CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY,FEBRUARY2,2016  ITEMS DISCUSSED  1. CALLTOORDER/ROUL CALL/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  2. ACCEPTANCE ORI MODIFICATION OF AGENDA/CONFLICTO: INTEREST DISCLOSURE  3. PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT  A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/NAVIGATE BAINBRIDGE UPDATE 5. NEWI BUSINESS (PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED ONI EACH ITEM)  A. NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM, AB 16-022 - EXECUTIVE - FINANCIAL AND BUDGET! POLICIES, AB 16-023 - FINANCE  B. REVIEW OF CITY'S2015 WORKPLAN: RESULTS AND: 2016 CITY-WIDE WORKPLAN PRIORITIES, AB 16-025 D. WENZLAU ARCHITECTS DONATION AGREEMENT, FIXIT- - AIR KIT2. BICYCLE SERVICE STATION, AB 16-020 F. WATER SYSTEM PLAN, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT #1, AB 13-002-PUBLIC G. WYCKOFF-EAGLE HARBOR SUPERFUND SITE PREMISES POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE, AB 16-014  - EXECUTIVE - PUBLIC WORKS WORKS EXECUTIVE 6. CONSENT AGENDA  E. 2016 POLICE VEHICLES PROCUREMENT CONTRACT, AB 16-021 -I PUBLIC WORKS  A. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE VOUCHER APPROVAL  B.F REGULAR CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 19,2016 C.SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL ADVANCE MINUTES,JANUANUARY21,2016 A. CITY COUNCIL ADVANCE FOLLOW-UP, AB 16-027- - COUNCIL I REGIONAL BOARD. APPOINTMENTS, AB 16-026-1 MAYOR TOLLEFSON  7. CITY COUNCIL: DISCUSSION 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS  B. CITIZEN COMMITTEE AND COMMISSION LIAISON APPOINTMENTS, AB 16-025-MAYOR TOLLEFSON A. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOTES, JANUARY 14, 2016-I DEPUTY MAYOR BLOSSOM B. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTES, JANUARY: 25, 2016- - COUNCILMEMBER TOWNSEND  9. REVIEW UPCOMING COUNCIL MEETING AGENDAS A. UPCOMING MEETING CALENDAR 10. FORTHE GOOD OF THE ORDER 11. ADJOURNMENT  1. CALLTOORDER/ROLL CALL/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEGSSPMI  Mayor Tollefson called the meeting to order at 6:58 p.m. with Councilmembers Blossom, Medina, Peltier, Roth, Scott and Townsend present. Records Coordinator. Jahraus monitored the recording of the meeting and prepared the minutes. Everyone stood for thej pledge 2. ACCEPTANCE OR MODIFICATION OF AGENDA/CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE 6:59 PM  ofallegiance. 6:59PM  MOTION: Imove to accept the agenda as presented. SCOTT/ROTH: The motion carried7-0.  3. PUBLIC COMMENT 7:001 PM  Jane Lindley, representing Island Power. Ms. Lindley. Island Power held a forum on public power and liability. There is confusion  regarding a ballot measure; as yes vote only means the City would have the right to establish a utility.  4. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT7:02PM  City Manager Schulze attended Kitsap Economic Development Alliance's) Decision Makers breakfast with Councilmember The finalists for the Planning Director position willl be selected the week ofl February 2 and there will be aj public The second meeting of thel Electric Utility Municipalization Task Force Meeting will take place Thursday, February 4. The Mayor Tollefson proposed that rather thanl having a roll call vote, he would announce the vote and the Councilmembers) voting in the minority. He also mentioned the generally planned meeting schedule for 2016. During the study sessions on the first and third Tuesdays, Council willl be on the floor for a more intimate conversation and workshop. Noj public comment will be accepted. Thisi is  Scott. announcement.  draft RFP will be reviewed and worki is expected to be completed by February 18.  subject to change.    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY,FEBRUARY2,2016  5. NEW: BUSINESS (PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED ON EACH ITEM)7:07: PM A. NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHING GRANTI PROGRAM, AB 16-022-1 EXECUTIVE  Community Engagement Specialist Stickney provided a PowerPoint and overview oft the matching. grant program. In 2015, City staff was approached by residents oft the Rolling Bay community who desired toj partner with the City to complete small-scale: neighborhood beautification projects including signage and flower baskets. Currently, the City lacks ai mechanism to facilitate such partnerships. Conversations with community members, former Mayor Anne Blair, and Councilmember Val Tollefson resulted in a desire to investigate municipal neighborhood matching grant programs as aj potential tool fort these types of community-City partnerships. Many cities across Washington State currently utilize netghborhoo-matching grants as a mechanism to engage community members, leverage resources, and accomplish neighborhood specific improvements and beautification projects. The following provides information regarding different program models that could be implemented to achieve similar results on Bainbridge Island. The following Washington cities' Neighborhood Matching Grant programs were analyzed: Tumwater, Kent, Kirkland, Redmond, Bellevue, Neighborhood Matching Grant Programs typically involve groups ofresidents applying toi the City for funds to complete allowed projects in their neighborhood or community. Funds awarded by the City are "matched" with funds from the community provided either through direct contribution, in-kind donation of materials, or, through most often, volunteer hours. Many programs require a volunteer component be included in the match, as an overall goal oft these programs is to enhance neighborhood cohesiveness. There ai number of reasons that communities implement neighborhood matching grant programs:  Shoreline, Seattle, Renton, Olympia, Wenatchee, Walla Walla, and' Tacoma. Definition and Purpose of Neighborhood Matching Grant Programs  Engage community members Leverage resources to complete community projects Build a community recognized for quality Facilitate neighborhood connections Fostering inclusiveness Beautification Improve quality ofl life Foster neighborhood pride  Aspects of Different Neighborhood Matching Grant Programs a City has as system of recognized neighborhood councils.  Eligible Recipients  One of the greatest variables among programs isi in regard to who is eligible to apply. A key aspect ofthis variability has to with whether In the City ofTumwater any neighborhood or community group (formal or informal) with ai majority ofr members living or working in the City is eligible to apply. Individual applicants, religious organizations, or political groups are not eligible to receive awards. Groups Other programs allow project applicants tol have al less formal structure. For example, in Redmond, applicants must consist oft twoor more individuals, from separate households and living within the city limits. Single businesses, city-wide organizations, social services, fraternal and religious groups and public agencies are not eligible as applicants. However, eligible applicants are encouraged to partner On the opposite side oft thes spectrum, in the City of Kent, applicants must either be an organized City recognized neighborhood council, or a group ofr neighbors or civic groups that have been sponsored by ai recognized City Council. Similarly, in Kirkland applicants must  receiving over $600 must have a tax ID number or a fiscal sponsor.  withi ineligible groups toj plan andi implement projects. bear recognized Neighborhood Association.  Across allj jurisdictions, political groups are not eligible for funding.  Eligible Projects  Though individual municipalities differ on what projects are eligible for funding, there are a number of commonalities:  2    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY2,2016  1. All projects must take place within the city limits andl be constructed onj publicly accessible property. Some municipalities Allow for partnerships with other government entities or taxing districts, ands some only allow for projects on public  property.  2. Ally projects mush have a lasting impact or direct benefit to the neighborhood or community. 4. Projects must be maintained by neighborhood volunteers, or be designed for low maintenance.  3. Projects must be accomplished in 121 months. 5. Projects must have written approval ofall adjacent property owners. 6. All city codes and permitting requirements must be met. 7. Projects must have demonstrated neighborhood support. 8. Projects must have neighborhood involvement at all phases. 9. The project must be within the City's legal authority to approve.  Examples of Projects  Community gardens Welcome signs or murals Neighborhood park play equipment Neighborhood beautification project Neighborhood newsletters, websites, mailings and emergency preparedness fairs)  Community building events (such as neighborhood picnics, parade entries, holiday events, outdoor healthy and recreation  Leadership training and education (CERT, Leadership Institute) Youth or environmental projects (skate ramp, trailhead, composting) Capital equipment purchases (neighborhood bulletin board, neighborhood picnic area)  Public art  Non-reimbursable expenses: fuel, food and or/alcohol (some cities do allow for food but prohibit "costly or extravagant" food items and catered meals), projects that require ongoing city funding or staffing, projects that been previously implemented or completed, work completed prior to signed agreement or after contract period, homeowner association' 's normally funded projects. All municipalities require that applicants submit a formal standard application thati includes al budget, a named project coordinator that will serve as a liaison between the project and the City, and a commitment or secured match. The City of Shoreline requires that potential applicants first submit an idea letter before being invited to apply. Most cities accept applications once or twice aj year, while Selection criteria for projects is often broad to maximize neighborhood ingenuity. However, ai few themes do exist. Most municipalities rate projects on their shovel readiness, the extent to which the project engages neighbors and fosters teamwork, and the benefit the  Application and Award Process  some of the larger municipalities will accept applications for small projects (under $500)s year round.  project creates for the community. Selection Committee  The make-up oft thes seleçtion committee varies across municipality. In some communities, projects are chosen by a designated City staff person or by the City Manager. In the City of Redmond, a committee of public officials selects projects. Ini the City of Shoreline, a cross-deparment review committee with one community representative undertakes the selection process, and selected projects are Most municipalities use similar funding models for their neighborhood matching grant programs. Some common components oft those  forwardedi to the City Manager for approval.  Funding Models funding models include:  1. Grants are paid out on ai reimbursement basis, with all significant changes to the budget needing approval from the City. 2. The neighborhood match component needs to cover a significant portion oft the project cost. Often the match required was 1:1. However, the City of] Kirkland only required 1:4 match, and the City of Shoreline required a 1:21 match. 3. All programs required that paid professional services be set at a "reasonable and customary rate." Some cities set aj price 4. All programs provide guidance on whether application preparation can count towards aj project's match. Some cities allow for a small match fors such activities, up to $150, some don't allow any time spent on preparing application to count, and others allow for up to 25% of volunteer labor match to be expended onj project planning and application preparation.  3. All municipalities set a price for volunteer labor. This ranged from $14/hr to $21.79/hr.  for donated professional services at $30/hr.  3    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY2,2016  6. All programs make it clear that City staff or other City funds cannot count toward match. 7. Additionally, all programs state that professional services must be either entirely donated or entirely paid for with grant funds (no discounted services). This isi intended to ensure that persons hired toj provide services or skilled labor are selected on the basis oftheir qualifications, experience and fees, not on1 their willingness to donate services. 8. The maximum grant amount allowed varies across municipalities from $1000 to $10,000. 9. All programs will remit payment either directly to vendors or directly to a project for incidental expenses. B. REVIEW OF CITY'S 2015 WORKPLAN RESULTS AND: 2016 CITY-WIDE WORKPLAN PRIORITIES, Deputy City Manager Smith addressed Council. In. January of each year, Citys staffa and the City Councili review progress on keyi initiatives and identify priority tasks fort the coming year. The reports provided int the agenda packet reflect results at year-end on the City'spriorities The results from 2015 indicate a great deal of progress across a wide range ofactivities. With few exceptions, the City was able to either complete or move forward with our 2015 priorities, including progress on several significant capital projects (for example Waterfront Park, City Dock, Eagle Harbor Sewer Mains, and Wing Point Way). Items that were delayed are shown, and will carry forward as part of 2016 workplans. The year-end report also provides selected performance measures toi illustrate service delivery andi multi-year trends for The City's workplans for 2016a are ambitious, but reflect the organization's commitment to continue our reçent progress in capital planning and construction, along with ongoing efforts to identify and adopt best management practices. It is important for the City to identify annual workplans and track progress on specific priorities. This process helps to improve accountability in City operations, to organize the use of limited resources, and to highlight areas for improvement. As we move ahead with plans for the coming year, this review of progress to-date and upcoming goals provides a useful reference for City staff, City Council, and the community as a whole. Finance Director Schroer explained adopting al biennial operating budget and updated capital plan is as significant work item for the City The transmittal memo and other materials included ini the agenda packet will provide background for the financial policies discussion, D. WENZLAU ARCHITECTS DONATION AGREEMENT, FIXIT-AIR KIT21 BICYCLE SERVICE: STATION, This Donation Agreement is for al Fixit - Air Kit2 2 Bicycle Service Station to be placed at the end of! Madrone Lane near Winslow Way It will be Wenzlau Architects responsibility fort the placement oft the station and the City'sr responsibility for the maintenance oft thel Fixit - Air Kit2 2 Bicycle Service Station. The terms oft the Agreement shall be five years or after which time iti is managed as city-owned  AB 16-025-1 EXECUTIVE 7:24P PM  for 2015, as well as departmental workplans for the coming year (2016).  key functions.  FINANCIAL. AND BUDGET POLICIES, AB 16-023-1 FINANCE7:41 PM  this year. Thel budget process begins with the adoption of financial policies.  which will continue in subsequent meetings.  AB 16-020- PUBLIC WORKS 8:001 PM per the mapi included in the agenda packet.  property.  MOTION: I move toj forward the Wenzlau Architects Donation. Agreement) for a. Fixit- - Air Kit2 2 Bicycle Service. Station tot the consent agenda at thel February. 16 business meeting forj further discussion.  TOMNSENDSCOTT: The motion carried 6-1. (Blossom)  For more context regarding the donation, City Manager Schulze will contact BIDA; Councilmember Roth will contact Squeaky Wheels, E. 20161 POLICE VEHICLES PROCUREMENT CONTRACT, AB 16-021 - PUBLIC WORKS 8:11 PM Barry andl Matt The 2016 capital equipment budget includes $220,000 for three Police patrol vehicles and one parking enforcement vehicle. City staffy worked with the Washington State Department of] Enterprise Services under contract numbers 03713 and 03813 for  the purchase ofthe following Police Department vehicles: 20161 Ford) Police Interceptor Utility/SUV (2),$62,796.67 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Pursuit Vehicle (1), $44,079.65 2016 Chevrolet Colorado Pickup-Parking Enforcement (1), $34,456.32  The remaining equipment budget totaling $78,667.36 willl be used for various miscellaneous equipment and upfitting the new vehicles. Equipment includes items such as emergency lights, VHF radio, prisoner seats, gun locks, mobile computer terminal docking station,  push bumper, radar, locking cargo box, etc. See attached vehicle specifications for each vehicle.  4    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY,FEBRUARY2,2016  8:19PM  MOTION: Imove that the City Council forward the purchase of three Police patrol vehicles and one parking enforcement vehicle in the combined amount 0f8141,332.64) from the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services Center and approval oft the remaining budget in the amount of878,667.36 to be usedto  upfit the new vehicles to the February 16, 2016 consent agenda. BLOSSOMASCOTT: The motion carried 7-0.  F. WATERSYSTEM PLAN, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT: #1, AB 13-002 As required by the State Department ofHealth andi in accordance with WAC 246-290-100, municipalities update their Water System Plan (WSP)approximately every six years. The City's last update was completed in 2006 and an extension was granted in 2012. Updating the Water System Plan includes water capacity information that demonstrates the physical ability oft the water system to Amendment No. 1i ist needed to update the draft Water System Plan with 2014/2015 data as requested by thel Utilities Advisory Committee during review oft the draft plan, and to extend thet term oft the contract to allow for continued UAC and City Council review The original Professional Services Agreement was approved at thel March 24, 2014 City Council meeting in the amount of $105,000.00; Amendment No. 1 would revise the contract amount to $115,370.00. A budget amendment of$10,370.00 is needed from the water  -PUBLIC WORKS 8:201 PM  provide water service. The Plan will alsoi include recommendations for future improvements to the system.  of the plan. fund.  MOTION: I move that the City Council forward the Professional Services Agreement Amendment. No. Iwith Carollo Engineers, Inc. ini the amount of810,370.00 for the Water System Plan and approve a budget amendment in the  amount of810,700.00 from the Water Fund to the February 16, 2016 consent agenda.  SCOTTMEDINA: The motion carried7-0.  G. WYCKOFF-EAGLE HARBOR SUPERFUND SITE PREMISES POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE, AB 16-014 City Attorney Marshall provided a comprehensive briefing on the agenda item. In 2005, the City obtained a ten-year premises pollution liability (PPL) insurance policy on the City-owned property known as the Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor Superfund Site (hereafter "Wyckoff Site" or "Site"). The policy is scheduled to expire on February 27,2016. This memorandum provides an overview oft the purpose oft the The Wyckoff Site encompasses the former Wyckoff wood-treating facility (operated from 1903 - 1994) and ai former shipyard. The wood-treating facility dipped telephone poles andi railroad ties into creosote and other substances to prevent the wood from rotting. Residue from the wood-treating facility included creosote, pentachloropheno. (PCP), and various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS). Release ofthese chemicals into the soil and into Puget Sound resulted in large-scale contamination. The shipyard contributed In 1980, the federal Superfund Program was adopted. In 1987, thel EPA] placed the Wyckoff Site on the National Priorities List (NPL). While thel EPA initially commençed a civil enforcement investigation of the Wyckoff Site, thei investigation became a criminal investigation when thel EPA learned that creosote discharge into the Puget Sound was likely intentional and not simply negligent. Consequently, the Wyckoff Company and several individuals were named in ai federal indictment. Between 1991 and 1994, the Wyckoff Company liquidated its assets and plaçed them in trust with ai non-profit holding company called! Pacific Sound Resources (PSR). The sole beneficiary oft the trust was thel EPA. In 1994, PSR entered into a consent decree with the United States, which dismissed its case against the Wyckoff Company d/b/a) PSR. Under the consent decree, funds held by the trust were dedicated for use by the EPAI to remediate and restore the Site; additionally, proceeds from any sale oft the Wyckoff Site were to be distributed solely to the In2003, the Trust for Public Land (TPL), working as a facilitator with the PSR and the City, negotiated an Option Agreement (OA) under which TPL would purchase the approximately 49.5 acres oft the Superfund Site in the years 2004-2006, and TPL would simultaneously reconvey the Site tot the City and the Parkl District forj park use and development activity. On December 8, 2004, the City, thel District andt the U.S. Government entered into al Prospective Purchases Agreement and Covenant not to Sue ("Agreement"). The Agreement protects the City and thel Park. District from responsibility for existing contamination or environmental clean-up costs under a reservation ofrights. The reservation ofr rights means that the City and District are not) protected by the. Agreement from liability  - EXECUTIVE 8:23PM  PPL policy and discusses the advisability of procuring a subsequent 10-year PPL policy. History of the Wyckoff Site - Federal and State Enforcement Action  organic compounds and heavy metals, such as mercury, lead, copper, and: zinc, to the Eagle Harbor sediments.  EPA.  for the following:  5    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUBSDAYFEBBUARY2206  Failing to meet the terms oft the Agreement;  Exacerbating the existing contamination on the Site (for example, penetrating thel harbor cap and causing ar re-exposure of  contamination on the harbor floor or harming the sheet pile wall); Releasing contaminants not listed in the Agreement as "Existing Contamination"; Damaging or destroying natural resources on the Site; and Violating local, state, or federal laws or regulations;  Criminal liability;  Accordingly, not all of thel EPA's potential claims set forthi in the 1994 consent decree were extinguished, and the EPA is legally In addition to thel EPA'sj jurisdiction over the Wyckoff Site, the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) hasj jurisdiction over the Site that is separate and distinct from the federal government's) jurisdiction. The Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) was adopted by the State of Washington in 1990 and governs the State'si interest in the Site's cleanup. On October 16, 2006, the City executed an Agreed Order (AO) with DOE, which orders the City to remediate the Site in a manner that does not conflict with the EPA's ordered cleanup and whichi includes tasks in addition to thel EPA's ordered Site remediation. In contrast to thei federal government's 1994 consent decree and 2004 Agreement that dismissed some but not all claims against the City and the District, the AO: is not a settlement "[DOE] reserves the right tor require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such actions necessary toj protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources resulting from thei release or threatened: release ofl hazardous substances at the Site." Ap premises pollution liability (PPL) insurance policy provides coverage for liability incurred by those activities or violations enumerated ini the bulleted list, above, set forthi ini thel EPA's December 8, 2004 Covenant Not to Sue, and in thel DOE's October 16th 2006. Agreed Order. Endorsements included in al PPLI policy, therefore, will provide coverage (for natural resources coverage). Thej premium for the ACE policy was $256,000. The District participated in thej payment oft the ACE premium. The City obtained, through Marsh, a quote fora a subsequent 10-year policy of$20m in coverage with the same deductibles with aj premium of $206k. This policy is through Beazley. Ift the City enters into the Beazley policy, the District willl be asked to participate in the payment of the premium.  authorized to bring claims against the City and the District for any oft the above-listed violations.  and did not dismiss any potential claims. The AO states inj pertinent part:  Premises Pollution Liability Insurance  Entering Into the Beazley PPL Policy  As a preliminary matter, the ongoing remediation activity at the Wyckoff Site is expected to last at least fifteen (15) more years. Helen Bottcher, the EPAI Project Manager assigned to the Site, indicated that a final cleanup plan is expected tol be adopted by the end of2016, and design and construction oft the final remediation infrastructure willl likely take place in 2017 and 2018. The cleanup willl be ongoing Without Superfund experts on staff, iti is difficult to quantify the exposure to the City for events enumerated in the EPA's and! DOE's reservation ofrights. More particularly, iti is difficult to contemplate a set of facts and circumstances that would constitute the discovery ofadditional contamination not known in 2004 and 2006, respectively, or what scenario might constitute the destruction ofr natural resources. Accordingly, the City has retained experts in the area of Superfund litigation, Marten Law PLLC. Prior to the City Council's meeting on February 16, 2016, the City will receive additional direction as to whether thej proposed policy is sound and whether the policy exclusions are minimal. While a formal memorandum from the firmi is forthcoming, iti is the firm's initial recommendation that thel high degree of uncertainty respecting the future oft the Site compels a conclusion that a subsequent PPL policy is appropriate and Mayor Tollefson requested more background from City Attorney Marshall; this agenda item will be on the February 16 Unfinished  for fifteen years following the design and construction.  warranted.  Business portion ofthe meeting. 6. CONSENT AGENDA 8:33 PM A. CONSENT AGENDA COVERSHEET B. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE VOUCHER APPROVAL  Accounts Payable Manual Check Numbers 340521 -3 340528, Regular Check Numbers 340529- -340639 fora at total of$384,285.73. Retainage Release Check Numbers 143 - 144 fora ai total of $20,724.48. Payroll Direct Deposit Check Numbers 035003 - 035115, Regular Check Numbers 107438-1 107444, Vendor Check Numbers 107445-1 107457, Miscellaneous Check Numbers 107458-1 107468, Vendor Check Number 107469 and Federal Tax Electronic Transfer EFTPS for at total of $525,064.22.  6    CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING TUESDAY,FEBRUARY2,2016  I REGULAR CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 19,2016 D. SPECIALCITY COUNCIL ADVANCE MINUTES, JANUARY21,2016  MOTION: Imove we accept the consent agenda as presented. ROTH/PELTIER: The motion carried7-0.  7. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION 8:34 PM  A. CITY COUNCIL ADVANCE FOLLOW-UP, AB 16-027- CITY COUNCIL  Mayor Tollefson reported City Council met in late. January to discuss work completed in 2015 as well as the 2016 work plan and B. CITIZEN COMMITTEE. AND COMMISSION LIAISON APPOINTMENTS, AB 16-025-MAYORTOLLEFSON  priorities.  MOTION:. I move to approve the committee and commission Council appointments as presented with the addition afCouncilmember. Peltier appointedi to the Design Review Board and Councilmember Townsend to  the Community. Needs. Assessment. SCOTT/ROTH: The motion carried 7-0.  E. REGIONAL BOARD APPOINTMENTS, AB 16-026-  MOTION: Imove to approve the regional board Council appointments as presented.  SCOTT/TOWNSEND: The motion carried7-0.  8. COMMITTEE REPORTS 8:401 PM  A. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOTES, JANUARY: 14, 2016-1 DEPUTY MAYOR BLOSSOM B. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTES, JANUARY 25, 2016- COUNCILMEMBERTOWNSEND  9. REVIEW UPCOMING COUNCIL MEETING AGENDAS 8:431 PM  A. UPCOMING MEETING CALENDAR February 9: Suzuki workshop. February161 Business Meeting Executive Session (Potential Litigation) 301 min. -A Added Focused Traffic Study Presentation (Info.) NMTAC Recommendations Standardized Speed) Limits (Info.) Cave Avenue Watermain Latecomer Extension Agreement (Public Hearing) Wyckoff Site Pollution Premises Insurance (Consider Action) Unfinished Business 20161 Police Vehicles Procurement Contract (Consider Action) Water System Plan, Professional Services Agreement, Amendment #1 (Consider. Action) Wenzlau Architects Donation Agreement, Fixit - Air Kit: 21 Bicycle Service Station (Consider Action) 10. FOR' THE GOOD OF THE ORDER 8:50F PM  Councilmember Peltier reported that he attended City Action Day in Olympia and was able to talk with all three legislators from  District 23,  11. ADJOURNMENT 8:531 PM Mayor Tollefson adjourned the meeting at 8:53 p.m.  Mayor  aL  ye  Kelly. Jahraus, Records Mapagement Coordinator  Oabau  7