BOUNTIFUL CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, September 5, 2017  6:30 p.m.  NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Bountiful City Planning Commission will hold a meeting in the Conference Room at City Hall, 790 South 100 East, Bountiful, Utah, at the time and on the date given above. The public is invited. Persons who are disabled as defined by the American with Disabilities Act may request an accommodation by contacting the Bountiful Planning Office at 298-6190. Notification at least 24 hours prior to the meeting would be  appreciated.  1. Welcome and Introductions.  2. Approval of the minutes for August 1, 2017.  3. Consider preliminary subdivision approval for Stonecreek Estates Subdivision located at approximately 1500 E and 400 North, Brock Johnston representing Rainey Homes, 4. Consider final site plan approval for Bristol Village a 19 multi-family townhome unit development at 1910, 1940 and 1950 S 200 West, Taylor Spendlove representing 5. Consider preliminary and final site plan approval for Colonial Square Service Alley 6. Consider final site plan and final plat approval for a commercial office development at 1065 $500 West, Jeff Beck representing Union Avenue LLC, applicant. 7. Consider a subdivision vacation for Shaw Subdivision, Justin and Lauri Shaw, applicant. 8. Discussion of potential changes to zoning and development standards in Plat A 9. Planning Director'sreport, review of pending applications and miscellaneous business.  applicant.  Brighton Development Utah) LLC, applicant.  Improvements, 500 W 2600 South, Kevin Alcott, applicant.  Neighborhood.  AE  Chad Wilkinson, City Planner    Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes August 1, 2017 6:30 P.M.  Present:  Chair- - Sean Monson, Vice Chair - Von Hill; Planning Commission Members - Jesse Bell, Tom Smith and Sharon Spratley; City Council Representation - Richard Higginson; City Attorney Clint Drake; City Planner Chad Wilkinson; City Engineer - Paul Rowland; and Recording  Secretary - Darlene Baetz  1. Welcome and Introductions.  Chair Monson opened the meeting at 6:30 pm and welcomed all those present.  2. Approval of the minutes for June 20, 2017.  Richard Higginson made a motion to approve the minutes for June 20, 2017 as written. Von Hill seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Hill, Smith and 3. Consider preliminary site plan approval for Bristol Village a 19 multi-family townhome unit development at 1910, 1940 and 1950 S 200 West, Taylor Spendlove representing Brighton  Spratley voting aye and Sean Monson abstained.  Development Utah LLC, applicant.  Taylor Spendlove was present. Chad Wilkinson presented the staff report.  The 1.18 acre property is located within the RM-19 zoning district. Surrounding uses include a mix of single family and multifamily uses to the north, multifamily residential use to the west and south and The development is located on three existing parcels one of which is vacant. The other parcels are currently developed with single family homes which would be removed before construction. Prior to issuance of building permits, these parcels will need to be consolidated to avoid structures crossing property lines. The applicant has indicated a desire to record a Townhome PUD plat to allow for individual ownership of the units in the future. The Code allows for this on existing projects, SO the applicant will need to first begin construction ofthe units and then apply for PUD plat approval after the The development is similar to the project recently constructed by Brighton Development on Pages Lane. Access to the project will be via a single 24 foot wide driveway on 200 West. The proposed development meets the minimum parking standards based on the unit mix and has provided one covered parking space for each unit as required by ordinance. Each of the units will have a two-car garage, a majority ofwhich will be accomplished via tandem parking spaces (one parking space behind the other). This is allowed in townhome style developments provided both spaces are assigned to the same unit. Guest parking is proposed to be provided within the individual driveways of the units. While this technically meets the Code, there is some concern that garages will be used for storage and that the overall number of spaces will be reduced, pushing guest parking into the adjacent street. Because oft the narrowness of the access driveway, parking will not be allowed on the interior access lane. The Commission may wish to consider a condition requiring on-site guest spaces not located in driveways.  single family residential to the east.  units exist.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - August 1, 2017  Page Iof3    The proposed structures are three stories and are less than the 35 foot maximum height for buildings in the RM-19 zone. The buildings meet minimum setback requirements for the zone. The applicant proposes ai mix ofc cultured stone and fiber cement siding. The units are slightly staggered along the front façade to provide some relief. Each of the units has a covered entry or balcony on the front of the building. The landscape plan shows fenced private recreational space for each unit. The units fronting on 200 West have been designed with entries facing the street. It is recommended that this design be enhanced by the addition of a sidewalk connection to 200 West connecting the entry to the unit. The proposed buildings show private outdoor space in the form of fenced areas at the rear of the units as required by Code. The proposed elevations appear to limit the amount of siding materials to 50 percent The submitted landscape plan exceeds the minimum 40 percent landscaping required by Code. A final landscape and irrigation plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 16 of the Land Use Ordinance and prepared by a licensed landscape architect will be required prior to building permit issuance. Storm water will be collected in a detention facility at the northeast of the property and then connected to an existing storm drain in 200 West. Water and sewer plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer with minor redlines to the location of the onsite hydrant. Sewer and water service to the project will be via existing lines in 2001 West which will require resurfacing ofthe road after construction. The proposed development is in an area that is zoned for multifamily use and with conditions meets the applicable standards of the Code. Current infrastructure is adequate to handle the additional units Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request for preliminary  ofthe exterior as: required by Code.  proposed.  site plan approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Complete any and all redline corrections.  a. Revise the location of the fire hydrant to the location shown on the annotated site plan b. Show sidewalk connection to the units fronting on 200 West in order to provide pedestrian  attached to this report.  access to the units from the public right ofway. 2. Prior to issuance ofal building permit, complete the following:  a. Obtain final site plan approval.  b. Consolidate the parcels and complete any proposed parcel boundary adjustments. Submit a final landscape plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 16 of the Bountiful City d. Any modifications required by conditions ofthe Planning Commission and City Council. Commission members and Staff discussed the concern for the parking challenges for guests. Mr. Wilkinson suggested that restrictive covenants be recorded for guest parking however, the HOA would need to enforce this. Mr. Spendlove confirmed that there are one or two vacant stalls outside of the garage, depending on the number of garage stalls. There is also street parking available for guests. Mr. Smith asked that a sidewalk be added to connect 200 West on one side of the access lane.  Zoning Ordinance.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - August 1, 2017  Page 2 of3    Tom Smith made a motion that thel Planning Commission pass a recommendation for approval to the City council for the preliminary site plan approval for Bristol Village a 19 multi-family townhome unit development at 1910, 1940 and 1950S2 200 West with the two conditions outlined by staff and the  addition oftwo conditions from Commission:  3. 4.  Show a sidewalk connection to 200 West on one side oft the access lane provided garages in order to preserve driveway parking for guests.  Record a restrictive covenant on the property requiring that residents park vehicles within  Richard Higginson seconded the motion. Voting passed 5-0 with Commission members Bell,  Higginson, Hill, Smith and Spratley voting aye.  4. Consider preliminary and final plat approval of the Bountiful City Cemetery Plat Q.  Paul Rowland presented the staff report.  Each addition to the City's cemetery requires the preparation of a subdivision plat map, review by the Planning Commission and the City Council, and then recording of the plat with the Bountiful City Recorder, all before any new burial plots can be sold. The next plat is now ready for review and The roads for this addition were constructed in 2015 and the sprinkling system was installed and the grass allowed to grow through 2016. The landscaping has now grown to the point that these plots are now: ready for sale and use. Additionally, the inventory of available plots in the rest oft the cemetery has shrunk to the point that we need to: move forward with opening this expansion. Plat Q contains 283 full sized lots, with each full lot containing eight individual 4 ft. by 8 ft. burial plots, and 21 partial lots. Partial lots, which contain between 1 and 7 plots, are caused when roads or other interferences cut Statfrecommended that the Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation for preliminary and Commission Members and Staff discussed the options for the East Cemetery property with alternative Richard Higginson made ai motion that the Planning Commission pass a recommendation for approval to the City Council for the preliminary and final plat approval of the Bountiful City Cemetery Plat Q. Von Hill seconded the motion. Voting passed 6-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Hill,  recording.  through lots. Thet total count for Plat Qi is 2,3361 burial plots.  final approval oft the Bountiful City Cemetery Plat Q to the City Council.  burial methods.  Monson, Smith and Spratley voting aye.  5. Planning Director's report, review of pending applications and miscellaneous business.  There have been 304 surveys taken for Plat A.  Chair Monson ascertained there were no other items to discuss. The: meeting was adjourned at 7:09 p.m.  Chad Wilkinson, Bountiful City Planner  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - August 1, 2017  Page 3 of3    Commission Staff Report  Item #3  Subject: Address: Author: Date:  Preliminary Subdivision Approval Stone Creek Estates  Subdivision 1600 East Bountiful Blvd City Engineer, City Planner September! 5, 2017  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Department: Engineering, Planning  Background  Mr. Brock. Johnston, of Rainey Homes is requesting preliminary approval of the Keller Property Subdivision, a 50 lot subdivision oft the long vacant Keller property located at the top of 400 North Street. The proposed subdivision would occur over four phases with preliminary approval being requested for the entire property and them final approval being requested for  each oft the phases as construction progresses.  Analysis  Layout and Zone Requirements:  The property, which is located between 1500 East and what would be about 1700 East on both sides of Bountiful Blvd., is what has long been referred to as the Keller Property. This proposed development includes 50 single family lots on 33.5 acres of ground and is located in the R-3 zone. Rainey Homes is proposing to develop the property in 4 phases and is requesting an overall preliminary: approval for the entire property, with final approval coming for each of the phases as they are ready for construction and sale. Bountiful City ordinance allows for this type of phased development as long as the preliminary plat 'illustrates the total subdivision Rainey Homes intends to develop the property in roughly the following four phases:  intended." Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4  south and west part of the property, includes 18 lots along the southwest: side of Bountiful Blvd., includes 9 lots  along both sides of the Eagle Ridge Drive extension to Ward Canyon, 15 lots single cul de sac between Bountiful Blvd. and the canyon, includes 8 lots All of the lots, as proposed, exceed the minimum frontage requirements (80 ft.) and minimum lot size requirements (11,000 s.f.) for the zone. Also, all of the lots have the required 3,000 s.f. buildable pad as defined by ground under 30% in slope that is outside of required side yards and setbacks. The lots as proposed would basically match or be slightly larger than the The farthest south E-W road will be quite steep. Not unusual in this part of Bountiful, but preliminarily it shows to have a grade of between 14.5% and 15%. Our code allows for streets with a grade to 12% without any type of special consideration, and up to 15% with  lots in the surrounding subdivisions.    review. This road provides a necessary connection between Bountiful Blvd. and Moss Hill Drive along the extension of Eagle Ridge Drive. There is no other place to provide this connection which will result in at flatter slope sO the grade of this street can't be avoided.  Phasing Considerations:  Along with the need to break the large amount of work required fori this project in to more manageable parts, the city and developer have discussed aj phasing scheme that will also Phase 1. When the utilities are installed in Bountiful Blvd. as part of Phase 2 (discussed below), a detour will be needed to direct traffic around the work: site. The best available detour is 1300 East, but if drivers ignore that, Moss Hill Drive, which is a 601 ft. wide local collector street, will provide the last and best way to avoid a traffic bottle neck at the road closure. Phase 1 includes the completion of Moss Hill Drive with all of its utilities and sidewalk on both sides of the street Phase 2. Phase 2 will close Bountiful Blvd. for the installation of the utility lines and will result inac completely rebuilt road: surface between the southeast end of the subdivision where the Phase 3. Because the extension of Eagle Ridge Drive is included on our Master Streets Plan asa 601 ft. wide local collector street and because our ordinances only allow for a maximum 600 foot long cul de sac, the construction of Eagle Ridge Drive as part of Phase 3 will require the extension of the paved travel surface all of the way to the end oft the pavement on the north side of Ward Canyon under the "B". The City has agreed that we willi install the paving, curb and walk over the Stone Creek debris basin and the developer will be required to construct: a paved roadway, similar to the section of temporary road on Skyline Drive below, to the end of the Eagle Ridge Plat Ci improvements. That will provide an all-weather surfaced road connecting both sides of the canyon. Additionally, the developer will be required to construct a 101 ft. wide sidewalk along the EAST: side of the new Eagle Ridge Drive extension and along the WEST side of Bountiful Blvd. from Eagle Ridge Drive to its current end at the Granada Hills Subdivision, to complete the existing walking trail along Bountiful Blvd. Phase 4. Phase 4 includes the nine lots around the cul de sac on the north side of Bountiful Blvd., some of which back on to Ward Canyon. Road construction ini this phase will be standard construction, however the layout of several lots are such that a restriction needs to be shown  meet a couple of other needs.  and a water line extended to 75 So. Street.  Blvd. meets the Granada Hills subdivision and Moss Hill Drive.  ont the final plat restricting construction on the steep slope of the canyon. provide development agreements and bonds to cover the improvements.  As each phase is designed, approved and constructed, the developer will be required to  Utilities:  subdivisionsistone creek estates subdivision! 2017pcp preliminary subdivision stone creek estates subdivision, september  2017.docx    Bountiful City currently has a waterline which runs in Bountiful Blvd. from View Crest Drive to where the proposed intersection with Eagle Ridge Drive will be. From that point the line runs along the proposed Eagle Ridge Drive alignment to the north and serves the area north of Ward Canyon around the "B". That is the only existing utility in the entire area, including sewer, water, irrigation water and storm drain. All of the utilities will have tol be installed as part of the subdivision development, including in Bountiful Blvd. When Bountiful Blvd. was constructed the property owner declined the opportunity toi install all of the utilities with the road construction, resulting in the need to now close and completely dig up the street The first phase can be constructed with only slight impact on Bountiful Blvd. at the southeast end where it connects to the Granada Hills Subdivision. It will also include installing a water line along Moss Hill Drive south to 75 South St. in order to provide a proper looped The construction of Phase 2 will require the Blvd. to be closed and all oft the utility lines be installed. The developer is aware oft this situation and knows that they will ultimately have tor reconstruct the street surface when the lines and service laterals have been installed. Phases 3 and 4 can have the utilities install as a normal part of the street construction, without  inc order to install the needed lines.  system.  disruption to traffic on Moss Hill Drive or Bountiful Blvd.  Storm Water:  After close review it has been determined that the additional run off water created by the development of this property can be handled in the excess capacity of the Stone Creek channel improvements and therefore onsite storm water detention will not be required. The developer will be required to pay the regular Storm Water Impact Fee at $2,100/ per acre. Modifications to the storm drain outlet into Stone Creek currently located at Moss Hill Drive and Bountiful Blvd. will need tol be approved and permitted by Davis County Flood Control.  Off Site Water Line Contribution:  Computer modeling of our water system shows that we currently have enough reservoir capacity to meet the needs of both this development and the future development of the Kingston property on the north side of Stone Creek. This area is served by the 1.5 million gallon reservoir located just east of the temple. However, our computer model has also shown that this development and the future Kingston property development will force a need to increase our ability to get water from the city's wells and other sources, all of which are located below Davis Blvd., to the Temple View reservoir. These improvements include a new pump house at the Hanna Holbrook Elementary school reservoir, new pump lines from that point to our existing trunk line running across Bountiful Blvd./Eaglewood Drive and eventually a new pump house located at a new 1.5 million gallon reservoir that the cityi is going to construct ont the Kingston Property. just west of where Moss Hilll Drive meets Bountiful Blvd. Ino order to make the on-site water system work for all but Phase 3, an additional tiet to our existing water system will be required on 75S So. Street. This will mean laying new line in subdivisionslstone creek estates subdivision 2017pc preliminary subdivision stone creek estates subdivision, september  2017.docx    Moss Hill Drive west oft the LDS church, but will reduce the need for multiple pressure reducing We have been meeting with Rainey Homes and the Kingstons for several months discussing their respective participation in these various projects, and the timing for each. While not all of the projects will be constructed with the first phase of this project, each will eventually need to be built as the phasing progresses. Ihave attached a summary spreadsheet which we have shared with the Rainey group and the Kingstons which includes the estimated timing and pricing fori the projects and how the responsibility for payment will be shared.  valves in the new streets.  Parcel 3  As proposed, the property that is to be developed with this plan excludes a 5.7 acre parcel, much of which is north of Stone Creek and which is inaccessible from the south side. It also includes the very steep ground along the south side of the creek which contains the abandoned road that used to bet the main access to the mountain before Skyline Drive was built. Bountiful City ordinance does not allow for remainder parcels to be left orphaned by the subdivision of a property sO this property would need to bei included as part oft the surrounding lots. Rather than creating a bunch of large, odd-shaped and mostly unusable lots, Rainey Homes has proposed that the Parcel 3 property be dedicated toi the city to be used as open space. The Bountiful Trails Committee is very excited about the prospect ofi improving the old road and constructing a trail which would connect from Bountiful Blvd. at Moss Hill Drive to Eagle Ridge Drive at the Stone Creek Detention Basin. Although a short section, it would be the first step in providing ai trail which could eventually be built from Rocket Park along Stone Creek to the detention basin and tying into the trails which access the mountain through Ward  Canyon.  Department Review  The proposed preliminary and final plats have been reviewed by the Engineering  Department and Planning Department.  Recommendation conditions:  Recommend preliminary approval of Stone Creek Estates Subdivision with the following  1. Pay the Storm Water Impact Fee as described. Participate in the off-site water costs as described.  2. 3. 4. 5. 2017.docx  Dedicate the property designated as Parcel 31 to Bountiful Cityf for trails and open Receive approval from Davis County Flood Control for any modification to the Construct the 10 ft. wide walk along Eagle Ridge Drive and Bountiful Blvd. as  space. storm water outfall.  subdivisionsistone creek estates subdivision: 2017pc preliminary: subdivision stone creeke estates subdivision, september    described.  6. 7. 8. 9.  Construct the full width of Moss Hill Drive including all curb and gutter and walk Reconstruct thei full width Bountiful Blvd. asphalt surface where the new utilities Replace any damaged or settled curb and gutter and sidewalk along Moss Hill Drive and Bountiful Blvd. and install new where it doesn't currently exist. Post the necessary bonds and pay the required fees with the respective phases. 10. Compliance with all Bountiful Cityz zoning ordinances and subdivision  on both east and west side. are installed.  construction requirements.  Significant Impacts  This development will have an impact on the traffic on 400 North Street primarily and Moss Hill Drive to a lesser extent. It will also have an impact on the utilities ini the area. Both the roads and utilities have the needed capacity to absorb the expected impact with the exception of the needed upgrades to the water system that have been discussed.  Attachments  1. Aerial photo showing the area to be subdivided; 2. A copy of the Water System shared estimate 3. A copy of the preliminary plat.  subdivisionslstone creek estates subdivision. 2017pc preliminary subdivision stone creek estates subdivision, september  2017.docx    Aerial Photo of the Proposed Stone Creek Estates Subdivision  subdivisionslstone creek estates subdivision: 2017pc preliminary subdivision stone creeke estates subdivision, september  2017.docx    888  #  BE d    snpajua  3107 ANF  S3IHIST NI3NDINOIS  VH  0966    sngajug 3 VH  wuTs  1373047 7141LN208 S3IVIS3) N33MDINOIS  10P8  a153MDMIIA    snpajug  wYW7S3 NOISIAIGEAS:  10P8  VH  M33MINOIS  B55  A  2d.153MDA3IA  B -  B  dg) logj lane  -    snpajug 9627-862-108 Dotk I81  x9475 ZINIGTISSON 3 aNFa  7241N208 M334DINOIS  VH  133.1S NSL  3d1S340.121A  4  -  -  *  -  N    i  4    Commission Staff Report  Item # 4  Subject: Author: Address: Date:  Final Site Plan Review for 19 unit multifamily townhome development Chad Wilkinson, City Planner 1910, 1940 and 1950 S. 200 West September 5, 2017  BOUNTIFUL EST.1 1847  Description of Request:  The applicant, Brighton Development Utah, is requesting final site plan approval fora19  unit townhome style multifamily development.  Background and Analysis:  The submitted final site plan substantially conforms to thej preliminary site plan which received approval from the Commission and City Council last month. The applicant has modified the site plan to address conditions related to access into the site, including sidewalk connections to the 200 West facing units and a sidewalk: along one side oft the access drive to provide pedestrian connection to the interior units. The applicant has also revised the onsite fire hydrant to the location requested by the City Engineer. The previously submitted building elevations have not changed and the applicant will be required to follow the design approved by the City Council. The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan which will require a few redline corrections in order to meet the Code, specifically related to number oft trees. A final landscape plan will be required in The City has received al letter from a neighboring property owner stating some concerns. A  conjunction with the building permit submittal. copy has been attached to this report. Department Review and by the Fire Marshall. Significant Impacts  This proposal has been reviewed by the Engineering, Power, and Planning Departments  The proposed development isi in an area that is zoned for multifamily use and with conditions meets the applicable standards oft the Code. Currentinfrastructure is adequate  to handle the additional units proposed.  G:ENGISitel Plans/1940S2001 West- Bristol' Village/PCF Final Site Plan Staff Report Bristol Village" Townhomes 9-5-2017.docx    Recommended Action  Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request for  preliminary site plan approval subject to the following conditions:  1. Complete any and all: redline corrections.  2. Priort to issuance ofa a building permit, complete the following:  a. Consolidate the parcels and complete any proposed parcel boundary  adjustments.  b. Submit a final landscape plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 16 ofthe  Bountiful City Zoning Ordinance. Include the following:  - Street trees shall be required along each street and any reverse frontage conditions. Each tree shall be a minimum two (2) inch caliper and shall bej planted at a minimum spacing ofc one (1) tree for every thirty-five (35) lineal feet ofs street frontage or fraction thereof ii. In addition to required street trees, each lot or parcel shall include the  over twenty (20) feet. following:  1. Atleast one (1) ornamental tree of at least one (1) inch caliper, and/or one (1) screening tree of at least two (2) inch caliper, 2. Five hundred (500) square feet of required landscaping in commercial developments that are two (2.0) acres or larger, or 3. Seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of required landscaping ina all multifamily developments and all commercial developments that are. less than 2.0 acres in size; and 4. Atleast one (1) shrub, minimum five (5) gallon, for each two hundred (200) square feet of required landscaping.  for each  C. Any modifications required by conditions oft the Planning Commission and  City Council.  Attachments 1. 2.  Aerial photo Site and utility plans  G:ENGISite! Plans/1940$2001 West- Bristol Village/PCI Final Site Plan! Staff Report Bristol Village Townhomes 9-5-2017.docx    3. 4.  Landscape Plan  Letter from Neighboring property owner  G:ENGISite Plans/1940S2 200 West- Bristol Village/PCF Final Sitel Plan Staff Report Bristol Village Townhomes' 9-5-2017.docx    Aerial Photo  S  G:ENGISite Plans/194052001 West- Bristol Village/PCF Final Sitel Plan Staff Report Bristol Village Townhomes 9-5-2017.docx    ia 3 =  1- l B 1-  298987  BRISTOL VILLAGE BOUNTIFULCITY,DAVIS TITLESHEET  COUNTY,UTAH  ECUS    200  WEST Pujc-  STREET  BRISTOL VILLAGE BOUNTFULCITY,DAVIS: COUNTY,UTAH SITE. ANDI UTILITY PLAN  ECUS.    WEST  STREET    asl  e  BRISTOL VILLAGE BOUNTIFUL CITY,DAVIS COUNTY,UTAH GRADING. ANDI DRAINGE PLAN  ECUS    -    MSR  E  200 WESTSTREET  Mwsrt  BRISTOL VILLAGE CITY, DAVIS COUNTY, STREET A PLAN AND PROFILE  BOUNTIFUL  UTAH  ECUS    E  E  N  WT   3  BRISTOL VILLAGE CITY, DAVIS STREET B PLAN AND PROFILE  BOUNTIFUL  COUNTY,UTAH  ECUS    gOe  ooooa  200 WEST  200WEST TOWNHOMES 1900SOUTH2 BOUNTFULUTAH HSALT    August 29, 2017  Dear Mr. Wilkinson,  As we discussed on Monday the 28th whenlc came into your offices, I'm sending this letter regarding the townhome development by Brighton Homes - Bristol Village on 200 West, Bountiful, UT. We own the property. just to the north of this new project and are concerned with the way the retaining wall Brighton Homes previously built the townhomes to the north of our property, ours being at 1880 South 200 West, called Hoffman Estates. When they built it, they had to build a retaining wall which they did SO. However, the wall is out of giant boulders that look nice but the problem ist the space between the fence and the rock wall. There is a gap of soil that is anywhere from 61 inches to at foot along the top of the wall, between the rocks and the fence. (Pictures are below). Inevitably, weeds grow int that space. This year they actually reached about 41 feet and have since been cleared by the HOA president of Hoffman Estates. The concern is that they must come on our property in order to maintain their property. This is not something we want to We are asking that you work with Brighton to come up with a solution to prevent this from happening again. Perhaps they could build a cement retaining wall withi the fence directly on top ofi it sO that there is no gap of We are working to bring our property to a state of low maintenance, but yet beautiful and the weeds from  will be built.  deal with on the south side of our property.  soil that will surely fill with weeds.  another rock wall built like this will be an eye-sore. Please address this and let us know what the decision will be.  Thank you. Katrina Dodd Kladodd@gmail.com 801-599-5578            Commission Staff Report  Item # 5  Subject: Author: Date:  Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review for improvements at the Square at 2600 Chad Wilkinson, City Planner September 5, 2017  Address: 546 W. 2600 South and 2699 S. 625 West  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Description of Request:  The applicant, Kevin Alcott, representing the Colonial Square Property Owners Association, isr requesting preliminary and final site plan review approval fori improvements to the service drive and employee parking area. The proposed improvements include approval of al building pad for a new 1,260 square foot storage/equipment building for the  development.  Background and Analysis:  The applicant previously completed improvements to the parking area and driveways located at the front of the development which were approved by the City Council in 2008. The current] proposal involves improvements to thej parking and driveway areas to the rear ofthel buildings and will include repaving the existing access road restoring/estabishing landscaping in this area and constructing a new: service and equipment building to store snow removal and other maintenance equipment. The work will also include the construction of a new waterway that will provide better handling of stormwater runoff The development was originally constructed around 1976 and therefore the landscaping does not meet current code standards. The applicant proposes to bring the site into greater compliance with currents standards by installing landscaping throughout the rear oft the site. Because of the site layout originally approved, iti is not possible to construct landscaping areas along all property lines as required by Code. Dimensionally, requiring 5 feet oflandscaping along the perimeter oft the site and 101 feet along areas abutting residential zones would eliminate much oft the) parking located in the rear oft the development. Since this is al request to reconstruct existing parking areas and does not involve any new building, other than a small equipment shed, calling for the site to come into complete compliance is not required. The applicants' proposal tol bring the site more into compliance with current standards is proportional with the request and is desirable to provide additional landscaping to the site while allowing for reconstruction oft the paved  from the site.  areas.  Department Review and by South Davis Fire.  This proposal has been reviewed by the Engineering, Power, and Planning Departments  G:ENGISitel PlansColonial Square Common. Areal Improvements/2017 Service Alley: and Landscape mpowememyCPalmny, and  Final Site Plan Staff Report Colonial Sqaure 9-5-2017.docx    Significant Impacts  Thej proposed development will bring a currently nonconforming site into greater compliance with code standards. Repaving the existing drive areas and providing additional landscaping will provide aj positive impact to the area and adjoining properties.  Recommended Action  Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval oft the request for  preliminary site plan approval subject to the following conditions:  1. Complete any modifications required by conditions oft the Planning Commission and  City Council.  Attachments 1. Aerial photo  2. 3.  Site and utility plans Landscape Plan  G:ENGISitel Plans/Colonial Square Common Areal improvemena017sewir. Alley andI Landscapei mpovememsyCPeliminin and  Final Sitel Plan Staff Report Colonial Sqaure 9-5-2017.docx    Aerial Photo  Google  G:ENGISite Plans) Colonial Square Common Area Improvements/2017: Service Alley andI Landscape VCPRNNSEA  Final Sitel Plan Staff Report Colonial Sgaure 9-5-2017.docx    REET  -  LLHA  AI  500_WESTS STREET  00 -  REVISIONS  COLONIAL SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS 5001 WEST 2600 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  MCNEIL ENGINEERING  sntyhitny  Itecture    00009999900009  E  REVISIONS  a 45  COLONIAL SQUARE MPROVEMENTS 500 WEST: 2600 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  ENGINEERING chitecture  MCNEIL neyham 5a100 Sany. Uak CMIE Structu    -  LA  H  500W WEST STREET  REVISIONS  COLONIAL SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS 500WEST 2600SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  MCNEIL ENGINEERING Banyhty, 5A.100 CMIEnghneering" Structur  y-rg    625WESTSTREET  BDLANG SUANSANSNNAE  L TTe  T  TT  500WESTSTREET  L0000  e  a 1 ' y TT  : T :  1111 - 3 MCNEIL ENGINEERING Engineering  REVISIONS CRIPTION  COLONIAL SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS 500 WEST: 2600 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  hitecture    u  500WESTSTREET  00000 O  REVISIONS  COLONIAL SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS 500 WEST 2600 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  3 MCNEIL ENGINEERING   hitecture Lany HDS    625WESTS STREET  &  00000 O  REVISIONS  COLONIAL SQUARE MPROVEMENTS 500 WEST 2600 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  MCNEIL ENGINEERING    E  LIMITLINE  d  N - - /  BUILDING  a  004 a  D0  00000  REVISIONS  COLONIAL SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS 500 WEST 26005 SOUTH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH  MCNEIL ENGINEERING  Sntyhi  Itecture    Item # 6  Commission Staff Report  Subject: Address: Author: Date: Background  Final Subdivision and Final Site Plan Approval for 5th West Office Park Commercial Subdivision  1065 S. 500 West City Engineer September 5, 2017  BOUNTIFUL EST. 1847  Department: Engineering, Planning  Jeff Beck has completed the plat map and site plans andi is now requesting final approval for the  four lot 5th West Office Park Commercial Subdivision.  Analysis  Mr. Beck has had prepared and submitted the plat map and site plan drawings for the proposed subdivision. Todd Christensen has checked and returned the plans and plat map to the All of the items and conditions reviewed with the preliminary submittal have been revise to meet requirements for final approval. In particular, the property owners met with representatives of the UDOT and have shown an access easement on the final plat map which meets the requirements set by the UDOT in order to get an access permit. The plans and plat The developers previously submitted building elevations and preliminary landscape plans. As the plans move forward to building permit, the elevations will need to match those approved by the Council. In addition, a final landscape plan will be required at the time of building  engineer and redline corrections have now been resubmitted.  are now ready for final review by the Planning Commission.  permit. Department Review  The proposed subdivision construction drawings and plat have been reviewed by the  Engineering Department and Planning Department.  Recommendation  With the conditions listed below, the proposed development meets the requirements of the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance and design standards and staff recommends the Planning Commission send a positive recommendation fort final approval to the City Council. 2. Post an approved bond and: sign a Bountiful City Development Agreement  1. Payment of all required fees. 3. Provide a current Title Report.  j-lsubdivisionsiSth west office park 2017pc final subdivision! 5th west office park commercial: subdivision, sept 2017.docx    Significant Impacts  This new development combines several properties and cleans up their multiple accesses. All  oft the negative impacts are minor.  Attachments  Aerial photo showing the area to be subdivided  A copy oft the 5th West Office Park Commercial Subdivision final plat.  Aerial Photo of the proposed 5th West Office Park Commercial    28261  ZZOE  bmp'a3sh3H 3old PPEN-PVSAInISORE VIN 1nauNnO8 x038d    Item #7  Commission Staff Report  Subject: Address: Author: Date:  Vacation of Shaw Subdivision 672 and 680 East 400 North City Planner September 5, 2017  Department: Engineering, Planning  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  The Shaw Subdivision is a two-lot subdivision located on 400 North. Justin and Lauri own both lots in the subdivision and wish to vacate the subdivision in order to combine the lots into one parcel. Subdivision vacations must be approved by the City Council by ordinance after a public hearing. The Land Use Ordinance requires that, prior to consideration by the City Council, the application be reviewed by the Planning Commission fort their recommendation of approval,  approval with conditions or denial.  Analysis  Mr. and Mrs. Shaw no longer have a need to sell off a portion of their property and now wish to build a detached garage across the existing property line between lots 1a and 2. The Code prohibits making improvements such as driveways or accessory structures to a lot that does not have a primary residential structure. Combining the lots through the subdivision vacation will The purpose of the prohibition on constructing accessory structures and driveways on vacant lots is to prevent these structures from being sold separately from a primary residence. Without the proposed combination, Lot 2 could still be sold separately from Lot 1 which could result in an accessory structure on an individual lot without a primary structure. Ini the past, this situation has resulted in accessory structures being converted to non-permitted business and/or storage use which is incompatible with the standards oft the single family zone. The only Issue with this vacation is that the subdivision plat provided al large easement to cover the Stone Creek channel running along the south and west side oft the property. That will need to be replaced by a new public utility and drainage easement covering the same ground.  make it possible to construct the desired improvements.  Department Review Planning Department. Recommendation  The proposed subdivision vacation has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and    Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the proposed vacation with the condition that the vacated. Stone Creek easement be replace  with a new recorded easement.  Significant Impacts  This subdivision vacation has no significant impacts.  Attachments 1. Aerial Photo 2. Shaw Subdivision Plat  Aerial Photo  E400N  389  680  379  369  359  subdivisionslshaw. suby vacation, 2017pc shaws subdivision vacation, sept 2017.docx    :  4  B  OgOLZ 3.E2A65    Commission Staff Report Subject: Discussion of Potential Zoning Changes in  Item #8  The Plat A Neighborhood Applicant: Bountiful City Author: Chad Wilkinson Date: September 5, 2017 Background and Analysis  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  The Historic Downtown area of] Bountiful, contained within the boundaries oft the original "Plat A",is the cultural and civic heart ofthe City. The neighborhood, bounded by 4001 North, 500 South, 400 East, and 200 West, has seen tremendous changes over thej past several years as redevelopment has occurred along Main Street and the surrounding neighborhood. In 2006, aj planning effort was undertaken that resulted in a document titled the "Bountiful Historic Fort Plan." This document included goals and policies and recommendations for the Plat A area. The document was never officially adopted, although several oft the goals and policies were used toi inform subsequent zoning changes and the Downtown Master Plan component of the 2009 General Plan. One oft the major recommendations related toj preservation oft the existing residential neighborhoods east of1 100 East and west of 100 West. In 2007, the zoning map was amended toi include the properties between 400 East and 100 East in the single family residential zone. The zoning of properties between 100 West and 200 West were not changed and remain in the multifamily zoning district. Residents oft this portion ofthe neighborhood have expressed concern over whether this area should remain ai multi-family residential zoning district, or whether zoning should be changed to preserve existing single family homes and encourage the Residents and business owners within the Plat A neighborhood have also voiced concerns over preserving the character of Bountiful" s1 historic downtown and have expressed a desire to revisit the allowed uses and allowed density of development in the neighborhood. Specifically, residents ofthe neighborhood have expressed concern over the number ofr multi-family units being constructed in the area and the scale and density of development. Recent developments including the IHC expansion and mixed use development within the Downtown (DN) zoning district have brought up questions related to allowed height, setbacks, parking and other  development of single family residential.  development standards.  In late March ofthis year, the City Council adopted a six month moratorium to allow time for the City to review these issues and make desired changes to zoning and development regulations prior to new development moving forward. As part oft the review process, the City initiated a survey ofresidents and business owners in Plat A in order to give opportunities for additional public input on development in the area. The City received over 250: responses to the survey, which was sent out to all property owners in the Plat A area. Staff has taken this input and  combined it with input from the following sources:    The 2006-2008 Bountiful Historic Fort Planning Process and documents Recommendations from Envision Utah given during the original planning process  Recent City Council Decisions The Recent Plat A Survey  Concerns expressed during recent application review by the Planning Commission After reviewing input from all oft these sources, Staffis] prepared to present recommendations for proposed changes to the zoning and development standards. In preparation for the discussion on September 5, staff has included a copy oft the current DN (Downtown) zoning standards for your review. Staff would also recommend reviewing the documents available at the following link: A link to this information has been forwarded to each of you via e-mail. The web page includes the results oft the Plat A Survey, along with the Goals and Policies Chapter from the Bountiful Historic Fort Plan (titled Plat A Information - Main Street Goals and Policies) This is a discussion item only and no action is required at this time.  ntpsy/www.pountifulutahgovPat-A  Recommendation: Attachments  Current D-N Zoning Standards  G:PLANPlat. Al Planning/PCS Staff Report Plat AV Work Session- Sep5 5: 2017.docx    CHAPTER7 DN-DOWNTOWN  14-7-101 14-7-102 14-7-103 14-7-104 14-7-105 14-7-106 14-7-107 14-7-108 14-7-109 14-7-110 14-7-111 14-7-112 14-7-120 14-7-101  PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS AREA OF ZONE YARD REQUIREMENTS PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS BUILDING HEIGHT DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS PERMISSIBLE LOT COVERAGE PARKING, LOADING, AND ACCESS SITE PLAN APPROVAL OTHER REQUIREMENTS  PERMITTED, CONDITIONAL, AND PROHIBITED USES  PERMITTED ADJUSTMENTS TO REQUIRED PARKING  PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES  The Downtown (DN) Mixed Use Zone is established to provide a district primarily for the preservation of the mixed use character of the commercial and residential uses in and adjacent tot the Main Street downtown area, consistent with the provisions of the adopted Bountiful  Historic Downtown Plan. 14-7-102 14-7-103  AREA OF ZONE  Each area of Downtown zoning shall be at least four (4) acres in size.  PERMITTED, CONDITIONAL, AND PROHIBITED USES  The following principal uses and structures, and no others, are allowed either as a permitted use (P)or by Conditional Use Permit (C) in the Downtown zone. Some uses may be expressly prohibited (N) in this zone. Any use not listed herein is also expressly prohibited. Properties fronting on 100 West or 100 East shall be limited to the residential uses allowed ini the (DN)  zone.  Table 14-7-103 Use Assisted Living Center Bail Bonds Banks, Credit Unions Bar, Tavern, Drinking Establishment Bottling, Canning, Food Production  DN C N P N C N C  Bulding/Construction Materials and Supplies w! outside Buliding/Construction Materials and Supplies wlo outside  storage storage  7-1 Chapter 70 Downtown Ord 2012-12    Use  DN N N C C P N C P N N N C C N N P P P N N P C N P P N N N C C P P N P P C P C N N P N C P N P  Check Cashing, Title Loans Construction Services w/ outside storage Construction Services wlo outside storage Convenience Stores Dry Cleaner, Laundry Service Fast Food Restaurant w/ drive-thru window Fast Food Restaurant w/ pick-up Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-thru Feed Lots, Animal Rendering, Animal Raising Fire Arm/Shooting Range = Indoor Fire Arm/Shooting Range - Outdoor Food Preparation, Bakery Gasoline Sales General retail w/ outside storage General retail w/o outside storage Grocery Store Hotels (Interior rooms) Industrial Manufacturing Kennels, Animal Boarding Laundromat Self-operated) Medical/Dental Laboratory Medical/Dental Office Millwork, Cabinetry Motels Drive-uplexterion rooms) Motorized Recreation Multi-Family Residential - Stand alone Multi-Family Residential - Stand alone; lot or parcel fronting on 100 West or 100 East Multi-Family Residential w/ Commercial Use Municipal Facility Non-motorized Recreation, Pool, Gymnasium - Public or Private Pawnshop, Secondhand Merchandise Personal Services Professional Services Public/Private Assembly Restaurant Security Services  Funeral Parlor, Cemeteries, and Crematory Services  Mail Order/Online Distribution office w/ onsite storage  Self Storage Units or Warehouse wlo Office Sexually Oriented Business, Escort Service Single or Two Family Dwelling - Existing Single or Two Family Dwelling - New Small engine/appliance repair Tailor, Seamstress, Shoe repair Tattoo Parlor Tutoring, Dance, Preschool, Daycare  7-2 Chapter 70 Downtown Ord 2012-12    Use Vehicle Part Sales Vehicle Repair Vehicle Sales Vehicle Salvage/Wrecking Vehicle Service and' Wash Vehicle Storage - Indoor Warehouse w/ office  DN N N N N N C N N  Welding, Autobody, Machine Shop, Fiberglass, Painting  Accessory uses and structures shall be permitted int the Downtown Zone provided that they are incidental to and do not substantially alter the character of the permitted principal use of a main structure. Such permitted accessory uses and structures include, but are not limited to, the A. Accessory structures such as garages, carports, equipment storage buildings and supply storage buildings which are customarily used in conjunction with and incidental to a Storage of materials used for the construction of a building, including a contractor's temporary office, provided that such use be located on the building site or immediately adjacent thereto, and provided further that such use shall be permitted only during the  following:  principal use or structure permitted in the (DN) Zone.  B.  construction period and thirty (30) days thereafter. MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS  14-7-104 follows:  The minimum area and street frontage for any lot or parcel in the Downtown Zone shall be as  Table 14-7-104 Use Commercial Mixed-Use Single Family (Existing only) Two Family (Existing only) Multi-Family  Min. Lot Size Min. Frontage  and Width 50 50 70 80 80  20,000 20,000 8,000 12,000 20,000  A. Lots with more than one (1) street frontage shall meet the minimum requirements along B. An existing lot or parcel that does not meet the minimum requirements shall be considered a non-complying lot, and all proposed development on such lot or parcel requiring site plan review shall follow the process for non-complying sites and structures. C. An multi-family residential development that is not part of mixed use development shall meet the density requirements and development standards of the RM-13 subzone,  all frontages.  except as set forth in this Chapter.  7-3 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    14-7-105  YARD REQUIREMENTS  A lot or parcel with a single family or two family dwelling shall conform to the minimum setbacks of the R-4 subzone. Multi-family dwellings shall meet the setback criteria oft the RM-13 subzone. All other uses, including mixed uses, shall meet the following requirements:  A.  Front and Street Setbacks. Each lot or parcel shall have a minimum building setback of twenty (20) feet from any front property line and/or any property line abutting a public 1. Along Main Street any building shall be located within ten (10) feet oft the street property line. Plazas, outdoor eating areas, and other pedestrian oriented site amenities shall be considered part oft the building for setback purposes. Along 400 South, 300 South, 200 South, 100 South, 100 North, 200 North, or 300 North any building shall be setback at least ten (10) feet and not more than Along Center Street, any building shall be setback at least five (5) feet and not Each lot or parcel that fronts onto Main Street shall have a minimum on-site parking setback off fifty feet (50') from the Main Street right-of-way line, or be  street, with the following exceptions:  2. 3. 4.  twenty (20) feet from the street property line. more than ten (10) feet from the street property line. located completely behind the principal structure.  B. Side Yard. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, each lot or parcel shall have a minimum building setback of ten (10) feet from an interior side property line. Any lot or parcel that fronts onto Main Street shall have no interior side yard setback except as C. Rear Yard. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, each lot or parcel shall have a  required by the International Building Code.  minimum building setback of ten (10) feet from a rear property line. Yard Abutting Residential Lots. Where property abuts an existing single family dwelling, the minimum building setback shall be ten (10) feet on the abutting side. Accessorys Structures. An accessory structure shall meet all of the setback requirements ofa a principal structure. An accessory structure that does not require a building permit, according to the International Building Code (IBC), may be located in a side or rear 1. The accessory structure is not within a front or street yard setback and is located more than ten (10) feet from any main building on the same or adjacent property. 2. The accessory structure has no openings on the side which is contiguous with the property line, and the walls ofs said building which are adjacent to the property 3. The accessory structure is designed such that all roof drainage is discharged  D. E.  setback area only if all of the following conditions are met:  line have a fire retardant rating as specified by the IBC. onto the lot or parcel on which it is erected.  7-4 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    F. Residential Uses.  Iti is the requirement of Bountiful City that multiple family developments reflect a sense of proportion. Proportion requires that the development be designed in such a manner that each unit receives a reasonable and approximately proportionate share oft the open space, landscaping, and other benefits oft the site. Locating units in such a way that benefits oft the site fall primarily to one unit or at few units, and not to others, is prohibited. Depending upon topography, property dimensions and site configuration, it is possible that this requirement may affect the number of units that can be physically located on a lot or parcel. The Planning Commission and City Council are granted reasonable discretion in administering the proportionality requirement, and may modify yard setback requirements by up tot twenty (20) percent subject to at finding that such modification will benefit all units more equally than would be possible ift the standard requirement was  applied. 14-7-106  PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS  A. The following structures may be erected on or project into any required yard, except that  they shall not obstruct a required driveway or pedestrian access: A fence or wall in conformance with this Ordinance. Landscape elements, including: trees, shrubs, and other plants. Necessary appurtenances for utility service as long as they are attached toa permitted structure and do not protrude more than two (2) feet into a required  1. 2. 3.  setback.  B. The structures listed below may project into a minimum front or rear yard not more than four (4) feet, and into a minimum side yard not more than two (2) feet, except that they  may not obstruct a required driveway or pedestrian access:  1. 2. 3.  Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, or other similar architectural Planter boxes or masonry planters not exceeding twenty-four (24) inches in 4. A covered entry or porch used for the protection of pedestrians entering or leaving al building, provided said structure is not more than one story in height Buildings that front onto Main Street and that are built within ten (10) feet of the front property line may have canopies with business identification sign area if the following  features. height.  Stairways, balconies, door stoops, fire escapes, awnings  and is entirely open on at least three (3) sides.  C.  criteria is met: 1. 2. 3. 5.  The canopy may protrude a maximum of six feet (6') into the Main Street right-of- The canopy shall not come within seven feet (7) of any parking stall, drive lane, The total combined length of the canopy or canopies shall not exceed two thirds  way, over areas of sidewalk. (2/3) of the building width.  or other portion of the right-of-way used for vehicle access.  4. The maximum height of the canopy shall not exceed five feet (5).  Off-premise signs are expressly prohibited.  7-5 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    6. Canopy sign copy area shall be a maximum of thirty-two (32) sq ft per property.  14-7-107  STRUCTURE HEIGHT  Any lot or parcel with single family or two family dwellings shall conform to the maximum height requirements of the R-4 subzone. Multi-family dwellings shall conform to the maximum height criteria of the RM-12 subzone. All other uses, including mixed-uses, shall not exceed three (3) stories or forty-five (45) feet in height, whichever is shorter, as measured at the average grade. A. A mixed commercial and residential building may be constructed one additional story in height as long as the additional story is set back an additional one (1) foot for each additional one (1) foot of height, up to a maximum building height of four stories orf fifty- five (55) feet, whichever is shorter, as measured at the average grade. The additional B. Chimneys, flagpoles, church towers, and similar accessory elements not used for human occupancy are excluded in determining height, however, the City may limit the heightof any protrusion that is found by the City Council to be a public nuisance.  horizontal setback does not apply toi interior side yard setbacks.  14-7-108  DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES  Al lot or parcel with a single family or two family dwelling shall conform to the minimum building separation requirements of the R-4 subzone. A multi-family dwelling shall meet the minimum building separation criteria of the RM-13: subzone. For all other uses, the minimum separation between structures shall be ten (10) feet or as required by the International Building Code, whichever is greater. This separation may be reduced through the site plan approval process if the reduced setback is consistent with the adopted Historic Downtown Plan, except that it shall never be less than the distance required by the International Building Code.  14-7-109  LANDSCAPING AND PERMISSIBLE LOT COVERAGE  A. A lot or parcel with a single family or two family dwelling shall follow the lot coverage requirements of the R-4 subzone. Al lot or parcel with a multi-family dwelling shall conform to the lot coverage criteria oft the RM-12 subzone. All others, including mixed- use developments, shall conform to the following criteria, in addition to any other 1. All landscaping shall be sprinkled and planted with substantial live plant material for the purpose of buffering, screening, and beautifying the site. At plant maturity, the landscaping should represent, as a minimum standard, compatibility with surrounding developed properties and uses and must be permanently A minimum ten (10) feet wide landscape buffer shall be required along all A minimum ten (10) feet wide landscape buffer shall be established adjacent to a  requirements of this Title:  maintained by the owner or occupants. frontage areas not occupied by drive accesses.  2. 3.  residential property.  7-6 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    4. 5. 6.  Parking, loading, and drive areas shall have a minimum five (5) feet wide landscape buffer when located adjacent to a side or rear property line, except for landscape buffering required between residential uses. Parking areas shall be landscaped as set forth in this Ordinance. Approved landscaping must cover a minimum of ten (10) percent oft the development site exclusive of any parkstrips in a public right-of-way. 7. Landscaping shall also be installed in all parkstrips to the same standards as other on-site landscaping. Asphalt, concrete, bricks, pavers, railroad ties, rocks, gravel, and other non-vegetative material is not allowed in the parkstrip area  between the curb and sidewalk.  B. During the site plan approval process, the City may require more or less landscaping consistent with the provisions of the adopted Historic Downtown Plan.  14-7-110  PARKING, LOADING, AND ACCESS  Each lot or parcel int the (DN) Zone shall have vehicle parking, loading, and access designed to  meet the requirements oft this Ordinance.  14-7-111  SITE PLAN APPROVAL  Except for single family and two family dwellings, site plan approval shall be required for any  development in the (DN) Zone as set forth in this Title.  14-7-112 A.  OTHER REQUIREMENTS  Signs. Any sign erected int the (DN) Zone shall conform to the sign provisions of this Title. Single family and two family dwellings shall conform to the criteria for the R-4 subzone, and multi-family uses shall conform tot the criteria fori the RM-12 subzone. All others shall conform to the criteria for the C-G subzone, except that pole signs shall not B. Uses Within Buildings. Any commercial use permitted int the (DN). Zone shall be conducted entirely within ai fully enclosed building, except as provided in subsections 1 1. Outdoor Display of merchandise for sale in the downtown area. Businesses located in buildings in the (DN) Zone that have setbacks less than three (3) feet from the public right-of-way may display int the public right-of-way, subject to the a. Any display of merchandise on the sidewalk may not exceed three (3) feet into the public right-of-way from the property line oft the business, except during the annual "Sidewalk Days" celebration. There may be no display of merchandise in the planter boxes in the public right-of-way. During the winter months, a display may not impede snow removal from  be permitted. and 2 below.  following terms and conditions:  b.  the sidewalk.  7-7  Chapter 71 Downtown Ord 2012-12    C.  The display shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the width oft the lot, parcel, or business. However, businesses with less than forty (40) feet of width may have a display not to exceed ten (10) feet in width. d. Only merchandise sold inside the business may be displayed outside. e. No outdoor display shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  f. g.  Each display shall be taken down att the end of each business day. The merchant shall be solely responsible for items displayed. Each display shall not create al hazard, sight distance, or other problem to pedestrians on the sidewalk or to drivers on the street.  h. Displayed merchandise shall not obscure or interfere with any official 2. Any business not listed in subsection 1 may include the outdoor display of merchandise for sale only if all of the following conditions are met: a. The outdoor display of merchandise shall not be located upon any sidewalk, walkway, driveway, or within any public right-of-way nor shall it interfere with pedestrian or vehicular movement or with safe and proper b. The outdoor display of merchandise shall not reduce the amount of off-street parking below that which is required for the associated C. No item shall be displayed outdoors except for those lawfully displayed and sold inside the business or businesses located ont the property. No hazardous and/or flammable materials (such as antifreeze, kerosene, poisons, pesticides and other similar items) may be displayed outdoors. The aggregate outdoor display area shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the linear frontage of the store front or 10 linear feet, whichever isg greater. A business located on a corner shall be considered as having  notice, public safety sign, or device.  ingress and egress of pedestrian traffic. commercial uses on the premises.  d.  two (2) store fronts.  e. No outdoor display shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  f. g. h.  A maximum ofi fifty (50) percent of the aggregate outdoor display area Items shall be displayed outdoors only during the hours that the business conducting the display is open to the public. Live plant material shall be Additional signs, beyond those allowed by this Title, shall not be allowed  may be located in any required landscaping.  exempt from this requirement.  as part oft the outdoor display and sales area.  7-8 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    i.  Outdoor displays for special sales or for one of al kind items which would exceed any oft these requirements may be granted a special permit by the Planning Director for a period not to exceed fourteen (14) days provided such special displays do not create parking, access, or traffic hazards.  C.  Structure Design and Materials.  Any structure, except for single and two family dwellings, shall meet the minimum design 1. Exteriors shall be maintenance free wall material such as high quality brick, natural stone, weather resistance stucco or masonite type material, or non-wood siding. Stucco, masonite or siding may not exceed fifty (50) percent oft the Each residential units shall have some private outdoor space ini the form ofa  criteria as set forth in this Title. In addition, the following shall apply.  exterior. balcony or patio.  2.  D. Neighborhood Compatibility.  Each structure, except for existing single and two family dwellings, shall shall be designed consistent with the adopted Historic Downtown Bountiful Master Plan, particularly with regard to building height, architecture, landscaping, and building mass. E. Trash Storage. No trash, used materials, wrecked or abandoned vehicles, or equipment shall be stored in an open area. With the exception of single family and two family dwellings, each development ini the (DN). Zone shall be required to have adequate, on- site, screened refuse containers maintained in al location approved as part of the site  plan.  F. Walls and Fences.  Any wall or fence erected around a commercial development or mixed use development shall comply with the requirements oft the (C-G) zone. Any multi-family development shall comply with the requirements for the RM-13 subzone. Any single family and two family developments shall comply with the provisions of the R-4 subzone. PERMITTED ADJUSTMENTS TO REQUIRED PARKING  14-7-120  A. Downtown Parking District Defined. The Downtown Parking District consists of those B. Proximity of Parking to Use. Required parking spaces for residential uses must be located on site. Required parking spaces for nonresidential uses must be located on site or in parking areas within five hundred feet (500') of the development site property boundary. Off-site nonresidential parking is allowed if the following documentation is submitted in writing to the land use authority as part of a building or zoning permit  properties located within the (DN) Zone.  application or land use review:  7-9 Chapter 7 Downtown Ord 2012-12    1. The names and addresses of the uses and of the owners or tenants that are 2. The location and number of parking spaces that are being shared;  sharing the parking;  3. Ana analysis showing that the parking area will be large enough for the anticipated  demands of both uses; and access to the parking for both uses.  4.  A legal instrument such as an easement or deed restriction that guarantees  C. Joint Use Parking. Joint use of required parking spaces may occur where two (2) or more uses on the same or separate sites are able to share the same parking spaces because their parking demands occur at different times. Joint use of required nonresidential parking spaces is allowed if the following documentation is submitted in writing to the land use authority as part of al building or zoning permit application or land  use review: 1.  The names and addresses of the uses and of the owners or tenants that are  sharing the parking;  2. The location and number of parking spaces that are being shared;  3. 4.  An analysis showing that the peak parking times oft the uses occur at different times and that the parking area will be large enough for the anticipated demands A legal instrument such as an easement or deed restriction that guarantees  of both uses; and  access to the parking for both uses.  D. No parking calculation which includes the parking areas owned by the Bountiful Redevelopment Agency gives any right of possession, any real estate interest, or contract right or right of way on any Redevelopment Agency property.  7-10 Chapter 71 Downtown Ord 2012-12