VERTICAL MIXED USE OPT-N FORM APPLICATION AREA: VAP Opt-in for Dimensional Opt-nf for Opt-In for "package" and must be (commercial zoning districts standards. accepted or rejected as uses only) (NO,LO,GO) Do NoT apt-m oactaph-n dondtopl-n donta-h ADDRESS OF PROPERTY* PAGE 6DfEP of Ther neighborhood Standards (These standards are a such) Parking Ground Floor recommends opt-in Reductions Uses in office fora all VMU related 2814 Ru Geple So7 W.26h St. 2500 - 2600 Sen Anhoao 2300 -2400 Nveos 2303 -230 5 Riofink 6L w.22rd 2209 Riofade 2401 Ser Gebriel 2402 Peerl st 2402 SgGebrrelst 40B W.2lst st 908 Papkrs+. 2112- Guedlopsr Xu L 4 1 tc I lr ( (t k H 4( 1x x 1 h K l 1 H 1C LI L iI i, le X 1 1 li 1 11 4 1 H 1I 4 1 it K (L f 1 (L I I 1 II h II 11 I o6: AW addresses Iti Asese Oe shoded as "Miel-use Conbhy Daineb ltin)" onk Umy debil maps.We do Nt Wih 4o opt-nb aN5 ot fege Adeses Neighborhood Planning and: Zoning Department 5 February 20, 2007 or ansoier. address wAa ovr bemderies. RECEMVED These listep properhes ae moto Be gpied-in EVMNI MeyhotautPmigaZmig Seet tedter VERTICAL MIXED USE OVERLAYI DISTRICT FORM ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPLICATION AREA: EASTWOODS boundaries of used exclusively Dimensional Opt-Outof Parking the VMU Overlay for residential use Standards NA PAGE aA of * Reductions Uses Ground Floor (commercial office in Amend the Districtt to exclude this propeny This property is Opt-Outof and does not have the MU combining district. a'package" Please note whether the neighborhood recommends that such) this property opt- intoVMU. Opt-Outof (These and must be accepted or rejected as V y standards are uses only) districts zoning (NO, LO,GO) 2821 Elwwoed Place 501 BellevuePlace 601 Rthervue Place 313DWVALSTERT 2800,29002904 SWISNER ST 2703,2901,2905 921E3o1 p8,a0,140Coes 1805,240,19AE_ES 2910Melcaldsse M V 4 V V V SWISABPST V V V V V y V V *Ift the detailed map does noti include an address for a property of interest please the propertya and note the number or address on both the detailed map and the opt-out assign form. a number or address to Neighborhood! Planning andz Zoning Department 3 February20, 2007 *Ht the detalled map does noti include an address fora a property ofi interest please assign a number or address to the property andi note the number or address on both the detailed map and the opt-out form. 5. IDENTIFY ARECOMMENDED LEVEL OF AFFORDABILITY FOR FUTURE VMU RENTAL Indicate al levei of affordability for residential rentai units. The affordability requirements are triggered only when a VMU Bullding takes advantage of the dimensional standards and Note: A single affordability level applies to all VMU-eligible properties within the application area. UNITS. reductions approved for a site. parking See Instructions for VMU Opt-In/Opt-Out Process for more detail. Recommended. Affordability Levei for VMU-eligible properties (check one): 80% of mediani family income 70% of median family income 60% of median family income Other level between 60-80% of median family income 6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: A1 The following questions refer to the official vote taken by the Neighborhood Planning Team or Neighborhood. Association on the Opt-In/Opt-Out: application. A. Was the vote taken in accordance with the Neighborhood Plan Team or Neighborhood Association by-laws? Yes_ Y No_ IfNo, please explain why and how the vote was taken. For example: multiple neighborhood associations were involved with the vote and each association has different by-laws. B. Please provide the results of the vote: Neighborhood Planninga andz Zoning Department For 13 Against_ O 6 February 20, 2007 C. Number of people in attendance at the meeting: 13 D. Please explain how notice oft the meeting at which the vote was taken was provided: Nohce fke mehig MS pild via enil rokhetm a ALA MONN FCANPAC M d whm Subswilse be CANPAC emai. lishswv. E.Please attach a copy oft the notice of the meeting at which the vote was taken. Ra) AeHAGNr6 F. Please provide a copy of the meeting minutes at which the vote was taken. (see atheld) G. Please read and sign the following: Neighborhood Plan Team By-Laws: Neighborhood Association By-Laws: gher, as described in question A., above: inasun SIGNATURE OF CHAIR (OR DESIGNEE) THE ABOVE STATED INFORMATION. IS ACCURATE AND COMPIETDMACCRDOACEMN: Sunes, DATE 2807 7. MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATION. AND DETAILED MAPS TO: (See atadkud.) Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department AACAMENTE, whd aleo dedudes aud avev leiovs mfrahn fon selet Nag-lovkw& Asceciehy. Attn: George Adams P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX78767 or, drop-off at the NPZD office at: One Texas Center 505 Barton Springs Road, 5"f floor Neighborhood Planning and Zoning! Department 7 February 20, 2007 RECEIVED JUN042001 IFYOUR AREA HAS PROPERTIES OUTSIDE OF THE VMU OVERLAY DISTRICT Nelchborhood ON PlanningaZoning WHICH THE NEIGHBORHOOD WISHES TO PERMIT VMU COMPLETE THE ATTACHED VMU OPT-IN See Instructions for VMU Opt-In/Opt-Out Process for more detail. Note: Ifyour area does not wish to recommend VMU for properties outside of the VMU Overlay District no applicationis Al blank copy of the VMU Opt-In form is provided below. Please print additional copies as FORM. required. needed. Nelghborhood Planning and Zoning! Department February 20, 2007 Eastwoods Neighborhood Eastwoods Neighborhood, in the Hancock Planning Sector oft the Central Austin Combined Neighborhood Plan, has recommended that no properties be opted into the VMU at this time. Here are the addresses with comments. Sites with present MU Overlays 28271 Ehmwood Place site of JP's Java, is a tiny site for which the neighborhood association supported a parking variance when it opened ai few years ago. The original use for thej property was ai filling station, then a cake shop for many years. There is no conceivable way it could 501 Bellevue Place - An old house with a dental office on the first floor and an apartment upstairs. We added MU in thel NP to make the present use conform to the plan and zoning. 6071 Rathervue Place - Another old house used as an office for the Lutheran Seminary. MU was added to cover an upstairs area's residential use and to legitimate the use oft the adjacent lot for 3113 Duval Street - The Episcopal Seminary oft the Southwest, which we were told requireda 2910 Medical Arts Street - This property might be granted VMU: in the future, if the support a VMU development because ofi its size and shape. parking. MU because ofits combination of uses as a seminary campus. neighborhood can approve a specific project. Cluster ofl Properties East of Red River 2903 Red River 2800,2900, 2904 Swisher Street 2703, 2901, 2905 Swisher Street 921 East 30th Street 2800, 2900, 2902 Cole Street 2804 2900 2908 1H35 These properties logically belong in the VMU category, and additional density was contemplated in the CANPAC plan. However, we wish to reserve VMU possibility for those traçts until after the effects ofi increased traffic from the St. David's and East Avenue PUDs havel been measured and adequately addressed. MT. C-I HERITAGE! NE/GHBORROQD.ASSOCIATION GENERALMEMBERSHIPMEETING First English Lutheran Church, 30h and Whitis Meeting started about 7:10 pm, Jed by Anne Heiuen July 9, 2007 1. Attending were. John Boardman,. John Cogdell, Lindsey Crow, Donna Endres, Betsy Greenbetg, Anne! Heinen, Dan Heinzen, Maxine Jenks, Jolene Kiolbassa, Laurie Limbacher, Marc McDaniel, Martha! Morgan, Ed] Morgan, Tracie Spers Strucker, Wade Anne Heinen pointed out thatthe position of president. has been vacant for somei time and voluntecred to fill the position. Jolene. Kjolbassa moved that we electAnne president. Lindsey Crow seconded the motion. The mption passed unanimously, Laurie Limbacher presented some case studies illustrating possible building çonfiguration permitted: under base: zoning, VMU, and VMU with density bonuses. The draft VMU opt- outj proposal that had. been circulated on the neighborhood list-serve was discussed. Discussion inclyded the VMU affordability requirement, the) paliticaladvisbiliyof opting out al large number of properties, design standards for the back and sides ofVMU developments, the development potential along 38th Stréet where parcels border al highly fragile portion, ofHNA, and the large numbero oflocal and iconic businesses inl a) Adda aj paragraph to thé first section indicating neighborhood willingness to work with developers. Also, indicate same at end of Section IV, paragraph 1). b). Addi in addresses 37021 Ronson Strect and 623 W.38th Street to Section IV, C)- Add aj paragraph 8) to Section IVto protect historic structures at 3700 Guadalupe (Trafton & Son Inc) and 3404 Guadalupe (Elephant Productions). Jolene Kiolbassa moved thaf we accept the opt-out proposal and changes. Julia Penn seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Thes approveddocument, with Odell, Julie Penn, and Darrell Williams. 2, New president of HNA 3. Amended opt-outproposal for VMU The following changes to the draft were agreed upon. Herifage, paragraph 6) along with- rationale amendments included, is attached. 4. The metingadjomzed. at9:30PM. At C-9 Chowdled sja/) AX32 Herilas NA AX33 1 W28 AT HST 232 Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY32 Legend Bmina Anas Cor Transit Coridor AF Fuure Corel Transh Conidor Vertical Mxed Use Ovaray DistiafOpkour) VMUF Residenlialy UsedProperies ("Opein) Mbad Use Combining Distridsropt-in) TCADP Papels Produced by City ot/ Austn Nelghborhood Planning and Zoning Dept, Oclober 21, 2008. This map has been produoed byt the Cyo ofAustin or the sole puposec af adingn regiona planninga andis not wamanted for any other usa. Nowaranty n meden regardingitsa scouragy arc completeness. VarticalN Miand Usel MapG Grids alack andw Whitamrd AT - Cjo AW32 Hevitnge NA AW33 P S1 Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AX32 Lagend BanuinaAs Corel Transi Coridor Future Corel Tansit Conidor Vertcal Mxed Use Overtay Distict(Op-aur) VMUResidentialy Used Mbad Use Combining Districts ("Op-in) TCADF Paroels ("Opl-in) Properies Austin Produced by Cty ol Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept., October 21, 2006. This map has been producedby the Ciyo at Austin for thes sole purpose ol aiding mgional planning andis noty wamanted lor any other use. Nowaranty isn made regardingh lts accuracy are completeness. Vartical Mijed USeM Map Grds Blacke andy Whie. md AT.c-II AW33 Hevilye NA AW/34 ENL RANLLG STAZE ophat a ppvhes D=4 440leet y3 Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AX33 Legend - Bacnina Anes ConT Transi Coridor * Future Corel Transit Coridor Vertical Mbed Use Overtay District (Oprour) VMU Residentially! UsedProperies Miadl Use Combining Disticia (Op-in) TCAD Paroets Producad Austin (Oprin by Gy ot Neghborhood Planning and Zoning Dept., Ootober: 21, 2006. This map has been produced by the Ciy otAustin for the sole purpose of aiding mgional planning andis noty waranted lors any other use. Nowamantyls Ismader regerding is accuracy or completaness. Vrticalh Mhoed Use MapG Gdds Black andy Whitemed AT. G-12- AX33 HevhcNA AX34 yiph Ateey Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY33 Lagend 47 Banninalas Core1 Transit Conidor 2 Fvlus Corel Transit Coridor Vertical Mrsd Use Overity DisticrOptour) VMURasidentiany Ueed Properies (Ophin") Mired Use Combining Districts (Opt-in? TCADI Parels Producad by cy d Austin Neighborhood! Planning andz Zoning Dep. Ociober 21, 2006. This map has bean prodiced by the Olyo dAustin for thes sole purposeol singregiona planning andis noty wamantedk fora any other ue. Nowarrantyh lsmadar regardingi its accuraoy or compleeness. VrtioalM Mxed Usek Map Grids Back andv Whitemdd Am. .6-17 6ADT WOOVSNA AY34 AY35 HANCOGK CCIR BOGG RFE UT CYDE TTEFEID DR 2200 A34 Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ34 Legend Bannina Core Transit Coridor Futur Core Tansit Coridor Vertical Mbd Ues Overtay Distict(Opk-our) VMUF Residentaly Uned Properties Mod Use Combining Diatricts TCADE Paroels A. C.2 Produced by Cly ol Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept, October 21, 2008. This map has been produced! by Che Clty ofAustin for the eole purpos of aidingn mglonal planning andi isnot warantad fbor any other (Optiny rOpt-n) Nowaranh usa. garding ls ecoursoyare complataness. Verticall Mbaad Usal Map Gide Black andi Whillen mdd AY33 6ASTWOPSN AY34 11777 ORTH UNIVERSITY HANÇOCK DEANKEETONST h EDEANKEETONS ST E25THS E24THST EASTMALVUT 22ND $T E23RD ST INNERTANUS 27STST 105 1)nc-40fest B733 Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ33 4 Bamnina Corel Transt Coridor 11 Rare Corel Tansh Coridor Vertiant Miedt Use Overlay Distict (Optour) VMUF Residendally! Used Propertes (OpHin) Mbod Use Combining DisticafOpln) TCAD Parcols AR.C- Produoed by Cty af Austin Nelghborhood Pming and Zoning Dapt., October 21, 2008. This produoed by thec Cly dfAustint fort hes sole purpose ofa aiding rgional planning andis noly waranledi map has bean . Nos egarding ibs scaracy arc completaness. for any other Vartical Usel Map cidsl Glack andv Whitemd AY34 HANCOCK NA HANCOGK 4r HANLOLK VMU Llovd L -/A apt UT/ UPPER BOGG CRFEK DETEREO 2200 Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ34 Legend Planning Anas - Core Transit Coridor $ Future Core Transit Coridor Vertical Mixad Use Overtay! DisricrOptour) VMUR Residentially Used Properties (Optn) Mixed Use Combining Districs rOptin) TCADF Parcels A Hzncock NA Produced by Cly df Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Depl. Ootober 21, 2006. produced by the Cily of Austin for the sole purpose of aiding regional planning notw warranted This map has been use. Nowarrantyi isn mader regerdings A accursoy or completeness. Verticalh Mbed Use) Map Gids Black andv White.md andisn for anyo other AW34 HANCOCKNA AWS ANEBOE - po Vmo vAless Clavd fr opt-in AY34 1inchE440f feet Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AX34 Legend 6 PanningAras Corel Transit Coridor Future Core Transko Coridor Vertical Mixed Use Ovarlay! District( (Optour) VMUI Residentialy Used Properies (Opl-n Mixed Use Combining Districts (Opt-in) TCAD Parcels Hancock NA Produced by Chy df Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept, Oclober 21. 2006. This produced byt the City afAustin fort the sole purpose afa aiding planning use. Now warrantyismader regardingitas accuracyo or completeness. regional andis notw warranted for anyo other Vertical Mbred Usek Map GridsE Blacka andy White.md map has been .7, AX34 TVANCOCK NA AX3 HANLOOK- ND VMU cld foc vnless opf-in 3208 1inch=440f feet. AZ34 Detalied Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY34 Legend PlanningAceas Corel Tranait Coridor Future Core Transit Coridor Verical Mbed Use Ovarlay District( ("Opt-our)! VMU Residentially Used Properties (Opt-n) Mixed Use Combining Districts rOpt-n) TCADF Parcels Aif 66 Hawkock NA Produced by Ciy of Austin Neighborhood Planning and2 Zoning Dapt., October 21, 2006. This produced by the City ofAustin for thes sole purpose of aiding regiona! planning use. Now warrantyian made regardingits accuracy or completness. VerticalMbed! Usek Map Grids Black andy White.mxd map has been andisn nolv waranted fora anyo other AX35 HANCOENA ANLOCK ND MJ UNLESS LLOUD foR ST-IP 4021 AZ35 1.inch-440fegt Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY35 Legend Plannina Areas Corel Transit Coridor Future Core Transit Conidor Vertical Mixed Use Overlay! District COptour)! VMUF Residentialy UsedF Properties (Opt-n") Med Use Combining Districts (Opl-n) TCAD Parcels Hancock NA Produced by Chy of Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept., October: 21, 2006. producedt byt the City of Austin for the solep purpose ofe aidingr reglonal planning andi la noty warranted This map! has been use. Nowarrantylen mader regarding tse ecouracyor completeness. Vertical Med Usek MapG Grids Blacka andV While.md fora any other 6 June3,2007 (NUNA): Letter to the City Council from the North University Neighborhood Association This letter is in response to our VMU application that the City staff has asked us to fill out. As a matter of zoning, VMU has a potentiaily large impact in our planning area, CANPAC, as well as, in our own particular neighborhood, NUNA. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our input concerning this citywide zoning change. During the 2004 neighborhood planning process, NUNA carefully drafted a NCCD ordinance with flexible tools for redevelopment, which we think will support and compliment future development including VMU. We also support the inclusion of affordable housing at 60% of MFI within the VMU proposal. NUNA, along with the other Central Austin Neighborhoods in CANPAC, is in a unique location adjacent to the University of Texas. CANPAC at large has a unique housing situation since the University of Texas provides little on-campus housing to the largest student body in the country; CANPAC absorbs most of the student body housing within its core demonstrated by the number of 86.4% rentai units. Because of this density, we have a concern regarding parking reductions associated with VMU in our area Since NUNA is the third densest neighborhood in the City, it is evident that we do support density, but we have concerns beyond for issues such as parking and some dimensional standards. NUNA has Opted- Our NCCD has divided. NUNA into districts; the Guadalupe district correlates with the Core Transit Corridor on Guadalupe Street. We have decided to Opt-In 10 properties to VMU from 27" Street to 30 Street. These addresses include: 2711,2801, 2815, 2817, 2825, 2909, 2915, 2917 2927 Guadalupe and 512V W 29" Street with no parking reductions. We also respectfully request to Opt- Out 13 properties along Guadalupe from 30" to 38th Streets (3001,3005, 3023, 3025, 3105, 3423, 3501, 3511,3701,3713 Guadalupe Street, 505 W. 38". Street, 3706 and 3707 Speedway). We scrutinized each property; we arrived at our decision for the VMUOpt-Out by determining what abuts each property- singie family or a residential component. Our setbacks, height provisions, and our districts within the NCCD determine our future growth. We are aware that the NCCD ordinance trumps or supercedes any VMUdevelopment Out of all parking reductions for any VMU development. We also feel that some properties on 38th Street (505 W. 38th, 3706'and 3730 Speedway) were inciuded in error on a "Ghost" Transit Corridor- W. 38" Street from Guadalupe1 to Speedway. These properties are iisted on a Core Transit Corridor that mysteriously ends at Speedway. A Core Transit Corridor connects with anotherstreet but should not end In the middie ofe A. C-14 street that goes nowhere; 35th/38th Street connects logically to Guadalupe, but then it continues with an abrupt end in the middle of 38th at Speedway. No buses travel east Awest on this stretch of 38th between Guadalupe and Speedway. We have also Opted-Out properties on the south side of 38th Street to be consistent with our nelghbors in Hyde Park, who have Opted-Out properties on their side of Ibelleve that this VMU process has been covered well within the structure of the NUNA neighborhood and the overall planning contact team, CANPAC. NUNA has its own Planning Team (NPT) with its own set of bylaws to review items as they arise. Then, the general membership of the neighborhood organization (NUNA has another set of bylaws) will receive on the evening of. June 41 the VMU recommendations (as stated In this letter) from the NPT for approval or disapproval (I will submit this neighborhood vote and minutes to George Adams as soon as Ireceive them.). Additionally, CANPAC, a group composed of members from the 7 neighborhoods with another set of bylaws, has had various meetings to discuss VMU and receive updates on the status of each neighborhood's progress with their individual VMU applications. CANPAC has voted to support the posltions of each individual nelghborhood. The point of all of this is that there will have been 3 reviews of the VMU process for NUNA. 38th Street. Respectfully submitted by: NUNA Planning Team (NPT) North University Neighborhood Organization CANPAC Written by: Mary Ingle, Chair of the NPT, Vice President of NUNA, member of CANPAC A.C15 NUNA'S Process For VMU Consideration Planning This Team VMUtopic has been covered In many ways. First off, the North tot the general (NPT) reviewed the map of properties In order to make a recommendation University or other related membership. issues are discussed The NPT's procedure for NUNA is that any planning, zoning The NPT then makes a recommendation initially to by the NUNA Planning Team (NPT). fora vote or approval at a regular meeting (1 the present first to Monday the whole of neighborhood, 2 general membership will meet on June 4, 20071 to vote on the NPT's every months). The Inorder to fulfill the noticing requirements, here is an explanation of how operate. The general membership of NUNA receives a printed, newsletter which lIsts the agenda and date of the upcoming meeting. hand-delivered The newsletter copy ofa agenda are also posted on a web site: www.nuna-austn.arg Included int this application are copies of 2 newsletters. Each edition has The latest issue announces the NUNA meeting for. June 4 with the posted. The recommendation that will be presented to the general agenda membership VMUvote The NPT's recommendation for NUNA Is to Opt-In the Guadeloupe (2711, 2801, 2815, 2817, 2825, 2915, 2917, 2927 Guadeloupe propertles on W29th) from 27th to 30th Streets; the other propertles on the Corridors will be recommended for the Opt-Out option. We have based our decisions for VMUOPHn/Qur-Out throughout our on logic- on what abuts each property/ how close are SF or MF residential NCCD area Parking is an issue of great concem inj the neighborhoods surrounding request that no parking reductions be given to any property owners in our UT. Wei respectfully our unique positioning next to the largest University int the country (Ground area because of hugely Inadequate parking on campus fori its faculty, staff and students. The Zero) which has lackofa adequate parking causes ane overfiow of cars Into our neighborhood regularly. result of this NUNA, recommendation for we in NUNA and an article item on VMU. is: and 512 VMU. Core Transit properties. Here Is an email anouncemenvagenda for the NPT further discuss VMU since the last VMUdiscussion on March meeting 14, 2007. May 8, 2007 to membershlp will meet on June 4, 2007, the deadline fori the application, The to vote general NPT's recommendation: for VMU. Announcement VMU Original Message on1 the 8, 2007 May for the NUNA Planning Team (NPT) meeting Included In the discussion From: --y Ingle To: bhegdiysNine: maphsyaransnw: ww: dsLX Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:52 AM Subject: NPT meeting for Tuesda/ALAS)58630: at AGE NPT AGENDA May 8, 2007 Tuesday 1.Mr Gupta's proposal for redevelopment (20 minutes max) 2. Discussion of some problem properties: 3. VMU and review of the Hyde Park letter for opting out Any other agenda suggestions?-Mingle 3411 Cedar 206 E: 30th Street Amc-le Commanication wiyh CMy Slaffabout NUNA gual Subject: RE: mmbship Vote RE: Status onsuf deadinebr ymu on' VMU Discussions Date: Mon, 71 May 2007 08:54:29 -0500 Thread-Topic: RE: Status on' VMU Discussions Thread-Index: ACePTNcAIhM-NOSCAIESZSWIOEMREKO From: "Adams, George" george.adamseclaustn.b.us To:" "Mary Ingle" ccasamagmal.utexas.edup Cc:" "Robertson, Jim" ASCdAgARUPA "Guernsey, Greg" P-ddasnur X-IM-AS-ProductVer: MPPIEAPYGSEAN X-TM-AS-Result: 0-11.19.300.00000031 A-Prootpoint-Virus-Version: vendor-fsecure engne-466.550223.11,123740.164 VXSOEXX9XSSwXSSI signaturesm0 kroolpaniSpem.Deals rule-notspam, policyadefault score-0 spamscorem0 ipscore-o phishscore-0 adutscore-0 classifier-spam: adjust-O reasonembx engine-3.1.0- 0703060001 derintions-main-0705070033 Subjecte Mary: Please get the application to us as soon as you can after the vote. George Adams From: Mary Ingle acscmassasay Sent: Saturday, May 05, 20078:29PM To: Adams, George Cc: Robertson, Jim; Guemsey, Greg Subject: Fwd: RE: Status on VMU Discussions Dear George, Thank you and Jim for meeting with our CANPAC, group last Friday 4/27 concerning our question about VMU. AsIs stated ini the meeting, our neighborhood association scheduled: meeting ist the night of June 4, the deadline for the VMU application. NUNA has its own Planning Team; Iam the chair. We voted in February to make ai recommendation concerning VMU toj present to the whole group, but Ifelt as though I needed more information. In the meantime, I1 have attended more meetings about VMU (more than! I care to acknowledge)! just sol wouldn't miss some important details for the application. I am hoping that we can have aj placeholder application for CANPAC, since NUNA will not be able to supply a vote any earlier than the evening of June 4. Would that be possible?Ithink that you understood from meeting with our group- Laurie Limbacher, Lin' Team, Barbara Bridges, Walter Wucash, an myself, that we have been working on this application diligently.Ieven think that it could be submitted in the morning on June 5. Please let me know. Iwould hate to let down the whole neighborhood and the rest OfCANPAC Would an individual neighborhood planning team vote suffice as avote for VMUissue7-Mingle with not meeting this deadline. Let me know ifthis would be possible. ATC-17 NUNA map Nwm Vnlvovsihy NA AX33 ORTH NIMERSITM Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY33 Logend BandgAmnt Cor Traneh Corridor 9 Future CoreT Transt Coridor Vertcaln Mrodi Ube Oreriy Dbirc (Optour! VMUR Rosidentiely UsedP Propertee COp-ry Micd Use Combiningo Dislaote rOpi) TCADParce luced by Cly a Austhn Austin Neighborhond the sole Panning andz Zoning Depe, October 21. 2008 Thian maph hee a accungyore parposo comple ofa ading mgionaip planahg andienot wamnlads forany oher benn Gridal and whiame AC-B Caswewk Heigis NA Itist the intention of the Neighborhood: Plan' Team to opt out of, tot the extent possible, all dimensional standards, parkingreductions, and additional ground floor uses in officel base district zoning for all the attached properties that are not aj part oft the verticle mixed use overlay, but which have MU: zoning designations in the Caswell Heights (West University). Neighborhood, bordered by Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., North Lamar Blvd., West 24th St., and San Gabriel St. Mixed use designations on the perimeter of the neighborhood were allowed int the neighborhood plan for this area only on the condition that their scope and number notl be increased at al later time. AT. C-14 Caswa AY32 JA Helyis NA 6IH3 I 25THST WZTHST y W23RD 21S 1inchs 440fpet BA32 Detalled Maps for Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ32 Prduoad by Cly Aurtin Bannhakans Corel Tranato Coridor Future Corel Tanst Comidor Wertioa Mlad Use Oretayt Duticropkour VMUF Residentidy Usedf Proparfes (OpH-r) hed Ua Combiningt Diticts(Op-in) ICADF Peroels Vertical Mixed Use Vcort Trantc APRACon WrlclMd VMUResident MadUse Con TCADParels AR6.lo produce the dfAustin Nichborhood fr te sole puposeo Plning af mdz aidngn Zoning Dept, Oubber21, 2006. This map has Map ids lack anding la anuroyo ar completa mgonals plenning andin not warardad for any othe ben andy Wismnd VAP AX32 AX33 WINDSOI ROAD AMESTANNVERSITE r W2THHAIFST, NORTH V N 28THSTC AZ32 Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY32 Legend BanningAreas Corel Transit Corridor Futune Core Transk Coridor Vertical Mied Use Overiay! DistrictçOpeoury VMUResidentialy! Used Properties (Optn') Mixed Use Combining! Districs(rOpt-in) TCAD Parceis Produced by Cly ol Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept., October producedb by the CHyo of Austin lor thes sole purpoee of aiding ragionai Vericaln Mixed Use Map Gids Black and Whita. md 21, 2006. This map has been use. Nowarranlyian made regardingl ks accuracyo ord completeness. planning andis npty waranted for any other AC-BI UAP AY32 AY33 NORTHI NIVERSI MANDSOR ROAD W2 2601 W26THST 25THST WZTHST MEST NIVERSITY W23RDST WR2ND T W21S7 DOWNTOWN 903 91023 Legand BanninaAceas Core Transit Coridor Fulure Core Transhc Coridor Vertical Mbced Use Overiay District ("Opt-outry VMUF Residendally Used Proparties Mixedl Use Combining Districis ("Opin) TCAD Parels psu Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-In/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ32 producedt Produced by by the Cay Cily of df Austin Austinf Neighborhood fort tha solep Planning andz Zoning Dapt., Ocrober 21, 2006. Thisn usa Nowarrantyisn mader regardingit Rs accurcy purpose or ol aiding regionai planning andisn noty warantad map! lor has any been other Verticall Mixed UseA Map Gride Blacka and whemxd complateness. (Oplin) AT-c-gg AZ32 VAP AZ33 157 DOWNFOWN 130, STHST 3832 inche 440 fee! Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: BA32 egend Planning Areas Core Transik Corridor Future Core Transit Corridor Vertical Mixed Use OveriayD Distet (Opkour) VMUR Residentially Used Properdes (Opkin') Mired Use Combining Districis/optn) TCADE Parceis Produced producadt by by the Cly Cly ot Ausin of Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Depl., October 21, 2006. use. Nowarntyier mader ragardingits ior the sole purpos ol aidingr regional planning andisn not waranteds This maph for has been other Vertical Mbed Use. Mapd Grids Blacka andi accuracyor Whits-md compleleness. any AT-GAS VAP AY32 SOR ROAD WESTAUSTIN NEIGHBORHDOD, GROUP OODRIDGE W25IHSY NMERSIT ENFIEND 1inch=4 440eet BA31 Detalled. Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ31 Lagend Plannina Areas Corel Transit Corridor 3 Future Core Transit Coridor Vertical Mbed Use Overtay DatictçOptour) VMUR Residentially UsedF Properties (OpHn) Mixed Use Combining Districts(Optin) - TCAD Parceis Produced by Chy of Austin Neighborhood Plaming andz Zoning Dept, Ociober producedb by! the Clly ol Austin for thes sole purpose ofaidingn regionel plamning andian 21, 2006. This map has been ue Now warantyien made regarding ls accuracy ord compleleness. Verticaln Mxad Use Map Grids Black andv Wita.md notv waranted for any other AT.C-44 AZ33 VAP AZ34 E20THST THS TES JT TSTHIS FISTHEE DOWNTOWN I4TH 4 12TH BB33 1inch 440feet Detailed. Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: BA33 Lagend PanningAreas CoreT Transit Corridor Future Core Transk Coridor Vertical Mixed Use Overlay DistictfOptou) MMUF Residentially UsedF Properties Mied Use Combining Districts( rOpln) TCAD Parcels Produced produced by City of Auslin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept, October ue Nowarrantyi iar mader regardingis sccuracyo ord compleeness. VerticaiMixedt Usek MapG Grids Blacka andy White.md by (Oplin) the Ciyo of Austin! for the sole purpose of aiding regional planning 25, 2006. This map has been andis noty wamanted for anye other AT.C-95 AY33 VAP AY34 NORTH UNIVERSITY HANCOCK wy DEANKEETONST E EDEAN KEETON ST uT E3TISN E2AIHST EASTMALYUT E23RD ST $T EmrceEd E21STST WB BA33 1nch-440feet Detailed Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AZ33 Legend PlanninaArpas Core Transit Corridor Future Core Transi Coridor Verticall Mixed Use Overlay District (Oplou) VMU Residentally Used Properties (Oplny Méxed Use Combining Districts(Optin) TCADE Parceis Produced by Cily of Austin Nighbohood Planning and Zoning Dapt, Octpber producedby the Cyo olA Austin ford thes sole purposeol aiding reglonai planning 21, 2006. This map has been ue Nowarrantyla made regarding its accuracyo or complateness. VericaM Mbedu Usak Map Grids Black andi While.d andisn notw waranted for anyo pther A C-86 Snon Cvest Nt AX33 WINDSOR ROAD AMESTANEERSINE W2STHHALFST AORTH W28THSTC Detalled Maps for Vertical Mixed Use Opt-in/Opt Out Process Grid Page: AY32 Lagend Bnola Corel Tanst Conidar A Fulune Corel Transit Coridor Vertical Mbed Une Overtay District roptour! VMUF Residentialy Used Properiss ropn) Mbed Use Combining Dutidsropln) TCADI Pacets Shoal Crest Prodcad by Clyat Austin! Neighbarhood Planning andz Zorg Dept, October 21, 2006. This mapt hes baen podrdbyCiy ue Nowerantyian dAustinfor regarding thes ks sole purpose of edingregione planning andiar noty wamanted for any othar yccmpi Uae MapG Gridel Black andy Whtamed ATC-A canpac: : Message: CANPAÇN Meeting, MAY: 29, 2007 Pagelof3 MMEETING Web Search Groups Home Hel NOTICE OF CANPAZ Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail Makeylyourhemep page Seàrch: AHOO.GROUPS [Sign Welcome, Out, bartley68 My Account] GET A GREATL LOOKING SITE. I'seasy with Vahoo! Web Hosting- Oet 25% offforalimitedt time. YALOO bartley68 barteys8Oyaho.com 1 Group Member Edit Membership Starta Group/My Groups canpac Home Messages Post Files Photos Links Database Members Calendar Yahool Groups/Tips Didy you know... Messages search is now. enhanced, find messages faster. Takel t fora as spini Yahoo! 360° Share your life through photos, blogs, more. Messages Messagei Repiy Forward Messages Help Start Topic Message List GoSearch 'Search! Advanced Vertical Mixed Use possibilities CANPACMeeting, MAY29,2007 Message 21701 of1 1788 Expand Messages Author Linda Team 01+ Barbara Epstein Sort by Date May 9, 2007 9:56 pm May 10, 2007 1:16am May 10, 2007 11:06 am Vertical Mixed Use possibilities Dear Neighbors, Inac couplec ofr recentr meetings wel have discussed the city's proposals for Implementing ther new Vertical Iteam2003 Mixed Usez zoningi inc oura area. Witha all. Re: (eastwoods] Vertical Mixed Use possibilities Ido note agreet that thel blocke east oft the proposed hotel site should! be encouraged tol be upzoned precisely becanse the bepstein@... city and ourt neighborhood: stillo cannot... Yes, Re: thatp [eastwoods) Vertical Mixed Use possibilities Linda Team MUL becauset propertyat thed dentist's Duval officei and is Bellevuei is one wez zoned Iteam2003 ofcoursei itist too smallf for VMU. Andi already my... mixed use. But e1 5 * Re: [eastwoods] Vertical Mixed Use Oscar Rodriguez May 10, 2007 ATACHMENT A atpi/groupsyahoo.com/grompleampacanpac/message/1701 6/3/2007 Minutes of CANPAC Meeting - May29,2007 Mary Gay Maxwell, acting as Meeting Coordinator, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. She asked Barbara Bridges to serve as recorder. The following CANPAC members were in attendançe: Laurie Limbacher (Heritage), Jim Damron (Caswell Heights), Tressie Damron (Caswell Heights), Walter Wukasch (UAP), Rick Hardin (UAP), Barbara Bridges (Caswell Heights), Bart Whatley (Hancock), John Foxworth (Shoal Crest), Mary Ingle (NUNA), Rick Iverson (NUNA), Mary Gay Maxwell (NUNA), Linda Guerrero (Hancock), and AI Godfrey (Heritage). The meeting agenda was distributed. Included int the agenda were: Bylaws (Membership requirement discussion and adoption ofbylaws) Mission Statement Discussion (Scope proposed for CANPAC; Process for VMUDiscussion (Completion of the process = what's left to do and who will fill Dean Keeton hotel project update (Dana'se-mail with latest neighborhood formalizing as statement) out the forms) information; request from developers) Initial PUD report (Bart'sreport from meeting) Tree Program (How do we want tol handle this?) Next meeting (Date, time location, moderator) Specific time segments were allotted for each item. BYLAWS- Barbara presented the final draft oft the bylaws with the changes discussed at the last meeting. Jim presented his suggestion for changes to 4C regarding membership that he had earlier distributed and discussed by e-mail. The group discussed this and decided to amend the draft toi include Jim's changes. The vote was taken on the Bylaws. The final vote was 12i in favor and one abstention (Laurie). Laurie noted that she abstained because she had not had time to read the Bylaws. It was noted that there were some typos that needed to be cleaned up in the clean final version. The group also agreed to revisit the discussion of4 4C at the next meeting to see if we still like this version or MISSION: STATEMENT- - Mary Gay noted that we had agreed at the last meeting that we need to come up with ai mission statement. Barbara read what the city says that the PARANSA contact.htm). We agreed that we perhaps have a broader vision for CANPAC that just whati is noted there. Laurie suggested wel havea committee to this and report back to the whole group. Barbara said that the group should e-mail committee members with ideas. The committee will include: Mary Gay, Jim VERTICAL MIXED USE - Reports were given on discussions, decisions, etc. in the individual neighborhoods regarding VMU. Laurie: reported that Heritage, which has the most affected properties in our area, had had ai number ofmeetings and that members were split on the issue of opting in/out. Consequently, they will currently opt out of want to make any amendments. planning team should doi in Neighborhood: Plan Contact Teams" Damron, Barbara, and Lin Team. ATACHMENT B-I everything and continue working on the issue for the next 45 days. NUNA has been discussing the issue and has the information for the CANPAC forms but they will not have an official neighborhood vote until theiri next meeting on June 4#. She said she checked with George. Adams and he said this process was O.K. Hancock noted that they were not on any CTCs but had some opt-ins on Red River. Caswell Heights reported that they would currently recommend opting out of all properties -1 those on the Lamar Block and the few MUs elsewhere - in light ofUNO being sO close and the fact that the issue ofnot wanting dense residential on both sides ofthe neighborhood has been the neighborhood's wish for many years. They may look at individual properties in the 45 day extension period. Shoal Crest will opt out of all in their area. UAP reported that their board had recommended that they opt out of everything because the feel that UNO offers more: and because they are already heavily invested in design guidelines that might come into conflict with VMU guidelines. Laurie reported that Lin told her that Eastwoods is opting out of everything. There was discussion about the concern that the addresses on the maps arei not always right and do not seem to include all addresses. Rick suggested that we list all possible addresses for aj property. Laurie reminded us that we need a CANPAC vote on1 this. She made a motion that CANPAC vote to support each neighborhood's list of opt-in/opt-outs and have the subcommittee of those who have been working on the forms fill out the final report. The vote was taken and it was unanimous. Those subcommittee members that will be filling out the final: forms for June 4t submission are: Walter, Bart, Jim, Laurie, Mary, Lin and. John. [Someone from DEAN KEETON PROJECT: Mary Gay read Dana'se-mail. She then reported that she received aj phone call from Carl Kernodle, representing the developers oft the project, He wanted to meet with her about the project. She told him that he'd havet to meet with the whole CANPAC group ifhe wanted to present information on the project. John suggest wei invite him to our next meeting and givel him a specific amount ofallotted time to make his presentation. Barbara suggested that wei may want tol hear from both the neighborhood and the developer at some point. The Planning Commission hearing has been postponed until June 26". Staffis recommending that the application be denied based on1 the contents of our plan. They are recommending ai much lower height. MF-6is currently the base zoning for thej property, so they would need a zoning change for greater heights. The neighborhood is currently split over height issue. Some want the height and funds for the neighborhood from the developer as a result of agreeing to higher heights while others don'twant thel heights suggested. Rick said he thought we really needed toj pay attention to what the neighborhood wants, but ifther neighborhood remains divided then we need to make a decision based on our plan. Tressie said she thought we'di really upset ai neighborhood is we went against a united neighborhood. Mary Gay mentioned that that's one of the reasons we: need ai mission statement. Jim said he thought we needed to decide what our. jurisdiction is. Rick noted that NUNA is worried about precedent with this project because the State Hospital might want to push for greater heights. Hei thinks it's really important tol have our. Eastwoods representatives at the next meeting. The group agreed that we would invite the developer to the next * meeting. Bart will resend usl his earlier e-mail about the hotel. It was suggested that we tell the developer we need information on the site plan, elevations, density and traffic Eastwoods needs to be added to this subcommittee.) ACHMENT B.A studies. Mary Gay will contact the developer and extend ani invitation for our next meeting. All suggested that wet tell the developer that he will have 10 minutes for his presentation and 10 minutes for questions. Tressie suggested that we also invite the neighborhood, but the rest ofthe group said that this should just be for CANPAC and the developer. The CANPAC representatives: from Eastwoods will already be at the meeting. Ift the neighborhood wants to meet with us, that can be at another time. PUD REPORT (Bart): Bart reported that Brewster, Mike and Lee arel looking at how to redo the PUD: requirements in the code especially as it relates to the problems connected withi infill areas that aren'treally meant for PUDs. The meeting that he went to seemed to be the birth ofap possible task force to look into the matter. There were both neighborhood folks and developers at the meeting. Neither the developers or neighborhoods are happy with the current process. One oft thei issues they will be looking ati is whether the city should perhaps shoulder some ofwhat ifr now going into private covenants between the neighborhoods and the developers to take some oft the burden off the neighborhoods having to try to enforce them. Two overriding questions that were discussed were: (I)V What are the characteristics and qualities that make aPUD superior? TREE: PROGRAM: The question for discussion on this topic was what do we want to do about it. Mary Ingle said she really would like us to participate but that we currently have too much on our plate tol be able to get an application together for this year. She suggested we put it off for ay year. The group suggestion was that we convey the thought tol Laura Patlove that we'd really like to be considered for next year. MISCELLANEOUS: Mary Gay asked for an explanation of the notice she received re the restrictive covenant at 21 Rio. Rick explained that this was an old covenant and had nothing to do with the current project as we knew it. He mentioned that he'd sent an e- NEXT MEETING: The group decided to next meet on. June. 11" (the second Monday of the month) from 6-81 PM at the AGE Building (same room as tonight). Mary Ingle will and (2) What are the ways that the PUD process can be improved? mail tot the group a while back about this. be the moderator for that meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15PM. [Minutes reported by Barbara Bridges] ACHMENT B.9 June3, 2007 Dear Mayor Wynn and City Councli Members: Neighborhood ber removed from the VMU overlay. Heritage Neighborhood Associgtionequests: that all properties within Heritage Ourecommendalion isi intended primarily as a placenolder" response whose purpose is to preserve rights afforded by the City'srecent 45-day extension of the "opt-out" period. We elect to use the next 45 days to further consider With this ieffer we would also like to communicate our concerns about the ordinance. We are especially concerned: since Heritage is a neighborhood that historically has had density, a wide range of affordable housing and a mlx of uses within the properties. We aiready practice what the VMU ordinance attempts to achieve. Below, therefore, we raise our eight concerns: 1. The ordinance is confusing and overly complex. The ordinance grants very substantial increases in development rights in Heritage. Our experience tells US that this combination of factors will lead to problems 2. The potenfial impact of relaxed dimensional standards Is severe. This "density bonus"i is not appropriate for Heritage, especially In locations adjacent to single-family and multifamily properties. The likely structure of any VMU projecti is an attractive facade facing the Core Transit Corridor with a concrete parking ramp in the back facing US, the nelghborhood. 3. Our neighborhood currently provides an excepfionally large varely of affordable housing options, ranging from apartments to small cottages to single-family homes. According to the Clty's own statistics, West University (whlch includes Heritage) has a median family income of $20,099. Obviously, Heritage is aiready doing more than enough to provide affordable housing options and should not be required tor make concesslons to developers to gain additional affordable. residential units. 4. One of the primary stated purposes of the ordinance is the prevenfion of urban sprawi. But adding housing downtown has not deterred developers from undertaking massive projects In rural areas. Sewer lines, utilities and roads continue to be built at a rapid rate In ther region 5. The cily should implement enhanced mass transit before contemplating the addition of denslty to the Core Transit Corridors. In proposing huge development before more mass transit is added, the city isessentlally putting the cart before the horse. We aiso understand that implementation of the VMU overlay. with implementation of the ordinance. surrounding Austin. ATCB the federalfunding formula has changed by making it more expensive, and therefore more difficult, toimplement a light rail plan. 6.We are concerned about our small local businesses, such as Flamingo Automofive, Tom'sTabooley, Antone's Records, Amy's Ice Creamand Toy Joy. The VMU ordinance has the potential to push these businesses out through the combination of rising property value and taxes. Many of US patronize these businesses and feel that they are ani important part of the fabric of our neighborhood. Indeed, out of the approximately fifly businesses in Heritage along Guadalupe and Lamar, only three, Starbucks, Sprint and Buffalo Exchange, are national chains. We are proud of our neignpornoodsrole as ani incubator for local businesses and hope to 7. When passed three years ago, we belleved our city-approved Nelghborhood Plan would be the template for fulure development. Our residents devoted many, many hours to create a viable plan that included upzoning to add density, especially in West Campus. Now, through the VMU ordinance, the Cityi is imposing more density on Heritage than what was agreed toi in the Neighborhood Plan. 8. - We are woried that these development rights will have a disproportionate impact on Heritage Neighborhood. Our viable historic neighborhood is only four blocks wide, bounded on three sides by Core Transit Corridors. These factors justify a cautious approach to the granting Thank you for making an effort to understand our concerns. Wel look forward to having a dialogue with you about the impact VMU will have on our small yet remain that way. of new development. rights in our neighborhood. diverse neighborhood. Sincerely, hirylulag Betsy Greenberg, Treasurer Heritage Neighborhood Association Agreed to unanimously at our 6/3/07 meeting A.C9