Dolores, Colorado  AGENDA DOLORES COLORADO TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AUGUST 8TH 2022, 6:30 P.M.  THE MEETING WILLE BEI HELD AT1 TOWNI HALL4 420 CENTRAL AVENUE.  IF) YOU WISH TO ATTEND VIRTUALLY, PLEASE VISIT THE" TOWN' WEBSITE UNDER GOVERNMENT TOWNI BOARD MEETING  FOR1 THE: ZOOMI LINK tips/townotdolores.colorado.gov  1.CALLTOORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL  4.A ACTION/APPROVAL OFTHE AGENDA  5. DENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL ORI PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.  6.CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: This is an opportunity for Citizens to address the Board at this time or during a Public Hearing. Each Person willl have! 51 minutes. The Town Board encourages public comment byt thei following sources: Live at the Town Hall, virtually via ZOOM (see the Town' Website for thel link), or by submitting your comments, via email, tot the Town Clerk att ammyetowpocoorscon ACTION/APPROVAL OFTHE CONSENT AGENDA: The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Board byas single motion approve matters that are considered routine or non-controversial. Here willl be no separate discussion oft these items unless a Board Member requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be Considered  any time before the dated Board meeting.  under specific Agenda item numbers.  7.1 Minutes from: July 11th, 2022, Board meeting 7.2 Minutes From:. July 25th, 2022, Board, /Workshop meeting. 7.3 Proceedings for the month of July 2022 7.41 Liquor License Renewal/ Hotel Restaurant: Mi Tequilas/Wendy Monzon    8. REMOVED CONSENT AGENDAI ITEMS: 9.STAFF REPORIS/PRESENTATIONS:  (Fort the record" The Building Official, and Public Works have submitted reports tot the packet).  9.1 Presentation:. Jim Spratlin, Montezuma County EmergencyManagerto: present Community Intervention  Plan.  9.2 Sheriff's Report: Sheriff Steve Nowlin 9.3 Managers' Report: Manager Ken Charles 9.4A Attorney's Report: Attorney Jon! Kelly 10. ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD BUSINESS: 10.2 Discussion: Utility Rate Increase  10.1 Discussion: Property transfer from the Town of Dolores tot the Dolores Fire Protection District.  10.3 Action/Approval: Area Agency on aging/Senior Meal site  10.4 Action/Approval: Appointing an additional membertoi the Housing Task Force  11. BOARD/COMMISSIONS:  11.1 Parks/Playground Advisory Committee 11.2 Planninga and Zoning Committee: 12.0UTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS: 12.1 Chamber of Commerce: Susan Lisak 12.2 Montezuma County Commissioner: Jim Candelaria  13. PUBLICHEARINGS:  14. ACTION/APPROVAL ADMANCEREOLUTONS:  14.1 Dscuso/Acton/Aprowas First Reading of Ordinance 559 Series 2022: Amending Ordinance 532 Series 2017 creating al Park/Playground Advisory Committee fort the Town of Dolores. (Adding a fifth 14.2Action/Approval Resolution R498 Series 2022: Lifting the Town of Dolores Fire Ban.  member position).  15.TRUSTEES REPORTS AND ACTIONS:  16. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE AUGUST Z2-WORISHOP/MEETING: 16.1 Workshop: Discussion/Presentation Budget 2023  16.2 Meeting: second/Final Reading of Ordinance 559: Series 2022 amending ordinance 532 Series  2017.  17.ADIOURNMENT:    CONSENT AGENDA  Dolores, Colorado  AGENDA DOLORES COLORADO TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES JULY11""2022, 6:30 P.M.  THE MEETINGI WILLE BEI HELD ATTOWN HALL4 420 CENTRALAVENUE.  FYOUWISHTOATTENDI VIRTUALLY, PLEASE VISITT THE1 TOWNY WEBSITE UNDERGOVERNMENT TOWNI BOARD MEETING  FOR1 THEZ ZOOMLINK ttps/townofdolores.colorado.gov  1.CALLTOORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL  4. ACTION/APPROVAL OFTHE AGENDA  5. IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OFI INTEREST.  6.CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: This is an opportunity for Citizens to address the Board at this time or during al Public Hearing. Each Person will have 5 minutes. The Town Board encourages public comment by thet following sources: Live at the Town Hall, virtually via ZOOM (seet the Town Website for the link), or by submitting your comments, via email, to the Town Clerk at ammyetowpocoorescon any time before the dated Board meeting.  ACTION/APROVALOFTME CONSENT AGENDA: 7.1 Minutes from the. June 13th, 2022, Board meeting. 7.2 Minutes from the. June 27th, 2022, Board meeting. 7.31 Proceedings for the month of. June 2022  7.41 Liquor license renewal: Western Refining Retail LLC. /Speedway for a Fermented Malt Beverage 7.5 Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Chamber of Commerce/summertest to bel held. July 16thf from  License.  11:00a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Page 11    7.6Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Rotary Club/Boggy Draw Beat Down at Flanders Park on 7.75 Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Chamber of Commerce/Escalante Days at the Flanders Park  August 6th, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00p p.m. August 13+h, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00p.m. 8. REMOVED CONSENT AGENDAITEMS: .ACTION/DISCUSSIONSPECALLICENSES/PERMITS:  9.1 Special Events Liquor License: IAMI Musict to bel held August 26th and 27th, at 311 Central Avenue Dolores Co. both events dates will bet from 4:00 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. For the record the premises was 9.2 Liquor License Renewal: Dolores River Brewery LLC/Mark Youngquist for a Brew Publ located at 10.1 Action/Approval: Purchase ofa 2002 International 7400 Vac-con Vacuum/Jetter Truck. 10.2 Action/Approval: Appointment of Housing Task Force Committee (HTFC). 10.3 Discussion/Possible Action: In support Initiative #63 fort the November Ballot. 10.4 Discussion: Reviewing the code concerning liquor licenses and special events permits. 10.5 Discussion: Design Concepts from Logan-Simpson on. Joe Rowell Park  posted and noticed. 100S.4th St. Dolores.  10. ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD BUSINESS:  11. BOARD/COMMISSIONS:  11.1 Parks/Playground Advisory Committee 11.2 Planning and Zoning Committee: 12.OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS: 12.1 Chamber of Commerce: Susan Lisak 12.2 Montezuma County Commissioner: Jim Candelaria  13. PUBLICHEARINGS:  14. ACTION/APPROVAL ORDINANCES/RES/RESOLUTIONS: settlement funds and providing said funds to the regional pool. Architecture Inc. to design a restroom facility for Flanders Park with Mike Thele, PE. To design ar restroom facility for Flanders Park.  14.1Action/Approval Resolution R492 Series 2022: Electing to Opt out ofr receiving OPIOID 142Discussion/Ation: Resolution R493 Series 2022, approving the agreement with Connie Giles 143Dkscussion/Ation: Resolution R495: Series 2022 awarding the bid to and approving acontract  15. STAFF EPORESPASENTAIONS:  (For the record The Building Official, and Public' Works have: submitted reports to the packet).  15.1 Sheriff's Report: Sheriff Steve Nowlin 15.21 Treasurer: Tricia Gibson 15.3 Managers' Report: Manager Ken Charles 15.4Attorney'sl Report: Attorney. Jon Kelly  Page 12    16. TRUSTEE REPORTS AND ACTIONS:  17. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS FOR1 THEJ JULY 25"H, 2022N MEETING:  18. ADIOURNMENT:  Page 13    Dolores, Colorado  MINUTES DOLORES COLORADO TOWN BOARD OF1 TRUSTEES JULY11"2022, 6:30P.M.  THE MEETING WAS HELD AT1 TOWN HALL 420 CENTRAL AVENUE.  IF YOU WISH TOI REVIEW THE RECORDING, PLEASE VISIT THE TOWN WEBSITE UNDER GOVERNMENT  TOWN BOARD MEETING ltps/townofdolores.colorado.gov  1. CALLTO ORDER: Mayor Reeves call the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.  2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  3. ROLL CALL: Board Members present, Mayor Leigh Reeves, Trustees Duvall "Val" Truelsen, Kalin Grigg, Sheila Wheeler, Chris Holkestad, and Andy Lewis. Trustee Mark Youngquist was absent.  3.1 Staff Present: Manager Ken Charles, Treasurer Tricia Gibson, Town Clerk Tammy Neely, Building Official David Doudy, and Attorney Jon Kelly. Appearing virtually was Public Works Director Randy 4.ACTION/APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Trustee Holkestad moved to approve the agenda amending it to add item number 10.6 to discuss. Sirens, seconded. by Trustee Lewis. Motion passed unanimously. 5. IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Trustee Lewis will not vote in the approval oft the Dolores River Brewery item 9.2 because of his employment. Mayor Reeves will be 6. CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: This is an opportunity for Citizens to address the Board at this time or during al Public Hearing. Each Person will have 5 minutes. The Town Board encourages public comment by the following sources: Live at the Town Hall, virtually via ZOOM (see the Town Website for  McGuire. Sheriff Nowlin was absent.  abstaining from the vote fori IAM Music for business purposes.    the link), or by submitting your comments, via email, to the Town Clerk at ammyetownotoorescon  any time before the dated Board meeting.  6.1 Michael Sawyer 207 N 20th: inquired what the Board is doing to propertiesi int the Town that are unkept and buildings in need of repair. Building Inspector David Doudy explained properties are currently being repaired. Properties owners are currently in the process of rebuilding and require time  for completion. The Towni is currently addressing the other propertyissues.  -ACTION/APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA:The Consent. Agenda is intended to allow the Board byas single motion approve matters that are considered routine or non-controversial. Here will be no separate discussion of these items unless al Board Member requests ani item to be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be  Considered under specific Agenda item numbers. 7.1 Minutes from the. June 13th, 2022, Board meeting. 7.2 Minutes from the. June 27th, 2022, Board meeting. 7.3 Proceedings for the month of June 2022  7.4 Liquor license renewal: Western Refining Retail LLC. /Speedway for al Fermented Malt Beverage 7.5 Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Chamber of Commerce/Summertest to bel held. July 16th 7.6 Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Rotary Club/Boggy Draw Beat Down at Flanders Park on 7.7 Special Event Liquor License: Dolores Chamber of Commerce/Escalante Days at the Flanders  License.  from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.  August 6th, 2022, from 10:00a.m. to 4:00 p.m.  Park August 13th,2 2022, from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.  Clerk Neely explained toi the Board the reason for a consent agenda and whyi iti is used.  Trustee Lewis moved to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Trustee Holkestad. Motion passed  unanimously.  8. REMOVED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: Noi items were removed. 9.ACTION/DISCUSSION SPECIAL LICENSES/PERMITS:    9.1 Special Events Liquor License: IAM Music to bel held August 26th and 27th, at 311 Central Avenue Dolores Co. both event dates will be from 4:00 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. For the record, the premises was posted and noticed. Sheriff Steve Nowlin reviewed the application and reported noi issues or violations with the applicant. No comment came from the public. Trustee Grigg moved to approve the Special Event Liquor license, for IAMI Music, seconded by Trustee Wheeler. Motion passed unanimously with  Mayor Reeves abstaining. from the vote.  9.2 Liquor License Renewal: Dolores River BrewerylLC/Mark Youngquist for a Brew Pub located at 1005. 4ths St. Dolores. Noi issues or violations were reported. Trustee Truelsen. moved to approve the renewal of a Brew Pub license for Dolores River Brewery, seconded. by Trustee Grigg. Motion passed  unanimously, with Trustee Lewis abstaining, from the vote. 10. ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD BUSINESS:  10.1Action/Approyal: Purchase ofa a: 2002 International 7400 Vac-con Vacuum/Jetter Truck. Manager Charles explained toi the Board that the current Vac Truck (Trucki is to clear sewer lines amongst other uses) is shared withi the Town of Mancos. The current Vac-Truck will need repairs in the cost range of 515,00.00-520,0000. Staff has determined thati it would be al better investment of the Towns financial resources to purchase and own thet truck outright. The existing truck will be given back to the Town of Mancos for the Towns share of current needed repairs. Manager Charles offered examples of whyi it would be good for the Town to purchase the truck. There are 2 options  available:  Move forward with another IGA with Mancos and co-own either a new or used truck.  Purchase a used truck for the Town of Dolores only.  The Staff recommends option two. Citing that Mancos uses thet truck: significantly, more than Dolores. Public Works Director Randy McGuire and Treasurer Gibson both support purchasing the 2002 International Vac-Truck, keeping it for town use only. The purchase price for the 2002 International will cost the Town approximately $44,570.00. Trustee Truelsen moved to approve purchasing the 2002 International Vac -Truck, providing that the agreement with Mancos is terminated, and the current truck is delivered back to the Town of Mancos, seconded by Trustee 10.2 Action/Approval: Appointment of Housing Task Force Committee (HTFC). Mayor Reeves opened the discussion of forming and appointing al Housing Task Force Committee, by appointing  Holkestad. Motion, passed unanimously.    herself. She will be looking for other people toj join. Trustee Wheeler stated she would like toj join for the reason that she would bring questions to the table that might not be thought of. Trustee Holkestad stated that he will join! because hel lived in cities that could not afford places for doctors, nurses, and teachers. He added iti is important to support the Town and keep growing and a place for people to live. Trustee Truelsen inquired about the makeup of the committee. Manager Charles answered there should be two Board Members, two Planning & Zoning Committee Members (Melissa Watters & Dan Heeney was previously appointed), Dolores State Bank representative, School Superintendent, and members from the Community. Manager Charles also stated that he was trying to get Shak Powers whoi is now with region 9. Manager Charles informed the Board that it was brought his attention by Kirk Swope who is the Chair for the Telluride Foundation, he will be asked to join the Task Force. The Task Force will be time consuming with a possible two meetings a month. There will need for grants, infrastructure, and more. Housing will need to bring in from $225,000.00 to $275,000.00. The Task Force will need toi find ways to put together aj package. The questions to ask is what goals should be prioritized, whati is most important owner occupied, rental or both. The Task Force needs to understand the rfpd process and  select a consultant that knows the process and guide the Task force through.  10.3 Discussion/Possible Action: In support Initiative #63 for the November Ballot. Mayor Reeves opened the discussion for Initiative #63, explaining thati it willl helpi fund better pay for Teachers int the State of Colorado. This would bei funded through TABOR. She: stated that Colorado is at the very bottom for compensating Teachers. The Board requested a presentation and more information.  10.4 Special Events Liquor License: Manager Charles proposed to the Board that Town Staff be allowed to review and approve Special Event Permits. Other Towns are doing this to save timeon meetings. There are not many events, and the staffi is familiar with procedures. Trustee Truelsen preferred to leave is as is. The other option would be to set special events on the consent agenda. 10.5 Discussion: Design Concepts from Logan-Simpson on. Joe Rowell Park. Manager Charles updated the Board on the progress with Logan-Simpson. He presented to new concepts submitted by Logan-Simpson: and asked the Boards opinion. Trustee Grigg commented that there needs to be more feedback from the citizens. The website has information oni it, but it does not have a comment section which could be more productive. Trustee Wheeler askedi if there are other options beside the website. Manager Charles suggested to go to the Chamber meeting Senior citizens lunches. Trustee Lewis suggested signs along the river walk. Trustee Holkestad comments that trash cansi in the plan needs to  be addressed. Trustee Truelsen requested hard copy maps of the plan.    10.6 Discussion/Action Sirens: Manager Charles discussed the needs of sirens, and whyt they are important to the Town. An award was presented. Manager Charles requested to move forward with the plan. Trustee Grigg moved to approve the award letter, and to move. forward, seconded by Trustee  Lewis. The motion passed unanimously, .BOARD/COMMISSONS:  11.1Parks/Playground Advisory Committee: No report. Trustee Grigg was appointed ex-officio for 11.2 Planning and Zoning Committee: Linda Robinson reported the meeting on. July! 5th, 2022, the Committee discussed, Flanders Park, Housing task force, and working with Building Official David Doudy  thel Parks/Playground Committee.  on building codes. 12.OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS:  12.1 Chamber of Commerce: Susan Lisak this Saturday will be Summerfest, with music, car show, and kids' events. She reported that there were 182 entries for the Gravel Grinder. Other events coming up willl bei the Boggy Draw Beatdown, and Escalante Days. Tuesday the gth of. July will be the next  Chamber meeting. Farmers Market, and Drive in movies are continuing.  12.2 Montezuma County Commissioner: Jim Candelaria clarified the term attainable housing is now known as workforce housing. He also urged the Board to take another look at the cost of housing, the project will put ai family in al house for $225,000.00 to $275,000.00. Hes stated that the price of materials has gone up considerably, that cost only covers 30%-34% of the average income. He suggested that the Board educate themselves on initiative #63, by watching a video on YouTube. Hei introduced Economic  Development Coordinator Jessica Thurman. 13. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Nol hearings were: scheduled. 14. ACTION/APPROVALORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS:  14.1 Action/Approval Resolution R492 Series 2022: Electing to opt out of receiving OPIOID settlement funds and providing said funds to the regional pool. Attorney Kelly announced that due to the small amount of funding from the OPIOD agreement other government entities willj join funds together to provide al local rehab facility thati is locally centered. Resolution R492 Series 2022 allows $1872.35, (the Towns award from the lawsuit) tol be combined with Montezuma County, LaPlata County,    Town of Mancos, Town of Dolores, City of Cortez, and other regions. The Southern Ute Tribe and Ute Mountain Ute Tribe will not bej joining. Trustee Truelsen moved to approve Resolution R492 Series 2022, too opt out ofs settlement, funds, and providing the funds to the regionalpool, Trustee Truelsen amended  the motion by adding the dollar amount of $1872.35, seconded by Trustee Grigg.  Motion was passed unanimously  14.2 Discussion/Action: Resolution R493 Series 2022, approving the agreement with Connie Giles Architecture Inc. to design a restroom facility for Flanders Park. Trustee Truelsen moved to approve the agreement between Connie Giles Architecture Inc. for design services associated with the Flanders Park  Restroom Project, seconded by Trustee Lewis. The motion passed unanimously.  14.3 Discussion/Action: Resolution R495 Series 2022 awarding the bid to and approving a contract with Mike Thele, PE. To design a restroom facility for Flanders Park. Trustee Trueslsen moved to approve Resolution R495 Series 2022, for a contract with Mike Thele to engineer a restroom facility for Flanders  Park, seconded by Trustee Lewis. Motion passed unanimously.  15.STAFF REPORIS/PAESENTATONS:  (For the record The Building Official, and Public Works have submitted reports to the packet).  15.1 Sheriff's Report: Sheriff Steve Nowlin was absent from the meeting. His report was submitted 15.2Treasurer: Tricia Gibson gave the monthly sales tax report and Treasurers report for the month of June. She offered an explanation that Marijuana Sales tax willl be combined with the State sales tax  toi the packet for the record.  for proper disbursement.  15.3 Managers' Report: Manager Ken Charles announced: The Vaccination Bus will be available at Summerfest  Five Box Cars will be added to the vacant tracks at the Goose Depot. Manager Charles also gave al brief history oft the Galioping Goose easement and property agreement with the Town. 15.4 Attorney's! Report: Attorney. Jon Kelly discussed sales tax concerning food trucks. Per ordinance food trucks must have al business license and as sales tax account. He also touched on the water shed. Mayor inquired about the DeStefano agreement. Attorney will follow up at the next meeting. 16. TRUSTEE REPORTS AND ACTIONS: No reports available for this meeting    17. UPCOMING AGENDAI ITEMS FOR1 THE. JULY2 25"H,2 2022 MEETING:  17.1 Workshop discussion: Utility Rate increase and report from SGM ont the water project.  18. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Reeves adjourned the meeting at 9:14 p.m.  Mayor Leigh Reeves  Town Clerk Tammy Neely    Dolores, Colorado  AGENDA  TOWN OF DOLORES COLORADO BOARD OF1 TRUSTEES MEETING/WORASHOP JULY25TH, 2022, 5:30P.M.  THE MEETING WILLI BE HELD ATTOWN HALL 420 CENTRALA AVENUE.  IF YOUV WISH1 TO ATTEND' VIRTUALLY, PLEASE VISIT1 THE TOWN WEBSITE UNDER GOVERNMENT TOWNI BOARD MEETING FOR  THE ZOOMI LINK  tips/townotdolores.colorado.oy  WORKSHOP: 5:30P.M. THROUGH 6:30 P.M: Includes dinner 1. Discussion: SGM Engineers waterline replacement project  2. Discussion: Utility Rate Increase 3. Discussion: Town Growth BOARD MEETING: 6:30P.M. 1. CALLTO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL:  4. ACTION/APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA  5. IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.  6.0 CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: This is an opportunity for Citizens to address the Board at this time or during a Public Hearing. Each Person will have 5 minutes. The Town Board encourages public comment by the following sources: Live at the Town Hall, virtually via ZOOM (see the Town' Website for the link), or by submitting your comments, via email, to the Town Clerk at ammyetowpococrescon  any time before the dated Board meeting. 7. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS:  71Dscusion/Dscusion Special Event Liquor License Permit: Southwest Colorado Cycling Association  Inc. (SWCCA)    7.2Discussion/Action: Violation off fence line (fence was built on town property) at7 700 Hillside Avenue  Dolores, Colorado.  73Action/Approval Appointments to Committees:  a.. Jen Stark to the Dolores Attainable Workforce Housing Task Force (DAWHTF) b. Mari Chubbuck to the Dolores Parks/Playground Advisory Committee (DPAC)  8. PUBLICHEARINGS: Nol hearing scheduled 9.DISCUSSION/ACTION: ORDINANCES/RES/RESOLUTIONS:  9.1Discussion/Action: Resolution R496 Series 2022; amending the. June 27th, 2022, Resolution creating acommunity to study affordable housing in the Town of Dolores to be known as the Dolores Attainable  Workforce Housing Task Force (AWHTF) 10.OTHER ORGANIZATIONS: 1. Chamber of Commerce: Susan Lisak 2. Montezuma County Commissioner: Jim Candelaria 11. STAFF EPORISPREENTATONS: 11.1 Managers Report: 11.2 Attorneys Report: 12. FUTURE AGENDAS: August 12.1 Budget 12.2 Utility Improvements 12.3 Review outcome of survey 13. TRUSTEES REPORTS AND ACTIONS:  14. ADJOURN    Dolores, Colorado  Est.7900  MINUTES  TOWN OF DOLORES COLORADO BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING/WORASHOP JULY 25TH, 2022, 5:30P.M.  For the recording of the workshop and meeting please visit the Town website  ntps/townordolores.colorado.ow  WORKSHOP NOTES: 5:30F P.M. to 6:30P.M.  1. Discussion: SGM Engineers waterline replacement project. Manager Charles introduced Catherine Carella for SGMa and explained that the Town and SGM are entering phase II of the waterline project. Catherine touched on thev water flow distribution, as well ast firet flow. Theyfound that the waterflow was exceptionally low. She also talked about the second water tank which was especially important to the Town, stating that it should be placed on top of the Mesa for better flow. The smaller water lines wouldneed" tol ber replaced. The estimated cost oft the project would be about 3.2 million dollars.  BOARD MEETING: 6:30P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  1. CALLTO ORDER: Mayor Reeves opened the Board meeting at 6:36 p.m.  3. ROLL CALL: Board Members present; Mayor Leigh Reeves, Trustees, Duvall "Val" Truelsen, Andy Lewis, 3.1Staff Members: Manager Ken Charles, Clerk Tammy Neely, TreasurerTricia Gibson, Building Official David Doudy, Attorney Jon Kelly, and appearing virtually Public' Works Director Randy McGuire. ACTION/APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Trustee Youngquist moved to approve the agenda asi is, seconded 5.1 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. No conflicts werei identified. 6. CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: This is an opportunity for Citizens to address the Board at this time or during a Public Hearing. Each Person will have 5 minutes. The Town Board encourages public  Chris Holkestad, Sheila Wheeler, and Mark Youngquist. Trustee Grigg was absent.  by Trustee Wheeler. Motion, passed unanimously.    comment by the following sources: Live at the Town Hall, virtually via ZOOM (see the Town Website for the link), or by submitting your comments, via email, to the Town Clerk at ammyetowpcocrescon  any time before the dated Board meeting. The was no comment from the public.  7.A ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS:  7.1 Discussion/Action Special Event Liquor License Permit: Clerk Neely introduced a special event permit application for Southwest Colorado Cycling Association Inc. (SWCCA). The venue was posted for the record, there were no comments made by the public. The event will take place at Kokopelli's Bike & Board, on August 6th, 2022, from! 5:00 p.m. to: 10:00 p.m. Trustee Youngquist tmoved to approve the Special Event Permit for Southwest Colorado Cycling Association, seconded by Trustee Truelsen. Motion passed 72Discussion/Action: Violation of fence line (fence was builto ont town property) at 700 Hillside Avenue Dolores, Colorado. Building Official David Doudy described the violation. On the property at 700 Hillside Avenue at fence was constructed and located sixi inches onto Town property. Property owners Fred and Kathy! Manar appealed toi the Board explaining thati the property was surveyed, the oldf fence was removed andanewi fenced was replacedi in the same area. Trustee Truelsen explained whent the Town was surveyed years ago a property error was found. In defense of the issue the Town agreed to allow the Manor's to keep the fence at its current location with the understanding that it still remains as thet town's property. Attorney Kelly will prepare an agreement between the Town and the Manars to let thei fence remain with stipulations. For future references, the Town will need to determine fence line issues on case-by-case  unanimously.  basis.  8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No public hearing scheduled 9.DISCUSSION/ACTION: ORDINANCES RESOLUTIONS:  9.1 Discussion/Action: Resolution R496 Series 2022, amending the June 27th, 2022, resolution creating acommunity to study affordable housing ini the Town of Dolores to be known as the Dolores Attainable Workforce Housing Task Force (AWHTF). Trustee Truelsen move to approve resolution R496. Series 2022,  seconded by Trustee Holkestad. Motion passed unanimously, 9.2Action/Approval Appointments to Committees:  a. Appointment tot the AWHTF:The' Town published a notice on the website, newspaper, and Board for volunteers to serve on the AWHTF committee. Jen Stark and Lainey Behan have submitted letters of interest (for the record thel letters werei included int the packet). Trustee Youngquist moved to appointJen Stark and Lainey Behan to the AWHTF committee, seconded by Trustee Wheeler. Motion passed b. Appointment to the Dolores Parks/Playground Advisory Committee (DPAC): Mayor Reeves movedi to approve. Jacob Carloni to the DPACcommittee, seconded by Trustee Youngquist. Motion passed Manager Charles discussed the possibility of adding a fifth member to the DPAC committee, for reasons of meeting a quorum. The Board agreed and instructed Attorney Kelly draw up a resolution for the next  unanimously.  unanimously.  Board meeting in August.    9.3 Action/Approval Resolution R497 Series 2022: Accepting Terms and conditions of the Award of and Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds for the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for the Town of Dolores emergency sirens. Manager Charlesi introduced the resolution stating that the plan was to add a siren at each end oft the Town. There isap possibility that there will be one siren with a 3-way alarm. The siren is loud and can be heard for quite ac distance. Trustee Truelsen moved to approve resolution R497. Series 2022, seconded by Trustee Lewis.  Motion passed unanimously. 10.STAFF REPORTS ANDI PRESENTATIONS:  10.1 Managers Report: Manager Ken Charles and' Treasurer' Tricia Gibson presented to the Board for consideration the possibility of raising water and sewer rates to meet the needs of the water/sewer systems. Treasurer Gibson explained that the rising expense fort the maintenance and repairs to the water system are exceedingly high. To accommodate for the expense, she requested that the Board to take inconsiderationar morel long-term approach (3-5 years) program. She presentedas Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position, Proprietary Fund Type, and Enterprise funds, for the year ending on December 31, 2021. The Statement detailed all expenses to the day-to-day operation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant, and' Water Treatment Plant. In which iti is showing a loss. The reserves are weak, and ar rate increase will prevent the reserves from being used. The majority of the Board preferred to use the tier system to raise water and sewer rates. The concerns are the current inflation for citizens. Manager Charles reported work is starting on 16th street issues (parking). Other streets will be 15th and 10.2 Attorneys Report: Attorney. Jon Kelly discussed growth and annexation. Annexation take place by Ordinance only. Under the Colorado Constitution the Town cannot annex property without a due process of some type. Exception would be municipal property as in the Harris property. The is a possibility of a process of a Flagpole Annexation, the exception again. A study would be required of the affected area. It  Thei increase would goi in to affect in January of 2023.  Hillside.  isac complicated and time-consuming effort. 11. OTHER ORGANIZATIONS:  11.1 Chamber ofC Commerce: Director Susan Lisak reported that there willl ber no more drive-inmovies 11.2 Montezuma County Commissioner: Jim Candelaria was absent for the meeting.  for the remainder of the season, due to wind damage on the equipment.  12. FUTURA AGENDAS: August 12.1 Utilityi improvements 12.2 Review results of the survey 12.3 Budget Workshop 13.TRUSTEES REPORTS AND ACTIONS:    13.1 Trustee Youngquist expressed his interest to hear the second applicant for DPAC. At the next meeting there should be a resolution to add a 5th member to the DPAC. The second applicant will be  notified to appear at the August meeting.  14. ADIOURNMENT: Mayor Reeves adjourned the meeting at 8:26 p.m.  Mayor Leigh Reeves  Town Clerk1 Tammy Neely    DR8 8400 (03/10/22) COLORADOI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Liquor Enforcement Division Submit to Local Licensing Authority  Fees Due Annual Renewal Application Fee Renewal Fee Storage Permit Sidewalk Service Area! $75.00 Additional Optional Premisel Hotel & Restaurant Related Facility- Campus Liquor $ Complex $160.00 per facility Amount Due/Paid  $ 50.00 560.00 $ $ $  $100X $100X  $550.06  Make check payable to: Colorado Department of Revenue. The State may convert your check to a one- time electronic banking, transaction. Your bank account may be debited as early as the same day received the State. If converted, your checky will not ber returned.  your check is rejected due toi insufficient or uncollected funds, the Department may collect the payment amount directiy from your banking account electronically.  Retail Liquor or Fermented Malt Beverage License Renewal Application  Please verify & update alli information below  Return to city or county licensing authority by due date  Licensee Name Liquor License# 03-15356 Sales Taxl License Number 44555367 -0000 Businéss Address 104 sand Streek Mailing Address Po B07 491 Operating! Manager Wendy N. &-10-97  Doing! Business As Name (DBA)  NEMDY MONZON Ki Teoulas L4c  License Type  Taueyn (CIEL)  Expiration Date 12-22  Due Date  Phone Number 970-676-040 Phone Number 970 - 5705974  Email  Mieguin220@grmile com  Date ofBirth Home Address  1. Doy youl have legal possession of the premises at1 the street address above? OYes [XNo  Are the premises owned or rented? JOwned Rented* table in upper right hand comer and include alli fees due. Dyes No delivery license privileges) OYes ONo NA  "lfrented, expiration date ofl lease 2-24  2. Arey your renewing a storage permit, additional optional premises, sidewalk service area, or related facility? Ify yes, please see the 3a. Are your renewing a takeout and/or delivery permit? (Yote: must hold a qualifying license type and be authorized for takeout and/or  3b. Ifs so, which are your renewing? Delivery Takeout Both Takeout and Delivery  4a. Since the date oft filing oft the last application, has the applicant, induding its manager, partners, officer, directors, stockholders, members (LLC), managing members (LLC), or any other person with a 10% or greater financial interest int the applicant, been foundi int final order ofa ai tax agency to be delinquent in the payment of any state or local taxes, penalties, ori interest related to a 4b. Since the date oft filing of thel last application, has the applicant, including its manager, partners, officer, directors, stockholders, members (LLC), managing members (LLC), or any other person with a 10% or greater financial interest int the applicant failedt to Since the date of filing of thel last application, has there been any change in financiali interest (new notes, loans, owners, etc.) or organizational structure (addition or deletion of officers, directors, managing members or general partners)? Ify yes, explain in detail and attach a listing of all Eiquor businesses in which these new lenders, owners (other than licensed financial institutions), officers, 6. Since the date of filing of thel last application, has the applicant or any of its agents, owners, managers, partners or lenders (other than licensed financial institutions)! been convicted of a crime? Ify yes, attach a detailed explanation. OYes MNo  business? OYes No  pay any fees or surcharges imposed pursuant to section 44-3-503, C.R.S.? Yes DNo  directors, managing members, or general partners are materially interested. Yes 4No  2    DR8400 (03/10/22) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OFI REVENUE Liquor Enforcement Division  7. Since the date of filing of the last application, has the applicant or any ofi its agents, owners, managers, partners or lenders (other than licensed financial institutions) been denied an alcoholl beverage license, had an alcohol beverage license suspended or revoked, or hadi interest jn any entityt that! had an alcohol beverage! license denied, suspended or revoked? Ifyes, attach a detailed 8. Does the applicant or any ofi its agents, owners, managers, partners or lenders (other than licensed financial institutions) have a direct ori indirect interesti in: any other Colorado liquor license, including loans to or from anyl licensee ori interest in al loan to any  explanation. Yes No  licensee? Ifyes, attach a detailed explanation. Yes EXNo  Affirmation & Consent best of myl knowledge. Signature  declare under penalty of perjuryi int thes second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct and complete tot the  Type or Print Name ofA ApplicantAuthorized, Agent ofE Business wendy Mon7on wendy Nonzon  Title owhLy Date 8-4-23  Report & Approval of City or County Licensing Authority  The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant are satisfactory, and we do hereby report that such license, ifgranted, will comply with the provisions of Title 44, Articles 4 and: 3, C.R.S., and Liquor Rules.  Therefore this application is approved. Local Licensing Authority For Signature  Date Attest  Title  3    DR8495 (07/23/19) COLORADOI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Liquor Enforcement Division  Tax Check Authorization, Waiver, and Request to Release Information  WENDY MONZOR)  am signing this Tax Check Authorization, Waiver and Request tol Release  Information (hereinafter "Waiver") on behalf of Mi TEGLLLAS LIL  (the Applicanvlicensee)  to permit the Colorado Department of Revenue and any other state or local taxing authority to release information and documentation that may otherwise be confidential, as provided below. Iflam signing this Waiver for someone other than myself, including on behalf of al business entity, Icertify that Ihave the authority to execute this Waiver on behalf oft the The Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue is the State Licensing Authority, and oversees the Colorado! Liquor Enforcement Division as his or her agents, clerks, and employees. Thei information and documentation obtained pursuant to this Waiver may be used in connection with the Applicant/icensee's liquor license application and ongoing licensure by the state and local licensing authorities. The Colorado Liquor Code, section 44-3-101. et seq. ("Liquor Code"), and the Colorado Liquor Rules, 1 CCR 203-2 ("Liquor Rules"), require compliance with certain tax obligations, and set forthi thei investigative, disciplinary and licensure actions the state and local licensing authorities may take for violations oft the Liquor Code and Liquor Rules, including failuret to meet tax reporting and payment obligations. The Waiver is made pursuant to section 39-21-113(4), C.R.S., and any other law, regulation, resolution or ordinance concerning the confidentiality of taxi information, or any document, report or return filed in connection with state or local taxes. This Waiver shall be valid until the expiration or revocation of a license, or until both the state and local licensing authorities take final action to approve or deny any application(s) for the renewal of the license, whichever is later. ApplicantLicensee agrees to execute a new waiver for each subsequent licensing period in connection with the renewai By signing below, ApplicantLicensee requests that the Colorado Department of Revenue and any other state or local taxing authority or agency in the possession of tax documents ori information, release information and documentation to the Colorado Liquor Enforcement Division, and is duly authorized employees, to act as the Appicants/icensees duly authorized representative under section: 39-21-113(4), C.R.S., solelyt to allow thes state and local licensing authorities, and their duly authorized employees, to investigate compliance with the Liquor Code and Liquor Rules. AppicantlLicensee authorizes the state and local licensing authorities, their duly authorized employees, and their legal representatives, to use the information and documentation obtained using this Waiver in any administrative or judicial action regarding the  ApplicantLicensee.  of any license, ifr requested.  application or license. Name (Individua/Business) Address City otores Home Phonel Number  Socials Spcurity Number/Tax Identification Number #4555367-0000  M Tequilg LLC lou S 2nd Strer  State Co  Zip 81333  Business/Worki Phonel Number  930 -570-5974 Printed name of person signing on behalfofthe/ ApplicantlLicensee INerdy MOnzon wendy Monzon  170 -676-0040  ApplicanLicense's Signature (Signature authorizing the disclosure of confidential taxi information)  Date signed 8-4-22  Privacy Act Statement  Providing your Social Security Number is voluntary and no right, benefit or privilege provided by law will be denied as a  result of refusal to disclose it.S7ofP Privacy Act, 5USCSS 552a (note).    PROCEEDINGS  8  :688 : e    ii    s] o    TREASURER'S REPORT TOWN OF DOLORES AUGUST 2, 2022  Petty Cash Hi-Fi Savings Account Checking Account Conservation Trust Fund ColoTrust Bonds Business Account (AFLAC) Regular Savings Account New Playground Account/Dc  $300.00 $1,094,874.05 $115,233.93 $20,332.90 $862,749.67 $556,805.40 $2,002.57 $5,209.62 $3,225.33 $2,660,733.47  TOTAL    Town board August 8, 2022, 2022 Building Official/Building Inspector report  Current projects:  1. 102 Railroad - Ai final inspection is scheduled. 2. Del Rio -Work continues on the floor oft the building. 3. 1101 N 16th Street- - Temporaryt fence erected to block traffic. 5. Kokopeli Bike - Installed a new water line and gas line. issued for a new water heater and door removal.  4. 201S2 2nd Street - Waiting for final construction toi issue thet final inspection and CO 6. 202 N 215t- Final inspection issued, and a COi issued for a R-3 Single Family 7. 18390 Highway 145- - Renew- -af fire and life safety inspection were conducted, and at final New permits: Six permits issued for ai total of $4,429.50 (3,491.90 was waived for Dolores School  District)  1. #1054-D Deck permit  2. #1055-N New manufactured home install 3. #1056- - Change of occupancy = demo permit 4. #1057 - New mini-split systems 5. #1058-Total remodel 6. #1059- - New roof 7. #1060-Temporary, Zircon permit 8. #1061 - Demo permit and change of use 9. #1062- Change of occupancy and water heater install 10. #1063-C Change of occupancy to A-2 Restaurant  11. #1064- - Deckr replacement Consultations- Phone and in person  58 for. July Construction Inspections  14 construction inspections of permits issued  Future projects on the horizon: 1. Hostel with 8-10r rooms 2. Auto parts store    Business Inspections 1. Two STRI Inspections Noi inspections in June Internet Technology  Set up thet two new board members computers  SPECIAL PROJECTS 1. Noreports STR's  No additional report on STR's this month  Compliance issues  1. Weed letters sent to two properties 2. Lights on 21stStreetx x2 3. Lighti issue on 20th street 4. Disabled vehicles    MAINTENANCE DAILY REPORT. JULY 2022  1-4 Plants. Anthony, RJ  5 6  Plants. Picked up trash. Mowed Flanders Park. Worked on the sewer service line at the Plants. Pulled the quarterly wastewater plant samples, the bacti and chlorine water samples. Finished work on the service line for the JRP restrooms. Cleaned the park Plants. Picked up trash and disinfected the bathrooms. Completed the repair to the. JRP bathrooms. Set up Flanders Park for the bike race. Completed the DMRS for the  JRP restrooms. Completed the turbidity report.  restrooms Mowed Riverside and Triangle Parks.  7  wastewater plant.  8-10 Plants. Wyatt. Got called out for quarter jam at the water dock Friday and Saturday.  11  Plants. Picked up trash and cleaned the restroom. Trimmed weeds around fire hydrants. Sprayed weeds in the orchard. Cleaned the chlorine weed at the well. Built a meter pit  for a new tap at 310 Riverside. Attended the BOT meeting.  12 Plants. Mowed the bar ditches along highway and walking trail. Mowed at. JRP. 13 Plants. Pulled the chlorine samples. Mowed at. JRP. Mowed the water plant and wastewater plant. Serviced the Ford pickup and the Dodge pickup. 14 Plants. Picked up trash and disinfected the bathrooms. Mowed at JRP. Trimmed weeds at. JRP. Set up for Summer Fest. Serviced the turbidity meters at the water plant. Fixed  Continued the meter pit build.  potholes on 20th and 21st streets. 15-17 Plants. RJ helped with Summer Fest.  18 Plants. Picked up trash and cleaned the restrooms. Marked utility locates. Filled the chlorine feed at the well. Worked on the mowers. Marked the new traffic barrels. Ran  the brush hog on Porter Way. Worked on 2023 budget.  19 Plants. MowedJRP. Marked locate requests. Worked on sprinklers. Lubed the motor 20 Plants. Pulled the chlorin samples. Mowed at. JRP. Conducted preventive maintenance on the dump truck. Checked a water line at the Out Post Motel. Moved the remote post Plants. Picked up trash and disinfected the bathrooms. Hung out shut off notices. Cleaned the mowers. Trimmed weeds at. JRP. Trimmed trees in the park. Read meters.  graders.  the 108N16" A as requested by owner.  21  1    Put out mole bait. Marked a locate request for 45 Railroad. Set up road closed signs on  16th street. Bladed west Central Ave.  22-24 Plants. Randy. Got called out for water dock on Sunday.  25 Plants. Picked up trash and cleaned the restrooms. Attended a weed meeting. Started gravel improvements on 16th street. Used 9000 gallons of water. Worked on 2023  budget.  26 Plants. Mowed at. JRP. Continued the gravel improvements on 16th street. Used 2000 27 Plants. Removed moles at. JRP. Picked up the fencing for the property at 600 Hillside and 606.5 Hillside. Pulled the chlorine samples. Repaired the toilet at the water plant.  gallons of water. Worked on1 the 2023 budget.  Finished the2023 budget list.  28 Plants. Picked up trash and disinfected the bathrooms. Continued removing moles at JRP. Used 8000 gallons ofwater. Serviced the chlorine feed at the well. Calibrated the  pH meter at the water tank. Opened the green waste dump.  29-31 Plants. Anthony  2    7/26/2022 5:55:19PM  TOWN OF DOLORES Billing Period Report For1 712022-77312022 Include' Write Off Accounts: True Amount" 33,057.76 -125.89 -3,498.57 -34,917.30 -45.51 -38,587.27 17,250.10 62.32 17,312.42 299.54 24,549.64 44.35 63.57 24,957.10 $36,740.01 Amount $2,534.24 $10,469.76 $674.31 $249.28 $2,364.34 $958.17 $92.52 $2,607.54 $44.35 $1,767.67 $841.71 $1,458.25 $222.24 $487.39 $13,159.18 $246.72 $2,022.91 $225.22 $0.00 $0.00 $1,373.94 $0.00  Page 67 of68  Account Location Transaction Type Active Hold Hold End Billing Period" Totals Balance Forward Payments & Credits Balance Transfer Payment Cash Payment Check WATERA ADJUSTMENT Payments & Credits SEWER SEWER SEWERI Balance Transfer SEWER WATER LATE CHARGE WATER WATER ADJUSTMENT WATERI Balance Transfer WATER Ending Balance Rate Code Totals Rate Code SEWER CS1 COMMI INTOWN $01 RESIDENTI INT TOWN S02 RESIDENT OUT OF TOWN S031 RESIDENT IN1 TOWN 1K S1K COMMSEWERIKMETER S90 SENIORLID DISCOUNT WATER C05 COMM.TAPI INT TOWN CW1 COMM INT TOWN CW2 COMM 1K OUT TOWN CW3 CM1KI INT TOWN MF1 100 GAL MULTIF FAMILY INTOWN MF2 1KN MULTIF FAMILY INTOWN MF3 1K OUT OF TOWNN MULTIFAMILY MF41 100 GAL MULTIFAMILY OUT OF TOV RO1 RESIDENT INT TOWN R02 RES. TOWNT TAP RO3 RESIDENT OUT TOWN RK1 RESIDENT 1KN METER TW1 TOWNY WATER TW2 TOWN WATER1K W90 SENIORLIDISCOUNT WDI WATERI DOCK1 1K  Transaction! Date 566 2 37 386 4 429 489 2 491 53 555 1 2 611 2,097  EID Last Reading New Reading Usage  Usage 627,100 2,802,900 97,800 293,000 1,007,000 383,500 4,400 501,900 0 632,000 185,700 643,000 46,000 31,100 2,905,600 0 259,600 69,500 63,600 273,000 383,400 240,000  Count 61 336 13 8 30 41 3 63 1 24 20 11 2 10 320 8 35 10 2  Usage Totals    7/26/2022 5:55:19PM  TOWN OF DOLORES Billing Period Report For17 7/1/2022- -7/31/2022 Include Write Off Accounts: True Amount" 12,500 1,680,200 300 140,000 100 3,378,200 5,211,300 12,500 1,771,600 300 140,000 576,700 3,737,700 6,238,800 11,450,100  Page 68 of68  Account Location Transaction Type Active Hold Hold End SEWER Commercial MultiFamily Other PublicGovt Residential WATER Commercial MultiFamily Other PublicGovt Residential Total Usage Negative Usage Other Receipts Description BUILDINGI PERMIT BUSINESSI LICENSE DOGI LICENSE LIQUORI LICENSE MARIJUANA! LICENSE PARKS ANDF REC REVENUE PROP TAX-OWNERSHIP PROPERTYTAX R&B TAX WATERI DOCK Payment Type Cash Check  Transaction Date  EID Last Reading New Reading Usage  No customers were billed for negative usage in this period.  Amount $710.00 $25.00 $20.00 $600.00 $3,330.00 $150.00 $1,513.23 $12,356.32 $1,703.13 $3,123.00 $23,530.68 Amount $-3,313.00 $-20,217.68 $-23,530.68  Indicates non-finalized charge    2023 Proposed Budget Community intervention Program  CIP Community! Intervention Program  COMMUNITYI INTERVENTION PROGRAM ACCOUNT# 001.1710.1220 OPERATING EXPENSES $ 001.1710.1226 FUEL 001.1710.1310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 324,223.00 $ 001.1710.1380 REPAIR ANDI MAINTENANCE $ 001.1710.1387 VEHICLE EXPENSES Amount compared to! last year  2022 BUDGET 78,862.00 $ $ 5,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ 408,285.00 $  2022 3MONTHS Est 62,776.00 $ 144.00 $ 48,749.00 $ $ $ 111,669.00 $ $  2023 BUDGET PURPOSED 15,000.00 6,000.00 354,840.80 4,000.00 8,000.00 387,840.80 (20,444.20)  ACCOUNT TITLE  New Line Item Added Includes Vehicle $33,394 and Equipment  CIP Income 2022 and 2023 2022 $ 228,641.00 $ 135,000.00 $ 28,580.00 $ 16,065.00 $ 408,286.00  Source Montezuma County 56% City of Cortez 33.1% Town of Mancos 7% Town of Dolores 3.9% Total Montezuma County 56% City of Cortez 33.1% Town of Mancos 7% Town of Dolores 3.9% Total Behavioral Healith Safety Net Grant July 1, 20221 to. June 30, 2023  2022-2023 $  2,023.00  $ 166,104.95 $ 98,179.85 $ 20,763.17 $ 11,568.03  296,616.00 Roll over from 2022  $  386,014.00 386,014.00 $  Total  $  408,286.00 $  296,616.00    CIP  Community Intervention Program  Community Intervention Program  Budget Proposal 2023 Submitted by Jim Spratlen  08/4/22  After reviewing the current Community Intervention Program's budget for 2022, Iwas able to project costs for 2023 budget proposal. The following is an explanation of the line items submitted for 2023 Community Intervention In the 2022 approved budget there was funding for startup equipment to get the program set for items for the next 3-5 years. That equipment consisted of, but not limited to, vehicle and interior design and maintenance, radios and programing, cell phones, IPad and applications, uniforms, etc. Based on these addition startup fees, this 2023 proposal will  Program budget.  be reduced by $20,444 in this budget proposal. Salary, and Fringe Benefits Line Items:  Based on the wages and benefits that we had for 2022, and adding a 5% cost of living increase, Iv would request this line item to be raised; From 2ea EMT positions salary based on $20.00 per hour was $83,200. 5% increase will be a total of $87,568. Benefits would also be raised from $30,784 to $32,400, bringing the total for EMTS to $119,968. From 2ea Behavioral Specialists positions salary based on $27.50 per hour was at $114,400. 5% increase will be a total of $117,938. Benefits would  1    also be raised from $32,032 to $33,023, A bringing the total for Behavioral  Specialists to $150,961. Total is $270,929  Administration costs at 21% FTE for EMTS and Behavioral Specialists and 5% for the County M&A for the grant management the total would be /would request the grand total for this line item be set at $354,840.  $83,911.  Operating Expenses Line Item: Compared to the startup cost in this line item in 2022 for vehicle and equipment, this will be reduced significantly for 2023 budget. This will be for various pieces of medical equipment, office supplies, uniforms, office equipment, and dispatch fees, etc. would  request this line item be reduced to $15,000.  The Fuel Line Item: As fuel costs went higher than expected for 2022, this is an estimate on what we predict the cost of fuel will be for 2023. Based on responses and follow-ups, trainings, meetings and traveling, Ihave added an additional $800 to the existing budget of $5,200. would request Repair and Maintenance Line Item: The equipment that is used in the CIP vital to the operation. Repair and maintenance for these items will continue and the costs will continue to rise. /have added an additional line item into this budget to be able to track costs more accurately /would request that the Repair and Maintenance line item be set at $4000. Vehicle Expenses Line Item: Due to having an older vehicle with a lot of miles, Vehicle maintenance in 2022 was high. Based on ongoing rise in cost to service the vehicle, / would request the Vehicle Expenses Line item be added to this budget to allow for better tracking of finances and the Summary: Overall decrease in the 2023 budget is $20,444.  the Fuel Line item to be raised to $6000.  amount be set at $8,000.  lam also asking for approval to roll over the left over funds in the CIP 2022 budget into 2023. The predicted amount would be estimated at $296,216.  2    We received an Expansion ofBehavioral Health Safety Net Grant Program (Note: We are anticipating a grant from the Labor and Health and Human Services house bill submitted by Sen Hickenlooper to begin in funding us Based on the rollover and grant we received, we will be able to fund the CIP for the year 2023 and will not be requesting any assistance from local  (EBHSNGP) July 1 2022 to June 30 2024 for$ 386,104.  estimated in May 2023.)  governments. Respectfully, Jim Spratlen, CIP Program Director Emergency Manager  3    STATE OF COLORADO  COLORADO FINANCIALSERVICES Andrea) Eurich, Controller PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1575 Sherman St,6 6" Floor Denver, Colorado 80203 www.colorado.goy July 28, 2022  Jared Polis Govemor Michelle Bames Executivel Director  RE: RFA #: RFP IHJA 2022000339 Expansion of Behavioral Health Safety Net Grant Program  Hello,  This letter is to inform you that Colorado Department of] Human Services (CDHS) - Office of Behavioral Health (OBH), has completed the evaluation of applications received ini response to the above solicitation. CDHS intends to award the following Applicants the work identified int the solicitation: 2. Mental Health Center ofl Boulder County Inc. (dba Mental Health Partners) 3.1 Mental Health Colorado, SAFER and Hombuckle Foundation 4. San Luis Valley Behavioral Health Group (SLVBHG) 5. Griffith Centers for Children CHINS UP 6. Summit County Government 7. Temnyson Center for Children 8.1 Boulder County Community Services Department 9. The Delores Project 10. Street's Hope 11. Aurora Comprehensive Community Mental Health Center 12. Mile High Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse 13. Envision You 14. All American Families dbal Families Plus 15. Colorado Coalition for the Homeless (CCH) 16. Montezuma County Department of Social Services  1. Savio House  Provided no protest regarding this solicitation and award is received prior to 5:00pm (MT) Mountain on August 04. 2022, iti is the intent oft the CDHS to enter into a contractual. agreement with the identified Applicants in compliance with the terms and conditions stated in the solicitation, published addenda, and the response proposal. Final awards will be contingent upon successful contract discussions. Thank you: again: fors your proposal and interest int thisi important project. Ifyouwould like tol leave feedback about any part of the solicitation process, please provide the feedback at the following link:    tps/docs.gpogle.om/omsdeItApOLseiggrEXSAGZPV/TIRKkpuersAAN5023vLcbylvcsma  w/viewform. Sincerely,  Digitallys signedb by Raven -0600  Raven Lopez Lopez Date:2 2022.07.281 10:05:17 Raven Lopez Purchasing Agent    876  TOWN OF DOLORES  JULY 2022    Detective Division Dolores Monthly July 2022  MONTHLY  YEAR1 TODATE  NEW CASES. ASSIGNED CASES PENDING  0 0  3 3 0 $0.00 $0.00  CASES CLEARED/INACTIVE/CLOSED  VALUE OFSTOLEN/DAMAGED PROPERTY VALUE OF RECOVERED PROPERTY  $0.00 $0.00  HOURS WORKED OTHER-HOURS WORKED  0 0  12  MONTEZUMA COUNTY DETECTIVE DIVISION HAD THE: FOLLOWING:  CASE#  OFFENSE-VIOLATION  STATUS    Summons Written For the  Town of Dolores  JULY 2022    MONTEZUMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 730 EAST DRISCOLL STREET CORTEZ, CO 81321 STEVE NOWLIN- SHERIFF 970-565-8452 970-564-3731  OFFICE  Dolores Summons Total Records: 42  CITATION CHARGES NUMBER C32513 Date Reported 7/3/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER C31962 Date Reported 7/27/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/15/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/5/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/2/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/19/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/26/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/19/2022 08/01/2022 12:04  Count 1  Issuing Officer AYBAR, HAKAN  Count  Issuing Officer NOWLIN, STEVE  Count 1  C32281 CRIMINAL VIOL ASSAULT IN THE THIRD DEGREE  Issuing Officer SCHMALZ, PETER  Count  C31473 CRIMINAL VIOL  ASSAULT. IN THE THIRD DEGREE, CRIMINAL VIOL- DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1  Issuing Officer GALLEGOS, MATTHEW  Count 1  C32225 CRIMINAL VIOL ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE  Issuing Officer PARKER, TOMAS  Count 1  C32627 CRIMINAL VIOL CRIME OF VIOLATION OF Al PROTECTION ORDER (M1)  Issuing Officer HINTON, WRANGLER  Count 1  C32228 CRIMINAL VIOL CRIME OF VIOLATION OF A PROTECTION ORDER (M1)  Issuing Officer PARKER, TOMAS  Count 1  C32480 CRIMINAL VIOL - CRIME OF VIOLATION OF AF PROTECTION ORDER (M2)  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS    CITATION CHARGES NUMBER  Count 1  C32224 CRIMINAL VIOL - DISORDERLY CONDUCT  Date Reported 7/1/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/14/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/13/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/19/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/23/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/20/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/8/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/30/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/30/2022 08/01/2022 12:04  Issuing Officer PARKER, TOMAS  Count 1  C32479 CRIMINAL VIOL DOG NOT UNDER CONTROL  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS  Count  C32478 CRIMINAL VIOL: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, CRIMINAL VIOL - HARASSMENT, CRIMINAL VIOL- 1  CHILD ABUSE (M3), CRIMINAL VIOL RESISTING ARREST  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS  Count  C31474 CRIMINAL VIOL - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, CRIMINAL VIOL - MENACING (PLACED ONTHER 1  PERSON IN FEAR)  Issuing Officer GALLEGOS, MATTHEW  Count 1  C32586 CRIMINAL VIOL DROVE VEHICLE DUI ALCOHOU/DRUGS/OR BOTH  Issuing Officer WEST, MARC  Count 1  C31546 CRIMINAL VIOL HARASSMENT INSULT, TAUNT, CHALLENGE  Issuing Offiçer MANN, HEATHER  Count 1  C32625 CRIMINAL VIOL HARASSMENT STRIKE, SHOVE, KICK (M1)  Issuing Officer HINTON, WRANGLER  Count 1  C30423 CRIMINAL VIOL  HARASSMENT STRIKE, SHOVE, KICK (M1)  Issuing Officer AYBAR, HAKAN  Count  C32301 CRIMINAL VIOL POSSESSION OF WEAPON WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE (ETOH/DRUG) 1  Issuing Officer HILL, BRYAN    CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/8/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/6/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/27/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/21/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/14/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/16/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/17/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/17/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/22/2022  Count 1  C32300 CRIMINAL VIOL RESISTING ARREST  Issuing Officer HILL, BRYAN  Count 1  C31545 CRIMINAL VIOL VIOLATION OF BAIL BOND CONDITIONS (M3), CRIMINAL VIOL - 3RD  DEGREE CRIMINAL TRESPASS  Issuing Officer HILL, TAYLER  Count 1  C31963 NON-CRIM ORDINANCE VIOL BEAR-PROOF RECEPTACLE  Issuing Officer NOWLIN, STEVE  Count 1  C31547 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - CARELESS DRIVING  Issuing Officer GOTHARD, PATRICK  Count 1  C32610 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - OBEDIENCE TO OFFICIAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES  Issuing Officer GILBERTO, JACOB  Count 1  C32702 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE OBEDIENCE TO OFFICIAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES  Issuing Officer GREEN, KAYLEE  Count 1  C32612 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - OBEDIENCE TO OFFICIAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES  Issuing Officer GILBERTO, JACOB  Count 1  C32613 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE OBEDIENCE TO OFFICIAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES  Issuing Officer GILBERTO, JACOB  Count 1  C32614 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - OBEDIENCE TO OFFICIAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES  Issuing Officer GILBERTO,: JACOB  08/01/2022 12:04    CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/3/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/14/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/17/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/18/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/23/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/26/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER  Count 1  C32316 TRAFFIC MIOL-ORDINANCE SPEEDING-  Issuing Officer LANYON, JACOB  Count 1  C32585 TRAFFIC MIOL-ORDINANCE SPEEDING-  Issuing Officer WEST, MARC  Count 1  C32317 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE SPEEDING-  Issuing Officer LANYON, JACOB  Count 1  C32626 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE SPEEDING LIMITS  Issuing Officer HINTON, WRANGLER  Count 1  C32703 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - SPEEDING LIMITS  Issuing Officer GREEN, KAYLEE  Count 1  C32548 TRAFFIC VIOL-ORDINANCE - SPEEDING LIMITS  Issuing Officer AYBAR, HAKAN  Count 1  C31471 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE MOTOR/OFF-HIGHWAT, VEHICLE WHEN LICENSE  DENIED, TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE VEHICLE W/ /0 VALID CO LICENSE-RESIDENT >30 DAYS, TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE FAILED TO OBSERVE/DISREGARDED TRAFFIC  CONTROL DEVICES  Date Reported 7/3/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER  Issuing Officer GALLEGOS, MATTHEW  Count 1  C31472 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE WOTONOFF-MIGHWAN VEHICLE WHEN LICENSE  DENIED, TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE VEHICLE w/O VALID LICENSE, CRIMINAL VIOL-  DROVE VEHICLE DUI- ALCOHOL/DRUGS/OR BOTH  Date Reported. 7/3/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER  Issuing Officer GALLEGOS, MATTHEW  Count 1  C32266 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE WOTONOFF-HIGHWAD VEHICLE WHEN LICENSE  REVOKED  08/01/2022 12:04    Date Reported 7/6/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/9/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/11/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER  Issuing Officer SCHMALZ, PETER  Count 1  C32476 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE MOTONOFF-HIGHWAD VEHICLE WHEN LICENSE  UNDER RESTRAINT  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS  Count 1  C32404 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE DROVE MOTOR/OFF-HIGHWAD VEHICLE WHEN LICENSE  UNDER RESTRAINT, TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE FAILED TO DISPLAY VALID REGISTRATION  Issuing Officer KENNEDY, ALEXANDER  Count  C32547 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE - DROVE VEHICLE UNDER RESTRAINT ALCOHOL/DRUG OFFENSE, 1  TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE  DROVE VEHICLE W/O VALID LICENSE, TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE-  SPEEDING > 5-9 MPH OVER PRIMA FACIE LIMIT  Date Reported 7/1/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/31/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/17/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/8/2022 CITATION CHARGES NUMBER Date Reported 7/11/2022  Issuing Officer AYBAR, HAKAN  Count  C32282 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE FAILED TO DRIVE IN A SINGLE LANE/WEAVING, CRIMINAL VIOL- 1  DROVE VEHICLE DUI ALCOHOL/DRUGS/OR BOTH  Issuing Officer SCHMALZ, PETER  Count  C32279 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE FAILED TO OBSERVE/DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1  CRIMINAL VIOL DROVE VEHICLE W/BLOOD ALCOHOL CONTENT 0.08 PER SE  Issuing Officer SCHMALZ, PETER  Count 1  C32475 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE - SPEEDING > 10-19 MPH OVER PRIMA FACIE LIMIT  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS  Count 1  C32477 TRAFFIC VIOL-STATUTE SPEEDING > 10-19 MPH OVER PRIMA FACIE LIMIT  Issuing Officer FROST, THOMAS  08/01/2022 12:04    JULY 2022  Municipal Code/Traffic Citations and Reports  Hours worked for Detectives and patrol  Detective Hours:  0  Patrol Hours:  37.5    e    58300 :  : 0o  00 0  22 E -  08888  10  DE  3    o D o DD o -  i 8  000 00  88088  3888  8080  2     80 888  0 80 00 0  00 80  888888 80    -  0 60 a 0 088 00  0 00 3 3 0 00 00 00 00 888    8888888 00 d0 00 00 00 00 d0 00 d0 888 08 o 888 80 la 0 08 08 a 8 00 00 3    S a  88 88  8888 0 a o a o 0 3  0 o o - 00    o 00 a 0 la  a 0  8 8  8    38888888 8    County ofl Montezuma Date Journal DOLORES CONTRACT PERMANENT SALARIES  Detail Ledger expense ledger Period: 06/22-06/22 Account Number  Page: 25 Jui28-2022-08:13AM  Debit Amount 4,978.48 5,660.29 10,638.77  Credit Amount  Payee or Description  Balance 43,038.12 .00 53,676.89  05/31/2022 (05/22) Baiance 001.1650.1120 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period" Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Baiance 001,1650.1152 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22)E Balance 001.1650,1160 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1220  06/04/2022 PC PAYROLL TRANS FOR 6/4/2022 PAYF PERIOD 06/18/2022 PC PAYROLL TRANS FOR 6/18/2022 PAY PERIO  YTD Encumbrance OVERTIME YTOE Encumbrance FRINGE BENEFITS  .00 YTDA Actual 53,676,89 Total 53,676.89 YTD Budget 108,000.00 Unexpended 54,323.11  226.18 226.18 13,397.75 .00 16,967.83  .00  .00  .00 YTD/ Actual 226.18 Total 226.18 YTDE Budget 4,000.00 Unexpended 3,773.82  06/04/2022 PB PAYROLL TRANS FOR 6/4/2022 PAY PERIOD 06/18/2022 PB PAYROLL TRANS FOR 6/18/2022 PAY PERIO  596.44 2,973.64 3,570.08  YTD Encumbrance OPERATING EXPENSES 05/20/2022 AP AT&T 06/20/2022 AP AT&T 06/16/2022 AP CORTEZ COPY& PRINT 04/20/2022 AP LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES  .00 YTD Actual 16,967.83 Total 16,967.83 YTDI Budget 39,000.00 Unexpended 22.032.17  3,154.98  97.78 97.77 473.75 398.70 1,068.00  06/30/2022 (06/22) Period" Totals ard Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1221 06/30/2022 (06/22) Periodl Totalsa and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1310 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period" Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001,1650.1387 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1425 06/30/2022 (08/22) Period" Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1500 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance 05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1610 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance  .00  4,222.98 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00. 00  YTDE Encumbrance MPI MAINTENANCE YTD Encumbrance PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YTDI Encumbrance VEHICLE EXPENSES YTDI Encumbrance FLEETCOSTS YTD Encumbrance TRAINING YTD Encumbrance DISPATCHFEES YTD Encumbrance  .00 YTD Actual 4,222.98 Total 4,222.98 YTD Budget 8,000,00 Unexpended 3,777.02  00  .00  .00 YTDActual  .00 Total  .00 YTD Budget 1,500.00 Unexpended 1,500.00  .00  .00  .00 YTD Actual  .00 Total  .00 YTDBudget 3,000.00 Unexpended 3,000.00  .00  .00  .00 YTDA Actual  .00 Total  .00 YTD Budget 6,500.00 Unexpended 6,500.00  .00 .00 00 .00 .00 00 .00  .00 YTD Actual  .00 Total  .00 YTDE Budget  .00 Unexpended  .00 YTD/ Actual  .00 Total  .00 YTD Budget  .00 Unexpended  00  .00 YTDA Actual  .00 Total  .00 YTDE Budget 30.000.00 Unexpended 30,000.00    County of Montezuma Date Journal CONTRACT REFUND YTD Encumbrance  Detail Ledger- expense leriger Period: 06'22-06:22 Account Number  Page 26 Jul28 2022 GB:13AM  Debit Amount  Credit Amount  Payee or Description  Balance 00 00  05/31/2022 (05/22) Balance 001.1650.1 1675 06/30/2022 (06/22) Period Totals and Balance  .00 .00 .00  .00 YTDActual  .00 Total  .00 YTD Budget  .00 Unexpended  Total DOLORES CONTRACT:  15,276.85  .00 59,317.03    Dolores, Colorado) ESt IS0O  Dolores Colorado  To: From: Dt: RE:  MAYOR AND TRUSTEES Ken Charles, Dolores Town Manager Meeting Information Update  August 8, 2022  Monday/s Town Board Meeting On the agenda are:  On the agenda for our regular meeting Monday August 8, 2022:  1. First Reading Ordinance 559 Adding a fifth member to the Park Advisory Committee. 4. Staff presentation on the transfer of property to the Dolores Fire Protection District. Logan Simpson is presenting its preliminary plan for JRP on August 11 at 6:00 pm. We will post the results oft thel latest survey and map oft the plan on our website. We will have the same presentation for our. August 22 town board meeting. This will bei followed by a public workshop with the community to review the results oft the questionnaire, review the Opportunities and Challenges exhibit and the two alternatives. Logan Simpson will facilitate Streets- the town crew completed work on 16th street between Railroad and Hillside. Even with the added width the parking remains a problem for circulation. Staff will bring options for limiting parking to either one side or none. We will have a similar approach to 15th. Between Escalante Days is August 13. This includes a softball tournament. Law enforcement and the Iattended a workshop August 2 at. Fort] Lewis College that outlined the various funding opportunities for workforce housingi in the state. The workshop was hosted by the Colorado Department ofLocal Affairs-Division of] Housing and Housing Colorado, a not-for-profit organization. The state has budgeted hundreds of millions for workforce housing that can be The First meeting of the town's] Housing Task is set for Tuesday August 9. The members oft the task force include Trustee Wheeler and Mayor Reeves, P&Z members Watters and Heeney,  2. Resolution 498 Lifting the Town of] Dolores Fire Ban. 3. Consideration of adding ai new Housing Task Force member.  General Updates  two breakout groups toi identify thel best areas for the alternatives.  'Railroad and Hillside.  town crew are preparing for the event.  used to offset costs of housing development.  420 Central Ave, POI Box 6301 Dolores, CO. 81323 Ph. 970-882-7720: fax. 970-882-7466 https:!! ommaliolbvescolondagos    Dolores, Colorado) fa 100  DSB Larry Engel, School superintendent Blincoe, Citizens Jen Stark and Lainey Beyhan. Wel have been seeking two proposals from manufactures of Bear Proof Containers. The town was recently awarded $27,000 from CPW to complete the transition to all bear proof garbage Flanders Restroom-staff will be meeting with our architect Connie Giles next week to discuss and make decisions on the design of the restroom. Staff will create al link on thei town's website like what we have for the JRP master plan that will list information. There continues tol be questions and concerns about the location of the restroom adjacent to Highway 145 versus along Sth street or in the northwest corner of the park. The location along Highway 145is primarily dictated by the proximity of the sewer and water utilities that are all located on the south side of town hall. Additionally, any other location would require a lift station, which is impractical due toi freezing, elevation differences, maintenance, and the cost. Staff estimates that a lift station would add an additional $50,000 to the project. Staffis working with the  containers. Weintend to award a contract this month.  historical society Upcoming Events  August 13 Escalante Days and Softball Tournament August 22 Town Board Workshop and Regular meeting  420 Central Ave, POI Box 6301 Dolores, CO. 81323 Ph. 970-882-7720 fax. 970-882-7466 https:!! lommoldolbuesculomaogor    First Amendment Issues Around Special Event Permits  Municpal government has broad discretion to express its views subject to restrictions such ast the Estblishment Clause. Rosenberger V. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 Granting an event permit to a private entity is NOT considered speach or endrosement of speach by the  (1995)  Speach by the  government versus government  Issuing a permit to hold an event on government property isr regulation of speach by the government. Lehman V. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 (1974) The next question is where the speach occrus - is the speach in a Traditional Public Forum?  Regulation of Speach by the government    *Atraditional publici forumi includes streets and publicparks. Hague V. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939) and Perry Ed. Assn. V. Perry! Local Educators' Assn., 460 U.S.37,45(1983)  Isthe permit to use Government! has very! limiteda abilityt to yegedinaTaltion.  PublicForum  apark a Traditional Forum?  -Local governments MAY impose limtied licensing requirements, including fees, andr regulate the time, place and manner ofe events and Governmentsi may NOT make arbitrarydecisions. on whoi is ablet to speak andi may NOTI regulatei the content oft the speach in the Traditional Public  speach in the Traditional Public Forum.  Restrictions in Forums  Forum.  Traditinal Public Forsyth County, Ga. V. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123, (1992).    No. The Town issued a special event permit to a private entity that chose to allow politcal speach. This is not an endorsement  Does the Town Violate the Establishment Clause by when a vendor allows politcialspeach?  the Town of the views permit holder or its vendors.  expressed by the  No. The town may NOT adopt regulations that restrict the type or content of speach permitted by vendors at a special event permitted by the Town in a Traditional  May the Town regulate speach by vendors at special events?  Public Forum such as a  parade.    Recall that parks and streets are traditional public  forums forj free speech  Parades are considered a traditional public forum Municipalities and other government entities may not regulate the content ofspeech in a traditional  public forum  Municipalities may impose reasonable regulations on the time place and manner ofthe: speech such as  requiring permits  Municipalities may NOT prohibit political messages  in parades  Butn non government parade organizers MAY regulate speech. For example in Hurley V. rish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group ofBoston (1995). Ina unanimous opinion delivered by, Justice David H. Souter; the Court held that the parade organizers- various veterans' groups-had a free speech right to exclude an Irish gaygroupfrom, participating in aSt.  Patrick's Day, parade in Boston.  While some municipalities have banned parades altogether, Courts, including a recent federal district court case outofPhlladelphia have not approved of such policies where similar typesofevents are permitted. See Philadelphia Vietnam Veterans Memorial Society City ofPhiladelphia.    Hurley V. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995). In al unanimous opinion delivered by Justice David H. Souter, the Court held that the parade organizers--various veterans' groups- had a free speech right to exclude an Irish gay group from participating in a St. Patrick's Day parade in The gay group argued that their exclusion violated both the state and federal constitutions and the state public accommodations law, which prohibited "any distinction, discrimination or restriction on account of. .sexual orientation.. relative to the admission of any person to, or treatment in any place of public accommodation, resort or amusement. ? But the Court said that being forced to include groups, such as a gay and lesbian group, would alter "the parade's expressive content and thereby violated the fundamental First Amendment rule that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content ofhis own message and,  Boston.  conversely, to decide what not to say."  The Public Forum.  In 1895, while on the highest court of Mas-sachusetts, future Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes rejected a contention that public property was by right open recognized,1444 and on review the United States Supreme Court endorsed Holmes' view.1445 Years later, beginning with Hague V. CIO,1446 the Court reconsidered the issue. Justice Roberts wrote in Hague: "Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. Such use of the streets and public places has from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of citizens." Although this opinion was not itself joined by a majority of the. Justices, the Court subsequently endorsed the view in several opinions.1447 The Roberts view was called into question in the 1960s, however, when the Court seemed to leave the issue open,1448 and when a majority endorsed an opinion by Justice Black asserting his own narrower view of speech rights in public places.1449 Later decisions restated and quoted the Roberts language from Hague, and that is now the position of the Court.1450 Public streets and parks,1451 including those adjacent to courthouses1452 and foreign embassies,1453 as well as public libraries1454 and the grounds of legislative bodies,1455 are open to public demonstrations, although the uses to which  to the public as a place where the right of speech could be    public areas are dedicated may shape the range of permissible expression and conduct that may occur there.1456 Moreover, not all public properties are public forums. "[T]he First Amendment does not guarantee access to government.'1457 "The crucial question is whether the manner of expression is basically compatible with the normal activity of a particular place at a particular time."1458 Thus, by the nature of the use to which the property is put or by tradition, some sites are simply not as open for expression as 1459 But if government does open non-traditional forums for expressive activities, it may not discriminate on the basis of content or viewpoint in according access.1460 The Court, however, remains divided with respect to Speech in public forums is subject to time, place, and manner regulations that take into account such matters as control of traffic in the streets, the scheduling of two meetings or demonstrations at the same time and place, the preventing of blockages of building entrances, and the like.1462 Such regulations are closely scrutinized in order to protect free expression, and, to be valid, must be justified without reference to the content or subject matter of speech,1463 must serve a significant governmental interest,1464 and must leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.1465 The Court has written that a time, place, or manner regulation "must be narrowly tailored to serve the government's legitimate, content-neutral interests but that it need not be the least restrictive or least intrusive means of doing SO. Rather, the requirement of narrow tailoring is satisfied : [s]o long as the means chosen are not substantially broader than necessary to achieve the government's interest.... "1466 A content- neutral time, place, and manner regulation of the use of a public forum must also "contain adequate standards to guide the official's decision and render it subject to effective judicial review. "1467 Unlike a content-based licensing scheme, however, it need not "adhere to the procedural requirements set forth in Freedman. "1468 These requirements include that the "burden of proving that the film [or other speech] is unprotected expression must rest on the censor," and that the censor must, "within a specified brief period, either issue a license or go to court to restrain showing the film. Any restraint imposed in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits must similarly be limited to preservation of the status quo for the shortest fixed period compatible with sound judicial resolution.'1469 A corollary to the rule forbidding regulation based on content is the principle-a merging of free expression and equal protection standards--that government may not discriminate between different kinds of messages in affording access.1470 In order to ensure against covert forms of  property simply because it is owned or controlled by the  streets and parks are.  the reach of the public forum doctrine.1461    discrimination against expression and between different kinds of content, the Court has insisted that licensing systems be constructed as free as possible of the opportunity for arbitrary administration.1471 The Court has aiso applied its general strictures against prior restraints in the contexts of permit It appears that government may not deny access to the public forum for demonstrators on the ground that the past meetings of these demonstrators resulted in violence,1473 and may not vary a demonstration licensing fee based on an estimate of the amount of hostility likely to be engendered,1474 but the Court's position with regard to the "heckler's veto," the governmental termination of a speech or demonstration because of The Court has defined three categories of public property for public forum analysis. First, there is the traditional public forum- places such as streets and parks that have traditionally been used for public assembly and debate, where the government may not prohibit all communicative activity and must justify content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions as narrowly tailored to serve a legitimate interest.1476 Second, there is the designated public forum, where the government opens property for communicative activity and thereby creates a public forum. Such a forum may be limited- hence the expression "limited public forum"-for "use by certain groups, e.g., Widmar V. Vincent (student groups), or for discussion of certain subjects, e.g., City of Madison Joint School District V. Wisconsin PERC (school board business),'1477 but, within the framework of such legitimate limitations, "a content-based prohibition must be narrowly drawn to effectuate a compelling state interest. 1478 Third, with respect to "[p]ublic property which is not by tradition or designation a forum for public communication," the government "may reserve the forum for its intended purposes, communicative or otherwise, as long as the regulation on [sic] speech is reasonable and not an effort to suppress expression merely because public officials oppose the speaker's view."1479 The distinction between the first and second categories, on the one hand, and third category, on the other, can therefore determine the outcome of a case, because speakers may be excluded from the first and second categories only for a "compelling" governmental interest, whereas exclusion from the third The Court held that a school system did not create a limited public forum by opening an interschool mail system to use by selected civic groups "that engage in activities of interest and educational relevance to students, ' and that, in any event, if a limited public forum had thereby been created a teachers union rivaling the exclusive bargaining representative could still be excluded. as not being "of a similar character" to the civic groups.1480 Less  systems and judicial restraint of expression.1472  hostile crowd reaction, remains unclear.1475  category need only be "reasonable."    problematic was the Court's conclusion that utility poles and other municipal property did not constitute a public forum for the posting of signs.1481 More problematic was the Court's conclusion that the Combined Federal Campaign, the Federal Government's forum for coordinated charitable solicitation of federal employees, is not a limited public forum. Exclusion of various advocacy groups from participation in the Campaign was upheld as furthering "reasonable" governmenta interests in offering a forum to "traditional health and welfare charities, avoiding the appearance of governmental favoritism of particular groups or viewpoints, and avoiding disruption of the federal workplace by controversy.1482 The Court pinpointed the government's intention as the key to whether a public forum has been created: "The government does not create a public forum by inaction or by permitting limited discourse, but only by intentionally opening a non- traditional forum for public discourse. "1483 Under this categorical approach, the government has wide discretion in maintaining the nonpublic character of its forums, and may regulate in ways that would be impermissible were it Application of these principles continues to raise often difficult questions. In United States V. Kokinda, a majority of Justices, who ultimately upheld a ban on soliciting contributions on postal premises under the reasonableness" review governing nonpublic fora, could not agree on the public forum status of a sidewalk located entirely on postal service property.1485 Two years later, in International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. V. Lee, the Court similarly divided as to whether non- secured areas of airport terminals, including shops and restaurants, constitute public fora.1486 A five-Justice majority held that airport terminals are not public fora and upheld regulations banning the repetitive solicitation A decade later, the Court considered the public forum status of the Internet. In United States V. American Library Association, Inc., a four-Justice plurality held that "Internet access in public libraries is neither a traditional nor a designated' public forum."1488 The plurality therefore did not apply strict scrutiny in upholding the Children's Internet Protection Act, which provides that a public school or "library may not receive federal assistance to provide Internet access unless it installs software to block images that constitute obscenity or child pornography, and to prevent minors from obtaining access to material that is harmful to them."1489 More recently, in Packingham V. North Carolina, the Court appeared to equate the Internet to traditional public fora like a street or public park. Specifically, Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, observed that, "[w]hile in the past there may have been difficulty in identifying the most important places (in a spatial sense) for the exchange of views, today the answer is  to designate a limited public forum.1484  of money within the terminals.1487    clear. It is cyberspace--the 'vast democratic forums of the Internet' in general, and social media in particular. "1490 Consequently, the Court struck down a North Carolina law making it a felony for registered sex offenders to use commercial social networking websites that allow minor children to be members, such as Facebook. Applying strict scrutiny, the Court held that the North Carolina law impermissibly restricted lawful speech as it was not narrowly tailored to serve the government's interest in protecting minors from registered sex offenders because it "foreclose[d] access to social media altogether,' 1 thereby "prevent- [ing] the user from engaging in the legitimate Nevertheless, although Internet access in public libraries is not a public forum, and particular Web sites, like particular newspapers, would not constitute public forums, the Internet as a whole might be viewed as a public forum, despite its lack of a historic tradition. The Supreme Court has not explicitly held that the Internet as a whole is a public forum, but, in Reno V.A ACLU, which struck down a prohibition in the Communications Decency Act of 1996 on "indecent" material on the Internet, the Court noted that the Internet "constitutes a vast platform from which to address and hear from a worldwide audience of millions of readers, viewers, researchers, and buyers. Any person or organization with a computer connected to the Internet can  exercise of First Amendment rights."1491  'publish' information.'1492 Footnotes 1444  Commonwealth V. Davis, 162 Mass. 510, 511 (1895). "For the Legislature absolutely or conditionally to forbid public speaking in a highway or public park is no more an infringement of rights of a member of the public than for the owner  of a private house to forbid it in the house." Davis V. Massachusetts, 167.U.S.43, 48 (1897).   1445 1446  307US.496(1939). Only Justice Black joined the Roberts opinion, but only Justices McReynolds and Butler dissented from the result. a  1447  E.g., Schneider V. Town of Irvington, 308U.S.1 147, 163 (1939); Kunz V. New  York, 340 U.S. 290, 293 (1951).- Da  1448  Cox V. Louisiana, 379 U.S.536, 555 (1965). For analysis of this case in the broader context, see Kalven, The Concept of the Public Forum: Cox V. Louisiana,  1965 SUP. CT. REV. 1.    1449  Adderley V. Florida, 385U.S.39(1966). See id. at 47-48; Cox V. Louisiana, 379 U.S.559, 578 (1965) (Justice Black concurring in part and dissenting in part); Jamison V. Texas, 318U.S.413, 416 (1943) (Justice Black for the Court). E.g., Shuttlesworth V. City of Birmingham, 394 U.S.147, 152 (1969); Grayned V.C City of Rockford, 408U.S.104, 115 (1972); Carey V. Brown, 447U.S.455,  1450  460 (1980). -  1451  Hague V. CIO, 307U.S.496 (1939); Niemotko V. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951); Kunz V. New York, 340U.S. 290_(1951); Shuttlesworth V. City of Birmingham, 3940.S. 147 (1969); Coates V. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S.611 (1971); Grayned V. City of Rockford, 408US.104.0972); Greer V. Spock, 424 U.S.828, 835-36 (1976); Carey V. Brown, 447 U.S.455(1980). J Narrowly drawn statutes that serve the state's interests in security and in preventing obstruction of justice and influencing of judicial officers are constitutional. Cox V. Louisiana, 379 U.S.559/(1965). A restriction on carrying signs or placards on the grounds of the Supreme Court is unconstitutional as applied to the public sidewalks surrounding the Court, since it does not sufficiently further the governmental purposes of protecting the building and grounds, maintaining proper order, or insulating the judicial decisionmaking process from lobbying. United States V. Grace, 461US.1710983. -  1452  1453  In Boos V. Barry, 4850.S.3 312 (1988), the Court struck down as content-Dased a District of Columbia law prohibiting the display of any sign within 500 feet of a foreign embassy if the sign tends to bring the foreign government into "public odium" or "public disrepute. " However, another aspect of the District's law, making it unlawful for three or more persons to congregate within 500 feet of an embassy and refuse to obey a police dispersal order, was upheld; under a narrowing construction, the law had been held applicable only to congregations directed at an embassy, and reasonably believed to present a threat to the peace Brown V. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966) (sit-in in library reading room). L Edwards V. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229_(1963); Jeanette Rankin Brigade V. Capitol Police Chief, 342 F. Supp. 575 (D.C. 1972) (three-judge court), aff'd, 409 U.S.972 (1972) (voiding statute prohibiting parades and demonstrations on  or security of the embassy. a  1454 1455  United States Capitol grounds).  1456  E.g., Grayned V. City of Rockford, 408 U.S.104 (1972) (sustaining ordinance prohibiting noisemaking adjacent to school if that noise disturbs or threatens to    disturb the operation of the school); Brown V. Louisiana, 383 U.S.131 (1966) (silent vigil in public library protected while noisy and disruptive demonstration would not be); Tinker V. Des Moines Independent School District, 393U5.503.0969) (wearing of black armbands as protest protected but not if it results in disruption of school); Cameron V. Johnson, 390 U.S.611 (1968) (preservation of access to courthouse); Frisby V. Schultz, 487U.S.474 (1988) (ordinance prohibiting picketing "before or about" any residence or dwelling, narrowly construed as prohibiting only picketing that targets a particular residence, upheld as furthering significant governmental interest in  protecting the privacy of the home). a  1457  United States Postal Serv. V. Council of Greenburgh Civic Assn's, 453U.S.114  (1981).   1458 1459  Grayned V. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 116 (1972).  E.g., Adderley. V. Florida, 385 U.S.39 (1966) (jails); Lehman V. City of Shaker Heights, 418US.29801974) (advertising space in city rapid transit cars); Greer V. Spock, 4240.S. 828_(1976) (military bases); United States Postal Service V. Council of Greenburgh Civic Ass'ns, 4530.5.1141 (1981) (private mail boxes); Perry Educ. Ass'n V. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460U.S.37 (1983) (interschool mail system); ISKCON V. Lee, 505U.S.672 (1992) (publicly  owned airport terminal).  1460  E.g., Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. V. Conrad, 420U.S.546/01975 (municipal theater); Madison School District V. WERC, 429U.S.167.0976) (school board meeting); Heffron V. ISKCON, 452 U.S.640_(1981) (state fair grounds); Widmar V. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981) (university meeting facilities).   1461  Compare United States Postal Service V. Council of Greenburgh Civic Ass'ns, 454 U.S. 114, 128-31 (1981), with id. at 136-40 (Justice Brennan concurring), and division, compare ISKCON V. Lee, 505U.S.672 (1992) with id. at 693 (Justice See, e.g., Heffron V. ISKCON, 452 U.S. 640, 647-50 (1981), and id. at 656 (Justice Brennan concurring in part and dissenting in part) (stating law and discussing cases); Clark V. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288 (1984) (prohibition of sleep-in demonstration in area of park not designated for  142 (Justice Marshall dissenting). For evidence of continuing  Kennedy concurring). a  1462  overnight camping). a  1463  Niemotko V. Maryland, 340U.S.268 (1951); Cox V. Louisiana, 379U.S.536 (1965); Police Dep't of Chicago V. Mosle, 408U.5.92.(1972); Madison School    District V. WERC, 429 U.S. 167 (1976); Carey V. Brown, 447 U.S.455(1980); Widmar V. Vincent, 454U.S. 263 (1981). In Lehman V. City of Shaker Heights, 418US.298/0974), a divided Court permitted the city to sell commercial advertising space on the walls of its rapid transit cars but to refuse  tos sell political advertising space. a  1464  E.g., the governmental interest in safety and convenience of persons using public forum, Heffron V. ISKCON, 452 U.S. 640, 650 (1981); the interest in preservation of a learning atmosphere in school, Grayned V. City of Rockford, 408 U.S.104, 115 (1972); and the interest in protecting traffic and pedestrian safety in the streets, Cox V. Louisiana, 379 U.S.536, 554-55 (1965); Kunz V. New York, 340 U.S.290, 293-94 (1951); Hague V. CI0,307U.5.496,  515-16 (1939).  1465  Heffron V. ISKCON, 452U.S.640, 654-55 (1981); Consolidated Edison Co. V.  PSC,447U.S.530, 535 (1980).   1466 1467 1468  Ward V. Rock Against Racism, 491 US.781,798-99, 800 (1989). Thomas V. Chicago Park Dist., 5XUS.316,323.0001.4  534 U.S. at 322, citing Freedman V. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51(1965). See National  Socialist Party V. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S.43.(1977). - Freedman V. Maryland, 380 U.S.51, 58-59 (1965). -  1469 1470  Police Dep't of Chicago V. Mosle, 408 U.S. 92 (1972) (ordinance void that barred all picketing around school building except labor picketing); Carey V. Brown, 447 U.5.455(1980) (same); Widmar V. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981) (striking down college rule permitting access to all student organizations except religious groups); Niemotko V. Maryland, 340U.S.268(1951) (striking down denial of permission to use parks for some groups but not for others); R.A.V. V. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377(1992) (striking down ordinance that prohibited symbols, such as burning crosses, that constituted fighting words that insult on the basis of some factors, such as race, but not on the basis of other factors). These principles apply only to the traditional public forum and to the governmentally created "limited public forum." Government may, without creating a limited public forum, place "reasonable" restrictions on access to nonpublic areas. See, e.g., Perry Educ. Ass'n V. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460U.S.37, 48 (1983) (use of school mail system); and Cornelius V. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 473 U.S. 788 (1985) (charitable solicitation of federal employees at workplace). See also Lehman V. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298(1974) (city may sell commercial advertising space on the walls of its rapid    transit cars but refuse to sell political advertising space); Capitol Square Review Bd. V. Pinette, 5150.S.7 753_(1995) (denial of permission to Ku Klux Klan, allegedly in order to avoid Establishment Clause violation, to place a cross in plaza on grounds of state capitol); Rosenberger V. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995) (University's subsidy for printing costs of student publications, available for student "news, information, opinion, entertainment, or academic communications, ," could not be withheld because of the religious content of a student publication); Lamb's Chapel V. Center Moriches School Dist., 5080.S. 384 (1993) (school district rule prohibiting after-hours use of school property for showing of a film presenting a religious perspective on child-rearing and family values, but allowing after-hours use for non-religious social, civic, and  recreational purposes).   1471  E.g., Hague V. CIO, ,307U.5.496, 516 (1939); Schneider V. Town of Irvington, 308U.S. 147, 164 (1939); Cox V. New Hampshire, 312 U.S.569 (1941); Poulos V. New Hampshire, 3450.S. 395 (1953); Staub V. City of Baxley, 355U.S.313, 321-25 (1958); Cox V. Louisiana, 379U.S.536, 555-58 (1965); Shuttlesworth V. City of Birmingham, 394 U.S.147, 150-53 (1969). Justice Stewart for the Court described these and other cases as "holding that a law subjecting the exercise of First Amendment freedoms to the prior restraint of a license without narrow, objective, and definite standards to guide the licensing authority is unconstitutional."Id. at 150-51. A person faced with an unconstitutional. licensing law may ignore it, engage in the desired conduct, and challenge the constitutionality of the permit system upon a subsequent prosecution for violating it. Id. at 151; Jones V. Opelika, 316U.S. 584, 602 (1942) (Chief Justice Stone dissenting), adopted per curiam on rehearing, 319 U.S. 103 (1943). See also City of Lakewood V. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 486 U.5.750(1988) (upholding facial challenge to ordinance vesting in the mayor unbridled discretion to grant or deny annual permit for location of newsracks on public property); Riley V. National Fed'n of the Blind, 487U.S.781 (1988) (invalidating as permitting "delay without limit" licensing requirement for professional fundraisers); Forsyth County V. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S.123 (1992). But see Walker V. City of Birmingham, 388U.S.307 (1967) (same rule  not applicable to injunctions). a  1472  In Shuttlesworth V. City of Birmingham, 394U.S.147 (1969), the Court reaffirmed the holdings of the earlier cases, and, additionally, both Justice Stewart, for the Court, id. at 155 n.4, and Justice Harlan concurring, id. at 162- 64, asserted that the principles of Freedman V. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965), governing systems of prior censorship of motion pictures, were relevant to permit systems for parades and demonstrations. The Court also voided an injunction against a protest meeting that was issued ex parte, without notice to the protestors and with, of course, no opportunity for them to rebut the representations of the seekers of the injunction. Carroll V. President and  Comm'rs of Princess Anne, 39305.17501968).   1473    The only precedent is Kunz V. New York, 340US.290.0195D. The holding was on a much narrower basis, but in dictum the Court said: "The court below has mistakenly derived support for its conclusions from the evidence produced at the trial that appellant's religious meetings had, in the past, caused some disorder. There are appropriate public remedies to protect the peace and order of the community if appellant's speeches should result in disorder and violence."Id. at 294. A different rule applies to labor picketing. See Milk Wagon Drivers Local 753 V. Meadowmoor Dairies, 312 U.S. 287 (1941) (background of violence supports prohibition of all peaceful picketing). The military may ban a civilian, previously convicted of destroying government property, from reentering a military base, and may apply the ban to prohibit the civilian from reentering the base for purposes of peaceful demonstration during an Armed Forces Day "open house."  United States V. Albertini, 472 U.S. 675 (1985). -  1474  Forsyth County V. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123(1992) (a fee based on anticipated crowd response necessarily involves examination of the content of  the speech, and is invalid as a content regulation). La  1475  Dicta indicate that a hostile reaction will not justify suppression of speech, Hague V. CIO, 307 U.S.496, 502 (1939); Cox V. Louisiana, 379U.5.536, 551 (1965); Bachellar V. Maryland, 397U.5.564, 567 (1970), and one holding appears to point this way. Gregory V. City of Chicago, 3940.S.1 111 (1969). Yet the Court upheld a breach of the peace conviction of a speaker who refused to cease speaking upon the demand of police who feared imminent violence. Feiner V. New York, 340.US.315.(1951). In Niemotko V. Maryland, 340U.5.268, 273 (1951) (concurring opinion), Justice Frankfurter wrote: "It is not a constitutional principle that, in acting to preserve order, the police must proceed against the crowd whatever its size and temper and not against the speaker."J  1476  "[Ajlthough a park is a traditional public forum for speeches and other transitory expressive acts, the display of a permanent monument in a public park is not a form of expression to which forum analysis applies. Instead, the placement of a permanent monument in a public park is best viewed as a form of government speech and is therefore not subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause." Perry Educ. Ass'n V. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460U.S.37, 45,46 n.7  Pleasant Grove City, Utah V. Summum, 555 U.S. at 464..   1477  (1983).  1478 1479  460 U.S. at 46. -  460 U.S. at 46. Candidate debates on public television are an example of this third category of public property: the "nonpublic forum." Arkansas Educational Television Comm'n V. Forbes, 523U.S.666, 679 (1998). "Although public    broadcasting as a general matter does not lend itself to scrutiny under the forum doctrine [i.e., public broadcasters ordinarily are entitled to the editorial discretion to engage in viewpoint discrimination), candidate debates present the narrow exception to this rule." Id. at 675. A public broadcaster, therefore, may not engage in viewpoint discrimination in granting or denying access to candidates. Under the third type of forum analysis, however, it may restrict candidate access for "a reasonable, viewpoint-neutral" reason, such as a candidate's "objective  lack of support." Id. at 683. -  1480  Perry Educ. Ass'n V. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460 U.S.37 (1983). This was a 5-4 decision, with Justice White's opinion of the Court being joined by Chief Justice Burger and by Justices Blackmun, Rehnquist, and O'Connor, and with Justice Brennan's dissent being joined by Justices Marshall, Powell, and Stevens. See also Hazelwood School Dist. V. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988) (student newspaper published as part of journalism class is not a public  forum). -  1481  City Council V. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466U.S.7 789_(1984) (upholding an outright ban on use of utility poles for signs). The Court noted that "it is of limited utility in the context of this case to focus on whether the tangible property itself should be deemed a public forum."Id. at 815 n.32. a  1482  Cornelius V. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 473U5.788.0985. The precedential value of Cornelius may be subject to question, because it was decided by 4-3 vote, the non-participating Justices (Marshall and Powell) having dissented in Perry. Justice O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice Burger and by Justices White and Rehnquist. Justice Blackmun, joined by Justice Brennan, dissented, and Justice Stevens dissented  separately. -  1483  473 U.S. at 802. Justice Blackmun criticized "the Court's circular reasoning that the CFC is not a limited public forum because the Government intended to limit Justice Kennedy criticized this approach in ISKCON V. Lee, 505U.S.672, 695 (1992) (concurring), contending that recognition of government's authority to designate the forum status of property ignores the nature of the First Amendment as "a limitation on government, not a grant of power." Justice Brennan voiced similar misgivings in his dissent in United States V. Kokinda: "public forum categories- originally conceived of as a way of preserving First Amendment rights-have been used : as a means of upholding restrictions on  the forum to a particular class of speakers."! Id. at 813-14.   1484  speech."497 U.S. at 741 (citation omitted).   1485    4970.S.720, 727 (1990) ("IRJegulation of speech activity where the Government has not dedicated its property to First Amendment activity is  examined only for reasonableness-).  1486 1487  5050.S. 672 (1992).  Id. at 683 ("[N]either by tradition nor purpose can the terminals be described as satisfying the standards we have previously set out for identifying a public  forum.").-  1488  5390.S.194, 205-06 (2003) ("We have 'rejected the view that traditional public forum status extends beyond its historic confines.' The doctrines surrounding traditional public forums may not be extended to situations where such history is lacking." (quoting Ark. Educ. TV Comm'n V. Forbes, 523U.5.666, 679 (1998))). While decided on constitutional vagueness grounds, in Reno V. American Civil Liberties Union, the Court struck down a provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that prohibited the use of an "interactive computer service" (.e., the Internet) to display indecent material "in a manner available to a person under 18 years of age." - 521 U.S. 844, 860 (1997). The Court did not consider the Internet's status as a forum for free speech, but observed that the Internet "constitutes a vast platform from which to address and hear from a world-wide audience of millions of readers, viewers, researchers, and buyers. Any person or organization with a computer connected to the Internet can  'publish' information."Id. at 853.   1489  American Library Association, 539 U.S. at 199; see also id. at 206 ("A public library does not acquire Internet terminals in order to create a public forum for Web publishers to express themselves, any more than it collects books in order to provide a public forum for the authors of books to speak.").- -  1490  Packingham V. North Carolina582 U.S.  No. 15-1194, slip op. at 4-5 (2017)  (quoting Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 at 868); see also id. at ("This case is one of the first this Court has taken to address the relationship between the First Amendment and the modern Internet. As a result, the Court must exercise extreme caution before suggesting that the First Amendment provides scant protection for access to vast networks in that  slip op. at 6  medium."). 1491 Id. at.  slip op. at 6, 8; see id. at 7 ("[G]iven the broad wording of the North  Carolina statute at issue, it might well bar access not only to commonplace social Washingtonpost.com, and Webmd.com."). The Court was careful to point out, however, that its opinion should not be read as barring states from enacting laws more specific than that of North Carolina, noting that [s]pecific criminal acts are  media websites but also to websites as varied as Amazon.com,    not protected speech even if speech is the means for their commission."Id. (citing Brandenburg V. Ohio 395U.S.444, 447-49 (1969)). Indeed, "it can be assumed that the, FirstAmendment permits a State to enact specific, narrowly tailored laws that prohibit a sex offender from engaging in conduct that often presages a sexual crime, like contacting a minor or using a website to gather  information about a minor."Id. -  1492  521 U.S. at 853. A federal court of appeals wrote: "Aspects of cyberspace may, int fact, fit into the public forum category, although the Supreme Court has also suggested that the category is limited by tradition. Compare Forbes, 523 U.S. at 679 ('reject(ing] the view that traditional public forum status extends beyond its historic confines' [to a public television station]) with Reno V. ACLU, 521U.S. 844, 851-53 (1997) (recognizing the communicative potential of the Internet, specifically the World Wide Web)." Putnam Pit, Inc. V. City of Cookeville, 221 F.3d834, 843 (6th Cir. 2000) (alternate citations to Forbes and Reno omitted). In Putnam Pit, the city denied a private Web site's request that the city's Web site establish a hyperlink to it, even though the city's Web site had established hyperlinks to other private Web sites. The court of appeals found that the city's Web site was a nonpublic forum, but that even nonpublic forums must be viewpoint neutral, sO it remanded the case for trial on the question of whether the city's denial of a hyperlink had discriminated on the basis of viewpoint.    Water and Sewer Rates Effective January 1, 2021:  Water Rates per installed tap: Base Rate - 4,000 gallons 4,000- -5 5,000 gallons per 1,000 5,000-30,000 gallons per 1,000 30,001 and up per 1,000 gallons  IN-TOWN $30.84 $1.55 $1.68 $2.04  OUT-OF-TOWN $44.35 $2.49 $3.04 $3.67  Water Dock Rates Per 100 Gallons: $ 1.50 Sewer Rates peri installed tap: Residential Commercial (first 10,000 gallons) 10,001 gallons to 30,000 per 1,000 30,001 gallons and up - per 1,000  IN-TOWN $31.16 $31.16 $ 1.77 $ 1.87  OUT-OF-TOWN $51.87 $51.87 $3.40 $3.78  PROPOSED Water and Sewer Rates for January 1, 2023:  Water Rates per installed tap: Base Rate - 5,000 gallons 5,001 -1 10,000 gallons per 1,000 10,001 - 20,000 gallons per 1,000 20,001 & up per 1,000 gallons  IN-TOWN $33.34 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00  OUT-OF-TOWN $46.85 $4.50 $6.00 $7.50  Water Dock Rates Per: 100 Gallons: $ 1.50 Sewer Rates per installed tap: Residential Commercial (first 10,000 gallons) 10,001 gallons to 20,000 per 1,000 20,001 gallons & up per1,000  IN-TOWN $36.16 $36.16 $ 2.66 $ 2.81  OUT-OF-TOWN $56.87 $56.87 $3.99 $4.22  * Ai flat fee of $5.00 per sewer tapi and $2.50 per water tap were added to the proposed 2023 base rate. Int the new tiers, proposed out-of-town water and sewer rates are 150% higher than in-town rates. *There are 13 sewer taps and 49 water taps out-of-town. In town, there are. 509 sewer taps and! 542  water taps.  *44 senior citizens are participating in the 25% reduced base rate: senior utility program.    August 8, 2022 Town Board Meeting  In-Town Water $30.84 $1.55 $1.68 $2.04  In-Town' Water Proposed Increase! 3% Increase 3%Increase 3% Increase 3%  Base Rate 1/21 (4,000 gallons)Base Rate 1/23 (5,000 gallons) 2024  2025 $3.18 $4.24 $5.30 2025 $4.78 $6.37 $7.96 2025 $38.36 $39.51 $38.36 $39.51 $2.82 $2.98 2025 $60.34 $62.15 $4.23 $4.48  2026 $3.28 $4.37 $5.46 2026 $4.92 $6.56 $8.20 2026 $2.90 $3.07  2027 $37.52 $3.38 $4.50 $5.62 2027 $52.74 $5.07 $6.76 $8.45 2027 $40.70 $40.70 $2.99 $3.16 2027 $64.01 $64.01 $4.49 $4.75  Base Tier1 Tier2 Tier3 3  $33.34 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00  $34.34 $35.37 $36.43  $3.09 $4.12 $5.15  Out-of-Town Water Out-of-Town Water Proposed Increase 3% Increase 3%Increase! 3% Increase 3%  Base Rate: 1/21 (4,000 gallons)Base Rate: 1/23 (5,000 gallons) 2024  Base Tier1 Tier 2 Tier 3  $44.35 $2.49 $3.04 $3.67 In-Town Sewer Base Rate 1/21 $31.16 $31.16 $1.77 $1.87  $46.85 $4.50 $6.00 $7.50  $48.26 $49.71 $51.20  $4.64 $6.18 $7.73 2024 $37.24 $37.24 $2.74 $2.89 2024 $58.58 $4.11 $4.35  In-Town! Sewer Proposed Increase 3% increase 3%Increase 3% Increase 3%  Base Rate 1/23 $36.16 $36.16 $2.66 $2.81  Base Commercial Tier2 Tier3  Out-of-Town Sewer Out-of-Town Sewer Proposed Increase 3%_Increase 3%Increase 3% Increase 3%  Basel Rate 1/21 $51.87 $51.87 $3.40 $3.78  Base Rate 1/23 $56.87 $56.87 $3.99 $4.22  2026 $4.36 $4.61  Base Commercial Tier2 Tier 3 SAMPLE BILLS  $58.58 $60.34 $62.15  In-Town Sewer/Water July 2022 bill from a commerical business using 11,000 gallons  Current sewer $32.93 Current water $42.47 TOTAL $75.40  New sewer $38.82 ($36.16+2.66) New water $52.34(533.34+515.00+54.00) TOTAL $91.16  In-Town! Sewer/Water July 20221 billf froma at home using 18,900 gallons  Current sewer $31.16 Current water $55.74 TOTAL $86.90  News sewer $36.16 TOTAL $116.50  New water $80.34 5334+51500+59200,  Out-of-Town Water July 2022 bill from al home using 28,600 gallons  Current water $118.53 TOTAL $118.53  New water $189.35 ($46.85+522.50+560.00+560.00)  TOTAL $189.35    Dolores, Colorado)  Meeting Date: August 8, 2022 AGENDA DOCUMENTATION  Discussion and Possible Action  ITEM  TO: TOWN OF DOLORES MAYOR &TRUSTEES  FROM: KEN CHARLES TOWN MANAGER  SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION CONCERNING FUNIDNG FOR THE  DOLORES SENIOR CITIZENS MEALSITE PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND  Montezuma County operates a senior meal program through the Social Services Department. Iti is] primarily funded with funds from federal and state programs. There is ai five-county regional Area Agency on Aging (AAA) that receives these funds and then distributes the: funding to county programs. Every region in the state has an AAA. The county program operates meal sites in Dolores, Mancos and Cortez. The town contributes $2,500 to the Dolores Meal site that operates out oft the community center. This is meant to cover the meal costs fori those seniors who need assistance. The meal site usually raises about $3,500 in About ai month ago we: received information that the. AAA had cut the budget that began July 1 from $176,000 to $99,000. Wel have noti received answers as to why the cuts and if all counties received similar proportional cuts, which Ib believe isi important. This caught the county program director off guard and everyone began talking. There is enough funding to run thej program through the end oft the calendar year but carrying the program through until June 30, 2023 will be a challenge. There was talk about closing Dolores and Mancos. Currently only the town ofDolores contributes any funds. Most oft the county operations occur at the Cortez meal site where most of thej population is located. Neither the county nor the city have historically contributed to the program. We are waiting to see what funds are derived from those Through discussion with BOCC, the meals program director and the town of Mancos we are considering ways to keep the meal sites open through June 2023. Wel have suggested that the two towns support the meals program by funding 50% oft the shortage. Before we make any additional contributions, I would like tos see what the cunty and the city contribute, but this action would allow the town to contribute at the  fees collected from paying customers.  tow governments  appropriate moment. FISCALI IMPACT  To operate thel Dolores meal site that offers two lunches/week and includes thei in-person site at the community center and the meals on wheels program that delivers meals costs approximately $31,000. With the town's contribution and the collected fees that leaves $24,000 of unfunded expenses. The obligation to thet town would be $12,000. Thei town can use: funds received from the American Recovery Act. Itist the recommendation of the Town Manager that the mayor and trustees support and approve the  RECOMMENDATIONS  additional contribution to support the Dolores Seniors Meal Site.  420 Central Ave, POI Box 630 Dolores, CO. 81323 Ph. 970-882-7720 fax. 970-882-7466 https!! lompordolborscolomdogow    Dolores, Colorado,  oU  Meeting Date: August gth, 2022 AGENDA DOCUMENTATION  DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION  Item 10.4  TO: TOWN BOARD  SUBJECT: Appointment to DAWHTF  PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND:  Interest to serve by a citizen. Possible discussion of adding an additional member on the  Dolores Attainable Workforce Housing Task Force (DAWHTF).  Introduction:  An interest was expressed by a phone call Kirk Swope of 18632. Highway 145, Dolores Colorado, to serve as ai member oft thel DAWHTF. Resolution R496 Series 2022. A Committee to study affordable  housing in the Town of] Dolores. Process: FISCALIMPACT  There is no impact financially for the town ofDolores  RECOMMENDATIONS  Staffrecommends Kirk Swope to be added to the DAWHTF as of August gth, 2022  420 Central Ave, P OE Box 630 Dolores, CO. 81323 Ph. 970-882-7720 fax. 970-882-7466 wwwtownoriolorescom    8/4/22,4:14PM  Town oft Dolores Mail- Fwd: Workforce housing taski force  Gmail  Tammy Neely ctammy@townofdolores.com>  Fwd: Workforce housing task force Kenneth Charles agdlonodc.one To: tammy ammy@bowmococescome  1message  Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:00PM  Ken Charles Dolores Town Manager 970-882-7720-0 970-759-0016-C  Forwarded message From: Gin Black gmbzvoc@yanoocom? Date: Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Workforce housing task force To: Kenneth Charles manager@townoldolores.com>  Ken- Thank you for asking that I be considered for a possible appointment to the Towns loriginally become very, excited about the possibility of this task force after talking to Dan Tishman. We discussed his projects and I thought it would be perfect for Dolores. Dolores is lacking in affordable housing for people who live here. It seems like a lot of the town homes and houses in Dolores are renting for $1000 and better. This is a large sum for our area. I feel that Dolores is losing a lot of hard-working people due to lack of housing. We need homes for teachers, firemen, policemen and many other vocations. I personally had a teacher and her husband rent one of our cabins at the Outpost for 2 years, because they could not only afford anything in Dolores but there was a clear lack of choices. They did not want to live in Cortez, and drive every day, especially in the winter. lam sorry to say but they did decide to move. So, in conclusion I am just sO excited about the task force being formed and perhaps being able to  Aworkforce housing task force.  help Dolores residents to work and live in our community.  Sincerely, Kirk T. Swope  On' Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 04:38:43 PM MDT, Kenneth Charles manager@townoldolores.com> wrote: lasked Kurt to see ifh he wanted to be considered for an appointment to the town's AWorkforce housing task force.  This would be included int the town trustees board packet of information. Itr might state Kurt's interest.ins thematter. Why he thinks iti is important.  Why! het thinks he can contribute. Ken Charles Dolores Town Manager 970-882-7720-0 970-759-0016-C  Mpglimalgongle.onimalonk-soassRaserpsawdhatgemnameachMaPSATADERsatrisuspBangenup-map.3A174028901. 1/2    ORDINANCE NO 559 SERIES 2022  AN ORDINANCE AMENDING 2017 ORDINANCE 532 CREATING A PARKIPLAYGROUND  ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE TOWN OF DOLORES, COLORADO  WHEREAS the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees created the Park/Playground Advisory Committee fori the Town of Dolores by Ordinance 532 Serries 2017 on December 11,  2017.  WHEREAS, the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees continues to recognize the need for aF Park/Playground Committee to advise and guide the Dolores Town Board on matters  involving the Town of Dolores owned parks, trails, and playground; and,  WHEREAS, the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees has determined that the committee will function more efficiently and have greater community involvement by expanding the  number of members of the committee.  NOWTHEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TOWN OF DOLORES BOARD OF  TRUSTEES THAT below in Title 2 Administration and Personnel Article 2.09 of the Park/Playground Advisory Committee Section 2.09.010. is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2.09.010 Creation, Appointments. Qualifications and Terms of Committee  Members. 1. Creation  There is hereby created a Park/Playground Advisory Committee, for the Town of Dolores, consisting of six voting members - one Town of Dolores Board Member and  five Citizens.  2. Appointments and Removal  All Committee members shall be appointed by the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees. Committee members may be removed from the Committee, only by action of the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees, for excessive absence or for cause see (5) below.  3. Qualifications of Committee Members  All Committee members must be Town of Dolores Residents residing within the Town  of Dolores.  4. Terms or Committee Members  Town Board Member shall serve as determined by the Town Board  All other members shall be for terms of two years upon the expiration of the initial  appointments.    A Town of Dolores staff member shall be appointed by the Town Manager to serve as liaison between the Committee, and the Dolores Town Manager and the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees. This staff member shall not be a voting member of the If Committee member position becomes vacant for any reason the Town Board shall appoint a new member to finish out the balance of that unexpired term.  Committee.  5. Removal  1. Committee members may be removed for cause -  "For cause" shall mean any cause affecting and conceming ability and fitness of a Committee member to perform the duties of a member of the Town of Dolores For cause shall also include an unexcused absence of a Committee member  Park/Playground Advisory Committee.  from three consecutive board meetings, regular or special,  2. The Committee secretary and/or the staff liaison shall report any reasons for cause removal to the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees, through the Town Manager.  6. Officers of the Committee  There shall be a chairperson, a vice chair and secretary all elected by the members of  the Committee from the Committee membership.  All terms shall be for one year with successive terms allowed. Elections shall be held in January of each year.  7. Meetings  Meetings shall be held monthly. Special meetings may be called at any time at the  request oft four members of the Committee or the chairperson. All meetings shall be preceded with the appropriate publicnotice.  All meetings are public meetings and shall be held in accordance with the Colorado  Open Meetings Law. 8.! Rules, Records, Sub Committees  The Committee shall follow Robert's Rules of Order, except where set out in this The Secretary shall keep a record of all meetings either through minutes or recording All records of the Committee are public records and subject to the Colorado Open-  ordinance to the contrary.  the meeting as the Committee decides.  Records Act.    All records of the Committee shall be kept in Town Hall under the care and custody of  Town Clerk.  9. Voting  A simple majority oft those Committee members attending any meeting shalll be sufficient  for Committee action.  10. Powers and Duties  (a) The Committee shall review items and make non-binding recommendations regarding the same to the Town of Dolores Board of Trustees and Town staff, when necessary, with respect to all aspects of planning, programming, procurement, installation, operations, maintenance, restoration, and promotion of Town-owned public (b) The Committee shall review, consider, evaluate and make non-binding recommendations regarding any Park projects when requested by the Town of Dolores  parks and playgrounds.  Board of Trustees or the Town Manager.  Repealer. All orders, bylaws, ordinances, and resolutions, or parts thereof, inconsistent or inc conflict with this Ordinance, are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of Recording and Authentication, Upon adoption hereof, this Ordinance shall be recorded in a book kept for that purpose and shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor  oro conflict.  this Ordinance, the intent being that the same are severable.  and the Town Clerk.  Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication.  PUBLIC HEARING. This ordinance shall be considered for second or final reading on the August 29, 2022, at the hour of 6:30p.m. in the Town Board Chambers in Town Hall, Dolores Colorado, at which time and place all persons may appear and be heard  concerning the same.    PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING August 8, 2022.  TOWN OF DOLORES  ATTEST:  Mayor  Town Clerk  PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING  On August 29, 2022.  TOWN OF DOLORES  ATTEST:  Mayor  Town Clerk    TOWN OF DOLORES RESOLUTION R498 Series 2022  AI RESOLUTION LIFTING AN OPEN FLAME FIRE BAN  WHEREAS, the Town of Dolores, Coloradoi is a statutory town incorporated under the laws of the state WHEREAS, the Town of Dolores enacted Ordinance No. 536 Series 2018 granting the Board of Trustees the authority to enact a resolution imposing an open flame fire ban as conditions require; WHEREAS, thei fire danger in Southwest Colorado and the Town of Dolores has eased; WHEREAS thel Montezuma County Sheriff recommends that the Town of Dolores lift thei fire ban for the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town of Dolores and surrounding community. WHEREAS the Board of Trustees wish tol lift resolution number R484 Series 2022 enacted on May 25th, NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITF RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF DOLORES as follows: 1. Thel Board of Trustees, pursuant to Ordinance No. 536 Series 2018 and as authorized by Colorado law, hereby rescinds the May 25th, 2022, Open Flame Fire Ban as defined in said 2. Thisr resolution shall continue in full force and effect until modified by the Board of Trustees. 3. The staff of the Town of Dolores shalli inform the public oft the rescission of the Open Flame Fire 4. Ifany section, clause, phrase, word other provisions of this resolution shall for any reason be heldi invalid, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, phrases words or other provisions and the validity oft this resolution shall stand  ofC Colorado;  2022, thati imposed at firel ban.  Ordinance within alli incorporated areas of the Town of Dolores.  Ban.  notwithstanding.  5. Introduced, read, and passed as a resolution at the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Dolores held on August 8th, 2022, at which a quorum was present. ADPOPTED by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Dolores, Colorado, on August gth, 2022.  THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF DOLORES:  By: Attest:  Mayor Leigh Reeves  Town Clerk Tammy Neely