Townol PRINCETON August t7,2023 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - BOARD MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to order 2. Invocation 3. Adopt Agenda for the August 7, 2023 Board Meeting 4. Adopt the Minutes for the July 10, 2023 Board Meeting 5. Persons to be Heard 7. Public Hearing 6. Discuss for Approval the Bank Financing for the Police Vehicle (Tahoe) A. Charles Eason - Special Use Permit Request B. Richard D. Braswell - Water and Sewer Request 8. Discuss Street Paving Plan 9. Comments from Mayor and Commissioners 10. Adjourn Next meeting is September 11, 2023 at 7:00pm 4 Town Of Princeton Board Meeting/. July 10, 20237:00PM Present: Mayor Don Rains, Mayor Pro Tem Mike Rose, Comm. Mike Holmes, Comm. Martin & Robinson Others: TAI King, TC April Williamson, Asst. TC Emily Caughron, PWS Michael Hardie, Chief Michael Smiley, Officer Brianna Everett, Carol & Stacy. Johnson, Aimee Louvierre, Charles Eason, Leslie Ingram, present by phone. David Johnson Mayor Rains called the meeting to order at 7:00PM Mayor Pro Tem leads the invocation and Comm. Holmes leads to Pledge of Allegiance Comm. Holmes makes a motion to adopt the agenda for the. July 10, 2023 board meeting and Mayor Pro Mayor Rains reads the consent agenda and asks ifa anyone has any questions. Comm. Martin does comment that a correction needs to be done in the minutes from the June 29, 2023 meeting in the golf cart ordinance section, Mayor Rains states that this will be correct and updated. Comm. Martin makesa motion to adopt the consent agenda and Mayor Pro Tem Rose seconds the motion. Motion passes Persons to be heard, Mayor Rains presents Bobby Green with a certificate for his retirement. Mayor Rains wishes him well and congratulates him. Comm. Holmes, Rose and Martin comment as well wishing him well and thanking him for all of his time over the years and that he will be missed but they hope he Mayor Rains begins the public hearing at 7:11PM. Mr. Charles Eason is present to present the rezoning at 9468 US 70 Hwy E. Mr. Eason goes into detail about what this business will be, he states that they do plan to have a pawn shop that will carry higher end items such as collectibles. They also plan to have a used car dealership and the fenced in portion of the property will be used for storage. Mr. Eason states they would also like to rent spaces for food truck vendors. Mayor Rains and the board do question the kind of things that would bei in pawn shop and they make sure they are aware of the permits they will need to have. Mr. Eason and Mr.. Johnson makes the board aware that they do not want any sketchy Next for the public hearing is the request from Richard D. Braswell to be exempt for annexation. Mr. Braswell has petitioned to be exempt from annexation within the town limits requesting water and future sewer: services. Mr. Braswell has agreed that if this is possible he will pay the out oft town rates as ac customer. TA King states in the memo that this property yis a part of Lakeview Estates and cannot be de-annexed from that development. Carol Johnson questions the location with saying that it shows that iti is a part of Lakeview Acres not the Estates. TA King thanks Carol Johnson for bringing that to their attention and that he had mentioned that before but could not additional information on it. Mayor Rains says with that these questions he would consider tabling this until they figured this out. Comm. Holmes says that we want to be able to provide him with these services but they want to make sure Mayor Rains asks if anyone from the public has any further questions, no one speaks at this time. Mayor Tem. Rose seconds the motion. Motion passes unanimously. unanimously. enjoys his retirement. business going on and that is not the business they want to run. they do it the correct way. Rains closes the Public Hearing at 7:40PM. With no other questions Comm. Holmes makes a motion to approve the rezoning at 9468 US Hwy 701 W With multiple questions and concerns with the request from Richard D. Braswell on being exempt from annexation Mayor Rains and the board agree to table this conversation until additional information is brought forward. Comm. Martin makes a motion to table this conversation and Comm. Holmes seconds TAI King presents the budget ordinance amendment FY23-24. TA King states that no changes were made in the budget but there was a clerical typo errori in the General Fund figures. With this correction this leaves the Park & Recreation at $16,300 and contingency at $0. TAI King saysa again this made no changes toi the budget it was just a clerical correction. Comm. Martin makes a motion to approve this TAI King presents the KS Bank Auto Loan for the new Public Utilities truck. King says they offered the most reliable options fort financing and he understands that the town typically finance for 3 years and moving forward he would: suggest we budget to "pay ourselves" annually so that we can pay cash fora vehicle vs financing as the rates have gone up. Comm. Martin does question the 4 year Vs thet typical 3 year and Mayor Rains by saying with already budgeting for the new fiscal year we can hopefully get ahead on payments and end up paying additional payments to payi it off in thei typical 3 year mark. Mayor Pro Tem Rose makes a motion to approve the KS Bank Auto Loan and Comm. Holmes seconds the Mayor Rains asksi if we can back up on the agenda and bring Aimee from the Princeton Public Library up to present what she came to speak on1 for Persons to be heard. Aimee says at the last meeting she presented a possible idea for thel library to move into the now vacant home on Peal St and that they looked into after and it came out to bet to expensive to fixi it up to where it would meet all codes. Aimee says she had: spoken to TAI King and. J&N Developers and they took al look at thel back section of the Community Building and that area would be perfect. Aimee says they would not have to do any remodel, the only thing that would have to be done is a wheel chair ramp at the back entrance. TA King comments that when he had met with Aimee after looking at the building that theyl had: spoken about them being responsible fori insurance and Wi-Fiift that was needed and as far as the electricity goes they were okay with splitting if the bill were to change. Mayor Rains did state that this would be temporary while the new building was in process buti it would be a good start for them. Mayor Rains asks ifa anyone had any other questions, no one had questions. Comm. Holmes states that he thought this was an excellent idea and Comm. Martin agreed. Mayor Pro Tem Rose makes a motion to approve this and Leslie with Tippy Toes Dance Studio is present for the meeting for the approval of her façade grant. Leslie says that she moved into her building at 102 S. Pine Street 20 years ago and at the time of her completing this project the building was due for major upgrades. Leslie goesi into detail with the board about the work that she completed. Leslie says that at the time of thet find the grant opportunity she did not know she had to come before the board before completing she just thought she could do the work and apply for the grant. Comm. Martin makes a motion to approve Tippy Toes for the grant and Comm. and Mayor Pro Tem Rose seconds. Motion passes unanimously. the motion. Motion passes unanimously. amendment and Comm. Robinson seconds. Motion passes unanimously. motion. Motion passes unanimously. Comm. Robinson seconds the motion. Motion passes unanimously. Holmes seconds. Motion passes unanimously. J&N Developers presents an adjustment request they have for the board. Stacy. Johnson says at the previous board meeting they requested the rezoning and were approved but they are now requesting this adjustment request to add storage units and pave a portion of the parcel of land located at 501S Pearl Street. They are requesting the adjustment int the watershed percentage of the developed land. Mayor Rains asks if anyone has any questions, no one speaks at this time. Comm. Martin makes a motion to approve this request and Comm. Holmes seconds the motion. Motion passes unanimously. Mayor Rains presents an environmental study to submit to the USDA for the new Princeton Community Building. Mayor Rains says that him TA King, TRC and Triangle JH have been working together to get every detail they need to be able to submit this study. Comm. Holmes questions the financing of the building how much it would cost, Mayor Rains responds with around 104 billion. Comm. Holmes says that he disagrees with that number and that if we were going to borrow that much money from somewhere he believes it should be used for other things the town needs as far as roads, sewer and other projects. Comm. Holmes says he does have issue with doing the study because then he will be able to see how much money they really think it will bet for the building. Mayor Rains comments that we will not be paying that much due to being hopeful for multiple grant opportunities as well. Comm. Martin makesa motion to approve the environmental study and Mayor Pro Tem Rose seconds the motion. Motion Chief Smiley introduces our new Officer Brianna Everett and explains her new duties. Brianna says she is excited to be apart the town and: she is ready to get started. Mayor Rains and the board welcome her. TAI King reminds the board that he will be out on vacation next week. Mayor Rains asks ifa anyone has any other questions or comments, no one speaks at this time. Comm. Holmes makes a motion to adjourn and Comm. Martin seconds the motion. Meeting is adjourned and the motion passes passes unanimously. unanimously. Don Rains, Mayor Emily Caughron, Asst. Town Clerk 2023 Tahoe Financing-$ $49,900.00 KS Bank = 3 years @ 5.125%= $18,366.65 4 years @ 53756-$14,195.18 5 years @ 5.6256-$11,725.49 First Citizens- 5 years @ 7.50% =$ $11,998.80 They did not offer quotes for 3or 4 years. Truist- 5 years at 5.75% They did not offer quotes for 3or 4 years. Itis my recommendation that we again use KS Bank for the Tahoe. Michael King, Town Administrator 7A Town of PRINCETON DONALD B. RAINS MAYOR To: From: Est 1873 MICHAEL KING TOWN ADMINISTRATOR Town ofPrinceton, Board of Commissioners JC Princeton, LLC 1724 S. Saunders St Raleigh, NC: 27603 DN.ohstondgmil.con (919)986-1462 Special Use Permit May 26, 2023 August 7,2023 Subject: Date Submitted: Date of Review: Subject: Special Use Permit Address: 9468 US Hwy 70 East Princeton, NC: 27569 Applicant: Charles E Eason Jr. /JC Princeton, LLC Petitioner: Charles E. Eason, Jr. 34 Woodall Farm Ln, Princeton, NC 27659 Applicant is petitioning the Town to allow 2 separate businesses on the parcel located at 9384 US Hwy 70 E. Proposed businesses would be include a "pawn store," to be located with the brick/motar bldg., and used car sales within the metal accessory bldg, located on the east side oft the property. Zoning Ordinances do not specifically list "pawn, or buy/sell/consign" business. Zoning Ordinance: 8.13.1 Purpose: The Highway Mixed Use Special Use Zoning District is intended to encourage a mix of medium densityresidentid. development in conjunction with appropriately, scaled and compatible commercial development, consisting ofretail sales and: services, professional offices, accommodations services and. similar uses on) properties within 500 feet ofthe U.S. Highway 70 corridor. Aspecial use permit, as providedj for in Article 15 herein, isrequiredas. a prerequisite 10 any use or development A development, plan is required as design becomes a critical consideration when uses which previously have been deemed incompatible are authorized to be placed in close proximity to each other. PEACEFUL, PLEASANT, PROGRESSIVE, AND PROUD" Town ofl Princeton isa anl Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer wwmyprincetonne: com 5031 Dr. Donnie H.. Jones, Jr. Blvd West, Princeton, NC2 27569 Oftice: (919) 936-8171 Fax: (919)936-2842 Office Hours: M-F8AM-SPM Town of PRINCETON DONALD B. RAINS MAYOR Est 1873 MICHAEL KING TOWN ADMINISTRATOR 8.13.3 Permitted Uses: Thej following uses are, permitted by Special Use Permit ini the Highway Mixed Use Special Use Zoning District provided they meet all requirements oft this Section and all other requirements established in this Ordinance. Uses not Iisiedareprohbied. Accessory uses & structures Adult care homes Automobile car washes Banks & other) financial institutions Bed & breakfast facilities Billboards (Offpremise Advertising Sign)" Business services Child care centers Child care homes Civic clubs & fraternal organizations Construction trades facilities, sO long as the storage ofequipment and materials is screened from view, from any public rights-of- Convenience stores with or without gasoline sales Cultural arts buildings Dance, health &e fitness) facilities Dry cleaning and laundry establishments Funeral homes Greenhouses & commercial nurseries Home occupations Hotels & motels Laundries, coin-operated Lawn & garden centers Music & art studios Neighborhood community centers Newspaper offices & printing establishments Nursing homes Offices, business, professional and public Parking lots & parking. garages Parks Personal services Progressive care facilities Recreational, facilities, indoors Recreational facilities, outdoors, commercial Religious institutions Repair services, miscellaneous Residential care) facilities Residential dwellings, single Residential dwellings, multi- Residential dwellings, two-family way family family Restaurants Retail stores Schools Service stations Theaters, indoors "PEACEFUL, PLEASANT, PROGRESSIVE, AND PROUD" Town of Princeton is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Mmavmprinstomnscon 5031 Dr. Donniel H.. Jones, Jr. Blvd. West, Princeton, NC27569 Office: (919)936-8171 Fax: (919)936-2842 Office Hours: M-F8AM-SPM 2 OHNSTON CQUNIO ORTI:CAROLINA DISCLAIMER ** Johnston County: no legal responsibility for thei represented! here. 30o 9440 HI TR-2 TR-3 9468 3.08A 8349 TR-6 TR-5 TR-4 TR-1 4256 PLAT 82-108 TR-7 PLAT 69-393 1,453A 5274 $o 2.35A 1166 7185 Scale: 1:760 1in.-63.32feet (Thescaleis-only: accuratew when printed! landscape na1ix17s nopages scaling.) July25,2 County 2023 GIS OHNSTON OUNIYO :* DISCLAIMER : Johnston County assumes nol legal responsibility fort the information representedhere. Result id: 04Q08012H Tag: 04Q08012H NCPin: 265200-52-8349 Mapsheet No: 2652 Owner Name 1: JC. PRINCETON, LLC Owner Name 2: Mail Address 1: 1724SSAUNDERSST Mail Address 2: Mail Address 3: RALEIGH, NC27603-2314 Site Address 1: 9468 US HWY70 Site Address 2: PRINCETON, NC27569- Book: 06155 Page: 0986 Market Value: 246590 Assessed Acreage: 3.080 Calc. Acreage: 3.100 Sales Price: 275000 Sale Date: 2022-01-07 Township: Boon Hill Flood Panel: 3720265200 KI 2014-03-31 Water District: Princeton Kenly Water District ETJ: Princeton City Limits: N/A Town Zoning: C-3 County Zoning: N/A OverLay Zoning: N/A. EMS District: STA7 Fire District: Boon Hill Law! District: 2 Census Tract: 405 Electric District: SMITHFIELD-SELMA MUNICIPAL Special Tax N/A Voting Distrints: North Boon Hill US Congressional 4 NCH House District: 28 NC Senate District: 10 Commissioner 3 BensoDistrint: N/A Smithfield Ward: NIA 18. PETITION REQUESTING EXEMPTION ONANNEXATION TO BECOME ATOWN WATER & SEWER CUSTOMER June 29, 2023 To the Town of Princeton: 1. ,Richard D. Braswell respectfully acknowledge that Parcel ID: 04012027D, 515 Martin Livestock Rd. Princeton, NC 27569, is not contiguous to the current primary corporate limits oft the Town of Princeton. Thus, the Town cannot annex the lot as statutes prohibit satellite annexation ofa al lot ori lots out ofas subdivision where other lot owners are not 2. Idol however wish to have access to Town water & sewer at thel lot and agree to pay the requesting annexation. out of town rate. Please accept myr request. POABul Richard D. Braswell 515 Martin Livestock Rd. Princeton, NC: 27569 ofJ June, 2023. Donald B. Rains, Mayor The Town of Princeton Board of Commissioners grants/denies the above request on this 26th day April Williams, Town Clerk Richard D. Braswell 425 Martin Livestock Rd. Princeton, NC 27569 Water and Sewer Request Board, Princeton is exempt from the % contiguous land requirement in S 160A-58.1. Therefore, Richard D. Braswell is al hardship case and can be provided water and sewer per approval of the board and should be charged out of town rates. All request for water and sewer outside the town limits should require annexation however, the board has the authority to grant a waiver on a case by case situation based off hardship of the land. We are working on updating this section ini the water and sewer policy as well and hope to present something to the Planning Board by September 2023. Thanks, Michael 5160A-58.1. Petition for annexation; standards. (a) Upon receipt of a valid petition signed by all of the owners of real property in the area described therein, a city may annex an area not contiguous to its primary corporate limits when the area meets the standards set out in subsection (b) of this section. The petition need not be signed by the owners of real property that is wholly exempt from property taxation under the Constitution and laws of North Carolina, nor by railroad companies, public utilities as defined in G.S. 62-3(23), or electric or telephone membership corporations. A petition is not valid in any of the following circumstances: (1) Itis unsigned. (2) Itis signed by the city for the annexation of property the city does not own or have al legal interest in. For the purpose of this subdivision, a city has no legal interest in a State-maintained street unless it owns the underlying fee and not (3) Itisf for the annexation of property for which a signature is not required and the (b) A noncontiguous area proposed for annexation must meet all of the following (1) The nearest point on the proposed satellite corporate limits must be not more than three miles from the primary corporate limits oft the annexing city. (2) No point on the proposed. satellite corporate limits may be closer to the primary corporate limits of another city than to the primary corporate limits of the annexing city, except as set forth in subsection (b2) of this section. just an easement. property owner objects to the annexation. standards: (3) The area must be SO situated that the annexing city will be able to provide the same services within the proposed satellite corporate limits that it provides (4) Ift the area proposed for annexation, or any portion thereof, is subject to subdivision regulation as describedi in G.S. 160D-802, all ofthe subdivision must (5) The area within the proposed satellite corporate limits, when added to the area within all other satellite corporate limits, may not exceed ten percent (10%)of the area within the primary corporate limits of the annexing city- This subdivision does not apply to the Cities of Asheboro, Belmont, Claremont, Concord, Conover, Durham, Elizabeth City, Gastonia, Greenville, Hickory, Kannapolis, Kings Mountain, Locust, Lowell, Marion, Mount Airy, Mount Holly, New Bern, Newton, Oxford, Randleman, Roanoke Rapids, Rockingham, Saluda, Sanford, Salisbury, Shelby, Southport, Statesville, and Washington and the Towns of Ahoskie, Angier, Apex, Ayden, Belville, Benson, Bladenboro, Bridgeton, Bunn, Burgaw, Calabash, Carthage, Catawba, China Grove, Clayton, Columbia, Columbus, Cramerton, Creswell, Dallas, Dobson, Four Oaks, Franklin, Franklinton, Franklinville, Fuquay-Varina, Garner, Godwin, Goldston, Granite Quarry, Green Level, Grimesland, Harrisburg, Holly Ridge, Holly Springs, Hookerton, Hope Mills, Huntersville, Jamestown, Kenansville, Kenly, Knightdale, Landis, Liberty, Lillington, Louisburg, Maggie Valley, Maiden, Mayodan, Maysville, Middlesex, Midland, Mocksville, Morrisville, Mount Pleasant, Nashville, North Wilkesboro, Norwood, Oak Island, Oakboro, Ocean Isle Beach, Pembroke, Pine Level, Pollocksville, Princeton, Ramseur, Ranlo, Richlands, Rockwell, Rolesville, Rutherfordton, Shallotte, Siler City, Smithfield, Spencer, Spring Lake, Stanley, Stem, Stovall, Surf City, Swansboro, Taylorsville, Troutman, Troy, Vass, Wallace, Warsaw, Watha, Waynesville, Weldon, Wendell, West Jefferson, Wilson's Mills, Windsor, Wingate, Yadkinville, within its primary corporate limits. be included. Youngsville, and Zebulon. (b1) Repealed by Session Laws 2004-203, SS. 13(a) and 13(d), effective August 17, 2004. (b2) A city may annex a noncontiguous area that does not meet the standard set out in subdivision (b)(2) of this section if the city has entered into an annexation agreement pursuant to Part 6 of this Article with the city to which a point on the proposed satellite corporate limits is closer and the agreement states that the other city will not annex the area but does not say that the annexing city will not annex the area. The annexing city shall comply with all other (c) The petition shall contain the names, addresses, and signatures of all owners of real property within the proposed satellite corporate limits (except owners not required to sign by subsection (a)), shall describe the area proposed for annexation by metes and bounds, and shall have attached thereto a map showing the area proposed for annexation with relation to the primary corporate limits oft the annexing city. When there is any substantial question as to whether the area may be closer to another cityt than to the annexing city, the maps shall also show the area proposed for annexation with relation to the primary corporate limits of the other city. The city requirements of this section. council may prescribe the form of the petition. (d) A city council which receives a petition for annexation under this section may by ordinance require that the petitioners file a signed statement declaring whether or not vested rights with respect to the properties subject to the petition have been established under G.S. 160D-108 or G.S. 160D-108.1. If the statement declares that such rights have been established, the city may require petitioners to provide proof of such rights. A. statement which declares thati no vested rights have been established under G.S. 160D-108 or G.S. 160D-108.1shall be binding on the landowner and any such vested rights shall be terminated. (1973, c.1173,S.2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), C.996, ,5.4 4; 1997-2, S. 1,2001-37.51,2001-2001-72,s-1,2001-438, ,s.1;2002- 121,s.1 1;2003-30, S. 1;2004-203, s. 180.0.0049/41700499. $.1;2004-203, SS. 13(a)-(d); 2005-52, S. 1; 2005-71, S. 1;2005-79, S. 1; 2005-173, S. 1;2005-433, $.9;2006-62, s. 1;2006-122, S. 1; 2006-130, s. 1; 2007-17, S. 1; 2007-26, SS. 1, 2(a); 2007-62, S. 1; 2007-225, S. 1; 2007-311, S. 1; 2007-342, S. 1; 2008-24, S. 1; 2008-30, S. 1; 2009-40, s. 2; 2009-53, S. 1; 2009-111, S. 1; 2009- 156, S. 1; 2009-298, S. 1; 2009-323, s. 1; 2011-57, S. 1; 2012-96, S. 1; 2013-248, S. 1;2 2014-30, S. 2(a); 2015-80, S. 1; 2015-81, S. 2(a); 2015-172, S. 2; 2016-48, S. 2; 2018-56, S. 1; 2019-58, S. 1; 2019-103, S. 1;2019-160, S. 1; 2021-17,5. 2;2021-21, S. 1; 2021-86, S. 1;2021-87, ,S. 1;2021-101, s.1; 2022-22, S. 1; 2022-26, S. 1; 2022-62, S. 45.) $160D-802. Applicability. (a) Fort the! purpose oft this Article, subdivision regulations shalll be applicable to all divisions ofatract or parcel ofl land into two or more lots, building sites, or other divisions when any one or more of those divisions is created for the purpose of sale or building development, whether immediate or future, and shalli include all divisions ofl land involving the dedication ofar new street ora change in existing streets; but the following shall not bei included within this definition nor be subject to the regulations authorized by this Article: (1) The combination or recombination of portions of previously subdivided and recorded lots where thet total number ofl lots is not increased and the resultant lots are equal to or exceed the standards of thel local government as shown in (2) The division of land into parcels greater than 10 acres where no street right-of- (3) The public acquisition by purchase of strips of land for the widening or opening (4) The division of a tract in single ownership whose entire area is no greater than 2 acres into not more than three lots, where no street right-of-way dedication isi involved and where the resultant lots are equal to ore exceed the standards of the local government, as shown in its subdivision regulations. (5) The division of a tract into parcels in accordance with the terms of a probated will or in accordance with intestate succession under Chapter 29 oft the General its subdivision regulations. way dedication is involved. of streets or for public transportation system corridors. Statutes. (b) A local government may provide for expedited review of specified classes of (c) Alocal government may require only a plat for recordation for the division of a tract or subdivisions. parcel of land in single ownership if all of thet following criteria are met: (1) The tract or parcel to be divided is not exempted under subdivision (2) of (2) No part of the tract or parcel to be divided has been divided under this (3) The entire area of the tract or parcel to be divided is greater than 5 acres. (4) After division, no more than three lots result from the division. (5) After division, all resultant lots comply with all of the following: subsection (a) of this section. subsection in the 10 years prior to division. a. b. C. All lot dimension size requirements of the applicable land-use The use of the lots is in conformity with the applicable zoning A permanent means of ingress and egress is recorded for each lot. (2019-111, S. 2.4; 2020-3, S. 4.33(a);2020-25, s. 51(a), (b), (d).) regulations, ifany. requirements, ifany. April Williamson From: Sent: To: Subject: Importance: Michael King mangempnctoncon, Tuesday, July 11, 20234:10PM 'April Williamson' FW: Richard D. Braswell Property High Please print this email and add it to the August board meeting along with Dickie Braswell's request. Thanks Michael From: Michael King malto.m.ingemyprincetonnc.com, Sent: Tuesday, uy11,20234,09PM To: 'Don Rains' donansncegmal.omo, 'waltermartin truth-invesugationscom: waltermartinetrutn. investgations.com>; 'Broderick Robinson' ; 'Emily Cc:' 'Bob Spence' Spenceess-aw.como, 'Michael King' m.angemyprncetonn.commhaideemmyprincetonnc.com Caughron' e.caugnron@myprincetonnc.com> Subject: Richard D. Braswell Property Importance: High Mayor and Board, Just at follow upt from last night. Bob's comments are below as well as mine. We can accept Dickie as an out-of-town customer who must pay the out-of- town rates. However, - do want to remind everyone that in doing this, we are setting or could be setting a precedent for other citizens who will ask to be treated the same way. Generally, that means if we extend the lines 300 feet to one customer, we do the same for another. There could be some variation if we have a very rational reason for treating the The water meter is already set and Dickie is an out of town water customer as Lake View already is out oft town water customers as well. We could add the property as and out-of-town sewer customer as soon as the lines reach this property. Ijust want everyone aware and don't want to open this up to become an issue in the future. Remember: J&N Developers asked last night about having town w/s without being in the town. We told them they cannot. If we are going to extend it to one out of town customer, we must do it for the next if the cost to us is the same, next one differently. frequently an issue of how far we have to run the lines. Ijust wanted to share my thoughts and keep the town protected according to the w/s policy. This willl be on the August agenda for discussion. Thanks, Michael Michael S. King, CZO Princeton Town. Administrator mingemprctomccon 503 Dr. Donnie H. Jones Blvd. West PO Box 67 Princeton, NC 27569 Office 919-936-8171X1111 Fax 919-936-2842 Cell 919-922-9020 wwmyprncetonccom Town of PRINCETON Est 1873 "Peaceful, Pleasant, Progressive, and Proud" Thisi isan EXTERNALemails Do not clicklinks oropen attachments unless you valdatethesenderand know thecontentis safe ALWAYS hoveroverthe. ink to preview the actual URlsteandconfim: its legitimacy Yes, that is fine. The only catch is having a general policy about how fary you will extend the lines. However, have not seen a suit on that around here. Robert A. Spence, Jr. (Bob) Attorney at Law 212 S Second Street, PO Box 1335 Smithfield, NC: 27577 (919)-934-1149 From: Michael King m.King@myprincetonnc.com> Sent: Tuesday, July1 11,202311:02AM To: Bob Spence Spence@sst-law.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot (No, extension of utilities to out of town, unannexed lot) l'agree. So, to be clear - we can add him as a non-town citizen and supply water and sewer without the annexation, basically as an out of town customer that we agree to service. The board just needs to say they approve and agree to offer the services As far as the sewer it will become available on this road within the next 24 months as we are extending sewer out that to an out of town customer. road. As far as water, that is available now. 2 Hope this helps. From: Bob Spence malosengestswcn Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 202310:49AM To: Michael King Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot (No, extension of utilities to out of town, unannexed lot) This is getingunderstandably confused. We can thank politics in the legislature 1. These lots are apparently not contiguous to the town of Princeton. Until contiguous they cannot be annexed into 2. THE REAL ISSUE THEN, SINCE ANNEXATION IS A 'NO GO" is to work an agreement to extend water or sewer as an out of town customer if Dickie corrects it. This SHOULD not be confused with annexation itself. 3. The major concern with out of town customers is how far the town, as a matter of policy, is willing to run lines to pick up: sucha a customer. For instance, Smithfield had a rule of 300 feet. As we discussed, running lines gets the city limits unless the entire subdivision sO elects. That is per statute. expensive quick. Robert A. Spence, Jr. (Bob) Attorney at Law 212SSecond Street, POI Box 1335 Smithfield, NC27577 (919)-934-1149 From: Michael King Sent: Tuesday, July1 11,20238:45AM To: Bob Spence Spence@sst-law.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of SubdivisionLot Good Morning Bob, Last night the exemption annexation for Richard D. Braswell was presented at the board meeting. There was some discussion about this from the audience and the board. The audience presented that this parcel was not part of Lakeview Estates and was part of Lakeview. Acres. Ihad mentioned this before. As you can see by the Lakeview Acres plat, the lot in Therefore, does this need to be approved via the Lakeview Acres homeowners? Can this still be exempt from annexation? question in part oft the ACRES and not the ESTATES. The audience said this parcel should need to annex into the town should it want town utilities. lincluded the plats for Lakeview Estates as well and do not see those 5 lots as part of the estates. Call me if you need to talk. If needed you can talk to Chip.Idid not include him on this email. The request was tabled until August. Thanks, Michael From: Michael King malto.m.king@myprincetonnc.com, Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 202312:10PM To: 'Chip Hewett' 3 Cc:' 'Bob Spence' Spence@sstlaw.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Bob & Chip, Take al look at this and see if this will be acceptable for me to present to the board. Thanks Michael From: Chip Hewett malto.chpehgpacom Sent: Thursday, June 8, 20231:41PM To: Michael King Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Cc:' 'Bob Spence' Spence@is-sw.com>: Dickie Braswell Daswelerbraswelcon Dickie: Please get with Michael and petition the Board for an exemption to be an out of town customer. Michael/Bob: Thank you for looking into this. Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NC27576 919-202-9811 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only for the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are nota named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the email or any attachments or from making any use of the email or attachments. Ify you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and shred this information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained int this email, including attachments, is noti intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may bei imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. From: Michael King Sent: Thursday, June 8, 20231:35P PM To: Chip Hewett chip@hgpa.com> Cc:' 'Bob Spence' pence@sst-aw.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of SubdivisionLot Chip, After researching Lakeview was developed prior to the annexation before services extended policy. Under the unique circumstances, Iwould have Mr. Braswell petition the Board for an exemption from the policy and to allow him to be an out of town customer. The meter has already been set. Ido not see this being an issue but would like to have the proper documentation fort the exemption as needed. 4 Isthiss something we can get done? Thanks, Michael From: Chip Hewett maltochp@hgpa.com Sent: Thursday, June 8, 202310:43AM To: Michael King pingempingtoncon Cc: 'Bob Spence' Spence@sst-law.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Bob: Princeton is asking again to annex the Braswell lot and we have run this rabbit before. Ihad provided proof that Brenda Braswell, before her death, had annexed the property into Lakeview. From whatlcan Ibelieve the statute is clear that the town cannot annex al lot in a subdivision. In addition, the Town is jumping overa tell this was the last communication on 8/31. Ihave also provided the email chain. subdivision to get to this lot and has allowed other houses in Lakeview to tapi into the system for a 1,500.001 tap fee. What aml Imissing. Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified! Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NC27576 919-202-9811 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only for the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing oft the email or any attachments or from making any use of the email or attachments. Ifyoul believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and shred this information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this email, including attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. From: Michael King Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 20229:36AM To: Chip Hewett chip@hgpa.com> Cc: 'Bob Spence' Spence@sst-law.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Hey Chip- - (And Bob correct me if this isi inaccurate) Looking this overa againlwould say that: 1. The property or 2 properties that Dickie owns are part of Lake View Acres, not affiliated with Lakeview Estates. They are not recorded as part of! Lakeview Estates thatl Ican find. 5 2. He will need to petition to annex said property(s) into the Lake View Estates Subdivision, get approval from the HOA, provide the annexation, have a new map recorded then provided us with said documents. 3. "IF" the HOA of Lakeview denies his request, then he would need to get with the other lots ofl Lakeview Acres Looking at the documents you emailed me it does say Lakeview Acres and there are 5 lots oft that subdivision. Let me petition to annex into thei town (all of the subdivision) would have to annex. know howlcan! help. Thanks, Michael From: Chip Hewett maltohip@hgpa.com Sent: Monday, August 29, 20225:01PM To: Michael King m.king@myprincetonnc.com> Subject: FW: Annexation of Subdivision Lot FYI- this is what I sent to Bob Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NC: 27576 919-202-9811 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only for the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than thei intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Ify you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the email or any attachments ort from making any use of the email or attachments. If youl believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the senderi immediately and shred this information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly: stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this email, including attachments, is noti intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. From: Chip Hewett Sent: Monday, August 29, 20221:00PM To: Bob Spence Spene@sst-aw.com> Cc: Marcus Burrell marcus@ngpa.com> Subject: FW: Annexation of Subdivision! Lot Bob: Here are the subdivision documents for Dickie Braswell, the lots were annexed into Lakeview from Brenda's prior deed. We did this research for Four Oaks and determined that a town may not annex a loti in a subdivision without getting all of the subdivision. Ihave included the statute and Marcus had some additional research Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NCZ 27576 919-202-9811 6 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only for the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are nota named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the email or any attachments or from making any use of the email or attachments. If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and shred thisi information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained int this email, including attachments, is noti intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may bei imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. From: Jennifer Bragg Sent: Monday, August 29, 202212:53PM To: Chip Hewett Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot From: Chip Hewett chip@hgpa.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 11:41 AM To:. Jennifer Bragg Subject: FW: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Help on this will need deeds and plats showing the lot he got from Brenda's estate Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NC 27576 919-202-9811 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only for the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Ify you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the email or any attachments or from making any use of the email or attachments. If yout believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and shred this information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this email, including attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may bei imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. From: Michael King pengemptincetomccom Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022:2:03PM To: Chip Hewett Subject: FW: Annexation of Subdivision Lot See below. From: Bob Spence malospeneestaw.con Sent: Friday, August 26, 20221:00PM To: Michael King Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot 7 lam not familiar with this specific situation. If the property is contiguous to our primary corporate limits, we can annex. If not, we still likely can satellite annex but there are more issues. Ican pull this butip presume Chip will. Robert A. Spence, Jr. Spence, Carter & Reed, PA 212 South Second Street P.O. Box 1335 Smithfield NC27577 919-934-1149 Fax 919-934-3635 spence/@sst-law.com From: Michael King m.King@myprincetonnc.com> Sent: Friday, August 26,202212:50PM To:' 'Chip Hewett' Cc: Bob Spence Spence@sst-aw.com> Subject: RE: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Good to see you also. The food was great ! Ihave cc'd Bob as well. So-A After talking with Marla, from what Marla told me that lots that were originally incorporated or annexed into Lake View Estates the town can provide sewer to them (if available at the time). This was "approved" sometime by the board between 2012-2018. lam looking back through the minutes as we speak to try to locate that exactly. Itold her that if that is the case we need to adopt that resolution into our W/S ordinance for clarification. We are currently underas sewer Can you provide the plat of Dickie'sp property showing that it is a part of Lake View Estates for our records. Whatlhave found: shows it is part of Lake View Acres not affiliated with Lake View Estates sol want toj just be sure.Icannot find Robert Balance property was annexed into Lake View Estates on 9/2020. See attached. lalso cannot find anything that So-i if this is not park of the Lake View Estates he could potentially petition to annexi into Lake View Estates with the HOA and town approval. In doing so, according to what was told, would be able to have town utilities provided with annexing into Lake' View Estates. Al loss for us tax wise by not annexing into the town, but this is something that apparentlywas agreed upon prior to my arrival. I hope I can find that documented in our minutes somewhere soon. lwant tol help him but just want to make sure the town is correct on this process. Let me see what Bob says as well if that moratorium. anything showing lots 1a and 2 are part ofl Lake View Estates. shows Lake View Acres and Lake View Estates are the same entity. is OK. Bob = Please advise if you are aware of this or something related to this "Lake View Estates" annexation. Hope this helps. : Michael 8 From: Chip Hewett maltochpehgpa.com Sent: Friday, August 26, 202211:32AM To: Michael King m.king@myprincetonnc.com> Subject: Annexation of Subdivision Lot Michael: good to see you. Jaime last night. That will be ag great place. On al business note and as you likely! know, represent Dickie Braswell. He met with me regarding Princeton'si requirement that he cannot tapi into sewer without annexation oft the pond front lot on Martin Livestock Road. Ihave had to deal with Thel loti is part oft the Lakeview Subdivision, dues are paid and subject toi the restrictive covenants. Under GS 160A-58.1(4) and: some case law, a Towni is not authorized to require or accept a noncontiguous property if the property isina this exact issue in Four Oaks andy you may want to run this by Bob Spence. subdivision. The statute provides that all of the subdivision must bei included. Dickie is willing to pay the tapi fee, but the loti is not subject to annexation. Pass this along to the powers and let me know ift the tap is authorized. Alan "Chip" Hewett NCDRC Certified Superior Court Mediator Hewett Law Group, P.A. 101 Blackstone Lane PO Box 369 Selma, NC 27576 919-202-9811 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, intended only fort the addressee(s), is confidential and may contain certain personal information. Any use of this email by anyone other than thei intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from anyf further viewing of the email or any attachments or from making any use of the email or attachments. If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and shred this information, any attachments, and all copies thereof. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this email, including attachments, is noti intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spam. 9 1991 LOCATIDN MAP HOLT ESTATE S15-50-41V 7813 $38-21-50V 87.87 N84-21-25E 20019 5 21-25 6.12 HOLTS POND Ac Z NOTES: 1-ALL INTERIOR LGTS SHALL HAVE. A 10 EASEMENT, 5'EITHER SIDE DF PROPERTY LINE 2- 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHALL LIE INSIDE OF ALL. EXTERIOR BOUNDARY LINES 3- AREA COMPUTED. BY COORDINATE METHOD 4 TOTAL ACREAGE IN TRACT- 7.03 5-NO GEODETIC MONUMENT WITHIN 2000' LAVEE HOLY, H. ORR HOLT, ETAL c/0 WILLIAMS REALTY P.C. BOX 646 CLAYTON, N.C. 27520 553-5804 LOTS 12SHALL REQUIRE LOW. PRESSURE PIPE SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS. LOT3S NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR SEPTIC TANK. HOLT ESTATE $28-46-07V OWNER: 10.91 SCALEINFEET RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P.A. ENGINEERS. LANDSCAPE AHCHITECTSS SURVEYORS LAKEVIEW ACRES TOWNS COUNTY JONNSTON OA1E JULYIR87 ro' SUBVEYEO BY CECKEC BY FE.J ORAWN DATE SN a/24Ye7 Town of PRINCETON Donald B. Rains Mayor Est 1873 Michael King Town Administrator August 7, 2023 Street Paving Plan Board, As we move forward with the new vehicle tag fee which should generate around $27,000 annually plus the Powell Billi funds of around $42,000 collected annually lwould like to discuss a street paving plan. There are many streets in the Town of Princeton that need to be addressed. Ihave reached out to local banks Iwould suggest that a street paving study be done in house and that list be brought back to the board for to gather quotes on financing for a project. assessment and putting together a plan of action. Thank You, Michael King "Peaceful, Pleasant, Progressive, and Proud" Town of Princeton isa an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer wmyprincetonnccom 503 Dr. Donnie H.. Jones, Jr. Blvd West, Princeton, NC27569 Office: (919)936-8171 Fax: (919)936-2842 Office Hours: M-F8AM-5PM.