY 150,Ste.F Winston-Salem, NC27127 Phone: Fax: 336.775.2118 336.764.0797 waemetyereneingcon KENNERLY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS WATER LINE TO SERVE P21-055- BOONES - WATER LANDING LINE SUBDIVISION EXTENSION TOWN OF STOKESDALE These Standard Terms and Conditions have been incorporated by reference into our proposal letter for the performance of planning, design, permitting or other professional engineering services. These Standard Terms and Conditions are fully binding upon Kennerly Engineering & Design, Inc. (KED) and the Clients accepting KED proposal letters just as ift they were fully set forth in the proposal letters. Should the Terms and Conditions set forth in the letter proposal contradict terms set forth herein, the proposal letter shall supersede. 1. PERIOD OF OFFER. KED proposal to provide professional services must be accepted within thirty (30) days of the date of the proposal and written acceptance will serve as KED Notice to Proceed. Written acceptance of the proposal must! be signed by an Owner, Partner, Officer, representative or agent of the client, pursuant to authority oft the client's governing body. Any extension of this thirty (30) day period may only be extended by 2. CLIENT'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. Client will specify in writing his authorized representative who will correspond with KED on the Client's behalf. KED will, upon initiation of this project, specify the Project 3. OWNERSHIP OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. Alli field data, field notes, drawings, specifications, studies, reports or other Construction Documents prepared by KED for this project (the CD) are instruments of service for this project only and KED shall be deemed the author and owner of the CD. KED retains all common law, statutory and other reserved rights including the copyright in the CD. The CD shall not be used by the Client or others for additions to this project or for completion of this project by others ori for use on other projects without the prior written permission of KED. The CD shall not be used for permitting or completion of this project except 4. FEES AND COMPENSATION. In the event the Client has a request for KED to perform additional services not included in the Scope of Work described in KED proposal letter, Client agrees to compensate KED for such services in accordance with the prevailing KED Rate Schedule (Current Rate Schedule attached). The unbilled portion of lump sumi fees shall be subject to renegotiation on each anniversary of the Client's acceptance of KED proposal letter to compensate for rising pay scales, changed conditions and other costs. The schedule of fees does noti include fees or charges to governmental agencies for the review and approval of plans or permits. Upon notification by KED, the Client shall promptly furnish such fees to the appropriate governmental agencies, 5. SERVICES RENDERED. KED will perform the work outlined on the accompanying Proposal Acceptance Sheet under thet fee schedule therein, and other services as necessary. KED will render services within prevailing professional quality standards exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality Regulatory Compliance. KED will seek adherence to all Laws and regulations applicable to the project. KED will advise Client of KED's interpretation of Client's responsibility and liability thereunder. KED will assist client in obtaining permits, if required, and provide necessary notice to regulatory bodies before starting work. Insurance. KED will maintain mandated levels of workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance, comprehensive general liability insurance, automotive liability insurance, and professional liability insurance as 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES. The Client shall pay KED for all reimbursable expenses incurred by KED in connection with the performance of professional services for the Client. Printing, travel expenses, photocopying and supplies not addressed in the KED proposal letter shall bei invoiced in accordance with our prevailing Rate Schedule. Other direct costs including, but not limited to, submittal fees, photographic expenses, deliveries, and external printing or copying services shall be billed at cost plus al handling fee of ten percent (10%). 7. PAYMENT TERMS. KED shall submit monthly invoices to the Client based on the estimated percentage of completion for a lump sum or fixed fee elements of the contract andi for actual time spent on hourly rate tasks at prevailing rates. Any sums quoted in KED proposal letter as estimates are estimates only and the Client will pay for all services rendered whether the sum is less than or exceeds the estimated amount. Payment terms shall be mutual written agreement of both KED and the Client. Manager who will act on its behalf and communicate with the Client's representative. upon full payment to KED for the CD prior to such use. so that the CD may be submitted in a timely manner. under similar conditions. required for the duration of the project. 12133 N. Hwy 150, Suite: F Winston-Salem, NC 27127 Office: 336-775-2118 wwemelyergnesrngcon Page 1of4 KENNERLY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS WATERI LINE TO SERVE P21-055- BOONES -WATERI LANDING LINE SUBDIVISION EXTENSION TOWN OF STOKESDALE Net 20, unless otherwise specified in the proposal letter. Ifp payment is not received within thirty (30) days of billing date, one and one-half percent (1.50%) of the billed amount will be added for each 20 days that the billi is outstanding from the original invoice date. Any invoice that is not paid within forty-five (45) days of the original invoice date, will entitle KED to stop work under this Additionally, KED reserves the right to refuse to provide to the Client or on the Client's behalf, any drawings or CD prepared by KED for the Client under this or any other agreement with the Client until all delinquent invoices are paid in full. Written notification from the Client must be received by KED within thirty (30) days of the date of a disputed invoice. All payments made on account: should specify the invoice numbers covered with each payment. If payments are received that do noti indicate the invoice number, KED will apply payments against 8. COORDINATION BETWEEN CLIENT AND KED. The Client and KED agree to give prompt written notification to the other of any development or occurrence that might adversely affect the scope or timing ofs services or any claim of a defect in the final work submitted by KED as they are detected. KED is not liable for damages caused by delays in performance of the services which arise from events beyond our reasonable control. 9. OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS. Opinion of probable construction costs, ifr rendered as a service under this Agreement, is based on assumed labor costs and approximate quantities of material and equipment, and therefore is of a conditional character. KED cannot guarantee the cost of work to be performed by others since market or bidding conditions can change at any time and changes in the scope or quality of the 10. DELAYS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE KED. Events that are beyond the control of KED may delay the performance oft the Scope of Services. In the event that the performance of the Scope of Services by KED is delayed beyond our control, KED shall notify the Client in writing of such delay and the reasons therefore, and the Client will seek appropriate adjustment to this agreement such that the schedule for deliverables in this 11. MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES. We will attend all meetings and conferences required by the Client or other representatives reasonably necessary for successful completion of the Scope of Project. Furthermore, we will meet with public agencies involved in the development oft the project on an as-needed basis. Since we cannot forecast the scope and nature of meetings and conferences with public agencies, we will perform this work at an 12. PLAN PROCESSING. The project will be designed in accordance with the regulations and policies in effect at this time with the appropriate governmental agency andi in accordance with the criteria specified by the Client at the initiation of this project. The fee schedule does noti include changes and revisions to the final plans, other than those required through the normal governmental approval process. The Client will be notified of any changes to governmental regulations and policies which will require additional work and fees by KED. After acceptance of KED proposal letter, the Client shall promptly furnish the appropriate design criteria for the project to KED. The Client will be furnished a set of plans for review prior to submission to government agencies. After Client review and acceptance of plans, any further changes, modifications, or revisions requested by the Client or authorized representatives willl be extras to this agreement. KED provides routine submission of the plans and CD for approval; however, it may be necessary to perform special processing with different agencies to better serve the needs of the Client. These special services include but are not limited to meetings and conferences with different agencies, hand delivery of plans from one agency 13. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. Upon written notice either Party may terminate this Agreement and any associated Work Authorizations without cause and/or for convenience after giving five (5) days' written notice to the other Party. Client shall be liable to promptly pay KED for all work performed through to the date of termination.. All KED expenses directly attributable to the termination, including fair and reasonable sums for overhead and profit for work performed, in addition to costs incurred by KED to terminate any said contracts agreement until satisfactory: arrangements for payment have been made. outstanding invoices at its discretion. project may affect estimates. agreement may be reasonably extended. hourly rate in accordance with the attached Rate Schedule. to another, coordination of plans with different agencies. 12133 N. Hwy 150, Suite: F Winston-Salem, NC: 27127 Office: 336-775-2118 wwaemel)ergnering.on Page 2of4 KENNERLY ENGINEERING &D DESIGN, INC. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS WATER LINE TO: SERVE P21-055- BOONES - WATERI LANDING! LINE SUBDIVISION EXTENSION TOWN OF STOKESDALE entered into connection with the performance of its services. 14. APPLICABLE LAW. These Standard Terms and Conditions shall bei interpreted in accordance with the laws of 15. MODIFICATIONS. The proposal letter and these Standard Terms and Conditions may be modified only a 16. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. KED: services shall be provided in accordance with generally accepted the State of North Carolina. document written standards. members ofi its profession. bya professional signed by both the Client and KED. KED shall use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by The Client waives all claims against KED, its employees, agents, stockholders, principals, owners, and directors fora all consequential damages arising out of or relating to the proposal letter, these Standard Terms and Conditions and professional services furnished by KED. This waiver includes damages incurred by the Client for remedial expenses, for loss of use, income, profit, financing, business, and reputation and for loss of KED liability to the client and to all third parties due to KED negligent acts, errors or omissions shall bet further limited such that the total aggregate liability of KED, its employees, agents, stockholders, principals, owners, and directors to the client or all third parties shall not exceed the lesser of one hundred thousand dollars The Client waives all claims against all individual employees, agents, stockholders, principals, owners, and directors of KED arising out of, caused by or in connection with any professional services furnished to the Client. Itis agreed that if any judgment is entered against any individual employees, agents, stockholders, principals, owners, and directors of KED, the Client willl look exclusively to the limited assets of KED for satisfaction of the 17. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. KED and Client agree to negotiate all disputes between them in good faith for a period of 30 days from the date of notice. Ifi informal negotiations are unsuccessful for 30 days, then the dispute will proceed to mediation pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. If mediation is unsuccessful, either party may submit the controversy to a court of competent jurisdiction located in North Carolina, which shall be the sole forum fora any litigation with respect to this agreement. Each party shall be responsible fori its own costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and court costs, incurred during any negotiations, mediation or 18. SEVERABILITY. Any provision or portion oft this agreement held invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid management or employee productivity or the services of such persons. ($100,000.00) or KED total fee for services rendered on this project. judgment. legal proceeding arising from a dispute. and binding upon the Parties. 12133N. Hwy 150, Suite:F F Winston-Salem, NC 27127 336-775-2118 Page 3 of4 wwemmenhyerpneingcon Office: KENNERLY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS WATER LINE TO: SERVE P21-055-1 BOONES WATER LANDING LINE SUBDIVISION EXTENSION TOWN OF STOKESDALE OWNERIREPRESENTATIVE AND KED SIGNATURE AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY KENNERLY ENGINEERING: CLIENT ENDORSEMENT and NOTICE TOI PROCEED By: By: Mhkzkmb Nikole LI Kennerly, PE President August 5, 2021 Title: Date: Address: Phone: Fax: Title: Date: Address: Phone: Fax: 12133 NN NC Hwy 150, Ste F Winston-Salem. NC 27127 336-775-2118 336-764-0797 121331 N. Hwy 150, Suite: F Winston-Salem, NC27127 Office: 336-775-2118 wwhemmanhyerpnsengcom Page 4of4 KENNERLY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. 2021 Hourly Fee Schedule Personnel Program Manager Project Manager Project Engineer Engineering Design Construction Inspection Services CADD Technician Administrative ** $125/HR $120/HR $120/HR $100/HR $75/HR $75/HR $65/HR Review, outside consultant and other fees are billed at a cost plus 10% for handling and processing, except as otherwise negotiated. Reimbursable Expenses Mileage Supplies, Reproduction Lodging & Travel Standard Per Diem/meals Standard Per Diem/lodging $0.560/Mile Cost Plus 10% Cost Plus 10% $55/Day per Person* $96/Day per Person* Rates for specific City/Counties are listed in the chart below as taken from www.rederalPay.org. Destination Asheville Atlantic Beach/Morehead City Chapel Hill Charlotte Durham Fayetteville Greensboro Kill Devil Hills Raleigh Wilmington 121331 N.HWY150, Ste.F County Buncombe County Carteret County Orange County Mecklenburg County $56 Durham County Cumberland County Guilford County Dare County Wake County New Hanover County $61 Meal Rate $56 $61 $66 $61 $56 $56 $66 $56 Lodging Rate $97 $100 $111 $129 $115 $109 $112 $96 $123 $119 Winston-Salem, NC27127 Phone: Fax: 336.775.2118 336.764.0797 wkmnelyemeheingcom Hugh Creed Associates, Inc. P.A. Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors E-MAIL: HCA@HUGHCREEDASSOCIATES.COM 13061 W. WENDOVERI AVENUE GREENSBORO, N.C. 27408 TELE: (336).2 275-9826 OR (336)275-8084 P.O.E BOX9623 GREENSBORO, N.C. 27429 FIRMI LICENSE #C-0551 August 6, 2021 PROPOSAL Mr. Derek Foy Town of Stokesdale Town Council P.O. Box 465 8325 Angel Pardue. Road Stokesdale, NC 27357 Dear Mr. Foy, Subject: Water Line Extension Ellisboro Road As per our telephone conversation and your e-mails on August 3, 2021, I hereby submit the following proposal for engineering and land surveying services requested in the preparation of construction plans for the extension ofapproximately 2,300 feet of 8-inch water main along Elllisboro Road, from Belews Creek Road to Boone Landing Subdivision. The work will generally be as follows: 1. Surveying/ Base Map Includes researching properties along Ellisboro Road, plotting deeds, making on- site survey locating driveways, signs, storm drain, power poles, etc., along with a topographic survey to use as a base map and easement deed descriptions if needed. Estimated Cost: $8,000.00 2. Construction Plans Includes preparing plan and profiles for the water line extension with required hydrants, valves, etc., from the base map, preparing permit applications and specifications for submittals to PWS, and preparing encroachment permit applications for submittal tol NCDOT. Estimated Cost: $8,000.00 3. Bid) Process Includes preparing the bid package for contractors, attending a pre-bid meeting with potential bidders, and assisting the town with awarding the contract to winning contractor bid. 4. Construction Staking Estimated Cost: $2,000.00 Includes periodic construction inspections, witnessing pressure testing, as-built plans, and completion certification to PWS. Estimated Cost: $5,000.00 Total Estimated Cost: $23,000.00 This estimate does not include any fees required by the town, county or state for review, permits, inspections, or recording. This estimate does noti include locating underground utilities. We will only invoice on ai monthly basis for the actual time and printing costs required to complete the work as outlined above up to the total estimated cost. Our hourly rates are as follows: Engineering Services: $120.00/Hr. Surveying Services: $150.00/Hr. Any additional work requested beyond what is outlined above will be performed at the Ifyou have any questions concerning this proposal, please call. Ifthis proposal is satisfactory, please sign and return it to this office. We appreciate your consideration of above hourly rates. our firm and look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, Hugh Creed Associates, Inc., P.A. Pa 1Cyb Norris Z. Clayton P.E., P.L.S. Acceptance oft this proposal: Signature Title Date Kroposaisqu2llPopoat Ellisboro Rd Water Linel Extension.docx Back Flow Permit/Application Fee $300.00 Application and Inspection Fee $300.00 It has been brought to our attention that when Guilford County does the back flow inspection, they are charging a fee of $40.00 to the installer. The information we give on the application list both as included in the $300.00 fee. Currently we do not know if the inspection was done or if passed the inspection. We do keep records of the application and the re-inspections performed by a back flow certified inspector. This is the process that we should be following in the future in order to have Guilford Co. complete these inspections and we know they have been done. With the application we advise the person applying they will be required to take this to Guilford Co. Building Inspections and inform the Town of Stokesdale of their inspection date via email or phone call. Town of Stokesdale will email a copy of the application to Guilford Co. They keep this on a board until the person brings the permit/application in and request the inspection. Guilford Co. will put this on their website once this has been completed. We do require re-testing for home-owner (every 2 years) and commercial (every year) - at their expense. The Backflow Preventer is required when Town water is used for connecting to pools and irrigation systems to protect the water supply. We do get a lot of complaints on the amount of $300.00 and why is this amount of $300.00 charged to protect the water system. Can we lower this amount since the inspection fee is not included in this and the owners are also responsible for the cost of re- inspections. TOWN OF STOKESDALE APPLICATION FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER (BFP) NAME OF APPLICANT: SERVICE. ADDRESS: BILLING ADDRESS: PHONE: (Home). TYPEOFSERVICE Last Name First Name MiddleInitial Street City (Work), State (Other). ZipCode Residence with oollmngation/Business Motel with Type ofCommercial Facility Other (Explain). Restaurant Seating Capacity. Apartments with InG Ground Irrigation System Units Units CONTRACTOR INSTALLING BACKFLOW PREVENTER Is Contractor licensed toi install BFP's: Yes No License #: Kind of Backflow Preventer tol be installed: Name: Phone: Exp Date: Date ofInstallation: APPLICATION FEES Other (Specify) Backflow Inspection Fee ($300.00) $ $ TOTALFEE $ Paid: Cash/Check/Credit (circled one) Received by (number) ACCOUNTI NUMBER: Ordinance #54. Section 1.9 ofthe Ordinance requires the following: All commercial (non-residential): facilities (buildings) will ber required toi installa aj pressure reduction principle assembly backflow quality ofv which willl be Wilkins, modelr number 975XLU (Specification Sheet attached) or its equivalent inc and commercial buildings willl ber required toi install ap pressurer reduction principle assembly withina ar ninety (90)d quality after performance. All Towno ofthe requirement tod dos so. Residentiall buildings will not bei required toi install al backflow preventions day assembly, perioda unlesst being there notified by swimming pool, ani in-groundi irrigation system, oral business usel located withint ther residence whicho could endanger the water existsa system with contamination; by way ofexample but not limitation such use may! beab beauty orr nails salon or any chemical mixing distribution activities. preventer, the Town ofs Stokesdale Phone: 336-643-4011 Revised 5/3/16 5 Excellence Lawn Care & Landscaping 7800 Pond ridge court stokesdale NC: 27357 dhering@excellencelawncare.com excelencelawncarecom EXCELLENCE LAWNCARE & LANDSCAPING COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL Stokesdale Town park 8325 Angel-Pardue road stokesdale NC: 27357 Customer # Estimate # Date 291 0000256 Jul20,2021 Total USD 5,500.00 Description Cost/Rate USD 5,500.00 Qty/Hr 1 Taxes % 0.00 mulch delivered andi installed hini Maagets Playground 300 Subtotal Taxes 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 5800 Notes: Now offering a5 5% discount if services are paidi in cash. price will be adjusted accordingly. Ifp paying by check pleaser maket them out to Dominick Hering. Total Estimated Cost PAYMENT STUB Stokesdale Town Park 8325 Angel-Pardue Road Stokesdale NC: 27357 Customer Customer # # Date Stokesdale Town park 291 0000256 Jul20,2021 5,500.00USD Total Estimated Cost Status Excellence 7800 Pond Ridge Court Stokesdale NC: 27357 dhering@excellencelawncare.com excelencelawncare.com Lawn Care & Landscaping