BOUNTIFUL CITY Tuesday, October 3, 2017  PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA  6:30 p.m.  NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Bountiful City Planning Commission will hold a meeting in the Conference Room at City Hall, 790 South 100 East, Bountiful, Utah, at the time and on the date given above. The public is invited. Persons who are disabled as defined by the American with Disabilities Act may request an accommodation by contacting the Bountiful Planning Office at 298-6190. Notification at least 24 hours prior to the meeting would be  appreciated.  1. Welcome and Introductions.  2. Approval of the minutes for September 19, 2017.  3. PUBLIC HEARING - Consider changing the zoning designation of approx. 44.3 acres, from RM-19 (Multi-Family Residential-19 units to the acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential-4 units per acre). The properties are located roughly between 400 North and 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Continued from September 19, 2017 - Consider approval ofa Zoning Text Amendment to the standards oft the Downtown Zone (DN) found in Chapter 5. Planning Director's report, review of pending applications and miscellaneous business.  500 South and between 100 West and 200 West.  7ofthe Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance.  Chad Wilkinson, City Planner    Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2017 6:30 P.M.  Present:  Chair- - Sean Monson; Vice Chair- Von Hill; Planning Commission Members - Jesse Bell, Tom Smith and Sharon Spratley; City Council Representation - Richard Higginson; City Attorney - Clint Drake; City Planner - Chad Wilkinson; City Engineer - Paul Rowland; and Recording  Secretary - Darlene Baetz  1. Welcome and Introductions.  Chair Monson opened the meeting at 6:30j pm and welcomed all those present.  2. Approval of the minutes for September 5, 2017.  Sharon Spratley made a motion to approve the minutes for August 1, 2017 with 2 corrections made on page 9. Mr. Smith's comments #2 was corrected from 100 North to 100 West and Ms. Spratley's comment #1 was corrected from single family homes to read accommodate small commercial and mixed use needs". Tom Smith seconded the motion. Voting passed 6-0 with Commission members 3. PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval of Zoning Text Amendment to the standards of the  Bell, Higginson, Hill, Monson, Smith and Spratley voting aye.  Downtown Zone (DN) found in Chapter 7 oft the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance.  Chad Wilkinson presented the staff report.  At the Planning Commission work session for the Plat A neighborhood held on September 5, 2017 staff recommended changes to the DN (Downtown) Zoning Standards found in Chapter 7 of the Bountiful Land Use Ordinance. In addition to these changes, staff recommended a zone change for the RM-19 zoning area located between 100 West and 200 West. The potential RM-19 Zone change will be considered at a future Planning Commission meeting. The purpose of this public hearing is to review potential changes to the DN zoning standards, receive public input and provide additional direction on the changes to staff. This direction will be used to further refine the proposed ordinance changes.  The proposed changes include the following: Changes to the building height requirements Changes to the minimum lot size Addition of standards regulating location of parking  Revisions to the architectural design standards for multifamily developments located along 100  West and 100 East  Other changes to correct inconsistencies and provide clarification  The draft ordinance contains the proposed revisions with changes to the ordinance indicated with Iti is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed changes to the Downtown Ordinance and hold a public hearing. After receiving public input it is recommended that the Commission give staff direction on the proposed changes and schedule an additional public hearing for  strikethrough text (showing deletions) and underline text indicating new text.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 19, 2017  Page lof5    October 3, 2017.  Proposed Changes to Chapter 7 Downtown Ordinance Text Amendment 2017 Version: Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use tablef found in Section 14-7-103.  Clarifications to the uses oft the downtown zone uses. Comments from Commission members:  1. Mr. Monson stated that he agrees with the mixed use on Main Street. Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use table found in Section 14-7-104. tol bei rounded up to 8500 but also could be changed with Commission direction.  The minimum lot size was suggested tol be 8250 lot size. The minimum lot size of 8250 was considered  Commission Comments:  1. Mr. Higginson requested that the minimum be 8000 lot size.  2. Ms. Spratley asked if there are many lots that won't meet the proposed 8000 minimum lot  size  3. Mr. Bell wanted clarification for single family home front onto Main St.  StaffComments:  1. Mr. Wilkinson answered that there are a few lots that won'tmeet the proposed minimum lot  size and that the single family homes cannot front onto Main St.  Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use table found in Section 14-7-105.  The single family and two-family dwellings were separated out to keep them separate for the two subzones. This included clarification to the street setbacks for 100 W and 100 E and addition of  language 500 S and 400 N for building setback. There were no comments from Commission members.  Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use table found in Section 14-7-107.  The proposed additions and changes were taken from the historic fort planning from 2006 and 2008 meetings, recent surveys and general clarifications. These standards were proposed to allow smaller building footprints and lower height. The changes are an effort to transition the height changes from residential to the east and west and the downtown zone. This would provide comparable height across 100 West and 100 East from the single family homes in the event ofthe approval oft thei rezone.  Commission and Staff Comments:  1. Ms. Spratley asked for clarification about the maximum height. She would like to see a 2. Mr. Higginson stated the Utah Land Use would like us to move away from granting  limitation on the height limit.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes- - September 19, 2017  Page 2of5    Conditional Use Permits. If an item can be approved conditionally meaning that you can mitigate the impact than its should to be allowed with the code and conditions.  3. Mr. Smith stated that he would like to see a set height limit.  Commission Members gave direction to staff:  1. To create a new section for steeples, towers, flagpoles.  2. Include a 55 foot height limit.  3. Setback for mechanical equipment 1 foot setback for every foot ofheight with a maximum of  101 foot.  4. The 20 % ofthe roof area could remain in the code.  Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use table found in Section 14-7-108 through 14-7-111.  Cleanup and Clarification to the Language of the Code. There were no comments from Commission members.  Mr. Wilkinson discussed changes to the use table found in Section 14-7-112C related to structure size These changes and additions would work toward a pedestrian oriented neighborhood clarifying the  and architecture.  architectural features and building sizes. Commission Comments:  1. Mr. Higginson asked for clarification oft the pitch roof measurements included in thel building height. He stated that the pitch roofs would allow forl home to get living space in the attic.  Staff Comments:  1. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the height measurement is the average of the midpoint oft the pitch roof and clarified that pitch roofs allowing living space in the attic would increase the roof  structure/height oft the home.  Commission direction to Staff:  1. The code should not make the homes shorter than the residential zone code but should fit in  architectural in the downtown area for pitch roofs.  Mr. Wilkinson concluded his presentation. Staff recommends that the Commission members open the Public Hearing and at the end ofthel Public Hearing this item be continued to the next meeting.  Chairman Monson opened the PUBLIC HEARING at 7:21 p.m.  Nick Gilson resides at 305 N 100E. Mr. Gilson reaffirmed the goals of the meeting as is to protect the neighborhood feel of this area. He also stated the Commission approved IHC building and feels that it doesn't fit the neighborhood feel. He feels that staff should not leave any ambiguity in the code  language and should place al hard cap on the height.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 19, 2017  Page 3of5    Ms. Horn resides at 47 S 300 East. Ms. Horn is concerned about the height that the roofneeds to be to allow living space in the attic. Commission Members described that there are trusses that can be used. Eric Egnoffi is an Architect for Process Studio in Salt Lake City Utah. Mr. Egnoffi is currently working on a project on 100 West and understands the intent of the new language. He would like Commission members to look at the height oft thel building with an mixed use, elevator, and parking options. Lori McGarry resides at 232 E 200 South. Ms. McGarry stated that she likes the hometown feel of this Sandy Inman resides at 183 W3 3375 South. Ms. Inman doesn't live in this area but is involved with the Museum Board and Historic Commission. She wanted to give some input to the Commission members about the Historic District. The area called The Fort District area originally had 62% historic homes and was able to be considered a Historic District. Ifthe City continues to allow the demo and rebuilding of apartments and we reach 50% or less ofhistoric homes then this area will no longer be called al Historic Larry Dupaix resides at 145 W 300 South. Mr. Dupaix spoke about the tall buildings in the downtown area. He stated that the developers would like to have taller buildings, but we should keep the height Alan Arbuckle resides at 120 E 550 North. Mr. Arbuckle is concerned about the complication of the proposed code, the height of the buildings, and the possible density in this area. He would like to see Chair Monson proposed that we continue this item to the next Planning Commission meeting. Richard Higginson made a motion that the Planning Commission continue this item to the next Planning Commission to consider approval of Zoning Text Amendment to the standards of the Downtown Zone (DN) found in Chapter 7 oft the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance. Von Hill seconded the motion. Voting passed 6-0 with Commission members Bell, Higginson, Hill, Monson, Smith and Spratley voting  Mr. Wilkinson added that the code language could add this as a third floor.  area and doesn't like the idea ofhave large apartments.  District.  lower in the neighborhoods.  managed growth in the downtown area.  aye.  Commission Members and Staff comments:  1. Mr. Higginson feels that we haven't changed the vision of the development to make Main Street grow. He would like the code to allow living space to be used without adding height 2. Ms. Spratley: is concerned about the need for developments tol have enough guest parking in a 3. Mr. Wilkinson suggested that we address this change to the parking code to the driveway 4. Chair Monson discussed that we take the approach oftaking the old ideas of rejuvenation of the downtown area. He would like the architectural standards in 14-7-112 C5 to be used on new buildings to look like single family homes and feels that this would be a good  tot thel building.  multi-family area and should be addressed in the code.  parking, perhaps to this section.  compromise to allow the structures to fit in with the rest of downtown.  Thanks to the public for all their comments.  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 19, 2017  Page 4 of5    5. Planning Director's report, review of pending applications and miscellaneous business.  APA Conference - Oct 5 & 6i in Park City.  Upcoming Meetings: Planning Commission meeting:  October 3, 2017 - Public Hearing for Zone Ordinance Amendment for Downtown Zoning and  Public Hearing for the text amendment for Downtown Zoning  City Council meeting:  October 10, 2017 - Ordinance Amendment for Downtown Zoning and Public Hearing for the text Chair Monson ascertained there were no other items to discuss. The meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p.m.  amendment for Downtown Zoning  Chad Wilkinson, Bountiful City Planner  Bountiful City Planning Commission Minutes - September 19, 2017  Page 5of5    Commission Staff Report Subject: Public Hearing- Zone Map Amendment from RM-19 (Multi Family Residential 19 units per acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential 4 units per acre) Property Addresses: Multiple; located roughly between 400 North and 500 South and between 100 West and 200 West Author: Chad Wilkinson, Planning Director  Item #3  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Department: Planning Date: October 3,2017 Background  The proposal is to amend the: zoning designation of 155 parcels totaling approximately 44.3 acres from RM-19 (Multi Family Residential 19 units per acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential 41 units per acre). The proposed zone change involves the western portion of the Plat A/Bountiful Historic Fort Neighborhood from approximately 100 West to 200 West and running from 400 North to 500 South. The proposed change does noti include any properties currently zoned commercial or professional office located within thatl boundary. The area is surrounded by commercial zoning on the south and west: and Downtown Zoning on the east. The Bountiful City Park adjoins the site to the north.  Analysis:  This zone change proposal represents the next] portion oft the recommendations presented to the Planning Commission at their September 5, 2017 meeting. Several factors have influenced the recommendation to rezone the area to a single family zoning designation. First, the Historic Fortl Planning process and documents identified this area as ai residential neighborhood along with the area east of 100 East. While the area east of100 East was changed to Single Family: zoning, the area on the west side has maintained a multifamily designation. Second, the development pattern of the area has remained predominantly single family in nature with single family homes currently existing on 113 ofthe 155 properties currently zoned RM-19. While there have been ai few multi-family developments in the past several years, the neighborhood has remained, for the most part, a single family residential neighborhood. Third, recent decisions by the Planning Commission and City Council have indicated a desire to preserve the single family character oft the neighborhood, even on the edges of the neighborhood where commercial development has encroached  over the years.  Fourth, the development characteristics oft the neighborhood and existing codes have not facilitated the redevelopment of the area as a multifamily neighborhood, in spite ofl being zoned for multifamily housing for more than 60 years. One oft the challenges with the current multifamily designation relates to the size oft the lots. Current: 2 zoning standards    restrict densities for properties that are less than an acre to 7 units to the acre. The current zoning further restricts the development of properties that are less than .25 acre in area to as single family residence. In order for al lot to have adequate square footage for a duplex, a minimum of.29 acres is required. However, the Code restricts converting an existing single family home to a duplex. This means that in order to construct: a duplex on al lot, an existing home must be removed and replaced with a new duplex. Many oft the lots that are currently developed as single family homes are less than the minimum size required for a duplex meaning that in order for multifamily development to occur, multiple parcels must be obtained, consolidated, structures removed, and new development approved. Because of the high costs of obtaining multiple properties, this has pushed development in the area to large scale multifamily structures that are not compatible with a single family neighborhood, rather than smaller scale multifamily development that may have originally Based on these factors, staff is recommending that the area be rezoned to single family residential. With that recommendation comes the recognition that many oft the properties in the area, especially along the edges of the neighborhood on 500 South and 200 West, have developed as commercial or multifamily residential over the years. These areas deserve additional consideration. The. area along 200 West was specifically identified in the Historic Fort) Planning process as an area that should "become more walkable" over time. Recommended policies focused on making the commercial area aj pedestrian oriented commercial district. This area should be considered in the future for adoption of mixed use standards that would accomplish the goals and policies ofthe Historic Fort plan. Ini the area immediately adjacent to 200 West, single family zoning should be viewed as a temporary zoning designation that would regulate the area while adequate standards for development  been envisioned.  are considered and adopted. Standard of Review  As a matter of procedure, whenever the Planning Commission considers al request fora rezone (zone map amendment), it shall review it in accordance with the provisions of14-2- B. For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable, and desirable development within the City, it is declared to be the public policy that amendments should not be made to the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance or Zoning Map except to promote the objectives and purpose of this Title, the  205 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE AND MAP, which are as follows:  Bountiful City General Plan, or to correct manifest errors.  Department Review  This item has been reviewed by the City Planner and City Engineer, and City Attorney.    Significant Impacts  Thej proposed zone change will facilitate the recommendations of the Historic Fort Planning process by formalizing the area as a single family residential neighborhood.  Recommendation:  Itis recommended that the Planning Commission forward ai recommendation ofapproval to the City Council for the proposed zoning map: amendment for approximately 155 parcels totaling t 44.3 acres (see the attached legal description) from RM-19 (Multi Family Residential 19 units per acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential 4 units per acre).  Attachments 1. Aerial photo 2. Existing Zoning Map 3. Legal Description    Aerial Photo  WA00N  106  2500S    Existing Zoning  E470Ns  R-4  P-0O 106 E3GON E200N DN  WAOON W300N M200N  250N RM- 13  P-O  RM- 19 Wpo  R-44  WI00S N200S W300S W400S W500S  R-4 W7250S  C-G  W3238 3258    Description of the Proposed Rezone for the area between 100 West and 200 West; and 500 South and 400 North Streets in  Bountiful, Utah September, 2017  Beginning at a point on the centerline of 100 West Street which is north along said centerline 132.5 ft. more or less from the monument marking the intersection of 500 South Street and 100 West Street in Bountiful City, Davis County, Utah; Thence North along the centerline of 100 West Street 1,741.0ft. mol to the intersection Thence East along the centerline of Center Street 225.5 ft. mol to the extension of the  with Center Street;  east line of the Benard property;  Thence along property lines in the following 10 courses: North along the said east property line 189.8 ft. mol;  West 35.75 ft. mol; North 60.0ftr mol; West 36.8 ft. mol; North 25.65 ft. mol; West 21.75 ft. mol; North 7.4ft. mol; West 26.65 ft mol; North 10.6 ft. mol; of 400 North Street; South 206.0 ft mol; East 27.5 ft. mol; South 25.0ft. mol; centerline of 300 North; ; South 189.75 ft. mol;  West 104.5 ft. mol. to the centerline of 100 West Street; Thence West along said centerline 488.5ft. mol; Thence along property lines in the following 4 courses:  Thence North along said centerline 1,270.8 ft. mol. to the intersection with the centerline  West 276.5 ft. mol. to the monument line of 200 West Street;  Thence South along said monument line 189.7 ft. mol to the intersection with the  Thence East along said centerline 153.5 ft. mol; Thence along property lines in the following 2 courses: West 153.5ft. mol to the monument line of 200 West St.; Thence South along said monument line 762.2 ft. mol; Thence along property lines the following 2 courses: South 165.0 ft. mol to the North R.O.W. line of Center Street;  East 147.0ft. mol;  Thence southeasterly across Center Street to a point on the south ROW line of Center Street at a point which is East 128.8 ft. mol. from the NW corner of lot 6 Block 30, Plat  A, Bountiful Townsite Survey;  Thence along property lines in the following 3 courses:    Southerly 71 ft. mol; East 4.75 ft. mol;  South 665.4 ft. mol. to the centerline of 200 South Street; Thence East along the centerline of 200 South Street 62.0ft. mol; Thence along property lines in the following 3 courses: South 189.3ft. mol to the centerline of 300 South Street; Thence West along the said centerline 229.3 ft. mol; Thence along property lines in the following 3 courses. South190.5 ft. mol to the centerline of 400 South Street; Thence West along said centerline 181.5f ft. mol; Thence along property lines in the following 6 courses:  South 189.3ft. mol; East 299.3 ft. mol;  South 190.5f ft. mol; East 48.71 ft. mol;  South 166.75 ft. mol; East 263.0 ft. mol; North 4.3 ft. mol; East 132.0 ft mol; South 60.0 ft. mol;  East 181.5 ft. mol to the point of beginning.    Commission Staff Report Subject: Public Hearing-Potential Changes to DN Zoning District Standards found in Chapter 7 ofthe BountifulLand Use Ordinance Applicant: Bountiful City Author: Chad Wilkinson Date: October 3, 2017 Background and Analysis  Item #4  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  This item is a continuation oft the hearing held on September 19, 2017. After receiving feedback from the Planning Commission at the initial public hearing, staff1 has made the following changes  to the proposed Downtown zoning ordinance amendment. The major components oft the proposed changes include the following:  Changed minimum lot size to 8,000 sf. for mixed use and commercial lots Added regulatory language related to guest parking spaces Eliminated "whichever is less" language from building height calculations Provided additional text related to mechanical equipment. Provided additional clarification in table of permitted uses  Again, the attached draft ordinance contains the proposed revisions to the existing DN zoning standards, with changes to the existing ordinance indicated with strikethrough text (showing deletions) and underline text indicating new text. At the public hearing, staffwill provide a detailed discussion of each oft the changes along with the reasoning behind the proposed change. Itisi recommended that the Planning Commission review thej proposed changes to the Downtown Ordinance and hold aj public hearing to allow for additional public comment. After receiving 1. Request additional revisions and continue the item to a future meeting for further 2. Forward the item to the City Council with ai recommendation to approve the changes to 3. Forward the item to City Council with ai recommendation of denial for the proposed  Recommendation:  public input the Commission may take one oft the following actions:  discussion  thel DN Zoning standards. changes. Attachments  Proposed changes to the DN (Downtown) Zoning Standards (Version 2) G:IPLANIPlat AI PlanninglDN Ordinance Change/PCS Staff Report DN Text Amendment- Oct32 2017.docx    CHAPTER7 DN-DOWNTOWN  14-7-101 14-7-102 14-7-103 14-7-104 14-7-105 14-7-106 14-7-107 14-7-108 14-7-109 14-7-110 14-7-111 14-7-112 14-7-120 14-7-101  PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS AREA OF ZONE YARD REQUIREMENTS PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS BUILDING HEIGHT DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS PERMISSIBLE LOT COVERAGE PARKING, LOADING, AND ACCESS SITE PLAN APPROVAL OTHER REQUIREMENTS  PERMITTED, CONDITIONAL, AND PROHIBITED USES  PERMITTED ADJUSTMENTS TO REQUIRED PARKING  PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES  The Downtown (DN) Mixed Use Zone is established to provide a district primarily for the preservation of the mixed use character of the commercial and residential uses in and adjacent tot the Main Street downtown area, consistent with the provisions of the adopted Bountiful  Historic Downtown Plan. 14-7-102 14-7-103  AREA OF ZONE  Each area of Downtown zoning shall be at least four (4) acres in size.  PERMITTED, CONDITIONAL, AND PROHIBITED USES  The following principal uses and structures, and no others, are allowed either as a permitted use (P) or by Conditional Use Permit (C) in the Downtown zone. Some uses may be expressly prohibited (N) in this zone. Any use not listed herein is also expressly prohibited. Properties fronting on 100 West or 100 East shall be limited to the residential uses allowed in the (DN)  zone.  Table 14-7-103 Use Assisted Living Center Bail Bonds Banks, Credit Unions Bar, Tavern, Drinking Establishment Bottling, Canning, Food Production  DN C N P N C N C  Bulding/Construction Materials and Supplies w/ outside BuldingConstruction Materials and Supplies w/o outside  storage storage  7-1  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017Verion210a-7Chapwr7Dmtowowm.0nd201242doox    Use  DN N N C C P N C P N N N C C N N P P P N N P C N P P N N N C C P P N P P C P C N N P N NC C P  Check Cashing, Title Loans Construction Services w/ outside storage Construction Services w/o outside storage Convenience Stores Dry Cleaner, Laundry Service Fast Food Restaurant w/ drive-thru window Fast Food Restaurant w/ pick-up Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-thru Feed Lots, Animal Rendering, Animal Raising Fire Arm/Shooting Range - Indoor Fire Arm/Shooting Range Outdoor Food Preparation, Bakery Gasoline Sales General retail w/ outside storage General retail w/o outside storage Grocery Store Hotels (Interior rooms) Industrial Manufacturing Kennels, Animal Boarding Laundromat Self-operated) Medical/Dental Laboratory Medical/Dental Office Millwork, Cabinetry Motels Drive-up/exterior rooms) Motorized Recreation Main Street  Funeral Parlor, Cemeteries, and Crematory Services  Mail Order/Online Distribution office w/ onsite storage  Multi-Family Residential - Stand alone,with frontage on Multi-Family Residential - Stand 0nepoorpacHeNng on-00.Wesiori00fast without frontage on Main Street Multi-Family Residential w/ Commercial Use on ground floor Non-motorized Recreation, Pool, Gymnasium - Public or  Municipal Facility Private Pawnshop, Secondhand Merchandise Personal Services Professional Services Public/Private Assembly Restaurant Security Services  Self Storage Units or Warehouse w/o Office Sexually Oriented Business, Escort Service Single Family eD Existing Single Family Dwelling property fronting on Main Street Single-er-Two Family Dwelling - New Small engine/appliance repair Tailor, Seamstress, Shoe repair  7-2  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017) Version210.3-17Chapler7DowmwnOwn-01d2012-2.doex    Use Tattoo Parlor Tutoring, Dance, Preschool, Daycare Vehicle Part Sales Vehicle Repair Vehicle Sales Vehicle Salvage/Wrecking Vehicle Service and' Wash Vehicle Storage - Indoor Warehouse w/ office  DN N P N N N N N C N N  Welding, Autobody, Machine Shop, Fiberglass, Painting  Accessory uses and structures shall be permitted in the Downtown Zone provided that they are incidental to and do not substantially altert the character of the permitted principal use of a main structure. Such permitted accessory uses and structures include, but are not limited to, the A. Accessory structures such as garages, carports, equipment storage buildings and suppl storage buildings which are customarily used in conjunction with and incidental to a B. Storage of materials used for the construction of a building, including a contractor's temporary office, provided that such use be located on the building site or immediately adjacent thereto, and provided further that such use shall be permitted only during the  following:  principal use or structure permitted in the (DN) Zone.  construction period and thirty (30) days thereafter. MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS  14-7-104 follows:  The minimum area and street frontage for any lot or parcel in the Downtown Zone shall be as  Table 14-7-104 Use Commercial Mixed-Use Single Family (Existing-only Two-Family and Multi- amiywoFanwyEting only Multi-Family all frontages.  Min. Lot Size Min. Frontage  and Width 50 50 70 5080 80  20,0008.000 20,0008.000 8,000 10.00012,000 20,000  A. Lots with more than one (1) street frontage shall meet the minimum requirements along B. An existing lot or parcel that does not meet the minimum requirements shall be considered a non-complying lot, and all proposed development on such lot or parcel requiring site plan review shall follow the process for non-complying sites and structures  7-3  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017 Version21 10-3-17Chapler 7 Downtown Ord2012-12.dosx    IC. Ar multi-family residential development that is not part of a vertical mixed use  development shall meet the density requirements and development standards of the  RM-13 subzone, except as set forth int this Chapter.  14-7-105  YARD REQUIREMENTS  Al lot or parcel with a single family CFiweamilyéwellig shall conform to the minimum setbacks of the R-4 subzone. Two-family dwellings and mMulti-family dwellings shall meet the setback criteria of the RM-13 subzone. All other uses, including mixed uses, shall meet the following  requirements: A. A  Front and Street Setbacks.  1. Eachletorpare-Alona 100 West and 100 East shallhave-aany building shall have minimuma minimum building setback of 20 feet and a maximum setback of of twenty-fiv (2025) feet from anyf front property line and/or any property line abutting a public street, Along Main Street any building shall be located within ten (10) feet of the street property line. Plazas, outdoor eating areas, and other pedestrian oriented site amenitie: Along 500 South,400 South, 300 South, 200 South, 100 South, 100 North, 200 North, or 300 North and 400 Northany building shall be setback at least ten (10) feet 4. Along Center Street, any building shall be setback atl least five (5) feet and not more  With-the-lelewing-exeeptions:  12. 2-3.  shall be considered part of the building for setback purposes.  and not more than twenty (20) feet from the street property line.  than ten (10) feet fromi the street property line.  3. Eaeh-GtoFpareeReMaPStP8:ShAHave-aiium-OR- epasngseibacko!8KGHHY-8#SP/OR:RMaRSi9eHN-olway-ine,erbe  SaNadcmpeePlNnaAIEINGr.  4.  B. Side Yard. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, each lot or parcel shall have a minimum building setback of ten (10) feet from ani interior side property line. Any lot or parcel that fronts onto Main Street shall have no interior side yard setback except as C. Rear Yard. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, each lot or parcel shall have minimum building setback of ten (10) feet from a rear property line. D. Yard Abutting Residential Lots. Where property abuts an existing single family residential dwellingzone, the minimum building setback shall be ten (10) feet on the Accessory/Siructures, An accessory structure shall meet all of the setback requiremen ofa a principal structure. An accessory structure that does not require a building permit, according to the International Building Code (IBC), may be located in a side or rear  required by the International Building Code.  abutting side.  E.  setback area only if all of the following conditions are met:  7-4  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017Version21 10-3-17Chapier7-Downow-Ord-2012-42.deex    1. 2. 3.  The accessory structure is not within a front or street yard setback and is located more than ten (10) feet from any main building on the same or adjacent property. The accessory structure has no openings on the side which is contiguous with the property line, and the walls of said building which are adjacent to the property The accessory structure is designed such that all roof drainage is discharged  line have a fire retardant rating as specified by the IBC. onto the lot or parcel on which iti is erected.  F. Residential Uses.  Itist the requirement of Bountiful City that multiple family developments reflect a sense of proportion. Proportion requires that the development be designed in such a manner that each unit receives a reasonable and approximately proportionate share of the open space, landscaping, and other benefits of the site. Locating units in such a way that benefits of the site fall primarily to one unit or a few units, and not to others, is prohibited. Depending upon topography, property dimensions and site configuration, iti is possible that this requirement may affect the number of units that can be physically located on a lot or parcel. The Planning Commission and City Council are granted reasonable discretion in administering the proportionality requirement, and may modify yard setback requirements by up to twenty (20) percent subject to a finding that such modification will benefit all units more equally than would be possible if the standard requirement was  applied. 14-7-106  PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS  A. The following structures may be erected on or project into any required yard, except that  they shall not obstruct a required driveway or pedestrian access: 1. A fence or wall in conformance with this Ordinance.  2. 3.  Landscape elements, including: trees, shrubs, and other plants. Necessary appurtenances for utility service as long as they are attached to a permitted structure and do not protrude more than two (2) feet into a required  setback.  B. The structures listed below may project into a minimum front or rear yard not more than four (4) feet, andi into a minimum side yard not more than two (2) feet, except that they  may not obstruct a required driveway or pedestrian access:  1. 3.  Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, or other similar architectural Planter boxes or masonry planters not exceeding twenty-four (24) inches in 4. Acovered entry or porch used for the protection of pedestrians entering or leaving al building, provided said structure is not more than one story in height  features. height.  2. Stairways, balconies, door stoops, fire escapes, awnings  and is entirely open on at least three (3) sides.  7-5  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017 Version21 10-3-17Chapler7DowniownOrd-2012-12.deex    C. Buildings that front onto Main Street and that are built within ten (10) feet of the front property line may have canopies with business identification sign area if the following 1. The canopy may protrude a maximum of six feet (6). into the Main Street right-ol 2. The canopy shall not come within seven feet (7) of any parking stall, drive lane, The total combined length of the canopy or canopies shall not exceed two thirds  criteria is met:  way, over areas of sidewalk. (2/3) oft the building width.  or other portion of the right-of-way used for vehicle access. 4. The maximum height of the canopy shall not exceed five feet (5). 6. Canopy sign copy area shall be a maximum, of thirty-two (32) sq ft per property.  3.  5. Off-premise signs are expressly prohibited.  14-7-107  STRUCTURE HEIGHT  Any lot or parcel with asingle family OFiwp-amiydwelinge shall conform to the maximum height requirements of the R-4 subzone. MAHHaIydwelingEeMAI-cOmOme-Re-RaMmUR egntOHenaOHRe-RM-126Wb29Pe- All other uses, nolding-RieG-uSes, shall-net-exeeed ree-G/SIOMeS-OFONY-INeLASPPHP-PRPgHE-ReheVAISeMOReF,aE-easuredaHne A.A For buildings located within 100 feet of the street property line on 100 West and 100 East: Building height shall not exceed 35 feet or 2 stories in height measured atth average grade. A-A, be constructed one (1)additional story-footin height as-lengasihe-adalionalslony-is-set baekar-adéitiena-one--eet for each additional ene-ten_(10) feet foet of heightsetbac from 100 East and 100 West as measured from the street-property line. B. Buildings located atl least 100 feet from the street property line of 100 West and 100E Ea shall not exceed three (3) stories or 45 feet in height-measured at the average grade. Buildings may be constructed one (1) additional foot in height for each additional ten(1 feet- of setback from 100 East and 100 West as measured from the right of way. C.E Buildings located atl least 200 feet from 100 West and 100 East shall not exceed 55 fee or 4 stories in height measured at the average A6PPA---- heig! HOWFSMPEOFHY-Ne -.wwe grade. Mssowthsewwdaae D. Maximum height for public and quasi-public buildings shall be approved through the sit . Chimneys, lagpoles.towers. steeples, and similar accessory and architechtural elemer not used for human occupancy are excluded in determining height, however, the City may limit the height of any protrusion that is found by the City Council to be a public F. Inno case shall the area covered by roof mounted equipment exceed twenty percent (20%) of the roof area. Roof mounted equipment shall be setback from the edge of the roof a minimum of 1 foot for every foot of height. If mechanical equipment is located within roofed and enclosed structures, these structures shall not exceed the maximum height for the zone whether or not these areas are designed for human occupancy.,  average-gradeshal. comply with the following height standards:  plan approval process by the land use authority.  nuisance. For the purpose of  7-6  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment: 2017Version2 10317Chaper7Dowmowm.0a42012-42daa4    B.  CAFReySlagpolesCRUeAPweSSeepeS-AdSmHaracgessonyalemmenis-ne-used 6ehumanoswpanysed.waCWimithehagh hanyponusoninasICWCamaHsbsapalinenNusARGeAMBR208A  14-7-108  DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES  AI lot or parcel with a single family FWP-amy-dweling shall conform to the minimum building separation requirements of the R-4 subzone. A two-family dwelling or multi-family dwelling sha meet the minimum building separation criteria of the RM-13 subzone. For all other uses, the minimum separation between structures shall be en-O-eet-OFas required by the Internationa Building Code. WAcReVesgreaieAm/9ereawcRGNowghine-sleplan ppreva-precess-#FRereducedise6'se1DACK-6-90R86IOREWAPnea6Ppled-iStOne-De-Downtown-Plan MPHNaHHehIneweEsedyasemslensiBwidpCada. A. AI lot or parcel with a single family riwoamydwelling shall follow the lot coverage requirements of the R-4 subzone. A lot or parcel with a two-family ormulti-family dwelling shall conform to the lot coverage criteria oft the AM-12-13subzone. All others, including mixed-use developments, shall conform to the following criteria, in addition to 1. AlII landscaping shall be sprinkled and planted with substantial live plant material for the purpose of buffering, screening, and beautifying the site. At plant maturity, the landscaping should represent, as a minimum standard, compatibilit with surrounding developed properties and uses and must be permanently With the exception of properties fronting on Main Street aA minimum ten (10) fer wide landscape buffer shall be required along all frontage areas not occupied by 3. Ar minimum ten (10) feet wide landscape buffer shall be established adjacent to.  14-7-109  LANDSCAPING AND PERMISSIBLE LOT COVERAGE  any other requirements of this Title:  maintained by the owner or occupants.  2.  drive accesses. residential property.  4.  Parking, loading, and drive areas shall have a minimum five (5) feet wide landscape buffer when located adjacent to as side or rear property line, except fo landscape buffering required between residential uses. 5. Parking areas shall be landscaped as set forth in this Ordinance. 6. Approved landscaping must cover a minimum of ten (10) percent of the development site exclusive of any parkstrips in a public right-of-way. 7. Landscaping shall also be installed in all parkstrips to the same standards as other on-site landscaping. Asphalt, concrete, bricks, pavers, railroad ties, rocks gravel, and other non-vegetative material is not allowed in the parkstrip area  between the curb and sidewalk.  B. During the site plan approval process, the City may require more or less landscaping consistent with the provisions of the adopted Historic Downtown Plan. Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017 Version210.3-17Chapr7Dowsownown-0id2012-12.dosk  7-7    14-7-110  PARKING, LOADING, AND ACCESS  A. Each lot or parcel int the (DN) Zone shall have vehicle parking, loading, and access designed to meet the requirements of this Ordinance. In addition to the standards of Chapter 18 of the Land Use Ordinance, the following shall apply to properties ini the DN a. Off street parking is not permitted int the front setback area and/or between the street and building. Parking shall be located to the side or rear oft the building, b.Parking for buildings fronting on Main Street shall be er-be-located completely 5-c.Required guest parking spaces shall be located in dedicated off-street parking spaces. Drivewaya areas and areas located in front of garage doors(for example int townhome style developments) shall not be used to satisfy minimum quest  Zoning district.  behind the principal structure.  parking requirements. SITE PLAN APPROVAL  14-7-111  Except for single family Rd-wolamydwalings, site plan approval shall be required for any  development in the (DN) Zone as set forth int this Title.  14-7-112  OTHER REQUIREMENTS  A. Signs. Any sign erected in the (DN) Zone shall conform to the sign provisions oft this Title. Single family and two family dwellings shall conform toi the criteria for the R-4 subzone, and multi-family uses shall conform to the criteria for the RM-12-13 subzone. All others shall conform to the criteria for the E-GDN subzones. ekeeptnatpPole signs B. Uses Within Buildings. Any commercial use permitted in the (DN) Zone shall be conducted entirely within a fully enclosed building, except as provided in subsections 1  shall not be permitted. and 2 below. 1.  Outdoor Display of merchandise for sale in the downtown area. Businesses located in buildings in the (DN) Zone that have setbacks less than three (3) feet from the public right-of-way may display in the public right-of-way, subject to the a. Any display of merchandise on the sidewalk may not exceed three (3) feet into the public right-of-way from the property line of the business, except during the annual "Sidewalk Days" celebration. There may be no display of merchandise in the planter boxes in the public right-of-way. During the winter months, a display may not impede snow removal from  following terms and conditions:  b.  the sidewalk.  7-8  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment: 2017 Version210.3-17Chaper7DownownO0id2012-42.dock    C.  The display shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the width of the lot, parcel, or business. However, businesses with less than forty (40) feet of width may have a display not to exceed ten (10) feet iny width. d. Only merchandise sold inside the business may be displayed outside.  e. f. g. h.  No outdoor display shall exceed six (6) feet in height. Each display shall be taken down at the end of each business day. The merchant shall be solely responsible for items displayed. Each display shall not create al hazard, sight distance, or other problem to pedestrians on the sidewalk or to drivers on the street. Displayed merchandise shall not obscure or interfere with any official  notice, public safety sign, or device.  2. Any business not listed in subsection 1 may include the outdoor display of merchandise for sale only if all of the following conditions are met:  a.  The outdoor display of merchandise shall not be located upon any sidewalk, walkway, driveway, or within any public right-of-way nor shall it interfere with pedestrian or vehicular movement or with safe and proper b. The outdoor display of merchandise shall not reduce the amount of off-street parking below that which is required for the associated No item shall be displayed outdoors except for those lawfully displayed and sold inside the business or businesses located on the property. No hazardous and/or flammable materials (such as antifreeze, kerosene, poisons, pesticides and other similar items) may! be displayed outdoors. The aggregate outdoor display area shall not exceed twenty-ive (25) percent of the linear frontage of the store front or 10 linear feet, whichever is greater. Abusiness located on a corner shall be considered as having  ingress and egress of pedestrian traffic. commercial uses on the premises.  C.  d.  two (2) store fronts.  e. f. g. h.  No outdoor display shall exceed six (6) feet in height. may be located in any required landscaping.  Ar maximum of fifty (50) percent of the aggregate outdoor display area Items shall be displayed outdoors only during the hours that the business conducting the display is open to the public. Live plant material shall be Additional signs, beyond those allowed by this Title, shall not be allowed  exempt from this requirement.  as part of the outdoor display and sales area.  7-9  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017 Version21 10317Chapw-Downiwmbm042012-12dw    i.  Outdoor displays for special sales or for one of a kind items which would exceed any of these requirements may be granted a special permit by the Planning Director for a period not to exceed fourteen (14) days provided such special displays do not create parking, access, or traffic hazards.  C. Structure Design and Materials.  Any structure, except for single and two family dwellings, shall meet the minimum desigr  criteria as set forth in this Title. In addition, the following shall apply.  1.  Exteriors shall be maintenance free wall material such as highq quality brick, natural stone, weather resistance stucco or masonite type material, or non-wood siding. Stucco, masonite or siding may not exceed fifty (50) percent of the Each residential units shall have some private outdoor space in the form ofa 3. The primary entrance ofa a building must be oriented to faceas street, plaza or approved pedestrian-way Ground floor residential units shall have the primary  exterior. balcony or patio.  2.  entrance oriented toward the street.  4. Multifamily residential buildings shall not exceed a 2:1 buising.widihdeplhto  building height ratio.,  5.  Multifamily residential buildings located along 100 East and 100 West shall incorporate architectural features consistent with single family residential design such as pitched roofs, gable roofs, dormers, overhanging eaves, etc., into the  design of the structures.  D. Neighborhood Compatibility.  Each structure, except for existing single and two family dwellings, shall shall be designed consistent with the adopted Historic Downtown Bountiful Master Plan, particularly with regard to building height, architecture, landscaping, and building mass. E. Trash Storage. No trash, used materials, wrecked or abandoned vehicles, or equipmer shall be stored in an open area. With the exception of single family and two family dwellings, each development in the (DN) Zone shall be required tol have adequate, on- site, screened refuse containers maintained in a location approved as part of the site  plan.  F. Walls and Fences.  Any wall or fence erected around a commercial development or mixed use developmen shall comply with the requirements of the (C-G) zone. Any multi-family development shall comply with the requirements for the RM-13 subzone. Any single family andi two family developments shall comply with the provisions of the R-4 subzone. Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017 Version21 10-3-17Chapler7Downtown-Ord2012-12.doex  7-10    14-7-120  PERMITTED ADJUSTMENTS TO REQUIRED PARKING  A. Downtown Parking District Defined. The Downtown Parking District consists of those B. Proximity of Parking to Use. Required parking spaces for residential uses must be located on site. Required parking spaces for nonresidential uses must be located on site orii in parking areas within five hundred feet (500') of the development site property boundary. Off-site nonresidential parking is allowed if the following documentation is submitted in writing to the land use authority as part of a building or zoning permit 1. The names and addresses of the uses and of the owners or tenants that are 2. The location and number of parking spaces that are being shared;  properties located within the (DN) Zone.  application or land use review:  sharing the parking;  3.  An analysis showing that the parking area will be large enough for the anticipated  demands of both uses; and access to the parking for both uses.  4. Al legal instrument such as an easement or deed restriction that guarantees C. Joint Use Parking. Joint use of required parking spaces may occur where two (2) or more uses on the same or separate. sites are able to share the same parking spaces because their parking demands occur at different times. Joint use of required nonresidential parking spaces is allowed if the following documentation is submitted in writing to the land use authority as part of al building or zoning permit application or land  use review: 1. 2.  The names and addresses of the uses and of the owners or tenants that are The location and number of parking spaces that are being shared; 3. An analysis showing that the peak parking times of the uses occur at different times andi that the parking area will be large enough for the anticipated demands A legal instrument such as an easement or deed restriction that guarantees  sharing the parking;  of both uses; and  4.  access to the parking for both uses.  D. No parking calculation which includes the parking areas owned by the Bountiful Redevelopment Agency gives any right of possession, any real estate interest, or contract right or right of way on any Redevelopment Agency property.  7-11  Chapter 7 Downtown Ord Text Amendment 2017) Version2 10-3-17Chapter 1Da0a30-iaaw