Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes  10N. Public Square March 19,2024 5:30P.M.  I. Open Meeting  Called to order by Chairman Frisbee at 5:29E PM. Absent: Brad Galland and Vandi White 1. Approval of Minutes  Present: Greg Frisbee, Becky Carr, David Elder, Lisa Ellis, and Larry Gregory, Staff Present: David Hardegree, Zack Arnold, Ashley Peters, and Keith Lovell  Chairman Greg Frisbee called for a motion to approve the minutes ofthe last meeting. Board Member Carr made ai motion to approve the meeting minutes from February 20,2024. Board Member Elder seconded the motion to approve the minutes. The motion carried unanimously.  Vote: 4-0  Certificate ofl Preservation: 2. COP24-09. 18 Noble Street  Applicant: Thomas Menerey  David Hardegree, Planning and Development Assistant Director, stated per the original application COP24-09, the applicant proposes replacement ofthe front door and to add shutters. The structure is Historic. No determination has been made ifthe structure is contributing. The applicant proposes to replace the existing utilitarian front door with a door more suited for a residential application. Example provided inj photo. The applicant also proposes adding storm shutters to the front windows. The shutters will slide into place when needed. Examples provided inj photos. The addition ofthe proposed door and shutters may not be appropriate if the utilitarian character oft the front entrance is to be preserved. However, the commission may determine the proposals are appropriate for the change in use (residential) which began about 2016.  Chairman Frisbee opened the floor for discussion.  Lindsey Menerey, 18 Noble St, came forward to answer the questions from the board.  Board Member Lisa Ellis asked if the shutters were going to be custom built and if they were going to be more traditional VS contemporary to match the door. Mrs. Menerey stated that they will be custom made and they are looking to match as much of the door as possible. Stated the main reason for the shutters was to keep the rain from coming in from the window.    Board Member Becky Carr asked ift the door would be rounded out at the top ori ifthere would be any other additional work. Mrs. Menerey said that the framer would come in and frame the door framei to the door that was: selected. Additional wood would be added in and then painted to match  the door.  Board Member. Larry Gregory as the applicant what their definition ofc clad wood shutters? Would they look more traditional, or would they be contemporary? Mrs. Menerey and Mr. Gregory went Chairman Frisbee asked the applicant if they are looking more for a contemporary look or traditional look as the house would fit more of a contemporary style. Mrs. Menerey agreed that Board Member Ellis stated that the door looks more traditional and that the shutters would fitif they looked: more. like the bottom ofthe door with ai raised panel that would provide Mrs. Menerey with the functionality that she is wanting and stick with the traditional look. Mrs. Menerey agreed. Board Member Larry Gregory asked is the door is going to be wood. Mrs. Menerey stated that the door was going to be wrought iron. Stated her previous wood doors started to allow water in  through all the options that were presented.  she wants to go for a more traditional look.  and were breaking.  Chairman Frisbee closed the discussion and asked for a motion to be made,  Board Member Ellis made ai motion to approve the replacement of the door as well as to install (2) barn- styled (sliding), wood storm shutters with raised panels to match the new door. Board  Member Carr seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Vote: 4-0.  3. COP24-10. 216 W. Main St the existing carport with a detached garage.  Applicant: Todd Adams  Mr. Hardegree stated per the original application COP24-10, the applicant proposes to replace The house is Historic, Contributing. The carport to be demolished is non-historic, non-  contributing.  Demolition of the carport is appropriate to provide space for the new detached garage and to All materials as presented in the building elevations and description seem appropriate for the district for new construction. See plans and description. These materials have been approved  correct the low spot that creates the drainage issues.  previously for similar projects.    The detached garage seems appropriate for the property and district. ofamulti-frontage lot was approved by the BZA on 2-8-24.  Variance V24-07 to reduce the side yard setback and allow the detached garage in the front yard  HPC: review and approval is required prior to issuance ofa a building permit.  Todd Adams, 216 W. Main St, came forward to add that the outbuilding that is located on the property is 25 years old. The garage building will be located in between the house and the outbuilding. The second story of the garage will have triple pane windows to match the look of  the home.  Chairman Frisbee opened the floor for discussion.  Board Member. Elder asked a question regarding the garage thati is being installed. Ifiti is wood or ar metal garage. Mr. Adams stated the door will be metal stamped tol look like wood and is similar Board Member Carr asked if the driveway would remain gravel or will be extended. Mr. Adams stated that the driveway might need to be extended to match the width oft the entry ofthe garage. Board Member Ellis asked if there will be one light on the side of the house or two. Mr. Adams  to what is depicted. The only difference might be the window size.  stated that there will be only one light present on the left side of the door. Chairman Frisbee closed the discussion and asked for ai motion.  Board Member Elder made ai motion to approve the entire project list as submitted. Board Member Carr seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Vote: 4-0.  II. OTHER  Mr. Hardegree came forward to discuss two topics with the board.  Mr. Hardegree came forward to discuss the approval to replace City Hall- The old fire station was approved to be torn down in order to build the new city hall. Would like the board to view the fire station to show the condition and why preservation and reuse is not an option.  The second topic Mr. Hardegree had was regarding IPADS being given to all board members to  help eliminate paper costs.    Chairman Frisbee asked about the fencing surrounding the old police station. Keith Lovell, City Attorney, stated that this is due to the fire department using it as at training facility. Mr. Hardegree stated no permits will be issued for the building demolition or townhome construction Chairman Frisbee also asked about the quiet zone: for downtown Cartersville. Mr. Lovell stated that it has been approved and they are waiting on CSX. Projected to take 6-18 Months.  at that location until this committee is able to review.  Chairman Frisbee adjourned the meeting at 6:001 PM  Date Approved: 04/16/2024  /s/ Greg Frisbee,  A4