Town Council Minutes Morehead City, North Carolina Tuesday, March 12, 2024 The Honorable Council oft the Town ofl Morehead City held its Regular monthly meeting on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, in the Council Chambers at City Hall located at 1100 Bridges Street, Morehead City, North Carolina, COUNCIL PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Mayor Gerald A. Jones, Jr.; Councilmembers Richard Abell, George Ballou, Lee Stiles, William Taylor, and Harvey Walker City Attorney Derek Taylor, City Manager Chris Turner, Finance Director/Assistant City Manager Jewel Lasater, Public Services Director/Assistant City Manager Daniel Williams, Police Chief Bryan Dixon, Deputy Police Chief September Tuttle, Planning and Inspections Director Sandi Watkins, Fire-EMS Chief Courtney Wade, Public Information Officer Anna Smith, Grant Manager Kelli Jones, Public Services GIS Technician Nick Maceo Donald oft the Carteret County News-Times, Ron Cullipher ofThe Cullipher Group, Steve Aloi, Aaron Arnette, Ray & Laura Ball, Tommy & Wanda Bennett, Doug & LeeAnne Bolton, Bill & Nancy Baily, Marguerite Cameron, James Carter, Reece Cockman, Les Collins, Steve & Sandy Corman, Spalding Craft, James Creel, Roger & Kathy Crowe, James Cummings, Glenn & Connie Curtis, Jane Domer, Beth Duff, Sandy Eskew, John & Jamela Everhart, Zac & Sarah Everhart, Joe & Mary Giallo, Kathy Glover, Jennifer Gold, Stephen & Ruth Gooden, David & Cindy Goodwin, Doug Gould, Jamie & Cathy Gould, Randy Gregory, Michelle Hicks, Rita Hicks, Tom & Cathy Howell, Matt Johnson, John Kerr, James & Marbeth Loynes, Andrea Lodge, Brandon Lusch, Marcia Martin, Kim McConkey, Chris McCutcheon, Sandra McDonald, Anne Munden, L.J. Palmer-Moloney, John & Emily Nobles, Buddy & Ann Peal, George Peal, Lela Faye Rich, Kelinda Rike, Linda Rike, Christine Rocco, Rose Rundell, Mark Saber, Janet Sanacore, Carolyn Schultz, Susan Schurer, Susan Shouse, Lawrence Shovar, Edward Slavin, Hamilton Sloan, Jackson & Pamela Sproul, Buddy & Wendy Stallings, Dana Starlin, Holly Starling, Rick & Denise Sykes, Scott Thompson, David Upchurch, Bill & Jolene Walker, Michelle Ware, Indi Webb, Jan Willis, John & Mary Frances Wright, Terry & Celeste Young, Jeannette Youngblood, and Donna Yourdin. Cunningham, and City Clerk Cathy Campbell. OTHERS PRESENT: Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 1 Mayor. Jones called the Regular meeting oft the Morehead City Town Council to order at 5:30j p.m. with a quorum present. Councilmember Ballou gave the invocation and Mayor Jones led the pledge of allegiance. With a larger than normal crowd present, Mayor Jones asked attendees to keep the Councilmember Stiles made a motion to amend agenda to add under New Business Item 5.B. Discuss Recording and Posting Town Council Meetings. Councilmember Taylor seconded, and the motion failed by majority vote. (2/3; Abell, Ballou and Walker opposed) chamber doors open at all times and to silence their cell phones. PRESENTATIONS/RECONITIONS Presentation ofl Resolution 2024-R-09 In Appreciation to Shirl Meadows Mayor Jones recognized the retirement of Revenue and Billing Supervisor/Tax Collector Shirl Meadows on February 1,2024, and her contributions tot the City. Ms. Meadows retired after more than 29 years of faithful service to the Town. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Mayor Jones asked ift the Council desired to: make any changes to the Consent Agenda. The Consent Agenda generally consists of housekeeping items that have been previously discussed and recommended by the Council Committees for Council consideration. Hearing no requests, Councilmember Walker made a motion to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. Councilmember Stiles seconded and the motion was carried unanimously. (5-0) Included within the Consent Agenda were the following approvals: A. Approve the minutes of the February 13, 2024, Regular Town Council Meeting as presented. B. Accept the Finance. Director and Tax Collector Reports as presented. C. Accept the Notice of Ad Valorem Tax Overpayments ini the amount of $3,235.58 for the D. Approve the Requests for Refunds of Overpayment of Ad Valorem Taxes in the amount E. Accept the Estimated Fund Balance Report as presented and recommended by the month of] February 2024, as presented. of$2,459.29 for February 2024, as presented. Finance and Administration Committee. Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2024 2 F. Adopt Budget Ordinance Amendment 2024-04 as presented and recommended by the G. Adopt Governmental Capital Project Budget Ordinance Amendment 2024-5 as presented H. Accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the period of. July 1, 2023 through December 31,2023, (as of February 29, 2024) as presented and recommended by the Finance and Adopt Resolution 2024-R-05, directing the Clerk to investigate aj petition received under Adopt Resolution 2024-R-06, fixing date of a public hearing on question of annexation Finance and Administration Committee. and recommended by the Finance and Administration Committee. Administration Committee. I. J. NCGS 160A-31 for annexation of three parcels on Business Drive. pursuant to NCGS 160A-31, as amended. K. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-08, endorsing the annual Reelin' For Research, Inc. Fishing Tournament and authorizing action necessary for the event to be held May 2-5, 2024, in Downtown Morehead City as presented and recommended by the Parks and Recreation Committee. L. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-09 in appreciation to Shirl Meadows upon her retirement from M. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-10, authorizing the lease of riparian and littoral rights located at the south end of Seventh Street to MGD Properties, LLC. as presented and the Town ofN Morehead City. recommended by the Finance and Administration Committee. N. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-11, authorizing Wetzel Pyrotechnics, on behalf of Danny Varner, to conduct a fireworks display at 667 Highway 24, Newport, on April 6, 2024, as part of a wedding event as presented and recommended by the Finance and Administration Committee. O. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-12, authorizing the temporary closure of the easternmost end ofAvery Street from Friday, May 10, 2024 through Sunday, May 12, 2024, for the Frey Wedding as presented andi recommended by the Finance: and Administration Committee. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-13, endorsing the Big Rock/Blue Marlin (Crystal Coast Tournaments Inc.) Fishing Tournament and authorizing action necessary for the event to bel held. June 7-16, 2024, ont the Morehead City waterfront as] presented and recommended P. by the Finance and Administration Committee. Q. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-14, endorsing the "Alive At Five" events and authorizing Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 3 action necessary for the events to bel held. June 21,July 19,August 23, September 19, and October 10, 2024, as presented and recommended by the Finance and Administration Committee. R. Adopt Resolution 2024-R-15, accepting Grant Award amounting in $5 Million from the Department of Environmental Quality for the purpose of improving stormwater runoff quality into Calico Creek as presented and recommended by the Finance and Approve application to the 2024-2025 NC Public Beach and Waterfront Access Grant Program for the purpose of upgrading and outfitting two of the public water sites as presented and recommended by the Finance and Administration Committee. Approve North Carolina Emergency Management (NCEM) Disaster Relief and Mitigation Fund (DRMF) Stormwater Mitigation Grant Project bid award to Ralph Administration Committee. S. T. Hodge Construction Company in the amount ofs $2,587,000.00. support of the NCEM DRMF Stormwater Mitigation Grant Project. U. Adopt Governmental Capital Project Budget Ordinance Amendment 2024-06 funds in The above ordinances are filed in Ordinance Book #9; Resolutions are attached to and made a part of the minutes herein. PUBLICHEARINGS Consider Adoption ofOrdinance: 2024-0-03, Approving the Rezoning of 300 Bryan Street and the Sketch Development Plan for Spooner's Cove Mayor Jones opened the public hearing and reviewed the rules for a public hearing as established under Resolution 2022-R-23. He then called for a motion to temporarily amend Resolution 2022-R-23 to give the attorneys 15 minutes following the public comment period to summarize their position. Councilmember Ballou made ai motion to temporarily amend Resolution No. 2022-R- 23 Establishing Rules of Order for Public Hearings to give the attorneys for the applicant and opposition up to 15 minutes following the public comment period to summarize their position. Councilmember Taylor seconded and the motion was carried unanimously. (5-0) Mayor Jones then called upon Planning and Inspections Director Sandi Watkins to introduce the request. Ms. Watkins advised that staff has received and reviewed a request from The Cullipher Group, P.A., on behalfofapplicant Spooner's Cover, LLC. and property owners Mary Lynne Osteen and Faith Ann Eure Matthews, to rezone Tax PIN #636613044567000 located at 300 Bryan Street from R-20 (Single-Family Residential) District to PD (Planned Development) District and to approve the Sketch Development Plan for. Spooner's Cove. Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2 2024 4 Spooner's Cove is a proposed 82 residential and one (1) commercial lot planned development. This project is in the rezoning and sketch plan phase. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requirements for PD sketch plan review appear to have been met, with the exception that annexation of the site would be required due to the proposed lot sizes being smaller than 15,000 square feet. The applicant has proposed as a condition of approval that the site be voluntarily annexed by the petitioner. Ifthe rezoning and sketch plan are approved, the project would undergo three additional approval phases: site development master plan, preliminary plat, and final plat. Thej property is located in the City'se extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and is zoned R-20. Surrounding zoning includes R-20, R15, Office and Professional, and Highway Commercial. The property is located in the Southwest planning neighborhood and is classified as Neighborhood Residential in the Land Use Plan (LUP). On February 21, 2024, the Planning Board conducted a review of the request for LUP reasonableness and afterwards, unanimously recommended approval with contingencies that the applicant has approved. Sally Lumpkin made the motion that was seconded by Nathan Chambers. A draft oft the Planning Board meeting minutes and a copy of the approved Planning Board resolution were included in the meeting packet for review. Al list ofj proposed conditions were also included in the agenda packet. Any approval should be contingent upon the list of conditions as written or modified. The petitioner is required to sign an agreement to the conditions ift the request is approved. The applicant's proposed uses include single family detached dwelling, townhouse duplex, accessory building/use, recreation use, outdoor (private marina), and signage. Ms. Watkins reminded the Town Council that this is the proposed sketch plan. The next phase of development would include the CAMA Major permit as well as a review by 10 state and four (4): federal agencies. Notice of this Public Hearing date was. published in accordance with G.S. 160D-601 in The Carteret County News-Times, once each week for two (2) consecutive successive weeks on Sundays, February 25, 2024, and March 3, 2024. In addition, the notice was posted on the bulletin boards in City Hall, on the City's website, and signs were placed upon the property. Abutting property owners were notified in writing ofthel Planning Board meeting, as well as the date ofthis public hearing. Next, Mayor Jones called upon the applicant to present his request and to share any additional information. Engineer Ron Cullipher of The Cullipher Group, representing the applicant, Zac Everhart, advised that Mr. Everhart engaged a firm from Atlanta, Georgia to develop a site plan for the community. Slides showing the proposed development plan, and renderings of the proposed development from different directions were displayed on the Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2024 5 projection screens. Ther renderings reflected their vision ofthe proposed streets, sidewalks, creek and docks, and the walking trail. Mr. Cullipher stated that it was their desire to create a walkable neighborhood with coastal architecture. He: noted that R-20 zoning is typically found in areas without water and sewer service. Ifannexed into the city, R-20 would no longer be appropriate zoning for the development; however, PD would be appropriate. Mr. Cullipher stated that the community and the Planning Board raised concerns about the density and traffic. This development is proposed with a density of two (2) units per acre which matches the current zoning requirements. They continue to work with North Carolina Department ofTransportation (NCDOT): regarding the developments ingress/egress. He presented a concept sketch of an R-20 cluster, which is an allowable use within the R-20. District, with lots up to 10,000 square feet (sf) and could be built upon the property at this time. He stated that the City'sordinancei is unclear oni minimum lot width; therefore, the concept is presented with some lots with widths of5,000 sf. It showed that the access to the water could become a series of long "spaghetti" like piers. The UDO allows individual owners of an occupied property can have upi to nine (9) slips; unoccupied properties can have two (2) slips. The property developer, Zac Everhart, then stepped forward and commended the Planning Board for their diligence. He provided a background of the project's development, stating that it began with he and Mary Osteen having a conversation about the history of the property. Her father was one of the original developers of Spooners Creek. Historical pictures ofthe creek were displayed showing that in 1958, the creek was sO shallow that it may not have provided passage for a kayak, but by 1964 the creek was wider and deeper due to added bulkheads. He pointed out that Mr. Cullipher's office is in close proximity to the property and isv very familiar with the property. During their first meetings, Mr. Cullipher advised him ofthe wetlands and all the federal and state guidelines that would have to be considered. He also advised that they would not be able to add bulkheads or cut new canals. Their next step was to obtain a survey. Mr. Everhart stated that he did not liket thei initial development that was presented because it felt heavy and he did not like the long "spaghetti" type piers, sO they began to explore other options. The Atlanta firm sent representatives to Morehead City, who spent a week getting a feel for the community and exploring the property. At that time, they determined to offer a diversity of product, and learning that Spooners Creek already had two PDs, they began to consider this option. They also reviewed the City'sLUP, as they desired to offer water access. In response to a request from neighboring property owners, he met with them on May 18, 2023. They discussed a variety of topics and asked questions. Mr. Everhart stated that at the end oft the meeting, he asked ift they had any concerns but none were: mentioned; therefore, he moved forward with the project. He said he heard nothing more: from the neighbors until just before the Planning Board meeting when he saw a Facebook post noting several concerns that were never communicated tol him. Responding to some ofthel Facebook comments, Mr. Everhart noted that the canal entrance to this property is greater in width than the mouth of the creek Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2024 6 leading to Bogue Sound, and regarding dockage, he noted that there are already two: marinas on the creek. In closing, he stated that the proposed is an environmentally friendly neighborhood. Councimember Ballou asked Mr. Cullipher to expand on the density requirement for R- 20 and PD Districts. Mr. Cullipher explained that the proposed two (2) units per acre matches the current R-20 ordinance requirements. A PD is allowed 2.14 units per acre including wetlands. Councimember Ballou then questioned the number of proposed boat slips. Mr. Cullipher stated that the City ordinance allows upi to nine (9) boat slips per lot, but iti is expected that the CAMA regulations will be more restrictive based on shading and water space per slip. Thej proposed development offers about four (4) slips per lot with some having less due to water depth. The same number ofs slips are allowed under the R-20 and PD Districts. Next, Councilmember Ballou asked if the developers had considered providing a right turn only egress onto. Highway 24. Mr. Cullipher stated that they have and the developers have initiated the discussion with NCDOT. He advised that they are proposing that the outlet be placed further west on the property frontage away from Bryan Street. Councilmember Walker suggested that the additional traffic out of the development would: make Bryan Street at thoroughfare and asked ifthe City can maintain it and ifitis] possible toj provide another outlet sO that Bryan Street can continue to be a walkable street. In addition, he noted that he would like to see the speed limit on Highway 24 reduced from 55 mph. Mr. Cullipher suggested that Bryan Street may already be serving as a thoroughfare due to the Mitchell Village and Mansfield Park neighborhoods using it as an alternate outlet. Regarding walkability, Mr. Cullipher shared that the developers are adding sidewalks along Bryan Street and Highway 24 as part ofthe development project, improving the walkability. The developers have also agreed to do an intersection study to determine what kind of changes can be made to improve the intersection. Councilmember Walker asked if the developers had met with the community. Mr. Cullipher stated that developer did meet with the community earlier. He added that what is proposed is not ai net increase to what could bej placed there under the current zoning designation. Councilmember Abell asked ifNCDOT had indicated when they would have an answer about the Highway 70 ingress/egress. Mr. Cullipher stated that they were. not very supportive, but may be more inclined to listen ifs supported by the City. Councilmember Stiles asked if a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) had been done. Mr. Cullipher stated that it had not but the developer had agreed to the intersection study, which will address the same components. He anticipated that NCDOT would suggest right turning lanes into and out ofBryan Street rather than another traffic light. Councilmember Stiles agreed with Councilmember Walker regarding the speed limit on Highway 24 and that the development would generate more traffic on Bryan Street. He wants more information about what NCDOT may do to improve safety in this area. Mr. Cullipher did Morehead City Town Council. Regular Meeting March 12,2024 7 not disagree; however, he noted that the traffic generated by a PD development and an R-20 development is essentially the same. Next, Mayor Jones invited the opposing party to come forward. Roger Crowe, a practicing attorney, came forward to represent the Spooners Creek community saying that he served on the Coastal Resource Commission for seven (7) years; therefore, he has some experience in this area. He shared that he lives at 132 Edwards Drive which stands to be directly impacted by this development. It was his opinion that the property should not be rezoned from R-20 to. PD and the sketch plan should not be approved because the proposed development is too dense, offers too many boat docks, and will have too much impact on the environment. He stated that the community is not opposed to development but believes it should be developed reasonably. Quoting from the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 9-15, Mr. Crowe read, "PD: is for. specialized, purposes where tracts suitable in location, area, and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be plamned and developed on a unified basis...but due consideration shall be given to the existing and prospective character of surrounding development.." He stated that all surrounding development is R-20 and R-15, with a section that used to be a marina and a restaurant. Mr. Crowe: noted that the developer is proposing to add 82 residential lots with a commercial cut out on39acres, eight(8)ofwhich: are coastal wetlands that cannot bei filled. In addition, he suggested that the development will add approximately 160 vehicles to Bryan Street which is already serving Mitchell Village, Holly Lane, Spooners Creek South, and Webb Court. Mr. Crowe also noted that a variety of wildlife that can be found in the area and suggested that a development with 62 boat slips will change this. It was his opinion that this development is not suitable for this location. Mr. Crowe then addressed the affordability of the proposed homes, suggesting that the only people that would be able to afford these homes are the high-end" people that live in areas such as the beltline and Carolina Colors. Next, Mr. Crowe quoted the consistency statement found in The Morehead City Plan 2032's Grow With Purpose Objective GWP-1.2, "Promote land use and development activities that balance economic development needs with the protection of natural resources and fragile environments," stating that 62 boat slips with only one entrance/exit does not fit this goal. He continued quoting GWP-1.4, "Promote infill and mixed-use development to encourage the preservation @fenvironmentally. sensitive lands," suggesting that development does not fiti these definitions. He closed by stating that the Town Council has the power to approve, deny, or modify the request. It was his recommendation that it be modified to meet the suitability statements. He then played a video of film footage oft the creek showing where the docks would be located. Closing out the opposition' s presentation Randy Gregory, of100 South Spooners Street, stated that he was employed as a Marine Biologist with the North Carolina Division of Marine Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2 2024 8 Fishers for 31 years. He liken Spooners Creek to Peletier Creek in size and shape, stating that thel high density around Peletier Creek hasi increased the sediments and runoffoftoxins, resulting in a number of impacts to the creek's water quality and fishery. Quoting from Dr. Paul Rudershausen and Dr.. JeffBuckel's paper, A Comparison of Fish and Invertebrate Assemblages Among Variably Altered Tidal Creeks in a Coastal Landscape, as published ini the February 18, 2016, edition of the Marine Ecology Progress Servies, he read, "Results indicate that loss of marsh, and breaks in marsh connectivity can lead to reduced abundances ofa dominant resident marsh fish. In order to maintain production of marsh fishes, planners should prioritize the maintenance ofintact salt marsh habitats and natural landforms." Mr. Gregory stated that adding 63 boat slips along the saltwater marsh will not only reduce public trust water access but will also impact the animals' feeding and nesting habitat. Mayor Jones asked ifthe Town Council had any questions of the opposition. There were none. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor. Jones then invited those wishing to speak in favor oft the request to come forward. Wendy Stallings, New Bern: Ms. Stallings spoke on the character of Zack Everhart, saying that they were previously Co-owners of Excel Learning Centers. She said that Mr. Everhart is the type of person that abides by all laws and will produce a wonderful property. It He reminded them ofthe three (3) minute time limit. was her opinion that he is a good person who always does what is right. Michelle Hicks, 111 McGinnis Drive: Ms. Hicks shared that she has lived in four different countries and has found Morehead City to be the best place in the world to live. She stated that she would like to live in the proposed development. James Cummings, 139 S. Spooners Street: Mr. Cummings said that he was in favor ofthe proposed development for three (3)1 reasons: first, he liked the design and the way it is laid out with sidewalks, parks, green space, less houses on the water, that more of the density closer tot the highway, and the variety ofhouses at different price points; secondly, that it will give 62 more families access to the water; and thirdly, because the only remaining places to create waterfront communities in Morehead City is Spooners Creek, Peletier Creek or downtown. Noting that the boat slips appear to be the largest point of contention, he pointed out that the riparian rights are what makes the development economically feasible. Ifthe boat slips were not allowed, water access will be limited to only those whose property align the waterfront. Having adock slip is a dream for many. Hej pointed out that there has not been a new development like this built in Morehead City for about 20 years. It was his opinion that this would be a good addition to the city. Chris McCutcheon, 390 J Bell Lane, Newport: Mr. McCutcheon shared that his daughter will return home, after completing graduate school next year, as a professional making Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2024 9 ag good salary, but she would never be able to afford the existing waterfront homes. He said this community will give hert the opportunity to purchase waterfront property. He estimated that the difference of101 homes between R-20 and PD would result in only an additional 20 cars. Seeing that no one else was coming forward, Mayor Jones then invited those wishing to Marbeth Loynes, 5208 Webb Court: Ms. Loynes asked the Council to listen to the residents who have spent their time and money gathering factual evidence based opposition to this rezoning request. It was. her position that the developer's primary selling point is to suggest that it meets the primary need for affordable housing in the area. Quoting The Morehead City Plan 2032's Grow With Purpose Objectives GWP-3.2 "Encourage housing types that address missing middle housing such as duplexes, townhomes, and clustered housing that increase the Town' 's housing supply... GWP-3.5 "Encourage development projects that include a diversity of housing types and price points", and GWP-3.6 "Use zoning tools to encourage the delivery ofneeded housing price points," Ms. Loynes stated that it was. ludicrous to think that a $450,000 to $500,000 townhouse would be affordable for the average Carteret County resident when the minimum income for the County is $61,000. She added that the average home price in Çarteret County is $375,000 and suggested that a development located further away from the water without the 62 boat slips would come closer to meeting this goal. She asked the Town speak in opposition to the: request to come forward. Council to retain the current R-20 zoning. Jamie Gould, 5210 Webb Court: Mr. Gould stated that he and his wife bought their dream home 10 years ago duei toi its location on Spooners Creek and their family spends asi much time on the water as possible. It was his opinion that if this development is allowed to move forward as proposed, he and other residents will no longer be able to enjoy their dream homes and water activities because there will be too many boats in a very small waterway. Hei reiterated that the City's plan documents requires that due consideration be given to surrounding uses which are R-20 or R15. He challenged the developer's statement that the proposed density is the same as R-20, stating that this would only be true ifit were being built on land where every acre could be built upon. It was his position that of the 39 acres only 19.71 acres could be built upon due to the wetlands and considering there are 82 homes to be built, this would actually mean there is. .24 acres allotted per home, which equates to a 254% density increase over that of the existing Spooners Creek neighborhoods. He asked the Town Council to deny the rezoning request. Glenn Curtis 5240 Webb Court: Mr. Curtis referenced Section 4-26.2(c) of the UDO "Double frontage lots, shall be avoided wherever possible., stating that there are 24 proposed double frontage lots included int this plan which isi inconsistent with the UDO. He suggested that the simple fixi is to leave the zoning as is. In addition, hej pointed out that the development must provide 164 off-street parking places, two (2) for each: residential unit; however the sketch plan is void of any guest or service parking. He then referenced page 60 of The Morehead City Plan 2032 stating that one oft the objectives is to promote ways to contribute to the Town's workforce housing supply or affordable housing, and it was his belief that the least costly home in the Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 10 development would not be considered affordable. He then referenced The Morehead City Plan 2032 Objective LWW-1.5 "Protect and conserve wetlands (coastal and non-coastal), for their functions that include. filtering pollutants and protecting water quality, absorbing. flood waters, recharging the ground water table, and providing wildlife habitat," stating that there are over five (5) acres of 404 wetlands on this property that are considered areas of environmental concern, and he wants to know more about the proposed fill for these wetlands and howt they are going to be protected going forward. Edward Slavin, 104 Henson Court: Mr. Slavin introduced himself as the president of the Spooners Creek North Homeowners Association. He stated that during the rezoning ofthe commercial property, at intersection of Harbor Drive and Highway 24, a traffic study was conducted that identified this intersection as the second most dangerous intersection in Carteret County. It was his opinion that this development will add an additional 160-180 vehicles traveling on Bryan Street which will overload the system. Stephen Gooden, 5109 Holly Lane: Mr. Gooden said that residents are already having trouble with Holly Lane becoming a thoroughfare with motorists from Rochelle Avenue and Mitchell Village seeking to avoid the Highway 70 and 24 intersection. He asked the Town Council to maintain the R-20 zoning to keep the density lower. LeeAnne Bolton; 5219 Webb Court: Ms. Bolton opposed the addition of6 63 additional boats on Spooners Creek, stating that this portion of the creek consists of only 4.1 acres. She proposed that, "Webb Court consists of 2,748 liner yards of waterfront access and 40 boats representing 68 yards per boat. Thej proposal is for 325 liner yards with 63 boats representing 5.1 yards per boat totaling a 1,300% increase in boats and pollution." She noted the number ofboats on other local creeks stating that the addition will prevent the enjoyment of water activities and native wildlife. It wasl her opinion that these economic concerns should be addressed int this phase of development based upon Governor Cooper's Executive Order 305 calling for the protection and restoration of critical natural and working lands. Kathy Crowe, 132 Edwards Drive: Ms. Crowe wished to talk about public trust waters defined as natural resources owned by the State and held in trust for the public. She also referenced Executive Order 305, that states that these resources must be protected, restored, and enhanced. She said that the clearing of the underbrush has already led to significant erosion of the parcel behind Webb Court and has reduced the depth oft the navigable waters. She added that these wetlands are: nurseries fora variety ofwildlife. Ms. Crowe claimed that the proposed dock consisting of 63 slips will be the length of three (3) and one half football fields and suggested that a boat ramp should be provided instead that could be used by all. She asked the Council to leave these waters open for all to use. Rick Sykes, 5242 Webb Court: Mr. Sykes distributed a map, stating that when he purchased his property, he was told that no one else would be allowed to build on the wetlands. Now, not only are they building on the property, but they are building a planned development with 82 units and 62 boat slips. He stated that the map shows a very narrow channel entrance Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 11 to the proposed location and the boat traffic, at low tide, will stir up, sediment that will disturb the oyster beds. Addressing the previous comment about the channel being as large as the one that exits the creek into Bogue Sound, he noted that no one swims in that area. Carolyn Schultz, 102 Taylor Lane: Ms. Schultz] pointed out that the pictures shown of the proposed development includes large, family homes, that are likely to include teenagers that will have their own cars. She then asked if vehicles from the commercial property would exit onto Bryan Street as is currently the situation for Sanborn Orthodontics. She suggested that along with the property owners, trucks pulling boat trailers and commercial traffic, it is placing al lot of additional traffic within a short distance. In closing, she addressed the Town Council asking, "Ifapproved and all the concerns noted tonight come to fruition, will you still be here to fix them?" Jack Sproul, 5117 Midgett Avenue: Mr. Sproul stated that he is a freshman at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and once completing his four years of school, it is his plan to come back home. He said that the proposed homes are not meant for the locals who want to come back home, but for people that move here from other areas. David Goodwin, 5236 Webb Court: Mr. Goodwin said that he has lived in Morehead City for 71 years. He asked the Town Council to leave Spooners Cove zoned R-20 as this will eliminate about 18 residential lots and the commercial lot shown at the corner of Bryan Street and Highway 24. He proposed that the increased traffic will cause this already congested intersection to become morel hazardous, causing motorists to find alternate: routes such as Midgett Avenue or Holly Lane. He noted that neither ofthe alternate routes have any stop signs between Bryan Street and Rochelle Drive. Heather Boney, 100 Grady Court: Ms. Boney presented pictures oft two poles in the waterway that she said represents the proposed location oft the dock. She stated that she moved tol Morehead City from Myrtle Beach because she liked boating here better, and she knew when she bought her home that the subject property would be developed at some point in the future. She stated that she was not against development orl Mr. Everhart, but she does question the level of the proposed development. Ms. Boney said that when she looks at the proposal, she thinks about the Joni Mitchell song, Big Yellow Taxi that states, "They paved paradise and put up a paving lot." " She asked the Council to consider all the comments made during this meeting and to make the right decision because "it always seems that we don't know what we've got til it's gone." Indi Webb, 215 Lord Granville Drive: Ms. Webb stated that she is one of the pedestrians that runs on Bryan Street and she knows that she will be highly impacted by this development. She noted that everyone in opposition has presented facts, statistics, and pictures while those speaking for Mr. Everhart only testified tol his character. It was her opinion that he could offer a good project within the existing zoning classification and asked the Town Council not to change it. Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 12 Mark Suber, 5218 Driftwood Lane: Mr. Suber stated that he has lived in this county for close to 50 years and agrees it is the greatest place to live and raise ai family. He said that he believes development is good and would like to see something built on this property that will benefit everyone. It was his opinion that the development, no matter the size, would damage the environment and he encouraged the developer and the Council to minimize the impact as best they could. He: further encouraged compromise, and asked the Council tot take into consideration how it will impact on everyone who is attending this meeting. Doug Gould, 5125 Midyette Avenue: Mr. Gould said that he watches dozens ofp people walking and riding bikes every morning, including children. "Traffic will be a problem." He asked the Town Council to consider that the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries is threatening to close shell fishing in the Newport River and Bogue Sound due to silting of the beds and estuary from the salt marshes due to runoff and stated that it is impossible to sink of the number of piling required for 63 boat slips and possible channel dredging without having serious runoff. This has a follow-up impact on fishing. He encouraged the Town Council to maintain the R-20 zoning. Bill Bailey, 5210 Midyette: Mr. Bailey encouraged a compromise based on reasonable expectations. The property owner wants to sell her property, the developer wants to maximize his profit, and the current homeowners want to retain their quality of living. This development has not met the expectation, and there needs to be an effort to reach a compromise. Assuring that there was no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Jones called upon the applicant's attorney to summarize their client'sp position, stating that they would have 15 minutes tos speak. Matt Johnson stated that he is working with the applicant and the property owners to solidify the sale ofp property. He stated that PD. allows up to 36 units per acre while. R-20 allows 2.18 units per acre. This development proposes 2.14 units per acre which is lower than the allowable density; emphasizing that the applicant is not seeking to maximize his profits. He advised that he was present on May 18, 2023, when Mr. Everhart met with Roger Crowe, Edward Slavin, Doug Gould, Glenn Curtis, and about nine (9) others. At that time, Mr. Everhart asked each one ifthey had any concerns about the proposed community and none ofthem spoke up. Mr. Everhart gave them his personal cell phone number asking them to call ift they had any questions or concerns, and later followed up with a phone call to Mr. Crowe that was not returned. No one contacted him. Mr. Johnson continued stating that he had received dozens of calls and letters since the Planning Board meeting from individuals stating that they want to be at the top of the list to purchase property in this development. He stated that these were individuals who attended the Planning Board meeting as members of the opposition, but after hearing the details, they now are in favor ofit. He added that the 82 new: residents of the development would be thankful for Council's courage to approve it. He stated that Mr. Everhart put together an all-star team and this will be a first class community and an asset to the City. Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 13 Mr. Johnson then provided thel history of Spooners Creek. It wasi introduced as Vera Mar Harbor and later named Spooners Creek, which: included ai full service marina, sandy beach, and restaurant. He presented pictures showing that the creek was only a stormwater runoff area at the time the initial development was proposed and was filled-in to create it. He also presented pictures of the two (2) existing Planned Developments, the dredged canals, the bulkheads and dockage throughout the creek, as well as the docks across the creek from the subject property. Mr. Johnson pointed out that the peninsula area ofthe property will consist ofa single residence and a park, and this is only one (1) of five (5) parks that will be part of this development. He stated that the map shows there is ample buffering between lots. Clark Wright ofl Davis, Hartman, Wright, attorney for the applicant, stated that rezoning iss supposed to be a 30,000: foot look to decide ift the proposal is consistent with the City's overall land use plan and goals. He pointed out that many ofthei issues raised during this hearing will be dealt with through the CAMA, stormwater, and other agencies permitting processes. Hes advised that the only wetlands to be disturbed are those necessary to create roads. If not rezoned, the development will be void of trailways and instead of one long dock, it will have as many as 52 individual long docks. The PD will provide for al homeowners association that will collect funds to maintain the single dock. The average price of any home in Morehead City is $375,000, approximately $70,000 to $80,000 above the state average. He felt that it was a big plus for the City ifMr. Everhart could provide another 60 landowners with access to the water with starting pricesof$400,000- - 500,000. Mr. Wright said that hel learned about smart growth while studying environmental law, which concentrates development where most appropriate on a piece ofland while preserving the rest of the space. He stated that this is what Mr. Everhart is doing by compromising with less density than what could be developed under PD or R-20 zoning. Mr. Everhart has also agreed to add to the covenants that 100% of owners must contribute funds to the Spooners Creek dredging fund. He suggested that it is better to have aj plan where you) know what you are getting rather than an R-20 plan designed to recoup the developer's expenses. PDs offer sO many more advantages. Mr. Everhart will have to comply with all CAMA permit conditions. He proposed that there would be much more dockage ifit is left up to individual property owners to obtain CAMA permits to access the water. In closing, Mr. Wright stated that the Coastal Federation is not opposed to the project and in fact is working with the developer to find funds for a conservation project. Mayor Jones then called upon the opposing party's attorney to summarize their client's Aaron Arenette, attorney with Sumrel Sugg in New Bern, NC, stated that he was representing Roger Crowe and thel Neighbors of Spooners Creek) LLC. He presented ar notebook presentation to the Town Council, calling their attention first to the guiding principles citing UDO Sections 9-15.1 and 12-1.4(c) which requires 1) conformity with existing and prospective character afsurrounding neighborhoods and development, and 2) consistency with the Land Use Plan (LUP). Stating that the proposed site is identified as Neighborhood Residential in the Future Land Use. Plan (FLUP) and is defined on page 75 as a) a development that "accounts for position and stated that they would have 15 minutes to speak. Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 14 more traditional lower-density, suburban-style areas, and b) to enhance existing lower-density residential areas..."I It was Mr. Arenette'sposition that this indicates a desire for larger lot sizes. He stated that according to the UDO, PD zoning allows for up to 36 units per acre which he proposed was: inconsistent with the stated lower density intent of Neighborhood Residential, and that PD was more appropriate in areas where the FLUP map allows for greater density. Mr. Arenette then reviewed the surrounding zoning stating that the abutting neighborhoods consists ofR-20 to the west and: south and R-15 to the east, with no abutting PD zoning. He noted that the decision to rezone is al legislative decision and the Town Council has the authority to deny the request; they are not bound by the Planning Board's decision. Property owners have the right to develop their property, but they do not have the right to rezone the property. Addressing density, Mr. Arenette quoted from UDO Section 2-271, stating that, densify is the number ofdwelling units permitted per net acre ofland, placing an emphasis on "net." He proposed that the "net" acres for this property was actually 18.01 rather than 39.53 once the wetlands (8.3), commercial lot (1.21), the five (5) park areas (2.33), stormwater pond (estimated 2), and streets (7.8) are subtracted out. He then presented a comparison between the allowable density of a R-20 Cluster Development that allows two (2) dwelling units per acre and a PD using his proposed "net" acreage. His calculation showed that the maximum number of permissible units in an R-20 District based on the "net" acreage would be 36 units and based on the stated 39.53 acreage would be 79 units. It was his position that PD zoning would allow 46 additional units based on "net" acreage, 20 additional units if subtracting out just the wetlands, ort three (3) additional units if based on the stated acreage. Mr. Arenette then provided a comparison of lot sizes between the two (2) zoning classifications, stating that he also feels this is incorrect based on "net" acreage. He stated that the R-20: requires lots of20,000 square feet (sq. ft.) and an R-20 cluster allows lots of 10,000 sq. ft. The proposed development consists oflots as small as 4,123 sq. ft. Hej proposed that this size lot does not conform with the surrounding neighborhoods that consist of20,000 sq. ft. or more, and further suggested that the developer could increase the number of units, if rezoned, to as many as 1,423 units based upon the PD allowance of3 361 units per acre. In addition, Mr. Arenette addressed the dockage and frontage. He stated that the proposed dockage of 63 slips was inconsistent in density with the surrounding dockage that provides a single dock and boat per lot. Quoting from the February 2024, Planning Board Staff Report, he read, "Subsection 4-26.2 (c) within the subdivision: regulations ofthe UDOstates that "double frontage lots. shall be avoidedi whereverpossible," " stressing the word "shall." He stated that the proposed development shows 25 double frontage lots. In closing, Mr. Arenette said that PD: zoning offers al lot of flexibility, and he encouraged the Town Council to either deny the request or approve it with additional conditions to increase lot size and reduce density. He noted that the newly proposed R-20 cluster plan was presented within the last week and has not been reviewed by the Planning Board or CAMA. Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 15 Mayor Jones then asked if any members oft the Town Council ift they had any questions Councilmember Walker asked Mr. Everhart ifthis was thei first time he was hearing about the concerns being presented tonight. Mr. Everhart answered affirmatively with the exception for the applicant, the attorneys, or staff. ofthe Facebook posts. Councimember Walker then asked what his thoughts were after hearing them. Mr. Everhart stated that he wished he had time to address each one, noting that he understands the traffic concerns but disagrees with their perspective on density to which Mr. Everhart tried to explain again. Councilmember Walker interrupted saying that he was less concerned with the numbers and more interested in whether Mr. Everhart would be willing to work with the opposing party toi reach a compromise. Mr. Everhart stated that he would; however, compromise does not always land in the middle, there is a financial impact and he has to be able to make a return on his investment. He advised that after meeting with Mr. Crowe and community members, their first act was to start raising funds tol hire an attorney. It was his position that they were not willing to compromise, having never shown any interest in working with him over the last 300 days. He added that he and Mr. Crowe have met with the Coastal Federation, together, to see ift there wasi room for compromise. Mr. Arenette agreed saying that a plan was proposed whereby the State and other agencies would buy a portion oft the wetlands and the developer would be compensated for loss ofrevenue on this portion ofland; however, att that time, Mr. Everhart was not willing to remove the wetlands from the plan. Mr. Everhart affirmed that he was: not willing to compromise on the sketch plan as presented at this meeting. At this time, Mayor Jones stated that if the request is approved tonight, the developers Councilmember Ballou stated that what he has heard tonight is that the developer is willing to compromise by making the decision not to maximize on the allowable lots within a PD and by keeping the density within the lower allowable limit for R-20. He then asked Mr. Cullipher to confirm his understanding that more density could be developed for a PD, but that they stayed within the R-20 density. Mr. Cullipher confirmed that they kept it below the R-20 density, and shared that they have already met withl NCDOT: and held a scoping meeting with all the different agencies. Mr. Cullipher added they also compromised on the number of boat slips, will be working with city staff and the city will involve the community. as the UDO would have allowed up to 100 boat slips. Seeing that the audience was speaking out oft turn, Attorney Derek Taylor reminded the Mayor that he had the authority to maintain decorum up to having members of the audience removed. Mayor. Jones asked the speakers to stick to answering the questions. Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 16 Councilmember Ballou asked how the boat slips will be assigned and who would be responsible for maintaining them. Mr. Cullipher stated that the homeowners association would maintain them and they would be assigned to property owners. He assumed that this would be done on ai first come first serve basis, but he was unsure at this time. Councilmember Stiles asked ifMr. Cullipher was aware ofthei impact the additional boat traffic would have on the area. Mr. Cullipher stated that the areai is already closed to shell fishing SO the environmental area will not be impacted, and the traffic on the waterway will not be an issue. Councimember Stiles then asked about their plans to clear-cut the property. Mr. Cullipher stated that they will save as many perimeter trees as possible. Seeing that there were no further questions, Mayor Jones closed the public hearing to Councimember Taylor commented that the concept presented depicts very nice homes that are beyond what would be considered affordable homes but suggested that the surrounding neighborhoods should appreciate that the developer is proposing a community with nice homes, ponds, greenspace, sidewalks, and parks instead of condominiums. The density is close to that of R-20, and the number of boat slips is going to be controlled by CAMA and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). He suggested a 30-day delay, asking the community and developer to get together to narrowi the key concerns to one (1) or two (2) issues. Councimember Stiles stated that his main concern is the increased traffic and he would like the decision delayed, allowing the groups to come together and to have NCDOT conduct a begin deliberations and discussion. traffic study done to ensure that quality oflifei is maintained. Councilmember Stiles then made a motion to table the decision for 30-days, allowing the community and developer time to work together and to have NCDOT conduct a traffic study. The motion died for a lack ofas second. tabled until the next regular Town Council meeting. City Attorney Derek Taylor recommended that the motion stated that the decision be Councilmember Taylor stated that in tabling the decision, the Council would have to be assured that the two (2) parties will work together to reach a compromise. He advised that it is unlikely that ai response will be obtained from NCDOT within that timeframe. He also pointed out that if the vote were taken during this meeting and denied, the developer would not be able tol bring the plan back to the Town Council for another six (6) months. Town Council meeting. Councilmember Ballou seconded the motion. Councilmember Stiles restated the motion, to table the decision until the April9,2024, Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 17 Councilmember Ballou agreed and stressed the importance of the developer to clarify density, saying there was a disconnect between the parties understanding oft the ordinance, and to1 reach agreement on the dockage. Mayor Jones questioned what procedural changes might result from the developer bringing back and altered sketch plan. City Attorney Taylor stated that they can reduce the density but they cannot increase it. Sketch plans are supposed to give the City a concept of what they want to do. The details are reviewed as part of the preliminary plan phase. The delay will not provide all the answers that are being asked. The Town Council can regulate the docks as an accessory structure. It is unclear, at this time, what the final preliminary plan will look like; therefore, the Town Council should concentrate on what is placed before them. The developer ist the one that makes changes to al PD plan and there is a lot of possible variability. The 30 days will give the Council time to absorb all the information provided tonight. Next month, if something has changed, the Town Council may considerit. Ifnothing has changed, the Council will decide on what is before them tonight. At this time, Mayor. Jones called fora a vote on the motion, to table the decision until the April9, 2024, Town Council meeting, seconded by Councilmember Ballou. The motion was carried unanimously. (5-0) NEW BUSINESS Cemeteries Consider Adoption of Ordinance 2024-0-02 Amending Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 Public Services Director/Assistant City Manager Daniel Williams appeared before the Town Council to request adoption of Ordinance Amendment 2024-0-02, amending Chapter 10 of the Town's Code ofOrdinances to provide clarity and to incorporate current market preferences. Hes said the amendment is essentially a housekeeping measure to provide clarity and consistency and to remove outdated practices. City Manager Chris Turner advised that the amendment has been reviewed by the City Attorney and was: found tol bes sufficient in all matters. Councilmember Taylor made a motion to adopt Ordinance 2024-0-02 amending Chapter 30 Cemeteries as presented. Councilmember Abell seconded the motion and the motion was carried unanimously. (5-0) Ordinance 2024-0-02 isj filed in Ordinance Book #9 CITYMANAGERS REPORT Cognizant of the hour, Mr. Turner dispensed with giving a full report and simply announced that all non-essential City offices will be closed on March 29, 2024, in observance of Good Friday. Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 18 CITIZEN REQUSI/COMMENTS (2 Minute Time Limit) Lawrence Shovar, 3200 Evans Street: Mr. Shovar stated that from 1940-2 2006 the properties at 3117and3119: Sunset Drive were owned by the' Town ofMorehead City and served as aj public park and beach. On October 25, 2006, the Town sold the property subject to a deed restriction that stated, "the property shall be retained in an open and unobstructed beach area to be used by the Grantor (the Town), its successors and assigns, and the general public. The deedrestrictions exist inj perpetuity to the land. " In. January 2021, Thomas Betts asked the Town to remove the deed restriction to build a dock, but he withdrew the request when he realized there was opposition to the change. Mr. Betts then sold the property in 2021 to Rudolph Real Estate LLC and they have now requested and received a permit to extend the bulkhead out 10 feet along the 98 foot frontage, eliminating a significant portion oft the public beach. Mr. Shovar stated that he was not opposed to a house being built within the current code. He noted that no notice was provided to the public regarding the destruction of the public beach, and he only became aware this week. He: noted that he requested a copy of the building permit on February 29, 2024, and received it on March 11, 2024. He then emailed each member of the Town Council, the City Manager, and the Director of Planning and Inspections noting his concerns. Only two council members responded. He asked all of the above to come out and look at the project and urged them tol hurry because the stakes are already in the ground. He asked the Town Council to act, as done by prior councils, toj protect the public beach by resending the bulkhead permit. James Carter, 3116 Evans Street: Mr. Carter stated that his family has spent their summers here since the 1920's and he: moved here three (3): years ago. He said that he also only became aware of the project this week. He questioned how a CAMA permit could be issued without providing public notice and suggested that the public interest is being compromised by the deep pockets. He asked the Council to check into it and put a hold on or resend the construction permit. Jane Domer, 3200 Evans Street: Ms. Domer stated that she purchased her home in 2016 knowing that the waterway in front of her home was aj public beach. CAMA did not post any signs or publish a notice in the newspaper. She contacted CAMA but was told it is too late toi make an objection. It was her opinion that this project was a major cover-up. She asked the Town Council to meet them down at the beach tomorrow morning sO they could see the project fort themselves. Ms. Domer said, they too, would have had al large crowd present if proper notice was given. She asked the Town Council to consider their concerns and to make the right decision. COUNCILCOMMENTS Councilmember Walker thanked everyone for coming. Councimember Ballou explained that he had responded to Mr. Shovar about meeting them but did not receive his response. He expressed hope that there will be a positive result from Morehead City" Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 19 the parties on both sides oft the Spooners Cove project. In closing, he wished everyone a Happy Easter. Councilmember Stiles stated that he feels good about the decision made regarding the Spooners Cove project but was disappointed that his fellow council members were not willing to discuss the live streaming of Town Council meetings. He agreed that it should be vetted through the Finance and Administration Committee but did not feel it was necessary to vet an administrative action through the other Council Committees. He concluded that the other council members do not want to live stream the meetings. Hei reported that Councilmember Ballou had commented that he wanted to avoid possible negative comments that are common on Facebook and preferred toi record thei meetings and then add them to the website to avoid comments. Since there appeared to be no compromise amongst the Council, he thought it might bel best to go back to the workshop meetings. Councilmember Stiles stated that he was following through on what the constituents had asked him to do, and ifcouncil members cannot take the ridicule, we should pack bags and go. home. Councilmember Taylor also hoped that the decision to delay action for 30 days regarding Councilmember Abell responded to Councilmember Stiles stating that he does not believe that anyone on the Council is opposed to transparency, but he didi not support thei request because he believesit does need to be vetted through the other committees. He continued saying that this endeavor is going to cost some money to do it right and thought the discussion was better suited for the budget discussions. He also took the opportunity to express his deep sympathy to Sally Lumpkin on the untimely death of her husband. He had the pleasure of knowing Lee Lumpkin and asked everyone to keep her and her family in their thoughts and the Spooners Cove project would have aj positive result. prayers. Councilmember Ballou addressed Councilmember Stiles comments saying that he agrees with sharing the filming of the meetings, but not live-streaming them because of the security threats. He noted that there was some disagreement among the Finance and Administrative Committee and feels it should be fully vetted to make sure that the funds are available to offera a good product, and the Council needs to see a full list of expenses before jumping in. Mayor Jones thanked Councilmember Abell for remembering Sally Lumpkin and her family. He added that Lee was a strong member oft the community and will be sorely missed. APPROVETHE FEBRUARY13-2024. CLOSED SESSION MINUTES AS PRESENTED This item was overlooked and will be added tot the April 9, 2024, Town Council agenda. ADJOURNMENT Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12,2 2024 20 There being no other business to discuss, Mayor. Joneyagjourned the meeting at 8:52 p.m. Mayor Attest: K D C17) Caenfapbn Cathy Campber, City dlerk Morehead City Town Council Regular Meeting March 12, 2024 21