Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes September 5,2017 6:30P.M. Present: Chair - Sean Monson; Planning Commission Members - Jesse Bell, Tom Smith and Sharon Spratley; City Council Representation - Richard Higginson; City Attorney - Clint Drake; City Planner - Chad Wilkinson; City Engineer - Paul Rowland; and Recording Secretary - Darlene Baetz Excused: Vice Chair- Von Hill 1. Welcome and Introductions. Chair Monson opened the meeting at 6:30 pm and welcomed all those present. 2. Approval of the minutes for August 1, 2017. Richard Higginson made a motion to approve the minutes for August 1, 2017 as written. Sharon Spratley seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, 3. Consider preliminary subdivision approval for Stone Creek Estates Subdivision located at approximately 1500 E: and 400 North, Brock Johnston representing Rainey Homes, applicant. Smith and Spratley voting aye. Brock Johnston was present. Paul Rowland presented the staff report. Mr. Johnston, of Rainey Homes is requesting preliminary approval ofthel Keller Property Subdivision, a 50 lot subdivision of the long vacant Keller property located at the top of 400 North Street. The proposed subdivision would occur over four phases with preliminary approval being requested for the entire property and final approval being requested for each oft the phases as construction progresses. The property, which is located between 1500 East and approx. 1700 East on both sides of Bountiful Blvd. The proposed development includes 50 single family lots on 33.5 acres of ground and is located in the R-3 zone. Rainey Homes is proposing to develop the property in 4 phases and is requesting an overall preliminary approval for the entire property, with final approval coming for each oft the phases as they are ready for construction and sale. Bountiful City ordinance allows for this type of phased development as long as the preliminary plat "illustrates the total subdivision intended..." Rainey Homes intends to develop the property ini roughly the following four phases: Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 south and west part of the property, includes 18 lots along the southwest side of] Bountiful Blvd., includes 91 lots along both sides oft the Eagle Ridge Drive extension to Ward Canyon, 15 lots single cul de sac between Bountiful Blvd. and the canyon, includes 8 lots All of the lots, as proposed, exceed the minimum frontage requirements (80 ft.) and minimum lot size requirements (11,000s.f.) for the zone. Also, all oft the lots have the required 3,000 s.f. buildable pad as defined by ground under 30% in slope that is outside of required side yards and setbacks. The lots as proposed would match or be slightly larger than the lots in the surrounding subdivisions. The farthest south E-W road will be quite steep, but preliminarily shows to have a grade of between Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page Iof10 14.5% and 15%. Our code allows for streets with a grade to 12% without any type of special consideration, and up to 15% with review. This road provides a necessary connection between Bountiful Blvd. and Moss Hill Drive along the extension of Eagle Ridge Drive. There is no other place toj provide this connection which will result in a flatter slope sO the grade ofthis street can't! be avoided. With the need to break the large amount of work required for this project into more manageable parts, staff and the developer have discussed a phasing scheme that will also meet other needs. Phase 1. When the utilities are installed in Bountiful Blvd. as part of Phase 2, a detour will be needed to direct traffic around the work site. The best available detour is 1300 East, but if drivers ignore that, Moss Hill Drive, which is a 60 ft. wide local collector street, will provide the last and' best way to avoid at traffic bottle neck at the road closure. Phase 1 includes the completion of Moss Hill Drive with all of its utilities and sidewalk on both sides of the street and a water line extended to 75 So. Street. Phase 2. Phase 2 will close Bountiful Blvd. for the installation of the utility lines and will result in a completely rebuilt road surface between the southeast end of the subdivision where the Blvd. meets the Phase 3. Because the extension of Eagle Ridge Drive is included on our Master Streets Plan as a 60 ft. wide local collector street and because our ordinances only allow for a maximum 600 foot long cul de sac, the construction of Eagle Ridge Drive as part of Phase 3 will require the extension of the paved travel surface all oft the way to the end oft the pavement on the north side of Ward Canyon under the "B". The City has agreed that we will install the paving, curb and walk over the Stone Creek debris basin and the developer will be required to construct a paved roadway, similar to the section of temporary road on Skyline Drive below, to the end of the Eagle Ridge Plat C improvements. That will provide an all- weather surfaced road connecting both sides of the canyon. Additionally, the developer will be required to construct a 10 ft. wide sidewalk along the EAST side of the new Eagle Ridge Drive extension and along the WEST side of] Bountiful Blvd. from Eagle Ridge Drive to its current end at the Granada Hills Phase 4. Phase 4 includes the nine lots around the cul de sac on the north side of Bountiful Blvd., some of which back onto Ward Canyon. Road construction in this phase will be standard construction, however the layout of several lots are such that a restriction needs to be shown on the final plat As each phase is designed, approved and constructed, the developer will be required to provide Bountiful City currently has a waterline which runs in Bountiful Blvd. from View Crest Drive to where the proposed intersection with Eagle Ridge Drive will be. From that point the line runs along the proposed Bagle Ridge Drive alignment to the north and serves the area north of Ward Canyon around the "B". That is the only existing utility in the entire area, including sewer, water, irrigation water and storm drain. All of the utilities will have to be installed as part of the subdivision development, including in Bountiful Blvd. When Bountiful Blvd. was constructed the property owner declined the opportunity to install all oft the utilities with the road construction, resulting in the need to now close and completely dig up the street in order to install the needed lines. The first phase can be constructed with only slight impact on Bountiful Blvd. at the southeast end where it connects to the Granada Hills Subdivision. It will also include installing a water line along Moss Hill Drive south to 75 South St. in order to provide a proper looped system. The construction of] Phase 2 will require the Blvd. to be closed and all of the utility lines be installed. The developer is aware of this situation and knows that they will Granada Hills subdivision and Moss Hill Drive. Subdivision, to complete the existing walking trail along Bountiful Blvd. restricting construction on the steep slope oft the canyon. development agreements and bonds to cover the improvements. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page 20 of10 ultimately have to reconstruct the street surface when the lines and service laterals have been installed. Phases 3 and 4 can have the utilities install as a normal part oft the street construction, without disruption After review it has been determined that the additional run off water created by the development of this property can be handled in the excess capacity of the Stone Creek channel improvements and therefore onsite storm water detention will not be required. The developer will be required to pay the regular Storm Water Impact Fee at $2,100/ per acre. Modifications to the storm drain outlet into Stone Creek currently located at Moss Hill Drive and Bountiful Blvd. will need to be approved and permitted by Computer modeling of our water system shows we currently have enough reservoir capacity to meet the needs ofboth this development and the future development oft the Kingston property on the north side of Stone Creek. This area is served by the 1.5 million gallon reservoir located just east oft the temple. The computer model has also shown that this development and the future Kingston property development will force a need to increase our ability to get water from the city's wells and other sources, all ofwhich are located below Davis Blvd., to the Temple View reservoir. These improvements include ai new pump house at the Hannah Holbrook Elementary school reservoir, new pump lines from that point to our existing trunk line running across Bountiful Blvd./Eaglewood Drive and eventually a new pump house located at a new 1.5 million gallon reservoir that the city will construct on the Kingston Property just west of where Moss Hill Drive meets Bountiful Blvd. In order to make the on-site water system work for all but Phase 3, an additional tie to our existing water system will be required on 75 So. Street. This will mean laying new line in Moss Hill Drive west of the LDS church, but will reduce the need for multiple pressure reducing valves in the new streets. While not all of the projects will be constructed with the first phase ofthis project, each will eventually need to bel built as the phasing progresses. As proposed, the property that is to be developed with this plan excludes a 5.7 acre parcel, much of which is north of Stone Creek and which is inaccessible from the south side. It also includes the very steep ground along the south side of the creek which contains the abandoned road that used to be the main access to the mountain before Skyline Drive was built. Bountiful City ordinance does not allow for remainder parcels tol be left orphaned by the subdivision ofaj property sO this property would need to be included as part of the surrounding lots. Rather than creating a number of large, odd-shaped and mostly unusable lots, Rainey Homes has proposed that the Parcel 3 property be dedicated to the city to be used as open space. The Bountiful Trails Committee is very excited about the prospect of improving the old road and constructing a trail which would connect from Bountiful Blvd. at Moss Hill Drive to Eagle Ridge Drive at the Stone Creek Detention Basin. Although a short section, it would be the first step in providing a trail which could eventually be built from Rocket Park along Stone Creek to the detention basin and tying into the trails which access the mountain through Ward Canyon. Staff recommended preliminary approval of Stone Creek Estates Subdivision with the following ten tot traffic on Moss Hill Drive or Bountiful Blvd. Davis County Flood Control. conditions: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. Pay the Storm Water Impact Fee as described. Participate in the off-site water costs as described. Dedicate the property designated as Parcel 3 to Bountiful City for trails and open space. Receive approval from Davis County Flood Control for any modification to the storm water Construct the 10 ft. wide walk along Eagle Ridge Drive and Bountiful Blvd. as described. Construct the full width of Moss Hill Drive including all curb and gutter and walk on both east outfall. and west side. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September. 5, 2017 Page 30 of10 7. 8. 9. Reconstruct the full width Bountiful Blvd. asphalt surface where the new utilities are installed. Replace any damaged or settled curb and gutter and sidewalk along Moss Hill Drive and Bountiful Blvd. and install new where it doesn't tcurrently exist. Post the necessary bonds and pay the required fees with the respective phases. 10. Compliance with all Bountiful City zoning ordinances and subdivision construction Mr. Rowland clarified that Bountiful City does not have a shortage of water storage in this area. FEMA has reviewed storm water detention for this area and found that the concrete channels have the ability to handle the excess water capacity. He also stated that Bountiful Blvd will be closed for about 3 months Commission Members expressed their excitement for the lot to be dedicated to the Trails Committee. Sharon Spratley made a motion that the Planning Commission pass a recommendation for approval to the City Council for the preliminary subdivision approval for Stone Creek Estates Subdivision located at 1500 E and 400 North with the 10 conditions outlined by staff. Tom Smith seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, Smith and Spratley voting aye. 4. Consider final site plan approval for Bristol Village a 19 multi-family townhome unit development at 1910, 1940 and 1950 S 200 West, Taylor Spendlove representing Brighton Development Utah requirements. during the construction season and the costs will bej paid for by the developer. The Commission asked questions related to timing oft the various phases. LLC, applicant. Taylor Spendlove was present. Chad Wilkinson presented the staffi report. The applicant, Brighton Development Utah, is requesting final site plan approval for a 19 unit townhome style multifamily development. The submitted final site plan substantially conforms to the preliminary site plan which received approval from the Commission and City Council last month. The applicant has modified the site plan to address conditions related to access into the site, including sidewalk connections to the 200 West facing units and a sidewalk along one side of the access drive to provide pedestrian connection to the interior units. The applicant has also revised the onsite fire hydrant The previously submitted building elevations have not changed and the applicant will be required to follow the design approved by the City Council. The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan which will require a few redline corrections in order to meet the Code, related to number of trees. A final landscape plan will be required in conjunction with the building permit submittal. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval oft the request for final site plan to the location requested by the City Engineer. approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Complete any and all redline corrections. 2. Prior to issuance ofal building permit, complete the following: a. Consolidate the parcels and complete any proposed parcel boundary adjustments. b. Submit a final landscape plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 16 of the Bountiful City Zoning Ordinance. Include the following: Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page 4 of10 i. Street trees shall be required along each street and any reverse frontage conditions. Each tree shall be a minimum two (2) inch caliper and shall be planted at a minimum spacing of one (1) tree for every thirty-five (35) lineal feet of street frontage or fraction thereof over twenty (20) feet. ii. In addition to required street trees, each lot or parcel shall include the following: 1. At least one (1) ornamental tree of at least one (1) inch caliper, and/or one (1) screening 2. Fivel hundred (500) square feet ofrequired landscaping in commercial developments that 3. Seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of required landscaping in all multifamily developments and all commercial developments that are less than 2.0 acres in size; and 4. At least one (1) shrub, minimum five (5) gallon, for each two hundred (200) square feet c.Any modifications required by conditions of the Planning Commission and City Council. The Commission discussed the concerns raised by the neighboring property owner. Mr. Spendlove stated that the retaining wall would be moved back and the fence built on the property line. Richard Higginson made a motion that the Planning Commission pass ai recommendation for approval to the City council for the final site plan approval for Bristol Village a 19 multi-family townhome unit development at 1910, 1940 and 1950 S 200 West with the two conditions outlined by staff. Sharon Spratley seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, 5. Consider preliminary and final site plan approval for Colonial Square Service Alley tree of atl least two (2) inch caliper, for each are two (2.0) acres or larger, or ofrequired landscaping. Smith and Spratley voting aye. Improvements, 5001 W 2600 South, Kevin Allcott, applicant. Kevin Allcott was present. Chad Wilkinson presented the staff report. The applicant, Kevin Alcott, representing the Colonial Square Property Owners Association, is requesting preliminary and final site plan review approval for improvements to the service drive and employee parking area. The proposed improvements include approval ofa a building pad for a new 1,260 The applicant previously completed improvements to the parking area and driveways located at the front of the development which were approved by the City Council in 2008. The current proposal involves improvements to the parking and driveway areas to the rear of the buildings and will include repaving the existing access road restoring/establishing landscaping in this area and constructing a new service and equipment building to store snow removal and other maintenance equipment. The work will also include the construction of a new waterway that will provide better handling of stormwater runoff from The development was originally constructed around 1976 and therefore the landscaping does not meet current code standards. The applicant proposes to bring the site into greater compliance with current standards by installing landscaping throughout the rear of the site. Because of the site layout originally approved, it is not possible to construct landscaping areas along all property lines as required by Code. Dimensionally, requiring 5 feet of landscaping along the perimeter of the site and 10 feet along areas abutting residential zones would eliminate much of the parking located in the rear of the development. square foot storage/equipment building for the development. the site. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes September 5, 2017 Page5of10 Since this is a request to reconstruct existing parking areas and does not involve any new building, other than a small equipment shed, calling for the site to come into complete compliance is not required. The applicants' proposal to bring the site more into compliance with current standards is proportional with the request and is desirable to provide additional landscaping to the site while allowing for Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request for preliminary 1. Complete any modifications required by conditions oft the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Allcott stated that the foundation and landscaping would be done prior to the building construction. Richard Higginson made ai motion that the Planning Commission pass ai recommendation for approval to the City Council for the preliminary and final site plan approval for Colonial Square Service Alley Improvements, 500 W 2600 South with the one condition outlined by staff. Sharon Spratley seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, Smith and 6. - Consider final site plan and final plat approval for a commercial office development at 1065 S 500 reconstruction oft the paved areas. site plan approval subject to the following conditions: The building will be approx. 1200 sq ft and will be fiber board siding. Spratley voting aye. West, Jeff Beck representing Union Avenue LLC, applicant. Jeff Beck was present. Paul Rowland presented the staff report. Jeff Beck has completed the plat map and site plans and is now requesting final approval for the four lot sth West Office Park Commercial Subdivision. He has prepared and submitted the plat map and site plan drawings for the proposed subdivision. Todd Christensen has checked and returned the plans and All of the items and conditions reviewed with the preliminary submittal have been revise to meet requirements for final approval. The property owners met with representatives of the UDOT and have shown an access easement on the final plat map which meets the requirements set by the UDOT: in order to get an access permit. The plans and plat are: now: ready for final review by the Planning Commission. The developers previously submitted building elevations and preliminary landscape plans. As the plans move forward to building permit, the elevations will need to match those approved by the Council. In Staff recommends the Planning Commission send a recommendation for final approval to the City plat map to the engineer and redline corrections have now been resubmitted. addition, a final landscape plan will be required at the time ofbuilding permit. Council. 1. Payment ofa all required fees. 3. Provide a current Title Report. 2. Post an approved bond and sign al Bountiful City Development Agreement Mr. Wilkinson presented revised elevations showing the north side of the Flex Building. No other Richard Higginson made ai motion that the Planning Commission pass ai recommendation for approval to changes were proposed between preliminary and final. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page 6of10 the City Council for the final site plan and final plat approval for a commercial office development at 1065 S 500 West with the three conditions outlined by staff. Tom Smith seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, Smith and Spratley voting aye. 7. Consider a subdivision vacation for Shaw Subdivision, Justin and Lauri Shaw, applicant. Paul Rowland presented the staff report. The Shaw Subdivision is a two-lot subdivision located on 400 North. Justin and Lauri own both lots in the subdivision and wish to vacate the subdivision in order to combine the lots into one parcel. Subdivision vacations must be approved by the City Council by ordinance after a public hearing. The Land Use Ordinance requires that, prior to consideration by the City Council, the application be reviewed by the Planning Commission for their recommendation of approval with conditions or denial. Mr. and Mrs. Shaw no longer have a need to sell off a portion of their property and now wish to build a detached garage across the existing property line between lots 1 and 2. The Code prohibits making improvements such as driveways or accessory structures to a lot that does not have a primary residential structure. Combining the lots through the subdivision vacation will make it possible to construct the The purpose of the prohibition on constructing accessory structures and driveways on vacant lots is to prevent these structures from being sold separately from a primary residence. Without the proposed combination, Lot 2 could still be sold separately from Lot 1 which could result in an accessory structure on an individual lot without a primary structure. In the past, this situation has resulted in accessory structures being converted to non-permitted business and/or storage use which is incompatible with the The current subdivision plat provided a large easement to cover the Stone Creek channel running along the south and west side of the property. That will need to be replaced by a new public utility and Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the proposed vacation with the condition that the vacated Stone Creek easement be replace Richard Higginson made a motion that the Planning Commission pass ai recommendation for approval to the City Council for a subdivision vacation for Shaw Subdivision as outlined by staff. Sharon Spratley seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Monson, Smith 8. Discussion of potential changes to zoning and development standards in Plat A Neighborhood. The Historic Downtown area of Bountiful, contained within the boundaries of the original "Plat A",is the cultural and civic heart of the City. The neighborhood, bounded by 400 North, 500 South, 400 East, and 200 West, has seen tremendous changes over the past several years as redevelopment has occurred In2 2006, a planning effort was undertaken that resulted in a document titled the "Bountiful Historic Fort Plan." This document included goals and policies and recommendations for the Plat A area. The document was never officially adopted, although several of the goals and policies were used to inform desired improvements. standards of the single family zone. drainage easement covering the same ground. with a new recorded easement. and Spratley voting aye. along Main Street and the surrounding neighborhood. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes September 5, 2017 Page 7of10 subsequent zoning changes and the Downtown Master Plan component oft the 2009 General Plan. One of the major recommendations related toj preservation of the existing residential neighborhoods east of100 East and west of 100 West. In 2007, the zoning map was amended to include the properties between 400 East and 100 East in the single family residential zone. The zoning of properties between 100 West and 200 West were not changed and remain in the multifamily zoning district. Residents oft this portion of the neighborhood have expressed concern over whether this area should remain a multi-family residential zoning district, or whether zoning should be changed to preserve existing single family Residents and business owners within the Plat A neighborhood have also voiced concerns over preserving the character of Bountiful' s historic downtown and have expressed a desire to revisit the allowed uses and allowed density of development in the neighborhood. Specifically, residents of the neighborhood have expressed concern over the number of multi-family units being constructed in the area and the scale and density of development. Recent developments including the IHC expansion and mixed use development within the Downtown (DN) zoning district have brought up questions related to Inl late March of this year, the City Council adopted a six month moratorium to allow time for the City to review these issues and make desired changes to zoning and development regulations prior to new development moving forward. As part of the review process, the City initiated a survey of residents and business owners in Plat A in order to give opportunities for additional public input on development in the area. The City received over 250 responses to the survey, which was sent out to all property owners int the Plat A area. Staffhas taken this input and combined it with input from the following sources: homes and encourage the development ofs single family residential. allowed height, setbacks, parking and other development standards. The 2006-2008 Bountiful Historic Fort Planning Process and documents Recommendations from Envision Utah given during the original planning process Recent City Council Decisions The. Recent Plat A Survey Concerns expressed during recent application review by the Planning Commission After reviewing input from all of these sources, Staff is prepared present recommendations for proposed Change the zoning for the area located between 100 West and 200 West currently zoned RM-19 changes to the zoning and development standards. (Multifamily 19 units to the acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential) This will reduce the amount of property zoned for apartments by approximately 40 acres Provide development standards that encourage the type ofmultifamily development Include transitions from higher intensity development on Main Street to development consistent with single family residential on 100 west and 100 East including Maximum height transitions 55 feet on Main to 35 feet on 100 West. 1f foot for each 10 feet ofadditional setback to mid-block. Add "whichever is less" language to current 35 foot and 2-story standard Provide architectural standards for residential development ini the DN zone along 100 West and 100 East that include elements compatible with single family residential, such as gable roofdesigns, smaller footprint sizes for buildings, in size envisioned in the 2006-08 planning process. primary building entrances facing the street. Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes September 5, 2017 Page 8 of10 Consider a 2:1 building width to height ratio to keep building sizes at a smaller scale along 100 West. Potentially provide exemption for rowhouse/rownhome Decrease minimum lot size ofCommercial and Mixed Use Development in Downtown from 20,000 sft to a size that better matches the minimum lot width standard (somewhere style developments between 7,500 to 10,000s sf) Minimum lot width is 50: feet- In order to meet the minimum lot size the lot would have tol be 400 feet in depth Reduce or eliminate the 50-foot parking setback from Main Street. Replace with standards requiring parking tol be located behind or to the side ofbuildings throughout the Horizontal VS. vertical mixed use -Clarify that Multi family is only allowed on Main Zone. Street when a commercial use is located on the ground floor. Provide clarifications on permissible height for roofn mounted equipment 1foot of setback for every foot ofheight for mechanical equipment/ penthouses No more than 20 percent ofroofarea. Add new Single Family residential tol list of allowed uses Correct errors and inconsistencies in code sections RM-12 Setback inconsistencies Next Steps Consider Text Amendment for DN Zone Standards- Public Hearing at Planning Commission Zone Change to SFR- Hold Public Hearing at Planning Commission October 3 September 19, City Council to follow Mr. Wilkinson showed zoning in 1954, 1961, 1963, 1993, and 2003. Current zoning is shown from 2008 to current. Commission Members comments: Mr. Smith: 1. Would like to see Main Street as a vital street with pedestrians and businesses 2. Would like to see the: zone changes to Single Family on the east of 100 West 3. Discussed the possibility of parking spaces in the middle of the block and large trees 4. Would like to see 100 W: more ofai residential feel Mr. Bell: 1. Liked what Mr. Smith had stated. 2. Would like to see parking more of an alley loaded 3. Outside dining 4. Sidewalk sales 5. Dining Downtown 6. Developers to use upgraded building materials 7. Appropriate trees for Landscaping 8. Provide owner flexibility - parking is important but not the only issue Ms. Spratley: 1. Minimum lot size - bringing down the size oflot to accommodate smaller single family homes Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page 9 of10 Mr. Higginson: 1. Design standards are ai necessity 2. Height restriction in the Downtown zone Staff Comments: Mr. Wilkinson: conforming Audience Comments: 1. Mixed use standards might be appropriate for the C-G zone area along 200 W 2. The current apartments would be in the proposed change ofzone and would be considered legal non- 3. Downtown zone does allow multi-family (Mixed Use) 1. Concerned about the addition of apartments in the Downtown zone 2. Consider instead of apartments - owner townhomes Mr. Wilkinson stated that the City staff would like to go forward with standards for the zone and text amendments. The code text should be available for the next packet. 5. Planning Director's report, review of pending applications and miscellaneous business. Planning Commission meeting: September 19, 2017- Public Hearing for the text amendment for Downtown Zoning October 3, 2017 - Ordinance Amendment for Downtown Zoning September 12, 2017- Working Meeting and City Council Meeting October 10, 2017 - Ordinance Amendment for Downtown Zoning City Council meeting: Chair Monson ascertained there were no other items to discuss. Themeeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m. Chad Wilkinson, Bountiful City Planner 1 Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 5, 2017 Page 10of10