CSelled 1759 OAMESTOWN NORTH CAROLINA Town of. Jamestown Special Meeting Planning Board August 24, 2020 6:00 pm in the Civic Center* Agenda  1. Call to Order- Sarah Glanville, Chair of the Planning Board  2. Roll Call- Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning 3. Public Hearing for Rezoning Request (Continued form the August 10th Regular Planning Board Meeting)- Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of  Planning  a. 2221 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159144) Approx. 27.89 ac +/-. From b. 5300 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #159105) Approx. 30.70 ac+/-. From AG to PUD 2207 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159106) Approx. 384.49 ac +/-. From d. 5230 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #65604) Approx. 0.41 ac +/-. From AG to PUD e. 5303 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #158765) Approx. 0.6 ac +/-. From AG to PUD 4. Discuss possible change of time and venue for September 14, 2020 Regular Meeting- Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning a. Staff recommends adjusting the time and location fori this meeting to be held in the Civic Center at 6:00 pm to permit members of the public to access Town Hall and speak in regard to the proposal.  AG (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Developmenty).  AG to PUD  5. Adjournment  *Please note time change  P.O. Box 848 Jamestown, NC27282  Tel:336)454-1138 Fax:(336)886-3504  wwwjamestowr-negow    RI CAMESTONVN  Town of. Jamestown Planning Board  Welcome to the Town of Jamestown Planning Boardr meeting. We appreciate your interest and we encourage, public participation inc our meeting. Your comments are important too ouro decision making process. Please note that there will be opportunities during the meeting fory you to address the Boardr members. Thef first opportunity will come ift there is a public hearing on the agenda, when the Chair declares the hearing open] for comment. The second opportunity to address the Board will come near the end of the agenda when the Chair will inquire ifanyone wishes to address the members oft the Board. Anyone addressing the Boardi will approach the podium; givey your first and last name and your complete physical  address. Comments may bel limited to three minutes.  TO: FROM: RE:  Planning Board Members  Matthew Johnson, AICP- Director of Planning SPECIAL CALLED MEETING Monday, August 24, 2020-6 6:00 PM Jamestown Town Hall, Civic Center  Items on the agenda:  1. Call to Order- -Sarah Glanville, Chair of the Planning Board  2. Roll Call - Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning  3. Public Hearings:  Procedure: Stoff will present the case tot the Board, followed by commentary) from the applicant. The Chair will open the public hearing and request to hear from both those inj favor and those opposed. Ifyou wish to address the Board during the public hearing, please come to the podium and statey your name and address for the record. Speakers may have up to 3minutes to address the Board. Please note, this is not a timej for dialogue or discussion and the Board may orr may not engage with youd att this time, even ifdirect questions are asked. Once the public hearingi is closed, no A. CONTINUED FROM THE AUGUST 10, 2020, Regular meeting- Rezoning Request -I Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning. Arezoning application has been  one mayspeak on the issue unless spedficalyrequested. by the Board Chair.  received for the following parcels:  2221 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159144) Approx. 27.89 ac +/-. From AG (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development). ii. 5300 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #159105) Approx. 30.70 ac +/-. From AG to ii. 2207 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159106) Approx. 384.49 ac+/. iv. 5230 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #65604) Approx. 0.41 ac +/-. From AG to  PUD. From AG to PUD. PUD.  Ify you are unable to attend this meeting, please call the Town Clerk at 336-454-1138    V. 5303 Mackay Rd. (Parcel# #158765) Approx. 0.6ac+/-. From AG to  PUD.  **This will be a continuation of the standard public hearing format whereby the applicant and the Board will engage in dialogue about the proposal. The purpose of this meeting will be to allow the Board and the applicant toj further explore the plans for the development and to encourage each party to work together toj find solutions which meet the vision for the Board and the public. The public will be invited to speak at aj future meeting. **  b. Vote on recommendation' to Town Council -Chair oft the Planning Board (**to be continued Adoption of the Statement of Consistency -Chair of the Planning Board (**to be continued  toal later meeting date**) toa a later meeting date**)  4. Discuss possible change oft time and venue for Sept. 14, 2020, Regular Meeting - Matthew a. Staff recommends adjusting the time and location fort this meeting to be held in the Civic Center at 6:00pm to permit members oft the publict to access Town Hall and speak  Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Planning Director  inf favor/opposition tot the proposal.  5. Adjourn  6. Next regularly scheduled meeting will be September 14, 2020 - location and time to be  announced in agenda item #4.  **Due to COVID-19, restrictions on public entry to Town Hall will be observed. Public entry will Anyone entering Town Hall must agree to have their temperature taken by a contactless  not be permitted at the August 24, 2020, meeting. ** thermometer and are encouraged to wear a face covering. The meeting will be broadcast live on the Town's YouTube channel at: Attps/wwwyoutube.com/Channe/UCmt MH3CM DfOvhsL09ZC6w Click Subscribe" and tapi the "bell" icon to be notified when we, go live.  Ifyou are unablet to attend this meeting, please call the Town Clerk at3 336-454-1138  2    WORKING AGENDA Items on the agenda:  1. Call to Order - Sarah Glanville, Chair of the Planning Board  i.  Welcome to the August 24, 2020, Special Called Planning Board meeting. In order to allow all attendees to be able to hear Board business, Iwould ask that at this time, members of the board and the audience please set your cell phones to "SILENT".  Thank you. ROLL CALL Sarah Glanville Dennis Sholl Eddie Oakley Ed Stafford Russ Walker Richard Newbill, ETJ Steve Monroe, ETJ Robert Lichauer, ETJ Sherrie Richmond, ETJ Rebecca Rayborn, Council Rep.  2.  Present  Absent  3. Public Hearings  A. CONTINUED FROM THE AUGUST 10, 2020, Regular meeting. Rezoning Request - Matthew Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning. Ar rezoning application has been  received for the following parcels:  i. 2221 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159144) Approx. 27.89 ac +/-. From AG (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development). ii. 5300 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #159105) Approx. 30.70ac+ +/-. From AG to iii. 2207 Guilford College Rd. (Parcel #159106) Approx. 384.49 ac +/. iv. 5230 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #65604) Approx. 0.41 ac +/-. From AG to 5303 Mackay Rd. (Parcel #158765) Approx. 0.6ac +/-. From AG to  PUD. From AG to PUD. PUD. PUD.  Ify you are unable to attend this meeting, please call the Town Clerka at 336-454-1138    b. Vote on recommendation to Town Council -Chair of the Planning Board (**to be Adoption oft the Statement of Consistency -Chair oft the Planning Board (**tol be  continued to a later meeting date**) continued to al later meeting date**)  4. Discuss possible change oft time and venue for Sept. 14, 2020, Regular Meeting - Matthew  Johnson, Assistant Town Manager/Planning Director  a. Staff recommends adjusting the time and location for this meetingt to be held ini the Civic Center at 6:00pm to permit members of the public to access Town Hall and speak  inf favor/opposition tot the proposal.  5.A Adjourn  a. Motion to adjourn: b. Second: VOTE:  6. Next regularly scheduled meeting willl be September 14, 2020-1 location and time to be  announced in agenda item #4.  Ify you are unable to attend this meeting, please call the Town Clerk at 336-454-1138  4    CSelled 1752 OFAMESTOWN NORTH CAROLINA  August 17,2020  Mr. Matthew L., Johnson, AICP, Assistant Town Manager  Town of Jamestown PO Box 848 Jamestown, NC 28282  RE: Town of Jamestown Castleton Village Property Water & Sewer Availability  Dear Matt,  The Town of Jamestown can provide water and sewer service to the Castleton Village property on Guilford College Road and Mackay Road. As previously discussed, we are basing availability on several assumptions as the project is in the early stages of design. The Master Plan indicates the: single family lot count (765); number of townhouses (708); and mixed use units (34). Assuming the single family units have 3 bedrooms, the townhouses at 2 bedrooms, and 3 bedrooms per mixed use unit, all at the standard design rate of 120 gallons per day (gpd) per bedroom, an average daily flow of 457,500 gallons per day is estimated (0.4575 MGD). Iwould round that estimate to Our water supply is provided from three sources. Our primary water source is the Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority (PTRWA). We have a water purchase agreement of 0.775 million gallons per day with PTRWA. We have an agreement to purchase up to 1.000 MGD of water from the City of High Point, and the ability to purchase water from Greensboro. Thus, we have a supply of at least 1.775 MGD available. We use about 0.50 MGD. Our largest annual monthly usages are about 0.65 MGD. We have water lines available adjacent to and near the site - some are through High Point's system and some are through Greensboro's system. As estimated above, our usage would increase to 0.96 MGD and our largest annual monthly usage would be 1.11 MGD. Thus, it appears that we have adequate capacity to serve this project with current agreements, and we should have the opportunity to increase those capacities in Our sewer system receives some flow from Greensboro, and it is ultimately treated by the City of High Point's Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant. We have an average sewer usage of about 1.3 MGD, and a sewer capacity of2 2.0 MGD. Approximately 0.1 MGD of the Greensboro sewer flow will be redirected into Greensboro's system in 2021. Our available permitted sewer capacity is relative to 90% of our overall capacity, or 1.8 MGD. Thus, our available capacity is0.5 MGD, and that should increase by about 0.1 MGD when Greensboro  460,000 gpd (0.46 MGD).  the future.  P.O. Box 848 Jamestown, NC27282  Tel:(336454-1138 Fax:336)886-3504  www.j jamestown-nc.gov    redirects some flow out of our system. Additionally, the Town is looking into other measures that will increase our sewer capacity: reducing inflow and infiltration; a flow reduction study; and purchasing additional capacity from We will continue to look at ways to best serve this and other properties. Please  High Point.  let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Respectfully, AORBLP Paul R. Blanchard, PE Director of Public Services  C:f file    From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Good morning.  Matthew Johnson  Katie Weiner; "Sarah Glanville Isglanvile/7@hotmalk com)"; "Dennis Sholl "Eddie Oakley (eo@norhstatenet "Eds Stafford"; Russ Walker (isthalker@gmail.coml, Rebecca Rayborn; "Richard Newbill hasemedtpatsacml, "Stevel Monroe", "Sherrie Richmond leememenotnsateneu Kenny Cole; Lynn Montgomery; MarthaWolfe: Lawrence Straughn; John Capes; Rebecca Rayborn  RE: Castleton Village Items Wednesday, August 12, 2020 12:26:00PM image001.png  Ihave had a couple of questions come to me that should be shared with everyone, as they are good questions andl IV want to be sure I'm communicating with you about these issues. Pleasedonot 'Reply All' so that we cans staycompliant with Open Meetings Laws. However, as items come upl 1) Some have questioned the size of homes offered for sale. Can we regulate that?  will try to share those answers with everyone.  a. Maybe. Because this is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) the Board and Council will have al lot more flexibility under the lawi in requesting changes to 'size' of homes or other buildings being proposed. The one caveat is that we need to be sure that we dor not request land uses which could be construed to be exclusionary. As an example, asking for ar minimum house size to be (arbitrarily) 3,000 sq. ft. + might be seen as unattainable for certain incomes and thus could be considered exclusionary. All requested conditions would also need tol be voluntarily agreed upon byt the a. The law is clear that the Town cannot regulate 'rentals'. Just as you could decide to rent your home, anyone who owns homes in a proposed development could also rent out their home without permission' from the Town. We should not be  applicant and owner oft the property.  2) How many oft these homes will be 'rentals'?  discussing 'rentals' during our meetings.  3) Does the! builder have access to resources that would address the endangered: species  issue?  a. We are not aware of any endangered: species on the property and it is atypical to request studies unless someone is specifically aware of aj particular issue. Please let a. Aslstated during the meeting on Monday evening, we need to be prepared for the idea that trees will be cleared from this property. As a parto of the PUD: zoning, the applicant is required to describe how they will preserve heritage and/or mature trees of interest, which they said they are working on currently. A questions was asked of me related to what types ofe enforcement penalties might be observed if they were to cut trees without at tree disturbance permit. Penalties can be upi to $10,000 per acre or fraction thereof for removal or damage to trees withouta permit. In addition, the Town may deny al building permit to any landowner who clears land in anticipation of development in violation of the ordinance for upt to3 years after completion ofa a timber harvest. There are exceptions, however, and lands that are managed as part of at timber harvesting plan could be exempt from  me knowi if anyone has further questions on that issue.  4) Can you describe how the Tree Preservation Ordinance works?    the Ordinance. These regulations are to help prevent someone from clearing land 'ina anticipation" of a possible development. A primary example would be the "Wrenn Farm" development (ex-t the new 7-Eleven) att the corner of Penny Rd. and Main St. which is located in the CITY OF HIGHI POINT's jurisdiction.  Please feel free to forward questions/Concerns that you are hearing from the community and Iwill  try to answer those for the group. Please do not respond to "all".  Thanks!  Matthew.Johnson, AICP ICMA-CM Candidate  Assistant Town! Manager/Director of Planning, Town ofJ Jamestown 336.454.7386 I miohnson@lamestown-nc.gov 301 E. Main St. (POE BOX 848). Jamestown, NC 27282 requests for review and copyingu under the Public Records Law."  wowamestown-ncgoy.  "Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, Ch. 132, Public Records, thise electronic mail message anda any attachments toi it, as well as anye electronic mail message(s) sent inr response toitr may bec considered publici records and therefore ares subject to public records  8    From: To: Cc: Bcc: Subject: Date: Attachments:  Matthew) Johnson Steve Monroe; Sherrie Richmond letich@nothstatene), Amanda Hodierne RE: Castleton Village Items Thursday, August 13, 20204:29:00PM image001.png  Katie Weiner; Sarah Glanville (salanvile77@hotmalz com); Dennis Sholl; Eddie Oakley (eo@northstate.neb Ed Stafford; Russ Walker Isciwalker@gmal.com; Rebecca Rayborn; Richard Newbill scharémemhilahwacom, Kenny Cole: Lynn Montgomery; Martha Wolfe; Lawrence Straughn; John Capes; Rebecca Rayborn  Good afternoon, Planning Board members.  lhope that you are diligently working on the: site specific master plan booklets that were provided to you and coming up with questions and/or suggestions for how to ensure that Jamestown's vision for the futurei is encapsulated into these planning documents. Ihave had several additional good questions come in and lwanted to: share them with you: and my responses. Overall, want to reiterate that the PUD: zoning district will allow you to deviate from the Ordinance where desired. You will be creating anj all new zoning district for this one specific area. The design choices are endless, but at the end oft the day, the applicant must voluntarily agree tot the conditions being asked 1. What is the current maximum dwellings per acres for the SFR and MFR: zoning districts in a. SFR would allow for upt to 4 units/acre, which roughly equates to 10,000 sq. ft. lots 2. What is the current minimum lot size for SFR and MFR and what are the current setbacks? a. SFR requires ar minimum ofa a 10,000: sq.ft. lot, a minimum of 60f ft. of lot width, front setbacks of 15f ft., rear setbacks of 25 ft. and side: setbacks of 6ft. b. MFR requires a minimum of a 7,000: sq. ft. lot for the 'parent' parcel, a minimum of a5 50ft. lot width for the parent parcel, a 20ft. minimum front setback, 51 ft. min. rear setback and! 51 ft. minimum side yard setback (Oft. if attached). 3. What is the current maximum height limit for SFR and MFR in thel LDO? a. SFR detached houses have. a maximum height allowance of 30ft. b. MFR attached buildings have a maximum height allowance of 361 ft. (roofs may be taller, but essentially this limits buildings to 3 stories). a. Residential districts require 10% of the subdivision lot area be reserved as open space. All other districts (excluding the Main Street zoning district) requires 5%of a. Yes. There are. multiple creeks running throughout the property. Floodplains will be noted on the technical plans andt there are ordinance requirements for how floodplains may be utilized which are proscribed by the State. 6. Will the Town get a copy oft the arborist's report for tree preservation? a. Yes. We will expect to see the results of that study.  oft them.  thel LDO?  (or % acre). MFR allows for upt to 6 units/acre.  4. What are our current open: space requirements?  the lot areal ber reserved as open: space.  5.1 Isthere any part oft this property which may be located in a floodplain.  7. Ithad previously been discussed top place the age-targeted homes, which would be one level, in the front oft the development. Reasons being, onel level homes would be more compatible with the Cedarwood development and visually you would not see ther roof tops  9    from Guilford Rd. Then place the SFR homes and the Town Homes toward the back of the a. This is a question that will need to be directed to the applicant. 8. There is a 50ft. scenic corridor overlay along Guilford College Rd. What does that mean and a. Descriptions of the SCOD may bei found in: section 8.5-3 of the LDO. The SCODin question is a "Gateway Scenic Corridor Overlay District". Essentially, it provides an area to restrict the placement of buildings and other development to preserve the aesthetic quality of the entryways into Town. These areas may be areas to discuss aesthetic protection tools such as landscaping, fencing, berms, and other landscape techniques which might help preserve the 'feel' of the current views along Guilford College Rd. Setbacks are set by Ordinance at 50ft., currently. As discussed previously, the PUD would allow: some variance from the strict application of the ordinance, but would have to be agreed to byt the applicant. a. The Board will have the discretion to ask for any changes that they feel are reasonable to ask for and that the applicant will agree to. a. This is a question for the applicant and will likely change slightly as the plan is altered due to feedback from the Boards and citizens. 11. Architecture The illustrations for TH And SF homes is not unique or charming. They look like any other TH development currently being built. Isee nothing about the building materials and the design in the plan. Ifeel it should have more decorative features to make ita an original and unique development. Itis concerning that not more detail was shown and not more details about building types, home products, detailing materials, articulated front a. Itisr reasonable for the Board to begin asking for the applicant to address your concerns related to these issues. Photos speak volumes andi it would be great for you to provide Town staff (me) with photos of things that you like about other developments or photos ofa architectural features which are important to you. That way, we can supply those to the applicant and they can write standards which a. Asl Idiscussed in a previous email, this can be discussed, but we want to be sure that a. Your may ask the applicant to consider providing crawl spaces for each building. There are pros/cons to both types of construction techniques. 14. What types ofr roof pitches are allowed under the current LDO? a. Roof pitches are not proscribed (and cannot legally be for SFR homes), but suggested roof pitches between 4:12 and 12:12 are recommended. 15. Are alll homes marketed for sale only? (i.e. - no "rentals") a. Asladdressed in a previous email, we cannot regulate 'rentals'. 16. What is proposed to be built/occupying the commercial areas?  development to: screen the height oft the buildings.  can it be made larger?  9. Ifeel that the SFRI lots are too small. How can we change that? 10. What is the proposed ratio of SFR to MFR (townhomes)?  facades and decorative features.  address those issues.  12. Ifeel that 1,400: sq. ft. ist too: small for al home. 13. Can we prevent slab-on-grade construction?  we: are not being exclusionary.  a. This isag great question for the applicant. However, rather than focus on a particular  IO    brand name or type of business (ex- Biscuitville' or pub-style restaurant), itis most appropriate to determine al list of acceptable land uses and focus on those. (ex.-V will allow restaurants, but will not allow restaurants with drive-thrus). a. During the rewrite of the Master Recreation Plan, it) was determined that the current ballfields have far exceeded their useful life and may be better to be relocated to a different location. Concurrently, the applicant indicated that they would likely be offering approximately 30 acres of land for the construction ofa recreation amenity to be dedicated to the Town for public use. To staff, it was reasonable to think that this may be a better location for the ballfields anda a 'sketch' was produced showing the possible relocation to this site. However, this is still up  17. Does the recreation amenity have to be al ballfield?  for discussion amongst the Board and Town Council. 18. What happened to the veterans housing components? a. This is a question for the applicant to address. beneficial to the town will be constructed. a. This is a question for the applicant to address.  19. The phasing plan should show which improvements or amenities that are necessaryor 20. Castleton is the name of a street in Whittington Hall. Will that be confusing to emergency a. Staff will follow up with emergency services to verify this concern. 21. Can you describe water/sewer utility capacity and thei impacts this development willl have a. We willl be asking the Public: Services Director to address this for the Board.  responders?  on our ability to: serve existing residents?  Please let me know if you have further questions.  Thanks!  Matthew. Johnson, AICP ICMA-CM Candidate  Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning, Town of Jamestown 336.454.7386 I mohnson@jamestown-nc.govl 301 E. Main St. (PO BOX 848). Jamestown, NC 27282 requests forr review and copying undert the Public Records Law."  wowAamesoND-ncgoy  "Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, Ch. 132, Public Records, this electronic mail message and any attachments toit it, as well as any electronici mail message(s) senti inr responset toitr may be considered public records and therefore ares subject top publicr records  From: Matthew Johnson Sent: Tuesday, August 11,20203:42PM  To: Katie Weiner <kweiner@jamestown-nc.gov; ;Sarah Glanville ganvile/7ehomal.om, gemae/ehotmalcom, Dennis Sholl <ohs113510ao.com>; Eddie Oakley    eo@northstate.net, eo@nortnstate.neb; Ed Stafford edstalford@coldwelbanker.com>; Russ Walker rscwalker@gmal.com, rcwaleregmal.como, Rebecca Rayborn rayom@amestowr. nc.gov>; Richard Newbill chatcenewoleyerocom, crichardenewbil@yahoocom>;Steve Monroe svmonoeegmai.como, Sherrie Richmond erncehenoristate.net, Cc: Kenny Cole kcole@)amestown-nc.govpilynn. Montgomery- mongomeyepmetown nc.gov>; Martha Wolfe mwore@amestown-negovojlawrence Straughn straughn@,amestowr. nc.gov>; John Capes ycapes@amestown-nc.gov; Rebecca Rayborn comeAmeOwPCEPe  eerichenortisiatenee  Subject: Castleton Village Items Good afternoon, all. Acouple of items to catch up on...  1) The Traffic Impact Study is available on the town's website here: tps/ww.amestown. cgov/news-and-notices/own-news. Sharen has set up this area as a clearinghouse for documents related to the. Johnson property rezoning. Our Facebook page has also been updated and will continue to be updated as wel have future meetings. 2) Diamondback is setting aside roughly 30 acres of land for a recreation amenity to be! built and donated to the Town of Jamestown. Currently, some limited discussion has been to move the current baseball fields (which are small, lack lighting, and arei in need of major repairs) to this location. However, Council has indicated that other uses should be considered. would ask that all ofy you (Planning Board and Town Council) be willing to discuss what should bei included on this site as we move forward with the planning process. 3) Inl light of last night's discussion regarding school overcrowding, Ihave asked the Mayor to assist us with making contact with GCS Board members and/or staff contacts to be willing to come to ai future meeting(s) to help answer some of the citizens' questions regarding their  planning processes for school infrastructure.  Thank you for your service! Matthew. Johnson, AICP ICMA-CM Candidate  Assistant Town Manager/Director of Planning, Town of Jamestown 336.454.7386 I mohnson@jamestown-nc.goy 301 E. Main St. (PO BOX 848). Jamestown, NC 27282 requests for review ando copying undert the Public Records Law."  wowamestown-ncgoy I  "Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, Ch. 132, Public Records, this electronic mail message and any; attachments toi it, as wella as any electronic mail message(s) sent inr responset toit may be considered publicr records and therefore are subject top publicr records  12    General Observations and Thoughts Regarding the Proposed PUD (August 17,2020)  Planning Board: The Town has reached out to Benchmark Planning (our consultant for the Comp Plan) and they have provided some feedback related to the initial proposal. Ihave also inserted staff thoughts ont the matter as well. Please consider using this as a basis for your discussion on Monday, August 24, 2020, as well as some of the questions/answers that have been proposed at the August 10th meeting. 1. Consider moving the park area (baseball fields, or whatever it may be) into the space between the main entrances. This could add significantly to thet function of the site. a. You eliminate a good bit of peak hour turning traffic goingi into the dense townhome development SO close to the major signalized intersections b. You make the park ther most prominent feature oft the development. Ties together the two mixed use commercial areas (see below for more on that). d. More accessible byi foot along trails, sidewalks, etc. from more of the development. 2. Farmers market - Perhaps it may be better toj just call that an event space or something along those lines to make it more flexible in its use. Will this be dedicated to the Town to  own/operate?  3. White house along Guilford College Rd. - Diamondback has repeatedly offered this to a willing non-profit. However, none! have appeared to date that are willing to take the house and fixi it up. Options include: 1) asking the developer toi fixi it up and use it as an amenity (sales office, clubhouse, etc.); 2) allowing a non-profit to acquire it andi fixi it up within a specified time frame; 3)a allowing HJS to come in and remove qualifying components for architectural salvage prior to 4. Possible needs for public safety land/buildings should be discussed with PSFD and GCSD. 5. Recommend moving the clubhouse amenity into the interior of the project to one of the flatter spaces that is about the same size. This could promote walking to the clubhouse. Having it at the entrance may create problems and makes it harder for families and older kids who can get there Ift that amenity area moves from the front, we can have small neighborhood-scale commercial areas on either side of the park. Make them 2: stories, ground floor retail and service uses- - ice cream, wine bar, sandwich shop, dry cleaners, kids clothes - and other similar uses. Upstairs areas could be office suites for music studios, a dentist, accountants, and other similar uses. Nothing big, but leasable space for professionals who might live there, or similar uses to serve the neighborhood. We need to keep in mind that the fewer daily errands that can be accomplished right around the neighborhood, the more external car trips this is goingt to 7. In place oft the park (ballfields or another use) at the corner of Mackay, townhomes could be  demolition.  on their own to access it.  generate.  relocated into this area.  13    8. Overall, suggest reducing the amount of landi for1 townhomes somewhat. Having them mostly on the Mackay side, except for keeping the ones beside the originally proposed commercial area, will help with traffic since there is better dispersal using the three Mackay Road entrances. So...the two T-2s that were on the inside of the loop are replaced with single family and the pod of SF int the northeast along Mackay is shown as townhomes ini this layout (by the relocated amenity area). The topography in those twoi interior T-2s may better suited fors single family as 9. Civic use at the corner of Guilford Rd./Guilford College Rd. - We have heard that this could be a "church". However, it might be a good place to plan for possible campus for Sheriff/PSFD. 10. The C/I area shown on the south: side of Guilford College along Bull Run needs to have specific 11. The age targeted housing doesn't really seem to make sense to me in its proposed location. It's completely segregated from everything else the community has to offer. Ifi it really is age targeted, then isolating/ /forcing people to drive everywhere doesn't seem like al big selling point. Also, we onlys see one entrance, so the developer either needs to strike a deal with the pet cemetery folks to get across their parcel into Fox Hollow, or there could be ramifications due to Fire Code. In light oft that, that spot could be good for any of the following uses: church, small 12. Int the plans, replace stock photos with photos from Jamestown (i.e. - no mountains, Castle 13. Can you distinguish between the S2 and S3 products? They have the same setbacks. 14. On page 8, it1 talks about the housing product". Perhaps we: should focus on neighborhoods" 15. Street layout - We understand that there are environmental features which cross throughout the community. However, we would like to: see more interconnected streets andl less cul-du- sacs, per the Comp Plan's requests. We are not really sure how you can efficientlyi install 16. Mixed-use components - Building design needs to be addressed. Some comments have said that the buildings look too "vanilla". The Board needs to spend time in dialogue with the applicant to consider how to improve upon the designs presented. Also, the Board should spend some time considering the types ofl land uses they would like to permit/prohibit (i.e. - 17. Parking should be addressed. We have found (ex - Riverwalk) that townhomes with garages and only one parking space are inadequate for households with several drivers. Also, neighborhood gatherings or visitors to residents ini these homes will require overflow parking  well.  uses planned fori it. Access to this areai is difficult.  private school, big preschool, congregate care facility or a similar use.  McCulloch is in High Point, etc.)  and the distinguishing characteristics of the community.  townhomes in cul-du-sacs.  prohibit adult uses, vape shops, CBD/marijuana shops, etc.)  areas.  18. Label which street cross sections will be public VS. private.  14    19. Identify who will operate/maintain publicvs. private trails. (We assume the HOA will handle all 20. Identify areas where existing sidewalk networks can/will cross into this development. 21. Entrance corridor- - Details about the entrance corridor need to be expanded. Would: suggest keeping the existing cedar trees and possibly installing al berm behind them for the proposed plantings. Would like to see more diversity in the plant selections and inclusion of native  private trails and amenities).  species.  22. Building heights - 501 ft. maximum for townhomes seems excessive.  23. Building lots - lot sizes are small-would like to see al better mix of sizes, styles, and layouts. Front-loading garages and multiple driveways block after blocki is not likely the design that most Jamestown residents would prefer to see. Ifthe lot width is only 201 ft., andi it includes a garage which typically takes up: 12', then the effective living space ont the main floor is approximately 8 24. Architectural design - Staff recommends a conversation about the more typical. Jamestown architectural vernacular. Jamestown tends to lean more Federal/Colonial and this should be  wide.  reflected ini the design guidelines.  25. Single family - Also showing a maximum height of 50, which ist tall.  26. In the single family neighborhoods, it may be good to also design some lot with detached 27. Some members of the Board have asked for "no slab on grade" construction. There are various schools of thought on this - slabs may offer better air quality since there is not an area to allow for mold growth, moisture, etc. Others may say that slabs are difficult to service since utilities will be encased in concrete. Staff will need direction from the Board/Council on these matters. Perhaps there is a compromise somewhere where a portion are allowed to be slab and a portion 28. "Standards for Residential Homes" on page 21 - need to specify details on the covered front entryways to ensure usability as a porch, etc. Also, would like to have details on types of building materials (shingles, siding, colors, styles, etc.). Perhaps not "all" homes need garages. Maybe there can be a product that can be mixed ini that doesn'to offer a garage?  garages, which is doable on 50' lot widths.  are required to have a crawl-space.