BOUNTIFUL CITY COUNCIL MEETING  TUESDAY,June 14, 2016 Work Session 6:00 p.m. Regular Session 7:00 p.m.  NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Bountiful, Utah will hold its regular Council meeting at City Hall, 790 South 100 East, Bountiful, Utah, at the time and on the date given above. The public is invited to both. the Work Session and Regular Meeting. Deliberations will occur in both meetings. Persons who are disabled as defined by the Americans With Disabilities Act may request. an accommodation by contacting the Bountiful City Manager at 801.298.6140. Notification at least 24 hours If you are not on the agenda, the Council will not be able to discuss your item of business until another meeting. For most items iti is desirable for the Council to be informed oft background information prior to consideration at a Council meeting. If you wish to have an item placed on the agenda, contact the  prior to the meeting would be appreciated.  Bountiful City Manager at 801.298.6140.  AGENDA  Work Session 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. 3. Council Reports 4. Consider approval of 5. BCYC report  1. City road maintenance and replacement discussion - Mr. Gary Blowers  p.3 p.5 p.9 p.13 p.21 p.27 p.29 p.33  1. Welcome, Pledge of Allegiance and Thought/Prayer 2. Approve minutes of previous meeting - May 24, 2016  a. Weekly expenditures > $1,000 paid May 16 &23,2016 b. Monthly financial report - April 2016 6. Deanne Henderson retirement - ChiefTom Ross 7. PUBLICE HEARING -FY2017 Budget - Mr. Galen] Rasmussen 8. 2016 Slurry Seal Contract - Mr. Lloyd Cheney Brasier, applicant - Mr. Chad Wilkinson  9. Consider preliminary and final site plan approval for an enclosed storage addition at RB Automotive Machine Shop, 11932 2425 W,Jay Mirci with. JKM Construction Inc. representing Rodger 10. PUBLIC HEARING Consider approval ofa Zone Map amendment from Multi-Family to (RM-13) Single Family (R-4) fort the property located at 12901 NI Main St, Kathryn Goodfellow, applicant 11. Consider preliminary and final subdivision approval for Goodfellow Subdivision, 12901 NI Main p.39 12. Consider final site plan and subdivision approval for Pages Hollow Townhomes, 320 W Pages, Taylor 15. Closed session to discuss the acquisition or sale ofi real property, pending litigation and/or to discuss the  - Mr. Chad Wilkinson  St. Kathryn Goodfellow, applicant - Mr. Chad Wilkinson Spendlove representing Brighton Homes Mr. Paul Rowland 13. Appointment of Administrative Law. Judge Mr. Clinton Drake 14. Adjourn to an RDA meeting with as separate agenda  p.43 p.49  character and/or competency of ani individual(s) (Utah Code $52-4-205).  City. Attorney    2    City Council Staff Report Subject: Road Maintenance Program Author: City Engineer Department: Streets, Engineering Date: June 14, 2016  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  Last fall the citizens of Bountiful along with all of Davis County, voted themselves a sales tax increase specifically tol be used resolve transportation related problems. We anticipate that Bountiful City will receive about $600,000 to use fors street maintenance, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk improvements, trail improvements, etc., in addition to the funding we already receive from the Class C gas taxj program and the money we have traditionally used from the city's General Fund and Capital Funds. Annually the Street Department sets al budget to provide for the maintenance of our streets and thej purpose oft this Study Session discussion is to review with the Council how that program is set and how the  budgets are determined. Analysis  Each year the Streets Department, with the assistance oft the Engineering Department establish as street maintenance program based on the needs oft the roads and the time and money available to get the work done. This maintenance has traditionally been anchored by our asphalt overlay program, which produces al nice smooth new: road surface which will last for several years. That program is expensive and overtime produces an asphalt buildup on the roads which must be reduced or removed, again at a fairly high expense. The last few decades have produced new: materials and technologies which can be used to coat or rejuvenate our asphalt roads. From overlays to fog coats, we arel looking for better and more efficient ways to maintain our roads in a way that the citizens of Bountiful can appreciate that their tax dollars are being used in a way that benefits them directly. An annual evaluation of every road produces the program that takes in to account the different new technologies and where they can be used, from which our budget is established. In the coming. year, we. have established our budget for the new $600,000 oftransportation  money using these general guidelines:  Overlay Chip Seal Slurry Seal Ha5 Surface Total  $300,000 (plus the money we have traditionally budgeted) 100,000 (plus $100,000 from our Gen Fund for total of $200,000) $500,000 ($100,000 to be held in reserves for future large projects)  50,000 (new technology) 50,000 (new technology)  3    This Study Session has been scheduled to give the Council a better understanding about how we establish the priorities in our: surface treatment program and to answer questions about the condition of our roads and plans fori improvements. This memo can't possibly cover everything we would like to review in our Study Session, but some things we plan to  cover include:  Howi is the condition oft the city streets reviewed?  How often are they inspected? How are priorities set?  What kind of future plan do we have and how often is it updated? What determines what surface treatment willl be used? Why wait on a surface treatment after al road has been cut and patched? Please bring any other question about roads, repairs, budget, etc., that you might have SO we can discuss it at the Study Session. Some suggested questions might include: Why is the crown SO high on some roads, and what can be done? What ist the difference between resurfacingand: reconstructing a road? Why do the sides oft the road seem to crumble first on some streets? Why is a newer road treated when we have older roads that appear to need work  Why crack seal?  first? Department Review Significantimpacts N/A Recommendation Attachments  This memo has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and City Manager.  This memo is forinformation only and comes with no recommendation.    Minutes ofthe BOUNTIFUL CITY COUNCIL May 24, 2016-7:00 p.m. Randy Lewis Pitt Gary Hill Lloyd Cheney Clinton Drake Chad Wilkinson David Burgoyne ChiefTom Ross ChiefJeff Bassett Gary Blowers Nikki Dandurand  2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 prayer. 33 35  5 Present: Mayor  Councilmembers City Manager: Asst. City Engineer: City Attorney: City Planner: Deputy City Recorder:  Kendalyn Harris, Richard Higginson, Beth Holbrook (arrived at approximately 7:15), John Marc Knight, John  15 Department Directors/Staff:  Police Fire Streets/Sanitation Recording Secretary  Official notice oft the City Council Meeting was given by posting an. Agenda at City Hall and on  22 the Bountiful City Website and the Utah Public Notice Website and by providing copies to the 23 following newspapers of general circulation: Davis County Clipper and Standard Examiner.  No Work Session Regular Meeting - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers  Mayor Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance.  31 Bracken Walters, Troop 665, led the Pledge of Allegiance and Councilman Richard Higginson gave a  34 APPROVAL OF MINUTES  Mayor Lewis presented the minutes oft the regular City Council meeting on May 10, 2016.  36 Councilman Higginson made a motion to approve the presented minutes and Councilwoman Harris 37 seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Knight and Pitt  38 voting "aye". 39 41 42 44  40 YOUTH COUNCIL REPORT 43 COUNCIL REPORTS  No report was made  Councilwoman Harris stated that on Memorial Day, an announcement will be made  45 concerning the statue for the infant cemetery. Councilman Pitt thanked everyone who participated in 46 the Chalk Art] Festival. Councilman Knight mentioned the Tour of Utah coming again this summer.  Page 1 of4    (City Council minutes May 24, 2016)  Councilman Higginson reported that the Bountiful Historical Society museum renovations are 2 underway. Mayor] Lewis concluded that he has been visiting local schools to show the City's support 5 CONSIDER APPROVALOF WEEKLY EXPENDITURES > $1,000 PAID MAY289,2016 7 $152,918.30 and May 9,2016, for $359,060.23. Mayor Lewis inquired about the "raptor protection" 8 in the May 2nd, report. Mr. Gary Hill explained it is fort the protection oft the new substation against 9 birds in the area. Councilman Higginson asked about thej progress with. JMR Construction. Staff 10 reported that the work is going well and on time. Councilman Pitt moved to approve the 11 expenditures as presented, and Councilman Higginson seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous 12 with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye". 15 item, as the applicant has another engagement to attend. The Council agreed.  3 for the Tour ofUtah.  4 6  Mayor Lewis presented the weekly expenditure summaries paid on May 2, 2016, for  13 14 16  Mr. Gary Hill asked the Council and the Mayor ifi item number 9 could be moved to the next  17 PUBLIC. HEARING- CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 2016-05. AMENDINGTHE 18 ZONE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIALIC-GPUD)TO MIXED USE (MXD-PO) 19 FOR PROPERTIES ADDRESSED 1512, 1560 AND 1580 SOUTH RENAIBSANCEIOWAE 20 CENTER AND 1520 SOUTH MAIN, BRUCE BROADHEAD. APPLICANT- MR. CHAD 23 portion of the Renaissance Town Center. The current C-G zoning does not allow for residential use 24 and the use was not included in the original development plan for the site. The Renaissance Town 25 Center Development was originally approved in 2000 and included a development plan that received 26 conceptual approval from the City Council. As part oft their approval of the conceptual plan, setbacks 27 and building heights were waived. The new standards would replace this wholesale waiver ofs setbacks 28 and heights with maximum height and minimum setback standards. The applicant has selected MXD- 29 PO designation which is a classification that requires 50 to 75 percent of the floor area of the project 30 be devoted to professional office use. Thej proposed standards limit the residential portion oft the mixed 31 use development to 25 percent of the total floor area for the zone. The proposed standards further 32 restrict residential use by prohibiting residential use on the ground floor of buildings in the zone in 33 order to ensure an emphasis on commercial and office use. Thej proposed zone defaults to the standards 34 of the MXD zone and/or to the generally applicable standards of the Land Use Ordinance, unless  21 WILKINSON 22  The request for mixed-use zoning is primarily to allow for residential use within the north  35 specifically modified by the proposed MXD-PO ordinance.  36 38 39 40  37 PUBLIC. HEARING- OPEN: 7:17p.m.  CLOSED: 7:18p.m.  Councilman Pitt inquired about the address of 1581 South, which staff explained only as a  41 future address. Councilwoman Harris asked if the conceptual picture was available to view. There is 42 noj picture available at this time, but the applicant did state thati itisa ai four-story building with aj parking 43 garage as the lower level. Councilwoman Harris moved to approve Ordinance 2016-05 as presented 44 and Councilman Higginson seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris,  45 Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye".  46  Page 2 of4  6    (City Council minutes May 24, 2016)  1 4  2 CONSIDER APPROVALOF THE PURCHASE OF A VOLVO COMPACTION ROLLER 3 FROM ARNOLD MACHINERYINTHE AMOUNT OF $108,325-1 MR. GARY BLOWERS 5 compacting asphalt for road maintenance projects. Three bids were received, with the 6 recommendation to purchase from Arnold Machinery Company. Councilman Higginson moved to 7 approve the purchase, and Councilwoman Holbrook seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous 8 with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye". 10 CONSIDER APPROVAL OFTHE PURCHASE OF AJ LANDOLL1 TRAILER: FROM SEMI- 11 SERVICE: INC. INTHE AMOUNT OF $69,993.25- MR. GARY BLOWERS 13 paving. Two bids were received, with the recommendation to purchase from Semi-Service. 14 Councilman Higginson moved to approve the purchase, and Councilman Knight seconded the 15 motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt 18 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF A TRAILMAX TRAILER FROM SEMI- 21 paving and reconstruction. Two bids were received, with the recommendation to purchase from 22 Semi-Service. Councilman Pitt moved to approve the purchase, and Councilman Higginson 23 seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, 26 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL  Mr. Blowers stated the Streets Department is in need of ai new compaction roller for  9 12  Mr. Blowers stated this trailer is needed to transport the paver and skid steer loader for street  16 voting "aye". 17 20  19 SERVICEINCINT THE AMOUNTOF $30,925-1 MR. GARY BLOWERS  Mr. Blowers stated this trailer will be used for transporting the compaction roller for street  24 Knight and Pitt voting "aye".  25 28  27 SERVICES WITH DAVIS COUNTY = CHIEF TOM ROSS  ChiefRoss stated that negotiations have been going on for over a year to revise existing City  29 contracts and cost sharing arrangements for animal control services provided by the County. During 30 those meetings, plans were outlined to change the cost sharing percentage from 37% City 63% 31 County to a 90% City 10% County cost sharing model tol be implemented over a six to seven year 32 period. Ini the case of Bountiful, this County proposal would have driven Animal Control costs from 33 the current level of $61,773 annually to $199,054 annually by the year 2021. City managers openly 34 expressed dissatisfaction with thej proposals in those meetings and proposed ai new agreement of 35 dividing the cost evenly. Councilwoman Harris asked if our City Attorney, Mr. Clinton Drake had 36 reviewed the proposed new agreement, which he has and recommends it for approval. ChiefRoss 37 added that the City has limited options for animal control and this Agreement is the best solution. 38 Councilman Higginson asked what the County's plan is after 2020, to which Mr. Gary Hill: responded 39 that it will stay at the 50/50 cost sharing plan. Chief Ross also stated that an advisory committee 40 will be formed as well to control the new agreement. Councilman Knight moved to approve the 41 agreement, and Councilman Higginson seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous with 42 Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye".  43  44 CONSIDER GRANTING TOUR OF UTAH A SINGLE EVENT ALCOHOL PERMIT-I MR.  45 CHAD WILKINSON  Page 3 of4  7    (City Council minutes May 24,2016)  I  Mr. Wilkinson stated that this permit was allowed last year during this event and is  2 recommended for approval this year. It will only pertain to two locations on the specified date. 3 Councilman Higginson made a motion to approve the permit and Councilwoman Holbrook seconded 4 the motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and 7 CONSIDER APPROVALOF, A. JANITORIAL CONTRACT FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY 10 of complaints from court personnel and the police department employees in regards to the cleanliness 11 oft the building and other issues. Management has held meetings with the current janitorial business 12 owner on several occasions and also made more detailed checklists and other process changes in 13 hopes that the service level would improve. Unfortunately, the performance is still subpar and we are 14 nowi ready to move forward. The Council asked ifthe new contract can be started sooner and if 15 references were checked. ChiefRoss stated the new provider can start as soon as possible and 16 references were checked. Three bids were received to provide janitorial services for the Public 17 Safety Building, with Wingfoot Services being recommended by staff. Councilman Knight made a 18 motion to approve the contract, and Councilwoman Harris seconded the motion. Voting was 19 unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye". 21 CONSIDER APPROVALOF ORDINANCE 2016-06 PROHIBITING DISCHARGING 22 FIREWORKS EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD - MR. CLINTON DRAKE 24 restrictions than previous years. Councilwoman Harris stated that a concerned resident inquired 25 about the street (Davis Blvd.) in question. Fire ChiefJ Jeff Bassett (Fire Code Official) has determined 26 that conditions within areas of Bountiful City arel hazardous for fires and has recommended that 27 restrictions be adopted for those areas posing a fire risk. Chief] Bassett also stated that access to 28 particular areas is also a concern and risk. Healso mentioned that the dates and times fireworks can 29 be used is in Utah State Code and cannot be changed by the City. Councilman Knight made a motion 30 to approve Ordinance 2016-06 and Councilman Higginson seconded the motion. Voting was 31 unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye".  5 Pitt voting "aye".  6 9  8 BUILDING WITH WINGFOOT SERVICES - CHIEFTOM ROSS  Chief Ross stated that over the past eighteen months they have received an increasing number  20 23  Mr. Drake stated that restrictions are being put into place per Utah State Code, but with fewer  32 33  Councilman Higginson made a motion to adjourn the regular City Council meeting,  34 Councilwoman Holbrook seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous with Councilpersons Harris, 35 Higginson, Holbrook, Knight and Pitt voting "aye". The regular City Council session was adjourned  36 at 7:50 p.m. 37  Mayor  City Recorder  Page 4 of4  8    City Council Staff Report Subject: Expenditures for Invoices > $1,000.00 paid May 16&23,2016 Author: Tyson Beck, Finance Director Department: Finance Date: June 1,2016  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  This report is prepared following the weekly accounts payable run. Iti includes payments for all expense invoices equaling ore exceeding $1,000.00. Payments affecting only revenue orl balance sheet accounts are: not included. Such payments include those to acquire additions to inventories, the remittance of payroll withholdings and taxes, and performance bond refunds. Expenses for salaries and wages and utility deposit and credit  balance refunds are: noti included.  Analysis  Unless otherwise noted and approved in advance, all expenditures are included in the current budget. Answers to questions or further research can be provided upon request.  Department Review Significant Impacts None Recommendation Attachments May 16&23,2016.  This report was prepared and reviewed by the Finance Department.  Council should review and approve the attached expenditures.  Weekly rpartcfepemsyepandars fori invoices equaling or exceeding $1,000.00 paid    0    0  0        City Council Staff Report Subject: April 2016 Financial Reports Author: Tyson Beck, Finance Director Department: Finance Date: June1,2016  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  These reports include summary revenue, expense, and budget information for all ofthe City's funds. Both revenues and expenses, including capital outlay, have been included. These reports  are presented to the City Council for review.  Analysis  Data within the reports and graphs presented provide detail of revenue, expense, and  budget results for the associated period.  Department Review Significant Impacts  These reports were prepared and reviewed by the Finance Department.  The FY2016 budget portion of these reports is the originally adopted FY2016 budget  approved by the City Council in June of2 2015.  Recommendation Attachments  Council should review the attached revenue, expense, and budget reports.  April 2016 Fiscal YTD Revenue & Expense Report-FY2016  13    -   n  3 B - 8 1 9    AEmino04000 yoNoomoo PEOOOO C in  s  vocomc  oHmams anoyi umno Hoy : 19999009000 MOEc Hmeme HOrOy  iummo a  000    6  VEmom  3  op  icoc o0ymrro nC  omarMen, mmasouon  ou  NN  am 0 ouioom Nm  ruoyponps rioinppoon    de 0000000 0000000 00  8  o0 00000  moour r0ogiu Omhorod OOrHmo moEd: mmw Nmn  mowos Nr 00001 omonos voNmm n    e  o 00  8 d8  o    1o  o  d0  88  000 000 0  o  1oo vmv Pi Nn 000 o  - 0o  000 o  o 10    8    City Council Staff Report  Subject: Author: Department: Date:  Recommendations for budget amendment, adoption, and setting ofaj property tax rate  Galen D. Rasmussen, Assistant City Manager BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Executive June 14,2016  Background  Onl May 10th of this year thel Mayorand City Council adopted at tentative budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2 2016 and ending June 30, 2017. This document also contained the original budget and estimated revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year. This tentative budget document has been available for publici inspection since the date ofi its adoption. Budgets of governmental entities are essentially aj plan which outlines the goals and priorities oft the entity and accounts for the sources and uses of funds to carry out the goals and priorities. These budgets are developed by management and staff; are: subject to review and approval by the elected body; and are open for review and comment by the public. Since budgets are plans, iti is contemplated that later amendment oft thej plan may be necessary to account: for changes in goals, priorities, ort to recognize actual revenues: and/or expenditures that exceed the original budget. Specific requirements to be followed by citiesi in budget development and administration are found in Utah  Code Sections 10-6-101 through 10-6-136.  Analysis  The adopted tentative budget contained budgets from all departments and funds of the City following meetings between department representatives, the City Manager, and the Mayor and Council. Thel budgets were balanced between revenues and expenditures and the format of the document conformed to the: standards prescribed by Utah Code Section 10-6. The attached ordinance is designed to formalize four: actions related to the tentative budget following a Power Point presentation, and aj publicl hearing inj preparation for the tentative budget to become the City's 1. Amendment oft the current year budget for selected departments to address expenditures or expenses that are projected to exceed the original budget by the end oft the fiscal year. The specific amendments and explanations for each amendment are detailed in the ordinance. 2. To consider, as aj part oft the new fiscal year 20171 budget, the transfer of $2,456,000 from the Light & Power Fund to the General Fund oft the City. This isar regular annual transfer. 3. Adjustments oft the budget for the newi fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017 (fiscal year 2017). These adjustments are: necessary to implement various technical corrections, and toj prepare thel budget document fora ai future: submission to the national Government Finance Officers Association for thej purpose of receiving their 4. Adopting the fiscal year 2017 budget (which includes the amendments, transfers and adjustments described above) along with related rates, fees, taxes, employee compensation  final adopted budget:  Distinguished Budget Presentation Award.  21    schedules, and a confirmation oft the City's participation in the Public Employees  Contributory: and Public: Safety Retirement Systems.  Ina addition to the ordinance, iti is also necessary, by resolution, to set the certified taxi rate andl levy taxes upon all real and personal property ini the city for calendar year 2016. The staff report includes a resolution to adopta a Certified Tax Rate of 0.000900 which should deliver property tax revenue in the: amount of $2,203,276. The final adopted budget would then reflect $42,318 morei in General Property' Tax Revenue than the amount shown in the tentative budget adopted on May 10. Every department of the City has submitted, reviewed, and approved their portion oft the budget. The budget, ordinance, and resolution have alsol been reviewed and approved by the City Manager  Department Review and the City Attorney. Recommendation  The following actions are: recommended by staff to the Mayor and City Council:  1. Adopt Resolution 2016-04 to: set the certified property tax rate and levy taxes for calendar  year 2016;  2. Adopt Ordinance 2016-07 to:  a. Amend the current year 2016 budget and  b. Adopt the newi fiscal year 2017 budget, which incorporates various technical corrections, a schedule of fees, taxes, and employee compensation schedules along with providing a confirmation ofthe City's participation in the Public Employee  Contributory and Public Safety Retirement: Systems.  Significant) Impacts Attachments  Adoption ofal budget and setting ofa propertyt taxi rate is required by Utah Code Section 10-6.  Resolution 2016-04, Ordinance 2016-07  22    MAYOR Randy C. Lewis CITY COUNCIL Richard Kendalyn Higginson Harris John Beth Marc Holbrook Knight John Pitt CITY MANAGER Gary R. Hill  BOUNTIFUL  TFUL  Bountiful City Resolution No. 2016-04  PORAIED AD  A Resolution setting the tax rate and levying taxes upon all real and personal  property in the City of Bountiful, Utah, made taxable for the year 2016. Itis the Finding of the Bountiful City Council that:  1. The City is authorized and required by the Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah 2. The City of Bountiful, through its elected officials and appointed officers, has determined the amount of property tax which should be included in the budget for the Fiscal  Cities (Utah Code $10-6-133) to set the real and personal property tax levy; and  Year2 2016-2017, beginning July 1, 2016, and ending June 30, 2017.  Now, therefore, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of Bountiful, Utah: SECTION1. The City of] Bountiful, through its duly authorized and legally appointed officers, has determined the amount of property tax which should be included ini the budget for the fiscal SECTION2. Bountiful has, based on assessed valuation information furnished by Davis SECTION3. For the purpose of defraying the necessary and proper expenses oft the City of Bountiful, Utah, and maintaining the government thereof, the rate oft the general tax levied upon all real and personal property within Bountiful, Utah, made taxable by law for the year 2016 (or for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017) is determined tol be 0.000900 on each dollar of assessed  year beginning July 1,2016, and ending June 30, 2017.  County, determined the rate ofthe general tax which should be levied.  valuation ofs said property, and is hereby adopted by this resolution. SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately.  Adopted by the City Council of] Bountiful, Utah, this 14th day of June, 2016.  Randy C.I Lewis, Mayor  ATTEST:  Shawna. Andrus, City Recorder  23    MAYOR RandyC.Lewis CITY COUNCIL Richard Kendalyn Higginson Harris John Beth! Marc Holbrook Knight John Pitt CITY MANAGER Gary R. Hill  BOUNTIFUL  Bountiful City Ordinance No. 2016-07  ORATED AD  An ordinance (1) amending the budgets of the City of Bountiful for the Fiscal  Year beginning July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2016; (2) adopting a budget for the City of Bountiful for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2016, and ending June 30, 2017; and (3) authorizing and directing the participation of the City in the Public Employees Contributory Retirement System and the Public Safety Contributory Retirement System of  the Utah Retirement Systems for fiscal year 2016-2017.  Itis the Finding of the Bountiful City Council that:  1. The Bountiful City Council, through its elected officials and appointed officers, has 2. This Budget has been duly considered and formulated according to the Uniform Fiscal 3. This budget includes estimates ofa anticipated revenues, appropriations for expenditures and expenses, adjusted compensation schedules for City officers and employees that reflect the rates required forj participation in the Utah Retirement Systems, and user: fees for  caused to be prepared al Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2016-2017; Procedures Act for Utah Cities (Utah Code $10-6-101 et seq);  City facilities and services.  4. A Tentative Budget was adopted on May 10, 2016, and made available as required by 5. A public hearing to consider this Final Budget has been noticed and held on June 14, 2016, according to the requirements ofthe Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah Cities. Now, therefore, it is hereby ordained by the City Council of Bountiful, Utah:  law;  Section 1.1. The City of Bountiful, Utah, through its elected officials and appointed officers, has reviewed the revenues and expenditures in all ofi its budgets for fiscal year 2015-2016. Section 1.2. The City, desiring not to overspend budget appropriations in any ofits funds or departments, desires to adjust revenues and/or expenditures in its budgets for fiscal year 2015-  2016.  24    Section 1.3. The budget changes set forth in] Exhibit A for fiscal year 2015-2016 are hereby Section 2.1. The City of Bountiful, through its elected officials and appointed officers, has caused to be prepared a budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2016, and ending June 30, 2017. This budget has been duly considered and formulated according to the Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah Cities and other applicable State and Federal law. Itisn now desirable Section 2.2. This budget includes estimates of anticipated revenues, appropriations for expendituresexpenses, adjusted compensation schedules for City officers and employees, and Section 2.3. The Bountiful City budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2016, and ending June 30, 2017, with the adjusted compensation schedules and the City user fees incorporated in Section 2.4. Bountiful City hereby confirms its participation in the Public Employees Contributory Retirement System and the Public Safety Contributory Retirement System ofthe Utah Retirement Systems for fiscal year 2016-2017. The budget and compensation schedules reflect the Annual Certification of] Retirement Contribution Rates required for participation int the current year. The City Manager and staff are authorized and directed to take such steps as are necessary toi implement the City's participation in these programs. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon first publication.  adopted.  and necessary to: formally adopt this budget.  user fees for City facilities and services.  its preparation is hereby adopted.  Adopted by the City Council of] Bountiful, Utah, this 14th day of. June, 2016.  Randy C. Lewis, Mayor  ATTEST:  Shawna Andrus, City Recorder  25    &  8888888 PRoye    City Council Staff Report Subject: 2016 Slurry Seal Contract Author: Assistant City Engineer Department: Engineering June 7,2016  Date:  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  Slurry seal is an asphalt treatment (maintenance product) which seals cracks and provides al new wearing surface on asphalt streets. It isi included in the family of thin treatments such as chip seals and microsurfacing products which are used to extend the service life of asphalt pavements. Between 1998 and 2006, the application ofs slurry seals was an important part of the City's street maintenance program. The program was discontinued after the downturn int the economy, and aftera a series of problems with the application of the product. Over the last few years, the Streets Departments has been conducting a series  ofs small pilot projects toi investigate the use of slurry seals once again.  Analysis  Al Bid Opening for the proposed FY 2016-2017 program was held on June 7, and proposals were received from 4 companies. Thel lowest price proposal was submitted by M&M Asphalt Services, who has been the contractor for the most recent pilot projects. Only $0.003 (yes...thati is three thousandths of one dollar) per square yard separated M&M and  the second-place proposal from Morgan Pavement. The results oft the three lowest bidders are as follows:  Engineer's Estimate M&M Asphalt Services Morgan Pavement Intermountain Slurry Seal  $150,000.00 ($1.53/sqyd) $108,665.70 ($1.055/sqyd) $108,974.00 ($1.058/sqyd) $143,170.00 ($1.39/sqyd)  The fourth bid has not been included in the discussion because it was submitted foran alternate surface treatment product which would normally be procured undera separate  process.  Department Review Significant Impacts  This memo has been reviewed by the City Engineer and the Street Dept. Director.  Two significant impacts are noteworthy:  27    1. Staffh had anticipated spending approximately $150,000.00 (new transportation funding) during the upcoming budget year, and had established aj program based on an installation price of $1.53 per square yard. Due to thel lower than anticipated price point of the proposed contract, staffintends to expand the program to expend the budgeted funds, and evaluate the Street Department Operations and Maintenance funds (general fund contribution) for opportunities 2. The Contract for this project includes a yearly extension provision, which would  tof further expand the program.  allow this contract tol be renewed for 2 additional years.  Recommendation  Itisre recommended that the Bid of M&M Asphalt Services be accepted at the unit  price of $1.055 per square yard.  Attachments None.  28    Council Staff Report  Subject: Preliminary and final site plan review for an expansion  ofan existing auto machine shop Address: 1193 S. 425 West Author: Chad Wilkinson, Planning Director Department: Date: June 14, 2016 Background  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Planning and Engineering  The applicant, Roger. Brasier is requesting preliminary and final site plan approval for an approximately 1890 square foot addition to an existing 2,800 square foot building used as an  automotive machine shop. Analysis  The original building was constructed in 1990 (the original address was 1203 S. 425 West). The business has operated continuously since that time. Surrounding uses include aj plumbing business to the north, auto sales and single family residential to the south, single family Because the use is adjacent to residential property to the east, a 20 foot building setback is required for the new building addition. The original landscape plan approved in 1990 required street trees along 425 West and a five foot wide landscape area along the east property line. Because the proposed building expansion will bring the structure closer to the residential property to the east, iti is recommended that the current requirement ofat ten-foot wide buffer be required. The proposed plan shows this ten foot wide area along with screening trees. Conditions included below also require that the landscaping in other areas ofthel lot be restored tot the original approved landscape plan, including street trees on the west of the property adjacent to 425 West and restoration of landscaping in the small areas on the north and south of The Land Use Ordinance requires three parking spaces per stall service bay or work station for auto repair uses. The building has effectively one service stall and has three parking spaces located ini the front oft the building. Two spaces are directly to the west oft the building with an additional space on the south west portion oft the lot. The ordinance specifically states that the three required parking spaces are to be kept open for customer and that adequate parking for  residential to the east and an automotive repair use to the west.  the property.  vehicles under repair must be provided elsewhere on the lot.  Department Review  The application has been reviewed by the City Planner and City Engineer.  29    Significant Impacts  The area where the building is proposed is currently paved, sO no newi impervious surface is proposed. The applicant will be installing additional landscaping on the east side oft the building, thereby creating additional pervious areas which will help mitigate storm water impacts. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on June 7, 2016 and forwards a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the preliminary and final site plan subject to  Recommendation  the following conditions:  1. Complete any and all redline corrections, including modifications. 2. Obtain required building permits for the proposed addition.  3. Install the 10-foot wide landscaping area along the east property line as shown in the submitted plan and restore landscaping as originally approved in other areas on the property. Specifically, the following landscaping shall bei reestablished on the property: a. Street trees required in the original approval shall be replanted along 425 West. b. Landscaping along the north and south property lines consisting ofl low lying 4. The three required off street parking spaces shall be used for customer and employee parking and shall not be used for storage of vehicles under repair.  shrubs shall be reestablished  Attachments 1. Aerial photo 2. Site plan 3.  Original 1990 Landscape plan  CMapewilsmmDasupcc Staff Report Preliminary: andl Final Site Plan] RBI MAchine! Shop 1935425W6.14-16daex  30    Aerial Photo  31    32    Council Staff Report  Subject: Public Hearing- Zone Map Amendment from RM-13 (Multi Family Residential 13 units per acre) tol R-4 (Single Family Residential 41 units per acre) Property. Addresses: 1290 North Main Street. Author: Chad Wilkinson, Planning Director  BOUNTIFUL EST.1 1847  Department: Planning Date: June 14,2 2016 Background  The proposal ist to amend the zoning designation ofa 1.45 acre portion of an existing 5.4 acre property from RM-13 (Multi Family Residential 13 units per acre) to R-4 (Single Family Residential 41 units per acre). The property is addressed 1290 North Main Street. The subject property is currently developed with a Single Family residence and al large orchard. The property is surrounded by Single Family residential zoningand use to the north and east, an RV repair business and vacant commercially zoned property to the west  and multifamily residential zoning and use to the south.  Analysis  The applicant has expressed a desire to separate the existing single family home on the property from the remainder of the property by subdivision. Thej property is currently split zoned with approximately 1.5 acres on Main street: zoned RM-13 and the remainder: zoned R-4. The existing residence is located within the RM-13 portion of thej property. Because the minimum lot size for RM-13 is one acre, the applicant is proposing to amend the: zoning map from RM-13 to R-4 which allows for minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet. This will allow for the division of the residence from thel larger property without the need fora a one acre minimum lot size. The: applicant has expressed a desire to apply for "greenbelt" tax status with the County for the orchard property and removing the residence from the A small portion of the lot located on the southwest corner oft the property is proposed to remain RM-13.This portion is too: small tol be developed as any multifamily use without combination with an adjoining property. Changing this sliver of property would create an isolated RM-13 lotsurrounded by Single family residential zoning. Staff recommends that since this portion of the property is already zoned RM-13, allowing the existing split zone condition to remain for this small portion of the property is appropriate in this instance.  property will facilitate their request to the County.  33    Standard of] Review  As a matter of procedure, whenever the Council considers a request for a rezone (zone map amendment), it shall: review iti in accordance with the provisions of14-2-205 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE AND MAP, which are: as follows:  B. For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable, and desirable development within the City, it is declared to be the public policy that amendments should not be made to the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance or Zoning Map except to promote the objectives and purpose of this Title, the  Bountiful City General Plan, or to correct manifest errors.  Department Review Significantimpacts  This item has been reviewed by the City Planner, City Engineer and City Attorney.  The proposal constitutes a decrease in the overall densities allowed for the property and is therefore not anticipated tol have significant impacts on: surrounding properties.  Recommendation:  The Planning Commission considered the request at their meeting on May 17, 2016. The Commission recommends approval of the proposed zoning map amendment ofa 1.45 acre portion of an existing property from RM-13 (Multi Family Residential 13 units per acre) to  R-4 (Single Family Residential 4 units peracre).  Attachments 1. Aerial photo 2. Application Materials 3. Existing Zoning Map 4. Proposed Zoning Map Amendment  34    Aerial Photo  35    Existing Zoning  1  E85W  ORL  RM-13 R-4  8330  C-G  185039 130079  RM-13  Googleeanth  36    Proposed Zoning  556  033005  R-4  GG  RM-13  430938  37    38    Council Staff Report  Final  TIFUL,  Subject: Address: Author: Date: Background  Preliminary and Goodfellow Subdivision 1290 No. Main Street City Engineer June 14, 2016  Subdivision Approval for  Department: Engineering, Planning  FDPATED AD  Ms. Kathryn Goodfellow is requesting preliminary and final approval for a one lot subdivision, separating a single parcel with an existing home fronting onto Main Street, from the! 5+ acre orchard at 1290 No. Main Street. The property was the subject of a recent Planning Commission rezone hearing and will be zoned R-4 with the presumed City Council approval on  June 14. Analysis  The proposed subdivision consists of a single lot with an existing home and garage divided off oft the larger orchard parcel. With 98.0ft. off frontage and 0.304 acres of area, the proposed lot exceeds the minimums required for the zone and provides for adequate side yard and rear Since this subdivision simply divides the property around an existing home from the larger undeveloped orchard parcel, all utilities are already provided to the dwelling and property. Any utilities fori future development of the orchard will be brought ini from the surrounding streets if  yards  and when that occurs. Department Review and Planning Department. Recommendation  The proposed preliminary and final plats have been reviewed by the Engineering Department  The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council grants preliminary and final approval of the Goodfellow Subdivision with the following conditions:  1. Provide a current title report. 2. Payment of all required fees.  Significant Impacts None.  39    Attachments  Aerial photo showing the area to be subdivided Acopy of the Goodfellow Subdivision Preliminary Plat. A copy of the Goodfellow Subdivision Final Plat.  Aerial Photo of the Proposed Goodfellow Subdivision  lsubdlwsonsgpodlelow subdivision, 2016cc preliminary and final subdivision goodfellow subdivision, june 2016.docx  40    133HISISVIOOE  ZE 133BISNIVW    133AISISYIO0E  90000  133H.ISNIYW    Council Staff Report  Subject: Address: Author: Date:  Final PUD Plat Approval for Pages Hollow PUD  320 West Pages Lane City Engineer June 14, 2016  Department: Engineering, Planning  BOUNTIFUL EST.1847  Background  Brighton Homes has completed the PUD: site plans, construction drawings and the plat map for this development and is now requesting final approval for the 14 unit Page Hollow PUD. This  PUD was granted preliminary approval by the Council on April 12, 2016.  Analysis  To review, the proposed PUD consists of 14 units on 1.21 acres with attached parking for each. The developer has modified his plans to show the necessary parking and side yards as well as the necessary utilities. The detention has been designed to avoid overflow from the creek  culvert.  Department Review Department. Recommendation  The proposed final plat has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and Planning  With the conditions listed below, the proposed development meets the requirements of the Bountiful City Land Use Ordinance and design standards and the Planning Commission sendsa 1. Post al bond to cover the costs of construction of required site improvements.  positive recommendation for final approval.  2. Make all necessary red line corrections to the drawings.  3. Payment of all required fees. 4. Provide a current Title Report.  Significant Impacts  This places 14 homes where there has historically only been three with the corresponding increase to storm water runoff and traffic on Pages Lane. All oft the impacts are minor and will  not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area.  43    Attachments  Lovely color aerial photo of the property ini its existing condition.  Copy oft thef final plat Copy of grading and drainage plan. Copy of building elevations. Copy of landscape plans.  Lovely Aerial Photo of Pages Hollow PUD Site  se  Pages Lane  W1600N  3003  jpud'slpages hollow:2 2016cci final pudp plat approval pages! hollow pud, may 2016.docx  44    Ii  ISIALPOE    NVId ALITLILA VIAAINIOOSIAVCAID TALLNNO8 MOTIOH SaDVd  MINIDNE  Sn3        xeld sewoyumo eueys sebed  383 3566665m.  o      HMANDOE 3NMIS3DNAISEM.IOE  SWOHNMOLMOTIOHS3DVA  Tèon  14 13834 43 138 33338 33  L Z A  3ANOSIVANd  55 e8000 0    City Council Staff Report  Subject: Author: Dept: Date:  Administrative Law Judge Term Renewal  BOUNTIFUL EST.1892  Clinton Drake City Attorney 14) June 2016  Background  On June 24,2014, the City Council approved an amendment to Chapter 8 ofTitle 2 oft the Bountiful City Municipal Code. The amendment empowered an Administrative Law Judge to hear certain appeals provided fori in the Bountiful City Municipal Code. The Council appointed Attorney Glenn Bronson to serve as the Bountiful City Administrative Law Judge. The Municipal Code states that the Bountiful City Administrative Law Judge shall: serve for  ap period oft two years. Analysis  The use of an administrative law judge for certain appeals contained within the Municipal Code has been an effective and efficient method of appeal for the public as well as the City. Mr. Bronson' s two year period of service as the Bountiful City Administrative Law Judge will expire this month. The Council may reappoint Mr. Bronson or appoint a new Administrative Law Judge. City Staff has reviewed Mr. Bronson's) performance over the past two years and has found him to be conscientious, professional and competent. An information sheet describing Mr. Bronson's education and experience is attached.  Department Review Significant Impacts No significant impacts. Recommendation  This Staff Report was prepared by the City Attorney and reviewed by the City Manager.  Iti is recommended that the City Council approve the reappointment of Glenn Bronson as  the Bountiful City Administrative Law Judge. Glenn Bronson Information Sheet  Attachments  49    PRINCE-YEATES  SOUND THINKIND. SOUND BOLUTIONB.  Glenn R. Bronson  Phone Number (801)524-1000 Email  gto@princeyeates.com Practice Areas  Bankruptcy, Commercial, /Business, Litigation  Glenn Bronson's practice concentrates on contract, fraud and bankruptcy-related litigation.  Prior Professional Experience  Until 1999 hej practiced in Los Angeles with Chadbourne & Parke, focusing primarily on government contracts-related  litigation. He thenj joined Prince Yeates andi moved to Salt! Lake City.  Education  Brigham Young University, J. Ruben Clark School ofL Law, J.D., cum laude, 1991  Served on the Moot Court Board of Advocates Utah State University, B.A. in English, cum laude, 1986  Admissions California, 1991 Utah, 1995 Affiliations  60    MAYOR Randy C. Lewis CITY COUNCIL Richard Kendalyn Higginson Harris John Beth Marc Holbrook Knight Johns. Pitt CITY MANAGER Gary R. Hill  BOUNTIFUL  City of Beautiful Homes and Gardens  BOUNTIFUL CITY, UTAH RESOLUTION NO. 2016-XX  PORATED AD.  AI RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING GLENN BRONSON AS' THE BOUNTIFUL CITY ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE WHEREAS, Bountiful City Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 2 requires that an Administrative Law Judge be appointed by the City Council to serve for aj period of two years;  and  WHEREAS, Attorney Glenn Bronson has served as the Bountiful City Administrative WHEREAS, Mr. Bronson is a licensed attorney duly authorized to practice law in the State of Utah and is qualified to continue to serve as the Bountiful City Administrative Law  Law Judge since. June of2014; and  Judge; and  WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reappoint Mr. Bronson as the Bountiful City NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Bountiful City, Section 1. Appointment. The Bountiful City Council hereby reappoints Glenn Bronson to serve as the Bountiful City Administrative Law Judge subject to all conditions contained in  Administrative Law Judge for an additional two years; and  Utah, as follows:  the Bountiful City Municipal Code.  Section 2. Effective date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. APPROVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOUNTIFUL CITY COUNCIL THIS  14"DAYJUNE, 2016.  Randy C. Lewis, Mayor  ATTEST:  Shawna Andrus, City Recorder  51