Approved Minutes oft the March 16, 2021 Sean Monson Clinton Drake Lloyd Cheney Francisco Astorga Curtis Poole Darlene Baetz Sam Bawden  2 3 4 5 Present: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Excused: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51  BOUNTIFUL CITY PLANNING COMMISSION  Commission Chair Commission Members City Attorney City Engineer Planning Director City Planner Recording Secretary Commission Member  Jesse Bell, Jim Clark, Lynn Jacobs (vice-chair), Sharon Spratley, and Councilwoman Kendalyn Harris  1. Welcome.  Chair Monson opened the meeting at 6:30 pm and welcomed all those present.  2. Approval of the minutes for March 2, 2021  MOTION: Commissioner Spratley made a motion to approve the minutes for March 2, 2021 as  written. Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. VOTE: The motion passed unanimously (6-0). Hank Nelson, applicant - City Planner Curtis Poole  3. ROE Apartments - Site plan review for ROE Apartments located at 1350 South 200 West,  Hank Nelson was present. City Planner Curtis Poole presented the item.  City Planner Poole indicated that the applicant requests a site plan approval to construct at two-family (duplex) development. Except for a few properties, most properties in this neighborhood are multi- family. Bountiful City code requires site plan review for all multi-family developments. City Planner Poole indicated that the proposed plans met all setbacks and landscaping. The plans show a two-story building at approximately twenty-six feet (26') and is ai mix of cementitious siding (Hardie Board) and stucco. Each oft the units would be oriented toward 200 West. Comments from Bountiful Power were made in a Development Review meeting of a utility pole located inside the northwest corner of the property that would provide service to this development and the existing apartments to the west and requested a ten-foot (10') wide rear yard easement and City Planner Poole recommended the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to  five (5') side yard easement to be recorded at the County. City Council with the following five (5) conditions outlined:  1. Complete all redline corrections.  2. Grant and record utility easements requested by Bountiful Light and Power.  3. Provide elevations and resolve any concerns regarding drainage to the satisfaction of the City  Engineer.    Bountiful City Planning Commission Approved Minutes March 16, 2021 Page2of5  4. Pay fees and post an acceptable bond in the amount determined by the City Engineer.  2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  5. Sign al Public Improvement Development Agreement.  Mr. Nelson thanked City Planner Poole for all his help with this project.  MOTION: Commissioner Spratley made a motion to forward a recommendation to City Council  Commission Jacobs seconded the motion. VOTE: The motion passed unanimously (6-0).  4. Continuation - Renaissance Towne Centre = Ordinance Amendment to the current adopted Development Plan (Zoning Map Amendment), Bruce Broadhead, applicant-1 Planning Director  Francisco. Astorga a. Public Hearing  b. Action: Continue the item to the March 16, 2021 meeting, staff requested.  Bruce Broadhead and Roy Bartee, representing Renaissance Towne Centre were present. Planning Planning Director Astorga stated this item was a request from the applicant to clarify and clean up the current ordinance. This includes an increase of overall square footage, increase building height of certain buildings, code language clarification, and to change the conceptual photographs'mages affecting potential architectural design. He presented a condensed table of proposed changes for the development of this property noting that mixed-use does not necessarily mean a mandatory  Director Francisco Astorga presented the item.  commercial/retail component.  Planning Director. Astorga indicated the following: Lot1, 63 and 7 are already existing buildings.  Lot 8 is currently approved as a commercial/office building at 2 stories with a maximum height of42'. Applicant requested an additional 14' inl height. Statfrecommended ani increase  to 48' in height which would accommodate a 3-story building. Lot 9 is under construction and almost completed.  Lotl0iscurrently: approved lasacommercialofitel building witha ai maximum of60' inl height. Applicant requested an increase in height to 65'. Staff recommended no change in the Lot 11 is currently approved as a residential/commercialoftice building at 8 stories with a maximum height of 110. Applicant requested an increase in stories at 9 stories. Staff recommended an increase to 9 stories with no change in height with a change in use from Lot 13 is currently approved as a restaurant building with a maximum of2 stories and a maximum of30' in height. Applicant requested an increase in stories to 4 stories and 56' in height. Staffrecommended an increase ofr maximum of 48' in height which would be able to accommodate a 3-story building. Lot 13 had always been proposed to be developed as a  approved height.  office to non-residential mixed-use.    Bountiful City Planning Commission Approved Minutes March 16, 2021 Page3of5  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  restaurant, however the use of restaurants does not fall in the general commercial code and Lot 14 is currently approved as a residential building with a maximum of 5 stories and maximum height of65'. Application requested a maximum of 5 stories and an increase in Lot 15a and 15b are currently approved as a restaurant building with ai maximum of2 stories and 32' in height. Applicant requested aj maximum of4 stories and 56'. Staffrecommended an increase in height of 48' which would be able to accommodate a 3-story building. Lot 16 is currently approved as a residential building with a maximum of 4 stories and a maximum heightof45'. Applicant requested an increase inl heightof56'. Statfrecommended Lot 17 and 18 - currently approved as ai restaurant use with a maximum of2 stories and a 30' maximum in height. Applicant requested an increase in stories to 4 stories and a maximum height of 56'. Staff recommended an increase of 48' in height which would accommodate a Lot 19 - currently approved as a residential building with a maximum of 2 stories and a maximum of42' height. Applicant requested an increase to 4 stories and a maximum of56' in height. Staff recommended an increase to 48' which would accommodate a 3-story The proposed amendment does not affect the Design Standards or Pedestrian Circulation that was approved in the 2019 Ordinance (Zoning Map Amendment and Development Plan). Chair Monson opened and closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. without any comments. Mr. Bartee stated that this ordinance amendment is a change to the general master plan for these properties. The proposed current square footage will be able to meet the parking requirements and currently exceeds the required parking requirements. The specific approvals and requirements for each building including the parking would be approved as each lot is brought forward for approval Mr. Broadhead stated that the intent of the ordinance amendment is not to have major changes but wanted to clarify their intentions for this project. The proposed changes are to be used to allow more flexibility for development and thej proposed uses and would like clarification for potential height and Commissioner Spratley was concerned about the height restrictions and hesitant to approve any changes in light of the exhaustive analysis and extensive public input done previously from prior hearings. She had a concern for the residents that have a proximity for the residents parking spaces. The Commission and Council put a lot of thought and care for the approvals at previous meetings.  does not meet the ordinance.  height of70". Staffrecommended no change to thel height maximum.  no change tol height maximum.  3-story building.  building.  with Planning Commission and City Council.  number of stories.  She felt okay with the changes to the uses.    Bountiful City Planning Commission Approved Minutes March 16, 2021 Page 4of5  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48  Commissioner Bell was also concerned about the height and the ability for a walkable community. Itisi important tol have a master plan and be able to share the vision oft this project. Planning Director Astorga met with ai number of concerned citizens in the Planning offices to discuss Chair Monson agreed to the changes in the uses but was concerned about thej proposed height changes. Commissioner Jacobs stated that he likes the project and the idea oft the transit system at this location but does not want to make a number of changes SO fast. He discussed concern for pedestrian The Planning Commission and Planning Director Astorga did not feel that the changes of uses would be detrimental to the project but felt that a minimum of2 lots be approved for restaurants. MOTION: Commissioner Spratley made a motion to forward a positive recommendation to City Council to amend the requested uses as proposed, maintain the already approved height limits in feet and remove stories/floors, and let building code prevail. Her motion also included that at least 2 pads should be used as restaurants with a minimum of1 14,200 square feet. City Council has the option to  the proposed changes with them.  walkways.  revisit the issue of the walkability for the west side oft the property.  Commissioner Clark seconded the motion.  Commissioners discussed the concern for the lack of sidewalk on the west side oft the property. Mr. Broadhead noted aj portion oft the west side of the property is not owned by him. Planning Director  Astorga noted the pedestrian walkways are not intended tol be changed.  VOTE: The motion passed unanimously (6-0).  5. Omnibus Land Use Code Text Amendment - City Planner Curtis Poole and Planning Director City Planner Curtis Poole presented the item. He indicated that the proposed omnibus amendment covers various sections ofthe Land Use Code and is reviewed with Commission and Council on a regular basis. These changes include accuracy and clarification to the existing code. City Planner  Francisco.Astorga.  Poole indicated the following changes:  1. Building Height 2. Non-conforming  Remove the text of two (2) stories in Single Family and Multi-family zone and leave the height Clarification to the non-complying and non-conforming language. A non-conforming site is to be reduced and mitigate the use of the previous use. The removal oft the references to definitions  ofthe building at thirty-five (35)ft.  that were not listed in the code. 3. Home occupation - Day Care 4. Mixed -Use. Zone  Correction to the language oft the number of children.  Clarification of open spaces or public space in the Mixed-use zone.    Bountiful City Planning Commission Approved Minutes March 16,2021 Page 5of5  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45  5. Mixed-Use Zone (Uses) Clarification oft the sub-zone designations. 6. Planning Commission Voting Commissioners attending the meeting. 7. Shipping Container 8. Location of Street Trees 9. Access Requirements  Clarification oflanguagei for voting requirements must have ai majority oft the number of] Planning Clarification of the zone the containers are allowed and the regulations for the container.  Additional language for the location of street trees.  Additional item clarifying the removal and replacement of an abandoned existing driveway. Clarification to the preliminary site plan review and the addition to include submittal of the  10. Site Plan Review. Application Submittal purpose and a survey to be required. Councilwoman Harris left meeting at 9:23 p.m.  City Planner Poole recommended the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to Chair Monson opened and closed the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. without any comment.  City Council.  Commissioner Bell discussed the approved street tree list. Planning Director Astorga suggested the list should be reviewed to ensure the proper trees would be given as the standard for street trees. This review would need to include individuals with expertise in landscaping and horticulture. Commissioner Bell questioned how the shipping containers would apply to sheds and accessory structures and did not feel like the proposed amendment provided language that would regulate how these situations would be addressed. City Planner Poole explained this amendment has come from many: requests from residents tol build with shipping containers, which may reduce the cost ofbuilding a new home and suggested the Commission remove item 7 and have staff come back later with MOTION: Commissioner Spratley made a motion to forward a positive recommendation to City Council for all items excluding item seven (7). Commissioner Jacobs seconded the motion. MOTION: Commissioner Bell made ai motion to adjourn. Chair Monson seconded the motion.  language to address the concern.  VOTE: The motion passed unanimously (5-0). VOTE: The motion passed unanimously (5-0). The meeting was adjourned at 8:48 p.m.  Sa Sean/Monson Planning Commission Chair