DA7  Planning Board Special Meeting November 18, 2019 Council Chambers Minutes & General Account  Planning Board Members Present: Sarah Glanville, Chair; Art Wise, Vice Chair; Eddie Oakley, Ed Stafford, Russ' Walker, Steve Monroe (ETJ), Robert Lichauer (ETJ), & Sherrie Richmond (ETI)  Planning Board Members Absent: Richard Newbill (ETJ) Council Member Representative: Rebecca Mann Rayborn Staff Present: Matthew Johnson, Kenny Cole, & Katie McBride  Visitors Present: Carol Brooks  Call to Order- Glanville called the meeting to order. Roll Call- Johnson took roll call as follows: Sarah Glanville- Present Art Wise- Present Eddie Oakley- Absent Ed Stafford- Present Russ Walker- Present Richard Newbill- Absent Steve Monroe- Present Robert Lichauer- Present Sherrie Richmond- Present Council Member Rayborn- Present  Approval of minutes from the September 16, 2019 meeting- Glanville stated that she had noticed a typo within the minutes. She requested that McBride add the word "they" to the fourth sentence of the sixth paragraph on page two of the minutes. McBride agreed to correct the minutes. Stafford made a motion to approve the minutes from the September 16th Planning Board meeting. Monroe made a second to the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote.  Oakley arrived to the meeting at 6:32 pm.  Public Hearing:  Text Amendment to the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) to add a new zoning district, "Planned Unit Development" (PUD)to Article 8 "Zoning Districts"-, Johnson stated that a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was al base zoning district that would be highly flexible for future developers. He added that it would also allow the Planning Board and Council to have strict review prior to implementation. He said that PUD's were generally used to regulate larger scale developments which used unified land development practices and allowed a mixture of various  1    DAPT  types of land uses while maximizing open spaces and recreational opportunities. Johnson asked Glanville asked. Johnson which properties may qualify to be zoned as a PUD district. Johnson gave Glanville a general overview of the areas that may fall into that category in the future. Richmond asked what the parameters would be for the PUD districts. Johnson said that all the conditions would be crafted individually for each development that was presented to the Planning Board Members discussed the potential economic and traffic impacts that may result Glanville opened the public hearing to anyone that would like to speak in favor or opposition of the text amendment. There was no one. Glanville closed the public hearing and opened the Stafford made a motion to recommend the approval of the text amendment to add PUD asa  the Planning Board Members if they had any questions.  Planning Board and Town Council. from the PUD zoning district with. Johnson.  floor to the Planning Board for discussion.  new: zoning district. Lichauer made a second to the motion.  McBride took a roll call vote as follows: Ed Stafford- Aye Eddie Oakley- Aye Art Wise- Aye Russ Walker- Aye Robert Lichauer- Aye Sherrie Richmond- Aye Steve Monroe- Aye The motion passed by unanimous vote. Stafford made the following motion:  "Imake a motion that the proposed zoning amendment be approved based on the following: 1. The proposed zoning amendment is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan of the Town of Jamestown. The Planning Board further finds that the proposed zoning amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan because it promotes development that meets the high architectural and environmental. standards integral in 2. The proposed zoning amendment is reasonable. The Planning Board considers the A. The report of the Town staff finding the proposed zoning amendment to be B. The Planning Board further finds that the proposed zoning amendment is reasonable because it allows for flexible land use while allowing for oversight by  Jamestown's small town character.  proposed zoning amendment to be reasonable because: reasonable is adopted by reference. appointed and elected officials.  2    DMTAFT  3. The proposed zoning amendment is int the public interest. The Planning Board considers the proposed zoning amendment to be in the public interest because: A. The report oft the Town staff finding the proposed zoning amendment to bei in B. The Planning Board further finds that the proposed zoning amendment is in the public interest because it will allow for unique development opportunities while providing safeguards to protect Jamestown's charm and natural resources."  the public interest is adopted by reference.  Wise made a second to the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote.  Public Comment- Nobody signed up. passed by unanimous vote. The meeting ended at 7:00 pm.  Adjournment- Richmond made ar motion to adjourn. Wise made a second to the motion. The motion  3