COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING May 14, 2024  The Henrico County Board of Supervisors convened a regular meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the Board Room, Administration Building, Henrico County Government  Center, Parham and Hungary Spring Roads, Henrico County, Virginia.  Members of the Board Present: Tyrone E. Nelson, Chairman, Varina District Daniel J. Schmitt, Vice-Chairman, Brookland District Roscoe D. Cooper, III, Fairfield District Misty D. Whitehead, Three Chopt District Jody K. Rogish, Tuckahoe District Other Officials Present: John A. Vithoulkas, County Manager Andrew R. Newby, County Attorney  Tanya N. Brackett, CMC, Assistant to the County Manager/Clerk to the Board Michael Y. Feinmel, Deputy County Manager for Public Safety W. Brandon Hinton, Deputy County Manager for Administration Cari M. Tretina, Deputy County Manager/ChiefofSlaf Steven J. Yob, Deputy County Manager for Community Operations Ben A. Sheppard, Director of Public Relations  Revérend Tyrone E. Nelson, Chair of the Henrico County Board of Supervisors and Pastor On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Cooper, the Board approved the minutes of April 23, 2024, Regular and Special meetings; and the April 11, 2024, Special meeting.  of Sixth Mount Zion Baptist Church, delivered the invocation.  The vote of the Board was as follows:  Yes: Nelson, Schmitt, Cooper, Whitehead, Rogish  No: None  MANAGER'S COMMENTS  Mr. Vithoulkas recognized Jackson Baynard, Chief of the Division of Fire, to celebrate Chief John Shaffer's service to Henrico County. Chief John Shaffer started his career with the Division of Fire in 1979. During his tenure with the Division, he has served in stations across the County at various ranks. His leadership has been an essential element of the Technical Rescue Team, Special Events Team, and Mass Casualty Team, as well as the many fire stations in which he served as the Station Captain. John is an incredibly efficient and effective Battalion Chief, incident commander, and administrator. He has also been    influential in envisioning and developing many of the current operational and John Shaffer's leadership has influenced many Henrico Fire leaders both past and present. John has been a consistent presence on the A-Shift command team, helping mentor chiefs, captains, and lieutenants. Chief Baynard noted he was fortunate to have had Chief Shaffer as a supervisor when he was Captain and had the honor of serving alongside Chief Shaffer as Battalion Chief and then again as a Shift Commander. He is a member of the team that others seek out for advice and counsel. He leads with his heart and will always find a way tol help someone under his command. He has consistently led with humility and empathy, when we talk about Henrico County having heart, leaders like John Shaffer are what we think about. Chief Shaffer was recognized for his leadership by the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association in 2019, receiving the Glenn A. Gaines Leadership Legacy Award. ChiefJackson stated Chief John Shaffer has joined the Henrico Legacy Circle for 45 years of service. Chief Shaffer thanked the Board and the Manager and stated he was very grateful to the County for giving him the opportunity to become a part of the world's greatest Fire Department. He stated he was very grateful to the County Manager who has always made him feel valued and appreciated because he shows genuine interest in the County's employees. He also thanked his wife, Terri, who has been his biggest supporter throughout these many years, who has been his biggest fan, and who has always had faith in him even when he did not feel worthy. Chief Shaffer stated he will not forget how fortunate he was to have been a part of the greatest County in the nation and to be of the few selected to wear the Division of Fire uniform. He prays God will continue to bless this Mr. Vithoulkas next recognized Raj Joshi, Chair of the Asian American Society of Central Virginia. Henrico celebrates its diverse communities of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander American people who invest their talents, intellect, and ingenuity into the day-to-day operations and strategic planning essential to how we deliver services. In May, we take time to appreciate the people whose creativity, understanding, and experience are rooted in the care we provide everyone, ensuring their well-being and strong connection to the County. She invited everyone to visit Henrico County Public Library locations in person and online, as well as the County's multicultural community engagement website for cultural and heritage programs and much more. Raj stated the Asian American Society is a non-profit established in 1998 to promote unity and diversity in Central Virginia and to promote cultural awareness about varied cultures. The organization has hosted the Asian festival at the Greater Richmond Convention Center for  administrative policies that guide the Division.  County and those who serve it.  the past 26 years.  BOARDOF: SUPERVISORS COMMENTS  Ms. Whitehead thanked Raj for the plaque presented to the County at the Asian Festival.  RECOGNITIONOFI NEWS MEDIA  Mr. Nelson recognized Lyndon German with VPM News.  2    PRESENTATIONS  Mr. Vithoulkas announced the first proclamation recognizes May 12 18, 2024, as Law Enforcement Officers Week, that encourages Henrico citizens to take note of these special dates and salute the County's law enforcement officers for their steadfast commitment to the County's public safety efforts. He reminded the Board and the residents. this proclamation will be presented by our Chairman on Thursday, May 16, at the Law Mr. Nelson presented a proclamation recognizing May 2024 as Older Americans Month. Accepting the proclamation was Amy Strite, Executive Director of Senior Connections, Capital Area Agency on Aging. Joining her were Ashlee Giles, Henrico County's Advocate for the Aging, and Sheila Cunningham, Recreation Coordinator. Ms. Strite thanked the Board for recognizing May as Older Americans Month and celebrating the commitment to  Enforcement Memorial Day Ceremony.  serve older adults in their communities. APPOINTMENTS/ESIGNATION  149-24  Resolution Appointment of Members Finance Board. On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item = see attached resolution. Resolution - Resignation of Member - Henrico Area Mental Health & On motion of Mr. Rogish, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution.  150-24  Developmental Services Board.  PUBLIC HEARINGS - REZONING CASES AND PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT  117-24 PUP2023- 00018 Tuckahoe  Gateway Associates of Richmond II, LLC: Request for a Provisional Use Permit under Sections 24-2306 and 24-4315 of Chapter 24 of the County Code to allow commercial uses and zoning modifications as part of a master-planned development on part of parcels 753-745-6957 and 753-745- 0470 located on the west line of N Parham Road approximately 240' south After staff presented an overview of the case, Andy Condlin spoke on behalf of Steven Alexander, the managing member of Gateway Associates. Mr. Condlin discussed the changes between the new proposal and the permit approved in 2019. He gave comparisons and details about building Mr. Alexander also spoke in support of the proposal, stating the changes from the 2019 proposal are necessary to make the project economically feasible. Mr. Alexander stated after 50 years of doing business with the County, they are partners and investors and request the Board grant this  of its intersection with Fargo Road.  height, setbacks, and landscaping.  request.  3    Jeremy Raw, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, spoke in opposition to the proposal and expressed concerns about height, noise, and traffic. Mr. Rogish expressed concerns that the proposal increased density on the site. Mr. Condlin stated this is correct and the heights and setbacks will also increase as well. Mr. Rogish also expressed concerns about student capacity at Freeman High School. Mr. Condlin stated apartments like the proposal are unlikely to attract families with school children. Mr. Rogish expressed concerns about road impacts and the proposed mix of uses on the Mr. Alexander addressed the use of the club house and the building footprint relative to Parham Road. Mr. Rogish noted a concern about On motion of Mr. Rogish, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, the Board did not follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and denied this  site.  parking.  item.  The vote of the Board was as follows:  Yes: Nelson, Schmitt, Cooper, Whitehead, Rogish  No: None  151-24 REZ-2023- 100258 Brookland  Costco Wholesale Corp.: Request to conditionally rezone from 0-2C Office District (Conditional), B-2C Business District (Conditional), and B-3C Business District (Conditional) to B-3C Business District (Conditional) Parcels 754-758-1687, 754-758-7677, 754-759-3406, and 754-759-7616 containing 17.81 acres located at the northwest intersection of W. Broad Street (U.S. Route 250) and Springfield Road (State Route 157). Mr. Schmitt stated his intention to move for a deferral of the case to continue discussions about the item, including sidewalks at the project. On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Cooper, and by unanimous vote, the Board deferred this item to the June 11, 2024, meeting.  The vote of the Board was as follows:  Yes: Nelson, Schmitt, Cooper, Whitehead, Rogish  No: None  152-24 REZ-2023- 100017 Varina  HD CVA, LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to M-1C Light Industrial District (Conditional) parcels 840-713- 3163, 841-710-2304, 841-712-4360, 842-709-8618, 842-712-1529, 842-712- 5063, 843-708-9028, 843-711-6375, 843-711-6508, 843-712-6388, 844-709- 3698, and 844-712-3071 containing 622.1 acres located on the north and south lines of E. Wiliamsburg Road (U.S. Route 60) at its intersection with  4    Technology Boulevard.  Staff presented an overview of the case.  Andy Condlin spoke on behalf of the applicant. He thanked the Planning staff and everyone involved in the case who have gone above and beyond in Mr. Condlin provided comments on buffers, setbacks, open space, and the additional community protections offered in the proffers for the case. He discussed limiting the truck traffic to Williamsburg Road and Technology Blvd. Mr. Condlin shared an example of the types of generators that could potentially be used onsite and explained they would be used in case of a power outage and tested periodically. He noted the applicant's commitment to perform a historical study. He noted the good jobs and revenue the Mr. Nelson requested a history of the White Oak Technology Park, which Mr. Emerson continued to respond to questions from Mr. Nelson regarding the parking lots, density, buffers, setbacks, and building standards (e.g., LEED Silver). Mr. Emerson noted the applicant's agreement to join the Mr. Nelson asked the applicant about building standards. Mr. Condlin explained datacenters are not geared towards human habitation, which is where the LEED standard is more appropriate. He stated the energy standards proffered were more in line with datacenter facilities. Mr. Emerson continued responding to questions from Mr. Nelson based on concerns received from the Planning Commission and community meetings. Mr. Emerson clarified the plan for provision of water and sewer utilities to the property. Bentley Chan, Director of Public Utilities, clarified that water usage for the project is expected to be minimal. Mr. Nelson asked for clarification on the types of generators at the property. Mr. Condlin explained the difference between the use of "tier 2" and "tier 4" generators at the project. Mr. Condlin stated Tier 4 would be a waste of resources and required a long lead time. Mr. Nelson asked questions about air monitoring at the facility. Mr. Condlin explained they will meet all DEQ requirements for air monitoring. Mr. Nelson asked further questions about the generators. Mr. Condlin explained the generators will be tested once a month and it generally takes 30 minutes for each generator, and they test them all over the course of a day. Mr. Nelson asked further questions about the availability of additional undeveloped land with the Technology Park, which were answered by staff.  working through the case.  project would bring to the community.  was provided by Joe Emerson, Director of Planning.  Technology Park and its covenants.  5    Mr. Nelson shared a letter from the applicant committing to provide $5 million in funding to support renewable energy installation in the Mr. Nelson asked about what uses would be developed at the property. Mr. Condlin explained the uses allowed under the proffered conditions, including datacenters. Mr. Nelson noted it might not be all datacenters. Mr. Nelson asked about noise concerns raised by the community. Mr. Emèrson explained how noise complaints would be investigated and how the proffer related to noise would be enforced. He noted most complaints about noise in the area related to airplane traffic from the nearby airport. Ms. Whitehead asked if there were any health issues inherent to data centers. Mr. Condlin stated that he is not aware of any, and the applicant is committed to meeting DEQ standards. She asked about the generators and DEQr requirements. Mr. Condlin stated they would be used when there isa failure of the electrical power caused by, for example, a weather event. Ms. Whitehead asked about air quality monitoring. Mr. Condlin stated DEQ is responsible for regulating air quality and the applicant will comply with the DEQ standards. Ms. Whitehead asked about artificial intelligence datacenter usage and if it was higher than typical datacenters. Mr. Condlin stated he cannot say for sure if the usage is higher for artificial intelligence. Mr. Nelson stated the information that is currently out there states artificial intelligence is using more energy. Ms. Whitehead asked Mr. Emerson about the designations for the property in the comprehensive plan. She also asked how long the construction process would last and if there was a commitment to use union labor. Mr. Condlin stated it would be al 10-year process, and there was no commitment to use union labor. Mr. Rogish asked Mr. Condlin about the difference between co-locator and hyperscale facilities and energy needs. Mr. Rogish also asked about the jobs brought by datacenter projects, including construction jobs during the construction phase. Mr. Rogish also noted the difference between the conditions proffered in this case versus rezonings approved for datacenters in neighboring jurisdictions. Mr. Emerson noted the infrastructure is not in place for those facilities whereas here in the County all that is in place. Mr. Schmitt explained he has no direct questions and felt it is important to. share that he and his colleagues have toured the facilities several times and have had the opportunities to meet with advocacy groups, staff, and the applicant. He has read every staff briefing document and public comment, he watched the Planning Commission meeting, and there have been hours of work and hours of work prior to this meeting. He appreciates the efforts on behalf of staff and Mr. Nelson that have been put forward in this case and wanted to share this information with not just his  community.  Mr. Condlin stated that is correct.  constituents but with all the residents of the County.  6      Mr. Cooper requested information about local hiring. Mr. Condlin shared his previous slide showing the type of workers this facility will bring in from the County. Mr. Cooper asked will they partner with County Schools and local colleges and universities. Mr. Condlin stated there has been a need for technical education, and they will continue to try and work with our local schools. Mr. Cooper asked if the datacenters have any impact on property values. Mr. Emerson stated it should increase the property value of homes, noting there are over 1,000 residential units approved in this community, and there is commercial development currently underway. Mr. Nelson requested the applicant work with HCPS if the case is approved for internships. Mr. Condlin stated they will work with schools. The Board recessed at 8:39 p.m. and reconvened at 8:44 p.m. The following individuals spoke regarding this item:  John Montgomery, a resident oft the Varina District, spoke on behalf of the Henrico Conservation Action Network ("HCAN"). He noted his approval of the work of the H.E.A.R.T. Committee, as well as County efforts to preserve open space at Varina Farms and Wilton Farms. He requested a deferral of the case because there were too many unknown factors and outstanding concerns about noise and Gray Montrose, a resident of the Varina District, expressed concerns regarding the new information received this evening about potential uses and the concentration of industrial uses in Varina. She expressed concerns about air quality and truck traffic, among Mr. Nelson asked Ms. Montrose to clarify her comments about the effects of air pollution on the community and asked Mr. Emerson for clarification of permissible uses allowed by the proffered Richard Sullivan, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, supported the rezoning, noting that datacenters bring minimal noise compared to other uses and that the proposed buffers were better than other Michael Keegan, a resident of the Three Chopt District, spoke against the case and expressed concerns about the energy consumption of data centers and its effect on climate change. Mike O'Brien, a resident oft the Varina District, noted how much the County is currently making in tax revenue from data centers per year ($20 million) and that his car is taxed at a higher rate. He explained this property was originally zoned for open space use and parks, but residents will not be able to go to this property. He does  air pollution.  others.  conditions.  areas of the County.  7    not feel the County is making back what they are putting into the Anne-Marie Leakes, a resident of the Tuckahoe District and member of the Board of Directors of HCAN, stated she doesn't feel there are policies developed for datacenters to protect public health Mark Peru, President of the Richmond Battlefields Association, requested the Board preserve the land just south of I-64 bordering Old Williamsburg Road to protect a significant part of a Civil War battlefield. He requested the Board defer the case to work with the applicant on preserving the 76 acres or at least discuss proper Jeff Dallas, a resident of the Varina District, also with the Richmond Battlefields Association, requested additional efforts to Aileen Rivera, a resident of the Varina District, requested the Board deny the case or at the very least defer the vote until the JLARC study on datacenters is released at the end of year. Ar resident from the Varina District voiced concerns with destruction of the land during construction and the effects on the Carol Ribley, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, expressed concerns about energy consumption. She urged the Board to defer the item and explore what it would take to get a better sustainable datacenter and await the results oft the JLARC: study. Charles Skelli, Business Manager of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers located in eastern Henrico, explained they support this project because it gives them the opportunity to put their apprenticeship program to work and give the next generation Glen, a resident of Chesterfield County, expressed concerns about energy consumption by datacenters driving new gas fired power William, a resident of the Varina District, stated he has worked on several of the projects in White Oak Technology Park. He stated these projects have allowed him to take care of his family. He supports these projects and the jobs they provide for the individuals who are building the projects. He stated technology is not going away; what better place than in Henrico to provide jobs for our  data centers.  and the environment.  preservation oft the historic land.  preserve the battlefield area.  environment.  achance at a career in the building trades.  plants to meet electric needs.  residents and our community.  8     *  Stewart Goodwin, a resident of the Varina District, opposed the project and expressed concerns about truck traffic and noise. Mr. Nelson asked Mr. Condlin again about noise monitoring and air quality monitoring. With respect to air quality, Mr. Condlin referred to the DEQ standards the applicant must meet. He stated he is not sure why the datacenters would be required to go above and beyond that since that is the standard everyone is held to in the state. Mr. Emerson and Ms. Montrose provided feedback about the availability of DEQ public hearings Mr. Nelson asked for clarification about the DEQ regulation for the generators and whether the land was to be dedicated to parks. Mr. Emerson stated it was never given as part of the park catalog; it was Mr. Nelson asked are wetlands normally designated as open space and is it misleading to designate it as open space. Mr. Emerson explained any case that has wetlands, the County requests they are rezoned as conservation districts. Mr. Nelson asked about the deed restriction and being rezoned to M-1. Mr. Emerson noted the limited uses that could be made of that Mr. Nelson and the County Manager discussed the JLARC study and the Mr. Nelson requested that Mr. Emerson discuss the Comprehensive Plan process, and Mr. Emerson explained the process of drafting the new Comprehensive. Plan and the process used for the current Comprehensive Mr. Nelson further discussed air quality monitoring with Mr. Condlin and Mr. Rogish explained the benefits of the County setting high standards for datacenters through the rezoning process and stated that the environmental impact would be worse in other localities with lower standards. He also discussed the backup power generation at the facilities, including the use of batteries, in addition to generators. Mr. Rogish stated he is very appreciative of the applicant's funding of solar energy Ms. Whitehead explained she hopes the time spent this evening dispels the notion the Board members defer to the member whose district the proposal isin. She stated Mr. Nelson had given her lots of information on the case and the phone number of Mr. Condlin for her to speak openly with him. She continued to wrestle with this decision. She discussed the prospect of waiting for the JLARC study. They will get information that will address how we will deal with Dominion and others, but that discussion is beyond what the Board will do tonight. She further stated that the protections  for this project.  classified as "Prime Economic Development."  portion of the property.  prospect of waiting for that study to be completed.  Plan.  the applicant.  opportunities for households in the County.  9    offered through the proffered conditions in this case far surpass the protections offered in cases in the region. She quoted Voltaire that the "perfect is the enemy of the good." She reassured her commitment to environmental issues, noting that climate change is real. This is about the Board taking the time to consider all the factors and coming up with the very best product we can sO that we take those benefits and use it for the community. She explained her intentions were to vote "yes" on the project but felt it was necessary to explain why, and she will continue to make sure the Board is being good stewards going forward for our residents and Mr. Nelson noted that the reason other localities do not have the restrictions and proffers that Henrico has been because they do not have the advocacy community the County has. He thanked the community for their efforts and prays they can see value in the work the County has done on this project. He stated he informed the Manager if the case passed, he would like to see the taxes generated by the project go to a dedicated fund, so the County does something transformational with the revenue. On motion of Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, and by unanimous vote, the Board followed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approved this item with the following proffered conditions: 1. Development and Building Plan. The Property will be developed in general conformance with the plan attached hereto entitled "WHITE OAK TECHNOLOGY PARK 2- OVERALL DEVELOPABLE AREA", prepared by Timmons Group, and dated February 27, 2024 (see case file) (the Development and Building Plan"), which is conceptual in nature and may vary in design, layout, final density, and other details shown therein, provided, however, any minimum building setbacks shown on the Development and Building Plan must be complied with and cannot be reduced. Those areas shown as DEVELOPABLE AREA" on the Development and Building Plan are permitted for development of the Property, which includes parking, access drives, roads, grading areas, utility installation and stormwater facilities, fencing and walls, including retaining walls, signage and other development. Those areas shown as BUILDABLE AREA" on the Development and Building Plan will be those general areas of the Property which are permitted for development of the Property as Developable Areas, and further on which buildings and structures, including utility infrastructure such as utility substations and pump stations, may be located. Otherwise, the specific design, general layout, and other details may vary from the Development and Building Plan as required for final plan approval, engineering reasons, design or compliance with governmental regulations, or as otherwise approved during any Plan of Development review, sO long as in no instance will any building be setback from the boundary of the Property less than what is shown on the Development and Building  for the County.  Plan.  10    :  2. Building Setback. Any building on the Property will be set back at least 100 feet from the specific boundary lines of the Property shown as' "100' BUFFER AND BUILDING SETBACK", "VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER AND BUILDING SETBACK (100' MINIMUM FROM P/L") and' "100' BUILDING SETBACK (TYP.)" on the plan entitled "WHITE OAK TECHNOLOGY PARK 2- OVERALL BUFFER PLAN", dated February 27, 2023, prepared by Timmons Group, and attached hereto (see case file) (the "Buffer and Setback Plan"). Landscaping, sidewalks, drainage facilities, utility lines (including fiber and telecommunication lines and related facilities) and connections, driveways, access ways, signs, flags, lighting, security fencing, parking areas, retaining walls and similar structures will be permitted within  any building setback area set forth in this Proffer 2.  3. Buffers and Landscaping.  a. Any buffer within the Property required in this Proffer 3 will be retained as natural to the greatest extent possible, provided, however, any buffer may include supplemental landscaping, berms and other purposes as approved at the time of landscape plan review. Roads and access drives (including any sight lines), sidewalks, utility easements (including drainage facilities, and fiber and telecommunication lines and related facilities), fencing/walls adjacent to any roads or drives, and signage will be permitted within any such buffer; provided, any such road, drive oru utility easements (other than electric power utility lines and easements) will be extended generally perpendicular through such buffer unless otherwise approved at the time of Plan of Development review. Fiber and telecommunication lines and related facilities may be extended parallel through a buffer sO long as the total width of the buffer is increased by the width of the easement for such fiber and telecommunication lines and related facilities. Any buffer required herein will include supplemental evergreen plantings necessary to provide additional screening for existing single-family dwellings adjoining such buffer as determined at the time of landscape plan review. A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of all plantings installed must be native species. b. The areas shown on the Buffer and Setback Plan (see case file) as "VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER AND BUILDING SETBACK (100' MINIMUM FROM P/L)" will be a minimum one hundred (100) foot in width, natural and landscaped buffer, and planted, if permitted within the Resource Protection Area, at a minimum to The areas shown on the Buffer and Setback Plan (see case file) as "50' BUFFER" will be a minimum fifty (50) foot in width, natural and landscaped buffer and planted at a minimum to the level ofa d. The areas shown on the Buffer and Setback Plan (see case file) as  the level of a transitional buffer 50.  transitional buffer 50.  II      "100' BUFFER AND BUILDING SETBACK" will be a minimum one hundred (100) foot in width, natural and landscaped buffer and planted at a minimum to the level of a transitional buffer 50. e. Supplemental landscaping consisting of evergreen plantings will be provided along any parking areas adjoining residential areas existing at the time of Plan of Development review. Such landscaping will be placed along the edge of the clearing limits adjacent to such parking areas, as determined appropriate at the time of landscape plan review to provide screening effective to screen lights from vehicles driving on such parking areas. All buffer areas will be marked at the time construction begins as required at the time of Plan ofDevelopment review. Any fencing within one hundred (100) feet of any boundary line of the Property (including Williamsburg Road or Technology Boulevard) will be decorative fencing, such as black cast aluminum decorative fence, security fencing, or as otherwise approved at the  time of Plan of Development review.  4. Uses. Only the following uses will be permitted:  a. Uses permitted in the Office Use Category, which include and are  limited to the following: Business and sales; ii. Business schools; iv. Data centers; and V. Professional services.  iii. Business training and conference facilities;  b. Uses permitted in the Manufacturing and Production Use Category, which include and are limited to the following:  1. Manutacturing, artisan; and ii. Manufacturing, light. Utility, minor;  d. Accessory uses, such as utilities, including, without limitation, electrical substations and switch stations, water and sewer e. Any other use permitted in the M-1 District if permitted by and ultimately approved with a Provisional Use Permit or Conditional Use Permit, as the case may be, provided, in no case will any  facilities (including lift stations); and  Manufacturing, Heavy uses be permitted.  5. Building Materials. Exposed exterior wall surfaces (above finished grade) of all individual buildings (excluding rooftop screening materials for mechanical equipment) must be constructed with one or more of the following siding materials: decorative concrete block (including, without limitation, split face block, smooth face block, fluted block, and ground face block), tilt-up or pre-cast concrete, brick, brick veneer, glass, metal (other than corrugated metal), stone, cast stone, stone veneer, stucco, synthetic stucco, glass block, cementitious  12    siding, insulated panels, concrete tile, or ceramic tile, unless other material is approved at the time of Plan of Development review. In no case will unpainted concrete block, unfinished corrugated metal, or unfinished sheet metal be permitted. For purposes of these proffers, "wall surfaces" will not be deemed to include columns, pilasters, trim, gutters, accent materials, architectural features, windows, doors, bay doors, piers, wall sections and headers near roll up doors and loading 6. Elevations. Buildings constructed on the Property will generally be inc conformance with the renderings attached hereto as Exhibit B and dated January 30, 2024 (2 pages, see case file), with respect to quality of design, massing and architecture, and the variety of features, unless otherwise approved at the time of Plan of Development review. 7. Lighting. All parking lot lighting on the Property will use concealed sources of light (such as shoebox type fixtures) and be dark sky compliant. Parking lot lighting fixtures located in the parking lots and within five hundred (500) feet of any existing single-family home must not exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height above grade level. Parking lot lighting and any exterior building light fixtures will utilize LED lamps or their equivalent. Lights located on the exterior of a building will not face toward the boundary line of the Property adjoining any 8. Height. No building on the Property will exceed a height of ninety- three (93) feet, provided as measured, including exceptions, as set forth in Section 24-8310 of the County Zoning Ordinance. 9. NoBurning. There must be no. on-site open burning of stumps, limbs, trees or other debris during site work or the construction of any 10. BMPs/Retention Ponds. Any retention pond or BMP facilities on the Property will be maintained in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations and any wet pond will be aerated. 11. Impervious Surface. No more than sixty-five percent (65%) of the Property will contain impervious surface consisting of buildings, 12. Utility Lines. Except for junction and access boxes, meters, utility lines in wetlands areas, existing overhead utility lines, electric power lines, and except as otherwise required by applicable laws, rules and regulations; all site-specific utility lines, including private electric, telephone, CATV or other similar lines, will be installed underground, unless otherwise approved at the time of Plan of Development review. 13. Detached Signage. Detached signage will be monument style, the base of which will be a material consistent with the building, and  doors.  existing single-family home.  buildings on the Property.  structures, parking areas and drive aisles.  13    landscaped. No such detached signage will be internally lit. No digital 14. Conservation Areas. Notwithstanding the uses permitted and regulated by the zoning of the Property, such portion(s) of the Property which lie within a one hundred (100) year flood plain as determined by definitive engineering studies approved by the Department of Public Works, and such portion(s) of the Property which may be inundated by waters impounded to a maximum elevation determined in a controlled, regulated manner by a structure or structures approved by the Department of Public Works, may only a. Stormwater management, retention areas, and stormwater b. Ponds, lakes and similar areas intended as aesthetic or Access drives, utility easements (including fiber and telecommunication lines and related facilities), signage, sidewalks, walkways, and recreational facilities installed in a manner to d. Such additional uses to the uses identified in A, B and C above as may be deemed compatible and of the same general character by the Director of Planning pursuant to the County Zoning The developer will, prior to the last Plan of Development approval for the Property, make an application to rezone such portions of the Property described above to a C-10 Conservation District. 15. Hours of Construction. The hours of any land disturbance activities, including operation of. bulldozers and other earthmoving equipment, within five hundred (500) feet ofany existing single-family home (which such area must be identified on any Plan of Development, as applicable), will be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. (or dusk, whichever is earlier) on Monday through Saturday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sunday, except in emergencies or where unusual circumstances require extending the specific hours in order to complete work, such as concrete pours or utility connections. Signs, in both English and Spanish, stating the above referenced provisions will be posted and maintained at all construction entrances to the Property prior to any land disturbances 16. Construction Traffic. Construction vehicles will only be permitted to access the Property by way of Williamsburg Road or Technology Boulevard. Any construction entrance must have a mud wash for the  changeable message signs will be permitted.  be used for the following purposes:  outflows.  recreational amenities or wildlife habitats.  minimize their impacts.  Ordinance.  activities thereon.  14    .  washing of construction vehicle tires as necessary to prevent mud from getting on public roads when leaving the Property. 17. Loading Areas. All loading docks must be screened from public view at the public rights of way. Loading areas facing a residential or agriculturally zoned property being used for residential purposes will be screened using landscaping, an opaque fence, or wall, or as otherwise approved at the time of Plan of Development review. 18. Diesel Generators. Diesel generators located on the Property may only be used for emergency purposes. For purposes of this proffer, emergency purposes means a need for the generators because of a failure in electrical power being provided to the Property from the main, typical source of electrical power, caused by a weather event, power grid outage, natural or human event, or other failure event. Diesel generators located on the Property may be tested only as approved under the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ") issued permit. Such testing will be conducted pursuant to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (or its successor) standards, as may be applicable at that time. All such generators must be installed pursuant to the applicable DEQ permit and operated pursuant to DEQ requirements and guidelines, including any necessary reporting. Any such generator must be located behind a building or screened from any public right-of-way or single-family home existing at the time of a Plan of Development by a wall, fence, landscaping, or other means as deemed necessary and approved at the time ofl Plan ofl Development review. No diesel generators may be used for production of electrical power to serve any use off the Property. The hours of generator testing will be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no testing on Saturdays or Sundays, provided that these limits will not apply to the testing of any generator(s) during time of commissioning (i.e., installation and start-up), and except in emergencies or where unusual circumstances require extending the specific hours in order to complete work. 19. Archeological Study. The applicant must conduct a Phase. 1 Archeological and Cultural Resource Study on the Property, in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, prior to the first Plan of Development approval on such portion of the Property subject to the Plan of Development. The applicant of such Plan of Development will provide a copy of the study to the Director of Planning of the County for review. Any culturally significant artifacts found as a result of such study or construction on any portion of the Property will be offered for donation to the County 20. Land Dedication. Prior to issuance of development permits on the portion of the Property with a current County Parcel ID of 840-713- 3163 and a current address of 2801 Old Williamsburg Road (the "Old Williamsburg Road Parcel"), upon request of the County, a minimum  or its assigns.  15    of.25 of an acre of the Old Williamsburg Road Parcel, such portion of Old Williamsburg Road Parcel to be north of Old Williamsburg Road, in the general area as shown as "0.25 ACRES OF DEDICATION AREA" on the Development and Building Plan (see case file), will be dedicated to the County or its assigns for use to place an historic marker and other improvements by the County or its assigns. Should any of the dedicated area not be used by the County within fifteen (15) years of the date of the dedication, title to the dedicated property will 21. Protective Covenants. Prior to or concurrent with the final approval of the initial Plan of Development for any portion of the Property a document setting forth covenants and restrictions (the "Covenants") will be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County, which will include Covenants relating to the development and maintenance oft that portion of the Property, and by which that portion of the Property will become subject to the Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions, and Easements For White Oak Technology Park, as may be restated and amended at that time (the "White Oaks Declarations"), other than requirements related to side and rear yard setbacks not adjoining a public street and reservation of easements by the Declarant under Section 8.01 oft the White Oaks Declarations. 22. Exterior Alarms. No exterior alarms or speaker systems will be permitted, provided alarms or beepers located on vehicles and 23. Trash Enclosures. Any proposed enclosure area for dumpsters on the Property that can be seen from a public right-of-way, if provided, must be constructed of masonry, tilt, or other cementitious product on three (3) sides that is complementary to the buildings. The fourth side must be gated with an opaque material. Trash enclosures will be additionally screened from view with landscaping or other screening 24. Best Practices. All buildings on the Property must be constructed and operated using best practices or better in the industry with respect to building construction, noise attenuation, and cooling technologies. All data center buildings will be constructed to LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) "Silver" standards for Building Design and Construction or a recognized industry equivalent such as EnergyStar (the "Building Standards"). Prior to the issuance of the permanent certificate of occupancy for such building, a licensed engineer or architect shall provide the Planning Department with certihcation that such building was constructed according to the Building Standards. The design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all data center buildings will be consistent with generally recognized industry energy efficiency standards and guidelines for data centers as determined by ASHRAE Standard 90.4  revert to the applicant or its successors in interest.  emergency alarms will be permittèd.  materials.  orar recognized industry equivalent.  16    25. Data Center Uses. Any project or building specifically used as a data center will be designed and constructed implementing measures and techniques incorporating the following measures, unless otherwise Minimize impervious areas and provide enhanced landscaping iii. Use a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of solar power for aeration iv. Use stormwater runoff from on-site detention facilities to irrigate Provide a minimum of 4 EV parking spaces per building within the data center employee parking. area, with at least 1 universal vi. Use LED fixtures for a minimum of eighty-five percent (85%) of vii. Use LED fixtures for a minimum of eighty-five percent (85%) of ix. Incorporate heat reflective roofing on a minimum of sixty percent X. Buildings will be constructed using best practice sustainability xi. Noise Attenuation Standards. When adjacent to any parcel with a residential dwelling in existence at the time of plan of development review, noise levels at any exterior property line caused by sounds emanating from the Property will not exceed 70 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. weekdays and from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, and 55 dBA between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. weekdays and from 10:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. The foregoing standards will not apply to the operation of construction equipment, mandatory safety measures (such as back up beepers on vehicles), emergency operations or noise resulting from work on public projects and/or on private or public utilities. For the purposes of this proffer, the term "emergency" means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseen events beyond the control of the data center operator, which requires the immediate use of the emergency generators to restore normal operation(s). Emergency operations will adhere to DEQ provisions and/or other relevant federal regulation. A baseline sound study of ambient noise will be conducted prior to land disturbing for any portion of the Property subject to an approved Plan of Development and the results of such study will  approved at the time of Plan ofl Development review:  within the ii. development areas;  ofs stormwater management facilities; landscape, lawn or buffer areas;  EV charger for each 2 EV parking spaces; all building interior lighting; all building exterior lighting; viii. Recycle construction material waste; (60%) oft the data center building roof;  measures; and  be submitted to the County.  26. Sidewalks. Sidewalks will be constructed to County or VDOT standards along Technology Boulevard and Williamsburg Road as required at the time of Plan of Development review for any portion of  17    7 2  the Property adjoining Technology Boulevard or Williamsburg Road, 27. Severance. The unenforceablity, elimination, revision or amendment of any proffer set forth herein, in whole or in part, will not affect the validity or enforceability of the other proffers or the unaffected part of 28. Traffic Impact. At the time of each Plan of Development review on any portion of the Property, a cumulative average daily trip analysis will be provided to the County of all uses located on the Property at that time together with the use proposed by such Plan of Development. If such analysis estimates more than 4,000 average daily trips (as determined by the 1lth Edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Code and/or based on actual traffic information submitted to and approved by the County Department of Public Works) as a result of all such uses on the Property, a traffic study as required by the County at the time of such Plan of Development review will be completed. Necessary road improvements must be made as identified in the approved traffic study and required in accordance with the phasing plan accompanying such Plan of Development at that time. Such traffic study must be updated in a cumulative fashion for each additional phase of development on any portion oft the Property, as required by the County Traffic Engineer. 29. Access. Vehicular access to any portion of the Property will be limited to Williamsburg Road and Technology Boulevard, and as an emergency access only via Old Williamsburg Road and Old Memorial Drive, unless approved otherwise at the time of Plan of Development review. Vehicular access to Williamsburg Road must be provided for that portion of the Property currently designated with GPIN 840-713- 3163 (the "Old Williamsburg Road Parcel) prior to final approval of a Plan of Development on that portion of the Property designated with GPIN 841-712-4360, unless otherwise waived in writing by the then existing owner of the Old Williamsburg Road Parcel. Access for the Old Williamsburg Road Parcel will be permitted on Old Williamsburg Road for any such portion of the Old Williamsburg Road Parcel used 30. Concept Road 80. Development of the southern portion of Parcel GPIN 841-710- 2304 will accommodate a future connection from Technology Boulevard to Old Memorial Drive, in the general location of" "Proposed Concept Road 80", as identified on the Development and Building Plan (see case file), or as otherwise approved at the time of Plan of Development review. At the request of the County, right-of- way, a minimum of fifty (50) feet in width, will be dediçated to the County for construction of' "Proposed Concept Road 80", provided that the developer will not be responsible for the construction of Concept Road 80, other than access improvements otherwise required at the  as the case may be.  any such proffer.  for open space, public or recreation purposes.  time of Plan of Development review.  18    :   31. Safe Conduct of Operations. All uses must be conducted sO as not to (a) create any danger to the health, safety or welfare of the citizens of Henrico County, Virginia or (b) cause any material adverse impact on the Property or surrounding areas by creating any excessive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, lint, odor, heat or glare beyond the boundaries  oft the Property.  The vote oft thè Board was as follows:  Yes: Nelson, Schmitt, Cooper, Whitehead, Rogish  No: None  PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER ITEMS  153-24  Resolution - Declaration of Surplus Property - Signatory Authority - Minor Subdivision and Deed of Gift to the School Board - Portion ofGPIN 767-754-5387 Abutting Hermitage High School - Brookland District. No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item. On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Ms. Whitehead, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Condemnation - Right-of-Way and Easements - Magellan Parkway Extension (Bridge Over I-95) Improvement Project - 650 Scott  154-24  Road and 676 Scott Road Fairfield District. Noone from the public spoke in opposition to this item. the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. 5519 Woodrow Terrace - Fairfield District. No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item. On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Ms. Whitehead, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item = see attached ordinance. Ordinance - Vacation of Building Line - College Hills Subdivision - 604  On motion of Mr. Rogish, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, and by unanimous vote, Ordinance - Vacation of Building Line - Bryan Park Terrace Subdivision -  155-24  156-24  Horsepen Road - Tuckahoe District.  Noone from the public spoke in opposition to this item. the Board approved this item - see attached ordinance.  On motion of Mr. Rogish, seconded by Mr. Cooper, and by unanimous vote,  19  y :.. :    PUBLIC COMMENTS  There were no comments from the public.  GENERALAGENDA 157-24  Resolution Support of PlanRVA Grant Application - Urban Agriculture On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Award of Contracts - Annual Environmental Engineering On motion of Ms. Whithead, seconded by Mr. Cooper, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Award of Contract - Henrico Sports & Events Center - Building Automation & HVAC Improvements - Fairfield District. On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item = see attached resolution. Resolution - Award of Contract - Lucas Road Waterline - Brookland On motion ofl Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Cooper, and by unanimous vote, Resolution - Signatory Authority - Construction Change Order - Greenwood Estates Waterline Improvements - Brookland District. On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Award of Contract - Woodcliff Subdivision Sewer On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Ms. Whitehead, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Signatory Authority - Award of Contract - Annual Contract On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Ms. Whitehead, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution. Resolution - Award of Contract - Bethlehem Road Improvements -  Planning.  158-24  Services.  159-24  160-24  District.  the Board approved this item = see attached resolution.  161-24  162-24  Improvements Fairfield District.  163-24  for Unidirectional Flushing Maintenance.  164-24  Brookland District.  20    On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote, the Board approved this item - see attached resolution.  There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:54 p.m.  Henrico-County, Virginia  GN  21    9hoclamation  OF THE BOARD OFS SUPERVISORS OF HENRICO COUNTY, VIRGINIA  LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WEEK  May 12-18, 2024  WHEREAS, the law enforcement officers of Henrico County serve our citizens daily, protecting lives and property and upholding local ordinances and state laws; and WHEREAS, by the nature of their duties, these officers endure grave danger and, on WHEREAS, the County'sl law enforcement officers help make our community a safe place WHEREAS, these professionals need and deserve the support of our citizens; and WHEREAS, it isi important to remember our officers who died in the line of duty and to acknowledge those officers who continue tos serve the County and the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, each year, the 15th day of May is nationally designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the calendar: week in which that date occurs is nationally designated as WHEREAS, the Henrico County Police Division will hold its annual memorial service and wreath-laying ceremony at Police Memorial Park on' Thursday, May 16, 2024, tol honor NOW, THEREFORE, BEI ITI PROCLAIMED that the Board of Supervisors ofHenrico County, Virginia, hereby recognizes May 12-18, 2024, as Law Enforcement Officers Week. and Thursday, May 16, 2024, as Law Enforcement Memorial Day in Henrico County; encourages Henrico citizens to take note of these special dates; and salutes the County's law enforcement officers for their steadfast commitment to the County's public safety efforts and for contributing significantly to the quality ofl life of this community.  occasion, loss oftheir own lives; and tol live, work, and play; and  Police Week; and  the County's fallen police officers.  Chairman  Board of Supervisors k  Mhpw.Rnaclus Tanyal N.J Brackett, Clerk May 14,2024    9hoclamation  OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF HENRICOCOUNTI, VIRGINIA OLDER AMERICANS MONTH  May 2024  WHEREAS, Henriço County includes more than 71,000 residents who are age 55 and over; and WHEREAS, these residents enrich our communities through their diverse life experiences that have enabled them to "connect, create, and contribute," "and WHEREAS, May is Older Americans Month, a time for us to acknowledge and honor Henriço older adults and their immense influence on every facet of our community; and WHEREAS, Henrico County includes a growing number of older Americans who contribute their strength, wisdom, and experience to our community; and WHEREAS, the 2024 theme for Older Americans Month is "Powered by Connection" which recognizes the profound impact that meaningful relationships and social WHEREAS, communities benefit when people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds are WHEREAS, Henrico County recognizes the need to create a community that provides the services and supports older Americans need to thrive and live independently for as WHEREAS, Henrico County continues to enhance the community for older residents by offering services and programs through the Division of Recreation and Parks, the Advocate for the Aging, and other County agencies, and in collaboration with Senior Connections the Capital Area Agency on Aging that promotes independence, explores the positive aspects of aging, and increases access to services that support aging in place. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITI PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, Virginia, that May 2024 is Older Americans Month.. The Board of Supervisors urges every resident to recognize the contributions of our older residents, help to create an inclusive society, and join efforts to support older Americans' choices about how they  connections have on the health and well-being ofolder residents; and  welcomed, included, and supported; and  long as possible; and  age in their communities.  Chairman  Board of Supervisors  g    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 149-24 Page No. loft  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLTIOA-Aplatment of Members - Finance Board Date: 5/024 Movedby(I). Cospu Secondedby(). Roçat  For Clerk'sUseOnly: OAproved ) Denied Amended ODeferred  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Cooper, R. Nelson,T. Rogish,J. Schmitt, D. Whitehead, W.  (2). REMARKS:  (2)  A PPROY  WHEREAS, by ordinance adopted March 11, 2008, the Board of Supervisors created the Finance Board to serve as trustee of funds designated by the County to be held, accumulated, and invested by WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.2-1547 of the Code of Virginia, the Finance Board is currently composed oft the Director of Finance, who serves an indefinite term, and three additional members with proven integrity, business ability, and demonstrated experience in cash management and investments, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, Virginia, reappoints the following persons to the Finance Board for a term ending May 24, 2026, or thereafter  the Finance Board for the purpose of funding Other Post-Employment Benefits; and,  who serve two-year terms.  when their successors have been appointed and qualified:  Vaughan G. Crawley John B. Wack  By. Agency Head Copy to:  By County Manager Certified: ACopy" Teste: Date:  7  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Ilem No. 150-24 Page No. lof 1  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Resignation of Member - Henrico Area Mental Health &  Developmental Services Board  For Clerk'sUse0 Only: Date: 5M2024 oAppoved 0 Denied 0 Amended ODeferred  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER V  wg.Rogat Seconded by(I). Schnuts  Cooper, R. Nelson," T. Rogish,J. Schmitt,D. Whitehead, M.  (2). REMARKS:  (2)  APPROY  WHEREAS, on January 11, 2022, Rupinder Kaur was appointed to the Henrico Area Mental Health & Developmental Services Board for a three-year term expiring December 31, 2024; and, WHEREAS, Ms. Kaur submitted her resignation from the Henrico Area Mental Health & Developmental Services Board on April 12, 2024, via email correspondence. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, Virginia, hereby accepts the resignation of Rupinder Kaur from the Henrico Area Mental Health &  Developmental Services Board.  By Agency Head Copy to:  By County Manager Certified: ACopy" Tesle: Date:  17  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    Brackett, Tanya From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tanya,  Totty, Laura Friday, April 12, 2024 10:15 AM Brackett, Tanya MacKay, Allison FW: Not able to continue the role  Good morning. Rupinder Kaur resigned from the CSB Board effective today. Please see her email below. Ms. Whitehead has the opportunity to appoint someone tot fill Ms. Kaur'sunexpired term which ends December 31,  2024. Please let mel knowi iflcan be of help.  Thank you, Laura Laura S. Totty Executive Director 10299 Woodman Road Glen Allen, VA: 23060 (804) 727-8585 (804)727-8580 fax e-mail: auratony@henncous  Henrico Area Mental Health & Developmental Services  From: Rupinder Kaur roopb7ehotmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 12,202410:06AM To: Totty, Laura <tot05@henrico.us) Cc: Maçkay, Allison MAC081Ohenncous) Subject: Not able to continue the role  Dearl Laura,  Ihope this message finds you well. lam writing to formally resign from the position of Board Member for the Three Chopt district with Henrico Areal Mental Health and Developmental Services. Regrettably, my increasingly overwhelming schedule no longer allows me to justify continuing in this role. My resignation willl be effective from today (4/12/2024). It has been an immense privilege to serve in this capacity, and I am deeply grateful for all the opportunities that have Iwish to express my heartfelt appreciation to all my esteemed colleagues on the board. Likewise, lextend my sincere gratitude to the entire team at Henrico Area Mental Health and Developmental Services for their dedication and  come my way during my tenure.  commitment to our shared mission.  Please let me know iflcan! be of any help to facilitate a smoother transition. Iwish you all continued success and fulfillment in your endeavors.  With warm regards, Roop' (Rupinder Kaur)  1    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 153-24 Page No. 1of1  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION Declaration of Surplus Property Signatory Authority Minor  Subdivision and Deed of Gift to the School Board Hermitage High School - Brookland District  Portion of GPIN 767-754-5387 Abutting  ForC Clerk's UseOnly: Date:5 514024 MA Approved () Denied ) Amended C) Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Movedby Cosper Secondedt by(1). whithiac) Cooper, R.  (2). REMARKE:  (2).  Nelson,T. Rogish,). Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  APPRE  WHEREAS, the County owns property identified as GPIN 767-754-5387 containing 14.301 acres, more or less WHEREAS, the County School Board desires to acquire a portion of the County Parcel as shown in Exhibit A WHEREAS, the County desires to donate the Property to the County School Board, and the Property is surplus WHEREAS, this Resolution was advertised, and a public hearing was held on May 14, 2024, pursuant to Va. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that: (I) the Property is declared to be surplus; (2) the Chairman is authorized to sign the Minor Subdivision Plat dated 7/27/23 titled "Plats Showing Lots 1 and 2, Originally Known as a Portion of Parcel D. and Parcel E," attached as Exhibit B; (3) the Chairman is authorized to sign a Deed of Gift conveying the Property to the County School Board in a form approved by the County Attomey; and (4) the County Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all closing and any Comments: The Real Property Division has processed the request through the Departments of Planning, Public Works, Public Utilities, Economic Development Authority, and Henrico County Public Schools without objection. The Directors of Public Works and Real Property recommend approval of the Board  (the" "County Parcel"); and,  (the "Property") for the Hermitage ACE Center and parking lot; and,  to the needs oft the County; and,  Code $8 15.2-1800 and 15.2-1813.  other documents necessary to complete the transaction.  paper; the County Manager concurs.  By Agency Head. Copyt to:  A ByC County Manager.  ?    Certified: ACopy Teste: Date:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    EXHIBITA  LOT REA-=204312 SOFT 0:4.702 ACRES TO SJRVEY TE UNE  EA-1394230 50. CR +9.050 ACRES TO SURVEY Ft UNL  1   Southernl  line  Actual  boundary isa approximate. boundary linei follows thec centerli line of Rocky Branch Creck.  r'80    I        CouRIV  LOT 2 AREA=+204812 SQ. FT. OR +4. 702 AÇRES TO SURVEY TE UNE CELL SITE (FELD LCCA ION) DEED BOOK 3223 PACE 18'0  518"1 1" 35 27625 (TO LINE)  EASTNC  LOT AREA-+394230 SQ: FT. +9.050 ACRES TO SURVEY TE LINE Ro  5  1  NOTES:  C.,T.. E  UNDER OF ANACTUAL FIELOS SURVEY MY GEOSPATV AELD ME REPORI. ro. ors FT. DEEDBOON 1238A PAGE 574 GPNE  FESS TOIAL COUNTY. VRGVIA 787-754-5379  W4/  SCALE:V"-ar    HUNCARY SPRING ROAD (RIGHT OF WAY VARIES) (COUNTY OF HENRICO PROJECT #S5540-704-154-00),  NE 27'04C 33703 6565 (IO SURVEYTE UNE OLY jA  L9T (TOTAL) (FO. SURVEY nt UNE)    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 154-24 Page No. 10 of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION Fairfield District For Clerk's Use Only: Date: 5,1024 Approved 0) Denied () Amended 0) Deferred to:  Condemnation  Right-of-Way and Easements  Magellan  Parkway Extension (Bridge Over I-95) iImprovement Project-650 Scott Road and 676 Scott Road -  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Schml  MopRocit Seconded! by(1).  Cooper,R. Nelson,T. Rogish,]. Schmltt, D. Whitehead, M..  (2). REMA A  (2).  WHEREAS, it is necessary for construction of the Magellan Parkway Extension (Bridge Over I-95) Improvement Project (the "Project") that the County acquire right-of-way containing 2,093 square feet; a permanent drainage easement containing 1,576 square feet; a permanent slope easement containing 4,748 square feet; and permanent utility easements containing 2,953 square feet (the "Right-of-Way and Easements") across the properties located at 650 Scott Road and 676 Scott Road, identified as Tax Map Parcels 786-760-9336 and 786-760-8752, respectively, and owned by Barksdale W. Haggins (the WHEREAS, the County has offered the Owner $8,737 as compensation for the Right-of-Way and Easements, improvements, cost to cure, and damages to the remainder, ifa any, but the parties cannot reach WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, Virginia desires to exercise the authority granted by the Code of Virginia (the "Code") to acquire title, to enter upon and to lake possession of the Right-of- Way and Easements, and to construct the Project prior to or during the condemnation proceedings; ;and, WHEREAS, after advertisement in the Richmond TimesDispatch, the Board held a public hearing pursuant t0 $S 15.2-1903 and 15.2-1905 of the Code, at which time the Board declared its intent to enter and take the  "Owner"); and,  an agreement on the acquisition of the Right-of-Way and Easements; and,  Right-of-Way and Easements for the Project across portions ofthe Owner's property.  NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that:  (1) The Board directs the County Manager to take the necessary steps to acquire the Right- of-Way and Easements over, under, upon, across, and through the property ofthe Owner, as shown on the plats made by H&B Surveying and Mapping, LLC dated May 9, 2023,  reduced  By Agency Copy to:  By County Manager, At  Certified: ACopy Teste: Date:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OFSUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 154-24 Page No. 2 of 2  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Condemnation Right-of-Way and Easements - Magellan Parkway Extension (Bridge Over I-95) Improvement Project - 650 Scott Road and 676 Scott  Road Fairfield District  copies of which are attached and marked Exhibits "A-1" and "A-2;" and as further described on Sheet No. 3(1), last revised June 13, 2023, ofl Magellan Parkway Over I-95 Project, a reduced size copy ofv which is attached and marked as Exhibit "B;"and, (2) The Board deems it necessary to enter upon the property and take possession of the Right-of-Way and Easements to construct the Project prior to or during condemnation (3) The Board finds a necessity exists to institute condemnation proceedings pursuant to the Code to acquire the Right-of-Way and Easements for the public use of constructing, operating, and maintaining the Project and to determine the amount of compensation and damages, if any, caused by the taking, possession, and acquisition of the Right-of-Way (4) The Board authorizes the County Attomey to institute and conduct condemnation proceedings to acquire the Right-of-Way and Easements in accordance with the Code; (5) The Board authorizes and directs the County Manager to continue to seek a voluntary acquisition of the Right-of-Way and Easements, to take all steps necessary to acquire the Right-of-Way and Easements, and to enter on and take possession oft the required Right-  proceedings in accordance with the Code; and,  and Easements; and,  and,  of-Way and Easements in accordance with the Code.  Comments: The Real Property Division has been unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement for the acquisition of the Right-of-Way and Easements. Therefore, the Director of Public Works and the Deputy County Manager for Community Operations recommend approval of this Board paper; the  County Manager concurs.    Exhibit A-1  OWNERSHIP: BARKEDALE W. HAGGINS DEED BOOK: 2891 PAGE: 784 PARCEL NO: 788-760-8368  NF WILLEA MAE POWELL, MARIANEAVES DOROTHY T. COLEY, SHEILAT.T TURNER DB. 2633 PG. 2068 Pa.21 PG.26 PARCEL ID: 786-760-9881 640 SCOTTRD. 765.25 TOSCOTTRD. PROPOSED! PERMANENT SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT $,673SF Q.082AG.  NOTES: THISPLATIS FORT THES PURPOSE PROPOSED RIGHTOFV WAY. SOLE Al PROPOSED OF PERMA UTILITYEASEMENT PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT, AND Two PROPOSEDI PERMANENT MANTENANCE EASEMENTS. THE BOUNDARY HEREON SURVEY. DONOTH BEARINGS REPRESENT ANDD DISTANCES A CURRENT 8HOW BASED ON THE SURVEY USEDI FORT THE DESIG PROPOSED EASEMENTS. HORIZONTAL (NADBS) DATUME ESTABLISHED REAL TIME KINEMATTC (RTO GPS OBSERVAT 02-23-2021. DIFFERENTIAL CORRECTIONS FROMNATIONAL GEQDETIC SURVEY (NGS) OPERATINGI REFERENCE STATION (CORS)" THEF PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON FALLSN7 FLOODHAZARD: ZONE: YUNSHADEDAREAS TOBE OUTSIDE OF THE02%A ANNUAL CHANC PLAIN, ASS SCALEDFROMF FEMA FLOODL NSUR MAP, MAPI NUMBER 51087C008SC. EFFECTIVE PEGEMEER 18.2007. THISPLATHAS! BEEN PREPAREDI WITHOUT MLE COMMITMENT ANDE DOES NOTA NECE INDICATEALL! ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE m  N-3,7B0,913.39 E-11,786,637.85  PROPOSED! RW 2,093 SF 0048AG. 1 74.71  S67'5836'E 808.28 (TOTAL)-  78.s3  BARKSDALE W. HAGGINS D.B. 2891 PG 0784 PARCEL PB.21PG25 D:788-760-9368 65DSCOTTRD. 3124AG(CALC)  /  PROPOSED PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1,578SF Q.038AC. TROP 05-09-2023'  az Ue. No. 002017 LD BURVENS  * PROPOSED PERMANENT SLOPE MAINTENANGE EASEMENT 1,175SF 0.027AG.  PROPOSED! PERMANENT ZYUTLTYEASEMENT 2804SF 0.067AG. 87491 N674726W 888.(TOTAL)  Graphio Scale: 1-30  VOHA Mon.  PROPOSED RIGHT OFI WAY 2,083 SQUAREFEET PROPOSED PERMANENT: 20 UTLITYEASEMENT 2,004 SQUARE! FEET PROPOSED PERMANENT ORAINAGE EASEMENT 1,678SQUARE! FEET TWO PROPOSED! PERMANENT SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS 4,748 SQUARE PLATSHOWING THE LOCATION OF/ A PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY, APROF PERMANENT: 20 UTILITYE EASEMENT, A PROPOSED PERMANENTDRANAGE AND TWO PROPOSED PERMANENT SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TOBE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE PROPERTYOF BARKSDALE W. HAGGINS DISTRICT,  N-3,780,759.77 E-11,788,492.88  UNETABLE UNE BEARING DISTANCE NIT2301E 1641 N74-0173E 30.76 N7445E 574014W 38.62 N6TI7SWHE  NF BARKSDALEW. HAGGINS D.E. 1149 PG. 351 P.B.21 PG. 20 PARCEL ID:7 788-780-8752 8768 SCOTTRD.  IN THE FAIRFIELD MAGISTERIAL SCALE: 1-30 H&B SURVEYING and MAPPING, LLG. PLATNUMBER, ALISONW, HANSON, uS" VA GURVEYORS UGI NO-:2017 SHEET 10F1 814MOOREFIELDF PARKI DRME, RICHMOND, VA: 23236 RECORDED 012 OFFICE (804/380-3781 'FAX: (804)859-5330  COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGI DATE:05-09-1 PB..  CURVET TABLE  CURVE DELTA RADIUS ENGTH TANGENT ICHPBEARING CHPLENGTH CI 00s32 4,280.60 4.40 2.20 5743858-W 440    Exhibit A-2  OWNERSHIP: BARKSDALE W. HAGGINS DEED BOOK: 1149 PAGE: 0351 PARCEL NO: 786-760-8752  NOTES:  1. THISPLATISF FOR THE SOLE! PURPOSE OF SHOWIN PROPOSED PERMANENT 20 UTILITYEASEMENT: BOUNDARYLINES: SHOWN HEREONI DO NOT REP CURRENT BOUNDARY: SURVEY. BEARINGS AND SHOWN! HEREON/ ARE BASED ON THE SURVEY THE DESIGN OF1 THE PROPOSED EASEMENTS. HORIZONTAL (NADa3) DATUMI ESTABLISHED THR REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTKJ GPS OBSERVATION: 02-23-2021. DIFFERENTIAL GORRECTIONS WERE FROMNATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) CONI OPERATING REFERENCE STATION (CORS)" "VAAD THE PROPERTYSHOWN! HEREON FALLS IN THE FLOODI HAZARD ZONE: TCLNSHADEDMAREAS TOBEC OUISDE OF1 THE02% ANNUAL CHANCE PLAIN, AS SCALEDE FROMI FEMA FLOOD INSURAN MAP, MAP NUMBER 6108700065C, EFFECIVE! DA DECEMBER 18, 2007. THIS PLATHAS BEENI PREPARED WITHOUT1 THE OFA1 TME COMMITMENT, ANDI DOES NOT NECES INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE TMLE.  N/F BARKSDALET W. HAGGINS D.B. 2991 PG. 0784 PARCEL PB.21 ID: 766-760-8365 PG.28 850SCOTTRD. $67'4726'E 871.30'(TOTAL)- 87TOSCOITRD, PROPOSED PERMANENT ZYUTLITYEASEMENT 49SF 0.001AC.  VDHMan. N-3,760,769.77 E-11,786,49288  1.53  (013) BARKSDALE W. HAGGINS D.B.1149 PG. 0351 D.B. 1368 PG, 37B(ISDHENRCOCO) P.B.21 PG,26 PARCEL ID: 786-760-8762 678 SCOTTRD. 2.908 AG. (CALC)  N-3,760,781.62 E-11,786,490.44  20  Graphic Scale: 1"-10  PROPOSED PERMANENT: 20 UILITYEASEMENT 49SQUAREFEET PLATSHOWING THELOCATION OF Al PROPOSED PERMANENT 2DUTILITYEASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE PROPERTYOF IN THE FAIRFIELD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, COUNTYOF HENRICO, VIRGINIA  TH OP 05-09-2023 bemubrtost Alison W. Hanson Lic. No. 002617 So SEESS  BARKSDALE W. HAGGINS  SCALE: 1* 10' H&B SURVEYING and MAPPING, LLC. ALISON W. HANSON, L8" VA SURVEYORSUG NO.:2617 SHEET10F1 614MOOREFELDE PARKDRIVE, RICHMOND, VA: 23238 013 OFFICE: (804,330-3781 FAX: (804)850-6330  DATE: 05-09-2023  PLATNUMBER. RECORDED.  PB.    DDBDD  Matchline Station 121-50.00/(Seo Sheot 3(0))  DE  BBBBB  BB  08  (z)c jaeus ces) 00'0 09+821 uoges BUppEW  STREET, SUITES 309 P)8047 782-1903 (F)804) 782-2142 RUMMEL, KLEPPER& KAHL, LLP  DATE 12/6/2022 MAGELLANI PARKWAY OVER 1-95 SHEET  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23223 MAGELLAN ENGINEER: PDP ENGLEWOODI FARMS DRMVET TOS SCOTTE ROAD Jn 0-06/08/23  PARKWAY CHECKED  OVERI-95 90%PLANS oBr8 BR08104  RKK  HENRICO COUNTY. VIRGNIA ROAD LAYOUT PLAN SHEET  02 06/13/23 ECALE r25    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 155-24 Page No. 1of2  Agenda Title: ORDINANCE - Vacation of Building Line - Bryan Park Terrace Subdivision 5519  Woodrow Terrace - Fairfield District  For ClerksUseOnly: Date: 5LoH MApproved 0) Denied Amended ) Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Movedb yCegper (2). REMARKS  ylhibhiad Cooper, R.  (2).  Nelson,T. Rogish,]. Schmitt,D. Whitehead, M.,  RO  WHEREAS, Chris Kapogiannis, the owner ofLots 8 & 9, Block A in the Bryan Park Terrace subdivision in the Fairfield District, also known as 5519 Woodrow Terrace, asked the County to vacate the 35-foot building line WHEREAS, the plat showing the Building Line is recorded in the Clerk's Office oft the Circuit Court of Henrico County (the "Clerk'sC Office") in Plat Book 23, page 77 (Exhibit A), and shown highlighted; and, WHEREAS, this Ordinance was advertised pursuant to Va. Code $ 15.2-2204, and the Board held a public WHEREAS, it appears that no owner of any lot shown on the plat will be irreparably damaged by the vacation.  running along the front oft the property ("Building Line"); and,  hearing on May 14, 2024;and,  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors that:  1) The 35-foot building line running along the front of Lots 8 & 9, Block A, Bryan Park Terrace subdivision, shown on Exhibit A, is vacated in accordance with Va. Code $ 15.2-2272(2); 2) This Ordinance will become effective 30 days after its passage as provided by law;  By Agency Head  Ay By County Manager. ST  Certified: ACopy Teste: Date:  Copyt to:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. (55-24 Page No. 2of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: ORDINANCE Vacation of Building Line - Bryan Park Terrace Subdivision  5519 Woodrow Terrace Fairfield District  3) The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Henrico County (the "Clerk"), is authorized, upon receipt of payment therefor, to record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the Clerk's Office after the expiration of 30 days from its passage, provided no appeal has been taken to the Circuit Court; 4) The Clerk is further authorized to index the Ordinance on the grantor and grantee sides of the  general index to deeds in the name of Chris Kapogiannis; and, 5) The Clerk will note this vacation as provided in Va. Code S 15.2-2276.  Comments: The Real Property Division processed the requested vacation through the Departments of Planning, Public Works, and Public Utilities without objection. The Director of Real Property recommends  approval of the Board paper; the County Manager concurs.    96-A2-30  THE o TME LAno 15 CORDAREE - no MoI B5 cosr PoR.  on TE PLAT OEBIRATED enesny Is  L  GREERWA  STREET  Mallisu hhb Ba Wpbar  N  unE, 1952 HOTARY PuBLIC.  VAEATED SE PB-/6D3 A6-553 SU001VIBION  m  pREs  A  POMRGE oF : Ti Po PROM in 528, PAGE. 45  VEo to n SAc JA,  d6 WEDSR 0,1030 BOROEO Ave a, r6a, 4 BKOOROED DEPT Gnso fak KTt  bos, PACE. 16, HCC. ow Wo DEEMABO B. HAMAn  EEERR CCTREAIE To THE PEST OF Pv EOMLEOGE Ano BLE AL o Fe EGuoEEr AS BKT woRr" in THE ORon AnGE - BuePYonS AVS COmPLEP. Aon ercoe Wivr.. OATION 1r TG COUPTY o Cneço. VA. Iua MAER. SEETIY ALk OP MR erank MORUMERTS A or TS PLAT WILL &6 SET Bw uLw, 15  PLArB OF Pow  fLZE  DUMBARTOR  ROAD  riorsa OSE- BEDEATIAL WATEE. € SEwEe ow  APP33HC -. 17. PApA an PLAEsI"   counTy avarEm TOR RABOUNO LASEI MEAT AF THIE Eno oF Gins TER. oT eR vere To ADurrG PROPEGTY MMEn OTECET 1S ATEROLO  BRYAM PARKTERRACE BROOKLM DISTRICT HEMRICO COURITYVA. SCALE l"-i0o' JUMEK, 1952 JonmH. FO2TER GINEEE SUeVEvOR  OF  1N17552 LLREI Biu  pa2S PAGE77 ICAMono, VIRGIIA 4750  SUB-003-52  EXHIBIT A    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 154-4 Page No.1of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: ORDINANCE - Vacation of Building Line - College Hills Subdivision 604 Horsepen  Road - Tuckahoe District  For Clerk's Use Only: Date: 51412024 (V'Approved C) Denied () Amended Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Moved! by(I). Roçhs (2). REMARI Au  Secondedby(I). Coopen  Cooper, R. Nelson, T. Rogish,). Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  2).  WHEREAS, Progress Realty Group, LLC, the owner of 604 Horsepen Road in the College Hills subdivision, asked the County to vacate the 35-foot portion of the building line on the property ("Building Line"); and, WHEREAS, the plat showing the Building Line is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Henrico County (the "Clerk's Office") in Plat Book 26, page 113 (Exhibit A), and the affected parcel is also shown on WHEREAS, this Ordinance was advertised pursuant to Va. Code $ 15.2-2204, and the Board held a public WHEREAS, it appears to the Board that no owner of any lot shown on the plat will be irreparably damaged by  the attached GIS map (Exhibit B); and, hearing on May 14, 2024; and,  the vacation.  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board that:  1) the 35-foot building line on Lot 8, Block D, Section 3, College Hills subdivision, shown on the plat recorded in the Clerk's Office in Plat Book 26, page 113, is vacated in accordance with Va. Code  $15.2-2272/2);  2) this Ordinance will become effective 30 days after its passage as provided by law;  By Agency Head  By County Manager. GNkk  Certified: ACopyTeste: Date:  Copy Lo:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OFH HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARDO OFSUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 15.-24 Page No. 2of2  Agenda Title: ORDINANCE - Vacation of Building Line - College Hills Subdivision - 604 Horsepen  Road- - Tuckahoe District  3) the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Henrico County (the "Clerk"), is authorized, upon receipt of payment therefor, to record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the Clerk's Office after the expiration of 30 days from its passage, provided no appeal has been taken to the Circuit Court; 4) the Clerk is further authorized to index the Ordinance on the grantor and grantee sides of the  general index to deeds in the name of Progress Realty Group, LLC; and, 5) the Clerk will note this vacation as provided in Va. Code $ 15.2-2276.  Comments: The Real Property Division processed the requested vacation through the Departments of Planning, Public Works, and Public Utilities without objection. The Director of Real Property recommends  approval oft the Board paper; the County Manager concurs.    FRaoRIo Wogc' a & ckesod and deoceo. as: soewn, a connecy wirn Deron Rood.  CrO  CKEMRETESNO  MORSE PEN  ROAD  N284377 AA 4 - 3 3 10 BLOLA- COLLEGEL TOP   BLOCAH SETKN3 WESTHWPYW HILLS lapryal B t a PAU cona 004 COLLEGE SECTION 34 HENPICOCQYA  SELT/ON-2 HILLS &a9o Rp  RIDGE More AH oasomegts are Kor and urilvis.  A MILLS  drowbope  Assoce. Surxors.   Eng  Sept2219sS.  Scok/BQd Sheef ofa  PB26  B.13.  EXHIBIT A -    16D 7610 1912 15* 7016  1607   15+ 719 16t5 1617  501  604 Horsepen Road  EXHIBIT B -  GIS Office, Registrar I GIS Office I  N  Henrico GIS  2/23/2024    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 157-24 Page No. 1ofl  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Support of PlanRVA Grant Application Urban Agriculture Planning  ForClersUseOnly: ( Approved () Denied () Amended () Deferred to:  BOARDOF: SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Date: 5,12024 Movedby (). Schmitt Secondedby). Rosoh  Cooper, R. Nelson,T. Rogish,J. Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  (2). REMARKS  (2).  APPR RO  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors wishes to express its support for the Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development Fund Planning Grant submitted by PlanRVA for the project entitled: Urban Land Evaluation and WHEREAS, the ULESA project represents an innovative, first-of-its-kind approach to identifying and assessing optimal locations for urban agriculture through the application of geospatial modeling; and, WHEREAS, by utilizing geospatial technologies and advanced analytical tools for site selection, this project will provide essential data for land use planning, support the expansion ofthe agricultural sector, and contribute significantly to our collective efforts in climate change mitigation and food security enhancement; and, WHEREAS, the project involves a collaboration among PlanRVA, local governments, Virginia Commonwealth University, and a wide array of local stakeholders, including government officials, farmers, developers, and individuals from the non-profit and private spheres, ensuring a comprehensive and inclusive NOW,THEREFORE, BE ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors supports the grant applicationsubmited  Site Assessment (ULESA)Development for the Greater Richmond Region; and,  approach to project development and implementation.  by PlanRVA for the ULESA project and the required $10,000 local match.  Comments: The H.E.A.R.T. Committee recommends approval of this Board paper; the County Manager  concurs. ByA Agency Head  By County Manager Certified: ACopy Teste: Date:    Qz  Copy to:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 158-24 Page No. lofl  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION: - Award of Contracts- Annual Environmental Engineering Services  For Clerk's Use Only: Date: 542024 VA Approved () Denied () Amended () Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Moved ywWhhiad Secondedb by(I). cogw  Cooper, R. Nelson, T. Rogish,J J. Schmitt, D. Whitehead,M.  WHEREAS, the County received seven proposals on January 4, 2024, in response to RFP #23-2613-1IEAR for WHEREAS, based upon review and evaluation oft the written proposals, the selection committee interviewed the  environmental engineering services as needed by the County; and,  following firms:  Marsh McLennan Agency Environmental Koontz Bryant Johnson Williams, Inc. Schnabel Engineering, LLC ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC  WHEREAS, the selection committee selected Marsh McLennan Agency Environmental and Koontz Bryant Johnson Williams, Inc. as the top-ranked firms and negotiated hourly rate schedules with each firm.  NOW, THEREFORE, BEI IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors:  1. Contracts to provide environmental engineering services are awarded to Marsh McLennan Agency Environmental and Koontz Bryant Johnson Williams, Inc. for a one-year period with the option to renew each contract for two additional one-year terms, all in accordance with RFP #23-2613-IIEAR and the 2. Compensation for services will be based upon the hourly rate schedules contained in the contraçts. 3. Fees for each contract will not exceed $2,500,000 for any single project or at total ofs10,000,000inany. one- 4. The County Manager is authorized to execute the contracts in ai form approved by the County Attorey. Comment: The Directors of General Services and Purchasing recommend approval of the Board paper, and the  proposals and hourly rate schedules submitted by each firm.  year term of the contract.  County Manager concurs. By Agency Head Copy to:  By County Manager Oyp  Certified: A Copy" Teste: Date:  Clerk, Board ofs Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. Page No. lof2  159-24  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award of Contract - Henrico Sports & Events Center Building  Automation & HVACImprovements: - Fairfield District  For Clerk'sUse Only: (Approved () Denied () Amended () Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Date: 52024 Movedby) Cospa  Seconded! by(I) Schmit  Cooper, R. Nelson,T. Rogish,J. Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  (2).  (2)  -  WHEREAS, the County received three bids on April 29, 2024, in response to Invitation to Bid No. 24-2664-3JL and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for the Building Automation & HVAC Improvements project at the Henrico Sports & WHEREAS, the project consists of installation of a facility-wide building automation system and HVAC improvements to control the rooftop HVAC units and other mechanical equipment at the building; and,  Events Center; and,  WHEREAS, the bids were as follows:  Bidders  Bid Amounts $1,008,350 $1,126,641 $1,330,000  EMC Mechaniçal Services, LLC (Richmond, VA) Atlantic Constructors, Inc. (Richmond, VA) (Richmond, VA)  Air Conditioning Equipment Sales, LLC  WHEREAS, after a review and evaluation of the bids, it was determined that EMC Mechanical Services, LLCis  the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.  By Agency Head f-fanis  By County Manager S  Certified: ACopy Teste: Dale:  Copy to:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 159-24 Page No. 2of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award of Contract - Henrico Sports & Events Center - Building  Automation & HVAC Improvements -Fairfield District  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors:  1. The fixed price contract for $1,008,350 is awarded to EMC Mechanical Services, LLC, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, pursuant to Invitation to Bid No. 24-2664-3JL, Addenda Nos. 1 and 2, 2. The County Manager is authorized to execute the contract in a form approved by the County Attorney. 3. The County Manager, or the Purchasing Director as his designee, is authorized to execute change orders within the scope oft the project budget not to exceed 15% oft the original contract amount.  and the base bid submitted by EMC Mechanical Services, LLC.  Comment: Funding for the contract is available within the project budget. The Director of Recreation and Parks,  the Executive Director of the Sports and Entertainment Authority, and the Purchasing Director  recommend approval of the Board paper, and the County Manager concurs.    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 160-24 Page No. 1of2  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award ofContract-Lucas: Road Waterline- Brookland District  For Clerk's Use Only: Date: 5142024 Approved 0) Denied Amended () Deferredto:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORSACTION  YES NO OTHER  Movedby pSchm-yg. Cogne  Cooper, R. L Nelson,T. Rogish,). Schmltt,D. Whitehead, M.  (2).  (2).  WHEREAS, the County received three bids on March 14, 2024, in response to ITB 24-2643-2EAR and Addendum WHEREAS, the project consists of providing approximately 2,040 linear feet of 12-inch ductile iron water main and approximately 401 linear feet of8-inch ductile iron water main. Additionally, the contractor will install four fire hydrants, 18 new water meter assemblies and water service lines, interconnections, associated appurtenances, and perform all associated clearing and grubbing, erosion control and surface restoration. The project also includes the rehabilitation of approximately 390 linear feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer with cured-in-place pipe liner and the installation of four site  No. Ifor construction oft the Lucas Road Waterline project; and,  inspection ports and associated lateral rehabilitation; and, WHEREAS, the bids were as follows:  Bidders Crown Construction Service, Inc. Temple Hills, MD Walter C. Via Enterprises, Inc. West Point, VA Tidewater Utility Construction, Inc. Suffolk, VA  Bid Amounts $964,127 $1,989,100 $2,942,000  WHEREAS, after a review of the bids received, it was determined that Crown Construction Service, Inc. is the  lowest responsive and responsible bidder for the fixed price contract with a bid of$964,127. NOW,THEREFORE, BEI IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors:  1. The contract for $964,127 is awarded to Crown Construction Service, Inc., the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, pursuant to ITB 24-2643-2EAR, Addendum No. 1, and the bid submitted by  Crown Construction Service, Inc.  By Agency! 8 -  By County Manager. Certified: ACopy7 Teste: Date:  R  O  Copyt to:  Clerk, BoardofSupervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. L0-24 Page No.2of2  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award of Contract-I Lucas Road Waterline- - Brookland District  2. 3.  The County Manager is authorized to execute the contract in a form approved by the County Attorney. The County Manager, or the Purchasing Director as his designee, is authorized to execute change orders within the scope of the project budget not to exceed 15% oft the original contract amount.  Comment: The Directors of Public Utilities and Purchasing recommend approval oft the Board paper, and the  County Manager concurs.    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. Page No.1of1  lut-2y  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Signatory Authority Construction Change Order = Greenwood  Estates Waterline Improvements- = Brookland District  For Clerk'sUse Only: Date: 54024 Approved Denied Amended ) Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPEVISORSACTION  YES NO OTHER  Moved! yaSchmid Secondedby(1). Rosioh)  Cooper, R. Nelson,T. Rogish,). Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  (2).  (2).  WHEREAS, on July 25, 2023, the Board of Supervisors approved a construction contract with J. Sanders Construction Co. to provide approximately 2,540 linear feet of 8-inch ductile iron water main along Colfax WHEREAS, due to the increased interest from residents, the project area was expanded to include an additional 16 customers on Creery Road, Vesely Lane, and Appling Road, which requires the contractor to WHEREAS, the Department of Public Utilities has negotiated a change order in the amount of $323,161.65 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that the County Manager is authorized to execute a change order with J. Sanders Construction Co. in the amount of$323,161.65,ina  Road and Bourne Road; and,  provide additional water main and water services; and,  for the additional work.  form approved by the County Attorney.  Comment: Funding will be provided by the Water and Sewer Revenue Fund. The Directors of Public  Utilities and Purchasing recommend approval of this Board paper, and the County Manager  concurs.  By Agency! 8  a By County Managèr Certified: ACopy Teste: Date:  Copyt to:  Clerk, Boardo ofs Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. 102-24 Page No. 1of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award of Contract - Woodcliff Subdivision Sewer Improvements =  Fairfield District Coopi (1). Movedt by (2). REMARKS:  For Clerk'sUseOnly: Date: 5M2024 (Approved () Denied ) Amended Deferred to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  whitekens  Secondedb by (1). (2).  Cooper, R. Nelson,T. Rogish,). Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  WHEREAS, the County received four bids on March 19, 2024, in response l0 ITB 24-2637-1EAR and Addendum No. WHEREAS, the project consists of providing approximately 2,265 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sanitary sewer main, including II manholes, 20 new site inspection ports and new service lateral installations, connection to an existing manhole,  Ifor construction of the Woodcliff Subdivision Sewer Improvements project; and,  and all associaled clearing and grubbing, erosion control and surface restoration; and,  WHEREAS, the bids were as follows:  Bidders Shield Contracting, LLC Ashland, VA RDS Utilities LC Powhatan, VA Godsey & Son, Inc. Richmond, VA Tidewater Utility Construction, Inc. Suffolk, VA  BidAmounts $1,190,763 $1,242,133 $1,242,790 $4,863,750  WHEREAS, after a review of the bids received, it was determined that Shield Contracting, LLC is the lowest  responsive and responsible bidder for the fixed price contract with a bidof$1,190,763. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors:  1. The contract for $1,190,763 is awarded to Shield Contracting, LLC, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, pursuant to ITB2 24-2637-IEAR, Addendum No. l,and the bid submitted by Shield 2. The County Manager is authorized to exccute the contract in a form approved by the County Attorney.  Contracting, LLC.  ByAgency MS  A By County Manager.  Certified: ACopy" Teste: Date:  O  Copyt to:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE  Agenda Item No. 02-24 Page No.2of2  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award of Contract = Woodcliff Subdivision Sewer Improvements =  Fairfield District  3.  The County Manager, or the Purchasing Director as his designee, is authorized to execute change orders within the scope of the project budget not to excced 15% of the original contract amount.  Comment: The Directors of Public Utilities and Purchasing recommend approval of the Board paper, and the County  Manager concurs.    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  163-24  Agenda Item No. Page No. 1of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION = Signatory Authority - Award of Contract = Annual Contract for  Unidirectional Flushing Maintenance  For Clerk'sUscOnly: Date: 5142024 (Approved C) Denied () Amended () Deferredt to:  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION  YES NO OTHER  Movedb by(I). Schmitk Secondedby) Whibhing Cooper, R.  (2). EM  (2)_  Nelson,T. Rogish,J. Schmitt, D. Whitehead, M.  WHEREAS, the County received three bids on March 5, 2024, in response to ITB No: 24-2639-IEAR and WHEREAS, the annual contract consists of furnishing all tools, labor, materials, equipment, fees, and supervision necessary for unidirectional flushing maintenance throughout the County as established by the Department of Public  Addendum No. I, for annual services for unidirectional flushing maintenance; and,  Utilities Operations Division; and, WHEREAS, the bids were as follows:  Bidders  Bid Amounts $236,000 $325,460 $545,000  Hydromax USA, LLC Flower Mound, TX Xylem Dewatering Solutions, Inc., dba' Wachs Water Services Columbia, MD Langford Exçavating & Utilities, LLC Woodford, VA  WHEREAS, the bid amounts were calculated by multiplying the estimated unit quantities listed in the bid documents WHEREAS, after a review and evaluation of the bids, it was determined that Hydromax USA, LLC is the lowest WHEREAS, the cost of each project assigned under contract will be determined upon completion of the project by multiplying the unit quantities authorized by the County by the unit prices submitted in the contractor'sbid.  times the unit prices set out in thel bids; and,  responsive and responsible bidder fort the unit price contract; and,  ByA Agency! 6  -  By County Manager Certificd: ACopy Teste; Date:  A) 1  Copyt to:  Clerk, Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. We3-24 Page No. 2of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Signatory Authority = Award of Contract = Annual Contract for  Unidirectional Flushing Maintenance  NOW,THEREFORE, BEI IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors:  1.  Pursuant to ITB No. 24-2639-1EAR, Addendum No. I, and the bids submitted in response thereto, an annual contract is awarded to Hydromax USA, LLC, for the period ofone year, with an option for the County t0 renew Fees for the contract may not exceed $1,000,000 fora a single project. Compensation will be based upon the unit costs in the contractor's bid. Estimated first year expenditures are approximately $1,000,000 which may vary The County Manager is authorized to execute the contract in a form approved by the County Attorney. The County Manager, or the Purchasing Director as his designee, is authorized to execute change orders within  the contract for up tot two additional one-year terms. depending on the actual needs ofthe County.  2.  3. 4.  the scope oft the project budget.  Comment:  The Directors of Public Utilities and Purchasing recommend approval of lhis Board paper, and the  County Manager concurs.    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. (C-aM Page No. tof2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: RESOLUTION - Award ofContract - Bethlchem Road Improvements- Brookland District  ForClerk'sUse Only: Date: 511412024 Approved () Denied C) Amended C) Deferredi w:  BOARDOF SUPERVISORS ACTION  VES NO OTHER  MdwuSchmitl Scconded by) Rogatw  Cooper. R. Nelson, T. Rogish.J. Schmitt. D. Whitehead.: M.  (2) REMARKS: API  (2)_  -  WHEREAS, the County received Ewo bids on April 26, 2024, in response to ITB 24-2662-3JOK and Addendum WHEREAS. the project consists of the reconstruction of approximately 2,400 linear feet of Bethlehem Road including a roundabout at the intersection of Bethlehem Road and Libbie Avenue, a shared use path on the south side of Bethlehem Road, a sidewalk on the north side of Bethlehem Road with ADA compliant handicap ramps,  No. I for construction of the Bethlehem Road Improvements project; and,  replacement of existing water and sewer mains, and new storm sewer facilities; and,  WHEREAS. the bids were as follows:  Bidders  Bid Amounts $6,387,248.89 $9,228,400.00  Shoosmith Construction, Inc. Chester. VA J.L.K Kent & Sons, Inc. Spotsylvania. VA  WHEREAS, the bid amounts were calculated by multiplying the estimated unit quantities listed in the bid WHEREAS, after evaluation of the bids, it was determined that Shoosmith Construction, Inc. is the lowest WHEREAS, the final contract amount will be determined upon completion oft the project by multiplying the unit  documents by the unit prices set out in thc bids; and.  responsive and responsible bidder for the unit price contract; and,  quantities authorized by the County by the unit prices submitted in the contractor' s bid.  By Agency Ilead Copy to:  By County Manager Certificd: ACopy Teste: Date:  096  AN  GNph  Clerk. Board of Supervisors    COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  Agenda Item No. l4-24 Page No.2of2  MINUTE  Agenda Title: Brookland District  RESOLUTION - Award of Contract - Bethlehem Road Improvements =  NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that:  1. The contract for $6,387.248.89 is awarded to Shoosmith Construction, Inc.. the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, pursuant to ITB 24-2662-3JOK. Addendum No. l.and 2. The County Managerisauthorized to execute the contract in a form approved by the County 3. The County Manager, or the Purchasing Director as his designee, is authorized to execute  the base bid submitted by Shoosmith Construction, Inc.  Attorney.  change orders within the scope of the project budget.  COMMENT:  The Dircctors of Public Works and Purchasing recommend approval of the Board  paper, and the County Manager concurs.    Bethlehem Road Improvements  N  EN 64 T *0 60  9 D P a Dmb. ap  DICKENS RD  60  EARLWICK sEcopa GPop  % A  blo    '  S Cos  MIDLAWNLN -DISTILLERSLN.  LIBBIE LAKE NORTH ST- 0 0  BINDERYLN- L-y VESTBLVDE  LIBBIE MILLEASI: BLVD) BAKERS MILL SOUTHST  IBBIE  RESOLUTION- AWARD OF CONTRACT- BETHLEHEM ROAD IMPROVEMENTS DISTRIÇT: BROOKLAND DATE: MAY 14, 2024  G Project Extent  1,000 Feet  1inch = 6001 ft  4